WEBVTT - Qualcomm and Apple's Chip Agreement, Daniel Zhang Leaves Alibaba

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. Caroline hides off today.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up on the program. Qualcom

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 3>and Apple extend their semiconductor agreement for three more years

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 3>in a sign Apple's in house chips are taking longer

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 3>than expected. Will bring you the details and Ali Baba's

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 3>former chief Daniel Jang leaving the company's cloud division just

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 3>months after agreeing to lead it. We'll have more on

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 3>the leadership changes and uncertainty facing the company as it

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>navigates a complicated breakup. Plus we'll talk initial public offerings

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 3>as Instacart kicks off its IPO row show and the

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 3>company seeks evaluation. That's a big drop from its pandemic heyday.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 3>We'll have that and so much more throughout the hour.

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 3>Let's get straight to our top story, Apple and Quawcom.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>This is about modems that go into the iPhone, connecting

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>them to the high speed five G networks. You can

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 3>see both shares. This is boosting Qualcomm up three point

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 3>five percent. Remember Bloomberg Is reported that Apple has been

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 3>working on its own in house modem. Twenty four hours

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 3>from now, Apple will unveil its iPhone fifteen. The expectation

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 3>was that that would be the last generation to use

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Qualcomm's modem. Not the case, according to the agreement which

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 3>was announced this morning. For more, let's bring in Bloomberg's

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Ian King on all Things Chips and Mark German, who

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 3>covers Apple. Ian will start with you. This was a surprise.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 3>What are the terms of the agreement as we understand.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 4>It, Yeah, I mean they didn't give the precise details.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 4>What they said was, look, it's the same as the

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 4>agreement that we have in place, and in terms of timing,

0:01:55.280 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 4>that's out until the twenty twenty six model and basically

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 4>same again, right, same deal that they signed in twenty nineteen,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 4>except it's going three years longer than it was supposed to.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the basics. What is it that Qualcom

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>makes for smartphones and in particular Apple.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's in particular Apple is the key here. This

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 4>is the modem. This is the chip that takes that

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 4>cellular radio signal, turns it into data, turns it into

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 4>a voice, and it's a crucial, crucial component that determines

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 4>just how well your phone works.

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 3>Gumman, let's bring you into the conversation. You have reported

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>that Apple was developing its own modem in house. The

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 3>story here seems to be that Apple's not as far

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 3>along as they'd expected.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 5>They're certainly not as far along as they expected when

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 5>they set out to build a modem in twenty eighteen.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 5>They were hoping to get that chip into phones beginning

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 5>around twenty twenty two. That got delayed a bit through

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty three, right, And you can see that in

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 5>the supply agreement they reach it qualcommon twenty nineteen is

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 5>part of that royalty lawsuit settlement. But the anticipation was

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 5>to begin getting that modem in flagship iPhones by the

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 5>end of this year or early next year.

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 6>And my anticipation is they'll still be able.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 5>To begin rolling out that modem, probably at the beginning

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 5>of twenty twenty five, not the tail end at twenty

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 5>twenty five, and they wanted to give themselves a little

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 5>bit of leeway agreeing through twenty twenty six.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 6>Now you have to.

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 5>Look at Apple and how many devices they have. They

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 5>have several skews of the iPhone, they have many skews

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 5>of the iPad, they have the Apple Watch as well,

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 5>and they need to get their own modem to work

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 5>in all of those different devices and also have them

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 5>certified to work across the world on hundreds of different

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 5>carriers in hundreds of different countries, and they have to

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 5>deal with the biocracy of that as well, the testing

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 5>the different conditions. They have to have the chipwork on

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 5>three G, four G, and five G, and that's not

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 5>something they can do in one full swop. So my

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 5>belief is they'll begin the transition with one or two

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 5>model in twenty twenty five and gradually expand that to

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 5>more models across twenty twenty six and into twenty twenty seven.

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Mark I and bear with me. This is what Qualcom

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 3>said this morning in their statement. This agreement reinforces Qualcom's

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>track record of sustained leadership across five D technologies and products,

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 3>and as Ian outlined the deal carries through in the

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six generation of iPhone, And as Mark, you

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 3>just outlined you think that this will be phased with Apple.

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Where does the modem sit within Apple's other activities in

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 3>silicon Because actually I think what we expect in twenty

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 3>four hours time is more proprietary silicon from Apple going

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 3>into the latest handsets.

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's just one leg of the stool, right Apple's

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 5>Harvard Technologies organization, the modem is a high priority component there.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 5>They have offices in San Diego, Cooper Tino, multiple places

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 5>in Europe, including in Munich, Germany, working on this modem.

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 5>They have thousands people on the effort. The person in

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 5>charge of the modem is actually a former Qualcom vice

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 5>president who left about half a decade ago to come

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 5>to Apple to work on this project. Johnny Strugi, who

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 5>is Apple Senior vice president of Harvard Technology who oversees

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 5>all the custom silicon. There's a special place in his

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 5>heart against Qualcomm, and so certainly this is a very

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 5>important effort for Apple. They want to design Qualcom out

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 5>of all of their products. They've been working on this extensively.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 5>They've run into battery life issues in terms of where

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 5>it sits in the overall organization. They have their Mac chips,

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 5>and then tomorrow they'll announce one new chip, the A

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 5>seventeen processor that's going to be the company's first three

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 5>and nanimeter chip. That's a major milestone for the company.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 5>There's also going to be a new wireless component that's

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 5>less significant, but certainly the A seventeen chip will be

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 5>one of the core elements of the iPhone fifteen pro

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 5>and Promac's announcement on Tuesday.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Shares up three and a half percent, on track for

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 3>the biggest jumps since July. Earlier in the session, on

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.679
<v Speaker 3>track for the biggest jumps since May. And it's spare

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 3>a thought for Qualcomm and what it means for them.

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, I said that this was a surprise, knowing

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 3>that Apple was working on its own mode. But this

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>is good news for Qualcomm.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you look at the analyst notes this morning

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 4>and they're saying this is like seven billion dollars of

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 4>good news for Qualcom had an analyst day last November

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 4>where they said, look, just take out the Apple numbers

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 4>going forward, take them out, act like we don't have

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 4>that business anymore, and they still do, so clearly that's

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 4>a part on the back for their abilities. This is

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 4>a very difficult thing. As Mark just explained, It's not

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 4>just a case of hey, design a nice piece of silicon.

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's a lot of software tuning. A lot

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 4>of work, a lot of insider knowledge that goes into that,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 4>and the fact that a company with the resources of

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Apple cannot replicate that effort in a timeline that they

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 4>had set for themselves tells you that Qualcom is doing

0:06:58.440 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 4>a good job, all.

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, Bloomberg, Smart German on Apple, Ian King on Qualcom.

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. And speaking of those analyst notes, let's bring

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 3>in Jordan Klein, managing director b Zoo's Securities. In a

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 3>note out today, client wrote, the news is a best

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.239
<v Speaker 3>case scenario for Qualcom, as some thought maybe Apple would

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 3>only do a one year supply deal and then move

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 3>on to their own chips. Mark German just explain that.

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.679
<v Speaker 3>So how do you see it, Jordan, the transition using

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Qualcom's modem to using Apple's own proprietary silicon based on

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the deal announced today.

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks for having me. I mean, I agree with

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>your host as kind of what they said that Apple's

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 2>been working on this for years. It's taking them longer.

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>We think they're going to gradually migrate over to their

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 2>own custom base ban it's going to take them, you

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 2>know again, probably at the earliest till twenty twenty five,

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, we think it could be their lower end

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>SC four that could start using their own baseman, and

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 2>then they would gradually shift to other models in the

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>lineup in twenty twenty six, so you know, but it's

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 2>three years some time, and in the meantime, you know,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Qualcomm kind of sustains its leadership position and gets the

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>added revenue and earnings that they would have lost starting

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 2>next year.

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Jordan, I spent all of twenty twenty one and all

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty two talking about the five G supercycle. Unbelievably,

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 3>my mind's already going to six G, and I just

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 3>wondered if you could talk us through how you see

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Qualcom as positioned, if we're all going to move on

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>to six G and the relationship with Apple in the future.

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a great question. I mean, again, like I said,

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Qualcomm is viewed as the best company and mobile technology,

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 2>and there's a reason for that. They've been doing it

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>longer than anyone. But if you ask the company about

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 2>six G and people have on their earnings calls, I mean,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 2>they don't even really think it's going to be an

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>impact until the end of the decade.

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, at the.

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Earliest you're talking five six years away. It's going to

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>take a long time for that to evolve. So I

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 2>think right now their focus is broadening their revenue base,

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>moving beyond mobile. I mean, there's a reason that that

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Investor day a year ago they told the Wall Street

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 2>community to kind of take this Apple business out of

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 2>their revenues. I think that they wanted to move beyond Apple.

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 2>They want to go into automotive, IoT, other areas of

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the market, even PC computing, where they can diversify beyond mobile.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>So look, it's going to be really big for them

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 2>when the industry is finally ready to go to six G.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 2>But to be honest, I think we've got multiple years

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 2>be it between then and now before it will really

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 2>matter for the Stocker investors.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 3>I've spoken to Christiano I'm on so many times about

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 3>this move towards automotive. Indeed, actually the importance of on

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 3>device running of LMS. You know, it's another area for Qualcom.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Can they maintaintain technology leadership the smartphone modem at the

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 3>same time is trying to move and throw these other

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 3>areas well.

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think they can.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that they make so much profit and money

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 2>from the basepan and the modem business. And really, when

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>you think about it, I mean they're licensing businesses almost

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent margins. It's it's basically a license to

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 2>print money, and they take a lot of that and

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 2>they use that to develop new areas of silicon new technologies.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 2>And they're out there talking, you know, a big game

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 2>about how generative AI is going to move from in

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>the cloud and these large big data centers towards the

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 2>end user device, and that's where they think they'll have

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>an edge because of their advantage in mobile processing units,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 2>where they're also a leader. So I think again, the

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 2>time's going to tell if users are going to, you know,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 2>upgrade their phones to a more powerful mobile processor where

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 2>they think they can get advantages doing AI on their device.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Jordan, of the universe of chick names that you're covering,

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 3>who do you see as best position to take advantage?

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 3>I suppose if the CAPEX and R and D commitments

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 3>right now that are going into how technology companies of

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 3>all sizes use AI within their core businesses, well.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I think first and foremost that conversation or that answer

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>has to start within Nvidia. I mean, there's a reason

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 2>it's almost doubled this year because they're just dominating the

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>shift in terms of processing from CPUs traditional server chips

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 2>towards global graphics processors which are much higher power, much

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>more energy efficient. So I think you start within VIDIA,

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 2>that again has a big advantage in a lead over

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 2>their competitors. But I think as we go into twenty

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, companies like AMD clearly are going to be

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 2>in the mix. Marvel and Broadcom are also big contributors,

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 2>are contributing to this AI investment thesis, and then I

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't count out TELL and I would also look to

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 2>these memory companies like micround because you're going to need

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of memory to run these systems.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Klein and Massoua Goods catch up and have you

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 3>here on Bloomberg Technology. Thank you, Okay, So this is

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 3>the market story. US majors trading in the green today

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 3>the S and P five hundred near it's forty five

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred level. The story has been outperformance in the session

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 3>of Technology. We get the CPI print Wednesday. In the

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 3>last seven days, a new story snuck in which is

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 3>concerns about China US China tensions, but also what's happening

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>with the technology sector in China, remember then, as that

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 3>one hundred is up more than forty percent year today,

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>why probably artificial intelligence. Let's tie this all together and

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 3>bring in Linda Dousol federated Herme's senior ecuity strategists. That's

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 3>a tough thing to ask, Linda, but right now from

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 3>a technology sector perspective, what is driving these markets?

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think you made the important point, which is

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 9>that artificial intelligency AI craze isn't really a craze. It's

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 9>a revolution. And as your previous guests discussed in depth,

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 9>you know whether or not we peeked out in our

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 9>use of chat GPT for the moment, lots of companies

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 9>out there are building for what is going to be

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 9>a great productivity and handswer So it's very exciting. It's

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 9>moved the market this year to date, and of course

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 9>it's had a nice little correction as well into now

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 9>so steadily now we look at it again and say

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 9>maybe it's time to get back in, and then we

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 9>trade down semiconductors.

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Linda is an equity strategist. Even if you're taking a

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 3>macro view, how has artificial intelligence changed the data points

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 3>that you look at. You know, we'll talk about the

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 3>FED and CPI in a minute, but I just wondered

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 3>if you've changed your approach the commentary you look at

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 3>where you look for information to try and understand what

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>AI is doing.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, Well, you know, I appreciate that question because just

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 9>as a general equity strategist, may it behooves us all

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 9>to learn about AI and how quickly it might come

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 9>and change our lives. So I guess the bottom line

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 9>for any general anybody who's looking at stocks is is

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 9>the company that you're looking at grasping this or are

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 9>they turning a blind eye.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 6>To it and expecting it to go away?

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 9>Those who are investing in this even you know, looking

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 9>for companies that are hiring for AI talent is one

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 9>very interesting way to look for stocks out there, and

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 9>the productivity enhancement that should be expected over the next

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 9>ten years can come a lot quicker than many people think,

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 9>and that's obviously going to show its way through earnings.

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Linda, is there any specific sub sector or area where

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 3>you see most potential upside from investments into whether it's

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:56.359
<v Speaker 3>accelerated computing or into large language models. The underlying technology

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 3>behind generative AI you.

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Know, that's a very interesting question.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 9>Is going to probably cross through all sectors of the economy.

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 6>But when you look at really there's two areas of it.

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 9>The information part of it, those jobs that are highly

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 9>information oriented that can be at first helped buy AI,

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 9>and then maybe see jobs displaced by AI over years

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 9>going forward.

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 6>So that'll be some of the.

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 9>More highly paid, highly compensated areas out there. I don't know,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 9>if you're a lawyer, maybe you need to watch out

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 9>here that type of a thing. And then on the

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 9>lower end of the spectrum, you'll see cost cutting in

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 9>terms of labor in areas that are heavily labor intensive

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 9>but that are repetitive, and that goes to the robotics

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 9>side of things. Your retail sales clerks, you know, are

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 9>in big, big trouble. I think if I was looking

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 9>to give advice to a young student, I'd say, you know,

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 9>you might want to go ahead and be a nurse

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 9>instead of thinking about going to work at the mall.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 6>For example.

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I am not a lawyer. I did go to law

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 3>school blenda, but I know numbers start out here in

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the Bay Area. They're looking to use AI for the

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 3>review of legal documents. I think we better also talk

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 3>about China. You know, the story about China is that

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 3>is kind of the tension between the US and China's

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 3>central government. But Ai is at the heart of that.

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 3>And I just wondered how you see the latest headlines

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 3>from China impacting this market.

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, China in general as a place to invest is

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 9>something that people are ever more afraid of for numerous reasons,

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 9>and this is just one extra thing to add to that.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 6>We want to be self.

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 9>Sufficient here and move lots of production here to the

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 9>United States, and I think other countries around the world

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 9>the same.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 6>This is going to take a lot longer than many think.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 9>Not being anew at this at all, but seems very

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 9>clear that we as the United States and our leadership

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 9>may want to try to tamp down those concerns. And

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 9>as you know, some of the best actually have the

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 9>best money being spent in capital expenditures in the manufacturing

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 9>side is because of things like the chip back where

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 9>money's coming from our government to help get more self

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 9>sufficient here in the United States.

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 6>So we can try to.

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 9>Wean away from China in this way, but it will

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 9>be longer. It'll take longer than many think and you know,

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 9>just bringing everything back short and we'll probably take longer

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 9>than many think.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Linda's CPI Wednesday. Where is your head out with the

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>FED and what that means for the tech sector.

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 9>Well, we had Federated Hermes believe that you will see

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 9>probably one more height this year, maybe it's November. Maybe

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 9>they wait one more time, and that is something that's

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 9>probably reasonably expected. You know, in the tech sector, the

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 9>tech sector, that's a long duration asset and you really

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 9>want to see you really don't want to see real

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 9>rates going up, and they've gone up fairly quickly here

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 9>as versus inflation expectations. If we're right about inflation expectations,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 9>they're coming down, then FED please stop raising rates. It

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 9>just makes it more dangerous or vulnerable for these for

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 9>these stocks that are long duration like tech.

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Linda Dousol's senior equity strategists over at Federated Hermes, Good

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 3>to see you coming up here on bloombo Technology, Ali

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Barber's former chief Daniel Jang quits more in the details. Next,

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 3>this is Bloombow Technology. Time for talking tech. First up,

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 3>India's ed Tech Titan by Jew's made the surprise repayment

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 3>proposal to lenders almost a year of conflict over its debts.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Sources say the firm is now offering to pay back

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 3>its entire one point two billion term loan in less

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 3>than six months. And Intel Sat, the world's biggest geostationary

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 3>satellite operator, trying to get a foothold in a technology

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 3>that's gained traction in recent years, low Earth orbit satellites.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 3>The company has taken stakes between five million and twenty

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 3>five million dollars in four businesses focused on low Earth

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 3>orbit to off for new services. Plus, Ali Baba's former chief,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jang has decided to quit just months after agreeing

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 3>to lead the company's cloud division and introducing a new

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>layer of uncertainty to China's largest e commerce company just

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 3>as it's navigating a complicated breakout. Let's bring in Bloomberg's

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Isabel Lee out in New York for more. What does this.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Mean, Haiyan?

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 10>Actually, this was really a surprise to many. It comes

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 10>after two months after his appointment. We have Goldman Sachs

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 10>saying it's a surprise, Bloombery intelligencying that this will likely

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 10>mean that the new partners will have more of an

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 10>influence in the strategic cloud decisions of Ali Baba and

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 10>Bloomberg just last Monday reported that Ali Baba was in

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 10>talks to raise funds from China state owned entities. So

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 10>the departure really caused some people to raise some eyebrows.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 10>And this comes after an eight year storied career for Zang.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 10>But not to worry, he will still be in the

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 10>Ali Baba's ecosystem. He'll be running the one billion tech

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 10>fund of the firm. But still the reshuffle comes as

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 10>Alibaba navigates this complicated and historic breakup into meaning Baby Baba's.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 10>We've discussed a lot in your show, but now I

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 10>guess the certainty is really getting to the investors. Ali

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 10>baba shares fell as much as three and a half percent.

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 10>That's their biggest fall in something like three weeks.

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 3>You know. Josi is like more of a known quantity

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 3>to us here in the United States, at least. He's

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 3>one of the co founders of Ali Barba alongside Jack Maher.

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 3>But tell us about the two new guys not necessarily new,

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 3>but newer names to an international audience.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 10>So Zen gave up his dual roles of CEO and

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 10>chairman to Eddie Wu and to Joseph Taie, so the

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 10>two are close confidence of MA. Let's go with Eddie

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 10>Woo first. So Eddie Wu is lesser known, but he

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 10>has been with me since the beginning, and he's a

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 10>computer science major. He's credited for the development of the paper.

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 10>Like Ali Pai, we have Taie. He's a well known

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 10>deal maker, and he's a Yale alumnus, and he's a

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 10>former lacrosse player, if that's of any significance, and he's

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 10>the owner of Brooklyn Nets. And like Wo, he was

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 10>with MA since the very beginning. So that probably tells

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 10>you that MA probably really values loyalty. But this means

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 10>that the two of them will be responsible for steering

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 10>a two hundred and thirty billion dollar company around after

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 10>years of struggling since twenty two and one when China

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 10>really cracked down at the tech sector. So this is

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 10>going to be an interesting space to watch. It's very much,

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 10>it's new, it's unexpected, and it's in the middle of

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 10>a huge historic reshuffle.

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, bloombergs Isabelle Lee with the lowdown on Ali Baba.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology, Ed love Loo here in

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco quick check on the markets. This is the

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>picture with the nazet one hundred up seven tens of

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 3>one percent outperformance in the technology sector. We get CPI

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 3>data Wednesday, and as we heard from guests in this hour,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 3>a big view to forming how we feel about the

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 3>FED based on that data print. But we're coming off

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 3>a one point four percent drop on a weekly basis

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 3>on the NASDAC last week. There were being concerns about China.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 3>We're through the bulk of earning season. It will come

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 3>around again from a points perspective. One of the big

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 3>stories in the session is Tesla basically on track for

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 3>its biggest jump since the end of January. Morgan Stanley

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 3>out with a note raising their racing on the stock

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 3>to overweight from equal weight, adding a street high price

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 3>target four hundred dollars. Adam Jonas and co. Are basically saying,

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 3>look at Dojo, Tesla's supercomputer and their work in semiconductors.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 3>This is going to add five hundred billion or up

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 3>to five hundred billion dollars in market cap. And they

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 3>basically say this is like an AWS moment for Tesla,

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 3>like Amazon was able to enter new markets like cloud

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 3>computing with AWS. They see that opportunity for Tesla. Remember

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 3>go back to twenty fifteen, Adam Jonas first onto the

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>scene with a seventy percent raise of his price target

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 3>on Tesla because he saw the future being in robotaxis.

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 3>Present day twenty twenty three not quite there, but it's

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 3>an interesting call nonetheless, and it's having a pretty big

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 3>impact on markets this Monday, right stories. Supercomputers are not

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 3>the only type of technology with growing commercial appeal. Enter

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 3>quantum computing an entirely separate kind of technology with the

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 3>capability to accelerate various sectors in society. I'm really excited

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 3>to say that joining us now to walk through this

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 3>tech wave is d Wave CEO Alan Barrats. It's one

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 3>of the first commercial quantum computing companies in the world.

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 3>And Alan, I would say that's a good place to start.

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 3>This misconception that quantum computing is still at the theoretical stage.

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 3>It's not out there in the real world. That is

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 3>a point of view that you would disagree.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>With absolutely, And first of all, thank you for the

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to be here today. I'm really excited to be

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>able to speak with you.

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 8>So you're absolutely right.

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Most people in the industry are saying that quantum computing

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is years away from commercial reality. But in DWave, we

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>took a very different approach to quantum computing. When it

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>has allowed us to deliver for commercial quantum computers today.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we've been delivering them for almost two years now.

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We have over sixty commercial customers that are leveraging our

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>quantum computer to see improved performance in a broad array

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of business applications.

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 3>And I'm going to play Devil's advocate for a minute.

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 3>You've sixty commercial customers, you've been delivering computers. I look

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 3>at your revenues and they are low. If quantum computing

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 3>is in the real world, why are you not booking

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 3>more sales as a real commercial product.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Sure, so, first of all, commercial quantum computing is still early.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>In other words, even we were not commercial until a

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>little over a year ago. So we've achieved that milestone

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and we are now getting started building the business. We

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>have seen our bookings accelerate quarter over quarter for five

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>quarters now. We have seen our average deal size grow

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>significantly from tens of thousands of dollars to well into

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the hundreds of thousands of dollars. And we are supporting

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:19.719
<v Speaker 1>applications as far ranging as employee scheduling, e commerce delivery,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>customer loyalty, rewards optimization, optimization of marketing campaigns, even improving

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the performance of shipping forts. So it is early days,

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but we're off to a great start and we're really

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>excited about the prospects for the future.

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Alan the basics of quantum computers, if one can say

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 3>such a thing, is that they use quantum mechanics to

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 3>carry out calculations as opposed to sort of high efficiency

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>than supercomputers. What is it about d Wave that is proprietary?

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 3>What is it that's unique about your technology?

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So, as I mentioned earlier, we've taken a different

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>approach to quantum computing from everybody else in the industry,

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, we're the only company in the world

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that pursues quantum computing in the way we do with

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the technology that we have developed. And we've developed that

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>technology entirely ourselves, everything from the design to the manufacturing

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the quantum computers, to the software for programming the systems,

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>all the way up through the Quantum Cloud service, which

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>is the vehicle by which our customers access our quantum computers.

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>We've designed, we've developed, we delivered that ourselves, and we

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have extensive patent coverage for all of that technology. We

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>have over two hundred US granted patterns and over one

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred in process worldwide. That space for quantum computing is owned.

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 3>By d Waves And a few weeks ago we had

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 3>a company called Phasecraft from the UK on the program

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 3>talking about their work in quantum algorithms and quantum computing,

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 3>and one of the observations made by that founder was

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 3>that China is making progress in the field of quantum computing,

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 3>but that it is a cooperative initiative globally for those

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 3>in the field. Could you speak to how you view

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 3>China's progress in quantum computing because as you as you know,

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 3>you know China right now and its access to technology

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 3>is a mainstay of the news cycle.

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're absolutely right, and in fact this is a

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>real concern. China is investing over fifteen billion dollars in

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>quantum computing. I was in Europe last week, actually I

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>was in the UK, Switzerland, Germany. They're all investing heavily

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in quantum computing. The UK over four billion in quantum Unfortunately,

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the US is currently investing less than four billion in

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>quantum computing. In some sense, we're a laggard in this space,

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and we absolutely must get our act together because this

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>technology is going to fundamentally transform the way businesses operate

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and they have a huge impact on the social and

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the economic environment, and the US must accelerate its investment

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in this area.

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 3>All right, Alan barrat CEO of d Way, thank you

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 3>for joining us here on Bloomberg Technology, all things quantum computing,

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 3>saying that word more and more. Now coming up, tech

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 3>Starle CEO Male Gave joins us to talk about the

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 3>outlook for the early stage funding ecosystem. They're changing how

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 3>they do their accelerator program. Want to understand why that's

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 3>coming up next? This is Bloomberg Technology, all right, it

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 3>is a big week ahead for IPOs in the technology sector.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's kick it over to New York City where who

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 3>else Bloomberg Shnali Bassek has all the latest sale.

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 7>It certainly is a big week. We're going to zoom

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 7>in on Instacart because it's setting the stage for an

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 7>ib that could value it at up ten nine point

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 7>three billion dollars. But here's the thing that is less

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 7>than a quarter of what it was worth at the

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 7>height of the pandemic. Let's bring in Bloomberg's Katie Roof

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 7>to break it down, because Katie, we were looking at

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.719
<v Speaker 7>this Instacart ipo and it is not the only one

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 7>that might be facing a down round.

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 11>Sure, so, you know, Instacart was well aware that the

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 11>market conditions have affected its valuation. They had lowered their

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 11>own internal valuation, which is the four and nine A

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 11>valuation to thirteen billion last year due to market conditions

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 11>and possibly due to their own slowed growth. But you know,

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 11>some people are saying that bankers may be trying to

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 11>price these things conservatively in order it to ensure a

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 11>pop so that it's well received in the market and

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 11>therefore opens the window for additional IPOs well.

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 7>Another example of this would be, for example, klavy out,

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 7>which even with a valuation that's close search where it

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 7>was last in private rounds, it is still lower. But

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 7>they are bringing in some interesting massive names at the beginning, Blackrock, Alliance, Bernstein.

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 7>What does this say about the model to taking companies public?

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 6>Now?

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 11>And so I think at this point most people in

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 11>the tech industry are no longer in denial the market

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 11>has been in a correction for over a year now,

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 11>and so companies, you know, are aware, especially if they're

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 11>coming to market, that it's not going to look like

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty one. And so it looks like a lot

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 11>of them are accepting that. But you know, we'll see.

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 6>I mean with.

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 11>Klavo especially, they're so close to where their last valuation

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 11>was from last year that you know, they may end

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 11>up being a nine billion dollar company or more if

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 11>they do pop on that first day.

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 7>Now, when you think about instacart, Sequoia D one are

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 7>among the largest investors. Tiger Global Co Two two very

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 7>well known Tiger cubs that have been investing in these

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 7>ipo these hot pipo companies. How important is this instacart

0:30:57.960 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 7>listening to them?

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, they're going to make a lot of money regardless,

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 11>because these are firms that invested, especially Sequoia, you know,

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 11>when this was a you know, a very young company,

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 11>and so depending on what share price they got in

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 11>it's still going to be for most of them, it's

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 11>going to be you know, a lot lower than where

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 11>it's trading at. You know, some of the ones that

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 11>invested at thirty nine billion valuation or whatever. I mean,

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 11>they're going to lose money on those shares unless there's

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 11>a gigantic pop. But by overall, you know, I'd have

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 11>to do the math. But if you're investing when when

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 11>it's you know, a dollar share or less, you're going

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 11>to make a lot of money.

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg's Katie Roof all over it breaking a lot of

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 7>news in this market. Thank you to you for your time.

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 7>Ed back to you.

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my thanks to you, Bloomberg Shnali Bassek alongside Katie

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Roof there as Shnali said, that's one end of the

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 3>scale pre IPO with IPOs imminent, Let's go to the other.

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 3>In today's VC Spotlight, tech Stars, the largest preceed investor

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 3>in the world, is making some strategic changes to the

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 3>way it operates its accelerator programs, starting with a move

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 3>to a two term schedule. Let's get more details on

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 3>that from tech Star CEO Mal Gabe, who joins us now.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 3>We had Gary Tan on the program on Friday, Summer

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, class of Y Combinator came to a close

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and he was talking about what was different this time round.

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Very interested to hear from you that you are also

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 3>thinking a bit differently about the accelerated program. Explain what

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>you've done.

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, absolutely, First, thank you for having me on your

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 8>program as usual, that's the pleasure. So the big news

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 8>for us is that we're moving to a two term

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 8>model for our extra program starting in twenty twenty four.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 8>And what it means is that our extra programs will

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 8>now start together and end together twice a year. And

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.239
<v Speaker 8>so the first string term which we are about to

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 8>which we're about to open, we'll be running twenty two

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 8>programs in sixteen cities across five countries, and we will

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 8>also have a remote program, and a lot of this

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 8>program will be in partnership with a corporate entity like

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 8>JP Morgan or Audi and few more. So that's the

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 8>big change.

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 3>You and Iron stage together at startup Grind earlier in

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the year, and I asked you a question that elicited

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 3>such a response from the audience afterwards, which is how

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 3>do you find candidates? How do you go out and

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 3>find the right precede stage companies.

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 8>So we're lucky to be a very well known brand

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 8>and a lot of entrepreneurs around the world know that

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 8>they should come to us if they are interested in

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 8>getting a first check and We received thousands and thousands

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 8>of applications every month, and so we go through this application.

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 6>What is very specific to tech.

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.719
<v Speaker 8>Stars is that we have local teams in the different

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 8>countries that I mentioned before, and so we have the

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 8>opportunity to meet in person was the entrepreneurs on the ground,

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 8>whether it's New York, Seattle, San Francisco, but also Paris, London,

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 8>Tel Aviv.

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Mail you're joining us from the Middle East. I believe

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 3>you're in Saudi Arabia right now. We know all about

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 3>Saudi money in growth stage companies, but you are looking

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 3>at the very earliest stage of Saudi founders. What is

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 3>the landscape like that.

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 8>So it's still a very early, very young ecosystem. Part

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 8>of the reason why we've been active in the Middle

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 8>East for a little over five years running ACTU programs

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 8>and making investments in the region. We now have over

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 8>sixty investments in the region. Part of the reason why

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:49.240
<v Speaker 8>we're there is because we are usually building the deal

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 8>flow that then the VC industry invest in. And when

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 8>we came here, part of what we were asked to

0:34:56.200 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 8>do was to go and find entrepreneur, find people who

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 8>wanted to be entrepreneur, find women, who wanted to be

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 8>entrepreneur and help them get there, help them BEBC backable.

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 3>There has been a debate among venture catalysts on the

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 3>pros and cons of partnering with Saudi LPs or taking

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 3>money from Saudi LPs. Where does TEXT does sit on

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 3>that debate.

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 8>We are an a political organization. We basically we go

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 8>where we believe that we can help entrepreneurs. We have

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 8>deeply rooted into our culture and into our mission the

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 8>idea that talent and ideas are evenly distributed around the world,

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 8>but opportunities are not. And so whether it's the US, Canada,

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 8>Saudi Arabia or Japan, when we see an opportunity to

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 8>go and support founders on the ground, we go there.

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that Gary Town reflected on on

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Friday was the thirty five percent of the Summer twenty

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 3>three class was an AI focused startup, but by the

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 3>end more than fifty percent were looking into AI in

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.879
<v Speaker 3>some way. Is there any number you can give us

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 3>about where those sitting in your accelerator program are proportionately

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 3>A focused in AI?

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 8>The number are fairly similar. The challenge is always to

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 8>distinguish when AI is there the core business that you're

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 8>investing in versus an enabler of the core business. When

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 8>you look at our latest investments throughout twenty twenty three,

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 8>the vast majority of companies have leveraged AI in one

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 8>form or another, and about twenty percent of them twenty

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 8>thirty percent of them have AI as the core of

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 8>their business.

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 3>My colleagues Shnali and Katie Ruth were talking about everything

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 3>that's to come this week in the IPO market. I

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 3>know that you're investing at the other end of the scale,

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 3>but you've been through so many markets. I just wondered

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 3>if you give us your perspective on how much of

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 3>a starting gun this week is for tech IPOs in

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three.

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 8>This is an important week if anything, because the entire

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 8>techn ecosystem has been waiting for that week for a

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 8>very long time. There hasn't been really any significant IPO

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 8>in the last twelve months, and so everybody's watching what's

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 8>going to happen. Is there going to be a successful

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 8>instacart IPO which will give increased confidence to venture capitalists

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 8>and to venture backed firms to go and get ready,

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:41.919
<v Speaker 8>or is it going to be very very tuned down

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 8>and in that case, the companies are probably going to

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 8>wait a little longer to go public, So Big week and.

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 3>Find them out. You have access to just an astonishing

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 3>body of data, real time data about the health of

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 3>very small companies around the globe. Know how has the

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 3>preceed market held up? You know, over the volatility of

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 3>the last eighteen months or so, the.

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 8>Early stage founding ecosystem has pulled quite substantially, with obviously

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 8>the exception of artificial intelligence and climate tech. Having said that,

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 8>if you look at Precede, the valuation have remained fairly stable.

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 8>They continues to be a really great deal flow for

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 8>Preceed investors. Lots of innovation driven not just by AI

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 8>but also blockchain and nanotechnology and so all in all,

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 8>compared to growth stage company that really took the biggest

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 8>hits so far, the early stage Preceed type of type

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 8>of companies have been fairly protected.

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Tech starle CoML gave investing in thousands of early stage

0:38:52.040 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 3>companies across the world. Thank you for joining us. All right,

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 3>today's going viral. You know what we're talking about. The

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 3>US Open, Novak Djokovic and Coco goth taking home the

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 3>champion titles over the weekend, but about fifteen million customers

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:17.240
<v Speaker 3>of Spectrum cable TV were not able to watch as ESPN,

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:21.959
<v Speaker 3>ABC and their sibling TV channels showed blank screens amid

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:27.280
<v Speaker 3>a dispute a business dispute with Charter Communications. However, breaking

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 3>news this morning, a deal has been reached, ending the

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 3>blackout for millions of PayTV customers, hours before the first

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 3>broadcast of Monday Night football, making Bloomboat Technology producer Jackie

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Lopez a very happy Jets fan. Let's get the important details.

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 3>As Disney shares on the move, Bloombo's Chris pal Mary,

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 3>who leads our media coverage, joins us from LA, what

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 3>do we know?

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 12>Well, you can see the market reaction. Disney's up a little,

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 12>Charter's up a lot. It looks like Charter regard much

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 12>of would have wanted two big takeaways here, wanted to

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 12>include Disney streaming services in their basic cable packages and

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 12>no additional charge to customers. It looks like that's happening.

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 12>So for sixty dollars the sixty dollars a month package

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 12>of cable channels, you get Disney Plus with ads thrown in.

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 12>Their similar deal for the people who pay more for

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 12>ESPN Plus. Also, when they launch an online version of

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 12>the ESPN the Papa Channel if you will, which Iger

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 12>Bob Iger, CEO of Disney has said they would, that

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.879
<v Speaker 12>will be included in the cable bundle as well, So

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 12>big win there. Other big surprise here is that a

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 12>lot of these lesser channels are off the Charter system,

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 12>and some of them are pretty well known. FXX a

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 12>spin off of FX Disney Junior Disney XD free Form,

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 12>which used to be an AM ABC Family channel. Those

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 12>won't be available to Charter subscribers.

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 3>So you have to share. Reaction charts are up more markedly,

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 3>Disney up a percentage point. You get a knee jet

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 3>reaction in the Bloomberg Jackie Lopez index because she's excited.

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 3>But here's the bit in the story, I don't understand.

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 3>There's a more narrow lineup on Spectrum. So it's not

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 3>all good for Charter, right, No, what that means is

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 3>they traded.

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 12>Yes, subscribers to Charter won't get those channels anymore, but

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 12>they used to have to pay for those and the

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 12>game in cable TV for a long time. So let's

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 12>create these spinoff channels and you get more money from

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 12>the subscribers, you know, but you just don't have Disney Channel.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>You have Disney XD, Disney Junior.

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 12>And those marginal channels are going away because of the

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 12>cable bundle costs so much, and that strategy isn't working anymore.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 12>And to see all of those channels dropped by the

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 12>second largest cable provider is big news. It really signals

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 12>that those channels will probably see a lot more of

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 12>them fading away.

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Yep, yep, they're still getting that GEO. That's important. Blooms Chris,

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 3>Tom Mary, thank you very much. That does it for

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 3>this edition of Bloomberg Technology. You can recap the show

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 3>on our podcast where you get it if you get

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 3>your pod costs, Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and of course on

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 3>all of your Bloomberg platforms. From San Francisco. This is

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology.