WEBVTT - Masters in Business: CEO Jonathan J. Miller (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.119
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Radio this week. I have a friend of mine, Jonathan

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Miller of Miller Matrix is his blog and Miller Samuel

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>is his shop. Jonathan has been an observer of the

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>real estate market and industry for for decades, literally decades.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We met some years ago. I'm trying to remember if

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the first thing we did was a conference. We were

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on a panel with the old people, Bob Schiller and

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Dottie Herman, who I believe was the head of Prudential

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>real Estate at the time, and it was oh seven

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or oh eight, and you know, she was the only

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>one who was remotely bullish on the panel. It was Miller,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Schiller and me, and it was like bear bearer and barrassed.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It was was pretty amusing. We've been friendly for for

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>quite a while. UM. I find him to be really

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>a unique set of insights into what's going on in

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the real estate market. What his firm does is gathered

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>data from around the country, very often in areas where

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>there are no other form of data collection going on.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Specific data far beyond what we see from the National

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:29.559
<v Speaker 1>Association of Realtors or what what the commerce department puts

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>out about new houses, and he crunches the numbers and

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>comes up with some really really interesting perspectives. If you

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>go to a real estate agency somewhere and they give

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you a tear sheet that shows you lots and lots

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of information about recent sales and length of time on

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the market and all that sort of stuff. His firm

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is the firm that actually collects that data, analyzes it,

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>interprets it, and puts it out. He's got deals with

0:01:55.600 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a number of different companies. Really a fascinating approach to UH,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>taking data and repurposing it in a way that's useful

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for consumers. I find him to be very, very insightful

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>about all things real estate. He also has a column

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>now he puts something out once or twice a week

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg View in addition to what he does for

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>his UH daily blog at Miller Matrix. Just all around

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>nice guy and tremendously knowledgeable and insightful. The most fascinating

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>thing UH, and I hope this came across in the interview,

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>is he often gets tagged as an expert in divorce

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>settlements and litigation and all sorts of crazy stuff, and

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>he's I am not exaggerating when I say he's pretty

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>much been in every single penthouse in New York City.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But he's the go to guy to a praise these

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty and a hundred million dollar properties. Not a lot

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of people with a deep expert teasing that. And he

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>could tell stories and actually has, and we touch upon

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it about some of these apartments that are just un believable,

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>just unbleeping believable. It's it's fascinating. And he tells um

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of fascinating tales about where he's been, what

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>he's seen, how stuff gets priced. Is there really a

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>difference between forty five and forty eight million dollars? Turns

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>out an extra bathroom here and a little bigger window

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>there worth three million dollars. It's really quite interesting. If

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you are all interested in real estate, and I am,

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and I assume many of you are, I suspect you'll

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>find this conversation to be engrossing. Without any further ado,

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Jonathan Miller. This is Masters in Business

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio Today. I'm actually thrilled

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to have an old friend in the studio. You may

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>not have heard him directly, but you've probably read a

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>quote of his in the New York Times or anywhere

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>else somebody is talking about real estate. Today, I have

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Miller, founder and CEO of Miller Samuel Welcome to

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the show. Great to be here. And I have to say, Barry,

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a great voice for radio. I have a

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>face for radio, is what you're trying to say. So

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who really don't know who Jonathan is,

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 1>he's fairly legendary in the world of real estate. I

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>think that's a fair statement. Right, well, at least in

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>my own mind. You're on legend in his own mind

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>if you're in New York real estate or a few

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So let me back up and give your CV a

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit. You're so you started out in this industry

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as a agent and then an appraiser the mid eighties,

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>all right, and and what kind of set you apart?

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about three things so people know

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>who you are. First, you were one of the first

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>guys in the real estate world. And this sounds insane

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>because you would thought this was going on for decades.

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Who said, Hey, all these transactions are generating a lot

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of data. Why don't we take this data and take

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a closer look at it and see if we can

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>discern any sort of meaning from how long a home

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is on the market, for what it sells relative to

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>its asking price, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. No one was really

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>doing this before you came along, not really. Most of

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>what was being done was marketing brochure not or very

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>complicated in the sense that it was sort of academia

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was hard for the consumer to digest. Uh.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>As journalists say the trend. Three data points make a trend,

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and then I like to say, the trend is your

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>friend until it ends right depend at the end. I

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like that that's even better. So that that's my contribution

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to Uh. You know, it's true if it rhymes right right,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so the second so, so, assembling the data was

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the first thing you did, and then miraculously you were

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>an objective commentator observer. You know, I used to mock

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>relentlessly the National Association of David Lay, the Chief Economists, right,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is painful, just just everything out of their mouths were

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just horrific marketing spin. Well, you have this dilemma. So

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in real estate transaction, to have this, you have this

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the broad view, you've got it.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>One end of the spectrum. You've got the real estate community.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>It's always a good time to buy was literally it

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>was literally an ad they put out in the midst

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of the housing collapse. It's always a great time to

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>buy or sell a house. What that really means is

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's always a great time to generate a commission based transaction.

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And ps, my mother was a real estate agent. This

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 1>was dinner conversation. So I'm not bashing real estate agent

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>as an outsider. This was literally what I grew up with.

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So when I mock these people, it's from the inside,

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>not the outside, right absolutely. And and then the other

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>end of the spectrum is the academics. You know, the

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>case Shiller index and and and all the problems of

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that and what the purpose of it is and uh

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and we've really position yourself somewhere in the middle, which

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is essentially in the trenches, providing uh, sort of on

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the ground observations about the market. And one of the

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>things that I found really fascinating being an appraiser was

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>during the whole big sort of housing boom, run up,

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>credit bubble back, uh starting circus, I started seeing it

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in oh three oh four. Uh, no one else was

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about it, and I thought it was really bizarre.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>It was you were out in left field, and in fact,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to emphasize your data slicing skills. So first, the data

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>runs that you put together, Actually it's a feed into Bloomberg.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you're on a terminal, I don't know what

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's called. The Yeah, we have a Manhattan Luxury price index.

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>There's three different meat metrics that are used. We also

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>have a luxury rental price index. And uh, and I've

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>also seen your specific regional housing data. Yeah, here's NASA County,

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>here's parts of Flower right. We cover eighteen different markets,

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so we cover we cover a whole bunch of markets

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in New York City, Metro for markets in South Florida,

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm now starting to develop research in Los Angeles.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's amazing because I'd love to see the San

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Francisco think that would be Uh. I was approached about that,

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but but nothing has come to it yet. But what's

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>amazing about it is the concepts of supply and demand

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>they don't change all that much. I mean the numbers change,

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>how many zeros are After it, I'm amazed what you

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>get in l A for a couple of million dollars

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>versus what you get in New Ye. Right, Well, you

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 1>always see you always see the celebrity, you know, a

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Depp or whoever. It's like, Oh, they sold their

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>palatial state for three and a half million dollars and

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, well, that's a large two bedroom in Manhattan.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>That is not a prestige play. Speaking of which I said,

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>there are three things. The third thing, which is we'll

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>get to You've been in pretty much every penthouse in Manhattan.

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that much of an overstatement? I have one of

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the most of the greatest experiences seeing these insane penthouses

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the design. However, what I don't usually get to see

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is them in the evening at night. It's always during

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the day, so I don't get to see them all

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>lights on the city, which is you know, half of

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the spectacular aspect of review. But we see and you

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>know that in itself is a whole different submarket of

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the housing market, uh, which is held up really well,

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.719
<v Speaker 1>which has held up really well because the money is

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>almost an afterthought. It's irrelevant. I'm gonna buy this because

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I can, and I don't know. Well, the whole uh,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just a digress to the whole phenomenon of this high

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>end aspect is it's a global phenomenon. It's just unique.

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's London, it's Hong Kong, it's Shanghai, it's it's to

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>any major city. It's it's booming because there's a boatload

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of money. We're talking real estate with Jonathan Miller, CEO

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and founder of Miller Samuel. Let's hold off on discussing

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the penthouses just for a few seconds. I want to

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>talk for a moment. I want to pick your brains

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>for a moment about what it is that drives most

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of real estate. We put together we were talking about this,

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>We're putting together a list, and it was everything from

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>demographics and household formation to interest rate wages. But really

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>all this comes back down to credit, doesn't it. It

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't. And that's actually one of the key components.

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the bulk of the housing market

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's really defined by access to credit. If

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>you look at you know, I always like to say

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>housing is local and credit is national, and and so

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>literally you know, post Lehman, uh credit crunch. Uh. Every

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>market started behaving the same way. We had things like

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>rents rising because people were tipped back into the rental

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>market because they couldn't qualify. We also had inventory begin

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to fall to record lows nearly universally across all housing

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>markets because a homeowner with lower negative equity, which is

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>roughly about all homeowners with a mortgage UH, don't qualify

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for that next purchase, either a trade up, a ladder, mover,

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>or downsize. So what do they do. They sit and

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 1>they don't. They don't ender the market organically the way

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that normally would bring their house to the market. And

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>then people that don't have a credit condition are saying, well,

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I can't find the house I want, so

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna list my house, and you sort of

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>double down on the problem. And only the only way

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>out of that are is twofold one is housing prices rise,

0:11:56.160 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>which naturally occurs because not necessarily own demand correct and

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and and or if strong fundamentals either. It literally is,

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if you can strain the supply, prices rise. And that's

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>been my biggest criticism of the pronouncement of the US

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>housing recovery as early as you know two years ago,

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>because the fundamentals in terms, you know, incomes generally stagnant

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US, unemployment even though the numbers on the

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>top level look good, it's still not good. And credit

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is about is tight, at least for residential mortgage, as

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it was in the days following Lehman. So so, I

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>never thought in my career that I would be saying

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that tight lending conditions are making housing prices rise. But

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they are, but they really it's it's a combination of

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>tight lending conditions following a boom and bust in real estate,

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because you end up with a lot of people who

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have any look, under normal circumstances, you're in the

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>house for seven years. Even if you have tight credit conditions,

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you should have some equity in the house. But if

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you bought at the peak before at correction, if you

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>put little or no money down, there is no equity there,

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and that locks you into that house unless you're just

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna walk away. And if you do that, good luck

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>qualifying for right. And I think that you know, the

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>narrative about housing right now is this idea that you know,

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is the housing recovery losing steam? You know, are we

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing you know, projections for housing price increases are going

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to be less this year than they were last year. Well,

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>last year was based on artificial conditions. I must see

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen from the context of the US housing

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>market as as really a an anomaly. In other words,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand ten, eleven twelve, we have this pent

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>up demand the election cycle to build up to the

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>fiscal cliff. The world apparently didn't end after the fiscal

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>cliff expired, and there was all of a sudden a

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>concern about rising interest rates because the economy was going

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to get better, and you had all the fence sitters

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>moving out of them out of their tax change as well.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And that if the tax change was certainly well on

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the high end of the market, especially and you had

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>people rush in, and you still have the low inventory issue,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>prices rise. Now we're you know, we're doing these year

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>over year comparisons and activity or prices. If they're not

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>above last year, it's somehow a failure or a sign

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of weakness. When I contend it's the wrong comparison to make,

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely is. We're discussing real estate in America with

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Miller. So now let's talk a little bit about

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the high end. We understand what's constraining everybody's houses. The

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>normal I don't even know what to call of. The

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>median house is about two D seven thousands, right, it's

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>right exactly somewhere on that and you know, obviously it's

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>really regional. Two seven thousand in the New York metro

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>area doesn't get you a lot. One of the people,

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>am I get to a closet in a hallway that

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to buy from the co op to combine

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>with your apartment. One of the people in my office

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>transferred here from Syracuse. They sold a house for a

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seven thousand NOWS and I'm like, what is

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. You look at a picture of it.

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>It looks like a regular little you know, a starter house,

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a ranch. But it would go for three in change here.

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So when we talk about normal housing, what, what is

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the story? What should we expect in the near future

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>from this housing market? Has the death of housing been exaggerated? Yes? Absolutely.

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think all it is is a reset from the

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>euphoria that we had last year, which was based on nothing.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I like to say it really was based on this

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>horrible skew created by by tight credit that we're already

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing a spread or a widening in general between the

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>high higher end of the market and the balance of

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the market in the context of the credit conversation we're

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>just having because it's so as you move up in price,

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a higher probability of either more cash paid or

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>just all cash Outright. You also have the the the

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>preference by foreign or international buyers towards the high end

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>their global investors. Urban markets along the eastern seaboard, on

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the West coast very similar, Phene, San Francisco, Seattle, Vancouver, Canada,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely very similar. And and that's that's a key driver.

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But other is that we're seeing a disparity between conforming

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>mortgages through the former g s c S versus jumbo

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>right that that banks like jumbo mortgages. They make money

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on them, they want to so the business decision, well,

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>slago is what and they like own the jumbo mortgage

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>market right right there, they're they're a huge lion share

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of the market nationally. But but any lender right now

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is looking to do jumbo deals because they make a

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>favorable return on it. And then and and the the

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the alternative, the the g SC related transactions, which is

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of the mortgage market is still burdened by in many ways,

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the credit outlook within that realm is very backward looking.

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>It's looking at the transgressions. The conservative element is from

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the UH you know, the transgressions that were made several

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago, the Department Justice going after banks for bad

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>lending practices, all those sorts of things. So it's very

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>backward looking, whereas I think the jumbo finance arena is

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>very much more current looking. Today, we're discussing real estate

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and housing with Jonathan Miller. Earlier we were talking about

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the difference regionally. How have these recoveries differed. You know,

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I know South Florida is different than Arizona, is different

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>than Las Vegas, is different than Southern California, which is

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously different than On Valley in Northern California. How do

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>these different regions compare and what does that mean for someone,

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>let's say living in New York or Washington, d C. Well,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>when you look at you look at a lot of

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the the national housing metrics, and you look at the

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>comparison by city, and you'll see generally what you see

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is markets that were hit very hard. Probably the hardest

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>were the markets in the what fd i C calls

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the Sand States, the Las Vegas of the world, essentially,

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>where there was a tremendous amount of speculation, carpenters and

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>nurses quitting their jobs and becoming real estate speculators, and

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and so they fell much harder and farther. And you

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>know that what I like, the way I like to

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>describe it is when you go from a dollar to

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>two dollars, it's a dred percent increase. So the metrics

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of showing their increase made them look like, Wow,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they're really recovering much more quickly than other other markets

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like New York, for example, that didn't have the speculation

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that you saw in these markets. So it's really almost

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>in apples and orange comparison. What you're seeing now is

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the markets that are seeing rapid rapid price growth. Some

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of them, like in Las Vegas, the rates are cooling

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>rapidly because they've they've essentially recovered a lot of the

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>almost overcorrection that had occurred in those markets is a

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of low hanging fruit, a lot of low hanging fruit.

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Whereas markets were the economy is very fundamentally, very strong,

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have a lot of speculation. Uh, you would

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>allude you had talked about it in an earlier segment

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about you know, someone from upstate New York and how

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>much you got their market, their markets in the country

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that didn't experience the same boom and bust. So they're

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to rise from the the ashes because it

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't really fall to the ashes. So so I think

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the rule number one is there is no national housing market, uh,

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>in the in the way that it's presented to us

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 1>every month with all the reports. And and and secondly I too,

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, to be fair to case Shiller, they

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>do release their twenty and forty metro region housing prices

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and then they jumb them all together. So when you

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the individual index, you could still see and

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of people who then take the

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>case Shiller data and slicing dice. In nice Land, you

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>could see. A couple of weeks ago, I ran two

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>different charts I forgot who I stole them from. One

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>showed the percentage recovery off the lows and how far

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they still have to go to get to the highs,

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and they were like Las Vegas was in both they

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>were crazy Wow. We're up off our lows, but we're

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>still But remember the high point that was reached was

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>complete fabrication and consense. It was based on right, it

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was based on They were building these excerbs in Las Vegas,

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>these big McMansions. That was a two and a half

0:20:55.560 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>hour drive from any urban center, any job center. So

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to support these homes if it

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>takes you whatever four hours round? Because what was driving

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the demand was lenders were just looking to lend. That

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>was how they made money. They package up the mortgages

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and sell them off to the offl of the risk

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of somebody else. We're not in that world anymore, that's right.

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>The the shift in credit, and I've written about this

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>over the years, went from the borrower's ability to service

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the loan to the lenders ability to sell the loan

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to a securitizer. Once that shifted in the borrower's ability

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to service, it no longer matter to hey, it was

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of time before it collapsed. So so

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>now we talked before briefly about other regions. Texas is

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>an unusual region. I don't think a lot of people

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>realize why Texas avoided the boom and bust. There was

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a change in their constitution. I think it was like

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.959
<v Speaker 1>a century ago where they are not allowed to do

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>cash out. No cash out refinances against their state constitution.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>So everybody maintaining their falling income, replacing it with helocks

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and financing their their day to day. Uh. When you

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>run low on money, you just borrow more because how

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>prices always go up. The other the other quirk in

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Texas is the idea that the transactions aren't publicly publicly recorded,

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So so any any studies that are done come out

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of the realtors, which is really a subset of the

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>public record to begin with, so it's not a full

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>data set. So you could almost argue too that ignorance

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is bliss, that that the market wasn't fully informed of.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So if I use a Zilo app and show me

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>what's sold nearby in Texas, I'm not going to see

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that I see anywhere in ins not

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily because the information isn't it's a nondisclosure state. So

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>there many non disclosure I don't know offhand. I want

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to say there's about a dozen. Okay, today I'm speaking

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>with my friend Jonathan Miller of Miller Samuel. He is

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>an expert on real estate appraisal, transactions, home values, etcetera.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 1>He has crunches, crunched a lot of data over the

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>past few decades about what drives housing. And one of

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the things we really haven't talked about much but I

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>want to discuss is the international component about this. The

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>international buyers coming here to North America buying up real estate,

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and the booming real estate markets we see in big

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>cities overseas. So why do we want to start with that, Well,

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll start with the basic driver of it is I'd

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like to say that global real estate, or specifically luxury

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 1>real estate, high end real estate in the in in

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the context of world a worldwide content text is the

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>world's new currency. In other words, you need bitcoin, You

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>just need a really nice apartment for a nice mion

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar price tag. So what you're seeing is you're seeing

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>across and this has really been a phenomenon that's virtually

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>exploded in the last three to four years, is you

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>have you have a lot of concern UH with wealthy

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>investors in terms of exposure to higher taxation as governments

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>grapple with UH weeken weakening or challenging economic conditions, political

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>turnout turnover. So you look at Europe for example, uh,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>tremendous you know pressure, Uh, you know government shortfalls, where

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>do we get the money from, limits on compensation for

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>securities industry, all sorts of things. Uh. And then just

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, a higher regulatory overlay for you know,

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>many of the wealthy that have their own businesses. You

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>start looking around the w world for maybe other places

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to diversify your your your your net worth, and one

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of them, it could be pork bellies, but one of

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>them is real estate and and real estate. Ironically, New

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>York is very favorable in the international environment since we're

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of the starting place for a lot of them.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong with the world right now in terms of

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>credit problems? Um, so cash is king here. Cash is king,

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and not only that, but it's really I think the

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>terminology here is this global safe haven that what you're

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for is people. I'd like to say that we're

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>building the world's most expensive bank safety deposit boxes where

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you where you put your valuables in it, like your

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>artwork and whatever else, and then you rarely go back.

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of that going on here. You've

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>been in a number of those apartments. Oh absolutely, and

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I don't know what mistake I made in

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.479
<v Speaker 1>my career path, but but I'm not to own one

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of those at least is that necessarily a mistake. You

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>have a very lovely home in Connecticut, and it's it's

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>certainly not a hundred thousand dollar ranch. It's it's a

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit nicer than that. And so most of us,

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>most of us are not going to be in a

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty hundred million dollar penthouse. In fact, nine percent of

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>us are not going to be And what you're telling

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>us is even the point of one percent who can

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>be in it, they're not even there. They're not amazing views,

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.719
<v Speaker 1>aren't they. It really is. And the way you have

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to look at it. What I find almost humorous about

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the topic is when you'll see, for example, in London,

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>there have been three transactions over two hundred millions. That's amazing.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>In the US, the three highest transactions there was one

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>for millions in the Hampton's, there was another one in

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Connecticut for a hundred twenty million, and then there was

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>another one in California for around a hundred million. And

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you throw those all together and it's not even a

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. It doesn't have anything to do with the

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>balance of the market. It is more like a circus

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>side show. It's an anomaly. It has nothing to do.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>But but what it what I think the real estate

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>industry sees it as, and you know, perhaps there's some

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>truth to it. It's like, well, if someone's willing to

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>invest ninety million dollars in a condo that they're rarely

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>going to use, that means they're very confident about the

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>New York real estate market and they'll there. You know,

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a good sign for everybody else. Maybe that's true.

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't maybe the million dollars then you don't know

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what the hell else to do. Well, I think that's

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>really what it is. And then what you're seeing is

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the other phenomenon you're seeing that's tied into

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>this look of the regions I talked about Europe. You

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>also have China. You have the wealthy Chinese trying to

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>extract their money out. You know, there's a right to

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>versify around the globe. Right Australia is undergoing Chinese investors

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, Sydney and Vancouver. I've always thought of as

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>life raths for the wealthy Chinese absolutely who are concerned

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>one day they have to hit the eject button and

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>get the hell out of dome. And you have that

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in uh In South America, the Brazilians have single handedly

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>bailed out the Miami housing market, which was a highly

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>speculative market with ten years of shadow inventory, inventory that

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>was essentially just built and can't be sold, and it's

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>all been gobbled up. There's really not like a hundred

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand condos. It was a ten year absorption rate. It

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>would take to you know, conservatively to and and it

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>was done in three years. And it was primarily because

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of Brazilians and Venezuelans. With the wealthy Venezuelans with the

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>regime change, we're looking to get out. And so you

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>see those phenomenons, but they have nothing to do with

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>any the average American homebuyers. So if someone is looking

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to pick up a vacation property in Miami, not that

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.479
<v Speaker 1>I am, but if you were, has that window closed,

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>did you miss the bargain opportunity? Were still seeing a

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>fairly brisk appreciation, right So that I'm sure there's you know,

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>depends every every neighborhood, every market it's a little bit different.

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting, and this brings back to the credit discussion.

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>If you look at Miami, which is a market that

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I prepare research for, about three quarters of all the

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>distressed condo sales are cash, right, I knew you're going

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to go that way about that's amazing. Well compare that

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to what the rest of the country is normally like,

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>right right, Well, it's about exactly. If you look at

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the non distress meaning anything that's not a foreclosure or

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a short sale condo market Miami, the cash buyers in

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that market account for about there's there's almost no difference there.

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The variation. It varies every quarter, but the variation is two.

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>It's really not a big difference, which means that it

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is a cash market. It remains a cash market. So

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>guess what kind of new development projects are being built

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in Misery appealing to international high end uh tremendous linkage

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>with New York City. It's about the same time to

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>fly to Miami as it is to take a car

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Hampton's or not quite the same, but that's

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of the three. It's seen as a competing element

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to it, especially markets like Palm Beach which are almost

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>all New Yorkers, very high and very little foreign whereas

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Miami is almost all foreign. So the cash you can

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>see for different reasons, the cash element of real estate really,

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or the access to credit really defines how markets behave.

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>That's quite fascinating. So we we see foreigners coming to

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the US and buying real estate, is that what's driving

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>things in London and Sydney and we're else it's exactly

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the same phenomenon. So you're so in almost every major

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>how urban market in the in the world, you're seeing

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>record prices. Uh. Incidentally, the high end market in London

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is about more expensive than the high end market in Manhattan.

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're is it just a matter of not that

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>much more space there were more or I think it's Uh,

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there is less space. I think that's part

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of it. Also, there's a closer proximity to the Middle East,

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to Russia, who while they're touted here as big players

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in the real estate market here because they buy hope,

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>high profile, they're not even the top twenty for tourism.

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>It's completely overhyped. The foreigners that are very active in

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the New York market. Uh. And on the East coast

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to be from Europe and and the the Chinese

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>or you know, the Asia in general is probably the

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>fastest growing UH contributors to the market. There was just

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>an article you mentioned Middle Eastern money boosting real estate prices.

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>It was just an article on Bloomberg today that talked

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>about how the Dubai International Airport just passed Heathrow as

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest international airport in the world. That that's just unbelievable.

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Dubai sees more traffic than London and that market is

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>largely driven by speculation. You know that It's it's a

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>not in the context of the flipping, right, it's more

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of a long term equity play. I think a lot

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of real estate investment right now or is that speculation?

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Then if it's it is speculation, but not in terms

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of I think. I think the way I discerned from

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>investment versus speculation is the time frame the window. So

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, the time frame in the last housing boom

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.959
<v Speaker 1>that got us got the real estate market into trouble,

0:32:56.240 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the time frame was weeks months quarters. That time frame

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>now is five ten years. It's a much longer window.

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It's really his investment, isn't it. It is an investment,

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's really what real estate has always been. We

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>just lost our minds as a as a housing market

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>during the last cycle that that's quite called a systemic breakdown.

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking with Jonathan Miller of Miller Samuel, New York Times,

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post, Wall Street Journal. There's a wall of quotes

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in your office. When I walk in, like I have

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>five things frames I walk in, you have like a

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>whole way with like nine seven was cheaper than artwork,

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess it is. So we're talking about real estate,

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and you and I know each other for a long time.

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of things I wanted to share with

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you that we haven't caught up. So you know, our

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>house has been on the market right for two weeks

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>before we were sold. So someone said to me, wait,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you sold your house in two weeks? Really liked seven

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to ten days. But we had to wait for the

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>contract to come back. So someone said, how did you

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>price your house? And we had gotten a huge This

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is like a middle class split level five hundred and change,

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>New Long Island, suburban bedroomtown, had not a big mansion,

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful kitchen. I love our granite I actually haven't

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>had an affair with our gran That's that's a whole

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>another story. It is. It is, I just fell in

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>love with this granite and it haunted me for days,

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and every other piece of granite just didn't do it.

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I know that sounds ridiculous. People don't think of me

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>as a person in a kitchen stroking like this is

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a nice piece of mica. But it's not. My grant

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is a spectacular It is an So the that's another

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 1>story I could share the granite. So before I tell

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you how we sold the house, the granite story was

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we finally so we we ended up in a house

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>by accident. It's one of these stories. We had a

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 1>bye and then we went and sold our house, and

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>then we went back to our by where we had

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>an agreed deal, but we weren't in contract yet and

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the seller had said to us, we decided we want more,

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And basically it was like, well, wait, you told us

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we had to do this really quickly, so we cut

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>our price significant. We cut a price fifty grand. That

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.439
<v Speaker 1>house also first weekend, and that was in the midst

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of the frenzy, so it was relatively easy to do. Hey,

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to more. That's fine, but then you

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>get full price or you get fast. You don't get both.

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you want, I'll go break this deal and

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 1>only cut the price twenty five brand and you could

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 1>wait six months and we could do it at this price.

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But you don't get both. And what response, Um, well,

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we won more. By the way. The side note about

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that is they had fifty deposit on a house that

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they're six months in their kind tracked to close, elapsed,

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and in order to not lose the fifty, they had

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to come up with another fifty, which is why they

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>were prushing us for the five. We walked away from that.

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Two years later they got their extra five, but they

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>lost a hundred to get it. And I remember saying

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to the agent, look, I know I have a facility

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of numbers, but you don't need to be a rocket

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>scientist to know that a hundred is a bigger number

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>than twenty five. So that sort of stupidity is life.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing, And you made the comment, you know,

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we sold our house in seven to ten days, right.

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So what you're seeing now in the market in general,

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and many housing markets, is when a seller who feels

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>very empowered because there's not a lot of supply out there,

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>so they don't have a lot of competition. The notion

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that you sell in seven to ten days means too

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>many sellers, that the broker priced it too lower, the

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>seller priced it too low, they gave it away when

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the wrong But that is wrong. You're absolutely right, But

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that is that is a an assumption because it's sold quickly,

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and I contend in this market, it's either price correctly

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>or it's not in the market. It's incorrectly right, right,

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not a dimmer switch, it's a it's a it's

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a it's an on off switch. So so here's what

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I did in order the price of the house. And understand,

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>we found a house that we fell in love with.

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'll spare the grizzly details, but it's a divorce,

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's a little complex, and it's it's a nicer

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>house on a bigger piece of land in a nicer town,

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>right next to this big preserve. So I'm paying a

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of bucks more for than SEC. But that house

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>was on the market. We haggled over the price. When

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 1>we finally they priced it too high. It had been

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on the market for almost I think three hundred days,

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>we're a live one. Oh look, we got someone interested.

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a contemporary house. You have to either like that

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:00.479
<v Speaker 1>or not, so I know it's kind of a little

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of a niche and it's an it's an odd price.

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not one of these big multimillion dollar houses, but

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not a five hundred thousand dollar house. And so

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:12.919
<v Speaker 1>it was a weird house. And so our concern was, Hey,

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to lose the house. We want to buy,

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>so we're not gonna give our house away, but we're

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>not gonna try and squeeze. Sometimes getting every last penny

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>is expensive. So here's what I did. I want. I

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>love the Zillo app. We've talked about this. We've both

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>been on our boats in the Long Island Sound using

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the nearby button on the Zillo app to look at

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>all the prices of the houses that are either for

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>sale or sold that are waterfronts, and it's mind boggling.

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>When I've been, when I've been in the harbor by

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Port Washington looking at King's Point, these houses are fourteen

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen million dollars, like the co ops and condos

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 1>that are hundred million. That that's made up. Those are

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>just that's just not real. But eight ten, twelve million

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar house, that's like a real number because there are

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>three four five million dollar houses. So I used that

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Zillo app and I said, show me every house that's

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>sold in my town with this many beds, three bedrooms,

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>two baths, this this much, you know, and and then

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I looked at them, and I said, everything that sold

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>at or above my price point. You know, I was

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:28.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for the price where everything was either much bigger,

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or nicer, or waterfront or some something that made it special,

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and where that line was. And then I looked at

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 1>everything that was sold, and it was either not as

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>nice as our house. You know, we stutted the whole

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>house and completely and there's nothing, you know, what has

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to be replaced. The garage door that was the we

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>ordered one, It never showed up, never paid for it.

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>That's literally the only thing that we didn't turn over

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in the past seven years. And so in what you're

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>describing is you're describing the aggregation of real estate information

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 1>right to the consumer. And and so it's very different. Now,

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting when I was talking before about the buyer saying,

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>or rather the sellers saying, oh, I sold it, price

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it too low because it's sold too quickly. Uh. What

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I also have seen through you know, decades of looking

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at transactions and appraising, is that if you overprice, you'll

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>ultimately end up with selling your home for a lower

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>price than if you had priced it very close to

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the market. It gets stale. That's a reality of it.

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of sellers don't get that,

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and they the agents lose interest. It's just you seeing

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>all what there, there's a nice house, but what's well

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>think of? Think of you know a lot of people,

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, on one hand where we have all this

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>great transparency, but in the other hand, you're conveying a

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>disconnect with the market. You're saying, uh, I don't know

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. This is what I want. So the

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>buyer's thinking, well, this person is going to be really

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>different cult to deal with. They're disconnected. Something wrong with

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the house that we don't know about. There's it's just

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all kinds of red flags and that slows down

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the the market in terms of the interest of your

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:15.839
<v Speaker 1>of your home. I see this over and over and

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>over again. It's quite amazing. So so when I looked

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at the run of Zillo data. I said, when I

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>put my house up for sale, there is not going

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a nicer house at this price point. In fact,

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>everything else plus or minus ten or twenty is not

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be as nice because I'm trying to look

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>at it as a buyer. Hey, if I'm trying to

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 1>between choose between this house for and that, I'm gonna

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>go with a nicer house. And I also saw what

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>sold within that price point. I have a feeling that

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>six d is a tough number to get over because

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're conforming mortgage, it's really tough. It's really tough

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to to sell something much above that. So could we

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have listed at six fort nine and and maybe squeezed

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>another maybe, But then we're trying to buy, and that's

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of this is we want that house.

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, when when I started as a trader

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>early in my career, I remember one of the head

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>traders once said to me, I was trying to squeeze

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>like the last couple of eighths. This is back in

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the days of fractions out of a trade, and he's like, look,

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you could get out of this transaction a quarter point lower,

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>just hit the bit and move on. But but but

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I could squeeze a few more eighths out of this.

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 1>He goes, Hey, I remember this old guy said to me, Hey,

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>leave a little something for the next guy. And can

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I tell you something. It's good advice if you're spending

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 1>all this time and effort in energy to squeeze every

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:59.959
<v Speaker 1>last dime. There are a lot of non monetary fact

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there's that go into the transaction. How smooth it is,

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>how easy the people were dealing with, it's it's he

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>works at a finance company in New York. He's being

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>transferred from else. They've been so far more or less

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure to deal with. And I can't help but wonder,

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 1>if I'm beating people up for that last ten or

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty thou dollars, how much mental anguish is that going

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to generate? Right? Because the whole the whole process is

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 1>so emotional. Anyway, it's surprisingly emotion it is, no matter what.

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 1>And then that was one of the problems during the

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 1>last boom and bus cycle was people are trying to

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>view housing as a you know, a stock or commodity.

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.359
<v Speaker 1>But but you know what, and that's part of it.

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But The bigger part is it also has a you know,

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a use, a usage, that place to live part of

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.360
<v Speaker 1>what you pay for. And it's an emotional I recall

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>the conversations I had with people. You oh, six oh

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>seven o eight. I'm sure you went through this way.

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You're at a barb cure, a cocktail party. That was

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the only conversation. And neighbors, would you know. Neighbors would

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>say to me, you know, I want to put my

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 1>house up. And by the way, these numbers are real.

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.320
<v Speaker 1>That my house that I sold for five and change.

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>People selling for seven eight nine, which never nine, but

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:21.879
<v Speaker 1>six seven almost eight. And I remember having a conversation saying, hey,

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the guy would say to me, the Smiths so their

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 1>house for seven fifty. Why can't I get seven fifty.

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 1>We have a better yard, a better location on the street,

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a nicer kitchen. Yeah, but the Smiths sold their house

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. That was two years. If you have

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 1>a time machine, I promise you I could get you

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>seven fifty if you don't have. But I'm gonna tell

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you I know people who still own Yahoo. It traded

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it almost two right, it's thirty bucks. They can't get

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to eighty. You can't get seven fifty. You have to

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 1>recognize the more. And then I would watch these people

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>put houses up for sale and they were all is

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>six months to a year behind the market. So the

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>market is at six hundred, there at seven hundred, the

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 1>market drops the fire. They're chasing it, chasing it, but

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like on a year left we had and never hitting

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the bid. We had a situation in Manhattan sort of

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the the tipping point of the market, and we were

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the Manhattan market was about two years behind the national market.

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.240
<v Speaker 1>The national market peaked in the summer of six. Ours

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was with Lehman in September of eight, and UH prices

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>within the next three to four months fell on average

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 1>about thirty. So essentially New York was late to the party,

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but we caught up real quick. And remember most co

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>ops were requiring thirty or the average co op is

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:50.839
<v Speaker 1>down so's so what we started to see is we

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>started seeing people start to come out three or four

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:57.839
<v Speaker 1>months later to buy, and the broker feedback was, well,

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they're all lowballers. They're all offering about thirty below what

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it was six months ago. And my comment was, if

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the only people in the market are buying something for

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty only willing to pay less than what it was before.

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>The there that is the new market bid, right. They're

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>not low bowling, you're high bowling the ass. And it

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>was fascinating because the real estate community in general was

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 1>more negative than the consumer and and and it took

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>them longer to sort of rebound because they were devastated

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:36.799
<v Speaker 1>because the whole principle of property going up forever was

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>shattered essentially. But you know, especially here in New York.

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So I graduated grad school in eighty nine, and unlike

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>many of my peers who immediately ran out and bought

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>co ops and condos, the market crashed. First thing New

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Fed Chack Greenspan did was cut rates, and he had

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a little boom in real estate in nine and then

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>as rates kind of normalized, if you bought something in

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine or ninety in New York City, you did

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not get back to break even until I want to

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>say nineties six ninety seven, when the dot com boom

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>really started to just started to kick in. And we

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 1>were just discussing this in the office yesterday. I remember

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that was still early in my career. I was on

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a seal side. I worked in a brokerage farm, and

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I recall hearing people say repeatedly, Hey, I need to

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty from my account. I need a hundred eighty thousand.

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm trading up, I'm buying a vacation property, I'm buying waterfront.

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 1>And back in the nineties, two thousand dollars was a

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>huge move. To go from four hundred to six hundred

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:51.240
<v Speaker 1>was a big move in real estate. Now it's another

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>bedroom and a little bigger yard. But in the nineties

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that was like five houses were really nice houses. Now

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a split level. You know, in a in a development,

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:06.919
<v Speaker 1>it's not a right. And what was what the conversation

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 1>was during the nineties, especially the early nineties, was I

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>know the market stinks, but I want to buy a house.

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be I lived twenty years and you know

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be here. This is our home, and and

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's I think that's always the right approach.

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>It has to be right for your situation. And I

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just what I marveled at how we lost our way

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>during this last go round. You know, really you brought

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>you brought in ten million people who previously did not

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>qualify for mortgages. That creates a huge but it was

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 1>more than clearly more than than just that, right, and

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 1>so even you know, some people have pointed to as

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the start of housing becoming unhinged. I look at that

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>as just getting back to where it was eight nine

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and a tremendous amount of stock market wealth. It was

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just diversification. There were people who turned to half a

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:09.359
<v Speaker 1>million dollars into five million, or a hundred thousand into

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a million. The numbers were just stupid. And so in

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of how many zeros are on your IRA, A

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't affect your lifestyle. But moving to a fill in

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the blank, bigger, nicer, closer to the water attitude, it's

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a it's a huge lifestyle change. Also, you're no longer

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle class suburb you were. You're now in

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a whatever, and people love those trade ups, which you know,

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we started talking about this during the break and I

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>want during the broadcast, and I've written about this, I

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:48.359
<v Speaker 1>know if you've written about it. I think all these

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 1>tales of this is the end of real estate as

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 1>an American pastime, I think that's nonsense. Wherever I look,

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:59.799
<v Speaker 1>I see people still in love with real estate. So

0:49:59.840 --> 0:50:03.799
<v Speaker 1>when it so, here's the thing when you what what

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I find after a change a condition where the markets

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 1>either going up or going down, pundits, observers, participants in

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the real estate market, I think linear. In other words,

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>when housing prices are rising, they're gonna rise forever, they're

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:25.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna fall forever. When inventory is falling, it's gonna fall forever.

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:28.399
<v Speaker 1>And there's kind of there's no web and flow. There's

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 1>no it's not it's cyclical. It oscillates, it doesn't project

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>out right, and and so I find that all the time.

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, the whole thing in you and

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:39.879
<v Speaker 1>I have talked about this, the whole thing about home

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 1>ownership and how it's declined. Well, it it reached a

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 1>point uh Fannie May and uh Fannie May stated goal

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>at one point on their website was se home ownership

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 1>in the US we got to sixty nine and change ridiculous.

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of ridiculous. And we're up from sixty nine

0:50:58.640 --> 0:51:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was about three to four percent above what the fifty

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 1>year norm normalized level was. So now we're falling below

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the you know, we've certainly have been falling from the

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine level, and now we're sort of right in

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the long term range, and it's continuing

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to fall. And and the pronouncement is, well, we're going

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a nation of renters. And and it's a

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of a ridiculous argument. It's as wrong to the

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 1>downside to the upside correct, and and really what it

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is is, well, of course, home ownership is falling. Credit

0:51:35.000 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is historically the tightest it's been in the modern era.

0:51:38.640 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You have a weak economy, you have all these problems.

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>That's why kids are living at home with their parents.

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not a lifestyle decision or a change, it's

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>a it's an economic decision because things are still not

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that great. And let me tell you, by the time

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this airs, my or get my house probably closed on

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:06.839
<v Speaker 1>my mortgage with Wells Fargo either happened or didn't happen. Um,

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but I've never experienced anything like the Wells Fargo jumbo investigation. UM.

0:52:15.160 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking to see if I actually got an email

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>from them right now. Uh that it's been pretty pretty

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:24.880
<v Speaker 1>astonishing the amount of detail that they've asked. They what

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>did I did I ever ever told you my game

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>show theory about banking with with lending. So think of

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it this way. This is This is the this is

0:52:34.160 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this is how to explain the irrational behavior that when

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you interact with a bank to get a mortgage. Look

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:43.919
<v Speaker 1>at a bank is playing a game show and let's

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 1>make a deal. Right So, Door number one is bar

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>from the FED for free, grow other lines of business,

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 1>rebuild your capital base, all those sorts of things, anything

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but mortgage lending. Door number two is lend to Joe

0:52:56.640 --> 0:52:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and Mary holmebuyer for thirty years. Maybe one of them

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:03.280
<v Speaker 1>lose the job. Maybe there's going to be uh decline

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in their local housing market at some point. So there

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:09.480
<v Speaker 1>there's there's risk, more risk associated with it. So they're

0:53:09.480 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to equalize the risk. This is very simplistic, but

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:15.279
<v Speaker 1>try to equalize the risk between the two choices. Now

0:53:15.320 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that now Joe and Mary holmebuyer more a third of

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:20.399
<v Speaker 1>your mortgage is never going to be the same risk

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:26.400
<v Speaker 1>level as as as borrowing from the FED as a lender, right, so,

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>so they're gonna make them jump through hoops. And I

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>contend it's not triple A. It's really quadruple A. It's irrational.

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>It's irrational lending. And that's the condition. And then you's

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is that our current conditional condition of quadruple A credit

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and irrational. We have the cleanest mortgage product being created

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in the history of mortgages because lenders, essentially, no matter

0:53:50.719 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what the the ads say on TV, that's the sales side.

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 1>The underwriting side is afraid of its own shadow. And

0:53:57.800 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>part of that is because of uh, they're you know,

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we're still under quantitative easing, although that's changing, but that

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 1>basically still very low. It's a little tight. But also

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:14.479
<v Speaker 1>also the economy is not robust. We're not seeing real

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:19.920
<v Speaker 1>strong income growth or employment numbers, you know when you

0:54:19.960 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>really break it down. So they're very conservative, and that

0:54:24.400 --> 0:54:27.839
<v Speaker 1>conservative is one thing. This is this, I think it's irrational.

0:54:27.960 --> 0:54:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's beyond it's one step beyond conservative.

0:54:31.360 --> 0:54:34.360
<v Speaker 1>It's these guys have have examined me so closely. My

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 1>proctologist is jealous. So they've asked they're looking for reasons

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 1>not to lend to you. They've asked for three years

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of personal tax documents. They've asked for three years of

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:51.840
<v Speaker 1>business tax documents. They've asked for six months of corporate

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and personal bank statements. And I'm happy to give them.

0:54:55.960 --> 0:54:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And every now and then they'll say what's this round

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>number we see on the fifteenth of each month. Well,

0:55:01.320 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's either drug lords giving me money or paycheck you

0:55:04.680 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 1>which would you guess? By the way, you have the

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>corporate account and the personal account, you can match. Oh

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you lost X here, You've got X there. Do you

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>think maybe that's a coincidence or and some of the

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:20.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff it's really you know, it's called fishing. Is essentially

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for any reason not to lend to you.

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 1>To be fair to Wells Fargo, their staff has been phenomenal.

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>They've given us this checklist and they warned us, hey, listen,

0:55:30.880 --> 0:55:33.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, this isn't a multimillion dollar mortgage. This

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 1>is barely more than the conforming mortgage a little more.

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:41.439
<v Speaker 1>And the quite the hoops they've had us jumped through.

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:45.240
<v Speaker 1>The one house we looked at that was in danger

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of collapsing into the you saw, it would have been

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:52.479
<v Speaker 1>double the mortgage, and the process was more or less

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the same. And I'm like, you know, this house is

0:55:54.520 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>going to tumble into the sea. Rights, it's the risk,

0:55:57.280 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't me. It's it's gravity, right, you'reware of it, right,

0:56:01.040 --> 0:56:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So so so we submitted the last of the paperwork,

0:56:04.880 --> 0:56:08.399
<v Speaker 1>they start processing it and just before they submitted, they said,

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we have a question on your credit score. My credit

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>scores okay, it's pretty good. My wife's credit score is phenomenal.

0:56:15.520 --> 0:56:17.319
<v Speaker 1>And I said, well, what's the issue. You said, I

0:56:17.360 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was above this cut off that well, over the past month,

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>your credit score dropped six points or something. Could you

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:28.319
<v Speaker 1>could you explain this thing? And I'm like, I look

0:56:28.360 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>at this, I'm like, I don't know what be easy?

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>What is this? So they have to translate it into English.

0:56:33.480 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out we hired two new people. We

0:56:36.160 --> 0:56:39.319
<v Speaker 1>bought two new computers for them, and this was the

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple financing and I and they said, oh, well that

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:45.879
<v Speaker 1>affects your credit. I go, look, you guys, see our

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>balance in our checking account. We could have gone out

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and spent three thousand dollars on two new computers. We

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>could have done that thirty times over. But instead the

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 1>account and said, hey, it's better for taxes to lease

0:56:57.680 --> 0:57:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it then to buy. So we leased it for a

0:57:00.280 --> 0:57:04.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty five dollars a month. That's what caused

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a credit score on the owner of the company. The

0:57:07.560 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 1>company lease this. It was like an insane it was

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>an insane. Yeah, but you go from whatever seven and

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:20.360
<v Speaker 1>something down seven points that that's a percentage change. That's

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the quadruple a standard debt everybody's being held to. And

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the challenge and that's what's defining the housing market

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. That that is. So I'm surprised if that's

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the case that any houses are getting. So, you know,

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we're here in Bloomberg. I have a contract I do.

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I do a column for Bloomberg View. And they said,

0:57:41.600 --> 0:57:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, list all your sources of income. Well, here's

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>what I get from Speaking Apparent, Here's what I get

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:48.880
<v Speaker 1>from our my day job, and here's what I get

0:57:49.840 --> 0:57:52.520
<v Speaker 1>from Washington Post, and here's what I get from Colombia,

0:57:52.800 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and here's what I get from Bloomberg. And they're like, oh, well,

0:57:56.280 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is it looks like it's the same amount every month

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg. Well, yeah, a contract. Can you send us

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the contract? And I had to ask somebody here, hey,

0:58:04.320 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>am I allowed to show this too, Like, yeah, I

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it. But meanwhile, you're asking for a contract,

0:58:11.000 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be a nineteen year old in

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Ohio that's viewing the document, right, it's a little more

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated than that, but not a whole lot more. And again,

0:58:19.920 --> 0:58:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to be look, I've been one of the biggest critics

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of banks since the financial crisis. To be fair to

0:58:26.480 --> 0:58:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Wells Fargo, they have been really extremely professional, very proactive.

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:34.760
<v Speaker 1>They would give us. It started out with this massive list.

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm holding my arms six ft apart, and each week

0:58:37.840 --> 0:58:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I would get an update with okay, these three items

0:58:40.360 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 1>have been collected. Now we're waiting for these things because

0:58:43.000 --> 0:58:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to gather all this stuff up to get a p

0:58:46.120 --> 0:58:50.440
<v Speaker 1>n L statement about two of the companies for the now,

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the accountants they're not going to do an audit unless

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we want to pay a boatload of money for it.

0:58:55.880 --> 0:58:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out the words review are a term

0:58:59.720 --> 0:59:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of our art that implies an audit like level of scrutiny.

0:59:03.600 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So Wells Fargo asked for a review of the p

0:59:06.240 --> 0:59:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and L and the accountants turned around and say, these

0:59:10.560 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 1>documents have been submitted in furtherance of federal tax filing.

0:59:14.440 --> 0:59:16.800
<v Speaker 1>They appear to be in order to us. That's the

0:59:17.000 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 1>most the accountants they wouldn't say we reviewed it. They

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly aren't gonna say we ordered it. But apparently submission

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to a furtherance of tax filings was sufficient

0:59:29.520 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 1>for well, I think think about that. So you have

0:59:32.760 --> 0:59:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that whole interplay between the consumer and the lender. And

0:59:36.920 --> 0:59:38.960
<v Speaker 1>then you look at the fact that you know, with

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the upticking mortgage rates over the last year, the rates

0:59:41.960 --> 0:59:43.920
<v Speaker 1>came back down. They came back down, But we're pretty

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>close to the lows now, aren't we And we're still

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're half a point up. But in a

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:52.000
<v Speaker 1>quarter when we have a really a three seven five

0:59:52.080 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for very long, you were there for short, they have

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen minutes and then it was back to four.

0:59:56.880 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that seems to be the floor you don't

0:59:59.680 --> 1:00:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna bring for when you look at that

1:00:01.880 --> 1:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and and U which created a lot of in many

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>ways sort of on one hand, the spike in rates

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>last year created this the surge, the last minute sort

1:00:13.480 --> 1:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of gasp of air of getting people off the fence.

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And now it's sort of framing the discussion about housing now,

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>which is it's less than last year, but really it's

1:00:25.000 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>not really from historical context, it's no different, and the

1:00:28.320 --> 1:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>rates are really nominally different, there's really no difference, but

1:00:31.640 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a four handle is still in insane But it actually

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>feels tighter or weaker, and and it's all from the

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>credit orientation that is driving housing. So we really didn't

1:00:44.920 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>get to what the proper role of government is in

1:00:49.320 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this because what some of the arguments that are being

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>made is you have rates at record lows, but we

1:00:56.240 --> 1:00:59.919
<v Speaker 1>have most of America unable to take advantage and refinance

1:01:00.360 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because either they lack the credit history the income history. Amazingly,

1:01:04.640 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they're making payments on a house at six percent. Imagine

1:01:08.280 --> 1:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>if they could refi at four that would do the economy? Yeah,

1:01:11.560 --> 1:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that would that would be a huge although you were

1:01:13.480 --> 1:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>effectively transferring some income from banks and giving it to everybody, uh,

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. But the question is what's the proper role

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for government and all this? And if Fannie and Freddie

1:01:25.400 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>are ultimately on the hook, why not waive some of

1:01:29.440 --> 1:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>these requirements and allow refies because if they default at

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>six percent, they're going to default at four percent, and

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they're less likely to default at four percent, So why

1:01:37.840 --> 1:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>not let them do a refi? Right? I think I

1:01:41.320 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>think the thinking right now, there's there's a lot of

1:01:44.600 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>uncertainties about the former g scs in terms of what

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the role is they're going to merge them into one institution.

1:01:50.280 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But Congress doesn't have the will to do that. What

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was the word you gonna say that the will to

1:01:56.400 --> 1:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>do that is that, yeah, exactly. Uh. That And the

1:02:02.040 --> 1:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>problem is that it is a one size fits all

1:02:06.960 --> 1:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>orientation in government in terms of terms of risk. I

1:02:11.960 --> 1:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>think part of it is the austerity concern, or maybe

1:02:17.200 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that's window dressing on the problem. And so there there,

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not giving anybody credit to be able to make

1:02:23.640 --> 1:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>intelligent decisions. We're really just saying we're not doing this

1:02:28.480 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and let the chips fall where they may. And that's

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a short sighted solution because like you said,

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of people with plenty of income. Uh, they

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>might be low on equity and they don't qualify for REFI,

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and yet there's an existing mortgage at that low equity level. Exactly.

1:02:49.760 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Another component has been uh, and there's been discussion about it,

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is that the whole concept of principal forgiveness focusing on

1:02:59.640 --> 1:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the the borrowers instead of focusing on the making the

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>bank's hole, focus on main street the economy hall would

1:03:06.920 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>make the economy hole, and then they're likely make banking hole.

1:03:09.960 --> 1:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But we're sort of stuck in this this box right now,

1:03:13.880 --> 1:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, Fannie May, Freddie Mack or making

1:03:17.240 --> 1:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money. It's highly volatile, it's it could

1:03:21.400 --> 1:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>turn on a dime. Uh. We're still dealing with the

1:03:25.640 --> 1:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>legacy issues of bad lending practices d o J going

1:03:30.280 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>after everybody. We have, uh, we have the buy backs

1:03:33.360 --> 1:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>being forced on the g S c s. We have

1:03:35.520 --> 1:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Congress saying forced by the g S, forced by the

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>g S. Right. In other words, if you sold a

1:03:41.440 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>pool of mortgages to Fannie of Freddy and there was

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of misrepresentation, fraud, whatever, it can be very slight.

1:03:50.520 --> 1:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Really Oh yeah, I mean it's not just because we

1:03:53.880 --> 1:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>know there was a ton of fraud all around. There

1:03:57.080 --> 1:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>was there was application fraud, there was underwriting fraud, there

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>was somebody's there was liar loans the whole deal. Because

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it was just it was just semantics. I've gotten into

1:04:10.320 --> 1:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>arguments with some of my conservative buddies about the liar loans,

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and my argument goes something like this, you're the bank,

1:04:18.520 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's your capital, you're lending it, right, You're the one

1:04:22.000 --> 1:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>who's taking the risk. It's incumbent on you to make

1:04:25.440 --> 1:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>sure that the person you're lending it to has an income,

1:04:28.840 --> 1:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>has a payment history, has a credit score. When you

1:04:32.000 --> 1:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>say don't tell me that, what you're effectively saying is

1:04:35.200 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, so to blame the buyers for you know, look,

1:04:40.040 --> 1:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you we all know the story. Wink wink, nudge nudge.

1:04:42.960 --> 1:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>What was going on with mortgage brokers? Here? Leave that blank,

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll fill it in. I mean people signed it and

1:04:51.080 --> 1:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>holding aside the bad behavior of the mortgage folks. If

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't ask for an income history tax file, now,

1:04:59.440 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the opposite of of the proctology exam I'm

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>going through with Wells Fargo. If you ask for none

1:05:05.560 --> 1:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of that. By the way, we refinance the house we're selling.

1:05:08.560 --> 1:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Two years ago it was more than

1:05:11.640 --> 1:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>fog a mirror, but not a whole lot more. And

1:05:14.280 --> 1:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the house we had sold before this, I think we

1:05:17.520 --> 1:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>refinanced that three times over seven years. I've been in

1:05:21.560 --> 1:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>my house for ten years. I think every year the

1:05:24.160 --> 1:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>first couple of years I had it, I think it

1:05:27.280 --> 1:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>four times. Yeah, it's and the process was signed here,

1:05:30.640 --> 1:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>initials here, checks in the mail. It was insane. So

1:05:34.880 --> 1:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>where has it's gone to? One ridiculous extreme. Now we

1:05:38.320 --> 1:05:41.959
<v Speaker 1>started an opposite extreme. But I hold the banks responsible

1:05:42.240 --> 1:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>if you don't ask people what's your income, what's your

1:05:45.960 --> 1:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>credit score, what were your tax filings, what's your payment history?

1:05:49.200 --> 1:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>How could you complain when they default? You didn't ask

1:05:52.240 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for that information, you didn't verify it. Hey, by the way,

1:05:55.440 --> 1:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>wink wink, nudge, nudge, give us a ballpark. Because they could,

1:05:59.280 --> 1:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>They could package and sell off the risk to somebody

1:06:01.960 --> 1:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>else who was unsuspecting. Although oh no, they knew, but

1:06:07.400 --> 1:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they were more than unsuspecting. They were Look, we're taking

1:06:12.080 --> 1:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>this risk and spreading it out. One of my favorite

1:06:15.000 --> 1:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>discoveries when I was researching bailout Nation was the warranty

1:06:20.880 --> 1:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>keep It was the warranty that that came with these

1:06:26.600 --> 1:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>non bank originated mortgages, primarily out of California. Were with

1:06:31.880 --> 1:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>these jobs right? They gave a warranty that said, this

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>mortgage will not this thirty year mortgage, this three and

1:06:42.560 --> 1:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty month mortgage will not default for ninety days, and

1:06:46.680 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>if it does, you could put it back to us.

1:06:49.400 --> 1:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>A toaster comes with a longer warranty than that. So

1:06:53.680 --> 1:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>how long did it take for the salespeople to figure

1:06:56.000 --> 1:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>out Hey, I'm not looking for people who could qualify

1:06:58.600 --> 1:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>for a thirty year mortgage. I'm just looking for some

1:07:00.960 --> 1:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>pushchmuck who's going to make the first three payments. And

1:07:03.800 --> 1:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the first payment is effectively waived. It's

1:07:06.320 --> 1:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>covered in closing about the so two payments and I'm

1:07:09.160 --> 1:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>out in days. Think of the irony of that though.

1:07:12.120 --> 1:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So during that period you had no credit standards whatsoever,

1:07:17.360 --> 1:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>housings housing prices rose rapidly. Fast forward to today, excess credit.

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>The pendulum has overcorrected to the opposite degree. Housing prices

1:07:29.680 --> 1:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>are rising and in many markets at a very brisk pace.

1:07:34.440 --> 1:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Credit is in play in both cases, but for completely

1:07:38.280 --> 1:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>different reasons. So somewhere in the middle is the much healthier,

1:07:41.720 --> 1:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>slower growth, more reasonable housing market. And that doesn't happen

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>until you get real job growth, real income growth. Not

1:07:52.240 --> 1:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a booming, but but just you know, the whole notion

1:07:56.040 --> 1:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that you actually have to have a job and have

1:07:58.240 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable income to qualify. When that, when those conditions improve,

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that's how you ease credit. That's how you get housing

1:08:07.040 --> 1:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to be truly what I call recovered. All we've seen

1:08:10.240 --> 1:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>right now I characterized as it's a rebound it's essentially

1:08:13.800 --> 1:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>off of a low, but there's dead cat bounce are

1:08:16.920 --> 1:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a little more than that. I think it's a little

1:08:18.320 --> 1:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>more than that, because you know, there's so much psychology.

1:08:21.479 --> 1:08:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know we have we have two cats.

1:08:23.680 --> 1:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not allowed to say that phrase at home, but

1:08:26.920 --> 1:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know there is some psychology to it. People

1:08:30.280 --> 1:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>not being afraid to venture into the market and buy.

1:08:33.880 --> 1:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is that it's everything is going to

1:08:38.080 --> 1:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>happen in slow motion and we want quick, quick results.

1:08:41.720 --> 1:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not how the real world operates. Now, you don't

1:08:44.800 --> 1:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>get that sort of stuff. So let's solve America's housing,

1:08:49.360 --> 1:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>credit and economic problems. All and one fell swoop. So

1:08:53.720 --> 1:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>here's what we're gonna do. So we've noticed that Obama

1:08:57.920 --> 1:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>has essentially given up on Congress US, who the day

1:09:01.160 --> 1:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this, we see in a gallop pole is

1:09:04.120 --> 1:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>now down to a seven percent record low since Gallup

1:09:08.920 --> 1:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>started asking this question, and I think it was three

1:09:14.160 --> 1:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>record low. Not only is it the lowest Congress has

1:09:17.000 --> 1:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>ever been, it's the lowest any institution America has ever

1:09:21.040 --> 1:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>ever marked and ament. And so Obama has very interestingly said,

1:09:28.400 --> 1:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take a page out of the George

1:09:30.240 --> 1:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Bush playbook and bypass Congress, and there's a lot of

1:09:33.600 --> 1:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff I can do through an executive order. And so

1:09:37.400 --> 1:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>here's what I want to know. We we know that

1:09:41.320 --> 1:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a tremendous amount of economic activity and economic potential

1:09:47.000 --> 1:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>locked up in people who are are stuck in their houses.

1:09:51.560 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We also know that ultimately Fannie and Freddie, meaning the taxpayer,

1:09:57.840 --> 1:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>is on the hook for those mortgages, whether they a

1:10:00.160 --> 1:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>fault at six p or default at a lower rate.

1:10:04.160 --> 1:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>What would happen if the President said to the head

1:10:07.840 --> 1:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of Fannie and Freddy, I want to institute a policy

1:10:11.080 --> 1:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that allows people who are current on their mortgages, so

1:10:14.920 --> 1:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we're not dealing with short sales, we're not dealing with

1:10:16.880 --> 1:10:22.519
<v Speaker 1>underwater sales, to refinance at their existing mortgage amount or lower,

1:10:22.640 --> 1:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>so there's no cash outs at the prevailing interest rate.

1:10:27.520 --> 1:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I know in theory this may reduce the income to

1:10:30.800 --> 1:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Fannie and Freddie, although there will be all these transaction

1:10:33.760 --> 1:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>fees that will help them. What is this a can

1:10:37.960 --> 1:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we can the President order Fannie and Freddie to do

1:10:40.240 --> 1:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that and be what would that do to the to

1:10:44.520 --> 1:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the U S economy and to the U S housing market? Well? Uh,

1:10:48.760 --> 1:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>so the caveat that you're not an economist, I probably

1:10:52.360 --> 1:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>say I'm a non economist proudly. So the new head

1:10:57.360 --> 1:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of f h f A, the regulatory agency that overseas

1:11:01.960 --> 1:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Fannie and Freddy that was formerly called O H G

1:11:06.120 --> 1:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>O and uh, they were asleep at the switch. Worse

1:11:11.400 --> 1:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>than asleep at the switch. They're the ones who gave

1:11:13.600 --> 1:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Fanny and the G S c S permission in late

1:11:16.960 --> 1:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five. Hey, you're losing market share at Wall Street.

1:11:21.000 --> 1:11:23.599
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to just do conforming loans. You can

1:11:23.640 --> 1:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>do non conforming meanings sub prime and all day. And

1:11:27.760 --> 1:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so two thousand six, Fannie and Freddy go headlong into

1:11:31.000 --> 1:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that just as the market is topic. They might have

1:11:34.080 --> 1:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>been his final spasm. And actually, when they changed their

1:11:38.160 --> 1:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>name to f h f A, it literally was the

1:11:41.400 --> 1:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>same website, just with different U R L and the logos.

1:11:46.080 --> 1:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Everything was the same. So I never quite understood that.

1:11:48.479 --> 1:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And I sort of feel like the the rejiggering of

1:11:52.280 --> 1:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Fannie and Freddy, if that were ever to happen, is

1:11:54.320 --> 1:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be kind of the same thing. It seems

1:11:58.360 --> 1:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>like a can of worms. But anyway, I think that

1:12:02.640 --> 1:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that you you take away income from Fannie

1:12:06.280 --> 1:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and Freddie to give it to I think it's more.

1:12:10.080 --> 1:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more important for the public to be

1:12:12.320 --> 1:12:15.479
<v Speaker 1>on their feet and spending in a consumer economy than

1:12:15.560 --> 1:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it is about worrying about whether Fannie or or Freddie

1:12:18.960 --> 1:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna make five million dollars this core. I think

1:12:22.240 --> 1:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>that's ultimately that just comes back to the text. It

1:12:24.439 --> 1:12:26.639
<v Speaker 1>comes back to the taxpayer anyway. So so I think

1:12:26.680 --> 1:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that's important. We do have the head of the f

1:12:30.520 --> 1:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>h A. F h f A is much more pro

1:12:35.040 --> 1:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>consumer in terms of their outlook and providing some flexibility,

1:12:40.200 --> 1:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to give flexibility to Fannie and Freddie. So I

1:12:43.760 --> 1:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>think that's all good. I just I haven't heard any

1:12:48.880 --> 1:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>overtures that the Obama administration would even entertain that. Well,

1:12:51.920 --> 1:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't spoken to them yet. But once I planned

1:12:54.240 --> 1:12:57.599
<v Speaker 1>this idea, well, I I have full confidence that you

1:12:57.640 --> 1:12:59.519
<v Speaker 1>could sell them on the idea. I don't know if

1:12:59.520 --> 1:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I could sell it, but it's a fascinating concept. I

1:13:02.000 --> 1:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's a I think it's probably a good concept

1:13:05.080 --> 1:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>because so much of our wealth is tied up uh

1:13:08.640 --> 1:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>people that are stuck. It's tied up in housing, and

1:13:11.240 --> 1:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that triggers a lot of other things. The mobility,

1:13:15.600 --> 1:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it triggers its real estate mobility, employment mobility, geographic mobility.

1:13:21.040 --> 1:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a key thing. And I'm looking for the downside there.

1:13:26.400 --> 1:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there really is any downside, especially from

1:13:30.760 --> 1:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the naysayers if it was if you were if you

1:13:34.640 --> 1:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>were ignoring principal reduction. Principal reduction is sort of a

1:13:39.880 --> 1:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>hot hotbed of debate. I'm in favor of it. Let

1:13:44.680 --> 1:13:46.599
<v Speaker 1>we could hold that to put that to the side,

1:13:46.600 --> 1:13:49.479
<v Speaker 1>and don't even do that. Just the people who are

1:13:49.840 --> 1:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>current have employed. You want to REFI to a lower

1:13:53.760 --> 1:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>rate and nothing else changes. Even you know, if you

1:13:57.800 --> 1:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>have a four thousand dollar Morgans in the house, that's

1:14:00.120 --> 1:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>or three fifty, does it matter if the interest rate

1:14:03.160 --> 1:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to to the note holder, if it's six percent or

1:14:06.720 --> 1:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>four percent, it shouldn't make a difference. So that there

1:14:10.240 --> 1:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>are people who hold the securitized notes, they have to

1:14:13.760 --> 1:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>expect a certain amount of maturation that happens normally. This

1:14:18.280 --> 1:14:21.479
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a huge shift. Now in theory, it

1:14:21.560 --> 1:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>creates a whole bunch of new paper that Wall Street

1:14:23.920 --> 1:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>can then move about and sell to these people. And

1:14:27.080 --> 1:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>if you want to hold onto whatever you have, you

1:14:30.160 --> 1:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>can hold it. The way this gets called is kind

1:14:33.200 --> 1:14:37.519
<v Speaker 1>of complicated. Back from the investors that we're expecting a

1:14:37.560 --> 1:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>six return. I'm sorry that you're you're gonna have to

1:14:42.000 --> 1:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>get a less of a return like everybody. But you're

1:14:44.320 --> 1:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>probably reducing dramatically the default that's right, that's the trade off.

1:14:49.080 --> 1:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You're you're getting a lower default risk because people can

1:14:51.880 --> 1:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>afford it, and you're you're helping the overall economy. So

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking I've been playing with this idea. I'm looking

1:14:58.280 --> 1:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for a downside to it, and other than the fact

1:15:01.439 --> 1:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that people hate government intervention. But you know, there's an

1:15:06.280 --> 1:15:10.719
<v Speaker 1>article in The Times today by Neil Irwin talking about

1:15:10.840 --> 1:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>formerly of the Washington Post, talking about the Import Export

1:15:15.280 --> 1:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Bank and how certain people hate it because it's government

1:15:21.040 --> 1:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in bed with big business. And but the reality is

1:15:24.439 --> 1:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the nature of industry globally, it has to be.

1:15:28.920 --> 1:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what's going Listen, If if the European banks are

1:15:31.680 --> 1:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>subsidizing air Bus, how can the US not allow Boeing

1:15:36.040 --> 1:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to compete on the same planet playing field. And if

1:15:38.880 --> 1:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't do that, what ends up happening is they

1:15:42.320 --> 1:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>lose the battle right to Airbus because it's subsidized. The

1:15:47.040 --> 1:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>ironic thing is the jackasses who were opposed to this

1:15:50.800 --> 1:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>are Delta Airlines, because, by the way, worst airline in

1:15:54.640 --> 1:15:57.599
<v Speaker 1>the planet, run by morons. I can't begin to tell

1:15:57.680 --> 1:16:01.759
<v Speaker 1>you how much I hate despise that airline, my least

1:16:01.800 --> 1:16:04.519
<v Speaker 1>favorite airline. Search the blog, search redults dot com for it.

1:16:05.520 --> 1:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You'll see. I don't know, and I don't care to

1:16:07.720 --> 1:16:10.879
<v Speaker 1>tell you the truth. But here's the amazing thing. Delta

1:16:10.920 --> 1:16:14.639
<v Speaker 1>opposes it because they say, oh, you're subsidizing bowing sales

1:16:14.720 --> 1:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to competitive um carriers overseas, and that's not the government's role. Hey, morons,

1:16:22.560 --> 1:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Neil Irwin points out, you guys were rescued in a

1:16:25.960 --> 1:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>government bail out, so just sit there and shut the

1:16:29.760 --> 1:16:32.479
<v Speaker 1>hell up. Or right, it's like, you know, wait, so

1:16:32.560 --> 1:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you got yours and that's the end of it. Nobody

1:16:36.000 --> 1:16:38.679
<v Speaker 1>of all the hypocritical things. I don't know if they're

1:16:38.680 --> 1:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>more hypocritical than they are a lousy airline, but those

1:16:42.040 --> 1:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>are your choices. Most hypocritical company in America, worst airline

1:16:46.080 --> 1:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in America. So that's uh. This message is brought to

1:16:49.360 --> 1:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you by Delta. Fly Delta, and maybe you'll make it there.

1:16:54.080 --> 1:16:56.559
<v Speaker 1>I just had a couple of really bad experiences with them.

1:16:56.560 --> 1:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Other people disagree with me about Delta, but UM actually

1:17:01.400 --> 1:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>rarely fly it, so I don't fly it anymore, and

1:17:05.920 --> 1:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll never forget. I was flying to Atlanta to give

1:17:08.760 --> 1:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a speech. I booked first class and they do what

1:17:13.439 --> 1:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of legacy airlines do, which is when they

1:17:16.000 --> 1:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have a full flight, they cancel it and they

1:17:18.760 --> 1:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>roll you into the next flight. And I'm like, listen,

1:17:21.200 --> 1:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be somewhere at six o'clock tonight. I know

1:17:23.920 --> 1:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>your your cancelation was nonsense. So they give me. They get, well,

1:17:27.800 --> 1:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll get you on this plane, and they go from

1:17:30.160 --> 1:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to A to B which is the middle from from

1:17:36.640 --> 1:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at back by the bathroom. And I'm like, I'm sorry,

1:17:39.479 --> 1:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I had a first class ticket. Why am I? And

1:17:42.040 --> 1:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the woman says, well, A, you didn't have a first

1:17:44.320 --> 1:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>class ticket, you had a six g Y ticket, and

1:17:47.840 --> 1:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>B that's the only seat we you know, that's all

1:17:50.200 --> 1:17:52.519
<v Speaker 1>we have at this time. So I'm like, let me.

1:17:53.280 --> 1:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I just have to stop you there. I don't know

1:17:55.720 --> 1:17:57.479
<v Speaker 1>what a six G Y is. When I went on

1:17:57.520 --> 1:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to Delta dot com, um, your choice is either first

1:18:02.439 --> 1:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>slash business class or Economy and there was like a

1:18:05.920 --> 1:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>six hundred dollar difference in in price. So I don't

1:18:10.000 --> 1:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>know how what what six g y is or whatever

1:18:12.960 --> 1:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the code was, but you give me two choices, business

1:18:16.320 --> 1:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>or coach. I picked Business. Is there an empty business

1:18:19.640 --> 1:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>class seat? I would like to have it? And at

1:18:22.240 --> 1:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that point it's like I had to get down there,

1:18:24.520 --> 1:18:27.759
<v Speaker 1>so I get on the flight. To add insult to injury,

1:18:28.040 --> 1:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>there's an empty seat in business. And then to make

1:18:31.400 --> 1:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>matters worse, when I called out to to say, all

1:18:34.400 --> 1:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I bought this ticket for whatever. I'd like a refund

1:18:39.680 --> 1:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of the difference, they proceeded to explain to me that

1:18:42.360 --> 1:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't tell the difference in price. Let me stop

1:18:45.320 --> 1:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>your second. I work in finance. I could tell you

1:18:48.080 --> 1:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the price of any of ten thousand stocks on any

1:18:51.960 --> 1:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>day for the last hundred years, at any second of

1:18:55.520 --> 1:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the day. Your own tickets. You can't tell me what

1:18:59.200 --> 1:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the hell these are outing for. I bought it. You

1:19:01.960 --> 1:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>could see the day I bought it. What were you

1:19:04.560 --> 1:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>selling the coach tickets for? It? Just refund me the difference,

1:19:08.680 --> 1:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and I said, you know what, and they refused to

1:19:11.240 --> 1:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>do it. They actually sent me a certificate for two

1:19:14.600 --> 1:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars, which when I went to use seven months

1:19:18.200 --> 1:19:21.759
<v Speaker 1>later was expired. So I said, you know, my penalty

1:19:21.800 --> 1:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>for this is one day I'm gonna have a radio show,

1:19:24.640 --> 1:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And on that radio show, I'm gonna tell people I

1:19:28.040 --> 1:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>love Virgin American Airlines. Even though the last trip back

1:19:30.840 --> 1:19:34.519
<v Speaker 1>from San Francisco, the seat didn't work, the juice didn't work,

1:19:34.560 --> 1:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>at the power on, the electrical didn't work, the TV

1:19:39.120 --> 1:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't work. Still better than Delta and UM anytime if

1:19:43.520 --> 1:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I have to fly Jet Blue, Jet Blue is always fine.

1:19:47.000 --> 1:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I get to sit in the front of Virgin and

1:19:48.840 --> 1:19:51.599
<v Speaker 1>Jet Blue, it doesn't matter you sit even the even

1:19:51.640 --> 1:19:56.839
<v Speaker 1>even more spaces like that is the greatest air travel

1:19:57.080 --> 1:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>bang for the buck. There is just those extra six

1:19:59.840 --> 1:20:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in just by you make all the difference. It really, uh,

1:20:03.160 --> 1:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it really does. So somehow the poor people on a

1:20:07.880 --> 1:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>treadmill listening to this, like I thought we were talking

1:20:10.240 --> 1:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>about this, red sky will not shut up. So let's

1:20:15.160 --> 1:20:20.799
<v Speaker 1>bring this back to housing and what this means going forward.

1:20:21.120 --> 1:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Assume the government does nothing. What what is them? Just

1:20:26.200 --> 1:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>play out? Yeah, what happens with Fannie and Freddie? What

1:20:29.080 --> 1:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>should the role of government be and and what do

1:20:32.360 --> 1:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we do with this, what how does housing manifest itself

1:20:36.360 --> 1:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of years. So I think that

1:20:40.439 --> 1:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>housing will follow the path of what the economy does.

1:20:45.160 --> 1:20:48.519
<v Speaker 1>In other words, I think, I think when we see

1:20:49.360 --> 1:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>real improvement in the economy, and what I mean by

1:20:52.720 --> 1:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that is simply more job real job growth, I think

1:20:57.040 --> 1:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that that makes all the difference in the world, and

1:20:59.400 --> 1:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that'll start to melt the problem increases, a little wage increase,

1:21:05.439 --> 1:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing more, you know, huge, just improvement, an uptick. I think,

1:21:11.560 --> 1:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to me, all that matters of the fundamentals that you know,

1:21:14.320 --> 1:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>this whole notion, this whole this whole notion of like

1:21:18.040 --> 1:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>housing is going to lead us out of this. I

1:21:21.520 --> 1:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>feel it's just the opposite. It always has been the opposite.

1:21:25.720 --> 1:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>But it's always stated as housing, you know, brings us out.

1:21:29.840 --> 1:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>It's always the the economic sort of interpretation of housing

1:21:34.720 --> 1:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is always how we get out of a you know,

1:21:37.400 --> 1:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a week period, and and I feel it's I don't

1:21:40.800 --> 1:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>know how that where that math comes from, but it's

1:21:44.040 --> 1:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>always backwards because you actually have to have a job

1:21:46.400 --> 1:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and have you know, income prospects to qualify for a mortgage.

1:21:50.680 --> 1:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>So I feel it all goes hand in hand on

1:21:53.520 --> 1:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the on the more specific government aspect of it is

1:21:57.160 --> 1:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think Congress has the will or the

1:22:01.040 --> 1:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>ability to make a sea change to what is responsible

1:22:06.760 --> 1:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>for of the housing of housing mortgages in the country.

1:22:11.880 --> 1:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that is just a disaster waiting to happen.

1:22:15.280 --> 1:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Meaning what should they be doing. I think they'll do nothing.

1:22:19.240 --> 1:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean as opposed to what would you want them

1:22:22.320 --> 1:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to do? Uh, I think what I'd want them to do.

1:22:25.120 --> 1:22:32.519
<v Speaker 1>So so what I've found is is, uh, there has

1:22:32.600 --> 1:22:37.599
<v Speaker 1>to be more awareness of sort of separation of church

1:22:37.640 --> 1:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and state. In other words, for example, you know the

1:22:41.080 --> 1:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest culprits, one of the biggest culprits in this whole

1:22:44.240 --> 1:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>last down cycle where the rating agencies right where they

1:22:49.360 --> 1:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>are basically joined at the hip with the people that

1:22:54.160 --> 1:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know that they were. They were under partners

1:22:57.600 --> 1:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with underwriters, just real state appraisers were joined at the

1:23:02.280 --> 1:23:05.599
<v Speaker 1>hip with mortgage brokers. Right, find the right appraiser, make

1:23:05.680 --> 1:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the number, we can do the deal. Right. We have

1:23:08.960 --> 1:23:11.479
<v Speaker 1>that whole and then we have the revolving door between

1:23:11.479 --> 1:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the regulators and private industry. So there's no real separation.

1:23:17.280 --> 1:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And to me, the only way you reduce that you'll

1:23:21.000 --> 1:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>never eliminate it, because human beings are really good at

1:23:24.400 --> 1:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>screwing things up. Just everything sort of devolves into chaos

1:23:28.080 --> 1:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>over time. I think you're trying to reduce it. What

1:23:30.400 --> 1:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Dodd Frank does the wrong It sort of takes the

1:23:33.920 --> 1:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong approaches. Let's regulate what happened in the past, and

1:23:38.320 --> 1:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that's always true. Isn't every regulation backwards looking? By absolutely?

1:23:43.000 --> 1:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's amazing how well the formation of the

1:23:46.000 --> 1:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>SEC and and glasst Eagle worked from the thirties because

1:23:50.120 --> 1:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it was backwards looking, but it was also when the

1:23:52.400 --> 1:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>pace of change was so slow. It was good for

1:23:54.840 --> 1:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy five years. That's whatever you pass, it's got like

1:23:57.720 --> 1:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that's part of my problem with this whole no stion

1:24:00.400 --> 1:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of red revamping Fannie and Freddie. When Fanny worked okay,

1:24:05.880 --> 1:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>from the depression up until right up until ten years ago, right,

1:24:11.160 --> 1:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and so you have to look at what changed in

1:24:13.720 --> 1:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>O five the middle last decade to make them implode

1:24:18.240 --> 1:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and then eliminate that. That's the we don't just because

1:24:23.120 --> 1:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>you put window you know, new window dressing on an

1:24:25.479 --> 1:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>agency that's effectively going to do the same thing doesn't

1:24:28.200 --> 1:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>make the problems go away. It's a waste of time.

1:24:31.360 --> 1:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Fannie and Freddie bashers always conflate two

1:24:36.920 --> 1:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>or three issues. One is, Fanny and Freddie was a

1:24:40.240 --> 1:24:45.719
<v Speaker 1>horrifically corrupt organization who spread a lot of lucre around

1:24:45.800 --> 1:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>d C. So they were the biggest supporters of public

1:24:50.400 --> 1:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>relations agencies. Every agency in Washington had a Fannie May account.

1:24:56.360 --> 1:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>They they were dominating. They spread them. Anny Franklin Rains

1:25:01.360 --> 1:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>was not afraid to spend the cash, and it was funny.

1:25:06.040 --> 1:25:08.519
<v Speaker 1>It was It was funny that I remember seeing guys

1:25:08.560 --> 1:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like Newt Gingrich not complain about them, and then you

1:25:11.840 --> 1:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>find out years later, even though everybody thinks of Fannie

1:25:15.040 --> 1:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and Freddy is a democratic entity, they were spreading the

1:25:18.600 --> 1:25:21.360
<v Speaker 1>money around on both sides of the aisle, which is

1:25:21.400 --> 1:25:24.559
<v Speaker 1>the smart way to do it. One of the good

1:25:24.600 --> 1:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>parts about the bail out is that we stopped all

1:25:27.200 --> 1:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that lobbying, at least for Fannie and Freddie. We could

1:25:29.680 --> 1:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have done it for the banks and for Wall Street

1:25:31.200 --> 1:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a much healthier country. Nobody thought to say, hey,

1:25:35.040 --> 1:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Goldman in Bank of America shouldn't really be in the

1:25:38.200 --> 1:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>corridors of power. As much as Fannie and Freddie were

1:25:41.760 --> 1:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>stopping both, but but hold that aside. Do we need

1:25:47.240 --> 1:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>an entity between the buyers and the banks, working either

1:25:53.240 --> 1:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>with or with the im premature of government to keep

1:25:57.520 --> 1:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates down? We we've seen European don't have this,

1:26:01.439 --> 1:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>although they also don't have thirty year fixed mortgages. How

1:26:05.000 --> 1:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is this done around the world? Will make this our

1:26:07.360 --> 1:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>last question. How are other mortgages processed, underwritten, regulated elsewhere

1:26:15.479 --> 1:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that might provide an alternative example versus what Fannie and

1:26:20.000 --> 1:26:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Freddie does. Well, So what's popular around the world are

1:26:24.600 --> 1:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>adjustable rate mortgages. I mean, that's that's not popular that dominates.

1:26:29.720 --> 1:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think many countries look at US as so it

1:26:32.960 --> 1:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>makes homeowners slaves to interest rate fluctuation very much so.

1:26:37.000 --> 1:26:39.559
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of it, so countries like Spain

1:26:40.200 --> 1:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>where you can't walk away from a mortgage ever ever,

1:26:44.800 --> 1:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>so you are tied to that and you have to

1:26:48.200 --> 1:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>pay it back. There is no there is no get

1:26:51.160 --> 1:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>out of jail free card in in the mortgage world

1:26:54.360 --> 1:26:57.559
<v Speaker 1>in countries like Spain in the US is in half

1:26:57.600 --> 1:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the US. In the US, it's basically just you know,

1:27:02.680 --> 1:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just another process you go through. It's but there

1:27:05.280 --> 1:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>are some states that a recourse states, meaning that that

1:27:08.120 --> 1:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a debt you can discharge in bankruptcy, but you

1:27:11.000 --> 1:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>can't just walk away. And then there are nonrecourse states

1:27:14.479 --> 1:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>where the state the contract says in the event that

1:27:18.120 --> 1:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you failed to pay for the house, the bank gets

1:27:20.479 --> 1:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the house. You're done, which was always thought of as Okay,

1:27:23.360 --> 1:27:25.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making the payments, I lose the house. That

1:27:25.600 --> 1:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was thought of as a kind of fair trade off.

1:27:27.720 --> 1:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Nobody expected a million people to do what it wants, right,

1:27:30.240 --> 1:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>an inundation of it, right, Yeah, the states that are

1:27:33.640 --> 1:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>dependent on the court systems were the slowest to recover.

1:27:36.360 --> 1:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Larida had a their own you know, hyper right, which

1:27:41.080 --> 1:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was supposedly was a debacle, a a

1:27:44.120 --> 1:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>gnarly mess of corruption and lack of oversight that and

1:27:48.400 --> 1:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of itself. I'm sure there's a book in that from

1:27:51.479 --> 1:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to sift through it. So so really, the countries that

1:27:54.560 --> 1:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have g s c s in the middle, the

1:27:58.200 --> 1:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>alternative is fluctuating rates. You know, at rates, it's a

1:28:02.680 --> 1:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>different perspective. You know, I'm, as you said, I'm not

1:28:06.360 --> 1:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>an economist, and I and and there's a lot of

1:28:09.320 --> 1:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>criticism about the the effort that it takes to to

1:28:12.760 --> 1:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>manage a thirty year mortgage, and we shouldn't be doing that,

1:28:16.479 --> 1:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>uh and and but it works so well for so

1:28:19.120 --> 1:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>long exactly. So my my view of that is, you know,

1:28:23.000 --> 1:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we're we're you know, we're questioning homeownership or questioning uh

1:28:27.120 --> 1:28:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Fanny May, and we're questioning thirty year fixed. Yet they

1:28:29.600 --> 1:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>worked really well until about ten years ago. So why

1:28:32.640 --> 1:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>don't we look at what happened ten years ago and

1:28:34.840 --> 1:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>focus on that. So that was sub prime, that was

1:28:38.320 --> 1:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>liar loans, that was mass securitization, that was a lack

1:28:42.439 --> 1:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of rating agency accountability. There were a lot of factors

1:28:46.520 --> 1:28:51.559
<v Speaker 1>caused a functional system to freeze, choke and spit everything

1:28:51.560 --> 1:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>out all at once. So then you like, then you

1:28:56.040 --> 1:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>think there's a place for the g S c S.

1:28:58.080 --> 1:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a place. I don't I. I The

1:29:00.920 --> 1:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>way I look at it is funnaments of the economy

1:29:03.920 --> 1:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>get back on track. All most of the stuff goes away.

1:29:07.479 --> 1:29:11.639
<v Speaker 1>It's just a long, gradual process. I fear that by

1:29:11.760 --> 1:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>embedding even more layers of Remember, all the regulators were

1:29:16.120 --> 1:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>asleep at the switch. Everyone Sheilla Beart maybe one of

1:29:19.400 --> 1:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the few exceptions, and the same with a woman who

1:29:22.160 --> 1:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>was the head of the commodities futures trading. She actually was. Yeah,

1:29:26.400 --> 1:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>she was soundly ignored by Greens. She was Chastis and

1:29:30.960 --> 1:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Greens absolutely, So I agree Sheilabert and Uh. I can't

1:29:35.240 --> 1:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>recall the woman's name, but I s' that's it. And

1:29:40.160 --> 1:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and they were the ones that sort of the voice

1:29:42.400 --> 1:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of reason. But the balance was they're caught up in

1:29:45.840 --> 1:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it too, and then a lot of it they didn't understand. It,

1:29:50.920 --> 1:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand you know, the all the the you know,

1:29:53.880 --> 1:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the financial engineering. So I don't think the answer is

1:29:57.320 --> 1:30:00.479
<v Speaker 1>add more. You made the basket. I don't think I

1:30:00.840 --> 1:30:04.599
<v Speaker 1>don't think adding more solves anything. I think it's let's

1:30:04.640 --> 1:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>get back to like fixing the economy first, and a

1:30:07.600 --> 1:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of this stuff plays out. It's not that we're

1:30:10.120 --> 1:30:12.479
<v Speaker 1>going in the right direction. It's just a slow motion

1:30:12.520 --> 1:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and slow motion ride. So as the economy goes, so

1:30:17.120 --> 1:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>goes real estate. Absolutely, Jonathan, I've had you here for

1:30:20.760 --> 1:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>two hours. Thank you so much for coming in. It's

1:30:23.920 --> 1:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>been a pleasure pleasure to you know, you and I

1:30:26.320 --> 1:30:28.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about this stuff all the time, but it's rare

1:30:28.720 --> 1:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>when we actually get to sit down for an uninterrupted

1:30:33.040 --> 1:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>meandering conversation about I thought the airline discussion was really important. Though,

1:30:38.760 --> 1:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you something, it doesn't take much to

1:30:42.479 --> 1:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>set me off. I'm I'm getting better, though. I'm I'm

1:30:46.000 --> 1:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>much more present. I read a fascinating study the other

1:30:49.920 --> 1:30:55.639
<v Speaker 1>day that essentially said the cathartic release of anger does

1:30:55.720 --> 1:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing too. Some people say, how you get it out

1:30:59.880 --> 1:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of your system? It turns out they've done studies and

1:31:02.360 --> 1:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>people it becomes persistent and higher when you especially when

1:31:08.360 --> 1:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you're driving. UM. So, really, I'm trying to learn how

1:31:12.520 --> 1:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to let these slights go and find a degree of peace.

1:31:18.960 --> 1:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I forgive Delta Airlines for their gross incompetence, and I

1:31:24.479 --> 1:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>choose to use my flying you have We know you

1:31:27.720 --> 1:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have choices in airlines today. Hell yeah, and that's why

1:31:32.400 --> 1:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I could at least get over my cost with with

1:31:37.360 --> 1:31:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Delta and gratefully fly. They apparently weren't. That's you're listening

1:31:46.560 --> 1:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business with Barry rid Holts on Bloomberg

1:31:50.240 --> 1:31:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Radio