WEBVTT - Maye vs. Daniels, McCarthy vs. Rattler and The Top Draft Class Prospects | Ticket to the Draft Podcast | Washington Commanders

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>In today's episode of Tickets to the Draft Podcast, we

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>talk JJ McCarthy why the wise is it just a

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>smoke schien or is there something actually there? And we

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about the rattler. He's gaining momentum in the second

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>or third round. What is his value there? We talk

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>about our top five at every offensive position, and we

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>have some very interesting research on the quarterback position. It

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>could be the difference. It all starts right now. Welcome

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Ticket of the Draft podcast. Pers there by

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Seekeeek the official primary ticket partner of the Washington Commanders.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm Logan Pulson here with just a guy, Jason, and

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we as always are talking draft contact. But like with

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>every draft, you can't escape the quarterback discussion. It's always there.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Here it is done dun dug. Specifically, two issues, right, Jason,

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about today. We're going to talk about

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>two guys in particular.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 2>JJ McCarthy and bencer Radd.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 3>These are names that, like, I don't know if they're

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 3>gonna be linked to the Commanders. I mean there's some

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 3>talk about JJ, but they're just names that are out

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 3>there right now. They're the hot top to talk about

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 3>it quarterback. It seems like the top three it consensus

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 3>top three, Caleb may Daniels. They've been talked about enough,

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 3>so now the media is switching into McCarthy and Rattler

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 3>and trying to dive into them. So we're going to

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 3>do that for I don't know, maybe the commanders take

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>one of them.

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe we'll touch on it just in case. I

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's the thing. Man is like, like, let's start

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with McCarthy, I think, And you know, like the smoke

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>stream thing, I think is interesting because there probably is

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>an element of that. But all I know is that

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>when I watched the film, and when I watch, like

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a cut up online, I forget who put it

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>out there, but it's every one of his throws from Michigan,

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So all the good ones, all the bad ones, and

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I just can't stop watching it. I think I sent

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it to you the other day. Right. It's it's one

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of those things where you see the timing, you see

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the anticipation, you see the arm talent, you see his

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>ability to kind of manipulate defenses with his eyes, and

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's stuff that I think is high level NFL quarterback stuff. Now,

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is he a sure fire thing. Absolutely not. Like he

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>has a hard time throwing to his left. He tends

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to overstride going that way, or when he's booting to

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>his right, he consistently boots to his right as opposed

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to his left, so like he has a kind of

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a habit of doing that. Right. He doesn't know how

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to layer throws all the time. There's issues there. But

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>when you watch, you say, man, it's it's not one

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to one because college is so different than the NFL.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But you see a lot of transferable throws, and you

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of transferable talent, and you see a

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that's more athletic than a lot of people think,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and you see a guy that's more competitive I think

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>than people think. And I think all of those factors

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to me kind of we're going to talk about our

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rankings here in a little bit, kind of pushing

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>him up my board as a guy with a really low,

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>really high floor. You know, I think he gets in

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the right system, Like everyone's talking about him maybe going

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to Minnesota. That seems like the right kind of fit form. Right,

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>He's going to run this kind of heavy play action offense.

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>They're going to run the footba they're going to a

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of keepers where he's out of the pocket. Using

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that athleticism. He adds a little bit of seasoning when

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to kind of his ability to do the

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback RPO type stuff. I think that plays at the

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>NFL level, but it kind of makes sense to me.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where you fall out, though, Jason, like,

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about it?

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>I feel like you said something on our last episode

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 3>when you talk with some PFF guys, specifically with Sam Munson,

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>that they even called out on their show, The PFF

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 3>NFL Show. They were like, oh, Logan Paulson made a

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 3>great point about JJ McCarthy, and you did, and it

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 3>was that while it's not a perfect one to one,

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 3>you get more one to one tape with McCarthy than

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 3>any of the other quarterbacks because they run that pro

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>style offense. They run the mesh concepts and whatnot, so

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 3>you actually see it happening more than you see with

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the other quarterbacks. So it's easier to be like, oh,

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel good about that because I'm seeing it with

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 3>my eyeballs.

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not projecting it.

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's not even really like it's not even the concept.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like the style. It's like how they run it,

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people will run mesh, they'll run

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like a dig and it clearly run dagger is what

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I call it. But it's how he throws it. It's

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like on time, it's on rhythm. It's the these tight windows.

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>He's like putting it in between defenders. He's throwing with anticipation,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and so I think stylistically it also feels right too,

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>because you're getting the you're getting the NFL concept, which

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of teams run college concept NFL concept. There's

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of crossover there, but you're getting the concept crossover,

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>but you're also you're getting an execution crossover, which to

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>me it's like, oh, this is this is a Sunday throw.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And I just find myself with him saying that all

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the time, and I think that it kind of makes

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you fall in love with it because the projection becomes

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that much easier. Because does that makes sense?

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And you're always talking about what you want to

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 3>do in the draft, as most gms, what they're trying

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 3>to do in a draft is risk aversion, right, So

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 3>if I can see it, then I would rather In

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>some instance there's there's something pulling at them. I would

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>rather take that than the projection. When this end, well

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe he can do it. So that's why I think

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 3>McCarthy's kind of moving up these boards because gms and

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 3>scouts are looking at going like, oh well, I feel

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 3>more comfortable in my evaluation being correct here. There's less

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 3>risk with JJ McCarthy. Now does that mean the ceilings

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 3>is high?

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>But so my question, I want to go back for

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>a second about the smoke screen idea. Oh yeah, so

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 3>once players have or gms have this evaluation on JJ McCarthy,

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 3>why would a smoke screen come in? Like why would

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Washington do that? What's the are other teams doing that?

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that this is like a couple of

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 3>teams I don't want to say like getting together and

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 3>like oh we're going to do this, but like a

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 3>couple of teams at want quarterbacks all saying well, let's

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 3>all say JJ McCarthy. Maybe that throws someone off the

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 3>scent that Drake may may then fall to us, right,

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 3>so maybe like maybe the Giants right would be like

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 3>Drake may falls to the Giants, like they'd be super thrilled.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I think with the smoke screen thing. I

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>think if you so. For example, I think if you

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>pulled everyone in the NFL, I think you'd probably have

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, most people would say Caleb Williams is one,

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but then the two three, four guys probably get a

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit mixed up depending on who you talk to,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>because you talk to somebody and they'll say may Is

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's a bomb, He's the next brock Asswiler. Right.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel that way, but like, there are people

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can find they would say that, right. Or

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, JJ McCarthy's the you know, he's the most

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>polished quarterback prospect since Andrew Luck. Like, I don't agree

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>with that either, but you hear people that say that, right.

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>So I think if there's three guys in the mix,

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and one of those one of those other teams, let's

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>just take Minnesota because they're like the most likely trade

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>up category. Right. Let's say let's say JJ is my

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>number one guy, and now all of a sudden, Washington's

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about them at two. Maybe that sweetens the trade

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>offer for Washington because that's their guy. Right, So let

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>me just said, hey, you know, we know other teams

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>might like this guy. We're all so interested in them. Now,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna do if you want one of

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>these three guys? You want to ensure you get these

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>three guys. We are the person you have to deal with, right,

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>because you're you're not gonna be able to deal with

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>just New England. You're not gonna be able to deal

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>with just Arizona, because we might actually take the guy

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that you want.

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'm a younger brother. I have two older brothers, okay, right,

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 3>and back in the day, we used to go to

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 3>Blockbuster Video thrun a.

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Movie referenced by you excellent, and my.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 3>Brothers would go up and I would say, oh, I

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>want to rent. We each got the rent one movie.

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 3>And I go up and I say I want I

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 3>want Jurassic Park. And my older brother would be like, no,

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I want Jurassic Park. Get out of here, pick a

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 3>different movie. This is my movie. I'll watch it when

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I want with my friends. You're not invited. And it

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 3>was very much of like this kind of bullying right

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 3>to get me. It just made me want Dress Park

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 3>more and more and more and more and more. Right,

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>And then I would go complain in my mind. Now,

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 3>obviously I'm a child, but I think this is kind

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>of the same thing, right, like you like you were

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 3>saying Minnesota, Oh, well, we kind of like JJ McCarthy

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 3>and then the Big Brother and the room the commanders

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>are like, well we like them, right, So if you

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 3>really want them, you may have to talk to us.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you may have to talk to us.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>And if we're nice about it, right, and you know,

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 3>being nice about it means give me three first round picks, right,

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 3>you know something like that.

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's what I think. That's what the point

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 2>of the smoke screen stuff is. Now.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if we're gonna take JJ McCarthy or

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 3>not here. I mean, maybe we will, maybe we won't,

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 3>But it like that's what some of these top teams

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 3>are doing with him and why he's getting so much

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 3>talk right now.

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I think so. But I also think it's it's weird

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>because I also think it's justified. And I think it

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>depends on how you look at the process and agin

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about our quarterback stuff later. But like

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Drake may probably has the highest ceiling of the next

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>group of guys after Caleb Williams, right, extremely high ceiling,

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Ella says like low floors is jayde and

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Daniel or High Floors is Jade Daniels and JJ McCarthy.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you're if you're an evaluator and that risk

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>aversion is important to you and you don't have a

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>plan for developing Drake May, necessarily you're going to lean

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>towards those guys. So I don't think it's totally unrealistic

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and especially and this is one of those things that

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring up, like it's it's really frustrating

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>for me as a talent evaluator because I've seen JJ

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Pennix and Nick's throw in person, but I haven't seen

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Jane danielsrow in person. And I have not seen Drake

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>maythrown person. But I think of the guys that I've seen,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Jane and Daniel or not je JJ McCarthy has the

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>best arm outside of Joe Milton that I've seen, right,

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm as far as our strength arm strength,

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm like really high on his arm talent, But

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>would i be higher on the other guy's arm talent

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>if I'd seen them throw in person? So it's one

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of those things where it's like it's there's there's levels

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to this, right, So I think I'm actually higher on

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>JJ's arm talent, and I think he's got more upside.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's it's all. It's all a matter of

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>perspective and opinion, and I think that's where it's like.

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So for me, these three guys, depending on who you

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to, you could probably get someone to say this

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is my guy, And all you need is one team

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or two teams to say JJ's the second best quarterback.

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Because that not the opportunity to trade up becomes more real.

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess I wonder if the response to this smoke

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 3>screen with JJ and all these quarterback talks at the

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 3>top is a team like Minnesota saying like, you know what,

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 3>we're cool, we'll just take the Rattler. Yeah, the right,

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 3>which is I think why he's getting a lot of

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 3>push right now. There is a lot of talk about

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Spencer Ratler not going high, but teams being like, you

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 3>know what, he's got enough traits second round, We're fine

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 3>with that, right. So with that, do you think that

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 3>that's part of why Rattler's getting a little more talk

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 3>around the around the NFL right now.

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, I hadn't thought of it that way, but that's

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>probably why, I think, you know, once you realize that

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these quarterbacks are going to get pushed

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit. And it's interesting because the media

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is always super high on quarterbacks every day do the

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>draft stuff. They're always really high on quarterbacks, they push

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>them up boards, and most often, outside of a couple exceptions,

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like it ends up falling kind of as it would have,

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of before the draft type started going.

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So what I mean by that is JJ will probably

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>go between eleven and fifteen, and then bow Nix will go,

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty five to thirty five, and Michael Pennix

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>will go thirty five to forty. So but if that

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen, like if all those guys get really pushed

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>up the board, then I do think you're looking at

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>like who's the best who can actually physically play the

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>position from a trade standpoint, And the list outside of

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>those guys is relatively short. And so that's why Rattler

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>gets pushed up, right, because he's got these physical traits,

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got this leadership quality. You know. I talked to

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the coach down at at his school and he was

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>basically saying he's been great, you know, and I think, yeah,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>he has this reputation of you know, because of the

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Netflix stuff, but you know, I think he's grown out

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of that and he's and when you watch him at

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the Senior Bowl, he's he is very talented. He can

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>move around, he's got a live arm, he's got different

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>arm angles, he's got different throws. And so you say, well, man,

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>if if this is it, if if if, if all

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>those other guys are gone, who can physically do it

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and become a starting quarterback in the NFL. Because we

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>have that, We have that sheet that we that Google

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>doc we work off of, and we literally have a column.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I have a column and it says can they physically

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>play in the NFL. That's the head that's the header

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of the column, and it's yes or no. And once

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you get to quarterback, there becomes a lot of questions

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>about arm talent, about physical size, and he's not a

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>big guy, but he does have the arm talent to

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>do it at the next level. I think that's why

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>people get super excited about his opportunity at the next level.

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 3>We also I can't remember which time when Sikama from

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 3>PFF was one, but he talked about Rattler with us,

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 3>and he mentioned, you know, this guy gets pressured a

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 3>lot South Carolina and so like more than anybody else.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>And he stayed calm, he stayed composed. Yeah, there were

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 3>some like what are you doing throws, but when there's

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 3>four guys in your face, sometimes that happens. And the

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 3>question was if he plays behind a good O line,

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 3>what could this guy be because the arm talent is there,

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's the projection that some teams are

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 3>looking at now is like, yeah, all right, so we

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 3>may miss out on some of these top quarterbacks, but

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 3>if we get a really solid wide receiver, if we

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 3>get a really solid offensive lineman in the early first round,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 3>and in the second round we take Spencer Raller, we're

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 3>fine with that because we see the potential there. Now,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 3>he's short, like you said, I think he's only six foot,

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 3>but his arm is live. What everybody is saying that's

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 3>been around him is he is completely matured from that

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 3>guy that was on the Netflix documentary and it looks

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 3>like he's ready to lead a team.

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 2>He's a leader, and.

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where you get in that like why

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>he's getting why he's being valued is because there's not

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that can play quarterback in the NFL.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you think he can, right, let's take a

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>shot on him and see what happens. And and like

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you said, maybe he doesn't have to start right away.

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he can sit for a couple of years. Maybe

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>he's you know the guy up in Green Bay Love.

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's not starting right away, They sit him

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years and he becomes something special.

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it likely? I think probably not, But is it

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a possibility? Yes, And I think that's why people are

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>talking about him.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, putting you on the spot.

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 3>What's the percentage chance that Washington trades Attitude or take

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 3>somebody else at to not a quarterback and then later

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 3>goes with a rattler or someone like him, I'd.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Say pretty low. I think, you know, as we kind

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of move towards the draft, it's becoming more clear based

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on some of the moves the teams made the conversation.

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's outside the realm of possibility, but

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we kind of knew this all along.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about this a ton. They're the offer to

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>for them to trade out would need to be huge, right,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>And if a team's not willing to present that offer

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to you, then we're going to stick and pick two.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 2>I think kicking pick seems like what they're doing, and.

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So i'd say that's probably ninety five like I was

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>putting money out, like, that's ninety five percent probably going

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to happen. You get that ten percent where you trade

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>back in the first round, maybe trade back up that

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, and then that three percent where you stick

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and pick a non quarterback and then draft Spencer Rattlers.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Probably you know, it's weight one percent.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I want to put it past Peters in the front

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 3>office here to pick up the phone. Oh right at

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 3>number two, right, Like, I think that offer could potentially

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 3>be out there, but it seems like it's going to

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 3>be a stick and pick thing unless it looks like

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota would be the team.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I definitely think the offer. I think they've

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they've probably engaged with teams, they've probably heard different offers,

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but as of today, I don't think any offer has

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>been big enough for them to move out of that

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>spot because it's going to need to be like what

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bears got last year. It's going to need to

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>be franchise changing, and our team's willing to be franchised

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>changing for guys. As again, we're going to talk about

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>our quarterback ranks in a little bit. That all have

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>question marks, you know, and I don't know. I don't

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>know if they if you're going to get the same

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>type of haul for that.

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're going to do top fives of every offensive position.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Next podcast will do every defense position. So yeah, we're

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 3>going to do our top fives of quarterbacks here in

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 3>a moment. But before we get there, I wanted to

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 3>talk to you about a conversation you and I were

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 3>having over text message this week, and that was for me,

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 3>this whole process once football college football has stopped, I

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>have I consistently forget how good some of these guys

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 3>are at game speed, right in the game. And specifically,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 3>I was talking with you about Jayden Daniels, who could

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 3>very well go to the Commanders at number two, and he,

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 3>like you said, I haven't seen him thrown in person.

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>We've seen some of these other guys do that the

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>post the post game process for the draft, so the

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Senior Bowl, the combines, the pro days. He hasn't stood

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 3>out to me, but I go back and I watch

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 3>his film and I'm like.

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Holy cow.

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 3>So my question for you is, how do you remind

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 3>yourself that this post game, all this all this leading

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 3>right up to the draft, all this measurable stuff, all

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 3>this throwing the ball without anybody in your face, and

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 3>it's with the guy that you've thrown the ball to

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 3>for four years. In some instances, how much do you say, Okay,

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 3>all that looks great with JJ McCarthy for example, Right,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 3>but remember the game tape. Right, we gotta look back

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 3>at the game tape and how it plays there.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>How much do you weigh that?

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 3>And how much do you get caught up in this

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 3>little pre draft process here.

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously I haven't caught up a little bit

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of it with JJ, you know, because I've seen him

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch. I think with Jay, and it's been relatively

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>easy because like, the only event that I really would

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have wanted to see him at was the Senior Bowl,

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to see him throw in person and

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>just see how he is. Like, maybe if he throws

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Combine, great, I don't really care. If he

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>throws at a Senior Bowl should be fine. It was fine,

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think for me it's just about remembering who

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the guys are, you know. So for like most of

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>these guys, you have a pretty good understanding, especially the

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>top guys's pretty good understanding of who they are and

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what they do. And I think with him, it's like,

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, what does he do well? He's got a

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>great fundamentals, He's got a quick release, he has great

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>deep ball accuracy. He sees the field, I think a

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit better than people think. He's a tremendous athlete.

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Has anything about the process changed that for me? No,

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Like when I watch his pro day, I'm like, I

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>think he I think in some ways I think his

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>release might be better after seeing him just throw by himself.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit quicker, but I knew it was

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>quick anyway. So like, that's who he's been. I think

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>with a guy like JJ, it's different because I've been

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>exposed tomorrow twenty two, I've watched more film. I've seen

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what type of athlete he is, and he didn't have

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to show that in college. It's the same

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>thing with like Darius Robinson going to the Sea Bowl, right,

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>he was playing a five technique kind of this run

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>stopping defensive tax, defensive end, highbred, and all of a

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sudden he moves to the edge and you're like, holy cow,

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>this guy's an absolute animal. He can actually win with

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>power and has some pass roustability and you see something different.

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's why with JJ, it moves up

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>with Jade, and it kind of stays the same with Caleb,

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but kind of stays the same with Drake. It's been

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting to watch because again, like but because he's kind

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of regressed a little bit in my mind, and it

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>regress sounds like a negative thing. It is. I still

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>thinks he's probably again the highest ceiling of the non

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Williams is, but that's that's from the film. That's

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>not from anything he's done in this process. And I

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's true of all these guys. So it always

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the film. It always goes back to

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity. But yeah, I think like if you have

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good feel for who the player is, then

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the post strafts, the post season stuff doesn't doesn't matter

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>as much unless it's changing the narrative on the guy.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think JJ McCarthy is a is a pretty

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>good example of that of that change.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I completely agree. I mean this being the first

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 3>time for me, I have to remind myself to go

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 3>back and look at the tape.

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I get caught up everything that's going on right now,

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 2>which I do.

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 3>I've watched the same couple of videos over and over

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 3>and over again because it's been a couple of weeks

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 3>since I've seen it, and I need to go back

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 3>and just refresh my memory of how good or how

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 3>suspects some things were.

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Get any given player.

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, I did a whole research packet on quarterbacks,

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 3>but let's save that for when we talk about the

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 3>top five quarterbacks because we have we disagree a little bit, yep,

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 3>And maybe we can look at this pack to see

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 3>if it supports or refutes any of our arguments that

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 3>we make there. All right, So what we're gonna do

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 3>is we're gonna do top fives plus one. And what

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 3>that is is we're going to go through every single

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 3>position on offense. We're going to group wide receiver and

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 3>tight ends together as pass catchers just for brevity sake.

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 3>I promise you you'll get a tight end segment in

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the future. But we're gonna do offensive line, running back,

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver, tight end, pass catchers, and then quarterbacks, and

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 3>we're going to do our top rankings in that position.

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 3>And then the plus one and the plus one means

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 3>just a guy we want to talk about. He may

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 3>not be in the top five, top ten, he may

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 3>not even be in the top twenty, as just a

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 3>guy we want to mention because we don't talk about

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 3>him enough and he sticks out to us. So it's

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 3>that plus one two, Like when you go to a wedding,

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 3>that plus one when you're looking for someone, it's like,

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 3>does this person really match with the wedding. No, it's

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 3>just a friend of mine that's helping me out, doesn't

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 3>know a brider groom. He's just here or she's just

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 3>here whatever. All right, yeah, okay, so that's what we're doing.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 3>So let's start with all O line logan go five

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 3>to one, Yeah, five.

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Five to one. So I'm going Joe alt to Lasi Fuaga,

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Troy Fatano from Washington obviously, Tulisa Fauga's from Oregon State,

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Olufshano Penn State, and then Amarius Mims from Georgia at

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>five for me.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you went one to five, which is fine,

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 3>one to five, five it's fine, it's fine. I just

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 3>don't want to confuse our listeners, all right. One for

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 3>me is also Joe Alt, which surprised me by the way,

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 3>because our pod we did with our top fifty.

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you did not have as number one, So that's interesting.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk to you about that.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Uh oulu Fashanu for me at Penn State is number

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 3>two to Leasy Fuaga from Oregon States three, Troy Fatanu

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Washington is four, and then Jackson Powers Johnson is five,

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 3>and I'll defend that. I'll defend that we can do

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 3>all right. So something that sticks out to me is

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 3>you flipped Fuanga and it seems like in the last

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Why is that. I think it came down to Fooga's

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>past protection. It wasn't anything that Joe did or Joe

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Alt's film did it just was it because you're splitting hairs? Really,

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>So with Fuaga, like I like him a lot. I

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>like watching him. I like his approach, I like his demeanor.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I just worry that he's going to be a guard

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>at the next level, you know, Like that's something that

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I keep coming back to him, Like I think he's

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>got the twitchiness to be a good tackle, but is

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>he going to be an excellent guard? And so, like,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel that's why it's still pretty high on my list,

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>because I'm very confident that either he's going to be

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a good right tackle or an excellent guard, He's going

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>to be a pro offensive lineman some capacity. It's just

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for a tackle, like I think Joe

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Walt's a tackle, you know, I think he's a tackle

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>through and through. I think that you know, we mentioned

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>some inconsistencies about his technique to give me pause, about

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>his physical development, to give me pause. But I think ultimately,

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>when you go back to the film, he's got a

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>good feel for his relationship to the rusher. He's got

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>a good play strength, he's got a nice kind of

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>competitive edge to him. He's a very solid prospect with

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a good with a good ceiling. So I think that's

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of where I kind of came back. I was like, Man,

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>can I really put a guy that I don't love

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>his past protection mechanics ahead of a guy that's just

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>been incredibly solid throughout his career. And my answer was

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimately no, So.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, So I don't want to argue for

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 3>oluf Fashanu anymore. I feel like I do that all

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 3>the time. I like oluf Fashanu at number two, like

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 3>you have him a little further down.

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>At four four.

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I get all your reasonings of why. I

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 3>also was thinking the other day, I wonder if, like

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>his power is not matching his athleticism. So I'm questioning

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 3>him just a little little bit. But coming from Penn State,

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 3>who has a really good strength and conditioning program there,

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 3>like super good and every now and then, he just

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 3>he can get overpowered.

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 2>For as big as he.

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Is, I'm wondering if that's a mix between technique and

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe some strength issues here as well.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 2>But he's so young. I just think he'll keep building there.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing I keep calling back to with him, though,

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like, yeah, I love the athlete. I like how

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>he moves. He's competitive, you know, he's got those small hands.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>He's not like I kind of wonder if he's going

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to be like Anton Harrison, who's a good pro but

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>is kind of limited because he's not overly strong. Like

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>when you watch like, I'm glad you put Jackson powers

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Johnson on here, because like there's no question to me

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>when you watch Jackson Powers Johnson, the center from Oregon,

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that he is strong enough and physical enough to play

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>at the NFL level. There's no question, no question, he's

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a good enough athlete. The reason he's not on my

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>list is because he's not I don't think scheme agnostic.

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he can. I think he's a very specific

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>type of player. But is he is he an NFL

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman that's going to be pretty good? Yes, It's

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>just about what is the value of what he brings?

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess.

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 3>So let me talk about Jackson Powers Johnson for a second.

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Why he's at number five for me, which is pretty

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 3>high for a center, And that's because I think it's

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 3>just you know what you're getting with, right. If he

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 3>were a tackle, Like, if he played tackle and he

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 3>had the skill sets of tackle, he'd be one or two.

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 3>But because he's a center, and like everything's about the

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 3>center vision, I think that's why he falls because there's

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 3>not really a whole lot I'm concerned about with him

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 3>as an actual player.

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 2>He's just a bulldozer.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 3>He moves people, he's mean, he's nasty, he's athletic for

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 3>his build. So that's why I put him at five

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 3>because if you're gonna you know what you're getting when

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 3>you take him, and that's a good NFL player.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think for me it's like, is he

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>can he run the outside zone? I don't think he can.

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Like Creed Humphrey is a big guy like him, they're

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of built in a similar way. Creed is a

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit more hit flexible and like upper back flexible

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>where he can kind of dip in and reach a nose.

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I know he did it at the Senior Bowl. He

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>looked pretty good doing it. I'm talking about Jackson powers Johnson. Yeah,

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not consistently on hape and it could be

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>because he's playing with some young guards that don't help

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>him out in that area. But I just again like

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you could have you'll have teams that have

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>him number one, or Zach Fraser from West Virginia because

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Zach Fraser is kind of that squirrelly, smaller center, very

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelsey esque in terms of how he plays. Not

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>quite the same athlete, but but similar. And so I

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna have guys that say, oh, I actually

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 1>like this kid from West Virginia more and as opposed

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to Jack. So that's why he's not in my top five.

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>But I think he's a good football player. I think

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>he's going to play in the NFL for a long time. Yeah,

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just like, you know, I think he's got to

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>go to a team like Baltimore that's gonna run a

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of gaps stuff and be very downhill and not

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>ask him to get outside of his frame too much

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of he can do it. But I don't

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>think you want him majoring in that kind of athletic

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>movement type stuff.

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, talk about Ameriusmims because that's a little bit of

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 3>a contract there.

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So for me, I you know, I obviously JC Latham,

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got Tyler Geidener, guys that I wanted to put

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in here and I was thinking about putting in here.

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, Graant Barton was another guy that I thought

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>about putting in here. And Graham Barton's film is excellent.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's probably more of a guard. That's why

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>he's not on this list specifically. But Amarus Mims, like

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>when you watch him, all the questions I have about

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>JC Latham's ability athletically, divertically passet are not there. The

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing with Geidon, Like the physicality that Guidon plays with,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Like he's he's got a little bit of a baby

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>deer to him in the sense that he's he's kind

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of bendy. He's strong, but he doesn't have this great anchor.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>And I want to look at a Marius Mims like

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>he has. He's got that twitch to him, he's got

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the power to him. He's a tremendous athlete, he's got

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the frame, he's young. And if you just look at

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the seven games, just watch those seven games, Like his

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>film is the best of that group of people, but

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's only seven games. So like I'm acknowledging that this

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.239
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit of a flyer here, and there

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>are picks that are safer. I just look at his

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>ceiling and I'm like, if you could get this guy,

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, between twenty five and third five or whatever,

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd be doing backflips if he can stay healthy. And

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:08.479
<v Speaker 1>because the physical tools are there in a way that

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>none of these other guys are. Like when you say, like, physically,

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>who's the most ready to play tackle in the NFL,

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you're either saying him or Troy Fatana, Like

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like that kind of is what you're dealing with there. Yeah,

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's but he's hurt all the time. So if

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you if you, if you feel good that that's not

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>an issue for him, then I think he's your guy.

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I put him in there, just because

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that the physical talent the film. Again, it's

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>only seven games, but he's playing Ohio State, he's playing Alabama,

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and he looks like he's the big It looks like

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>you're watching high school football and you got the guy

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>going D one and everybody else is just a normal

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>high school player, which is very unusual to see. So

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that talent, that frame, that ability is so unique. And

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if he gets in the right situation, like

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be like hell, he could end up

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>being the best player in the class. Yeah, if he's healthy.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 3>We we mentioned a couple of times like he's an Avenger.

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 3>He's built like that kind of thing, and he kind

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 3>of is right if you think about the Marvel movies, right,

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 3>and when you first get Hawk, right, when he first

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 3>becomes a Hawk, Bruce Banner, Yeah, a little a little

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 3>out of control, doesn't quite know, but the physical tools

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 3>are there. So the Avengers are like you know, what,

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 3>we'll bring them on, we'll train them up, we'll learn

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 3>to control the anger, right, control that stuff. But he's

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 3>just such a physical freak. He's got to be on

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 3>the team. And that's what Amaruswims is like, he's he's

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 3>a rale avenger. Yeah, and again like you could have

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 3>the incredible Hawk on your team.

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And he's just it's good. It's it's very good.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It's only seven games and so I can't I can't

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>stress that enough. I understand what's happening here. But Gottley,

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a he's a he's a he's a good football player.

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And you also like to Patana, Let's talk about him

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>real quick. He's he's your guy, right, you like him

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot?

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like him a lot, But go ahead take so.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I just I just got to talk about him because

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>lot people said he's gonna be a guard. I think

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be a tackle. He's got the twitch, the

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>athletic twitch that makes you think he could be special

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>at the position, and I think that's something that that's

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>why he's the third guy for me, ahead of all Lufashana.

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>He also has got a little bit of a better

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>anchor he's just got a little bit of a nastiness,

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.479
<v Speaker 1>a more consistent physical to him and Oliano, So that's

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>why he's ahead of Old of Fashana for me on

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>my list.

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's excellent in a run game, very aggressive, mean, yeah, yeah,

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 3>I really like him a lot. We've talked about about

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 3>him amount guys that we haven't talked about all that much.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll start because yours is a little more obscure, and

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I haven't watched the guy that you're you're going to

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 3>bring up here. So but I have Christian Hayes from Yukon.

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 3>I think he just plays with a toughness. Yeah right,

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 3>he's uh, he can get into that second level. He's aggressive, he's.

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Got some.

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 3>It seems every now and then in past protection can

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 3>get pushed around a little bit.

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you said that because I felt the same way.

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he at the Senior Bowl, very physical, physical

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in the run game, snappy, explosive out of his stance.

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But everyone you're like, what's this Like.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, why why are you getting shoved around a

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 3>little bit? And I don't know the the techniques of

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 3>the skill, the nuances and skills of the position to know,

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 3>do you have any thoughts on him?

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So, I think there's a couple of things, like sometimes

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a little high hipped. I think he

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>bends well, but he's a little high hiped. He gets

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a little loose with his hands and when you're going

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and so that's something that's a little bit alarming to me.

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people have him as their

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>number one guard, but for me, when you watch him,

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of like, this is going to be an

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>issue unless you get with a really good technical offensive

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>line coach.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I think it's coachable.

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But I do think it is coachable, but you need

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to get the right guy to help him out. I

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>think you need to help him understand like what he's doing.

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Also there's times where he's he's like over extending to

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>get to certain positions, and I think just understanding like

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>when you can put it all on the line and

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>when you have to be a little bit more conservative

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I think will help him. And that comes with experience.

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So I like him, you know, in terms of competitive toughness,

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like insanely high competitive toughness, like unbelievable. So he's a

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun to watch. I think he's going to

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>be a good pro. Just about what does he become?

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Is he just kind of a you know, a C

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>plus level starter for a long time, a guy you're

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>looking to replace, or does he kind of mature from

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a technical standpoint and become a guy that you feel

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good about, you know, long term for your team.

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha?

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Who's your plus one?

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Roger the Party Roger Rosengardner from Washington. He plays right tackles.

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>He plays opposite Troy Fatanu and I people have been

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about him, you know, kind of up and down.

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>He's he's there's nothing specially, he's very vanilla. He's six ' five,

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>he's I think he's two ninety nine. He re did

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>run a fast forty at the combin and the get

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of the fast forty to the combine kind of a

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>weird build, and I was like, Oh, this guy, he's

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a little undersized, nothing special, thirty three in a quarter

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and an eighth inch arms, Like what does he actually do?

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And then when I watched the Michigan game, so the

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>National Championship game, I was kind of blown away by him.

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I'm always looking for guys that, you know,

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we kind of go through the same ten names at

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the top of the draft. Is there somebody kind of

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that sits right outside that that area that you feel

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:51.719
<v Speaker 1>like could be a starter in the NFL? And when

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I watched this film, I was like, yes. And the

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>reason I felt that way is because he has tremendous

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>recovery speed with his feet and he's got it excellent,

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>excellent dexterity and coordination to his body. And so when

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at high level tackles in the NFL, they're

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>athletic like that. Either they're crazy big or they're crazy athletic.

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And I was just I couldn't get over Like there

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was a couple of times where the guy hits him

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>with an inside move, he overseets it bad, he does

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a spin move himself, works his feet, looks like a

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>basketball player out there, gets back in front of the guy,

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>winds the pocket, Pennic steps around it, and just was

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous place. So his ability to recover in those situations.

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you don't like the set originally because he's off

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the line, but the foot speed, the dexterity, and the

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>ability to kind of get after guys a little bit

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>right because he's so quick and explosive. He's able to

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get on guys really quickly and movement in the run game.

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>He's got a little bit of an edge. Reminded me

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot, honestly of Troy Fatanu. I think Troy Patana

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is a better, more physically gifted player, but in terms

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of foot speed, I just was like, this is the

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>twitch NFL starting caliber tackles have to their feet. And

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why I was just like, he's a guy that

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I could see here being in Washington, and I don't

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>know if he's a left tackle at the NFL level,

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but a guy that if he's sitting there, I don't

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>know if it's forty because I think it'd be good

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>value at forty honestly after watching him, but a guy

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that could play for this team, no doubt in my mind.

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's move on to running backs. Yep, Okay,

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 3>running backs was actually pretty difficult for me.

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>This is this is really hard, Yeah.

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Really hard, And we'll talk about why because we don't

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 3>think any of these guys may go in the first round.

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 3>But it seems like there's a lot of talent that's

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 3>bunched up late second third rounders.

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think probably third to fourth, third, fourth, fifth round,

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that kind of area.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I want to be surprised if a team

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 3>like the Cowboys gets a little triggered back with running

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 3>back and goes late in the second round.

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, so here's what I have.

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I have at number five, Ray Davis from Kentucky, Number

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 3>four march On Lloyd from USC, three is Blake Corn

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 3>from Michigan. Two Jonathan Brooks from Texas, and one is

0:33:58.120 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Right from Tennessee.

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Who's here time?

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. My top five is will Shipley from Clemson, Marshawn

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Lloyd from USC, Blake Koran from Michigan, Jalen Wright from Tennessee,

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and Trey Benson from Florida State.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, so let's talk about Marshaon Lloyd and Blake

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Blake korm because we both have them four to three.

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I like them both. They're both good football players.

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Like they I think Marshawn Lloyd is explosive. I think

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 1>he's got pass catching ability. I don't think he's elite

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in either one of those categories, but I think he's

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a really good football player. And I think he's a

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>guy that if Washington said we're gonna draft running back

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth round to be kind of a third

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>down rotational growth piece here for this team. I'd be like, great.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just how I feel about him, you know.

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think I kind of feel the same way

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>about Blake Coorm. I think Blake Orm's got better down

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to down vision than Marshawn Lloyd. I think he cs

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL runs really well. He s his short air burst

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is great. I think he catches the football well. The

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>problem is he's five to seven, he's not very big.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, I think they're both good football players,

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the issue with this class. It's like,

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>if you have a role as a stat and you

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>see a vision for this player, you're gonna be okay. Yeah,

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just about making sure they gets to the right

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>fit and they fit a need for you, I guess

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm saying.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 3>I like Marshall Lloyd a lot. He look good at

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 3>the Senior Bowl on his tape. I wonder if this

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 3>is like the Caleb Williams effect, where the USC effect

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 3>where it looks like every now and then he turns

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 3>down just planning his foot and hitting a hole for

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 3>trying to bounce outside.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 2>To make a big play.

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 3>And I wonder if that's just usc being like, go

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 3>for the home run every time, swing for the fence

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 3>instead of just hey, let's grind out these three yards

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 3>right here, just hit this hole really hard, whereas he

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I feel like it's the opposite with Blake Koram, where

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 3>he has great vision, he's going to hit that hole,

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 3>He's going to go run right where he's supposed to.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 2>And that doesn't mean he.

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't bounce from time to time, but he's he's going

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 3>to hit that play as it's designed, as it's supposed

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 3>to be run.

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:54.760
<v Speaker 2>He's just not super.

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Big, Yeah, And I just think there's a more consistency

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to Blake Orm's game, and that's why he's the what

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>is he the third guy? He's the third guy as

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the post of the fourth guy, And the only thing

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>that keeps him from being the number one guy is

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>that he's a little bit small. Yeah, and had a

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a regression in twenty twenty three as

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a post twenty twenty two.

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my top guy in your number two is Jalen Wright.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 2>You want to talk about him real quick?

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think like at this point in

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the drafts for running back specifically, I'm just looking for traits, right,

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 1>and Jalen Wright is a trait of the traitiest guys. Right.

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>He's like six I think he's five eight five. No,

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 1>he's five to ten. He's two hundred and ten pounds.

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>He has the most explosive runs in college football. Last

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>year he has the highest yards per carry. Like he

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:34.879
<v Speaker 1>is a home run hitter. Like again, we talked about

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>running back vision. I'm not sure it's always there for him.

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>They run a lot of trap, they run a lot

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of counter where he's like hitting a hole, and because

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of that offense in Tennessee, it's like really spread out,

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>so like once he kind of clears that first level,

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like he's hitting his head on the goalpost. But I

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think he's pretty good in pass protection.

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think he doesn't catch the ball great, but

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you could kind of work that skill set

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>with him and find an explosive guy for your offense.

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of hit home runs, and I think when

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>you look at Oh Gosh, I forget that I'm the guy.

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>The name of the guy that was drafted by Baltimore

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>last year, the little running back but having an explosive

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>playmaker in your offense with that kind of speed is

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly valuable. So that's why he's he's number two for me.

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And again I couldn't put up his number one because

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't sure if there was the volume of NFL runs.

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think definitely a very good football player, guy

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>that I'd be excited if the commands draft.

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's his explosiveness, right, It's it's eye popping in

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.439
<v Speaker 3>some instances. He just he has He hits the whole hard.

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 3>He runs super fast, he's got getaway speed. No one's

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 3>going to catch him when he gets going. He has

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 3>good hands, not great, but when he gets the ball

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 3>in space, I forget about it. N it's really talented.

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 3>He's he's super young. He's and I think that that's

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 3>what you were talking about a little bit with the

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 3>negative there is that the super young is a good

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 3>thing in the sense of like, well, he's young, not

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of miles or is still coachable. But also

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 3>there's not a lot as far as like you're saying,

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 3>this NFL caliber run, he hasn't.

0:37:57.920 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 2>He just hasn't. He doesn't have a lot of tape

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>on it.

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 1>He runs fast, right, Yeah, that's what he does big

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's pretty big. He's stout. But I like him.

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got again. To me, there's a little

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>bit of a there's an opportunity there for him to

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>be something more, to be a playmaker at the next

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>level as he posts some of these other guys who

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 1>I think like like with like Marshall Lloyd. I think

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be a good player. I don't think

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he's ever anything special. I think I think Jalen Wright

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>has an opportunity to do that.

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, And then you added number one, Tray Benson,

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 3>who's not on my list. It's actually my number six.

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 3>That's the only reason down on my list. So talk

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 3>about explosiveness. This guy is explosive. So why is he

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 3>number one for you? And I'll tell you why he's

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 3>numbered six.

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So for me, he's because of the explosiveness quite honestly,

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Like when you look at when you look at what

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they do in Florida, a Florida state where he's the

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>running back, obviously a lot of kind of messy runs,

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>not really well blocked, and it's really muddy and murky.

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.280
<v Speaker 1>He does take shots, he's not super shifty in the hole,

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 1>but when he has a crease, like if it's an

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>outside zone system like I think about Kyle Shanahan or

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mike McDaniels or Green Bay for example, like

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 1>with with the floor up there, if they had him

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in that offense, he would be devastating because he's big,

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.800
<v Speaker 1>he gets sent hell fast, he's fearless when he's getting downhill,

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and he does have the home run ability. And again

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I just look at like when you're looking at running

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>back in the NFL, you're not looking for a guy

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to carry the load like Derek Henry. You're looking for

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy who has a role on your team. Yeah,

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think he has a role with those teams

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. And if you want to if you want

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>an effective, explosive rushing attack, get an explosive runner, and

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 1>he's he's that guy.

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 3>So so for I agree with everything you said. The

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 3>reason he's number six is because of what you said,

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 3>is that he to me, he relies so much on

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 3>that athleticism that I don't know if the technique is

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 3>right there, if the.

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Visions fully can be coached up.

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Though, Yeah, I mean I definitely maybe if you get

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>him in a system, it's a little bit cleaner, you know,

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 1>like Florida State it's it's muddy, very muddy. All that's

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a good point. So if maybe you get him, and again,

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I this is where I'm kind of like, if I'm

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>taking a running back, I want to be able to

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>hit a home run, like I can get a third

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>down past protecting back, Like I want a guy that's

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit on run, Like I didn't put your number,

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 1>what is it Brooks on my Liston Brooks he would

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>be another guy that would fit in this category because

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just because he's coming off the knee right, But the

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>same type of deal, like I want a guy that

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>can hit home runs. I don't want to get on

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>base with a running back. I want a guy that

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can be a productive playmaker in my office. And so obviously,

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>like if you look at my list, it values that

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 1>skill set.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 3>So here's the difference between Jaleen Wright and Trey Benson

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 3>to me is that Jalen Wright has all these things

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about.

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Explosive, Uh.

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Wright will strap up for pass protection and he

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 3>will say, come on, come on, let's go, like he

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 3>wants to mix it up there. And I went back

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 3>and I looked at all passing plays from Tennessee and

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 3>from Florida State to see the pass protection from them,

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 3>because they don't always put those in the cutups for

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 3>running backs. They just do their routes or their runs, right.

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 3>So I went back and looked at all passing plays,

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 3>and uh, yeah, Jalen Wright, not afraid, wants to mix

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:05.760
<v Speaker 3>it up, steps up Benson.

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>A little bit down. But I thought I thought he

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>caught the ball better, which is yeah, I agree, one

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred I think, I agree, I think And this is

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>where it gets kind of funny. It's like beauty's in the

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I of the beholder. I think he's a little bit bigger.

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a little bit faster. I think he

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>catches the ball a little bit better. But you know,

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like there is there's issues with him. I'm just we're

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>just both upside plays in terms of what you're seeing

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>splitting hairs.

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 3>All these guys are very close. I'm real quickly going

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 3>to do Ray Davis. He's just a bowling ball.

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I love him.

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:33.839
<v Speaker 2>I love him.

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 3>He's I think he's a better pass catcher and route

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 3>runner than people want to give him.

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Credit for because of his size.

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 3>But I think this guy could come in and be

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 3>a rotational piece right away and be effective for a team.

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 2>The plus one for me, I couldn't help myself.

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I know. I saw this one.

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Yi Vaki, he's his safety from Utah, but man, his

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 3>running tape is so good and I just I have to.

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 2>Bring him up whenever I can.

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 3>I would love to have him on a team as

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 3>an athlete, a special teamer. He's going to be an

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 3>awesome special teamer. Forever drafts him and then yeah, maybe

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 3>he gets a carry or two at running back if

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 3>you need it, and he'll do pretty good.

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he'll do pretty good. I like that pick. So

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>for me, Will Shipley from Clemson. I'm a little high

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>on him than most. I just saw a role for him.

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Small. He seems small, small.

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Skinny guy, but yeah, you can play like basically slot receiver.

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think about mismatches with the running back spot. I

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>want guys that can hit home runs. He kind of

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>fits that. Mouli ran a four three to nine in

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>his pro DA. He's explosive, catches the ball well, has

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>some good power, and is a return specialist. So that's

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 1>why he's on my list. And then my plus one

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 1>is Braylen Allen from Wisconsin, and there's something to be

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>said for having just a big dude who can get

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>downhill with good contact, balanced, decent vision. He's not going

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to hit home runs, but I think when you look

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>at his volume, his career and his ability to stay

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>healthy and his ability to just consistently pound the rock, like,

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>there's something there, right and I and again, he's going

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to fill a specific role for you. He'll he'll kind

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of move the sticks. I think he elevates the offensive

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:04.279
<v Speaker 1>line slightly. He's like a slower b rob to me,

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a less athletic be rob, maybe a

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more power, but a guy that fills a

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>very specific type of role and is unique because he's

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>six to two and he's doing forty five and I

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>think he catches the ball pretty well, so you know,

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a unique guy there.

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're moving on the pass catcher.

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, this is where as a producer, I just had

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 3>to like take a deep breath because I told you

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 3>with these when we were setting this up, pick one

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 3>through five plus a plus one, and you sent me

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 3>a one through six with a plus three.

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>So let me just say this. So We're not going

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to go through all these guys, but I did. This

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 1>is kind of an exercise to say, like, there are

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys in this plot. I guy and

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't. And I was just looking at your top

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>your top five, and the only person I would disagree

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>with you on is the fifth one. So I just

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 1>threw some other names in there. So if you read

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>your top five.

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, so my top five, you also didn't include

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 3>the top of the consensus.

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I didn't include the top three. I just

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.280
<v Speaker 1>said because there's like a lot of guys, right, there's.

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 2>A lot of guys.

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:00.479
<v Speaker 3>So here's here's my my top five. Five is Brock

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Bowers from Georgia. Yeah, four is Brian Thomas Junior, LSU

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 3>three of Doomsay, two Leak Neighbors, and one Marvin Harrison Junior.

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:11.360
<v Speaker 3>So we're just going to for the purpose of this conversation, Marvin,

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 3>here's some Leak Neighbors duns. They're pretty much the overwbings three.

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about them plenty before. We're gonna just say, Okay,

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 3>you guys are top three. You're over here, so we're

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 3>gonna go Basically, you have an issue with me as

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 3>brock Bowers.

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>No I saw Brian Thomas Judter brock Bowers. I agree

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with I agree with percent, and then I would say, like,

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the next guy. Right.

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 2>If the next guy you have.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Xavierly Get written down on this piece of paper, I

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think that that's your sixth guy. I think that's a

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>little high for me. For the get I would probably

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it's only one higher than you. I know, No, I

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 1>got it, No, I oh, I meant that should be

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>xavier Worthy, type of Xavier Worthy. And then it last.

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So I have three guys that I would probably slot

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in there, just potentially above him. And again I like

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Xavierly get a lot. I think I think Ady Mitchell

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Worthy or Lad McConkey. I think you you could

0:44:58.120 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>twist my army the way and I would put that

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>guy in that six spot.

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing. When you talked with again sam

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Munsen about this, right, he made a good point where

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 3>all these guys are so good, they're so close together

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 3>that when you go from five to ten, you're like, oh,

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 3>this is my tenth best receiver. Well it really, on

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 3>any gift day could be the fifth.

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 2>And that's true.

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 3>The reason I keep putting Lagette up as high as

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 3>I do is because man, he just looks so good.

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Every time I see him, he just looks really, really

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:27.839
<v Speaker 2>really good.

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:29.439
<v Speaker 1>He's like in my next tier. He's on my sheet

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of paper. He's on this list of twelve people. So

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I like him a lot. And the point of this

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>exercise is the top three guys are the top three guys,

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and like kind of however, whoever you talk to. I mean,

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of Marvin Harrison and then you know.

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Neighbors and a doomsday back and forth.

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But then then after that, it's pretty solid. And I

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of really good football players at

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the position this year.

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 3>So what's interesting about this that I want you to

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 3>talk one is how Brock Bowers, a tight end, fits

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 3>in with all these receivers.

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so why did you slot him.

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Where you did, which is right behind Brian Thomas or

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:03.320
<v Speaker 3>as the fifth best pass catcher in this draft?

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 2>And do you think he'll go fifth? Do you think

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:05.800
<v Speaker 2>these guys are.

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he might actually go ahead of Brian Thomas Jr.

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, and I can see an argument as to why.

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's very polished, and so I think the

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that I have a hard time with Rock Bauers.

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Is he's six ' four, he's two forty. I want

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, is what he waited. I think he's a

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:19.360
<v Speaker 1>great athlete. I think he is a great feel for

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>running routes creates separation as a football player. Johnny. My

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>question is like he needs to go to a system

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 1>that utilizes his skill set, that understands what he is.

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Because he's not going to play a traditional inline Why

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be your move F And I don't

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>think you feel good about him in run game matchups

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 1>very well. Like I know he gets the comp to

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle because that's who he looks like once he

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:44.280
<v Speaker 1>catches the ball. But in line, I think he's willing.

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just like it's a mismatch. You know, he's he's

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>going up against guys who are significantly bigger than him,

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and so like, what do you do with him? Like

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I felt like Kyle Pitts was an easier evaluation because

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>he could literally do anything. He can play Why he

0:46:57.680 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>can play X, he can play F. I feel like

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Bauers isn't doesn't quite have the speed to play a

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>true X receiver, and he's going to have his pro

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>day coming up here with Themarus Mims at Georgia sometime

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in April. So we can get like a you know,

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:12.839
<v Speaker 1>reevaluation on this if he runs a four to four

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But that's that's where I got a little

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>bit weird. It's like, what is his actual role? Is

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he a big slot? Is he a power slot. I

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:21.399
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good role for him, but I also

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think that kind of maximizes his ability in the

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:25.399
<v Speaker 1>run game. If he went to a place like LA

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.320
<v Speaker 1>where he's playing like a pseudo wide receiver, tightand hybrid,

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he'd be extremely valuable there. But again it's

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 1>about fit for him and the offensive coordinator having a

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>vision for how to maximize his skill set because he doesn't.

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Because to me, if you want a power slot, there's

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>also guys like Kean Coleman or Johnny Wilson, these big

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>receivers you know, who have tremendous kind of acrobatic catching

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the football ability, and he doesn't quite have that. But

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>he does other stuff well too. So like that's where

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like role and fit and function in the offense becomes

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:54.799
<v Speaker 1>really important. To me.

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about eighty or Ann and I Mitchell, Yeah

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 3>night from Texas. Because I have him as my plus one,

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 3>a guy I wanted to talk about. You have him

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 3>as your number three or number five if you conclude

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 3>the other guys in ye five. Yeah, so right behind brock.

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Bowers, you have technically six.

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 2>Technically technically six, you're right.

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So let's talk about him.

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 3>Real quick because I have question marks about him. I

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 3>do too, But why do you have him so high?

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Though?

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think the thing is, like, I we once

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>saw him at this combine yep, and I thought he

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>had a rough combine running routes. I don't think he

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:31.839
<v Speaker 1>looked good. And when you watch film, there's a you

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit more route running nuance, right, And

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a guy that I do like to listen to

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the consensus a little bit, right, So right now I've

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of got that tethered to me as an anchor

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>because even though he had a rough senior bowl, I

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 1>do think you see an explosive playmaker. I hear the

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 1>comp to CD the Lamb a lot, and if that's

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the comp that's pretty. He's a little bit more explosive

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>than that. I think he could be a true X.

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:57.359
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna push that value up a little bit.

0:48:57.400 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Do I see it all the time on film? No?

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But is the potential there for him to get there

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>from a route running nuanced standpoint, from a vertical speed standpoint, yes,

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I think he needs again needs to get a good

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 1>coach to get him going. But I understand people saying like, oh,

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 1>he and Brian Thomas are kind of in the same

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>tier for them because they're big, they're fast, and they

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>can run all the routes. And that's why I kind

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of I haven't as much as I want to move

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>him down, I'm just like, stay the course, watch a

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more film, let's see how the process develops.

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 3>So here's why he looks like Ceedee Lamb to me, right,

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 3>and I do see that comparison. Other than they're built

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of the same, is that it seems like every

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 3>now and then they have a hard time creating great

0:49:39.600 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 3>separation someone you would expect from your number one receiver.

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 3>But he still makes to play, He still makes to catch,

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 3>which is Seedy Lamb's superpower. It doesn't matter if somebody's

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 3>draped all over him, he can get the ball. The

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 3>issue is I'm curious if that's because ady Mitchell can't

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 3>create that separation or if he's just a little bit

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:02.359
<v Speaker 3>lacks a daisical times, because that does show up.

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 1>It does show up, I do think. And also there

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was at the combine there were some ankle tightness stuff

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 1>ability to sink in his hips, which again would affect

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 1>his ability to separate. Again, that's the guy that I

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to. You know how you said

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you go back and watch the quarterbacks all the time.

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that I'm gonna go back and watch

0:50:15.719 --> 0:50:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a bunch because I need. I don't have a great

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 1>feel for him, and my inclination is to put him

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:24.240
<v Speaker 1>at like eleven or twelve, But there's so many people

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that are so high on him that I'm like, I

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:27.760
<v Speaker 1>got to do a little bit more work on this, yeah,

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just in case. But again, I think the athletic profiles

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>there you do see some stuff from a STEM standpoint,

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they're like, Okay, I get what people are talking about.

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if I see it with enough

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>regularity and enough kind of fair enough demonstrative ability to

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of be that high on him. But again I'm

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm reserving judgment on it.

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I want you to talk about your guy who tight end,

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Jared Wiley from tc OH.

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I really like Jared Wiley. Obviously. He's a guy

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that I've worked with, I've met him, and I think

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the thing about him is when you watch him in

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, he's crushing people in the run games,

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and then when you watch him in twenty twenty three,

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not doing that as much, but he's catching the

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:07.919
<v Speaker 1>football well. I think he has an adr touchdown versus Baylor, Right.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of got this silky smooth, kind of tall

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>guy ability to kind of create separation. And I'm like,

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the guys who are getting paid

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in this free agency cycle, Kobe Parkinson, who was in Seattle,

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>just signed with Carolina. I think he was on a

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:23.719
<v Speaker 1>three year, twenty million dollars deal. It's because he can

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:26.919
<v Speaker 1>block in line and work the seam of a defense, right,

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think Jared Wiley can do that, and he's

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>way down a lot of people's lists. But when I

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to the NFL guys, they have him in like

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the top three most of the time. So I'm a

0:51:35.000 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 1>little confused as to why there's a departure there. And

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's because maybe it's because the the NFL media

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is not great at evaluating tight ends. I don't know,

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>but I find that my tight end rankings tend to

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>line up more with NFL teams as opposed to.

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I wonder.

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm just throwing this out there, see if it sticks.

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:58.799
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if it's because when we evaluate tight ends, right,

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:01.000
<v Speaker 3>and I get I kept myself doing this when I

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 3>watch tight ends. Is that well, we want we want

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Travis Kelce, Yeah, right, we want that's what we're looking for.

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 3>We want to Kyle Pitts. We want a game changer

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 3>in that sense. We're high on brock Bowers because it's

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:17.319
<v Speaker 3>the pass catcher first. And I wonder if like, well,

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 3>there's only there's only four or five of those guys

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:23.360
<v Speaker 3>in the league, right, every other tight end has to

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:27.840
<v Speaker 3>play the tight end in the traditional sense, right, and that's.

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 2>What you were great at. You were great at that.

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 3>So he falls down maybe because he doesn't show these

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:35.840
<v Speaker 3>flashes that maybe some of these other tight ends do

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 3>in the passing game.

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Not that he doesn't, but it's different, but it's different

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:41.399
<v Speaker 2>because it's like, oh, well he's not Travis Kenny.

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why you see guys like sor

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>not Shaud or Jatavian Jatavian Sanders from Texas getting pushed

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>up boards. That's why I see brock powers really high.

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's important for fans to understand what

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:54.879
<v Speaker 1>that position. It's like, what is the role?

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, is he going to be like? Because they do

0:52:58.120 --> 0:52:59.799
<v Speaker 1>need a block, They need a pass protector, need to block.

0:52:59.840 --> 0:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Even really good guys like Travis Kelsey's kind of the

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:04.800
<v Speaker 1>exception there. Yeah, George Kittle's excellent at it, Darren Waller's

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 1>excellent at it. Even Mark Andrews gets after it a

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:09.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit, right, So I think like that's something that

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:12.480
<v Speaker 1>needs to be considered with those guys specifically. And like

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bowers is special because he's a special athlete, he

0:53:15.080 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>runs special routes. But Sanders, for example, is a guy

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that I'm a little bit on the fence about because like,

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:24.759
<v Speaker 1>can he be an elite pass catcher and not have

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to do that other stuff? And I don't think that's

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:27.319
<v Speaker 1>exactly the case.

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So all right, here we go. We're time for the quarterbacks.

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Quarterback it.

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 3>We made it the quarterbacks. We can't not talk about quarterbacks.

0:53:34.560 --> 0:53:36.359
<v Speaker 3>This is interesting We're not going to spend too much

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:38.399
<v Speaker 3>time on it because we talk about them all the time,

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 3>but I want to talk about how these are lining up,

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 3>all right, So logan number five for me, I have

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 3>b NIX for is JJ McCarthy, Three is Jade and Daniels,

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:50.359
<v Speaker 3>two Drake May, one Caleb Williams. This has really not

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 3>moved much for me throughout this entire process. Looks like

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:55.400
<v Speaker 3>it shifted a little bit for you. Give me your

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:55.879
<v Speaker 3>top five.

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, my top five is five is Bo Nicks from Oregon.

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>For is Drake May from u NC, Three is JJ

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:04.799
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy from Michigan, Two is Jane Daniels from LSU, and

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:06.840
<v Speaker 1>one is Caleb Williams from USC.

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Wait a minute, why is Drake May at number four?

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so this is I'm glad you asked me that

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:15.839
<v Speaker 1>because to me, this is why I hate doing like

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>one to ten lists, Because these three guys one, two, three, four,

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Jane Daniels, JJ McCarthy, Drake May are all in the

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>same tier. So for me, they're the same. It just

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 1>depends on how you're looking at the individual prospects. So

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I've said this a couple of times on the show already,

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Drake May has the highest ceiling of this class, of

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:38.440
<v Speaker 1>this group of three of that made three guys, But

0:54:38.480 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I also think his floor is really low, Like when

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at how he handles, like some of his

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>footwork fundamentals, some of the incanstisties throw on the.

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Football, he drifts a little bit in the pocket for some.

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Reason, he like finds pressure at weird times, like it's

0:54:51.520 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of these alarming things. But again and then

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you watch his big time throws and you're like, I

0:54:56.480 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like a lot. I like everything in here. This is great.

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Aiden Daniels, for example, is a guy that I think

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:06.239
<v Speaker 1>actually has a really high floor. I worry about his ceiling, right,

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:08.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think if I have said this on other shows,

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.879
<v Speaker 1>if he had to start a game today, I would

0:55:10.920 --> 0:55:13.480
<v Speaker 1>feel the best of those three about him starting today.

0:55:13.480 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And so maybe that's why I feel like the Commanders

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:18.879
<v Speaker 1>are not set up necessarily to have the quarterback sit

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:20.800
<v Speaker 1>for a long period of time because of their backup

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:23.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback situation. And again that's not a knock on anybody here.

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 1>That's just my personal opinion. They might feel differently about that,

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Commanders, But I look at this and I say,

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 1>if I just start someone to day. It's Jane Daniels

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think he's got a quick release. I think

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he feels pressure relatively well. I think there's enough NFL

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:39.800
<v Speaker 1>throws on his tape, and I think the playmaking ability

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with his legs regulates defense for the first year or

0:55:43.080 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 1>two that you feel pretty good about it. And then

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:47.720
<v Speaker 1>JJ we talked about again. I think very high floor.

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Not sure about his ceiling because I think you see

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of NFL throws and I think there's a

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:55.399
<v Speaker 1>guy that's ready to handle the responsibilities of the NFL game.

0:55:55.400 --> 0:55:57.359
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to hit a Grand Slam home

0:55:57.480 --> 0:56:01.280
<v Speaker 1>run is strake may. I also think there's an opportunity

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to strike out there.

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 3>So that's why I feel that, Yeah, you're a power

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 3>hitter swinging for the fences. Maybe you strike out, but

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:09.880
<v Speaker 3>maybe you hit it four hundred and fifty feet. Okay,

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 3>So I have Jade and Daniels at three. McCarthy is

0:56:13.360 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 3>sneaking up there, and the reason I'm falling on Jade

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 3>and Daniels, and I want to tell you why this

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:17.920
<v Speaker 3>is all right.

0:56:18.000 --> 0:56:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I did a bunch of research.

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it.

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 3>I was talking to you in text message and I

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:25.839
<v Speaker 3>was about, you know, what makes me nervous about Jade

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 3>and Daniels, and maybe I could be way off base.

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Here was that he only has that one big year.

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:35.280
<v Speaker 3>So how many guys have had a breakout senior season

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 3>or last season in college then go to the NFL

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:41.759
<v Speaker 3>and find success and what's the correlation? And you said

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 3>to me, well, maybe games played matter matters, right, because

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 3>maybe they have that breakout season because they have a

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of time right in college and they're getting better.

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to put words in your mouth, that's

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 3>basically you're saying. So you're like, look at that too.

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:58.400
<v Speaker 3>So here's what I found, all right, I went through

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 3>all the way back to twenty twenty. I think it

0:57:01.280 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 3>was maybe even a little further. I went all the

0:57:03.120 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 3>way back that I could last five years, I think

0:57:05.239 --> 0:57:08.720
<v Speaker 3>it was. And I looked at who had quote unquote

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 3>success in the NFL, how many games they played in college,

0:57:12.520 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 3>and whether they had a breakout game, breakout season, or

0:57:15.280 --> 0:57:17.080
<v Speaker 3>last year, and that's kind of what moved them up

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 3>draft boards. So pick a name, right, Let's say Baker Mayfield.

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 3>He had forty eight games in college. Yeah, okay, so

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 3>that's more than twenty five games. I made twenty five

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:32.040
<v Speaker 3>a marker because that means you played at least two

0:57:32.040 --> 0:57:37.440
<v Speaker 3>seasons full seasons, and he had a single breakout season

0:57:37.600 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 3>at the end of his senior year.

0:57:39.360 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 2>It was just a jump in town. Right.

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Then you have a guy like let's say CJ. Stroud

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 3>played in twenty five games, so two seasons, consistent, consistent.

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:52.480
<v Speaker 2>High level play. Yep, all right, what's.

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Another name that would be a good Joe Burrow is

0:57:56.480 --> 0:57:59.600
<v Speaker 3>an outlier, right. What I found is he played twenty

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 3>eight games games, he had a breakout season and success

0:58:03.440 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL. That's an outlier. And what I mean

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:09.240
<v Speaker 3>by that is the guys that have had breakout seasons

0:58:10.160 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 3>even with starting two seasons or more in college, it

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 3>still doesn't necessarily equate to success. Yes, correlation doesn't mean causas,

0:58:20.520 --> 0:58:22.680
<v Speaker 3>but Joe Burrow is the exception.

0:58:23.400 --> 0:58:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So the three names that have been successful right

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL are Baker Mayfield relatively, right, Jalen Hurts relatively,

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and then Joe Burrow. Of that category, you had breakout years,

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that breakout years, that had breakout years, that's right.

0:58:38.520 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So you look at guys that had breakout years that

0:58:43.760 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 3>like Malik Willis, Kenny Pickett, right, Jalen Hurts, But that

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:51.720
<v Speaker 3>took him a while to get to get to success.

0:58:51.720 --> 0:58:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I would say had success.

0:58:53.120 --> 0:58:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Grey Lance, Zach Wilson, right, Like these are Mac Jones, right,

0:58:57.080 --> 0:58:58.920
<v Speaker 3>your names is like, Okay, they had a breakout here.

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Here's here's the correlation.

0:59:00.800 --> 0:59:03.840
<v Speaker 3>That everyone's making with Jayde and Daniels is to Robert Griffin. Well,

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 3>what did Robert Griffin do? He had a breakout year? Yeah,

0:59:06.520 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 3>he played forty games with a breakout year. Jade and

0:59:09.240 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Daniels fifty five games a breakout year.

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, I'm with you.

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:15.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's why I keep falling on Jade and Daniel's

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I keep trying to find what it is because it's

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 3>not always the tape. I'll go back and I'll look

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 3>at the tape and he is dynamic. Yeah, but there's

0:59:23.600 --> 0:59:27.400
<v Speaker 3>just something irking me right, Like it is this just

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 3>a flash in the pan in college and I'm nervous

0:59:31.160 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:59:31.560 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 1>If I was gonna say so with Jaydon Daniels again,

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:35.960
<v Speaker 1>like his career arc is so unique and it's so

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>hard to kind of make ay and again like I

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 1>think this is a really telling thing, but like this

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is what I would make an argument to tend to

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 1>say why Jadon and Daniels doesn't fit this. So at

0:59:43.640 --> 0:59:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Arizona he was Arizona State, he was fine, right, I

0:59:47.040 --> 0:59:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think he had I think it was his sophomore year,

0:59:48.640 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 1>played pretty well, six round pick. And then they have

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the COVID year. Yeah, Arizona State explodes like everyone leaves

0:59:56.840 --> 1:00:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the program. It's crazy ghost. LSU has a pretty good

1:00:00.280 --> 1:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>year in twenty twenty two or whatever it is, twenty

1:00:02.840 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight year, so exposed in twenty twenty one, goes

1:00:05.800 --> 1:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>as an okay year in twenty twenty two, that has

1:00:08.320 --> 1:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a great year in twenty twenty three and a crazy

1:00:11.160 --> 1:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>wos Eisman, right, And so what I would say is

1:00:14.200 --> 1:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that adversity early coupled with the fact that last year

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>he kind of had already projected from like a sixth

1:00:21.360 --> 1:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>round pick at Arizona State to a third or fourth

1:00:25.000 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>round pick at LSU last year to being a first

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>round pick this year, shows a consistent progression. And then

1:00:30.280 --> 1:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this is where I get really weird with quarterbacks. It's

1:00:32.400 --> 1:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>because you're evaluating like ten things at one time, Like

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the talent is the talent there? Yes, is the

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>processing there maybe and you just kind of go through

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the list. The other thing I've heard about him from

1:00:44.480 --> 1:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>multiple people is that he's an insane worker. So like,

1:00:47.840 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>if you do draft him, he's not going to be

1:00:49.600 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's not going to He's not gonna he's

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to not make it because he's not working hard.

1:00:54.720 --> 1:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's another thing about bringing his flora.

1:00:56.720 --> 1:00:58.439
<v Speaker 1>But I agree, I think there's a lot of stuff there.

1:00:58.520 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you look, if you if you

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the other thing, consistently high level of play.

1:01:03.080 --> 1:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The names are there are really interesting too, just if

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you read through them real quick. Yes, there's the Russell Wilson's,

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bryce Young's, the c. J. Stroud, the Trevor Lawrence,

1:01:11.000 --> 1:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>justin Herbert kellen Mond. Obviously there's out lout.

1:01:14.160 --> 1:01:18.520
<v Speaker 3>There's exceptions the exception, right, But you want from just

1:01:18.560 --> 1:01:21.520
<v Speaker 3>doing the research, it looks like you want at least

1:01:21.560 --> 1:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>two seasons in college of consistent play. That's what it

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:29.000
<v Speaker 3>looks like. There's a correlation, not a causation, but a correliation.

1:01:29.320 --> 1:01:31.520
<v Speaker 3>And of the top four quarterbacks that we talk about

1:01:31.520 --> 1:01:35.400
<v Speaker 3>in this drab Williams, may Daniels, McCarthy, Williams May and

1:01:35.480 --> 1:01:39.480
<v Speaker 3>McCarthy all have played at least two seasons of college

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>football at a high level. Daniels sticks out he's played

1:01:43.280 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of college football one big year, same thing

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:49.280
<v Speaker 3>with Bo Nicks, a lot of college football, more college

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:53.200
<v Speaker 3>football games than any other quarterback one big year, which

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>is concerning.

1:01:54.160 --> 1:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm with you, and I think you talk to

1:01:56.720 --> 1:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>NFL evaluators, it's concerning. I think it's a concerning thing.

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like, why because everyone can get hot statistically, everyone

1:02:03.280 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>can get hot for a season, right, It's like, can

1:02:05.080 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you maintain that level of success? And I'm totally with you,

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And again that's why this quarterback thing, quarterback evaluation is

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>so challenging. And I think we've talked with this a

1:02:14.440 --> 1:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>million times. Those three guys are in the same tier

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for me, right, those three players we just talked about.

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

1:02:20.720 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>The situation that they go to and the plan of

1:02:23.320 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>development for those guys is going to be the deciding thing. Like, really,

1:02:29.000 --> 1:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter who comes to Washington of those three guys, Like,

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with any of them, right, but what is

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the vision? How do they get him to progress? And

1:02:38.560 --> 1:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously different models of getting that done, but that

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to me is the deciding factor and that's why the

1:02:43.760 --> 1:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback conversation is so so interesting I think this year.

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Now let me be clear, if Jaden Daniels comes

1:02:49.880 --> 1:02:52.880
<v Speaker 3>to Washington, I will be stoked because he has talent

1:02:53.240 --> 1:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the lore right, he is super talented. I love what

1:02:56.720 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I see And like I said, I went back and

1:02:59.160 --> 1:03:01.800
<v Speaker 3>I watched the film and I was like, oh my gosh,

1:03:01.840 --> 1:03:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I can see how this guy could be just a superstar.

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:08.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm just I'm just taking this other piece of information

1:03:08.360 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 3>that I looked at.

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>That's it's important.

1:03:09.640 --> 1:03:13.560
<v Speaker 3>But there are all three, all four of these quarterbacks,

1:03:13.600 --> 1:03:17.360
<v Speaker 3>are they any one of them could be really really good.

1:03:17.400 --> 1:03:20.280
<v Speaker 3>You can see it. And I'm not a jade and

1:03:20.360 --> 1:03:21.919
<v Speaker 3>Daniels cater. That's what I'm trying to say.

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Like, I like him, all right, but I do think

1:03:23.880 --> 1:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>like when you watch the film, like if you're being objective,

1:03:26.160 --> 1:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>there are questions.

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Like does there are questions with every guy.

1:03:29.200 --> 1:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But is his arm talent where it needs to? Like,

1:03:32.120 --> 1:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>there's questions about it. So I'm glad you brought that up.

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really good exercise for sure.

1:03:35.960 --> 1:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>All Right, that's our show.

1:03:37.360 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>We're going to do this next week, but with all

1:03:39.680 --> 1:03:43.120
<v Speaker 3>the defensive side, and then we're going to get really

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:44.720
<v Speaker 3>close to the draft. We're coming up on that. We

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>got a very big show for that the week of

1:03:47.880 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>the draft, so make sure these guys stay tuned for that.

1:03:51.040 --> 1:03:52.400
<v Speaker 3>That's all I'm going to say about it right now.

1:03:52.680 --> 1:03:53.919
<v Speaker 3>It's a huge.

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Self all right, thanks.

1:03:57.240 --> 1:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Is that it?

1:03:57.800 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>That's it.