WEBVTT - Leading Off September 16th, 2024 (Ep. 903)

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>What is up my friends? Hello, everybody the Welsh lives.

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It's leading off right here on Fantasy Pros. I am

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the Welsh, that is the Joe Rico. I am back

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 1>after a little bit of a hiatus. A Rico and

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Baba have been taking us through all September. Still are

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:24.159
<v Speaker 1>by the way, but I had been meant to be

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>here for Mondays. Wasn't last week. But I am here

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and I am glad to see all of you and

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to all of you. By the way, Leading Off

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by bet three six five. Use

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the promo code leading off that five bucks, get one

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty in bonus bets. You can go and do that today,

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>get locked in over. I'd bet three six five and

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a gambling problem, called one eight hundred

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:49.319
<v Speaker 1>bets off or one eight hundred gambler. Oh yes, Joe

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Rico been holding down the fort with somebody.

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>You're back like the terminator. My friend. Is good to

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>see you. We've missed you on the show. We've missed

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>you on the show. It's been a lot of fun

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 2>getting to do shows with Bubba. But back into the

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>old routine we had in July and August, getting to

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>do some shows together. So we got what two more

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 2>left this season together? Maybe one more if Bubba's on

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>next Monday. So this might be our send off the

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 2>two of us.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say this. You didn't even think

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of that. Actually, yeah, this might be the last one

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you and I are doing. Yeah, the plan. It is crazy.

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I know everybody is dealing with, especially all the peanuts

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and cracker jacks that are still hanging live. It's good

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to see everybody, but like, it is crazy to think

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that the season is just about completely done. We've got

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>this week. Some crazies out there. People play into next week.

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You people are insane, but you know you want to.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit less insane, I suppose we can

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>be honest. It was crazy years ago because of the

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>forty man roster designation that would happen in September, where

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the entire forty man roster would become available and then

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>teams would just do like wacky stuff. It's not quite

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that now. Starting pitchers are a little bit eh, a

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit eh, you know, fore innings and stuff like that.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Some bullpen open and whatever. But it's not as crazy.

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's still it's insane going through to the very end.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>But yes, we've got the rest of this week. The

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>next week most likely will be Bubba and I on Monday,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and then the final show as long as everything goes

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to plan next Friday. Just reminding everybody, Joe and I

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>will do a great return for the final in season

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>show that we're doing here on leading off, but lots

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of cool off season stuff will be here for you.

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I know Joe and I haven't I especially have I

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>get the extra bonus points that Joe doesn't get. But

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll be here talking you through to the end of

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the season, getting you set into the off season and

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>some more Arico and Bubba. Let's get into it, Joe,

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to talk some baseball. It's been a lot

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of football lately, and let's talk about James Wood. Two

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>for three yesterday, two solo homers, he had a walk

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>as the Nationals beat the Marlins. Now with a two

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>seventy three slash and almost one hundred higher OBP, seven homers,

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve steals, sixty six games. If you want to play extrapolation,

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you're probably in the vicinity of like eighteen thirty, eighteen

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. We could almost with progression. Call this a

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty outlook. As he's improved his strikeout rate, he's

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>making better contact holding. The batting average I think is

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>so so key, you know, a big thing with like,

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how people are going to walk out

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of this year with O'Neal Cruz. I think it's a

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 1>smashing success. I think what O'Neal Cruz has done, even

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>though he just got hurt, he's moved to centerfield to

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>hit the batting average that he's had pull out a

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty season. Thought he'd have more Homer's hand up

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. That's a big win. The same

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>thing with James Wood, and we're getting into territory of

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about twenty twenty five a whole lot, and he

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't quite got the love of the Churios and the

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Merrill. Probably maybe it's because it's not as deserved,

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but the improvement of the batting average, the power speed combo,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it's really been awesome.

0:03:58.200 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 3>He's been amazing.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, especially in a year where most rookies have

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 2>fallen on their face and disappointed us, James Wood has

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>been one of the few where you used a mid

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>season pickup or you stashed him and it's actually paid off.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a couple of little concerning things like the twenty

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>nine percent strikeout rate. I don't love.

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the steals, he has twelve of them,

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but he's been caught seven times, so I'd like to

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 2>see him be a little bit more efficient.

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 3>But he's been amazing. And I think if.

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>We're looking at early twenty twenty five stuff Paba did

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 2>that early draft, I think he went at the end

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 2>of the third round in a fifteen team or so,

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 2>like the forty to forty five pick range.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that's probably.

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Gonna be what we're gonna have to stomach if we

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 2>want James Wood on our teams next year.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting Bachman and I have been doing

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this thing on the in This League Baseball podcast where

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we've been essentially assigning this talent. So two weeks ago,

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>we did these are the first round players, not like,

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>here are fifteen guys. No, it's these are the players

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that justify the first round talent. We came up with

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>only thirteen of them. We then did the second round talent,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think we ended up with like eighteen players.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That kind of quantified second round talent, and then we

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>had this fringy area. James Wood was kind of like

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>not quite talked about in the fringe. He maybe but

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe he should be. And there were a few players

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna talk about one of them, like in

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Cheerio Cheerio and Merrill. We did kind of just decide

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to graduate into that second round talent. Wood will probably

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>end up being like a I don't know I had

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a third or fourth round talent. People are gonna extrapolate.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>You're probably the strikeout rate might cool him on projections,

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna be some pretty big numbers. And twenty thirty. Man,

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty thirty. You can't can't be hating on that. Also,

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack Or did Jeb Moore and James Wood.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, like the power, he might even

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>be leaving a little bit on the table, Like he

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 2>has seven homers in sixty six games, but fifty two

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 2>percent hard hit, ten percent barrel rate, that could even

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>be twenty five thirty home runs.

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 3>It wouldn't really surprise me.

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, he's leaving it on the table, as is

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>O'Neal Cruse. I'll come back to that too, like O'Neil

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Cruz has sacrificed. I think some launch angle an attack

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for really good batting average, and then I think the

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.239
<v Speaker 1>next step is going to be to get the ball

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>back in the ear more. When you hit the ball

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like one hundred and twenty miles an hour and you

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have like, you know, huge average evs and max evs

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like that, you're leaving power on the table. Cruise is

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>leaving and I think James Wood is doing it in

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the same way. We just see like a common thing

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with rookie young players is like getting the ball in

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the air is a problem. You'll see launch angle be

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the thing that is struggling when they have like you know,

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>really good barrel rates and really good hard hit rates

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. One guy has not had to

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>struggle with it is Jackson Surio three for five, three

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>run homer, two run triple against my d Backs yesterday.

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Homer was his twenty first and this is a shoutout

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>to Rotal World for putting this together, placing him twenty

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>first all time on a list of players that are

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty or younger. With I think it's that they didn't

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>finish their sentence of twenty twenty the twenty five if

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>he were to hit twenty five homers would put him

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>in the tie him with Eddie Matthews and Orlando Subpita.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>He's also now fourteenth on the RBA I list for

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty year olds, which puts him in like ridiculous territory. Everybody,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the time of year where we're like, you know,

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>putting like this guy's in this list and this and

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the jection ture has been absolutely incredible, and we put

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>him as a second round talent for next year. I'm

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>not sure how you feel about that, Like back end

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of the second round twenty five to thirty is probably

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be like an easy so like a third

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>rounder and head to head twelve team, fifteen team roto

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>probably the back end of the second round.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>He has such an amazing profile. Everything is, everything is amazing.

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>He hits the ball hard, he steals you know, the

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 2>in game power is good. He doesn't strike out a lot,

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the walk rate's pretty solid, not a lot of Babbitt pluck.

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Like there's nothing you can point to really to say like,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 2>oh I don't really buy this, especially.

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Being twenty years old.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Like if we're talking about him as the number one

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 2>overall player in fantasy like two or three years from now.

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't at all be surprised by it. I think

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>he's definitely going to be a second rounder. If you

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>get him in the third next I'd be prett happy

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>with that.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>George Kirby allowed one hit over seven innings. He combined

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Thornton and Edward Bizardo Edward Bizardo for a

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>seven zero shutout over the Rangers. This stat also in

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>rotal World. Kirby now six to zero with a point

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>nine two ERA and eight career starts against the Rangers.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, like there's a place just built in

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>he's had rent free space in the Rangers head as

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Kirby keeps going kind of disappointing, Like the up and

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>down of Kirby this year. I really thought he was

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a cy young contender, but he has still been,

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty phenomenal in points.

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I thought he was going to take

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 2>that step forward. I thought there was a chance that

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 2>he could break into like that top three overall pitchers

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 2>in baseball. But he's kind of if you look at

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the preseason projections, just pulling up what they had in

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the Fangrass projections preseason, He's kind of done like exactly

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>what they were thinking pretty much. Three five, three six,

0:08:56.160 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 2>type era, twenty three percent strikeout rate, solid whip. I've

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 2>heard a lot of Mariners fans recently. I think it's

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>because of the bad stretch that you had talked about

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 2>how it was a disappointing season, but you know where

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I drafted Kirby. I find it hard to be actually

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 2>disappointed in the production I've gotten.

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think a lot of it had to do

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>with it was just like sky high expectations. Like I

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>remember the moment for it wasn't everybody, it was for me,

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>But it was like about ten months ago a little

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more maybe here at first pitch out here in

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Arizona and I'm on Rates and Barrels live show. It

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>was me Eno and DVR, and someone asked the question

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 1>because in the studio audience on the live show of

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>like you know who if it's not I think they said,

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know somebody, not Garrett Cole or whatever, who is

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the number one pitcher? And I had brought up George Kirby,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And it was because of the command numbers and like

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Jason Collett was with me and we kind of had

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>this long conversation around it where you know, a bunch

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>of us were picking on, like, because there's different elements

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we're gonnaocus on. Sometimes it's going to be you know,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously strikeout rate and pitchability. But it was like George

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Kirby's command master, and it was like, if he could

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>just improve here, those command numbers could equate to him

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe being like an elite strikeout player number one in baseball,

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but he just still is inconsistent. You know, he just

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>has those blow up games where you know he doesn't

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>want to walk somebody and he starts pitching to too

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>much contact and then it just gets blown up or whatever.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Kirby's an interesting one. A couple of good guys that

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have definitely helped up fantasy teams as of recent David

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Peterson allowed four hits, one run with six strikeouts across

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>seven and two thirds and a no decision against Philly.

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>He had eighteen swing and misses, which was almost a

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>season high. Also fourteen hard hit balls. I've seen that

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit lately. I was doing some CBS h

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Q hits talking about some pitchers with some really really

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>big hard hit numbers. And then the other one with

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the Reds. Ret Louder allowed three runs on six hits,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>five and one third struck out five. They lost, but

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>has a one point seven to four ERA over his

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, last four MLB starts has been great. He's

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of a if he threw ninety seven, he'd be

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a Kirby clone because he's a guy that likes to

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>hit the zone. He struggled a little bit with that,

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>got that wipeout sweeper slider. He's been throwing thoughts on

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>David Peterson Rehet Louder right now.

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 2>David Peterson is one of the hardest pitchers to evaluate

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 2>in all of baseball. Like he's having the best stretch

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 2>of his career to eighty five ERA, but it's come

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 2>with a nineteen percent strikeout rate, a one point three

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 2>to one whip, almost a double digit walk rate. I

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 2>don't really trust him, I really don't. I know he's

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>been mowing down solid teams here, but if I'm looking

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 2>at lineups for the last couple of weeks and having

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>to trust what he's done, I just don't know that

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 2>it's really that sustainable. Everything below the surface is a

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 2>little bit concerning for David Peterson unless he gets the

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 2>strikeout rate back up to where it was because he

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 2>was an elite not maybe not elite, but twenty six

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven percent strikeout rate down to nineteen, I just

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>don't feel a lot of safety throwing him out there.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 2>For Louder, he's also been good, but you know, he's

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>really and he's a younger guy, so it's a little

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 2>bit different, but he's way out performing his expected metrics,

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of strikeouts. So both of them kind

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>of make me nervous down the stretch here deploying them

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 2>over the last couple of weeks.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, we're also in a point like in

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the chat was talking about you, just like I also

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>people asking question here, question there, and it's like, it's

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. You just got to have a

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>quick trigger finger. The thing that's really been working with

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>the Mets. They are one of the hottest teams in baseball.

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>That was the thing I did. I think it was Saturday.

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I did a hit on HQ doing a couple we

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>were talking about maybe it was Friday, you know, I

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>think you know it was Friday, talking about like Jacob

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>de Grom's first start and a couple other things, and

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the Mets had just pulled off a win over the

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Phillies and they're like nine in one in their last

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>ten and they're you know, their bullpen era had been solid,

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>their overall era over the last thirty days had been money.

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>There's just momentum, and sometimes momentum carries. So like, I agree,

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I'm always paying attention to underlying stats and

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>overperforming and stuff like that, But when there's like, you know,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>two more starts to go and you have momentum on

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the side, I think Peterson's pretty fascinating. I think Louder

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is also pretty fascinating. And we'll continue, by the way,

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of the show talking about other ins and outs

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of players that might be helping you guys, you know,

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>over this next week, because, like I said, just you go, oh,

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>guys not performing yet, Bye bye bye. Injuries at this point, obviously,

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>an il stint is a season ender, but any type

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of injury is warranted. So like I'm just gonna throw

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this out. Who put this question in here?

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>R M.

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing Garcia said, should I drop Kowser for win?

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Robless or Pete Crow Armstrong head to head points semi final,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>not Robless. Robless is on our injury report, so I

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>would be scared about him. I might for Pete Crow

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong because he's been one of the hottest players in baseball.

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I got him on the list by the way to

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>run homer victory over the Rockies on Sunday. I'm not

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at it this say. I think he's pacing out

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to like thirty stolen bases, just quietly having what a

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Nico Horner year. He is Nico Horner in the outfield,

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>except he had a really bad stretch run. And I

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know why people don't perceive people perceive I think

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>him in a worse light. Nico Horner always didn't have

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>power projection, and he overplayed his stolen bases a bit,

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and I hated him this year as far as fantasy goes.

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But Pete Armstrong was free, has been free, has had

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>absurdly low percentage ownership percentages up until two weeks ago.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>A week ago, so he has been a massive pickup.

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>He's been hot. Pick up the hot hand right now.

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Still in base guys don't really help in points, but

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little bit of power is showing off

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>scoring runs. I'm into Pete ro Armstrong right now.

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I am too.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I think the reason people were more down on him

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 2>is because it was just so bad initially offensively, like

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 2>what he did last year, what he did the first

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>half of this season. He had like a thirty six

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 2>WRC plus for the first half of the season.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 3>He was not doing anything.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I know, over the last month, he's a top ten

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>fantasy player while playing some of the best defense in

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the league. I think that people are kind of just

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 2>slow on the turnaround because of how low he was before.

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, he's only fifty six percent rostered on Yahoo.

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure it's even lower on ESPN and a little

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>bit higher probably on CBS. But he's available. I wouldn't

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 2>have any problem making that swap for Kowser.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would make that swap if you want to

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>do that. That's a play to definitely go with two

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>on the interesting column. And I'm pointing this one out

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>because I literally this was the back to that TV

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>hit that I did. I was literally talking about this

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and then I just kind of like laughed when I

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>saw it after coming into a tied game. Rice el Iglesias,

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>whom I just want to point out had not allowed

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a run since June sixteenth. He had had I believe,

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty four straight innings of not giving up an earned run.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Gave up five runs in two thirds of an inning

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>as the Braves loss to the Dodgers, which is crazy

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the not earned run. This is a note that Rotal

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>World had, which was when he took his own is

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>only lost in fifty nine appearances. This season's era still

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>under two, but it jumped almost a full run. I

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>just I like laugh to myself because we were talking

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>about this, and I'm like, yeah, Risler Glacier has been absurd.

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Thirty four straight innings, he's been so locked down, and

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>then probably most critical time, big playoff piece for people

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>going into Championship week, he gets blown up for five

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and runs. I guess it wasn't a blown save situation,

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but takes a loss. I just thought that was fascinating

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with Iglesias. And do you think Iglesias is going to

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>be like a top five closer next year? He's not

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the pricey price range, but I

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like he was around six or seven this year,

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so it's not going to be that much worse or

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that much better.

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I suppose even he should be close to a thirty

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 2>one saves buck eighty seventy right point seven to two.

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Whip is just insane.

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like Edwin Diaz is probably going to

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 2>go ahead of him because of the name value and

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of leagues Class A will go ahead of him.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe hater he's top five, though he should be top five.

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>It's funny the guy in the chance on the chat

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Glaciers lost me my championship yesterday. So I was away

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend with a friend and we were doing

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 2>all these pickups for the head to head semifinals and

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 2>like all right.

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Stream jpcars, stream, you know whoever else.

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 2>Were talking, David fest and all this stuff, and it

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 2>he was up seven to three with like a couple

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>of games left, and I was like, all right, look,

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>you look like you're pretty good. Riise Ellah Glacy has

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>cost him his whole season yesterday is no whole season.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 2>Lost Whip by point one, lost e ra a. It's crazy, man.

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Head to head is all that it takes is just

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 2>one bad ye outing and your whole season is done.

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 3>It's awful.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>It definitely will turn you into cry baby Rodo, Like yeah,

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like we have those stories. Our friend group has those

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>stories that our famous fam our little world was our

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>bogman and I's friend will. He was up in the

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Championships Sunday night baseball Hunter Pence comes up, hits two

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>homers in the game, we tie eight to eight, and

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I won because of tiebreakers in the regular season. So

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he would change his team to like eight dash eight

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>would be his team name, like never for these are

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that these are your villain arcs, this type

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Bt Fouts Iglesias is his villain arc

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>right there. Can you imagine? It's just such a brutal blow.

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>The other fun piece, I still can't believe this is real.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Helio Ramos hit a game tying homer in the ninth

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>inning yesterday on Sunday. Giants ended up losing, but that

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the story. Ramos became the first ever right handed

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.719
<v Speaker 1>hitter in the history of Oracle Park to hit it

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>into the right field bay, to hit it over into

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the water, the first right handed hitter ever. I can't

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I isn't like twenty five years this day?

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Is that?

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Am I wrong about that? With a stadium that's a crazy,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy stat to me. And it was Helio Ramos. So

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad it was like a giant that did it

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in their ballpark. But I don't know, that's one of

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>those that you've heard on just like I don't know,

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem real to me. Someone has to have

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>done it. Nope, it was Helio Ramos yesterday.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 2>You were you're a San Francisco guy, right, Was that

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the same park that was there when you were a kid?

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Or is it different park? No?

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>It was Ah, what was I'm forgetting what it was? No, this,

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this was the same one that was there.

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I was made to say Candlestick, but that's the.

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm just surprised, like Stanton ever did it

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 2>once or just even like I don't know Pools in

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 2>his prime, Miguel Cabrera.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying, Like, how did no other right

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>handed hitter like accidentally do this? At some point you're saying,

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know many games Aaron Judge has played there.

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's but that's also like what's so uniquely special

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's a uniquely special baseball thing where it's like

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you can have this ballpark that's been standing there for

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>X many years and something has never happened, and all

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this of a sudden boom boom.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 3>There you go. It is pretty wild, like Bonds did it.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I guess.

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess a lot of their famous guys are left

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 2>handed hitters over the recently. I mean, I guess it's

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 2>just most yeah, I mean obvious, but it's still it's

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 2>still bizarre, like it's I mean, it's hard. You know,

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a far distance, opposite field, but for it to

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 2>have never I was very surprised. I think I saw

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, tweet about it, and I was.

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Like, it's just so crazy.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And twenty plus homer season for Helio Ramo so

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>point another sneaky rookie in here. I feel so bad

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for pet Fouts, says, I can't think about it too

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>much or I get a little salty about Ryce. E

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Iglesias also shout out to Travis first year following the

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Pod my first ever league win last night. That's awesome,

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and the official Mark yelling at us Peterson, you guys

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>are wrong. I mean I brought up I actually defended,

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know if you were even listening because

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I just said, David Peterson is someone that has been

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>good and you should follow the rest of the season

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>because of momentum. So listen with the ears. All right.

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 3>That was directed to me.

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, but he said you guys, So I'm

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>going to take it personal. If you say you guys,

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that's not saying, hey, Joe, you're wrong. We would have

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>moved on and I would have agreed with you, by

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the way. I would have agreed, yes, Joe is very

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong and he should be punished. But you said you guys.

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So there you go, three up and three down. On

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the up. Three players on Sunday hit some double dongs.

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>We had James Wood who we talked about, Michael Bush

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and Riley Green. Michael Bush sneaky, sneaky this whole year.

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Did you have a stat line up here? I don't

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>want everything to break apart in my computer if I

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>do this, but I feel what is it twenty something?

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Homer just absolutely. He was a big preseason guy for me,

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and then he just kind of got boring and fed down.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Give me those numbers.

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 2>So over the last week, by the way, number one

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 2>overall fantasy player over the last seven days, but for

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the season, as a whole, seventy one runs, twenty homers,

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>sixty three ribbies, two steals in a two fifty seven

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>batting average.

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty solid, pretty solid, very solid for free. That's

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the other thing for free. Also Kid Povich yesterday five innings,

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>struck out eight. Love a little bit up and down,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit moving through here, but Kid Povich is

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>making it work. Christopher Sanchez went seven, struck out seven,

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>continues to do it on the three down Cad and

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Dana three and one thirds, gave up five earned runs.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Bel Cal Quantrill went two and one third, gave up

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>only two earned runs and walked six. Blue Mark Vientos

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>over four with four strikeouts. I believe the golden sombrero.

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Do we ever figure out? Is it platinum sombrero? The

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>over five with five strike down?

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 3>I think it's platinum. Yeah. I wonder if anyboy's ever

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 3>had that over six with six strikeouts. I don't even

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 3>know what we'd call that. Probably never happened before, or

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe that, Oh, I.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Cant think of it, but I don't think we can

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>say it on the show. What we would call that?

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, it's okay. The official Mark he says,

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>my bad Joe is very wrong. That's what we were David,

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>David and Peterson. He is in for it next week.

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>We just want to point that out. On the injury front,

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of them, and I'm not advocating

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to any of these things. I'm about to say that

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you cut these players, but if there's any like ambiguity

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>about the timeline, you have to make tough decisions, but

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>just follow it. Francisco Lindoors undergoing an MRI and his

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>back on Monday. That is critical. He is absolutely critical

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to this team. Onneil Cruz, this is kind of where

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm leading to. He left Sunday's game against the Royals

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with left ankle discomfort. Monitor that because you don't want

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but like, if he's gonna miss the week,

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>you know exactly what you need to do. Victor Roeblis,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this is another one. He came up earlier. He left

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday's game against the Rangers on Sunday with an apparent injury.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll probably find out news about that, so I might

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have to do that. Diamondbacks, they activated Gabby Mourno from

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the ten day and then place Paul Seawald on the

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen day if he had not already been cut Bye

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>bye bye bye. Don't need Paul Seawald anywhere. And the

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Phillies activated Alec Boom. Alec Boom back critical for that team.

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>That Mets Philly thing has just been just a ton

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.239
<v Speaker 1>of fun just to watch it. I like seeing these

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>teams like bounce back up. I feel like the NLS

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>has just been h you know, like the Dodgers have

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>been kind of weird as of recent The Diamondbacks over

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty days have the worst bullpen era and

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>all of Baseball Padres have not. I thought what the

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Padres did in the trade deadline was like, Oh, They're

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>leading up to have this incredible, massive run with this bullpen,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and it just hasn't. Robert Swarez blew a save last

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>night and then Adrian Morion, Adrian Morion had to get

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the save. They traded for Tanner Scott Jason Adam. They've

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>got Robert Swarez and Adrian mo Morion is getting saved.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not how that's supposed to be.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Robert Suarez, I mean, for the season as a whole,

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 2>he's been very good, but over the last like I

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know, maybe month or so things have not gone

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 2>as well for him. A few blown says yeah, with

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the last month six to seventy five ERA one fifty

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 2>nine whips, So you know, the Rodo people won't mind.

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 2>But like you mentioned earlier, the head to Heead people

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 2>might have some beef with Robert Suarez.

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I like this Fenway six k's is the vibranium some brera.

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>That one makes me laugh because I'm a nerd. And

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>then Michael said the dfade sombrero that also these definitely

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Has there ever been a player that has

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>struck out more than six times in a game? What's

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the most strikeouts a single player has had in one game,

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>not like a double header on the day, but like

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a singular game which obviously went to multiple innings. What

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think it is?

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I would say probably five or six, but I want to.

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Say someone has struck out seven times. We should look

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that up for like the next show. I just want

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>to know.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So, most strikeouts in a game as a batter, Carl

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Carl Wheelman fifteen in in game though in nineteen thirteen

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 2>he strugg Yeah.

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, extra innings is okay?

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 3>How many six times? So it looks like six is

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 3>the most in a single game.

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Wow, there's never been seven.

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Done most recently by Jeff Jenkins of the Milwaukee Brewers

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 2>on June eighth, two thousand and four. So it's been

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty years. Is assuming I'm looking at the right data here,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's I think it's six.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So we should call that the perfect sombrero. I think

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I have the name. It's like the perfect game, the

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>perfect sombrero. It happens like once every like twenty years,

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and then seven would just be, you know, the all

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>time worst goat. I mean, we say Brandon Mott, Wait,

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>hold on, look at this. Benway says Brandon Moss seven

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>times in a game in twenty thirteen. Sam Horns seven

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>times in a fifteen game in nineteen ninety one.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 2>According to chet woh chat GBT. So probably hopefully right,

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:17.239
<v Speaker 2>but you never know, you never know.

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm calling the set one of those is the

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>perfect sombrero, and it might not need to be seven.

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>That's I don't know. That's Those are the things that

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>keep me up at night, by the way, like I

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>just wonder about those awesome things, like what could have been,

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Like who did something so horribly bad that we can't

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>get out of it. Hopefully we can do something so

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>amazingly good friends, let's talk about some bets. Let's get

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in on it for the best Bets of the day

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>with Yeah, how funny is this when you two are

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>there and it's like literally neither one of these two

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>are on that you guys have been having fun with that?

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>It is the best bets of the day, our three

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite bets, and mister Joe Rico, let's start with you.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I'd also point out if people haven't like picked this

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>up when we talk about the best bets, it's something

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 1>that there's a fantasy implication in it as well. Obviously

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>if we're taking certain prop players just want to throw

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that out. But what do you got on your best

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>bets of the day?

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 2>So I'm starting off and I think we might be

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 2>on the same page here with Paul Skeins over six

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 2>and a half strikeouts, it just feels like a very

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 2>low number. He's pretty consistently going over and at worst

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 2>he's been getting like six strikeouts in the game. It

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 2>feels like a pretty safe bet at minus one zero

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 2>five for Skins over, and I'm going with Redebtmers to

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 2>record the win. These are always a little bit trickier,

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 2>but he's looked great against two awesome opponents in this

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>first couple starts out, he gets the White Sox as

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 2>long as he's able to go five six innings.

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 3>That Penn behind him is.

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 2>A little bit of a concern, but the White Sox

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 2>are just a joke. I feel like Red Detmer' is

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 2>a plus money to get the win is a pretty

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty safe bet. And then Antonio sends a Tella who's

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 2>making his season debut tonight at Cors against the Arizona Diamondbacks,

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 2>who I mean, they've been like the best offensive team

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 2>in baseball this year, arguably at Coors, a guy faving

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 2>in his debut. Sends a Tella who's never been a

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 2>great pitcher really over two and a half earned runs

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 2>at minus one thirty five. All those are bet three

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 2>six five, And I'll add just quickly, if you're seeing

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Reed Debtmer's out there in like a daily pickup league

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 2>for that start tonight, that's a pretty pretty nice stream

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>you can get there.

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Only forty two percent roster right.

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Now, and Diamondback hitters would be a great shot. The

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>only thing that's going to keep Sinstela off. This is

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>if he's only doing like an opener, I don't know

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>how it's two and a half. If they are gonna

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>let him go a full run, I'm gonna play against

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that here as well. I like I like those bets,

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and I like you getting tricky with it too, Like

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the debtmers to record a win. I think that's a

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>fun tricky one. So, as you mentioned, I'm we I'm

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>tailing the Paul Skins one. He's facing the Cardinals twice

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this year. He struck out eight in both outings. We're

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>on the back end of Like I'm not saying it is,

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's like, yeah, maximum three more starts. What if

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this was the last start and or you know, there's

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>one more out of it, Like I think you go

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>balls to the wall, is what I'm saying. So six

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half it is very reasonable. He's had some

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>six strikeout outings, but he has gotten to the Cardinals

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit. It's minus one oh five. I like

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that number number two. Give me the Dodgers first five

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>money line. You guys know, if you follow it all

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>season long, you know me. I love my first fives.

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>That's where I get most of my action going. I

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>will say that the Dodgers' money line today is not

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad number. It's minus one fifteen or minus one

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen one eighteen Yashanoba Yama Moto versus Max Freed. The

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers over the last thirty days have a over two

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty average against lefty, so they have been hitting it.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>It is also the Dodgers who have been lacking some consistency.

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But Yamamoto has been really good. I believe he's given

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>up one earned run over his last four outings since

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>being back. So I am or maybe it's three. I'm

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna go and back Yama Moto on the first five.

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a little bit more juiced. So I just need

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>them to be winning. If they're tied, I get my

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>money back minus one thirty. I'm also in on that

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>full game, and then I really love this one. Spencer Arraghetty.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Strikeouts are low for him because you're going against Padres.

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Padres can be a tough team to strike out, though

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we have seen some big outings. Raghetty is at four

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half over, so five strikeouts I need. He

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>has hit this number in eight of his last nine outings.

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>He has really found a rhythm into the second half

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>outside of like one or two difficult situations. But five

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts over this full one, I love that against the Padres.

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Those are my best bets. We both got schemes. I

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>got Dodger's first five money line and Arrighedtty over strikeouts.

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got schemes with Redebtners to record a dub and

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Cinctela to give up over two and a half

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>earn runs. Yes, friends, those are the best bets of

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the day with Welsh and mister Joe Arico. Before we

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>get to the home run call here, just very very quickly,

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw a couple comments in here. Let's see where

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>did it go? Dylan said, dilemma Nolan at red hot

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee too rough outings or Tyler McGill who's lined up

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>for a two step with the Washington and Philly at

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>City Field.

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 3>It's Nola for me, I'm not even thinking about it.

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 3>It's Nola.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Nola too. I mean, I get it.

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's a hot situation. But like McGill's also

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>going up against Philly like there, so there's like you

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>get the advantage of Washington with McGill for a sub

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sub middle ish pitcher and then Philly. Or you just

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>go with like a toa Ben pitcher who's got a

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>couple you know, rough upcoming matchups, but a great offensive support.

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna definitely definitely do that. Another one, uh Cada

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>versus Weaver or go brand Herder who just had the

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>combined or almost combined no hitter who runs it back

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in Baltimore? Do you feel there?

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Probably go with Weaver.

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I think, like the way the cash is bullpen usage is,

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a little bit hard to predict.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 3>It's probably you said up most of the time.

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>But Weaver, I think he's a pretty safe bet to

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 2>give you an essay or a win, giving you good

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>ratios with strikeouts, better team.

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I think we ever would be the way I go.

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>The home run board. We've had the home run contest

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>all season long. Remind you, guys fantasypros dot Com, slash Chat,

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>come and join the Discord, become a premium member. You

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>can have access to playing this. I mean, I don't

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>know why we're being honest. Play it the rest of

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the year. There's only two more weeks, but you can

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>play it next season. Plus I kind of want to

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>add another contest. And right now South African G has

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a four home run lead with two weeks to go.

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Guerrero is giving him the eye. Look at that eye.

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>He is saying South African G. I'm coming for you,

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm bringing an autographed bat because that's what he's

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. We got a four home run lead over

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Razor Ramon Razor, oh Man b Trot at fifty one.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Only three are over fifty Wonkee Penglin coming in hot

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in top ten with forty six. Joey p is held

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>with his imperpetuity at forty one. I could not tell

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you where I'm at. The great Fred Dinger is at

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the board. Fred Dinger is if was here,

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh Fred Digger is here. I don't know. I don't

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>know if I've had any I've had. I think I

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>have had Raphael Dever's imperpetuity here for a little bit,

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so you can let me know. I don't think I'm

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>close to that board, which I know. Our boy Donnie

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is dying for me to get on the board because

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:19.239
<v Speaker 1>he's got a box of oh crap, what is it?

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>The what's the thing that I'm still at thirty three?

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't had a home or this entire time. What

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>are the things that everybody the Italian I'm I'm going

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to get murdered for this Cano. Yeah, I apologize. I

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>just I didn't. I had never had a Connoli before

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the season, and then Donnie brought him. Yeah, it's not

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>looking good for me, Donnie. But South African g is

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>locked in here. So Joey, what do you think? Where

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are you going for your home run call? Today?

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Angelo? Where is it?

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Angelo kind of nailed it right here all d Backs

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 2>against Senzatela. I'm going with Jock Peterson. I just think

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be a disaster in Colorado tonight

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the Diamondbacks.

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I put up ten runs again. I think Jock.

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Peterson he's been a little bit cold recently, but the

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 2>matchup is too good to pass up here.

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm joining you and I'm going with Christian Walker. Christian

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Walker actually has a pretty solid BVP versus big home

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>run threat. I'm gonna go with it, so we are

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 1>both doing it. By the way, Dinger said a Rico

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>up to thirteen today, I have that up there, So

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty impressive. So next season we get you going

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>with it. We like to get those big prizes. We

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>like to do fun stuff, So make sure you check

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>out everything over on the Fantasy Pros discord. Make sure

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you're locked in all the season long and right here,

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>not only on the podcast feed, but the YouTube because

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>don't go anywhere, because we're gonna have more off season

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>content than you've ever had before, talking redraft talkin dynasty

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>here on this feed, and we got more Joe Rico

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and Casey Bubba coming up here on Wednesday. Thanks everybody

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>for having me back after I've been out for a

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. I will be back again on Monday

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and Friday of next week, so I got a packed one.

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you're locked in. Find Joe Rico, Joe Rico

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine and find me at is It the Welsh

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Until next time, I love you all and we will

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>talk to you right here. Leading off on the Fantasy

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Pros MLB channel peace Out.

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 4>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 4>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok At

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy Pros and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 4>dot com Slash Fantasy Pros MLB