WEBVTT - Mini Crush #23

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, welcome to movie Crush Mini Crush. Hello. That's

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>how you doing. I'm doing well, man, doing pretty well.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>How about you? I'm doing great, as you know, a

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>little under the gun. Under the gun. So we got

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to record this thing so I can go to the airport.

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So geez, let's get right to it. So to chit chatting.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>We got a new segment. Oh boy, it's called all

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>right shopping. So no, a little bit like almost famous

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>where actors had been turned on movies, um that went

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>on to be very iconic roles. This is uh this

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>directors who turned down jobs, and some directors are very

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>famous for turning down a lot of great movies, you know,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>because a lot comes their way. Alfred Hitchcock turned down

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>The Exorcist, he turned down Rosemary's Baby, he turned down

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Wait until Dark, and he turned down whatever happened to

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Baby Jane. Interesting. It makes sense though, because he's sort of,

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's sort of the originator of that vibe

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>with like psycho and stuff. I could see them wanting

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to him to be their first pick for absolutely Exorcist.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think you would have gone as far as

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>freed can would have. But we'll never know. Yeah, it's

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting proposition. David Fincher. He turns down a lot

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of work because you know, a lot of these directors

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they can do whatever they want, so a lot of

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>movies come their way. But he turned down The Black Dahlia.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>He turned down the documentary Madonna, Truth or Dare. Uh.

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>He was gonna direct and then dropped out. He directed

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Madonna videos, well, so that makes sense.

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>He did Vogue, I Believe and Maybe Express Yourself. Interesting. Uh.

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He turned on Mission Impossible three, dropped out over creative differences.

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>He was going to direct Catch Me If you Can uh,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and instead directed Panic Room. Yeah. A lesser Fincher though.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Panic Room, yeah for sure, but not not a bad movie. Uh,

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Batman begins. He turned that down to direct another film,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Eight Millimeter. He turned down Remember that one. I loved

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>eight Millimeter. Really it's so trashy, but it's it's it's

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's about the snuff industry, like you know, bondage,

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but well, yeah, it's it's I enjoy it. He turned

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that down to direct Fight Club, So good career choice there,

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and then he turned down the movie Collateral, the Michael

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Mann movie with Tom Cruise and Jamie Fox was good.

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>He's like, he's like an assassin. It was good. And

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll you'll see a thread here popping up the great

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Martin Scorsese. The movie Clockers, Spike Lee ultimately directed, he

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>turned down, He signed on, but dropped out to do Casino. Well,

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that's clearly the right choice. Yeah. He also turned down

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Collaterals two. Oh wow, let's just keep track here. Interesting

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>he turned down Schindler's List. Very interestingly. He turned down

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the offer because he felt that a Jewish director should

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>take that job. I would have thought that was Spielberg

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>from Soup to Nuts. Yeah, like his baby. I would

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have thought that. But that's interesting. That's wow. Okay, yeah,

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>so very uh. I mean this just goes to show

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you too. Sometimes these movies are percolating around Hollywood for years,

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>passed around. Uh, Spielberg speaking of he was gonna direct

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Big and he actually wanted Harrison Ford to start on

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the lead role. But when they went in another direction,

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he turned down Collateral got it. I feel bad now

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>because people thought this was hot shit script Michael Man like,

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was he the fourth choice? Yeah, it must have been.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And those are just the people I saw. I don't

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>know how far down he goes on the list. That's

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael Man. Yeah he did. What did he do? What's

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>what's he known for? Uh? Well? Heat? Yeah, and the

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>original Man and Hunter movie. I thought, that's what I thought.

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I love that Man Hunter movie. That one's good. Heat

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is also, I watched that recently, Michael. Yeah, Heat is

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>just an epically good movie. Yeah. One of the great

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>crime movies of all time, The Curious Case of Benjamin

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>button Um. Apparently, according to IMDb, he was attached to

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the film in the nineties and it was gonna have

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise aging backwards Spielberg. Spielberg turned it down. You know,

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it seems like more of a Spielberg movie than a

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a Fincher, right, Yeah, weird choice for a Fincher.

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like that movie. I did not care for

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that movie. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. He was

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>considered to direct the whole series, but apparently J. K. Rowling,

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>uh I didn't want to lose control of of the franchise,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and she thought Spielberg like, it's all over. Well, they

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>parsed it out to a bunch of different directors like

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Columbus. I think directed the first two of Home

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Alone Fame, and then then there were a couple of

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting prestige directors like that. Alfonso Koran did one of them. Yea,

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but just the one, the kind of darker one. I'm

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not I didn't see the last two. I think they

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>get pretty ark. See, I knew you were a big fan.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, man, I dropped off. I haven't seen the

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>last like two or three. I really don't care about

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the movie. It's it's in the zeitgeist. Man. I I

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:14.799
<v Speaker 1>you have a daughter. I have a daughter. She doesn't

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>like it either. She does not like it. She doesn't

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not like her thing. And I think you guys

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>need to really dig into an unpack white how you

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>feel about Harry Potter. This is all your narrative here

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>at Chuck. I don't know where this is coming from.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>This thing we created Last Action Hero, Spielberg turned that

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>down to Directionler's list. That was a ship movie, so

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, rain Man. He backed out because he needed

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>to start on Indiana Jones in the Last Crusade. How

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>about that ye Meet the Parents. Apparently he was approached

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to direct that with Jim Carey as the lead. Ye,

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll think of him as he's got good physical comedy

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the movies, but he's not a comedy director

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, Like, no, not not in that way. That

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>would have been an odd choice. It would have been like,

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to try this comedy. Yeah, yeah, that a

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>movie for sure. And then finally we're going to finish

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>up with a great Terry Gilliam with take this job

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and shove it. He uh turned down some pretty good movies.

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>American Beauty, turned down interesting, a movie called Enemy Mine

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that I remember growing up. It was a sci fi

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>masin alien on the cover, that's all I remember. Yeah,

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>lucas a junior plays an alien Forrest Gump through Terry

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Terry Gilliam's eyes. It would have been interesting. Yeah, And

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>most of these I'm just like, what would Terry Gillham

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have done? Yeah, yeah, very much. He's he's his own thing,

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of who framed Roger Rabbit? Yeah? Alien Insurrection apparently

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. Alien Resurrection Maybe

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:45.239
<v Speaker 1>would I say insurrection resurrection in insurrection? This is another

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those room this This is like the Mandala effect.

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Alien Resurrection there should be an Alien insurrection.

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Fincher directed Alien Resurrection. That's the one alien

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>movie that he directs. Funny, it seems like there was

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for a time. They probably still are just like eight people.

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>They're all my favorites. They mean, like they growing up

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 1>like Fincher and Gilliam, like and um, you know, Spike

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Michelle Gandry were like my, my guys. Have

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you seen the preview for the new Showtime series that

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Michelle gandr is doing? What? No, dude, just look at

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the trailer. It's called Kidding. It looks great. I do

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>want to say one thing about Gilliam. He's been trying

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to make this Don quixotea movie forever, didn't he have?

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But then he lost the rights. Shut up, yea. He

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>lost the right to the last minute, like the production

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>company that owned it. He apparently, in a weird, unprecedented move,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>he went ahead and made the movie even though he

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the rights. So it's gonna it's dead now.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think of that. That's what I read. Yeah, and

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's made. Yeah, it's got Kylo Ren in it, and uh,

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, such a like like I think he

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>needs to just they made a documentary about him trying

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to make that. Yeah, it's called Lost in La Mansha.

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It's really really good. I haven't seen that one. I

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>needed check that out. All Right, we're gonna go with

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a trope time segment. Tropes keep coming in. Um, we'll

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>start with David Gooch, he said, not necessarily the Gooch,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily trope. But coffee cups are clearly always empty. Uh,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe not a quite a trope, but I definitely agree

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>with him there. You mean in terms of like the

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>weight of it. Yeah, like coffee cups and like suitcases,

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's always clearly empty. There's definitely I've seen a video

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>where it's it's mostly from TV where they show people

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>slinging around a coffee cup and it's just very clearly

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>got no hath to it at all. Like there's a

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a YouTube compilation of that, so that that's certainly

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a thing. Yeah, for sure. You know, I'm gonna pull

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>one off Facebook real quick because this is a live one,

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>because I saw this one just earlier that I thought

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty good one. Uh. This is from sigh low. Uh.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I call it the Hollywood rap when gift boxes always

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have the lids wrapped separately so the actor can just

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>pop off the box and not tear into gift wrapping.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>That is a total trope, is no, nobody, nobody, because

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the fun is tearing into that gift wrapp

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>is you know, um let me see here. Uh. Lee

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Dallas says the I'm in trope when a fourteen year

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>old hack gets into a multimillion dollar computer system and

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>under thirty seconds I'm in. It's like, it's like, yeah,

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm in. It's so great. That's a total trope. Uh.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of these tropes are about just cutting

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>to the chase. You let me see. Benjamin Johnston says

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the action chascene running, driving, riding a horse so fast,

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but wait there's a cliff. Yeah, that's pretty good. I

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>thought of one to day. Actually my daughter pointed it out. Um,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it was raining and there was a big giant puddle

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>and I drove through it and she said, good thing,

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>no one was walking there, she said, but that only

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>happens in the movies. Someone's having a bad day, and

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>then adding insult to injury, a car drives by and

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>trenches them in a torrent of water. Could just take

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it any Oh, it did. That's funny, and just the

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>wet down period like all movies. You know, all streets

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are wet movies because they call it the wet down.

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>If you didn't know this and you start paying attention,

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>you wonder did it just rain? And every movie I've

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>ever seen, especially at night, they do this because it

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>looks better at night. But I'm sure it makes it

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>more reflective and makes it where you can see. And

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>on every single movie there are water trucks that drive

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>down the road and these sprinklers go off, and they

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>call it the wet down, and they do it before

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>they shoot every single scene. I did not know that.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>That makes perfect sense. Yeah. The only person that very

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>famously does not do that very purposefully is Alexander Payne.

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>He is very adamant about his movies looking like movies,

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and he insists on two things, which is which are

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>dry streets and dirty cars. If you ever look at

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>one of his movies, like the windshield will be dirty,

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's just like a no, no, you don't do

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that in movies. You like, clean that wind shield right

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.839
<v Speaker 1>before you shoot. But Alexander Paine is like, no, it's

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>not real. Love, I like that too, um Bill Steele.

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Every building has a ventilation system a grown person can

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>fit through, but in real life they could barely fit

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a toddler. Bill says that as if he's done that

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>like stuff to toddler kind of okay, Yeah, so you

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>gotta get it. You gotta have a toddler on your

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.599
<v Speaker 1>crew if you're if you're pulling off a heist. Yeah,

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one build. Then you're totally right, uh Kayla.

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Marie Carbone, great name. In romantic comedies, there's always a

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>declaration of love. First kiss in the rain. Why is

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it always raining, Well, because it's more dramatic to have

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a kiss in the rains. The wet down, Yeah, it

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is the wet down. Uh let me see here. Achimi Yamaguchi,

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>great name. The shortcut to the airport. How do these

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>people always know about a shortcut that no one else

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is aware of and they only use the shortcut when

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>they need to chase someone down? James Kinnett un clipping

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the push stud on a holster when getting ready for

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a gunfight. Yeah, but then putting the gun away and

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>never securing the gun back in. Well, you know, there

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>might there might that there might be another gunfight coming up.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>That's true. It's a good point, noll. The old double gunfight,

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the old double gun fight. Hey, one good gun fight

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>deserves another. Uh. Let me see, Tammy Mitchell. Uh. The

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>woman who was suddenly vomiting always pregnant, or two people

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>who hate each other end up loving each other. Yeah, Tammy,

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>those are two tropes for sure, and I'll add one

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to the woman vomiting meaning she's pregnant. The uh the

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the movie means they have the consumption.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It means they're gonna die. Like nobody colls in a

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 1>movie unless they're gonna die, not to mention. If it's

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>like you know, seventeen hundred set movie and they're coughing

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>into a rag and away, that's a little bit of blood.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Total trop Uh Yeah, I mean no one that bugs

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit too, Like no one calls her

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>sneezes and movies ever, it's just a thing. I guess

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to see people sneeze. I was gonna say.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>To do with the vomiting thing, they usually also have

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it happened at a moment for dramatic effect where they're

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in heated argument or something and then all of a

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sudden she runs in pukes, and then it's like comes

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in back and immediately knows she's pregnant. Yeah, it's like

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>right away pregnant again. Time savers Sean Leech is the

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>person being pulled up and out of the way of

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>an oncoming object at the very last second. That's a

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>total trope. And I'm also gonna go with this the

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 1>the car or the run away when something is falling,

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>like a smoke stack or a tree or anything. Instead

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of turning right or left and getting out of the

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>path of the falling thing, they just try and straightly

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>outrun it. In the direct past, yeah, there's that that

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that really silly moment in Prometheus, the Alien prequel or whatever,

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>where there's a ship that's a circle. It's a giant

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>rain like a hula hoop, and it's rolling and she

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of runs away from it instead of just stepping

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to the side. It's literally a hoop shaped chip that's

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>rolling at her. It's like, Harry, you know, Yeah, that's

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a total trope, all right, and we're gonna finish up

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>trope time this week. These are great everyone with Michelle

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>uh Apola, Tigi Apolotic we Michelle Michelle Apola tagu lovely

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>beautiful name. I know I'm getting that wrong, so Michelle,

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>please tell me how to pronounce that in the future.

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Water breaking going into labor when about ten percent of

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>woman's water breaks even on its own, it's a timesaver

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and easy exposition, but it's been pretty detrimental to many

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of our society's understanding of how labor works. That's true.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you would think that of the time women

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have babies. It's like my water broke everywhere. It's funny

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you say that. The coworker of ours, who I will

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>remain named um, just had a lovely baby and in

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the office Emailly sent out talking about you know, when

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it happened. He said, his wife's water broke, and then

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>parenthesis wrote in quite dramatic fashion style, exactly, but like,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that is interesting, all right, So that's trope time.

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Keep them coming, everyone. We're gonna move on to stream

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this and comment card. And I could have sworn I

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>already picked this for stream this, but I went back

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>through the stats compiled by Jill Hurley and the gang,

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't see it. Maybe I just talked about

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it briefly, but This is something I watched the last

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>late last year. Uh, the Spike Lee's reboot of She's

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Got to Have It. Did I talk about this? You

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>just you've talked about that, you liked it? All right, Well,

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm officially putting it in the stream this section because

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it is so great. It's based on the movie from

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and the same name. When I saw that She's Got

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to Have It was being rebooted as a TV show,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought why, why, why bother? And then I watched

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it and it is great. It is really really awesome. Uh.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Ten thirty minute episodes with Dewonda Wise is Nola Darling.

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>She is phenomenal. Uh. Anthony Ramos from from Hamilton's Mars

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Blackman and especially I thought who could play Mars Blackman

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but Spike Lee. But Anthony Ramos brings his own Mars

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Blackman to the table and it's great. And he you know,

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he he does a couple of a little like please, baby, Please,

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>baby please. He does a couple of the old Mars

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>black Man lines, but he makes it his own yet

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it's still the same and in a way that's like,

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>it's really really great. Uh. Lyric Bent is Jamie Overstreet

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and Cleo Anthony as a greer child. Uh. And if

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't know about the original movie or the show,

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a story of a young African American woman who

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>has got three boyfriends and she doesn't want to choose

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>between them. They all do something different for her. One

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is very stable and has money and as uh ambitious.

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>One is silly and fun that's Mars, and one is

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a model and super handsome. Uh. And she's very frank

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>about her sexuality. All the guys know she's not cheating

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>on them. They all know about each other. And that's

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the great parts in the movies. All the

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>guys at one point get together and they she brings

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>them in and they have a big dinner together to

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of go through this. But he manages, Spike Lee manages.

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>He directed all the episodes to make this completely fresh

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and new for today's times. Took a movie from dusted

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it off. And I'm dying to know how this came

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>about to begin with, uh, because it was a sort

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>of a brave thing to do, I think, a risky

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. But it's of the time, it's fresh,

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it's current, it's funny, it's well acted, it's the direction

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is great, and I thought it was a one off

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in an Emily and I were really disappointed, but I

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>saw that earlier this year was picked up for a

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>season two, So it is it works for that, like

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they can just extend that world or is it that

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>contain story that's sort of in the movie or does

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 1>it go beyond that? It's contained, But it's it. They

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>could totally do more, and I'm glad they are. It's

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>really really great. It sounds like it's a good ensemble opportunity, right,

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you could have different stories with these characters and acting.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>That sounds I'm interested to see where it goes. To

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>wonder why is it just so great. I've never heard

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of her before, and she's just beautiful and so talented,

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's good. I got a big fat crush

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on her right now, so does Emily. We agree on

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that one. Uh. And then finally comic cardinal questions from

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you all to us. We'll go through a few of these,

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and then I got high tail it out of here. Everyone.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Um let me see here, all right? Who was your

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>most revered film crew regular from throughout the history of cinema?

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>He said, For example, costumer Edith Head Yeah, all right,

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the great Roger Deakins. I was

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>going to do that. Yeah, that's easy. It makes it easy. Well,

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about it then. Now he's just that, he's

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>done everything and as he's just visually responsible for some

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest movies of of our time. And you know,

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>he's just fantastic cinematographer and you can just see his

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fingerprints on so many iconic movies. He doesn't have just

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>one style or one look. He's very adaptable and that's

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>just such a crucial you know, crew member in general,

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's one of the best versions of that. And

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>he finally won his Oscar I think for the for

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Blade Runner eight. Yeah, way overdue, like he was. I

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>think they gave it. I mean he deserved it for

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that for sure, but I think the outcry was so

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>great by this point. Uh just ticking through some of

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>his his movies here, Barton Fink, shawsh Ink, Redemption, Fargo.

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>He worked a lot with the Cohen brothers, obviously, Uh

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Kuon done a brother, Where aren't they all? The man

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>who wasn't there No Country for Old Men? Revolutionary Road,

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>The Reader, Skyfall, jar Head Ah, of course, you just

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>said the New Blade Runner. Uh, just amazing. He's even

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>made some documentaries. He did one on Van Morrison and

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>one on Carl Perkins. So hats off to you, Roger Deakins.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>He's even had some smaller movies like You're You're forget

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the director, but it's when you highlighted the Passion Fish.

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>He did that one as well. Oh really, John Sayles, Wow, yeah,

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Roger Deakins, you know you're gonna get a gorgeous looking film.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Good question from Howard Carson. Uh, let me see here.

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Alex Glasnovic says, what movies have your favorite favorite supplements,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>commentaries or special features on their blue ray? You know,

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't do the blue ray, and like I said,

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't do this much anymore, but I used to

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>really get into this. So my pick is going to

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>be an old one. But um, Boogie Nights has a

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>very very great direct your commentary if I remember correctly,

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's always good. It's like a masterclass to sit

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>in and hear pt Anderson talk about making a movie.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>So that that's my pick. Do you have one no

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.239
<v Speaker 1>director's commentary or actor's commentary that stands out? I'm just

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so out of the loop with those. I haven't really

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>messed with any in quite a long time, so I

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>can't even when one doesn't come to mind. Yeah, in

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the same way, I missed that stuff. But it's it's

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to watch a movie and then rewatch it again

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>with a commentary on these days. I can't believe he

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>used to have that much time in my life. Must

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>have been nice. Uh, let me see, Kayla. M h

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>What is your least favorite genre? M hmmm. I don't

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>know if I have a least favorite genre. I mean,

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe the rom com because so many of them are

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not very good. This I guess my answer. But if

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a good rom comma, I love it, it's fine. Yeah,

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But but typically you're gonna have to win me over

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>because because even when people call it a rom com,

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like the fact that you're giving it that

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>distinction implies something of a lack of quality, like a

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>lesser film, like like a guilty pleasure kind of film. Right. Yeah,

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So I guess rom com for me, same for you.

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's an easy one to go to, yeah,

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>because so many of the other genres. It's just like

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a good ship and and and all of them.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>If we're talking sci fi, horror, comedy, drama, is that

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about? Documentary? I guess I don't know. Thriller, thriller,

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>action adventure. I'm gonna say action adventure if if we're

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna like, you know, other than rom com, A straight

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>action adventure to me is not always interesting. I don't

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>seek them out. Good answer. I don't have an answer

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for this, Noe, but you might Anthony Norris's did you

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>ever have a test movie for people that you dated

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>or want to to date, Like, well, let's see if

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they like this, because it'll tell me a lot about them.

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever have one of those? I mean, just

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>any everything you like, every every everything I like. It

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>has to tick all the boxes. No. I did hit

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it off with a girl once because we both liked

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>um the Talking Heads movie True Stories, and that was

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>an odd one because it's strange and a lot of

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>people don't even know it exists, and it's got a

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>very odd sensibility. It's a lot of David Byrne kind

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of stream of consciousness talking and just weird suburbia stuff.

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Umb I can't remember, but John Goodman's got a weird

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>little part and didn't remember that. But yeah, that that

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that was one. That all right. She passed the test,

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but apparently I passed the test for her too, because

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it was also like a favorite movie of hers, and

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it ended up being this like cool little cross test thing.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what movie was? It was True Stories?

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh that was her test was hard. We were both

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of testing each other. There was another movie, so

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it was just like we both liked it and were

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>surprised that each other not only about it but also

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>liked it. Good one, Kate Jacobsen, what's a reboot that

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>should never happen? Good question, Kate. There's plenty, but I'm

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go ahead and throw out the Godfather series

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>right off the bat. There's just some movies you can't remake.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that Hollywood, as as awful and money

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>grabby as Hollywood is, I don't know they would ever

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>allow that to happen. I think you're right, but then

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you never know it's happened before. When I've been like,

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>what maybe they do the Godfather for the Godfather four?

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>We could? Yeah, yeah, you gotta wonder two, like, does

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he own the rights to that property in some way?

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Would he have to have final say. It's just to

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>whether they could do that, because it seems like, I mean,

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Paramount Pictures probably owns the rights to that, but he

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>may have some juice. Can it? Can a director be

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>tied to that property in such a way where like

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't really go forward with it without him? I

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I wonder it seems like from the very beginning he

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>had such pull that maybe he was able to smartly

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>get that kind of deal. Yeah. I but you're right,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, So that's that's comic card. Thanks for your

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>questions everyone. Yeah, one last thing, I just want to say,

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you're getting shredded a little bit on Facebook for not

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>liking Castaway. Uh well, getting getting healthily roasted, even naturedly roasted.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I didn't dislike Castaway. I thought it could have been

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a much stronger film. Yeah. I know there's people that

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are that are that are giving you props and saying

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that had you had a good point about how it

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>should have started a little later in. But then there's

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>some people like Nope, Wilson, the volleyball was a crucial

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>character and you, sir, are wrong. But I still love you.

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I can take it. I can take it. Your homework

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is let me look here it scribbled down. Uh, your

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>homework is, oh great. The movie get Out. Remember this

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is a long time ago. I had David Diggs of

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's my first Tony winner, David Diggs and his best

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>friend growing up, Raphael Kassal. They teamed up, like I said,

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>old high school friends too from Oakland to write a

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>movie together called blind Spotting, and I held off on

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the release. I interviewed them quite a while ago, but

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>held held off on the release to a line with

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this movie blind Spotting, it's really really good. It's very

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>timely movie um about um, race and class. Uh, set

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>against the backdrop of a gentrifying Oakland, like I said,

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.479
<v Speaker 1>their hometown. It's a really really good movie. And the guys,

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we're just so cool and nice and just sweetheart dudes.

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh DV Digs. It was great to meet both of them.

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So we talked a lot about their movie and filmmaking

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and Hamilton's UM, but we did talk about get Out. Uh.

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>They agreed that they could both talk about that movie.

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Instant classic. Yeah, So watch get Out and listen up

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this Friday and we will see you next week. Later