WEBVTT - OK(We’ll)C | Mon NBA Best Bets 

0:00:00.930 --> 0:00:04.490
<v Speaker 1>What these young bloods have to understand, that this game

0:00:05.309 --> 0:00:10.290
<v Speaker 1>has always been and will always be about buckets. Just

0:00:10.380 --> 0:00:11.300
<v Speaker 1>attack the basket.

0:00:11.340 --> 0:00:12.220
<v Speaker 2>Stop it!

0:00:12.619 --> 0:00:14.180
<v Speaker 3>Stop it!

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Do it like that!

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:24.590
<v Speaker 1>Oh! With no regard for human life! Bang! Bang!

0:00:24.630 --> 0:00:27.650
<v Speaker 3>I cannot believe you've done it again!

0:00:27.810 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me? Oh! Welcome to Buckets presented by DraftKings.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>My name is Matt Moore. Thanks for joining us for this,

0:00:37.260 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>our Monday best bets episode in the association. We'll get

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.220
<v Speaker 1>to size props and totals to do that. I've got

0:00:43.260 --> 0:00:45.980
<v Speaker 1>Brian Fonseca and I've got Michael Fiddle. Brian Fonseca you

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>can find from the New York Post sports page, as

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>well as his own page over at YouTube at youtube.com

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>slash at Brian Fonseca. He's Brian Fonseca NY on Twitter

0:00:59.060 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and on blue sky. Did I get all that right?

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:01:02.460 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>And Michael Fiddle, the maestro of the market, the prognosticator

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of live movement. I got to workshop that one. Michael Fiddle,

0:01:14.100 --> 0:01:16.300
<v Speaker 1>joining us as he does every day. You can catch

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>him on Better Day at betterday.com. I love those guys.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:25.230
<v Speaker 1>So support Mike over there with Scott Seidenberger, the guys

0:01:25.270 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>over at Better Day. Also, check out his own show

0:01:28.300 --> 0:01:30.660
<v Speaker 1>that he does throughout the week on his own page

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>at Fiddles Picks on Twitter. I'm still going to call

0:01:34.060 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it Twitter. I'm going to be old and dead and

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:37.780
<v Speaker 1>still calling it Twitter in the afterlife.

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:38.420
<v Speaker 2>Back in my day.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.580
<v Speaker 1>On tonight's show, we will get to all sorts of

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>great sides, props, bets, all for you. So I have

0:01:46.620 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>been debating whether to talk about how we've been doing

0:01:48.900 --> 0:01:52.740
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Because if you know me, in the

0:01:52.780 --> 0:01:56.470
<v Speaker 1>words of Michael Scott, I'm not superstitious. but I'm a

0:01:56.530 --> 0:01:59.630
<v Speaker 1>little stitious. And so I don't like to necessarily, and like,

0:01:59.730 --> 0:02:03.330
<v Speaker 1>also I don't talk about it when we're sucking ass.

0:02:03.370 --> 0:02:05.090
<v Speaker 1>So I try not to brag a lot when we're

0:02:05.110 --> 0:02:08.550
<v Speaker 1>doing great. I will say results have been very good.

0:02:08.870 --> 0:02:11.780
<v Speaker 1>Our three stars in particular have been absolutely killing it.

0:02:12.010 --> 0:02:13.610
<v Speaker 1>We've been doing real well. You can follow in the

0:02:13.669 --> 0:02:16.450
<v Speaker 1>action network app at buckets pod. You can find that

0:02:16.550 --> 0:02:18.369
<v Speaker 1>in the action network app and tell us, and you'll

0:02:18.389 --> 0:02:20.370
<v Speaker 1>find all of our bets on there. We've been doing

0:02:20.410 --> 0:02:23.810
<v Speaker 1>really well. And so excited to keep that going. I'm

0:02:23.910 --> 0:02:26.130
<v Speaker 1>four and one on the day. Fiddle, you would have

0:02:26.169 --> 0:02:30.709
<v Speaker 1>been so proud of me today. Model found value on

0:02:31.350 --> 0:02:36.450
<v Speaker 1>Celtics Moneyline and Magic Spread. Now, we lost the Magic

0:02:36.490 --> 0:02:39.130
<v Speaker 1>Spread component because they pulled away late, but I was

0:02:39.270 --> 0:02:43.750
<v Speaker 1>purely price shopping. It was this side. This price is

0:02:43.770 --> 0:02:46.710
<v Speaker 1>not commiserate with the spread. I've got this model where

0:02:46.750 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this is value. Took both sides of it. Felt totally

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.419
<v Speaker 1>fine with it. Did well tonight on sides. Very well

0:02:53.500 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on those. I'm taking a break, I think from totals

0:02:56.150 --> 0:02:58.230
<v Speaker 1>because like early in the season, there were spots I

0:02:58.270 --> 0:02:59.790
<v Speaker 1>wanted to kind of take when I didn't feel like

0:02:59.810 --> 0:03:01.950
<v Speaker 1>the market was adjusting. Now I feel like the market

0:03:02.010 --> 0:03:05.350
<v Speaker 1>is starting to not rapidly adjust. It's still behind. We're

0:03:05.370 --> 0:03:08.550
<v Speaker 1>still in like unders are, you know, the pace of

0:03:08.590 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>play is down. Offensive fouls are up. So scoring a

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.020
<v Speaker 1>little bit down, but I did just, I purely price

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.700
<v Speaker 1>shopped and laid the money line with the Celtics today

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.700
<v Speaker 1>based purely on that, money line was inaccurate to me

0:03:19.860 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that was not incommensurate with what it should have been

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:23.100
<v Speaker 1>so yeah.

0:03:23.030 --> 0:03:25.109
<v Speaker 3>All day i was kicking myself i did not take

0:03:25.230 --> 0:03:27.750
<v Speaker 3>celtics money line and then i saw jason tatum leave

0:03:27.790 --> 0:03:30.370
<v Speaker 3>the game with like a bloody face yeah early and

0:03:30.410 --> 0:03:32.050
<v Speaker 3>i saw the alert and the replay and i was

0:03:32.090 --> 0:03:34.290
<v Speaker 3>like oh my thank god i didn't take celtic and

0:03:34.330 --> 0:03:36.570
<v Speaker 3>then he came back and he was incredibly clutch late

0:03:37.250 --> 0:03:39.150
<v Speaker 3>um so then i was like no i should have

0:03:39.190 --> 0:03:41.990
<v Speaker 3>taken celtics and they ended up covering the six and

0:03:42.010 --> 0:03:44.140
<v Speaker 3>a half and sevens in market but Hey, if you

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.300
<v Speaker 3>could take both sides, if you could find good value,

0:03:46.380 --> 0:03:48.380
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's something I love to do. It's rare

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>that you could find, was it at, was it simultaneous, Matt?

0:03:51.540 --> 0:03:54.810
<v Speaker 3>Was it like, or was it after some line movement?

0:03:54.820 --> 0:03:56.230
<v Speaker 3>You did one and then came back in.

0:03:56.230 --> 0:03:57.970
<v Speaker 1>On another, came back in and then came back out

0:03:58.010 --> 0:03:58.850
<v Speaker 1>on the other. Yeah.

0:03:58.950 --> 0:04:01.010
<v Speaker 2>That's Hey, Hey, that's sharp.

0:04:01.550 --> 0:04:01.710
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:04:01.830 --> 0:04:02.210
<v Speaker 4>There you go.

0:04:02.270 --> 0:04:04.370
<v Speaker 3>I'll get to the buckets record that you got right now.

0:04:04.950 --> 0:04:08.589
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about OKC whose pets heads

0:04:08.630 --> 0:04:12.220
<v Speaker 1>have fallen off. So Last week, it starts with Jalen Williams'

0:04:12.260 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>horrific injury. We kind of talked about that one. We

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about a little bit about Case and Wallace. Then

0:04:18.860 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Alex Caruso goes down with a minor injury. And now

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Chet Holmgren's out two months. And it just has piled

0:04:24.220 --> 0:04:25.750
<v Speaker 1>up and piled up and piled up and piled up.

0:04:27.140 --> 0:04:32.650
<v Speaker 1>So let's try and put a number on this. My

0:04:34.570 --> 0:04:41.750
<v Speaker 1>fully healthy power rating on them is somewhere... a round ish,

0:04:42.290 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about nine points. I've got them losing about six points

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.820
<v Speaker 1>of value combined with these injuries, which to me sounds.

0:04:50.020 --> 0:04:50.620
<v Speaker 4>About right.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:52.740
<v Speaker 1>Just based off of the sheer number of them, depending

0:04:52.779 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>on who's in, who's out.

0:04:54.220 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:04:54.740 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 1>When they get some guys back, it'll be better, better

0:04:56.820 --> 0:04:59.730
<v Speaker 1>or worse. I still have them as like a good team.

0:05:00.370 --> 0:05:00.630
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:05:00.750 --> 0:05:02.810
<v Speaker 1>And I still actually have them the, where I've got

0:05:02.850 --> 0:05:05.510
<v Speaker 1>them modeled right now is I'm actually going to be

0:05:05.570 --> 0:05:07.270
<v Speaker 1>on them tomorrow. We'll talk about that. My best bets.

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I think futures perspective, game perspective, value perspective. I'd like

0:05:11.339 --> 0:05:12.940
<v Speaker 1>to get you guys' thoughts on it. Phil, how do

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>you kind of cap the injury situation to OKC?

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.789
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I've downgraded OKC 6.7 points. And so I

0:05:20.850 --> 0:05:23.430
<v Speaker 3>do still have them better than an average team on

0:05:23.470 --> 0:05:27.970
<v Speaker 3>a neutral court. But this is pretty staggering. And you

0:05:27.990 --> 0:05:30.510
<v Speaker 3>can kind of go two ways with this, Matt. Like historically,

0:05:30.550 --> 0:05:32.810
<v Speaker 3>the way that we rate OKC and the way that

0:05:32.860 --> 0:05:36.380
<v Speaker 3>we price certain players when they miss or they're in, Like,

0:05:36.580 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 3>J-Dub is worth less than you would normally imagine because

0:05:40.430 --> 0:05:42.990
<v Speaker 3>you have Chet and you have SGA and you have,

0:05:43.430 --> 0:05:46.729
<v Speaker 3>you know, iHeart and Caruso and Case and Wallace and

0:05:46.750 --> 0:05:48.910
<v Speaker 3>all these guys to fill in and kind of lift

0:05:48.950 --> 0:05:51.409
<v Speaker 3>the boat and take the usage, AJ Mitchell, McCain, all

0:05:51.430 --> 0:05:54.230
<v Speaker 3>of them. And so it's like, okay, well, J-Dub's actually

0:05:54.250 --> 0:05:57.150
<v Speaker 3>not worth that much ATS because the usage, the replacement

0:05:57.180 --> 0:05:59.900
<v Speaker 3>value is actually still very high. Then you say, okay, well,

0:05:59.940 --> 0:06:02.900
<v Speaker 3>now you're losing so many pieces, you know, do you

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:07.050
<v Speaker 3>need to then further the the value of J dub

0:06:07.110 --> 0:06:08.910
<v Speaker 3>for what he is and maybe a little bit, but

0:06:08.950 --> 0:06:11.310
<v Speaker 3>then the inverse of that is like, well, now you're

0:06:11.330 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 3>just asking SGA to do more lifting and to have

0:06:14.140 --> 0:06:16.420
<v Speaker 3>a higher usage rate. So then also the value of

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 3>SGA should also go up respectively when he's playing. And

0:06:20.900 --> 0:06:23.900
<v Speaker 3>so it's kind of takes away from the negation of

0:06:23.940 --> 0:06:26.270
<v Speaker 3>certain players. So it's like, it's like kind of a

0:06:26.330 --> 0:06:28.990
<v Speaker 3>cluster thing and it's, it gets you in a weird

0:06:29.010 --> 0:06:33.500
<v Speaker 3>situation where, It's worth talking about because it's almost impossible

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:34.380
<v Speaker 3>for the market to.

0:06:34.490 --> 0:06:36.310
<v Speaker 2>Accurately predict this.

0:06:36.370 --> 0:06:38.830
<v Speaker 3>And like, I think we're going to see pretty significant

0:06:38.870 --> 0:06:42.110
<v Speaker 3>line movement on OKC nearly every game.

0:06:42.390 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's like, how do we figure this out?

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I also think from we can get into it, but

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>from a live betting perspective, they used to have such

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.529
<v Speaker 3>a strong bench. And so it used to be like

0:06:53.570 --> 0:06:56.910
<v Speaker 3>pretty interchangeable, like who would dominate the other team. And

0:06:56.950 --> 0:07:00.090
<v Speaker 3>now their bench is guys we've never really heard.

0:06:59.970 --> 0:07:00.510
<v Speaker 2>Of, right?

0:07:00.570 --> 0:07:02.610
<v Speaker 3>Like Mara got a lot of love in the off

0:07:02.630 --> 0:07:06.810
<v Speaker 3>season and preseason as an exciting rookie. But besides him,

0:07:06.860 --> 0:07:09.820
<v Speaker 3>like it's a bleak list of players coming off the

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 3>bench for them. And suddenly I'm like, well, my main

0:07:12.980 --> 0:07:16.020
<v Speaker 3>thought was live models can't possibly have adjusted for how

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.420
<v Speaker 3>bad OKC's bench is now. So that when the starters

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:24.430
<v Speaker 3>come off, I almost think we should be fading OKC immediately.

0:07:24.550 --> 0:07:27.630
<v Speaker 3>And like SGA's rotation is pretty known. So it's like

0:07:28.110 --> 0:07:29.890
<v Speaker 3>right when you know that SGA is going to check

0:07:29.950 --> 0:07:32.220
<v Speaker 3>out of the next whistle, it should be pretty much

0:07:32.260 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 3>an immediate bet like tomorrow on the Cavs at that point.

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:38.740
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think one of the things that's tough here

0:07:38.860 --> 0:07:41.050
<v Speaker 1>is trying to figure out how the market is going

0:07:41.060 --> 0:07:43.130
<v Speaker 1>to go because you're right about the cluster side of this,

0:07:43.550 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of the compounding impact of defensive loss of, j-dub and

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>casein and then chet so you lose multifaceted help defender

0:07:53.850 --> 0:07:55.570
<v Speaker 1>honestly i will tell you this when i do film

0:07:55.590 --> 0:07:57.610
<v Speaker 1>work on okc the number one thing that stands out

0:07:57.630 --> 0:07:59.470
<v Speaker 1>to me when i watch their defense the number one

0:07:59.510 --> 0:08:03.530
<v Speaker 1>thing beyond everything else is j-dub um it is amazing

0:08:03.790 --> 0:08:06.130
<v Speaker 1>he is he is in my opinion maybe the best

0:08:06.190 --> 0:08:08.740
<v Speaker 1>help defender that is not a shot blocker in the

0:08:08.820 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>nba like he is incredible in terms of his anticipation

0:08:13.020 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Like there'll be these sequences where Shay's in a really

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup on the, like J-Dub has pushed weak side, right?

0:08:18.980 --> 0:08:21.020
<v Speaker 1>He's on the very far side of the court having

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a matchup zone and Shay gets beat on an edge

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:26.790
<v Speaker 1>and the guy, and right at the point where the

0:08:26.820 --> 0:08:28.230
<v Speaker 1>guy is going to like go up for the layup,

0:08:28.610 --> 0:08:35.670
<v Speaker 1>J-Dub has magically Nightcrawler X-Man bamfed and just appeared to

0:08:35.910 --> 0:08:38.230
<v Speaker 1>fuck up his shot. It's incredible. He is amazing.

0:08:38.830 --> 0:08:41.989
<v Speaker 3>There's a really cool video, Matt, of SGA being asked

0:08:42.030 --> 0:08:43.910
<v Speaker 3>who's the best defender on the team. And this is

0:08:43.950 --> 0:08:46.430
<v Speaker 3>last year. And he's like, well, if you want point

0:08:46.460 --> 0:08:50.140
<v Speaker 3>of attack defense, it's KSO. If you want rim protection,

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 3>it's Chet. And then he's just sitting there. He's like,

0:08:52.780 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 3>it's fake. And then he goes, you know what? No,

0:08:55.140 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 3>it's Dub. Dub's the best defender on the team. And

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.660
<v Speaker 3>so he pretty much walks through that whole progression that

0:08:59.700 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 3>you just went through.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:01.939
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Fonseca, I think futures. I don't want to get anywhere

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.780
<v Speaker 1>near any of this. Like most of these guys, J-Dub's

0:09:08.820 --> 0:09:13.170
<v Speaker 1>obviously not going to be back, right? But I do, like,

0:09:13.250 --> 0:09:16.190
<v Speaker 1>Kasem will be back. Caruso's already, I think he's already back.

0:09:16.790 --> 0:09:17.230
<v Speaker 1>And then.

0:09:17.570 --> 0:09:19.329
<v Speaker 4>Caruso's still out.

0:09:19.390 --> 0:09:19.810
<v Speaker 2>He'll be back.

0:09:20.250 --> 0:09:21.230
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he'll be back sooner.

0:09:21.250 --> 0:09:27.890
<v Speaker 1>And then Chet, two months later, right, will be, he'll

0:09:27.910 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>be back.

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 4>January-ish, maybe.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>And they'll have time to figure this out, and they're

0:09:31.580 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>still very good. Like, one of the things that I

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.500
<v Speaker 1>was kind of starting to hint at there, too, was,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, there is the compounding value of it, But

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>part of it, you know, Fiddle is just like they

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.620
<v Speaker 1>start from such a high place anyway. They're power rated.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.140
<v Speaker 1>So like I have them 10.9 actually is what I

0:09:45.140 --> 0:09:49.180
<v Speaker 1>looked up, right? Preposterous. Like they're so much better than

0:09:49.220 --> 0:09:51.250
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. So they can lose all these guys and

0:09:51.290 --> 0:09:52.569
<v Speaker 1>I'm still going to find value on them because they're

0:09:52.590 --> 0:09:55.050
<v Speaker 1>starting from such a high place. But Brian, I think

0:09:55.070 --> 0:09:57.090
<v Speaker 1>from a futures perspective, it does bring some interesting things

0:09:57.110 --> 0:09:59.110
<v Speaker 1>to the table. Most notably, I think Division is probably

0:09:59.150 --> 0:10:02.260
<v Speaker 1>like the most interesting thing you can kind of get

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to here, but you just got to be very careful

0:10:04.740 --> 0:10:06.819
<v Speaker 1>to kind of keep an eye out for over. I

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know which way the market's going to react. If

0:10:08.420 --> 0:10:09.980
<v Speaker 1>they lose a couple, is it going to be like

0:10:10.020 --> 0:10:12.700
<v Speaker 1>a massive downgrade? Is it like, because right now I'm

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.380
<v Speaker 1>trying to be, I'm trying to be very forgiving with them.

0:10:15.490 --> 0:10:18.070
<v Speaker 1>Cause I'm like, they're emotionally reeling right now. But the

0:10:18.090 --> 0:10:20.579
<v Speaker 1>thing with the NBA is, The games just keep coming

0:10:21.340 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 1>and you just keep playing. And so they'll get, I

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.300
<v Speaker 1>think they'll get better because I think Dagnall will, he'll

0:10:27.350 --> 0:10:30.730
<v Speaker 1>diagnose the problems and figure out solutions. But I think

0:10:30.750 --> 0:10:33.290
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out an accurate way to approach how

0:10:33.309 --> 0:10:34.910
<v Speaker 1>to bet them from a futures perspective is tough.

0:10:35.630 --> 0:10:38.949
<v Speaker 5>And it's hard because you have guys, a lot of

0:10:38.990 --> 0:10:41.349
<v Speaker 5>guys just playing more than you expected, which is always

0:10:41.370 --> 0:10:44.090
<v Speaker 5>going to be difficult early on in their careers. I

0:10:44.130 --> 0:10:50.069
<v Speaker 5>think one of the underrated things about all this that, Personally, like,

0:10:50.850 --> 0:10:52.929
<v Speaker 5>is something I've been paying close attention to is we're

0:10:52.970 --> 0:10:56.530
<v Speaker 5>still getting nothing out of Nikola Topic and Thomas Sorber.

0:10:57.070 --> 0:10:57.550
<v Speaker 4>Like, nothing.

0:10:57.590 --> 0:10:59.949
<v Speaker 5>Like, they can't even get healthy enough to see minutes.

0:11:00.750 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 5>They can't even get healthy enough to be active at times.

0:11:03.540 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 5>And Topic, who was probably projected at one point, at

0:11:07.940 --> 0:11:11.220
<v Speaker 5>one point, a top five pick prior to partially tearing

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:15.700
<v Speaker 5>his ACL, he later had testicular cancer. Now he gets his...

0:11:16.450 --> 0:11:19.700
<v Speaker 5>fourth year option declined. So he's effectively a free agent

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:24.150
<v Speaker 5>after the season anyway, which is interesting because like not to,

0:11:24.820 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 5>not to make a light of this, but this could

0:11:26.820 --> 0:11:30.020
<v Speaker 5>be a transaction waiting to happen, potentially via trade, if

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.870
<v Speaker 5>OKC wants to actually pursue things. I know, Matt, you've

0:11:32.910 --> 0:11:35.890
<v Speaker 5>talked about that's not really what Sam Presti does, but

0:11:35.910 --> 0:11:38.050
<v Speaker 5>this is a unique situation where three of your best

0:11:38.070 --> 0:11:40.870
<v Speaker 5>guys are out, and maybe you have to change course

0:11:40.890 --> 0:11:42.390
<v Speaker 5>a little bit if you want to continue to keep

0:11:42.429 --> 0:11:45.220
<v Speaker 5>this window open. We'll see what happens there, but them

0:11:45.250 --> 0:11:48.700
<v Speaker 5>getting nothing out of Topic and Sorber is a little

0:11:48.740 --> 0:11:52.020
<v Speaker 5>bit more concerning to me because they have all these

0:11:52.059 --> 0:11:56.020
<v Speaker 5>draft picks, And part of this was, well, they'll just

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 5>keep drafting really good players. Both of these guys were

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.189
<v Speaker 5>basically lottery picks, and they can't see the floor, which

0:12:03.330 --> 0:12:06.790
<v Speaker 5>I think is putting a hole in your roster beyond

0:12:06.850 --> 0:12:09.609
<v Speaker 5>already not having Cason Wallace and Chet Holmgren and Jalen

0:12:09.650 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Williams and Alex Caruso now, who's currently been out with

0:12:13.010 --> 0:12:16.020
<v Speaker 5>an ankle injury. So you're playing Bennett's thirds more than

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:17.219
<v Speaker 5>you probably plan on doing.

0:12:18.190 --> 0:12:18.770
<v Speaker 4>Immediately.

0:12:19.270 --> 0:12:21.310
<v Speaker 5>Jared McCain's in your starting lineup. I think he's going

0:12:21.330 --> 0:12:23.620
<v Speaker 5>to get better. He's 0 for his last 11 from three,

0:12:23.630 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 5>his last two starts. I don't think he's going to

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 5>continue to struggle this way from three. But the fact

0:12:28.580 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 5>that they need his three-point shooting to the degree that

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.300
<v Speaker 5>they do, you know, he could be overtaxed in that area.

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 5>We're seeing Adai Mara have to play, you know, significant

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 5>minutes relative to what we probably expected. And this is

0:12:40.990 --> 0:12:42.650
<v Speaker 5>a team that also just got rid of Lou Dort,

0:12:42.730 --> 0:12:45.189
<v Speaker 5>Isaiah Joe, and Aaron Wiggins, all of whom were consistent

0:12:45.210 --> 0:12:48.420
<v Speaker 5>contributors for this team. So, like, There's a depth question

0:12:48.460 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 5>that I'm worried about because as they continue to play

0:12:51.740 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 5>and these games get piled up, and you know you're

0:12:54.340 --> 0:12:58.350
<v Speaker 5>talking about the pace and everything like that, as guys

0:12:58.370 --> 0:13:01.090
<v Speaker 5>get overtaxed, this is how more injuries can happen. And

0:13:01.130 --> 0:13:03.150
<v Speaker 5>if you have guys on your roster who aren't ready,

0:13:03.850 --> 0:13:08.850
<v Speaker 5>I'm not looking at OKC like, yeah, it's time to

0:13:08.890 --> 0:13:11.210
<v Speaker 5>sort of make a decision on them. I'm just going

0:13:11.230 --> 0:13:14.030
<v Speaker 5>to kind of watch this because there's too many moving

0:13:14.070 --> 0:13:14.689
<v Speaker 5>parts right now.

0:13:15.450 --> 0:13:19.070
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with that. um there's too many moving

0:13:19.110 --> 0:13:24.910
<v Speaker 1>parts i've got right now wolves projected 52.7 nuggets 52.2

0:13:24.910 --> 0:13:28.230
<v Speaker 1>thunder 52.1 that's schedule adjusted but that's also based off

0:13:28.290 --> 0:13:30.990
<v Speaker 1>of like if they were to play like this in

0:13:31.030 --> 0:13:34.750
<v Speaker 1>this state forever i can't like i'm not gonna i'm

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna do a projection based off of well if

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:38.820
<v Speaker 1>so and so returns on x date because i just

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know right it's like check can be check can

0:13:41.100 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>be eight you know eight weeks it could be the

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.230
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season like we don't know right So

0:13:46.250 --> 0:13:49.110
<v Speaker 1>I do think I kind of lean a little bit

0:13:49.130 --> 0:13:52.150
<v Speaker 1>towards towards Wolves division. I think there's probably a little

0:13:52.170 --> 0:13:54.109
<v Speaker 1>bit because they're the one that has slipped most in

0:13:54.130 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the markets and some of the prediction markets

0:13:57.220 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>are trading. Yes, 15 for that division. That to me

0:14:01.020 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of seems like probably if you're going to look

0:14:02.580 --> 0:14:05.380
<v Speaker 1>from a futures perspective, one of the better ones that

0:14:05.420 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you can find just based off of the fact that

0:14:07.870 --> 0:14:09.870
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of this idea of, oh, they're going to

0:14:09.890 --> 0:14:14.330
<v Speaker 1>go to pieces without ant and one ant recovery is

0:14:14.370 --> 0:14:18.610
<v Speaker 1>always pretty crazy. And then two, their team is still

0:14:18.630 --> 0:14:21.670
<v Speaker 1>pretty good and they're very well coached. Like, yeah, they're

0:14:21.690 --> 0:14:25.050
<v Speaker 1>plus 700 at DraftKings for the division. Like, they're longer

0:14:25.070 --> 0:14:27.450
<v Speaker 1>than the Blazers. That might have to be a bet.

0:14:27.590 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 5>Are you not worried at all about Ant's knee beyond

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.340
<v Speaker 5>the arthroscopic knee surgery recovery?

0:14:33.860 --> 0:14:37.020
<v Speaker 1>Brian, this is the NBA in 2026. I'm worried about everything.

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.380
<v Speaker 2>I have an idea for a future.

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.100
<v Speaker 5>Not to mention LaMelo Ball's injury history, which has not

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:44.620
<v Speaker 5>had an impact on this season yet.

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>What's that, Fiddle?

0:14:46.330 --> 0:14:48.250
<v Speaker 3>So I think the best way to target this might

0:14:48.290 --> 0:14:51.910
<v Speaker 3>be the NBA cup stuff because Chet's injuries the next

0:14:51.990 --> 0:14:54.270
<v Speaker 3>two months. So what if we look NBA cup and

0:14:54.290 --> 0:14:57.570
<v Speaker 3>they're in West group B with Minnesota, who's also down

0:14:57.710 --> 0:14:58.410
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Edwards.

0:14:58.750 --> 0:14:58.910
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:14:59.350 --> 0:15:01.810
<v Speaker 3>And then they're also in there with Memphis. Who's been

0:15:02.220 --> 0:15:05.500
<v Speaker 3>hot as hell and new Orleans who I've been watching

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 3>some new Orleans recently. Cause Antonio Daniels on, on the

0:15:09.180 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 3>call is my favorite league pass announcer by far.

0:15:11.220 --> 0:15:11.739
<v Speaker 1>He's really good.

0:15:11.980 --> 0:15:12.300
<v Speaker 2>He's on.

0:15:12.500 --> 0:15:14.620
<v Speaker 3>I learned so much about basketball when I listened to him.

0:15:14.660 --> 0:15:17.180
<v Speaker 3>So just like, Aside from all the betting stuff, if

0:15:17.540 --> 0:15:20.940
<v Speaker 3>you ever watch League Pass, highly recommend a Pelicans broadcast.

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:26.180
<v Speaker 3>But going a step further, so I'd be looking Pelicans

0:15:26.230 --> 0:15:29.750
<v Speaker 3>or Grizzlies. They play each other on Monday night, as

0:15:29.770 --> 0:15:32.550
<v Speaker 3>probably most people are listening to this episode. So we've

0:15:32.670 --> 0:15:36.850
<v Speaker 3>seen a little bit of money come in Pelicans. And

0:15:36.890 --> 0:15:40.050
<v Speaker 3>so what I would recommend people do is check where

0:15:40.100 --> 0:15:43.580
<v Speaker 3>that market is before the game starts. because I would

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.300
<v Speaker 3>assume the results might impact that market a bit. But

0:15:47.340 --> 0:15:51.380
<v Speaker 3>it's currently a 6.5 line now. And let's just assume

0:15:51.420 --> 0:15:54.090
<v Speaker 3>it's like minus 110, because it's pretty much consensus both ways.

0:15:54.790 --> 0:15:58.450
<v Speaker 3>If that closes 5.5 and there's some sharp action Pelicans,

0:15:58.910 --> 0:16:03.090
<v Speaker 3>then Pelicans' West Group B winner, like plus 950, which

0:16:03.130 --> 0:16:06.580
<v Speaker 3>is at DraftKings, starts to become very intriguing. If it

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 3>ends up being bet out to Memphis minus 7.5 tomorrow,

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.130
<v Speaker 3>it's clearly people on Memphis for this specific matchup. then

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:17.860
<v Speaker 3>Memphis plus 450 or better in market also becomes intriguing.

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:19.350
<v Speaker 3>So I actually think the best way to target it,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 3>because Ant's going to probably miss the next two months

0:16:21.540 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 3>and so is Chet, is fading this West Group B

0:16:25.900 --> 0:16:27.020
<v Speaker 3>and finding the long shot here.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.570
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I always have a hard time with the long

0:16:29.590 --> 0:16:31.610
<v Speaker 1>shots because the Cup has kind of shown the opposite, right?

0:16:31.630 --> 0:16:34.950
<v Speaker 1>Where the teams that go the distance are usually the favorites.

0:16:35.170 --> 0:16:39.110
<v Speaker 1>Wolves got off to a 26-point differential advantage over Clippers

0:16:39.130 --> 0:16:41.610
<v Speaker 1>in the first. That's the only Group B game that's

0:16:41.630 --> 0:16:44.780
<v Speaker 1>been played. So they're already got a 26-point advantage here

0:16:44.820 --> 0:16:48.180
<v Speaker 1>in point differential. I do agree that watching Pelicans, Grizzlies,

0:16:48.220 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and watching that score in particular is going to be,

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.340
<v Speaker 1>I think, maybe the one to watch the most. Although, again,

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.100
<v Speaker 1>we'll get back to them. Best bets. Now that I've

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of remembered this is cut play. Thunders plus 110

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.590
<v Speaker 1>to win that group. I see you shaking your head.

0:17:01.850 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 3>There's not enough money for me to take the no

0:17:04.460 --> 0:17:08.909
<v Speaker 3>out there. I wish we could fade this on the

0:17:09.030 --> 0:17:11.170
<v Speaker 3>no side, but you really just have to pick another winner.

0:17:11.190 --> 0:17:11.929
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:15.700
<v Speaker 1>Let's do some best bets. Let's get to the best

0:17:15.740 --> 0:17:19.340
<v Speaker 1>bets for your Monday slate. We'll talk about that. We

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.830
<v Speaker 1>will break all this down. Let's go ahead and get started.

0:17:22.109 --> 0:17:24.689
<v Speaker 1>As a reminder, we do three stars, two stars, one stars.

0:17:24.970 --> 0:17:27.390
<v Speaker 1>Three stars are our best bets. Those have been really

0:17:27.430 --> 0:17:31.709
<v Speaker 1>good for us this season. The actual numbers here on

0:17:31.890 --> 0:17:37.380
<v Speaker 1>three stars is we are 15-8 by my count this

0:17:37.420 --> 0:17:39.500
<v Speaker 1>season on three-star bets on buckets. We are off to

0:17:39.540 --> 0:17:44.109
<v Speaker 1>a great start with three-star bets. Two stars, good bets.

0:17:44.390 --> 0:17:46.810
<v Speaker 1>And then one stars are typically more of our leans.

0:17:47.830 --> 0:17:50.369
<v Speaker 1>They are, you know, sometimes we have enough and we

0:17:50.410 --> 0:17:52.910
<v Speaker 1>like them. We genuinely like them. All my one stars

0:17:52.950 --> 0:17:59.630
<v Speaker 1>are plays. But a lot of us use leans, edges, sidles.

0:18:00.869 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Brian Fonseca coded because Brian's always too much

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.899
<v Speaker 1>of a pansy to come out firing with three solid bets.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:12.379
<v Speaker 5>Why would I do that if like half of– 75%

0:18:12.380 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 5>of shit isn't even up yet.

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It's true. You're, you're, you are just, and by the way,

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.300
<v Speaker 1>Brian is tied with Brandon Kravitz right now for best

0:18:19.340 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>record on buckets to start the year. So I will

0:18:21.220 --> 0:18:21.459
<v Speaker 1>give him.

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.620
<v Speaker 4>Now I'm going over three.

0:18:23.660 --> 0:18:23.900
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

0:18:24.380 --> 0:18:26.090
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no problem. I haven't got to jinx you.

0:18:26.510 --> 0:18:28.530
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm like over six right now. So I'm due.

0:18:28.850 --> 0:18:31.610
<v Speaker 1>You have one. You, you, you, you, you have one.

0:18:32.190 --> 0:18:34.630
<v Speaker 1>You are, you are trying to catch up fiddle. Got

0:18:34.650 --> 0:18:36.290
<v Speaker 1>CLV on most of them though. And you know, you

0:18:36.330 --> 0:18:38.830
<v Speaker 1>know that that's, that's where your process is. That's where

0:18:38.850 --> 0:18:39.750
<v Speaker 1>it matters. Yeah.

0:18:39.850 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's that's what they tell me. That's what I tell people.

0:18:43.740 --> 0:18:46.820
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with Brian Pacecca. Let's start with your three-star

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:47.540
<v Speaker 1>better than I, Brian.

0:18:48.580 --> 0:18:53.180
<v Speaker 5>The best rebounder on the Philadelphia 76ers right now, Vijay Edgecombe.

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I like it.

0:18:54.810 --> 0:18:58.170
<v Speaker 5>I just, I don't, these numbers are too low for him.

0:18:58.190 --> 0:18:59.950
<v Speaker 5>This is probably going to go to six and a half.

0:19:00.010 --> 0:19:04.449
<v Speaker 5>These numbers are too low for him. Joel Embiid, we

0:19:04.510 --> 0:19:09.830
<v Speaker 5>expect to see him next game. But even so, Vijay

0:19:09.869 --> 0:19:12.090
<v Speaker 5>Edgecombe is one of the leading rebounders.

0:19:11.570 --> 0:19:12.070
<v Speaker 4>On this team.

0:19:12.130 --> 0:19:14.910
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if people know that because Philly doesn't

0:19:14.950 --> 0:19:17.050
<v Speaker 5>have a lot of guys who.

0:19:16.890 --> 0:19:18.210
<v Speaker 4>Attack the glass at all.

0:19:18.290 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 5>They're one of the worst rebounding teams in the NBA

0:19:20.900 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 5>so far this season, as a matter of fact. And

0:19:23.619 --> 0:19:25.940
<v Speaker 5>Vijay Edgecombe is like second on the team in rebounding

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:27.980
<v Speaker 5>because LeBron's not going to get a ton of rebounds.

0:19:28.020 --> 0:19:31.820
<v Speaker 5>He'll get rebounds because he's LeBron, but he's not going

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 5>to fight for them the way that Vijay Edgecombe is.

0:19:33.940 --> 0:19:36.070
<v Speaker 5>And then Joel Embiid is not the same rebounder he

0:19:36.150 --> 0:19:37.310
<v Speaker 5>used to be. He's not the same a lot of

0:19:37.350 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 5>things he used to be. Edgecombe, as far as the

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.740
<v Speaker 5>five and a half, seven, actually eight his last game,

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.450
<v Speaker 5>eight and back to back at seven against Indiana before

0:19:47.510 --> 0:19:50.510
<v Speaker 5>that Saturday game and then he had 13. 13 against

0:19:50.550 --> 0:19:53.650
<v Speaker 5>Milwaukee and seven against Cleveland, like over this and every

0:19:53.670 --> 0:19:56.010
<v Speaker 5>game this season, except opening night against the Knicks where

0:19:56.050 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 5>everybody was there.

0:19:56.910 --> 0:19:57.430
<v Speaker 4>That's fine.

0:19:57.780 --> 0:20:01.820
<v Speaker 5>Even if everybody's there, but just he's actually like, he

0:20:01.859 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 5>has to figure out other ways to contribute, obviously, because

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.300
<v Speaker 5>he's not going to make the scoring leap because of

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 5>everybody on the roster.

0:20:07.540 --> 0:20:08.180
<v Speaker 4>And he's doing that.

0:20:09.220 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 5>He's not getting a ton of opportunities to play make,

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 5>which is something that I think he can, you know,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.790
<v Speaker 5>dive deeper into, but he's just not getting that type

0:20:17.810 --> 0:20:20.169
<v Speaker 5>of usage right now. But rebounding is something I think

0:20:20.210 --> 0:20:21.910
<v Speaker 5>is going to be constant for him all season long.

0:20:21.950 --> 0:20:24.229
<v Speaker 5>And to some degree, even the steals, but right now

0:20:24.270 --> 0:20:29.530
<v Speaker 5>he's at 7.8 a game. Joel Embiid comparatively is at

0:20:29.530 --> 0:20:33.070
<v Speaker 5>9.4 and with more opportunities, given the position he plays

0:20:33.550 --> 0:20:36.010
<v Speaker 5>and LeBron's at seven and Jalen Brown's at 6.2. Like

0:20:36.050 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 5>you have, you have nobody else here. doing what vj

0:20:39.980 --> 0:20:43.060
<v Speaker 5>is doing in terms of outperforming his position on the

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.570
<v Speaker 5>glass so over five and a half six and a

0:20:45.570 --> 0:20:48.430
<v Speaker 5>half is fine he's been killing this number uh for

0:20:48.630 --> 0:20:49.730
<v Speaker 5>most of the season so far.

0:20:50.330 --> 0:20:54.310
<v Speaker 1>Okay defensively the bulls allow the second most shots at

0:20:54.350 --> 0:20:58.530
<v Speaker 1>the rim and they do keep the three point rate

0:20:58.570 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>down which is pretty good they're low on forcing mid-range

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.450
<v Speaker 1>attempts it's mostly stuff at the rim but I also

0:21:07.470 --> 0:21:08.889
<v Speaker 1>do like this because I just think BJ is just

0:21:08.930 --> 0:21:11.990
<v Speaker 1>like so physical. I honestly like, I feel like I

0:21:12.010 --> 0:21:15.530
<v Speaker 1>want to play BJ edge comb in some capacity versus

0:21:15.609 --> 0:21:18.950
<v Speaker 1>every single team. Also the pace, the pace here, I

0:21:18.970 --> 0:21:20.990
<v Speaker 1>think is the, is the real big edge here. Chicago's

0:21:21.010 --> 0:21:23.070
<v Speaker 1>just playing super fast. They're just letting the kids run

0:21:23.109 --> 0:21:26.190
<v Speaker 1>up and down the court and BJ likes, they do

0:21:26.250 --> 0:21:28.469
<v Speaker 1>like BJ bringing the ball up because I watched them

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this morning. I watched Nick Sixers. They're running sets where

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.460
<v Speaker 1>BJ brings the ball up and then they run maxi

0:21:34.660 --> 0:21:38.860
<v Speaker 1>off multiple screens. to get him the ball, not even

0:21:38.940 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just like to get him clear of denial, but also

0:21:42.500 --> 0:21:45.070
<v Speaker 1>like to literally hit him on the move. So VJ

0:21:45.109 --> 0:21:47.850
<v Speaker 1>is setting up a lot of their offense, which means

0:21:47.869 --> 0:21:49.210
<v Speaker 1>he needs to get the rebound and they'll let him

0:21:49.230 --> 0:21:50.969
<v Speaker 1>get the rebound. Cause he's going to get it anyway.

0:21:51.410 --> 0:21:53.970
<v Speaker 1>So love this play over five and a half rebounds

0:21:54.050 --> 0:21:56.630
<v Speaker 1>for VJ edge comb who whips ass. I love him.

0:21:56.730 --> 0:22:01.109
<v Speaker 1>He's so much fun. Michael fiddle. What's your three-star play

0:22:01.190 --> 0:22:01.550
<v Speaker 1>of the night?

0:22:02.490 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 3>My three-star play is going to be Cleveland Cavaliers hosting

0:22:05.859 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 3>OKC over 227.5. Like I said, I think these markets

0:22:11.220 --> 0:22:14.540
<v Speaker 3>with OKC are the most vulnerable right now. So I'm

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 3>going to take the over here. There was a clear,

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.310
<v Speaker 3>clear late over push in the last game against Houston.

0:22:21.670 --> 0:22:23.810
<v Speaker 3>Then got a text message that said someone sent me

0:22:23.869 --> 0:22:28.689
<v Speaker 3>syndicate on Houston and OKC over 219.5. I think it

0:22:28.790 --> 0:22:32.070
<v Speaker 3>actually landed like 218.5. but always I care more about

0:22:32.090 --> 0:22:35.010
<v Speaker 3>what the market moves in previous games more than the results.

0:22:35.050 --> 0:22:38.490
<v Speaker 3>And I also think two things. I think OKC's defense,

0:22:38.510 --> 0:22:40.570
<v Speaker 3>we talked about Chet, we talked about Jada, we talked

0:22:40.590 --> 0:22:45.100
<v Speaker 3>about Kaysen, Caruso. It's OKC's defense that is most struggling

0:22:45.140 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 3>right now, respective to what they normally are. So I

0:22:47.780 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 3>think that's where we might be off market right here

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 3>with an over. And I also think it's that Houston

0:22:54.100 --> 0:22:56.590
<v Speaker 3>was so able to stop this team and play physically

0:22:56.609 --> 0:22:59.130
<v Speaker 3>that that I don't think Cleveland presents the same kind

0:22:59.170 --> 0:23:01.710
<v Speaker 3>of issues defensively. So I think OKC will still be

0:23:01.730 --> 0:23:03.250
<v Speaker 3>able to get their points. I think they were under

0:23:03.270 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 3>a hundred last game. So I think the, the over

0:23:05.580 --> 0:23:08.220
<v Speaker 3>here is the right play. We already saw, uh, one

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.580
<v Speaker 3>of the sharpest books in market openness at two 27

0:23:11.580 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 3>minus one Oh seven, both ways. Uh, and they've been

0:23:15.060 --> 0:23:17.930
<v Speaker 3>bet up to two 28 and a half. So, uh,

0:23:17.970 --> 0:23:20.310
<v Speaker 3>two 27 and a half kind of putting the angles

0:23:20.369 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 3>together of previous game action, uh, forecasting the injuries and

0:23:24.980 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 3>the biggest impact, and then some top-down with where the

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 3>market-leading books are going. No-brainer, Cleveland OKC over 227.5.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:32.570
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:23:34.090 --> 0:23:37.630
<v Speaker 1>I've got this projected 228.6, and that's before defensive adjustments

0:23:38.150 --> 0:23:40.590
<v Speaker 1>based off of the missing personnel for OKC. So, yeah,

0:23:40.630 --> 0:23:41.670
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a good play. I'm going to

0:23:41.690 --> 0:23:46.470
<v Speaker 1>tell you on this. I like this. Cleveland OKC over 227.5.

0:23:46.470 --> 0:23:47.690
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that you're going to notice, the

0:23:47.710 --> 0:23:50.450
<v Speaker 1>OKC is so good at disrupting all the pick-and-roll stuff.

0:23:51.460 --> 0:23:53.460
<v Speaker 1>the teams that they've played since the injuries have been

0:23:53.510 --> 0:23:55.209
<v Speaker 1>starting to get the pick and roll. And you could

0:23:55.410 --> 0:23:57.550
<v Speaker 1>tell that they're just like, Oh God, this is so

0:23:57.590 --> 0:23:59.649
<v Speaker 1>much easier than it usually is versus these guys. And

0:23:59.670 --> 0:24:02.070
<v Speaker 1>you're like, you see kind of Shay being like, fuck,

0:24:02.510 --> 0:24:04.430
<v Speaker 1>like I don't have, you know, it's not Shay's fault.

0:24:04.550 --> 0:24:07.860
<v Speaker 1>Like Shay's got a huge offensive load, but teams are

0:24:07.890 --> 0:24:09.379
<v Speaker 1>able to now attack Shay a little bit more and

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>get to pick and roll actions, which means Jared Allen's

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>probably going to have a, have a huge game on

0:24:12.619 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the interior. Just cause they don't have enough to contest him.

0:24:15.300 --> 0:24:19.540
<v Speaker 1>Anytime Hartenstein's out, you know, Mara's is the kid's huge, huge,

0:24:21.230 --> 0:24:24.710
<v Speaker 1>but I, you know, Mobley is more, is stronger. And

0:24:24.730 --> 0:24:27.820
<v Speaker 1>Jared Allen, I was honestly like, he's big and powerful

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.939
<v Speaker 1>and strong. So like this play quite bad. I'm going

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell you on this Cleveland OKC over two 27

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half. We'll come back to this game in

0:24:34.859 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit for my three-star play. We're going back

0:24:37.180 --> 0:24:41.060
<v Speaker 1>to a familiar one. Golden oldie. Well, and the corner

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.930
<v Speaker 1>threes angle versus the Denver Nuggets to money. Kamara over

0:24:44.950 --> 0:24:49.369
<v Speaker 1>two and a half threes. Denver is, I believe it's,

0:24:50.340 --> 0:24:53.580
<v Speaker 1>They give up the fourth most threes per game from

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:58.300
<v Speaker 1>the corners, despite playing at a really slow pace. That's

0:24:58.740 --> 0:25:02.459
<v Speaker 1>not ideal. They are third, actually, at 13.2. They are

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>holding opponents to 30% on shooting this season. I can

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.170
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you, having done it, that's shot variance. Now, there's

0:25:10.210 --> 0:25:15.250
<v Speaker 1>things I like about Denver's defense systemically this season. The

0:25:15.290 --> 0:25:17.850
<v Speaker 1>results so far have been actually kind of like, oh,

0:25:18.150 --> 0:25:21.129
<v Speaker 1>there's like some promising stuff in there. They are running

0:25:21.790 --> 0:25:24.669
<v Speaker 1>an even further scheme this season, which is they are

0:25:24.710 --> 0:25:28.130
<v Speaker 1>bringing a third defender into pick and roll and DHO

0:25:28.270 --> 0:25:31.169
<v Speaker 1>actions and what's called a high nail. If you are

0:25:31.210 --> 0:25:33.889
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with the X's and O's on this, the

0:25:33.970 --> 0:25:38.300
<v Speaker 1>idea is that you show up extremely early for third,

0:25:38.859 --> 0:25:42.179
<v Speaker 1>a third defender help. So high pick, let's say it's

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>high pick and roll and Dame's going to his left. Okay.

0:25:45.930 --> 0:25:48.060
<v Speaker 1>The guy on the left, which would be Cameron Johnson

0:25:48.100 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>in most situations, is going to show up way early.

0:25:51.140 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That means that the weak side rotation sees that Cam

0:25:54.260 --> 0:25:57.340
<v Speaker 1>is there early so they can plot out and be like, oh,

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I know I got to go cross out to this corner.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.780
<v Speaker 1>And that's all well and good. The problem is that

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.590
<v Speaker 1>if you don't contain at the level adequately, if your

0:26:05.630 --> 0:26:09.230
<v Speaker 1>big isn't stable, if your guard has trouble getting over screens,

0:26:09.270 --> 0:26:12.650
<v Speaker 1>which they do, the reversal to the weak side happens.

0:26:12.790 --> 0:26:16.030
<v Speaker 1>And now everybody's already shaded over. So that weak side

0:26:16.090 --> 0:26:19.450
<v Speaker 1>corner is even more open. And if you can beat

0:26:19.510 --> 0:26:22.090
<v Speaker 1>the strong side help, the corner's open as well. And

0:26:22.109 --> 0:26:24.550
<v Speaker 1>Nikola Jokic is trying to close out for a three.

0:26:25.050 --> 0:26:27.490
<v Speaker 1>Spoiler alert, he's not going to. He's just going to

0:26:27.510 --> 0:26:33.389
<v Speaker 1>be like, why bother? This is a fundamental issue with

0:26:33.430 --> 0:26:36.070
<v Speaker 1>Denver's defense and has been the last two seasons. We

0:26:36.109 --> 0:26:38.810
<v Speaker 1>have played this consistently in the regular season and the playoffs.

0:26:39.570 --> 0:26:45.030
<v Speaker 1>Tamani Kamara. is the Blazers' number one corner shooter this season.

0:26:45.730 --> 0:26:52.570
<v Speaker 1>That is his spot for the Blazers. He is the

0:26:52.650 --> 0:26:56.340
<v Speaker 1>number one guy for them this season in that capacity.

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:01.619
<v Speaker 1>And he's been shooting a lot better. So last season,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he went over this in the last two times that

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.859
<v Speaker 1>they played Denver, which coincides with the last two games

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>after Kamara kind of figured out how to shoot. Kamara

0:27:12.180 --> 0:27:16.830
<v Speaker 1>this season is averaging 3.2 corner three attempts per game,

0:27:16.830 --> 0:27:21.210
<v Speaker 1>4.6 above the break, mind you, but 3.2 from just

0:27:21.250 --> 0:27:25.939
<v Speaker 1>the corners alone and shooting 50% on them. This is

0:27:25.980 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a great look for two and a half. He's been

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely great. He plays well against Denver, Tamani Kamara, over

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>two and a half threes, get in the market. That's

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.739
<v Speaker 1>my three-star play. I very rarely play props, but this

0:27:37.850 --> 0:27:39.970
<v Speaker 1>one is the one I like the best on the night.

0:27:40.340 --> 0:27:41.850
<v Speaker 1>where you get your more best bets. Our two stars

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.689
<v Speaker 1>and one stars are coming up. But first, this message

0:27:44.990 --> 0:27:47.970
<v Speaker 1>from DraftKings. Basketball season is here, and we've teamed up

0:27:47.990 --> 0:27:50.430
<v Speaker 1>with DraftKings to bring you a brand new offer. Whether

0:27:50.450 --> 0:27:53.090
<v Speaker 1>you're following the biggest matchups, keeping up with your favorite team,

0:27:53.210 --> 0:27:56.389
<v Speaker 1>or watching your favorite player all season long, DraftKings is

0:27:56.430 --> 0:27:59.930
<v Speaker 1>now available in all 50 states, from New York to California.

0:28:00.010 --> 0:28:02.190
<v Speaker 1>So no matter where you are, you can stay connected

0:28:02.250 --> 0:28:05.510
<v Speaker 1>to basketball. So if you're new to DraftKings, sign up

0:28:05.570 --> 0:28:10.149
<v Speaker 1>with code BUCKETSPOD. Spend $ 5 and get $ 200 in total

0:28:10.210 --> 0:28:15.090
<v Speaker 1>rewards plus three months of NBA League Pass on DraftKings.

0:28:15.570 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>That's code BUCKETSPOD. Download the DraftKings Sports app today and

0:28:20.420 --> 0:28:25.139
<v Speaker 1>keep basketball at your fingertips all season long. DraftKings, the

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:30.260
<v Speaker 1>crown is yours. All right, let's keep it rolling. I'm

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:31.820
<v Speaker 1>going to snake draft this. I'm going to go next

0:28:32.300 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>with a very quick play on the Minnesota Timberwolves. I'm

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.980
<v Speaker 1>laying the 11 and a half. I make this 13

0:28:37.980 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I do not think I have noticed

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that the market kind of freaked out when Ant went down.

0:28:42.570 --> 0:28:44.790
<v Speaker 1>Like they just freaked out. And then the Warriors showed

0:28:44.870 --> 0:28:46.830
<v Speaker 1>up and beat the snot out of them. And so

0:28:46.850 --> 0:28:50.030
<v Speaker 1>the market was kind of like, see, that's how important

0:28:50.150 --> 0:28:52.170
<v Speaker 1>Ant is. And I'm like, I don't know, man. I

0:28:52.630 --> 0:28:55.030
<v Speaker 1>think Golden State's actually as much as I like, they

0:28:55.070 --> 0:28:56.910
<v Speaker 1>look like the worst team in the Western Conference to

0:28:56.930 --> 0:28:58.590
<v Speaker 1>me outside of the Kings. Cause the Kings are in

0:28:58.610 --> 0:29:00.890
<v Speaker 1>their own universe, the worst non Kings team in the

0:29:00.910 --> 0:29:03.770
<v Speaker 1>Western conference the first week or so. And now I

0:29:03.810 --> 0:29:06.130
<v Speaker 1>look up and the warriors have a top 10 schedule,

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>adjusted offense and defense, and they're leading the league in

0:29:08.980 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive rebound rate. Steve Kerr is a goddamn wizard. He

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.380
<v Speaker 1>just is amazing. He's a warlock. So I don't think

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:16.940
<v Speaker 1>that that loss is as bad or as much of

0:29:16.980 --> 0:29:19.020
<v Speaker 1>a condemnation of the wolves as it seems they handle

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.070
<v Speaker 1>business versus the Clippers in that cup game. I think

0:29:22.110 --> 0:29:24.430
<v Speaker 1>that this is an overreaction by the market to ants injury.

0:29:24.530 --> 0:29:26.590
<v Speaker 1>I think the Milwaukee bucks are going to be one

0:29:26.610 --> 0:29:29.810
<v Speaker 1>of the worst teams in again, non Kings division in

0:29:29.890 --> 0:29:31.790
<v Speaker 1>the league. And honestly, the bowls might be worse than,

0:29:31.970 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>than both of those teams, which is honestly golf clap

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:37.910
<v Speaker 1>for you for finding away bulls to be worse than

0:29:37.930 --> 0:29:40.670
<v Speaker 1>the sacramento kings but you probably are um they're on

0:29:40.690 --> 0:29:42.230
<v Speaker 1>pace for the bulls are on pace for the worst

0:29:42.410 --> 0:29:44.650
<v Speaker 1>srs of all time by the way that simple rating

0:29:44.690 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>system that's point differential versus schedule worst of all time

0:29:48.860 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is what they're currently on pace for not a great

0:29:50.710 --> 0:29:53.500
<v Speaker 1>start in small sample i just think this is too

0:29:53.540 --> 0:29:55.500
<v Speaker 1>light a number uh fiddle am i gonna be right

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>or wrong on this with what you think the market's

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna do at 11 and a half.

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 3>No, I think we're pretty much on market and there's

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 3>some 10 and a half out there that might be

0:30:03.510 --> 0:30:07.209
<v Speaker 3>kicked out to 11 and a half. So I'm actually totally, totally, totally,

0:30:07.250 --> 0:30:08.130
<v Speaker 3>totally fine with this.

0:30:08.170 --> 0:30:10.190
<v Speaker 2>This Milwaukee team is dreadful.

0:30:10.390 --> 0:30:14.770
<v Speaker 3>Like they are pretty horrible. And then they're even worse

0:30:14.830 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 3>in crunch time situation. So if we're in a, you know, three,

0:30:19.740 --> 0:30:22.340
<v Speaker 3>four possession game with four minutes left, I trust the

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 3>wolves to stretch it out rather than the Milwaukee to,

0:30:25.540 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 3>to get it back.

0:30:26.140 --> 0:30:29.530
<v Speaker 1>Okay. that's going to be my two star. Let's go

0:30:29.550 --> 0:30:32.610
<v Speaker 1>to Brian Penseca again. Brian, what's your two star play

0:30:32.630 --> 0:30:32.970
<v Speaker 1>of the night?

0:30:33.870 --> 0:30:36.910
<v Speaker 5>This one's juiced already, but Duncan Robinson over two and

0:30:36.950 --> 0:30:41.780
<v Speaker 5>a half threes because he's shooting as expected, honestly, an

0:30:41.820 --> 0:30:45.420
<v Speaker 5>ungodly amount of three so far, 53 and six games.

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 5>So you're getting like nine attempts per game. He's over

0:30:49.860 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 5>two and a half and four of these. He started

0:30:51.940 --> 0:30:54.350
<v Speaker 5>off the season on fire, making five, five and five

0:30:54.390 --> 0:30:56.730
<v Speaker 5>in the first three games of the year. two for 10,

0:30:56.730 --> 0:30:58.850
<v Speaker 5>three for eight and two for seven. They just need

0:30:58.870 --> 0:31:03.430
<v Speaker 5>his spacing too much. And this is a.

0:31:03.690 --> 0:31:04.750
<v Speaker 4>Good and bad thing.

0:31:05.770 --> 0:31:07.830
<v Speaker 5>It's a good thing for now because like he's getting

0:31:07.850 --> 0:31:10.210
<v Speaker 5>the minutes you need his shooting. Duncan Robinson is one

0:31:10.230 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 5>of these guys that you steps on the floor, you

0:31:11.860 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 5>know what you're going to do. We can have a

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 5>conversation about like later on what that entails and anything

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 5>like that. But like, I think that with Duncan Robinson

0:31:21.100 --> 0:31:25.700
<v Speaker 5>and this particular matchup against Charlotte, Charlotte's giving up a

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:30.020
<v Speaker 5>lot of high quality threes and teams are making 37.6%

0:31:30.020 --> 0:31:31.980
<v Speaker 5>against them, which is about the seventh or eighth highest

0:31:32.020 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 5>percentage in the NBA so far. That may level out

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.740
<v Speaker 5>at some point because we're seeing a lot of just like,

0:31:38.140 --> 0:31:40.220
<v Speaker 5>you know, some teams are in slumps, some teams are not.

0:31:40.700 --> 0:31:44.670
<v Speaker 5>But I think with Duncan Robinson, the attempts are what

0:31:44.710 --> 0:31:46.630
<v Speaker 5>matters here and the attempts are the most consistent. He

0:31:46.670 --> 0:31:49.610
<v Speaker 5>hasn't gotten fewer than seven. He does not always need

0:31:49.670 --> 0:31:53.310
<v Speaker 5>seven to make three. But if you get 7, 8, 9, 10,

0:31:53.310 --> 0:31:55.010
<v Speaker 5>you'll be in the ballpark here. There's going to be

0:31:55.050 --> 0:31:56.790
<v Speaker 5>three and a half step pops. So I wanted to get,

0:31:56.810 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 5>or I wanted to mention rather of the two and

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.420
<v Speaker 5>a half before we get, you know, into the three

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:03.940
<v Speaker 5>and a half.

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Territory and whatnot.

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:06.780
<v Speaker 5>Cause there is where it's like, all right, I might,

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 5>I might just back off at that point, but two

0:32:09.740 --> 0:32:11.620
<v Speaker 5>and a half, Duncan Robinson over threes.

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.190
<v Speaker 1>Playing over overs versus the Hornets always makes me a

0:32:16.190 --> 0:32:19.330
<v Speaker 1>little bit nervous with their entire defensive scheme being built

0:32:19.350 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to win the math game. But, I kind of get

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it based off of how they're going to have to

0:32:22.740 --> 0:32:25.610
<v Speaker 1>send help. I can't tell. Do you think the Hornets

0:32:25.620 --> 0:32:27.090
<v Speaker 1>are as bad as they look? Because there's a lot

0:32:27.110 --> 0:32:28.750
<v Speaker 1>of metrics that are like, yeah, the Hornets are bad.

0:32:28.770 --> 0:32:30.250
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know how much of that is that

0:32:30.310 --> 0:32:30.970
<v Speaker 1>or it's just the injuries.

0:32:31.610 --> 0:32:32.730
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't.

0:32:33.190 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 5>Because Conk and Nipple is going to be back. Kobe

0:32:36.620 --> 0:32:40.220
<v Speaker 5>White is going to be back. Grant Williams, who, look,

0:32:40.460 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean, people can roll their eyes, but that's one

0:32:42.260 --> 0:32:42.820
<v Speaker 5>of their leaders.

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Yep. I was about to roll my eyes. That's why

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:48.550
<v Speaker 2>I'm laughing at the Grant Williams.

0:32:48.570 --> 0:32:49.130
<v Speaker 4>Like, come on.

0:32:49.170 --> 0:32:51.430
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't impact the rating at all. He might a little.

0:32:51.510 --> 0:32:52.510
<v Speaker 4>No, no.

0:32:52.530 --> 0:32:56.110
<v Speaker 3>Especially they're going to bench Nas Reed like mid game.

0:32:56.150 --> 0:32:57.430
<v Speaker 2>Cause he's not playing hard enough.

0:32:57.650 --> 0:32:58.610
<v Speaker 4>That was weird.

0:32:59.290 --> 0:33:01.380
<v Speaker 3>I was on the Hornets plus seven and a half

0:33:01.420 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 3>for that game. And they went into halftime, like about

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.740
<v Speaker 3>to be up 10. I think it was Danis Jenkins

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.460
<v Speaker 3>makes like a near half court shot to make it

0:33:09.500 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 3>a seven point game going into half.

0:33:11.540 --> 0:33:12.900
<v Speaker 2>Again, I'm on plus seven and a half.

0:33:13.430 --> 0:33:13.650
<v Speaker 5>Hmm.

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.420
<v Speaker 3>Pistons win the second half by 15. I lose by

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.450
<v Speaker 3>half a point. Definition of my season so far. That

0:33:20.490 --> 0:33:23.410
<v Speaker 3>being said, I do think that the Hornets actually will

0:33:23.430 --> 0:33:26.150
<v Speaker 3>be pretty damn good once they get their guys back.

0:33:27.230 --> 0:33:29.770
<v Speaker 3>I'm enjoying this skid because I look forward to backing

0:33:29.810 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 3>them once they're healthy. And I'm glad the rating's not

0:33:32.580 --> 0:33:34.420
<v Speaker 3>going to be too high and then elevate.

0:33:35.500 --> 0:33:35.820
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:33:36.340 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Duggan Robinson over two and a half threes for Brian Fonseca. Fiddle,

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:41.820
<v Speaker 1>which two-star play on the night?

0:33:42.690 --> 0:33:45.310
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go with the Orlando Magic on the

0:33:45.370 --> 0:33:49.350
<v Speaker 3>money line. There's a minus 130 available. There was a

0:33:49.470 --> 0:33:52.660
<v Speaker 3>very sharp move across the board, across three market leading

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:56.850
<v Speaker 3>books on this out to like minus 140, minus 145.

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was very noticeable. Just seeing that on

0:34:00.100 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 3>an odd screen, using an odd screen is the most

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 3>fundamental tool. I went in, bet a minus 120 at

0:34:06.500 --> 0:34:10.090
<v Speaker 3>the time. Minus 130 is still great, which is in

0:34:10.130 --> 0:34:14.489
<v Speaker 3>market right now. And I think the biggest angle here is, yes,

0:34:14.530 --> 0:34:17.569
<v Speaker 3>the Magic are dealing with some injuries to Suggs and

0:34:17.610 --> 0:34:21.549
<v Speaker 3>to Palo. I think Palo, if you look at the

0:34:21.610 --> 0:34:25.890
<v Speaker 3>gap between his EPM and those kind of advanced metrics,

0:34:26.570 --> 0:34:29.989
<v Speaker 3>and then his market rating, it would tell you that

0:34:30.050 --> 0:34:34.489
<v Speaker 3>Palo's a little bit overrated by betting market and less

0:34:34.570 --> 0:34:39.689
<v Speaker 3>impactful versus on his expected plus-minus. And so I've always

0:34:39.750 --> 0:34:41.630
<v Speaker 3>been like kind of split on the Palo thing. I

0:34:41.670 --> 0:34:44.390
<v Speaker 3>actually thought he's looked really good early this year, too.

0:34:45.230 --> 0:34:47.930
<v Speaker 3>But I'll back that trend. I think that's very true

0:34:47.969 --> 0:34:50.430
<v Speaker 3>for like a Jalen Brown situation. Also, we saw a

0:34:50.489 --> 0:34:53.590
<v Speaker 3>big move towards the Knicks when Jalen Brown was out.

0:34:53.610 --> 0:34:55.660
<v Speaker 3>And then we saw the 76ers come out and beat

0:34:55.700 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 3>the Knicks. And it's like, well, he's always been one

0:34:57.780 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 3>of those players that's, you know, worth three points to market,

0:35:00.780 --> 0:35:04.189
<v Speaker 3>but has like an EPM of like 1.2. So maybe

0:35:04.230 --> 0:35:06.089
<v Speaker 3>we should be fading those things. And so I think

0:35:06.140 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 3>right now the Orlando magic are a little bit undervalued

0:35:08.980 --> 0:35:10.940
<v Speaker 3>in market. And I actually think that that's starting to

0:35:10.980 --> 0:35:14.020
<v Speaker 3>be caught up with, we see some sharp moves. Wizards

0:35:14.100 --> 0:35:19.169
<v Speaker 3>play some sloppy basketball. They have some talent. Debonza looks

0:35:19.190 --> 0:35:23.950
<v Speaker 3>fantastic thus far. Like he looks really good. So I'm

0:35:24.010 --> 0:35:27.190
<v Speaker 3>impressed with him. But, but Trey doesn't seem to be

0:35:27.250 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 3>shooting much anymore. It's everything's a floater. AD is taking

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 3>too many threes. The rest of their shooters aren't, aren't

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 3>sharp enough. Uh, so a team like the magic that

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 3>plays very cohesive, uh, very strong net rating for the

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.350
<v Speaker 3>starting group, giving the magic on the money line at home, uh,

0:35:42.770 --> 0:35:45.010
<v Speaker 3>as over this wizard seemed as playing a little too sloppy.

0:35:45.810 --> 0:35:45.910
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:45.950 --> 0:35:47.509
<v Speaker 1>I like this one. I can't get enough of an

0:35:47.550 --> 0:35:50.950
<v Speaker 1>edge on it to feel good about it. Orlando. I

0:35:50.989 --> 0:35:52.690
<v Speaker 1>need to do a deep dive on them to just

0:35:52.710 --> 0:35:54.740
<v Speaker 1>kind of understand what's going on with them. And part

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:59.569
<v Speaker 1>of it's just like, look, Suggs and Bankaro, um, One

0:35:59.590 --> 0:36:03.210
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons I'm skeptical is I'm not counting a

0:36:03.250 --> 0:36:06.630
<v Speaker 1>huge loss of Bancaro because Bancaro was so bad last

0:36:06.670 --> 0:36:10.950
<v Speaker 1>year that my composite rating on Bancaro is basically like, eh,

0:36:11.650 --> 0:36:14.390
<v Speaker 1>it's fine if he's out. And the magic would probably

0:36:14.430 --> 0:36:16.890
<v Speaker 1>tell me it is not, in fact, fine if Paolo

0:36:16.910 --> 0:36:19.859
<v Speaker 1>Bancaro is out. Like, that's a massive scoring threat who

0:36:19.900 --> 0:36:22.100
<v Speaker 1>actually provides gravity, and he started off the season great.

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>We could really use him. So I... Totally get that.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:27.779
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the reasons why I'm trying to be

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.420
<v Speaker 1>like a little, I've played Orlando in various spots based

0:36:31.500 --> 0:36:33.220
<v Speaker 1>off of just the model plays. And I'm like, yeah,

0:36:33.260 --> 0:36:34.820
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I need to wait until I get a

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>better idea of what Vancouver's impact is going to be

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:47.250
<v Speaker 1>on that. All right. Let's we did Brian's and we

0:36:47.270 --> 0:36:49.089
<v Speaker 1>did Phil's and we did mine. So we go, we're

0:36:49.130 --> 0:36:51.770
<v Speaker 1>to one stars. Let's go back to Brian and let's

0:36:51.790 --> 0:36:53.529
<v Speaker 1>see Brian's one star by the night.

0:36:54.690 --> 0:36:59.270
<v Speaker 5>This is one that I'm monitoring because weirdly you would

0:36:59.310 --> 0:37:03.690
<v Speaker 5>think given all the injuries, Shay may start getting more assists,

0:37:03.770 --> 0:37:06.730
<v Speaker 5>although he might start seeing, he's going to see more blitzes.

0:37:06.790 --> 0:37:09.910
<v Speaker 5>So this is what's a by-product of this. Hasn't gotten

0:37:09.950 --> 0:37:11.810
<v Speaker 5>over five and a half assists in one game this

0:37:11.850 --> 0:37:16.509
<v Speaker 5>season yet. So under five and a half, it just

0:37:16.550 --> 0:37:22.050
<v Speaker 5>hasn't done it. Even with the shorthandedness of this roster,

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 5>So against Cleveland, too, who has been playing well, say,

0:37:26.620 --> 0:37:29.060
<v Speaker 5>for whatever the fuck happens to them on opening night,

0:37:29.660 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 5>they've been better since. So this is more so something

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:37.390
<v Speaker 5>I'm watching. And I think with Shea Gildas Alexander, like, obviously,

0:37:37.870 --> 0:37:40.969
<v Speaker 5>you've been on this, Matt. Like, you've... And obviously, he's

0:37:40.989 --> 0:37:44.490
<v Speaker 5>developed as a passer. But, like, you've also mentioned he's

0:37:44.570 --> 0:37:47.370
<v Speaker 5>not the best passer in the league.

0:37:48.410 --> 0:37:49.689
<v Speaker 4>Or pretty far from.

0:37:49.710 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 2>And now....

0:37:51.940 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 5>With the overemphasis on what he's going to be able

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.469
<v Speaker 5>to do or not do offensively and how important jared

0:37:57.489 --> 0:38:00.029
<v Speaker 5>mccain becomes and aj mitchell becomes and things like that

0:38:00.469 --> 0:38:02.750
<v Speaker 5>like the way they're going to spread out the offense

0:38:02.810 --> 0:38:07.569
<v Speaker 5>is not by shea gildas alexander playmaking for everybody else

0:38:08.350 --> 0:38:10.450
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be figuring out ways that other guys

0:38:10.489 --> 0:38:14.109
<v Speaker 5>can get their shots cleanly and it's not necessarily going

0:38:14.130 --> 0:38:15.670
<v Speaker 5>to be hey shea is all of a sudden going

0:38:15.690 --> 0:38:19.110
<v Speaker 5>to get 10 assists a game and whatnot so I

0:38:19.150 --> 0:38:21.670
<v Speaker 5>don't think this will stay here all year, but I

0:38:21.710 --> 0:38:25.310
<v Speaker 5>find it curious that no matter the scenario, he's been

0:38:25.390 --> 0:38:27.250
<v Speaker 5>under five and a half so far. And in the

0:38:27.330 --> 0:38:30.109
<v Speaker 5>two games since the big injuries, three and two.

0:38:30.610 --> 0:38:32.379
<v Speaker 4>So that's where we're at with SGA.

0:38:33.420 --> 0:38:37.820
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking up opponent assists right now to see where

0:38:37.900 --> 0:38:40.340
<v Speaker 1>the Cavaliers... So the Cavaliers are one of the higher teams.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:44.220
<v Speaker 1>They are 21st in terms of fewest opponent assists allowed.

0:38:44.890 --> 0:38:47.070
<v Speaker 1>One thing I will tell you, though, in your favor

0:38:47.130 --> 0:38:47.710
<v Speaker 1>here is.

0:38:49.340 --> 0:38:52.170
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the blitzing blitzing takes away assist from the

0:38:52.270 --> 0:38:55.410
<v Speaker 1>primary initiator, because what he has to do is he

0:38:55.469 --> 0:38:57.130
<v Speaker 1>has to hit the pocket pass. And then the pocket

0:38:57.170 --> 0:38:59.230
<v Speaker 1>pass is going to hit the corner. So what happens

0:38:59.270 --> 0:39:01.250
<v Speaker 1>here is Hartenstein is going to go on the short roll.

0:39:01.810 --> 0:39:04.469
<v Speaker 1>They're going to show Jared Allen at the level. Now

0:39:04.630 --> 0:39:07.830
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing like the calves Atkinson started mixing it

0:39:07.890 --> 0:39:10.350
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit. This was like under this is their,

0:39:10.510 --> 0:39:12.710
<v Speaker 1>their base coverage is very good at the level, but

0:39:12.750 --> 0:39:14.270
<v Speaker 1>they know that they have to mix it up sometimes.

0:39:14.610 --> 0:39:17.970
<v Speaker 1>So they'll play a high drop. Sometimes they'll with Mobley

0:39:17.989 --> 0:39:22.020
<v Speaker 1>in particular, they'll switch. Jared will sometimes switch even though

0:39:22.060 --> 0:39:24.860
<v Speaker 1>it personally makes me a little nauseous every time that

0:39:24.910 --> 0:39:27.170
<v Speaker 1>they have him do it, they will absolutely switch with

0:39:27.290 --> 0:39:29.210
<v Speaker 1>one fours like that's the counter here is the shades

0:39:29.230 --> 0:39:31.090
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, that? I'm just going to bring whoever

0:39:31.130 --> 0:39:33.509
<v Speaker 1>Harden's guarding and make you switch it. And then I'm

0:39:33.530 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>going to attack Harden, right? Regular season. You don't switch

0:39:36.820 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on as much though. And to that point, if you're

0:39:40.180 --> 0:39:44.500
<v Speaker 1>switching fewer assists, if they play at the level, Short

0:39:44.540 --> 0:39:47.299
<v Speaker 1>roll pass to Hartenstein. Hartenstein stops about the free throw

0:39:47.340 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 1>liner right below it and then kicks to the corner.

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's an assist wind up being created because you

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:58.060
<v Speaker 1>create a four on three. But they don't result from

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.580
<v Speaker 1>the primary initiator unless he's able to jump past, kick

0:40:00.620 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to the far side. And that happens sometimes.

0:40:03.140 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 4>Boucher is not doing that.

0:40:04.500 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he's not doing that.

0:40:05.900 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 4>That's what Luka will do. That's what Kate Cunningham will do.

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:12.290
<v Speaker 1>He's a good passer. The biggest thing that I try

0:40:12.310 --> 0:40:14.190
<v Speaker 1>to explain to people is just that Shea doesn't make

0:40:14.270 --> 0:40:17.750
<v Speaker 1>second-level reads. He's very good at making the first-level read,

0:40:17.790 --> 0:40:20.470
<v Speaker 1>and he makes the pass very cleanly. He's on target

0:40:20.489 --> 0:40:24.170
<v Speaker 1>with most of his passes. And this isn't a critique

0:40:24.210 --> 0:40:26.150
<v Speaker 1>of him. And it's not like, oh, he makes the

0:40:26.290 --> 0:40:29.589
<v Speaker 1>obvious pass. No, it's like there's reads. Like, if they

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:32.739
<v Speaker 1>do this, you should do this. The great passers in

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:36.739
<v Speaker 1>this league are like, oh, they did this... So I

0:40:36.780 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>should pass here, but they know that. So that rotation's coming.

0:40:39.940 --> 0:40:42.060
<v Speaker 1>And if I wait a second, the other guy will

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>be open. That's what Jokic and LeBron and Harden and

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Halliburton and a couple of other guys were able to do.

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.180
<v Speaker 1>So it's just kind of like a different level of performance.

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.500
<v Speaker 1>I will knock out my one star here. It's related

0:40:55.540 --> 0:40:58.430
<v Speaker 1>to Fiddle's... I think... Was your three?

0:40:58.800 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Was he over?

0:41:00.010 --> 0:41:03.029
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Your three star. And it's Thunder plus four and

0:41:03.050 --> 0:41:06.510
<v Speaker 1>a half. I kind of alluded to this. Like, I just... Um,

0:41:07.010 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not that I don't have the calves bad. It's

0:41:08.980 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>just that I have the thunder so much better than

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:13.980
<v Speaker 1>the calves fully healthy. I think this is the question

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:15.860
<v Speaker 1>that you have to ask yourself is how good are

0:41:15.900 --> 0:41:18.940
<v Speaker 1>the calves as a baseline level? How good are the

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>thunder at a baseline level, fully healthy, and then account

0:41:22.020 --> 0:41:24.690
<v Speaker 1>for the injuries. If you take out J Dub and

0:41:24.710 --> 0:41:28.250
<v Speaker 1>Chet Holmgren and Case and Wallace, I'm not denying the

0:41:28.370 --> 0:41:34.090
<v Speaker 1>cumulative compounding cluster injury nature of this, but on a

0:41:34.190 --> 0:41:37.620
<v Speaker 1>base level rating, the Thunder are still the number one

0:41:37.660 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>defense in the NBA. They haven't like completely gotten crushed defensively.

0:41:43.340 --> 0:41:45.580
<v Speaker 1>They will figure out the offense. They are well coached.

0:41:46.219 --> 0:41:47.460
<v Speaker 1>I do not believe that they should be four and

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.219
<v Speaker 1>a half here. So I'm going to go ahead and

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.260
<v Speaker 1>take four and a half. I make this much closer

0:41:51.300 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to a pick them, which to me, that's probably too light.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.980
<v Speaker 1>I would be like, if, if this was pick them,

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:58.950
<v Speaker 1>I would be, I wouldn't be like, Oh, that's accurate.

0:41:59.430 --> 0:42:01.690
<v Speaker 1>I would probably be like, Oh, I like the calves

0:42:01.710 --> 0:42:03.250
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here, but I do think this is

0:42:03.290 --> 0:42:05.450
<v Speaker 1>two to two and a half points off. So I'm

0:42:05.510 --> 0:42:08.270
<v Speaker 1>on OKC plus four and a half for my one-star

0:42:08.310 --> 0:42:10.270
<v Speaker 1>play for tomorrow. I have bet that, and it is

0:42:10.310 --> 0:42:15.430
<v Speaker 1>in the Action Network app. Fiddle, can we do your one-star?

0:42:16.170 --> 0:42:17.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we can do my one-star.

0:42:17.290 --> 0:42:19.890
<v Speaker 3>Before I do my one-star question, does anybody on the

0:42:19.930 --> 0:42:22.830
<v Speaker 3>bucket screw have a Houston Rockets season.

0:42:22.430 --> 0:42:23.370
<v Speaker 2>Win total over?

0:42:24.130 --> 0:42:24.330
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:26.110
<v Speaker 2>Literally everybody?

0:42:26.140 --> 0:42:29.540
<v Speaker 3>Because we're going right back to the well. Houston Rockets

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 3>minus four and a half.

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.500
<v Speaker 2>Choo-choo! I think they're whether six and one right now.

0:42:35.620 --> 0:42:36.500
<v Speaker 2>Absolute wagon.

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Houston is got Shangoon back in their last game and

0:42:40.380 --> 0:42:42.690
<v Speaker 3>they're going against a Boston team. That second night of

0:42:42.750 --> 0:42:46.670
<v Speaker 3>a back to back on the road headed to Houston

0:42:47.050 --> 0:42:50.670
<v Speaker 3>and Mitchell Robinson's already been ruled questionable for rest. And

0:42:50.710 --> 0:42:54.060
<v Speaker 3>if they don't have that kind of rebounder in the

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:58.740
<v Speaker 3>lineup against this team, That's a significant loss. We talked earlier.

0:42:58.780 --> 0:43:01.670
<v Speaker 3>Tatum got hit in the face and started bleeding. I

0:43:01.710 --> 0:43:04.910
<v Speaker 3>expect him to be fine. I wouldn't overly be shocked

0:43:04.950 --> 0:43:07.990
<v Speaker 3>if Paul George or Derek White was added for injury

0:43:08.070 --> 0:43:11.330
<v Speaker 3>rest reasons tomorrow and the second night of a back-to-back

0:43:11.390 --> 0:43:14.870
<v Speaker 3>on H-Town. Hopefully they go out tonight, the Celtics. uh,

0:43:14.930 --> 0:43:16.730
<v Speaker 3>text the local bartenders and see if they see the

0:43:16.770 --> 0:43:20.670
<v Speaker 3>Celtics at the Houston clubs. But anyways, um, this is,

0:43:20.710 --> 0:43:22.589
<v Speaker 3>this is a spot where I think the line could

0:43:22.630 --> 0:43:25.230
<v Speaker 3>move significantly on news that we don't know right now.

0:43:25.290 --> 0:43:27.489
<v Speaker 3>And even so I like this line. If, if we

0:43:27.530 --> 0:43:29.950
<v Speaker 3>know all the news and it is what it is. Um,

0:43:30.050 --> 0:43:32.450
<v Speaker 3>I like this line as it is for Houston. I, again,

0:43:32.469 --> 0:43:34.990
<v Speaker 3>I just think it's a huge loss. If you're Mitchell,

0:43:35.010 --> 0:43:38.450
<v Speaker 3>Robinson's going to be out against this team. Um, and

0:43:38.469 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 3>then the way that the, uh, Rockets play defense. You

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.410
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of point of attack defenders on a

0:43:45.510 --> 0:43:48.290
<v Speaker 3>guard heavy and shoot heavy team that can close out well.

0:43:48.350 --> 0:43:52.069
<v Speaker 3>So give me some Marcus Smart revenge tomorrow. I'll take

0:43:52.130 --> 0:43:55.750
<v Speaker 3>Houston Rockets minus four and a half. One star because

0:43:56.770 --> 0:44:01.399
<v Speaker 3>it's the values potentially in getting information that's not out there.

0:44:01.420 --> 0:44:03.940
<v Speaker 3>But I just like it as a small play if

0:44:03.980 --> 0:44:05.500
<v Speaker 3>we do know all the information right now.

0:44:06.310 --> 0:44:08.390
<v Speaker 1>On the break pod says PG has already confirmed he's playing.

0:44:08.430 --> 0:44:10.430
<v Speaker 1>I have not seen that yet. Cause I'm not as

0:44:10.510 --> 0:44:11.290
<v Speaker 1>active on Twitter as.

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:14.500
<v Speaker 3>I, he's priced in Derek white's priced in, you know,

0:44:14.540 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Mitchell Robinson's price questionable. And I just like, we've talked

0:44:17.660 --> 0:44:18.800
<v Speaker 3>about some player values.

0:44:19.420 --> 0:44:21.940
<v Speaker 4>Mitchell Robinson should be in. Cause he sat today.

0:44:22.500 --> 0:44:24.509
<v Speaker 5>Cause typically how they'll do that is just play one

0:44:24.550 --> 0:44:25.470
<v Speaker 5>leg of the back to back.

0:44:26.030 --> 0:44:26.230
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:44:26.370 --> 0:44:29.750
<v Speaker 3>He's questionable for rest tomorrow again. So, you know, we're,

0:44:29.790 --> 0:44:31.930
<v Speaker 3>we're priced, we're priced in on these guys. And so

0:44:31.969 --> 0:44:34.250
<v Speaker 3>I think they might, it could go heavy.

0:44:34.050 --> 0:44:34.489
<v Speaker 4>The other way.

0:44:35.170 --> 0:44:38.399
<v Speaker 1>The, um, I looked up Missoula and how he does

0:44:38.420 --> 0:44:40.970
<v Speaker 1>in these three and four spots middling. There's no real

0:44:41.010 --> 0:44:43.009
<v Speaker 1>trend advantage there over the law, over his time with

0:44:43.030 --> 0:44:46.350
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics. There's no like, Oh, Stevens used to be

0:44:46.590 --> 0:44:52.070
<v Speaker 1>the best. Um, just as like an anecdote, Brad went

0:44:52.090 --> 0:44:55.970
<v Speaker 1>on Jim Rome back in the day. And I happened

0:44:56.030 --> 0:44:58.170
<v Speaker 1>to listen to it because like I was aggregating stuff

0:44:58.190 --> 0:44:58.890
<v Speaker 1>for CBS.

0:44:58.989 --> 0:44:59.379
<v Speaker 4>Of course.

0:44:59.430 --> 0:45:01.660
<v Speaker 1>And one thing that Brad said was, well, I kind

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of figured out in the NBA coming from college, um,

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>if you just take all these spots where you're supposed

0:45:06.140 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to lose because it's a schedule spot and you just

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.980
<v Speaker 1>win them, then you come out way ahead and it

0:45:12.020 --> 0:45:14.259
<v Speaker 1>gives you all this leeway of what you want to accomplish.

0:45:15.030 --> 0:45:17.750
<v Speaker 1>And so I just started betting the Celtics on every

0:45:17.790 --> 0:45:20.390
<v Speaker 1>single back to back spot with Brad. And it was

0:45:20.570 --> 0:45:23.230
<v Speaker 1>nails because he got him up for every single game

0:45:23.550 --> 0:45:25.310
<v Speaker 1>where they were in a bad rest spot. The Missoula

0:45:25.330 --> 0:45:27.850
<v Speaker 1>has not really been like that. The advantage has not

0:45:27.870 --> 0:45:30.259
<v Speaker 1>been there. I show a little bit of edge on

0:45:30.300 --> 0:45:33.900
<v Speaker 1>Celtics here. I'm I'm, Because I was the same way

0:45:33.940 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 1>you were when I first looked at the board. I

0:45:35.300 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, ooh, what's Houston? This looks like a spot.

0:45:38.940 --> 0:45:41.779
<v Speaker 1>Houston's been killer. They've been playing with such an edge.

0:45:43.980 --> 0:45:46.420
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to stay away, but I do agree that

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:50.150
<v Speaker 1>this looks like a really good spot here. Especially the

0:45:50.190 --> 0:45:53.430
<v Speaker 1>Celtics playing the Magic. They get so banged up. Somebody

0:45:53.450 --> 0:45:56.950
<v Speaker 1>was replying tonight on one of the Celtics threads that

0:45:56.969 --> 0:45:58.710
<v Speaker 1>I follow, which is like, thank God nobody got hurt.

0:45:59.580 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Like that's just always a reaction to the magic game.

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see kind of how it goes. All right.

0:46:05.620 --> 0:46:09.799
<v Speaker 1>So those are our bets for the Monday slate. We're

0:46:09.820 --> 0:46:11.900
<v Speaker 1>going to give you our best bets brought to you

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>by DraftKings Sportsbook. Best bets on the night. Private Second

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:20.550
<v Speaker 1>likes Vijay Edgecombe over five and a half rebounds. Fiddle

0:46:20.590 --> 0:46:23.450
<v Speaker 1>likes Cleveland OKC over 227 and a half. I like

0:46:23.489 --> 0:46:25.270
<v Speaker 1>that one more and more the more I talk about it.

0:46:25.980 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going back to the well on the corner

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>three angle against the Denver Nuggets. Tumani, Kamara, over two

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:34.420
<v Speaker 1>and a half threes. Those are our best bets presented

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>by DraftKings. Don't forget to use code BUCKETS when signing

0:46:37.580 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>up for a great offer. DraftKings, the crown is yours.

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:43.589
<v Speaker 1>Got some comments I want to hit on the way

0:46:43.750 --> 0:46:49.350
<v Speaker 1>out here. We do have some time for those. Bonjaman

0:46:49.590 --> 0:46:53.970
<v Speaker 1>Johenson says, Cooper flagged to the moon against the Kings.

0:46:53.989 --> 0:46:54.190
<v Speaker 2>Nailed it.

0:46:54.460 --> 0:46:56.540
<v Speaker 1>Dude, I watched Cooper flag tape almost all day. I

0:46:56.560 --> 0:47:00.450
<v Speaker 1>just sat down and watched Mavs offense, and then I slid.

0:47:00.650 --> 0:47:02.910
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to add this on the app. I just

0:47:02.950 --> 0:47:04.730
<v Speaker 1>put a little bit of money on Mavs to make playoffs.

0:47:05.330 --> 0:47:08.089
<v Speaker 1>I unfortunately am like, shit, they're really good. Dusty Mays

0:47:08.130 --> 0:47:09.189
<v Speaker 1>is doing some good stuff there.

0:47:09.210 --> 0:47:12.939
<v Speaker 4>I'm surprised Cooper flag isn't discussed more.

0:47:13.650 --> 0:47:17.069
<v Speaker 3>For most improved player, let's start the discussion. Let's keep

0:47:17.130 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 3>having the discussion.

0:47:19.070 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Just for intellectual honesty and not because of any bets

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that we may.

0:47:22.300 --> 0:47:25.710
<v Speaker 2>Have put in. No, no, no, no, no.

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:28.219
<v Speaker 4>I meant just in general. But he is.

0:47:28.140 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 2>The most improved player year over year right now. A

0:47:30.460 --> 0:47:31.240
<v Speaker 2>little show called.

0:47:31.100 --> 0:47:33.660
<v Speaker 1>Locked On NBA talked about him and I actually said

0:47:33.739 --> 0:47:34.859
<v Speaker 1>that I thought that by the end of the year

0:47:34.900 --> 0:47:38.180
<v Speaker 1>he would be better than Kevin Durant. That is what

0:47:38.219 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he will be at the end of the year.

0:47:39.739 --> 0:47:42.980
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I just think I think in a lot of

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 5>other cases, he would have more of a stand base,

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 5>but for whatever reason, he doesn't.

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:52.450
<v Speaker 2>The stand base got their previous heart stolen.

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:56.229
<v Speaker 1>Who dropped 40-plus tonight. I want to applaud you, Brian,

0:47:56.250 --> 0:47:58.850
<v Speaker 1>for definitely Euro-stepping around what I know you wanted to

0:47:58.890 --> 0:48:02.670
<v Speaker 1>talk about there. Apocalypse says, I still love Minnesota for

0:48:02.690 --> 0:48:05.830
<v Speaker 1>the Cup. Look, I think there's no bad way to

0:48:05.890 --> 0:48:07.770
<v Speaker 1>bet that group B because of the injuries and how

0:48:08.150 --> 0:48:11.750
<v Speaker 1>crazy it is. like the nuggets won their first cup game.

0:48:11.770 --> 0:48:13.189
<v Speaker 1>And I'm kind of like, how can we fade this?

0:48:13.210 --> 0:48:14.029
<v Speaker 1>Cause they don't want to go.

0:48:14.489 --> 0:48:14.950
<v Speaker 2>It'll be interesting.

0:48:15.550 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Um, on the break says, are you taking any, uh,

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:20.839
<v Speaker 1>JT MVP odds at 10 to one cup MVP odds

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:21.859
<v Speaker 1>are plus eight 50.

0:48:21.860 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Jason.

0:48:24.380 --> 0:48:29.650
<v Speaker 5>Probably not, but. I'm a little surprised at, and slightly

0:48:29.710 --> 0:48:33.190
<v Speaker 5>worried about the usage so far. I'm like, does Boston

0:48:33.290 --> 0:48:34.910
<v Speaker 5>need this much Jason Tatum?

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:35.430
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.580
<v Speaker 3>But I'd be interested in a Jason Tatum finals MVP.

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:40.859
<v Speaker 2>Cause I am interested in Celtics finals.

0:48:41.340 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Yeah.

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 5>I think they're a team that I want to see

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:47.569
<v Speaker 5>how they get to the playoffs, but I don't think,

0:48:47.590 --> 0:48:49.129
<v Speaker 5>I don't think Jason, I just don't think Jason Tatum

0:48:49.170 --> 0:48:49.830
<v Speaker 5>is winning MVP.

0:48:50.950 --> 0:48:53.710
<v Speaker 1>Uh, free sauce likes Brian's one-star bet. Uh, he says

0:48:53.750 --> 0:48:55.469
<v Speaker 1>he likes the SJ on the under five and a

0:48:55.510 --> 0:48:57.890
<v Speaker 1>half assists under every game. Not that he's getting the potentials.

0:48:57.910 --> 0:49:00.669
<v Speaker 1>The OK team just can't hit shots. Also, SJ historically

0:49:00.810 --> 0:49:04.810
<v Speaker 1>owns the Cavs from a scoring perspective. Bonjeman also says

0:49:04.830 --> 0:49:06.690
<v Speaker 1>Kobe White's not on the injury report tomorrow.

0:49:07.250 --> 0:49:09.830
<v Speaker 2>Saw that injury clean.

0:49:10.150 --> 0:49:13.810
<v Speaker 5>Doesn't impact what I said about Duncan Robinson, obviously, because

0:49:14.150 --> 0:49:16.430
<v Speaker 5>Kobe White's not going to play that much defense.

0:49:16.550 --> 0:49:19.890
<v Speaker 4>But but he he him.

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:21.700
<v Speaker 5>Being back and conk and nipple, I don't know when

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:22.880
<v Speaker 5>conk and nipple is going to be back, but it

0:49:22.900 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 5>should be pretty soon.

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:25.359
<v Speaker 2>They said soon. Yeah.

0:49:25.380 --> 0:49:27.779
<v Speaker 5>It should be pretty soon. Like, and then you need Brandon,

0:49:27.930 --> 0:49:30.050
<v Speaker 5>Brandon Miller, who I think is going to be great.

0:49:30.390 --> 0:49:32.410
<v Speaker 5>Just the shot attempts need to come down a little bit,

0:49:32.450 --> 0:49:35.830
<v Speaker 5>but they won't until he gets help until he gets

0:49:35.870 --> 0:49:39.219
<v Speaker 5>more help. But, you know, honestly, they blew it against Philly.

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.259
<v Speaker 5>They've probably should have won that game this weekend.

0:49:42.050 --> 0:49:44.110
<v Speaker 1>Okay. This total open two Oh nine and a half

0:49:44.230 --> 0:49:45.830
<v Speaker 1>to eight and a half. It's already at the two

0:49:45.870 --> 0:49:47.630
<v Speaker 1>to 10 and a half. I think I'm going to

0:49:47.670 --> 0:49:50.330
<v Speaker 1>bet the over, but that Kobe white piece of news fiddle,

0:49:50.730 --> 0:49:52.589
<v Speaker 1>we've got market move. There's two 11 and a half

0:49:52.610 --> 0:49:54.790
<v Speaker 1>on the market. I'm going to go ahead and I'm,

0:49:55.930 --> 0:49:57.549
<v Speaker 1>On the Action Network app, I'm going to log it

0:49:57.590 --> 0:49:59.989
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I will grab this number or whatever.

0:50:00.010 --> 0:50:02.670
<v Speaker 3>It's not even just Kobe White. It's moving Schroeder to

0:50:02.710 --> 0:50:05.810
<v Speaker 3>the bench unit, like gives that bench unit a significant

0:50:06.070 --> 0:50:10.370
<v Speaker 3>offensive floor boost. So it's like, I don't know if, yeah,

0:50:10.450 --> 0:50:12.890
<v Speaker 3>it's a small boost to the starting unit, but it's

0:50:12.930 --> 0:50:15.020
<v Speaker 3>a big boost to this bench unit that's not going

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:17.580
<v Speaker 3>to be relying on like Sion James to, I know

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:19.939
<v Speaker 3>he's starting, but he's playing a lot with the reserves too.

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:22.799
<v Speaker 3>So Grayson Allen's doing a lot of heavy lifting for

0:50:22.820 --> 0:50:23.140
<v Speaker 3>that group.

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not I count that for official buckets bets

0:50:26.500 --> 0:50:29.410
<v Speaker 1>will depend on whether we win or not.

0:50:31.350 --> 0:50:33.489
<v Speaker 5>How many minutes do you think Kobe White plays? That's

0:50:33.570 --> 0:50:34.830
<v Speaker 5>the last thing I wanted to ask on that.

0:50:34.870 --> 0:50:36.170
<v Speaker 1>He's coming back from the cap. 26. 24. I was

0:50:36.190 --> 0:50:38.050
<v Speaker 1>going to say 22. We're in the same-ish neighborhood. 22

0:50:38.050 --> 0:50:40.950
<v Speaker 1>to 26 is the range for sure.

0:50:40.950 --> 0:50:42.330
<v Speaker 5>29 points per 36 when he was in Charlotte last

0:50:42.350 --> 0:50:44.509
<v Speaker 5>year for that brief period.

0:50:52.969 --> 0:50:57.540
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy because I heard from several people that they

0:50:57.560 --> 0:50:59.420
<v Speaker 1>did not think Kobe was coming back because he did

0:50:59.460 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>not enjoy his time at the end of last season.

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:07.020
<v Speaker 1>And yet the front office loves him so much that

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:10.310
<v Speaker 1>they got him back. He and Nas are the two

0:51:10.350 --> 0:51:15.050
<v Speaker 1>guys that Peterson is banking on. I can only imagine

0:51:15.070 --> 0:51:17.689
<v Speaker 1>Peterson's reaction when Nas got benched the other night being like,

0:51:18.210 --> 0:51:21.490
<v Speaker 1>do you understand? I traded LaMelo Bull for him. Right.

0:51:22.060 --> 0:51:25.940
<v Speaker 1>I need you to play the guy. Free sauce also says,

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 1>give me SGA over 29 and a half and under

0:51:28.140 --> 0:51:30.620
<v Speaker 1>five and a half assist. I kind of interesting. That's

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:33.700
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting. Like, look, I like that versus certain defenses.

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:35.420
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I like it enough versus Cleveland,

0:51:35.460 --> 0:51:37.510
<v Speaker 1>but I don't mind it schematically. It's not like it's a,

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:40.739
<v Speaker 1>it's not a full drop team, which is where I

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:43.819
<v Speaker 1>would like it the most. Yeah. But it's also not

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:45.700
<v Speaker 1>like a zone team, which is where I would like

0:51:45.719 --> 0:51:46.620
<v Speaker 1>it the least.

0:51:46.820 --> 0:51:48.160
<v Speaker 2>So, okay.

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:49.610
<v Speaker 1>That's going to do it to go over our bets.

0:51:49.739 --> 0:51:54.050
<v Speaker 1>Once again, on the slate. Brian Vitek, VJ Edgecombe, over

0:51:54.050 --> 0:51:57.370
<v Speaker 1>5.5 rebounds. Duncan Robinson, over 2.5 threes. And SGA under

0:51:57.370 --> 0:52:01.009
<v Speaker 1>5.5 assists. Fiddle likes the over in OKC Cleveland. The

0:52:01.070 --> 0:52:03.790
<v Speaker 1>Magic on the money line. And the Rockets, minus 4.5.

0:52:03.790 --> 0:52:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm on to Monty Kamara, over 2.5 threes. The Timberwolves,

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:10.490
<v Speaker 1>minus 11.5. Lay in the wood. And the Thunder, plus 4.5.

0:52:10.489 --> 0:52:16.219
<v Speaker 1>And let's throw in Pistons, Hornets, over 210.5 currently in

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:18.860
<v Speaker 1>the market. Thanks for joining us. My thanks to David Payne,

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 1>our producer. We appreciate you guys. We'll be back tomorrow

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:23.360
<v Speaker 1>night with more. Best bets for you heading into the

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:25.859
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday slate, including King of the Court. Hope you guys

0:52:25.910 --> 0:52:27.430
<v Speaker 1>have a great night. We'll see you guys again next time.

0:52:27.450 --> 0:52:35.790
<v Speaker 1>Until then, let's get buckets. Action Network reminds you, please

0:52:35.850 --> 0:52:39.210
<v Speaker 1>gamble responsibly. If you or someone you care about has

0:52:39.250 --> 0:52:41.709
<v Speaker 1>a gambling problem, help is available 24-7 at 1-800-GAMBLER.