WEBVTT - The Ultimate 2026 Superflex PPR Mock Draft: QB Runs, Zero RB & Best Values (Ep. 2108) 0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:04.360 Hello, everybody, Welcome into the Fantasy Pros Football Podcast. I'm 0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:06.840 Ryan Warmley, joined by a full house here. Today we 0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:08.960 have Scott Bogman, we have Pat Fitzmorris, and we have 0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.280 Andrew Ericsson, and we are mock drafting. It is the 0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.600 rare redraft superflex mock draft. I feel like usually when 0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.400 I'm doing a super flex one, it's dynasty. This is redraft. 0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.040 We wanted to give something for these superflex managers who 0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:22.320 are getting ready for their drafts. 0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:24.560 Here in the next month. It is also PPR. 0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.040 We're gonna be drafting three starting receivers, seven bench spots, 0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.080 no kickers or defenses, and yes, like I said, a 0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.720 super flex reminder for everybody that all of our twenty 0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.400 twenty six consensus rankings and tiers can be found at 0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.159 fantasypros dot com slash rankings. Before we dive in, Erickson, 0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:41.640 how are you feeling about this mock. 0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.440 I'm feeling really good. I've done a lot of superflex 0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.640 best Ball drafts with Tom Strachan over on the Best 0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.640 Ball live stream on Twitch, so I feel like I'm 0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.600 not really in on Chartered Waters here. I know we 0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:57.080 haven't done as much superflex mock drafting, but I feel 0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.040 ready to go. I got my cheat sheets sloaded up 0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.440 Draft Wizard. You boys better be ready to buckle up 0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:03.720 because I got an A in the super Flex Real 0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:05.600 Draft Best Ball earlier this week. 0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.199 Very nice, Eric, she's drafting with the one oh seven fits. 0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:09.600 You are right next to time at the one oh six. 0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.679 Any kind of strategy you're looking to test out today? 0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.520 Yeah, I did want to try from the middle of 0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.720 the first round and see. Honestly, I'm I'm hoping i'd 0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.040 get to skip quarterback in Roun one and see what 0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:21.840 things look like. 0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:22.840 Glad we're doing the show. 0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:24.000 I know there have been a lot of people on 0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.200 our discord asking me when we were going to do 0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.360 a super Flex mock, and I know one of the 0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.920 people asking me that question, Mattie Ice, is in the 0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.640 mock with us today, So yeah, they should be fun. 0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:34.640 Bog. 0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.080 When you're at the one oh nine, I assume you 0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.480 will not be skipping quarterback. That's just not really in 0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:39.800 your DNA from what I can. 0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.600 Tell, probably not, but it is a mock, and I 0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.760 did pick kind of the middle to do that specifically, 0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.920 so we'll see, like if there's too good of a 0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.080 of a quarterback to fall back to me. I did 0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.120 a mock yesterday where I was picking at nine and 0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.880 Jayden Daniels fell to me, and I was like, well, 0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:58.560 better go ahead and take Jayden here. So if a 0:01:58.560 --> 0:01:59.920 good one falls to me, I will take one by 0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.840 I am going to try to not take a quarterback 0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:04.720 in the first round and see what it looks like, 0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.800 because it's something I typically don't do. Hopefully the Dewey 0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.760 decimal system doesn't smoke us over here, so that would 0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:11.320 be nice. 0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:12.840 I kind of wish I was picking in the middle, 0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:14.600 just because I never do. When you're hosting, it so 0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.400 much easier to pick on the end. So that's why 0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.000 I always take either the one oh one or the 0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.200 one twelve. I've got the one oh one today. It 0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:21.880 would be nice to kind of test out a middle one. 0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.760 It's just harder when you're trying to play hosts as well, 0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:25.560 because I feel like I always either end up with 0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.880 whoever follows me at the one twelve or Josh Allen 0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.040 with the one oh one, which is who I'm going 0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:29.320 to take. 0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.960 This guy can't juggle, my god, come on, it's. 0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.560 Harder, you know, sorry, It's easier to just do it 0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:35.880 this way. 0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.040 By the way, today's live super flex mockdraft is done 0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.720 using our mock draft lobby over at fantasypros dot com 0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.239 slash draft Wizard. Just like you'll see today, Our multi 0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.519 user drafts allow you to practice quick and fun mock 0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.000 drafts against both real and CPU opponents using the same 0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.720 easy to use interface as our draft simulator. Join a 0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.079 public mock draft or create a private one for your 0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.840 friends over at fantasypros dot com slash Draft Wizard. 0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.840 Draft is starting in two seconds. One, here we go. 0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.400 I will not waste any time. I will take Josh Allen. 0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.280 No sense in overthinking it. You have the one on one. 0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:07.160 It's super flex. I think he could argue he's in 0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:08.640 a tier of his own, even I know, you know 0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.160 fits really like Drake May. When we're talking Dynasty Lamar 0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.320 could be really good this year. You know I'm gonna 0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.640 keep it simple. Josh Allen. One oh, one easy pick. 0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.960 Would anybody here have done anything different? Or is it 0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.600 Josh Allen across the board for you three, Josh Allen. 0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.520 For me, it's got to be Josh Allen. 0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.040 I think there's a case for Drake May personally. 0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:31.200 Really, I think if you're gonna I think what the 0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.960 second pick is interesting because I think May versus Lamar 0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.320 is is really intriguing to me. There's been a lot 0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.960 of very positive discussion about what Declan Doyle has done 0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:40.119 in camp so far in Baltimore. 0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:41.400 Lamar has won the MVP. 0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.160 I keep saying this that he's won the MVP every 0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.720 time he's at the first time, you know, offensive play 0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.800 caller his first year and that new offense, he's won 0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.400 the MVP. He does go one to two here to 0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.560 Maddie Ice, and then May goes three, so unsurprising one, two, three, 0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:55.800 you could quibble with the order. 0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:57.440 I think on two and three for the. 0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.480 Minute, Can I ask ericson real quick, if you're doing 0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.880 Katie in a super flex twelve man, what is your 0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.040 number one spot to pick at? Is it three because 0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:06.560 you get one of the best quarterbacks, you get the 0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:08.880 nice pick coming back in the second or would you 0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.560 maybe go something later to pivot from quarterback in the 0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:12.120 first round. 0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.080 I think for me it's Drake May is the person 0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.400 that I want the most, so kind of strategically placing 0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.599 my draft slot where I can get him the latest. 0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.360 So here he went third overall, so I know that 0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.520 when we've done the Super Flex Mox or the Best 0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.760 Ball Draft with Tom, I've got Drake may at one, 0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.600 We've gotten Drake may three, have gotten to Drake may 0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.719 at five. So it varies a lot of the time. 0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.480 And look, I don't need to go on a whole 0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.520 soliloquy about Drake Mayo over Josh Allen, because I do 0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.840 think Josh Allen is still he's the quarterback to beat. 0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.839 He's number one for a reason. But some of his 0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.840 passing yards per game fell off a little bit last year. Now, 0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:50.480 a lot of that to do with the receiving corps, 0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.560 but double some injuries at the end of the season. 0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.200 We'll see how long the rushing lasts. Drake May's rushing quarterback. 0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.400 Drake may also got a j. Brown and Romeo Dops, 0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.400 two receivers that are better than and we're in the 0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.320 head last year. So I just think that this could 0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:04.960 be another ceiling year for Drake Maye. 0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.159 Erickson is in the clock here fits you do go 0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.720 away from quarterback taking Bjon Robinson? Now did you make 0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.680 this peck having seen his new haircut. 0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.120 I've not seen the new haircut. Am I going to 0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:14.880 regret the pick. 0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.320 It's it's astonishing. It is a jaw dropping decision by him. 0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.680 This haircut Bob and brought it up before we started 0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.560 taping the show, before you hopped in the room, and 0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:24.159 my jaw hit the floor. 0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.080 Quite honestly interesting. 0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.560 I've not seen that. Hopefully this is not a bad omen. 0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.320 Well, well, what was what went into your decision of 0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.480 Bijon versus Gibbs, because it clear if you want to 0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.400 go running back here, what went into that choice for 0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:36.160 you between those two. 0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.440 I'm really close and if I'm lucky enough to get 0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.360 the one oh one in redraft in one qbs, obviously 0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.960 in six different leagues, I would probably split it three 0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.240 and three. But if you're going to force me to 0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.960 make a choice, and I know Gibbs has had the 0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.440 better touchdown. 0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:53.000 Output for sure. 0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.840 What I prefer about Beijon just that he's bigger. If 0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:58.760 you're gonna have a workhorse role, like I want the 0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:02.080 guy who's you know, built more like a Mini van 0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.599 than I want the guy with the NASCAR build rather 0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.560 than the Indie car build for workorse duty. And I 0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.320 feel that's, you know, Bijon is maybe just a little 0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.240 bit better equipped to handle the sort of workhorse role 0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.640 that we hope both guys are getting this year. 0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.359 We're into the early second round. But circling back to 0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.920 your first pick, ericson you do go Jamar Chase. I 0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:24.920 think if you want to go away from quarterback, that's 0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.320 also a pretty easy choice of best receiver on the board. 0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:30.560 I argue that be the best non quarterback on the board. 0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:32.360 Was that just kind of your goal all along to 0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:33.279 get somebody like Chase? 0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:39.440 No, I didn't realize that Gibbs was still available. I honestly, 0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.080 I didn't even fathom the idea that he would actually 0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:43.600 still be on the board. So I was just looking 0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.400 really quickly because I was talking about Drake Mayo while 0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.760 I was on the clock. So of course I'm distracted, 0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.520 distracted and drafting. But Jamar Chase still is my number 0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.480 three overall player. It's full PPR. He can be the 0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.960 wide receiver one with a healthy Joe Burrow, and I 0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.560 do think that in full PPR you are a little 0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.760 bit more open. I'm more open to drafting the top 0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.560 skill players because it's easier for them to close the 0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.640 gap versus and a half PPR where the quarterbacks just 0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.480 scored that many more points than the skill position players. 0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.200 Yeah, I think full PPR starting through receivers chases is 0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.600 justifiable for sure in the middle of the first round. 0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.560 Even in super flex, Bogman, you do go at the 0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.640 quarterback with your first pick Jade and Daniels, and you 0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.600 pair him with Christian McCaffrey in round two. 0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:22.440 What are your thoughts on your first two picks? 0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.400 Yeah, I mean, look, Heerts and Herbert went ahead of 0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.280 Jayde and Daniels, so I mean he's my fifth player 0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.600 in super flex, So to get him at nine I 0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.880 thought was just too big of a deal to pass. 0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.200 Gibbs would have been a fine pick there too, but 0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.800 I got McCaffrey on the way back. So, like in 0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.040 the built to start here, even though it's a lot 0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:41.360 of injury risk up at the top. 0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.640 I was thinking about this earlier, and obviously I wasn't 0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.120 in a position to pick him. I think I might 0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.320 have justin Herbert as my QB five, and I think 0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.280 you might be closer to QB four than QB six. 0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.160 I'm just like so intoxicated with this is the most 0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.400 talented quarterback that we've seen in one of these Shanahan 0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.960 style systems before. In terms of the arm strength and 0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.160 the processing and just everything. Like I want to see 0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.160 this terminator quarterback in a Mike McDaniel offense, and I 0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.720 really want to be invested in it rather than playing 0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.040 guessing games on like is it Quentin Johnson this week? 0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:10.960 Is it Trey Harris? Like I like Lad McConkey. 0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:13.360 I just want a lot of Justin Herbert, and I 0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.600 think i'd rather have him than jayde Daniels in a 0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.080 new offense coming off the injured year Jalen Hurts. You know, 0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.320 there's always been questions there, Like I just like him 0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.600 that much. I think it's understandable. There's definitely a lot 0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.760 of upside there, but I still it's it's the legs man. 0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.680 I'm on the clock all year. Yeah, and I think 0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:31.160 that's fair. 0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.240 I'm gonna take Bowers just I think he could break 0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:34.000 fantasy this year. 0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:34.720 It's full PPR. 0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:36.240 I think he's gonna catch a ton of passes in 0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.160 Vegas and be the tight end. 0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.600 One second pick to pair with Alan and Bowers. 0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.560 Obviously, I'd like to get some running back and receiver 0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.920 help getting going here. I'm just gonna take you know, 0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.480 I'm gonna take a j Brown new offense paired with 0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.160 the elite quarterback, you know, Drake London. I just have 0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.600 more questions about the quarterback that he's paired with right now. 0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.000 So that's kind of the tiebreaker for me going with Brown. 0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.200 I could have easily gone London or Nico wanted to 0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.840 take a receiver there, given who's on the board, but 0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.080 I go aj Brown fits here on the clock here 0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.000 at a couple of spots, You've got Bijon and Justin 0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.200 Jefferson so far. Are you going to kind of break 0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.640 the sea on quarterback now or looking to wait even 0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:10.560 longer at the position? 0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.439 I think I'm going to break the sea on quarterback. Well, 0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.600 see though no guarantees, I mean there are I've said 0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.440 that in one QB, I feel like there are about 0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.920 eighteen quarterbacks. I would be okay with this my starting quarterback, 0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.160 and some of those guys are still on the board now. 0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:26.600 I don't know if any of those guys are going 0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.000 to be on the board when I pick again in 0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.200 the middle of the fourth round, so I'm probably gonna 0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:30.760 have to act. 0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:31.240 Here pretty soon. 0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.800 Ericson, you have Jamar Chase paired with Brock Purdy, was 0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.679 pretty an easy choice for you. Compared to you know, 0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.520 Dak Prescott still on the board, Jackson Dart, Bow Nicks, 0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.520 Patrick Mahomes. When you were at that spot, did it 0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.440 feel like there was a bit of a discussion with 0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.800 you internally to make that call or was that easy 0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:48.080 for you? 0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.720 I was looking at another player that I don't want 0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.960 to name until half as Morris makes his pick, So 0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:57.600 what FITSI after you? 0:09:58.480 --> 0:09:59.439 I love this tension. 0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:02.280 There was another quarterback. 0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.600 I was like, yeah, well, while Rolfits is on the clock, 0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:05.920 I'll just run through a recap of some of the 0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.719 other guys they've gone off the board, James Cook, O 0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.080 Mary and Hampton, Ceedee Lamb, Dak Prescott in the back 0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.600 half of round two, first half of round three. Besides 0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.120 the picks I made Drake London and Patrick Mahomes, Jonathan 0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.000 Taylor that feels like a pretty nice value early if 0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.520 he picks into round three. I considered him at the turn, 0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.960 and then Chase Brown and then Jackson Dart goes to 0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:24.800 you fits. 0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:26.160 Yeah. 0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:30.160 I was a little torn between Dart and Knicks. Thought 0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.959 it was encouraging that Nicks led the league in pass 0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:34.760 attempts last year, even though he was playing on a 0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.000 team with a really good defense, which suggests he's going 0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.000 to throw a lot of passes again this year. Dart 0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.079 is going to be a wild ride for sure because 0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.000 of the way he plays, which is, you know, reckless. 0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.400 Recklessly would be putting it kindly. I'm a little more 0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.480 encouraged though by the fact that we saw Malik Neighbors 0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.400 looking pretty good in practice the other day. And boy, 0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.000 I mean I had Eric I had Melik Neighbors ranked 0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.240 wide receiver twenty two a couple days ago when Ericson 0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.760 and I just took him in the King's Classic Draft 0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.000 in Canton where we were partnering up like at the 0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.640 end of the beginning of the fourth rone and a 0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.600 fourteen team draft. I mean, he goes up to like 0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.199 if he's good to go for week one with seemingly 0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:18.080 no limitations, is the top ten wide receiver, And I 0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.480 feel that much better about Jackson Dart with the healthy 0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:21.360 Molik Neighbors. 0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.760 Ericson, the fact that you didn't take a quarterback here 0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.439 after Fitz picked, is that telling that you wanted Dart exactly? 0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.240 That's who I was going to go after here, and 0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.160 it was someone that I was considering even when I 0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.160 was picking in the second round with Rock Perdy. I 0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.520 do think that the conversation in super flex formats, I 0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.080 do look at quarterbacks a little bit differently. I think that, 0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.640 if I was able to it, I actually have quarterbacks 0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.240 ranked differently in the two quarterback league versus a one 0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.240 quarterback Leaguecause in one quarterack league you can really just 0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.400 shoot for the moon, where you can be like I 0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.360 want all upside because you can play the waiver wire, 0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.880 Whereas in two quarterback you really value I think a 0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.600 little bit more of that stability where you're just looking 0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.800 for is this guy starting every single week, where which 0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.000 Dart because of his more volatile type of play the 0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.079 rushing in terms of okay, is this guy gonna be 0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.480 the blue medical tent every other week? That concerns me 0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.720 if I've taken me the second round as my stable quarterback. 0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.800 That's why I wanted Purty instead, because I feel really 0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:14.360 good about him. I know he got hurt last year, 0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.319 but in terms of him being there available putting up 0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.760 weekly production at a top twelve rate, I feel good 0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.160 about that, which is why I preferred Dart as at 0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:22.920 two then a one. 0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:25.360 Yeah, Bunting. 0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.640 So far, we're a few picks in a round four, 0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.360 the only manager to not have taken a quarterback. A 0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.240 couple of managers already have two, he has none. He 0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.000 started with Pooka, JSN, Devon h Chan and Kenneth Walker, 0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.360 while Bogman's on the clock fits. 0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:38.959 What do you think about that? 0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.520 Start from Bunting, while really good, start with the positional guy, 0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.480 so it'll be interesting to see how Bunting can spackle 0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:47.600 that quarterback position. 0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.720 I know Bogman wanted George Pickens based on his sigh 0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.319 the fick before him, Bob, when you've started Jayden and 0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.760 Daniels CMC, Trey McBride, you and I are the only 0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.560 two to take a tight end so far, and then 0:12:58.600 --> 0:12:59.960 Matthew Stafford as your QB two. 0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.520 Yeah, just a little more stability with the wild ride 0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.760 that is Jane Daniels with Matthew Stafford right, CMC. I 0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.280 thought was a nice value pick, but I was between 0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.680 McBride and Pickens. I went with McBride here lots of 0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.840 touchdown upside obviously at a premium position, but man to 0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:21.040 miss Pickens by one spot was brutal here, especially if 0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.920 like very few quarterbacks go in between this pick two. 0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.200 But I did just pivot to Stafford to give myself 0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.079 some stability at the QB spot. A. 0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.000 Lave goes next and then ericson. 0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.280 You take Flowers, a player that we've talked about a 0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.880 lot on various shows this summer. You are clearly buying 0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.839 into him in this new offense led by Decklan Doyle 0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:42.360 paired with Lamar Jackson. 0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.559 Yeah. I just think that he has improved every single 0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.040 year of his NFL career. He is elite after the catch, 0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.720 he can make plays downfield. He's super explosive. So JSN 0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.360 last year was one of the rare wide receiver ones 0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.160 or wide receiver two. However, it was in weeks seventeen 0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.360 and it was right neck and neck with Pooka. But 0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.640 how is he able to be so highly ranked and 0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:08.120 finishing without seeing a monster red zone? Chair was because 0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.559 of all the explosive plays he was able to generate, 0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.560 especially downfield. So I look at Za Flowers, I think 0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.280 he has no competition for targets. I don't think Mark 0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.280 Andrews has anything left in the tank. And it's Bateman, 0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.920 it's rookie receivers. I think Flowers could flirt with a 0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.040 thirty percent target share, and I think he could see 0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.400 fifteen hundred perceiving yards this year. And if you can 0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.560 score touchdowns like like, that's the one thing. It's like, 0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.040 imagine if happy to have a putt maagine z flowers 0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.640 how to score touchdowns? Like and then we're cooking with gas. 0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:38.960 Uh fits you goo Kyler. 0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.600 So you got Dart and Kyler as your QB duo here, 0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:42.760 how are you feeling about that pair? 0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.800 Could not resist thirde to go double Konami at quarterback, 0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.720 and you know with the two running guys and being 0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.360 able to pair up Kyler with Justin Jefferson works really well. 0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.840 Kyler was QB one in fantasy points per game in 0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.400 every season of his career until last. And now he 0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.280 gets to play with Kevin O'Connell and if he can 0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:09.200 just win this QB battle against JJ McCarthy. Yeah, so 0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.160 I'm feeling pretty good about kyler bounce back this year. 0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.080 I'm going to pause the draft for a moment just 0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.360 to let everybody know that we have two giveaways for you. 0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.000 If you want a chance to win a fifty dollars 0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.320 Fantasy Pros shop code or a one year Betting Pros 0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.560 Premium subscription, then this is your shot. 0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:25.040 I'll have to do. 0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.480 A subscribe to the Fantasy Pros YouTube channel right now, 0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.720 drop a comment below on any of our videos, and 0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.000 that is it. We'll be announcing both winners right here 0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:33.680 on the channel, so make sure to turn on those 0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:35.880 notifications so you can know when new videos are up 0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.080 and to claim your prize. I also wanted to pause 0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:39.360 here and just give a second to kind of look 0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.200 at these first four rounds are sort of the real 0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.240 core of your team, obviously, somebody other than your own team. 0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:45.760 I want to go around the horn and hear who 0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.560 you guys like best so far, Bachman. 0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.040 I'll start with you. Who's a team that you like 0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.320 best their start other than your own. 0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.960 I like Pepper with Gibbs Lawrence and then the two 0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.200 strong wide receivers right next to me, even though Pepper 0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.120 took pickings from me. Very annoying. But I really like 0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.280 this built so far. As long as we show up 0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.160 that second QB, which I think is on the way 0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:07.640 here in this. 0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.280 Round ericson what about you? 0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.800 I like your team, Worm, I think you're shaping up 0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.800 pretty well. My fellow zero RB brother. 0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:20.480 Yeah, I always fall into that when I do these mocks, 0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:21.240 for whatever reason. 0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:22.640 And then when I do a real draft, I'm like, 0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.520 Shoul probably should get a running back a little bit earlier. 0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.280 But I just I'm like, I'm just again, it's a 0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.480