WEBVTT - What's Next For Businesses Amid Delta Variant Spread 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's talk about Don

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>McCree joins us right now, head of commercial banking at

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Citizens Financial Group and Don um. We have over the

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>last really our heard um, some really pessimistic outlooks due

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to the resurgence of the delta variant and maybe MoU

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever other Greek letters are upon us. Um. How

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>does it look in your world? Well, I think we're

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a little bit of a slowdown, but I

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>have to say that we continue to be quite optimistic

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and we we think we're going to get through some

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of these variants. Our clients are actually doing quite well,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and our transactional businesses, our M and A business, and

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>our capital markets businesses are all time highs and the

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>pipelines continue to build. So we continue to be, you know,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>focused on Delta and the and the potential new viruses,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>but quite optimistic as we look forward and I see

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that you bought j MP Group. UM is a capital

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>markets business that I'm familiar within US and folks to

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>work there talk to us about j MP and kind

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>of what you guys are thinking about in terms of

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, making this acquisition in terms of your capital

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>markets capabilities. Yeah, so it's it's really exciting for us.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>We've been on a five year kind of UH strategy

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to build out our capability sets UH to be able

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to do really whatever our client states to do at

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>any pointant time. So built out to big syndicated financing business,

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>built out I bought three M and a boutiques, recently

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>bought a valuation firm, have a great debt capital market

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>securities business, and what we were missing was was equities.

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And j MP is just built a tremendous business over

0:01:56.000 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the last several years. It's really recording record results and

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and it also brings us deep sector experience and some

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>really exciting sectors namely healthcare, UM technology, real estate, and

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>financial services. So we think we think it really is

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>complementary to us. There's very little overlap, so it's kind

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred synergistic for us. And most importantly, I

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think is the the culture there is very similar to

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>our culture and uh, and that's really the most important

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>thing when you're when you're when you're buying a capital

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>markets firm, like like j MP, what's your what's what's

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>your d n A, what's their DNA. What's the similarity

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and culture that you like? I'd say client focus, uh,

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, first and foremost, and really a premium on

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>building really deep relationships where deep industry expert these is

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>delivered and we've become really the trusted partner with with

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>each of our clients and that just tends to expand

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the the ways that we can engage with every other

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>every client. What we've been able to do for the

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>last several years is really bring three, four or five

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>six different products to the table, you know, as we

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>built at our client franchise, and j MP thinks very

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>similar to that in terms of the way they really

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>try to build deep client relationships. Don tell tell us

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>about loan demand out there. There's so much liquidity in

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. There's a lot of fiscal stimulus, and we've

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>heard some of the the bank, some of the bigger

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>money center banks and the ernest calls talk about, you know,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the loan demand isn't there um necessarily what are you

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing with with your clients in your markets. It's it's

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it's reasonably muted right now, and you hit the nail

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on the head is a lot of clients are sitting

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of liquidity and they're going to need

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to use that liquidity before loan demand really picks up.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Where we're seeing it is in utilization rates of our

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of our facilities, which are six to seven points lower

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>than they normally would be as economy recovers. So the

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>good news on the on the flip side is what

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing as record capital markets fees. So if companies

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>are financing and needing to raise capital, we're experiencing, you know,

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>very strong capital markets flows which offset some of the

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>weakness on the loan side. But we think, we think

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it begins to come back. Our loan pipelines are looking

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, reasonably good towards the back end of the year.

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and some I would call it transactional loan

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>facilities like abs, warehousing and things like that are beginning

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot more active. Does the rates environment

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>depress you. I mean, it doesn't seem like even the

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>terminal rate if you look at it, depressed me emotionally. Yes,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tough. I mean with the flat with rates

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>where they are in a flat yield curve. You know,

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the spreads are under pressure. We've been able to you know,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>lower our deposit costs in my business reasonably aggressively, so

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we've been able to hold our net interest margin. Um

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so so far, so good. But but you know, the

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>spread income is is certainly under pressure for the entire industry.

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Don talk to us about the credit quality. What are

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you seeing in terms of credit quality for your portfolio?

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And again, it seems it's come in much much better

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>than expected. It seems like over the last eighteen months,

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>given the economic disruptions, what are you see? It's terrific.

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean every I won't say everyone, but the vast

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>majority of our companies are doing better than we expected

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>them to do. So they're they're clearly seeing, you know, um,

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>positive things on the horizon. And a lot of it

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is because a lot of these companies really hunkered down.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And I've said that this this downturn, the COVID downturn

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>was much different than prior downturns, and that it was

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>immediate and it was deep. So CEOs and CFOs got

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>very serious and right sized their businesses very quickly, and

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that allowed them to build up liquidity and and actually

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>come out of the beginnings of the return with huge

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>amounts of excess capacity. So that's resulted in all the

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>releases that you're seeing all the banks make in terms

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of their credit reserves. And we still we still see

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>very bright things on the future and we we really

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have moved beyond the credit issues that we we we

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>were staring at about you know, a year and a

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>half ago. Surely fiscal spending didn't hurt and when we

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's not gonna last like that forever, right,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So eventually, um, the federal government going to stop spending

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, multiple trillions of dollars extra every year um

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>or or will they What do you think about that?

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there a fiscal cliff or or or is there not?

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>It's it's there. There's there's a there's a fiscal cliff

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of removing some of the stimulus that's been there.

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Some of that will be offset with things like the

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure program. So it will be different forms of spending

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>which will continue to be simulative stimulated. That that it's

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>not really worrying the client base right now. What's worrying

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the client base is the supply chain. And if if

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we hear a common theme from from a broad set

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>of clients, it's the inability to get goods that they're

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to source in the market. And people do expect

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that to continue for a while. So that's it's in

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a funny way, that's having a constraining effect on the

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>performance of some companies, even if their order books or strengthening,

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so as well as they're doing, they would be doing

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>even better if they weren't having the supply chain and

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact their labor problems that a lot of them

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>are facing in terms of if you can hire someone,

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the cost of the as hires are going up quite substantially.

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, done, You, like a lot of other bankers

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>are saying business is good. What's the biggest risk out there?

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>What's the worry for you guys? I think a big

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>resurgence of covid um so that I think that and

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>or some geopolitical event that nobody can anticipate. I mean

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>so so but the thing we're focused on is tracking

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, COVID. It feels okay to us now and uh,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're out traveling seeing clients, were getting good

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>reports from uh, you know, most of our clients, and um,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty optimistic. And five seconds here, are you back

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in the offices. Are your teams back? Yes, they are.

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting in New York right now, and uh, we

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>we were trying to get people back. I think it's

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>super important from a cultural standpoint. Yeah. Absolutely, Okay, that's

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the debate here for a lot of companies. Don McCree,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Yet again, we'd love

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>getting your perspective on what's going on out there. Uh.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>In corporate America, Don McRee is ahead of commercial banking

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>for Citizens Financial Group. And again is what we've heard

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of bankers. Business is good. They're clients

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are continuing to invest. Uh. They are looking forward, Yeah,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>looking for capital, looking for returns. Uh. And business is

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>good despite a flat yield curve and low interest rate environment. Now,

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as Paul has been saying, we're gonna bring in Randy

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Swimmer right now, Senior Managing Director and co heed of

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Senior lending. At Churchill Asset Management, they have thirty one

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in committed capital and UM. One of the

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>things that that obviously people are looking for UM desperately

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and not finding very easily, Randy, is return. I heard

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Howard Marks the other day say he thinks, you know,

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>three basis points is enough reward for the risk of

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>high yield debt, of junk debt, which I thought was

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing. Where are you finding return? Yeah, so if

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you think about where high yield used to be, it

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>used to be high yield, it used to be you know,

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>high sing old digits UM. It has not been the

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>case for a while. There's reasons, technical reasons why that's

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the case. But what's happened with investors. They're looking at

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the private market now because the premium, the so called

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>illiquidity premium, because the private market typically doesn't trade the

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>way the bond market does. That premium is anywhere from

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred to three hundred basis points over the liquid

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>credit markets, and that's attractive for investors. So, Randy, give

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of you know, the credit quality in

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the private capital business, UM, in the

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>leverage loan business, UM, because it seems like it's been

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>better than expected, you know, after just coming through eighteen

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>months of this economic disruption brought about by the pandemic.

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>What are you seeing? Yeah? And in fact, if you

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the overall direct lending and private credit business

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>defaults over the last eighteen months been lower than the

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>broadly syndicated market, which are the large liquid loans and

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>then the high yield market. And in part I think

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that's because the private credit market has been focused more

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on defensive industries in general, less on things like oil

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and gas and retail, which obviously have gotten hammered um,

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, through the COVID period, and more on defensive

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>business to business sectors like healthcare, software, technology, and business services.

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And so being an active manager in private credit um

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>meant certainly for us going into COVID, we focused on

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>those sectors that are less correlated to consumer spending because

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>historically we've been doing this for fifteen years under the

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Churchill banner, we've known that recessions do tend to be

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, led on the consumer side, and so the

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>less consumer facing businesses you have generally the better when

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you go into these And that's exactly it happened for

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>us and a few others in the COVID period. We

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>have no defaults or losses related to COVID, and so

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>then you come out and you're still how the tail

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>wind here with these these we call them to have businesses,

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the businesses that have done well and have been relatively

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>unaffected by COVID. I wonder about the still the underperformance

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of UM. You mentioned oil and gas energy, the underperformance

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of basic materials producers. We haven't seen them bounce back

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of the market. And I know at

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>least the in Europe we see basic materials and energy

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>trading just about half the forward pease of the broader market.

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to change? Well. Part of the focus

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>now is related to the economy as a whole. And

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we recognized about the biological threat

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that COVID represented was that it really UM was moving

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>around the the the economy and how businesses were reacting

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to that threat. And what was interesting was as you

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>think about where we were and predicting what was happening

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>with the economy a year ago versus where we are today.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>The iron is, we thought we were going to be

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the downturn UM and at the point

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>where we were going to be looking towards the end

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>with a pretty pretty clear sailing and that would be

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>could be measured across the economy in terms of overall

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth and so forth. And what we have discovered

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>instead is that the delta variant has had has really

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>weighed down on the potential growth that we could see

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>across the economy. And obviously things like commodities are driven

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>by that growth. And you can see in the equities markets,

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>since you know, kind of returning from the labor day weekend, UM,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>there's investors are kind of concerned about what what does

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that mean in terms of the growth for this year?

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>UM certainly employed him. We've seen that impacted in the

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>most recent label reports. What does that mean sort of

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>medium term for growth because that is going to impact

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>some of these more cyclical businesses. And Randy thanks so

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We really appreciated getting a look

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>at the middle market private lending business. It is a

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>increasingly liquid business where you can get some very attractive

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>relative returns UH and Randy Schremmer gives us some color there.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Randy Schremmer, Senior Managing Director, CO head of senior lending

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>at Churchill Asset Management. Think about thirty one billion dollars

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in committed capital. Uh. He is a alum of the

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan Chase. That's early in my career. I was

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>at Chase Manhattan Bank. We were leverage lenders to media

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>companies and um. It is a very good business, but

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it is all about credit quality and doing the really

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>deep dive and credit analysis to see if the cash

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>flow is there to pay you back. As you're lending

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 1>against cash flow, and a lot of these businesses not

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>against assets like inventory or hard assets, so you can

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>have to do the really good cash flow analysis. Right

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty four highs for the SP five hundred this year,

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>strong earnings, an accommodative Federal reserve, although tapering is certainly

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on the table later this year. What is an investor

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to do? Let's bring in Jordan Jackson. He's a global

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>market strategist for JP Morgan Asset Management. He's also a

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Wahoo from the University of Virginia, but we won't hold

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that against him. Jordan, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you telling your clients here at JP Morgan

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management about this market? Right here? Well, it's as

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly an interesting market. You know, I'm still of the

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>opinion I'm fairly bullish on the market. I I stay

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>constructive due to a couple of reasons. So I think

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a powerful tail wind from the FED um

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>individual fiscal stimulus. I think the key there is tapering

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is not tightening. Right, We're still looking at an additional

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>rest least seven hundred eight eight hundred billion in fiscal

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that should kit the market, uh between now in

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the middle of next year. I think

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>bibacks are going to be strong and and may accelerate

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>from here on out. And I think corporate balance sheets

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>are sitting on high levels of cash with with low leverage,

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and that should should be supportive of subsher hold the

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>distributions going forward. Um. You know, look, I think growth

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is still going to remain above trend as well. And

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think all those paints are pretty goldilocks

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>scenario for for equity markets. Where do you see the

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>best valuations or where do you see the best value?

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I should probably phrase that differently. Sure, you know, I

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>still see some value in the more cyclical, value orientated

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>parts of the market, but I think investors should really

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>start to strike a bit more of a balanced tone

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>when we start talking about, you know, value versus growth.

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously that the large tech names continue to kind of

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>play a bit more defense and in a market like this,

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>as growth concerns continue to weary the markets, and and

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the delta bar continues to spook the markets as well.

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But I still think we're a biased for uh steeper

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>yeld curves. I still think that we're of yields are

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>at today. They're just not aligned with the fundamental picture

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>or the fundamental outlook, and so um I think in

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that environment, you know, financials can still do well. I

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>still think energy and industrials again, those value orientated parts

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of the market can can do well as the economy

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>continues to reopen. So it's a it's a it's less

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>so about you know, trying to overweight value versus growth.

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think striking a bit of a balance between

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the two makes makes a whole lot of sense. How

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>about that sixty forty portfolio, Jordan, Is that still a

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>thing or is that a thing of the past, Given

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>where global yields are right now, I'd argue that it's

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's a thing of the past. You know,

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>when we look at sort of valuations on the equity

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>side and on the fixed income side, you kind of

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>put those two together. On the forward returns that you're

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>getting out of sixty forty portfolio, um including you know,

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>baking in inflation, are are roughing around one to two

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>on it on a real real return going forward over

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the next five or ten years. So that's just not

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>going to cut it for for investor. But I think

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's less about you know, how much of a

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty you need or or how much of a floor

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>do you need, but more so about you know, looking

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>at the overall portfolio and identifying where the opportunities to

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>add things like alternatives where you can sort of uh

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>more liquid alternative if you can head some of that

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>equity downside, but also complimenting that with some of some

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>more private alternatives as well, things like real estated infrastructure

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>for those qualified investors who that can provide a uncorrelated

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>return stream um to to the overall portfolio. So I

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's gonna be a lot more conversations around alternatives

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>within that sixty forty portfolio because we know just returns

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in public markets just aren't going to be there going

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>for it? What about crypto? A lot of people are

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about forty one portfolio. I mean, look, if you're

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about discussions, I'm sure these these are discussions you're

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>having with investors, whether or not you're allocating money to it,

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>right absolutely, And and and investors are are you know,

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>asking for you know, where are their vehicles and and

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>avaluence they can access access to market? Um. You know, look,

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I I think for those investors who are willing to

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to stomach that kind of volatility, obviously, the move that

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you've seen in the crypto markets over the past couple

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of days certainly comind us that it is is a

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>very very volatile market. But you know, I think cryptal

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is here to stay. Um. And again, for those investors

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>who are able to craft out a sleeve of the

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>portfolio making some of the volatility, I think, I think

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>go for it. Jordian, do you think this market is

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>going to rationally I guess I'll use that term um

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of discount the tapering that is expected later this year.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect a taper tantrum of any sort or

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think that that's done a good job of

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of signaling where it's going. I like the phrase

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>tapering is not tightening, yes, because they're still growing the

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet right, just at a slower pace. Again, absolutely,

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned earlier about about another you know, eight

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred billions, so still set to liquidity. It's set to

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>hit the market from now until the middle of the

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>middle of next year. You know. I think the Fed

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>has done a pretty good job at um you know,

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>communicating tapering is on the table and when tapering is

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>likely to occur, and so I think the markets have

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>more or less are are prepared for it. And I

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>think the big difference that that I got really out

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Jackson hole and the difference that I've identified

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>um or I'm seeing with relative to taper is the

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>chair has been really good at separating tapering from when

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rate hypes are are expected to come. When Ben

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Berniki came out and made thirteen and made comments about tapering,

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you saw you saw the front end, oh I s

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>markets essentially moved from pricing in no rate hikes over

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the next two years to pricing in five rate hyps

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>by September thirteen, UM. And so there was just this

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>there's this idea that you know, a tapering the balance

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>sheet was immediately going to uh push the push the

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>FED to begin hiking rates once tapering was done. I

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 1>think their own power did a really good job at

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>separating the tapering discussion from the interest rate high discussion,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and so where I was a bit more in the

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>camp that the BED would be a little bit more

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>aggressive to tape of the balance you to open up

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the pathway to high grade from sometimes maybe the fourth

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>quarter of next year, of the first half of I

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>think they've done a good job at sort of sitting

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on the silines and saying that, hey, it made me

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the second half before we see some rate hikes. Jordan,

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Pleasure having you on

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the program. Jordan Jackson, global market strategist with JP Morgan

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management. This is Bloomberg. Well, the delta variant is

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>keeping this pandemic on the front burner for investors as

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>an issue. The questions include what will this mean for

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>economic growth on a global basis going forward. Let's bring

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in Constance Hunt, our chief economists for KPMG. Constant, thanks

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>so much for for joining us. We really appreciate you

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>taking the time here, how are you factoring into your

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>g DP model. Um, this lingering pandemic driven by the

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>delta variant. Yeah, hey Paul, great to be with you.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>It really comes across in two key dimensions. One of course,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is the global supply chain. So with the pandemic lingering,

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it means that factories have the susceptibility to be shut down,

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that people have the susceptibility of course of calling in

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>sick and being unable to work, and and of course

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>all the issues with shipping. I mean getting someone to

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>work in the merchant marine ship sector during a pandemic

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is really really difficult. So they're in addition to the

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>supply chain bottlenecks at the factory floor, there are supply

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>chain bottlenecks with regarding getting goods out to market, and

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of course that has knock on effects and impacts our economy,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and we see that most acutely in the chip shortage

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>that's impacting the auto sector as well as in the

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>number of other sectors. And as a result of constants,

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you're you're reducing your GDP forecast drastically if I'm reading

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it right or is it well, it's from a quarterly perspective,

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>very drastically, Yeah, down to one point seven percent from

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>six previously. Yeah, for the third quarters, so for the year.

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Just to put that in perspective, right, that takes us

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>from a six point four percent growth fore to four

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>point seven. So our assumption is that we do see

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>some easing of the delta variant in the fourth quarter.

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the mistake we have all made ever

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning of this pandemic, and we continue to

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>make because I think people are optimists at heart, um,

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>is that we continue to underestimate the impact of the

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>pandemic or we we revert to the mean of saying, Okay,

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>well we'll get through this and then we'll get back

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to normal. And you know, when we look at what happened,

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, to consumer confidence in August that our decline,

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody had penned their hopes on September being to get

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>back to normal time, schools would get back to normal,

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>offices would get back to normal, life would get back

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to normal. And there's just nothing worse than dashed hopes.

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>What is your sense constance for this supply chain? Because

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Matt and I we talked to you know,

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>lots of corporate executives and from across a whole swath

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>of industries, and we're just hearing that it it continues

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a big issue. How long do you think

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>it will be a big Yeah? And and kind of

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>what does that too for growth? Yeah? Well, I mean

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>here's where you need me to be on with an

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>epidemiologist or a virologist, right, because how long it goes

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>on really depends on how long the pandemic goes on.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And and I think obviously, because we have the vaccine,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we know we have the potential to have the pandemic

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>go on for a much shorter time than history large

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>pandemics of this nature have gone on. But yet it's

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the distribution of that vaccine across not just the US

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>population but the world that is really causing the pandemic

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to linger and and having continued health and economic effects.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>And if we can answer the question of how long

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic goes on, we can answer the question of

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>how long the supply chain problems go on. Yeah, I mean,

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>m the supply chain issues are so broad. One of

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the issues those just the chip shortage, and surely that

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is less affected by the virus. Now, Oh, I mean

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it had its origins in in um In in

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of the type of chips that were being made, right,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>so that the year up to five G and then

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the shift and demand due to the pandemic away from

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>five G related chips to more traditional chips. So there's

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that aspect. But but I do think the the chip

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>shorg is being impacted by the pandemic because a lot

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of the factories are not able to operate a full capacity.

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And then the shipping issue that I mentioned, right, so

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>even if you get them produced, getting them into a

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>port that's clogged up, it has delays um getting them

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>onto a ship, getting them out of of Asia into

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the port of Los Angeles. I mean, the backup of

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>ships in the Port of Los Angeles is significant, and

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>um there just aren't enough containers to to get the

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>get the goods distributed throughout the country. And we look

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at if we look at goods consumption in the first

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>half of this year, it grew it in nine annualized rate,

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and just to put that in perspective, goods consumption in

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for the whole year grew at about three and a

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>half percent. Right, So this surge and demand for goods

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is also clogging up the supply chain and taking up

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>room on trucks and container ships. UM that might otherwise

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>be uh you used fight ships and and and and

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and so we're seeing bottlenecks across multiple dimensions and it

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>just takes time to work through those bottlenecks, even if

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>we could produce the same number of chips at the

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>factory floor, which we are not. What's interesting, uh, Constance

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Charlie Pellet Bloomberg Zone. Charlie Pellett gave me

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a great app to use. It's called find Ship and

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 1>it kind of tracks all the ships around the globe

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and boil. There are a lot of ships off the

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>port of Sandals. I know it's on the terminal map,

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but not everybody has terminal. I know, but not everybody

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>has a terminal in front of them. All right, I

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>just want to point out and that's that is a

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>very cool thing. With map go on the Bloomberg terminal

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>you can also track all the ships. And by the way,

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I follow us very closely as well, because I want

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to I need to ship a car, hope. I hope

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to ship a car and a motorcycle, um and some

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.239
<v Speaker 1>motorcycles to the US, but it's so expensive to get

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a container right now, especially for privacy calls. Unbelievable. Please

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>do all right, Constance always great talking to you. Thanks

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Constance Hunter talking to us

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>about the Delta derail. This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. Put

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio