Speaker 1: All right, News round up and information overload our here's
Speaker 1: a Toulfrey telephone number eight hundred and nine four one
Speaker 1: sean if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: I think if you look at Arctic frost and now
Speaker 1: we do know for a fact, it's been confirmed by
Speaker 1: the Attorney General Pam Bondi, it's been confirmed by the
Speaker 1: FBI Director Cash Bettel, that there is an investigation into
Speaker 1: what is a grand conspiracy to influence the outcome of
Speaker 1: elections and much more, going back to the dirty disinformation dossier,
Speaker 1: the double standard in terms of applying the law, no
Speaker 1: reasonable prosecutor would prosecute July twenty sixteen. Of course that
Speaker 1: was mister Higher Honor himself, James Coomi, the dirt, you know,
Speaker 1: the Faiza warrant, abuse, all the way through Russia, Russia, Russia,
Speaker 1: all the way through every other issue. You know, the
Speaker 1: Biden's being protected, the family syndicate. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: a real investigation. When when they had Jack Smith before Congress,
Speaker 1: I think one of the best moments was when Congressman
Speaker 1: Brandon gil Lam Jack Smith were making up his own
Speaker 1: legal theory as a means of justifying his conduct and
Speaker 1: in this case specifically about spying on members of Congress
Speaker 1: and then hiding it with non disclosure orders on top
Speaker 1: of making payments, which is a separate issue. Here's that exchange.
Speaker 2: In May of twenty twenty three, you also issued subpoenas
Speaker 2: for toll records of nine US senators and an additional representative.
Speaker 3: Is that right?
Speaker 4: In May of twenty three we did issue.
Speaker 2: You did, and there were non disclosure orders in conjunction
Speaker 2: with those subpoenas as well.
Speaker 4: Right, that's correct, consistent with Department policy law.
Speaker 2: So again, nobody would know what you were doing. The
Speaker 2: senators would, and the representatives would, and the American people
Speaker 2: wouldn't know what you were doing.
Speaker 3: Is that right?
Speaker 4: The toll records that we secured in the non disclosure
Speaker 4: orders were consistent with policy.
Speaker 2: And you knew whenever you're doing that that there was
Speaker 2: a risk you were violating the speechure debate clause.
Speaker 3: Is that right?
Speaker 4: The toll record subpene is that we secured, where with
Speaker 4: the concurrence of the public.
Speaker 2: Conte your own analysis says that you knew there was
Speaker 2: a risk you were violating the speech or debate clause.
Speaker 3: I have it right here.
Speaker 2: This is an email from John Keller at Public Integrity
Speaker 2: Section to your team, as you are aware. Quote, as
Speaker 2: you are aware, there is some litigation risk regarding whether
Speaker 2: compelled disclosure of toll records of a member's legislative calls
Speaker 2: violates the speech or debate clause in the DC circuit.
Speaker 2: That's from your own analysis, right there. So you did know,
Speaker 2: didn't you.
Speaker 4: So with respect to the item you just put up
Speaker 4: on the screen, the last sentence states.
Speaker 2: Uh, oh, we're going to get to the last sentence. Okay,
Speaker 2: we're going to get to the last sentence, and you
Speaker 2: cite case Lawn here. Quote the bar on compelled disclosure
Speaker 2: is absolute, is right?
Speaker 3: Is that right?
Speaker 2: Or do you think that you didn't have to abide
Speaker 2: by that precedent?
Speaker 4: To be clear, this is not this statement is not
Speaker 4: from my office. This is the statement.
Speaker 2: This is This is your justification for those penis and
Speaker 2: indios that you ordered. This was part of your analysis.
Speaker 2: It's a cursory analysis. I think it's worth noting let's
Speaker 2: get to that last sentence then.
Speaker 3: Quote.
Speaker 2: Given my understanding of the low likelihood that any of
Speaker 2: the members listed below would be charged, the litigation risk
Speaker 2: should be minimal here. In other words, you're using a
Speaker 2: novel legal theory, which you knew was novel, has never
Speaker 2: been tested by any court. You're not charging any of
Speaker 2: these members. Nobody's going to know about it because you
Speaker 2: issued indios. Nobody is going to sue about it. So
Speaker 2: sue this, So who cares? We're going to do it? Anyways,
Speaker 2: you walked all over the Constitution throughout this entire process.
Speaker 2: The gentlemen's time behind are members of Congress, and you
Speaker 2: know it. It's absolutely disgraceful.
Speaker 1: All right, Congressman Brandon Gill joins us now from the
Speaker 1: great state of Texas. God bless Texas.
Speaker 3: Sean, I'm doing great, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: All right, So a very important exchange in my view.
Speaker 1: Do you think anything's going to happen with this? Probably
Speaker 1: the question I could asked the most is yeah, Sean,
Speaker 1: and you've done great work. You've exposed a lot of
Speaker 1: corruption and then nothing ever happens. And you know, I
Speaker 1: try to explain to people a lot, in a lot
Speaker 1: of cases the statute limitations have run.
Speaker 3: Out, well, that that could be the case. Here. The
Speaker 3: goal of these hearings, whether we do it on Somali
Speaker 3: fraud or about Jack Smith or anybody else. The goal
Speaker 3: of the hearings is to develop the information to bring
Speaker 3: a case to dj CA and then used to prosecute
Speaker 3: people who have been who have engaged in illegal activity.
Speaker 3: It seems like jack Smith probably did engage in quite
Speaker 3: a bit of illegal things throughout this entire investigation. Remember
Speaker 3: this whole Arctic frost investigation began with testimony from Cassidy
Speaker 3: Hutchinson that was completely debunked. Then they used information from
Speaker 3: the January sixth Select Committee, which was run by Democrats
Speaker 3: for Democrats that was highly political. And then of course Jackson, by.
Speaker 1: The way, is do you believe a crime took place?
Speaker 1: Because apparently all of the records involving I called the
Speaker 1: Predetermined Outcome made for primetime movie the novel that was
Speaker 1: the January sixth hearings. I mean, they used Cassidy Hutchinson,
Speaker 1: but not the driver of the vehicle that they had
Speaker 1: testified that Donald Trump never tried to commandeer the car
Speaker 1: that he was being driven in that day. But you know,
Speaker 1: a hearsay witness, We'll put that person up because that
Speaker 1: person heard that Donald Trump tried.
Speaker 3: To Right, We're going to base this entire DOJ Special
Speaker 3: Investigation off of hearsay and then use that to start
Speaker 3: justifying tapping, collecting phone data on sitting Republican congressman and
Speaker 3: sitting Republican senators, including the then Speaker of the House,
Speaker 3: Kevin McCarthy. And they were doing this all in order
Speaker 3: to do to get one person, and that was to
Speaker 3: get President Trump press charges against him influenced the results
Speaker 3: of the twenty twenty election. I mean, this is throughout
Speaker 3: this entire process, just walked all over the content Institution,
Speaker 3: violating the speech or debate clause, for one, by collecting
Speaker 3: data on sitting Republican congressmen around the time of a
Speaker 3: major vote, and you mentioned it earlier, in order to
Speaker 3: sort of justify himself. We have the internal analysis that
Speaker 3: Jack Smith used to get these phone taps, and even
Speaker 3: their own analysis said that we believe that there is
Speaker 3: some litigation risk, but we're going to do it anyways.
Speaker 3: We're going to do it anyways because we're not collecting
Speaker 3: data or we're not pressing charges rather on these members
Speaker 3: of Congress. So we're going to concoct an entirely new
Speaker 3: legal theory that says that this is okay. Remember this
Speaker 3: legal theory has never been tested in any court, and
Speaker 3: we're going to slap Indos on it non disclosure order
Speaker 3: so nobody knows what we're doing. In other words, this
Speaker 3: is probably illegal, but here's some new legal theory that
Speaker 3: we're going to use to justify it, and nobody's going
Speaker 3: to know, so we're going to do it anyways. I mean,
Speaker 3: that was the analysis. It was about a paragraph long
Speaker 3: legal analysis that Jack Smith used, and this was so
Speaker 3: flagrantly unconstitutional, but that's what we were dealing with, and
Speaker 3: that's what we're trying to get to the bottom of
Speaker 3: still right now.
Speaker 1: I mean, it really is remarkable. They knew all these
Speaker 1: top members of Congress and the Senate. They know who
Speaker 1: they called, where the call was made from, they knew
Speaker 1: the location of where they made the call, the location
Speaker 1: of who received the call. I mean, this is so
Speaker 1: invasive and atrusive. Wouldn't you normally, you know, under you know,
Speaker 1: the Fourth Amendment, have protections against unreasonable search and seizure.
Speaker 3: Of course you would, And I think Jack Smith knew that,
Speaker 3: and that's why he wanted to keep all of this private.
Speaker 3: In conjunction with those with those phone tamps, the subpoenas
Speaker 3: that he issued, he also issued non disclosure orders. And
Speaker 3: I found that the non disclosure order related to Kevin
Speaker 3: McCarthy particularly interesting because he referred to in that order
Speaker 3: that he sent to a judge, referred to Kevin McCarthy,
Speaker 3: the sitting Republicans Speaker of the House, as a flight risk.
Speaker 3: As if you think that Kevin McCarthy is going to
Speaker 3: hop on a plane and fly to Argentina and live
Speaker 3: his life as a fugitive. I mean, that is insane.
Speaker 3: And yet that was the justification that he brought brought
Speaker 3: forward with a judge. Now they try to claim that
Speaker 3: those those ndos are just sort of standard form letters,
Speaker 3: but we also have the indos that they used to
Speaker 3: collect data on Senator Cruz and other senators, and they
Speaker 3: don't refer to them as a flight risk.
Speaker 1: So this wellplain explain to me how the January sixth
Speaker 1: committee was able to destroy or I guess they're missing
Speaker 1: all of the records because I assume and suspect, let's
Speaker 1: put it that way, maybe a better word. I suspect
Speaker 1: they got rid of those records because they knew it
Speaker 1: would be incriminating with the new Trump administration coming in,
Speaker 1: and they were not going to leave any evidence behind.
Speaker 3: I think you're right there. And you know, the amazing
Speaker 3: thing about this whole Arctic frost investigation that we're doing
Speaker 3: to oversee what happened is most of them ormation we
Speaker 3: have isn't coming from the FBI. And that's not a
Speaker 3: reflection on cash. Butttel, he's been great. It's because the
Speaker 3: people who were engaged in this knew what they were
Speaker 3: doing is wrong. They destroyed documents, they hid documents. What
Speaker 3: we have here is information that we got from whistleblowers
Speaker 3: primarily I mean, I mean, they knew what they were
Speaker 3: doing was wrong. You know, typically if you want to
Speaker 3: hide what you're doing, you probably have something on your
Speaker 3: conscience that you know what you're doing in this context
Speaker 3: is illegal and unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: Quick break more with Congressman Brandon Gilla, Texas on the
Speaker 1: other side. Then we'll get to your calls coming up.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine four one Sean. As we continue, we
Speaker 1: continue with Brandon Gill, Congressman Texas. Then we'll get to
Speaker 1: your calls coming up eight hundred nine four one Sean.
Speaker 1: As we roll along this Tuesday, let me ask you
Speaker 1: about it. Well, it's kind of related. Everything in Washington's related,
Speaker 1: and for those that don't know. By the way, there
Speaker 1: was an announcement earlier that we reported on the House
Speaker 1: did pass this bill to end the government shutdown, at
Speaker 1: one point two trillion dollars spending package to end the
Speaker 1: partial government shutdown. Today it cleared a bipartisan vote under
Speaker 1: the insistence of President Trump. I don't know what's going
Speaker 1: to happen if Democrats want to run on defunding the
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security and eliminating ICE. I'm all in
Speaker 1: favor of that, because the American people and overwhelming numbers
Speaker 1: won't want that, and it won't go over well and
Speaker 1: it won't end the way they think it will end.
Speaker 1: But you know, you had written Mitch McConnell asking his committee.
Speaker 1: And this goes back sometime on the issue of the
Speaker 1: Save Act and how eighty three percent of Americans want
Speaker 1: proof of citizenship to vote. The House did their job
Speaker 1: with it, the Senate needed to do theirs. Where are
Speaker 1: we with that.
Speaker 3: That's something that we're continuing to push. The shutdown. It
Speaker 3: is over. We've got the bill pass out of the
Speaker 3: House today, but I think that the fight on the
Speaker 3: save back still remains, and we've still got a DHS
Speaker 3: Appropriations Bill that we're going to be working on there
Speaker 3: as well, And I agree. I'd love to hear Democrats
Speaker 3: run this next election cycle on defunding ICE and you know,
Speaker 3: reopening up the borders and all of the things that
Speaker 3: stopping all of the things we got a mandate to
Speaker 3: do last fall. But with the Save Act, this is
Speaker 3: something that the vast majority of Americans, including Democrats, agree
Speaker 3: with it. The American people do not want illegal aliens,
Speaker 3: are foreign nationals influencing our election system. I mean, that's
Speaker 3: a core part of American stock.
Speaker 1: A big part of it, though, is proof of citizenship.
Speaker 1: Now I've said we need, we need national standards, voter ID,
Speaker 1: signature verification, pain of custody control, runny mail in ballots.
Speaker 1: They should be under a camera's watch from the minute
Speaker 1: it enters any voting facilities so nobody can tamper with it,
Speaker 1: updated voter rolls, partisan observers, and every precinct watching the
Speaker 1: voting all day and the vote counting all night. I'd
Speaker 1: prefer paper ballots myself. Why would Democrats be against that?
Speaker 3: You know, I think the Democrats believe that this is
Speaker 3: an existential political battle for them because their whole ticket
Speaker 3: towards long term electoral politics in the US is allowing
Speaker 3: foreign nationals and illegal aliens to vote. I mean, that
Speaker 3: was the core premise behind open borders for four years
Speaker 3: under Joe Biden. We'll let us miss so, in.
Speaker 1: Other words, we'll let you come in, we won't vet you.
Speaker 1: Among you will be murderers, rapists, kyle molesters, known terrorists,
Speaker 1: cartel members, and gang members, and then we'll give you
Speaker 1: something of great value, American citizenship and wink, wink, we
Speaker 1: hope you vote for US. Is that what it was.
Speaker 3: That's exactly what it was. And on top of that,
Speaker 3: illegal aliens being in the United States are counted in
Speaker 3: the census, which impacts congressional apportionment, meaning the number of
Speaker 3: congressmen that each state gets. So blue states get bigger
Speaker 3: representation than red states do because they tend to be
Speaker 3: the states where you have more sanctuary juris dictions. So
Speaker 3: this entire, this entire open border's agenda from the left
Speaker 3: was intended to systematically rig America's elections in favor of
Speaker 3: the left.
Speaker 1: Look, the polls show this isn't popular. I think it's
Speaker 1: in the high eighties in terms of the percentage of
Speaker 1: Americans that want proof of citizenship to vote. If you
Speaker 1: look at the actual numbers, and I went over this
Speaker 1: last night, the number of people that want illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: and home is in the upper sixties. It's breathtaking to me.
Speaker 1: The Democrats have now staked out this hill where they
Speaker 1: want a defund dismantle of no bail laws. Reimagine the
Speaker 1: police open borders.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 1: And they are fighting against ice, supporting the worst of
Speaker 1: the worst criminals and attacking them and smearing and slandering them.
Speaker 1: They voted for the largest tax increase in history. They
Speaker 1: have you know, they have married themselves to the climate
Speaker 1: alarmist religious cult, and Republicans voted for the largest tax
Speaker 1: reduction in history. I'm like, okay, I'll take a choice
Speaker 1: election like that every day of the week.
Speaker 3: Oh, I mean, you're exactly right. I mean, this is
Speaker 3: the same party who told the American people that boys
Speaker 3: can become girls and boys should be playing in girls'
Speaker 3: sports and thought that that would be politically popular. And
Speaker 3: this isn't a party that's particularly known for living in reality.
Speaker 3: But the bet that they've made, they think that, however unpopular,
Speaker 3: open borders are, however unpopular, just wildly unchecked spending. Is
Speaker 3: what we can do is bring these people in and
Speaker 3: we will tell them you vote for Democrats and we'll
Speaker 3: give you amnesty. And that's the plan. That is their
Speaker 3: electoral strategy. They can't win over voters in the country
Speaker 3: currently through logic or through any kind of compelling political argumentation,
Speaker 3: so they've got to rake the elections.
Speaker 1: All right, we appreciate your time. Brandon gil Congressman Texas.
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir. Keep up the good work. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine four one, Shawn our number if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. Now did you see
Speaker 1: or hear were you watching this week Weekend? Any of
Speaker 1: the Grammys? You like me? I didn't watch it, but
Speaker 1: I saw the highlights of it. You know Billie Eilish,
Speaker 1: I do? Okay, Now, did you know that Billie Eilish
Speaker 1: said that we all live on lands that were stolen?
Speaker 5: I did hear that?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 1: Did you know that Billie Eilish has a three million
Speaker 1: dollar home.
Speaker 5: I do know that.
Speaker 6: Yes.
Speaker 1: Yeah, she was railing against ice and insisting that no
Speaker 1: one is illegal on stolen land. That was the comment
Speaker 1: that she made. She has a three million dollar mansion
Speaker 1: in Los Angeles, and now It was a little background
Speaker 1: checked by The New York Post. The indigenous inhabitants of
Speaker 1: the La Basin, known as the First Angelinos, said they
Speaker 1: appreciate Eilish's sentiment. However, they noted the performers never come
Speaker 1: back to them directly insisted the next time she explicitly
Speaker 1: referenced them. Quote, Eilish has not contacted our tribe directly
Speaker 1: regarding her property. We do value the instance when public
Speaker 1: figures provide visibility to the true history of our country,
Speaker 1: and it is our hope that in future discussions, the
Speaker 1: tribe can explicitly be referenced to ensure the public understands
Speaker 1: that the Greater Los Angeles Basin remains part of their territory. Huh,
Speaker 1: I'm sure she's.
Speaker 5: Going to sell our house right away. Absolutely. Really what
Speaker 5: she should do is she should, with her own money,
Speaker 5: turn it into some sort of incredible museum. To pay homage,
Speaker 5: as you would say to.
Speaker 6: All of.
Speaker 4: It was too easy. I had to do it. Homage.
Speaker 1: Homage, right, it's homage. It's not homage like you usually say.
Speaker 5: I do say homage, but I was teasing.
Speaker 1: You, but homage.
Speaker 5: She really should turn it into the trial.
Speaker 1: Not sauce. It's it's not sauce. It's not it is
Speaker 1: it always is. Hand over.
Speaker 5: She should hand it over and turn it into a museum,
Speaker 5: and pay for her home to be turned into the museum,
Speaker 5: to pay homage to the tribe, and really just do
Speaker 5: it all in her own dime, to show that she's committed.
Speaker 1: She is committed to the effort. You're butchering the King's English.
Speaker 1: Just for the record, all right, this is the this
Speaker 1: is one weird story. Joe Biden, her ex husband, arrested
Speaker 1: yesterday on charges he murdered his wife in their Delaware
Speaker 1: home in December. Guy, his name is William Stevenson, previously
Speaker 1: married to the former First Lady. He's been hit with
Speaker 1: first degree murder charges for allegedly killing his current spouse
Speaker 1: at their Oaks Hill. You know, according to the house
Speaker 1: at Oaks Hill in Delaware, cops resounded domestic dispute, found
Speaker 1: her unresponsive on the floor. What the hell is that?
Speaker 1: And you know there was an article about the woman
Speaker 1: from Arkansas that hunter had a child with the girl.
Speaker 1: There was a picture of the little girl she was.
Speaker 1: She was just adorable. How do you as a as
Speaker 1: a father? I'm not saying you have to stay with somebody.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, how about if you bring a child
Speaker 1: into this world, you got to you gotta man up
Speaker 1: and be responsible, take care of your kids. Man, that's
Speaker 1: just yeah.
Speaker 5: But he doesn't see it like that. He told her
Speaker 5: he didn't want that kid. He told her to handle it,
Speaker 5: and she said, no, I don't believe in that. I'm
Speaker 5: gonna have the baby. He's like, all right, you're on
Speaker 5: your own.
Speaker 1: So, I mean, you know, people saying she's a former stripper,
Speaker 1: I don't care what she did for a living. They
Speaker 1: had a consensual relationship, she had a child, and then
Speaker 1: the worst part is the President and first Lady ignored
Speaker 1: her at the time, Joe Biden and Joe Biden wouldn't
Speaker 1: even acknowledge their own granddaughter.
Speaker 5: Honestly, in the long run, I think it's a really
Speaker 5: good thing. I don't even know why this woman wants
Speaker 5: anything from these people.
Speaker 1: You know what, that's actually not a bad analysis. I
Speaker 1: don't maybe you know, I do know people that get
Speaker 1: divorced and then like one parent just skips out and
Speaker 1: they just check out and they just go away, And
Speaker 1: it's actually in the best interest of the kids that
Speaker 1: that person is gone. There are horrible people that are
Speaker 1: not meant to be parents.
Speaker 5: It's totally true.
Speaker 1: So I met Savannah guf Thrie one time, and now
Speaker 1: I knew Katie Kirk. Never liked Katie Kirk. Katie Kirk
Speaker 1: was not a nice person. It just wasn't every time
Speaker 1: I used to remember, I used to do all those
Speaker 1: shows GMA and The View and the Today Show and
Speaker 1: all those shows. I don't do that crap anymore. I
Speaker 1: don't need it. I don't need them. But anyway I
Speaker 1: met her, she could not have been nicer just and
Speaker 1: I'm just straight up telling you, she was a very
Speaker 1: genuine nice person. Wasn't triggered or offended that Sean Hannity,
Speaker 1: the Conservative is there. She didn't care. And I met her,
Speaker 1: talked to her a little bit, really liked her. I
Speaker 1: feel terrible for her because, you know, the sheriff out
Speaker 1: there saying that her eighty four year old mother did
Speaker 1: not leave on her own from their residence on Saturday night,
Speaker 1: and you know, more details are coming out and they
Speaker 1: think that she might have was likely snatched from her
Speaker 1: bed in her home. And Pema County Sheriff Chris Nanos,
Speaker 1: you know, said to CBS, I can't think of the
Speaker 1: last time we're in the middle of the night in
Speaker 1: someone's bed. An eighty four year old woman disappeared on us.
Speaker 1: We believe she was taken out against her will. Now
Speaker 1: I think she had a ring tone, one of those
Speaker 1: ringtone everyone's would really have simply safe. They're just so much,
Speaker 1: it's so superior. But ringtone is pretty good. I guess
Speaker 1: it's better than nothing. But they think this woman was
Speaker 1: abducted from her home. And I you know, why would
Speaker 1: anyone want to abduct an eighty four year old woman
Speaker 1: that apparently was not doing well healthwise? It's terrible.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean they said after twenty four hours that
Speaker 5: she was going to be in bad shape because she's
Speaker 5: going to need her medicine. I have ring and I
Speaker 5: have to say, you know, I actually have ring ends.
Speaker 5: Simply say if I have two systems, but and I've
Speaker 5: had simply save for years and then we had it
Speaker 5: ring on for another reason. Anyways, more details than you need,
Speaker 5: but the point is.
Speaker 1: You've got Have you gotten the updated AI generated outdoor
Speaker 1: Guard Protection for simply I haven't.
Speaker 5: I haven't gotten need to update.
Speaker 1: It because it is like it's the next generation on steroids.
Speaker 1: It's incredable.
Speaker 5: So they have they have a great program and it
Speaker 5: works really great, and we've kept it for years.
Speaker 1: But I will tell you that I have facial recognition,
Speaker 1: I have recording all day long that lasts for years.
Speaker 1: It just is a scary environment because the left is
Speaker 1: is so radicalized to me, and you know how chilling
Speaker 1: is it for Savannah Guthrie and her eighty four year
Speaker 1: old mom. What looks like a ransom note being reported,
Speaker 1: As we said earlier by TMZ, it's scary.
Speaker 5: It is scary, And what's more scary is it's like, Okay,
Speaker 5: if they pay this ransom, do they get their mom back?
Speaker 5: Has this person already hurt their mom? Like we said
Speaker 5: it before. You know, again, she hasn't had her medication
Speaker 5: in twenty four hours. It's been thirty six, I think,
Speaker 5: or forty hours since she's been missing. And it's a
Speaker 5: really scary thing.
Speaker 1: We're praying for Savannah's mom. It sounds terrible. The only
Speaker 1: thing I'm going to add to it, and it's separate
Speaker 1: in the part, it's just the commentary. I think we
Speaker 1: should give the proper amount of attention in the hopes
Speaker 1: of finding this woman, and everybody now in the country
Speaker 1: knows this woman is missing and knows what she looks like.
Speaker 1: That's a good thing. However, in the month of January,
Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty some odd people shot nearly thirty
Speaker 1: dead in Chicago, nobody knows one name. And then all
Speaker 1: of the people that have been raped and murdered and
Speaker 1: victims of violent crime and child molestation that Ice has
Speaker 1: been arresting, that never gets put into perspective by the
Speaker 1: legacy media mob. Now they might not seem related in
Speaker 1: many many ways, they're not. However, you know, with all
Speaker 1: the concern rightly that we're giving Savannah Guthrie's mom, why
Speaker 1: don't we give concern about You know, this is like
Speaker 1: the Democrats not standing for Lake and Riley's family or
Speaker 1: Joscelyn Nungarry's family. You know, either you care about humanity
Speaker 1: or you don't. You know, black lives matter. Every life
Speaker 1: matters to me. I believe God created every man, woman,
Speaker 1: and child on this earth. I don't like it when
Speaker 1: people are raped and murdered and victims of violent crime.
Speaker 1: And you can't think of a worse punishment for a
Speaker 1: child molestor In my mind, I agree with.
Speaker 5: You, and I will and I will say I read
Speaker 5: a story yesterday about it gentleman whose daughter was snatched
Speaker 5: out of her bed and there was a child predator
Speaker 5: that was registered in the area. He was released because
Speaker 5: all across these Blue cities we have lowered the incarceration
Speaker 5: time for people who commit any type of pedophilia, which
Speaker 5: is beyond me. And this guy climbed into her window,
Speaker 5: took this child and was in the process of raping her,
Speaker 5: and her father came and killed him and rescued his daughter,
Speaker 5: and he went to jail. He's now out of jail
Speaker 5: and running for Congress, which is kind of amazing in
Speaker 5: and of itself. But those are the stories we don't
Speaker 5: hear about every single day. So while I love that,
Speaker 5: you know people are paying attention and praying for Savannah Guthrie,
Speaker 5: I wish they prayed for everybody this way.
Speaker 1: I wish they played then I think if we did
Speaker 1: and people, I wish people appreciated ice. Anyway, let me
Speaker 1: get to our phones. Eight hundred nine to point one.
Speaker 1: Shawn is on number Greg and Tennessee what's up? Greg?
Speaker 1: How are you glad you called Sir Hi?
Speaker 6: Hi Sean. It's good to talk to you.
Speaker 1: Uh, pleasure, pleasure is mine circle? Did you call?
Speaker 6: Yeah, we go way back to I don't know, nineteen
Speaker 6: eighty nine when you used to fill him for Rush.
Speaker 6: So I've listened to you for a long time.
Speaker 1: I hope you didn't hear that first show at Rush
Speaker 1: the Golden EIB, Mike Fell and Rush comes back from vacation,
Speaker 1: Don Hannity and to the Golden IB microphone. I mean,
Speaker 1: is there anybody that was more good?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 1: Every other There were people that never understood Rush, and
Speaker 1: it cracked me up because he had his tongue in
Speaker 1: his cheek the whole time, and that was so stupid.
Speaker 6: He was a great guy.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 6: The reason why I'm calling it I have a Well,
Speaker 6: first of all, you know, there's I'm sure there's tens
Speaker 6: of thousands of people around the world that want to
Speaker 6: become US citizens and they go they do things like
Speaker 6: they go to the US embassies wherever they're you know,
Speaker 6: whatever country they're in, and they do things the proper way.
Speaker 6: So my question is how many of those people are
Speaker 6: bumped or even denied because of all the illegal immigration
Speaker 6: into our country. You know, the millions that come here
Speaker 6: illegally how does that affect legal immigration. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean there's a fundamental unfairness to it,
Speaker 1: and people don't want to bring that part up. Look,
Speaker 1: what I want ICE to do is to first prioritize
Speaker 1: all the violent criminals to make our street streets, town
Speaker 1: cities more safe and secure. As it relates to the
Speaker 1: people that enter this country illegally, I think that we
Speaker 1: have a system in place that works perfectly. They self
Speaker 1: deport we pay for their airfare home, we give them
Speaker 1: money in their pocket, and the right to come in
Speaker 1: legally after we vet them. I think that is has
Speaker 1: got to be a penalty. And I'm quoting Barack Obama
Speaker 1: when I say that, However, that that's not the immediate problem.
Speaker 1: The immediate problem are the murderers, rapists, child molesters, other
Speaker 1: violent criminals, gang members, known terrorists in the country. I
Speaker 1: would prioritize them first, which is what they're doing.
Speaker 6: I agree with that. However, I want them all to
Speaker 6: leave because the people that do it legally are probably
Speaker 6: going to be a better benefit to our country and
Speaker 6: help our country not be a a you know, a
Speaker 6: bad thing to our country. They're going to take from
Speaker 6: us instead of get to us as you know, as
Speaker 6: American citizens, and cost us money.
Speaker 1: And of course it's costing untold hundreds of billions of dollars.
Speaker 1: And this is the the This is why I like
Speaker 1: Lindsay Graham's bill. It will totally completely codify once and
Speaker 1: for all that sanctuary cities and states have to be abolished.
Speaker 1: And they're not going to get any taxpayer support if
Speaker 1: they don't because they're aiding a betting and obstructing. And
Speaker 1: it has to end. It has to and they do it.
Speaker 1: They've institutionalized this law breaking. It has to stop. All right.
Speaker 1: That's gonna wrap things up for today. We will have
Speaker 1: the latest Savannah Guthrie. This TMZ blockbuster now looks like
Speaker 1: there might be a ransom note. We're following that. Nancy
Speaker 1: Grace will join us on that. We will have the
Speaker 1: latest on the immigration in sanity or a Fleischer writes.
Speaker 1: Previous Senator Tom Cotton will join us. We are officially
Speaker 1: officially on a RAN Watch Trisha McLachlan, Tommy larn and
Speaker 1: much more. Set your DVR tonight, Hannity nine Eastern News.
Speaker 1: You will never get from the legacy media mob. That's
Speaker 1: why you should set your DVR. We'll see you tonight.
Speaker 1: Back here tomorrow. Thank you for making this show possible.