WEBVTT -  What’s Trump’s Venezuela Endgame?

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Over the last two months, the United States has launched

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 2>a series of strikes off the coast of Venezuela.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>The US military carried out another lethal air striker, another

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>US Stride.

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 3>New strike go to suspect the drug boat in the cribbe.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>The massive explosion sending debris raining down in international waters.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Despite questions about evidence and due process, the administration insists

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 2>lethal strikes like these will continue. The Trump administration says

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 2>it's targeting narco traffickers.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>The President keeps making this claim that every time he

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>strikes one of these boats, he prevents about twenty four

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand drug related deaths in the United States.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Nick Wadhams heads up Bloomberg's National Security team.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>That is obviously a highly dubious claim, but he's basically

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>making the equation. You know, if you have x tons

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of fentanyl on the boat, and a tiny dose of

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>fentanyl can kill a person, that's how many drug related

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>deaths are being saved in the US. So they essentially

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>see this as an invasion by drug runners flooding the

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>US market, and this is the way they're going to

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>stop it.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Experts say these strikes violate international law.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>The real motivation for why these are actually happening is

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>something that has remained a very elusive reporting target.

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>The US is also building up its military presence in

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the Caribbean, which is fueling intense speculation over what the

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 2>White House is planning to do next and what its

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 2>overall objective is. CBS News is Nora O'Donnell asked President

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Trump about that in an interview that aired on Sixty

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Minutes on Sunday on Venezuela.

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 4>In particular, are Maduro's days as president numbers?

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 3>Oh so, yeah?

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I think so you. I'm David Gera, and this is

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the big take from Bloomberg News Today. On the show,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>as the Trump administration continues to authorize strikes on boats

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>off South America, we take a look at the military

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>hardware President Trump has ordered to the region, Why he's

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 2>taking aim at Venezuela now, and what could happen next.

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Over the last two months, strikes carried out by the

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>US military on vessels in the Pacific and Caribbean have

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 2>killed more than sixty people. The Trump administration says those

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>strikes and a growing military presence off the coast of

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 2>Venezuela are meant to hinder the flow of drugs from

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 2>South America to the United States. I asked Bloomberg's Nick

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Wadhams if there is more to the story.

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The element that's very high in a lot of people's

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>minds is Venezuela is leadership president Nicholas Maduro. The US

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>says he's essentially the head of this drug running criminal enterprise,

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>though as far as we know, not a lot of

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>drugs are produced in Venezuela. It's mostly a transit point

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for drugs flowing from elsewhere. But that has fueled a

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of suspicion that the US basically wants regime change

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela. I mean, we know for a lot long

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>time that the US has wanted Nicholas Maduro out. They've

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>put a multimillion dollar bounty on his head for any

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>information leading to his arrest. They tried in Trump's first

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>term to usher him from power. They failed, And now

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a Secretary of State and Marco Rubio who

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>has been even far more explicit about his desire to

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>see Adua leave power. And so that has then fueled

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of speculation that the military build up is

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>not really about targeting these boats, but it's laying the

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>groundwork for airstrikes or possibly even an invasion that would

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>lead to Maduro's ouster.

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Nick, how effective has this campaign been as a way

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of ratcheting up pressure on President Maduro? What do we

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>know about what's happening on the ground in Venezuela.

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It has ratcheted up a great deal of pressure on

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Maduro. There's no question that he is feeling the heat.

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>He has called up troops, he's put his country on

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>high alert. The question, though, is what the ultimate effect

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>will actually be the opposition in Venezuela. You may recall

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that opposition leader Machado just won the Nobel Peace Prize

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for her efforts, but she essentially argues that all this

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>pressure is going to put so much of a squeeze

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on Nicholas Maduro that he's going to be.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Forced to leave power.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>The flip side of that is the argument that actually,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>by creating this extremely tense environment, that only gives Maduro

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>additional strength and support and attracts more people to his

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>side and essentially entrenches his position so that he emerges

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>from this even stronger. So there are a lot of

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>questions about how tenuous his grip on power really is.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there has been a great deal of reporting,

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>including by Bloomberg, that he is looking for a way

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>out and he would vastly prefer a diplomatic solution to this.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>There had been some.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Reporting that he was even looking for a strong economic

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>deal where he would essentially sell all Venezuela's oil to

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I asked Beco Wawer, the defense lead at Bloomberg Economics,

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to detail just how much military might the US is

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 2>mobilized off of South America.

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, we've got a lot of seapower, airpower, and firepower

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 4>now in the Caribbean and in the Eastern Pacific, and honestly,

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 4>this is probably the most that we've seen in those

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 4>two regions for quite some time. So we've got multiple

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 4>guided missile destroyers which tend to carry missiles, including Tomahawk

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 4>land attack missiles that could be used in potential strikes.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 4>We also have an amphibious Ready Group, which allows the

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 4>US to have a number of forces in the region.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 4>So this is where you see a marine expeditionary unit

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.119
<v Speaker 4>embarked upon and it should be there in about a week.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Or so, and that's going to bring not only sizeable

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 4>number of sailors aboard, but also aircraft fighter aircraft that

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 4>can take off from the decks of the carrier and

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 4>potentially do strikes on either ships, whether it's these narco

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 4>trafficking boats or perhaps even strikes on land. In addition

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 4>to that, we've seen some special Forces assets in the

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 4>region as well, which is added to some of the

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 4>potential pressure campaign that right now, this build up is

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 4>likely placing on Maduro, where it is almost a bit

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 4>of a psychological operation. It's not just about the build

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 4>up itself and what those capabilities could bring, but as

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Nick was talking about, what it is that that pressure

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 4>could force Maduro to actually end up doing, which could

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 4>be potentially stepping down from power.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Nick, I think of this piece that retired Admiral

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 2>James Uvritis road for Bloomberg Opinion, which he said, Look,

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 2>if the goal here is to take out narco traffickers,

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>take out these boats, there's no way you would need

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>this much manpower and this much military equipment. So what

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>does it indicate to you just all that's being marshaled.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>There right I Mean, it's a great question because when

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you're deploying an aircraft carrier strike grew and then you

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the size of the boats that the administration

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>has essentially been blowing out of the water.

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 3>There does seem to be a real imbalance there.

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, the big question we've really been trying

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to answer is how much of this is actually heading

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>toward some sort of massive conflict where the US would

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>strike the land, which after all, is something that President

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump has said he's willing to do. And how much

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of it is essentially the president using military assets at

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>his disposal to basically act as a deterrent, to send

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a threatening message.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>That it's all bluster. You know.

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>The administration, when we have asked him about this, have said, hey,

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we've deployed military assets all around the world for many years,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and then when we deploy them in our own backyard,

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>suddenly the media freaks out. Why shouldn't we be interested

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in what's going on in our own hemisphere? And that

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>really is sort of part of the problem. Where in

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>past administrations when you had strikes like this, a lot

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of it was done in secrecy, but then there would

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>at least be some attempt to sort of explain or

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>walk people through a lot of the details, maybe on

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>background or even off the record, sort of making the

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>case in a very clear way about what the strategy

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>actually was for doing all of these things, which on

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the surface seemed to be rather contradictory. And right now,

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>aside from some pronouncements, we have not really been able

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 1>to interrogate the administration in a public way about why

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>precisely they feel if this is a campaign designed to

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>target narco traffickers, they need to deploy an aircraft carrier

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>strike group and a submarine and all of these other

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>assets which would in any other circumstance be seen as

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially a prelude to an invasion.

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 2>After the break, what a US attack on Venezuela could

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 2>look like, and how that country's oil reserves are shaping

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the Trump administration's plans. Because something you have a lot

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 2>of experience with are war games gaming out sort of

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>what might happen in a scenario like this, How do

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 2>you look at sort of the way that this might

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 2>evolve and what that might mean, how it might play on.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so with my war gaming hat on, thinking about

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 4>all of the games that I've run for the Department

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 4>of Defense and for other militaries around the globe. I

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 4>sort of see this as there being a few different options.

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, one would be using some of the covert

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 4>assets that the US uses, trying to use special operations

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 4>forces to do some type of regime change from within.

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that that's a little bit more of a

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 4>less likely scenario. So instead, that makes me think that

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 4>there's probably two potential strike options if we're looking at

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 4>the assets that are currently in theater. The first one

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 4>is going after infrastructure, having these big, showy strikes that

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 4>are very visible and very public and can last for

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 4>several days, maybe a few weeks. The second option would

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 4>be one that's more so going after the various nodes

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 4>of the cartels, so going after different transportation routes, going

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 4>after cartel leadership, particularly when they're on the move. And

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 4>this is going to look a lot like some of

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 4>the counter terrorism operations that we've seen in places like

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 4>Afghanistan and Iraq. It's going to require a bunch of

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 4>air power and air strikes. So really I think what

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing here are two kind of options. These big

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 4>attacks kind of a little bit like what we saw

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 4>the administration do against the Huthi's earlier this year, and

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 4>then also these almost counter terrorism style attacks where they're

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 4>going to go after transportation nodes and key leadership. In

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 4>both cases, there's a fairly limited track record of success.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 4>So that doesn't necessarily give me a lot of hope

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 4>that if the US were to conduct any of these

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 4>strikes that they would be successful at going after and

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 4>stabbing the flow of drugs, if that truly is what

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 4>the impetus for these attacks would be.

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Nick, I know that Venezuela has an awful lot of oil,

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 2>and I wonder how that might be shaping the way

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the administration is thinking about its course forward.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>David, that is really at the heart of so much

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of this, because when you look at this conflict through

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of oil, you really start to peel back

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of layers and see some hidden currents that

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>have been coursing through this administration since Trump came back.

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 3>So you've essentially got two pulls.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>One is Marco Rubio, who wants to ramp up even

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>further the sanctions that have been imposed on Venezuela to

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>choke off its oil industry, stop the flow of oil,

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and really starve Maduro of the hard currency.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>He needs to stay afloat.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you have a Trump advisor who's

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>now actually run the Kennedy Center for Donald Trump. He's

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the former ambassador to Germany, someone named Richard Grenell, and

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he had been pushing this idea that no, let's open

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it up entirely. Let's essentially create a situation where we

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>lift all the sanctions and then the United States buys

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>all of Venezuela's oil, and then we can tear iff

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the heck out of everything coming in from Venezuela and

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially make Venezuela the fifty first state of the United States.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 3>So a very different approach and sort of playing.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you have these two advisors playing to different aspects

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 1>or different impulses from the president, one being his desired

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>piece through strength and desire to get tough, and then

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the other, Hey, tariffs and business deals and let's make

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a deal art of the deal. You know, I don't

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>care so much about your values and whether you believe

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in democracy as long as we have a business partnership

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>between the two countries. And safe to say, right now,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rubio approach has definitely won. There is absolutely no

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>indication that present and Trump is going to be willing

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon to lift those sanctions and pursue any sort

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>of oil deals with Venezuela. But he is getting pressure

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>from some of his allies. Obviously, the oil majors. Chevron

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>still does some business in Venezuela. They would love to

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>get into that market. And the question is, well, how

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>long does Trump's patients last? Is he really after coming

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to the presidency billing himself as the peace president, He's

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>solved a bunch of wars, he didn't start any new ones.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Is he really going to commit to the idea of

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a massive campaign? I mean, right now there essentially there's

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>very little notion that the US would put actual boots

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>on the ground in Venezuela. But is he willing to

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>enter into a lengthy air campaign against Venezuela when it

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>goes against so much of the reasons why he said

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he deserved to be president a second time? And how

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>much is he going to lose patients for that effort

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and then try to lean into some other effort where

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>he could essentially cut a deal with Maduro the way

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you saw him try to cut a deal with Vladimir

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>putin North Korea? Is Kim jong Un and even in

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>some cases you know has said he wants to cut

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a deal with a run.

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm David Gurat.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>The show is hosted by me Wanha and Sarah Holder.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 2>The show is made by Aaron Edwards, David Fox, Eleanor

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Harrison Dengate, Patti Hirsch, Rachel Lewis, Krisky, Naomi, Julia Press,

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Tracy Samuelson, Naomi Shavin, Alex Sakura, Julia Weaver, Young Young,

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and take Yasizawa. To get more from the Big Take

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and unlimited access to all of Bloomberg dot com, subscribe

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 2>today at Bloomberg dot Com Slash Podcast offer. Thanks for listening.

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back on Monday.