WEBVTT - BrainStuff Classics: What Was Stephen Hawking's Final Project?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff production of I Heart Radio. Hey

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff Lauren Vogbaum here with another classic from the

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>podcast archives. In this one, we take a look at

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>what turned out to be theoretical physicist Stephen Hawkings final

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>research paper about the multiverse. Hey brain Stuff, Lauren vog

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Obam here. Days before his death, on March fourteen, famed

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>theoretical physicist and cosmologist Stephen Hawking completed what would be

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>his final research paper. It has since passed peer review

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and was published online in the Journal of High Energy

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Physics on April. Written with co author Thomas Hertog, a

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>theoretical physicist at the University of louisn Belgium, the paper

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>adds another facet to our understanding of this universe that

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>we live in, and needless to say, it's complicated. Titled

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation, the publication discusses an

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>enigmatic problem facing cosmologists. But before we delve into the

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>crux of the study, let's go back to when our

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>universe was a baby, some thirteen point eight billion years ago.

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of evidence suggests that our universe originated from

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a singularity, an infinitely dense point from which all the

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>universe as we know it was born. We call that

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>event the Big Bang. But how the Singularity came to

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>be and why the Big Bang happened isn't of concern

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. We're interested in what happened immediately after our

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>universe was spawned, a period known as inflation. Cosmologists predict

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that inflation occurred over a vanishingly small period right after

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang, during our universe's very first ten to

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty two seconds. During inflation, the universe expanded exponentially and

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>much faster than the speed of light. After only a second,

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the energy from this inconceivably gargantuan explosion condensed to form

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>sub atomic particles that, over millions of years, created the stars, galaxies, planets, and,

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>after another few years, a life as we know it.

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Once this inflationary period ended, the universe's rate of expansion slowed,

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>but it continues to expand to this day. Because inflation

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>powered a faster than light speed expansion, the observable universe

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>that we see today is not the entire universe. Rather,

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>we exist inside a region of the cosmos that light

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>has had time to reach. It's like dropping a pebble

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>into a calm swimming pool, The first circular ripple to

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>propagate from the splash travels at a fixed speed across

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the surface of the pool. If we imagine that the

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>limit of our observable universe is that ripple traveling across

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the pool at the speed of light, it's not that

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing exists beyond that ripple. There's more pool or universe

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>beyond it. We just can't see it yet. So the

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>consequence of inflation is that there should be a lot

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>more universe beyond what we can see, even with our

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>most powerful telescopes. And cosmologists have been grappling with the

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>possibility that our universe is not the only universe. In fact,

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>we could be nothing more than a single bubble in

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>an infinite, frothy ocean, a concept known as the multiverse.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>The idea here is that inflation didn't happen once, It's

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 1>always happening via some infinitely vast chain reaction known as

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>eternal inflation. One universe will appear, and inflation will take over,

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>expanding that universe, and that universe will have its own

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>quantum instabilities that will spawn more singularities that go on

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to create more universes. It's like blowing up a party

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>balloon that itself spawns many other party balloons that are

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>rupped from its rubbery surface, seemingly at random. If this

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>situation sounds chaotic, it is. Proponents of this hypothesis think

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that eternal inflation is unstoppable, vastly complex, and continually generating

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>new universes, and the math of this situation suggests that

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the multiverse acts like a fractal, fractals being sets of

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>data that contain repeating patterns at every scale. Visually, this

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>means that complex shapes look pretty much the same at

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a wide range of scales, like a small piece of

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it looks pretty similar to the whole structure. Think of

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a head of cauliflower. Any given segment will resemble the

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>whole head, and if you zoom in further, each cluster

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of buds resembles the larger segments. It's worth noting that

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in this theory, each success of universe and the multiverse

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't likely share the same physics as our universe. One

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>universe might not have gravity, another may not support the

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>forces that hold matter together. There would be a lot

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of stillborn universes that just don't amount too much. We

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>humans are simply lucky to have a universe that has

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the right environment to create what we see, a philosophical

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>argument known as the anthropic principle. The problem with eternal

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation is that it's messy and infinite, and that the

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis is ultimately untestable. So what does Hawking and her

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Tog's research have to do with this unrelenting multiverse In

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>the multiverse? Are you? Niverse is merely a pocket universe

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>where inflation has ended, and despite the odds, it found

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>enough calm to create a bounty of stars and galaxies

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of humans living on some random rock

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>pondering the cosmos. What's going on beyond our pocket of

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>calm is, however, somewhat different, Hawking said in an interview.

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>In the usual theory of eternal inflation predicts that globally,

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>our universe is like an infinite fractal with a mosaic

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of different pocket universes separated by an inflating ocean. The

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>local laws of physics and chemistry can differ from one

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>pocket universe to another, which together would form a multiverse.

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>But I have never been a fan of the multiverse.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>If the scale of different universes in the multiverse is

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>large or infinite, then the theory can't be tested. The problem,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>according to Hawking in her Dog, allies with the incompatibility

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of Einstein's general relativity that governs the evolution of the

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>universe and quantum mechanics that seeds the creation of new

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>universes through quantum fluctuations. The eternal inflation model of the multiverse,

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>as her Tog said in a press release quote, wipes

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>out separation between classical and quantum physics. As a consequence,

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Einstein's theory breaks down in eternal inflation. Their study doesn't

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>go as far as reconciling general relativity with quantum physics,

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a quest that has so far been unsuccessful, but they

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>use the math of string theory to help simplify the

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>multiverse model. A quick recap. String theory predicts that all

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>subtomic particles in our universe are in fact composed of

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one dimensional strings that propagate through space. The vibrational state

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of these strings is what gives these particles their quantum

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>state such as charge, spin, and mass. But string theory

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>also predicts the existence of the hypothetical graviton, a quantum

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>particle that carries the force of gravity. The math that

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>suggests that gravitons exist is solid, but no one's been

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>able to point to one yet. String theory would therefore

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>provide an explanation of how einstein general relativity gravity jibes

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>with quantum physics using the mathematical framework of string theory.

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>This final study from Hawking simplifies the multiverse. Hawking and

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>her dog used the string theory concept of holography to

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>reduce our three dimensional universe down to a two dimensional

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>surface from which the universe we know and love is projected.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>By doing this, they were able to describe eternal inflation

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>without general relativity, creating a timeless state. Her dog explained

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this move in a statement. When we trace the evolution

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of our universe backwards in time, at some point we

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>arrive at the threshold of eternal inflation, where our familiar

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>notion of time ceases to have any meaning. The math

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is complex, but the result is interesting. The calculations have

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the effect of turning the infinite and fractal multiverse into

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a far simpler and finite situation that eternal inflation does predict.

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Hawking said this about it. We are not down to

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a single, unique universe, but our findings imply a significant

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>reduction of the multiverse to a much smaller range of

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>possible universes. To put it in perspective, Hawking's final paper

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't revolutionize our understanding of how the universe and indeed

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the multiverse works, but it is a valuable addition to

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge field of theoretical work. Specifically, her Tug hopes

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that this study may help a search for ancient gravitational

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>waves that were generated by eternal inflation. These ripples in

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>space time are far too weak for current gravitational wave

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>detectors to detect. However, we need to wait until advanced

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>space based observatories such as the European Space Agencies planned

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>LIESA mission are launched. Regardless of whether the study leads

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to groundbreaking discoveries about the cosmos that we live in,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a testament to a great scientist who worked tirelessly

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>his entire life to answer some of the biggest questions

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that humanity has pondered, and on Hawking's shoulders, other great

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>minds will build on this work to hopefully decipher whether

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>our universe is unique or if it's just one bubble

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>chaotically floating in the ocean of the multiverse. Today's episode

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>is based on the article Stephen Hawking's Last Paper Takes

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Multiverse on Housetofworks dot com, written by Ian O'Neill.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Brain Stuff is production of I Heart Radio in partnership

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with housetfworks dot com and it's produced by Tyler clang

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Or more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the I heart

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.