WEBVTT - The Ultimate Outfield Guide (EP. 761)

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome and everybody to Fantasy Pros. This is the Fantasy

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast. It's meet Jill, we paid Joe Pisapia, and

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>today we're gonna take a look at the outfielders. That's right,

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the ultimate outfield Guide. We're going to go through

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the outfield ones all the way to outfield five. There's

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some d h's in there as well, because

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>that's how we roll. And of course helping me go

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>all the way rolling down the hill is the Welsh,

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>your favorite everybody. Let's hear three cheers for the Welsh.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I love that there's no three cheers for anybody anything

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>like a hip hip paraye. Yeah, like we don't get

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>a good old three cheers for anyone. Let's bring that

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>back this year. I'm leading off.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 2>How would we do that? We're gonna do paray, yeah,

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 2>sound something or.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Just cheer three times? I don't know, we'll figure that out.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>We've got hip hip paraye the same as three cheers.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 2>What is what would you do if you three cheered hooray, hooray, hooray.

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that let that does feel awkward. That wanted you

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to do it. I really wanted you to do it.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was super awkward. How about just hip hit paray.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>What won't be awkward, of course is this show the

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>rest of it? Well, actually no guarantees on that, but

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>we are gonna go ahead and we're gonna talk about

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>these outfielders, our favorite draft picks to make our tiers

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>where we have the drop offs even within these groupings.

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Here of the outfielders, and again you can see all

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>these ranks at fantasypros dot com on the MLB ranking side.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget. Also, as you're drafting your teams, sink your

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>leagues for free. Use the Fantasy Pros Baseball My Playbook.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You can manage all of your fantasy baseball teams on

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>your yahoos and your CBS's and your espns or wherever

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the heck you play, all in one spot, set all

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>your lineups, look for your free agents on one app.

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>You say yes, I say that's correct, so go do that. Also,

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>don't forget as well. Draft Wizard is open for business

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasypros dot Com slash mock. You can also download the

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Draft Wizard app as well, and of course, the Draftkit

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is free and available at Fantasypros dot com slash Draft

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Kit and remember, when you're a Premium Fantasy Pros member,

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you'll get upgraded tools for all of the above, including

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the amazing draft software, so you can never screw up

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a draft ever in the history of the universe. So

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Welsh the outfielders last year, this was a tricky group.

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Certainly some outfielders were very excited about, but then the

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>bottom kind of fell off. I feel like when we're

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at this group this year, I feel a little

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>bit better. I also feel like we're getting some youth

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>influx here that's going to help things as the season

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>goes on, especially some better health excuse me, from some

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>guys like Riley Green and a few others could also

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be exactly what this position needs. Would you agree?

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And there's there's other like little sneaky things we're

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 2>not going to talk about here, but like Byron Buxton

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 2>is going to be playing in the outfield this year

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>if he plays, so he'll requalify. There's other sneaky things

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>to look out for. It was announce over in Padres Camp.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 2>Padres have like one registered outfielder right now in Fernando

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Tatis Junior. That Jackson Merrill, top infield shortstop prospect is

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>going to play in the outfield. So that's another guy

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>that's going to play in the outfield. So it's coming

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 2>back to say that like this position, it can get

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>away from you, and that's my biggest problem with it.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>But there are sneaks. Stop with the Bucks and I

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>know some.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even laughing about Buckston. What I'm laughing about

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>he said, it's only one registered outfielder. And all I

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>can think about, does he have to go to all

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the other teams and tell everyone that he's a registered outfielder.

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 2>Yea, they have to have a list and everything like that. Yeah, Joe,

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>it's a great one. That's a really good one. I

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 2>think he did. Then that's why they're bringing some others in.

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 2>But yes, depth is the question here. Five outfielder versus

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>three outfielder, those are the question. And will go through

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 2>them because the tippy top looks great. There are some

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>sneaky sneaks later there. But I promise you this position

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 2>can get away from you in drafts because of what

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the entirety of this board looks like. When you attack pitchers,

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>when you attack infield, stolen bases, you can go. You

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>can be into like the seventh round and go, oh my,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 2>where are my outfielders? And then you're out field two

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>and three way far behind. And you can be but

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you have to be behind somewhere in your positions. But

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>it ain't great when you got five outfielders that you're

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 2>dealing with.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's start here before we get canceled on

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the show. Let's start with Ronald Acunya. I mean he

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is Okay, here's maybe a dumb question. Is Acunya a

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>tier unto himself? How does forty seven question? I mean

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>he is. Of course he is well because it was

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>such an incredible year last year. And I mean, look

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>when you when you make that jump, like he had

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>forty one home runs back in twenty nineteen, right, but

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he has never hit thirty cents. And I know we

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>had the COVID short year, but still, I mean, this

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is the guy who's batting average jumped to the highest

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that's ever been at three thirty eight. The stolen bases

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>double almost anything he's ever done. Thirty seven was his

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>previous career high. I mean that that is the one

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>thing you ask yourself. It's like, is it repeatable and sustainable?

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Probably not? But if he gets ninety percent of it,

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>He's probably still in the tier above himself right onto it.

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Remember, yeah, I remember that story I told where we were

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 2>talking with some of the dev team about projections and

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 2>it kind of became about Otani in this dynasty way

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and it was like, hey, you know, Otani, should he

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>be worth this? And it's like, well, he is two players,

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 2>and my argument was like, well, hey, here's what we

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 2>have to do. We have to bring Otani to the

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>same ish level as Akunya because Akunya performed like two

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>offensive players. I mean, just we do this thing where

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 2>we can cut it like I always love to do this,

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 2>look at a player's performance from a year that was

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that was high and then say, okay, what does this

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 2>guy look like if you cut off ten to fifteen

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 2>percent of the production. Okay, this is the guy. Blah

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 2>blah blah. You take a fifty percent of the production

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 2>and it's still like thirty something stolen bases is.

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Something deals with twenty homers. It is fifty something RBI,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's like c J Abrams, but it's seventy something

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>run scored, so it's still like it is j Abrams.

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like Abrams it's like two abrams put together.

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>So Acunya performs at a level of like two players.

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 2>You absolutely can always and you should ask can a

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 2>guy repeat? But I do look at this and I go,

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 2>this is who if this guy wants to be in

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 2>these new rules, this is where he went, and how

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 2>much production can you cut off until you find your

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 2>reasoning why you wouldn't take him number one? And I

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 2>think it's a big number. Acunya is the clear cut

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 2>number one. I ain't trying to get cute here. He

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 2>performs at two levels so much so. And I know

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I've said this once or twice, but he had brought

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 2>up conversation where people wanted to create three third round

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 2>reversals in leagues because it wasn't fair.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh god.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I would never do that, that's silly. But I saw

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 2>that conversation popping up.

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I got your third round reversal right here, buddy, All right,

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the next grouping here. So Acunya an

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>island after that. Julio Rodriguez, Corbyn Carroll, our Boy, Mookie Betts,

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker, Fernando Tatis at seven. You've got Aaron Judge

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Jan Sota at eight Alvarez at nine and then Luis

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Robert at ten. To me, this is the top ten?

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that grouping two to ten? That is so if

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>one is the superlative tier in Acunya, this is the

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>A tier right after that? Would you agree?

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 2>Yes? But as my teas work, could I see myself

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 2>taking je Soto in any scenario over Julio Rodriguez. It's

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>way closer than what we did in the Ultimate Infield Guide,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 2>which you guys can go check out on podcasts or

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 2>YouTube right now. Go do that. It's way closer. But

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the answer is no. So in that these are this core,

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Julio Carrol and Bets are their own tier. In my mind,

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't deviate from those three. It is always those three.

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's Julio Carrol, Bets, and then it's Tucker Tatis,

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Judge Soto that's the next tier, and then it goes

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 2>to the other guys you mentioned. But like these are

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>the names, there isn't I'm not taking a guy off

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not gonna but that's how I break them apart.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 2>But these are the dudes.

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I already have bet Julio Drigez for ALMVP again just

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like I did last year, I anticipated Showeotana getting traded,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and I still hold true. If Otani did get traded

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>like you should have, I think Julio second half would

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>have spoken volumes. It would have a very interesting conversation.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think we've seen the best out of

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Julio Rodriguez yet, which is scary for the rest of

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the league. So obviously this group is great. These are

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>all first round picks basically, So I mean, we can't

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>split hairs over either of them because I don't have

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>any hairs to split anymore literally, but you still you

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>have plenty. Let's take a quick break in the action

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell you about fan Tracks, the most customizable fantasy

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>platform in the industry, offering the greatest fantasy experience for

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>your dynasty keeper, redraft and best ball leagues. Create or

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>join a Fantasy Baseball Commissioner league, invite your friends, and

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>dominate your draft this season. Fan tracks Free MLB League

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Manager is the most customizable, easy to use, and feature

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>rich platform in the industry. If there's anything lacking in

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>your current fantasy league manager, fan Tracks likely has it.

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Go deep with the ultimate keeper and dynasty leagues. Create

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a simple redraft league or even a customizable Best Ball

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>league with up to two thousand teams. And if you're

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>coming from another service, fan Tracks can import any of

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>your current leagues and customize them as needed. Fantasy sports

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sleep, neither does fan Tracks. With seasons running three

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five days a year, many have already renewed,

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>scheduled their drafts, continued trading of players, draft picks, et cetera.

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason why fantasy players who try fan Tracks

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>make it their permanent home for all their fantasy leagues.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Sign up for free today and be entered to win

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the fan Tracks Game day experience, where fan Tracks will

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>send you and your league to an MLB game of

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>your choice. Simply go to fantracks dot com slash Fantasy

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Pros and sign up today. That's fantracks dot com slash

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, fan Tracks, the home of fantasy sports. And

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>now back to the action. Michael Harris comes in eleven,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Randy Rose arena at twelve. So between those two guys,

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>who are you taking Harris or a Rose Arena?

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Michael Harris, he is one of my draft day targets.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely love him. The only thing that gets me

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 2>off of him. Is if I like went in a

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>different territory like pitching, pitching third round pitching in fifteen

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>team leagues is ten tends to be where I want

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 2>to go. But I do want Michael Harris. We talked

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 2>about it with Ario Cohen on the ATC Projection Show

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 2>here that he performs at essentially a first round value.

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 2>We did that thing where I broke it down guys

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 2>that hit two eighty go twenty twenty in the outfield.

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 2>There were four that did it last year. The other

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 2>three we already talked about in the outfield. Michael Harris

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 2>is the fourth. I think he's going to bounce back

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 2>even bigger this year. I love the team to run

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>ballpark factor is great. Harris is going to hit a

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 2>little bit higher in the lineup than some of the

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>other guys, like the I talked about Jared Kellnick in

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 2>an episode that I think he's going to bounce back

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>up that. I love Michael Harris. I'd love to target him.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 2>I love to get a value on him. And the

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>high batting average really gives him a floor that he

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't hurt you anywhere.

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Now forty point different than batting average between Harris and

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>rose A Raina, I begrudgingly agree with you, but you

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>know I love Randy Roseraina. He's just fun. Next one

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at at least is gonna see at thirteen, Nolan Jones

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>at fourteen, Mike Trout at fifteen. Let's stop here, Mike Trout.

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Welch's it's come to this. I feel like this is

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>where we are. So last year only played eighty two games.

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>When he did play on the field, you know, eighteen homers,

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>forty four ribbies, fifty four run score to sixty three

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>batting average of the fast Bros. Projections right now on

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>FP have him at eighty eight runs, thirty four homers,

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven RBI. We know the stone bases are gone

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>hitting two sixty three. Where are you at with Trout?

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Is Trout somebody you think like this is a good

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>value for him? Or is Trout somebody where you're just saying,

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I just can't take this roller coaster

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>anymore with the injuries, and now he is like a

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Kunya on island, unto himself, but not in a good way,

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>because the rest of this Angels team is not good. Welsh.

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 2>I know a lot of people He's kind of become

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 2>like the Degram of hitters in some degree where people

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 2>are like, I just can't do it. When he's on

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 2>and when he plays, he performs at a high level,

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and I hate doing this because like I tend to

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 2>defend de Grom and then he gets hurt, and it's

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 2>everything that everybody said, I'm right because he's the best

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 2>player on the planet when he's playing, and then he

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>gets hurt, like everybody said, So this just leads back

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to like, yeah, I'm of course I'm going to be

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 2>back on Mike Trout. This is the cheapest you have

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>ever gotten Mike Trout outside of like, you know, the

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 2>rookie year when he was saying.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm a tempted, Like that's how cheap I'm a tempted.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 2>But like as you should be, because he is a

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>high thirty to forty home run hitter. Even with bad

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 2>players around him, he can pull ninety ninety. He doesn't

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 2>run anymore. That's gone, and I think the average can

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>improve a little bit. I think he might be a

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 2>little less swing heavy, but it's the playing time and

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 2>that's what you're gonna have to come to terms with.

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>If I took Ellie de la Cruz and I had

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Jazz Chisholm. I don't think I'm gonna take Mike Trout.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 2>But if I had a lot of safe options, if

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I took the Freddy free like I took Freddy Freeman

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 2>in the first and I took you know whatever, Bryce

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Harper in the second, or I guess I wouldn't take

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>two first basemen Raphael Devers in the second. I'm the

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>little depleted of stolen bases. Hopefully i'd make it up earlier,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 2>but like I could, I think it's calculated risks with players.

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 2>To me, Mike Trout is worth a calculated risk. It's

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>just is that at the expense of other worthwhile risks.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>You'll already I think you'll already know the bats that

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>are risky by the time you get to Trout, to

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>know if you can do it, then it may becomes trump.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>That makes a difference. I would say this too, and

0:12:58.520 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe I'm going to say these words, and

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm might live to regret them. In roto leagues. I

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>can't justify taking Trout over Chisholm. I just can't do it. Yeah,

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>too much, I think those are right the batting average

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be that far apart. They both

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are huge injury risks. One is much younger. I just

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't justify it, and I know that might.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 2>Be for the stolen bases. I get it.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I get Like I said, because roto leagues, I

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>can't head to head or season along. I can't justify

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Trout over Chisholm. I can justify Trout Sam Bellinger that

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I can do a little bit easier. Who's next on

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this list at seventeen? Christian Yelich at eighteen, coming off

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 1>a year where he was nineteen homers twenty eight stolen bases,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>hit two seventy eight, so a bounce back year for him,

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, and it's been a while, like this is

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>his best season since twenty nineteen. Are you buying Yelich's

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>bounce back?

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess I wouldn't say buying because if I were buying,

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I think I would be like hyper aggressive on Yelich,

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and I don't feel hyper aggressive. I mean, seventeen stolen

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 2>bases are seventeen homers twenty three stolen bases is the

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>projection on the bat X, which of single aggregate pretty

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 2>inctions was the highest ranked according to Fantasy pros last year,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>so those aren't extreme numbers. I think the batting average

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>could dip. I actually think the stolen bases might dip

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. I think Yelich is coming to the

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 2>point where he does need to pick a side. He

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>needs to pick a side. Is he gonna is the

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 2>power gonna go and he's gonna work it through the

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 2>legs and be a higher batting average guy, or are

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the legs gonna go and he's gonna work on this

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>side of being a bigger power hitter and maybe selling

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>out a little bit more. And I think that deficiency

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 2>with the injury stuff might be a problem. I'm fine.

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I really am indifferent about Yelich. Like if I come

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>into a spot and he's fallen a little bit, I

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of want a value on him, and he makes

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 2>sense for the roster construction, I'll do it. He's definitely

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 2>not a drafted target for me, though.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what. I like him at this ADP

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And in some ways I actually feel better about him

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>than I do about chishm or Trout because he did

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>play one hundred and forty four games last year, undred

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and fifty four last the year before, and you know

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in both of them, you know did show stolen base

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>potential nineteen seals in twenty twenty two twenty eight last year,

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the batting average did make some progress there. So I

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think Yelich is just fine. In fact, this is another

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>guy too that I feel like in those salary cap

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>leagues that he's kind of going to be undervalued, and

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll come at a really nice return on investment.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you're looking for a solid I think you can

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>pay for number three outfielder price and get Yellich as

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>your second outfielder, if that makes sense. I think that's

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what I'm getting at.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>If you could get a burger today and pay for

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 2>it tomorrow.

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes again, Josh Lowe at nineteen. Kyle Schwarber, who defies

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>gravity too. I mean, how this guy hits a buck

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety and still can put up you know, one hundred

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty bi.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know it wasn't he the first player to

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 2>like hit forty under two, under hit undertwo something like.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>That, one ninety seven? But how how he scored one

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eight runs? I mean, I know you have

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>forty seven homers while there you go, there's fifty percent

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of them right now, but that's it, Like he is

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>those true outcomes. So he is one of those dangers

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of roster construction. You just have to account for it.

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>After Schwarber continuing on our list here, Brian Reynolds, Nick Casiano,

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Saya Suzuki, and George Springer close out outfield too. So

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of this grouping from Garcia to Springer, who's your favorite

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>guy in this tier?

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Probably? Oh, you added Adalise.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Well at least was at thirteen. So if you want

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to like I say, no, I want the premium guy.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna wait. Like you basically have two ways

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to go about this. You can go ahead with the

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>premium guy in Garcia. You can go in the mid

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>range with Yelich and just kind of get by, which

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is understandable. Or you go to that next grouping here

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>towards the end and say, okay, Casianos, excuse me, Brian

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds and those guys are serviceable outfield twos.

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>So there's two guys that I like, and I probably

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 2>pair them together and they're probably the targets. It's my trout,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 2>like I mentioned risky in my words. And then the

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 2>opposite of that, Brian Reynolds. I have Brian Reynolds. I

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 2>think on every roster construction I've done so far, as

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 2>far as NFBC, like DC's and fifties go, Brian Reynolds

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 2>has been like a major target of mine because that

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>is a floor out fielder who does a little bit

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>of everything, a little bit of runs, a little bit

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of RBI, good batting average, twenty plus homers, ten plus

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 2>stolen bases, not as sexy as some of these other guys,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 2>but it mitigates some of the risk. Most likely, if

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 2>you've been listening, you can tell at some point, I'm

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna take a shot. I'm gonna take a risk somewhere.

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 2>It could be a picture, it could be Trout, it

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 2>could be an led La Cruz. I'm gonna take it somewhere.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 2>So you've got to have your back up in my mind,

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 2>you have to have your backup plan of who are

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 2>the safe options that help that. There are some pictures

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.959
<v Speaker 2>that we'll talk about in the next episode, and there's hitters,

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and Brian Reynolds, to me is one of those hitters.

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 2>That's a good like all right, I can take a breath.

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>This guy's gonna help fix some of the problems if

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>things don't work out with what identify I took Kyle

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Schwarber and all that. By the way, if Kyle shr

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>if you didn't look at his batting average, Kyle Schwarber

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 2>was an elite three category player. Elite elie I mean

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 2>we talked about.

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Last was such a deficit, you know when he doesn't

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>steal bases really so you know.

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>You know what he is. He's the power hitting version

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 2>of kind of like Nico Horner where I was. I

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 2>admit in the last episode, Nico Horner is not quite

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 2>elite in three categories, but he's high up. He's like

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 2>elite stolen bases, really good batting average and maybe elite runs.

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's three categories. The other stink, Well that's Kyle Schwarber,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and he stinks stolen bases and stinks in batting average.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 2>But if I were to take one of those type

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 2>of guys, specifically Shorber, Brian Reynolds is a great backbone

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>for that because he just evens it out.

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>If I was in a deep three outfielder league, three

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>active outfielders, I think Yelich, Brian Reynolds and then taking

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>a shot at Riley Green later on the draft was

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly the kind of boys I'd like to go, like

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if I missed out early on the big album.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Ya, I was about to say, if you go late,

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 2>because the strategy is a little bit different. Five to

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>three outfielders.

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>It is, it is, But I'm just saying if it's

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>If that's the format, I think that makes some sense

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of getting the best bang for your buck.

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you one hundred percent. I've always been a

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Brian Reynolds guy. Everybody who's watching the show for years

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>knows that steady floor things you can count on, and

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds has been that dude. All right. The outfield threes

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this is where we start to get a little wacky. Here.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>You gotta see some guys here with some positives and

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>some negatives attached to them, and also some guys that

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you're not exactly sure where they're gonna play. Spencer Steeer

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>at twenty five, Evan Carter twenty six. I've already voiced

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>my concerns about him, Jordan Walker at twenty seven, Lane

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Thomas at twenty eight, Tiascar Hernandez at twenty nine, Anthony

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Santan dere at thirty let's stop here. I want to

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>compare the Baltimore guys because Mullins is at thirty one.

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about this first grouping here. You

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>were a big Jordan Walker guy. Last year. It was

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a you know, getting sent up and down kind of year,

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>filling out, you know, the first year of his MLB

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>service time. Do you think Jordan Walker is ready to

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>hit the ground running in twenty four.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean he was sent down because of the defense,

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Like he was hitting two seventy eight. I think at

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the time he was sent down and we were like, whoa.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 2>You see a lot of young players struggle with getting

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 2>the ball up in the air. Sometimes you're gonna see

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 2>them struggle with barreling, and that's just something that time takes.

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 2>That's one of the arguments for Eli Da La Cruise.

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Eli Day La Cruz had like sky high ground ball rate,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.479
<v Speaker 2>three degree launch angle, low bit. Those are things that

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 2>improve over time as long as you are a competent hitter,

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 2>and Jordan Walker is like an incredibly competent hitter, been

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 2>working all off season getting bigger. I think Mason Wynn

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>had put out the report shortstop for the Cardinals that

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 2>he was. I think he put on like fifteen to

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty pounds of muscle this offseason. He's got incredibly, incredibly

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 2>great bat speed with a contact approach that's going to

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 2>hit for power, salt in person in the AFL, I

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 2>love Jordan. I think Jordan Walker's a twenty twenty guy

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 2>this year. I'm in on him big time. And I

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 2>will say my other favorite, just to throw it out.

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I love Taoscar Hernandez. I really really do. Taoscar Hernandez

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 2>goes into a I think it's a better for right

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 2>handed hitters, or at least comp Oh no, no, because

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 2>it's a Seattle exponentially better ballpark factor. I was thinking

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 2>Toronto exponentially better ballpark factor. Going from Seattle, which is

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.959
<v Speaker 2>the worst, and going to the Dodgers, which is a

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 2>mid pack team, good hard hit numbers, he's essentially on

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 2>part with where he's been when he was in Toronto,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the year before he hit thirty five homers.

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Similar factors in LA. And you go into that lineup

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 2>that may want to not attack some of the top

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 2>end of the of the staffs and also may want

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 2>to attack harder the back end of the lineup, so

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 2>they're not giving extra opportunities to get Otani and get

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 2>bets up. All I'm saying is like, I think to

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 2>Oscar Hernandez is gonna hit thirty plus this year. I

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna come back in it. And it was

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 2>a great signing by the Dodger. So I really love

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>his new destination.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I remember when the Otani signing happened. I

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>think I said to you, I was like, you know,

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I still feel like that lineups a little top heavy.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>When we start making signs like this, it starts to

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>length in that lineup, like it just it just really

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>does makes a big difference there. So we're in agreement there.

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Santander A another big power season. Cedric Mullins a down

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>year for him, with Hestin kirs Dad, with some of

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the other talent that you have. You know in this mix,

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is Mullins in danger of maybe getting dell tire or

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>losing out some playing time coming off a year we

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>hit just two thirty three, the stolen bases were down.

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>I know he had some injuries, he only played one

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixteen games, but still, do you think Mullins

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that isn't long for Baltimore or do

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you think they say, no, Mullins is our guy, bad

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>year right off, and he might actually suppress the value

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>of some of the youth in Baltimore.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good question. I kind of find it

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 2>hard to believe that, like the team would trade like

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 2>another veteran, Like you're just gonna have a bunch of

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 2>like twenty two year olds like running around like it's

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 2>like a college team. Maybe they do. I think Mullins

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 2>is still like a top end of the lineup type

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>of hitter. He still steals bases. I think they believe

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 2>in him. Defensively works. I think he would more suppress

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the Colton Kowsers of the world than them want to

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 2>move them, especially because they're Pennant running this year like

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 2>they're going for it now. If Baltimore just completely falls apart, yeah,

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I think Mullins is gone. I think he's absolutely gone.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think that's gonna happen with Baltimore. I

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 2>think they have a legit shot to win this division,

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 2>but if it did, that would be the spot. He's

0:22:58.240 --> 0:22:59.959
<v Speaker 2>another one of those guys. Mullens is kind of like

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 2>he's in that not super exciting major target. But we

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe should pay attention because these are like twenty plus

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 2>stolen bases outside of the top one hundred, and we

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>really should pay attention to those type of players. So

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 2>there might be some potential, but I just don't know

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 2>if the struggles are gonna keep him at the top

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 2>of a lineup. I think that's where you're gonna fall apart.

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Like I think Jackson Holiday is making the opening day roster.

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>You've got Gunner Hender you know, you got a lot

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 2>of like interesting bats there.

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Take me through the Orioles opening day, like, Okay, Jackson

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Holliday makes the roster. We know where Gunner Henders is

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna play, like, you know, like we know some of

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the things already, like who gets squeezed. Somebody's got to

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>get sqeezed somewhere here.

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So we'll go over to roster resource. Right now.

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 2>They current And by the way, we found out that

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Holiday isn't play second base for the team, not shortstop.

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 2>So here's how the lineup works and roster resource. They've

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 2>got Gunner leading off, They've got Adlee hitting two. I

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 2>think that's locked. You've got Santander at three, and then

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 2>it goes, Oh, Hernon Hayes that ain't locked. Mullins is

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 2>hitting six, mount Castle at seven, Jackson Holiday at eight,

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 2>and Jordan Wag at nine, So there is room.

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>For you're kind of locking him Mountcastle at DH because

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where you want him.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, yeah, well, because I got a Herne

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>at first, but that could be Heston Kerstadt. I do

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 2>think there's a possibility that what you could do is

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 2>you could have Mullens laid off Adlee at two and

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Gunner at three, So there is I think there's room

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 2>for that improvement to happen with Cedric Mullins, and there's

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 2>still kind of some lineup. If you look at that lineup,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 2>you go, he's not necessarily holding anybody back, like they

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.239
<v Speaker 2>might get right rid of Austin Hayes before they get

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 2>rid of Cedric Mullins.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Heston Kirstadt is the guy that I keep coming

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>back to. I told you I like that player a

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>lot and very excited to see him this year. All right,

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's continue on with this grouping here, because after

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore guy's at thirty two, you have Ian Happ

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Suri Ruiz thirty three, overall all TJ. Friedel at thirty four,

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Riley Greed at thirty five, So Leira thirty six, who

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>just signed with San Francisco as of us recording this.

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So again, this is where the drop off is, Ruiz.

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>You know a guy one dimensional like he's there for

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>stone bases, but for a guy who steels as many bases,

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's not scoring enough runs. At the same time,

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Green is the guy that I circle on this list.

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I think we started to see the potential that I

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>don't think this ADP is going to hold or this

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>ranking is going to hold as we get deeper into March.

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Would you agree with that statement that Green is one

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of these guys that you know is going to be

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, people start to see him. That's gonna start

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to get talked about more in the fantasy baseball community.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>That ADP the ranking, everything's going to rise. So now

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 1>is you're kind of your best value early on?

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not sure he'll be a massive, massive riser,

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 2>but he will. And I agree with you, this is

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the guy. This is the guy that I would target

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the two guys of all the guys you said in

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 2>this grouping, I like Riley Green, and I actually really

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 2>like Jorge Solaire. He's just a guy kind of continuously

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 2>trying to get late power from He's got a team

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 2>he's locked in, gonna hit in a prominent spot in

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the lineup for the Giants. I mean, I think the

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 2>best hitting environment. But that's fine. I'm totally into him.

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 2>But Riley Green is a player that I want. He's

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 2>ranked higher than what he is his ADP is going for,

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 2>which is a really odd one. He's one of the

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 2>biggest risers on that and a big hard hit numbers.

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Barreling health was a problem. I think he's going to

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 2>get over that twenty mark. I personally think he's going

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 2>to hit over twenty five this year. I just don't

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 2>know if they'll be like hype around a Tigers outfielder

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna make him go crazy. But I won't disagree

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 2>with you saying this is the best time because like

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>his ADP's around. I think it's one thirty four on

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Pro's ADP, the consensus ADP.

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And thirty fifth player overall one hundred and seventy in

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>ADP consensus right now.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't love it if he gets inside the top

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 2>one hundred or something like that. So yeah, take him

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 2>now and you.

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Might get him at a better one seventy average ADP. Like,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to outperform that, Like I just do.

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I think he's he's a better player than that. I

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>think he's a guy that has twenty twenty potential. You

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>saw the batting average come up last year. I think

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Riley Green's finally starting to figure it out. And look,

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>that's great because you know Torkolsen figured out in the

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>second half last year. I want the Tigers to be

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>respectable again. You know, I grew up in the eighties

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Tigers had some respectable teams, Like this is

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a good you know, the pitchers have not panned out,

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know they really.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, they got scooball the Colt Keith is going.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 1>To be in the line. No, but I'm talking about

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>like that Manning group, like all those guys that were

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>coming through, Like oh yeah, Casey, none of those guys

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>have worked out the way that you know we thought

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>once upon a time. All right, outfield four, here we go.

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>This grouping starts with number thirty seven, Masatake Yoshida than

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>James Outman at thirty nine, Chas McCormick at thirty nine

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and Jackson Churio at forty. Let's stop there. Uh look,

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I know he's just a boy, but Churio is a

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>special player. I think this is too low Welsh. What

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think I think he's Yeah, I understand that. Okay, okay,

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>let's rank him at forty. I get it. But to me,

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>he's much closer to twenty than he is to forty

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of rank.

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 2>So my caveat always is totally I'm a prospect person,

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>but I don't typically hone in on prospects in redraft

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 2>leagues except when their values. And you know, Corbyn Carroll

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 2>ended up not being well, he ended up being in

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 2>value because he just completely destroyed all expectations. But like

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 2>he jumped in to the top fifty, and when these guys,

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, further further up, that makes it tough. Here's

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 2>the deal, though, none of these guys are why at

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Langford's Jackson Curio, Jackson Holiday, They're not jumping up because

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 2>people are a little bit timid because they're not getting

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 2>what they want to hear, guaranteed roster spot. But Churio's

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>got the contract. Murphy, well, but he's got a hard

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 2>ass in Pat Murphy being his coach, So like that's

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 2>a little like if there's a guy that would you know,

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 2>didn't run out a ball that would probably bench him,

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 2>it would be Pat Murphy. But my point is is,

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>like these guys aren't being given the extra benefit because

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>if Jackson Chiroo had a guaranteed spot, I don't see

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>how anyone would let him slip out the top one hundred.

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Same thing with Jackson Holiday, same thing with Langford, and

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 2>same thing with Junior Camenaro. They're all late. So because

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of that, I'm targeting them. I won't take them all

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 2>because that is way too much risk. But Jackson Curio

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 2>is a great power speed combination. He has some strikeout

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>issues that I think could still be prevalent, but he

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 2>has the best fantasy combination of tools I think than

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>any of these guys. So absolutely I'm in on, sure

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 2>you go if I can get him. The only problem

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 2>is he's the number one of the rookies, not counting

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Evan Carter, but the other four. He's the number one

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of those guys that is going right now because of

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the extended contract.

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>As you should. Brandon Nimmo a forty one, really solid player.

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of the like he should be in the

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>top forty I think, because I mean, do you feel

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>better about Outman or Nimo? I feel better about Nimo.

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, Nemo safer if I want batting average and runs,

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Nemo safer. But I think Outman has louder counting stat potential.

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 2>But he's in hit at the again. Hitting at the

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 2>bottom of a Dodgers lineup, though, just doesn't mean anything.

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>It's like the Braves too, It's like that I'd rather

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 2>that than hitting four for the Pirates.

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't know, I understand that thought process,

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but I just feel I'll take the safer Nimo over Outman,

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Who's a couple of spots ahead of Nimo right now

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in points leagues especially too. Neimo's a very safe player.

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Forty two Barcelo Zoner than Tommy Edmund, Jared Duran, Lars Newt,

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>bar Stephen Kwan, Wyatt Langford, and Chris Morrell at forty eight.

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>You're a big new bar guy last year. What do

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you think about him at forty five this year?

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm still down with the Newt. I really want him

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>to be able to you know, I really want him

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 2>to do. I heard this rumor when he was in

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the AFL a couple years ago that he had trademarked

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Duke Bar as a protein bar and it never came

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 2>to fruition. I want him to make that bar, and

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 2>I want the Newt bar, but I want new Bar

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 2>to start implementing a lot of that drive line stuff

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 2>that he's been doing while taking batted balls, hard hitted

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 2>batted balls and putting them in the air, and the

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Homers to start going.

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It feels like a bounce back for the Cardinals this year,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it Like it made some of those like I

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>know they were aggressive on the pitching market with all

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the veterans they signed, right the Grays and the Lynns

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and all these guys they brought in there, Like I

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>think they were like, look, you know, especially once Corbyn

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Burns is now out of that Division two. I don't know,

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>but it feels like Saint louis so back in.

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 2>This might be like super annoying to hear for anybody,

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>but just as if you want anecdotal stuff like there's

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 2>no WBC this year, you know, new Bar was gone

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and Goldie was playing for teams like I'm not saying

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>that that has to be a distraction, but there's maybe

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 2>that was a small setback to the focus, the concentration

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 2>and where Nutbar needed to be. That's just kind of

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 2>like narrating what I want to happen. But guess what,

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 2>he's outside the top forty. I think he's a great

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 2>outfield option to target, as do I Jared Duran. Jaron

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Duran is a huge target for me as well. That

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>by the way, rumors that the Padres were talking to

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 2>them about Jared Duran really which would be really interesting

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 2>with the Red Sox. But Duran is almost guaranteed full

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 2>time playing time, big stolen based numbers, had huge hard

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>hit numbers last year. I think he's ready to take

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 2>a big fantasy jump. It'll be interesting though if he

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 2>were to be traded. I don't know how I would

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 2>feel about that that a Red Sox team. Again, it's

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 2>just rumors. It may not happen, but Red Sox team

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 2>giving up on him like that, But I'd be a

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 2>pretty powerful offense either way. Neotbar and Duran, I'll take

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 2>both of them.

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel like the Red Sox have much of

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a plan anymore. Isn't just me like that front offense.

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Ever since the Moviie trade, I still trying to figure

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>out what the hell they're doing. I think you can.

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I think the fans are doing the same thing.

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you could circle the Mookie Bets trade, and

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>ever since you're watching the Red Sox just slowly kind

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of just throw their hands up, like we don't really

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>have a plan.

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Here, you know. Management they brought in Kyle Body, who

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 2>was a creator of drive Line, and he can probably

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 2>do some wonders with that pitching staff. So that's a

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>first start. Craig Breslow is going to be there. That's

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 2>a really good start. I do think what they probably

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 2>look at they look at an offense that doesn't fit

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 2>what they're looking for long term. It's like we have Devers,

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 2>we have Cassas, and then we just have stuff. They

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 2>have minor leaguers on the way, but I don't know.

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know where Duran fits. I don't know where

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 2>some of these guys fit for them. So I agree

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 2>with you. I don't know if offensively they've built quite

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 2>enough of a plan where I think they feel okay

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 2>where they are pitching.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Whyat Langford to forty seven, that's a player we're both

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>high on. Let's talk about why at Langford your expectations here. Again,

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you might have to be patient, but at forty seven

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>overall on the outfield list, you think that's good enough

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for patience to pay off.

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so. I pushed him up really high

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 2>at one point early in the year, I talked myself

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>down a little bit as they've poured some cold water

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 2>on potentially him starting out. Also, this might seem stupid,

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>but like Seger, maybe having you to start at DH

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 2>might give one less opportunity for Langford and they may

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 2>want some you know, they may want an extra, an

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 2>extra infielder to cover for shortstop with Sieger not being

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 2>able to play it. So maybe that is the reason

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 2>that they push Langford out to start the year. But

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 2>I do think he is up within the first month

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 2>unless he struggles, and I think he has a better

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to win an Ale Rookie the Year than I

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 2>do Evan Carter. And maybe I'm just being too negative, Nancy,

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 2>but I placed a future on Rookie of the Year

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 2>future on Why at Langford a little bit earlier in

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the year. So I'm big, big obp skills, big power,

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 2>trouty type of body to me, and he's running. Yeah,

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 2>he looks like the real deal. But we need a

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 2>bigger sample size, and I think it might start in

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 2>the minors before the majors. But I'll still take it

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 2>in the late forties because we're now in a space

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 2>where like you can replace, you could take him, and

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 2>you can replace for a short period of time.

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Closing out outfield five here now forty eight. We just

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>did morel So after that, Kerry Carpenter at forty nine.

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Then Eloia Menez who's gonna be dhing at fifty var

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>show at fifty one again, check your leagues for local

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:24.240
<v Speaker 1>listings of eligibility lords Guriel, then Tyler o'near, Jared Kellnick,

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>who's now with the Atlanta Braves. What do you make

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of that trade in the off season, That's what we

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>really haven't talked about much. Many you know, start off

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>real hot. Everyone thought, Okay, we're all good. He's finally

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>figured it out, and then you know, kind of right

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:36.720
<v Speaker 1>back to square one. It feels like a lot. Then

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>when an organization like the Braves comes around and picks

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 1>you up, I'm always very intrigued. It's like when the

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.280
<v Speaker 1>rays sign a pitcher. You know, it was a conversation

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 1>we had last year about Efflyn. I was like, oh,

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited about effeled with Tampa. Uh just well,

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>certain organizations just kind of have a way of magic

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>wand that they wave and all of a sudden, these

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>guys we should come useful again.

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 2>I would say, I don't want to like bury it

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 2>or repeat, so like, go listen to the Bold Prediction Show.

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I have kell Nick segment in there, but suffice it

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to say I like it. I definitely like to move.

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 2>And you know, one of the negatives to the trade

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 2>very early on was oh he might platoon with von Grissom.

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Grism's gone. He traded on to Boston.

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So that to Boston to Boston, how he feels a

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>good trade?

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 2>That was a good trade.

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess von Grisson to me, I'm not you know,

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a von Grissom guy. I just haven't been.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll see, we'll see if I'm right or wrong. Guriel

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>O'Neil Kelnick then Sewinsky at fifty five, Taylor Ward of

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty six, Starling Marte fifty seven, Jad Martinez still without

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a home. We'll see what happens is a thirty home

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>run season for him. Again, these are DHS slash outfielders here.

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Utility guys were talking about as well. In the outfield,

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Max Kepler, Tavares, that's the top sixty here. Outside of sixty,

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>their names like Brent Rooker, you know who had a

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>really good power season, Giagarlos Stanton, who was still a

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>big name, although in terms of playing games, like he

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred games last year, hit twenty four runs.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Like he's kind of like a is what he is,

0:35:57.760 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>almost like.

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 2>A fun little scratcher, like a little it's like a

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 2>two dollars scratcher, got you bet on.

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>For a home run prop. He's not a guy I

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 1>want on my fantasy team anymore. I feel like that's it.

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>And then you have weird situations like Alex Vradugo with

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees. Now I can't believe Alex Vrdugo and Marcus

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Stroman or Yankees if there are two human beings that

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, in terms of their effervescence and personality

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really fit the historic I wish George Steinbrenner was

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>still alive, Like I love to see that meeting between

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>these guys that's gonna be really fascinting to see how

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to place out it really is, because they are very

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>outspoken guys. Uh. Some people really like him in the clubhouse,

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>some do not. And the Yankee culture, I don't know.

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>You think there's like a change here going on the

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Yankee culture where I don't want to say they're getting desperate,

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>but they're certainly opening themselves up to things maybe they

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>weren't previously looking for in terms of player personalities that

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 1>are now personnel decisions they have to make because there's

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>deficits on this team they have to fill.

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 2>You know, what's interesting about what you said is I

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 2>don't think there's a real well reason.

0:36:56.360 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>How many organizations now Dodgers red so right, Like he's

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>bound a couple of times here.

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>But but you know he was actually I remember here

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 2>a little thing in the AFL when he was here

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 2>years and years and years ago. He had one of

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.399
<v Speaker 2>the worst performances here. What I was gonna say is like, oh,

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 2>you know what, the Yankees lack of leadership, Like Judge

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 2>is not really like a leader, Garrett Cole not really

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 2>a leader. Rizzozo percent can be, but that's not his

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 2>deal right now.

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>He's looking for to get paid.

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 2>I didn't see any Yeah, I mean I saw I

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 2>saw him a lot with the padres in and camp

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that. And I mean you walk into

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 2>a situation where Manny Machado is kind of like the

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 2>leader and Tatis, but he never exemplified that. But like

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Rizzo might be the guy. My whole point was, like,

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:43.720
<v Speaker 2>it is interesting, that's a kind of leader list team,

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 2>but Rizzo might be the guy that you worry about,

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 2>those big personalities, kind of running a muck. But I

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 2>hadn't really thought about like that, Rizzo. There's probably a

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:55.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of platoony that's going on Strowman and uh later outfield. Eh,

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 2>That's why I want to try to get in on this.

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 2>If I'm in a three outfielder league, I don't feel

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 2>the pressure and the weight as much. But my strategy

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 2>would be get one of the upper tier Ish guys.

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Then you could even play in the middle for like

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 2>a Brian Reynolds, and then you could play a little

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 2>bit deeper the Riley Greens that are falling. Give me

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Luis Robert, Brian Reynolds and Riley Green. Bam, we're good

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 2>five outfielders. Where the pressure happens, the position can get

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 2>behind you. You could take one good dude, Hey, I

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 2>went out and I got Corbyn Carroll and now all

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden you let it go. You miss out

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 2>on Brian Reynolds. And now your outfielder two is Riley Green,

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 2>But then your outfielder three is you know, I mean,

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 2>I guess I should look at this list here. Your

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 2>outfielder three is Ian happ and then your outfielder four

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 2>is further down here Tyler O'Neill, and your outfielder five

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 2>is I really looking at John Carlos Stanton? Am I

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 2>really looking at it?

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So? I just don't want to let the position get

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 2>too far ahead of me. So be more cognizant. If

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 2>you're in a five outfielder, if you prioritize some of

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 2>those guys a little bit early, you could have an advantage.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 2>But don't go nuts in three outfielder because there is

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 2>some decent depth through the first thirty five or so.

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 2>But where you know, Scott White I did an episode

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 2>with he had said, you know, win in doubt, take

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 2>outfield I think we've moved beyond that a little bit

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 2>where we have a better understanding. But keep an eye like.

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Better than last round. Last year was terrifying. I think

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we all like.

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Neighborhood watch, feel like a neighborhood watch sign. But it's

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 2>just like outfielder, like, just make sure we're all watching

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 2>outfield better than last year.

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Again, some of the youth that's coming through here, I

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a lot to be excited about. Some of

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the guys you know, getting healthy too, better than last year.

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Still a drop off, still clear, Still some land mines

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to you to avoid. But who are some of your

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>favorites we want to hear from you? Drop your comments

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>below in the YouTube channel. Let us know. Don't forget

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to Fantasy Bros MLB. Yeah, and make sure

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you also ring that bell for notifications to Licko's ding

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>because we've got Fantasy Fest coming up on the fifteenth

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of March. We've got Leading Off coming up right after that.

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Every single day the Welsh and I talk a baseball

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:03.280
<v Speaker 1>amazing times here over what's happening?

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 2>How did that? How did we get to that spot?

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, we're here already. Uh, never sleep, that's

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure. From football to NFL draft coverage, now to

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>baseball coverage here so my head is spinning here. But

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>by all means, keep giving me crap about me mispronouncing

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 1>one name over and over again on the name.

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 2>You Reagan's Reagans. There we go.

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Me the YouTube comments because I got a thick skin

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and the time they're fun. And you know what, now,

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna call him dragons over and over again.

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 2>I actually told Joe that when he was and I

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 2>was just comment didn't.

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm gonna do. Just keep you keep all

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the comments, you know, making fun of you. That's fine.

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna keep doing it.

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 2>And I told you you should. You should just you

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 2>should just lean into it now like I did.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I did lean into it the other day. But I'll mean,

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 1>look again, it's literally you're doing three shows in a day,

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and three different sports. I did an NBA show as well.

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes things kind of slip your mind a little bit.

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>But that it's okay. We're here for all of your

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>full service baseball, and uh, you know what, I'm gonna

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>go draft some shares of him right now on the

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>draft Wizard, just so I have some shares that I

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>could start to do some simulations and some regans, some

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>ragons let's call the whole thing off, Let's call the

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>show off. Everybody that'll do it for us, But the

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>story of the game goes on for the Welsh. I'm

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Joey P. We'll see you next time, kids, Ray guns blazing.