WEBVTT - How Close are we to Curing Alzheimer's?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, Mango? What's that? Well, you remember a few

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>years ago when the social media sites and apps, and

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking Facebook especially, they started using this facial recognition

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>programming and that was used to recognize all of us

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and these photos that we were posting. And I remember

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>when it first started happening. I think this is honestly

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit creepy, Like, how did you know

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>that was my friend Steve? I mean, the guy was

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>wearing a hat, he had on glasses, then he had

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>longer hair than he might have weighed five or six

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>more pounds, Like, how did you know that was Steve?

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, it was so impressive, but also so creepy.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I felt the same way. I kind of had mixed

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>emotions about it. But you know, as much as the

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>world of artificial intelligence can sometimes weird us out and

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>leave us feeling a little bit violated, even you know,

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the more I've read about its potential applications in the

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>world of medicine, the more I'm actually fascinated, you know,

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>by what it might be capable of in the decades ahead.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So how do you mean exactly, Well, I've been reading

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>some about how so many conditions and genetic ones in particular,

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>have what some in the medical field would call a

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>certain face, and that is a set of similar features

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that might indicate whether someone might have a certain genetic syndrome. Now,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the advantage of technology is obviously that these machines can

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.839
<v Speaker 1>process so many millions of pieces of data at one time,

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and they'd be looking for these common features, even very

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>subtle ones. So some of those same programmers who were

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>helping places like Facebook, they're getting involved to help with

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the diagnosis of Alzheimer's, something that's often incredibly difficult to

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>diagnose before significant damage has been done in the brain,

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're often looking for these subtle speech delays or

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>slight hiccups as you might describe them, that a doctor

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>might not be able to see it first. And it's

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>still very early, but of course we all hope this

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>leads to better diagnosis and better treatment, and the progress

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to date does give us some real hope. I feel

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>like most of us have been affected by Alzheimer's in

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>some way, knowing a loved one who's suffered from it.

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I know both of us have. So you know, today

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to talk a little bit about that, Like

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>what we know about Alzheimer's, what kind of progress we're

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>making and fighting it, and who seems to be doing

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the best job of caring for those with Alzheimer's. So

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>let's get started, right hey, their podcast listeners, Welcome to

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Part Time Genius. I'm Will Pearson and as always I'm

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>joined by my good friend man guest shot Ticketer and

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of the soundproof glass, hunched over

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>his brand new copy of Mandarin for Dummies. It's been

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a while since I've seen a dummies book, but anyway,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's our friend and producer Tristan McNeil, and of

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>course he's on theme as usual. You know, I was

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>reading just this week about how learning a new language

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>can help stave off Alzheimer's in some cases. And this

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>was from a study out of York University in Toronto

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>where they actually examined over a hundred long time bilingual

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's patients along with over a hundred monolingual patients, and

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it turned out that on average, the bilingual patients have

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>been diagnosed with Alzheimer's about four years later than the

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>monolingual patients. So the idea is that because learning a

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>second language gives the brains such a strong workout, it

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>can actually help keep the full effects of the disease

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>at bay longer, which is really interesting. But you know,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it's honestly sometimes tough to say for certain, because they're

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of genetic and environmental factors that can increase

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or decrease a person's chances of contracting Alzheimer's, and we'll

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be talking about a few of those later on. But ultimately,

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>no one is immune to the disease, and the greatest

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>risk factor associated with it, of course, is is just

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>age itself. In fact, studies have clearly shown that the

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>number of people with Alzheimer's disease increases with age, so

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>much so that roughly one in five people now suffer

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>from it by the age of eight five. And I

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>know all of this is upsetting to think about, and

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>people who have Alzheimer's disease and their family are already

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>dealing with it on a daily basis, and those of

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>us who have been lucky enough not to have to

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>face it in some big way would probably rather focus

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on just about anything else. But the truth is this

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is something everybody needs to stay informed about, particularly if

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you plan to live past the age of sixty. Another

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>good news is that scientists are already hard at work

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>on new research and new treatments, and that's what we'll

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>be focused on today. You know, all those promising approaches

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to Alzheimer's disease that could hopefully lead to earlier detection

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>and improve symptom management and hopefully one day of course

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>secure that's right, But before we get to the more

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>hopeful side of the topic, we should probably do a

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>quick crash course on what the disease is exactly. So

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for starters, Alzheimer's disease is a chronic, progressive neurodegenerative disease,

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>which means it's a form of dementia that leads to

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>severe cognitive loss and eventual death. And while there are

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>several different kinds of dementia, Alzheimer's is the most common,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>accounting for somewhere between sixty eight percent of all dementia cases.

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So really, dementia is something of an epidemic at this point,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I would think, because you know, some of the stats

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I found all researching, we're pretty jaw dropping. Apparently, Alzheimer's

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is now the sixth leading cause of death in the

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>US and the seventh worldwide. And that really wasn't the

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>case even fifty years ago. Yeah, So Alzheimer's was formally

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>recognized as an epidemic back in the seventies, and sadly

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>that designation still stands today. In fact, that the world

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>has a larger aging population than ever before, which inevitably

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>means that the number of people who developed the disease

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is only set to grow. For example, this organization called

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's Disease International, they estimated that about five million people

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.799
<v Speaker 1>in the US and nearly fifty million people worldwide currently

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>suffer from dimension one form or another, but by twenty

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>fifty the number is projected actually to reach one hundred

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty one million. Wow. So it's obvious in light of

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that why they such a big push to find a

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>cure as soon as possible. But you know, I'm curious

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>how long have we known about the problem, Like, is

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's something we've been trying to get a grip on

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>for centuries or this a relatively new threat. Well, dementia

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as a broad concept is popped up in medical text

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>going all the way back to ancient Greece, but the

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>first case study for Alzheimer's in particular was in nineteen

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>o one, and that's when this German neuropathologist named A.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Louis Alzheimer, you know who the disease is named after,

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>began treating a woman at an asylum in Frankfurt, and

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the fifty one year old patients seemed to suffer from

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>some kind of psychosis. In addition to rapid memory loss,

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>she reported I guess uh, strange feelings of jealousy towards

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>her husband. She also had these odd behaviors, like she'd

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>dragged furniture to and fro She'd hied uh. Sometimes she'd

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think people were out to kill her, so then she

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>would scream out loudly. It was pretty sad, and so

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>was Dr Alzheimer able to help her in anyway? No,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>not really. But when the patient died five years later,

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer was able to dissect or brain, and his findings

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>formed the basis for the first formal description of pre

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>senile dementia. So what did he find when he looked? So?

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Today we know that the main effects of Alzheimer's, like

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>memory laws, decreased thinking ability, Personality changes like these are

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>all the result of dyeing brain cells and the atrophy

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of certain key regions of the brain. And the reason

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>these brain cells start to die off is because something

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>has disrupted the communication between the neurons and the brain.

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So Alzheimer's biggest contribution was really identifying what that something was,

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least most likely what it is, because when

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>he dissected that patient's brain and examined it under a microscope,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>he identified these tiny tangles and plaques dotting the gray tissues.

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And and these are the masses that that are some

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of protein build up, right, yeah, there are. There

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>are these two types of proteins at work. It's the

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>amyloid and the tao. And while we don't know what

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>prompts the accumulation of these proteins are how exactly they interact,

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>their presence is usually a telltale sign of Alzheimer's. So

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the amaloid is recognizable because it bunches together into sticky

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>clumps through these beta amaloid plaques. And the tow is

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>easy to spot because it accumulates as tangles of these

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>watered up protein strands. You know, even before we started

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>doing our research for today's episode, I'd always heard that

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest obstacles for treating Alzheimer's is that it's,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, notoriously difficult to diagnose. By the time the

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>symptoms manifest enough to be caught, much of that damage

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>has already been done. But why is that, like, if

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>these plaques and tangles are so noticeable. Yeah, it's a

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>good question, and the answer is that we actually haven't

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>found a reliable or accurate way to measure these protein

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>build ups, especially in living patients. So more than a

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred years after that initial case in Germany, there's still

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>no definitive way to diagnose Alzheimer's without dissecting the brain

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>post mortem to look for these hallmark plaques and tangles.

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And in recent years, some postmortems have given a reason

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to question whether the presence of these build ups is

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>really telling the whole story anyway. Oh, so what do

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>you mean by that? Well, there have actually been some

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>cases where patients who were said to have Alzheimer's were

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>revealed to not have plaques and tangles in their brains.

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And maybe even weirder, there are also cases where post

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>mortem exams show massive build ups in the brains of

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>people who had excellent memories. So while these plaques and

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>these tangles appear to have some part in the onset

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of Alzheimer's, it isn't true in all cases, and as

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a result, a growing number of researchers are starting to

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 1>think that chronic inflammation might actually play the larger role

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in the disease than they initially thought. So here's how

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Scientific American broke down the new hypothesis and article from

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>last November. In the brain tissue damaging long term inflammation

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can also be caused by a build up of cells

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>known as microglia. In a healthy brain, these cells engulf

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>and destroy waste and toxins, but in Alzheimer's patients, the

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>microglia failed to clear away this debris, which can include

0:09:56.360 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>toxic tow tangles or amyloid plaques. The body then activates

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more microglia to try to clear the waste, but this

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in turn causes inflammation. Long term or chronic inflammation is

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly damaging to brain cells and ultimately leads to brain

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>cell death. Okay, so in this case, the inflammation, which

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>could be worsened by the plaques and the tangles would

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>would actually be the real culprit behind the dying brain cell.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So how would just been thinking about this? How would

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that impact the search for for treatments, though, I mean,

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>from everything I've read, it seems like most researchers have

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>been focusing on the other ways to prevent or destroy

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 1>these protein build ups. So I mean, I hate to

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>ask this, but have we been heading in the wrong

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>direction this whole time? Well it's too early to say

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but I really hope not. It would be

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>devastating to see such a colossal amount of effort and

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>money lead to a dead end. I mean, we hear

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>about new promising treatments all the time, but all too

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>many of them disappear from headlines a few months later

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>because they were later proven ineffective during trials. And in fact,

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point, none of the hot twenty three experimental

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's drugs developed between two thousand and fourteen have made

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it past the later stages of clinical testing. And that's

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously a concern for all sorts of reasons, you know,

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not the least of which is just how much it

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>costs to develop even one new form of treatment. For example,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that there was this two thousand sixteen study from the

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Health Economics, and it found the average research

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and development cost for a new medicine are about two

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollars. Good lord, it's hard to even

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>wrap your head around that kind of money for something

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. But you know the truth is that, you know,

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we as a country still aren't spending as much on

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's researches we likely should be. I mean, stimulate spending

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for Alzheimer's research was increased to around I think it

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>was around one point eight billion dollars this year, and

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that does get it pretty close to that two billion

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar mark that the Alzheimer's Association has has long been

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>saying that researchers needed in order to treat the disease effectively.

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But this funding has to be every year, so there's

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>no guarantee that that upper trend will continue long term.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And not to mention that's just funding for new research,

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the actual cost of health care for

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>dementia already exceeds two hundred billion dollars each year in

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the US. Yeah. But despite the uncertainties that still surround Alzheimer's,

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>like all that plaques and tangles, research we've been spending

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so much money on will still be super useful no

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>matter what. And that's partly because many researchers are now

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>pushing for a more personalized approach to Alzheimer's treatment. It's

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>similar to the way we're dealing with cancer, like there's

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>no one treatment that's effective for every kind of cancer,

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>or even for every case of the same kind, and

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the same way with Alzheimer's. So the idea you

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>had the new approach is to use multiple drugs to

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>target the many different changes in the brain that can

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>occur with Alzheimer's. Okay, I see. So for instance, you

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>might start a patient off with one drug if you're

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to reduce that build up of amyloid plaques or

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and then you might switch to another

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>if inflammation is the bigger issue, or or change it

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.599
<v Speaker 1>up if it's different for another patient exactly. So, Alzheimer's

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is obviously this complex disease and it doesn't manifest the

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>same across the board, so it's helpful to have as

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>many tools at our disposal as possible to treat it,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and that way we can mix and match medications to

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>create treatment plants tailor made for each patient's pelecular profile.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, well, that does sound like a more promising

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>approaches as well. As a nice reminder that it's worth

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>tackling this problem from as many different angles as we can.

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you never know which one might lead to

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 1>that game changing solution that we're always looking for. Absolutely,

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And in the meantime, there's still some effective ways to

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>reduce your chances of contracting Alzheimer's, and even a few

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>new ideas for how to detect and diagnose Alzheimer's without

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>having to wait for a postmortem. Yeah, well, I definitely

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about those, but before we do, let's

0:13:48.400 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. You're listening to Part Time Genius

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about the most promising efforts to treat

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's disease. All right, mango, So we talked about how,

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>for decades now, the prevailing theory has been that Alzheimer's

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>is caused by these cell killing protein build ups in

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the brain. And you noted how chronic inflammation is also

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>thought to have some role in that degeneration. And what

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>strikes me about all this is it it seems like

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we know where the accumulations and inflammation may come from,

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>but we don't really know why they occur. Yeah, that's true,

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>but but a person's genetics do provided least some clues

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>as to what's going on. For for example, we know

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that the trigger for most cases of Alzheimer's is a

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>single mutated gene and it's on one of our chromosomes.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Then remember that we all have two copies of every gene,

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>one from each of our parents, so potentially someone could

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>have two copies of this mutated gene. Al right, So

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>how big a factor is this mutation on whether a

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>person develops Alzheimer's or not? I mean, it really depends

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on how many copies of the muta genes someone has.

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So if a person has one copy, then there's up

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to chance of them developing the disease, And if they

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>have two copies, then the likelihood jumps to as high

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>as eight seven m alright, And so how common is

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it to have one or two of these genes? So

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>apparently about of the population has one copy, but it's

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>only two percent that have two copies. And testing for

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the genes is actually something you can do through something

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like twenty three and ME or one of those other

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>personal genetics tests. You know, though, you know, whether you

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>want to stress yourself out with something like that is

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>another question entirely. Yeah, I can see. I'm you know,

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people might feel like that level of

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>self knowledge is is something they're not quite prepared to handle,

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and especially considering that many researchers say there's more to

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the disease than just genetics. For example, I was reading

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>how some scientists think that the true causes of Alzheimer's

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>can be traced back to more environmental factors. That includes

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>everything from your diet to how many times you've been

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, hitting the head in your lifetime too. Of course, yes,

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know how many languages you speak? Yeah, definitely, so

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that language one is actually rooted in the fact that

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>people who stay mentally active experienced less cognitive decline as

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they age, and amazingly, that remains the case even for

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>people whose brains were later found to be riddled with

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>familiar signs of Alzheimer's, like those plaques or tangles we've

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>been talking about. So even when the disease is already

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>set in, elderly patients who make it a habit to

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>read or write or play thinking games like chess can

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes stave off its symptoms for a lot longer. In fact,

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>one two thirteen study found that people who didn't routinely exercise,

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>their brains experienced cognitive decline full forty eight percent faster

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>than those dident Yeah, that's pretty pretty good endorsement for reading.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you know, for those times when your

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>brain just needs a break or you know, it does

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>look like there's some other ways, and and one of

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>these that many people might find of interest is by

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>knocking back a couple of of drinks. Or at least

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the word from a study that came out earlier

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this year in Scientific Reports. Honestly, that kind of sounds

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like a made up name for a dun over like this.

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>This was in Scientific Reports, So I should have a

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>drink a lot, that's right. But the researchers found that

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>drinking just two glasses of wine daily is enough to

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>net you a positive effect, which it works due to

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the way the alcohol interacts with the brain. So apparently

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the wine enhances the brain's ability to remove those damaging

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>toxins that build up in the brain, which of course

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>includes those TAO and beta amyloid proteins that we've been

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about. The brain typically does this by pumping in

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>some cerebral fluid to flush away those troublesome plaques and tangles.

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>But there's something about alcohol that gets the old cerebral

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>fluid flowing more efficiently. And in case you're not a

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>wine drinker, there is some evidence that other forms of

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.479
<v Speaker 1>alcohol work too. For instance, there was another study from

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago that found that beer drinkers

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>tend to have fewer ammoloid build ups than non beer drinkers. Now,

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>as always, I do need to pause here and say

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the key part here is moderation. Excessive alcohol consumption is

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>obviously not a good thing for anybody. Yeah, I mean,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really wild to lay out all the environmental factors

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>potentially connected with Alzheimer's, Like I saw this one report

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>in the Journal of Neuroscience about how even something like

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sleeping on your side can help delay the development of

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>both Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. And apparently it goes back to

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the fluid flush routine our brains used to clear out waste. Like,

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it turns out the fluid flows most effectively when we're

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>asleep and on our sides. All right, so it sounds

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like we've got the solution here. We just need to

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>do some Sudoku puzzles all day long. Line on our

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>side and then drink ourselves into a wine comas that

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the solution here, Yeah, and pick up cantonese. I

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's not the part of right, right, Okay, that's right.

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I forgot, But I mean, you know it's it's there's

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>no surefire way to hold back Alzheimer's either, you know that.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing about all these environmental risks we're talking about,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like they can only suggest probable connections between things that

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have already happened. Like I've even seen studies that link

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>drinking soda, both regular and diet, to the onset of Alzheimer's.

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And and while there might be a correlation between getting

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's and drinking soda, that doesn't mean that one necessarily

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>caused the other to happen. Well, that's a good point,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And I mean these kinds of lifestyle considerations can be

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of reassuring for us to think about. But the

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>research I do find most exciting is this stuff aimed

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>at finding new detection methods for Alzheimer's. After all, it's

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eighteen, and it feels like we need

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a better system than having to dissect these brains post mortem. Yeah,

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree, and that's why I was excited when I

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>first found out that we actually do have tests that

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>can identify those gene mutations I mentioned earlier, the ones

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that make a person more likely to develop Alzheimer's. But

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, many people who develop Alzheimer's don't

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>actually carry that genetic marker. Well, many who do never

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>end up exhibiting Alzhemer's symptoms. Well, so this is kind

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of like the plaques and tangles then, right, like that,

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>they're reliable markers that maybe point the way to Alzheimer's,

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>except for all of these cases where for some reason

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't, yeah, exactly, And and that means that even

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>genetic testing can't provide any real degree of certainty one

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>way or another. And that's what makes it all so confusing, Like,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>even if you don't have the genetic markers, you could

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>still develop the disease. Well, thankfully, some researchers have begun

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>branching out from genetic and environmental factors and they're concentrating

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on these so called biomarkers instead. Now, the idea here

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is that the body exhibits tell tale biological signs of

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's that we don't necessarily have to look at the

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>brain to find so that we can look for these

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>clues in all kinds of places that might be in

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the blood or in the cerebro spinal fluid we mentioned earlier,

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>or even in the eyes of all places, And honestly,

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that last one is probably my favorite because all it

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>involves is administering these fancy eye drops, and that's just

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so much less obtrusive than digging around in somebody's brain. Yeah,

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that obviously sounds way better there to me,

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>But walk me through what makes these eye drops so fancy. Well,

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>even though we have things like pets cans to help

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>us take a closer look at living brains, it can

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>still be incredibly tough to identify those beta em aloid

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>build ups that often point to Alzheimer's. And that's largely

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because the betas are just one of many kinds of ammolloids,

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're all kinds of hard to tell apart. Plus,

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>there are many different neurological disorders that are linked to

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>specific ammolloids, So if you can't tell which protein you're

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at, then you really can't determine which disorder it's

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>pointing to. I see, So how did the eye drops

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>help with that? All right? Well, this is where things

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>get really cool. So you know how the eyes are

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>closely connected to the brain, right, Well, the connection is

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>so close that amyloids actually accumulate in our eyes too,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not just the brains. So the researchers are hoping that

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>by adding these fluorescent markers to eye drops, they'll be

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>able to light up the ammoloids in the eyes and

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>different colors, and of course each color would correspond to

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a different ammoloid and bike stay chin from that to

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the disorder it's associated with. So in theory, you could

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>have a doctor diagnosing a patient's condition just by looking

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>them in the eye. Isn't that incredible? Yeah, it really is.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>And it actually reminds me of this other new Alzheimer's

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 1>tests I've read about. It's called the Opposite or the

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, and it's basically one

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of those scratch and sniff cards with like forty different

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>odors on it, which is really clever because you know,

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we've known for a while now that people with neurological diseases,

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>including Alzheimer's, often lose some or all of their sense

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>of smell. So if a patient nails the opposite, you

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty much know that they're not going to have Alzheimer's,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>at least for the next few years. And I know

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of other reasons why people lose their

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>ability to smell, So you know, it's not like it's

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>just this comprehensive test for Alzheimer's or anything. But as

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Kate Horowitz from Mental Fauce puts it, the results are

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>instantaneous and at it's a far cheaper starting point than

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>other brain scans. Huh, well, that's that's true. But all well,

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about ways to potentially delay the onset of Alzheimer's,

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as some new ideas for how to detect

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and even diagnose it earlier. So now why don't we

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>take a look at a few of them may maybe

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>more out of the box approaches to Alzheimer's treatment and

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>how they hope to make a difference in the lives

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of those with Alzheimer's. That sounds great, but first let's

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. Okay, well, so what kinds of

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>unorthodox approaches to Alzheimer's treatments are you excited about? All right,

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>so I came across two rest examples that really stood

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>out to me, and they're pretty different because one highlights

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the power of the individual in this ongoing fight, and

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>one showcases what a motivated community can give back to

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>those who are suffering from Alzheimer's. So I'll start with

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the first one, which is this may a new app

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's called Timeless and it's being developed by a

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>fourteen year old girl named Emma Yang. And yes, you

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>heard that right. Emma is indeed a teenage program prodigy.

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>According to an article in Fast Company, Emma code of

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the app herself and the hope that it will one

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>day help her grandmother, who has Alzheimer's, to remember her

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>loved ones. I mean, first off, that is so inspiring

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and also heartbreaking, but it also sounds like a really

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>great concept. So how does it work well. The idea

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is to use facial recognition as a way to remind

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the user who a certain person is and also what

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>their relationship is to them. So once the Timeless app

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is loaded up with all of this information and Alzheimer's

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>patient can refer to it anytime they have trouble recognizing

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>someone's face, and all they have to do is take

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a quick photo of the person, and the app will

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>pull up all of their information. So the hope is

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that once a patient refers to the same entries enough times,

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll start to better retain that information. And that's not

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the only thing it does either, So Emma has also

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>programmed the app to provide appointment reminders and even help

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>users recognize when they might be repeating a task that

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>they've already completed. So, for instance, if a patient calls

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a friend for a second time because they, you know,

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>forgot about the first call they made, the app will

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>notify them that this is the second call to that

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>number in that short period of time. So while this

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>isn't something that would be useful in the later stages

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of Alzheimer's, it could be a way to help prolong

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>those family interactions in the meantime. I mean that that

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>is really clever. I'm guessing the app hasn't hit the

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>market though yet. Right now, m is still working on

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>securing all the funding that she needs to get it

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>out the door, but it sounds like the plan is

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to release it within the next couple of years. Well,

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm obviously rooting for her, but I'm curious, like,

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>what's the more community driven program that caught your eye.

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So this one's part of a cultural program that was

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>started a couple of years ago by a handful of

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>museums that are in Wisconsin and Minnesota, and it's called

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Spark and it works in partnership with Alzheimer's Association. Is

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a way to help stimulate patients memories. So according to Smithsonian,

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the program's main goal is to quote use artwork and

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>other sensory input to help stimulate long term memory retention

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>among patrons. And so some of these tours even have

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the patients interact with sensory items along the way you

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>think about like scented candles or a piece of textured cloth,

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and the ideas that all of this can help spark

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>their memories. So, for example, if a group of patients

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>was looking at a sculpture while a scented candle was burning,

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you lit that same candle a few hours

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>later and ask the patients about the sculpture, the scent

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>might help them recall more about that piece and their

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>perceptions of it, and you know, they would have a

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>better memory of it than without that sensory input. I mean,

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>that's really awesome. So do you have any sense of

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like how many museums offer programs like this, Well, so far,

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there are fourteen of them that are part

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.959
<v Speaker 1>of the Spark program and they hold art tours and

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>painting classes, as even dances, and these are all for

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's patients and their caregivers. But these programs are actually

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>modeled after a similar initiative that was at MoMA and

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that started a little over a decade ago. And because

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of the success of these kinds of programs, you've got

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>museums all over the US that have started investing in

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>their own ways, and all of these are efforts to

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>help them, you know, those with memory laws re engage

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with art. That is such a great idea. And and

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>since we're talking about ingenious, community driven Alzheimer's programs, I

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>do want to talk just a little bit about this

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>government funded nursing care company outside of Amsterdam that runs

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>what it refers to as a dementia village. So I'm

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>sure you've heard about this, but it's an entire model

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>town known as hoke Awake, and there are more than

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty resident patients living together in groups there.

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>It opened in two thousand nine as a way to

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>combat the social isolation and lack of activity that people

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>with dementia often deal with, and instead of feeling cooped

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>up with nothing to do, patients are encouraged to carry

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>out everyday activities in this controlled environment. And it's built

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like a functioning tiny town, so they can go grocery shopping,

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>they can visit the hair salon, catch a movie at

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the theater, or even grab a cup of coffee at

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the cafe. All of these storefronts are staffed by caretakers,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and they also populated the town and help look out

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>for patients safety. It's really incredible. Yeah, and I love

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this concept and you're thinking about it. It gives these

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's patients a chance to socialize more and and even

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>regain some of that independence that they had before. And

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>imagine it must have such a big impact on their

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>quality of life overall. It actually reminds me a lot

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of that town in Belgium where there's like this seven

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred year old tradition of residents taking in patients with

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>neurological disease or mental illnesses. So the towns people just

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of adopt these patients. Into their families and look

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>after them like their own And it's that same kind

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of all for one mentality that I get from that,

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, that hoc Awake approach. Yeah. Plus this prop

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>town set up in general is just kind of awesome, right,

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like Truman Show, but without any of that

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>exploitation aspect to it. What's the fun and that no,

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but you're you're right well, And it's also cool to

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>see this immersive approach to dementia care catching on in

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>other places, like I read there's a similar facility in Ontario.

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Now there's actually a daytime care center in San Diego

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's set to open I think later this year,

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and that one was partly inspired by hok Awake. So

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>at a daytime center, and I guessink the patients don't

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>actually live there full time. Yeah. So the project is

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>largely the brainchild of Scott Tardey, who's the CEO of

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a nonprofit called Glenner Alzheimer's Family Care Centers, and his

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>idea was to use set design to craft this immersive

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>environment for Alzheimer's patients to visit and reminisce during the day.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And reminiscence is really the key word here, because the

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>unique aspect of this project is that it's patterned after

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a clinical practice called reminiscence therapy. Now, this is when

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>facilitators use prompts like photographs and music to help patients

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>recall events and fee feelings from earlier in their life,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and it works really well. There's all kinds of studies

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to show that this form of treatment actually helps boost

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>both cognitive function and quality of life. So the idea

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>here was that if you can build an entire town

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>designed to seem familiar, the effects of this kind of

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>therapy might be even greater. So I'm curious, how do

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you make a place feel familiar to a whole bunch

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of different people. Well, the nonprofit did something really smart here.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>They designed the whole town, which is called Glenner Town

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Square by the way, to look like it's from the

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>period between nineteen fifty three and nineteen sixty one. And

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they did this because that's the period when most of

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>today's dementia patients were young adults. So, for example, if

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a patient is in their early eighties and two thousand eighteen,

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that means they were born in the mid nineteen thirties

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and would have been you know, eighteen nineteen twenties, somewhere

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>around that in the mid fifties, right, So that's interesting,

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But like why focus on when they were young adults

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>over when they were kids or adults or some other

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>period of their lives. Well, apparently the memories from the

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>person's twenties and thirties are the ones that stick around

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the longest. It Scott tart To explained, quote graduation from

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:13.719
<v Speaker 1>high school, college, first jobs, marriage, perhaps children, These are

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the milestones typically in somebody's life. So that twenty year

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>period seems to be where memories are the strongest. M

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's really interesting, and I think it's curious

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that like this example is more pleasant filled than Truman Show,

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's it really is stunning to see how people

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>are thinking outside the box and coming up with new

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>approaches to deal with Alzheimer's. But you know that there's

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>one group of people affected by Alzheimer's that we haven't

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>talked much about today, and and that's the tens of

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>millions of people who watched their loved ones struggle with Alzheimer's.

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And what I find so inspiring about the ordeal is

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that despite all the pain, they go through while caring

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>for friends and family members, they remain eager to find

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the disease in any way they can. Yeah, that's very true.

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And actually I found this Wired article from last September

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that talks about a new way everyday people are helping

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>researchers just get a little bit closer to that cure

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for Alzheimer's. And this program is called Stall Catchers, and

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a video game where players examine images of

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>mouse brains and they try to spot any clogged blood vessels,

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>which they call stalls in this case, and and those

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>could be obstructing blood flow in the brain. This kind

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of reduced cerebral blood flow has been linked to Alzheimer's,

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you can treat this, there's a chance that

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>memory loss could actually be reversed. And the method has

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>already proven effective and lab mice. But there's one important caveat,

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's that all the drugs tested so far to

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>improve blood flow have also destroyed the mice's ability to

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>ward off infections, which is obviously a deal breaker for humans.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And so as a result of this, researchers continue to

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>test new drugs in search of one that will leave

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>patients immune systems intact. But here's the problem. You know,

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>every time they test the new drug, they then have

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to check images of the mice brains for stall halls

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in order to see if that medicine is or isn't working.

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And since each new drug brings about thirty thousand images,

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to sort through the results of each trial can take

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>up to a year just a process. Wow. So so

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing that's where the game comes in. Yeah, that's

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly where it comes in. So the researchers have teamed

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>up with this nonprofit innovator called the Human Computation Institute,

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and so together they've developed this online game to help

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>crowdsource the data that they need. Players will sift through

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>thousands of grainy, black and white slides of these mice brains,

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're hunting for any sign of stalls, which show

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>up as these small black spots in the images. So far,

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>more than six thousand people have logged onto play Stall Catchers,

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's helped speed up the researchers work tremendously. In fact,

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>when game activity is at its peak, the players effectively

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>complete a week's worth of research in a single hour.

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So process that you know would otherwise take decades, might

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just take a few years instead, which could really mean

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>all all the difference for patients currently dealing with Alzheimer's.

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that really is incredible. So do we

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have any info on who the user basis for Stallcatchers, like?

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Is it mostly people whose friends and family have been

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>affected by Alzheimer's? Yeah, I mean that's really the heart

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of the game's community, and and that, to me is

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>such a powerful reminder of why it's important to not

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be discouraged when the latest promising treatment for Alzheimer's falls through.

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is something Miranda Cats actually touches on in

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>her piece for Wired. She's describing how the friends and

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>family members of Alzheimer's patients have responded to stall Catchers,

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is how she puts it, Frustrated by high

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit overheads and the glacial pace of research, they've left

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at an opportunity to take things into their own hands.

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And though a true cure for Alzheimer's is still distant,

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Stallcatchers has already proven an effective treatment for one of

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the diseases most insidious symptoms, helplessness. Yeah, I mean that

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that really is so important to keep in mind. You know,

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>according to the All Cemer's Association, more than of what

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we know about the disease was only discovered in the

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.399
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years. So while progress might seem slow when

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you consider what we've known about Alzheimer's for over a century, now,

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>at least we're now at a point where researchers are

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>covering a massive amount of ground fairly quickly. And I

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>know it sounds cliche, but we really are closer to

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a cure than ever before, even if that happy outcomes

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>still has many years left to go. Yeah, that's true.

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in the meantime, you've got these ridiculously

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 1>smart people that will continue coming up with new and

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>clever ways to manage symptoms in Alzheimer's patients and to

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>keep hope alive in their loved ones. Yeah. So with

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that in mind, what do you say we dive into

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact off and check out a few more promising approaches.

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do it, h Okay, So I want

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a couple of very different groups that

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have made for very interesting studies. And the first is

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in a village in the mountains of northwestern Colombia, and

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>it's called Antioquia, which happens to be home to the

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>world's largest concentration of Alzheimer's suffers, And to make matters

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>more difficult, they're primarily people dealing with early onset Alzheimer's. Now,

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this is because of a gene that's been passed down

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>through the generations and has unfortunately stayed in the population

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>because of inbreeding, and sadly, what it often means is

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that rather than children eventually taking care of their parents

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as those parents age, the reverse often happens, where the

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>elderly population is having to care for their children in

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>their forties and fifties. Oh man, that's tragic. So in

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>our research for today's episode, I was reading about how

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>scientists have been able to study the gradual impact of

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Alzheimer's on writers as they battled the disease. And one

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of these was Iris Murdoch, who is this philosopher and

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>writer who is eventually unable to write because her demension

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 1>has just got so bad. But because she wrote twenty

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>six novels, researchers were able to look at her writing

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>over time and found that while the structure of her

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>novels pretty much stayed the same, in her later works,

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the vocabulary was far more limited, and there was actually

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>a similar study downe on Agatha Christie's work and they

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>found a twenty decrease in her vocabulary later in her

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>writing career. In fact, you know, it's kind of strange,

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>but one of her last novels, Elephants Can Remember, actually

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>involves the writer dealing with memory issues. But you know,

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing really is fascinating that if you have

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this legacy of written work, you know, it's not just

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>literature departments but scientists who can actually analyze it for humanity. Yeah,

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely interesting. They're they're taking a look at that.

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So I mentioned earlier there was another group that also

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>made for very interesting studies. And the other one I

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about is this multi decade study. It's

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>called the nun Study, and it's actually one of the

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>largest Alzheimer's studies ever conducted. There was a researcher from

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the University of Minnesota named David Snowden that got the

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>study going in the mid nineteen eighties, and it was

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.959
<v Speaker 1>with a group called the school Sisters of Notre Dame

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>who agreed not only to have these certain evaluations done

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>during their lives. It also to have their brain studied

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>after they passed away. Now, what makes this group so

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>helpful to study is that it's a relatively homogeneous group

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that lives pretty similar lifestyles. So it's a good bit

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>more control than what you could do with with most

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>other groups. The study is actually still going, but they've

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>had some very interesting findings over the years, and including

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that researchers have been able to look at

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>autobiographical essays that these sisters wrote when they joined the sisterhood,

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>not on average that would have been in their early twenties,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and even from those essays, they are able to predict

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>those who are more likely to develop Alzheimer's. So those

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>who wrote the more complex essays were found to be

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>less likely to develop the disease. It's just it's just

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>wild to me that they could find predictors like that

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>so early in these women's lives. Oh man, that is fascinating.

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>So here's something I think about a lot, right there.

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>All these studies out there that tell us one week

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 1>that something is bad for us, and then the next

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>week it's good for us. And here's another one of

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>those studies, and it's about cell phone use. Well, I mean,

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I understand that that it might not be as harmful

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>as we once feared, but how in the world could

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 1>this be a good thing. Yeah, so I'm not suggesting

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone start increasing their cell phone use, but a study

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>out of South Florida did find the exposing mice to

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>microwave radiation from cell phones both seemed to protect them

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>from Alzheimer's and in some case even seemed to reverse

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the effects. So, as one of the study leads, this

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>guy wants Sanchez Ramo said, quote, it's such dramatic and

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>counterintuitive effect. I joked that the animals must have been

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>mislabeled or that the power wasn't switched on. And you

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>know that this effect was there for both the mice

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.439
<v Speaker 1>who were exposed to the radiation before they showed signs

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of Alzheimer's and for those who were exposed after they

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>started showing signs. And again, you know, we're not recommending

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone start using their phones more because of this interesting study.

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just that it's fascinating to think that there's studies

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that you don't expect the results to come out the

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 1>way they do. You know, I've actually got another one

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like that where you never know if the effect of

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>something is going to be positive or negative. And this

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>one involves caffeine, and of course we bring the mice

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in again for a study, and it's a study led

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.800
<v Speaker 1>by researcher Gary Aaron Dash and his team found that

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 1>a group of mice who were bred to end up

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>with Alzheimer's, if one group was given regular water to

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>drink and the other was given water with caffeine infused

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>in it, those who had receive the caffeine actually had

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a fifty percent decrease in their beta amyloid levels. No,

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>those were, of course those tangled proteins that we talked

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, And the amount of caffeine was roughly the

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of giving a person five cups of coffee and

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a day. And while this was a promising finding that

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps caffeine could be introduced in some way to help

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>those who have already developed Alzheimer's, it's of course still early,

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And as with the study you last mentioned, there's definitely

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>not a recommendation here that people go out and start

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>consuming lots of caffeine. So, you know, I do think

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it's good to end on a couple of hopeful facts,

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>even if there's still a long way to go with

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>all these studies. And I actually say we should dedicate

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>today's trophy to the many brilliant researchers, Kara loved Ones

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and millions of brave patients who remained determined to fight

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this disease. I second that. So here's the continued progress

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and the fight against Alzheimer's. Thanks so much for listening,

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks again for listening. Part Time Genius is a production

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of how stuff works and wouldn't be possible without several

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>brilliant people who do the important things we couldn't even

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>begin to understand. Tristan McNeil does the editing thing. Noel

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown made the theme song and does the mixy mixy

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sound thing. Jerry Rowland does the exact producer thing. Gay

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 1>blues Yer is our lead researcher, with support from the

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 1>research army including Austin Thompson, Nolan Brown and Lucas Adams

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and Eve Jeff Cook gets the show to your ears.

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Good job, Eves. If you like what you heard, we

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>hope you'll subscribe. And if you really really like what

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you've heard, maybe you could leave a good review for us.

0:41:55.680 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Do we do We forget Jason Jason, who did the

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 1>property bu