WEBVTT - Machines, Morality and Sexbots

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie Tagli. Julie

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>name an evil robot? Okay, you're just laughing. I'm sorry.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the first one that comes to mind.

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't have you see the brain today? Then I'm

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>wearing the brain that you're wearing. Yeah, if you see

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the model, Yeah, it's a weird hat for sure. But no,

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like evil robots and saying film in film, Okay, well,

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could say the terminator, but he wasn't

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.319
<v Speaker 1>really a robot. Well, I mean, yeah, underneath the fake

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>skin he was, you could say Arnol Schwartzenegger. There, Okay, well,

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll let's roll with the terminator thing. All right, so

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he's he's in the well, no, because he's probably not

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a robot. But but yeah, the Terminator. There's a classic

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>example evil robot, right though even in this case, it's

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the terminators just programmed to perform function. And in the

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>first movie that function is quote unquote evil, And in

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the second film he's programmed to do something good. Yes,

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's the interesting thing that we've

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>been talking about when we've been talking to Dr Ronald

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Arkin at Georgia Tech, and he of course is the

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>man he and his UM research assistance who are responsible

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for what they're calling in the media the Decepticon, which

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds really you know, brooding and scary, but it's basically

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>robots that have had deception programmed in them so they

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>can deceive other robots and they can deceive other people.

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But turns out that they're actually working on different emotions

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>with robots just so that like for instance, like the

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the Terminator, that they might be able to learn empathy

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>or something like guilt that would help them operate out

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>on the battlefield. So there's probably a joke there about

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.279
<v Speaker 1>UM some sort of like faith based robotics program like well,

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, because on a certain service of it, why

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>would you want to make a robot feel guilty. It's

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like these these bots have it too good, and you know,

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>install some guilt in them, make them feel bad for

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.119
<v Speaker 1>a change, because we have found out that guilt actually

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>helps us to behave in a way that's more altruistic. Right, Okay,

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna actually listen to Dr or can talk

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>about this a little bit. Well, let's let's talk about emotions,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 1>and we do. I've worked in emotions for decades, actually

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in robot emotions. I worked on Sony and EBow the

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>small robot dog Curio, their humanoid. We just finished a

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>project with Samsung UH and Billie Mushkeina, my student just

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>successfully defended or dissertation yesterday on time Varying effective models

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of behavior a complete a span of effect including traits, attitudes, moods,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and emotions. UH. We'd like to think it's the most

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>complete model of emotion for any robotics system ever. Today.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like a palette. You can wonderful emotion and effective

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>portraits that can interact with human beings. But the real

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>question is does emotion belong in the battle field and

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>what value does it bring? M What value does emotion

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>bring to the battlefield. Some could argue that fear would

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be a useful one for in terms of self preservation,

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but anger and frustration and many of the others seem

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>to UH tend to cloud judgment in human beings and

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>lead them towards criminal acts. That's what we'd like to

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>engineer out of the battlefield. If we potentially could. Now,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in some of my work I did include one of

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the emotions. There are moral emotions which include empathy and

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>compassion and alike as well. Too. One could argue that

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>those emotions are already legislated into the Geneva Conventions. So

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, if you adhere to that, you are

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>being empathetic. Uh, you're not. You're understanding the distinction between

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the civilian. You're making sure that you're not applying unnecessary

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>force in different sets of circumstances. You're making sure that

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>when you kill someone it is done in a way

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>which is not considered uncivilized. So in that sense, we

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have to incorporate that motion directly into the ROADBOT

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>if and it follows those uh, those rules, it potentially can.

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But what we did incorporates a different moral motion, which

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>was guilt. Interestingly enough, uh, we use guilt as a

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>mechanism by which the system could reduce the level of

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>force it uses if it doesn't fully understand it. So

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>let me give an example. Um. One of the things

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's done prior to the deployment of a weapon is

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a battle damage estimate. So if you were going to

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>drop a bomb in a particular area. You would have

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to have an estimate. This is religious proportionality on other things. Uh,

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you would drop this weapon and you would expect such

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and such to occur. Afterwards, you do a battle damage assessment. UM.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>So suppose, for example, an autonomous system, say an intelligent

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Reaper or something like that, the unmanned area vehicles they're

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>using now, which are under human control at this point

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in time, made a decision that it was going to

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>drop a weapon, and it did a battle damage assessment.

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>It calculated the collateral damage it could occur. There's important

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>things to understand. What you're disturbing to many people about

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the tolerance of civilian casualties and civilian deaths, which is

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>actually a part of warfare, but that that dates back

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Middle Ages and the principle of double effect,

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>among other things. You're not a war criminal if you

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>kill a civilian. Your war criminal if you intentionally kill

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a civilians. And there's fundamental differences. It's very hard to expect,

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>inspect a human mind to be able to tell. So

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting that he's talking about this model of

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>emotions for robotics system UM and even that the whole

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>point about how you don't necessarily need to program empathy

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and compassion if the robot can follow the rules of

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Geneva conventions, right, so the protocols of it. So

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>if if the robot follows that, then you don't necessarily

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>need to to get into the weeds with empathy at

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>least in that case, right, if you've got a robot

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>but that is performing specific functions out on the battlefield. Um,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to look a little bit more at

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that Smith's and Debot componential I R T model for guilt,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>because this is the cognitive model that they used for

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>their robots. And they said, okay, let's look at a

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>good model of guilt and how to program it. So

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that model is actually they studied the process of the

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>structure of guilt and this what was administered to two

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sevent equal students, and the finding show that

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>this kind of modeling is appropriate to investing through other emotions. Right,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But what you're using teenagers? Though? Oh yeah, the the

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>guiltiest humans on the planet, are you? I mean, yeah,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm just a little I don't know about

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>using teenagers to program robots, you know, like, oh right, right, Well,

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know, they were not you know, saying

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like let's take their skill level at driving, or you know,

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>their their seat of judgment reasoning here and instilled in

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a robot. I can just imagine robots becoming very moody,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>having crushes and and and just all sorts of ridiculous stuff. Yeah. Yeah,

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know what, I'm sure there's a market

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for that robot somewhere out there. Um. But there were

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>five different components of guilt, and the first one. I'll

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>just kind of run through these quickly because actually, there's

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a really great paper on This is very long, so

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that nobody wants to hear uh twenty page

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>paper described here, So we'll just get to the meat

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of it, which is the first The first condition is

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that guilt implies an appraisal in terms of responsibility. Okay, Okay, So,

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, guilt only appears in situations for which one

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>feels personally responsible for. Okay, So that's like, Um, I

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to walk the dog and then the dog

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>pooped on the living room floor. Yeah, that's kind of

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on me. Because I was supposed to walk the dog.

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>That was my responsibility. I feel guilty. Yeah. The poops

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>on you. The second is that guilt implies an appraisal

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.679
<v Speaker 1>in terms of norm violation. A violation of a norm

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or the moral order proceeds guilt. Yeah, dog poop does

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>not go in the living room floor. Right, that's a norm.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a norm and that norm has been defied. Right.

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Guilt implies the third one, a negative self evaluation as

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a covert reaction of the type I did something bad.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's the negative self of that evaluation relates to

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>an act, and it's not a definite disapproval of the

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>entire self. Okay, so it's like, hey, I'm a pretty

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>good guy, but man, I should have walked that dog

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>so it didn't poop on the living room floor. Yeah.

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So I mean you're not going into a shame spiral, right,

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying, gosh, I could I could probably be

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>better if I didn't do that. Exactly. I'm not losing

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>sleep over it. It's not a crisis, but to self

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>need to get better at walking that dog. Yes. This

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>presentation is brought to you by Intel Sponsors of Tomorrow.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Number four is, while feeling guilty, one's attention and inner

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts or covert ruminative ring reactions focused on the act

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>much more than on the self. I really hate that

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that dog pooped on the floor, and it's my doing,

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>right that we're looking at here. Yeah, well, and I

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>was also kind of thinking about Lady Macbeth in the

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>super crazy way. She's not a norm obviously a guilt

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but outdamn spot right, she's obsessed with the blood on

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>her hands, the imagined blood on her hands, and and

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the She's not doing a lot of

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>introspective work right, right, She's just turning it over in

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>her brain over and over in and then the fifth

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>one is that guilt implies the motivations and action tendencies

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>related uh to ourselves, So one is inclined to confess,

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to undo one's fault and try to write what her

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>what was gone wrong with an apology. Okay, I'm not

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>sure how to relate that to the dog poop though, Well,

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I guess you could say, especially if this

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is the space on teenagers, right, like, sorry, um, I

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>will not do that again. I will take the dog out. Okay. Yeah,

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that's the acknowledgement part, right, So these

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>are that's the actual cognitive model that they used to

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>them program the robots, which is pretty fascinating. Right, So

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you see that play out. Obviously, this is an algorithms

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a if if in then situation. Um.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But nonetheless, here we are trying to create some sort

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of morality in robots, right, even if it's x than

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>y yes on carpet, then sat exactly exactly. Um. But

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it was really interesting because Dr Arhin was talking about

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this um, and then he was talking about in a

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>larger context, we need to really be thinking about robots

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and our connection to them. So it's not just okay,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll use them out in the battlefield, but how do

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>we connect to technology as a whole. So he had

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to say about why we can't help

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>but connect to technology even though it's not another human.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's hear that. But the real key for us

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is I have been concerned in robotics from the very

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>beginning with the behavior of intelligence systems, and uh, these

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things affect behavior. Fortunately, now we have architectures

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>where we can create and compose autonomously robotic behavior. So

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>these systems can do things in the context emissions or

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in the context of your home or whatever you like.

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And in some cases emotions are very useful. If you

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>want a robot companion, you would probably like it to

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to express emotions so you could train with

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it and but feel that it's more a part of you.

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Remember the Tamaguchi's that people used to have, the little

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>watches that people would cry when they didn't feed them,

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and they died in the In all sorts of things,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we have this propensity of human beings to create bonds

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>to artifacts extremely easily. Uh, it's very natural. Cliffness studied

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this in his book The Media Equation UH and documented

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it very well that even if we fully understand that

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this is an artifact, it doesn't matter. And what's interesting

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is that roboticists, and this begs many different other ethical questions,

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we can create these artifacts in ways that we can

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>make you want them. Uh. Same you go to a movie, right,

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>what are you watching? You're watching a bunch of dots

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>on a screen. Uh, And you walk out there crying,

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>laughing if it's a good movie, and you'll have paid

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for the privilege of doing that, And you're being manipulated

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Your emotions are being an it's like

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a ride, right, Well, a robot could have that same capability,

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but it can follow you around and it can be

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>more a portion of your life on a daily basis,

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So that actually changes things to some degree. This physical

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>embodiment actually alters the equation in many people's minds, so

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that there is an extra level of concern that we

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>need to address as we move forward with this technology.

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So again it comes down to the fact that our

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>our emotions can be manipulated by anything. Yeah. I loved

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it when he was talking about the movies. He was

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>just saying, look, this is sort of pixelated light and

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you are crying, you know, um, because we can't help

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>but see ourselves in all those different situations. You know.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's like the rorshot test of our existence. Yeah,

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like the we've I've mentioned before, the bit from

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Community where Jeff Winger points outther you give a pencil

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and name and then you snap it in half and

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>then we feel sad. You know. It's like we can

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we can just become emotional attached just about anything. Yeah,

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we ascribe meaning to everything. Um. And we've talked about

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Sherry Chuckle before too. She's the psychologist who worked at

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>M I T for many years and and adults. Yeah,

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>she she developed a crush on Cog, the lab robot,

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and found herself wishing that she had more alone time

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with Cog in the sense that you know, the other

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>her her co workers were maybe bow guarding some time

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with with Cog. Um. Not that she wanted to get

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>intimate with Cog. And we're making her sound crazier than

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>she No, No, she's actually she has some really interesting

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>things to say. She has a book out called Alone Together, um,

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and about how again we're connecting with technology and we're

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>making the connection, but we're all doing it alone together. Um.

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>But so you know, actually dr Arkin brought her up

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, because she was going to be talking at

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Tech the week that we spoke to him. And

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>then he also brought up the fact that he teaches

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>robots ethics in terms of intimacy to his class and

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>robots and society. And of course you know who came

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>up during the XY with three exes. Well, hey, let's

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>hear what dr Arkin has to say about Foxy Roxy

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and William's dissertation which I was mentioning, uh that she

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>very successfully passed yesterday one of the studies. We did

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of human robot interaction studies, and one of those

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>was having a robot in a search and rescue mission. Uh,

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>start when a sudden event occurs, start to give commands

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to a human being to evacuate, to get out of

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the room. When we did it without the effective component,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>there was very little compliance, actually none. Uh. Well he

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>added the effect people started moving when the robot told

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>him to go in that case. So the very interesting dimensions. Uh.

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And you don't even need that in many cases. But

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the point is that once the more and more we

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>understand human intelligence and human feelings, and the more and

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>more we put them into these systems, the more prone

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we are to fall in love, to care, to whatever

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with these particular devices. And that begs the next question,

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>which I'm talking about with my class this week as

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>well too in robot ethics. It is uh, intimacy and

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>how far you want to go? What is socially acceptable?

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>What is societally acceptable? Where are we going to draw

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the lines? And very very very few people are we

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>wing to approach that subject. It's it's very interesting. There's

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>virtually no academic research whatsoever going in the intimate level,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the deeper levels of human robot interaction and robot sexuality. Uh,

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>there are no funding agencies that I am aware of,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it would dare to uh fund in that space. You

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>can imagine the repercussions that that could occur. But there

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are people doing it. I was just saying, yet you

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>know there's a market for it because they've already Yeah,

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's exactly right. It's kind of like what the pornography

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>industry is being done in people's garages and warehouses and

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the like as well too. There was the so called

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>first sex robot called roxy r o x R. Yes, exactly.

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, that's a bad robot. Sorry, I wouldn't even

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>call it a robot as well too. And the point

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is you can make claims about things which are completely

0:16:55.600 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>unfounded because people don't understand the the ways of which

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>humans relate to these particular artifacts. And if you're abhoard

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>by the mere thought of that, that's okay, But then

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.239
<v Speaker 1>what you're gonna do about it? I mean, are you

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>going to provide guidelines, restrictions, regulations for the conductor research?

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now? There are no such guidelines of restrictions, So

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>there's just a social pressure, as Lessig would talk about

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in this context. But we may uh, and I also

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have to blame our own profession for not coming up

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>with much in the way of regulate, regulating the way

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in which we do things. It's still it was a

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>real cow cowboy cow girl field when I first got started. H.

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Now we have much more effective scientific measures for evaluating results,

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>but we still haven't got to the UH bioethics community

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>as well too in those aspects, although we do and

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I am a member, a founding member the technically Tripoli

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Technical Committee and robo ethics. But it's getting stronger. People

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>are understanding that we're succeeding. That's the scary song. You see,

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>there were actually succeeding in making these kinds of artifacts

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and the consequences of them. Uh, we don't fully understand.

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So Roxy a bad robot, Yeah, a bad robot in

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Roxy's case. They're taking their uh sort of well less

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>successful attempt at a healthcare robot and turning it into

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a into a sex spot for to make a few,

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, to to to generate a little more revenue flow,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. Yeah. Yeah, but but yeah, so's the

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>issues out there. We we we need to be thinking

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. Uh and and uh, yeah, I don't know

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>if it means we need to found like a you know,

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Sex Spot Institute of North America or what right? Right?

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And actually I think this isn't included in the in

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>the audio, but I did ask him about whether or

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not these issues surrounding intimacy with robots or something that

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>are slow going in the United States and are are

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are more talked about in Europe for instance, And he said, well,

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a good scientist, I don't have any

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>data so I can tell you that, but I can

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you that people started talking about it in Europe, uh,

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>far earlier than we are now talking about it in

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Um. And that there are all sorts

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of issues that they're talking about with robotics in terms

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of like even like robotic spare parts. If you were

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to have you know, say an exo skeleton arm, um,

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, who should get that arm who should have

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>access to these enhancements essentially? Um? You know? And and

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, oh, that kind of makes me think that

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>there could be this black market created for some of

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this technology if we don't now start thinking about how

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>we want to release it to the public or we

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>want the public at large using technology. UM. And so

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about things like that, like a exo

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>skeleton or a robotic arm, then you're really talking more

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>like people who might use it in terroristic acts, you know,

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>or to to bolster those sort of um, terroristic acts,

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if that makes any sense. But not like the building

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of a sex spot in their basement. Well that's that's

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>a concern too. But he was sort of saying, this

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is all a part and parcel that that you know,

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>in in Europe, some of these other considerations have been

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>going on for a while. UM, have the have nots,

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>who would have access to it? How would it be used?

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's what's the best use of this technology? Um?

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And he also brought up another really interesting point about

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, really looking at the situation and trying to

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>figure out are we we being sensitive to it in

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>the right ways? Are we really listening to all of

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the voices, um that are out there, including neo Luddites. Yeah.

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that he actually has his class

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>study Ted Kaczynski and UM in some of his writings

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of neo Luddites and what they can learn

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>as programmers about the technology they're creating. Uh. And of course,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who aren't familiar, Kazynski was of

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>course the Unibomber, famous for the Unibomber Manifesto, which is

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>another documented is that is far too long to read,

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's entirety here. Some only gonna read half of it.

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Um No, I'm just gonna read a couple well, just

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>a brief excerpt from it here, just to give you

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>an idea in case you've never looked at it. It

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>starts off like this, The Industrial Revolution and its consequences

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have been a disaster for the human race. They have

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>greatly increased the life expectancy of those of us who

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>live in advanced countries, but they have distabilized society, have

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>made life unfulfilling, has subjected human beings to indignities, have

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed to widespread psychological suffering in the third world, to

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>physical suffering as well, and have inflicted severe damage on

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the natural world. And it kind of goes on from there.

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's is kind of a downer about about technology

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>in the modern age and where it's headed, and it's

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just a very grim you on how technology has

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>changed life on Earth. Yeah, and just just for a

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>little refresher for everybody to He actually sent sixteen mail

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>bombs to various targets at universities and airlines, um, and

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to get his message across UM. So obviously

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this was someone who is not uh playing with full

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>deck and was had some interesting things to say, but

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was more psychotic. Yeah, and um, you know, killed some

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>people and it was it was not a good thing.

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, again that being said, it was interesting

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to to look at the material I assume of a

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Neil Ludite and try to find points there, points of

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>consideration at least. I mean, it's like with politics, even

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're more of a middle to line person, it

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>pays to at least glance over and see what the

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the extreme opinions on either side are thinking about. Yeah, well,

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 1>let's hear what Dr Orkand has to say about that.

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>There are people all that. Bill Joy, in his article

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>why the Future Doesn't Meet Us, which was published at

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the millennia I believe it was in Wired,

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about g n R genetics, nanotechnology and robotics due

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to self replication as leading to the extinction of mankind

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and the solution that he advocated is we should relinquish

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>all research in that particular space. Most of us think

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a little premature, um. But if that is the

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>threat is as great as he argues, it's something we

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>should continue to discuss. Um. So I just want to

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>put that on the table as well. And actually his inspiration,

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>uh was the UNI Bomber for much of his work

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>as well too in terms of reading what Kazynski wrote,

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>which actually encouraged my class to take a look at

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>as well too. Not because I admire the man, far

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>from it, but rather a neo Luddite has a perspective

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that must be considered in terms of what we are

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially doing as a society. And everyone implores the means

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that we're used in that particular case, but nonetheless we

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>have to be aware of the technologies that we're creating,

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what the potential effects are on our species and our civilization.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Univirment's Manifesto as a classroom text, Yeah yeah,

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>And again I think it's really interesting that he introduces

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that just so that his students would be aware of

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the issues. And it was making me think about confirmation

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>bias and why we, you know, with our confirmation bias.

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>As humans, we can't help but continue to seek out

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>supportive material to to help us come to the conclusion

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>we want the conclusions we'd like to come to in life, right,

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>we typically do that. We typically don't seek out stuff

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that that makes us wrong about something. Right. So, actually,

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Millot knew, uh Milo. Now he is the author

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of The Drunkard's Walk. He has some interesting things to

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>say about that um in that book about confirmation bias.

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And here's a quote. It says, to make matters worse,

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>not only do we preferentially seek evidence to confirm our

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>preconceived notions, but we also interpret ambiguous evidence in favor

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>of our ideas. This can be a big problem because

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>data are often ambiguous. So by ignoring some patterns and

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>emphasizing others are clever, brains can reinforce their beliefs even

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in the absence of convincing data. So again, I think

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very interesting that the class would look at

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that text. We'll try to find something in it that

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>that might have a kernel truth to it. Yeah, I mean,

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like anytime you see somebody who say goes down

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the road of conspiracy theories, or or or even just um,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>let's say one particular political ideology or another. You know,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>if they start just consuming just one type of media

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>about it, like all they read or books by this

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>particular author and their um their comrades about a particular

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>movement or or set of ideas. Then that you know,

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you are what you eat. You you sort of streamline

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>your your your brain on that particular topic. So it Yeah,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it pays to have a little wider viewpoint on things. Yeah,

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>food for thought there if you are which what you eat? There? Um,

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Dr Ronald Organ again for taking

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the time to talk to us about robotics and ethics

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we really appreciate it. So, hey, what do

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about the future of social interaction with robots?

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>About guilty robots or sexy robots? Let us know we're

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and Facebook, both of those as below the

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>mind and you can always send your thoughts to blow

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the mind at how stuff works dot com for moral

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics. Is it how

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. To learn more about the podcast,

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>click on the podcast icon in the upper right corner

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of our home page. The house stuff Works iPhone app

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 1>has a ride. Download it today on iTunes,