WEBVTT - U.S. May Need France-Like Lockdowns to Beat Covid

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonny Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Market

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Our columnist today, right this,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>hospitalization rates haven't yet reached the levels we saw in

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>the spring in the United States, but the danger of

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>an acute health crisis maybe even greater. He knows what

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about. Some Felias, senior pharmaceuticals analyst for Bloomberg

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence and director of research for e A. Some what

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>do you mean by an acute health crisis? Yeah, Hi, Bonny.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So Um, You know, nobody likes to write these things

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>because it depresses me just as well as anybody else

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>who reads it. But when I look at the detail

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>that's coming through, and when I see what's going on

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>here in Europe, UM, there are a few signals that

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that really worry me. So clearly everybody can see that

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that UM positive cases are rising rapidly. But then when

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the data and a lot of you know,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>people to look at their hospitalizations, they go, well, that

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to happen as much, and deaths appeared to

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>be a bit lower now, which are absolutely true. What

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about is that that that that there is

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that that gives us a full sense of security in

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that you the reason hospitalizations are lower is that there's

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot more people who are catching it, who are younger,

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>who tend to get not sick, but then don't forget

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>they go and then pass it on to their elders,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>which takes time. Then we've also got a lot more

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>stringent about who we hospitalize, so that means that whatever

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>hospitalization you see is probably pretty severe patients. So you

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>have to take account of that, and then of course

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we can't treat them better, but but we haven't necessarily

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>increased the number of beds available. And then on top

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of that, the virus is going into a trajectory that's

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that's likely to be many times higher than it was

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>in the spring summer months. In this eventually is likely

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to be just like other common cold, a seasonal virus.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So although the cases were that high in the summer,

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be much higher now, So that's what

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>worries me. A combination of all this together. Sam, You're

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>based in France right now and you've got a lot

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of experience around the continent. Um, what do you think

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>has been the key driver in the resurgence of the

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>cases in Europe? Has it simply been the seasonality or

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>is it just fatigue? What? What are you seeing there?

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised Paul if if it's a combination

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of all that. But certainly in the colder environments we

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>do two things happen to us. One is, at least

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>two things happen. One is that we tend to be

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>more indoors, which is where the virus has a great

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>time of passing from person to person. And secondly, our

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>lungs reduced their ability to be able to clear stuff out.

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>So you'm sure you've heard of viral load. If you've

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>got ten viral party as ni lung and it was

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>very good at getting rid of it quickly in the

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>summer where humidity is a bit higher, that's great. But

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>if that think can go in and you don't get

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>rid of it as much, that's essentially equivalent to having

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a higher viral load giving you a risk of worth disease.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's what the risk in the winter is. And

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of course if you start off at a higher base

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>already in terms of the virus circulating in people who

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>are infected, then you're setting yourself up for a pretty

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>tragic exponential growth, which is what I think has surprised

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the UK, the French and the German authorities. That's an

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>excellent explanation of what happens. I hadn't heard it really

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>explained that plainly before, but it definitely would cause you

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot more careful having heard that, And

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that's just what I was going to ask Angela Merkel

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that in Germany they don't know where seventy five

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of the infections are coming from. I mean, where

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are they coming from? Remember the money there. A lot

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of people get this disease, especially the young again who

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>ray symptomatic. And if you listen to some of the

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>topic epidemiologists in the world, you have to think about

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this virus. It's most infectious in terms of it passing

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>on to others during the pre symptomatic and the early

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>infection in me whether symptomatic or not symptomatic. So that's

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>when it's so few days and then and then we

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>look at all the data that's coming out of all

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>these antibody trials. The viral load, the amount of viral

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>virus in your body back up your throats and all

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that declines really quickly by day ten, ten eleven, day eleven,

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we get test results four or five days after we've

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>been tested. What are those people doing in that time?

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Are they as careful as they should be? So, Sam,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>in your day job, you are one of the top

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>farmer analysts in the city of London. What are the

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>companies that you talked to, and you've talked to for decades?

