WEBVTT - And, This is Ezra Klein

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, coming up next, I have Ezra Kleine here in

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>studio talking about his new book that he co authored

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>with Derek Thompson called Abundance. In this book, Ezra does

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not hold back on taking a very critical look at

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>democratic governance all across the United States of America, in

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>particular in my home state of California. This is Gavin

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Newsom and this is Ezra Klein. Ezra is great to

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have you here in studio.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me here for this weird inversion.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Weird inversion, and you've been I mean you've been all

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>over the place. You got a new book, Abundance, and

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>we'll jump right into that, but I want to just

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>frame a little bit of the relationship that we have

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that goes back and you may not even remember this.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I was a new mayor in San Francisco and was

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>asked by Bill Mahert to go on a show. I

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>remember that you were one of the panelist, and I'll

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>remember forget just sparring with Bill obviously, and then you

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And after the show was done and we were all finishing,

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you had left, maher goes up to me and he goes,

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>who the hell was that? And I'm like, I know

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>who the hell was that, and it was you. We

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>were like whoa, uh, just for both of us didn't

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have a you know, I was I was relatively new,

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Bill's been seasoned.

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>You a lieutenant governor then, I don't think you lieutenant.

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Got wasn't it? You know? It was I still was liet.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure lieutenant governor. So but I was like, anyway,

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd been on the show a bunch of times, but

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you were. You had a next level capacity to analyze

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>things and to deliver a point of view. And so

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising to me that so much of that,

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>including that conversation we probably had on that studio and said,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's reflected in what you've been focused on.

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I think about your book from that era, Republic two

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 2>point zero.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>It was called right, yeah, Citizenville, Citizenville you had to

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>take the town square digital and reinvent government. How about that?

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's something we should thread into this conversation. I

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 2>think people have forgotten that era of Gavinism.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I think in so many reflects in aspects

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I was reading this book and you're reflected in this.

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this has been my struggle as a former mayor.

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>You chronicle San Francisco, California disproportionately. But this book is

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally about the future, and you framing the future in

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>abundance terms. But it's also a real shot against liberalism

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in many respects, against the world we created now competing

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>against us in terms of process and courts and laws

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and rule making and all of that that's created so

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>much of this cost of living dynamics. So tell us

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>what was the inspiration of the book. Tell us a

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what abundance is.

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the reason the book is so rooted in

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 2>California that I am. I mean, so this book is

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 2>co authored with Derk Thompson from the Atlantic, and so

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 2>we both have our own things you bring to it.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 2>But I grew up in Irvine, as you know. I

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 2>went to the C system that went to d C

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 2>for twelve or thirteen fourteen years, and I spent a

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 2>bunch of time in DC covering a political system where

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the problem was Republicans were bad. Oftentimes the things that

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to see happen were not happening there because

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 2>they were being blocked by the Republican Party. And then

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen, I moved back here. I moved back

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>to Oakland and then to San Francisco, and I looked

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>around and it just wasn't doing well. People were unhappy,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>people were leaving. I mean, I mean, you know this,

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 2>you're a retail politician, like you can sense people's anger

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>when they find out you have anything to do with politics,

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>they tell you real quick. And we could see the

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 2>housing crisis hadn't tastasized into something that was genuinely now

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>a crisis. Not just homes are expensive. California high speed

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 2>rail has always lit me on fire that, yeah, we'll

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 2>get to that. And when I began to and I

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>was thinking about clean energy where your I mean, the

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 2>goals that you have set for clean energy in the

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 2>state are remarkable, and in order to achieve them here

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 2>or nationally, because the Inflation Reduction Act was passing around

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>this time too, that I was thinking.

0:03:58.520 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>About a lot of this.

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>We have to build faster than we have ever built,

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>and the laws don't really permit that. And so the

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>thing that I began thinking a lot about was that

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>there is something liberalism is good at and knows how

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>to look for, which is where can we subsidize something

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 2>that people need. But there's something liberalism is bad at

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 2>because it doesn't know how to look for it, which

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 2>is how do we create more? How do we make

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 2>it possible to build more of things people need? And

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 2>not only are we not good at pursuing that, we

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>don't even realize how often we are getting in the

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>way of it, how often we are the problem. There

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 2>is I think something bracing as a liberal about asking

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 2>this question of why, in the places where people who

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>agree with me govern, you and I don't think have

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 2>that different politics aren't the outcomes what I want to see?

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Why can't I go say to the Texans or the Floridians, No, no, no, no,

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 2>you just have to do our policies from California. And

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 2>that's the thing I'm grappling with here.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>No, And I appreciate that, and we'll get to that

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>question because I think it's a fundamental question, and it's

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting what you sort of define from that prism. That's

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>important because what people are actually looking for isn't necessarily

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what you are identifying. Specifically, I would challenge, as the

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>problem is that said, what you identify as the problem?

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree that. I was going back to my speech,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>my first speech is governor at the State of California,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>it might have well, it's these pages. Yeah, literally said

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if you can build a sports stadium with these new

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>rules and fast tack of judicial process and what we

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>referred to, we'll get the SEQUA are California rules that

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>go back to quite literally Ronald Reagan in nineteen seventy

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to environmental review. It should work for homelessness,

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it should work for housing. And I announced that day

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>an effort to sue up to forty seven cities. We

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>started with one, Huntingdon Beach, California. Doesn't make you popular

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>as governor to announce a lawsuit against Erl City because

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>they weren't meeting their zoning requirements under our housing element.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So much of that again reflected in this friction and

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>your own reflected frustration and lived experience in the state

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of California. But my point is this, as a practitioner,

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a very different reality. But what you identify, I

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>completely embrace these labyrinths of rules, federal rules, state rules.

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely localism though, and I want to talk about that

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>localism is determinative and you pick on understandably San Francisco,

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but you can look at almost any city, including a

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican health city like Huntington Beach, and these same rules

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and restrictions apply there in the same frustrations. So from

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the prism of left versus right, you take the shot

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>against liberals. But can't we argue that there is sort

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:54.559
<v Speaker 1>of quality of consideration and nimbism that persists in rural

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and red parts the countries.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me flip this because to shadow box around

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you know more about California governance than

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I ever will in a thousand years ago in this

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 2>would be ridiculous. Why is it easier to build homes

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 2>in Texas and California.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>They have Well you established that in the book. In

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Houston you make the point I think it was seventy

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand permits in twenty twenty three, just seventy five hundred

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in a much smaller city, San Francisco, but understandable contract

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a city with more demand, more demand, and it's simply

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>because they have no zoning. They have land use consideration,

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but Austin has zoning. Yeah, but not Houston. In the

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>context of that.

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 2>The thing I'm getting it here, which I really would

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>like your the thing you just said right about localism.

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>It's so important, and like, this is so much the

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>conversation I'd love for us to have here because the

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>texture that you have been grappling with of why do

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>things that you want to have happen not happen is

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I think a really interesting thing to add to it.

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 2>But when you're saying, well, you know, is this really

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 2>a problem for liberals. It's easier to build in Texas

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and Florida. They're not just in California, but in California

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>or New York. Right, the cost of living crisis is

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 2>worse in blue states. And a little bit of that

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 2>is Blue states are place a lot of people live,

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>but you should be able to in places ent governing

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>for the working class and theory, and your point.

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Is a point and just to level set, people are

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 1>listening completely agree this notion of the supply demand imbalance.

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're making an econ one to one argument. Uh,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And that supply to imbalance is next level in the

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>state of California, Whi're simply not building enough housing and

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that goes to I mean, and you correctly identify a nimbiism. Uh,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and people you know, incumbent protection rackets, so to speak,

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>not just from a corporate perspective, but someone who's very

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>satisfied with their backyard and their views and their home

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and their community. They don't want density, they don't want

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>other people moving in, they don't want any infrastructure built

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.359
<v Speaker 1>around it. As it relates to transportation, they're very satisfied

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>with what they have, and I think and they abuse

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in some respects a lot of these rules that have

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>been around decades and decades uh to advance that aim.

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 2>So you identified all this, I think pretty well as

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>a problem for the state and for you. So when

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 2>you gave a State of the State a couple years back,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm genuinely forgetting the number. What was the housing goal

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 2>you set?

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We said, well, we had we had an audacious goal

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that was a study of studies that identified what the

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>state would need in order to address the supply demand

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and ballants. But we made the point we were going

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>through a legally binding process what we referred to as

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>arena goals, and we've established that here is the legally

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>binding goal two point five million units by twenty thirty,

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is the established state policy, and that's the goal.

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So you're not on track for that, not even close

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>why for well number of reasons, macroeconomic. I mean, I

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>think you have to be fair as it relates to

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the realities of what just occurred, as it relates to

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the constraints around the marketing of interest rates or interest

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>rates are high. Obviously, we came out of a very

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult period during during COVID, but fundamentally because of the

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>inability to get local government to get out of the

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>way and allow for more construction. And that's why we

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>created a Housing Accountability Unit. That's why we've taken eight

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>hundred actions, That's why I've unlocked seventy five hundred units, uh,

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we have advanced forty two sequel reforms

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in some of the most significant housing reforms in California history.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>As it relates to eighty US, which you identify eighty US.

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Now you can buildinally do in single fami family home

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>zoning and duplexus. But at the end of the day,

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>state visions realized back to.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Localists, why did the ADU effort work and the single

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 2>family housing or multi family housing didn't. I mean, those

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>were big bills and we Yimbi's greeted them with delight.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>But I would say everybody would say that what was

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 2>it us be nine yes if the cities have made

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 2>it so those don't. Actually it doesn't build as much

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 2>housing it and.

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why we created this housing accountability to drive more

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>responsibility at the local level and providing technical assistance. It's

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not just a stick, it's also a carrot. But no,

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>look there's the that's the construct, right, I mean, that's

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a classic example. People like their neighborhoods. That's the foundation

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of Nimbiaism. And I had look this yimbiism frame, which

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is yes in my backyard. For those wondering the hell

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>we're even talking about, I embrace it. I celebrate. I

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's been a more yemb governor in California's history.

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's why we've signed so many of these bills

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and supported many of these bills. But you're right that

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>application a lot of these are new reforms just in

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the last few years in this high interest rate environment.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see how quickly things unlock as interest rates

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>dropped down. But fundamentally, it's the Nimbiaism that drags it.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you something about the housing reforms. As

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 2>I flipped the whole table this podcast. It's problem with

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 2>having a podcast host on. So during the election, when

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris and then Barack Obama at the DNC, actually,

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 2>by the way, on Barck Obama than Kamala Harris. We're

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 2>up there talking about the need to build three million

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>new homes, right and really sad in like Yimbi's from

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the stage. I was thinking, man, that is a huge

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 2>intellectual victory for movement that didn't exist like twenty five

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 2>minutes ago. I started thinking and and started running back

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 2>the date, and I'm like, Okay, how's it working out?

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 2>And you look in San Francisco and housing starts aren't up.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 2>And you look in LA and they're not up. You

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 2>look in California. Not talking here about ADUs, but housing

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 2>starts in January twenty twenty five were lower than in

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen. I began thinking to myself, oh shit, we

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 2>actually have won an intellectual argument without winning the policy.

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 2>So I began doing some reporting because I knew how many.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not literally how many, but I knew there's been

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 2>a pretty torrid pace with you and you know, Scott

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Wiener and Buffy Wicks and a bunch of other housing

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 2>local and the Last Day bills, and so I began

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>calling developers in San Francisco and said, what's going on here,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 2>why don't I see a movement? And how much you're building?

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And what they all told me was I didn't end

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>up writing this piece. I just didn't have time, but

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 2>I meant to for some time. Was all these fast

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 2>track bills required me to take on a bunch of

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>new standards and requirements, prevailing wages and environmental standards and

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 2>this and that. That made it more expensive for me

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to take the fast track than just do what I'm doing.

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 2>It wouldn't pencil out for me to do it right.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's one hundred percent true. I

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>could see you. But if that's not it, why do

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 2>you think all those bills didn't lead to Well.

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them have. How we can talk about it,

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't want to get into really parochial politics,

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>but we can talk about a five hundred unit project

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on Stevenson Street in San Francisco was never going to

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>get done until the state intervened and compelled the hand

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of the city to actually move forward again. I mean,

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and you've got an ideological war that's going on in

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>progressive cities. They don't believe in the supply demand framework.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't believe in this notion of abundance. Fundamentally, they

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>have a d growth mindset, which you talk a lot

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>about or at least right around in the book, And

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>so you're struggling with that ideological spectrum. But San Francisco,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just infamously just loves its neighborhoods. Doesn't

0:13:57.880 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>want to see it up, so they don't want to

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>see the density. So they're constantly pushing back against this,

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and we are as a state finally intervening in the ways

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the state is never intervened in the past. So I

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's a little too early to sort of assert

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that the sort of fatalist or have a fatalist a

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>notion of what hasn't yet occurred, when in fact, we're

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>starting now to flex our muscles and the application of

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>these laws are now starting to fully go into effect,

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately we want to see them materialize and manifest.

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's I think that's that's the friction. But look,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>let me just stipulate again. We're not arguing here, You're

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent right.

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 2>I was asking I'm curious.

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>No, but but also you're not. I'm you know, you

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about as a bagel of earth was everything, Yeah, everything,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>attack everything together. Even we're a little critical of the

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration and the Chips and Science Acts and the

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure stuff because they did the same thing. Look, you

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>go to the.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Rural broadband effort. Right twenty twenty one, they passed a

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 2>bi Parson infrastructure bail. We'll say it's the biggest infrastructure

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 2>bill in decades, which is not wrong one point two.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Turing, but five hundred and five to fifty of.

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 2>New Yeah, And one of the big headline pieces of

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 2>it is forty two billion dollars for World Broadband YEP

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one that passes by the end of twenty

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. Functioningly nobody's hooked up to Royal Broadband. And

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>me and Derek look into it, and there is a

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 2>fourteen stage process. I mean, I'm sure California was going

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>through a fourteen stage process of their creating a map,

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 2>and then the map can be challenged, and there's these

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 2>letters of intent and so on and so forth, and

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 2>by the end of their administration of the fifty six

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 2>states and jurisdictions that were trying to apply for the money,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 2>three had made it through, which, putting aside the fact

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 2>that them, me and all these people didn't get broadband,

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 2>it also meant that they couldn't run on that right.

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 2>So much of the political theory of the Biden administration

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 2>was that if you can show liberal democracy can deliver,

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 2>you will pull people out of wanting these strongmen who

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 2>say they're going to burn the whole thing down and

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>give you something out of the ashes. And if you can't, really,

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 2>if the things don't move fast enough, if they don't

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>get to the people fast enough, it's much harder for

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>liberal democracy to make the case said it delivers. I

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>want it to deliver. I like these policies, but the

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 2>speed thing is a real problem. And I'll say one

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>more thing, because I was talking. I did an event

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the other night with John Favreau and we were talking

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 2>about we were talking about high speed rail, but I

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 2>was saying that the stimulus bill under Obama that had

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 2>three big headline projects for reinvestment. It had high speed rail,

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 2>it had smart grid, and it had a nationwide system

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 2>of interoperable health records.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember those days.

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Oh for three. Yeah, at some point we got

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 2>to be upset about this.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>You know. So you have five core chapters in this book.

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You talk about growth, you talk about governance, you talk

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>about deploying, inventing. You know, a lot of language very

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>familiar here in the state of California. Again, abundance is

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally foundationally who we are, at least believe we are

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in the state of California. And so in that respect,

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree this sort of this perception performance is one thing,

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and I would argue a little bit more favorably to Biden.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, seven hundred and seventy five thousand manufacturing jobs,

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>just the job growth generally, and I'm not just talking

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>about job recovery from the pandemic, but the six plus

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>million jobs that you have to stack on that after

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>we were back to full recovery. The fact that Chips

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and Science Act is producing real results as it relates

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>to private sector investment, and the fact that we finally

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have an industrial policy that is worker center centric. And

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that worker centricity that you can argue against,

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>because that was in you call it out and here

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>when you talk to Gina about issues related to childcare

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and other aspirational frameworks as it relates to small businesses

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and reaching diversity goals and the like. But there is

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental disconnect, and you're absolutely right as it relates

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to these large scale, adacious projects. And I will give

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you your do on high speed rail. I have been

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>as critical or more than you have about this. In fact,

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you reference my pivot after I took this

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>job as governor, where we called out the status quo

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>and now we're trying to level set and get this

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>back on track. But at least there's a vision. At

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>least Obama had a vision. He wanted to be big

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and big things, he wanted to do big things. And

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at least progressive states still have a vision and they

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>have a design. I mean, and I think that's part

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of an abundance frame and and and while it's difficult

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to manifest that vision, I don't think it's an indictment

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>necessary it well, it's indictment in terms of our ability

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>to deliver on time and under budget. But the vision

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>I think is foundational and important. And I give credit

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to the aboveman administration in that respect. For all three,

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>even if they were over.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Thirsk, I'm all for vision. I upset the point of

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 2>this book is that I want the things to happen.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we could talk about high speed rally, we

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 2>must talk about high speed draft. But before we before

0:18:58.680 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 2>we get there for a second, I mean, I do

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the question around this book because it is very critical

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 2>of how liberals have governed. Well, then why you're just

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 2>a Republican?

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 2>If Texas is so good at housing? And the thing

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 2>that I keep telling people is you've really confused means

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 2>and ends here. Another thing that keeps coming up is like,

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 2>you want deregulation. Isn't that a Republican thing? Well not

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>if I'm deregulating the government itself so it can deliver

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 2>on the things you want. What's supposed to matter in

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 2>politics is not the means, it's the ends. And what

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I sort of want. What I'm trying to push here

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 2>is for liberals to get a little bit more means

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>agnostic and more like ends obsessed. So the thing that

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I the place where I probably differ a little bit

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 2>in what you just said a second ago, is that

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to give anybody credit for a vision

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 2>that didn't happen. High speed rails you have a great

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 2>quote to me in this I use it in the

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 2>book High speed Rails undermined the public's faith and what

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 2>can get done? It undermines the next high speed rail?

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>And the thing that I want to see happen is

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 2>a kind of reckoning inside the governing I would call

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 2>it a culture. Not just laws. It's not just regulations,

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 2>although it is all those things. But it is a

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 2>culture of what happens when the Democrats who are setting

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>this stuff up getting the room together, and people start

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 2>raising their hands and saying, what about this and what

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 2>about that? And how about the other thing? And instead

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 2>of here and no, I think it's kind of a

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 2>little bit, and it's not the only thing going on,

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 2>but there is something wrong in a culture that so

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 2>often fails to deliver what it promises. I mean, not

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 2>just high speed rail, the big dig, the second Avenue subway,

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 2>right these you know, parts of them got done in

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the second Avenue piece or the big dig eventually got done,

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 2>but too much, too expensive. You can't do enough if

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 2>you're doing that, and it's not inevitable. Europe builds trains

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 2>better than we do. They just do. And they have

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 2>governments I checked, and they have unions more than we do.

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just the lawyers. And you point that

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>out of the wall.

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's an issue I'd be very curious to hear.

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 2>So this is the thing I think people don't know

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 2>that I would love to hear it. To your thoughts

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 2>on that we do government different in this country than

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 2>they do in Europe, is a qualitative difference between it,

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 2>which is they run government through bureaucracies and we restrain

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 2>government through courts, which at the moment with Trump, seems

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>good in a bunch of ways, and there are ways

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 2>in which it's good, and there are also ways in

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>which it makes it hellacious.

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You got it to deliver, Yeah, and I would say

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the central theory of least. The argument that I

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>would make against the high speed rail is, I mean, look,

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this thing started, and you make the point it started.

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>There was sort of talk about the vision. The original

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>vision was not Obama, it wasn't even necessarily Jerry Brown.

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>But you pointed nineteen eighty two when Brown at least

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>says former Governor Jerry Brown, we should look at this

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>high speed rail thing. And then eventually Arnold Schwarzenegger, a

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Republican puts a bond on the ballot in two thousand

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and eight, and the voters approve it. And you're right.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of promotion and promise. Thirty three

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollars, two hours and twenty minutes downtown

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty by twenty twenty and the whole thing. And then reality.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Now I get here later decade plus later and reconcile

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we have to dig our way out

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of this. There's a new reality. There's a scarcity of resources,

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>there's an abundance of delay, there's an abundance of cost overruns,

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and we have to level set that we need to

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>build something or we're left with literally nothing. We're left

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>with pieces that go nowhere, that have no utility and

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>actually have a long term costs. But let's do it

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>by telling people what it is and what it's not.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>And so this focus on the Central Valley, which is

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>recognized was stipulated as a requirement under the Obama grant,

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the three billion dollars in one of the fastest growing

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>parts of the state, an important part of the state,

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>a state that has deep desire to connect to the

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the state, and a state of mind that's

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not just about a transportation project, but about upsony about

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>economic development, which a lot of that has occurred in

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>and around these new stations that have been built, fifty

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>large scale projects, the size of three Golden Gate bridges.

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>The entire environmental cpearance is now one hundred percent done.

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>LA to San Francisco, there were two.

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Thousand, twenty twelve to twenty twenty five.

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't I can't make up for that. I can

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>only deal.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>With the quota party, which is crazy.

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. But the point is we're at the point

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>where just announced we're doing railhead. We're finally laying the tracks.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean we could, we can lament about it. We

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely learned from it, and we've stressed test a lot

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>of it. You talk about the consulting class versus a

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>bureaucratic class, you're absolutely right, and we started to shift

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that just a few years ago. But the litigation on

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand, two hundred and seventy parcels that we

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>had to purchase was next level, and that delay, I

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>think is the core of this. There's plenty of other

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>bureaucratic malays and other issues we can identify, but back

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to this notion, I think you're right this idea of

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think liberal litigation. I don't know what phrase

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you used in the book, but we were mindful of

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that and critical of that, and you mark that as

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>a big part of the sort of nineteen seventies construct

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in a America and tell us a little bit more about.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we can put a pin in high speed rail.

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 2>There are two major liberal movements that happen in the

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century. The one we think about a lot is

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 2>New Deal liberalism. That's the one where we build aggressively.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a growth orient to liberalism. It's a liberalism of

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 2>material goods. And it's the liberalism that defines the left

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 2>right divide in our national narrative. Right liberals believe in big,

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 2>strong government, conservatives believe in small, limited government. In the sixties, seventies, eighties,

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 2>you have real problems that have emerged from this New

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Deal order. We have built heedlessly, recklessly, intensely. We are

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 2>cutting highways all across the country, many of them, they're

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>not all of them through marginalized communities, but man, the

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>rich communities don't like it when a highway goes through

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 2>either right, and they have a lot of the power

0:24:55.119 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 2>that leads to this. There is a genuine spoiling of

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 2>the environment. My colleague Derek likes to talk about the

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 2>moment in Los Angeles. I think it's in the forties

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 2>or fifties where people wake up and think there's been

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 2>a chemical attack from Japanese, but it turned out that

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 2>the city had launched its own chemical attack on itself.

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But you'll forget. In California, a lazy pundit could suggest

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the modern environmental movement started in nineteen sixty seven in

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>reaction to that in the business community saying enough and

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Governor RONA. Reagan established the California Air Resources Board, of

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>which that rights and responsibility were afforded under the nineteen

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>seventy Clean Air Act, which you also highlight in the

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>book Richard Nixon affording California waiver so that we can

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>address the unique air quality concerns that you identify them book.

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 2>And then of course everybody forgets it's Reagan who signs

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 2>the California Environmental Quality Activity.

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this SEQUE issue that you and others and myself.

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 2>It's worth I think taking time, it's worth taking I

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 2>think a minute on SEQUA. So Reagan signs a bill

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 2>into law. From Jake Ambnder's research, it doesn't even merit

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 2>a full article in the La Times. It's interesting nobody

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>quite knows what they've done because initially SEQUA it just says, look,

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 2>when the government does stuff, it's got to produce o

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 2>report on you know what the likely consequences are. No

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 2>big deal. And then there is a proposed development in Mammoth, which,

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, the great ski and snowboard town, which I've

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 2>been too many many.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Times, you Southern Californians.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Math, But there's a mixed use development that's proposed there,

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, sort of condos and some shopping at the

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 2>bottom of them, and a bunch of rich Mammothians, I

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know what they call themselves. Foul lawsuit, and they

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 2>have a novel argument, which is that this development can't

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 2>go forward because it violates SEQUA. And this gets rejected

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 2>the courts because this is not roughly would this be

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd want to double check this, but early seven years

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 2>these things, but I could be wrong with that. So

0:26:55.600 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 2>so what happens here is that the courts reject this

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of times because Seque is about public development,

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 2>and then the Supreme Court rules no no no. Public

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 2>development is anything that requires a permit by the state

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 2>of California. There's a Sierra Club lobbyist who we quote

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 2>in the book. It says after that sequel applies to

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 2>anything where you are rubbing two sticks together in the state.

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 2>And so, now, having been as Ambunder puts it in

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>his dissertation on this stuff, informed by the courts of

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 2>what the law they passed actually does, the legislature puts

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 2>a pause on it because now everything's in a huge

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 2>legal limbo. But the key thing is at SEQUA. I mean,

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure you know all this much better than

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I do. But Sequa's power is amplified a lot by

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 2>courts that interpreted it in a way that was very

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 2>different than anybody initially interpreted it. And this is part

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of a period in liberalism where you have this rise

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 2>of an environmental movement that has legal dimensions and political dimensions,

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and statutory dimensions and cultural dimensions. It's Rachel Carson, It's

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Ralph And the key thing about this period of liberalism,

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the New Left period of liberalism, is it is fundamentally

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 2>skeptical of government action. The New Deal is this alliance

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 2>between the government, the unions and the corporations to build,

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>to put people to work, to industrialize America and make

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 2>it into this kind of advanced, globe spanning superpower. And

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the new Left comes in and says, we are destroying

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>this place, We are turning this country conformists. The term

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.239
<v Speaker 2>tiki Taki comes from a song about Daily City and

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 2>how gross all those homes are. Right, Like, there's a

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 2>whole thing about the esthetic destruction of it. I have

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 2>great quotes from Lyndon Johnson's speeches about we used to

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 2>worry about the ugly American, Now we have to worry

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 2>about the ugly America. Right, there's a whole change. It

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 2>begins to happen. And the way that this moment in

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>liberalism tries to square the circle because the new Left

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 2>is part of this era that's very individualistic, right. We

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 2>think about this for Reagan and individuals, but it's happening

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 2>on the left too and wants a highly participatory democracy.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 2>And the way it tries to square it is create

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a million different ways that individuals or individuals represented by

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 2>nonprofit groups typically can sue the government to stop it

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 2>or force it to think about things that it wasn't

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 2>thinking about before. Sorry, gott a mosquito there, And it

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 2>creates ways to sue the government and force it to

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 2>think about things that it wasn't thinking about or had

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 2>an earlier Get.

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>That damn thing.

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 2>If I got it, I'd be like a mom and

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 2>that I remember the time when he truly seems superpowered.

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 2>So the way they do that is they create this

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 2>raft of legislation. Of it is some of it is environmental,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 2>but not all of it. And what it allows is

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 2>for individuals or individuals represented by groups and a huge

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>world of nonprofits emerges to take the best talent out

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 2>of the law schools and set them to suing government

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to sort of enforce this. Ralph Nader, when he runs

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>for president in two thousand, is asked what qualifies you

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 2>to be president? Says he has sued more government agencies

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 2>than I have. And yeah, and so this is very

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 2>potent in blue states. It had a strong New Left,

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and we don't think about it. Really, it's not part

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 2>of our national narrative of the left and the right.

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Our national narrative is like the guys who like government

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and the party that likes government and the party that doesn't.

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 2>It's not that way. The right loves a big police

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 2>state and the left has a very divided soul on government.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 2>It likes some kinds of government, but it hobbles government.

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 2>And that sort of made sense for its time. But

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 2>now we're in a different time where the problems are

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 2>problems of not building enough and environmentally particularly, All of

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, we've gone from a period where it really

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>was environmentally important to stop much of the things that

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 2>were happening, and now we're in one where the environmental

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 2>movement has to build, build, build, build the i ras

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of building approach to climate change, and our laws are

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 2>not set up for that. And this is where I'd

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>like to get your perspective. The thing that's also is

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 2>like the Democratic coalition is not set up to revisit

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>those laws. You all been doing little carve outs of SIQUA. Yeah,

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 2>but you've not ripped it out and rebuilt it, and

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 2>nor have we done that at the national level. And

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 2>as much as Democrats know this, the environmental groups don't

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 2>want to do that. There's a lot of power and

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>incumbents around the legislative architecture we have now, and you

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 2>don't get a huge I mean, you've tell me if

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:25.239
<v Speaker 2>this is wrong, but I feel like you don't get

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a huge parade for rebuilding legislative process, right zero.

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean so it feels like the contrary. It's years

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and years of friction, trial and error. It takes a

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. You introduce, you socialize, it gets nowhere,

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>finally gets through new coalition, new personalities, You finally get

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it done. Then two years later you're actual exercise it.

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you two specific examples. I have a two

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy day judicial review process that we pushed.

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>We worked it for. Its first use case was the

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>first above ground storage facility in California, last half century sites.

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It's in an offstream dam in California. At the second

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>quite literally a week ago, for three hundred megawatt large

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>scale solar facility which we are testing. It hardly perfect,

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but that was three years in the making just to

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have this established rule where I can finally fast track

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>large scale projects to start addressing your point. And you're right,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>there was no fundamental coalition for any of that. It

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>was a very lonely process until after years and years

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of trial and error, we finally broke through.

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you think you benefit from the other side of it,

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 2>from being able to get these projects built, Like if

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 2>you could get them built, do you think like it's

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 2>an intermediate period of pain and then better politics.

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>It will be better politics, but I won't be around

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy the fruits of that. And I think that's

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the great struggle. To your point, I mean you made

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that point about Biden earlier. I mean that's just a

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it's forty eight months. You're in the middle of trying

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to address the pandemic. You've got all kinds of global issues,

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got supply train constraints, you've got war in Ukraine,

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>You've got all of these issues, and yet he passes

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I refer to as a master class.

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>You are more defensive of Biden's record than of your own.

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm more proud of the work they did, breaking

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>through actually addressing the issues that Democrats claim they wanted

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to address, including marginally. And I agree with you again,

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there's zero daylight in this book which is markable, including

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>its own critique, my own self critique of my own

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>state and my own performance. So it's interesting. But he had,

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>as I said, industrial policy, there was worker centric and

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>there was reforms at the same time, to deal with mansion,

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>which you acknowledge in the book.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Marginal Well, the progressives killed those we just killed. But

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about the permitting the permanent reforms.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>But that sort of manifested and finally on the Chips

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and Science Act to be a version of that with

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and Cruz as it relates to. So there was

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>some component parts.

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And they learned on this. I mean, Brandiese, who is

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Biden's former a NEC director, has an awesome piece in

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Affairs about why we need to build faster. Right,

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>there's learning here. But I would wish but.

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>If we but I'm going to let me stipulate, let

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>me make this quickly if we can figure that out.

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>If we can, I don't. This is this is the

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>most one of the most important books democrats can read.

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Wake up. I sent this to the two leaders of

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>my California Assembly and Senate.

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 2>You love to hear it.

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I just know. No, I'm serious, I said, guys, wake

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this is it. I mean, we're being judged here at

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a different level. We've done some good things together. We

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>got to get serious. As the spot on on a

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of this stuff. There's some you know, we had

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>population growth, the last two years. By the way, in

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>December they updated all the census numbers. It grew in

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>California the last two years. He had red states that

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a population declined in the last few years, with the

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>exception of Vermont. There's some QUI I can equivalent some

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>of that respect, but fundamentally, these larger trend lines you

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 1>identify and this friction struggle to build more and build

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 1>better and to address I'm with you on the high

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>speed rail. It furiates me as a taxpayer. You're one

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent. It's an indictment of our ability to deliver.

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 1>That said, we are finally doing realized where by train sets.

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>We got partnership with the Bright Line and High Desert Corridor.

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>We did full electrification of Caltran seven hundred and fourteen

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>million dollars fifty one miles. We got all the environmental

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>work done, all the hard works now behind us. Now

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we're laying track and we're finally getting that first one

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred nineteen miles done. We'll get to one seventy one.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a six point five billion dollar gap. We have

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>strategy to address that.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't even want to go I want to hold

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 2>high title for a second. I want to do one

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 2>thing on Biden before we go.

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But the issue with Biden is I don't know what

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the hell more he could have done in a short

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>period of time to deliver on a bold vision and

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>lay the tracks for benefits that will enjoy. Yes, not

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>all in forty eight months, but over the course the

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>next four eight years.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>It'll be loving Like. I'm not saying it's all his fault.

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.760
<v Speaker 2>That's not my point here, right, He is inheriting a government,

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 2>although you see in a very dark way with Musk

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 2>and Doge that a lot that was taken as a

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 2>binding constraint actually isn't. So I want to hold that

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 2>because I think there are things as grotesque is what

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 2>that crew is doing to the government. There's also things

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 2>that need to be learned from what they're doing to

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 2>the government.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But it didn't.

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I really think it's important to hold this in mind

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 2>for all of us, because it's something I really did

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.439
<v Speaker 2>not understand. It did not used to take this long

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 2>to deliver Medicare. Medicare delivered Medicare cards a year after

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 2>they passed that bail. It took the Affordable Care Act

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 2>four years to begin delivering actual insurance to any we

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 2>can talk. It took on the Inflation Reduction Act, which

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 2>is doing the much smaller job of just beginning to

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 2>negotiate prices on some drugs three years to get that started.

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean we built I mean, these are the classic examples.

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:39.919
<v Speaker 2>But we built the Empire State Building in a year.

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 2>The average environmental review takes four and a half years.

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Just a few years ago to get bridge. I agree,

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 2>All this The thing that I want to say about this,

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 2>which is not Joe Biden's fault, but it is the

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 2>fault of now. I think a long period of Democrats

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>beginning to get accustomed to this slowness. This is not

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 2>going to work politically. I agree with you are not

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 2>going to hold the people you need to hold if

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 2>your answer in every term is he can't feel what

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 2>I did because a government takes too long. If it

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 2>had to take too long, fine, but it doesn't actually right.

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 2>These are man made and it's not.

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Just government, it's also private sector. I mean, there is

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>there is another component of this. The markets actually play

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>a really significant outsize influence in timing on a lot

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of these things, on investments, et cetera.

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but they would build fast. In a lot of cases,

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 2>if we let them build fast, I mean, they're not

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 2>why we didn't get world broadband done.

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>That was not that No, but that's just you know,

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree, that's fifty states solutions, thousands thousands.

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Think I'm pushing on a little bit here with using

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 2>the example of Biden, not you, But I do think

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 2>this is I think that those of us who want

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 2>to defend liberal democracy from an actual challenge to it.

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 2>One of the things Trump is getting the most mileage

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 2>out of, and he says it himself all the time.

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it's why he likes what Elon Musk is

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 2>doing for all. The risk of it is the sense

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 2>of constant action. Yeah, all of a sudden government which

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 2>normally you don't feel moving. You feel it moving, maybe badly.

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe what you feel is the heat from it burning

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 2>to the ground, but you feel movement. Right and Populace

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>have that. They have a politics of energy almost all

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 2>of the time.

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:15.959
<v Speaker 2>This is something you see across countries, and I think

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 2>that Democrats need to begin to think about speed as

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 2>a thing we are actually tracking and pursuing government. We

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 2>have other things we need to pursue. In track equity right,

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 2>just right. There are a lot of things we need

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 2>to think about and you need to make trade offs

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 2>between them. But speed is one we have just let slip.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's not just like bad, because it's kind of

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 2>sad that we let it slip. Jake Sullivan said about Biden,

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 2>he said, elections are measured in four years, and his

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 2>presidency will be measured in decades. It won't or his

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 2>policy agenda be judged in decades, so much of it

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to get undone, including a lot of the

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Transatlantic alliance that he worked so hard to rebuild that

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 2>it won't. One reason that this book is politically important

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 2>to me not just the kind of background, as is

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 2>a policy reporter, and the stuff I like is like

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the details of the policy. But one reason it's politically

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 2>important to me is that Democrats have I think, got

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 2>in a little bit of learned helplessness around not every

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.439
<v Speaker 2>little bit of how gardment moved slowly. People think about

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 2>procurement reforms. You've done a lot on that, but in general,

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 2>the sense that we just can't do what we once did,

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 2>like the way the garment used to work. I was

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 2>reading a great piece by Harold Myerson, who's at the

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 2>American Prospect, and he's a great California reporter too, and

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 2>he wrote this piece was back during the stimulus debate

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 2>under Obomba. He sent it to me the other day

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 2>and he talks about the way the worst progress administration

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 2>started up under FDR and the unfathomable speed at which

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 2>they just cut through everything to put millions of people

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 2>the equivalent today of putting ten million people to work

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 2>in a matter of months. Right, And he was saying,

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 2>you can't do it today, Harold was because you just

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have the laws. But I just think it's really

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.720
<v Speaker 2>important to say laws are man made. There are laws

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 2>of physics, there are technical things we don't yet know

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 2>how to do. But the difference between places at construct

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 2>apartment buildings quickly and that don't is that's us.

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. And look and you highlight some of

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>those successes. I mean you you talk about what happened

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>during the Trump administration in COVID. By the way, a

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of innovation happened during COVID. Yeah, including on land use.

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>We did something called home key, room key. We changed

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>land use and sequel. We did it through a emergency frame.

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 1>You referenced the Eye ninety because risk tolerance went up,

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>risk tolance went up, I ninety five and emergency frame.

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It's exact posts of any we had the Eye ten,

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>which we got done in eight days. That was even

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>more through the ninety five. Yeah, you should have added

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that and one nice thing you could have said about

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>our state. But so there was a state of mind though.

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're doing it right now in terms of

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the emergency work we're doing on the rebuilding of the

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>fire declaration and people are celebrating it and the emergency.

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.879
<v Speaker 2>Structures work better. Yeah, then why is it not making

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the normal structure closer to them?

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>No? I look, I this this is why. That's why

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do this podcast, is why I love

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like your book. That's why I think it's essential

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>reading for democrats. This notion of speed, appearing to take

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>action but not doing things to people, but with people

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and finding that right balance it's not I think there's

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the stress. And it goes to your opening point about

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 1>some of the questions you're getting sort of this notion

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of a binary that it's one or the other. Why

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>aren't you a Republican as opposed to risk taking without recklessness.

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You know what's that right balance? You know? Is the

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>right balance of DOGE is the example of the one

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty billion dollars that Clinton and Gore saved

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on a one point four trillion dollar government and they

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>reduced the size of the workforce by four hundred thousand.

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>But they did that again in partnership and did real

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.760
<v Speaker 1>reform versus the recklessness of DOGE. Is it the RFI

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.800
<v Speaker 1>two process. I thank you for recognizing our procurement reforms

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>you highlight. We brought in gen Polka to it from

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Code for America to bring in a private sector version.

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.439
<v Speaker 1>We did the original DOGE. We call it ODI, which

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>the Office of Digital Innovation, which is now Office of

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Data Innovation. We're trying to change the entire procurement framework.

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>We inherited these old Cobalt systems that you highlight from

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:13.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty nine and these IBM mainframes in the nineteen eighties.

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>All of that creates a stress on the system, and

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>so it's not easy overnight to fix it. But the

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>emergency mindset and I think the break the glass point

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 1>you're making is for democrats right now, and it's the

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>soul searching we have, we got to deliver it.

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Does your legislature want to fix it?

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>They all intellectually do. But then you have you have

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>every constituency in every group, and they're showing up twenty

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>four to seven. Then nimbiism as well established. You've established

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it from the mindset. It's not just by the way Reagan.

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>In sequel, it's the NEPA, it's in Dangered Species Act,

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the Clean Water Act, all the stuff Nixon did.

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>But it's not. But in any reform, people panic, oh,

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't care about you You've just turned it conservative.

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>You can't even I mean, we've had a podcast here.

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:04.279
<v Speaker 1>You talked to Republicans. You're like, geez, what the hell

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is going on? Guys selling out sold his soul. So

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you have reforms around process. In sequel, people panic said, what,

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you just want to destroy the environment. So there's a

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 1>political price you pay for that reform. But you're right,

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a political price for not reforming, which is where

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party is today. So speed decision making, the

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of action and purpose. By the way, a lot

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of what this president is celebrating is what the last

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>president did, and a lot of the investments, I mean

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the AI investments that Sam and others were making and

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're making.

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to get the credit. That's one of the

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:43.760
<v Speaker 2>reason I think the speed thing is actually so important.

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 2>You want to shorten. Look, the policy feedback loops are

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 2>broken because people don't know who did the policy. When

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 2>you said a second a couple of minutes ago that

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 2>these projects that can only exist because of your fast

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 2>tracking will not exist while you are in office, right,

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:03.760
<v Speaker 2>that a breakdown of the way the voters can maintain

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 2>accountability right when they don't know who did what. It's

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 2>actually a big problem. One thing that I think about

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 2>with what you were just saying on the politics of

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 2>it is that and I see it very clearly in California.

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure it's true in other places. You can you

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 2>should tell me if this is facile. You can avoid

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:24.280
<v Speaker 2>short term pain in a way that ultimately creates almost

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:26.720
<v Speaker 2>unsolvable long term pain. And so you know you obviously

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:30.279
<v Speaker 2>used to be mayor of San Francisco London Breed said

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the right things on yimbiism and all

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the rest of Itancisco, but couldn't get it done and

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 2>lost reelection. Not the only reason, but a big reason.

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:42.839
<v Speaker 2>People are furious about the homelessness problem there, and that's

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 2>in large part of a housing problem. It's not the

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 2>only reason, but.

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>A large problem. You make that point, and you're spot on.

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 2>In Oakland, they were called the mayor in Los Angeles.

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's a lot of reasons for what's going

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 2>on there, but Crusoe ran a much stronger campaign than

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 2>people have expected at the beginning, and.

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Former Republican we're out performed a.

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 2>Lot of Yeah, and so you have this sort of

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 2>thing happening where there's almost I think, I don't want

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:07.320
<v Speaker 2>to say a ceiling. We'll see what you do in

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years. I don't want to say a

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 2>ceiling on where California politicians can go. But it is

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 2>very hard to be successful when people are angry of

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 2>our problems that maybe you didn't cause, right, but you're

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 2>also not willing to take the pain out assault.

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm trying. I am taking the pain and I'm

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>taking the political I mean, I can give you proof

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>points of the work we've done in the political capital

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>We've used to get a lot of these reforms advanced,

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's I think that's That's where I struggle a

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit with the book. Just again, the book that

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I celebrate and I'm handing out to folks, is it's

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of that is acknowledged the actual policy

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 1>reforms that we are advancing, that we are marching and

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>moving towards, and how we're actually starting to see some

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>progress in that respect. But with that in mind, I

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.799
<v Speaker 1>get the speed and the scale, but I also want

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to make a case. Look, this is a state, you know,

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>where we're aiming population again, We're running budget surpluses. We

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:08.280
<v Speaker 1>dominate in every innovative category you talk about the future

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of abundance in the context of invention and deployment, that's California.

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Eighteen percent of the world's R and D is in

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the state. No other state comes close. Only two countries

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>have more R and D, and that's that's Germany and China.

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:26.360
<v Speaker 1>This is a state with forty one percent more manufacturing

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>output than the state that tends to get a lot

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of credit in Texas. Texas, by the way, takes seventy

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>one point one billion dollars of federal money from the taxpayers.

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We give eighty three point one billion dollars. We have

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:43.959
<v Speaker 1>more scientists, engineers, more, Nobel laureates, more venture capital. Half

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of the unicorn companies in the country are in California.

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot going right. They just get a survey

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of the top ten happiest cities. I would respect Houston

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>went on that list, but Santa was very Irvine was

0:46:57.680 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on that list. Fremont interesting, number one, San Diego. So

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know, we dominate in AI. The

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>world again, we're inventing the future happens here. By the

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 1>way you saw in homelessness, the numbers through the roof

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.840
<v Speaker 1>across the rest of the country stabilized here in California.

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>The housing crisis not unique to Blue states, any larger, longer,

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 1>lower taxes in this state than in many many states.

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>People talk about the high taxes in California. It's just BS.

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Sixteen states. Sixteen states tax their poorest residents more than

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we tax our top one percent. Forty percent of our

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:39.760
<v Speaker 1>residents pay lower taxes than in Florida and Texas. Eighty

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of our residents pay slightly above average taxes. So

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this notion of even being a high tax state is BS.

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>This notion that everyone's leaving is complete BS. We dominate

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in so many of these categories because I think of

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>our values, but we're not build enough damn housing, and

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that's led to this homeless crisis. Not exclusively, you said,

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's contributed. And yes, we had a vision decades ago.

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The taxpayers advanced it on a high speed rail and

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we watched China clean our clock. You highlight that in

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>miles and numerics that are depressing. Don't you want you

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to repeat them? I can for everybody, but I'm not

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 1>going to. But we're going to get the damn thing done.

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 1>They complained about the Erie Canal, they complained about the

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Panama Canal, they complained about the trans Continental Railroad right

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:27.840
<v Speaker 1>before it finally started, uh to start to start to

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>see real progress. And I feel like we're at that

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>tipping point with this damn high speed rail. But nonetheless,

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you're right speed.

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 2>Rail for a second. So I, for instance, I will,

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I will, I will say, first look, I love California. No,

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I have redwoods tattooed on my shoulder, like no joke,

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and like and leaving the state to go live in

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 2>New York City was like the right thing for a

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 2>bunch of reasons. But but you know, a difficult personal

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 2>choice for me because this is my soil. So every

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 2>you live through a tough time, though, Francis, you know

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 2>what I would still I mean it was that was

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 2>that was im That was a tough time in the pandemic.

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And by the way that city is coming around, it's

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 1>turning around. Objectively, I love s F two objectively.

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, as I say, what is a criticism is

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 2>an act of love.

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, bless you. There's a lot of love, a lot

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of love.

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 2>In this book, man, a lot of love in this book.

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:24.240
<v Speaker 2>But and then this is I think always the great

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:30.760
<v Speaker 2>uh paradox of California. California is the frontier of the future.

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 2>It always has been. And technologically as you said, but

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 2>also culture right. You go to northern California, we're inventing

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:40.759
<v Speaker 2>everybody's technology. You go to southern we're given the whole world.

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 2>It's culture right, It's a wild place. And the to me,

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the reason the housing thing matters here, the reason I

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:51.799
<v Speaker 2>structure the housing chapter the way that that I do

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 2>with Derek, is that you need to make it possible

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 2>for people to be and and and prosper from that

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:07.239
<v Speaker 2>prosperity right, it is good for people.

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 1>To be near the AI boom.

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I have friends. I mean they fought fires in the

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 2>city of San Francisco, couldn't afford to live there.

0:50:13.920 --> 0:50:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 2>The point of California's riches is that they should be shared,

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 2>not shared necessarily just through taxation and reistribution, but through

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the ability to people to go live in these super

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 2>high productivity places. Where has happened with like a young

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Steve Jobs and Wosniak, you sort of fall into this

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 2>world where maybe if you have a genius for something,

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:35.720
<v Speaker 2>you have the connections to make it matter.

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I have this sort of line in the book that

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 2>in making these cities so expensive, we did the real gating.

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:45.439
<v Speaker 2>We really closed the frontier, because the true frontier isn't land.

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Its ideas you frame it with Horace Greeley, go west,

0:50:48.680 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 1>young Man, go west, and then you create that new construct.

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I want to pull that. It's actually everything

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 2>you say about California. And you know this I'm not telling,

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 2>but I'm sanding for the audience that that makes it

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 2>so important that like the working class families can be

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 2>here are not driven out but on my speed rail.

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 2>Let me because by.

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 1>The way, just beg the housing crisis in this state

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>explains more things and more ways on more days, that

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:18.279
<v Speaker 1>affordability issue is the core of ninety percent of California's

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 1>real and structural problems. This is foundational. Again, you could

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not be more right. It is at the core of

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the issues that define the challenges not just to this state,

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:32.880
<v Speaker 1>increasingly all over the United States. We talk about the

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>future happening here first, where America is coming to traction.

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>That's all those wonderful things. Then you and I were

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 1>just discussing, but obviously all of these perilous issues that

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you have been discussing, and the reason you wrote.

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 2>This book so high speed rail. So when I went

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 2>on and did the reporting on that, and I went

0:51:49.640 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 2>up and down the track with the people building it

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 2>and the people from the rail authority, and they told

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:55.399
<v Speaker 2>me a couple things that have stuck in my head

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:56.799
<v Speaker 2>that I don't try to resolve in the book, but

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I'd be careious for your thoughts. So one was that

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 2>the said Bakersfield Leg, which is the leg that is

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:05.359
<v Speaker 2>currently being tried. I think they said they had something

0:52:05.440 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 2>like line of sight either had spent or head line

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 2>of sight on something like it was in the range

0:52:09.960 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 2>of eleven to fifteen billion dollars.

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 1>We thirteen point four billion dollars of which ten point

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 1>eight from the state and two point six from the feds.

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.759
<v Speaker 2>All right, and that the estimate on finishing was said

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to Bakersfield was thirty six billion.

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, there's there's currently our estimates and this plus

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>or minus and this moving target about six point five

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars that we based upon what we have the

0:52:33.600 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 1>current commitments. We had additional three billion dollars from the

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>federal government. Obviously, the term of administration is trying to

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:42.279
<v Speaker 1>analyze that as they did in the last time. And

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>then cap and trade proceeds that will continue to accrue

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>if we extend cap and trade. Can you bond against that?

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of variations.

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying you think you have line of sight

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:54.239
<v Speaker 2>on the money we have with a delta six point

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:57.439
<v Speaker 2>five billion roughly, And what a bunch of the people

0:52:57.440 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 2>working on set is like, look, in the end for

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 2>this to really work, needs to be LA to San

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Francisco and now would cost one hundred and ten billion dollars.

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well we're looking at and I don't you know, Look,

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:10.879
<v Speaker 1>we've extended high speed rail the idea is to get

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it in these density and population quarterors, which is the

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>point you make in the critique, and get Ta Fresno,

0:53:17.160 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, to Gilroy where Caltran is, and we can

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:23.239
<v Speaker 1>we can then connect to San Jose and into San Francisco.

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 1>We have the existing infrastructure in place. That's about an

0:53:26.160 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 1>hour you get into Palmdale. Now you're connecting with the

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>new Bright line that's going all the way to Vegas

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and one of the fastest growing parts of the state

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in Palmdale, where middle class families can still afford a home.

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And so those are component parts and that's where I

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 1>think that thirty six million billion dollar number came from.

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Those three component parts. Roughly add up to that now

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that to Hatchpee Mountains, getting them over all of those

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 1>larger issues. Those are issues that obviously are component parts of.

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:57.440
<v Speaker 2>This larger and that'll be you know, over the course

0:53:57.480 --> 0:53:58.320
<v Speaker 2>of many minuters.

0:53:58.400 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Right. Oh.

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:01.359
<v Speaker 2>But I think the I think the big question people

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:03.359
<v Speaker 2>have about it, and you hear people asking us all

0:54:03.400 --> 0:54:04.319
<v Speaker 2>the time, is that And.

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm just write I inherited this.

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:11.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm not blaming governors on the dog.

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to think that.

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 2>Question is if there is not a line of sight

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:19.120
<v Speaker 2>on that thirty six to one ten billion, right, that

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:21.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't exist, and that's a very hard.

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Thing when you're trying to get revenue generation. Once you

0:54:23.160 --> 0:54:25.560
<v Speaker 1>start getting the large population corridors, if you could connect

0:54:25.600 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley to Central Valley, which is the foundational argument,

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and you can start sharing. We're looking at train sets

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that have interoperability not just with bright Line, but a

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 1>high desert corridors. You have two private sector partners and

0:54:38.000 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we're actually procuring train sets very very shortly, as I

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>say we did the railhead. We're starting to lay track.

0:54:44.400 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 1>This thing is starting to get very very real. Some

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:49.799
<v Speaker 1>of the projects you did see are projects that will

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 1>have profound impacts economically in terms of the up zone,

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:55.879
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the Fresno corridor, and Fresno is a very.

0:54:55.840 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Important I think the big the big worry I heard

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 2>from transportation types is that the ridership in those quarters,

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 2>as fast growing as they may be, is not enough

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:05.959
<v Speaker 2>to throw off money. It's not even enough to handle

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:08.440
<v Speaker 2>that operating budget very likely, and it's definitely not going

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 2>to throw off money that's going to complete one hundred

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and ten billion dollar train, and that we're finishing something

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 2>that in the end is going to be a monument

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 2>to not being able to Well there's the thing we

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 2>want it.

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're not going to be able to build a

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:21.400
<v Speaker 1>new airport. We're not, you know, I mean the end

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 1>of the day, we've got these constraints that are well

0:55:23.840 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>established already, these pre existing constraints. There's not a high

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>speed railing system that's not enjoying some popularity and success.

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Most at least are wildly popular. It's an experience no

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>one's had in the United States of America. At least,

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we're out there daring and we're trying to it can be.

0:55:41.520 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Made that would make the next pieces just easier. I mean,

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:47.319
<v Speaker 2>I was always interested that, Like it wasn't exempted from

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:49.800
<v Speaker 2>sequel in the first place. It's a pro environmental project,

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I know. You know, are there things like that?

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I mean, I wish you wrote this

0:55:54.239 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 1>damn book in two thousand and seven. Wow, Where the

0:55:56.800 --> 0:55:59.160
<v Speaker 1>hell were you? It's a good question, seriously, by the way,

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:02.880
<v Speaker 1>where were you? I was in Washington, man in Washington,

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was in Washington. I mean, but you're right, no, look,

0:56:05.239 --> 0:56:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't see it's the art of the possible,

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and I know that back to that's a practitioner framework.

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love to intellectualize all these things what

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:15.080
<v Speaker 1>could have, should have, would have, but there's certain foundational facts.

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 1>And interestingly, you made the point in the book that

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I have to over and over make to people, why

0:56:20.440 --> 0:56:23.880
<v Speaker 1>did we start in the Central Valley? It was a requirement,

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:27.720
<v Speaker 1>federal requirement for federal dollars. Now it's not the worst idea,

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Intercontinental.

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Just to say it was a requirement because the federal

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:34.240
<v Speaker 2>program wasn't just for high speed rail. It's his start

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:38.359
<v Speaker 2>where you had air pollution for marginalized communities, which is

0:56:38.719 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 2>both Like, I just want to say this because it's

0:56:41.080 --> 0:56:42.480
<v Speaker 2>part of why I'm saying this in the book is

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:46.440
<v Speaker 2>that that all sounds great and there's you can come

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 2>up with reasons starting Central Valley, but it's the part

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:52.240
<v Speaker 2>of the state that will generate the least political capital

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 2>to keep going because it has the least danse ridership.

0:56:56.600 --> 0:56:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's also part of the state that does have

0:56:58.719 --> 0:57:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, you talk about it ignorance, poverty,

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and disease. You talk about the issues of air quality

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and life expectancy, you talk about the economic opportunity.

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 2>But as air quality is the whole track.

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, ultimately fully electrified track. I mean that ultimately will This.

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Is just to me, it's an example. This one wasn't

0:57:15.239 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 2>California's fault. This was the Obama administration. But it's an

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:21.480
<v Speaker 2>example of they should have given I want to say

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 2>what I think should have happened here. They should have

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 2>given you whatever three some billion dollars that's what that

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:30.600
<v Speaker 2>grant was, and just said use it for high speed rail.

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:57:31.200 --> 0:57:33.560
<v Speaker 2>It shouldn't have been a stacked series of ideas. Right,

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:35.760
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't all need to be a triple axle. Right,

0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 2>high speed rail is hard enough, as you know better

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:38.560
<v Speaker 2>than I do.

0:57:38.800 --> 0:57:42.040
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, representative democracy is a tough thing. Dictatorships

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 1>are a little easy.

0:57:43.760 --> 0:57:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Representative Tom knew that.

0:57:45.520 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of folks in the Central Valley,

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the elected officials, a lot of the

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 1>blue dog Democrats a lot.

0:57:50.600 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 2>But the Obama administration when they created those programs, right, yeah,

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:55.800
<v Speaker 2>that's a lot happening. I really, this isn't.

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>There were a lot of representatives, Democrats, representers that still

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 1>sipulated their support for that bill in those dollars that

0:58:04.520 --> 0:58:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it go to the center.

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 2>There is a lot to be politics in that. I

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 2>don't want to take that away, but I do want

0:58:08.760 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 2>to say because this comes up a lot when I'm

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 2>talking about this book. It's like, oh, do you hate democracy?

0:58:13.080 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 2>People have no fucking idea what is happening in these

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 2>regulatory processes, Like I cover this professionally, and when I

0:58:21.440 --> 0:58:23.680
<v Speaker 2>dig into what is happening after these bills pass, I'm like,

0:58:23.720 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, really that is not democracy. That is,

0:58:27.760 --> 0:58:29.520
<v Speaker 2>we have created things that were supposed to a lot

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of participation and they are often very captured. Maybe they're

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 2>captured by interests. You like, that's fine, but that is

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 2>not the thing that you know, the massive Californians have

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 2>voted for Prop one A knew they were getting. And

0:58:41.040 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 2>even those of us covering the stimulus bill, we're not

0:58:43.480 --> 0:58:47.680
<v Speaker 2>looking at the precise requirements in the notice of funding

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:50.600
<v Speaker 2>opportunity in the grant program. So there is this thing,

0:58:50.680 --> 0:58:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I think where a lot of this highly technocratic governance,

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 2>which is very much a negotiation between different interests, is

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 2>in this like King's Cup Way being justified as democracy.

0:59:02.120 --> 0:59:05.240
<v Speaker 2>That's not what democracy looks like. I'll use that chant here, right,

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not SHP. Nobody knows about you.

0:59:08.440 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Look, I mean you're you're very adjacent to the arguments

0:59:10.960 --> 0:59:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk is making with Doge, this clay layer

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of bureaucracy. This is not representative. Who the hell are

0:59:17.040 --> 0:59:19.560
<v Speaker 1>these people to make these rules? Who are these people

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 1>making these decisions? And the opacity of these decisions? And

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I've made in sunshine and daylight and a lot of

0:59:25.320 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 1>these three levels.

0:59:26.440 --> 0:59:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Supposed to Nicholas Bagley, the more liberal law professor, making

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:32.440
<v Speaker 2>these rules. But I think I'll take the head.

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:34.200
<v Speaker 1>No, it's well, it's not even a hit. But I mean,

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it goes to the sentiment, it goes to

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it goes to the thematics of your book.

0:59:39.360 --> 0:59:41.080
<v Speaker 1>It goes to what you're trying to stress test and

0:59:41.120 --> 0:59:43.840
<v Speaker 1>what you're trying to stress upon us as Democrats, that

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we need to be more accountable. Here's anything. But let

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 1>me make this point. I say this all the time,

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:50.560
<v Speaker 1>my legislative friends. Right when I sign a bill, I said,

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this happens so obviously not indictment of any individual legislature.

0:59:54.000 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 1>It's in sort of institutionalized. They think the process is done,

0:59:57.320 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>process just begun.

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Just beginning program again not problem.

1:00:00.640 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Solving, and then that implementation application goes through exactly what

1:00:04.200 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. What's an You mentioned no foes in in

1:00:07.680 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in the book, we have no fuzz, which I notice

1:00:10.360 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a funny availability, not opportunity. And then you stack all

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>those things up with all these rules and requirements along

1:00:17.000 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the lines you suggest that was never part of anyone's understanding.

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Your vision is what you just saw this, And I

1:00:22.280 --> 1:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's absolutegitimacy.

1:00:23.720 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I have this joke that everybody knows a schoolhouse rock

1:00:26.560 --> 1:00:28.600
<v Speaker 2>song of like how a bill becomes a law, but

1:00:28.640 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>what they don't know is how a law becomes or

1:00:30.400 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>does not become like a reality, right, like the things

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 2>that happened after actually much more complicated. But I want

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>to say one thing about Elon Muskandoje And at this

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>point I was just I just referenced Nick Bagley, who

1:00:40.680 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 2>is a great administ of law professor of Michigan. He

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>was Gretchen Whitmer's your your gubernatorial colleagues, chief counsel. He

1:00:47.280 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>wrote this piece it's very influential these days and very

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 2>influential for me, called the procedural fetish, And one of

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 2>the things he says in that that I think is

1:00:54.240 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>really wise is that the Democotic Party is very legalistic.

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>It's got a lot of lawyers in it. Between Tim

1:01:01.920 --> 1:01:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Walls was the first person on a Democratic ticket since

1:01:06.120 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Mondell to not go to law school. We're very legalistic

1:01:10.160 --> 1:01:14.400
<v Speaker 2>and lawyers and constitutional lawyers and administrative procedure lawyers. They

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:16.400
<v Speaker 2>grapple a lot with a very hard question, which is

1:01:16.440 --> 1:01:19.560
<v Speaker 2>what makes government action legitimate? And the answer they often

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>come to his procedure right is following the procedures set

1:01:22.160 --> 1:01:23.760
<v Speaker 2>out in the laws and the rules and the court orders,

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:26.200
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. It's not that there's nothing to that. But

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the point Bagley makes, which I think is the right

1:01:28.280 --> 1:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>counter or the way to think about the point Elon

1:01:30.120 --> 1:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Musk is making, is it, to most people, what makes

1:01:33.280 --> 1:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>government legitimate in a democracy is it they are getting

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:38.840
<v Speaker 2>what they think they voted for. When they vote for

1:01:38.920 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you and you say you're going to do X, Y

1:01:40.240 --> 1:01:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and Z, they got X, Y and Z. And if

1:01:42.360 --> 1:01:44.600
<v Speaker 2>they don't feel like they got that, they vote you

1:01:44.640 --> 1:01:47.600
<v Speaker 2>out right. They see you as illegitimate failure. And the

1:01:47.720 --> 1:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>problem with Musk and Doge, in addition to its lawless nature,

1:01:51.880 --> 1:01:55.880
<v Speaker 2>is that its ends are terrible, and the people did

1:01:55.880 --> 1:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>not vote for, you know, not to be able to

1:01:59.200 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 2>reach anybody at Social Security Administration or the IRS. Ever

1:02:02.320 --> 1:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>again on the phone, right, that wasn't part of the pitch,

1:02:05.400 --> 1:02:09.920
<v Speaker 2>But it's I think really important that liberals have a

1:02:09.960 --> 1:02:12.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit more of the sense not the procedure is meaningless,

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>because it isn't you need procedure. But what really connects

1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:20.000
<v Speaker 2>government to people is outcomes, the lived experience of government

1:02:20.120 --> 1:02:23.880
<v Speaker 2>acting in their life. And if you are letting endless

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>levels of not just process but process, you have created.

1:02:26.440 --> 1:02:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean when we're talking about no foes and no fas,

1:02:28.640 --> 1:02:31.200
<v Speaker 2>and I mean that is the work of men and women.

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, we are writing that shit down on the computer.

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and when we lost everyone, we opened up with sequences.

1:02:36.840 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>And this is this is going to be a very high,

1:02:39.160 --> 1:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>high audience podcast. But when you do that, I think

1:02:43.160 --> 1:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>that that actually is a cultural change. The thing I

1:02:46.280 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>respect about Elon Musk there's a lot these days I

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:52.440
<v Speaker 2>don't like about the guy, but there is a relentlessness

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>to the way he pursues his objectives, a real sense

1:02:55.240 --> 1:02:58.080
<v Speaker 2>it in between here and the end he is seeking

1:02:58.480 --> 1:03:00.920
<v Speaker 2>might be a lot of pain a lot of disappointment,

1:03:00.960 --> 1:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>might be a lot of angry people. But if this

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 2>is worth it, which on Tesla and SpaceX it was,

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:08.280
<v Speaker 2>and on destroying the federal government, in my view it isn't,

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>then this is worth it, And that I think has

1:03:12.280 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 2>not been the culture of liberal governance. The culture of

1:03:14.520 --> 1:03:18.120
<v Speaker 2>liberal governance has actually been to try to generate political

1:03:18.160 --> 1:03:21.320
<v Speaker 2>support by giving things to interest groups in the middle

1:03:21.320 --> 1:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of the process. Right, you pass the bill, then there's

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:26.680
<v Speaker 2>a regulatory thing. Nobody's really paying attention to that, and

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:28.800
<v Speaker 2>you do a bunch of payoffs there, and then the

1:03:28.840 --> 1:03:31.000
<v Speaker 2>thing doesn't work as well, or it's slower, or it's

1:03:31.000 --> 1:03:33.440
<v Speaker 2>more expensive, and then people think you don't do a

1:03:33.480 --> 1:03:38.840
<v Speaker 2>great job, and like that's actually undermining the legitimacy of government.

1:03:38.920 --> 1:03:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Could agree more. By the way, sort of going back

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to that book, Citizen literally talks about this in the

1:03:50.560 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>context of it's not inputs, it's outcomes. This pyramids inverting

1:03:54.040 --> 1:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>more choice, more voice. I talk about government being a

1:03:56.960 --> 1:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>vending machine where you put in your taxes, you get police, fire, healthcare, education.

1:04:01.800 --> 1:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>If you don't like what you get, you kick the machine,

1:04:03.840 --> 1:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you shake the machine. And shifting that paradigm and not

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just government efficiency, but how government works. Moving away from

1:04:11.080 --> 1:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you vote, I decide more of a participatory framework in

1:04:14.720 --> 1:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>between elections. We're finally starting to see the fruits of

1:04:18.440 --> 1:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that vision, and near the end of my term in

1:04:20.640 --> 1:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the context of these new models we've created, Engaged California,

1:04:24.240 --> 1:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>our new procurement platforms, the work that Jen Polka helps

1:04:27.400 --> 1:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>seed in the reforms we're doing as it relates to

1:04:29.560 --> 1:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>our large scale IT reforms. But look, this is this

1:04:35.480 --> 1:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>notion of being accountable. Society becomes how we behave we

1:04:39.280 --> 1:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>are behaviors. All this, to your point, happened on our watch.

1:04:42.360 --> 1:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>We own it. Democrats, we own it. Can't point fingers.

1:04:45.800 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You got to look in the mirror. You got to

1:04:46.880 --> 1:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>take responsibility. I think foundationally that's at center of this book,

1:04:51.120 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's very helpful and it's humbling as well,

1:04:54.560 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's critically important this time not only that we

1:04:57.720 --> 1:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>focus on situational politics, but how we're governing and how

1:05:02.160 --> 1:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we're delivering real results, because I mean, if I have

1:05:05.400 --> 1:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>another press conference about how much money we're spending almost this,

1:05:08.080 --> 1:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna take my head off. They want to see

1:05:10.400 --> 1:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>encampments off the damn street that's what they're measuring by.

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>They want more housing so that the cost of that

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>housing goes down because there's more supply. They don't give

1:05:19.760 --> 1:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a damn about the process. They don't know what a

1:05:21.600 --> 1:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>nofa is or a no foe. They don't care about

1:05:24.080 --> 1:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>any of that stuff. You're one hundred percent right, it

1:05:26.320 --> 1:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>does matter. I think there's a balance that we have

1:05:29.640 --> 1:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to find. We're trying to find that balance. We're iterating.

1:05:32.560 --> 1:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But this notion of relentlessness is very resonant. What you

1:05:36.320 --> 1:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>just said. To be seen doing what you said about

1:05:39.440 --> 1:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump a minute ago, we've got to be seen not

1:05:42.680 --> 1:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>defending the status quo, defending the high speed rail. This

1:05:47.120 --> 1:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>went really well for.

1:05:48.040 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Me, but defends into our breef.

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Sort of dynamic expectations that taxpayers rightfully are placed on us.

1:05:58.680 --> 1:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But let me just end with that, because you and

1:06:01.640 --> 1:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this book making that case from an abundance frame, back

1:06:06.240 --> 1:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to this nomenclature around abundance. But you talk about DARPA,

1:06:10.960 --> 1:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you talk about CRISPER, you talk about ARPA, NEET, going

1:06:15.520 --> 1:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen sixty nine, the origins of the Internet,

1:06:18.320 --> 1:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the nih the NSF, you talk about

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>all of these things. That few people that are listening

1:06:25.040 --> 1:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>even know, but that are important, and it relates to innovation.

1:06:28.480 --> 1:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not an act that occurs, it's a process contradicting

1:06:31.840 --> 1:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of what we just said that unfolds

1:06:34.040 --> 1:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>over time.

1:06:34.600 --> 1:06:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Tell me a little bit, Well, everything's a process, so

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:38.760
<v Speaker 2>we don't want to say all processes are bad, just

1:06:38.800 --> 1:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>like all regulations are not good or bad. Yeah, this

1:06:42.040 --> 1:06:43.919
<v Speaker 2>is the other piece of the book that we haven't

1:06:43.920 --> 1:06:47.200
<v Speaker 2>talked that much about. But abundance is not just like

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:49.680
<v Speaker 2>me banging my fist on the table about how high

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:54.439
<v Speaker 2>speed relting get finished. It's also motivated in part by

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:58.880
<v Speaker 2>a belief that Democrats have developed a dysfunctional relationship with

1:06:58.920 --> 1:07:00.920
<v Speaker 2>technology and in way of the future. Sure, and I

1:07:00.960 --> 1:07:03.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of date this back in my own reading of

1:07:03.120 --> 1:07:06.920
<v Speaker 2>it to around twenty sixteen, when I think the harms

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>of social media became really salient to people. I think

1:07:10.120 --> 1:07:12.280
<v Speaker 2>it got over blamed for the twenty sixteen election. I've

1:07:12.280 --> 1:07:15.240
<v Speaker 2>never been a believer that misinformation was like the driver there.

1:07:15.600 --> 1:07:18.280
<v Speaker 2>But it is rotting our brains and it's not making

1:07:18.320 --> 1:07:20.600
<v Speaker 2>us better people, and it's fucking up our kids. Right,

1:07:20.800 --> 1:07:23.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's represented by like a small crew of tech

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:25.680
<v Speaker 2>billionaires who you know, in the years since, have turned

1:07:25.720 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, more and more both right and weird, and

1:07:30.000 --> 1:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I think the left got to become very skeptical of it.

1:07:34.520 --> 1:07:35.960
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that we're trying to say

1:07:36.520 --> 1:07:39.080
<v Speaker 2>is that a huge amount of social progress, a huge

1:07:39.080 --> 1:07:40.959
<v Speaker 2>amount of what makes it possible of the life better

1:07:41.000 --> 1:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>than the one we live now, is not just new

1:07:43.320 --> 1:07:46.080
<v Speaker 2>social insurance programs, though those are very important and I

1:07:46.080 --> 1:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>would like to see some of them, or redistribution. It's technology,

1:07:50.800 --> 1:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and it is also being thoughtful about the government's ability

1:07:55.080 --> 1:07:59.760
<v Speaker 2>to organize resources and rules and manpower to pull technology

1:07:59.760 --> 1:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>from the future into the present. Right, the canonical example

1:08:02.720 --> 1:08:05.280
<v Speaker 2>here is a Manhattan Project, But you can think of

1:08:06.320 --> 1:08:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the Internet, which, as we talked about, you know, comes

1:08:08.200 --> 1:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>from the arpinnet. You can think about Operation warp Speed,

1:08:10.840 --> 1:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>like the one truly great success of Aalen Trump's first term,

1:08:13.480 --> 1:08:16.720
<v Speaker 2>which is now disowned very much by him and and

1:08:17.000 --> 1:08:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to some degree by the Democrats to some credit to

1:08:20.400 --> 1:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. And so there is a There are

1:08:24.000 --> 1:08:26.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of problems like the only reason we have

1:08:26.920 --> 1:08:31.080
<v Speaker 2>any shot on preventing a world of three or four

1:08:31.080 --> 1:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>degrees of warming Celsius is because we have created miracles

1:08:35.439 --> 1:08:43.200
<v Speaker 2>through government policy in solar winds.

1:08:41.360 --> 1:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Would not exist for the regulatory of.

1:08:45.680 --> 1:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>One of the great one of the great shames of

1:08:48.840 --> 1:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>what Elon Musk has become is that guy is a

1:08:51.439 --> 1:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>walking advertisement for the power of public private partnership. He

1:08:55.240 --> 1:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is just like every major company he has done, is

1:08:57.600 --> 1:09:01.559
<v Speaker 2>built on government subsidies, government loan guarantees.

1:09:02.200 --> 1:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Government demand. In the original.

1:09:05.680 --> 1:09:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Now guys just pulling the ladder up after him. It

1:09:08.080 --> 1:09:12.439
<v Speaker 2>drives me fucking crazy, but I guess.

1:09:12.840 --> 1:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But also it's a principle that you lay out as

1:09:16.120 --> 1:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it relates to Dartha and which gave us GPS, gave

1:09:19.240 --> 1:09:22.519
<v Speaker 1>us the self driving car he's now promoting that gave

1:09:22.600 --> 1:09:23.719
<v Speaker 1>us so much of this innovation.

1:09:23.800 --> 1:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and certainly that seated it. See and you know,

1:09:26.479 --> 1:09:29.519
<v Speaker 2>look like I'm a big believer in universal healthcare. A

1:09:29.560 --> 1:09:31.439
<v Speaker 2>lot of my career has been, you know, about trying

1:09:31.479 --> 1:09:34.520
<v Speaker 2>to expand health insurance. But where health insurance.

1:09:34.120 --> 1:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>In the only state that does that, regardless of ability

1:09:37.320 --> 1:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>to pay in their resisting conditions and immigration.

1:09:39.680 --> 1:09:43.479
<v Speaker 2>But there's a reality to this that for the people

1:09:43.520 --> 1:09:46.439
<v Speaker 2>who have health insurance, which is most people, what really

1:09:46.479 --> 1:09:48.840
<v Speaker 2>matters is when you get sick. Is there a cure?

1:09:49.360 --> 1:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>My wife is kept alive by shots of Vinceland. She

1:09:51.800 --> 1:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>just is. Right, at another age she wouldn't be. There

1:09:56.200 --> 1:09:58.840
<v Speaker 2>is so much that we do not yet know how

1:09:58.880 --> 1:10:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to cure, right, there is so much. I mean, what

1:10:01.400 --> 1:10:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Medicare or Medicaid can offer, or private health insurance because

1:10:04.160 --> 1:10:07.280
<v Speaker 2>they don't yet cover it for most people with GLP

1:10:07.400 --> 1:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>ones is just more valuable than what it could offer

1:10:09.840 --> 1:10:13.320
<v Speaker 2>before GLP ones. These are going to be transformational medications

1:10:13.320 --> 1:10:17.280
<v Speaker 2>for people they already are. And so getting really serious

1:10:17.640 --> 1:10:21.680
<v Speaker 2>about what we want the government to do technologically and

1:10:21.760 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 2>having a vision of the future that is an abundant one, right,

1:10:26.040 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>a vision of the future that is not just about

1:10:28.280 --> 1:10:31.000
<v Speaker 2>like how cheap consumer goods are. That's fine, but it's

1:10:31.040 --> 1:10:33.519
<v Speaker 2>about the things we need to build or better a

1:10:33.560 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 2>life right, cheap energy, cheap healthcare right, abundant housing, education. Right.

1:10:39.120 --> 1:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of things we only touch on in

1:10:40.640 --> 1:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the book that are really important here. I think that

1:10:44.240 --> 1:10:46.759
<v Speaker 2>one of the shames of politics in the last couple

1:10:46.760 --> 1:10:49.200
<v Speaker 2>of years is it got to be a really bitter

1:10:49.360 --> 1:10:52.960
<v Speaker 2>argument over our past, right, with the r right.

1:10:52.880 --> 1:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Notion of American reverse pre nineteen.

1:10:55.520 --> 1:10:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Sex the right that is gripped by a deep nostalgia

1:10:59.400 --> 1:11:02.200
<v Speaker 2>for an America. I think that never really was, and

1:11:02.280 --> 1:11:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the left was really focus, really focused on the injustices

1:11:06.360 --> 1:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>of our history, which I think are very real. So

1:11:08.439 --> 1:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to undermine that as a thing worth confronting,

1:11:12.439 --> 1:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>but I think visions of the future, for different reasons

1:11:14.880 --> 1:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>on both sides, became really degraded. Cole and one thing

1:11:18.200 --> 1:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>that did change with Trump between his first term and

1:11:20.439 --> 1:11:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the second is Elon Musk Mark Andriesen. In a way RK. Junior,

1:11:24.360 --> 1:11:27.600
<v Speaker 2>they changed his meaning. Trump was the defender of the

1:11:27.600 --> 1:11:30.639
<v Speaker 2>past America in twenty sixteen, Make America Great Again. All

1:11:30.680 --> 1:11:33.960
<v Speaker 2>these futurist influencers and you know, rocket makers and so on.

1:11:34.320 --> 1:11:36.600
<v Speaker 2>They sort of made him into something that represented a

1:11:36.760 --> 1:11:39.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of future. I think it's quite dark one, but

1:11:39.240 --> 1:11:41.960
<v Speaker 2>it is, but there is around him. JD. Vans right,

1:11:42.080 --> 1:11:45.720
<v Speaker 2>It changed what he meant and I think to compete

1:11:45.720 --> 1:11:48.320
<v Speaker 2>with that, and given that they're going to destroy the present,

1:11:49.120 --> 1:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's going to end up being a

1:11:50.280 --> 1:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>very attractive vision to people. But to compete with that,

1:11:52.400 --> 1:11:54.799
<v Speaker 2>I think Democrats need to figure out how to represent

1:11:54.800 --> 1:11:57.840
<v Speaker 2>a future again. I think Obama represented the future. I

1:11:57.880 --> 1:12:01.840
<v Speaker 2>think Bill Clinton represented the future. And like both that

1:12:02.000 --> 1:12:04.519
<v Speaker 2>sort of ability to grab reform, which is part of

1:12:04.560 --> 1:12:07.479
<v Speaker 2>what abundance is about, reform of government, and that ability

1:12:07.560 --> 1:12:10.080
<v Speaker 2>to grab the high ground of the future, which is

1:12:10.120 --> 1:12:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the other part of what it's about. This ability to

1:12:12.080 --> 1:12:16.040
<v Speaker 2>integrate a theory of technology and an optimism about it,

1:12:16.080 --> 1:12:19.320
<v Speaker 2>and the ability to sort of rapid in policy. Those

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:22.080
<v Speaker 2>things are really important. We haven't talked about AI. There's

1:12:22.080 --> 1:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot coming here that's going to be very important,

1:12:24.560 --> 1:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and the party that medical frame and the party and

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the thinkers in it are going to have to be

1:12:29.240 --> 1:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>alert to this side of it too, because it is

1:12:33.040 --> 1:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>a mistake to think of politics as a separate sphere

1:12:35.280 --> 1:12:38.200
<v Speaker 2>from technology. You know, if we could do more modular housing,

1:12:38.240 --> 1:12:40.360
<v Speaker 2>it would change what is possible in housing policy.

1:12:40.439 --> 1:12:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:12:40.840 --> 1:12:44.160
<v Speaker 2>These things are bi directional, they're intertwined, and like, I

1:12:44.160 --> 1:12:46.559
<v Speaker 2>would like to see a liberalism that isn't just angry

1:12:46.920 --> 1:12:48.439
<v Speaker 2>about a bunch of things that government is failed to do,

1:12:48.520 --> 1:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>as I am, but it is also optimistic about what

1:12:50.960 --> 1:12:53.360
<v Speaker 2>is possible. And that's where that vision between red and

1:12:53.360 --> 1:12:55.880
<v Speaker 2>blue states really diverges. I mean Trump and them, they're

1:12:55.880 --> 1:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to destroy winded solar. They don't want this vision.

1:12:58.080 --> 1:13:00.439
<v Speaker 2>They don't want more trade, they don't want more people.

1:13:00.520 --> 1:13:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Right there, it's all scarcity, and that leads a pretty

1:13:03.439 --> 1:13:05.880
<v Speaker 2>big opening for the Democratic Party to capture both reform

1:13:05.920 --> 1:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and abundance from them.

1:13:07.160 --> 1:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I love that and it's a great way to end

1:13:09.240 --> 1:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's a framework of optimism, of course, you know,

1:13:11.479 --> 1:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciate just I'm thinking about Clinton, don't stop

1:13:13.880 --> 1:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about tomorrow. I mean, obviously there was language around that,

1:13:17.200 --> 1:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, talking about your tomorrow's not his. Yesterday's

1:13:21.040 --> 1:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously the journey that we were on in the nineteen

1:13:23.320 --> 1:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>sixties with the vision that was JFK. But I will

1:13:26.840 --> 1:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>say about our state, and it's a point of pride

1:13:28.680 --> 1:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and in principle for me as governors said, or as

1:13:30.920 --> 1:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the future ex governor, as a fifth generation California future

1:13:33.880 --> 1:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>happens here first. And I talked about this being America's

1:13:36.880 --> 1:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>coming attraction. But that's that's the game that separates, I

1:13:40.160 --> 1:13:43.519
<v Speaker 1>think our game from the game played everywhere else. It's

1:13:43.520 --> 1:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the reason we went from the seventh largest economy to

1:13:46.040 --> 1:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the sixth largest economy in the world, and we dominate

1:13:48.479 --> 1:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in so many spears even today. But you're absolutely right.

1:13:51.840 --> 1:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>We now have to dominate on that reform agenda and

1:13:53.920 --> 1:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to deal with the original sin and that's

1:13:56.240 --> 1:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>housing and again being accountable to these larger visions as

1:14:00.160 --> 1:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>well and deliver and level set with folks. And so

1:14:03.080 --> 1:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>it's in that spirit of an abundant mindset that Ezra,

1:14:07.560 --> 1:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you took the time to be here. I'm

1:14:10.360 --> 1:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>really moreover pleased you took time to write this book,

1:14:13.439 --> 1:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>which is an essential reading for everybody listening. Thanks for

1:14:16.080 --> 1:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>being with us, Thank you so much for having me.

1:14:17.920 --> 1:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Thank you