WEBVTT - A Closer Look At Impact Investing 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I want to bring

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in Mayo Engelstein right now, CEO of Open Road Alliance.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a philanthropic organization in an area that we've been

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>covering a little bit more lately, and I just find

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:38.319
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fastening impact investing. Maya, thanks so much for joining us.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>UM talk to us first about the difference between impact

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>investing and e s G investing, Right, UM, so E

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>s G Environmental Social Governance criteria is really it's a

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>set of standards, right, It's a criteria impact investing. I

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>think of it is really more about an investment thesis

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>for investment strategy, and a good way to think about

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it is to kind of bring it into the conceptual

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and just realize that every investment that ever has been

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>made in the history of investing has actually had an

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>impact on the world that could be environmental, could be social,

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and that impact could be negative, positive, or neutral. Until recently, though,

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we just never bothered to notice or take into account

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in our investment decision making whether that impact was positive, negative,

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for neutral, and what we as an investor wanted to

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>get out of it. So E s G. I think

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of it if you think about it on that continuum

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of negative to positive impact. E s G is really

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a set of criteria that helps us avoid doing harm,

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 1>that make sure that the impacts of our investment are

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>not on the negative side. Impact investing, however, is really

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a strategy that says, I don't just want to avoid harm,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I really want to pursue an investment strategy that is

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>proactively and intentionally prioritizing being on the path to end

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of that spectrum. My, can you give us an example

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of maybe a type or an actual investment that you

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>guys made that has been successful for you. Yes, UM,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So Open Road Alliance. The primary area of impact investing

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're engaged in is in debt. So we want

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>a force short term bridge lung fund primarily supporting businesses

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in the emerging in emerging markets. UM, that's really designed

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to help businesses that are at an inflection point of

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>growth and scale and for us that we support a

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>variety of impact areas UM, so everything from climate change

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to healthcare UM to gender, gender equity and human rights UM.

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And an example of somebody that we help with our

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>investment thesis around this UM would be in the renewable

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>energy space, where the renewable energy, particularly in emergency markets

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>is of course growing and growing and growing, but they're

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>still subject to the same market inefficiencies UM as the

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>rest of the market. So, for example, we supported Hubco

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Power UM when they were entering their series raise and

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a m at the time, the largest series

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>raised for a renewable energy company in East Africa as

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollar raise UM, but they needed five hundred

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars in order to get to close UM and

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>we provided that five thousand dollar loan. They got to close,

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>they were able to see the massive expansion UM and

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of course the impact in a company like that is

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>baked in UM just given the nature of what they're doing.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And so how do you actually define success for you?

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it returns or is it uh, you know, change,

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>It's both, it's both. So we actually think about certainly

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the financial terms. We're a lender, and we are, you know,

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a lender that wants to have the same financial baseline

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>as other lenders. We want to need to break even,

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to meet it. Are in I r R

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>are open MOAD Impact Fund. We do service third party assets,

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we have assets of her management, So we certainly have

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to meet all of those fiduciary responsibilities. But what's different

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>about our investors is, of course they want to go

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>above and beyond that. They're not looking for maximum profits,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they are looking for maximum impact in the areas that

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.119
<v Speaker 1>where they're investing. So that really is where we're gonna

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>where we go to to look for in terms of

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, what is what is happening because of this investment.

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>How many kilowatts of clean energy are coming online? How

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>many more customers who didn't have access to electricity previously

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>now have access to electricity because of this investment. So

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>my kind of going forward give us a sense of

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>where you think the opportunities are going to be for

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>impact investing. Where what areas are you guys are going

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at. We're gonna be looking in a

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of areas. I do think, you know a game

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>climate is just a really obvious one and a really

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>big one. Um And but I have to say, you know,

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>my sense is really the future. When people asked about

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the future of impact investing, my first sense is the

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>future of impact investing isn't impact investing, It's just investing.

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Because we have learned over the years, and especially in

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>these past couple of years between COVID and inequity and

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>everything that has been happening in our country and around

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the world, that you know, this traditional system of making

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.559
<v Speaker 1>investments without being aware of the impact that they're having

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really worked out for us. And you know, you

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>only have to look to of course Business round Table

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and Black Rock and you know, other actors in the

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>main field. The convergence of impact and investing it's on

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a collision course. And I don't think that in ten

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>years time there's actually going to be any distinction between

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>what today we're calling impact investing and what is called investing.

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just all gonna be the same thing. Well, you know,

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I was talking with a Leam Ramtula from Developing World

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Market recently and I was thinking the distinction I would

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>make isn't between impact investing in E s G. But

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>really between impact investing and charity, I would rather do

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>impact investing. If I can make a difference in someone's

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>live LIFs and UM, then just donate money. It makes

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>more sense absolutely, And if you're looking at it from

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the charity and of the perspective, there is a very

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>clear economic argument to be made. Write a grand charity.

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a guaranteed loss, guaranteed zero percent return. Impact investing

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>from an impact traditional charity perspective has huge leverage building

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>because you automatically have that opportunity to capital for more impact. Hey, Maya,

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Maya Winkelstein, CEO

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of Open Road Alliance, will have more coming up. This

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. Now let's bring in Jason Pride. He is

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer of Private Wealth over Glen me They

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>have forty billion dollars a little more than four any

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of assets under management out of Philadelphia. Jason,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Well to be on

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>with you guys. Let's talk about UM, the peak growth narrative,

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's one that it seems like market participants are

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>convinced about and nonetheless UM they continue for the most

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>part to bid up stocks. Okay, right now we're down

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but we um continue to bump up

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>against new record highs. What's your view, So we might

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit of an opinion here. We think

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that the peak growth narrative is Look, it's it's in

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>one way it's a fact, and the other way it

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>actually doesn't matter that much to investors. And here's the

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>reason why. Peak growth comes about from from a realization

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>or a reality that when you're growing up of a

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>low base that that occurred during the previous recession, your

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>growth rate is going to hit levels that you just

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>don't see during the regular portion of the cycle. You

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>hit those peak growth levels, and then one you annualize

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>past that low base, you actually back off from those levels.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>This happens every single time we are coming out of

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a recession. It is a very regular occurring thing and

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>something that actually historically doesn't matter to markets once you

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>get past. And the reason for that is once you

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>settle back down from these these high growth rates coming

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>off the low base, you settle into a sustainable growth

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>rate that ends up being acceptable for investors. All of

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the past recovery cycles we've been through have seen peak growth.

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the market through move right past peak growth

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and realize that behind peak growth is an underlying base

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of growth that ends up being acceptable to them because

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it ends up being in the middle of an ongoing

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>economic expansion. We don't expect this period to be any

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>different than that, all right, given that background, Jason, where

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>are you, folks at Glenn Meat, Are you positioning your

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>equity portfolio is more for kind of a reopening cyclical

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>trade or are you, like a lot of folks sticking

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with those big top line stories, whether it's an Apple

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>or an Amazon or something along those lines. Look, I

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>see it's actually a mix of those those two things.

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>One thing is is we are not in the full

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>force recovery at this point in time. We are when

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>year past it, we are entering into the kind of

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like the ongoing expansion period. Having said that, there's a

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit more gas in the tank on on the

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>recovery um. There are portions of their market that are

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>not fully back to previous lowest, portions of the economy

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that are not fully back to the previous levels. We

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to face the COVID pandemical a little bit, and

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>that's holding back certain parts of the economy. So we

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's actually a little bit left in the reopening trade.

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So I would say on the whole we're pretty balanced

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>between the two aspects. Would maybe a little bit of

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a tilt, a very marginal tilt towards the reopening trade

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>because there's a little bit more left in the in

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the tank there for us as we go through the

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>next I would say six to twelve months aread. I

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think I would also underline that that what seems to

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be coming out of Washington right now with the the

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>upcoming um UH Infrastructure and Reconciliation Bill, is likely going

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>to be helpful for those more reopen oriented traded industrial cyclicals,

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>domestically oriented companies than the large global multinationals. It seems

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a little bit more punitive to the large

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>global multinationals. On the tech side. How much help do

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you expect the industrials, How much fiscal help do you expect? Well,

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a pretty big bill. I think we're

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.839
<v Speaker 1>looking at mainly from the tech side. Um they peered

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>back some of their expectations on how they're going to

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>be applying the global intangeable income taxes and lifted the

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>expectation for base statutory corporate tax rates, but still the

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>bigger multinational tech players are gonna get harder, hit harder

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>than the more domestically oriented industrial play. And look, it's

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.719
<v Speaker 1>an infrastructure spend. At least a good portion of it,

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>seven billion dollars in infrastructure oriented spending is going to

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>be going through and that should benefit UM cyclical industrials

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>more than it does the big tech place. How do

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys think about valuation here in this market, Jason?

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of folks are saying, you know, even with

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the ten yield tent tenure yielding in at one point

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>three roughly, boy, this is an expensive market. How concerned

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>are you about that? And we we tend to agree

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>with that. Even when you adjust for interst rate short

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>term and long term interest rates, equities on a global

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>basis are sitting in like in the eightieth percentile range

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of valuation. So on the high side, domestic stocks are

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>actually sitting above the nine percentile, with the growth oriented

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>place UM sitting actually closer like seven PERCENTIUL so kind

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of nosably territoryile and above tends the result in red

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>used for returns over the next one three and five years.

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Eightieth percentile does it though, which is pretty interesting. The

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>note and what that what that conveys is actually there's

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>not really everything in the market is overvalued. It's actually

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>more most concentrated those large growth names. When you look

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>at large value, it's more reasonable. When you get down

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the small it's more reasonable when you look abroad, International, APTA.

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It was some of the better areas that we think

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>set out there actually set on in Asia where look

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>they've they've been hit for reasons, but they are the

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>most attractive areas out there in the global marketplace. All right, Jason,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for your perspective in your comments.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Jason pride ce io of Private Wealth for Glenn Mead.

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:47.719
<v Speaker 1>They are based in the town of Brotherly Love. That's Philadelphia, Pa. Well,

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we always love to talk M and A deals, and

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a big one in the text base and it

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>involves a company that has got a product called mail

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Chimp into it. It's going to acquire email market and

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>mail Chimp for twelve billion dollars. I don't know where

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to go with this, but let's start with our leader

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in all things tech that's on a rag running. He's

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a Senior Software and I T services animals for Bloomberg

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence on I know into it. Okay, application software company

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>buying some more software. What is a mail Chimp and

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>why is it worth twelve billion dollars? It's a good one, Paul,

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it. Everybody in the software space

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>wants to be like Salesforce. They want to go by,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>go out and buy other software assets so that they

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>can sell in then got installed base. And that's exactly

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>what in chet is doing. Mail Chimp is an email

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>marketing software company. So you know, if you want to um,

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, send me spam every day about you know,

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>some kind of product that you have. You know, you

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>use one of these software products. I wonder what the

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>name comes from, is it uh? Is there a history

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of monkeys delivering mail? Or I have no idea, but

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>but hands down, if you think about it right now,

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>how are people reaching out you. Nobody's mailing you pamphlets

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and trying to get you to buy some stuff. If

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a large installed base of customers that already

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>use your product, this is the best way for you

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to you know, sell into another thing that they will

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>buy from you and keep on increasing your recurring revenue

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>from that customer piece, and everybody wants to target the

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>SNB market right now. So, Matt, I don't know if

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you know this, but whenever I see an M and

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>A trade go across the Bloomberg terminal, the first thing

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I do is hit M A go Well, then I

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>go to look at the advisors, what investment banks are

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>working on this deal and for the seller here for

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>mail Chimp, Frank Quatrone and Catalyst still doing big, big

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>deals in tech. Just one of the all time grades

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in technology investment banking on a rug. So what's really

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, talk to us about into it? Here, here's

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the company. I got a hundred and fifty billion dollar

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>market cap. Most people, including me, don't really know much

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. Talk us about this company and kind of

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>where they're growing. Uh, what's behind this company? Since you

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>look at it, I mean, they are the the you

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>know everything tax, turbo tax and then they that's really

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>their bread and potter. But just like it is for

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>any other even large installed based software company. You know,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a derby, whether that's salesforce, whether that's into it.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now you have to figure out how can I

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>sell another product? To my customer base. And that really

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is the game here. You know, a value investor would

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>have said, why don't you just go out and buy

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>your stock every you know, every every year and use

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the free cast for that. But Salesforce has shown that

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>buying a lot more products it does help in the

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>long run. It helps in customer retention, your turn rate

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>goes down, and then you can, you know, increase prices

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>when you bundle these things, and that's what the CEO

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is doing. They bought a company called credit Karma a

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>little while ago for seven billion dollars and this is

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the same string of acquisitions. This is

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a can pick one alright, So what's what's next? Then?

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess is there are they looking for pretty much

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>anything that they can fit into And is finance just

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>super easy right now? I think finance is super easy

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. And for all of these software companies, what

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at is what is their niche and market

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And for introit it is the SMB market. So whenever

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you see an economy, uh, you know, rebound, you see

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the number of small businesses go up, and this is

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>where the sweet spot is for Inteuit. They want to

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to not just do the tax software for

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>these companies. They want to sell additional products. And now

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>whether this is you know, let's say right now they're

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>using email marketing software. You know, potentially they could think

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>about something in advertising, something in the front office customer service,

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>something in the back office such as finance. So they

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>can they can figure out many areas where a small

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and medium business would need more software products. You know, Matt,

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I just pump put up the camp chart, which is

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>something you like to do for these names. Look at

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the last five years, boy into it's had a compoundent

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and your return about forty a year versus the SMP

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of eight. So it's up another fifty percent this year.

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So another great software story. That's all I has. All

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the companies he follows all are up like fifty percent

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a year every year. Well, it's uh, just a fascinating

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>time for these companies. And um, it kind of reminds

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit of those days when Frank Quatrone

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>was the prince of Silicon Valance. You know, I mean

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of our a lot of bankers today

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>probably are too young to remember Frank Quatrone. Um he

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>got embroiled in some real issues just as he was

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>all vindicated. Well yeah, yeah everything, uh huh okay. So

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 1>definitely a fascinating, a fascinating story of Frank and of

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>into It and Male Champa Rona. Thanks so much for

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Bloomberg Intelligence. Apples holding a product event

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>today one pm. Lost ree time, maybe iPhone thirteen upgrade,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe a watch upgrade. So my question is do I

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>need to run over to the Apple store on Fifth

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Avenue and upgrade all my Apple stuff? Joining us is

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on on Shriny Boston, Senior Semiconductor on Hardware Analysts. He

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>covers Apple for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us here in the

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So Anna, what's is there a

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>big deal today or is this just kind of, you know,

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>some upgrades on the edges. Look, it's going to be evolutionary, right,

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So we've said this. There are a billion iPhone users

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in the install base and the fact that we upgrade

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about twenty of them every single year is phenomenal. So

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what you want to do is produce a product that

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is revolutionary, that drives that refresher great up what we

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>saw with the revolution last with the iPhone twelve was

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the five G move, and we expect the momentum to continue.

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>We think we're not We're nowhere near done yet with

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the super Psyche. So this is a this is an

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary story. So the answer to your question is, it

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>would be nice if you went out and upgraded everything

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as possible. But we're expecting, you know, fifty

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>one million units in counter quarter three and about eighty

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>nine millions to be sold in counter quarter four. But

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in the grand scheme of things, this is an evolutionary upgrade,

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>more five G, more momentum, continuation of teams. But the

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Watch is going to be revolutionary, isn't it? Or at

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>least the shape is going to be different. It's bigger, um,

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it should be capable of more? Does it tell time? Look?

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>You know you you bring up a good point, Matt Miller.

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that you brought up the connectivity portion, the halo effect.

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, iPhone drives, Watch, iPhone, drives, Macmac drives, iPhone, everything,

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 1>drive services. Right, So the connectivity um or the connectivity

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>between all of these products within the closed the walled garden,

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>if you may, is the wholly grade for Apple to

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the extent that I can get you upgraded on the watch,

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>which hasn't seen that much of an upgrade UM in

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>recent times. Is a is a great advancement. The fact

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that services, despite the epic drama, we can make that stickier.

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a high margin business. We can expand that. That's

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>if I can do that consistently, If I'm Apple every

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>single time, a single product every year or every other

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>year in some cases, and increase the attached rate, that's

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>what drives iPhone tripments and services grow. You made a

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>second point which was interesting, which not many people are

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about, is the gating factor is supply constraints right UM,

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and the chip shortage is here to stay, unfortunately, and

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the visibility of that through be maybe through first half

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. So depending on how strong demand is and

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>where demand comes from and what other products are have

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>high demand, there could be a re percussions even two

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>companies like Apple UM which saw some spill over into

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>iPhone and three Q. Alright, so I'm trying to get

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Tom Kane to upgrade the five G. I'm trying to

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>ma can download his movies and his music much faster.

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Is five G really a super cycle driver? I'm just

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>not feeling it. Yeah, you know, it's interesting because one

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>of the things that unlike remember the two G two

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>three G conversion was voice to data. Right, three G

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>two four G was huge upgrades from a speed perspective

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>from in the four G in the in the data landscape,

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>four G two five G is yes, about more speed,

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>but also about a variety of more connections. It's just

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>not about the handset anymore. It's about handset, it's about autos,

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it's about industrial IoT, but the services associated with all

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of those new expansive products and product categories. We're not

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 1>there yet, okay, So this is going to be a

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>long journey, and it's come first to the consumer. And

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>at the margin we're going to be able to see

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>faster speech. We are not there with the true millimeter

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>wave implementation of five G either, so all of this

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to take time. Um, we're not seeing any

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>dramatic art poo increases. So you're going to download your

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 1>movies faster. You're going to be able to stream when

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you're on the train in New Jersey transit. That's the answer. Paul.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I remember hearing all this about three

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>G as well. And and now when I see three

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>G on my phone, It's like a nightmare scenario. It

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't doesn't work anymore. We're we're spoiled, Punch. I can

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>tell you that, you know, the even four G might

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>seem slow compared to a year from now with five.

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>So bottom line on on, I want to go out

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>and get myself a new iPhone. Have been waiting and

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>waiting and waiting. I want to go and get the

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>new watch the seven series seven Watch? Am I going

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do that next week? UM, particularly

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on the high end? I think you will be able to. UM.

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that we've been consistently saying in

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the last year is that the shipments of Apple, particularly

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone, are gonna skew towards the higher end. All

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of the camera advancements and the UM lens and enhancements

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and the screen enhancements are going to drive UM the

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>performance needs and the storage needs of the iPhone UM

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>much much higher. And as a result, you know that

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>seven dollar iPhone is not going to cut it free, Matt,

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly with the pretty pictures of cars that you take.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna you're gonna move towards a high end

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna shell out. Well, I actually pay a

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>massive monthly fee in order to get a free the

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>free phone of my choice every year. There you go.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're already on a good upgrade cadence. Yes, exactly,

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and I should have upgraded in April. But I knew

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>if I just wait a little bit longer, just a

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>couple more months, I keep telling myself, a couple more months,

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I can get the thirteen on. Thanks so much for

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>joining us on Trinative aust On there from Bloomberg and

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>telling thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Matt Miller y three and on Fall Sweeney

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio