WEBVTT - Why Do Our Knuckles Crack?

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to side Stuff, a production nuff iHeartRadio. I'm

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Hoory Champ, and today we are taking a crack at

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>knuckle cracking. Why do we do it, why does it happen?

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And is it bad for you? We're going to talk

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of experts about it, including one researcher

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>who thinks they figured out the real reason why joins

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>made that popping sound. It's not what you think, So

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>stop wringing your hands, get cracking with us as we

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>snap up and answer to the question why do our

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>knuckles crack?

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Everyone, So, one of the fun things about being a

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>current is seeing something about yourself end up in your kids.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>It could be your looks, or your personality or even

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>your mannerisms. It's usually fun, but sometimes can be a

0:00:54.800 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>little unsettling. Cannot a minute, WHOA, I'm talking me correctly. Yes,

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I am a knuckle cracker, and so is my daughter,

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>but my spouse and my son not so much, which

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>made me wonder why do some people's knuckles crack and

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>some don't? What actually makes that sound? And is it

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>bad for you? And if it is bad, why do

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we keep doing it? As it turns out, knuckle cracking

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the type of joint we have

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 1>in our bodies. To tell us about this type of joint,

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I reached out to doctor Neilima Sharma, a biologist and

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>researcher at University College London. Well, thank you so much,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Taka Sharma for joining us.

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Sure, that's my pleasure.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Today we're talking about knuckle cracking and here it has

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>something to do with something called a sinovial joint. Is

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that how you pronounce this iino you' or sinovio?

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess it may depend on whether you're on the

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 2>side of the Atlantic.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>How do you pronounce it?

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I call it a synovial joint?

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Syno jo. We'll go with them. Can you tell us

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>what is the sinovial joint?

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>So, sinobal joints are the kind of joints that are

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>found in your elbow or your hip. They are characterized

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 2>by relative sliding of two surfaces next to each other. So,

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 2>if you want a common example, a door hinge functions

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 2>very similar to how a cynobial join functions. You have

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>two metal surfaces in a door hinge that are sliding

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 2>with respect to each other.

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So most of the joints in your body are what

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>are called sinobial joints or synovial joints as other people

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>pronounce it, And those are the kinds of joints that

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>are like door hinges or like ball of socket joints,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>where the surface of one bone curves around the surface

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of the other bone, and they rotate and slide around

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>each other. That's one way to join two boats together.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Another kind of joint that you see in nature and

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in some parts of our body are cartilaginous joints.

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So these are the joints found in your spine. So

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>here you have two bony elements which are very stiff,

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 2>and they are connected by a soft cartilage element in

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the middle. Okay, so you can imagine, like the way

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 2>they function is by bending.

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of join cartilaginous joint don't have any

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>moving parts. It's basically like joining the ends of two

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>sticks of wood together with a short rubber tube. The

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>joint bends by bending the tube. Now, when we were

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>evolving as primitive animals, we first evolved bones and cartilage,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and initially all of our joints were cartilaginous. You can

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>imagine we were blobby fish swimming in the ocean and

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we had a skeleton, but it was all put together

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with basically rubber joints. But then at some point we

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>started developing this new kind of joint, synovial joint, which

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>had two moving, rotating parts. Now, if you have two

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>bones rotating and rubbing against each other, after a while,

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll wear each other out and get creaky. So a

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>feature of these sinovial joints is that they have a

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>gap in between the two bones which is filled with

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a lubricant.

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 2>And again, like an adore hinge, you need to keep

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the joint lubricated, so you oil these hinges very often

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>to maintain a seamless function. In the same way, our

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 2>sinoval joints are also highly lubricated.

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I see, I'm not very handy around the house, so

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't really lubricate my hinges, maybe as much as

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I should. But what's special about a sainovial joint as

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>opposed to any other kinds of joints.

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So this substance called sinovial fluet, which exists between these

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 2>two surfaces that gives our sinoval joints that's lubricating properties.

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So snovial joints have a gap between the two surfaces

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of the bones that slide past each other, and this

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>gap is filled with a special liquid that is basically

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>like a super lubricate.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 2>So this is a very cool fact about sinoval sewage.

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Particularly the sinoval fluid, is a substance that is known

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>to have one of the lowest coefficient of friction in

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>both biological materials as well as engineered materials.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Really, it's super slippery.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's super slippery. It's more slippery than what ice

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 2>on ice feels like. Really, and ice on ice is

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 2>super slippery. Yeah, whoah, more slippery than oil. Yeah, absolutely,

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>And that's why you have to lubricate your door headges

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>get a few months now.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>You're making me feel guilty, But.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>You do not have to lubricate your joints as much.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 2>They function for sixty years of age if you take

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:54.239
<v Speaker 2>care of them properly.

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, these special sinovial joints with the two bones separated

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>by gap filled with a super slippery liquid are basically

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason our knuckles crack. We'll get into the physics

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of why that happens later in the program. But what

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this type of joint also did is give our vertebrate

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>ancestors essentially a superpower.

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 2>This kind of joint. So you can imagine that when

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm moving my elbow, I do not really face a

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 2>resistance while I'm moving it. So it's I know, will

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>joints allow you to be more mobile and faster. I

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>can move my elbow so much faster because there's absolutely

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>no resistance here and all I have to do is

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>turn my muscle on. This would have allowed animals to

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>operate quickly. So if I'm a predator and I have

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 2>a joint that moves early fast, I am definitely able

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 2>to cash more prey and I'm also able to evade predators.

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 2>So they must definitely have given animals and edge over

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 2>other animals who did not have these joints. And maybe

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>that's why they spread so fast that most vertebrates that

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 2>we'd know now do have a lot of signe joints.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that could have been their secret weapon to take

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>over the world.

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, WHOA, this is your speculation, but definitely interesting speculation.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so sygnobil joints could possibly be the reason you, me,

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and most vertebrate animals are here. Cinovial joints are easier

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to move and therefore faster, and they have a wider

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>range of motion than the cartilaginous type of joint, which

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>could have given the vertebrates that had sinobial joints the advantage.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Now it's interesting to think about what exactly prompted vertebrates

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to develop this type of joint. According to doctor Sharma,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the conventional wisdom for at least the last hundred years

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>or so has been that vertebrates evolved this kind of

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>joint when they moved from the ocean to land. The

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>idea is that sinovial joints are better for standing and walking.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>People used to think that cinobil joints only evolved because

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>animals moved out from water to land, and because on

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 2>land you have to bear larger loads. You need like

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>these joints which do not become unstable.

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Because cartilaginist joints are unstable.

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Because they are like a rubber tube. Now, if I

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 2>stand on a rubber tube, it can compress or it

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>can buckle out of shape.

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not that sinovil joints don't become unstable, but they

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>are definitely more stable than cartilaginous joints. If you would

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>want similar range of motion out of the two joints,

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 2>so there was a conventional wisdom for many years we

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 2>have cygnovial joints because we needed them to walk on land.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.599
<v Speaker 2>But the reason I reached out to doctor Sharma is

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>that she's the lead author in a recent study that

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 2>says this is not true.

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>So this is a paper.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I was published last year, and I was

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 2>researching the question of when the joints evolved, whether or

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 2>not skates and sharks at sinobile joints.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>What doctor Sharma and her colleagues did, by study current

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>animals and studying the fossils of ancient animals, was to

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of pinpoint the evolution of sinovial joints and therefore

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>when exactly animals started to be able to possibly start

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>cracking their knuckles. And they dated it to about four

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred million years ago. Now this date is significant according

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to doctor Sharma for two reasons. And they're going with

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>me here for a second. I promise it'll be worth it.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>That date four hundred million years ago is before animals

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>moved from the ocean to land. So the reason we

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>have synovial joints is not so we could stand up.

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But wait, if that's not the reason, then what is well,

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 1>four hundred million years ago. It's also the time when

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>jaws were first developed. That's right, before four hundred million

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago, fishes just kind of had a circular mouth,

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of like lampreeze or leeches. But then four hundred

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>million years ago, vertebrates evolved jaws that could open and close,

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>and that could bite and chomp and prey. And this

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>brings up the crazy idea that maybe the reason we

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>evolved synovial joints, and therefore the reason we can crack

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>our knuckles, could have been to eat better. Okay, to

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>be fair, the evolution of sinnovial joints and the evolution

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of jaws happening at the same time could just be

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence, and there are sort of examples of old

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>fish that maybe have sinobial joints in their fins and

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>not their jaws. But still it does point to one

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>possible answer to the question why do we crack our knuckles.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Here's my hypothesis that knuckle cracking is a byproduct of

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>developing these kinds of joints so that we could move

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>faster and be better at eating and moving and running

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and swimming, and eventually walking and running it's like it's

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 1>something we can't avoid if we wanted to have this

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of joint.

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess not. It is definitely a byproduct of

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the evolution of these kind of joints and an interesting

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>vibe product.

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if we couldn't crack our knuckles, we

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't be here. Okay, I just had one more

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>question or doctor Sharma. Okay, last question, do Korsharma? Can

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you crack your knuckles?

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness. Oh well, it's really loud.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 2>To be honest, I don't think I've done this in

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the last five years. Oh really, Yeah, I do have

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 2>because usually.

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you have this ability to crack your knuckles, but

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not a composion for you. No. That brings us

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the next question we're going to answer in this episode,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>which is, if we can crack our knuckles, why do

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we do it? And why do some of us do

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it compulsively? When we come back, I'm gonna talk Jane

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientists about this, and we're gonna address whether cracking your

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>knuckles is that for you. So stay with us. We'll

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>be right cracked, but I mean we'll be right back. Hey,

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll come back we're talking about cracking our knuckles, and

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so far we've learned the reason we can crack our

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>knuckles is that it's a feature that came with an

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>upgrade in the joints of our early vertebrate ancestors. Those

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>are the joints in your body are what are called

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>sinovial or synovial joints, and they're pretty good. Here. Try this,

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 1>if you can swing your arms around in a circle

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and open and close the fingers in your hand. Isn't

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it incredible how easy and smooth it is to do that,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and be amazed at what a wide range of motion

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>each of your joints has. Well, it's all due to

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>signovial joints, but sometimes they do crack. We'll get to

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the physics and the fluid dynamics of why that happens.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>But first I thought we could answer the question of

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>why we crack our knuckles from a psychological point of view,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Why are we compelled to crack our knuckles and why

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>does it annoy certain people? To dig into the mind

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of the knuckle cracker, I reached out to doctor Dwayne Godwin,

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a psychologist and neuroscientist at Wake Forest University and the

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 1>co author with me of the book Out of Your Mind. Well,

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks doctor Godwin for joining us again.

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Hey or hey, how are you doing.

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm great. I'm cracking my knuckles here.

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh are you?

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.599
<v Speaker 1>I can't stop. I can't stop. That's the that's the

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>question we're trying to answer today. Can you character knuckles?

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>You just don't do it. I can.

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 4>It's not very impressive.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh boy, that was pretty loud.

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh it's a microphone.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>The first thing I asked doctor Cockwin was what does

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>psychologists think of knuckle cracking? And apparently the answer is

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't.

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's not an extensive literature on knuckle cracking.

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 4>With a lot of the other things we talk about,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 4>there's usually something like a study, there's scales that you

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 4>can compare with advanced neuroimagery. But knuckle cracking, you know,

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't really hurt you for the most part. It

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 4>doesn't produce the kind of euphoria that you might associate

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 4>with a drug, so it's harder to study in that way.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I see, it's not high in the priority list of

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the nih or National Science Foundation.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, if you're sort of balancing things out, Oh am,

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 4>I going to look at brain tumors versus knuckle cracking.

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but not everyone can study brain tomors. I mean,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody's got to study the knuckles. Yeah, So knuckle cracking

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is not a high priority in the scientific community, although

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we did find a couple of case reports where psychologists

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have treated people who said they had a problem with

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>cracking their knuckles.

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there are a few case reports where this joint

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 4>cracking or clicking becomes excessive or distressing or really hard

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 4>to stop. One of the reports described compulsive joint clicking

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 4>driven by an uncomfortable joint sensation that they could ease

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 4>only after repeated clicking. So it would be like, you know,

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 4>popping your neck multiple times to get relief in your neck.

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 4>And then there was another case study that described improvement

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 4>with this dopamine drug and the fidget spinners.

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you can take a drug to stop cracking your knuckles.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Look at to why that works in a little bit.

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>But first I wanted to ask doctor Godwin what he

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>thought was going on in the brain when we crack

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>our knuckles.

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 4>So it's not hard to reason out what might be happening.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 4>A reasonable hypothesis is that knuckle cracking can ride along

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 4>on the same circus that the brain uses for habits

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 4>in our normal lives. The habit system is a feature

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 4>and not a bug. It takes actions that you repeat

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot, makes them fast and low effort. You don't

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 4>want to consciously replan every step of tying your shoes

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 4>or unlocking your phone or driving a familiar route, and

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 4>so the brain chunks those behaviors into packages that can

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 4>run with minimal supervision.

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I see, it's like the brain is made to put

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>certain things into that category of automatic behavior.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's very advantageous from an evolutionary perspective. If you

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 4>were thinking about every action that you took, then it

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 4>would be very difficult to navigate the world day to day,

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 4>and it would be difficult if you were performing at

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 4>a very high level in sports. For example, if you

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 4>had to think about every placement of a golf club

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 4>as you were making a swing. If you don't somehow

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 4>make that more automatic, then you get into issues like choking,

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 4>because that is kind of overthinking those kinds of behaviors.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>In other words, our brain is wired to form habits,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and to form a habit, all you need is for

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you to do it several times and for it to

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>feel good.

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 4>So early in learning, the prefrontal cortex is more involved

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 4>because you're deciding and evaluating. But with repetition, the control

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 4>shifts toward the dorsal strainum and motor planning areas and

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 4>the behavior becomes more automatic, and dopamine is involved in that.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 4>It's one of the signals that helps to stamp in

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 4>a habit if it's producing either a rewarding outcome or

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 4>a relief, and relief in some sense can be rewarding

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 4>related to this sort of knuckle cracking behavior.

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Like if it somehow feels good, then your brain will

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>want to keep doing it.

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, for knuckle cracking, the rewards is kind of this

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 4>relief from stiffness or tension in the joint, and relief

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 4>can be powerful because it teaches the brain that this

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 4>movement fixes the sensation. So over time, the queue can

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 4>be as subtle as a tiny joint feeling a moment

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.479
<v Speaker 4>of stress, or even just seeing your hands, and your

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 4>brain is cued to add activate that loop.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I know what you're thinking. If knuckle cracking involves

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the dopamine reward circuit in your brain, does that mean

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's like an addiction. Not quite. According to doctor Godwin,

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>knuckle cracking doesn't quite rise to the level of an addiction,

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.719
<v Speaker 1>but it can become a compulsion.

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 4>What distinguishes a habit from a compulsion. As a habit,

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 4>you identify it, you know it, and you can stop it.

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 4>It's something that you can interrupt or distract yourself from.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 4>The compulsion is a feeling that's almost overwhelming that you

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 4>must complete the act. It's very much the similar brain circuit,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 4>but in the case of compulsive behavior, the dopamine stamp

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 4>is more profound.

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 4>But for the most part, there's no reports in the

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 4>literature that knuckle cracking fits into a category that would

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 4>identify it as an addiction.

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 4>There may be somebody out there that has a knuckle

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 4>cracking addiction. You can't just disclaim that or disprove that,

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 4>but I would say that it would be pretty rare.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>You'd call him a real knucklehead.

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, or a crackhead. Knuckle crack head.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, I might get in trouble for them. Now.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>The good news for knuckle crackers out there is that,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>as far as anyone knows, popping your joint is not

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that bad for you. In nineteen ninety eight, a doctor

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>named Donald Unger from Thousand Oaks, California published the letter

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in the journal Arthritis and Rheumatology, in which he reported

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the longest running experiment on the subject of knuckle cracking

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>since he was a kid. Doctor Unger had the habit

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of cracking the knuckles on his left hand, but only

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on his left hand, not his right hand, and he

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>did it at least twice a day. Fifty years later,

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in a somewhat tongue in cheek case report in the journal,

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>he was happy to report that after about thirty six

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>five hundred knuckle crackings, neither of his hands head arthritis,

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and that there was no notice difference in the appearance

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>or health of both hands. For that case report, doctor

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Hunger was awarded the two thousand and nine ich Noble Prize,

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>which he happily accepted, saying, quote, after about sixty years

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>of knuckle cracking to prove that it does not cause arthritis,

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps I deserve some sort of award end quote. Now

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there have been a couple of larger studies. In nineteen

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ninety a couple of doctors from Mount Carmel Mercy Hospital

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit studied a group of three hundred participants, seventy

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>four of which were knuckle crackers. They found that quote,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>there was no increased preponderance of arthritis of the hand

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in either group. However, habitual knuckle crackers were more likely

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to have hand swelling and lower grip strengths. Habitual knuckle

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>cracking was associated with manual labor, biting off the nails, smoking,

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and drinking alcohol end quote. And In nineteen seventy five,

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>two medical researchers from the University of son Kelvia, Bornia

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>published the study in which they surveyed twenty eight elderly

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>patients about eighty years old and twenty eight kids about

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven years old. They found that just as many kids

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>cracked their knuckles as older people, although they do admit

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that some of the elderly patients couldn't remember if they

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>cracked their knuckles. But more importantly, they found that the

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>knuckles of the elderly patients who cracked their knuckles weren't

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>just as healthy as the knuckles of the elderly patients

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>who did not crack their knuckles. They concluded, quote, the

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>data fails to support evidence that knuckle cracking leads to

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>degenerative changes in the metacarpal falangeal joints. In old age,

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the chief morbid consequence of knuckle cracking would appear to

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be its annoying effect on the observer end quote. Yes,

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 1>knuckle cracking can be annoying, And it turns out there's

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>actually a name for this. I just have a side question,

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>which is when I hear other people crack your knuckles,

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it gives me that sense of like, ew oh, what

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>is that.

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's a condition called misphonia, and it's kin to

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the fingers on a chalkboard response, yeah, and sort of

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 4>being grossed out by body horror, that sort of thing.

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 4>And the idea I think is your brain might interpret

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 4>the popping of bones and flesh as being something that is,

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 4>from an evolutionary perspective, something to avoid, uh huh, And

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 4>so you may be having a response to that.

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, it's tapping into like a very primitive reflex

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in the brain.

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Maybe again, you know, there's no literature on this, you know,

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 4>it's really interesting that what it does point out there's

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 4>this aspect of the physics of how knuckles pop. There's

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 4>the sound that comes from it.

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And that brings us to the last way we will

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>answer the question why do our knuckles cracked, which is

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>by digging into the physics of what's going on. What's

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>actually making that cracking sound? Is it your bones grinding?

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it something actually popping inside of your joints. When

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we'll talk to a Harvard scientist who

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>thinks they finally figured out the real reason our knuckles

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>make that sound, and it's not what you think. So

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>stay with us. We'll be right back. Hey, welcome back.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>We're cracking the mystery of why we crack our knuckles,

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and so far we've learned it's related to the kind

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of joints we have and that it can be a

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>compulsion for some people. Now the question is what actually

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>makes that cracking sound. As it turns out, it's been

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a mystery in the scientific community for over one hundred years.

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us about it is doctor Vannie Suja,

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a researcher at the Vis Institute at Harvard University who

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>specializes in bubble physics. Well, thank you, doctor Susjah for

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>joining us.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 3>First, my pleasure and it's great to see you.

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, my first question is do you crack your knuckles.

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I do. And one of these people who has

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 3>this compulsive disorder, you know, I cracked my knuckles whenever

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 3>we're I'm frustrated when something doesn't work, and that's more

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 3>days in my life than usual.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Can we hear your knuckles cracking right now?

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Let me try.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you hear some Yeah that was pretty fun. Yeah,

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that's really dense. Now. In twenty eighteen, doctor Suja was

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the lead author of the paper titled A Mathematical Model

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>of the Sounds Produced by Knuckle Cracking, in which they

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>claim to finally settle the debate of what actually makes

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the that happens when we crack our knuckles. It's a

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>debate that, according to doctor Suja, has been going on

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for over one hundred years. Tell us the history of

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out where the sound comes from.

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we were able to trace it back to at

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 3>least the early nineteen hundreds, where there's actual published scientific

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 3>literature on people saying, look, not everybody can crack their knuckles,

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 3>so people kind of like document their way back.

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>According to doctor Suja, one breakthrough came in nineteen forty

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>seven to doctors from the Saint Thomas Hospital Medical School

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in London decided to do experiments on actual fingers, measuring

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>how much tension was needed and how far apart the

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>joints needed to be to create a crack, and they

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>realized that it might have something to do with how

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>sudden the joint snaps.

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 3>They said, like, it has to do with how quickly

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the joints are being separated. There's something there and they

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of concluded that when you do this so fast,

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, could be vibrations and a tissue and that

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 3>could be the sound.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>But then in nineteen seventy one, another group of British

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>scientists for the University of Leads decided to make a

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>plastic model of a joint, put some fluid in it,

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and they use the high speed camera to see what

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>happens when you pop the joint.

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 3>They actually build a kind of mockup model of the

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 3>tissue and they could see some bubble activity happening as

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 3>they were pulling about this joint and they said it's cavitation.

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And here we get to what scientists think is the

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>culprit makes the knuckle cracking sound. Cavitation. Cavitation is what

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>happens when you suddenly get bubbles inside of a liquid. Now,

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>one way to get bubbles inside a liquid is to

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>boil it. When you heat water on a stove, the

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>water molecules at the bottom get hot and they turn

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to steam, which is a gas, and so they form bubbles.

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But another way to turn water to gas is to

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>lower the pressure. If you put a glass of water

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum chamber, you'll start to bubble and boil,

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>even if it's a room temperature. It's sort of like

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.479
<v Speaker 1>when you open a can of soda.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 3>The best anology I can draw is like opening a

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 3>soda bottle. It's pressureized, right, and like you open the cap,

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 3>you're suddenly changing the pressure. And what that leads to

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 3>is sort of bubbles coming out.

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And so here's what those scientists in nineteen seventy one

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>thought was happening. When you're cracking your knuckles, you're bending

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>your joints, but at some point you can over bend

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>them and that pulls the two bones apart. But there's

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>fluid in between them, and so that fluid gets stretched,

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>which causes the pressure to drop and you form bubbles. Now,

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the scientists in nineteen seventy one saw the bubbles in

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>their model and they thought, ah, that's what's making the

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>cracking sound. It's the bubbles from cavitation popping.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 3>This is sort of like the rapid formation and collapse

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 3>of bubbles that had been known to like damage propellers

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 3>with these bubbles, and that ended up being like the

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 3>state of the art for a long time. And remember

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 3>growing up and like it whenever somebody asked me what

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 3>causes the sound of it's a gavitation, because that used

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to be the thing.

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>As doctor Suji said, this is what people thought caused

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>knuckle cracking for a long time. It's the bubbles from

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>cavitation in the joint popping, right, that makes sense. But

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>then about forty years later, in twenty fifteen, a group

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of Canadian and Australian engineers and doctors decided to get

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>more high tech and they used an MRI machine to

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>see what was going on inside of an actual knuckle.

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 3>They actually did the first imaging study. They used MRI

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 3>to look inside the knuckles and as we said before,

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 3>MRA is slow, definitely cannot see what's happening at the

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 3>moment these sounds are coming. But what they could see

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 3>was at slow enough time points, they could actually see

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the bubble there, oh, and it persisted.

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>What the Canadian engineers and doctors saw was that even

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.239
<v Speaker 1>after the knuckle had made the cracking sound, there were

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>still bubbles. The bubbles hadn't popped. But if the bubbles

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>hadn't popped, what made the cracking sound?

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 3>And that gave them an interesting idea. So they said, look,

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 3>there's bubbles still in there. Maybe it's not a collapse,

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 3>but it is a formation of these bubbles that could

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 3>be the source of the sound. So that suddenly opened up,

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, more questions, and the flood gates of questions,

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 3>and suddenly, like the knuckle cracking was in the debdfield again.

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the entire knuckle cracking research field was thrown into

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this array. Okay, to be honest, there aren't that many

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>people looking into this. I mean, it's not like the

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>government and foundations are pouring billions of dollars to figure

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>out knuckle cracking. But still it became a topic of

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>debate again. Was knuckle cracking caused by bubbles forming in

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the liquid inside the knuckle joints or was it caused

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>by the bubbles popping. That's when doctor Sujah entered the picture.

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 3>So this is more than a decade back. And I

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 3>was in Frans as a master's student.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I was in this class of a wonderful professor by

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 3>the name of Abdel Barka, and he said, I have

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 3>two weeks to figure out an interesting problem in buying mechanics,

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 3>and sought okay. And I'm like sitting in frustration, kind

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 3>of cracking my knuckles, and Sally like, oh, this seems

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 3>to be an interesting problem. You knows buying mechanics in

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 3>there and read more about it, and there's flood mechanics

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 3>in there, there's bubble physics, and I got all excited.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>What doctor Suja did was create the most accurate mathematical

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>model of the physics of joint bubble formation that had

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>ever been done. Okay, let me through what you did.

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So in a computer you wrote up a simulation of

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>what we ended.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Up modeling three critical events mathematically. So one is how

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 3>the pressure is changing, and there's a so called lubrication

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 3>theory that's in fluid mechanics we can leverage to predict

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 3>how fluid pressure changes when there's motion in a small

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 3>enough gap, so we use that. And second, there's a

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 3>really intriguing theory that basically describes what happens to a

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 3>bubble in the fluid where the pressure is changing. So

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 3>we know how the pressure change is quantitatively, we know

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 3>how this bubble is going to respond to that pressure,

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 3>and finally we wander to link this pressure to the

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 3>sound we hear. So there's another set of equations that

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 3>go from this pressure oscillations to audible sound. So three equations.

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, the details here get a little technical. It turns

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>out that there are several ways that the cavitation bubbles

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in the joint can be made, either from the liquid

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>being pulled apart or the liquid being stretched by friction.

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's also what happens after the joint gets pulled apart,

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>which is that the pressure goes up again because flood

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>rushes in to fill the gap. But the point is

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that doctor Suja modeled all of this and he simulated

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the sound the bubbles would make, and then he compared

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it to the sound of actual people cracking their knuckles.

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And then you tested this by bringing people into an

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>antichoic chamber and having them crack their knuckles. Yes, how

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>did you find people who could crack their knuckles?

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people who love cracking knuckles and like

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 3>helping out for the name of science. So you know,

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 3>it was at the university, and there's a lot of

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 3>frustrated pieces. Yes, we did briefly advertise this study, but

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, mostly what of mouth as he put a

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 3>microphone right next to somebody's knuckle.

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's precisely.

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 3>What of those like we had people set in like

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 3>a recording studio and have people come in and crack

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 3>the knuckles close to a microphone.

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you have them work on their thesis so that

0:32:58.400 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they would get frustrated?

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 3>That wou'd have been a good point. I know we

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 3>could have gotten more volunteers that way.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So doctor Suja compared the frequency signature the sound from

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>his mathematical simulation to the signature of real knuckle cracks,

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and they matched. But here's the thing. In doctor Suji's simulation,

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the sound didn't come from either the bubbles forming or

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the bubbles popping.

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 3>And what our modeling work showed was you could still

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 3>have a collapsing bubble and produce sounds, but the bubble

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 3>need not collapse completely for the sounds to happen. You

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 3>don't need the bubble to go to a size of zero,

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 3>but it could be like starting with something big, going

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 3>to ten times smaller and stop there. And still that

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 3>partial change in size was sufficient to explain the sounds. Okay, okay,

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 3>so you can still see the bubble after knuckle cracking.

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>What doctor Suji's model showed was that the popping sound

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>actually comes from the bubbles shrinking, not when they form,

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>not when they pop, when the bubbles shrink, And that

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the best explanation we have about where

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the knuckle cracking sound comes from. All right, and say,

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you've helped partially resolve this big mystery that's been sitting

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>around for over fifty years.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Partially.

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>The cool thing is we were able to like kind

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 3>of say, maybe both of you guys can be right

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen seventy one and twenty fifteen, and there's a

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 3>way to go forward from there.

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 1>And as a bonus, doctor Sugis's model actually predicts why

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>some people can crack their knuckles and some people can't.

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 3>And a good thing about mathematical moral and a lot

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 3>of marveling for this reasons. You can quantitatively say how

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 3>certain parameters and this problem in fact the sound. For example,

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 3>what if you have a different joint spacing. What if

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 3>you pull the join a little bit harder?

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 3>And why can't some people crack their knuckles? The model

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 3>says they are the only spacing is too large. You

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:06.959
<v Speaker 3>won't be able to generate precious low enough to cause

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 3>the bubbles to form an oslate in a way that

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 3>can produce.

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>The sound amazing? Has this changed how you see your

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>knuckles or when you crack your nuckles? Do you think

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>about it differently now?

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 4>And no.

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Could you go back to your mother and say, see, mom,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>every time I cracked my knuckles, that was good for something? Yeah?

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 3>And the response I would get is like, do you

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.800
<v Speaker 3>have no other, you know, important scientific problem to think about?

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>It's never enough, is it right? Exactly? Yeah? It's like,

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>why aren't you curring cancer? Why are you trying to

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out knuckle cracking?

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Do you have too much time on your plate?

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Stop cracking your knuckles and get to work on something important.

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well to recap as annoying as someone cracking

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>their knuckles is, it's all because we have these fluid

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>filled joints. Let us do amazing movements like walking and

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>running and climbing. It's not issarily harmful to crack your knuckles,

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>even if you do it compulsively, and hey, it could

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>end up getting you a PhD and a job at Harvard.

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>You just have to knuckle down. Thanks for joining us,

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Hey, a big shout out to

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 1>doctor Gage Crump. We also interviewed about the evolution of

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>sinolial joints and to our editor Rose, who can't stand

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 1>people cracking their knuckles, so the fact that she edited

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 1>this episode is a huge active bravery and commitment. Thanks

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to Rose. Oh and also, this week is Brain Awareness Week,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>so if you're interested in learning more about the brain,

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>check out my book with doctor Dwayne Godwin, Out of

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind, available wherever books are sold. You've been listening

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to Science Stuff the production of iHeartRadio, written and produced

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>by me or Y Champ, candited by Rose Seguda, executive

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>producer Jerry Rowland, audio engineer and mixer Ksey Pegram, and

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you can follow me on social media. Just search for

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>PhD Comics and the name of your favorite platform. Be

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sure to subscribe to Sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app,

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts, and please

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>tell your friends we'll be back next Wednesday with another episode. Hey,

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>please take a second and leave us a review on

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to the podcast.

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot,