WEBVTT - When Has a Single Vote Decided an Election?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff production of iHeart Radio. Hey brain Stuff,

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Lauren vogbamb here, You've probably heard the old truism that

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>every vote counts. But judging from the history of low

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>voter participation in US elections compared with that in other

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>developed countries, it seems that many Americans haven't believed that

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>casting a ballot for a particular candidate or for a

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>particular issue really matters that much. In the case of

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>the twenty six team presidential election, this was substantiated by

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a Pew Research Center survey in which of non voters

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>who were eligible to cast a ballot cited my vote

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>would not matter as the explanation for why they abstained.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>That's nearly as high as the number who said that

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 1>they didn't vote because they didn't like either candidate, and

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>higher than the portion who had neglected to register by

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the deadline. When it comes down to it, the chances

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of a single voter casting what searchers call a pivotal vote,

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that is, a single vote that swings an election are

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty remote, but it does happen. In a two thousand

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>one study, University of Chicago economics professor K. C. B.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Mulligan and business economic consultant Charles G. Hunter studied nearly

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a century's worth of congressional election results and twenty one

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>years worth the state legislative election returns, nearly fifty seven

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand elections at all, not counting uncontested races. Out of

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the sixteen thousand, five hundred and seventy seven federal elections studied,

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>only one was decided by a single vote, but the

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>researchers found seven state elections that came down to a

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>single ballot. As Mulligan wrote in a post for the

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>New York Times Economics blog, the chances that a voter

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>will cast a ballot that will determine the winner of

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a federal election is less than one in one hundred thousand.

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>In state races, the odds increased to one in less

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>than twenty five thousand. In local elections, where the electorate

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>may be in the few thousands or even hundreds, Pivotal

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>votes can happen even more often. While nationwide data isn't available.

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>In Ohio alone, fourteen races for office in resulted in

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>either a tie or a single vote margin, according to

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the Record Courier newspaper. We spoke with Mulligan via email.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>He said that determined the winner, incentive to vote is minuscule.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Even in a local election with say two thousand votes,

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>it's still only a one in one thousand chance. But

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>even though one vote has only a tiny chance of

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>being deep pivotal one in an election, that doesn't mean

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that voting isn't important. Collectively, votes matter a great deal.

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Certain groups in the population that have higher turnout rates,

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>such as older voters, the wealthy, and white Americans, benefit

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>from the clout that they achieve as a result. But

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we also spoke with Sean McElwee, an analyst for Demos,

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a public policy organization that works to reduce

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>plitical and economic inequality in the United States. He said,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when gaps in turn out are smaller, policies more equitable.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Even in deeply blue or red districts, vote shares send

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>important signals to representatives about their constituents. In local elections

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>where turnout rates are often single digit, vote margins are

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>far narrower, and turnout is even more skewed against people

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of color, young people, and low income folks. Of course,

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>some of that turnout is influenced by citizens access to voting,

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>including their ability to get correct and timely information about

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>ways for them to make their vote and their ability

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to actually get to the polls or send in an

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>absentee ballot. Many states and localities have been accused of

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>voter suppression that is purposefully making it difficult for people

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>from these demographics that are traditionally underrepresented at the polls

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to start making themselves heard through voting. But that's a

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>different episode. Today, let's talk about a few of the

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>elections that were decided by single vote. The only congressional

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>election to have been determined by a single vote was

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen ten election for the thirty six Congressional district

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of New York. Democratic challenger Charles Bennett Smith, a newspaper

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>editor by trade and an advocate of prohibition, faced Republican

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>incumbent D. S. Alexander. According to a New York Times

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>article from November twentie of that year, after the initial

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>counting of the returns, the two candidates were tied at

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, six hundred and eighty four votes each, but

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the election board noticed an error in the total on

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a tally sheet from one district. When it was corrected,

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Smith received the single vote needed to elect him According

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to his Congressional biography, Smith became the chairman of the

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>House Committee on Foreign Affairs and was elected three more

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 1>times to Congress before losing a re election bid in

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eight. But the city of seat Pleasant, Maryland, had

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the strangest one vote elections ever in the

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>year two thousand. It was decided by a vote that

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't cast. A woman showed up at her polling place

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>on the evening of the election, and though she was

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>registered to vote, her name didn't show up in the

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>records because she had changed her address. Officials did not

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>allow her to cast a ballot for the candidate of

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>her choice, Thurman D. Jones Jr. And Jones lost the

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>election two hundred and forty seven to two hundred and

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>forty six to incumbent Eugene F. Kennedy. Jones later filed

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit contesting the result, but in a two thousand

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>one ruling, the Maryland Court of Appeals overturned a lower

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>court ruling and left Kennedy as the winner because it

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>had not been shown that fraud had been committed. Then

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>there's the case of the twelve Democratic primary for the

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty seventh Legislative district in Missouri because of redistricting, Representative

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Newman was pitted in a primary against a fellow legislator,

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Representative Susan Carlson. On election night, Newman prevailed by a

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>single vote, one thousand, eight hundred and twenty three to

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>one thousand, eight hundred and twenty two, but the St.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Louis County Election Board declined to certify the results, saying

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that a hundred and two voters at one polling place

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>had mistakenly been given ballots for a neighboring district. But

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in a do over primary seven weeks later, the result

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>was unchanged. Newman again won, this time by votes, and

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in one instance, a one vote election result included a

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>ballot cast by a deceased voter. In two thousand eleven,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in the village of Manilis, New York, a man named

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Arnold Ferguson, who was the father of one of the

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>candidates for the village board, submitted an absentee ballot ahead

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of election day, but then died three weeks before the election.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Election officials later admitted that Ferguson's vote should not have

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>been counted, but the state Supreme Court ruled the ballot

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be challenged after it was removed from its envelope.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It's unclear what impact the ballot had on the outcome,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in which Harold Hopkinson won by a single vote over

0:06:54.839 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark Baum. Today's episode was written by Patrick J. Kaiger

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>and produced by Tyler Clang. For more on list and

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of other topics, visit how stuff works dot com.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Bring Stuff is a production of my heart Radio. For

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.