WEBVTT - Meta Cable Expansion Stalled by Iran Conflict

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and Vla Low in San Francisco.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 3>US Defense Secretary Pete Hegsev gives an update on Iran.

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>As we near the end of week two of the war.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, the new so called not so Supreme leader

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 4>is wounded and likely disfigure.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Class.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Adobe CEO Shantanu and the Ryan will resign amid skepticism

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>about the company's ability to thrive in the AI era,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 3>and the S ANDP is considering changes to rules governing

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>how companies join its index, which could fast track SpaceX's

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>entry after an IPO. Let's get to markets, and this

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>is what the financial markets look like this Friday. It's

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 3>a kind of continuation of the broader theme of the week.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 2>There is slight.

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Pressure on equities and asat one hundred is modestly lower,

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 3>basically flat. And you see Brent crude, the global benchmark

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 3>for oil above one hundred dollars a barrel. With a

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 3>micro focus of what's happening in the Middle East and

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 3>the Gulf, there has been some other news flow and

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 3>earning considerations around that. When it comes to the tech sector,

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 3>we can get to those later in the hour, but

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 3>right now it is very much the macro and what

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 3>is happening with the war in Iran. President Trump and

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Iran's leadership are both striking a defiant tone as the

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 3>war in Iran is in its second week, with Trump

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 3>vowing new strikes with quote unparalleled firepower. US Defense Secretary

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.919
<v Speaker 3>Pete Hegseff has also weighed in saying Iran's new Supreme

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>leader is likely wounded following recent attacks. Here with all

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 3>of the latest is Bloomberg's Washington correspondent Tyler Kendall, what

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>do we need to know?

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, hey, and good morning. While as you mentioned, the

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 5>US is threatening Iran with fresh attacks, the latest suggestion

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 5>that there is going to be no let up in

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 5>this conflict. We heard from President Trump in a post

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 5>on truth Social earlier where he said that the US

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 5>maintains unlimited ammunition and has quote plenty of time.

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Plus.

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 5>We heard from the US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 5>a briefing to reporters earlier today where he confirmed the

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 5>US and Israel have hit more than fifteen thousand Iranian

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 5>targets and says that Iran's one way drone usage is

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 5>now down ninety five percent, that.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 4>The United States is decimating the radical Iranian regimes military

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 4>in a way the world has never seen before. Never

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 4>before has a modern capable military which Iran used to

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 4>have been so quickly destroyed and made combat ineffective, devastated from.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 5>An operational level. We know that insuring safe passage through

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 5>the Strait of Hermus remains a top priority, as Secretary

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 5>Hegseth went on to say, quote, We've been dealing with it.

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg News is now reporting that several back channels have

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 5>been opened between US allies and Iran about reopening the

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 5>straight Those sources caution that they are not optimistic that

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 5>the efforts are going to yield results. Earlier today, a

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 5>Turkish government official did confirm that a Turkish flagged vessel

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 5>did make its way through the critical waterway, the latest

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 5>example about negotiating for safe passage, but ed as there

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 5>is mounting political pressure on President Trump when it comes

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 5>to higher energy prices. We did see the US and

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 5>move yesterday move to wave certain sanctions related to Russian oil.

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 5>We saw a second temporary waiver issued for those cargoes

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 5>that are already at c ED at this point. Are

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 5>data analyzed by Bloomberg estimates that this could impact nearly

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 5>three hundred and ten thousand refined products bluebooks.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Kendall, thank you.

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 3>With the war in Iran continuing to Royal Region, Meta

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 3>has announced its pausing part of its major internet expansion

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 3>efforts in Africa, specifically work on a key underwater cable

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>system that would have run through parts of the Middle East,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 3>including Oman, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia. Here with the

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 3>details is Bloomberg's tech editor Olivia Solon. We're showing that

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 3>the kind of map the network, Olivia, of the cables

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 3>zoomed in on the Gulf region explain the actions the

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 3>metas taking and the details that we need to know.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 6>Right well, because of the war in Iran and the

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 6>missiles that have been coming across the Persian Gulf, Meta

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 6>well has been kind of forced to take the decision

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 6>to stop building part of this enormous cable system that's

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 6>been building for.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 2>A while called to Africa.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 6>They've actually built the bigger part of it around the

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 6>continent of Africa, but last year they were forced to

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 6>sort of delay work on a section running through the

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 6>Red Sea because there were whothy missile attacks on ships there.

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 2>And when they.

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 6>Did that, they said, it's okay, We've still got this

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 6>other section going through the Persian Gulf, and that's the

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 6>part that we're talking about now. Well, now, because of

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 6>the missile attacks there, the boats that install cables have

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 6>issued of what's called a force measure notice saying they

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 6>can no longer continue to meet their contractual obligations due

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 6>to obviously the massive safety concerns, And so that means

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 6>this part of this very important new high capacity fiber

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 6>optic cable is on hold.

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>The bigger picture for Meta, what is it that they

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 3>were trying to achieve in Africa in the region more

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 3>broadly in laying down basically what is updated infrastructure.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 6>Right, they want to bring a huge amount more connectivity

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 6>to the Middle East and Africa, and I think they will.

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 6>You know, they've already succeeded that partially, but this huge

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 6>section both in the Red Sea and now in the

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 6>Persian Gulf means that this additional capacity that was going

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 6>to really help sort of fuel the data center build

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 6>out that's happening in the region is not to be available,

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 6>at least in the short term.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Olivia Solon thank you another meta headline. The company

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 3>is reportedly delaying the role out of its latest AI

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 3>model after internal testing showed it underperformed compared with rival systems.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 3>That's according to a report by The New York Times.

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 3>This is how equity markets reacting to that meta under

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 3>pressure down almost three percent. Then, you know, looking at

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the trading, particularly in the pre market, alphabet Pairent of

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Google is up percentage point now but had been up

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more markedly. For more on what this

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of indicates about the competitive landscape and what it

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 3>means for investors, Ioka, Yoshioka, portfolio consulting director a wealth

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 3>enhancement group and you know interesting case study, right, Meta

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 3>in alphabet both names that you hold that you look at,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 3>there are let's say three or four berths for big

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>frontier model labs or the big tech companies working on

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 3>next generation models. And when you get a piece of

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 3>news like this, you see meta move to the downside,

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 3>alphabet moved to the upside.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 2>What do you interpret from that?

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 7>Sure ed?

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 8>So you know, when we think about both of these stocks.

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, we try to look at things in the

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 8>context of the long term versus some of these short

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 8>term moves that we're seeing in markets. You know, we

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 8>do see these dislocations from time to time, but over

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 8>the long term, we know that the growth rates for

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 8>both of the stocks are very high and they're you know,

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 8>they've got high quality balance sheets supporting the growth that

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 8>they're trying to accomplish.

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Right now, we're trying to digest still ongoing data, largely

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 3>rearing relating to earnings, and I think just before the

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 3>earning season hit, you had many people in the markets

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 3>come out and say, this is this is what we

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 3>will will judge momentum by simply earnings performance in aggregate

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 3>at this point when it comes to particularly the hyperscalers,

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 3>but our focus on AI. What was it that you

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 3>learned from the earnings season?

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, earning season provided a lot of incremental information

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 8>just regarding the overall buildout of AI and where we

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 8>are and the focus that investors have on that return

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 8>on investment that everybody wants to see, just given how

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 8>much CAPAX is being spent by the overall hyperscalers. But

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 8>you know, we also saw that earnings wasn't everything, you know,

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 8>especially in the software space in which earnings continue to

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 8>go higher and yet the multiples got destroyed.

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 2>So the software space interesting.

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess if you look below the index level and

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 3>take a look at January, February, now March, what was

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>it you saw in investor behavior and the attitude towards

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the tech sector?

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 8>Sure, so you know, it really depends on some of

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 8>the macro economic data that we've been dealing with, some

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 8>of the geopolitical data. To January and February, we clearly

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 8>saw that sell off in software and it reverse in

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 8>March as a little bit of a flight to quality again,

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 8>seeing a little bit of a balance from something that

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 8>had sold off quite a bit and less cyclical per se.

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 8>And you know, you saw the safety of the mag

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 8>seven as well. During this sort of geopolitical conflict that

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 8>has been going on.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 3>What's dominating the news cycle is war in Iran. Again,

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, from the technology investors' perspective, what is the

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 3>incremental data, the soft data, the macro level data that

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 3>you're tracking to make decisions with the portfolio.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 8>I think from our standpoint, it's clearly the duration of

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 8>this conflict, which is going to be key. I think

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 8>everybody else has talked about this, and it's the one

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 8>thing that nobody really can forecast. If it's short, it's great.

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 8>If it's a little bit longer, it's a little bit

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 8>more detrimental. There's key raw materials, especially for semiconductors that

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 8>could sort of offset some of the production issues that

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 8>we've seen in the past, and so, you know, really

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 8>supply chain issues. We don't want them to kind of

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 8>come back again, and you know, really hit inflation. And

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 8>so those are some of the key metrics we're looking at.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 8>But tech specifically, I think can be a little bit

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 8>more isolated, just because of the long term secular growth

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 8>nature of a lot of the companies in the tech sector.

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 2>AI is still the dominant theme for.

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 8>You absolutely, especially when it comes to technology and for

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 8>the overall market, it's just the overall contribution from the

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 8>hyperscalers and capex and what that means for the overall

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 8>US economy and globally as well, and you know, just

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 8>the use cases and the workflow changes for a lot

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 8>of enterprises. I think is the predominant sort of you know,

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 8>issues that we're all trying to figure out over the

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 8>next several years.

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so next week we either do or we don't

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 3>have a big macro event, which is in Nvidia's GtC conference.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's so difficult to gauge how that moves

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 3>the need or are you genuinely sort of braced for

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 3>it is a big item on the calendar or kind

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 3>of noise really and hype around what's happening.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's really going to depend on what kind

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 8>of information sort of comes out there. You know, in

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 8>video stock has been a little bit range bound for

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 8>the last several months, and hopefully, you know, if they

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 8>have some sort of big announcement, perhaps it moves the stock.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 8>But I think that the bar is high. You know,

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 8>you've seen Earning's growth of over seventy percent, and you

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 8>know the stock is trading at twenty two times. We're

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 8>going to see some updates on Vira and via Rubin

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 8>and even Fineman, and I think when we get some

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 8>of that additional detail, perhaps it will move the stock.

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, at Nvidia GtC and DC we got that

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 3>surprise half a trillion dollar figure from Jensen one which

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 3>was literally on a slide behind him and a little

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>more information than that. Yoko Yoshioka wealth Enhancement grew. Great

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>to have you back on the program, Thank you very much.

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Some news.

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 3>Amazon plans to use chips from startups Cerebras alongside its

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>own training and processors.

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a combination that.

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 3>The companies say we'll be able to better run AI software.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 3>AWS will begin offering a new service based on the

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 3>arrangement in the second half of twenty twenty six. According

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 3>to a statement, financial terms weren't disclosed, and when that

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 3>headline hit, By the way, there was a little move

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 3>lower in nvideo to session lows, but it kind of

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 3>bounced back after Okay, coming up. Leadership uncertainty at Adobe

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 3>overshadows otherwise pretty steady results. We're going to discuss that next.

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 3>This is blim big tech. Shares of Adobe are really

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 3>under pressure here. We're off session lows down six and

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 3>a half percent. At one point in the session, we're

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 3>on track for our biggest drop in exactly one year

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 3>to the day. On the week, Adobe very close to

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 3>having its worst five day performance since the end of

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 2>The news.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 3>The company announced on its earnings call that Shantanu Nuran,

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 3>who served as CEO for.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Nearly two decades.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Is stepping down the stock has already been under pressure anyway,

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 3>down over thirty percent on the last year or so.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Is it faces concerns about its ability to thrive in

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 3>the AI era. Let's get to it. Bloombok's Brodie Ford

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 3>is here with us. I mean, this is not a

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 3>new story with Adobe and whether it is managing well

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 3>transition into the AI era.

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>But we'll start with Shantanu.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 3>You and I exchanged emails about well what happens next?

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 3>So tell us you know, there's an effort to find

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 3>a successor. And I guess did we get any insight

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 3>as to why Shantanu's decided to take this decision at all?

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, Shantanu was a legend, right, I mean, he was

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 9>in that seat for eighteen years, and he gets a

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 9>lot of credit for turning Adobe from a company where

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 9>you just buy a photoshop or another product tool in

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 9>time to one of these recurring subscription businesses that is

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 9>just normal, but at the time was quite novel.

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 10>But at the end of the day, I.

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 9>Think he was seen as a CEO of that era

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 9>and the AI era. A lot of these SaaS companies

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 9>are needing to undergo a transition or reinvention, and it

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 9>appears that he or the board or somebody decided that

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 9>he might not have been the right person to lead

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 9>that transition.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 3>There were some data points in the earnings themselves, you know,

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 3>customer behaviors for example, particularly about images, things like that.

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 3>What did you learn about the AI story for Adobe?

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 9>People that are using AI within Adobe products? But the

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 9>big risk for them is that the cost of content

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 9>creation has gone down a lot. A lot of the

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 9>hit creative programs are not made by Adobe, right. I mean,

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 9>Adobe's valuation for a long time was based on being

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 9>really kind of the only game in town if you

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 9>were a professional, and every day that becomes a little

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 9>less true. And that's what they have to reckon with.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>We said at at the start of the segment, so

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 3>we should probably go back to it that actually earnings

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 3>were okay. You know, if you if you can move

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 3>past the news that the CEO of the last two

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 3>decades is moving on, what did the numbers say about

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 3>the business.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 9>It's quite similar to a lot of the big sass names,

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 9>whether it be Workday or Salesforce, that they're seeing steady

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 9>growth slight decelerations some uptick of their AI products, but

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 9>at the end of the day, it's just not enough

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 9>to convince investors that AI will be an additive and

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 9>not a competitive force against their business.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Being Boss Brady Ford all across the software space, thank

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>you very much. Another news item, a jury in Los

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Angeles will soon decide the outcome of the high stakes

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 3>social media trial and the claims that sites like Instagram

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 3>and YouTube are dangerously addictive to young people. Final arguments

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 3>just concluded after roughly four weeks testimony from medical experts,

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 3>a whistleblower, and Mark Zuckerberg himself. The jury of seven

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 3>women and five men is set to begin deliberations today.

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up, Ramp CEO Eric Lyman joins us to

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 3>discuss the company's latest acquisition and an expansion into Europe.

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 3>That conversation is coming up next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Fintech startup Ramp is acquiring European payments platform bill Hop.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 3>The deal will help Ramp expand its footprint, in large

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 3>part because bill hop is licensed in the UK and Sweden.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 3>To speak with RAMP CEO Eric Lyman and like this

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 3>is interesting, right, I think the best place to start

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 3>is Europe. If you regard UK is Europe and Sweden

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 3>and then Audics. You know, why Europe and why now

0:16:58.200 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 3>with this Eric.

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 10>And thanks so much for having me on, And it's

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 10>a reason that we're incredibly excited about.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 11>We're already working with so many of the fastest growing

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 11>companies based in Europe. We think about companies like eleven Labs,

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 11>to great companies started by European founders like Stripe in Versell,

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 11>and I would say Europe is having a moment and

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 11>we want to be there for it and bring so

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 11>much of it be brought to American companies, to the

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 11>companies operating in that region.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 2>That's an interesting point.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 3>Like when you posted the news this morning on different

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 3>social platforms, you know, one of the interesting points of

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 3>discussion is what is the competitive landscape like for you

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 3>in Europe and how is it different to in the US?

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Like in America? And correct me if I'm wrong, but

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 3>you go up against kind of the big banks. Is

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 3>that the same in Europe or is it a different

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 3>industry there?

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 11>In many ways, it's very consistent, I would say, whether

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 11>it's the US or even in Europe. Classically, if you

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 11>were a bank you were able to move money, and

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 11>if you weren't, you could sell weird after market software

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 11>to do your expenses or pay your bills or things

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 11>like that. And the result was probably what most people

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 11>still feel of. You know, one hour a month, you

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 11>have the worst hour slowly doing your expenses across different systems.

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 11>And part of what we proved out in the US

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 11>is it doesn't have to.

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 10>Be so hard.

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 11>You know, we've created cards where you tap them and

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 11>your expense report is done for you, your books are

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 11>closed for you. And the result is that companies spend less.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 11>The average business spends about five percent less, and the

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 11>average business on Ramp grew last year by about sixteen percent,

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 11>which is multiple times the US average.

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 10>And so just as we've brought this to the US, we.

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 11>Want to bring that same innovation and more to the

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 11>great companies being built and operate out of Europe.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 3>Operate out of Europe. But like Lot's, it's a global world.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Is a funny thing to say, but you know, many

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 3>of your customs or clients, right they would have a

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 3>footprint operationally in different jurisdictions like the US and Europe.

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 3>And you know, is this kind of therefore about like

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the multinational client that you're trying to go after.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 10>It's a bit of both.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 11>I mean, so for today, let's say you're a multinational

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 11>leader like a Shopify or like a CB. You can

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 11>issue cards today locally and make payments all around the

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 11>world in Europe, in Asia, in Latin America, you name it.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 10>Ramp is able to do that.

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 11>But part of what this acquisition brings is the capabilities

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 11>to serve European headquartered or based companies without operations in

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 11>the United States, and so they're able to benefit from

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 11>that same global infrastructure. But it really allows us to

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 11>reach a much larger market.

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 3>Talking a little bit about RAMP the company, the startup

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 3>and you running it, you have like the who's who

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 3>list of investors. And what I find interesting is not common,

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 3>not unique to you. You know, it's come up a

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 3>lot recently. You sat on a lot of the money

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 3>that you raised for quite a long time. You've gone

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 3>out and done an acquisition. You know what's that like,

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, deciding to spend the funds raised.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 11>It's look, with everything we do, just as we're trying

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 11>to help our customers get more from every dollar an hour,

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 11>we want to too and I think you're exactly right.

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 11>The business has raised more than two billion dollars of

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 11>equity capital, the vast, vast majority of it is still

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 11>on balance sheet, and RAMP is even generating cash even

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 11>as we're one of the fastest growing companies in the world.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Now interesting, would you would you give me a number

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 3>on that, you know, any sort of financial metric on

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 3>the health of how it's going.

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 11>You know, I would say this, We've had four straight

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 11>quarters of accelerating growth. The businesses call it doubling every year,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 11>which is really an outlier. And last year, I believe

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.719
<v Speaker 11>together we shared that last summer we passed more than

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 11>a billion dollars a year in revenue and US dollars,

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 11>and so we've seen that growth rate even accelerate.

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 10>So it's quite unique.

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 3>You run a tight ship and you know you're trying

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 3>to grow RAMP, and I really appreciate you know, sharing

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 3>the dates are on that point.

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>The landscape's very interesting.

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Like Brex selling to Capital One as an example, over

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 3>many years on the show, the guys of Brex would

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 3>never have said that that would be the case. How

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>do you feel about ramps independence, you know, long term

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and where it fits in a big sea of large

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 3>financial players.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 11>I think it's a really special thing. If you talk

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 11>to let's say a finance leader of a company, let's

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 11>say with five hundred employees, their finance suite looks like

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 11>a mess. There we find there's something like twenty tools

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 11>on average, something for cards and for bill payments, something

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 11>for ar something for expenses, something for procurement, something for approvals.

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 10>It's horrific.

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 11>And part of what we've done is collapse that and

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 11>really simplify it. And I think that has first made

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 11>us unique in the market and allowed us to grow

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 11>even faster than the largest financial institutions.

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 10>And so we're excited.

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 11>We're over two percent of all the corporate and small

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 11>business card transactions in the US, and well.

0:21:58.480 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 10>We're very excited about that.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 11>We look forward to taking on the next ninety eight

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 11>percent and delivering something better.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Eric, we just have thirty seconds.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 3>But looking at Block as an example, will you reduce

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 3>headcount because of AI?

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 11>Look, we have salespeople who were closing two three times

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 11>the dollar value of deals than we did last year.

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 11>And from my vantage point, when you have people who

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 11>can do that, you want to hire as many as

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 11>you can as.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 10>Fast as possible.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 3>Eric Lyman Cram is really great to have you back

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Now, coming up on the show, changes to rules governing

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 3>the S and P five hundred could rocket SpaceX onto

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 3>the index. We're gonna have details on that Bloomberg story.

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Next it is halftime. These are the markets, and this

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. I'm Ed Ludlow,

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 3>SMP dal Jones Indices considering changes to how companies join

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 3>the S and P five hundred.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 2>That's all.

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 3>According to sources, the move could potentially fast track elon

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 3>musk SpaceX onto the lists after it's expected to be

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 3>a blockbuster public market daily later this year. Bloombergs car

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.479
<v Speaker 3>Porto is here with the details. It's a big story

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 3>that the team broke and tried to explain in detail

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 3>the considerations that are happening. And they are considerations, So

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 3>let's start with that. What have we learned in our reporting?

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 12>Well, yeah, it's important to note that no final decisions

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 12>have been taken on this. However, should S and P

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 12>decide to change its rules its committee, it would be

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 12>absolutely momentous. Who would you excuse the pun put rocket

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 12>fuel on the trading of SpaceX as a new company.

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 3>You and I did a story together yesterday. It was complicated,

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 3>in part based on regulatory filing, in part the people

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 3>we spoke to. But in short, SpaceX's acquisition of Xai

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 3>has closed and there is some ownership cans that took place.

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Explain it to our audience.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, I wish we had half an hour, But in short,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 12>it's effectively tiding up the balance sheet, putting different pieces

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 12>of equity into different boxes. Tesla's investment in Xai has

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 12>been rolled over into SpaceX. Some of the early investors

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 12>who've been with Elan for a long time across different companies,

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 12>those like Vallar and DFJ have also had the stakes

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 12>in SpaceX slightly increased as part of these changes.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 10>It's all designed to make your.

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 12>Equity term sheet look a little bit more normal as

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 12>you approach the IPO process, which we still expect to

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 12>happen this summer or into Neil Autumn.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Bloembos card Border part of the team that's done

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of reporting on I guess mechanics of what's

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 3>happening with SpaceX ahead of an anticipated public market debut.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's get an investors perspective on all of it.

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Peter Singlehurst leaves the private company's team at Bailey Gifford

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 3>an investor in SpaceX, but other names that I guess

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 3>we've talked in the text of being potential blockbuster IPOs

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>down the line. Anthropic is another example. Peter, you welcome

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 3>back to the show. I think it's the first time

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 3>we've had the opportunity to speak since SpaceX acquired XAI.

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 3>And I guess just what's your reaction to that, How

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 3>you guys felt about it, the interpretation of the rationale

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 3>behind it.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 13>I think when you step back and you consider what

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 13>has made SpaceX such an incredible business over the last

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 13>ten years, it's their ability to drive down the cost

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 13>of launch. It's the deflationary nature of their business. And

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 13>when you look at other hardware categories where we've seen

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 13>that historically, such as Moore's law in transistors or Flatley's

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 13>law in genomics, when you drive down cost.

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 2>By order of the magnitude, it.

0:25:53.040 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 13>Opens up phenomenal unforseeable use cases, and we're seeing that

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 13>in the domain of space now. Starlink has been the

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 13>first application of that, and we think there's a statable

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 13>case that data centers in space could well be the

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 13>next application that opens up as you drive down that

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 13>cost of launch. Now it's early days for that, it

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 13>remains unproven, but if that is to be something that

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 13>is feasible, being vertically integrated into an LM model such

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 13>as the Rock model will be an advantage for SpaceX.

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 3>At the time that the news came that SpaceX would

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 3>acquire Xai, we did some reporting that essentially XAI operates

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 3>as a subsidiary of SpaceX in parts. There's also itar considerations,

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 3>but there's also xai's financial situation, which is the debt

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 3>burden and its rate of cash burn. How did you

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 3>feel about SpaceX taking on that balance sheet?

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 13>Essentially, I think if any business is going to take

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 13>on a company that has those necessary capex requirements, it

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 13>needs to be a company that's in a very robust

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 13>financial position, and SpaceX is in a privileged position of

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 13>having not only a very strong balance sheet, but having

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 13>strong profitability in cash flow dynamics. And so the combination

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 13>of a business that does require significant CAPEX in the

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 13>form of Xai, alongside a business that has a history

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 13>of high capex investment, but has been able to show

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 13>how that can translate into help very strong levels of profitability.

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I think could be a strong combination.

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Kyle did I think a pretty good job a few

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 3>moments ago explaining the sort of technicalities of a transaction

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 3>closed like this. But the big picture is the net

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 3>result of Tesla now having literally a financial stake in

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX because of the investment it made of the series

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 3>of XAI that being rollover in SpaceX, the Elon Inc.

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Story is kind of coming together. How do you feel

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 3>about that?

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, the proximity of those two giants.

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 13>I think there's always been a complicated web of interconnections

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 13>between Elon Musk's companies and we saw this as Tesla

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 13>owners when they acquired solar City. Ultimately, what will drive

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 13>shareholder returns will be to strong execution and growth of

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 13>these businesses. And at the time of the Solar City

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 13>acquisition by Tesla, it was controversial, but in the end

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 13>it turned out not to really matter because Tesla was

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 13>such a phenomenally successful business and we believe that dynamic

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 13>will exist here with SpaceX. It is probably one of

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 13>the businesses in our portfolios with one of the most

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 13>robust competitive advantages and growth opportunities. If you look at

0:28:55.760 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 13>orbital launches done annually, SpaceX is leap and bounds ahead

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 13>of anybody else. It has an incredibly strong market position,

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:09.239
<v Speaker 13>a very strong proposition to its customers, and we think

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 13>ultimately that will be the main driver of return to shelders.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 3>We're showing kind of the rest of your portfolio of

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 3>private company investments, and I get that's actually split across

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 3>a you know, more than one trust, right, But what

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 3>those companies all have in common is the staying private longer.

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Many of them have done tenders or secondaries. Explain, you

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 3>know what's happening in that private markets, in that private

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 3>market that's supporting that theme.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So there is a two kinds of transactions that

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 13>we see happening in the later stages of the private markets.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 13>We are continuing to see very large primary capital rounds

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 13>where companies are raising capital to invest in their businesses.

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 13>And they're it's businesses such as anthropic such as and

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 13>ill such as Wave that are raising billions of dollars

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 13>to invest in the huge market opportunities that they have.

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 13>But that capital that they're raising is going into their

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 13>businesses for investment. You then have a second category of

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 13>large late stage transaction, which are secondary transactions where either

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 13>early shareholders or employees are selling to other shareholders. And

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 13>I would categorize the transactions done by the likes of

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 13>Data Bricks or Stripe or indeed some of the transactions

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 13>that SpaceX have done in this cap. Now, what's making

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 13>that possible is the fact they have businesses in very

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 13>strong financial positions that are in many cases generating cash

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 13>flow where they actually don't need more external capital, but

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 13>where there's clear demand for their shares, and so matching

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 13>off some of that demand and supply is good for

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 13>employees who want to be able to realize some of

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 13>the gains from their options. It's good for the companies

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 13>as they start to potentially reduce some of the overhe

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 13>that might exist as they come to the public markets.

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 13>And it's good for investors who want to buy shares

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 13>in those companies.

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Peter, we've been very focused on anthropic and anthropics relationship

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 3>with the US government, with the Department of Defense. My

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>understanding is that there's like this group of investors that

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 3>basically applaud Dario Ammi Day for having redlines, but also

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 3>you know that there's this belief that there is a

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 3>commercial advantage in holding that moral high ground. They would

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 3>cite the data of Claud's placement on the different app

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 3>stores and downloads activity after the Pentagon labeled it at

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 3>potential supply chain risk. But it's that sort of commercial

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 3>opportunity of taking the moral high ground that I wanted

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 3>to ask you about and your thesis towards Anthropic in

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 3>that respect.

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 13>I personally wouldn't contextualize it within the realms of moral

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 13>high ground. I think this actually comes down to business culture.

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 13>So one of the things that we really focus on

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 13>when we diligence business is the cultures of organizations. And

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 13>then we're not looking for good cultures or bad cultures.

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 13>We're looking for effective cultures, and we're looking for cultures

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 13>that will be instrumental in driving the performance of businesses.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 13>And one of the things that's striking about Anthropic is

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 13>that they have a very strong culture around AI safety

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 13>and over the long run, you do need to make.

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Sacrifices to maintain cultures.

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 13>And so where we see companies and we're seeing this

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 13>in the case of Anthropic making sacrifices and taking difficult

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 13>decisions to act in ways that are congruent with their cultures.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 2>We applaud that.

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 13>Because we think it enables companies to survive and thrive

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 13>in the long term.

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Peter Singlehurst, head of private Companies at beg IF it

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 3>has been great to have you back on bloom Betel.

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 3>I really appreciate the depth that we went into across

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 3>some of the companies in the portfolio. Now coming up

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 3>in the show, we're going to speak to Lucid's c FO.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Topic with Sayid. After a kind of difficult day for

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 3>the shares yesterday, simple story invest Today, they told us

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 3>about the future and more about their plans for Robotaxi.

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 3>That conversation. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech. Lucid is trying

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 3>to prove it can be more than in a luxury

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.239
<v Speaker 3>ev maker, and it's invested day. The company laid out

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 3>a plan to scale into the high volume mid size market,

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 3>partner more details on the partnership with Uber on Robotaxi,

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and most importantly, shortened the path to positive free cash flow.

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 3>The big question now is execution and how they pay

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 3>for growth without burning through too much capital. Joining us

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 3>now is lucid CFO to think you said and welcome

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 3>to the program.

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 2>It's good to see you.

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to start, actually if I may, with the

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 3>environment that we're in and just the supply chain impact,

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 3>but also the financing impact that you're seeing from the

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 3>war in Iran, because of course Saudi Arabia and different

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 3>Saudi entities are your biggest backers. What are you saying

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:26.839
<v Speaker 3>on your desk right now?

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 14>Well, for the moment, I mean, the disruption that we

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 14>have seen have been rather minimal. So we have not

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 14>noticed major disruption as far as our supply chain and

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 14>so for we did see some tactical adjustment of some

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 14>of the logistic costs of the shipping companies hav indeed

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 14>increased some of the pricing, but as far as our

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 14>operation is concerned, we didn't see any disruption for the

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 14>time being. So we will need to see long term

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 14>if the events and the tension are for too long,

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 14>how it will impact the business. But for the moment,

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 14>I have to say that the disruption is rather minimal.

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 3>The big headline for you in the Finance Org was

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 3>a timeline or a plan to get to positive free

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 3>cash flow. Yes, I'd kindly ask for a little bit

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 3>more detail. What is the timeline on that and mechanically,

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 3>what are the levers you can use to achieve positive

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 3>free cash flow.

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 14>So we have two important linstones. The first one is

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 14>the gross margin positive and this is expected to happen

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 14>in the medterm and you should read the midterm basically

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 14>the next three years. And the free cash flow positive

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 14>expected by the late decades.

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 10>So this is the plan that we have.

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 14>This is the guidance that we have provided yesterday during

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 14>our investor day. So several levers that we will be

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 14>activating to get there. First of all, I mean we

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 14>are in an industry where scale is important. School scale

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 14>coming out of mid size is one of the key

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 14>catalysts to allow us to go to break even margin

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 14>and cash flow positive. So that's the first liver. The

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 14>second one is the margin improvement and the additional revenue

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 14>streams that we will be adding.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 10>To our top line.

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 14>So the margin is expected to improve on the back

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 14>again of the scale. The various improvements that we're doing

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 14>not only in terms of constraining the bill of material

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 14>or constraining some of the cost lines that we have

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 14>in the company. It's also about simplifying what we will

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 14>be bringing to the market. Going forward. So when you

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 14>work on a platform with the ninety five percent part

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 14>communality over time, this is how you leverage the cost

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 14>and this is how you constrain it and you accelerate

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 14>the journey towards the gross margin positive. Then there's the

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 14>additional revenue stream and I guess that we will be

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 14>talking about that. The fact of we winning software revenue

0:36:55.440 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 14>revenue from business partnerships on robo taxes. This is additional

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 14>catalyst which we'll accerate the journey.

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 3>So we are so focused right now on the business

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 3>model for Robotaxi for all the different conduits of what

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 3>is a web of partnerships. Right you have announced Project

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Lunar purpose Built Robotaxi to see that. But what I

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 3>want to understand is at volume, there's a financing risk

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 3>and an execution risk from taking the vehicles off the

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 3>production line and then a fleet operator taking them. So

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 3>who takes on that burden? Whose balance sheet gets that done?

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 10>Well?

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 14>There are different models and these models are not meant

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.720
<v Speaker 14>to be static. So I mean speaking about what exists

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 14>and what we already know. So the first deal that

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 14>we have done with our partners with Nuru and Uber

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 14>was a deal, which was based on the assumption that

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 14>Lucid provides the technology and the platform, and the car

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 14>or provides the software and the AI autonomous driving capabilities,

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 14>and Uber takes on the asset. So this is how

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 14>we have set up the first iteration of the deal,

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 14>and we have always said that there will be older iterations,

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 14>and yesterday the first step has been announced. It's not

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 14>completely finalized. It will be finalizing in the coming weeks,

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 14>but we have announced what the next step would be,

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 14>and we can perfectly imagine that things will evolve over time.

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 14>So the whole question is about the value chain in

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 14>the ecosystem and how it is split between the different

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 14>components or partners being involved in this business.

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 3>We're having a finance conversation, which is, you know it's

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 3>appropriate you are the CFO. I wonder like how interesting

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 3>the mechanisms can get, Like, you know, Uber has a

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 3>financial interest in this, the capital light models. So do

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:05.399
<v Speaker 3>you see maybe private equity or the banks coming in

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 3>with some kind of special purpose vehicle? Right, they finance

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:14.959
<v Speaker 3>that block of volume production until sometime where the fleet

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 3>operator pays you and says, here, here's the money for

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 3>all the cars that we're taking from you because you're

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 3>not going to operate the service, right, You're not going

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 3>to operate the fleet. And then you know, to what

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 3>extent do you need some revenue guarantees from those other partners?

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so obviously, I mean the gold standard in these

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 14>kind of businesses is too secure recurring revenues. So this

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 14>is how you spread the risk over time, and this

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 14>is how you give confidence on the validity of the

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 14>business case. Having said that, I mean we are also

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:54.720
<v Speaker 14>staying away from whatever is associated with the capital intensive business.

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 14>So I don't think that we will ever have a

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 14>model where we own the assets we generate revenue out

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 14>of it. There are companies who do this kind of

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 14>business very well, companies, institutions, businesses who are experts in

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 14>managing assets. So I think that over time, with the

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 14>growing grobotaxi market and the expectation in terms of growth,

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 14>and you saw the various assumptions in terms of market size,

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 14>it's really rearranging from three hundred billion dollars to over

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 14>a trillion depending on the study you look at.

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that this will create.

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 14>New business models and new operators who will start joining

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 14>the overall value chain over time.

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 3>And that's the bit that our audience really wanted to understand.

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 3>You say, Licid TFA, it's great to have you on

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech.

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Thank you know.

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Coming out, we're going to talk about US government effort

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 3>to enlist Silicon Valley in its AI warfare ambitions.

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Stick around. This is bloombag Tech.

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:04.240
<v Speaker 3>The Trump administration's decision to blacklist Anthropic after its dispute

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 3>with the Pentagon to spark debate about how the government

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 3>does business with the technology sector and buys AI. Here's

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 3>what the CEO of Dell, whose biggest customer is the

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 3>US government, told Bloomberg.

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 7>We're kind of a foundational provider of the infrastructure. What

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 7>I can say from our standpoint is, obviously we have

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 7>various controls and systems to make sure we're selling to

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 7>the right, you know, to to the authorized users.

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 10>But we, you know we I don't think.

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:40.760
<v Speaker 7>A company can dictate to a sovereign government what it

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 7>does with its tools.

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 3>It's also costs a spotlight on efforts to enlist Silicon

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Valley into the government's vision for AI warfare. That's the

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 3>focus of the forthcoming book from Bloomberg's owning Katrina Manson

0:41:54.040 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Project Maven, Katrina joins us. Now the timing of of

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 3>this book, the recent reporting that you've been doing, this

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 3>is the story right now the use of technology in

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the government's relationship with the technology sector. I guess take

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 3>us inside what you've written and the conclusions that you've reached.

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 15>Thanks so much. I think the thing that I've discovered

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 15>is that this effort to bring AI to war that

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 15>started in twenty seventeen with Project Maven, and then we

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 15>learn much less about it after Google workers protested and

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 15>Google obviously didn't renew its contract. But the effort kept

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 15>going in two key ways. We already publicly know about.

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 15>One of them, which is ma even smart system, the

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 15>system designed by palent Here but including lots and lots

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:49.880
<v Speaker 15>of different data feeds to help narrow down target selection

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 15>on a sort of digital almost a Google Earth platform.

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 15>That's one thing. But the thing that we really look

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.439
<v Speaker 15>at in the story that we've published today is the

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 15>way the military has tried to put AI onto drones.

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 15>This is this big effort that of course is at

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 15>the center of Dario Amaday's concern about the development of

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 15>fully autonomous weapons and the way AI might be used

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 15>at it I've looked at one element, which is computer vision.

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 15>That isn't the thing that he was worried about. He's

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 15>worried about LMS. But the effort to get computer vision

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 15>onto drones is about allowing drones to recognize targets, select them,

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:31.319
<v Speaker 15>and then be able to execute fire on them.

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Bloombergs Katrina Manson, author of the new book Project Maven,

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much, and it's due out very soon

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 3>later in this month. That does it for this edition

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Tech. Actually, since we've come on air, this

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 3>is what financial markets look like. Now's that one hundreds

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 3>now down half of percent, a big move higher in

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 3>the US tenure yield, and again Brent crewed the global

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 3>oil benchmark.

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 2>We're above one hundred dollars a barrel.

0:43:57.239 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 3>We focus on the war in Iran and the tech

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 3>ology sector. Check out the podcast for the recap. You

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 3>know where to find it. This is Bloomberg Tech.