WEBVTT - Tech Selloff and Affirm Earnings

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco and this

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. Stocks

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>plunge after FED chair J Paul warrens there is war

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pain to come for the economy, the NAZAC and the

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>SMP posting their biggest one day loss in two months.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get to read on how a hawk ish

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>FED will impact tech, venture capital and more. Plus what

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>does it mean for buy now, pay later? I'll ask

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a firm CEO max selection. With America's credit card debt

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>nearing highs not seen since the financial crisis and flying

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>taxis might not just be fodder for sci fi and more.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to show you a company with hopes to

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>get them in the air and soon like kind of soon.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Want to dig deeper into what this means for tech

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and investing and bringing Steve Sarah Sino, founder and general

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>partner at Active in Capital, a growth stage from that

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>focuses on commerce. So Steve, just what was your reaction

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to these comments from j Pal and how do you

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to impact markets more broadly. Yeah, well,

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to his comments, uh during his last speech,

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clear that they weren't going to move off

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>rate hikes anytime soon, even though there was a lot

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of wishful thinking on behalf of people like me other investors.

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a good desk reality that happened

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just as people are returning from vacation, getting kids back

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>into school. Investors are paying attention again. And I'm not

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>surprised by how much market was down. I think, look,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the four trajectory here doesn't look great. Um. And there's

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.279
<v Speaker 1>some interesting things when you look at the overall public

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>market versus private markets. You predicted there would be millions

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of layoffs in tech specifically the last time we spoke,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that was just a couple of months ago. What do

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you think now? I did so that was back in May.

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Also at at that time of restimation was the market

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>was going to pull back. I think the layoffs has

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>just begun. Um. It's happening across almost everyone's portfolio and

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>probably eating their companies. And what's interesting is even though

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the overall markets are down more than particularly on the

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>growth side, growth tech stocks are down much more than

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.679
<v Speaker 1>what we're hearing from the bigger consultants, meaning the allocators

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of capital to investors. The Q two numbers are gonna

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>come in down four to six percent. So what does

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that mean. That means that investors gps haven't taken their

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>medicine and there is going to be more pain in

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 1>our market. And that pain is in the form of layoffs.

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be the form of something like twenty

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>of all venture back companies going out of business. Of

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>venture back companies aren't going to survive this absolutely, like

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw this in two thousand, two thousand one, two

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand two. And what happens when the market pulls back,

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Investors start taking their time to invest, we're more patient

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with capital. LPs pulled back as well, and there's just

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>less capital go around. We're seeing it also less company creation.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>So the pace of company creation last year was much

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>faster than this year. And what you're gonna have to

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 1>do as an investors rationalize your companies um and every

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>investor is going through that right now. So hang on,

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are you saying you think this is gonna be as

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>bad as the dot com bust? I don't know. That's

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a question. I'm like, that's a question. I think this

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>could if this is a prolonged period. What what's really

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>painful for tech investors and growth investors generally is prolonged

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>market malay's prolonged volatility because it's a lot easier to

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>come in and invest behind and market that's a little

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more stable or market they were, you know, interest

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>rates or continue to go down when they're going up

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like this. This hasn't happened a long time, and I

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>think when the pace slows, you have to rationalize where

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you put your cap at all. So if this last

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>for two or three years, you could see more than

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of the company's about a business it will last for

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a year or two. The market rebound much faster. And again,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is tied into what Pal did today

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>with regards to inflation. Growth stocks are very very sensitive

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to interest rates, and interest rates at three per cents

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>one thing, it's going to five six percent is going

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to be another. And that's what we're waiting for because

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>we can invest in these valuations if rates are going

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>much higher. So are you estimating a one, two or

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a three year downturn? And how is that impacting your

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>investment strategy. Yeah, right now, we're expecting a two to

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>three year malays, so meaning our companies need to have

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>capital for at least two and a half to three years. Man, i'mum,

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>what is that like? What companies are We looking at?

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Two types? So one is these companies being created in

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this environment and this happened back in two thousand, Better

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>DNA very strong culture around protecting capital, and they're just

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>growing up in a different way. Those companies are rising

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>from the ashes of this mass. They're gonna be very strong.

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>We're very interested in the earlier stage. You also have

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>companies at the much leader stage, meaning they've got hundred

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of revenue. And what's happened is a

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the late station investors have actually pulled out

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of the market, and there's a lot of reasons for that,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but because they're not there, other investors now can step

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>in at reasonable valuation. So it's really a barbell. Some

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of these very large companies with proven business models, high

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>gross profit, they're going to do great. Um, two of

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>our companies, Saloonas and Triads just raised capital. And then

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>these earlier stage businesses that are coming out rising out

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>of the ashes are probably going to do really well.

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>They're going to prove their business model, they're going to

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>prove their unit economics, and that's when people like me

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>come in and put capital onto supercharged growth. So there

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>are opportunities, but there will be pain. Let's talk a

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about that pain. What does that mean

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>from a labor market perspective. I mean, there's been some

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>really interesting swings in the labor market. You know, you're

0:05:54.320 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>saying layoffs while we've got unemployment at historic lows. Yeah,

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the data is really hard to wrap our head around

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's not what we're seeing in the market generally.

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So I you know, I can't vouch for the government data,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but we will see layoffs in tech and there's some

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting things, um that are happening when you start laying

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>people off. You know, we're seeing salaries and just general

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation around the cost of hiring really good people starting

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to slow a little bit. This is typically what you

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>would see in a down market, but it's not being

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>reflected in the data. The interesting thing is our companies

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with B two B exposure are doing very well. Some

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of them have re accelerated growth. Our companies with more

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>B two C exposure. On the converse side are having

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a harder time, and this is more recent, and this

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>could be because inflation is really affecting people's pocketbooks. But

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>when you look at this, this is why this market

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is so difficult to parse, is that there are companies

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>performing really well, but right now we see more on

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the B two B side than the B two C side.

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Steve, thanks for giving it to a straight

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>activate founder and general partner, Steve Saraceno, We're gonna let

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you get on with your weekend, hopefully put some of

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this doom and gloom out of your head for a while.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.119
<v Speaker 1>A firm fat expectations in its latest earnings report, except

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>for a lower than expected forecast, siting macro economic uncertainty

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>ahead that sent shares tumbling. This as we heard from

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>FED chair, your own pal that taming inflation will likely

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>require restrictive monetary policy for some time. Let's talk about

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it all with the firm CEO and co founder, Max

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Option himself. Max, great to have you back with us.

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So listening to your call, you said, the economy is

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>more than likely in the beginning stage of a downturn.

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Now that we see and hear what j Pal has

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to say. The FED is going to stay hawkish. Do

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you think a recession is inevitable? You know, I'm no

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>macro economists, so I'm glad uh. You know Mr Powell

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is uh is in charge, not me. UM. I do

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>think that the need for by out pay leader goes up.

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Both in a case of recession, we go folks are

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to make sure that their cash flow is impacted

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a little as possible, and in the inflation, which is

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>where we are right now, the pocketbook is hit harder

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>because everything is a little bit more expensive, so we

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are seeing more demand for the product. But because of

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty in the macroeconomic events ahead, it seems very

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>pertinent to be very very focused on credit outcomes and

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that that's reflecting our guide. Can you give us some

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>color on what you're seeing in consumer spending habits. You know,

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously consumers are under pressure. Everything is more expensive, from

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>gas to groceries. How is that reflected in your data?

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's definitely the great rotation. We've talked about this before,

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>but the you know, sometimes it may a tremendous number

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of goods were replaced with services, and I think It

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>corresponds more than anything to this idea that we've all

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>been cooped up for a long time because of the pandemic.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>But over the fourth of July weekend, we saw unbelievable

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>growth in travel, um experiences, tickets, all the sort of

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>standard things that you would expect people sort of jump

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>back onto after COVID. They're all still doing really really well,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and the demand is very very strong. There's definitely real

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>weakness relative to last year and even the year before,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and things like homewears, um and uh, quite a lot

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of other things that just what we pre purchased during

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, if you will. Now our point of view

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is actually a little bit skewed because we're still growing

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>really really quickly. We saw, you know, over growth in

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>general merchandise, which is just the growth we're seeing within

