Speaker 1: History was just made. Now. If you were paying attention,
Speaker 1: you saw two of the three presidential candidates making a huge,
Speaker 1: historic announcement about the future of bitcoin and the United
Speaker 1: States government. And as the historic news was making headlines
Speaker 1: across the world, Kamala Harris, the third one, appeared to
Speaker 1: want to jump in with her support. But secret moves
Speaker 1: just done reveal that the Biden Harris administration is actually
Speaker 1: trying to sabotage the announcement, and even worse, preemptive moves
Speaker 1: being done are subverting the will of the people. In
Speaker 1: this video, I'm gonna break down the big news announcements
Speaker 1: that could change the world a historical parallel from about
Speaker 1: eighty years ago to see how this could change things.
Speaker 1: We're gonna look at the math behind what was proposed
Speaker 1: and what it could mean. We're gonna look at the
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris campaign seemingly abrupt about face, and then the
Speaker 1: secret rug poll showing the administrative's true colors. Now there's
Speaker 1: a lot here, right and as this race heats up.
Speaker 1: If you care about the future, then you need to
Speaker 1: see what's really going on now real quick. If you
Speaker 1: do the channel. My name is Mark and I've been
Speaker 1: making educational content about bitcoin, macroeconomics, and freedom for I
Speaker 1: don't know about seven years now. I've coached thousands of
Speaker 1: investors on navigating these markets, and I'm a partner in
Speaker 1: a bitcoin hedge fund. I was speaking at the Bitcoin
Speaker 1: conference this year, witnessing live the announcements we're going to cover.
Speaker 1: In fact, I spoke on the main stage about two
Speaker 1: hours before Trump, so I was able to get a
Speaker 1: lot of behind the scenes insider information that I'm going
Speaker 1: to share with you right now. So let's jump right in,
Speaker 1: all right, jumping right in. We are talking about what
Speaker 1: I'm calling the largest, most culturally important event happening in
Speaker 1: the world right now. Now, quantitatively, we had about twenty
Speaker 1: five maybe thirty thousand people. It's about the biggest event
Speaker 1: in the world. Now. Of course there's bigger other types
Speaker 1: of events, but not conferences. But more importantly, I call
Speaker 1: it the most largest culturally important event. And the reason
Speaker 1: why I say culturally important is because it reached across
Speaker 1: every area of life. We had the tops from each industry,
Speaker 1: the top people from Walsham, the top people from fintech.
Speaker 1: We had two of the three current presidential candidates for
Speaker 1: the United States the leader of the free world, probably
Speaker 1: the most important person in the world. We had a
Speaker 1: dozen plus senators and congressman. We had top entertainers that
Speaker 1: were there. I mean, Kid Rock showed up. We had
Speaker 1: Russell Brand there, Dave Smith, the comic, we had entertainers,
Speaker 1: you name it. Across the cultural mainstream. It was there.
Speaker 1: I mean President Trump, I mean it's a pretty big deal, right,
Speaker 1: and so this was a big deal. There was a
Speaker 1: lot of announcements coming out of it. Let's just kind
Speaker 1: of break this down. So the big news that, of course,
Speaker 1: I'm sure you're already knowing what we're talking about, is
Speaker 1: the announcement by two of the three presidential candidates, RFK
Speaker 1: Junior and Trump and what they had to say about bitcoin. Now,
Speaker 1: Bitcoin's come a long way, and if you're one of
Speaker 1: those people who still think it's like this magic Internet money,
Speaker 1: you might want to pay attention. We literally have a
Speaker 1: presidential race being run on this platform. We have Larry Fink,
Speaker 1: head of Blackrock, the largest asset manager world, on CNBC
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago saying that he was wrong,
Speaker 1: he changed his mind, he did the work. He thinks
Speaker 1: bitcoin is a legit asset that everyone should own. So
Speaker 1: if you don't believe Larry Fink and you don't believe
Speaker 1: Trump and RFK, you still think it's the magic interner money,
Speaker 1: well you're falling behind. But I'd still probably advise you
Speaker 1: to watch the rest of this because when you see
Speaker 1: what Kamala is doing, it might change your mind. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's talk about some of the announcements that we had.
Speaker 1: So the first up was RFK Junior, and he spoke
Speaker 1: on Friday. He went first before Trump and before other announcements,
Speaker 1: so he kind of got the first mover advantage and
Speaker 1: he vowed some really big things. He gave a great speech.
Speaker 1: We're going to link to it in the show notes
Speaker 1: down below. If you want to go watch his full speech,
Speaker 1: it's definitely worth it. He had some really good scriptwriters
Speaker 1: and he stuck to the script. I'll tell you why
Speaker 1: that's important a minute. But basically, in his talk and
Speaker 1: his speech, he vowed to make biitcoin a strategic reserve
Speaker 1: assets has been talked about quite a bit. Now what
Speaker 1: does that mean strategic reserve? Well, you hear me talk
Speaker 1: about oil for example, So we have the strategic Petroleum Reserves,
Speaker 1: the SPRS. That's what Biden was draining they're pretty much empty,
Speaker 1: not not much reserves left. He drained those to keep
Speaker 1: gas prices down that he caused through inflation. But the
Speaker 1: bitcoin strategic reserve would be like an oil strategy reserve,
Speaker 1: or it would be like the gold that we have
Speaker 1: in Fort Knox that backs up the US government. And
Speaker 1: he wants to make bitcoin a strategic reserve asset, and
Speaker 1: he calls it corruptions greatest foe. So the thing that
Speaker 1: I really enjoyed about rfk's talk is that. And actually,
Speaker 1: if I go back to some things Trump said, and
Speaker 1: even going back to some of the things that even
Speaker 1: Larry Finger from Black Croc said, they are not just
Speaker 1: giving it lip service in this they're explaining why, what
Speaker 1: are the mechanisms that drive supply and demand. You can
Speaker 1: tell that there's a real understanding about this. And so,
Speaker 1: for example, it's corruption's greatest foe. Corruption because the governments
Speaker 1: of the world, the Federal Reserve and all the governments
Speaker 1: of the world print an endless amount of money. That
Speaker 1: endless amount of money goes into forever wars. Those forever
Speaker 1: wars then become a honeypot or eruption. All that money
Speaker 1: goes to buy mansions for all these billionaires that are
Speaker 1: feeding off of this like industrial military complex for example.
Speaker 1: That's one example of many. If elected, Kennedy intends to
Speaker 1: direct the Treasury, the United States Treasury, to purchase five
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty bitcoin every single day, five hundred fifty
Speaker 1: bitcoin daily until the USM masses a reserve of four
Speaker 1: million bitcoin. It's a pretty big number, five hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty a day until we get four hundred million. Now
Speaker 1: why do those numbers make sense. I'm going to come
Speaker 1: back to the five hundred and fifty million in a minute.
Speaker 1: But for the four million bitcoin, it's not just a
Speaker 1: random number. RFK Junior wants to get the bitcoin reserve
Speaker 1: to be about equal as the gold reserve. He sees
Speaker 1: them as maybe equally important. I think he sees that
Speaker 1: bitcoin is the future, the bigger ascid have, and so
Speaker 1: he thinks that we should get bitcoin the reserves up
Speaker 1: to at least where we have the gold reserves. That's
Speaker 1: where that number comes in, the five hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: bitcoin per day, that's a that's bigger thing. We're going
Speaker 1: to get to the math of this in a minute
Speaker 1: and let you know what I think about that. A
Speaker 1: couple other key points of rfk's talk that I thought
Speaker 1: were really good was he emphasized bitcoin's role in protecting
Speaker 1: individual freedom. And so I worked on the news desk
Speaker 1: at the event during rfk's talk, and I was saying,
Speaker 1: it's not really that bitcoin is on the ballot with
Speaker 1: RFK and Trump and not Kamala. It's not that bitcoin
Speaker 1: is on the ballot. What's really on the ballot is freedom,
Speaker 1: individual freedom. Like, as people, we should be free to
Speaker 1: save our money and whatever we want to save it,
Speaker 1: and we should be free to transact and willever we
Speaker 1: want to transact it. In so it's not about bitcoin,
Speaker 1: it's about preserving the individual's right to have freedom of choice.
Speaker 1: And that's what he says right here he recounted out
Speaker 1: the Canadian Trucker's protest. The freason of the financial assets
Speaker 1: influenced his advocate. So when he saw what happened with
Speaker 1: the Canadian Trucker's protest, how a peaceful, law abiding protest
Speaker 1: was demonized by the Trudeau government and literally in accounts
Speaker 1: got frozen for even donating like on GoFundMe for example,
Speaker 1: that's what woke them up. Bitcoin made him realize the
Speaker 1: importance of financial freedom. That's something I say all the time.
Speaker 1: Without the freedom to transact, there is no freedom at all.
Speaker 1: So even though in the United States our Constitution guarantees
Speaker 1: as freedom such as the freedom to assemble, if I
Speaker 1: can't transact as in put gas in my truck to
Speaker 1: drive to the assembly, or get food when I get there,
Speaker 1: or a hotel room. Without the freedom to transact, I can't
Speaker 1: go exercise my right to assemble. We can go down
Speaker 1: the list, you understand, he said, quote I realized that
Speaker 1: transactional freedom, the freedom to transact, wasn't important, was as
Speaker 1: important as freedom of expression, because if he can't transact,
Speaker 1: he can't really express, he said in the first Amendment.
Speaker 1: He also stressed bitcoin's potential to protect personal freedoms, promote accountability,
Speaker 1: and combat government corruption. Back to corruption's biggest foe. Because
Speaker 1: of accountability, the government has so much corruption because there's
Speaker 1: no accountability. The FED won't go through an audit, the
Speaker 1: military campas through an audit, the IRS can't get their
Speaker 1: book straight. And so because there's no accountability, then it
Speaker 1: breeds corruption. Bitcoin, he says, quote is anti war. It's
Speaker 1: anti war. Sounds like a pretty good thing. To me,
Speaker 1: I'm not for forever wars. I'm certainly not for nuclear
Speaker 1: threats coming out of Russia and Ukraine in that situation,
Speaker 1: potentially the Middle East as well. He said it's an
Speaker 1: insurmountable foe of government coruption. We talked about that. Now
Speaker 1: he talks about backing the US debt with hard assets.
Speaker 1: So the gold, the gold is a hard asset that
Speaker 1: is backing assets. He wants it to include, as he says,
Speaker 1: bitcoin to stabilize the dollar and control inflation. The strategy
Speaker 1: and proposing leverages the scarcity and liquidity of bitcoin along
Speaker 1: with gold and other hard assets. So we already have gold,
Speaker 1: fordamn oil, and he just wants to add bitcoin. When
Speaker 1: you think about it in that terms, it doesn't seem
Speaker 1: that far fetched. Now. After Trump, or after RFK went up,
Speaker 1: then the next day was Trump. As I said, I
Speaker 1: was speed on the main stage a little bit before Trump,
Speaker 1: hoping to stay backstage and get a glimpse of him.
Speaker 1: Sad to say that didn't work out. The security was
Speaker 1: crazy tight at the event, Secret Surity, secret Service was
Speaker 1: all over the place and they cleared everybody out. I
Speaker 1: couldn't hang out back there. However, Trump went up, and
Speaker 1: a lot of people, including myself, thought that Trump would
Speaker 1: have to sort of one up RFK, he'd have to
Speaker 1: go even bigger. RFK said we want to get four
Speaker 1: million bitcoin. Trump's gonna have to say, well, we need
Speaker 1: five million bitcoin. But that really wasn't the case. And
Speaker 1: to be honest with you, I wasn't super impressed with
Speaker 1: Trump's presentation, partly because it seemed like he just showed
Speaker 1: up and gave like a campaign rally speech as opposed
Speaker 1: to like a talk specifically to the bitcoin crowd. Now,
Speaker 1: just for reference, the reason why both RFK and Trump
Speaker 1: both feel like they need to address the bitcoin crowd
Speaker 1: specifically is because of the size. We'll come back to
Speaker 1: the size the donations. We're gonna look at that in
Speaker 1: a minute. So based off of the size and the
Speaker 1: need and the importance of coming to talk to them,
Speaker 1: and you think he would have prepared a little bit better.
Speaker 1: Maybe he should have had someone write a speech and
Speaker 1: read the speech, but it seemed like he was just
Speaker 1: ad libbying the whole time. I'm going to link to
Speaker 1: Trump's talk down below. It's still worth a watch. It's
Speaker 1: actually kind of funny. But he did say some really
Speaker 1: good points. If you were to basically take his whole
Speaker 1: talk and edit it down to just a few minutes,
Speaker 1: it was really good. It was all the fluff in
Speaker 1: between this sort of got you distracted. But here's a
Speaker 1: couple of things. He also wants to create a strategic
Speaker 1: national Bitcoin stockpile reserve. So Trump and RFK are both
Speaker 1: on board with this. He wants to direct the US
Speaker 1: Treasury to build a reserve of bitcoin with the DOJ's
Speaker 1: current holdings. Now this is the key piece. So currently
Speaker 1: the US government is one of the largest holders of
Speaker 1: bitcoin in the world. I think about two hundred and
Speaker 1: four thousand or two hundred and ten thousand bitcoin, about
Speaker 1: one percent of all the bitcoin in the world the
Speaker 1: US government has. And what RFK and Trump both want
Speaker 1: to do is say, hey, the bitcoin that's being held
Speaker 1: currently by the Department of Justice because they've seized it
Speaker 1: from you illicted things. They want to take the bitcoin
Speaker 1: that the DOJ has and transfer it over to the Treasury.
Speaker 1: So if either one of them wins come November, they
Speaker 1: say that'll be day number one, they're going to do that.
Speaker 1: So they want to add to the stockpile. They want
Speaker 1: to direct the Treasury to build a reserve, and they
Speaker 1: want to take the dog's current holdings as its core.
Speaker 1: All right, so take the two hundred and ten thousand
Speaker 1: put into the US government's book permanently. They want to
Speaker 1: end an anti bitcoin policy. So the Biden administration, the
Speaker 1: Biden regime has literally been running literally like on an
Speaker 1: anti crypto campaign. That's what Elizabeth Warren calls it. Not
Speaker 1: mincing words here, she's been doing that. And then of
Speaker 1: course the actions speak louder than words. And he said
Speaker 1: he will fire Gary Gensler, head of the SEC that's
Speaker 1: been extremely aggressive against this technology, said to fire him
Speaker 1: on day one. The crowd had massive applause for that.
Speaker 1: He said he wants to end operation Operation Choke point
Speaker 1: two point zero. Choke point two point zero. I've talked
Speaker 1: about it quite a bit, and it's where basically the
Speaker 1: banks are choking out legal businesses because it's not fitting
Speaker 1: the Biden regime's ideology. So for example, bank accounts getting
Speaker 1: shut down because you want to transfer money to a
Speaker 1: to exchange, for example, businesses that are in the bitcoin space.
Speaker 1: For example, my fund, I have a hedge fund and
Speaker 1: it has it's called the Bitcoin Opportunity fund, and because
Speaker 1: it has the word bitcoin in it. As we were
Speaker 1: bringing an investment capital, people were having trouble getting money
Speaker 1: wired into our fund because it had that word of
Speaker 1: the name. That's an example of a choke point two
Speaker 1: point zero. And Trump said he wants to embrace stable
Speaker 1: coins for US dollar dominance. Now, for the bitcoiners, that
Speaker 1: wasn't a real big point. They didn't like the stable coins. However,
Speaker 1: I've been pretty open about it. I think the stable
Speaker 1: coins are sort of this interim step. They're very complementary
Speaker 1: to bitcoin right now, and we're seeing stable coins sort
Speaker 1: of proliferate around the world in other countries Argentina and Venezuela, Peru, Lebanon, Turkey,
Speaker 1: where their currencies are just completely collapsing. Moving to a
Speaker 1: US dollar stable coins pretty easy for them. It worked
Speaker 1: very well because they can't get physical dollars. And then
Speaker 1: he said he wants to end the development of a
Speaker 1: CBDC and block all future attempts. He said, as long
Speaker 1: as I'm president, there will be no CBDC in the
Speaker 1: United States. So again, if you take Trump's talk and
Speaker 1: you can press it down, a lot of good things.
Speaker 1: Now they both basically said the same thing, create a
Speaker 1: Bitcoin strategic reserve, and to move the two hundred and
Speaker 1: whatever four or ten thousand bitcoin, about one percent of
Speaker 1: the supply over into the US government's reserves. Okay, so
Speaker 1: that's what they're both talking about. I want to read
Speaker 1: her at therese points because we're going to come back
Speaker 1: to that. Now. After Trump, we had Senator Cynthia Lummas.
Speaker 1: Now Canthia Lummis is from Wyoming and she is a
Speaker 1: big proponent of bitwoin. She's been putting all types of
Speaker 1: bills forward. And Trump kind of was talking off the
Speaker 1: cuff like he does. Senator Lummas was very strategic and
Speaker 1: very detailed on what she wanted to do, and so
Speaker 1: she laid out a perfect bill. Now, regardless of RFK
Speaker 1: or Trump win, even if it ends up being Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris campaign or presidency, we have senators like Senator Lummis
Speaker 1: who is still putting these bills forward. So even if
Speaker 1: both of those presidents lose, well, we still have people
Speaker 1: in the government putting bills like this forward. The United
Speaker 1: States currently maintains strategic reserves in certain hard assets again oil, gold,
Speaker 1: critical to American national security, and she wants the US
Speaker 1: government to hold onto the bitcoin for twenty years. So
Speaker 1: she wants them to take the bitcoming have put it
Speaker 1: into the restatetic serves and hold it for a period
Speaker 1: of twenty years, establish a decentralized network of secure bitcoin
Speaker 1: vaults operated by the United States Department of Treasury. So
Speaker 1: they want to direct the Treasury to actually hold the
Speaker 1: bitcoin through decentralized vaults, implement a one million, much bigger
Speaker 1: one million unit bitcoin purchase program over a period of time.
Speaker 1: She wants to take five percent of the total bitcoin supply,
Speaker 1: mirroring the size and the scope of gold reserves, which
Speaker 1: puts it up to back to that million. One million
Speaker 1: is about five percent of the supply, and as she said,
Speaker 1: keep it on scope with the gold reserves paid for
Speaker 1: by diversifying existing funds within the federal reserve system. And finally,
Speaker 1: a firm self c the rights of private bitcoin holders.
Speaker 1: So some of the things we're seeing coming out of
Speaker 1: the Biden now Biden Harris regime, especially led by Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren on anti crypto is they're attacking the right to
Speaker 1: self custody, meaning they don't want you to own your
Speaker 1: own bitcoin. The reason why is of course, own nothing
Speaker 1: to be happy literally, in a debt based monetary system
Speaker 1: that we live in, you literally aren't allowed to own anything.
Speaker 1: So those stocks that you think you own, you know, Apple, Google, Testla, etc.
Speaker 1: You don't actually own those legally, they're owed to you.
Speaker 1: The money in your bank, it's not your money, not legally,
Speaker 1: it's owed to you. Your house, you basically rent the
Speaker 1: land by paying every single month to the property tax assessor.
Speaker 1: Don't pay that, you get kicked out like any other
Speaker 1: tenant would. And so we don't own anything. And the
Speaker 1: last thing that we can own right now is bitcoin,
Speaker 1: and they don't even want us to own that. Okay,
Speaker 1: Now all three of those Lummus, Trump, and RFK all
Speaker 1: are sort of proposing about the same thing. Now, why
Speaker 1: is this historical? Well, as I talk about quite often
Speaker 1: about every eighty years we have a financial revolution. You
Speaker 1: might have seen me use this chart many times before,
Speaker 1: and so this sort of charts out these eighty years.
Speaker 1: We're witnessing one right here. About eighty years ago we
Speaker 1: had one another eighty years so here was nineteen forty four,
Speaker 1: the Breton Woods Agreement. Here eighteen seventy three, the Panic
Speaker 1: of eighteen seventy three, Panic of seventeen ninety six, which
Speaker 1: was at the same time as the American Revolution. So
Speaker 1: about every eighty years we have this, and last eighty
Speaker 1: years ago was the Breton Woods Agreement. Now, of course
Speaker 1: that was historical where it changed the entire monetary system
Speaker 1: of the entire world. Literally, the whole world got together
Speaker 1: at Bretton Woods and agreed that the dollar would be
Speaker 1: backed by gold and all the currencies of the world
Speaker 1: would be pegged to the US dollar. And that changed
Speaker 1: the system. It put the US at the very center
Speaker 1: of the entire global monetary system, created the US dollar
Speaker 1: homogeny that we know today. Now what's interesting about this
Speaker 1: is again eighty years later, we're having another financial revolution.
Speaker 1: Now what's interesting about this is that bitcoin grew from
Speaker 1: the bottom up, all right, So basically it started with
Speaker 1: individual people, started with shadowy coders, and it started moving
Speaker 1: up into more mainstream to obviously the point that we
Speaker 1: have today in Nashville is happening right now. But it
Speaker 1: started from the bottom up. And as it went from
Speaker 1: the bottom up, from people, not from governments, but from
Speaker 1: people up. Finally it got to the government level. We
Speaker 1: had El Salvador was the first country to adopt bitcoin
Speaker 1: as its reserve standard. Now bitcoin is also at the
Speaker 1: bottom of the country stockbau right, it's one of the
Speaker 1: smallest countries in the world, poorest countries in the world.
Speaker 1: So it was the first two adopt it. So we
Speaker 1: had a people movement from the bottom up, and then
Speaker 1: El Salvador was a government from the bottom up. Now
Speaker 1: the president of El Salvador, President Buchayley, has been talking
Speaker 1: with lots of other government leaders, but other small governments,
Speaker 1: you know UAE or other small countries like that. Now
Speaker 1: what's interesting though, is it's been bottom up. However, I
Speaker 1: always thought that the US would be the last to
Speaker 1: move because of the dollar. They're the ones that have
Speaker 1: everything to lose. It's the currency of king currency. However,
Speaker 1: so if the United States moves, then every other nation
Speaker 1: is going to move, Now would they? Well, let's just
Speaker 1: see Donald Trump is favored to win sixty five percent
Speaker 1: chance and I believe he'll do what he says. That
Speaker 1: means there's about a sixty five percent chance this happens
Speaker 1: now real quickly. While I was in the Bitcoin conference,
Speaker 1: we had a lot of discussions, so we saw how
Speaker 1: this industry is literally changing right before our eyes. With
Speaker 1: big money coming in and specifically trying to move into
Speaker 1: more public plays around the bitcoin crypto space. There is
Speaker 1: big money be made. As a matter of fact, I
Speaker 1: think if you want to double, triple, even five extra
Speaker 1: net worth over the next couple of years, you are
Speaker 1: going to have your chance. As we moved through the
Speaker 1: second phase of this, I'm going to break all this
Speaker 1: down with all the data I got at the conference
Speaker 1: and you can come join me live next week. There's
Speaker 1: a link down below. I'm going to show you all
Speaker 1: the charts, aull. The graphs show you how the money's
Speaker 1: moving and how you can just play along with this
Speaker 1: to dorouble, triple, quadruple, whatever over the next couple of years.
Speaker 1: So check it out. Join me free, it's live, come
Speaker 1: hang out. All right. So anyway, moving along, So let's
Speaker 1: look at the math of this. Okay, So if we
Speaker 1: look at the math, what we can see is again
Speaker 1: they've proposed five hundred and fifty bitcoin per day. Now,
Speaker 1: what's interesting about this is the bitcoin supply. Every day
Speaker 1: we have bitcoin that's released, and what happens is over time,
Speaker 1: every four years, the supply of bitcoin being released gets
Speaker 1: cut in half. All right. That's known as the having cycle.
Speaker 1: We just had that a few months ago. Currently, right now,
Speaker 1: there's about four hundred and fifty bitcoin per day being created.
Speaker 1: That's what we call the inflation rate, right the flow
Speaker 1: the stock the existing supply to the flow the new
Speaker 1: incoming inflation rate. So four hundred and fifty they want
Speaker 1: to buy five hundred and fifty, which is more than
Speaker 1: the new supply being created now. In four years, or
Speaker 1: about three and a half years from now, this will
Speaker 1: get cut in half and it will be more like
Speaker 1: two hundred and twenty five, but they want to still
Speaker 1: continue buying five hundred and fifty per day. Now, this
Speaker 1: doesn't include all the other bitcoin that the ETFs are buying.
Speaker 1: The ETFs are buying about that same amount individuals like
Speaker 1: you and I that buy every single week on our
Speaker 1: paychecks or whatever, and of course the stampede of other
Speaker 1: governments that will move in to start buying as well. Now,
Speaker 1: price is always the equilibrium of supply over demand. Right now,
Speaker 1: we know the supply is fixed at twenty one million,
Speaker 1: so it's a fixed supply. So if the demand goes
Speaker 1: up five hundred fifty day on top of the ets
Speaker 1: buy and five ffty day on top of US and
Speaker 1: then the rush of other nations. What do you think
Speaker 1: happens to the price, Well, it's pretty easy to understand
Speaker 1: as a matter of fact, what happens when they set
Speaker 1: a floor of five to fifty days. It sets a
Speaker 1: price floor, right, we know that they're going to be
Speaker 1: buying that every single day, and it will set that price,
Speaker 1: and it gives us a lot more ability to sort
Speaker 1: of predict out in the future where that price a
Speaker 1: bitcoin be. Now, a better way to do this would
Speaker 1: be not to announce this and this secretly start doing it,
Speaker 1: but to make that plocamation. It will set a floor
Speaker 1: in the price and send it up. It'll be pretty amazing.
Speaker 1: We can see here. This is known as a stock
Speaker 1: to flow price model. It's one of a dozen indicators
Speaker 1: that we could potentially look at. And what we could
Speaker 1: see is that this shows that potentially, you know, by
Speaker 1: twenty in of next year, bitcoin could be anywhere around
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty up to his high as four
Speaker 1: hundred thousand at the upper band, So that would be
Speaker 1: about the highest level that it's sort of projected out
Speaker 1: to be in this level, more realistically probably in one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty, two hundred thousand range. However, if news
Speaker 1: like this goes through, even if the RFKAN Trump lose
Speaker 1: but Lummas gets her bill through, four hundred k is
Speaker 1: very clearly insight. Now, this is a big maybe if
Speaker 1: one day, but Trump is favored to win right now.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, I believe he's at the
Speaker 1: time of this recording in the betting markets. I believe
Speaker 1: he has about a sixty to sixty five percent chance
Speaker 1: of winning. So that's not a long shot. I believe
Speaker 1: Trump will do that if he wins. He said he
Speaker 1: would on day one. I believe he'll do it, and
Speaker 1: he's got a sixty five percent chance of winning. Do
Speaker 1: the math in your own net. Okay, Now, what's interesting
Speaker 1: about this is that, again, why did Trump and why
Speaker 1: did RFK feel the need to come and address the
Speaker 1: bitcoin crowd specifically. Well, that's because it's the people's vote.
Speaker 1: What we can see right here in politics, obviously, politicians
Speaker 1: need to raise money for their campaigns, and we get
Speaker 1: these super packs where they basically bundle up money and
Speaker 1: deliver it over to whatever candidate may be. And what
Speaker 1: we can see based off of off of the campaign
Speaker 1: contributions right here is we can see that the fair
Speaker 1: Shake pack, which is basically the Bitcoin slash crypto pack.
Speaker 1: So those are the bitcoin crypto companies, the people that
Speaker 1: are donating into this, not directly, but into this super
Speaker 1: pac right here we can see it's become the number
Speaker 1: one super pack right now, Bigger than the Make America
Speaker 1: Great Again super pac just barely exceeded that, Bigger than
Speaker 1: the Senate Majority pack, and on and on and on.
Speaker 1: So the bitcoin and crypto crowd is not just some
Speaker 1: little fringe thing. And I know it's magic Internet money.
Speaker 1: It's not some fringe thing. It's gone to become the
Speaker 1: largest pack. Now. There's a lot of back and forth
Speaker 1: on this, like is this good or bad? I thought
Speaker 1: bitcoin was supposed to separate money in state. That's hold
Speaker 1: on the topic. I could dig into. Let me know
Speaker 1: in the comments down below you want me to do that.
Speaker 1: But we're seeing is there's a lot of single issue voters,
Speaker 1: seemingly who want bitcoin to be on the ballot. But
Speaker 1: the reality is, like I said earlier, it's not that
Speaker 1: they want bitcoin to be on the ballot. It's that
Speaker 1: we want freedom to be on the ballot. We want
Speaker 1: freedom to choose how we want to save our money
Speaker 1: and how we want to spend it. If you don't
Speaker 1: like it, cool, no big deal, don't use it. But
Speaker 1: why would you want to ever vote to take away
Speaker 1: someone's right to choose? And that's what we're seeing right now,
Speaker 1: loud and clear. Now here's the RUG poll. You're ready
Speaker 1: for it. So Harris, Kamala Harris, seeing what's going on,
Speaker 1: Seeing that Trump and rfkre generating all the supports, seeing
Speaker 1: that they're tapping into this massive donor base, very affluent
Speaker 1: donor base as well, Kamala Harris says, huh, well, maybe
Speaker 1: maybe I should be pro crypto, which is pretty hard
Speaker 1: to do when Harris Biden regime has been overly aggressive
Speaker 1: and not overly aggressive literally saying anti crypto, literally doing
Speaker 1: everything they can to shut it down. So how could
Speaker 1: she go from being so anti literally openly attacking, to like, well,
Speaker 1: maybe we should reconsider this. So we have here, Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris campaign seeks a reset with crypto companies. She wants
Speaker 1: to reset. I do over, hey, forget all the stuff
Speaker 1: that I've been trying to do to shut you down
Speaker 1: for all these years, Forget all the money that we've
Speaker 1: caused you to waste on frivolous lawsuits that we've been
Speaker 1: suing you through the SEC. Forget all that. Let's let's
Speaker 1: reset this. Okay. Well, Vice President's team aims to improve
Speaker 1: relations after Indussey criticism of the Biden administration. Well, the
Speaker 1: Bigcoin conference did invite Harris to come, did invite her
Speaker 1: to come address the crowd, and she turned that down. Now,
Speaker 1: just to give you an idea of some of the
Speaker 1: persecution the Biden Harris regime has been doing. Biden's wants
Speaker 1: to add a mining tax, a mining tax. So anyone
Speaker 1: that's in the bitcoin space that's doing bitcoin mining helps
Speaker 1: process transactions, secure the network, he wants to tax them
Speaker 1: as much as thirty percent tax on the electricity. So
Speaker 1: you know, you can buy electricity do whatever you want
Speaker 1: with it, but no, no, no, if you mind bitcoin
Speaker 1: with electricity, we're going to add a thirty percent tax
Speaker 1: to this. This is just one example of how hard
Speaker 1: they've been attacking the industry. Like literally, you can use
Speaker 1: electricity for anything you want, but if you use it
Speaker 1: for that, you have to pay an additional thirty percent fine.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just insane. That's an idea. But here's
Speaker 1: the thing. Kamala is. Like I said, the whole Kamala
Speaker 1: Biden campaign has been so aggressive that now even the
Speaker 1: Democratic legislators the DNC had to write Kamala and say
Speaker 1: you need to back off. You've been too aggressive. We're
Speaker 1: gonna lose the campaign. Several US Democrat legislators and electoral candidates,
Speaker 1: not just the candidate, legislators with the candidates, have now
Speaker 1: written to the DNC calling for a change in the
Speaker 1: party's approach towards the digital ass industry. This development comes
Speaker 1: as the Republican Presidents of candidates Donald Trump has continued
Speaker 1: to gain popularity as a cryptocurrency advocate ahead of coming
Speaker 1: US elections. Now, Trump I didn't really get into specifics.
Speaker 1: He didn't show that he really understood it quite as
Speaker 1: good as RFK because Trump didn't read the speech. He
Speaker 1: would just add libbing. And some of what Trump said
Speaker 1: was maybe some people took it as a little patronizing,
Speaker 1: but he basically said, look, I want you to be
Speaker 1: free to do whatever you want. If you want to
Speaker 1: do bitcoin or crypto or whatever it is that you're
Speaker 1: playing with, that's what he said, do it. And of
Speaker 1: course that's why I said it's not Biiccoe on the ballot.
Speaker 1: It's freedom to choose, and that's exactly what the DNC
Speaker 1: has seen. It's like, hey, this persecution of this industry
Speaker 1: is going to lose us a lot of ground. Now.
Speaker 1: Cameron Winkleboss, one of the Winkleboss twins from Facebook Story
Speaker 1: and now Bitcoin billionaires, he said, hey, beware of the
Speaker 1: big bus bluff from Harris and her advisors. They're in
Speaker 1: the process of working on a quote unquote reset with
Speaker 1: the crypto industry. He said, Hey, be respectful of your time.
Speaker 1: Let me just lay out a couple things. Please, don't
Speaker 1: bother unless don't even bother at trying to have a reset,
Speaker 1: unless you're prepared to take swift, bold action and concrete action.
Speaker 1: You can't burn bridges for four years and then expect
Speaker 1: to rebuild them with words, with your lip service like
Speaker 1: that doesn't work. Like you have been overly aggressive for
Speaker 1: four years. You need to come out and you need
Speaker 1: to talk that down. So this is where we're at. However,
Speaker 1: that's the lip service. This is exactly what Winkobos is
Speaker 1: warning about because the real actions are coming here. This
Speaker 1: is the rug pol you're ready for it, the big bluff. Now,
Speaker 1: while Kamala is seemingly wanting to repair ties with the industry.
Speaker 1: The wedge that RFK and Trump have is to take
Speaker 1: this one percent of the bitcoin supply, the two hundred
Speaker 1: thousand bitcoin and move it to the books of the
Speaker 1: government to keep it. And as they have this wedge,
Speaker 1: that Kamala could just say, hey, I'll do that too.
Speaker 1: She could do that, but no, she won't because she's
Speaker 1: over the aggressed. So what does she do? Well, she
Speaker 1: secretly the Biden Harris whoever's running the government, whatever regime,
Speaker 1: starts secretly doing this is from Cynthia Ummis, Senator Lummas
Speaker 1: behind the curtain, the Harris Biden administration executing it the
Speaker 1: direction of Secretory Yellen and Senator Warren. The Biden Harris
Speaker 1: regime is operating a business as usual with the hope
Speaker 1: you aren't paying attention. So what is that business as
Speaker 1: usual that you're not paying attention to? Will the US
Speaker 1: government just move two billion of that seized bitcoin two
Speaker 1: days after Trump's speech? So the Biden Harris campaign is like, well,
Speaker 1: we're not going to openly embrace it. We could do that,
Speaker 1: we could give people freedom. We won't do that. What
Speaker 1: we'll do is we'll get rid of that two hundred
Speaker 1: thousand bitcoin. We'll just dump it on the market real quick.
Speaker 1: So Trump and RFK have no leg to stand on. Now,
Speaker 1: why would they do something like that. I mean, they
Speaker 1: could not be that mean and evil, could they. They
Speaker 1: couldn't really actively be trying to subvert the will of
Speaker 1: the people. I mean, they wouldn't do that, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is democracy, right, it's what the people want. Well,
Speaker 1: we have press for this. I'll explain toda a second.
Speaker 1: Tyler Winklbass again says on Saturday, Trump pledged to never
Speaker 1: sell any of the US government's bitcoin. Two days later,
Speaker 1: the Biden Harris administration regime moves two billion of the
Speaker 1: bitcoin to sell it. Great look and great way to
Speaker 1: reset with our industry. So you say you want to
Speaker 1: reset with us, but you're literally subverting the will of
Speaker 1: the people and trying to rug pull what the president
Speaker 1: nominees or people running for presidential elections are saying. Now again,
Speaker 1: would they really do that or could this just beak coincidental? Well,
Speaker 1: let me just take you back not that far. What
Speaker 1: we can see, I've reported this on the past. Here
Speaker 1: we have an article this is directly from Senator Scott's website.
Speaker 1: I pulled it from maybe the most authoritative site. This
Speaker 1: is from August of last year, so about a year ago.
Speaker 1: And you might remember that Trump was trying to build
Speaker 1: a border wall and built some of the border wall.
Speaker 1: Of course, the Democrats were fighting that border wall. Well,
Speaker 1: a lot of the parts for the border wall had
Speaker 1: been built and they've been sitting there in Texas, and
Speaker 1: the Biden administration, of course, was not moving on this.
Speaker 1: And so the Republican the GOP side started moving and
Speaker 1: they started passing bills that were going to get the
Speaker 1: wall started again. And so just as they were getting
Speaker 1: these bills passed that would basically be able to get
Speaker 1: around with the president was trying to block and we
Speaker 1: could start building the wall again. What did the government
Speaker 1: What did the Biden Harris regime do. Well, what they
Speaker 1: did is they secretly started to sell off all the parts,
Speaker 1: all the parts that had been sitting there paid for
Speaker 1: by your tax dollars. The will of the people had
Speaker 1: approved to go ahead and get the wall restarted again.
Speaker 1: So the Biden Harris regime secretly started to dump them
Speaker 1: and for literally pennies on the dollar, getting rid of
Speaker 1: as fasts, they can Why so the GOP, the Republicans,
Speaker 1: the will of the people could not be done, which
Speaker 1: is exactly what's being done with the bitcoin right now.
Speaker 1: The people want it, they're voted with their money. Trump
Speaker 1: and RFK are running on this and they're just going
Speaker 1: to secretly dump it. Pretty interesting, right now. What do
Speaker 1: you think about that? Do you see that this has
Speaker 1: become a big bargaining ship or is it still that
Speaker 1: magic Internet money that people think it is. I'd love
Speaker 1: to know. Also, by the way, next week, I am
Speaker 1: having another live presentation where I'm going to be bringing
Speaker 1: all the information i got from the Bitcoin conference and
Speaker 1: let you know what's going on with bitcoin and crypto
Speaker 1: and hint, hint, hint, there's big things going on the
Speaker 1: way that bitcoin has now made mainstream, specifically going into
Speaker 1: the public sector. If you're not paying attention to this,
Speaker 1: you are missing a chance to potentially double quadruple your
Speaker 1: net worth over the next couple of years. So come
Speaker 1: join me live if you want. There's a link down below.
Speaker 1: I'm going to show you all the charts, all the
Speaker 1: information that I've got the companies that are actually blowing
Speaker 1: up right now. So if you want to take advantage
Speaker 1: of this. Don't miss out on this opportunity. You're sleeping
Speaker 1: on history being made right now. Come join me. There's
Speaker 1: a link down below. But let me know what you
Speaker 1: think about Harris's deal. Is it lip service or is
Speaker 1: she proving her real colors with her actions? Let me
Speaker 1: know in the comments down below, of course, as always,
Speaker 1: give me thumbs up on this video if you like
Speaker 1: it, and if you don't, you can give me a thumbs down.
Speaker 1: That's okay, but at least tell me what you think
Speaker 1: and oh, subscribe will you're at it? And that's what
Speaker 1: I got, all right, to your success. I'm out.