WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2018 NFL MegaPod Week 15 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man Now, Down Now Thursday morning, December.

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It's the Beating the Book podcast Gil Alexander. This episode

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>sponsored by the Power Rank eighteen Bowls Season Report that's

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the work of Ed Fang, Ed who's been a guest

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast many many times. He's a Stanford pH

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>d and regular guest on the Megapod. The pdf document

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>has all his best predictions for spreads and totals, right

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>ups on each game, that covers situations and complete bowl

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>pool advice like that as well. To check it out,

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>go to the Power Rank dot Net. It's a u

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:43.959
<v Speaker 1>r L that will take you to a page where

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you can learn more about the Power Rank eighteen Bowl

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Season Report, again brought to you by Ed Fang. I

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend it again at the Power Rank dot Net.

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Week number fifteen in the National Football League and as

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Marco will tell you, that means it's our second to

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>last week of the regular season because we do not

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>do a week seventeen, and if I try, Marco will

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>tell me we're not doing it. So it is week fifteen.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>We're excited about it. As the NFL season comes into

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the home stretch. That voice you heard on the right

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>I believe is that of Marco to Angelo from Wager Talk.

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Marco. We did it once and it was

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a total disaster. Total disaster because we don't know, you

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know who's playing, you don't know motivations, and it's

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just a whole thing. It's a squirrely week guessing lines.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't do a guessing lines that week either. Thank you,

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Marco as always an ace. You're here too, Yes, yes, sir,

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>yes sir, thanks for having me again. And yes it's

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>winding down, baby, but the postseasons around the corner, and

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the best part of the season. I am very,

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>very excited, and we're very excited to have our score

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>X winner join us for the wild card Megapod right now,

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Profitable in the lead three weeks to go. Now in

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the regular season, we'll see if he gets to the

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Promised Land or she. I don't know, profitable could be

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>she and our first returning guest of the year. We've

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>gone this whole way having a different guest every week.

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>He is our returning guests from week number one. He's

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>been with us a couple of times at least every year.

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Super Contest Champion from the San Souci team, ladies and gentlemen.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Brady Cannon, Good morning, Brady, Good morning guys. Happy to

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>be back. Always a pleasure, and uh, you know, this

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>is one of the fun things about football season every year,

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>joining you guys, getting around the Megapod roundtable. I appreciate

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the invitation and look forward to the next hour or so.

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate having you. All right, gentlemen, let's start it

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>with Monday Night football. As we always do, we go

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>in reverse order. Monday Night, New Orleans at Carolina. New

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Orleans coming off a come from behind win against the

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Bucks that coupled with the Rams loss against the Bears

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday night, means that the Saints are back in

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the driver's seat for the number one position in the

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>NFC playoffs. Right now, they hold the tiebreaker having beaten

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Rams this year, So the Saints need to just

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>win out and they've got home field throughout the NFC

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>playoffs there at Carolina. Carolina has lost five games in

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a row. They were six and two, now they're six

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and seven. They lose last week to the Cleveland Browns,

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of these situations again where you you

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>watch the Panthers Christian McCaffrey fills up the box scory

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>seemingly each and every week. But Cam Newton in key situations,

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>especially in Golden Ghost situations. I don't know if there's

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>something wrong with Cam, what's going on, but he has

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>no touch whatsoever. He's like whipping the ball into guys

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>from the five yard Light's like the worst thing to watch,

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just awful to watch. Caroline and key situations. McCaffrey, as

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, sixteen carries for sixty three yards two touchdowns,

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>also six receptions for thirty eight yards last week in defeat,

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but the Panthers ten penalties for sixty eight yards five

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>straight losses. As I mentioned, that'll increase the heat on

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>coach Ron Rivera. Newton overthrew Jerry's right on fourth and

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>goal for three with two thirty five left. Uh and

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>even though Carolina got the ball back, Newton, who has

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>been playing with the sowred right shoulder, didn't have Devin Funches.

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>He was picked off by Damarius Randall with fifty seven

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>seconds left. And that's all. She wrote. Saints favored by

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>six here consensus across the board. Let's call it six

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half consensus because it's all over the place, really,

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but six and a half appears to be the consensus

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>right now as we do this Thursday morning at Carolina, Brady,

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we start with you your thoughts. I made the line

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Saints minus seven, Gil, and it opened up Saints minus

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>six and a half pretty much six everywhere now, as

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you say. And then in the super contest they made

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the number five and a half, which I think is

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting, and I think it may close even lower. Uh,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>some recreational play may bring the number back up a bit,

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know, primetime game all the early money

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>though in every opinion I've heard so far as on

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers, and when I crunched my numbers, I have

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans winning this game by five points. So there's

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely not enough, not enough of a discrepancy for me

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to want to make a play on this game. And

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm glad my numbers came out as such,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because as much as the situation makes sense for Carolina,

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I can't trust this team anymore. It was

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a while back on that Thursday Day night when they

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>were just boat raced by the Stealers. They started out

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>with an early score and it looked like we were

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>in for a really good game, and then Pittsburgh just

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>took off and buried them, and I thought that was

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 1>an anomaly for the Panthers. I thought they were a

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty good squad. And then the next week I backed

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>them on the road at Detroit. And it still ticks

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>me off that you're good, buddy Riverboat Ron decided to

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>go for two instead of kick the extra point. Uh

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So Anyway, that was five games ago, and like you say,

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Carolina hasn't won a football game since. Since November four,

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they haven't won a game, and before that they lost

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>two out of three. So I told myself a few

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago that this is a bad football team. I mean,

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they look sexy. McCaffrey is great to watch, but I

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're a little bit in disarray right now, and

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pass on this game. I know the Saints

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>machine has so showed some vulnerability, uh in the last

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, but I just can't back the Panthers,

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm staying away from this one. Gil. I'm with

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>you Brady on on Guessing lines on Monday on Visa

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and on the podcast here Beating the Book. I actually

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>guess New Orleans minus four and a half, and so

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you would think it would trigger a bet for me

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Panthers once I see the line what the

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>actual line is. But I absolutely refused to put money

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>behind the Carolina Panthers. I do not trust Cam Newton

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>at all. I just think that this team has no

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>clue how to win in crunch time. I think you

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>said it right there. They find a way to lose.

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>They cannot close out a game. That's a good point,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and yet they are just a half game out of

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the number two wild card position in the NFC. Minnesota's

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>at six six and one Carolina along with Philadelphia and

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington at six and seven, So they're in it, right.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>They've got a lot to play for. Drew Brees Marco

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>coming off a twenty four or thirty one performance at

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay for two hundred one yards, one touchdown, one pick.

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>He was sacked one time only two nine total yards

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of offense for the Saints in victory. They were down

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and three at halftime from behind to win it,

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>they repeat as NFC South champions. Their defense limited the

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>bucks number one ranked offense to eighty one yards in

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the second half of that game last week, and most

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of that came on a final drive of the game,

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of garbage time. So Saints defense not often lauded

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>as the strength of this football team and certainly won't

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be considered that now, certainly better this year than they

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>have been in recent years. Well, I can't disagree with

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>anything you're pointed out there. The thing of this is,

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the Carolina team in last week. You know,

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I was on him a couple of weeks ago. They

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>burned me, and I've been on the sidelines. I've watched

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the games the last couple of weeks. I haven't touched

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>them since that stupid Seattle game in which they went

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>up and down the field and found a way to lose.

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>But when they lost to the Browns last week, I said,

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, this is it. This is now totally hit

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the fork out, stick the picket in Carolina. We're gonna

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going against them. And then what do I do?

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But I pull my schedule book out, see who they're

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>playing next week, and I'm gonna go back to an

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier game this year. Guys. I pulled it out, and

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I brought out the al Pacino line from you know, Scarface,

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>just what I thought I was out, pull me back

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in and it was the New York Giants and we

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>got to win with that game. If you remember, And

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what did I say? It's a team that's in total disarray.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Their garbage there. You know you can't play them, but

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a Monday night game, prime time. They don't want

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to be embarrassed. Uh. The same thing applies here to Carolina.

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the last game that you can even consider

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at them this season. If they lose this game,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>just go ahead right now and bet the advanced line

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for next week when they go to Atlanta will get

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>your When Atlanta comes to town, we'll lose the game

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>out right. Uh, this is a team that this is

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it in Riverboat Ron can use his Moniker all he

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>mounts and this one because they're the underdog, they're given

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>no shot to win this game. Um really no pressure. Yeah,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>there's pressure that they technically can still get to the playoffs.

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>They're only half game behind in Minnesota. Looks like they're

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in free fall right now and all of that. But

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you have to lose? It's fourth and two,

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>go for it. You're down one at the end of

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the game after scoring a touchdown, go ahead, go for

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>two again. You know what, I'll take the points here.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>You know that's it. Yeah, live it up, Run, because

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be gone at the end of the season

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when you missed the playoffs. I don't know if I

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>said this on this show or on Visa on a

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Numbers game, but Riverboat Run. There's been situations this year,

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 1>notably the Detroit game where they lost by point. He went,

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>he elected to go for two at the end where

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I almost feel like his nickname made him go for

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it right, Like it's almost a self fulfilling prophecy, like

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>he's like, well, I gotta live up to Riverboats. I'm

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna go for it here for no reason whatsoever. And

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>then I also think that he's gotten to the point

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>where he's Dusty Baker. And so what I mean by

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>that is Dusty Baker. A lot of us like to

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>kill Dusty Baker for always making the wrong moves in

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a baseball game as a manager. But Dusty Baker's got

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>to the point now where even when he makes the

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>right move sometimes it just doesn't work out for him.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>When he was a manager, that is, And I think

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Ron Riverboat ron Is at that point, so he's like,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, he goes for it when he shouldn't and

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>then when he does the right thing, like Graham Gono

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Shanks one, I just think he's that guy right now.

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Ace your thoughts here on this game? Why the way

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it should be noted Saints last week against the Bucks,

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>first half they ran the ball nine times for just

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>three yards. That was a little off. Now they stuck

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>with it, which I like, and they finished with a

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards on thirty attempts. But that was a really

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>slow start after a really bad game a week before

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and Thanksgiving against the Uh not on Thanksgiving, but the Thursday,

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the previous Thursday against the Cowboys. So the Saints had

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>about three halves of ridiculous football. We'll see if that

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>ever rears its head again. How do you feel here? Yeah,

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is uh one of those games where

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>again you know who a better team is and it

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>appears they're in opposite trajectories. But like we say, I mean,

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>when you when you talk about betting sports, the points

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>beer becomes a great equalizer, um. And how much better

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is one team than the other? Um? Now we're looking

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>at two teams that really know each other well. And

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line with the Saints is this as good

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>as they have looked, meaning they're ten and one straight

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>up and against the spread in their last eleven games. UM.

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>They haven't looked all that great in the last three.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they got really lucky to cover against Tampa Bay,

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a game they were down fourteen three in UM and

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they've only averaging a little over two hundred sixty yards

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a game over the last three. So this high powered

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>offense UM has been slowed down a little bit. Personally,

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>because I have a lot invested in the Saints future,

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see them lose the game in

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the regular season as opposed to going into the playoffs

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on a run. UM. I just think it's good to

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>refocus the team. I they it happened at Dallas UM

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and that three point loss, But again I didn't like

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>how they responded against Tampa Bay, falling behind like they

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>did UM, turning the ball over even lost the turnover battles. Personally,

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this may be a little too many points,

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with Marco. I mean, sure, Carolinas uh

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>alive mathematically, UM, but they're kind of in a low

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>law situation. I mean, it's prime time game, it's it's

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a divisional rival, and let's not forget more important than

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>anything else. These two teams played each other three times

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>last year, three times. Saints won all three games against them, um,

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>including playoff revenge for Carolina losing last January in New

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Orleans as six and a half point dogs in New

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Orleans lost that game by five. If you remember, uh,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>so again, I mean, there's a lot for Carolina as

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>far as liking the situation they're in and not liking

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>again the objectory they've been in the last five weeks.

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>But with that said, they've just found ways to lose games.

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>They haven't been getting blown out. Other than that Pittsburgh

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>de buncle. The loss of Detroit was by one. The

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>loss of Seattle was by field goal by Campbell one score,

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland one score. Granted, all those games were very winnable. UM.

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>With that said, if you look at the point spreads

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in those games, it's not like they were big favorites

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in any of them. I mean, they were a one

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>point favorite in Cleveland, they were a three point favorite

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>against Seattle. UM. You know, so again, they have been

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>playing close games. I think six and a half I

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like that, and I leaned under also. Um again, the Saints,

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you think high, high profile offense and all that, but

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>they have not been an over machine. They're they're five

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and eight to the under. In fact, you know a

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>team that averages thirty five points a game is cashing

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>under tickets because it's total is too high. I mean,

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>look over their last four games, you have two totals

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that are fifty five or higher, one that was sixty one.

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty hard to hit these numbers. Man. With one

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>thing about the NFL betting markets, it's extremely efficient, and

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw a lot of high scoring games early. Well

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.479
<v Speaker 1>guess what now we're seeing a lot of high totals

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>late and not too short, These games are gonna keep

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>flying over. So again I like the points with Carolina

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and I like the under as well too. So that's

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>where my mind is right now, taking the points of

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Carolina six and a half. Taking the under in this one.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Should be noted that really weird scheduling anomaly. The Panthers

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and Saints have not played yet this year division opponents,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>so they've got two games against each other here last

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. So it's home for Carolina at New Orleans,

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>then a game at home against Atlanta followed by at

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. So best case scenario for Carolina here in

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>their pursuit of the number two wild card position, which

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>again they're only a half game out of right now,

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is that they figure out a way to get the

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>win here and then somehow that last game means nothing

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to New Orleans, so they would need a Rams loss

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point to for that to be the case.

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And then Carolina, you know, would be a very credible

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>thing to say they could win all three of their

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>last games, but gotta get past this one first, that's

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and that's a tall order. Sunday night, it's

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia at the Rams. This is now at eleven eleven

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half consensus somewhere in that pocket. It's up

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>from nine and a half. The reason for that is

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that Carson Wentz underwent a scan on his back on

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday that was inconclusive and was scheduled to undergo an

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>m r I today Thursday to help diagnose an issue

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that has plagued him for several weeks. That according to

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schefter over at ESPN, either way, it appears that

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Wentz is unlikely to play in this game against the Rams.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>NFL Network first reported that that he was unlikely to play.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a scenario where Carson Wentz doesn't play anymore

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>this year at all, especially if the Eagles, and very

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>likely the Eagles are eliminated this week. Eagles coach Doug

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Peterson saying that Wentz was experiencing soreness and tightness in

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>his back and woulden practice in his stead, will be

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl champion Nick Foles. Rams favored by eleven and

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a half. I've got nothing else to add, Marco. Yeah,

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>this is that you're paying a price for the Rams,

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>who are going to be coming home in a very

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>angry mood. And last week the Bears made Jared Goff

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>looked like Jared Goff under the direction of Jeff Fisher.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was horrible, horrible, four interceptions. That defense

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely dominated the game. Uh, doesn't have to worry

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about that this week. Last week, Philadelphia probably the most

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>misleading score of the weekend. You know what goes into overtime,

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and everybody that had Philly at plus three and a

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>half was screaming, I got ever opted overtime, and you

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>know you did. You shouldn't even have been in overtime. Okay,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>come on, when you give up five hundred and seventy

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>five yards of offense and the team that had all

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of that offense turned the botrow over three times, you

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>know you were lucky, you were even in the zip

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>code of that game. So let's forget about all of

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that non it And really, I gotta tell you if

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Dallas could put up those kind of numbers last week

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in what was literally a playoff atmosphere, because if Philadelphia

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>would have won that game, Philadelphia was in control of

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>their own destiny to make the playoffs. Now you know

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they're in deep, you know what with that loss. Now

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to play an angry Rams team that after

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>pounding their heads against that brick wall known as the

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bear defense for four quarters last Sunday, They're gonna

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>look at this defense and they're gonna think they're running

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>through Swiss cheese this week. I don't want to lay

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>all those points, but what I will play, and it's

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the ultra square play. But man, how

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>many times have we sat here on this podcast and

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about a prime time game and said, uh, this

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is too square. I can't take the over I'll try

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to sweat through the under. Now. Now, I'm not gonna

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. If I get involved in this game, it's

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the over and that's the only way I possibly play this.

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>You know the Rams are going to be in an

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>angry mood. You know they're gonna want to put up

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>points this week. And this is a team prior to

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>last week that's put up thirty five or thirty thirty five,

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty six, fifty four points in the last uh four games.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I look for them to come back and score this

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>week and then just keep scoring in Philadelphia. They should

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>get some points because this is not a stellar Rams defense,

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and find a way to get this thing over. The

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>total two fifty two and a half somewhere in that

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>pocket on the total right now, which is down from

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>an opener of fifty four and a half. And last weekend.

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Let me just give the caveat for Eagles fans and

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Eagles backers. The opening kickoff that the Eagles recovered the

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>fumble on just completely a travesty and a miscarriage of

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>justice on a football field. Completely get it. The seventy

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>five yard or to tight end Dallas Goddard that was

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>whistled for a phantom offensive p I was maybe the

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>worst thing I've ever seen on a football field. And

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>then yes, there were makeup calls on Randy Gregory and

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>later in the game on Zeke Elliott. There the officials,

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>almost recognizing their error, did everything they could do in

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>their power to to allow the Eagles to matriculated back

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and score anyway after the Dallas got her miscarriaged justice.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But there's nothing that makes up for a seventy five

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>yard flag like that that just comes out of nowhere.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It just so happened. The Eagles were will score. But

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>DeMarco's point, all of that said, Eagles were out gamed

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>two thirty three to seventy before halftime. That's a first

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>half stat But let me give you the full game stats.

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>That box score was just ridiculous and it went into

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>overtime as we know. But Dak through for four fifty

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>five forty two of fifty four for four fifty five

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>against the Eagles. Zeke gained a hundred fourteen on the ground,

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve catches seventy nine a Marii ten catches for to

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and three touchdowns. Total yards for the game was

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>five seventy six to two, fifty six to twenty two

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>through the year one forty two to thirty four on

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the ground, nine d three total plays for the Cowboys,

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>forty eight for the Eagles. Cowboys were eight of sixteen

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>on third downs, the Eagles were one of nine. But

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>it really came down to Dallas miscuse. Dallas was minus

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>two in turnovers and they committed eleven penalties for a

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred eleven yards. That went a long way towards keeping

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles in the game time of possession. In that game,

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>time possession doesn't always matter, but in this game it

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. Forty eight Remember it went and overtime and

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas almost used the entire overtime. But eight for the

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys twenty two thirty two for the Eagles. Your thoughts, Yeah,

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a tough to back Eagles in this

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>spot after that loss to the Dallas Cowboys because so

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>much was on the line. But if there's one thing

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>with the Philadelphia Eagles this season that's been pretty easy

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to predict, um, if they run the football, they have success.

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean they cannot win or cover games if they

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have success running the football. And real quickly, what

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is, against Carolina, they ran for

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight yards, lost the game straight up and against

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.479
<v Speaker 1>the spread. Against Dallas the time ran for only seventy

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>one yards, lost the game straight up and against the spread.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Against New Orleans fifty eight yards, lost the game straight

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>up against the spread, and then last week against Dallas

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty four yards lost the game against the spread and

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>straight up. Over the last seven games, the three games

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they did win Jacksonville Giants, Washington. What all three games

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have in common they rushed for over or more yards

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>per game. If they run the football, the Eagles could

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>win and you could run on the l a rams.

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the bottom line. This is a defense that allows

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>five point one yards per rush, so they will have

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>some success. And with when it's going down, you know me,

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that's usually the perfect storm for added value. The betting

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>market always overreacts to injuries, suspensions, weather, and once it's

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>factored into the betting line, it's useless information. And more importantly, again,

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the overreaction adds line value. The only thing I want

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to add with this matchup is the fact we know

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>when Philadelphia this has happened before, and when Wentz went down,

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>they went on to win a Super Bowl, so the

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>reaction may not be as drastic as with other teams,

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>meaning the overreaction. With that said, I still think double

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>digits you've got to look to Philadelphia or leave the

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>game alone. And I get it. You know, we talked

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>about this a lot. I hear the conversations in sports

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>betting forums everywhere, UM and and on talk shows that

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>were they about how double digit favorites are doing in

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL of late. You know, over the last five

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>years they've been money makers. You look over a larger

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>sample size ten years they have it. What do you

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>pay attention recently or the bigger sample size? That's an

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>argument who's gonna win? You know? Um Granted, if you've

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>bet them lately, you've made money, But if you've done

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it over the last twenty years, you haven't. So what

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.479
<v Speaker 1>do you do going forward? Time will tell. But I

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>think game by game you gotta look at it individually.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's just way too many points. I

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. I disagree with Marco on the total

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>and the only reason is this, man, you're looking at

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>two under teams. I mean that the books have done

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a really good job. They've done a phenomenal job. Obviously

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna pay a premium for Super Bowl champions, no

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>surprise Philadelphias four and nine against the spread, But the

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Rams are eleven and two straight up

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and only five and six against the spread, you haven't

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>made money on them. Books. Have this team figured out

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. I mean, they've done a good job of

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>not letting the Rams hurt them, and here you are

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>again forced to lay a big price with them. UM.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I lean Philly, and again I think the totals a

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit too high. These two teams scored seventy eight

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>points last time they played. UM. Granted, not the same defense,

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>especially on the Eagles side of the ball as last year,

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so I could see why the adjustment. I don't think

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it should be that significant. Last year's total was forty seven.

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at a touchdown difference this season. I think

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit too high. I like the under also,

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but I like the points with the Eagles more. I

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't bet the game either way, but if it was

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>going on tonight, that's decide. I'd be looking at. The

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>best thing going for the Rams here is that this

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>is at home and not in cold weather have you

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>ever seen a quarterback just go into the tank like

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>cold weather is kryptonite for Jared Golf like I've never

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>seen it be for any other quarterback in quite the

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>same way. Twenty forty four credits to the Bears defense

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>as well, but from the outset, Jared Goff just looked

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like he did not want to be there. Four no touchdowns,

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>four picks, sack three times. That was a career high

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>four picks. His passer rating is that of a hundred

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight point three is nineteen point one. And if

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Sean McVeigh can remember that Todd Gurley's is running back,

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's the other thing, that's the only weakness of

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Sean mcveigh's. Sometimes he just forgets he has Girle. Eleven

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>carries for Girley in that game the other night for

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight yards the magic number for Gurley. Michael Lombardi

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>always throws this out on visa. Seventeen carries. You get

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>seventeen carries out of Todd Gurley. They never lose, but

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a game. You know, people can say, oh,

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>they clinched. The NFC West home field, especially this year,

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is everything, especially in the NFC, Like in the NFC playoffs,

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and right now again the Saints hold the tiebreaker, so

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>even if the Ms went out, they got to hope

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for a Saint's loss in the NFC NFC Championship. I

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>can see the Saints maybe going into l A and

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>beating the Rams. I just don't see the Rams going

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>into the New Orleans and beating the Saints. I really don't.

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So that game to me, meant everything to the Rams

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the other night, they didn't look like they had any

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>interest in being there. I think it might actually be

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for the Eagles to have Nick Foles

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>going in this game instead of Carson wentz Um. I

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>think it would have been really hard for Philadelphia to

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>get up off the mat and show up for this

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>game after the way they lost at Dallas last week,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, their hopes of winning the division basically done.

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>But but Foles kind of opens up a new story

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>or an angle. And of course, as you say, Gil,

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who led them to their Super

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Bowl victory last year. So I think it's a little

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of a spin on the fallen hero theory, the

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>team rallying together after their guy has gone down. But

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, the replacement is a hero that

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>took them all the way, So you could almost not

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have a better turn of events if you're an Eagles

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>fan for this game, for this game only. I'm not

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>sure if that will hold true after this Sunday, but

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in this spot, I think it gives them a reason

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to show up and possibly some inspiration with with Folds

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>at the controls, I think it would have been really,

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>really easy to fade the Eagles this week off of

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that last game. And maybe this is maybe that's a

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit of an overreaction, but I think now you

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>have reason not to fade them. And in my opinion,

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the lines too high whence Folds, I I really don't

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>think it makes a difference. It's too high. I I

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>made it eight and it came out nine and a half.

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Now it's ten and a half or eleven. Um, my

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers have the Rams winning this game by half that

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>four to six points, depending on how you account for

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the change at quarterback. And I haven't made a play

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>on this game yet, but uh, I think there's only

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>one way you can look here. And why are the

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Rams favored by by eleven when Dallas was favored by

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>three and a half last week, Okay, And in truth,

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>they really won that game by three points. You know,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the deflection turns it into a six point win. And

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys make all great points about you know, the

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the discrepancy and yards gained. But you know, if that's

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>truly a three point game, why are the Rams favored

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>by eleven here? And I think that you can argue

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that Los Angeles has less of a home field advantage

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>than Dallas, So Philly or nothing here for me. Uh

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>As far as the side, I just think it's too

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>many points. And again, I think Folds is actually kind

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of a good thing that gives this team a little

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a lift. Who would otherwise just you know,

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>be pretty much riding the season off at this point.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And and Marco, I think you make a good point

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>about the over two. Certainly Philly has no defense and

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Rams should be able to go up and down

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the field. But with Folds in the lineup, I think

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Philly will show up and put some points on the board.

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a Mini contest pick on the Eagles, Brady as

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the Mini contest kicks off this for the Super Contest

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. Maybe No, No, I'm not I'm not

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that dead set or don't feel that confident in the pick.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I would have to take the points

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.199
<v Speaker 1>if I did play the game. As I like to say,

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:16.479
<v Speaker 1>You're not George Costanza in your way to the ticket window.

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>You're not pushing the women and children out of the

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>way during a fire. I understand. Well, I mean it's

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>a theory that Nick Foles might give this team a

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a lift. But I don't know if

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know a whole lot about this Philly team that

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 1>you guys pointed out, they were pretty darn lucky to

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>be even closed last week. There's been a number of

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>spots where I've looked at them as a good spot

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to back them this season, and they've really failed to

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>deliver a number of times. So not high on my

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>list to go backing them again. All right, let's go

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to Sunday daytime. Ace, you got DIBs. Yeah, and again,

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I had to lose the last week. And this is

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>not by any chance, uh pat on the back or

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>or like saying I had a great week. But this

0:28:55.960 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is just a perfect example of we have a snore group.

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>That's there are demographic guys like us, guys that bet

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and The best way I could put it is, this

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is a perfect example of why there's no such thing

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>as going on the internet and looking for that one

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>lock and having that one game that can't lose and

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>searching for that game of the year type nonsense that

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist because last week I went nine and one

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>on my bets and the one that I lost was

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the one I gave out on this podcast and the best,

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and I give out bigger bets here. Honestly, I bet everything.

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, Like, my bet spread is the same since

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm betting five hundred my best bets, I'll put one

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half x. The two X is the most

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll go is two X. So if I have a

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>five average bet, my best bet will be a thousand.

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>That you know it's the most will be um. But

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>with that said, can you can you do us a favor?

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you go one and nine this week and make

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the one the one that you get? Right? Yeah, exactly right,

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's see. No, that's just it would that matter more?

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.239
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? Like, that's why gotta be cautious. Man.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>We all want that one game that's not gonna lose,

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But there's just so much randomness in in that sixty

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>minute football game. But I'm gonna go ahead and I'm

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you a game again that I already bet.

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I already put one and a half X, probably gonna

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>go to two X by the time the week's over. Um,

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's San Francisco over to Seattle Seahawks. Um. I

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.959
<v Speaker 1>took plus six when the line opened, and that's why

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I have won and a half X. And I'm gonna

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>go to two X because I think I'm taking plus

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>four now. UM, I think there's still value at plus

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>four as long as I'm getting more than the field goal.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I like San Francisco. Listen, Seattle looked great of late,

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>but if you really dig in, it's a team that's

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>been out gained in five of their last six wins.

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the game they played against Seattle

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco just two weeks ago, not even ten days ago. Um,

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at that game, San Francisco held the ball

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>for five minutes longer, had more first downs through for

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>almost four hundred yards compared totally a hundred and sixty

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>yards um through the air for Seattle. The problem is turnovers,

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and two of the turn of the three turnovers were fumbles,

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and we know when a fumble, when the ball hits

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the ground, it's random who's gonna pick it up once

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it hits The fact that they dropped they fumbled twice,

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and twice Seattle got it, it's hard to recover from that.

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So they're minus three turnovers in that game, even though

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>statistically they played a very good game. Um So, again,

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this line now is just it opened too high,

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and I still think it's high. The Seattle team now

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're starting to pay that premium that wild card

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>must win situation, and um you know, I think Teddy

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Cover said it best when he said teams are in

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>must win situations because they have they've been mediocre all season.

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you've been winning and the Saints aren't

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in must win situations, you know, I mean, Rams aren't

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in must win situations. Granted, if you want home field advantage,

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>there's still things to play for, but it is in

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a must win you're in the playoffs. Um So, if

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a teams in a must win that their mediocre of best.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And again Seattle is coming in having covered all these

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>games in a row, but those are games they could

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>have lost. Theseily, I mean against Green Bay against Carolina.

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I think this is an over valued

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Seattle team that's just gotten lucky. They haven't turned the

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>ball over. I mean they've had one turnover over the

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. Um They've been creating turnovers, and I

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's about time San Francisco wins that turnover battle.

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean they have not forced the turnover since octobery

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>against Arizona. They've gone five straight games without forcing the

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>team to turn the ball over. I hope that changes

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>someday because I got a lot of money on San Francisco.

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I like him at plus six, I like him at

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>plus four. I'll sprinkle them all the way down the

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>plus three. So give me San Francisco forty nine. There's

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>no team finer this Saturday. Give them to me. That's

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a sprinkle as well. Right there, San Francisco waiting right

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>now plus three and a half as we do this

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday. Warning, by the way, really strange scheduling quirk.

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>You have two Saturday games this week in addition to

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday night game between the Chargers and the Chiefs.

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Houston's at the Jets, Cleveland's at Denver. Those are two

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Saturday games amongst five bowl games in college football, So

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the remaining games that are on Sunday daytime, they

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>left only two games for the afternoon. So there's there's

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>eight no nine early games in the NFL on Sunday nine,

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and then two in the afternoon Seattle at San Francisco,

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>which is the one oh five Pacific four oh five

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Eastern kickoff, and then what amounts to a de facto

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>standalone game with apologies to the Seahawks and the Niners

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>unless you have money on them, New England at Pittsburgh.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>This weird, this weird thing, right, Like, why do they

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>only have to four oh five you know, four o'clock games?

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>That I hate that, especially from a betting standpoint, that sucks,

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>which they were more spread out, Brady, your choice of

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Sunday games there or Saturday? Uh yeah, or Saturday this week.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go with a real stinker here today, Gil.

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, there are some real stinkers I thought.

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I thought last week provided like the most games on

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday all season that had these crazy exciting finishes

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>either in determining an outright winner or involving the point spread,

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and then there was like four games, you know, out

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of what is their sixteen games, whatever, their fourteen games,

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>there was like four games all day that were immediately

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>like c SPAN two boring, while everything else it seemed,

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 1>was completely pure. You know, today's NFL down to the wire,

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>last two minutes and in many cases down to the

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>final seconds. And then this week, boy, on paper, there

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are some bad ones. How how dare you? How dare

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you insult our legislative process? It is very exciting, ready

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>right right, I'm waiting for that documentary to come out

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.439
<v Speaker 1>on C SPAN. Would be awesome. No, I I'm gonna

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>use one of those uh ugly games, and that is

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Cardinals visiting the Atlanta Falcons. The Falcons are

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty bad team, specifically really bad on defense. They

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>rank twenty six in the NFL. Arizona is a really

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>bad team specifically on offense, ranking dead last in the NFL.

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 1>But the Cardinals defense is pretty good and they rank

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>in the top half of the league on that side

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of the ball. And I don't mind having an underdog

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>with a better defense that has a shot to win

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the game out right, And they did just that at

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 1>lambeau Field. Two weeks ago, and the Packers, of course

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>just beat the Falcons. So simply by the transitive gentleman,

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals beat the Falcons right well, seriously, they do

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>get after the they get after the quarterback. They're very

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>solid on third down defense, and their defensive passer rating

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 1>is much better than Atlanta's. And when the Ravens beat

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta two weeks ago, they outyarded the Falcons three hundred

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and sixty six to one and thirty one, just a

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty one yards for this Falcons offense. And

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously the Ravens defense is better than the Cardinals. But

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the point is, if a better defense can keep the

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Falcons offense down, Atlanta has nothing left they can't defend

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and if they can't score, their toast. And I also

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.359
<v Speaker 1>think this is a little bit like a college bowl

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>game handicap. What what does Atlanta really have left in

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the tank? Okay? And then you have the Arizona Cardinals

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 1>with a first year coach a rookie quarterback. They're trying

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to improve, they're still trying to win games. They they

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they have something to play for and that's winning anything

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cardon or the Falcons rather uh, They're a team

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a perennial contender, a perennial powerhouse, who is horribly

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>disappointed to be where they are at this point in

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the season. And why do they care about this, you know,

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this playing this team that is awful when all they

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>have possibly left to make anything positive about this season

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is to beat a couple of division opponents on deck

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>in the final two weeks of the season. UH in

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers and UH, I think it's the Buccaneers that

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>they play in the final game. I just think this

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Arizona or the Falcons team is awful. I thought last

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>week the Falcons against the Packers was one of the

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>worst games on the slate with two teams again that

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>have been horribly disappointing, two perennial contenders, UH, that have

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.399
<v Speaker 1>each won four games now the Packers five games after

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>beating the Falcons last week. UM, and I just am

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>not ready to to back Atlanta. And what's funny is

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>when I was getting this ready for this show, I

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>saw all of a sudden, the team coming in on

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Falcons and now the spreads like up to ten.

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It was the same thing that UH with the game

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Ravens. Everybody thought that was the spot for

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons. What happened, They got blown out. I think

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they've got a chance to to lose this game outright

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. I made the number six and a half.

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>It opened, I is nine and a half. It came

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>down to eight and a half. Now it's back up

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to ten even ten and a half. Um. As ugly

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>as this is and as hard as it is to

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>back the Cardinals, I don't think Atlantic can lay more

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>than a touchdown to anybody. They've won four games a season,

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>they've lost four at home. Give me the points and ace,

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, do the honors. Sprinkle it, baby freckle, oh man,

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Arizona plus nine and a half. The Falcons are

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that bad man. I wouldn't be surprised if they lost

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the game. Uh. That capsule had everything in it, Brady,

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. It It had C span two and had

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the transitive property of geometry in there. You said the

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>word out yarded, which is always a favorite of mine,

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and all about a ship show of a football game.

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>So we really appreciate that. Arizona at Atlanta, UH, one

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of these games this week along with say Washington at Jacksonville,

0:38:55.800 --> 0:39:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Oakland at Cincinnati, Detroit at Buffalo. You know these games

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>are just awful unless you're betting on them. That's the Uh,

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the great Tonic Marco. What you got on Sunday, Well,

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna sound like Ace here and say I love

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday Card. I had four different teams penciled in

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>for what I was gonna do on the show. For

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the best bet, and the one that I was not

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna use, I'm gonna use because I was, you know,

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>saving this for later in the week, Uh, on my

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.280
<v Speaker 1>premium phones, which will probably still be there. Uh, because

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I like the game and it's Christmas time right now.

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 1>There's no team in the NFL that nobody wants any

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>part of, more so than my Pittsburgh Steelers. They've lost

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 1>three in a row. In guys, you want to understand

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>why I am bald and I have high blood pressure,

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>well just look at the steelers last three games. Think

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>about this for a second. All three games were decided

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in the final twenty seconds, either by a game winning

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>scorer or a game saving turnover. All three games. You

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>go back to the Denver game, Ben throws the interception

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to the right at the goal line when they're they're

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>going in for the win. Uh, you go to the

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>or I should say, for the tie, you go to

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the Charger game comes down to not one, not to,

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but three field goal attempts before the Chargers finally get

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it through the uprights at the end of the game

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 1>on the final play the game. And then last week

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in Oakland, they get down there, Juju almost breaks it

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>all the way in for the score for the win,

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but goes out of bounds with five seconds left. No problem,

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Boswell kick the field goal, go to

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>over time. No, they're playing on a freaking cow pastor

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 1>at the unbelievable you know, and I sent it out,

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the picture of him slipping with his plant

0:40:55.280 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>foot and said the Steelers season slipping away and it us.

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, they're back home and they're facing

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots, and you know what last week

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and why nobody really ripped him. If if Todmlin would

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>have did what Belichick did on the final play of

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the game, we would still be talking about it stopped. Okay,

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Belichick made a colossal air. He doesn't make many. You know,

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you probably can count on one hand, and have fingers

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>left over the last five years mistakes he's made. But

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 1>having Gronk on the field for the final play of

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the game was just stupid. He always puts them there

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for the hell mary play. And I agree without a

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent. He's a receiver that can go up and

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>muscle for the rebound. He's got you know, tall wingsprand

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>with him knows how to catch the football. Obviously, yes,

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent you put him on the field. There

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>weren't the thirty yard line. Daniel couldn't throw it into

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the end zone from the thirty yard line in any lifetime. Okay,

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to reach the end zone wasn't a hell

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 1>merry situation. And he was a liability on the field.

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And who, by the way, missed the final tackle but Gronk,

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>And because he's Belichick. Oh well, okay, it's all right,

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, colossal blunder. Let's look at the scheduling. First

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of all, all year long, New England has not been

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the same team on the road this year. They got

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>drilled at Jacksonville early in the season. Yeah, that was

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the big revenge game for Jacksonville and everything, and they

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>came to play and Blake bortles out a marvelous game.

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, yeah, Blake bortles through for three seventy seven.

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Where's Blake Bortles now on the bench. They lose the

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>next very next week to Detroit. Then you go to

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago game. They win the Chicago game, but they

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>only won that game thanks to the blunders of the Bears.

0:42:56.640 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 1>The Bears put up thirty one points against them. New

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>England had a couple of special team plays. Then they

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>played that boring Monday night game. Yeah, they wont to

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>cover against Buffalo. Do you remember they brought Derek Anderson.

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I think they pulled him off a garbage truck or

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>something and put him in the lineup. And they needed

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a pick six to secure the point spread cover. They

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>got Railroad. They got railroaded in Tennessee the Jet game,

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 1>no quarterback. They had to have a pick six late

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in that one to get the cover as well, or

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I think any interception to save it. Uh And then

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we saw what happened last week in Miami. Yet was

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the last play of the game. They shouldn't have lost

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the game, but they weren't covering the game, and every

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>time they scored Miami answer, did they give up thirty

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 1>four points to Tannehill. The other unique part about the

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>schedule for New England this year, every time they played

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on the road, they played back to back road games.

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:56.439
<v Speaker 1>They've never had a home in a way back home.

0:43:57.080 --> 0:44:00.280
<v Speaker 1>All of the matchups this year have been in pairs.

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And this is gonna be their fourth road game in

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:07.800
<v Speaker 1>five weeks. Nobody's talking about that. That's a horrible scheduling spot.

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Talk about revenge games. This is the mother of all

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>revenge games for the Steelers because the Steelers lost that

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>game last year on the Jesse James controversial call. That

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>should have been a to you know the score for

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers and win the game, but no, New England

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>got it. And I think that game cost the Steelers

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>twice because I think that's the reason the Steelers lost

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the playoff game to Jacksonville last year. All they were

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about and thinking about was playing New England the

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>very next week in the revenge Well, they didn't get

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:44.839
<v Speaker 1>their chaots for revenge last year. They get it now

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and last week in Oakland, horrible scheduling spot for Pittsburgh

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>go to Oakland when they had this game on deck

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and after the Sunday night game against the Chargers, I'm

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Pittsburgh gear. Everybody is looking at New England.

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I Ben's gonna be able to score. And how about

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 1>how guts he Ben coming back in the game. My

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>question is will come back again? Yeah? Tomlin, what are

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you doing? Okay? Yeah? You know anytime you're gonna take

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin versus Belichick, it's a coaching mismatch. I gotta give

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 1>that part of it up. And I know that Belichick.

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>It seems like every year he comes to town in

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>December with that stupid freaking hoodie and if you just

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have a green hoodie, because for me, he's the grinch

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that steals my Christmas every freaking December. Well, it's a

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Christmas miracle this year, Steelers win this game. Ben's gonna

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>get it out. Juju is gonna go nuts, A. B's

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:48.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna get his Connor will be back. But hey, again,

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:51.280
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the system in the offensive line. Steelers

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>really didn't have any problems at running back last week,

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and that was the third string quarterback or third string

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>running back at the start of the season. I'll go

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ahead and take new An. I'll take my Steelers against

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>New England, one team's favorite. I'm sorry. I'm so glad

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you picked this game, and I have so much to

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>talk about. I wish I was taking notes because I'll

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>inevitably forget something here. One, You're right about Bill Belichick

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Dolphins. The Miami miracle, for sure, and even

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 1>more so than that, Tom Brady taking a sack at

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first half which cost the steel

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>which cost the Patriots, uh left them with zero points

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>there on that drive. And at the end of the game,

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>right before the Miami Miracle, New England decides to kick

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a field goal to go up five and kick off.

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>They could have opted to just run the ball and

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>try to score touchdown, and even if they fail, they

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>pin Miami back at the one yard line. Now, I'm

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>not saying that's wrong, but to Marco's point, if all

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of those things happened to I don't know the Cowboys

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>under Jason Garrett or the Chargers under Anthony Lynn, we

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>murder them, right, Bill Belichick, even the great Bill Belichick,

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>deserves some criticism, and that was not his finest hour,

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>to say the least, as far as Pittsburgh's concerned. Ben Roethlisberger.

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with you. At the end of that

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:05.839
<v Speaker 1>game was very strange. It was almost like Tomlin decided, well,

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>if it gets dire, that's when we'll put in big

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Ben and it's Sir god Dyer and then like, all right,

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess he'll play. And then you know, as it proved,

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it was too little, too late because Boswell slipped on

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the on the turf. As you mentioned. The other thing

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I just want to mention is this, and I'm with you, Marco.

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I will be heavy on the Steelers. I was guessing

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 1>lines on Monday morning. There was no line on this

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>because we didn't know about Big Ben at that time.

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I thought Pittsburgh would be favored. I really did. I

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>was very shocked to see and Vinny told me Vinnie

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Moley Luis said, don't be surprised of New England's favorite.

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 1>New England was favored by one when it came out.

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:43.919
<v Speaker 1>It is already two and a half. I do not

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 1>agree with this move at all. Like for all the

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>reasons you stayed, I will be all about the Steelers.

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll be teasing them, I'll be playing them straight, I'll

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>be playing them on the money line. I am all

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:58.439
<v Speaker 1>over the Steelers here as well. Glad you picked that game.

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Um let us do a Thursday night talk here because

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>this potentially is a great game between the Chargers and

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. Before we do that, as always, remember that

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>support for the show is brought to you by Bookmaker

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>dot Eu. They've been an industry leader for close to

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty years now. Professional players consider them a must because

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>their first to post odds, they take the highest limits,

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and they pride themselves correctly so on never having kicked

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>out a winning player. Ever, that is huge. In fact,

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 1>if you ask pros what's the thing they value the most,

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that's it don't kick me out period. Let me play

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>your book it or not. Bookmaker one of the only

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 1>places on Earth that still does not kick out a

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>winning player. They're a high volume sports book best suited

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for the sophisticated player who understands sports betting, also catered

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to large recreational players, and their motto, as it's been

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.840
<v Speaker 1>from the outset, is where the lines originate, because chances

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are the sports book that you use follows their line.

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And once again, if you visit Bookmaker dot eu slash Gill,

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that's Bookmaker dot U slash g I l L visit

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:01.840
<v Speaker 1>them now. You can claim an exclusive welcome bonus of

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 1>up to three hundred dollars. I swear by Bookmaker. I

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know what I would do without him. Bookmaker dot

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 1>e slash gil let's gil with two els, Join and

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>claim you're welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars.

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank me later. Can't wait to bed on tonight's game

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 1>live pre flop every which way. I'm all about the

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 1>charges here tonight, the three and a half point dogs.

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I do not believe in the Chiefs right now. Without

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt, they will not have Spencer Wear tonight either.

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Both teams will be down to the third string running backs.

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Williams for the Chiefs, Jackson for the Chargers. We've seen Jackson,

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:38.440
<v Speaker 1>justin Jackson, He's been good. I just don't believe when

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the line doesn't change from Kareem Hump to Spencer Wear

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>let alone to a third string, I don't believe it.

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I believe it in the running game, I believe there's

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not much of a downgrade. But in the passing game,

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you cannot tell me the Chiefs are as good. And

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I've purchased, I've I've loaded up on some Chargers futures

0:49:53.239 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 1>here for the a f C. I truly believe they

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>are the sneaky team. I think they're the most balanced

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 1>team in the a f C. And they're a team

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that has no home really, so I don't care if

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they're on the road now with futures. Keep in mind,

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it's more profitable if you just bet them game by

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>game in the playoffs. But I got them at plus

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>seven or plus seven ten seven and one. Those are

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.440
<v Speaker 1>long gone for the a f C. Your thoughts on

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this game tonight, Brady will start with you. What are

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you thinking? Yeah, I'm with you, Gil. I have some

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 1>money invested in the Charger's future as well, and I'm

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 1>in that neighborhood of seven or eight to one. I

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:28.720
<v Speaker 1>got them a while back. Uh. We know the Charges

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>have had this game circled for some time now, but

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they can use that game against the Steelers

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh a couple of weeks ago to kind of

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>calm their nerves a bit and maybe kind of go

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 1>with a been there, done that, you know, act like

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a champion type mentality and not crumble under the pressure

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that this game would normally present. You know, they went

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>into a hostile environment in prime time in Pittsburgh, never panicked,

0:50:53.520 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 1>won that ball game. I think that really gives them

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a huge boost going into a very similar situation here tonight.

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I really hope they win the game out right. Um,

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I think three and a hook as a play. I

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>made the line three. I wouldn't be surprised if it

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:11.359
<v Speaker 1>closes at three. Go bolts, Go bolts. By the way,

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers have called up a practice squad running back

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as well, So it looks like Melvin Gordon is out,

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:20.359
<v Speaker 1>even though they're officially leaving that open. Looks like it's

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. It looks like they're being clement weather. When

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at the forecast yesterday, not so bad anymore, Mac, Yeah,

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I gotta look at the Chargers as well. Uh, live

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 1>dog here. This is a team it's been you go

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:33.479
<v Speaker 1>back to the end of last season and what they've

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 1>done this year. Uh, they're, you know, one of the

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:40.839
<v Speaker 1>winningest teams in the NFL. Kansas City. I will give

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 1>them credit and give Pat Mahomes those two fourth down plays,

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:50.239
<v Speaker 1>especially uh, the second to last one where he scrambling

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>all over the place and yet throws across the field

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>across his blody and steel hits the guy I mean

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in stride didn't have to making an adjustment of any kind,

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:07.280
<v Speaker 1>hits him in stride, he'll for the fourth dound conversion.

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:10.360
<v Speaker 1>That play was you just this kid just continues to

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>amaze me week after week. And that was against what was,

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, the number one defense in the NFL. That

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>part skill scares me. But I see this as a

0:52:20.160 --> 0:52:23.239
<v Speaker 1>game that's gonna come down to the wire, gonna be

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a three point game. And if I'm thinking it's gonna

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>be a three point game and there's a hook out there,

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 1>there's only one way for me to do it. And

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:33.479
<v Speaker 1>grabbed that three and a half hooks everywhere. Still yeah,

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:35.800
<v Speaker 1>real quickly on my best bet for the week, Just

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>so I could let the listeners know the way I

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:40.480
<v Speaker 1>gave it out to my guys. Instead of patting like uh,

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:42.759
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I do everything from one hundred to

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a thousands, how I raped my my bets. Instead of

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:48.240
<v Speaker 1>doing this line like a lot a seven fifty or thousand,

0:52:48.239 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I gave a five hunter for the game five hundred

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>first half. That's how I like the limit risk once

0:52:53.600 --> 0:52:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in a while, kind of like going to two hands

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in black jack, especially when you're able to get plus

0:52:57.960 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 1>three in the first half and plus four were for

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a game right now plus three and a half and

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:03.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of spots, but there's plus four is out there,

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but you can still get plus three in the first half,

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 1>only minus one fifteen, even minus one ten in some spots.

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Just throwing that out there for tonight game, like this

0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is what makes my job so difficult. You know. It's

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:16.799
<v Speaker 1>not just looking into accounts seeing what guys that win

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>long term are betting and passing that along because these

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 1>guys don't agree a lot of times, and a lot

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:24.799
<v Speaker 1>of times I don't agree with them. Um. And this

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:27.359
<v Speaker 1>is a spot where as soon as this line came

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:29.759
<v Speaker 1>out in the accounts that I give out, the one

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:32.240
<v Speaker 1>group they've bet under fifty six and a half. Another

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 1>group came in behind them. When it got the fifty five,

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they still bet it under fifty five. Um. Then last night,

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 1>while I was out to dinner, the total of fifty

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:42.800
<v Speaker 1>two and a half, and I started hearing all these pains.

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I look at my phone and it's two different groups

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>now going over fifty two and a half. I wake

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>up today it's at fifty four and a half. So

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:52.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the right side under fifty six or over fifty two?

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Time will tell um. I was looking at the Chargers too.

0:53:56.040 --> 0:53:58.240
<v Speaker 1>You know how I feel about Kansas City. I still

0:53:58.280 --> 0:54:02.760
<v Speaker 1>think they're overvalued. Um again when they've stepped up, they've

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 1>lost against teams you know in New England, the Rams.

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Um is this a step up? I think? So with

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that said, what scares me is that at looking at

0:54:12.280 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 1>at back end of a book right now, um that

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:17.879
<v Speaker 1>already has a lot of plays in public plays. It's

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty split, man, the the the action split. It's not

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:24.719
<v Speaker 1>one sided as you may think with Kansas City money. Um.

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that this line was three minus fifteen

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and now it's three and a half, and it's not

0:54:31.160 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>public money that really is behind it, because I'm telling

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you I'm not seeing one sided public money here anywhere. Um.

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 1>It scares me a little bit because I like the

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Chargers as well. But that three and a half, man,

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's not the public that laying that half is

0:54:47.360 --> 0:54:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is what makes me pause a little bit. Yeah, Pinnacle

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Lean also suggesting, yeah, suggesting, hey give us money on

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, but not what it used to be, Not

0:54:57.400 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 1>what it used to be no, no, no, yeah, a

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:02.320
<v Speaker 1>right before we get to uh no, not before anything.

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. Final two questions of the big favorites

0:55:05.440 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>this week, and uh, I'm gonna make it six points

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>are higher. Which is the one that you believe is

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the most likely to lose? Outright? Saturday? The Houston Texans

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>seven point road favorites, maybe six and a half on

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the road against the Jets. Scintillating football. Uh And then

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, whole bunch of them. Chicago six point favorites

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:25.360
<v Speaker 1>at home against the Green Bay Packers. Baltimore seven and

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites at home against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta nine and a half point favorites at home against Arizona.

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota seven and a half point favorites at home against Miama.

0:55:37.280 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe there's some hooks out there in this game.

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea why Minnesota should be favored by

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>more than seven in this ballgame. Jacksonville seven and a

0:55:45.080 --> 0:55:50.360
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites against the Redskins. Kessler Josh Johnson Jaguars,

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Redskins catch the fever? Sorry, got excited? Rams eleven and

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites at home against the Eagles on Sunday,

0:55:57.080 --> 0:55:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and then, as we mentioned, New Orleans six and a

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:01.320
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites on the road at Arolina, most likely

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:03.759
<v Speaker 1>to lose outright of those big favorites, Brady, I'm gonna

0:56:03.760 --> 0:56:07.360
<v Speaker 1>go with the Ravens. I think Tampa Bay's got a shot.

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I made Yeah, I made this line seven and a

0:56:11.480 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>half and it opened up eight and a half and

0:56:13.480 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I immediately took it as a play in a contest

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that I'm in. Baltimore comes off of that great game

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 1>with Kansas City. Marco, you talk about Mahomes, I mean,

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:24.200
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, what a ball game and what a player

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:26.319
<v Speaker 1>that guy has been. Um. I thought it was one

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:28.239
<v Speaker 1>of the better, one of the better football games I've

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:31.840
<v Speaker 1>watched all year. And they come up short. Um, And

0:56:31.920 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't for Mahomes, you know, they probably win

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that game they should have wanted a couple of times.

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs are able to escape some fourth down conversions there.

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And what do they have up next is the Los

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Chargers in Los Angeles on the road. I think

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough spot for Baltimore. Their top ranked defense

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:54.439
<v Speaker 1>versus a top rated offense. I normally prefer to play

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the defensive side in a game like that. But again,

0:56:57.400 --> 0:57:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the situation uh is not good for Ravens

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and the pressure is all on them. You talk about

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:06.399
<v Speaker 1>what was the Panthers game being footloose and fancy free.

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Campa Bay is carefree to and should play

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good game. Joe Flacco backup quarterback now fully healthy,

0:57:13.880 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the hip is fine, and he is your backup quarterback

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for the Baltimore Ravens. Marco, I'm gonna go with one

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is gonna be one where I'm gonna put

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a disclaimer to it because they're either gonna win it

0:57:24.760 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>or blowout or they're gonna lose the game out right.

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's the Chicago Bears this week. The spot is

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just so horrible. Last week, I'm sitting there, you know,

0:57:34.280 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>just like I did with Caroline and say, okay, this

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is a perfect situation. Now Carolina has done, I'm all

0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:41.840
<v Speaker 1>excited to go against them, and then I see the

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>schedule who they're playing well with Chicago. After that performance

0:57:45.800 --> 0:57:48.440
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday night, I said, this is a young team.

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:50.960
<v Speaker 1>They're they're still learning how to win, and this was

0:57:51.040 --> 0:57:55.400
<v Speaker 1>their statement game. Fat and Sassy comes into play and

0:57:55.400 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 1>then I look and see who they're playing. Are playing

0:57:57.120 --> 0:58:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, They're hated rival. The game that they able

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>way the first game of the season by twenty points.

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But still that was such a huge win on Sunday

0:58:06.760 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Night because, yeah, they had a couple of other statement

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>games this year, the division win on Sunday Night against

0:58:12.720 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota and so forth. But when they beat the Rams

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in the fashion that they beat the Rams on Sunday

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Night football, they told the world we are a legit

0:58:22.600 --> 0:58:25.920
<v Speaker 1>contender for the Super Bowl. That's when I want to

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 1>go against the team is when they hit that pinnacle mark,

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the high water mark, and this is you know, Aaron Rodgers.

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:37.200
<v Speaker 1>They're either gonna stuff Aaron Rodgers if they come to play,

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 1>or Aaron Rodgers are gonna pull his magic. I'm gonna

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and say Chicago as the team that can

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 1>get upset. I think you're right, Mark. I agree there,

0:58:46.800 --> 0:58:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna go listen. Number one, I think there's

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of teams they could lose, so let's throw

0:58:51.880 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>them out there. Carolina could beat the Saints at home

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>um Miami against Minnesota because the simple reasoning, fuck that team.

0:58:59.040 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I hate Minnesota that that that's the bottom line, just

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:07.200
<v Speaker 1>suck that team. Excellent reason, excellent reason. Thank you. That

0:59:07.320 --> 0:59:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the best handicap I could give for them. That team

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:16.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna go Eagles, baby. At plus five hundred, I gotta

0:59:16.520 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 1>go Philly. I don't think they should be a five

0:59:18.520 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to one on their dog. Granted, you know, they haven't

0:59:20.840 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 1>been moneymakers on the road of late I get it, um,

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But still, I just think if you look at power

0:59:27.360 --> 0:59:31.000
<v Speaker 1>rating wise strictly power rating wise, Um, I think that

0:59:31.160 --> 0:59:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina and New Orleans, I think Carolina could upset,

0:59:34.280 --> 0:59:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think Philly is the most values getting five

0:59:37.240 --> 0:59:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to one on the Philadelphia team. Man, I you know again,

0:59:40.320 --> 0:59:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Rams haven't lost a single game at home, so you know,

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and Philly is two and four team on the road.

0:59:45.600 --> 0:59:47.480
<v Speaker 1>But just they're they're capable, you know. I mean, if

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they bring an AID game, Philly is capable of beating anybody.

0:59:50.680 --> 0:59:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think getting that many at five to one

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to me as it was worth a little gamble. All right,

0:59:54.800 --> 0:59:56.440
<v Speaker 1>let's keep it to ten seconds or less. What game

0:59:56.480 --> 0:59:57.680
<v Speaker 1>do you want? No part of you live in a

0:59:57.720 --> 0:59:59.960
<v Speaker 1>bizarro world, Brady. You have to make a side bet

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>on everything but one. What's the past. This one's pretty easy.

1:00:03.400 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Gil Washington and Jacksonville, you talked about it. I mean,

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I think by the numbers, the Redskins or the side

1:00:09.800 --> 1:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to back. But how can you do that?

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't remember a team that's been more

1:00:14.000 --> 1:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>injured than this team. This is a really ugly game

1:00:17.800 --> 1:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that the Jaguar is favored by seven and a half.

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Come on, I don't want any part of this one.

1:00:22.600 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Total at thirty six in today's NFL, that's uh. I

1:00:26.400 --> 1:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's about a twenty seven in dog years and

1:00:28.720 --> 1:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>what it used to be. That's just so low. Marco

1:00:31.520 --> 1:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>will game no part of bake it fast. It's better,

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's no part of me that will have any

1:00:37.200 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>money in any shape or form on Washington Jacksonville. Direct

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>TV allows you a screen with eight games. There are

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>nine early games that this has to be the game

1:00:45.280 --> 1:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that falls off the screen that they don't include yet.

1:00:48.520 --> 1:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Throw the trifact, let's just go quickly. Same thing. I mean,

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that went from six and a half through

1:00:53.040 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>seven now seven and a half. I don't know who

1:00:55.040 --> 1:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>had fall in love with Jacksonville, but I want nothing

1:00:57.200 --> 1:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to do with that game. Yeah, they pitched a shutout.

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>They pitched a show it out a couple of weeks ago,

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and what they do. They scored six. Now they're favored

1:01:04.000 --> 1:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>by seven and a half. Make it for that'd be

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that'd be the game. I'd include. That does it for us, gentlemen.

1:01:09.720 --> 1:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you as always, Marco, Ace Staples, pillars of the show.

1:01:14.120 --> 1:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, guys, and Brady Cannon, our only return guests

1:01:17.240 --> 1:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of the year thus far, Super Contest Champion. Many Contest begins, Brady,

1:01:21.600 --> 1:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's do this. Yeah, that's all we've got left, San

1:01:24.880 --> 1:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Susy hoping for a dollar consolation prize. Let's do it.

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not on the team, but I'm rooting for myself

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, Marco, Marco, Marco, and Ace. I apologize. I

1:01:36.520 --> 1:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't even give you guys a chance to say anything,

1:01:38.200 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>but thank you guys, both of you seriously, always there

1:01:41.360 --> 1:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>when you need him. Don't appreciate it, man. Let's do it, everybody,

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>good luck on all your picks, and as always, thank

1:01:48.120 --> 1:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you so much for listening.