WEBVTT - Was Humpty Dumpty Always an Egg?

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Brainstuff, a production of iHeartRadio. Hey brain Stuff,

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vogelbaum. Here we need to talk about Humpty Dumpty.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You may well have grown up with this nursery rhyme,

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but just in case, let's review it goes. Humpty Dumpty

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sat on a wall, Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>All the king's horses and all the king's men couldn't

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>put Humpty together again. It's a simple verse, but there's

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on here. Who is this Humpty character?

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Why was he sitting and why did he fall? Why

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>on earth was the monarchy involved? And why couldn't they

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>put the poor guy back together? Furthermore, is he an egg?

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>In popular culture today, Humpty Dumpty is almost always portrayed

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>as an anthropomorphic egg. He has legs and arms coming

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>off of his large egg body slash head, and he's

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>wearing clothing. But the poem doesn't say the Humpty is

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>an egg. The thing is this poem was probably originally

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>intended to be a riddle. If you can't put him

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>back together after a fall, what is he? An answer

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>is that he's an egg, which is part and parcel

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of modern portrayals. A spoiler alert Okay. The Humpty Dumpty

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>rhyme first appeared in seventeen ninety seven in a book

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>called Juvenile Amusement written by one Samuel Arnold. In the original,

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the first two lines were the same, but the last

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>two lines read four score men and four score more.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Could not make Humpty Dumpty where he was before. It's

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>not really material here, but a score is twenty men,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so this means eighty plus eighty or one hundred and

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty men total. Anyway. There have been a few other

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>variations since then, but they all amount to about the

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Humpty falls best efforts can't set him right. Certainly,

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the exact wording could influence the answer of the riddle.

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>The original I'd have referred to a famous historical person,

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and other versions that talk about being unable to set

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Humpty upright again might refer to a different creature, like

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe a tortoise. An illustration from eighteen oh three in

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Mother Goose's Melody portrays him as a normal, non egg

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>human boy. So why is Humpty so firmly an egg today?

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Blame Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass and what Alice

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>found there. The sequel to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland a

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>first published in eighteen seventy one. The book devotes a

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>whole chapter to Humpty Dumpty. But here's the passage where

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Alice first comes upon him. The egg only got larger

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and larger, and more and more human. When she had

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>come within a few yards of it, she saw that

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it had eyes and a nose and a mouth. And

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>when she had come close to it, she saw clearly

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that it was Humpty Dumpty himself. It can't be anybody else,

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>she said to herself. I'm as certain of it as

0:02:55.320 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>if his name were written all over his face. Then

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>refers to Humpty as looking like an egg. Allowed, and

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>he's very offended. At any rate, a humanoid egg fits

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>right in with the story's surreal cast of characters. But

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this was the first time Humpty Dumpty was depicted as

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the character that we're familiar with today, complete with an

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>image by the book's illustrator, John Tenniel. The Alice books

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>were and remain popular, and future illustrators of the nursery

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>rhyme have often paid homage to Tenniel's depiction of the character. Okay,

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so we know why he's an egg today, But was

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>he always an egg? What was the inspiration for this

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>riddle in the first place. Let's go back even further.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>The first known appearance of the term humpty dumpty in

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.839
<v Speaker 1>print was in sixteen ninety in a slang dictionary, where

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's defined as a drink being ale boiled with brandy.

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>There's no real explanation for this slang term, although strong

0:03:55.720 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>beer was sometimes called hum around that time. Also, so

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>if you think this drink sounds gross, there's no accounting

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>for taste. But there were a lot of warm beer

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>or wine plus liquor cocktails happening back then. Skipping ahead

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen eighty five, one Francis Gross noted in his

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>book A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue that the

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>term could refer to either the drink or to a short,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>clumsy person, which is sort of getting somewhere, okay. In

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen forty two, a Punch magazine, a popular British satire publication,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>claimed that Humpty was a symbol for Cardinal Thomas Walsey,

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>who was appointed in eighteen fifteen during King Henry the

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Eighth's reign. Their claim was meant to be funny, but

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not totally implausible. Wallsy apparently enjoyed sitting on the

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>walls of the high tower of Cowwood Castle in York,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and he notably fell from grace with King Henry for

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>not obtaining the Pope's permission for the king to divorce

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>his first wife and Mary Anne Boilen. Wallsey was ultimately

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>arrested by the King's men. Another theory, with perhaps a

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>few cracks in it, is that Humpty Dumpty is an

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>allusion to King Richard the Third. Richard has often been

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:14.799
<v Speaker 1>depicted as having a grotesquely rounded, hunched back, partially because

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of negative propaganda in Shakespeare's play about him. The Bard's

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>patron at the time was one Fernando Stanley, who was

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a direct descendant of one of Richard's enemies, so it's

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>no wonder that in the play insults are hurled about

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>him like that he's a poisonous, bunch backed toad. In reality,

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we now know, after his remains were found buried under

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a parking lot in twenty twelve, that Richard only had

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>scoliosis mild enough that it would have made one shoulder

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>sit a bit higher than the other back to Humpty Dumpty.

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Though Richard was killed in the Battle of Bosworth in

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen eighty five, kicking off the reign of the Tudors.

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.679
<v Speaker 1>It's claimed that Richard the Third's horse was named Wall,

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and that Richard died after falling off of Wall and

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>being attacked beyond, and no matter what his men tried

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to do. Yet another theory is absolutely untrue. It was

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>written up in a spoof article in Oxford Magazine in

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties, but it wound up gaining popularity. It

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>purported that Humpty Dumpty was in fact a cannon that

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>was used in Colchester, England, in sixteen forty eight to

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>defend against a siege during the English Civil War. As

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>with many towns at the time, Colchester's castle, churches and

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>village were surrounded by a protective stone wall. The forces

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>defending the town put a cannon on top of the

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>church tower at Saint Mary's at the Walls Church and

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.119
<v Speaker 1>nicknamed the cannon Humpty Dumpty. When it came under fire

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>by Parliamentary armies, the tower toppled and the cannon was

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>destroyed and couldn't be put back together again again. That

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>one's a definite spoof. It seems that Humpty Dumpty has

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>some secrets in that egghead of his after all these years,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>but his legend lives on characters like Humpty, Alexander Dumpty

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in the film Puts in Boots, and the albeit minor

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>batman villain Humphrey Dumpler, whose attempts to fix things that

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he perceives as broken always and in disaster. Today's episode

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is based on the article was Humpty Dumpty really an egg?

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>On how Stuffworks dot Com? Written by Rebecca Treon. Brain

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is production of by Heart Radio in partnership with

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>how Stuffworks dot Com and is produced by Tyler Klang.

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Four more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows,