WEBVTT - Tech News: IBM Considers AI Over New Hires

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. He there,

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are you. It's time for the tech news for May

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>second two, thy twenty three and first up. You may

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have seen some headlines like Godfather of AI quits Google

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to warn us about artificial intelligence, or something along those lines.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>The godfather in question is not Don Corleone. It is

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>doctor Jeffrey Hinton. He's been a researcher in AI in

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>general and deep learning in particular for decades, and he

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>says that he quit his job at Google so that

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>he could speak out about his concerns centering around artificial

0:00:55.480 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>intelligence without having those concerns impact Google directly. He says

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that generally speaking, Google has behaved in a responsible way

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>with regard to AI research. Now, I'm going to do

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a full episode about doctor Hinton and his concerns next week,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>so be on the lookout for that episode. Rather than

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>dive into all those details here, I'll say that when

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>someone who is deeply entrenched in AI research comes forward

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the potential dangers of the technology, it's

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>probably a good idea for the rest of us to listen. Personally,

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been concerned, but not quite at the point of

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>being worried about AI for a while now. But I'm

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>also worried about the fact that people tend to overgeneralize

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>when they talk about AI, or they use one aspect

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of AI to represent the entire field. Maybe, however, it's

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>time for me to crank the threat level up a

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>notch or two in my own brain. We'll talk more

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>about that next week, but we do have a few

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>other AI stories today. We're going to get to those

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in a second, but spoiler alert, several of them fall

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>into the bad news category. Before we jump into all that, however,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to give an update on the legal crusade

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>some film studios are on in order to defeat evil

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>content pirates, who clearly are the most substantial threat to

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment industry's quest to make all the money in

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the world. Little editorial note, I might be a little

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>bit facetious here. The film studios have sued an Internet

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:32.559
<v Speaker 1>service provider formerly called RCN, now known as Astound Broadband,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 1>saying that this ISP did nothing to stop its customers

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>from downloading more than thirty different films illegally. As part

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the studio's quest for justice, they have applied for

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:50.119
<v Speaker 1>subpoena against Reddit. Why well, because the studios had identified

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a few user handles that had posted in various piracy

0:02:55.680 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and intellectual property and ISP related subreddit and the studios

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted names. Gush darn it, They wanted to know who

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>those users were, and they were ready to force Reddit

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to hand over any data it had about those users.

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Reddit told the studios to pound sand saying, these people

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>you've identified, most of them aren't even talking about the

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>topic that's relevant to your case, and by any standard,

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we will not hand over that information. And now a

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>US District court judge has cited with Reddit, saying that

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the studios cannot force Reddit to violate the First Amendment

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>rights of those users, that the barrier to doing that

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>has not been met. And again the judge said, the

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>identity of those folks really has nothing to do with

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the studio's actual legal case. As for the case against

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the former RCN, well that's probably going to be a

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a tricky path as well. As a platform

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>RCN isn't actually responsible for what its users do, though

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>those protections only extend so far. If a platform is

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>told about illegal activity, then it's supposed to take reasonable

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>action to stop that activity or else potentially lose legal

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>protection in the process. But it's a tricky thing to

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>argue in court, so there's no guarantee that the studios

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 1>will get the justice they so want. Now, I decide

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to include the story to illustrate how these protections can

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>be important. That they can shield platforms and users platforms

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like Reddit or internet service providers from becoming a big

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>old target from a heavy hitting industry like the film industry.

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And while I love film and I think film commerce

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is a valid business that has real challenges facing it,

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I also recognize that media companies in general historically have

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.239
<v Speaker 1>used disproportionate response to perceive threats to their bottom line,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>even when the threat ends up being unquantifiable. Next up,

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the Writer's Guild of America or WGA, is now on strike.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>The WGA represents writers who work for film and television

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, and the strike means that members

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of the union cannot do any work relating to that.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>They can take no meetings, they can't pitch story ideas,

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>they aren't allowed to communicate with collaborators about a project

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>as long as the strike is going, all work relating

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 1>to producing, writing for TV and the films in the US,

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they it has to stop. The WGA is in negotiations

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>with Hey, those film studios that we were talking about

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a second ago, and at stake are several elements that

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>relate to tech, which is why I'm covering this story

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in tech stuff. For one thing, streaming has really changed

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the economics of media. In the old days, before streaming

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>platforms are really a thing, writers would receive compensation not

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>only in the form of a fee for their work,

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>but they would also receive something called residuals, which are

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like royalties. So let's say you write an

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>episode of a television show We're just going to make

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>one up. We'll call it Cyborg John and his Amazing

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Tech stuff, and you get paid for your work. You

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>write a teleplay, it's used, you're paid. Then about a

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>year later, a television channel airs the episode a second time. Well,

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the station is making money by selling advertising against an

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>episode you wrote, so the channel is profiting off of

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>your work. Thus it stands to reason that you should

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>get a share of that money, so you get some

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>in the form of residuals. If Cyborg John the TV

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>series hits that magic number of episodes that are needed

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to go into syndication and that number varies depending upon

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the show, well that's even better news

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>because it means your episode could be showed again and again,

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and every time it is you get a little payout.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>This becomes part of your long term income. It kind

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.679
<v Speaker 1>of becomes passive income at that point. But streaming really

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>changed things. Streaming doesn't always depend upon advertising for one thing,

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>so residuals become a lot trickier to figure out. How

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>do you determine the value of a view if there's

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not directly advertising served against that view. It really does

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>become tricky. This means that writers are seeing a hit

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to their long term compensation as people turn more and

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>more to streaming. Plus, a lot of shows have really

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>slimmed down their pool of writers. They used to have writers'

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>rooms filled with lots of writers, and now you have

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>these sort of micro writer rooms where a couple of

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>writers have to share the whole workload for a full

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>season of shows. So workload is going up and compensation

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is not. On top of that, there's a fear that

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>shows will start to lean on AI tools to take

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>over part of the writing process, which will push more

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 1>creatives out of the industry. So the strike is really

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about the WGA trying to force Hollywood to adjust to

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the current environment because the old economic model just doesn't

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>work due to the changes in how the business itself works.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>How long this strike will go on will remain to

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be seen. Already, it's affecting stuff like late night talk shows,

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>which can't go on without writers, and we're likely to

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>see more effects the longer the strike goes, like possibly

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>next year, some shows will have truncated seasons, they won't

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>have as many episodes because the writers went on strike. Also,

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there are two other major unions in Hollywood, the Screen

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Actors Guild American Federation of Television and Radio Artists aka

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 1>sag AFTRA, and then there's also the Director's Guild of

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>America or DGA. Both of those unions have their own

0:08:55.720 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>contracts with film studios expiring on June thirtieth. Probably also

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>want to renegotiate, especially with things like streaming being part

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of the mix, and for Screen Actors Guild AI and

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Deep fakes are definitely something that I'm sure a lot

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>of people are concerned about. So I feel like the

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Writer's Guild of America is kind of forging a path

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that these other two unions are likely to follow, at

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>least in large part. And potentially this could mean we

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>could see all three unions, you know, strike that's like

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the worst case scenario for consumers, because that would mean

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that pretty much all activity in Hollywood shuts down period

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>TVs and movies, so it can be a real dry

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>spell until things get hashed out. On the other hand,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe the writers end up making some progress with the

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood studios that then the DGA and SAGAFTRA can build on.

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll just have to wait and see. Now, that bit

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about AI taking an important part in the creative industry

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>might seem a little premature, but then you just need

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to look at Bloomberg News and it's interview with IBM's

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>CEO r Vind Krishna, and that will change your mind.

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Toot sweet. So in that interview, Krishna revealed that IBM

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>plans to put its hiring plan for nearly eight thousand

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>jobs on hold to see if maybe possibly AI could

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>do those jobs instead. I mean, why hire real human

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>beings if the robots can do all the work. I mean,

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>robots don't get sick, they don't go on maternity leave,

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't ask for a raise, robots don't organize into

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>a union and threaten to stop working if their demands

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>for stuff like health care and benefits aren't met. Krishna

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was talking about jobs that do not face customers, so

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>these would be behind the scenes, in house roles, stuff

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>like HR jobs. So maybe that HR robot will actually

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>listen when someone brings up a concern, or maybe that

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>robot will just be really really efficient at minimizing the

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>potential impact to the business while trying to make the

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>problem go away, not resolve, go away. I am salty

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:11.599
<v Speaker 1>today must be because yesterday was May Day. Anyway, Krishna's

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>comments are not likely to make anyone feel better about

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the fear of AI replacing them, of taking our jobs,

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's exactly what IBM appears to be exploring. And y'all,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I am not a doom sayer. I don't believe AI

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to replace us all. For one thing, it's

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>just not practical. If AI did replace us, if AI

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>got all the jobs, well, no one would be able

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to make a living. And if no one's making a living,

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>then they can't afford to buy stuff. And if you

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>can't afford to buy stuff, these companies can't make any money.

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>They just go out of business because who are their customers.

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Even businesses that have other businesses as customers, those secondary businesses,

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 1>they're going to go out of money right because there's

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>no one buying anything. It literally becomes a self defeating

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>strategy in the long run. So it ultimately does matter

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>how much cost you eliminate from your operations if you're

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>also eliminating the ability for people to buy your product

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>or service. Hey, maybe I'm giving companies like IBM too

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>much credit for thinking ahead and considering consequences. Okay, we

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>got a lot more news stories to go today. We're

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break. Okay, we're back, and we've

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>got more AI stories. So Samsung is now telling employees

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to avoid using AI. Specifically, Samsung wants its employees to

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>avoid generative AI tools stuff like chat GPT, which employees

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>had been using to do stuff like you know, alter code,

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>create new code, that kind of thing to help with

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>basic steps along those lines. So why is Samsung saying, hey,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. Well. Last month, Samsung had a couple

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of embarrassing incidents in which employees had shared company IP

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>on chat GPT and that information subsequently leaked to the

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>general public. So folks were working on stuff like Samsung's

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>own proprietary code and also sharing stuff like meeting notes

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to use generative AI to create stuff

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>like reports and presentations, but then that sensitive information got out,

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's not great for Samsung. If I were to

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>create an analogy, I would say, as a Southern fella

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>brought up in the state of Georgia, this would be

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>like if someone from Coca Cola had shared Coke's formula

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with chat GPT in an effort to brainstorm new co

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Cola ideas, and then the formula would then leak to

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the public. That would be disaster. That's kind of what

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 1>happened to Samsung. So now Samsung is saying that these

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>AI tools aren't secure, and to be fair, they are not,

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and that employees shouldn't be using them to do work. Now,

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this makes a lot of sense because until

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>companies have their own sequestered generative AI tools, not necessarily

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>created by the company itself, but one that is is

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>only being used by that company. It doesn't have connections

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to the outside world. It can't send information outside of

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the organization. Well until that day happens. You have to

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>treat these AI tools as a security flaw. Really, generative

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>AI is highlighting a lot of issues in the way

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that companies currently do business. We've seen the cloud computing

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>industry grow and evolve and adopt tight security controls in

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the process as a necessity so that they can continue

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to do business. If your cloud computing company can't show

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that your operations are secure on their network, well they're

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to have any customers. So generative AI needs

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to follow that same pathway. Moving on to Twitter, because

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Heaven help us if we can get through a news

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>episode without having to talk about it. The reports that

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>brands are still pretty iffy about posting on Twitter or

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>using it as an advertising platform because the transition of

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the blue check mark from being a verification mark into

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>becoming a paid subscription feature has led to a rise

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of impostors posing as all sorts of things, including official brands,

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and with Twitter's moderation team absolutely decimated by rounds of layoffs,

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and we'll come back to that in a bit too.

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>It is harder and harder for Twitter to respond to

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>violations like that in a timely fashion. Plus, as a

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>fun little bonus news item regarding Twitter blue check marks,

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>some formerly verified Twitter users found out that by changing

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>their bios they could get their check mark back, at

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>least temporarily now. Originally the word was that if you

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>put former blue check in your bio, you put the

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>actual words former blue check part of your bio, your

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>little check mark would return. And sure enough a lot

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of formally verified users tried this out and it seemed

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to work. But then later on some folks said this

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>would happen if you just updated your bio in any way,

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so you didn't have to put those specific words in

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>for it to happen. It would just happen if you

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>made an edit to your bio, and also that this

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>change was temporary. I did not try it out myself,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but my buddy Tom Merritt tested the former blue check method,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and sure enough he got his check mark back before

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he deleted the phrase from his bio and went back

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to being an unchecked shlub like the rest of us.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>It really shows that Twitter's systems are held together tenuously

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at this point, and that again is not a surprise,

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>because there's hardly enough folks at the company to keep

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>things running, let alone implement new features. Yesterday, Twitter appeared

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to have some technical issues, as many users reported that

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the service had logged them out of the desktop website

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and then wouldn't let them log in again. So. I

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of folks these days access everything via apps,

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>but I'm an old person, so I still go to

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>websites and stuff, including for the rare times when I

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>pop on Twitter. I typically use the desktop Twitter website.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I use tweet Deck, but either way, I'm using

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a desktop version. I almost never am on my phone

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>looking at this, but I am on I'm typically looking

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>for the tech stuff feed. So for folks like me,

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>getting logged out and then being prevented from logging back

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in is kind of akin to being exiled from Twitter, which,

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>come to think of it, doesn't sound like that bad

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of a fate these days. The Verge reported on this

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>issue and pointed out somewhat snarkily that there was no

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>telling how long it would take for the problem to

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>get fixed, because we really don't know how many folks

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are even working on those kinds of things at Twitter

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>these days? And any inquiry to Twitter's defunct PR department

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>comes back with the infamous oop emoji. The Verge did

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>hypothesize that maybe this had something to do with Twitter

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to fix that problem of formerly verified people getting

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>their check marks back, but who knows. I will say

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that today, when I was checking on Twitter, I had

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>no issues, I was not logged out, I was fine.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So whatever it was, I assume has been fixed, or

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>at the very least hasn't affected me. Now. I mentioned

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that Twitter's moderation team has been nearly eliminated as part

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>of the massive cuts Musk has made to the company's staff.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>That led to a real doozy of a problem. Over

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, some Twitter users were posting the Super Mario

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Brothers movie to Twitter, the new one, the animated film,

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>not the Bob Hoskins film, although someone might have done

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that too, I don't know, but I'm specifically talking about

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the movie that's out in theaters. They posted the whole

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>darn movie start to finish, and these tweets stayed up

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for hours. They gained millions of views. I think the

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>primary one got more than nine million views before it

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>got taken down, and then Twitter finally clamped down on

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>them and even started to suspend accounts as a result

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of this. Of course, once it goes up somewhere, it

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>can pop up somewhere else. Someone else can do the

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>exact same thing. And I mean, it is understandable that

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter has now suspended accounts that have been found to

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>do this. But if Twitter failed to act, then those

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>movie studios we've been talking about, they sure would not

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 1>go easy on Twitter. If Twitter is shown to not

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>respond to stuff like DMCA violations, it can be held

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>responsible for hosting illegal material. Again, platforms enjoy a lot

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of legal protection, but only if they can show that

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>they're making their own steps to curtail illegal activity. If

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they are aware of illegal activity and they're not doing

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>anything to stop it, then sometimes those protections can go away.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Us for how this happened in the first place, well,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.239
<v Speaker 1>part of it is because Musk loosened the restrictions on

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>how long a video that's posted to Twitter is allowed

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to be so a lot of it also has to

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>do with the fact that the company has virtually no

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>one to watch out for stuff like this. Anymore. So, Yeah,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's idiosyncratic woes continue. Some environmental activist groups have filed

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits against the US Federal Aviation Administration, or FAA. This

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is with regards to SpaceX's test flight of its Starship vehicle.

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You might remember that Starship launched off the ground successfully

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>last month, but subsequently malfunctioned when the first and second

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>stages failed to separate. This prompted SpaceX to hit the

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>self destruct button. But during the launch, the force from

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>those massive engines, the thirty three engines of the first

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>stage of the Starship that caused a lot of damage.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>It created craters in the launch pad, It hurled debris,

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>including large heavy debris, all around the area, and that

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>area happens to include some really sensitive wildlife habitats, something

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that SpaceX has had to contend with since setting up

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>operations in Texas, and the environmental groups are accusing the

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>FAA of failing to put SpaceX through proper environmental reviews

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>before signing off on the test flights of the Starship.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>As part of this lawsuit, these environmental groups are seeking

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to force the FAA to revoke its license to SpaceX

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>until a more thorough environmental review can happen in order

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>to prevent further destruction to these habitats. That area is

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>home to several endangered species, some of them critically endangered,

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and I do think a thorough review is a reasonable request,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the wake of the damage the starship's engines

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>did to the launch area. No one really anticipated it

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>being that bad, not that it was, you know, widespread destruction,

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>but it was enough to cause some concern, and I

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>think a review is probably warranted. It may turn out

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that everything's fine and still within the parameters of the agreement,

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>which is that's fine too. SpaceX should be able to

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>continue then, but without a review, we just don't really know. Okay,

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got a few more stories to cover before we

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>get into any of that. Let's take one more quick break.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>We're back. An inquisitive bitcoin enthusiast has used their knowledge

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of blockchain to identify nearly one thousand digital wallets held

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>by various Russian governmental agencies, including ones like the Foreign

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Military Intelligence Agency and the Foreign Intelligence Service. The anonymous

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>detective accuses the owners of these digital wallets of using

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the accounts to finance stuff like hacker groups. So it's

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>an open secret the worst kept secret in tech really

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>that Russia relies on hackers to conduct espionage, sabotage, and

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>infiltration campaigns on various targets. It's entirely possible that official

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>government agencies are using these digital wallets to fund those efforts.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of hacker groups lean heavily on digital currency

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>because there's less government regulation and oversight. It's easier to

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>avoid imperial entanglements, as obi Wan would say. Further, this

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>secret sleuth claims to have seized control of at least

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these wallets, which they have backed up by

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:55.719
<v Speaker 1>then burning through money like literally destroying digital currency. So

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that suggests this is not an empty boast because according

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to Reuters, they destroyed around three hundred thousand dollars worth

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin while making their claims. And that's putting someone

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>else's money where your mouth is, all right, I mean,

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like you mean business if you're just burning three

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred grand in order to get attention. According to Yahoo

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Finance and the firm ch Analysis, the vigilante has even

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>taken Russian money held in these digital wallets and then

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>funneled that money to Ukrainian aid groups. Ultimately, this does

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>not speak well of Russia's security practices. If they've managed

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to lose control of all these digital assets. Speaking of Russia,

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>by the end of June, it's going to be just

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit harder to find love in that country, or

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe not love, maybe you know, casual flings. You see,

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the Match Group has announced that it's going to be

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>shutting down operations in Russia on June thirtieth. The Match

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Group owns, among other things, Tender, so Russians will soon

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>find themselves unswipeable at least on Tender, and at least

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>while they're in Russia. Why is the Match Group pulling

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>out of Russia, Well, basically, it's because Putin's government does

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>terrible things. So the Match Group said that the importance

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>of human rights was the main reason for closing up

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>shop in Russia. That contributing to an economy that supports

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the violation of human rights isn't something the brand really

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to be associated with. Bad optics. In other words,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of other companies have similarly shut down in Russia

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and pulled out of operations. The country has actually converted

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at least some of the buildings that were left behind

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>into copycat operations. Meant to fill in the void, so

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe they'll have their own Russian version of Tender. Gizmodo

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>reports that a Microsoft Windows update has created frustrations for

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>some users out there. When it comes to setting a

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>default browser. It's the ideal. You should be able to

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>choose any browser as your default and that's that. But

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>after this update, apparently it has become harder to choose

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>anything other than Microsoft's own browser Edge as the default,

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and switching to you know, Chrome has presented some users

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>with annoying pop ups that essentially asked the same question

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, like are you sure you want

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this as your default browser? The only way to fix

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this problem was to roll back the system update. Gizmoto

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>goes further, though, so Google had incorporated a button within

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the Windows version of Google Chrome. It was in the

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>upper left hand corner of the browser window, and if

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you clicked on this button, it would let you automatically

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>set Chrome as your default browser. And you wouldn't actually

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>have to go into your computer's system settings in order

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to make this change. So they were just making it

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>easier for you to select Google Chrome as your default

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to. But that Microsoft Windows update broke

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>this functionality within the browser. So professional users had one

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>huge array of problems. But for your consumers, your average

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>people who are using Google Chrome, the button really just

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>stopped working because Moto found that by changing the name

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Chrome app, the problem went away. So suddenly

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the button worked again just by changing Google Chrome's name,

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and that was it. Like they didn't change the code

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>or anything. They just changed the name of the app,

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and once they did, then this barrier went away. That

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>suggests that Microsoft was perhaps purposefully targeting Chrome itself, because

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.239
<v Speaker 1>if just a name change fixed that issue, and if

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>other browsers weren't having similar problems, it seems like Microsoft

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>might have been targeting Google Chrome, the most popular browser

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>out there. Google, for its part, ultimately turned off that

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>default browser button, which solve these problems, because of course,

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Google was getting lots of complaints from people say, hey,

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I set your browsers my default, but I keep getting

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>hassled by these pop ups. What's up? So they turned

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the button off. That ended those endless pop ups that

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>were frustrating users. But again it suggests that Microsoft was

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>perhaps trying to make it harder for folks to switch

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 1>to some other browser. And y'all who were online in

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties might think the story sounds really familiar.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>That's because it's not that much different to the accusations

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that Netscape made against Microsoft in the early days of

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the web browser wars. The more things change, the more

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they stay the same. Finally, this past weekend, the World

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Wide Web celebrated its thirtieth anniversary of emerging from CERN's

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>ownership to enter the public domain. CERN, which is the

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>same organization that's behind the Large Head Collider, was where

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Tim Berner's lead developed the basics of what would become

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the World Wide Web and web browsers using stuff like

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>hyperlinks to connect different documents together, even if those documents

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>lived on different servers. And it was on April thirtieth,

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety three that CERN made this decision to release

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the code into the public domain, and they relinquished all

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property rights to the code. Now, it still took

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>some time for this web idea to catch on. I

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>was actually in college when this was happening, and I

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>distinctly remember looking at early web browsers in the computer

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>lab in my college library, and I was thinking, good grief,

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that's slow. Forget that it takes forever for these web

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>pages to load up. I'm just going to stick with

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>FTP and tel net. Why would you even use a

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>web browser? Now? In my defense, there weren't that many

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>web pages out there when I first was exposed to

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the web. They were incredibly primitive web pages and they

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't really change much. So you would go to one

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you went to the same web page a

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>month later, it would be exactly the same. There was

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>really little reason to go to the same web page twice,

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in other words, But obviously over time things changed, to

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>put it lightly, and now thirty years later, we can't

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about things like commerce and communication and professional networking

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and creative efforts. We can't talk about any of that

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>without also including the web as part of that conversation.

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So happy belated Emancipation Day, world Wide Web. And that's

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it for this episode, the tech News episode for May

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>sewo twenty twenty three. I hope you are all well,

0:30:53.000 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.