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>our partners like Walmart and Target and Amazon. Folks are

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>buying commodities because that you know, that's something that you

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>buy all the time anyway, and so we're seeing short

0:09:59.920 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and growth within the merchants that we have. But I

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>think very broadly, e commerce grew only seven percent last year,

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>which is probably the lowest number in a very long

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>time for comparison, Affirm grew eleven fold that much, but

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in a better year would have growing an investor.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing credit Americans, credit at you know, has

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>not seen since the financial crisis. I'm wondering if the

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>economy is in a more difficult position and consumers are

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>under pressure, does that mean more business for by now

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>pay later and Affirm? But is that not good for

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy. You know, it's a careful balance. Um, it

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is definitely good for us so long as we're good

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at our job, which is managing risk and underwriting, and

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we are. We are very confident in our ability, and

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>our latest numbers proved that pretty decisively. So you know,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's we continue to deliver on that promise. Obviously,

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>over extending the consumer is a terrible idea. Nothing stays

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>more than looking at something you purchased and realizing that

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't pay off over time, and so we are

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>very careful not to extend credit where we think the

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer will not be able to carry the burden. Um.

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It does help that we don't charge late fees, we

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have compounding interest. All the things that we build

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in the product from the very beginning to fully align

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>ourselves with our end consumer help us be motivated to

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>make the right decisions, and so we feel good about

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>our position, our ability to help consumers. UM. I think

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>America will have to borrow more because the prices are

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>going up, and we're here to do our part, but

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>world also gonna have to be careful with how we

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>use credits. The delinquency rate rose more than two for

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the first time this year in July and August. Is

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that an alarming sign for you? I think it was

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>more like one percent about a year ago. And how

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>are you addressing that beyond beyond you know, changing or

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>tightening the criteria for underwriting a great question. UM. Credit

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>performance is generally very, very seasonal. So if you sort

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of look at the charts that we put in our

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>supplement as we file all of our filings, you'll see

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that it really is mimicking the patterns of annual performance.

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Going back to for example, twenty and twenty one, we're

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>just very, very weird years. On the one hand, there

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>was tons of buying. On the other hand, of the

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>government was literally handing out money to consumers. Delinquencies were

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>repressed artificially, if you will. The Guard rails we use

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>when you run our business is return on assets, which

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>is basically gargon for yield. What are investors are capital

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>partners get from the loans that we generate and absolute

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>adjusted charge offs or basically losses that we're willing to

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>take on. Obviously, our capital partners would worry if those

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.599
<v Speaker 1>losses ticked up more than various covenants and groups that

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we have. And if you look at all of our metrics,

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly the metrics I look at and the metrics that

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>we filed publicly, we have managed to both of those

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>guard rails exceedingly well. If you look at our for example,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>allowance for loss provision, and it's been taking down every

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>quarter for the last three So we are managing credit

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>better than we have given any much more benign credit climate.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Now what it actually means practically, the cool thing about

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a firm is because we're integrated so deeply into the

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Emergen ecosystem, we have a lot more interactive tools beyond

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just your basic We're so sorry your card has been declined.

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>That's an awful experience. Somebody wants to have that. In fact,

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>if you actually look at our approvals quoted on quarter,

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we added three points of incremental approvals across

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 1>the hire portfolio. Doesn't mean that everybody on average gets

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>three percent more likely to say yes. Is that we

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>figured out ways to say yes even when we think

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the consumer is seeking on too much risk for them.

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>For example, we can say, hey, we need to verify

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>your income because we think you're overburdening yourself. Now, if

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we're convinced that your income is different from what we

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>estimated it to be, it would be wonderful to extend

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the credit to you. Or for example, we can say, hey,

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>we think you should make it down payment on this

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>couch or on this bicycle, because once you do that,

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot easier for you to carry the burden

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of this particular So we've really been deploying a lot

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of those tools all across the last six nine months,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and we would see increased demand, increase approvals, and better

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>credit outcomes. You know, our firm shares obviously had a

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty big downward move today. There is a broader market

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>sell off. Your CFO said, you're approaching the next fiscal

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>year prudently. I mean, what's your reaction to the affirm

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>stack drop, the broader tech sell off and you know,

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the possibility weren't for this kind of volatility for the

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>foreseeable future. You know, I think, I think, and I

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to try. I definitely think of a

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>firm in measures of years and quarters is not a

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's an artificial marker that I think, Uh, we have

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>messed for ourselves. It is far better to worry about

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>how we'll do next year and the year after in

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a decade from now than what the stock price will

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>do for us tomorrow afternoon. Certainly, in a day like today,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we are a footnote to a footnotes to

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a broader sell up thanks to the Hawkers policy statements

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that we just heard. Um, that's it. You know, I've

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>never been more excited to show up to work as

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I am today. We have a ton of stuff to build.

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>We bragged a lot about really amazing engagement metrics and

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>debit plus the card that we've been working on for

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so long. You know, it's definitely and you know, my

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>heart goes out for our team. And obviously the investors

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that look at the stock price always want to see

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it go up. I would encourage them to look to

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the future. The product that we're building really makes a difference.

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>We see so much positive consumer sentiment. We know what

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we're doing managing credit. We've done really well and we'll

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to do so. Over time, the market will catch

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>up and the share price will do what it always does.

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I am very, very focused to leading the company to

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a long term, successful business of permanent value. So let's

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about the lot term. On the call, you talked

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>about the pursuit of growth, the possibility of buying up

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>other players, given you know that the you know, the

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>broader macro environment, some of these other players may be struggling.

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>We've seen some other players go through you know, other

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>BNPL players go through some pretty big layoffs. What are

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you looking at? What kind of companies are you looking at?

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And could we see you know, a big deal or

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>an acquisition spree um. Definitely nothing to report today. I

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that there's no no speculation in

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>embedded in my answers here. But you're totally right. The

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that the way I think about potential targets, and

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely looking quite actively now. We have shown to

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>be really really good at credit management, and obviously the

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>economic realities uncertain will continue. Having book hands and the

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>wheel will continue to need credits and approvals and all that,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but we know what we're doing. We we've shown this

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to ourselves and much more importantly frankly, to our credit

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>investors capital market partners. There are companies that have had

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>amazing ideas, They built great products, so the beginnings of

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>something really wonderful, but they're just not good at underwriting.

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And you get better at it with scale and time.

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>We've been at it for eleven years, with a lot

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of data, with a lot of experience. We know how

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>to manage it. It would be great to find some

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of these ideas and teams. Really, really, the most important

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>thing about any company is the people running it. And

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>when you find these teams and they're missing that credit

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>management muscle or actually capital markets which we've also built

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>up over the years, you know that those kind of

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions are fantastic because you know, you you love what

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>they've built and you want to make it go faster

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and get bigger, and so that that is what we're

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>looking for. The filter for me, I learned I didn't

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>invent this one. This was something one of my investors

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>told me. You know, is this acid better off owned

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>by a firm and if the answer is yes, you

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>should look. And if the answer is I'm not sure,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>stop looking now. So we apply that filter judiciously. All right,

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that little nugget of advice. Max Lapchin, co founder

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of from Great to have you back, Max

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is appreciate the time. Thank you. Some other stories we're watching,

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple facing a potential anti trust suit from the Department

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of Justice. Shares dropped after Political reported the lawyers are

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>in the early stages of drafting a complaint against Apple.

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>The DJ hopes to file it by the end of

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the year. California is the first government in the world

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to effectively ban gas powered car sales. By California Air

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Resources Board voted unanimously to adopt a plan that mandates

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>zero mission and hybrid plug in vehicle sales. The rule

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>will likely be adopted by fifteen other states currently signed

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on to California's existing zero mission vehicle program. And Mark

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg vented to Joe Rogan about the pains of content moderation.

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>The medicineo says it's simply quote sucks, but he's more

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>pleased with his company methodology then rival twitters. Here's what

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he had to say on the Joe Rogan experience. One

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>theme in my world view around this stuff, and when

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it gets to some of the stuff that we talked

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>about before, is like, I don't think that this stuff

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is black and white, or that you're ever going to

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have like a perfect AI system. UM. I think it's

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>all trade offs all the way down, because this whole

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that's like arbitrating what is okay and what is not.

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I obviously have to be involved in that because this

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is at some levels, you know, I run the company

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and um, and I can't just abdicate that. But but

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I also don't think that as a matter of governance,

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you want all of that decision making vested in one individual.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm emily changing san from Cisco.

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to the markets and the Texel off.

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in four Runner managing partner Ury

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Kim for more on this uh eerie. Obviously, there are

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>big questions about what a more hawk ish FED and

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>high interest rates means for venture capital. What's your reaction

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to what j Powell had to say? Well, I don't

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>know that anyone's really surprised, because we've all been we've

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>all been thinking about how things were going to pan

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>out with inflation and how to manage it. It's just

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>been a very volatile few years, a total roller coaster

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>from pre COVID, post COVID being a run up and

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>now a huge market corrections. So, you know, I think

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that never before of private markets then as connected to

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>public markets. Um, usually we'd say, hey, these companies are young,

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they've got time. We don't need to worry about what's

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>happening out there. I think ultimately investors see what's happening

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to private to public companies and they say, hey, if

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this is how the valuation is going to look, then

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I need to moderate my entry point and the valuation

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to pay right now because there might

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>not be a uh a top end of the market

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>when we go public. So I think there are a

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of open questions about that. And you know, today

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to price a deal. That's the that's

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the sort of freezing of the market, and everyone's trying

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what's happening in the market to see

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>if that means that they can start, you know, investing

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in a cautious way. Um, But what it does mean

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is that companies have to get back to unit economics,

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>good business fundamentals, um, and just realize if you want

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to build a business that's gonna last, it's gonna make sense,

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and the valuations will come and go as they do

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in the public markets. You know, we heard from an

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>investor earlier in the show, so you sirs, you know

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of Active in Capital. He had some pretty gloomy things

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to say. He said he thinks there's gonna be millions

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>of layoffs in tech and that they've only just begun,

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that potentially more than twenty of venture backed companies will fold,

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and that the downturn is going to last two to

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>three years. What do you think? Do you agree with that?

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty grim picture. I don't want to agree

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>with that. We have to we have to realize that

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a possibility for for sure. Um. What would I

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>say to that? I think that you know, it would

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be imprudent if companies today didn't take the opportunity to

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>right size their teams and to be thoughtful about if

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>markets stay volatile and funding and capital resources are limited

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>going forward, you just want to be able to have

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>optionality and maybe you don't need to grow to year

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>over year. Maybe you can grow a little bit slower,

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but continue to build a business that people can look

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>at and say, hey, there's a real company here. It

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>makes sense over time, it will continue to generate profitability.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Profitability was not something people were looking at for the

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>last handful of years, maybe even the last decade. So

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, will the recession happen and stick around longer?

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Who knows? I mean reading tea leaves. Maybe, but ultimately,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>great businesses are made in recessions as well. And it

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it just it creates constraints that the best companies continue

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to do well because they're the only game in town.

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And yes, that might mean that twenty percent of companies

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to go out of business, And candidly, maybe

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. You know, maybe in a bull market you

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>see too many businesses being funded that ultimately don't have

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the right economic structure to be real companies over time. Um. So,

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a glass half bull sort of person.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, you know, we're cautiously optimistic and we're just

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna do do our jobs, continue to do it through

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>uptimes and down times. Meantime, there are new rules from

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the NASDAK requiring listed companies to have more diverse wards

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that are being challenged and challenged in federal court starting

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>next week. I know you've been thinking a lot about this. Uh,

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do you make of the fact that

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a challenge to something that to others would seem

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>so obvious. You know, it's it's hard to see just

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>because I am a diverse board member, both female and Asian.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And the number of women who have um been appointed

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to boards Fortune five hundred boards of the last year

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>has actually, over the last three years has doubled. Um.

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>There was a stat that said women comprised of all

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the Fortune five hundred board appointments last year. That's amazing.

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, black directors were of new appointees that would

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>never have happened if all this light weren't shone down

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that there wasn't any diversity before. And

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>so when you have these mandates put out there, Yes

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it's challenging, Yes it's a quota, and and maybe that's

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>not the right way to manage the process, but what

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>it resulted in was real action and we were filling

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline with new people. Um. The record number of

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>appointees that were new appointees that had never been board members.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Was that that's the lynch fan because if you would

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have always had to have board experience to get another

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>board role, the look, not many of us have that

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>um and so what's that first moment that a woman

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 1>or a person of color can get that experience? Uh?

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>And and so I think that these sorts of rules

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>or at least guidelines does put pressure on boards to

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>prioritize diversity. And I think it's better for the company,

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's better for management to have a more variable viewpoint

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>around the table. And ultimately, you know, it may not

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be a law that we have to comply with, but

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly going to be something that shareholders, customers, employees,

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>leadership all want. And so whether there's a rule or not,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope to continue champion that it doesn't always work.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sometimes you know, you have needs and if

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a female or person of color who has

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that experience, I get it. But then how can we

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>fill the pipeline. How can we make sure to get

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>other ways of getting that experience into the hands of

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>people that are you know, important to have as a

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>voice around the table. Use me the point that a

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>very hot venture capital investing environment over the last year

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>meant a lot of people taking a lot of board

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>seats as these companies were raising new rounds and expanding

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>their boards. But that that also meant Um, I believe

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the term you used is shotgun weddings and that that

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't always been a good thing. Can you explain what

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you mean by that and how that's played out? Yeah,

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think in certainly, and there's been plenty of other

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>years in the last decade where there's a real exuberance

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in the investing market and the founders have a choice

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>of the people to get to work with. But a

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of times you end up picking the person who

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>bid the highest, and that's not always the best decision

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>because that person is gonna be an investor on your

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>cap table for a very long time, in fact, maybe

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>into verptuity and um. If they take a board seat,

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be on your board for a long time.

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talk around our table that says many

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of these investor board members stay on your board longer

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>than marriages last, and that's like seven or eight years.

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>So if you're not aligned with the vision and the

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>values and the communication and the partnership style of the

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>person that's investing in your company as a majority investor. UH.

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And then as such, joining the board, you are stuck

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>working with this person and dealing with this person for

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a really long time. And the job of a board

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>member it's a to do share responsibility to do what's

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in the best interest of shareholders. And that's not always

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be aligned with what the CEO wants to

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>do or feels like they want to do. UM. So

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the relationship is meant to have tension. There's an appropriate

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>push pull, but ultimately the board members have to stand

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>up for the shareholder value and UM and and that

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is just a voice that you definitely want to make

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>sure you're aligned with. I'd love to get your reaction

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to the big Solica Valley controversy over the last couple

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, which has been andreason horror it's writing its

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>biggest check ever to Adam Newman. UM. You know a

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>controversial founder. Uh, residential real estate idea. Some people, Uh,

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good thing. Some people don't like it.

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>What do you think. I don't know that I have

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>a say in that one. You know, really, when investors

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>have founders they've worked with before, they back them again.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there are a lot of things that

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>happen in companies that are not portrayed actually in market

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>or with press, and so nobody knows except for the

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>management team and the board, um, what happened. Uh. And

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>so if Andreason continues to have faith in Adam, that's great,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they should back them. It Really it shouldn't be that

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>if you have a company that you know goes under

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>or doesn't go as planned, that you can never work again.

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just the investor has to decide, I still trust you,

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I still believe in you as a founder, and I

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>want to back you again. And that's kind of the

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>end of it. So I don't know enough of what

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>happened in that company, like what really happened in that

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>company and ultimately what led to the ups and downs,

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and no one really does, so I don't, you know,

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 1>chop from the cheap seats over here. Um, But I

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>understand the intention of when you back somebody you've worked

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>with and you've been in the trenches with. So perhaps

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that is what is driving that investment decision. You're not

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the cheap seats you're but I appreciate you

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>taking a swing at that ere Kim flour runner managing

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>partner um and speaking from some very valuable real estates.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>If I could describe those seats myself, thank you. Okay. Meantime,

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the US and China are nearing a deal to avoid

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>mass delistings. The agreement would allow American auditors to go

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to Hong Kong to check the records of Chinese but

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>he's listed in New York. Bloombergs David Weston spoke with

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the architects of the deal, US Public Company

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Accounting Oversight Board Chair Erica Williams. Take a listen. So

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the agreement, as Chair Ginsler mentioned, is the most detailed

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and prescriptive that we've ever had with the Chinese, and

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it provides for us to have complete access to the

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>audit work papers in China with no loopholes and no exceptions.

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>There are three key provisions. First, the p c o

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>B and the p c o B alone has the

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>authority to select which firms and audit engagements we inspect

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and investigate. Second, there are procedures that allow us to

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>view the audit work papers completely with no redactions. And third,

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we have direct access to interview and to take testimony

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of any of the individuals who are involved in the

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>audits that the pco B chooses. How does this compare

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>with arrangements with other countries? They have public and traded

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>companies who are traded our exchanges, So we are able

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to access the audit work papers of more than fifty countries.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Every country where the p c o B has registered

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>entities we accept China, we've been able to have complete access.

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>This agreement allows us that complete access that we demand

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.719
<v Speaker 1>so that we can audit the auditors in China. And

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it is, though um more detailed and prescriptive than any

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>agreement we've ever had with the Chinese. Does it go

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>any farther than your arrangements of other countries or does

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it go any less far? And by the way, are

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there any special provisions with respect of sensitive data, because

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>as I understand the Chinese card was saying, we're worried

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>about national security. There are no special arrangements with China.

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We are not providing them anything that we don't provide

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>other regular regulators and entities around the world. So this

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is just an agreement that's very detailed, so that there

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>are no questions that the p c o B is

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to have full complete access as

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is required under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act that

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>can was passed and we are very hopeful UM that

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.479
<v Speaker 1>this first step in reaching the agreement will allow us

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>once we get our inspectors and investigators on the ground

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in China to have complete access as it's written in

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>paper UM in the agreement. Matter. Sure you just said

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the critical phrase their first step. I mean we all

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>know that's one thing to get an agreement. And by

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, congratulations, I know you've been working on it

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a long time, but then you have to actually get

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it implemented. What are the next steps in implementation? So

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I have instructed our inspectors and investigators to be able

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to be on the ground in China in mid September. UM.

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.239
<v Speaker 1>We are actually going to be conducting the inspections and

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>investigations in Hong Kong because the health and safety of

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>our staff is of critical importance. We are though going

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to be able to have full and complete access to

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese work papers UM in Hong Kong that we

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>need in order to conduct our inspections and investigations. How

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>big a job is this, I guess one of the

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>things I'm asking is how many people are gonna have

0:32:58.400 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to send over there? And how long is it going

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to take them? So inspections and investigations, David, they take

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.239
<v Speaker 1>as long as they take. UM, I can't predict that.

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we have a team of talented, dedicated pc

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>O B staff that are ready in their bags, are

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>packed and ready to go. UM. And whether or not

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we are able to complete the inspections and investigations really

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>will determine be determined on whether or not the Chinese

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>provide us with complete access as is required under the

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>agreement that we signed today. All right, Erica Williams, their

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>US public company Accounting Oversight board chair. I don't necessarily

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>think move to proof of stake is a great thing

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for Ethereum in the short run. I mean, essentially, Bitcoin

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and ether are the only proof of work networks still alive,

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't seen any issue on the other proof

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of steak networks. We think that Ethereum very well could

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>get back to a thousand or even lower if the

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>merge doesn't go well. If the merge goes well, basically

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that's going to allow the concept of staking happen and

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>in individuals institutions can earn eight nine and I think

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>proof of steak will be just fine on rooting as

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>an operator for Ethereum Merge to be smooth and to

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>happen in September fifte very well. Ethereum has been promising

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>proof of steak since basically they started wake me up

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>when the transition happens. Time now for a crypto report,

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And just heard from some of our of our guests

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>there and what they think of the upcoming Ethereum merge,

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>both bowls and bears alike. Let's talk about this more

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>now with our own David Pan who has been covering

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the merge. So, David a lot of writing on this,

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:56.959
<v Speaker 1>and a lot depends on whether it happens smoothly or not. Right, So,

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I was seeing a lot of discussion around the whether

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the margin will be successful. We have been seeing growing

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>concern among some of the investors saying, yeah, you know,

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like the there there will be more awareness of the

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>potential security risks um during and after the merge. Uh

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>They Basically one argument from the investors is that the

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>merge basically has been simulated uh in on a serious

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 1>test nets but not in the real environment, so nobody

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>knows what really happened during the merge and after the merge.

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Another reason is that you know, hackers are not incentivized

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the initiative attack against the network um UM during the

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>merge on the test nets UM, so you know, like

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a really it is a really really big

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>question mark UM around the merging and whether it's going

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>to be successful or not. Theory recently raised bug bounties basically,

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it, paying people to find flaws in

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the system. How much will that help UM that would

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>have only help you know, A has been increased from

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty thousand dollars to one million dollars.

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>That kind of reflects the growing concern over the security

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>risks potentially UM. But UM in terms of UM whether

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that will actually be effective in preventing any potential attacks

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and we we don't know because we have seen UM

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:27.720
<v Speaker 1>attacks that have cost the investors losing billions of dollars,

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So UM who knows, you know, what will happen after

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the emerge and like we would certainly see a more

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable state of the network during and after the emerge,

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and UM UH that will be. Everybody is actually expecting

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to see, you know, how this would unfold, and some

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of them are saying it's going to be successful, but

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>successful by some of the others who are more skeptical

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of the transition. They're saying, you know, um, the risks,

0:36:55.440 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>risks are are bigger and bigger over time, you know,

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>as we get closer to the merch. Al right, lots

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to continue to watch as we get towards mid September. Bloomberg,

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>David Pan, thank you. Well, it might sound like the

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff of sci fi, but the reality of flying taxis

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe closer than you think. Bloomberg's on a Rug Kataki explains,

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if you had the option of skipping traffic while coming

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>from point A to B, will you take it? What

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't the sky? Electric flying taxis are a

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>lot closer to reality than what we think. But the

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>big question is how will people perceived this flying objects?

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>And that is why Volo Poplar is showcasing its aircraft

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>here in Singapore. The Vola City is a fully electric

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>aircraft which is designed for the inner city mission. It's

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>caters for the highest safety, for low noise and for

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a fully electric flight. One big obstacle is that not

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a single electric flying taxi has regulatory approvals in place.

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Companies like Bullock Opter do believe that they will get

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it pretty soon enough, just in time for the four

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Paris Olympics, but regulators will take their time to ensure

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>these flying vehicles are actually safe enough. We have eighteen

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>fully electric motors, and if we lose one or two motors,

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>or if they're not working, we can still safely perform

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 1>our mission. Airlines have an ambitious target of turning carbon

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>neutral by twenty fifty, while electric flying taxis are not

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>expected to replace Airbus eight twenties or boiling seventy sevens

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the near term. This is definitely a forest step

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in that direction. We're sitting inside the Velocity and as

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you can see, it's very comfortable. You have a lot

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of leg space which you nobody don't have at the

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>conventional helicopter. Well, you also can see it's a two

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>seater and this is the autonomous version. In the starting

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>configuration we will have a pilot sitting here and the passenger,

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and in the autonomy version you don't need that anymore.

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.720
<v Speaker 1>The big question is how much artist things going to cost.

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Bono Coopter says it will be forty percent cheaper than

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>helicopters could begin which and eventually it will be at

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>par which premium taxis That means anybody who can afford

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a taxi can afford a flying taxi. This is how

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we move. I'm on aratogy for more stories like this,

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>please follow us on your favorite platforms. And finally, a

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar action may be coming from one of Silicon

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Valley's most prolific art collectors. Around one fifty artworks from

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the collection of the late Microsoft co founder Paul Allen

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>are set to be auctioned at Christie's in New York

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this fall. Christie and Allen's estate expect to bring in

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>more than a billion dollars. Christie says all proceeds will

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.240
<v Speaker 1>go to philanthropy, and that does it. For the sedition

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology Monday, we're gonna hear from the CEO

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of Cube, Christina Ross, about the challenges for startups when

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it comes to funding in a downturn. And don't forget

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to check out our podcast wherever you get your podcast.

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco. Have a wonderful weekend, everyone.

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg,