WEBVTT - Lemon Out, Tesla Down, SpaceX Up

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Listen. Honestly, I'm not meaning to offend you. You're an

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 2>intense person. Where does that intensity come from? Let's boil

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that way. And I had a tough childhood? You did?

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Huh so right.

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Wilf Isaacson goes into it in the book. We only

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 3>have a couple minutes left, so all right, too long

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 3>to describe the one or two questions I can do,

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>and then we'll call it.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Again, I don't mean to upset you. Why are you?

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 4>You? Just well you are must gives now the richest

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 4>person on the planet. More than half the satellites in

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 4>space are owned and controlled by one man.

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, he's a legitimate super genius.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean legitimate.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 5>He says.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>be different.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 5>Health vote Republican.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>on him.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Anything he does, he's fascinating people.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to Elon Inc. Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 4>The tape you just heard was a part of a

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 4>very surreal, very strange interview between Elon Musk and the

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 4>former CNN anchor Don Lemon. Today is March nineteenth, twenty

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 4>twenty four. I'm your host, Max Chafkin in for David Popadopolis,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 4>who is on vacation recovering from the live taping we

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 4>just did at south By Southwest. You know, one of

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 4>the funny things about planning this show, one of the

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 4>exciting things about this show is the sheer number of

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk news that comes out in any given week,

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 4>and this one was no exception. All of his companies

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 4>have been making news. There's been new in Earth and

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 4>in space and in the media, and on X we're

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 4>gonna be talking about all of that, talking about Tesla

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX and Starlink doing basically a Smorgesborg of Elon, if

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 4>you will. And then we're gonna get to that now

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 4>infamous interview between Elon and former CNN anchor Don Lemon.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 4>You just heard a clip from that. Don Lemon's news

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 4>show was supposed to appear first on X, but Lemon

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 4>and MUCKs parted ways, essentially canceled the show after one

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 4>episode after that interview, And we'll do that. So to

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 4>break down all of this Elon News. We have Dana Hall,

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 4>who is our four full time Elon Musk reporter. Hello Dana.

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 5>Great to be here.

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 4>And then later as we dig into the lemon of

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 4>it all, we will be joined by Kurt Wagner, who

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 4>covers social media for Bloomberg News. But first we're gonna

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 4>start with Dana and these news stories a lot of

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 4>big news. I'm gonna run through these, and I want

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 4>you to tell me what, to your mind was the

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 4>biggest one of the past week. So first, Tesla stock

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 4>has been going way down, and Musk has lost his

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 4>spot as the world's richest guy. I think he's in

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 4>third now. SpaceX had a launch of its Starship Rocket.

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 4>It was I think kind of successful. Taiwan is developing

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 4>a alternative to SpaceX's Starlink. And we got news about

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 4>a new contract that SpaceX has with the US National

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Reconnaissance Office. Okay, so those are four stories. What's the

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 4>biggest deal of those?

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 5>For I would say, of the four stories that you mentioned,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 5>I think the most interesting one is that this news

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 5>that SpaceX has this huge contract with the National Reconnaissance Office.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 5>And it's not a new contract, it's a contract from

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty one. But now we know that the NRO

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 5>is doing it, and that's just like yet another sign

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 5>that Musk has muscled his way into being this incredible

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 5>part of the military industrial defense complex. And that is

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 5>just like a huge thing that I think that people

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 5>really forget about Elon. He's always seen as you know,

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 5>the bombastic owner of X, the CEO of Tesla, but

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 5>his role as a military contry actor just says so

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 5>much about his standing in the world and why the

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 5>US government is so perplexed and be fuddled by this guy.

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 4>And this was a new contract, right, I mean a

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 4>contract that was inked under the Biden administration. You know,

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Musk has talked a lot about you know, Joe Biden

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 4>being against him, but as you I think have pointed

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 4>out a bunch of times in this podcast, you know,

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 4>Biden administration and people close to the White House can

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 4>be frustrated with Elon Musk, but they also need him,

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 4>and I think this is probably another, you know instance

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 4>of that.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they need him for a lot of things. I mean,

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 5>strictly on the SpaceX side, they need SpaceX to ferry

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 5>astronauts to the ISS for NASA, but they also need

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX to launch military satellites, and now apparently they also

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 5>need SpaceX to help the Pentagon and the NRO develop

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 5>spy satellites. So this is like a very big deal

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 5>that Elon is in this role and that SpaceX is

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 5>in this.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Role, right, And I mean the weird thing here is,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 4>at the same time this news of this contract and

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 4>you know, evidence obviously of a pretty robust or growing

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 4>military business with this thing, we're also seeing, you know,

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan essentially complaining or getting worried about the prospect of

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 4>having to rely on an Elon Musk hardware and possibly

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 4>developing its own sort of version of starlink. How do

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 4>we reconcile those two stories.

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that you know, it's kind of like,

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 5>no one wants Elon Musk to have a monopoly on

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 5>space based satellites or space based Internet, and he is

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 5>rapidly approaching approaching that, I mean, nobody else. He has

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 5>more satellites for the Internet up and up in space

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 5>than anybody else. And I think that Taiwan very you know,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.119
<v Speaker 5>astutely kind of watching Musk and his relationship with China,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 5>is just very worried about that, and they want to

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 5>protect themselves. So I think that that makes total sense.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's been a lot of focus about what

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk has said or not said about Russia and Ukraine,

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 5>but the whole Taiwan China conflicts like here, you know,

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 5>is just like equally important strategically geopolitically. It has a

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 5>lot of implications, and Musk's has said some pretty like

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 5>why things about China and Taiwan that are totally at

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 5>odds with the Biden administration. And so that's like another

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 5>geopolitical conflict to watch.

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 4>So just to stay on SpaceX, I mean, I think

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 4>what most people who were sort of just watching cable

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 4>news or whatever probably know about is this SpaceX launch

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 4>which happened last week. This was the Starship rocket. This

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 4>is what Elon Musk has previously called the big e

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 4>fing rocket. I guess that will one day, in theory,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 4>could be sent all the way to Mars. The rocket

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 4>sort of got into space and then it exploded. What's

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 4>your take on this? This is like basically just a

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 4>par for the course or something. This is an in

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 4>development technology. We shouldn't read into it one way or

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 4>the other.

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 5>I think that media organizations really kind of miss how

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 5>space companies view research and development, which is that you

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 5>have to test a lot and fail a lot before

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 5>you achieve full success. And like I'm old enough to remember,

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, like in the early days when SpaceX would

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 5>first try to land the rocket on like a drone trip,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 5>they would always miss, Like the rocket would land in

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 5>the water, it would explode, it would like it would

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 5>hit and fall over, and like we had story after

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 5>story about like how the drone ship test failed, but

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 5>eventually they nailed it, and now they do it all

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 5>the time and it's not a big deal. Starship is

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 5>very similar, Like it was a big leap forward because

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 5>it it cleared the launch pad and it it went

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 5>for farther and faster than it had ever gone before.

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, then it like broke up on re entry.

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 5>But like they did a lot, like it was very successful,

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 5>Like in the eyes of SpaceX, it was the most

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 5>successful launch to date, and so in the eyes of

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 5>the company, this was a huge success and they hoped

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 5>to get back at it. I think they're aspirationally like

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 5>six to eight weeks.

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, my big question here is like what is the

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 4>business for this giant rocket.

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 5>It's like way.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Bigger than their biggest you know, rocket Falcon nine or

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 4>is it the Falcon nine Heavy? But like, do they

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 4>know what it's gonna what the actual like payloads are

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 4>going to be, and how they're gonna make money on

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 4>this thing?

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 5>Eventually, if they a will to take humans to the

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 5>Moon and Mars, that's the sort of goal. But because

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 5>it's so big, they can launch way more satellites on it.

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 5>So I think the biggest customer for Starship is star Link,

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 5>like SpaceX can put a lot more of its own

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 5>satellites into orbit using this much bigger vehicle.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 4>Before we get to the next segment, I mentioned earlier

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 4>that Tesla's stock price is way down this year, as

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 4>is Elon's wealth. Dana, you never gave me your take.

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So the process of a limit, Can I start

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 5>with the least big deal?

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 5>I think the wealth ranking. I'm so bored of that.

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 5>It's like the richest people in the world jockey back

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 5>and forth, up and down, like it changes every day.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 5>Who cares, like whether he's the richest or number two

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 5>or number three?

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but I agree with you, But that's not the

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 4>actual story. The story is that Tesla's stock it's down

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 4>more than any other or it's sort of been neck

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 4>and neck with another well known company, Boeing, which of

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 4>course has had like plain parts falling off. Last I checked,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Tesla had actually performed worse since the beginning of the

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 4>year than Boeing. So the actual story is Tesla's stock

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 4>has lost an insane amount out of its market share.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 5>Tesla stock is way down this year. Investors are sort

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 5>of frustrated. There's not like a real growth wave anytime soon.

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 5>A lot is riding on the next generation vehicle. You're

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 5>seeing Nvidia and all of these like big tech companies

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 5>that make up the Magnificent seven get all of this limelight.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 5>But you know, Tesla's stock has always been volatile. I

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 5>don't think it's like I mean, I don't think it's

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 5>like in a free fall. I just think that there's

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 5>like a lot, you know, like it's not clear what

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 5>the next big catalyst is going to be, and so

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 5>that's what has investors kind of bummed out.

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, my ranking is almost the exact opposite of yours.

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 4>For what it's worth, my ranking goes Tesla's. Tesla's stock

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 4>followed by the launch, followed by the nro the star

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Shield Starlink contract with the US government, followed by Taiwan

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 4>complaining about Musk's dominance. You know, I just think, like

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about somebody who I think, like what he

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 4>does depends on how the stock is doing, on how

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 4>he perceives his own how he perceives people are reacting

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 4>to him. And I think like these headlines saying that

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Tesla is the worst performing stock of the SMP. It's

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 4>worse than even the you know, airline that can't keep

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 4>the you know, parts of the playing together. You know,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 4>Elon is an extremely online guy. I do think that

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 4>is really important. Although I completely agree Dana the wealth

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 4>question is is not really relevant or that or that interesting.

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, when you're worth more than one hundred and

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 4>fifty billion, you know, what's a few billion here there?

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean Elon is very aware of his own wealth,

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 5>let's put it that way. He's not very liquid.

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Now, we're going to get into the Don Lemon Elon

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Musk interview, and to do that, we're going to bring

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 4>in Bloomberg News social media reporter Kurt Wagner. Kurt, Welcome

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 4>to Elon Inc.

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Hi Max, thank you for having me all right.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 4>So Don Lemon former Sienna and anchor who was by

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 4>his own account fired last year, you know, after a

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 4>series of controversial appearances on TV during which he said

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 4>that Nicky Haley was quote not in her prime, got

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 4>into a racially inflected confrontation from Vivek Ramaswami. He announced

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 4>that he was coming X because you know, he wanted

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 4>a place for a quote, an honest debate without hall monitors.

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 4>He promised his new show, The Don Lemon Show, would

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 4>be bigger, bolder, freer. Kurt, you watched it, Did it

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 4>deliver on that promise?

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 6>I have to admit I probably didn't watch enough Don

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 6>Lemon before this interview to fully compare er s.

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 4>It was big, but not necessarily bigger.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying it's big, but yeah, the jury still out

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 6>on the bigger part.

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, you know, this interview was really interesting

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to me.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 6>It obviously like I ended up, of course watching the

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 6>whole hour, and the second half was just so much

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 6>more like awkward because you could tell that Elon was

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 6>so visibly frustrated with what was going on that it

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 6>started off, you know, even though he was asking sort

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 6>of some confrontational questions.

0:11:58.240 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually thought it started off okay.

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 6>And I was like, right, you know, there's kind of

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 6>like he's asking the tough questions that we would all

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 6>want someone to ask Elon if he was there. But

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 6>the second half just got so uncomfortable to me because

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 6>Lemon was really like needling him on certain specific things

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 6>that it was very clear Elon had no interest in

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 6>actually talking about. And so you know, you saw that confrontation,

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 6>which makes for I guess, you know, great great video

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 6>content if you want to call it that, but you know,

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 6>the interview.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Itself I thought got progressively worse.

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, we should say just at the top of this

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 4>segment that after the interview, Elon Musk essentially, according to

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 4>Don Lemon, canceled what was supposed to be a deal

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 4>to air the Don Lemon Show Bigger Boulder, Freer without Hall, Monitors,

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 4>all that good stuff that it was already done. But

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 4>basically by the end of the interview, as Elon Musk

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, walked away, you know, in frustration. It seemed

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 4>Dana there were, like Kurt says, a couple of kind

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 4>of tough questions. Don Lemon asked, I guess about two

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 4>related topics, drug use, and that the impact of that

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 4>use on national security, which is that if Elon does it,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 4>it's good.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 5>I think what was really interesting about the interview was

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 5>that Lemon asked Elon Musk specifically about his usages of ketamine,

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 5>which you know has been rumored about for years, and

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 5>the Wall Street Journal had a whole story about Musk

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 5>and drug use, and Musk was very open about it.

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 5>He said, I have a prescription for ketamine. I take

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 5>it for depression. I you know, sometimes have it helps

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 5>me get out of these bad moods. I'm under a

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 5>doctor's care. I don't take it a lot. There are

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 5>weeks when I don't take it at all, but like

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 5>I take it, And investors should be happy with that

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 5>because Wall Street fundamentally cares about execution.

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Teesley is worth about as much as the rest of

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 3>the car industry combined from nothing, So I know that's

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>pretty good as a mention. We had the best LA

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Car autoth last year. So for investors work, if there

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 3>is something I'm taking, I should keep take it.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 4>This is Dana the I think what Matt Levine are

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 4>kinbably called the Elon theory of management.

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 5>I think it's remarkable that we're in a day and

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 5>age where as CEO is now talking so openly about

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 5>his mental health. And I thought that the way that

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 5>he answered the question was actually assuring to Tesla investors,

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 5>because the interview aired on Monday, and like Tesla stock

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 5>was up six percent yesterday, and we were sort of joking, oh,

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 5>like investors like prescription drugs. But it was like he

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 5>just answered it forthrightly, He was honest about it. He

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 5>was like, yes, like I take ketamine, Like what is

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 5>the big deal? And ketamine is increasingly legal, it is

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 5>used in all kinds of therapies for people with PTSD,

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 5>and the Veterans administrations like it's very much where you know,

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 5>the use of psychedelics and things like ketamine are very

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 5>much where marijuana was twenty years ago in terms of

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 5>just growing social exceptions and a growing body of research

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 5>that it can be an effective tool. And so I

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 5>thought that Musk candled that actually very well, and it

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 5>was kind of like now we've got like the drug

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 5>use questions sort of like done. Like Musk affirmed on

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 5>camera on tape that yes he has a prescription for ketamine.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Actually, Elon and his allies sharing these clips like using

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 4>them to kind of you know, own or dunk on

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Don Lemon. The weird thing is, you know, ahead of

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 4>this interview, Don Lemon, who is, like it should be said,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 4>making the most of this right, like he is not

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 4>letting this opportunity go to ways. He went on CNN

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 4>last week to essentially complain. He implied very strongly it

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 4>had been the drug thing, although I don't think it

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 4>was the drug thing, right Kurt.

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we don't know exactly what part of the

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 6>interview set Elon off to cancel this partnership, but I

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 6>agree with both of you. I mean that was pretty

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 6>early in the conversation, and I thought, I agree. I

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 6>thought Elon handled it well, like he talked about it.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 6>He didn't labor any of the points, but like we

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 6>did get some answers, and I thought where it really

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 6>went off the rails for me was like much later

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 6>on towards the towards the end, when they started talking

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 6>about Elon's views on speech and what Elon calls censorship

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.119
<v Speaker 6>and what Don Lemon was referring to as you know, moderation,

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 6>and and like you could tell at that point that

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 6>they just fundamentally disagreed on what Elon should be doing

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 6>with X. And I felt like the end of that

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 6>exchange was the moment where, if I had to pinpoint,

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 6>I would say he was just like, Okay, you know

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 6>this guy, this guy's clearly not aligned with my views

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 6>on what X should be and where it stands on

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 6>the on the spectrum of free speech. And there's no

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 6>way I'm giving this guy any money.

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, totally agree. And you know, Don Lemon had not

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 4>promised that Cringe would be a part of the show,

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 4>but I definitely think in that moment it was. It

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 4>was really a rough lesson. Let's let's hear a little

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 4>bit of that exchange. So you said, if they kill

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 4>the company, it's them, but doesn't the Buck stop with you?

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're on. I have to say, choose your question, Kathy.

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 3>That's five minutes left, okay, But so the same question

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 3>you want to ask, the same question as you said

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that they are killing the company, but you're the head

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 3>of the company, the Buck business stup of the I

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 3>acquired X in order to preserve freedom of speech in

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 3>America the First Amendment, and I want to stick to

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 3>that and if that means making less money, so be it.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean that's.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 5>Produce our questions carefully. I'm going to use that. I

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 5>love that line.

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Have you heard him speak to people that way, either

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 4>of you.

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 5>I think that this is kind of classic Elon. He

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 5>gets he gets like he's very sensitive, and he gets

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 5>very he gets upset easily, Like I mean, like when

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 5>he was at the deal Book conference at the Year Times,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 5>he got like pretty upset about the whole idea of

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 5>advertisers blackmailing him and you know, told famously told them

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 5>to go f themselves. And like I think he also

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 5>gets bored, and his time is pretty I mean, it's

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 5>for a guy who has run six companies, Like it's

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 5>amazing that he gave that. He that he talks so

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 5>much and so openly all the time on all these events,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 5>but he gave this guy an hour, and I think

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 5>he just got increased, seemingly annoyed, and like it was

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 5>like I felt like we were watching, like I felt

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 5>like a volcano was about to explode. And then like

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 5>he gets like more and more kind of quiet and

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 5>like intense as his rage is boiling beneath the surface.

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 6>I was going to agree he's done some Twitter spaces

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 6>in the you know eighteen months or so since he's

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 6>taken over the company, and there's been some moments where

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 6>you know, they'll bring someone up sort of quote unquote

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 6>on stage to ask a question, and the either ramble

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 6>or they're they'll actually ask him a challenging question that

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 6>he's not used to getting, and he'll sort of do

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 6>the same, like he'll cut them off and or just

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 6>completely change the subject and sort of dismiss that person.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>So that that's where I've heard him do it before.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 4>It really is a good reminder that like he has

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 4>not allowed himself to be with a critic like he

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 4>even here right even in this interview where he is

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 4>is dealing with questions he doesn't like, where Don Lemon

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 4>seems really be getting under his skin by pointing out,

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 4>you know the obvious, which is like your CEO of

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 4>this company, you keep saying Disney's killing it, but you

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 4>know it's it's actually you, and Elon just can't take it.

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's a good reminder that these other interviews

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 4>have been in extremely friendly conditions where where Elon is

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 4>either with like Joe Rogan or Lex Friedman, one of

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 4>these influencer types who is you know, kind of borderline

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 4>sycophanic with him, or where he's like literally controlling the

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 4>other participant's microphone like in an X space is a

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 4>Twitter spaces thing, Kurt, he made good on his thread threat.

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 4>It appears that Don Lemon show the partnership with X

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 4>is gone. Where does the format?

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Where does this?

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Does this? Where does this leave the whole plan that

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 4>they were going to have all these TV shows? How

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 4>big a loss is Don Lemon for the Elon musk

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 4>Linda Yakarino pivot to video strategy.

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, this is what I wrote my newsletter on this

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 6>week was that I thought the decision to cancel Don

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 6>Lemon's contract or partnership was really the mistake here, not

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 6>anything that was actually said during the interview. I think,

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, as bad as both Elon and at times

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 6>Don Lemon looked a in this interview, the issue was

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 6>that that he bailed on this partnership and sent a

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 6>signal to the entire media industry that partnering with X

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 6>is you know, only going to work if you continue

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 6>to make Elon feel good or make Elon feel happy

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 6>or safe for whatever you want to say. And so

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, I don't think Don Lemon was necessarily going

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 6>to be the champion that carried X into profitability. But

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 6>I also think that he, you know, they really really

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 6>talked about this partnership, how important it was.

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>It was sort.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 6>Of the he was like the face of this pivot

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 6>to video and this like push towards more professionally produced content.

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 6>And the fact that they got rid of him so quickly,

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 6>to me, is just yet another sign that like Elon's

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 6>impulsive decision making is hurting the business of X.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 5>I sort of skimmed through something in the New York

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 5>Post about like Don Lemon wanted a cyber truck and

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 5>equity and like a bunch of money. Is that true?

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 5>Like I couldn't figure out the sourcing of that. It

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 5>seemed like a very strategic leak from the Elon side.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 6>Sure, I don't know if it's true, but it it

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 6>doesn't surprise me, Like, it sounds very believable to me

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 6>that someone who is like trying to come up with

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 6>a partnership would say, well, here's the compensation package I want, Like,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 6>let's negotiate this. The fact that they announced Don Lemon

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 6>back in January, that Elon sat for this interview, and

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 6>that they had not apparently one figured out that compensation package.

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 6>And two that Elon was acting surprised at the format

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 6>of the show, right, that was his whole thing. He

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 6>was saying, Hey, I'm bailing on this deal because this

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 6>is just CNN but on X and it's like.

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Would you think you were buying to talk about this?

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, exactly, So you agreed to sit for a whole hour.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 6>Didn't you know that before you sat down?

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 4>So two things on this on the point of Dana

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 4>made One is Okay, I don't know if Don Lemon

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 4>asked for a cyber truck, but like, he's Don Lemon,

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 4>he's a big star. He gets paid a lot of money,

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 4>as like Kurt saying, to go on TV and if

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 4>your ambition is to recruit other people like you know,

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 4>Tucker Carlson also gets paid a lot of money. You know,

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 4>Joe Rogan, who I'm sure Elon Musk would love on

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 4>the X platform, gets paid a lot of money. Like

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 4>you got to deal with this kind of thing. And

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 4>the approach of like kind of canceling the show, attempting

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 4>to if in fact these were leaked deliberately, you know,

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 4>attempting to embarrass you know, former star like it's not

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 4>going to make the next deal any easier. And the

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 4>other people that they announced at the same time, I

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 4>think one of them is, you know, Tulsey Gabbert is

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of like an Alt Democrat, not a Don Lemon

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 4>level star by any stretch.

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 6>No, Don Lemon was the biggest name for sure, and

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 6>then Tucker Carlson, the other big name that we all

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 6>thought was partnering with X, ended up sort of being like, well,

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 6>I put my stuff on X, but I was never

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 6>officially a partner. So it's like, even this effort to

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 6>move to video has had a ton of fits and starts,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 6>and it's just again, this to me was a huge

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 6>red flag for this whole effort.

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 4>The other thing, too, is that this is like, if

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 4>you're really trying to make this a thing, you don't

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 4>want every star to be focused on Elon Musk. If

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 4>the only way to get video like viewers to an

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 4>ex video is to have Elon on the video, like,

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 4>that's a bad sign too. Right now, it often feels

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 4>like X is just the Elon Musk, you know, reality show,

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 4>And of course this Don Lemon thing forwards it, but

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't. It doesn't like allow them to build a business,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, in any way. I want to move on

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 4>to a couple of the sort of weird political parts

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 4>of this, of this interview, as well as some of

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 4>the things that Elon's been tweeting about. What did you

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 4>two make of Don Lemon's efforts to like press Elon

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 4>Musk on his, for instance, endorsement of The Great Replacement

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 4>or the tweeting the recent tweeting about these kind of

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 4>immigration related conspiracy theories.

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 6>I think it was good that he brought that up

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 6>and sort of, you know, attempted to have some kind

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 6>of discussion about this. I think hearing Elon try and

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 6>defend some of these tweets was really frustrating to me.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 6>And I think the biggest issue that I took from

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 6>this was that there was an exchange where Don Lemon

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 6>said something along the lines is, well, don't you feel

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 6>some responsibility to sort of, you know, know that the

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 6>things you're tweeting are either accurate or as close to

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 6>accurate as you can, Like, shouldn't you be kind of

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 6>doing your homework before tweeting these things? And Elon's response

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 6>was essentially, well, the community will just fact check me

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 6>if I'm wrong, and to me, it was such a

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 6>disappointing glimpse into his thought process, which is, I'm just

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 6>going to say whatever I want, you know, implications or

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 6>consequences be damned, and I'm just going to put the

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 6>pressure or the responsibility of actually determining whether I'm saying

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 6>true things on other people. And as we all know,

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 6>by the time anyone fact checks him, or by the

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 6>time anyone challenges him or whatever, like, the damage is

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 6>oftentimes done.

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 6>He has reached hundreds of millions of people, he has

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 6>he has stirred up his fans and supporters to probably

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 6>say many of the same things. And it's just like,

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 6>I just thought that was a really disappointing framework for

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 6>him to basically say, it's not my responsibility to say

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 6>to say thoughtful things, it's everyone else's responsibility to check

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 6>me on that.

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 5>I agree with Kurt completely. He makes a really good

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 5>point that, you know, Musk seems to be relying on

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 5>this community notes feature on X to kind of fact

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 5>check falsehoods, when if you had actual content moderation, you

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 5>could nip that in the bud much more quickly. But

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 5>that's not the business model.

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, and I feel like we sort of

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 4>saw some of the limits of that approach. Even in

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 4>this interview, you know that the segment where Lemon was

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 4>like attempting to fact check on the immigration stuff, I

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 4>thought was like pretty weak and ended up just having

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Musk kind of repeat a bunch of the same falsehoods

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 4>and come off almost sounding reasonable. Like I feel like

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 4>if this was on CNN, we would be talking about

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 4>should CNN really be like, you know, spending this much

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 4>time like giving air to these theories about like democrats

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 4>secretly importing you know, illegal migrant you know, sorry, democrats

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 4>secretly importing you know, migrants who are undocumented. Like the

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 4>whole idea doesn't even make a lot of sense because,

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 4>as Don Lemon said, the migrants don't vote. But if

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 4>you just listen to what Elon said, you might think, oh, okay,

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 4>like he's very well informed. I want to switch to

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 4>another thing. Dan, it's to stay with you. Why has

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Elon this did not come up on the Don Lemon thing,

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 4>but Elon Musk has in addition to this immigration fixation,

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 4>he has spent quite a lot of time on the

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 4>topic of birth control and has been like tweeting about it,

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, over and over again over the past few months.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 4>In February said hermonal birth control makes you fat, doubles

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 4>the risk of depression, and triples the risk of suicide.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 4>That claim has been called into a serious question by

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 4>actual experts. Is this just this is like some kind

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 4>of weird fertility thing, Like, what's going on with this?

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 5>Our colleague Sophia Alexander and I have dug a lot

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 5>into this. Yeah, musk is very worried about population collapse

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 5>and the lower than fertility rates in the industry world,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 5>and he really thinks that people should have as many

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 5>children as possible. He himself has ten that we know of,

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 5>and he has funded like an academic at the University

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 5>of Texas at Austin to kind of create this whole

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 5>institute that's all about fertility and population. And this is

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 5>like a this is like a pet project of Elon's intellectually,

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 5>and he is like very part of the whole like

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 5>natalist movement. And it's super interesting. I mean, I think

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 5>that there's a lot more to report out there, but

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 5>this is this is part and parcel of that.

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 6>I think the people who would be bothered by Elon

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 6>musk Man's plaining birth control to people have already either

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 6>left or written Elon off because he's said so many

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 6>misogynistic and sexist things over the years that like, people

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 6>who would be bothered by this are sort of either

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 6>not on X anymore or already shaped their opinion about Elon,

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 6>And so I kind of feel like at this point,

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 6>anything else that he says in that vein is sort

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 6>of just like like, I don't.

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Know, we've heard it, we've heard it before.

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.959
<v Speaker 6>Obviously different content, but the same general idea, where like

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 6>he is here to explain something that he probably shouldn't

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 6>be trying to explain to anybody.

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 4>And I mean, just to put a button on this, like,

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 4>this is not good for Linda Yakarino, this is not

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 4>good for X, right, I mean, Kurt, Like, what's she

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 4>doing right now? How do you imagine her? She's watching

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Don Lemon, you know, probably trying really hard, I guess,

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 4>to cheer on the boss, but also what like just

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 4>thinking like, oh man, this is making things a lot harder.

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 6>Well, this was the one question that I was really

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 6>disappointed that Don Lemon did not ask, which was, how

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 6>does Elon view his own behavior as affecting negatively affecting

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 6>Ex's business right.

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>They got into this whole.

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 6>Idea of like the clip we played about how Disney

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 6>Elon is saying Disney's going to bankrupt and ruin this company,

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 6>and Don Lemon is saying, well, is is this your responsibility?

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 6>And what I wanted him to say is like a

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 6>lot of the reason advertisers are not spending money on

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 6>X is not because they're worried about where they're going

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 6>to show up in the feed. It's because they're worried

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 6>about what you're going to tweet on any given day,

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 6>and should you be changing your own tweeting behavior if

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 6>you want to save X? And he didn't quite get there,

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 6>and I was disappointed that that that question wasn't asked,

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 6>But it ties into what you were just asking Max,

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 6>which is like, how does Linda continue to do this

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 6>job right? Because every time she goes out and attempts

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 6>to sell something or to promote something, or to lure

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 6>Don Lemon to come bring his talk show to X,

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 6>Elon sabotages it with his own sort of decision making

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 6>and behavior. And so everything we've heard is that Linda

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 6>is totally bought into this guy, and totally bought into

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 6>this mission. But like you have to imagine, at a

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 6>certain point, she's saying, how can I continue to do

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 6>this job when the one person who's my boss continues

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 6>to undercut all of my efforts?

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 4>All right, So to end this show, we've got another feud.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 4>So you know, we've talked about some of the other

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 4>big Elon fuse recently. You know Mark Cuban, the billionaire

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 4>former owner of the Dallas Mavericks, a Bay Area pie baker,

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 4>a Nobel Prize winning economist, a famous CNN host, And

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 4>we can add Ruth Bader Ginsburg's family renowned Supreme Court

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 4>justice now deceased. Her son got into a big dispute

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 4>with Elon Muskin. I'm just gonna give you guys a

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.959
<v Speaker 4>quick synopsis of this. So there's an award you may

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 4>have been familiar with, the Dwight d Opperman Foundation's RBG Award,

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 4>which has been awarded to quote women who have strived

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 4>to make the world a better place for generations that

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 4>follow their own, women who exemplify human qualities of empathy

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 4>and humility, and who care about the dignity and well

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 4>being of all who dwell on planet Earth. Now I'm

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 4>not sure about this I'm not an expert in philanthropy

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 4>and I'm not an authority on this, but I do

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 4>think a key phrase here is women. Previous honorees of

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 4>this award have been Queen Elizabeth the Second, Barbara Streisan.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 4>The latest honorees include Rupert Murdoch and Elon Musk. This

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 4>led to James Ginsburg, rbg's son saying it was a

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 4>quote desecration of his mother's legacy, and the ceremony has

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 4>since been suspended.

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 5>What I don't even I had never even heard of

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 5>this award before?

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Like what?

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 5>Who made this decision? It makes zero sense on so

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 5>many levels, particularly like the humility part, Like what what

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 5>so I haven't followed I haven't followed this, but is

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 5>this This is a feud because now that the the

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 5>Ginsburg family is feuding about the award itself.

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 4>Ginsburg Feasts versus Musk, I believe is the feud.

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 6>When I first saw this, I assumed that the foundation

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 6>must be like really strapped for cash because they gave

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 6>it to a Murdoch uh and Elon and the hope

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 6>was like maybe they would donate or something like that,

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 6>because otherwise I don't think it makes any sense that

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 6>like it just truly sounds like an onion article or

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 6>like a SNL skit or something, because other it just

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 6>makes no sense.

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Beyond that we.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Have talked about one sided feuds. I think this is

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 4>the one sidedest of one sided feuds. I don't believe

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 4>Elon has acknowledged this award or the fact that it's

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 4>been withdrawn. Although this creates an opportunity for a furtherance

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 4>of the feud, he could complain and insist that he's

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 4>going to attend the ceremony. I was also like trying

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 4>to rack my brain for again, like you, Kurt, like

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 4>what is the reason? And I believe like RBG, like

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 4>very early in her career did defend take on a

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 4>men's rights case and there was like interesting legal rationale.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 4>It was about women's rights ultimately. But maybe this is,

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, in recognition of Elon's role as a great,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, men's rights poster.

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 6>I'm wondering when we're going to hear that the woke

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 6>mind virus is the real enemy and the reason that

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 6>he lost this this wonderful award.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Dwight Dio Oberman Foundation, Operaman Foundation, we are here, we

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 4>are ready to explain this if you want to get

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 4>in touch, and with that we'll leave it there. Thank

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 4>you for listening Elon Inc. And thanks to Dana and Kurt.

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 5>Always a pleasure.

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 4>This episode was produced by Stacy Wong. Naomi Shaven and

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Rayhan Harmansi are our senior editors. The idea for this

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 4>very show also came from Rayhan. Blake Maples New Dad

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 4>handles engineering and we get special editing assistants from Jeff Grocott.

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 4>Our supervising producer Happy Birthday is Magnus Hendrickson. The Elon Inc.

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 4>Theme is written and performed by Taka Yazuzawa and Alex Sigiera.

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Brendan Francis Noonan is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.959
<v Speaker 4>is the head of Blueberd Podcasts. I'm Max Chafkin. If

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 4>you have a minute, rate and review our show, it'll

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 4>help other listeners find us and we will see you

0:33:57.680 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 4>next week.