1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:02,600
Speaker 1: If you're able to get the best version of all

2
00:00:02,600 --> 00:00:05,640
Speaker 1: these guys, or somewhat close to the best version of

3
00:00:05,680 --> 00:00:07,760
Speaker 1: all of them, it really could be one of the

4
00:00:07,760 --> 00:00:09,240
Speaker 1: best rotations in baseball.

5
00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:17,919
Speaker 2: Here we go back on FT with Jesse Friedman, longtime

6
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,040
Speaker 2: Arizona Diamondbacks writer, podcast host. Great to have you on,

7
00:00:21,160 --> 00:00:25,560
Speaker 2: Jesse Happy almost spring training time and works had to

8
00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:28,280
Speaker 2: keep kind of rolling through team by team previews. But

9
00:00:28,440 --> 00:00:33,360
Speaker 2: how you doing not a bad offseason to cover the team?

10
00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:35,839
Speaker 3: Hey, guys, I'm great, appreciate you having me.

11
00:00:36,560 --> 00:00:40,080
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, anytime you swoop in and sign the

12
00:00:40,120 --> 00:00:43,040
Speaker 1: top free agent pitcher on the market, like you're probably

13
00:00:43,080 --> 00:00:44,559
Speaker 1: doing pretty well for yourself.

14
00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:48,120
Speaker 3: So yeah, the Diamondbacks to very much to my surprise.

15
00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:51,760
Speaker 1: Honestly, they've had a pretty nice offseason for themselves for sure.

16
00:00:52,960 --> 00:00:53,720
Speaker 4: Are you mad?

17
00:00:53,760 --> 00:00:56,120
Speaker 5: We just had jameson Tai on on and I asked

18
00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:58,560
Speaker 5: them they have to go play the Dodgers in Japan

19
00:00:58,680 --> 00:01:00,720
Speaker 5: for two games, and I'm like, are you should even go?

20
00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:03,640
Speaker 4: Because they're gonna win every game?

21
00:01:03,720 --> 00:01:06,240
Speaker 5: So as the Diamondbacks in the division have to play

22
00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:08,920
Speaker 5: them thirteen times, the team that beat them two years

23
00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:11,760
Speaker 5: ago knocked them out of the playoffs. And played really

24
00:01:11,760 --> 00:01:15,039
Speaker 5: well against them in twenty four? Should they even play

25
00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:17,479
Speaker 5: the season because the Diamondbacks are trying here. They brought

26
00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:19,800
Speaker 5: in some big moves and did some things we're gonna

27
00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:21,800
Speaker 5: get into. But should the Diamondbacks even try this year?

28
00:01:21,840 --> 00:01:24,280
Speaker 5: Should they just forfeit the games of Dodgers?

29
00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:26,399
Speaker 3: Yeah?

30
00:01:26,440 --> 00:01:29,960
Speaker 1: I mean, You've got two competing narratives here, right, I mean,

31
00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:32,480
Speaker 1: I mean one aspect of this is I think we

32
00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:35,680
Speaker 1: can all agree that, yes, some owners should go out

33
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:39,600
Speaker 1: and spend more money than they do. But there's also

34
00:01:39,640 --> 00:01:42,560
Speaker 1: an element of the fact that the Dodgers say that

35
00:01:42,680 --> 00:01:45,479
Speaker 1: the Dodgers are pulling in more revenue than the Diamondbacks

36
00:01:45,520 --> 00:01:47,640
Speaker 1: and then a lot of other teams around the league, Right,

37
00:01:47,640 --> 00:01:50,560
Speaker 1: I mean, I think that is not really a controversial

38
00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:54,400
Speaker 1: point to make, and so there are inherent advantages there.

39
00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:57,600
Speaker 1: At the same time, we saw what happened in twenty

40
00:01:57,720 --> 00:02:01,400
Speaker 1: twenty three, right, That Dodgers team maybe wasn't quite as

41
00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:03,520
Speaker 1: star studded as the team we're expecting to see in

42
00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:06,320
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, But that Dodgers team was pretty good

43
00:02:06,320 --> 00:02:09,440
Speaker 1: as well. And the Diamondbacks went in there and frankly

44
00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:13,280
Speaker 1: kind of obliterated and humiliated them in some ways. So

45
00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:16,040
Speaker 1: you know, on one hand, there are some inequities in

46
00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:18,360
Speaker 1: this sport that are just kind of inherent to the

47
00:02:18,360 --> 00:02:20,680
Speaker 1: way that the sport runs. And on the other side,

48
00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:24,920
Speaker 1: you've got this element of randomness in the postseason that

49
00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:28,680
Speaker 1: really allows anything to happen if you're able to get in. Obviously,

50
00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:31,480
Speaker 1: the Diamondbacks very narrowly were not able to do that

51
00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:34,440
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. But with the addition of Corbyn

52
00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:37,679
Speaker 1: Burns and the offseason that they've had and how good

53
00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:40,160
Speaker 1: they already were last year, I think they have a

54
00:02:40,200 --> 00:02:43,040
Speaker 1: decent shot in twenty twenty five to get back in there.

55
00:02:43,360 --> 00:02:45,280
Speaker 1: And who knows what happens at that point.

56
00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:49,480
Speaker 2: Yeah, hey, arm health matters. We've seen that be a

57
00:02:49,480 --> 00:02:51,519
Speaker 2: problem for that team many times in the past. It

58
00:02:51,560 --> 00:02:52,440
Speaker 2: could be a problem again.

59
00:02:52,520 --> 00:02:52,920
Speaker 4: We'll see.

60
00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:55,639
Speaker 2: All right, So let's get to business here, and let's

61
00:02:55,639 --> 00:02:59,160
Speaker 2: get Diamondbacks fans and just fans of any team besides

62
00:02:59,200 --> 00:03:02,760
Speaker 2: the Dodgers may be excited with our twenty twenty five storylines.

63
00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:15,240
Speaker 2: Twenty twenty five storylines for the Arizona Diamondbacks. Here's what

64
00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:18,880
Speaker 2: we're gonna run through with Jesse right now. The dreamy rotation,

65
00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:22,320
Speaker 2: which obviously was boosted by this big signing in the offseason,

66
00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:25,960
Speaker 2: the Josh Naylor edition which is sneaky and the p's loading.

67
00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:28,400
Speaker 2: We'll talk Toatel and Corbin Carrol, and then also just

68
00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:31,160
Speaker 2: remind everyone that the Diamondbacks were pretty damn good last

69
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:33,880
Speaker 2: year too, they just were facing a different playoff field.

70
00:03:33,919 --> 00:03:37,800
Speaker 2: So Jesse Friedman, let's begin with the headliner, as we should.

71
00:03:38,280 --> 00:03:42,600
Speaker 2: Corbin Burns signs surprisingly with the Diamondbacks because we saw

72
00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:45,400
Speaker 2: almost no whispers about this. So when you add him

73
00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:47,680
Speaker 2: to what's already there, do you think this is one

74
00:03:47,720 --> 00:03:49,760
Speaker 2: of the best rotations in Major League Baseball?

75
00:03:49,800 --> 00:03:51,680
Speaker 3: If not maybe the best?

76
00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:57,120
Speaker 1: I think it could be that. You know, that's really

77
00:03:57,160 --> 00:03:59,720
Speaker 1: the best answer I can give on that. I'm hesitanting

78
00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:03,080
Speaker 1: to go too far in that direction, because frankly, you

79
00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:06,280
Speaker 1: look at the numbers a year ago and the results

80
00:04:06,320 --> 00:04:09,000
Speaker 1: were not good for this starting rotation. The Diamondbacks had

81
00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:13,240
Speaker 1: a four point seventy nine starting rotation era in twenty

82
00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:16,159
Speaker 1: twenty four. And yes, there were a lot of factors there.

83
00:04:16,279 --> 00:04:18,679
Speaker 1: You know, Zach Gallon missed a month, plus Meryl Kelly

84
00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:22,080
Speaker 1: missed four months. At Ward, Rodriguez missed four months. Obviously,

85
00:04:22,200 --> 00:04:26,280
Speaker 1: the Jordan Montgomery move did not pan out, to put it,

86
00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:29,599
Speaker 1: to put it mildly, but yeah, I mean, this is

87
00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:31,880
Speaker 1: a team that on paper still had quite a bit

88
00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:35,080
Speaker 1: of talent in twenty twenty four, and you add Corbyn

89
00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:38,479
Speaker 1: Burns to that mix. It's an easy rotation to dream on,

90
00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:39,760
Speaker 1: I guess, is what I would say.

91
00:04:39,760 --> 00:04:40,480
Speaker 3: At the very least.

92
00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:42,440
Speaker 1: I mean, Zach Gallon has been one of the more

93
00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:45,640
Speaker 1: consistent frontline starters in the game for a while. Meryl

94
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:48,760
Speaker 1: Kelly when he's healthy, when he's been healthy in recent years,

95
00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:52,520
Speaker 1: has been excellent. And Wardo Rodriguez was fantastic with the

96
00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:55,800
Speaker 1: Detroit Tigers back in twenty twenty three. Ryan Nelson really

97
00:04:55,880 --> 00:04:58,680
Speaker 1: came on strong in the second half, a good young

98
00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:01,600
Speaker 1: pitcher for this team. So if you're able to get

99
00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:05,040
Speaker 1: like the best version of all these guys, or somewhat

100
00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:07,280
Speaker 1: close to the best version of all of them, it

101
00:05:07,360 --> 00:05:09,880
Speaker 1: really could be one of the best rotations in baseball.

102
00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:12,520
Speaker 1: I'm just a little hesitant to go too far down

103
00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:16,120
Speaker 1: that road when the reality in twenty twenty four was

104
00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:17,359
Speaker 1: very different from that.

105
00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:20,920
Speaker 6: How hesteron are you to say that Josh Naylor is

106
00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:23,240
Speaker 6: going to be able to fill Christian Walker's shoes because

107
00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:27,599
Speaker 6: Christian Walker kind of a quiet, super productive gold glove

108
00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:34,120
Speaker 6: first baseman. Josh Naylor also productive, not quite the resume super.

109
00:05:33,800 --> 00:05:39,680
Speaker 1: Loud, yeah right, not so quiet with Josh Naylor, they

110
00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:43,960
Speaker 1: are very different personality wise, you know, I think offensively,

111
00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:48,000
Speaker 1: Josh Naylor and Christian Walker are pretty similar. I was

112
00:05:48,040 --> 00:05:51,680
Speaker 1: looking at some numbers earlier today. Over the past three seasons,

113
00:05:51,800 --> 00:05:54,880
Speaker 1: Christian Walker has a one to twenty three ops plus.

114
00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:59,080
Speaker 1: Josh Naylor also has a one to twenty three ops plus.

115
00:05:59,680 --> 00:06:03,599
Speaker 1: So offensively, I think on paper it could be it

116
00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:07,039
Speaker 1: could be, you know, a pretty good swap for the

117
00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:09,240
Speaker 1: Diamondbacks where they can at least get something close to

118
00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:12,719
Speaker 1: what they were getting with Christian Walker. Defensively is a

119
00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:17,279
Speaker 1: very different story. Watching Christian Walker play first base is

120
00:06:17,720 --> 00:06:20,960
Speaker 1: one of the most amazing things about watching the Arizona Diamondbacks,

121
00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:23,480
Speaker 1: or it has been the past three seasons. It's been

122
00:06:23,520 --> 00:06:25,240
Speaker 1: fun for me to to kind of get a front

123
00:06:25,320 --> 00:06:27,919
Speaker 1: row seat to that because he is really good. He

124
00:06:28,040 --> 00:06:30,479
Speaker 1: is the best defensive first baseman in all of baseball

125
00:06:30,520 --> 00:06:33,680
Speaker 1: as far as I'm concerned. And Josh Naylor, you know,

126
00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:36,800
Speaker 1: not to say he's necessarily a liability over there. I

127
00:06:36,839 --> 00:06:40,239
Speaker 1: know the metrics in twenty twenty four we're not great,

128
00:06:40,600 --> 00:06:43,520
Speaker 1: but there's a substantial difference, right, I mean there's a

129
00:06:43,560 --> 00:06:46,560
Speaker 1: reason that I think on baseball reference war, you know,

130
00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:49,000
Speaker 1: Christian Walker has almost twice as much war over the

131
00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:52,240
Speaker 1: past three seasons as Naylor does. Part of that is

132
00:06:52,279 --> 00:06:54,640
Speaker 1: the number of games that the Walker has played He's

133
00:06:54,760 --> 00:06:57,360
Speaker 1: been able to stay healthy. But part of that is

134
00:06:57,400 --> 00:07:00,479
Speaker 1: also that Christian Walker is an extraordinary defender and Josh

135
00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:03,680
Speaker 1: Naylor is not that. But in terms of filling you know,

136
00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:07,040
Speaker 1: Walker's shoes at first base, I think the Diamondbacks did

137
00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:10,120
Speaker 1: reasonably well for themselves. You can plug Josh Naylor into

138
00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:12,360
Speaker 1: the middle of the lineup and and feel pretty good

139
00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:12,800
Speaker 1: about it.

140
00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:19,080
Speaker 4: Jesse, do it with me. Yeah, you gotta rock the baby.

141
00:07:19,080 --> 00:07:21,080
Speaker 5: You gotta learn to rock the baby like Josh Naylor

142
00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:23,560
Speaker 5: does when he hits home runs. Right, you better get

143
00:07:23,640 --> 00:07:26,120
Speaker 5: used to rocking the baby when he gets when he

144
00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:27,440
Speaker 5: comes up and he hits his home run.

145
00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:30,679
Speaker 4: Yeah right, right, rock the baby. That's right.

146
00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:32,720
Speaker 3: It's the Yankee fans. They do it to him back.

147
00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:35,680
Speaker 5: He did a White Sox a lot, so I know

148
00:07:35,760 --> 00:07:39,040
Speaker 5: that pained. You know, we talked about Josh Nayeler. You

149
00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:42,040
Speaker 5: guys have two other studs on your team. One of

150
00:07:42,040 --> 00:07:44,680
Speaker 5: them could tell Marte had a shot to win the MVP.

151
00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:45,880
Speaker 4: Before he got hurt last year.

152
00:07:46,160 --> 00:07:47,880
Speaker 5: And then Corbyn Carroll the rookie of the Year two

153
00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:50,840
Speaker 5: years ago and had a great second half. What can

154
00:07:50,880 --> 00:07:53,920
Speaker 5: these guys do to improve from where they were last year?

155
00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:56,240
Speaker 5: And the Diamondbacks scored a lot of runs last year.

156
00:07:56,320 --> 00:07:59,840
Speaker 5: Can they keep up the offensive surge they had last year?

157
00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:02,600
Speaker 5: And then with the new pitching staff, will that helped

158
00:08:02,640 --> 00:08:04,400
Speaker 5: them get better?

159
00:08:06,760 --> 00:08:10,200
Speaker 1: As far as how they can improve, I mean, Coutel Marte,

160
00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:13,040
Speaker 1: I think it's hard. It's hard to ask the improvement

161
00:08:13,080 --> 00:08:15,880
Speaker 1: there at this point. You did mention he got hurt

162
00:08:16,200 --> 00:08:18,240
Speaker 1: toward the end of the season, which was a turn

163
00:08:18,320 --> 00:08:20,200
Speaker 1: for him. So you know, if he's able to play

164
00:08:20,200 --> 00:08:22,160
Speaker 1: a full one hundred and fifty five games or so,

165
00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:25,680
Speaker 1: that would certainly be a big development. But Kutel was

166
00:08:26,160 --> 00:08:28,400
Speaker 1: outstanding for this team. I mean, he had thirty six

167
00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:31,160
Speaker 1: home runs in twenty twenty four. Had he not gotten hurt,

168
00:08:31,200 --> 00:08:34,160
Speaker 1: he probably would have STD the forty you know, winds

169
00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:38,240
Speaker 1: up finishing third in NL MVP voting. So you know,

170
00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:40,520
Speaker 1: if he's able to just be anything like what he

171
00:08:40,679 --> 00:08:43,080
Speaker 1: was in twenty twenty fours, if he's able to duplicate

172
00:08:43,080 --> 00:08:45,480
Speaker 1: that in twenty twenty five, that would be enormous for

173
00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:49,360
Speaker 1: this team. Corbyn Carroll in terms of improvement, that's where

174
00:08:49,360 --> 00:08:52,840
Speaker 1: the narrative really lies for me. Corbin, as you said,

175
00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:55,200
Speaker 1: was great in the second half. He had an OPS

176
00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:59,200
Speaker 1: over nine hundred, and that came after hitting two home

177
00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:01,760
Speaker 1: runs in his first eighty seven games. The man hit

178
00:09:01,800 --> 00:09:04,360
Speaker 1: two home runs in his first eighty seven games, and

179
00:09:04,400 --> 00:09:07,080
Speaker 1: he finished the year with twenty two home runs. So

180
00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:09,480
Speaker 1: that gives you a sense of just how different of

181
00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:13,120
Speaker 1: a player Corbyn Carroll was down the stretch. And you know,

182
00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:16,280
Speaker 1: obviously this this is a game of adjustments. You guys

183
00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:19,520
Speaker 1: certainly know that as well as anyone. You're not gonna

184
00:09:19,559 --> 00:09:22,040
Speaker 1: just sort of coast to being a superstar player and

185
00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:24,760
Speaker 1: never never face any bumps in the road along the way,

186
00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:27,800
Speaker 1: at least at least not most of the time. And

187
00:09:27,840 --> 00:09:30,000
Speaker 1: it really felt like Corbyn Carroll kind of got over

188
00:09:30,040 --> 00:09:32,160
Speaker 1: the hump in the second half. And you know, I'm

189
00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:35,240
Speaker 1: not sure if he's gonna finish first and MVP voting

190
00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:38,680
Speaker 1: or you know, how much MVP consideration he'll ultimately get,

191
00:09:38,960 --> 00:09:41,360
Speaker 1: but he seems like a pretty safe bet to be

192
00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:43,920
Speaker 1: a lot better in twenty twenty five.

193
00:09:45,880 --> 00:09:48,760
Speaker 6: I don't think many people. I'm sure you know many

194
00:09:48,800 --> 00:09:51,920
Speaker 6: people know that the Diamondbacks last year had five more

195
00:09:51,960 --> 00:09:55,160
Speaker 6: wins at eighty nine compared to the eighty four that

196
00:09:55,200 --> 00:09:58,160
Speaker 6: they won in the year they went to the World Series.

197
00:09:58,960 --> 00:10:03,959
Speaker 6: Is this team built for October but isn't sure how

198
00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:06,360
Speaker 6: to get in or are they just going to improve

199
00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:09,960
Speaker 6: again with the new roster configuration that they came up

200
00:10:09,960 --> 00:10:11,120
Speaker 6: with like they did last year.

201
00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:15,800
Speaker 1: I think they have a shot to be even better

202
00:10:15,880 --> 00:10:18,480
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty five than they were in twenty twenty four.

203
00:10:18,559 --> 00:10:19,720
Speaker 3: I do, And you're right.

204
00:10:19,840 --> 00:10:22,520
Speaker 1: I mean the narrative that the twenty twenty four Diamondbacks

205
00:10:22,559 --> 00:10:26,400
Speaker 1: were a big disappointment. I mean, in one sense, yes,

206
00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:29,199
Speaker 1: like you miss the postseason, you feel like you've you know,

207
00:10:29,440 --> 00:10:31,920
Speaker 1: you feel like it is a disappointment, rightfully so. But

208
00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:34,320
Speaker 1: on the other hand, they did win five more games

209
00:10:34,600 --> 00:10:37,720
Speaker 1: than they did the season prior, and you talk about

210
00:10:37,800 --> 00:10:40,280
Speaker 1: being built for the postseason, It's a little bit hard

211
00:10:40,280 --> 00:10:43,320
Speaker 1: for me to know exactly what built for the postseason means.

212
00:10:43,360 --> 00:10:46,080
Speaker 1: But when there's so much randomness involved, but you know,

213
00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:49,120
Speaker 1: you feel pretty good about you know, Corbyn Burns starting

214
00:10:49,120 --> 00:10:52,000
Speaker 1: a game one, Zach Allen starting a game two, Merrill

215
00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:54,320
Speaker 1: Kelly game three, you know whatever. They'd have a number

216
00:10:54,360 --> 00:10:57,200
Speaker 1: of options after that. This is a team that I

217
00:10:57,240 --> 00:11:01,400
Speaker 1: think could probably compete with anyone in twenty twenty five

218
00:11:01,600 --> 00:11:05,200
Speaker 1: in a postseason series, certainly, And I think a big

219
00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:08,199
Speaker 1: question for them is what does the offense look like?

220
00:11:08,559 --> 00:11:11,800
Speaker 1: You mentioned earlier this team scored more runs than anyone

221
00:11:11,840 --> 00:11:14,720
Speaker 1: else in baseball in twenty twenty four, which still kind

222
00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:16,839
Speaker 1: of blows my mind. I'm still not a direly sure

223
00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:19,880
Speaker 1: how that happened, but that was the reality of the situation.

224
00:11:20,000 --> 00:11:22,600
Speaker 1: This team just absolutely beat the tar out of the

225
00:11:22,600 --> 00:11:26,120
Speaker 1: ball the entire season, and I'm not sure I'm expecting

226
00:11:26,120 --> 00:11:28,240
Speaker 1: that to continue in twenty twenty five. I still think

227
00:11:28,280 --> 00:11:31,480
Speaker 1: they could be a good offensive team, especially if Corbyn

228
00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:34,680
Speaker 1: Carroll is able to take that step forward. But you

229
00:11:34,720 --> 00:11:38,280
Speaker 1: don't have Jack Peterson anymore. Christian Walker, as we said earlier,

230
00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:42,120
Speaker 1: is no longer here, even though they did get a

231
00:11:42,160 --> 00:11:46,120
Speaker 1: solid replacement there, I think in Josh Naylor. So yeah,

232
00:11:46,160 --> 00:11:48,320
Speaker 1: the question is, you know, if you do take a

233
00:11:48,360 --> 00:11:51,079
Speaker 1: step back on the offensive side, which I think is likely.

234
00:11:51,400 --> 00:11:54,080
Speaker 1: How much better can your pitching staff be than it

235
00:11:54,160 --> 00:11:57,079
Speaker 1: was a year ago? And I think it probably could

236
00:11:57,120 --> 00:11:57,960
Speaker 1: be quite a bit better.

237
00:11:58,040 --> 00:11:58,880
Speaker 3: Right I mentioned.

238
00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:02,160
Speaker 1: Earlier a four point seven nine starting pitching eer. With

239
00:12:02,240 --> 00:12:05,599
Speaker 1: some of the names that they have this season, I

240
00:12:06,040 --> 00:12:08,480
Speaker 1: think if you're able to stay healthy, that group could

241
00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:12,120
Speaker 1: take an enormous step forward and ultimately land this team

242
00:12:12,280 --> 00:12:13,400
Speaker 1: in a much better position.

243
00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:17,040
Speaker 2: Okay, Jesse, So let's recap, because then I'm going to

244
00:12:17,080 --> 00:12:18,560
Speaker 2: put you to the test and tell us what we're

245
00:12:18,559 --> 00:12:23,600
Speaker 2: missing about this team. Because we covered Burns, Naylor, Katl

246
00:12:23,720 --> 00:12:26,840
Speaker 2: and Corbyn bringing it this year, and then how the

247
00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:30,959
Speaker 2: team was pretty damn good. Last year was a different

248
00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:32,960
Speaker 2: landscape for them to have to hit, and they just

249
00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:35,320
Speaker 2: didn't get over the hump. I mean, the Mets were

250
00:12:35,320 --> 00:12:39,079
Speaker 2: a pretty surprising team, and obviously the Braves were in

251
00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:41,679
Speaker 2: a weird spot last season. The Diamondbacks were in that

252
00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:46,560
Speaker 2: super awkward position of watching and rooting for one team

253
00:12:46,559 --> 00:12:49,720
Speaker 2: to win both games. Anyway, fast forward to twenty twenty five.

254
00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:52,640
Speaker 2: What are we missing storylines wise that is going to

255
00:12:52,720 --> 00:12:55,239
Speaker 2: dictate the success of the Diamondbacks.

256
00:12:57,120 --> 00:12:59,360
Speaker 1: I think The first thing that comes to mind for me,

257
00:12:59,400 --> 00:13:03,640
Speaker 1: Scott is is are the Diamondbacks done this offseason. I'm

258
00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:05,600
Speaker 1: not sure that they are. I think there's a chance

259
00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:08,360
Speaker 1: that come opening Day this team could still look a

260
00:13:08,400 --> 00:13:10,240
Speaker 1: little bit different. I know they would like to add

261
00:13:10,280 --> 00:13:13,800
Speaker 1: a closer if they can. Obviously, Paul Sewald had his

262
00:13:13,840 --> 00:13:16,760
Speaker 1: struggles down the stretch last year. He left in free agency,

263
00:13:17,120 --> 00:13:19,080
Speaker 1: so I think that's a hole they would like to fill.

264
00:13:19,400 --> 00:13:22,000
Speaker 1: I could see them adding a right handed bat to

265
00:13:22,040 --> 00:13:26,320
Speaker 1: maybe get some some DH reps as well, So I

266
00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:28,400
Speaker 1: think there are still some things that could be done

267
00:13:28,480 --> 00:13:31,640
Speaker 1: here that The flip side of that narrative is that

268
00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:33,880
Speaker 1: I still think there's a decent chance they look to

269
00:13:33,880 --> 00:13:36,560
Speaker 1: trade someone like Jordan Montgomery in order to free up

270
00:13:36,640 --> 00:13:40,199
Speaker 1: some salary space. Their payroll is inching close to two

271
00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:43,920
Speaker 1: hundred million dollars right now, which is, you know, very much,

272
00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:48,280
Speaker 1: far and away the highest enfranchise history. So I'll be

273
00:13:48,320 --> 00:13:50,600
Speaker 1: curious to see what happens here over the over these

274
00:13:50,679 --> 00:13:52,720
Speaker 1: next couple months as we get close to the season.

275
00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:55,720
Speaker 1: The other narrative that comes to mind for me is

276
00:13:55,920 --> 00:13:59,079
Speaker 1: Ao Henio Suarez, a name that we haven't we haven't

277
00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:01,160
Speaker 1: mentioned yet. You know, if you had asked me in

278
00:14:01,200 --> 00:14:03,760
Speaker 1: the middle of last year if the Diamondbacks were going

279
00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:07,920
Speaker 1: to pick up his fifteen million dollar club option, I'm

280
00:14:07,960 --> 00:14:10,400
Speaker 1: not sure I would have taken the question seriously frankly.

281
00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:13,840
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, he in the first half really

282
00:14:13,880 --> 00:14:16,320
Speaker 1: really struggled. He had an OPS in the five hundreds

283
00:14:16,320 --> 00:14:19,360
Speaker 1: for multiple months, and then in the second half he

284
00:14:19,440 --> 00:14:21,640
Speaker 1: was one of the best hitters in all of baseball,

285
00:14:21,680 --> 00:14:25,000
Speaker 1: had an OPS over nine hundred. He had four four

286
00:14:25,080 --> 00:14:29,160
Speaker 1: hit games in the second half. He was unbelievable. And

287
00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:32,840
Speaker 1: I think I could see a scenario where maybe Gino

288
00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:35,920
Speaker 1: is able to be a great player again in twenty

289
00:14:35,960 --> 00:14:39,000
Speaker 1: twenty five. Or you could also maybe see a scenario

290
00:14:39,160 --> 00:14:41,960
Speaker 1: where as he continues to age, you know, maybe we

291
00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:44,960
Speaker 1: see some regression as we started to see at the

292
00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:48,200
Speaker 1: beginning of last year. So I think he's a name

293
00:14:48,240 --> 00:14:49,960
Speaker 1: to watch in twenty twenty five for sure.

294
00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:51,160
Speaker 4: Yeah.

295
00:14:51,160 --> 00:14:54,760
Speaker 2: It was great pick up, great Dudet, good fella, good fellow,

296
00:14:54,800 --> 00:14:58,560
Speaker 2: good fellow. That Gino Suarez. That's right, Jesse. Great to

297
00:14:58,560 --> 00:15:00,600
Speaker 2: have you on. Thanks for all the insight, man, really

298
00:15:00,600 --> 00:15:03,680
Speaker 2: good stuff, great intel, and we'll have you again on soon.

299
00:15:03,720 --> 00:15:06,640
Speaker 2: Everyone give Jesse a follow at Jesse N Friedman f

300
00:15:06,800 --> 00:15:09,280
Speaker 2: R i E D m A N on Twitter.

301
00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:12,960
Speaker 3: Appreciate you man, Yeah, thanks guys, always happy to do it.