WEBVTT - Mets Top 10 Prospect Ranking | 600

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>It is time for us to give our Mets prospect rankings.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>After the trade deadline, we got a bunch of new

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>names in and we got to rank them. It's been

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>a while. We haven't talked about this farm system really

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>since the MLB Draft. Almost none of the draft guys

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>coming to my top ten, but we do have a

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>bunch of new guys from the trades cracking at least

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>inside my top ten I'm assuming inside of yours, James.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Before we get going into it, makes sure you guys

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>are subscribed to Met stuff over here on YouTube and

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening to us Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google, Drop

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a Parting, Drops Review, Download, Subscribe. Shout out to all

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>our members who got access to this one early according

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>early on a Friday. You basically are gonna have almost

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like a full twenty four hours of this before anybody else,

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So make sure you joined that membership if you can.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited about this. I mean, the Mets prospects are weird.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, to say the least, it feels like there's

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a clear at least one to two in my eyes,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and then everything else you can kind of go anywhere.

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a clear like top tier, second tier.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the Mets top five prospects are probably a

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit more muddled than maybe some of the public

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>outlets would like to admit, maybe the top seven guys.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>And I still think this is not as bad as

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the top ten. As what's going around right now in

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the baseball world. People were saying the Mets had won

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the worst systems in baseball before the deadline.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>That may have been true.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I have three new prospects inside my top ten since

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the deadline, and I'm still I still think there could

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be like five or six guys from this list their

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:28.919
<v Speaker 1>top hundred prospects by early next season.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:29.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised at all. I think we'll just

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>get it started with number ten. Yeah, I have Sammy

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>ste four.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 2>At number ten. I'm hiring staffur than you.

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there you go. Listen now, Sammy, I love what

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw off of him. To me, a lot of

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>times when I do this prospect stuff, I do look

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>at what they've done at levels. I look at age.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of raw talent, Sammy might be

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the higher guys in this system just because

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of that swing change with the power. I could see

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>him by the end of this season being easily top

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>five in the Mets system. Like, not even a bait,

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>whether or not he is. I just want to see

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what those swing changers look like now in the Mets organization,

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>playing in Brooklyn.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with that.

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Mine number ten, I had Jack Wendinger, who's had a

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>disappointing season at TRIPAA so far. I'll get you guys

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the stats on Wenninger in a second. But I still

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have him dropping as much as I think maybe

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>his surface stats will indicate, which is having a four

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half VRA, having a thirteen percent walk right

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in only twenty two percent strack out rap because I

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>still look at Wenninger's stuff. He still has two legitimate

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>secondary pitches. I think we'll get major league hiters out

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in his slyther and his splither, and the slyer will

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>be good against right he split it will be good

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>against lefties. Right there, you have the makings of a star.

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>His fastball and the sinker are both fine pitches, not great,

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they're fine. I think they could ascend to being good

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>if he could one consistently locate them, which has been

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a big problem this season, or two fine. The last

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>tick of velocity the Mets have been hopelessly so checked

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>four with him too, So we can go from ninety

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>three to ninety five to ninety four to ninety six.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that'd become a big deal for Wendinger. He

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>did that better last season.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this season maybe physically, just hasn't had the

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>same success. But there's still to me a fine back

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>end starting pitcher in Jack Wenninger. Yes, I had him

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit higher, because again I do think

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the floor, like you said, is going to be just

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a back end starting pitcher. He has enough pitches to

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>be successful enough at the major league level. I think

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the rocket ship helium has ended on him right now

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>until something changes. Like you said, maybe there's a velo

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>step that eventually happens for him. But guys like Jack

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Wendinger are winning Wenninger. Wenninger, sorry, is very, very valuable

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to a roster like the New York Mets in the future.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Anytime you have young, controllable pitching, it's valuable. You see,

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>teams are always looking for young controllable pitching, especially at

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the deadline. What we saw, whether he makes an impact

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for this team where he makes an impact in another organization,

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. I do think that this is a

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>major league baseball pitcher, and I think it's probably next season.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I think even you could see a spot star for

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>him at the end of this season. It can just

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to see, yeah, just see, we're gonna see a lot

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of the rookie debuts across the league and probably with

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Mets too, over the next few weeks.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>But who's your number nine?

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Jack Brimer?

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>For me at number nine, okay, had Rymer a little

0:03:58.480 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>bit higher. Mine was a Milion p. Treck.

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I had Petray a little bit higher on mine. Actually, wow,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a little again, probably a little bit of box score

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>scouting here. I know Rhymer big thing this year has

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>been the injuries have really hurt his progression through the

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues this season. Got to double A. Is hitting

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>okay so far, but again just the inconsistent with the

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>playing time because of the injuries. The raw stuff is

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>really good with him, like he makes legit loud contact consistently.

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's a third baseman, which is also

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>why I bumped him down a little bit. I think

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>he's ultimately a right handed hitting first basement, which is

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the most desirable if we're coming up with

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the perfect prospect. It's so funny. I'm starting off with

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the draftnick Mark followers over here, rhymers for a ten,

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>nine to ten, you went a little bit higher on them.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>It is nothing about changing my theory of what kind

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>of prospect he can be. It's just it's slowed down

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit for me. I'm giving it more to

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the guys with helium right now. Yeah, And I think

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's odd that's happened this year, but a lot

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Mets prospects that they're expecting a lot of

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>heading into the season just I've had injury riddled seasons

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and just had taken steps back physically, but injuries specifically,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I've hurt Rhymer, They've hurt Will Watson, who is in

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>my honorable mentions. They hurt Mitch Voight a lot. At

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the season. We're going to talk about

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>him way closer to the top. Like, it's just unfortunate

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of these Mets guys that were pushing

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>or even Brimer's case, inside top hundred list heading into

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the season have just had poor seasons. And that's fine

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen, but you can't really take away from Jacob

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Brimer as a twenty one year old.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 2>Double a last year.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>The guy had like an almost nine hundred ops and

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>run sixty games. He was someone that actually broke through

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the power ceiling in Brooklyn, which you always talk about

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>how difficult that is for Mets prospects and how that

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is a big indication for us of when an offensive

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>prospect is really really on a different level compared to

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>other guys who could be in the system. Yeah, definitely.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see how we adjust the rest

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I feel like where I'm at right

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>now with my Mets prospect rankings is one of the

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>least stable that I've ever felt over the last few years.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Where by the end of the season, when we do

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>this again after the minor league season ends, I wouldn't

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>be shocked how different our lists both look, and especially mine.

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think my entire top ten almost can be in

0:05:58.440 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>completely different spots.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 2>We do this two months from now, Yeah, without a doubt,

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be shocked. Yeah, and then just to talk about, well,

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 2>where'd you have Petray? Had Petra at number five?

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, so okay, My number eight was Rhymers. We covered

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>him so we could wait to talk about My number

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>eight was Winninger.

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 2>So there we go.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We've got some guys covered there. Seven, Ryan Clifford. Hi

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Clifford off my top ten this time. My seven was

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>tongue interesting, Okay, I had tong a little bit higher

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>with Clifford being at number seven. For me, I just

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>know that the raw power is there. This year has

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>been there's no way to describe it a disaster for

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Clifford at Triple A. The Mets have been desperately

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for anybody to play first base. It's now Jared Young,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>who's having a nice season. But the fact that there's

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>been such a flux at that position in terms of stability,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and this was a year where if Clifford had any

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of juice at Triple A, definitely gets a look

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and could have even possibly won that position. It's a

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>real shame that has taken such a step back. He's

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>still incredibly young, he still has ridiculous power. I'm just

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to chalk it up as a lost season.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll figure it out next year. Yeah, I think that's

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>totally fair. Again, Young Clifford is till twenty two years old.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I even think a career trajectory of like a Jared

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Young should give some hope for the future of Ryan

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Clifford being a strong side platoon first baseman. And while

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he can't touch the ball like a nearly forty percent

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>straker race is untenable. A seventy four percent zone contact

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>rate is like worse than Spencer Jones, just to give

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a comparison. But the fact that he's still popping out

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>one tense, one eleven's one twelve, one thirteen to one

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen in Binghamton last year, anytime his back goes on,

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the balls hit very hard. And again, if he has

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to repeat Triple A and he turns twenty three years old,

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I don't think that completely takes him off

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>being a major league player one day, but we will

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>learn a lot at the end of the season because

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the Mets have to put him on the forty men. Yes,

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So that indication is that if he's on the forty man,

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>he's already played the full season at Triple A. You

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>should be ready to play major league baseball next year.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So if they think this is not salvageable, he might

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>be Rule five eligible. But I do still think that

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he makes their forty man roster by the end of this.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But he was off my top ten after weigh seasons.

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair. I just there was nobody that

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was like my honorable mention, and I think you're probably

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna mention him at some point. Wandy Austin Yen was

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>one of my honorable mentions.

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 2>He's really high for me.

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I know, he's number eleven for me. I just

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's he's sixteen years old. I just I can't. I

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>cannot tell you with certainty that because of what he's

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>done as a sixteen year old that he's gonna be

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>good even at age seventeen. I just I don't for sure.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so insane. But I do love him

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as a prospect, and I love what I've seen this far.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But he was my he was my honorable mention. Where

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like I wanted to be crazy with him, I can't

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in my own heart, I can't do it. He I

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>think this offseason you'll start to see him actually sneak

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>into certain top hundreds, and I'll just he's my number six,

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>So I'll start talking about him right now.

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 2>We'll wait to talk more about Tong. Who'd you have

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>at seven?

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Tong Tong per BK fan O nine Mets Prospect group.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>He's a great person on Twitter to get DSL lower

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>minds information on the Mets. He had Wanda ascien as

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a one eleven max exit of flat at sixteen. Okay,

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I did not see that. I saw six, So that

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>would change things for me. This one was hit directly

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>into the ground. But if any sixteen year old the

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>United States of America had the one eleven max exit philosoity, No, totally,

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>they would be talking about for two years at playing

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>slick shortstop at Wandassian size, which is already I think over.

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>He's six feet tall, already one hundred eighty pounds. He's

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna grow sixteen years old, and he's turning seventeen

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>quite in a few weeks. Again, we'll get to seventeen,

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>but we're gonna have we have physical projection. We have

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>someone with legit speed, who already has insane raw power,

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>who looks like not only can stick a short stop again,

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>he's going to turn seventeen in two weeks. Heart to

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>say these things, but looks like one day he'll be

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a really good defensive shortstop. He doesn't have to be

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in the forty Mantle twenty third least. We've got a

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of time on want the Ossi in here, but

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>just seeing those bones are before, just seeing those bones

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>have a player who went to the DSL again, did

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing at sixteen and rocked it. He's I

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get more excited about the Mets prospect,

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>even though he's a child. Yeah, no, I will say

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>did not know one eleven because of course Twitter has

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the worst search functions. Is the worst thing they've done

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>to in the history of so it's the worst search ever.

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>There's never been a worse search. Truthfully, I don't know why.

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But when I searched the wandi Ossian exit velocity to

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>try and get anything I want, the first thing that

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>came up was who It was a bunch of pirates

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>tweets from Platinum Key. Somehow, that's so funny. The first

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>tweet Wanda Assi and exit velosities to search. The tweet

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>is Henry Davis. Leaves no doubt about this one. A

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>spring training home run seems like wand right, Yeah right,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Henry Davis wandi Assian same thing, Yeah, same thing. If

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I had known one eleven top five prospect in the system.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 2>It's me six.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>He almost got to five. He almost did. My number

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>six is the other youngster, Ellien Payneyeah. I put him

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at number six. Again, I see people being very very

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>aggressive with him as a hitter. I am wondering because

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I still think the exit villows haven't been there yet

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to like really be an eye opening, which again I

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>think is super important. But does seem like he's going

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>to be able to play shortstop better than we thought,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>which is really good for his floor.

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, at least well enough. He was my five.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's fair, and just the bottom line is that

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Elli and Payne, with all the peedigree and everything he

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>came with being an above average bat in low a

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>as an eighteen year old with big slump's, big hot

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>streaks trying to find his consistency. That's that's enough to

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>me to make me think he's very clearly a fringe

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred prospect and as a lefty bat who

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>should be, like you said, possibly an adequate shortstop, certainly

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>someone who could play the other infield positions, probably quite well. Yes, again,

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>there's enough traits here, enough of a hitterish profile and

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>enough room for projection. Even though he does look he

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>looks like his size is kind of there. I'd be

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>curious if he ever got to like a one to twelve,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>one to thirteen max ex of philosophy. I'd be very surprised, honestly,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>if you had a thirty home run future as a

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>major League killer. Yeah, I see like an eighteen to

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty two home run guy who could run a high

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>batting average in a decent on base percentage. Yeah, there's

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different ways to be a very very

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>productive major league baseball player. I don't think it's going

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to be in the superstar form of Eli and Payana.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.599
<v Speaker 1>Like his international signing pool money would have possibly indicated

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna Ossien. Ossien might be that guy, specially at

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball What eleven at sixteen, that's absolutely insane. There's

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't put him in pitching machines that go one

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to eleven. If a high schooler did that, there would

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>be scats from all over the country watching his games.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>He would be the number one pick and they would

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>be like talking about should he continue to play high

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>school baseball just because he might get hurt? So what

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, you'd have like the Bryce Harper thing where

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like should he go to Juco? Should he get

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>his ged go to Juco so we can get drafted early,

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and like the fact that he was such a big

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>international money guy, like he's just it looks like there's

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>could be something really nice here. Yeah, no, super talented.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>My number five was amilion p tre where I can't

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't shake the aj Ewing thing that I'm that

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we said earlier on where it's like very very similar

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Ish like hitter ish puts the ball and play a ton.

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Left, different twing, different twitch, different twitch.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Ewing's got more of the athleticism I see more of,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>like the bat to ball with a million p tray

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and the numbers I think would support that as well.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 1>But like, give me the in between of those two guys,

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and I really like that kind of player. And it

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>seems like he's a capable second basement even corner outfielder,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>which I like a lot. It's probably also a relatively

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>capable third basement depending on his arm. But just simply

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and we said this at the trade deadlines, why we're

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>so excited about him as again, the centerpiece of the

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Peralta trade, a ninety percent in zone contact, one

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred eleven mile prior max exit phlosoity, and nearly two

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>times as many walks to.

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 2>Strikeouts at double A.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>While he's older again, he's twenty three years old, turned

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty four soon or just maybe had just turned twenty four.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>It's it looks like some of the next season should

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be contributing to the big Ley roster, which is really exciting. Yeah,

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>as a likely functional player, his floor is awesome, Like

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I like him very much, learning more about him, all right,

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So that means we're in the top four now, right, Yes,

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>number four. I went Jonathan Santucci, okay with you as

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Toalng much higher still, I have tongue at three, okay,

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>and I listen, you're gonna have the pitch stuff a

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit better than me here. I just I can't,

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So I went Santucci for tongue three. I can't shake

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>what I've seen with tongue in the past.

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 2>This year is bizarre, Like what.

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>The fuck happened? Did he have an out of body

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>experience where it's no longer jonah tong? Did he have

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the uh willow wishing willow thing where he like wished

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>for something and it actually caused a demon to take

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>over his body, because it's like he is completely a

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>shell of himself. And I do wonder what that could

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>be and what that means moving forward. But the stuff

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>has been so good that I just I'm gonna believe

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in it until I physically can't anymore. I think that's

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>totally fair. And my whole thing with Tongue is that.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And I had them at seven on my list, but again,

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't have that big of a difference between now

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>four and nine on my list. I think that's fair.

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>And yet before get to my four in a second,

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>but these are all guys who would consider not kind

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of closest to the top one hundred, but more guys

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>would between like the one hundred and twenty to one

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fiftieth best prospects.

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Totally, But at the end of the.

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Day, with tong if he can't get a pitch to

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>move left, he will not be able to be a

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>major league starting pitcher, unless as he continues to physically mature.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>We're still very possible with Joe and Tongue still as

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a twenty three year old still is a pretty I

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>think he's still eve in a shade of below the

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>average age at Triple A, like he could still possibly

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>even find another sick because he's still filling out. He

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>still looks very young and slight, and he's now sustaining

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety five. But that was like still blow where he

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was wanted to be last year.

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 2>But still whatever.

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Less the color has been so inconsistent at Triple A

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this year. There is some games where it moves left

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and is great, and it'll sit eighty nine, touch ninety.

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it'll go over ninety, but then it won't be

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>able to go left as much. Sometimes I'll have a

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>little more depth on it. Makes me think sometimes he's

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>experimenting still with two different color shapes, which it's just

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>been this entire season of trying to figure this out.

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And I do fear that sometimes messing with that color

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>has altered his fastball in the way that's a little

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>bit unfortunate, losing some of the great shape on that.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But the change up still looks good. And he's adjusted

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>his curve ball to be a little bit more of

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a power curve this year, which is something we called

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>out last year.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 2>The pitch was just simply too slow.

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>We've seen some starts where he's had average curve ball

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>velocities around eighty two to eighty three recently. So there's

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>still plenty here to work with. And I'm not even

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>close to quitting on Joe and Tong in any way,

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>shape or form. But it is just like you've done

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a year of trying to get this thing together. You

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>have to get this thing together at some point. Hot take.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, throw away the cutter, throw away a slider.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you just lean into being fastball, change up,

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to get a wicked hammer. I think

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>with the way that his armslot is just keep trying

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>both no fuck it, stop it, and the way that

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he throws, I don't think it's ever gonna work. There's

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a reason that we don't see those guys throwing cutters

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>because it just doesn't really work. There's not many guys

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that throw like there's not many guys that throw like

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Jonah Tong to begin with, which like Y Savage is

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>like the closest comp but he's a different freak and

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a different animal. But like, just get a hammer, just

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>get a wicked curveball. I think that's how you do it.

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>It's unfortunate because you're gonna become a three pitch pitcher

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and it does hurt your ceiling. But I don't think

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that the development or the attempt of development of this

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>cutter slash slider is doing him any good. If anything,

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's making him take a step back. I don't think

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really possible with his armslot. I'm looking at some

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>armslot guys right now and I want to see what

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>pitches they're throwing. He's this is the most lazy take

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm ever gonna have, because Beren Brown has a fucking

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>hammer like that curveball is disgusting. But he's a he

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is a fastball curveball pitcher.

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing else.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's think.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean Tobias Myers has similar armslot and had I

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>mean stinks back comp right now, but he's shown success

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>with a color in the past. I think it definitely

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>is possible, and I do think that they're going to

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to try to do it because of all of

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the other pitcher that thing could exist. For Tom I

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>think if he has a hammer, like, how much better

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>can this curveball get than it is right now?

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>It can get much better?

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think if you stop, if you just throw away

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the cutter slider thing, you're not going to be able

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to get a pitch that move's left. Get the curveball going.

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It still might at the end of the day always

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>hurt him against right handed batteris like that curveball still might. Yeah,

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>but twelve six is have worked in the past against righties.

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I think again, as baseball, we've fallen in love in

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>love with the slider over the last couple of years

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for good reason. There's gonna be an adjustment back. But

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the curveball is still a very very good pitch. You

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>can be a great pitcher with a great curveball. Oh,

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>he definitely could be a good pitcher with great curveball.

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>He just still hasn't shown that great curveball. So to me,

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the cut is almost ahead of the curveball.

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes.

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the fact that he can't the fact

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that he can't throw that cutter like like it's so bad.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the color shapes that he throws sometimes is

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more slytherish, where the cover is something

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that is moving on not that dissimilar vertical plane. Is

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>that fastball, which I think the one they want, But

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>there's something with more depth on it sometimes which is

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>not too dissimilar at a very different velocity than the

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>one jeremiahs Strava throws. And jeremiahs Strada is so over

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the top, but he gets more natural cut on his fastball,

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>so he is able to cut that ball a.

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Little bit better.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>And because of he has that more of a supernation

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>biased than tongue does. He can't throw the change up

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the tongue does. He throws a splitther that it's just

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he's because like the way that this cutter moves, it's

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>just the worst version of his fastball right now. So like,

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what's the fucking point? Well, if the point is that

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>just moves left and he gives righty something, think about

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in the outside of the plate.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 2>If it moves two inches left, that's like, who gives

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 2>a shit? No, I think that's incredibly valuable.

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Not if you think so bad the fastball vert is

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>still been fine. I think they're willing to give up

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>some and I think that was at least the thought

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>process this year is give up some fastball vert.

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 2>For some color left.

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>This is where I'm gonna say, like I disagree with

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>against righty's. I think it's more so against lefties. If

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that cutter is moving less than six inches, he can

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>only throw that pitch on the outside order ariighties, and

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not moving enough to get with at most points,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like these major league hitters are talented enough where they're

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>still gonna barrel up that pitch if it's only moving

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>horizontally two inches. I think this is also the problem

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of pictures like Tobias Myers, where the

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>stuff's not really moving a big amount over to the

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>left against the same side, and he'll never.

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Be able to get that pitch to move a lot.

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm like, I think it's useless best why

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>said the change up is the saving grace for him,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>because that pitch will miss bats, I think against hitterers

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>from both sides of the plate, that is something that

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he should be able to kind of always have with him,

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>at least something that has been really really critical from

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, even this year at triple A, that change

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>up as a fifty one or forty percent free and

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>even the color again Triple A doesn't matter. He's not

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>throwing it in his own very much against thirty percent

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>chase like there are moments where it flashes and it

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>stays above ninety sometimes when that depty one doesn't, but

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe that will miss his more bats like. It's just

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>basically similar as we said about Clifford, but with more

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>talent to start on. It's a wash year. Don't let

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that make you totally forget about John Tom completely right

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the kid off, but just understand that there's still development

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 1>needs to happen here. Yeah, he's twenty three. A lot

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of pitchers don't peak until.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 2>They're like twenty seven, so I mean even later.

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Some twenty seven year old just got traded. Yeah, Randy

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Johnson was thirty, he was quite old. Yeah, so again

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>it take some time whatever. And then Nolan McLean come

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>up on twenty five. Yeah, I'm not I'm not particularly

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>worried about tong just interesting to you how they do

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it moving forward. And then did you have Santucci three?

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I had Saint Tucci three, but I didn't say myy four?

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh who is your four? Sammy'stafer baby, Sammy's the four.

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Nice, that's my guy. So you and Jonathan DeMeo, I

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>combined Jonathan Mayo and Joan and Joe DeMeo. Joe DeMeo

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>shout out Joe both super super high on Stafour in

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the list, and I love it. I think the ceiling

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is there. Yeah, I think the ceiling is there, and

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the floor is better than it seems with

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his swing and miss in the minors,

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>just because he just plays really good.

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Defense and he's an amazing athlete.

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like he can withstand a thirty percent track up

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>rate in two years in the major leagues better than

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>most other players can because I can see him being

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a plus defender, growing into even a better defender than that,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and still hitting for power. I believe it. Like right

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>now we're seeing calls to Montgomery do this and it's

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like very inconsistent kind of at the play, but the

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>home runs the defense completely save his value. Not saying that,

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think calls my GM re Freshval's bigger

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>than Stephora. But that's kind of the archetype where I'm

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing here in terms of a floor, which is why

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm ranks to four highly and the twenty games before

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he got traded fifteen home runs control and a twenty

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>five percent track out ray when he had like a

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty three strike out ray before those twenty games started

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and that Coen sided with his swing change. David Stearns

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>dropped the nugget in the post trade then press conference

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>that it came with rising bad speed, like as a

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>mega athlete with that kind of power with who possibly

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>just made like a career altering adjustment, Like I would like.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 2>To see him continue to do this.

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to see him at double A next season

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>because it looks like he has all the tools of

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>being a freak and he's another guy. If he closes

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the season as hot as he played in July, he'll

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>sneak into the back of top hundred lists for sure.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Gonna just gonna wait until I see that. That was

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the only reason why I had him at number ten.

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Super Fer Santucci, we haven't talked about too much, so

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you had him at three, I had him at four.

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>We're basically in the same realm. He's just been really good.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>He has been the Mets pitcher this year. If you

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>look at the minor league pitching staff, he's been the

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>guy who has had the most excitement. He dominated Double A,

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>dom dominated it like, made it look like his bitch,

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and now he's at Triple A. And we're gonna see

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.360
<v Speaker 1>him make his adjustments. He is going to run into trouble.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>It is going to happen, and if he doesn't, holy shit.

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 2>We got a rocket on our hands. Yeah.

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Another guy who there is He has claimed to being

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the top prospect in the Mets system right now, with

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>no issue ranking him there. Also, again, he's probably going

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a guy who sneaks in the top hundreds,

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>but he's still i think hitting the same roadblock that

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been thinking about recently. First of all, as the

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>left youth rows ninety four to ninety five above average veal,

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that's good shape is it's not that good, but it's

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>good enough with that velo And it's a great slider.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>That's been a great slider since he was drafted in

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the second round out of Duke a few years ago.

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And we're still probably similarly same conversation here, waiting on

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the third pitch, waiting on the changeup that he flashed

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in college. Then he threw four of

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>them in his first triple A start out of ninety pitches.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So it is still going to be Slyther fur Seemer

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for jumbo Corbin Jonathan Santuccio KORbin. I love Jombo Corbin,

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but again like it's he also seems like there's two

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>different slid this year looking at his pitch chart from

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>that first Triple A start, where there's one that is

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>more of just like a pure gyro guy just kind

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of spins and kind of sits at the near the

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>zero zero line for the pitching nerds out there on

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the pitch charts. But then there was one with more

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>depth on it. So I'm wondering if he's manipulating that

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>pitch a little bit to give make the two pitches

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>really act like three pitches. We see guys like Justin

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Steele to this too. Yeah, I'd like to know because

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's such an interesting thing to me. Is like

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>to throw a worse version sometimes it's interesting. Yeah, I

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>mean more there's a different version if they're lining up

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>your slide and no, you're throwing a slider boom.

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 2>That one dropped through extra interest. That's how you get them.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>No, totally, I'm interested to see what he does though

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>at Triple A, especially because now we can get some

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Legiti number stuff. Yeah, I can't wait to do that.

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>But it's the fastball ninety five good enough for me.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Top two.

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>I think we have the same names. I wonder if

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:47.719
<v Speaker 1>they're in the same spots. At number two, I went

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Voight. Number one, I went Jefferson Rojas.

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Yep, exact same.

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Mitch Voight, I think is probably gonna sneak into

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the top one hundred very soon. It feels like it's

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a super small sample having his way with double A

0:23:57.880 --> 0:23:59.959
<v Speaker 1>simply put well, I mean, I think you even put

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>lightly first eight games at double A for Mitch Voy.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 2>We have a six hundred batting average. That's pretty good.

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty good right there.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:07.719
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that while he dealt with an

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>injury early in the season, he did not start off

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>very well. He's been playing so well lately that again,

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very fair for Mets fans to begin

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>to get just very excited about what Mitch voy can

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be as a hitter, as a defensive player, just even

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.479
<v Speaker 1>as again someone who might wind up as a fringy

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>top hunch of prospect and end of season re ranks.

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He seems like he can also play shortstop at a

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>very high level. It seems like he's really good over there.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>There are some plays that I saw from highlights again highlights.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be the best players that he makes.

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>But from Brooklyn where I'm like, I couldn't believe he got

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to that ball, and then watching him throw when he

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>lets that thing loose, he has a fucking howitzer attached

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to his right arm.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 2>He's ridiculous. No, he's a freak athlete.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he made big changes at the end of his

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Michigan careers, getting away from pitching, which is where the

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>arm comes from, and finding just one a little bit

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>more power, but two elite swing decisions and he's taking

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>them here. I have a good note from Jeffrey Paster

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Dostro of Baseball Perspectus on on recent newsletter about Mets

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>prospects that boyight now through this part of the season

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>he's been hot, is matching his ex of velocities from college.

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 2>But that was with a metal bat. True.

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Wait, that's a good point. Yeah, So we have one

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seven mile proro ninety PERCENTILEGGS velosity in a

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>max of one to twelve.

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 2>That's playing shortstop at Michigan when he was there. It's

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>a good question.

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't know, how was he not the shortstop he was

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in the elite second basement. I think his profile looked different

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>when everyone thought he was going to be a second basement.

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But now, like you said that, he's regarded as someone

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that not only could be an adequate shortstop, but legitimately

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 1>a good one who could be in Triple A next season.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he's hitting the.

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Ball this hard, and he's making these go swing decisions

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>really good on bass guy, way more walks to strikeouts

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>since late May when it looked like he was healthy

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>against stealing bases like a madman like he is. This

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>is a ballplayer right here, and someone that I'm ready

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for Mets fans to become legitimately excited about. You know,

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be a big name next season for sure.

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And then of course Number one Jefferson Rojas newly acquired

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 1>from the Chicago Cubs. Straight up, just good player, all

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>around good. The power seems like it's going to be

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>solid enough. The bat to ball skills seems good, seems

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like the fielding is good, the arm is strong, good athleticism.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a very very very high high floor player. Definitely,

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>he's an aggressive hitter, so I'm curious how that happens.

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>He continues to move up levels or even possibly get

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to the major leagues next year, because I do think

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>also his forty man clock starts after this season. He

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>was a super super young yeah, seasfect, so that makes sense, and.

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 2>So he's been around a while. He's relatively a famous prospect.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He just turned twenty one at the beginning of this year,

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so we'll play almost the entirety of next season still,

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just twenty two years old and likely begin at TRIPAA.

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>But some advanced day that we had on Rojas, when

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a week and a half before the trade deadline with

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>completely telegraph that we were getting him from the cups

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for one of the starting pitchers. It's a twenty five

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>percent with rate, which is really good, a fourteen percent

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in zone swinging mis rate, which is really good. Only

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a thirty one percent chase rate, which is shockingly low

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>from a hitter as aggressive as Jefferson. Rojas is only

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>three point six pitches per played appearance mark you remember

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>our fancy baseball legue last year, pitches per play appearance

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>as a category electric that's really low right there, and

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>then eggs of lost.

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 2>He is good, not great.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>One ten max one hundred four mile power ninety nearly

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a forty percent hit rate. That's all good, but again

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>at his age, I could still see him growing into

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>more power, possibly as some tweaks come in pitch selection

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>one day, because he just loves to swing at everything

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in his zone right now, which is great sup productive doing.

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's just without the defensive upside. The upside is

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that he coulds adequately play short but play third quite well.

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>He you said it was what one ten max exs

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of ve lo o, Yes, one ten max ex av

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>low and the average was at what the average we

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have EV fifty or I EV ninety, which is one

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>oh four. That's basically your average then right, yes, no

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>EV ninety, No, that's that's your ninety percentile. So it's

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>like takelop off the top.

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Of top percent. Flop off those yeah, take those off.

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay. So I'm just trying to find like a shortstop

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>at the major league level right now who's like similar

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is in terms of the eggs of velo stuff, just

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>so that like I mean honestly, like it's it's not

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>too far off like what Francisco Lindor does in terms

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of like max ex and veilos. But Lindor Andy think,

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is Ross switch hithers, he's left, he's just right right,

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>He's just already. I mean, it's like Sander Bogarts.

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah kind of is he could be He could be Bogartsy.

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would. I would take a Bogartsy hitter because

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>he's he's hitherish. I think in Will Sam It's recent article,

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>someone did, like the best case here if he puts

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>on some strength and really gets to pull in these

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>fly balls, is a non switch hitting can tell.

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Martee, ooh, that'd be sick, just because.

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It's great aggression in the zone that's come with shockingly

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>good swing decisions for his aggression. I like it. Cool, Yeah,

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>sign me up, lots of Yeah, lots of his own swings.

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Has the ability to pull in lyft at a very

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>young age. For being able to pull in lift like

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a fun profile. Unless there's big strides with

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the bat, that is not going to be monster potential

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>here now. But this is a major league baseball player

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're gonna see thirty home runs from

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Jefferson Ross. No, that's okay too.

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of good Xander Bogarts was hitting like twenty

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>home runs a year for the Red Sox. He was

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a damn good player back then. Bogart's fun comp We

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>could run with that one as a righty back, good size.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Will never be an elite shortstop defend there, but could

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>probably make it there.

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Bogart's the problem.

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>If I remember correctly, he is just bigger than Jefferson Rojas.

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 2>He's like six 'two or Rojas I think is under.

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Six, but brohas was under six news like eighteen. I

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know how big Jeffon Rojas is right now. That

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is fair. He's twenty one now, so see that's what

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying those He's not one hundred and fifty pounds,

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>so I don't trust that height list of either you

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>know who's you know what size. He is very much

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>like and similar exit Velos too. He is very much

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like zach Netto. Okay, Zacknall is a little bit whippier,

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.479
<v Speaker 1>though it's a little whippier, but the bat speeds below

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>average for zach Neetto, the exit Villos are basically the

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>same as what you just told me for Rojas. I

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>think the difference is that Rojas will be able to

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>play shortstop better than the Zach Netto, which is one

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of the worst in baseball. Yeah, I always forget that

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Bogarts as a monster. Yeah he's just sixty twenty. Yeah.

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>If Ander Bogart is born in different country, he'd be

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>split out wide. Yeah, you'd be playing wide receiver for

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. He'd be the X right now, I'd be

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>getting phades in the end zone. Football's on the mind,

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But I I think that's it for our prospects, right,

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And how about your honorable mentions. Name some guys that

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you're excited about. I'll name some guys that I'm excited

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>about that didn't get mentioned. Yep. I still like Carson

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Wiggins and Adan Robbins, and I still think we're gonna

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>take some time to get them in here. Eli Crono's

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>another guy who was flashing top hundred upside has had

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>an injury riddled season. I think Giovanni Rodriguez should be

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>someone that Mets fans should keep an eye on, just

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>because he's It takes a long time sometimes for the

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>international prospect especially international catchers, to get defeat wet and

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we were a little bit what's it called spoiled by

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Walver as assent, but as a nineteen year old

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and a ball he's still playing ball well, so I

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>do think that's something that he's just a player I'm watching.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I also again, Will Watson just started the rehab assignment.

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I like him.

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Cole mathis the prospect that we got for

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>David Peterson is quite interesting.

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 2>And there's one more guy.

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to get his name right right now because

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>he's someone who's flashing as well.

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 2>It's Davielle Ortado.

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, oh the picture the Cuban. Yes, he's looked really good. Yeah,

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>so he's someone. And also kleiner As is his name.

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Also in the low miners, who are guys who are

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>younger are titles now with Brooklyn and he's pitching well

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>enough there. The strikeouts have gone down, the walks have

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>gone up, but he's someone who we should do some

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>intrigue there on the offensive side of things. Guys that

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention Randy Guzman still just hits the

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>ball on this list too exceptionally hard. There's a ton

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of swing and missing his game, but he takes absolute

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>daddy hacks at the plate. Also shout out to Chris

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Suero because even though again he's striking out thirty percent

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.959
<v Speaker 1>of the time at double A, he's walking sixteen percent.

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>That's just like.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Super super intriguing as a prospect playing a lot of

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 2>catcher right now as well.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Also, we still to shot out moreb though he still

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>looks like a fringe fourth outfielder type, who's who could

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be a valuable play at the next level. Gary kill

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Hill the other piece we got in the friendly prault

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to trade cam Tilly. A lot of people are into

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>cam Tilly right now.

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's been raging Benglington right now. That's my guy

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 2>right there.

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>He has been raging a few guys who are not

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>going to play pro ball this year, but we'll get

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>into it next year after they go to the pitching lab.

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Luke McNeely and Shan Sadao are two mid round picks

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>from this year. There and Aiden Smith just has haid

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>two home runs of Brooklyn. Nice, let's go Hayden Smith.

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, just a quick little because the Mets

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have now been doing this a lot in the David

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Stearns era. I think we got a couple guys from

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Independent Baseball that are a little bit older that are

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>quickly getting promoted again. They should be because of their

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>age to the level. But John Bay and JT. Benson,

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe were undrafted guys that have been putting up

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>some good numbers. I don't know if they ever make

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it to the majors. It is quite the uphill battle,

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but it is really cool to see that the Mets

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>who Jonathan Pintaro. They found him on the scrap people like,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely out of nowhere. There's a lot of guys that

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the Mets have been picking up recently from different walks

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of baseball, Daniel Duarte that have ended up making soon

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey on some sort of appearance on the Mets roster.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Bay and Benson are guys to keep an eye out for.

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no doubt. Benson was your Oregon Let's click.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know much about him, just that he

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>was an undrafted guy. It just says he was purchased

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>from Indie Ball in March of twenty twenty six.

0:32:58.960 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 2>JT.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Benson good podcasting here. He came from Louisville. He went

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to University of Louisville and then he played for He

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>played in the Frontier League last year, lit it up

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and he was played for the Evansville Otters. So we're

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>forty and fifty six in the Frontier League, which I mean,

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that's for the love of the game right.

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 2>There, that truly is.

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>But again, I think this system right now, I think

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>conservatively at rank it somewhere between fifteen and twenty and

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>all of baseball after the deadline.

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 2>And if we get the proper growth.

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And hot finishes from a lot of our injured guys

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of guys missing time with injury, he's

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna send more guys to the AFL. We'll get more

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>data on some guys we don't have, probably like a Rhymer,

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.239
<v Speaker 1>probably like a Cole Mathis. I bet Petray gets there

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to see what's good for next year. So I want

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to see steffergo there if he had a season hockeyball.

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Want that guy to keep playing ball. Like it's the

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Mets boys as well, have tended to use that as

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the place for the injured guys to play more.

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 2>But this year we've had good players injured.

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Well I know I'm saying, but like's that's usually what

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the Mets have been using the AFL for.

0:33:57.840 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 2>It seems like I.

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Would just I would like to see the Mets put

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>some real AFL talent out there, because they haven't in

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>years now, they haven't in quite since. Honestly, we went

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>out there. Maybe we just have to put Arizona in

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the fall snakes up to see if they're in the

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>World Series. But that's I think it's a fine system

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think it's one has been a little

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>underrated nationally. I think there's a good upshot right now

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Mets minor leagues for a system that has

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>graduated Nolan McLain, Christian Scott, aj Ewing, Carson ben Zach

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Thornton this season alone.

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:26.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, Thorton's not graduated yet, just in our minds.

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>He's in our minds, he's graduated in our less I'm

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressed that the Mets system isn't the worst in baseball.

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, it's not bad that we're actually maintaining our spot.

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So let me know what you guys are thinking down

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the comment section below. Don't forget to subscribe to met

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuff for more Mets content. You can follow James on

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>social media at James Shawn and I'm Draftnick Mark. We'll

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>catch you guys on the next one peace.

0:34:45.320 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Out piece Mets then.

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Then then

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't that that S, don't that that