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>What are they tell you about therapeutics, not vaccines, but

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>just the ability to treat this better as we go

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>into a second or here in the United States maybe

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in a third way. Yeah, so there's a lot of

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>activity going on unfortunately clinical development. Drug development is a

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a game of snakes and ladders. You

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>go up, you seem to be doing really well, and

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you just fallen a ladder or a snake hunter image

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>wry because I think it's the snakes, and you go

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to square one. So you know,

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>just today we had a bit of news from Regenera

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>on saying that their antibody didn't seem to work in

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>very severe patients in hospitals. So these folks are all

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>doing what they can with what science tells them is

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>likely to work, and then testing it out in a

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>virus and a medical condition that we're learning on the

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>hoof about. So we are getting progress, but it's a

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit like two steps forward, one step back, um.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And and you know that we're getting progressed because the

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the the death rates are lower, the mortality rate is lower. Unfortunately,

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we're learning more about how awful the viruses and people

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>who catch it in terms of long COVID and and

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>who knows what long term issues we're cooking up with

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this virus once we've been infected some you know, it's

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough, tough conversation, but the companies sort of

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>want their employees to come back to work in the

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>office space. I mean not all of them, and there's

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary leniency when it comes to that, but some employees

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>do want to go back. I mean, what's the advice

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>for those employees? Yeah, I mean, look in in France,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we just had our lockdown and last night or two

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>nights ago. Yeah, it was two nights ago. Um um

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>as of midnight last night. So basically, people who can

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>work from home have to work from home. It's not

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a choice anymore. Um. They're taking their time to figure

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>out what to actually tell people in terms of guidance.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I if the UK trajector continues the way it is

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>with all the various tier one, tier two, tier three,

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>if they don't work out, Remember frant tried the same thing.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>They tried curfews and and early closure of restaurants andthing.

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't help. Um. So this is why I'm

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying and what I wrote. Maybe the only

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>solution a little bit like when you have a wildfire,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the only way to manage it is to cut the

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of forest out so that the fire can

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>jump over to the next side. And maybe that's the

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>only way. It's a horrible thing to say, and I

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>really wish I didn't feel that this could be the

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>only way, but it seems like that's the only way. Sam.

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Just our schools open are closed. There in France, schools

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>are open. Schools are open, but they've become a lot

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>more clever about him to manage the groups of students

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and all that. And also the data appears to suggest

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that there's less transmission among school children and then bringing

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it home than there is at universities. So the short

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>university is right interesting. Hey, Sam, thanks so much for

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Sam Fazeli, he's a senior pharmaceutical analysts and

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>he also runs the European research business for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the leaders of that great business for Bloomberg

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and UH he's also writing for Bloomberg Opinion right now

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>sharing some of his expertise on the healthcare business. He

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from UH France, where again, UH,

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the lockdowns are beginning, And the question, Vonnie is you know,

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess for the folks in the UK is that

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of the next step for the UK is lockdowns?

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And again here that doesn't seem to be much appetite

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>for that in the States, but we will monitor closely.

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>We had a bunch of the big tech and tech

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>media names reporting last night, let's break it all down.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>There was absolutely nobody better to do that with, UH

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>than Lauren Martin. Lauren Martin, she's a senior media analysts

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that need him in company because her research coverage it's

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>really a convergence of where the media and technology spaces.

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>She covers the big tech names like Ammal, Apple, Amazon, Google,

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the traditional media names like Discovery and This and Disney

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and those types of things, and even some of the

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>technical players, the rokus of the world, the uh and

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the snaps. Brings it all together with a really good

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>overview look of the space. Lard, thanks so much for

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. Let's start off with Apple stocks trading

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>off about five percent. I thought the numbers were good.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>This is just a stock price to perfect giving a

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit back, you know, maybe I think it's a

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>regularly over emphasis on iPhones. iPhone sales were week and

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>China was down yere every year in the quarter. You know,

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>we would say we would sort of counter that by

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>saying what we liked the most about Apple's earnings was

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>they hit an all time high installed base of active

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>devices with um iPad and Max sales up forty and

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent, respectively, so they're installed bases growing seconds. They

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>added thirty five million subscribers in the last ninety days,

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>so they're out five hundred and eighty five UH million

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>paid subscribers, which is an annuity stream type of revenue,

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>which is fantastic. And then services hit a record almost

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen billion dollars at a gross margin of sixty seven percent,

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So they're there. I was quickly approaching the growth mosic

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>contribution of the entire hardware sector of Apple, even though

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>hardware apples known as a hardware company. So all of

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>those things are really positive to us. Laura, how concern

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>to be about the drop of in China? Is it

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.239
<v Speaker 1>a one time thing? Is it due to added competition?

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And willis impact Apple going in the future. So I

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think China is predominantly a new phone market and that

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you might recall that they're um. They actually announced the

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>new iPhones UM three weeks later this year, so they're

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in a different quarter than last year. So last year

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you had two weeks of the new iPhones UM, and

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so the Chinese are very active in that. We expect

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the new iPhone twelves and there's four different models of those,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>which started two weeks into the October quarter to be

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a major seller in China. That we would expect China

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to rebound in this quarter and going forward. Hey Loo,

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>how about the services business for Apple, I know speaking

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to you in the past, that's really a growing part

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of their business. Is a business that investors are really

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>focused on. How's that progressing? Um really fantastic. So one

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of the things they're doing is very clever, and in fact,

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're getting sued by one of their competitors

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for this is there bundling things. So rather than just

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>paying for music separately for Apple TV, separate from Apple Fitness,

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple from Apple News, they're introducing I think on Monday,

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>actually a really big bundle where you're you know, you

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe for twenty dollars a monthly your whole family

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to like nearly every service they have, and if you

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>really really want everything they offer, including like Arcade the

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>video game streaming space, you can pay thirty dollars for

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>your entire family. So I don't know about you, but

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm paying like ten dollars for Cloud, or my kids

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>paying ten dollars or something. You know, if we wrap

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it all up, we can have like twice as many

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>services for half the money. I think that's really smart

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>because that should at drive services growth higher, which is

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>fantastic for margins. Yeah, I mean, I can definitely see

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>many many households paying that pretty genius, Laura, what should

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we when we consider Amazon, what should we be concentrating

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>on because obviously it grew its revenue by some again though,

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can annoy people if you don't deliver,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And for example, Amazon Prime hasn't been able to be

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>as quick as it used to be because there's so

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>many people on the system. You know, there are things

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that are sold out and so on. Kind of Amazon

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>hold onto the market share that it's gained. So um,

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I really think Amazon is the best physician stock sort

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of regardless of whether COVID is short or long. I

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>think it's the most hedged because if we're going to

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>go into lockdowns again, that means e commerce is going

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, more in demand, especially for the

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. And I think one of the things that

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>people are saying is that the holiday season may really

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>tax the logistics capabilities. Well, Amazon sort of got trial

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>by fire at the early days of the pandemic and

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then on Prime Day when the Prime Day was up

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty year over year, So it keeps testing it's logistics change.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So I expect it's actually ability to deliver during holidays

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to be better than anybody else's about getting things to

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you on time in a in a you know, um

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>safe manner. So I actually really like Amazon for either

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the of the economy opening or COVID lockdowns going longer.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Amazon is the best most hedge, best positioned

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in that they win either way. Hey, Lauren, how about

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the cloud business for Amazon? That's been such a great

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>story there and really a profit story, you know, relative

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to the core e commerce business. Um, it's getting more competitive,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft's making big gains, alphabets making big big gains.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you view the Amazon web services business? Yeah,

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>really excellent. Like we just got from Google last night

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to start breaking out their cloud businesses

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>because these are such great profitable businesses. So yeah, And

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the quarter Amazon reported three and a half billion dollars

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of profit on eleven billion dollars of revenue in their

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>cloud business. I would expect it to be equally as

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>profitable for Microsoft and for Google. Um. And I do

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>think they're making inroads. But I also think Paul that

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>this whole this this has been accelerated, that COVID has

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>accelerated the move to the cloud by all businesses. So

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the pie just got bigger by the brought

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>forward for two years because of COVID. Everybody's moving to

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the cloud faster businesses, So there's just sort of a

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>bigger pie for everybody. And Apple is the dominant provider,

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but if there's room for other people now thanks to

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID to also, like Google was talking, they do a

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of states. They do this state of Virginia, they

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>do countries. They're doing more sales like government contracts for

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>their cloud business. And Amazon, as you know, really specializes

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in small businesses moving to the cloud. Laura, we're nearly

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>out of time, but how do you feel the executives

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>did this week in front of Congress. I'm sorry, executives

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>are in front of talk about Google, Facebook, and Twitter. Um.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Lots of criticism about Twitter, but I'll stand aside there

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>because I don't cover Twitter. You know, I think there's

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a because I am very worried about Facebook. I think

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it has the highest regulatory risks in because I think

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the aisle think that Facebook has become

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a referee for news and it basically as a gate

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>keep information that scares conservative and more. But really even

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Democrats feel that they're actually livelihood is at risk with

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook actually making the prioritizations of what people see in

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>their news feed. So I sort of feel like Facebook

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is as the highest risk of getting fined or broken

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>up or having some kind of negative regulatory consequence in

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>one both by EU and by the US. So I'm

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>scared about that for Facebook. Let's so for Google and

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Amazon. Alright, Laura, we have to leave it there,

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but very much appreciate your time, so fun speaking with you.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You cover some of the really companies that we just

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>are talking about daily at this point. That is Laura

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>need him joining us there on Google and Facebook. Uh sorry,

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Laura Martin from need him always say that Laura Martin

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>need him analysts and talking to us about Apple, Amazon, Facebook,

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and Google. So Paul, we'll do it all again next week.

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It should be an interesting week next week. I think

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a little event maybe on Tuesday, but two day

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and so the build up and then the days after

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be very interesting. We're just going in Dominic Nolan,

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Senior looking director at Pacific Assets and Management. Dominic, You've

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>got various scenarios laid out and what would happen to

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the bond market say, for example, in the event of

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a change of presidency and a vaccine success. Let's start there,

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens to bonds if that happens, I can hear me, okay, Bunny,

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Sure I can, Okay, great. I think it really depends

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on which way the Senate goes. Assuming the potust goes

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to Biden in that particular, and let's assume the House

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>stays blue, then you have in theory it would be

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a blue waves that the Senate also goes blue. You

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>most likely have extreme stimulus in there, and that will

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be some extent offset which is good for the economy,

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>probably offset a little bit by increase in taxes. But

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to rates, I would expect rates probably

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>start to move up a little bit. I mean we've

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>been we've been had a huge pressure on rates from

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a downward side. If you have a thought of massive stimulus,

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>then you have the inflation longer start to end of

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the market, and I would expect a bit of a

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>a steepener on here, so the long end starts to

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>move up with the expectations of massive, massive fiscal spending. If, however,

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the Senate stays red, they will probably be a block

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>two extreme stimulus. I think if Biden wins in the

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Senate says red, they'll be a blocked anything he wants

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to do. So I would envision a scenario where horse

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>training takes place, where you want stimulus to come into

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the system at the same time, you know, the Senate

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>would be blocking, trying to block that or mute that,

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>or in exchange, we want lower taxes and that particularly,

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>that's it's much more uncertain. And that's the combo that

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think. Um, yeah, it would be uncertain. And I

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>would say if they couldn't get stimulus passed in a

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>time where the COVID space, the COVID cases are spiking

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>like they are, you might have a situation where rates

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to drop with the expectation there's not enough stimulus

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to support the economy. So those are the It really

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>depends to me on which way the Senate goes dominic.

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously we do have those electoral uncertainties, but

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to central bankers around the world, um,

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and it just feels like an environment where rates are

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>lower for longer in general. So how do you know

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income investors like you good folks, a specific asset management?

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about, you know, the kind of

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the one to two to three year pull here, where

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>do you make money? It's a great question. I think

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of return, profiles are going to be duted. Honestly,

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you're sitting in an environment where most most of the

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>short term paper is or a lot of it's yielding

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>below one. So if you can somehow return one two

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in that range, I think that's actually pretty attractive given

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the status of short term rates across the glow. And

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.479
<v Speaker 1>when we look at it, the central banks are a

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>massive support for the system for liquidity, So we do

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>feel that you're downside is is backstopped to a large

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>extent by what people have called the FED put. And

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>you go in, you know, and there's there's room for

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>total from probably some spread products, certainly a little bit

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of compression on the corporate side. You probably have some

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>elements in structure products. We're not mortgage folks, but I

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>think the global the global demand for yield will continue

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to grind spreads tighter. That's our that's our medium term view,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>given the central bank support. So if you can get

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>basis points of of spread on top of clipping a

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>coupon that's how you get to your one and a

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>half to two percent yield for short duration for one

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to three part of the curve. That's what I adventure.

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>What happens to the higher yield elements of the market,

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and even the junk bond market, I mean how tied

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and those spreads go. We talked about that a lot

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>on the floor and US high yield sitting with a

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>with a five handle on it, and I feel is

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that you cannot go much lower until you look across it.

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, European high yield, which is sitting at two

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So on one hand, I'd say, from

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>from a compensation for wrisk standpoint, I feel as though

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>HILD shouldn't even be at this level. But I think

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just living in a world that is dated, in

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a new central bank monetary our quey world. It can

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly go tighter. And you think about again, Europe European

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>hi yield at two and a half, that's an economy.

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not growing as fast as the United States. Investors

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>are willing to take sub three on leverage finance over there,

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So there is certainly an argument in the United States.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>You could grind inside a thought so Dominic, just real quick,

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds, give me a sense of credit quality that

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in your portfolio right here. It's a bit bifurcated.

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think our approach we've taken more you know, tilt

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to the more performing companies and being very very selective

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to what we call the COVID sectors

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and our COVID sectors, the class, your hospitality, your gaming, travel, entertainment.

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Those are areas where if we go through another wave,

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>there are many of these leverage finance structures that just

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>won't make it and you'll see another wave of bankruptcy.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So from our side, we're tilting certainly the more liquid

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>side of the market, better better credits. But it's really about,

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the business model. Right now, there's so

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>many business models that were quote recession proof, but not

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>pandemic proof, and I think you've had to adjust that

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>right So that for us, that's our approach. All right, Donnic,

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much. We really appreciate your thoughts as always,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Dominic Nolan, Senior Managing Director of Pacific Asset Management. Right now,

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>let's head down to Washington. Did you see our Washington

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>studios get World and Nash on the News. We can

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>do that with Nathan Hagar. Nathan Well our next guest

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>right this year hardly needs the ghosts and ghouls of

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Halloween to make it scary for investors. Sarah Ponzac is

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>with us in studio. She is going as a bear

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.479
<v Speaker 1>for this Halloween, right, Sarah, Well, I'll start it off

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>by saying, this is an annual tradition that we do

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>every year ahead of Halloween. We ask money managers across

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street to send us the charts that scare them

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the most. So it's our annual tradition out today ahead

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of Halloween tomorrow, of course. Uh. And it was quite

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the compilation. Sure, we could say has been haunting enough.

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>The amount that we have all gone through in markets,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>just in life, to dealing with COVID nineteen and whatever

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.479
<v Speaker 1>else might be within financial markets. There's plenty toorry about,

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as these money managers did point out all highlight a

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>few of them. Steeve Chevrone, he's a portfolio manager and

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>equity strategists over at Federated Hermes. He brings it really

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>close to home with the election coming up in just

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days. Election Night on Tuesday, he points

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>out the fact that mail and voting voting is obviously

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>very high, hitting upwards of forty of the vote this year.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Given historical patterns, that means that we could see over

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>one million Belts rejected in the upcoming election. He says,

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So if this is the case, I know we all

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hope that we will have a result on Tuesday evening,

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we know that that might not be the case. And

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for markets, if we do have a contested election, and

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>if we have this drawn out process, that would just

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>introduce more of volatility, more uncertainty. On top of that,

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>some other themes that were introduced, Jason Thomas over at

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the Carlisle Group pointed out corporate debt rising. Our corporate

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>debt to GDP is rising above, which is full above

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the prior records, so plenty of spending and companies have

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>been forced to spend more if they can and borrow

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>even more um during the COVID crisis. One that I

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyed and really was just telling this week because

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>when we had that large sell off on Tuesday. Although

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a sell off again in markets today,

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>not to quite the same extent a Tuesday, it was

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting because hedges didn't work, and one of those hedges

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>being gold. Gold actually fell in tandem with equity markets too.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>So what Evan Brown Over at u BSS Management points

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>out is that the rolling sixty three day correlation between

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>gold and the SMP five hundred has been positive for

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.719
<v Speaker 1>a majority of this year. So what that means that

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>gold may no longer be He calls it a reliable

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>ballast to portfolios during risk off period, So especially from

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>multi asset investors, those who are looking for protection hedges,

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a concern. Hey, sir, what did you make of

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the or what we're seeing today in terms of the

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>nastac the nastack one on the heels of those tech

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>earnings last night. I you know, I've kind of looked

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>at the tech earnings broadly defined as uh, pretty darn good.

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Yet you know, the markets not seen it that way.

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>They were David Bonson over at the Bonson Group I

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I received this excerpt from him this morning and I

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>thought it put it together very nicely. He said, none

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of Thursday's tech earnings results were bad and some more

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>spec tacular, But the market is reacting negatively because when

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>something is priced for better than perfection, it becomes pretty

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to live up to those expectations. And that's the

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>world that we're living in right now. Not only were

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>these companies priced for perfection, they are priced for better

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>than perfection. And you see the tiniest little flub take

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple for example, missing iPhone estimates, not providing guidance. At

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time, a theme that I have heard highlighted

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that almost every single one of these

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>companies highlighted uncertainty around COVID nineteen and tech is supposed

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the area of the market that can kind

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of withstand this. We saw earlier in the week with

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>SAP over in Germany that they really had to pull

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.959
<v Speaker 1>back on guidance because they are concerned that lockdowns over

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in Europe are going to hit them headed into one.

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>In the beginning of the year, when we think about

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the rally that we saw, investors kept saying look beyond

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>look into one. Well, now, if we are seeing COVID

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>cases rising, and if these companies that are supposed to

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>be the beneficiary areas or at least your safe havens

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>being the big tech companies are still expressing doubt or

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty surrounding it, you have to wonder if one is

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>really going to provide the boost that is right now

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>built into markets. Also, though the Apple news, the China

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>sales were down the border, I mean that sort of

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>should reverberate through markets, right, I mean this was not

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just an Apple story, but generally a China consumption story. Right. Well,

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because we have seen such a strong economic

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>balance back in China. So to see that China sales

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for the iPhone we are we're very depleted down. It

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>causes some concern. Now that does make me wonder though,

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is this more so a competition issue for Apple in

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>China with other phone makers smartphone makers in the area,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or is it more so a true economic macro consumption

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>picture and reflective of that, especially ahead of the holiday season.

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>But it is interesting to see that discrepancy considering that

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we have seen this strong economic come down come back

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>over in Asia. That's what I still look at the

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>VIX here, uh, you know, at thirty eight, the market

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is still you know, I think the investors are still

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>very concerned here as we look into Look, they certainly

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are the VIX at Uh. If you try to extrapolate

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that to mean what is the VIX predicting in terms

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of percent changes a day. I mean that is that's

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a gain or a loss of more than two percent

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a day that it's predicting. Right now, we see the

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>SMP off a little bit more than one percent, but

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you consider what is upcoming right now. We have an election,

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we have COVID nineteen case counts on the rise. We

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>have restrictions over in Europe and concerns about we could

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>see restrictions in the US. We don't have a fiscal package.

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>So the amount of risks that are out there right

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>now are just very large, and they're also front of

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>mine for investors. And the reality is we're going to

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>be dealing with volatility. Yeah. I think you're absolutely right there,

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what the market is telling us. Sarah,

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Sarah Ponza, cross asset

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.479
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News, giving us her thoughts on the

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>markets here again, you know, we had those tech numbers

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>last night, generally very solid, but the market is clear

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the underwhelmed with the NASTAC to tech heavy NASTAC trading

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>off two percent here. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn. And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio