WEBVTT - Trump and Canada Bounce Around on Tariffs

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Insight from the reporters and

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 2>editors that bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.799
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenovek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, we got some news. Market started off

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>this morning kind of mellow after yesterday's selling, and then bam,

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we got a headline out of the White House.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we certainly did check out. Shares of aluminum and

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 3>steel producers Century Aluminum, US Steel, New Core all higher

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 3>this after President Trump said he would increase steel and

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 3>aluminum tariffs on Canada to fifty percent to retaliate against

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Ontario's move raising taxes on electricity sent to the US,

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 3>ramping up his fight with the US's largest trading partner.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 3>We got Joe Doe with us. He's Bloomberg News Metals

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>and mining reporter and heavy machinery reporter. He joined us

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 3>here in Bloomberg internat Active at Brokers Studio. Joe, how

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 3>much steal and aluminum do we get from Canada?

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 4>About sixty percent of our imports in aluminum or from Canada,

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 4>and something like twenty three percent of our steel imports

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 4>are from Canada. I think the steel numbers over five million.

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, so these tariffs are certainly material, no question.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely they are. I mean they're they're deeply material

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 4>on aluminum, and they are significant on the steel front.

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Do we have the capacity in the United States to

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>provide and produce all the steel and aluminum that we

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 3>need without importing any.

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 4>There is capacity still available in the domestic supply chain

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 4>by the US mills for steel. We're running at about

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 4>seventy five percent right now. Earlier one of our bi

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 4>analysts was saying we could go, you know, eighty five percent,

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 4>which I think if you're hitting eighty five percent, that's

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 4>what the mills tell you is when they're really making

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money and they can do. They can't

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>go over ninety percent because it just doesn't make sense.

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 4>You'd be running them too hard and you could break things. Aluminum,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 4>there's absolutely no way, bottom line.

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So okay, so what do we do. We just have

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 4>Right now, it seems like you're going to have to

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 4>pay a lot for aluminum coming from Canada and you'll

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 4>be paying if you're buying from Canada, you'll be paying

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 4>a lot for steel as well. But the Algoma CEO,

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 4>who's one of the three major steelmakers in Canada, was

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 4>on our sister network in Canada earlier today and said,

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 4>we're calling up all of our customers in Canada and

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 4>asking them to buy from US. And a large part

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 4>of that is because there's worries of retaliatory terrafs and

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 4>everything else. But I can tell you I had a

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 4>at a meeting earlier today with someone who's very familiar

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 4>with the Canadian steel market and said, you know, if

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 4>things get really hairy, that's what you're going to see

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 4>the Canadian steelmakers do. They're just going to sell to

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Canadians and then the US market's going to figure out

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 4>how to fill that need.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're already seeing the effects of these announced tariffs,

0:02:58.680 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 3>says Carol.

0:02:59.280 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 5>Mentioned.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Just a few minutes ago, Ontario announced it was suspend

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 3>a twenty five percent surcharge on electricity sent to the

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 3>US after President Trump announced he'd double steal in aluminum

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>tariffs on Canada fifty percent. This in an escalating trade

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 3>war between the neighbors. So are we going to see

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 3>these tariffs removed, because Canada's responded.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 4>This is a hard thing to figure out. We I

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 4>had a few phone calls this morning that we were

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 4>able to add in to our main bar story that

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 4>was first announcing that the President had made this point.

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 4>And what we found out through sources who are experts

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 4>helping out on the steel and aluminum terrafs. Right these

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 4>are people who have effectively been saying we should have

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 4>these tarffs were admitting to us that they were unaware

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 4>that the President was going to do this today. I

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 4>think that's significant that even when the industries that are

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 4>supposedly getting the benefit weren't looped into something. It just

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 4>shows the mayhem. It just shows how so much of

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 4>this is coming together in a snap out of nowhere.

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 4>And I think the trouble is and you hear this.

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, in the past two weeks, I've sat down

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 4>with so many traders who are in the physical markets

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 4>for stealing aluminum, and I've said, it's impossible to put

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 4>a bet on right now. We can't do anything. We

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 4>don't know if the example that I was given by

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 4>one person was they had made a bet on copper

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 4>right there was an expectation that on some level the

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 4>President would do something on copper. And then at the end,

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 4>at the beginning of February, he came in and said, yes,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 4>we are going to do something on copper, and it

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 4>looked like that trade was great. But then a few

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 4>days later he came back and said, well, copper's not

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 4>going to be a part of this initial round of terrace,

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 4>and so that trade is completely wound right there. I

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 4>think that's just an anecdote of what we're talking about

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 4>here as to why it's so difficult even for traders,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 4>right who make money on the way up or on

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 4>the way down, are just saying we're staying away from

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 4>this for the moment.

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>That is pretty amazing, right to just say hands off

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>right as you say that they like to play the volatility.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, help me out here. Maybe stupid question, I'm

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>okay with that, but I mean in terms of the

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>US steel and aluminum industry, or I guess it's really

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they do they want higher tariffs.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Listen the domestic steel producers and the which.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Have been decimated over the decade.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Well yeah, I mean, listen, these the steelmakers have been

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 4>mostly okay, Like if it's such a long breakdown, and

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 4>we don't have to get into it. But New Core

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Corporation makes a lot of money their A plus bond ratings.

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Same with Steel Dynamics, Right, these guys do very well

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 4>and they sell a lot of steel. But the issue

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 4>is they want to make better profits. And that was

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 4>the whole point in twenty eighteen when we implemented the

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Section two thirty two terrafs on steel. It was not

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 4>about jobs. We talked about this, right, It wasn't about jobs.

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 4>It was about making capacity utilization go up. So if

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 4>you're running at eighty five percent, you are maximizing your

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 4>profits as a steel mill.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Right, Joe, this is going to be news to you

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 3>because you're not looking at your terminal right now. But

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the President making comments he says on Canada will probably

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 3>make a different tariff decision. He said he's looking at

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 3>backing down on the fifty percent duties on Canada. Just

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 3>your instant reaction to that, there.

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 4>You go, like you know, I mean, here we are

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 4>in this moment, right, I cannot imagining sitting on a

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 4>trading desk right now just seeing that and actually probably

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 4>laughing about it like that. That's probably what you're seeing

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 4>from a lot of folks around these markets, and I'm

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 4>not just saying it who are just kind of chuckling

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 4>to themselves. And it's not because it's funny.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>No, right, that's right, that's right. I mean right, because

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>if anything you need, it's one thing. If it's a

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>policy you don't like, but it needs to be clear,

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>correct and not necessarily change from hour to hour, day

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to day.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Correct. And remember we heard this from the steelmakers in

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 4>twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen. They were the beneficiaries of the

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 4>steel tears. But even they were saying to us back

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 4>then because Trump was saying, well, we're going to give

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 4>exemption to these countries in those countries, but maybe not

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 4>those countries, in these countries. Finally, they just started saying,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 4>tell us what it is you want to do. If

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 4>it's nothing, then that's fine. If it's something that's great too.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 4>At least we can start telling our customers to book.

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 3>If we find ourselves in a situation here in the

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>United States where people who build things and make stuff

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 3>are using US produced steel and they're using perhaps imported

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 3>aluminum because we can't make enough aluminum and paying more

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 3>for that imported aluminum. Do we see inflationary effects on goods?

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it'll depend on the good I think aluminum. A

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 4>place where we immediately saw inflationary effects was like window frames,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 4>because window frames are aluminum and actually bought by a

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 4>lot of regular people in America. And you saw those

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 4>prices shoot up. I mean it's not like they were

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 4>on an index, but we saw anecdotally it was like,

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, people just seeing you know, twenty thirty forty

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 4>percent higher prices on window frames. I mean, listen, the

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Ford CEO did say, if all of these tariffs, right,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 4>like the Canada Mexico terrafs that haven't gone on, the

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 4>aluminum terras steel terrors go on and they stack, it's

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 4>going to blow a hole through the industry. And you

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 4>had Coca Cola say last month as well, like, well

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 4>we might consider moving back, you know, substitution, right instead

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 4>of cans will go to plastic. Well the problem with

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 4>that is like, yeah, you think the consumer is going

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 4>to be okay with you Coca Cola suddenly going to

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 4>plastic bottles instead of aluminum. I mean this has been

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 4>a trend that consumers have been asking for, right, Hey,

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 4>we don't want to be ruining the environment, right, So wait,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 4>suddenly you're just throwing that out the window and going

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 4>back to a cost saving Oh and good luck changing

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 4>the supply chain on that.

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of building out additional capacity, is that

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>even likely if there are tariffs? I mean at the expense,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>the commitment the long.

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 4>Term like it could happen. It could happen in steel.

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 4>I think we talked about that a few weeks ago,

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 4>which is like, you know, if there is a long

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 4>term feeling that these terriffs are going to stay on,

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 4>the steel companies could start investing more into building out

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 4>more capacity. Right now, they still have space to use

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 4>current capacity that's not online, and if they see longer

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 4>term they might invest in that. I think the question

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 4>is will we actually see capacity invested in in the

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 4>aluminum space, because the aluminum space is much more of

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.599
<v Speaker 4>an electricity play, right, Like the Hawesville smelter that was

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 4>in Kentucky that is currently idled used as much energy

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 4>in one day as the entire city of Louisville, which

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 4>is the nearest city.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 3>So you got AI and you got making metals using electricity.

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 4>And remember a lot of those power contracts in say

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 4>like the Northwest that used to be used by Alcoa.

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 4>When Alcoa shut down all of their mills, a lot

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 4>of that energy went towards data centers. Well, it's just

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 4>it's so expensive, and that's why Quebec remains the aluminum

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 4>producing region of North America. It's a bunch of hydropower.

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 4>It's cheap. They supply a lot of energy to to

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 4>some of the northern states here in the US, as

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 4>many people have found out in the past week. So

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 4>it's just it's it's real. Mayhem.

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh okay, sorry, I'm looking at the Trump.

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm a little speechless.

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>President say, I don't see your recession at all. And again,

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>as you said, the energy all right, So so are

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you just going to wait for the next headline or wait,

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you know things are going to finally calm down?

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Traders start to make trades.

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 4>Listen at twelve and one am whatever whatever the tariff

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 4>number that is in place, that will be real and

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 4>that will be actionable because they'll the the customs will

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 4>actually be adding on to the register. Okay, this is

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 4>what you owe for these incoming products. That's at least

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 4>something people can start to hang their hats on other

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 4>than that. Uh, it's it's like one industry person told

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 4>me a few weeks ago and when I asked, well, hey,

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 4>are these Canadian and Mexican tariffs actually going into place?

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 4>And they said, I'll let you know at twelve oh

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 4>one Wednesday.

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Not wild, but that's the reality of it, right because

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it goes into fact. Listen, you're super busy. You're the

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>person we always want to talk to when we have

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>got a story like this because you know it like

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>nobody else. It just blows us away every time. So

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you. We know you've got to run,

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but Jodo, you just totally rock. Bloomberg News Medals and

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Mining and Heavy Machinery reporter. Thank you so much, really

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it.

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 2>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Airline stocks are taking a hit today. Two of the

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 3>biggest US airlines slash their financial forecast. The carriers, along

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 3>with Arrival Southwest Airlines, are raining expectations in the face

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 3>of a broad and rapid reversal of demand trends that

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 3>had buoyed the industry heading into twenty twenty five. Carol,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about Delta Airlines and American Airlines.

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the group overall though down about two and a

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>quarter percent, but we're down more than four percent earlier

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in the session. Let's get to what it all means,

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>what you need to know about the outlook for the industry.

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Back with us is Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Aerospace, Defense and

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Airlines analyst George Ferguson. He is in our Bloomberg News

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>bureau in Washington, DC. So, George, I have to say

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that when the Delta headlines cross yesterday and we saw

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the stock immediate reaction, it just tanked. We all got

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a jolt started there. American followed

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Southwest too to some extent. Is it all the same

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>story about consumer demand?

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it feels to me to be very similar.

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 5>So we also had Jeff Blue come in today, and

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 5>I think the core story here is that demand is softening,

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 5>so they're all lowering their revenue expectations.

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 5>Seeing as well is that for some of them, fuel

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 5>is helping to prop up earnings to some degree for

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 5>the lower cost carriers, but for Delta, lower fuel prices

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 5>wasn't enough and so they I think showed one of

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 5>the bigger decreases in expectations for one que.

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Did we get any specific commentary about details as to

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 3>why the guidance cut here, George? Is it based at

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the front of the plane the back of the plane?

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Is it consumers? Is it business who's not spending money

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 3>right now like these carriers thought they would.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So, working off the details that Delta gave us,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 5>they said that premium was still holding up well, and

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 5>international was still holding up well, right, so Pacific and Transatlantic.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 5>So it made it sound like economy was having difficulties.

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 5>Latin America was already in difficult shape. Sounds like it's

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 5>still in difficult shape from probably an oversupply perspective. And

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:44.599
<v Speaker 5>they also said close in bookings were weaker. We typically

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 5>associate that with business travel, So it feels like maybe

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 5>there's some concern in the business community, maybe with all

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 5>the you know, sort of all the changes in government

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 5>we've seen in the first couple of days of the

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration, but seemed like there could be a bit

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 5>of a business confidence problem.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 3>You said close in bookings, meaning flights that are booked

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 3>within a certain time period.

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, tickets, you know, tickets booked within less than a month.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 5>Usually it's a couple of weeks before travel. Traditionally, that's

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, been the realm of business travelers.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay, why is jet Blue up? It's up four point

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>three percent? Help me hear. Yeah.

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 5>So, I mean when we looked at Jet Blue's revision again,

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, the revenues off a bit, but they saved it.

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 5>They are they they save their profit expectations on fuel prices,

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 5>and it didn't look you know, it didn't look that bad.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 5>So I think Jet Blue has been one that's been

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 5>cutting capacity. I think the more you're cutting capacity and

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 5>not trying to grow your network right now, you know,

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 5>the more able you are to hold out for some

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 5>better fares. And so Jet Blue looked better than some

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 5>of the other competitors we saw.

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 3>George, can we extrapolate the way that these airlines are

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 3>talking about demand into other parts of the economy or

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 3>in an economic cycle? What is the signal? I guess

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 3>is a better way to ask this question that airlines

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 3>send to us about what's happening in the economy.

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think you absolutely can extrapolate, right, So I

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 5>think you know, travel demand is, you know, for the

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 5>leisure traveler, very discretionary. I think when you get concerned

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 5>about your pocketbook, you probably pull back there first. I

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 5>think in the US, especially domestic, which Delta called out

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 5>as one of the weaker markets, we have the ability

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 5>to drive a lot of places rather than fly. It's

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 5>usually a bit cheaper, it takes longer, Right, We've all

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 5>loaded the family into the car in New Jersey and

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 5>driven them to Orlando. It can be cheaper, but it

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 5>can be a little taxing on your nerves. So I think, yeah,

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a good indicator of the consumers.

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 3>George just speaking from experience here or is this sources

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 3>say yeah?

0:15:57.960 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Sources say all right.

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 4>So can this change?

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course anything can change, But I mean

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so is it potentially or could be a first quarter thing?

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And then depending what goes on in the economy. I

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a lot coming at consumers, business travelers the

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>US economy right now. But could it change be it

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>second quarter or second half?

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 5>An airline world things can always change very quickly, so

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 5>can it change? Yes, there is a bit of a

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 5>dynamic and airline world going on this year too, and

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 5>that is that Easter has been moved into the second

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 5>quarter from the first quarter, so we expected a little

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 5>bit of softness in the first quarter. But I still

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 5>think this feels like the you know, the basic economy

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 5>customer is a little more concerned about their finances and

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 5>not traveling. Who cares what the cost is. And again,

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 5>I think you need to see signals coming from the

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 5>economy to make them feel more secure. I think to

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 5>see demand pick up for second quarter.

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Hey, George, well we have you in Washington, d C.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you've got a chance to even

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 3>see this because it just broke in the last fifteen

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 3>minutes or so. But NTSB Chairman Jennifer Homandy was speaking

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 3>at a newser the NTSB making two emergency recommendations after

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 3>that DCA crash. The NTSB recommending permanent helicopter restrictions near DCA.

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 3>The NTSB also recommending an alternative helicopter route near DCA.

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Just way in on the aftermath of this crash in

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the earlier part of this year, and the recommendations that

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 3>the NTSB is making, what happens now.

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that sounds totally appropriate. I'm surprised it took this long.

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 5>It's DCA's too busy of an airport to be running

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 5>training flights around with the pilots under flight vision sorry

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 5>night vision goggles. Sounds like exactly the right decision.

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, just real quickly thirty seconds left. Southwest Airlines ditching

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>free check bags, the end of an era. I'm terrified

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to see what comes next from the industry. I mean,

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a big deal, right, but maybe good for them

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it is.

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean Southwest is just becoming more and more like

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 5>a full service carrier. Like everyone, They're looking for different

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 5>ways to generate revenue from their customers. I think it'll

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 5>help the premium program out as well. Right, the loyalty program,

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 5>I should say, you know, if you're a loyalty member,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 5>you are going to get I think one free check bag.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 5>I think you get an assigned seat. It's all about

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 5>trying to drive people, not loyalty program generate revenue from it,

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 5>something Delta does so well as one of your additional

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 5>streams of income for the airline.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>As someone who never packs lately, I know what it's

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>like to pay some baggage fees.

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 3>And literally it's not even like it's like you exceed

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the fifty pounds limit when we travel, like you're going

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 3>for a day, Carol.

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>George Ferguson, Thank you so much. Bloomerintelligence, Senior, Aerospace, Defense

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and Airlines Alice, by the way, Southwest up eight and

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>a half percent.

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live each

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 2>weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car Play

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 2>and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody.

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Volatility persisting in US assets following yesterday's wrenching session definitely

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>was a different one, that's for sure. We've seen an

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>early rebound in stocks, erase gains that we've seen it

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>rally again on those headlines of Ukraine ready to accept

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>a US proposal for our thirty day truth. So we

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to see a lot of bouncing around the VIX.

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it hovering just below thirty. It's a level

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about yesterday that our Market Live blog

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>notes that when it goes above thirty, we have then

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>tend to see stocks bounce up. So there's a lot

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>going on and trying to make sense of what comes next.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And we've got a great guest to get into it all.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, here in the studio, Jennifer Grancio is back with us.

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 3>She's head of ETFs at TCW. She's a former CEO

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 3>of Engine Number one. It was that little known hedge

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 3>fund that successfully waged an activist battle against the integrated

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 3>energy Giant, snagging three board seats and promising to push

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 3>a low carbon future. Engine number one was bought by

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 3>tc W.

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Could be part of your bio forever.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 4>You do know that.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I think she took on big oil and I got

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 3>a board seats. Jennifer, could that be back with us?

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 4>First up?

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Today's market activity? Yesterday's yes, you know that's behind us.

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 3>We're still in the session today. We're seeing it bounce

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 3>off the lows. Certainly, how has the investment narrative changed

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 3>and how is it being reflected in ETF flows for you?

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean the markets love certainty and what we

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 6>do not have right now is certainty, and so in

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 6>many cases we may actually be lower than where valuations are.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I'm not going to try to call that,

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 6>but from an uncertainty perspective around not just tariffs, but

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 6>the concept of tariffs, how pervasive, how long, how broad

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 6>across the different markets. So I think we continue to

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 6>see that our view, we're an active manager or at TCW,

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 6>so our view is, you know, you really have to

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 6>understand the fundamentals and that allows us to keep investing

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 6>even through the cycle.

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean actively in terms of fun

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>flows or you know, I'd love to know if you

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>guys saw anything interesting happening, not just this week or yesterday.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like over the last couple of weeks

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment has definitely changing the market. So are you

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing money flow out of certain types of ETFs flowing

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>into certain ETFs?

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 6>Give us an idea of what the environment's But I

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 6>think with this level of volatility, what we're seeing initially

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 6>is mostly institutional money movement. So I think we're seeing

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 6>hedge funds have shorts, they're covering shorts. It's resulted in

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 6>net buying, so I think a lot of the buying

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 6>through volatility has probably been hedge funds and institutional. At

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 6>the same time, we're seeing a very strong fixed income market.

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 6>Where people are watching the equity market fall, not everybody

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 6>is appropriately positioned and prepared. In core fixed income, we've

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 6>seen inflows there and I think it's been a little

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 6>quieter in thematics. But our review would be this is

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 6>an excellent buying opportunity, even.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 3>If we see what he's moved lower in the near future.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's it's sometimes hard to catch a falling knife.

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 6>I think it's extremely hard to call the markets. And

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 6>if you look at the last couple of years, we've

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 6>had very strong performance in S and P the last

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 6>couple of years, so it's correcting. We don't know where

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 6>the bottom is. I think it's a mix of starting

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 6>to come back in and reposition.

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to use these words, is this time different,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 3>which you're never supposed to use when talking about the market.

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 3>But is it Because we heard from President Trump over

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 3>the weekend that he's one not ruling out a recession

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 3>too there could be some short term pain. It seems

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 3>like his view on the markets, at least the way

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 3>that he's communicated it and his White House has communicated it,

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 3>is that it's okay if they go down, which I

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 3>think is different than a lot of people thought he

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>would look at the markets given what happened during his

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 3>first term. So is this time different?

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think so far. Behaviorally, his behavior is very

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 6>different this time. From a TCW perspective, we think that

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 6>the market was heading for a recession for quite a

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 6>while now, so we think the market needed a correction

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 6>like this. The question is, really, you know, where's the bottom,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 6>how does it bounce off of that? And where do

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 6>we go from here? In some cases, sectors or high

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 6>quality companies, right they may be price lower right now

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 6>than their fundamental value. So as an active manager, that's

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 6>what we do all day, both in the bond and

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 6>the equity portfolios.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's it like being an active manager?

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 4>Though?

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>In an administration where there are things coming and sometimes

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a move forward to move back, whether it's on

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>tariffs or so and so forth. I mean, I guess

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost thinking like, what is activism in a Trump

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>White House where there are concerns about conflicts of interest

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>business people in areas now overseeing those areas? What is that?

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>From a government perspective? How do you see that? Yeah?

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean I think we see it as It's very

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 6>hard to predict and so investing in based on trying

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 6>to understand what's very hard to predict, hard to do,

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 6>but positioning. So if you think about broad you know

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 6>broadly the economy, this is a recession is probably coming.

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 6>Job and growth wages have been slowing, and so how

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 6>we deal with that as an active manager is it

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 6>stick to the fundamentals. In the case of fixed income,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 6>we've been positioned for recession. So performance Why is a

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 6>fund like an ETF like Flexer is at the top

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 6>of the performance group right now because we're positioned for

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 6>something exactly like this right and in the equity space

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 6>in the ETF, so a lot of what we do

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 6>are very long term, durable, secular, thematic trends, and so

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 6>we will see volatility, but we still think we're holding

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 6>the names that really grow out of it.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you get a little bit more specific and share

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>what kind of those the app for sure?

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 6>So on the equity yeah, So on the on the

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 6>equity side, we manage one fund that is more of

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 6>a defensive growth fund and its compounders is the name

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 6>the tickers grow Gear g RW. And what Grow does

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 6>is it holds a very concentrated portfolio of twenty five stocks,

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 6>but they're not only the highest flyers, they're very high

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 6>quality growth companies and so Grows actually outperformed the market

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 6>so far this year and has be positive. Then next

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 6>to that, if you really want to invest in the

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 6>trends that are shaping the economy for the years to come,

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 6>and we fundamentally believe will add value in portfolios through time,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 6>and you need them to diversify from the kind of

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 6>the mag seven. We run a strategy around power, which

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 6>is p WRD Powered is the ticker, and a strategy

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 6>on US supply chain and everything that's going on now

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 6>it's just going to accelerate reshoring to the US. And

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 6>we run an AI fund. And while some AI names

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 6>have gone down quite a lot, remember how much they've

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 6>gone up the last few years. And we're investing in

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 6>the broad trend.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Where specifically are you seeing value there? Because our own

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 3>gena Martin Adams a Bloomberg Intelligence out with a note

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 3>today that says some of the biggest s and P

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 3>five hundred stocks by market caps still trade at an

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 3>abnormally large premium despite vast underperformance so far this year.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, we hold some of those names in

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 6>the AI fund that we run, which is an eight

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 6>year track record, tickers a fed AI FD. But in

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 6>AVID we also hold a name like Deer, where Deer

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 6>is a manufacturing company that is using smart technology to

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 6>be more efficient in how we handle water and fertilizer.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 6>If I'm a farmer, I make more money. It's more efficient,

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 6>And that's what I mean by for us, we're not

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 6>just holding We are holding some of those big names,

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 6>but we're also holding the companies are getting AI right first.

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 6>And in the power and energy sector that continues to

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 6>be an incredibly important sector because we're using more and

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 6>more and more power. Transportation, we hold GE, for example

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 6>Empowered and GE is a company that makes airline engines

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 6>really hard to do and then they do all the

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 6>replacement and travel continues to go through the roof right

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 6>as middle classes grow. Travel has been up I think

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 6>almost every year except during COVID.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna have to leave it on that note.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So glad we got some time with you. Really appreciate it.

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Grancio. She is head of ETFs over at TCW,

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>usually on the West coast, but here in our studio.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business This Week podcast. Catch

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 2>us live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern.

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to it, folks, because we are just about

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes away from the closing bell and with us

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>right now is Doug Ramsey, chief investment officer at the

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Luthold Group, joining us right here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio on another volatile day. So great to have

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you here. How are you.

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 7>I'm doing well. It's great to be in New York

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 7>City on a beautiful spring day.

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It is beautiful, it feels good. The selling, the volatility.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>What is it telling you about trends in this market?

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think things were pretty toppy looking before the top.

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 7>And I say that because we had a lot of

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 7>internal breakdowns of the sort that you typically see before

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 7>a major market top right, small caps, underperforming transportation stocks, utilities.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 7>I could go down a list. We actually have list

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 7>of eight bell weathers, and seven out of the eight

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 7>were sounding and warning. The only group that was confirming,

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 7>to use market technicians terminology was the financial stocks were

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 7>very strong into that market top which only three weeks ago,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 7>but so like sort of the standard cracks were there,

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 7>and the issue of just looking at that in isolation

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 7>is you will see the market look internally vulnerable like

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 7>that from time to time during a healthy bull market,

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 7>and those things will just be resolved. Is the market

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 7>push is higher, has done so that's well, go ahead.

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 7>Is that is troubling all of those cracks coming at

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 7>a time when the economy is more vulnerable than it was,

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 7>say six to eight months ago in terms of income

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 7>growth and that sort of thing.

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, you we got things to the notes

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 3>that you sent our producer Paul Brennan. The firm cut

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 3>net equity exposure of fifty percent in the Leuthold Core

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.479
<v Speaker 3>ETF and other funds, and it increased a short position

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 3>in the Nasdaq one hundred. Yeah, when exactly did you

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 3>do that?

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 7>It's it's been a I guess over time. I mean

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 7>we came into the year probably fifty eight percent equity exposure. Now,

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 7>because in our tactical strategies we run our long equities

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 7>and equity hedges. When the market sells off, it will

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 7>adjust down quicker than if you were just running like

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 7>a sixty forty portfolio or something like that, or obviously

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 7>if you're all equities, you keep at one hundred percent equities.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 7>So I think we were fifty four percent last week,

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 7>and then on Friday we had some things triggered, so

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 7>we went to fifty percent. So now with the market down,

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, since Friday's closed, we're probably forty. So it's

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 7>sort of like self adjusting downwards because of the way

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 7>we approach.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 3>At what point would you start adding to that equity

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 3>position though, Like when do things get cheap enough or

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 3>when does the market come down enough to do that.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 4>On pure cheapness, It's gonna be tough. Yeah, there could

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 4>be other.

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 7>Things just in terms of market action that would get

0:29:54.600 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 7>us there, But we are really concerned about the prospect

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 7>that the market sell off becomes an economically self fulfilling prophecy.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 7>So we've written now for a couple of years about

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 7>the impact of the wealth effect as possibly having sustained

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 7>the economic expansion in twenty three and twenty four despite

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 7>the leading indicators, well all the leading indicators except the

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 7>stock market pointing down for a couple of years. Well,

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 7>now you have what we would argue is the most

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 7>important leading indicator pointing down and via the wealth effect,

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 7>could deliver the final blow to the economic expansion.

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, so the recession talk and the economic data points.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess there's sentiment, right, which can turn

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>into reality, and then there's of course fundamental So are

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals breaking down? I mean, some of the technicals did, right,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>but I mean is that significant in its own right?

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But or is it fundamentally longer term fundamentals breaking down

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in your view?

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, they could and respond to a break in market

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 7>wealth and just I mean thinking And another reason we're

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 7>so focused on the wealth effect is just the size

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 7>of the stock market relative to the economy today. I mean,

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 7>in the peak, just three weeks ago, total market cap

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 7>of US equities was two hundred and five percent of GDP,

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 7>more than two x. We're down to like one hundred

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 7>and eighty five percent. So in percentage terms, it's an

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 7>eight and a half percent correction. In terms of the

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 7>loss of wealth to the economy, it's a twenty percent

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 7>hit relative to GDP. So to the extent that the

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 7>stock market has always like a stock market decline has

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.479
<v Speaker 7>been one of the final catalysts that sort of nudges

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 7>the economy into recession when it was already vulnerable. I

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 7>think that's even more true today. And there's a great quote.

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, at times like this it always comes to mind,

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 7>but it was from George Soros about fifteen years ago.

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 7>Just in terms of summarizing this, this interaction between markets

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 7>and the economy, he said, financial markets have a very

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 7>safe way of predicting the future. Cause it so here

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 7>we are with personal income growth only one point eight

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 7>percent year over year. It was double that two years

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 7>ago or a year ago. Real employment growth or I'm

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 7>just I'm sorry, year over year non farm payrolls in

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 7>last Friday's report were one point three. We've never dropped

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 7>to a level that low and not subsequently fallen into recession.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 7>So we're sort of at stall speed on income and

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 7>employment growth and then lo and behold. And we haven't

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 7>talked about the tariff impact. We're more focused on this,

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 7>you know, significant blow from a loss in stock market.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're so sad we have to leave it there.

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Doug Ramsey, hopefully we can reconnect very very soon, a

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer of course, of the Luthel Group.

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal