WEBVTT - Markets, Diamonds, And Autonomous Driving

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I want to get

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>um straight back to markets here. The volatility has been

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>uh uh really, I don't want to say unprecedented, but

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been unique certainly. And uh it's come through commodity,

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>from commodities, through rates into stocks and Um, right now

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk to somebody who has to put his

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>money where his mouth is. Phil Palumbo is the CEO

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of Palumbo Wealth Management. Um, how do you deal with

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of situation? Phil? How do your clients deal

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>with this kind of volatility? Well? First, I think you

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>know you have to. You have to put it on

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the table that we could bank on the recession at

0:00:58.280 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty two, if not the beginning of

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the way I look at it, the binary decision for

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the FET it's either he's going to let inflation run

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>or he's gonna have to step in and raise interest

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>rates aggressively, and he doesn't want to do both, which

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>tells me that it's going to be a hard landing

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>versus a soft landing, which is going to create increased

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>volatility and eventually put us into a recession. And so

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>how do you invest around that given that there are

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>so many uncertainties. I mean, it feels like a fifty

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>basis point hike next week has been all but ruled out,

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but where the FED goes from there is still a question.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Like Matt was saying earlier, I think there's still six

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>hikes are so priced into the next year, but again seven,

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So look at WORP, W I RP, going do I

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time on that page just staring

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers, not quite sure what to make of it.

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But each number represents a basis basis hike, basis point hike. Okay, okay,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So point being there that you know there's still seven

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>hikes priced in, but you have started to see some

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>chatter that those bets could be paired back. How do

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you position your portfolio around that those bets will will

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>be paired back? The fact is not gonna be able

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates seven times will be in a recessment

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>before that happens. So in the meantime, I've been very

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>vocal about to see when I was on your show,

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>two evaluations were aggressively high, whether it's the high flying technology,

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the technology sector, or even just d SMP five DRED,

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So those were opportunities to reduce risk and rebound portfolios.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a fully invested investor, and you've been

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>over the past three plus years, you actually performed well

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Project two. If you didn't take risk off the table

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>any type of big run ups in the markets like

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw yesterday, which will happen during these situations, you

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>should reduce risk from your portfolio. That's number one. Number

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>two you should be looking at heads equity strategies within

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>your equity portfolio to protect you on the downside. Three

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is you should have gold and you should have commodities,

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>which have been always very vocal with that. Within a

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>balanced portfolio, gold and commodities when inflation accelerates does really well,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and history going back to an eight proves that, and

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>gold is a hedge against stocks going down. So if

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you're truly balance properly, which most people are not, this

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is the thing that you can be doing to help

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>counter balance risk when we do enter in a recession

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at some point at the end of twenty two in

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of twenty three. So what you're saying, we're

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>now an environment where you want to sell the rallies

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>rather than buy the dip. Absolutely, you sell the rip

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and you don't buy the dip in this environment. However,

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the only thing I will say though, is that for

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>new money, which have a lot of clients that sold

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses and have new capital, this is the best time

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to come into new money, right because you're getting the

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to be able to build out a portfolio when

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got valuations that are declining here, right, So this

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a great opportunity to buy stocks of

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>great businesses at a cheaper level. So for new money,

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's excellent. You know. For fully invested investors, you know

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be in for some pain again. Hopefully you

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>did some rebalancing and you and you have a properly

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>balanced portfolio to help you muscle through this. Can we

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about the yield curve a little bit, because I'm

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at the twos tens spread. It got below twenty

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>basis points earlier this week, you know, a few banks

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>or at least one bank has suggested it could invert

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it in the next week or so. How much of

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the signal are you taking from that tremendous amount of signals?

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So Green Spin always said, tell me where the tenure is,

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'll tell you where the where the where the

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>where the economy is going. I say, tell me where

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve is. I'll tell you where the economy

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is going. The yield curve is flat, continue continues to

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>flatten out around twenty three basis points. The two is

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>intend that is going to invert. Somebody on TV just

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the other day just said if it inverts this time,

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>it's different. We're not going to go with the recess.

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's ridiculous. The track records accurate. And

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>then if you take that and you put on top

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of that forty year high inflation data a fetter reserve,

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna have to raise interest rates. We're coming off

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>extreme valuations before. When you put it all together and

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>connect the dots, I just don't see how you know,

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't like I keep on saying, you know, enter

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>into recession. So yield curve. To answer your question, is

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important aspects of of of the

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of the data points in terms of where we're going

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>with the economy. I just want to quickly get an

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>example of a hedge equity strategy. We're not getting too

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>deep in the weeds, the options weeds. What do you uh,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what would you advise? So what we did as a

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>firm is we spoke this, uh this this company called

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a Little Harbor. They have an e t F called

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>MSTB Mary Sam Thomas Boy. Essentially, what they do they

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>long d SMP five hundred and they use options vixed

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>through VIX futures to to hedge out the equity side

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of it. So about of our equity portfolios in this

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>particular exchange traded fund. We did this transaction September October

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>one and we're still along at right now. So the

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>thought is, if we do hit a recession, we go

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>into a bear market, we hope that they'll do what

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to do. Right, Um, that's number one. Typically

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we before that we had spy on that of our

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>clients portfolios. So now we just moved that to the

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>ms TWB to hedge out the the SNP five hundred,

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's what we're using. We don't use any types

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of collars on our equity strategies or we don't buy puts,

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, so we don't do any of the individual options.

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>We depend on other managers to do that for us.

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And just quickly, I mean, how is that strategy been

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>playing out? If I look at the VIX right now,

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's spent most of March above thirty with this particular

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>strategy of the sup full is greater than ten toll percent,

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>then the VIX the the options or uh, the risk

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on it down so we will actually kick in. So

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty much been fun with the SPV SPF just

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>been doing from pete to trough so far. So it

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't kicked in yet. It's only if you get

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a major waterfall decline where really will click, will click

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and protected that piece of the portfolio. Alright, Phil, great

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to get some time with you, very interesting stuff. Thanks

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Phil Palumbo there who runs

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>his own fun Palumbo Wealth Management and UM it used

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to be at UBS, spent years a decade at UBS,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and before that was at Morgan Stanley. So it's the

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>guy who knows what he's talking about. Very interesting m

0:06:51.640 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>edging strategy. Let's talk about cars. I'm ready, Really we're

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about light oar Angus Pacola joins us,

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>co founder and CEO of Auster And if you didn't know,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Austa is one of the hottest light our companies out

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>there right now, went public vias back in one and Angus,

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have you on the program. Um. I'm

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>still trying to get my head around sort of light

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>our versus Tesla um test because Tesla says they don't

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>want to use lighter but they have had partnerships and

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>light our companies. Why why is light are important? Right now? Sure?

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And before I answer that, I just want to give

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a brief kind of perspective on Auster and what we're

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.239
<v Speaker 1>doing in light are that stands apart and really Outster

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is the digital light our company building digital chips that

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>transform a legacy analog technology into the digital future. And

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and on the performance of benefits and affordability of digital technology.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>We diversus right, diversified across markets. So what what Tesla

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is lacking? And I think that what what Lighter brings

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to the table is an absolute trust in data quality

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>UM that that is not there with cameras. So what

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you see from Tesla is they've gotten in some hot

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>water because occasionally, and it is occasionally, the cars get

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>confused with camera technology because cameras, because cars are basically

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>because Tesla UM has neural networks to try and decipher

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>what they see in video, right like humans, but they're

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>not as good exactly right, Yeah, So a camera needs

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a neural network in order to interpret its environment UM,

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and that sometimes gets confused, and so it sometimes crashes.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's really that's a really challenging UM situation to

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>be in if you want to go to full autonomy,

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>where people aren't paying attention and they get to fall

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>suits in their cars. Lighter, on the hand, other hand,

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>directly measures the information that you care about with no

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>additional post processing, and it does it so reliably that

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Lighter is already used in safety critical environments across the

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>world like industrial settings UM and and it's trusted to

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>save people's lives day in and day out and has

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>for about thirty years in the industrial setting. So Lighter

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get confused and you can truly trust the data

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>with your life, and so Tesla aside. I mean, what

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>does adoption of light ar look like? Yeah, and that's

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that's really um So lidar is the third and kind

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of last critical sensing technology after cameras and ratear. Sensors

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and light are because you can trust your life on it,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and because it's so effective at understanding the true and

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>rich three D environment around anything any machine, whether it's rolling, flying, driving,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>or monitoring those moving objects. It's the perfect sensor for

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>bringing our entire world into the autonomy age. And I

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>think of it as it's like finally realizing the future

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Jetsons the Jetsons TV show laid out. So

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>flying cars drive and robots that delivery packages, um, safer

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>cross crosswalks with lower congestion at intersections, and yes, self

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>driving cars are all made possible because of lighter technology

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in combination with the autonomy technology stack that rides above it.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a really fantastic, safer, cleaner, less congested,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>more efficient, higher quality of life future that we're building

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:35.239
<v Speaker 1>through a combination of lighter sensors and and affordable autonomy technology.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>It does make sense. I mean from what you're saying,

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense to me to combine it with video

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and you don't need I guess, radar UM and and

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the neural network. But what Tesla says is that you

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have to pre map the environment with a light ar

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and then create a high dep map and then insert

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the lanes. And if you have to do that, it

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>seems like a lot of computing power. Yeah, I think

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that's just kind of that that's that's the legacy way

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about it. But most companies using LIDER today

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>don't pre map, and they do similar things. It's a

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>similar software stack and algorithmic stack to camera technology, but

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to rely as heavily on machine learning UM,

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>which is great. Machine learning is great at distinguishing between

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a hot dog and your cat in an image nine

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time, but it's not great at doing

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent of the time and an auto and

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>then you know, when when human life is involved, you

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to do it a d percent

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of the time. Solider allows you to remove some of

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the fancy machine learning, trust the data with your life,

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>just kind of the raw data coming out of the sensor,

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>but also apply some of the learnings that we've gotten

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>from the camera world. So you know, we don't have

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to pre map anymore. That's not what companies are doing today.

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It is what companies thought about doing five years ago,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>but the industry has moved on from that, and I

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think TUSSA was just kind of right in not premapping,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I solicited questions from our Blueberg news Print

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>team about what to ask you. And Andrew Grant said

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that the most important question for lighter companies right now

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is whether A d S or a v S are

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the most important market. A d S a d a

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>S being advanced driver assistant systems, a VS being autonomous vehicles.

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Which of those markets do you see is more important

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for your company? Yeah, well, well this is one of

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the places that OUST stands apart. So we've built this

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>more affordable, more performance digital lighter technology, putting lighter onto

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 1>literally one silicon chip, and that's allowed us to diversify

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>across many different applications and automotive, industrial, smarter prastruction, robotics,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and so we actually aren't trying to bet on whether

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a v S or eight ASS is the more important

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>market because we're playing in both. Our products are literally

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>good enough to play in both, just like digital cameras

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>are able to play in the eight ASS market and

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the AD market. Digital cameras go on telephone poles and

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they also go on the drones that are flying on bars. Um.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So digital technology is so flexible you can address all

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>these markets. And I actually am a big believer in

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>both ADAS and a v s now eight AS I

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think is the sure bet with huge volumes, and it's

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>it's more clear on how eight AS is moving from

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>L two plus hands on driver aware systems to L

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>three driver you know, hands free, eyes free systems, and

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they're lighter plays a huge part and allowing a person

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in the car to take notes on the way to

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>work and be hands free, eyes free. Um. But lighter

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is also the critical sensing technology on autonomous vehicles and

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in many cases it's the only sensor on an autonomous vehicle. UM.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>And so that's going to happen. But I think it's

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a little less because apes are such a high bar

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of technology and reliability. Are Our veteran war

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>reporter Greg Jarrett Angus points out that light ar is

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>extremely helpful in military applications. Do you, um, do you

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>see a big market there as well? Yeah, that's absolutely right.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So um, lighter can be incredibly useful in situations like convoying.

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a huge amount the number of support

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>vehicles in the military is far greater than the number

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of active kind of UH fighting vehicles. And that's where

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>most casualties happen in wars, and the supply chain, and

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>so there's immense opportunities to automate a supply chain. Um,

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>these vehicles should be automated. It's fuel trucks, it's it's

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>food trucks with all kinds of supply vehicles that historically

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>have been hit by their their I D s and

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>things like that, and you really would like those vehicles

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>just be autonomous. It's so fascinating. I wish we had

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>more time, Angus. Hopefully we can get you back. Thanks

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us and Angus. Pacola there the

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO of ALSTA. Let's get over now to Dave Harden.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>He is the founder and president of Summit Global Investors. Dave,

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you take from the kind of alatility that

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, you know, wash through commodities because of this

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>war um in two rates and and kind of you know,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on this side of the Atlantic, it hasn't rocked the

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>equity markets as much as it has on the other side,

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>but we still were, uh, you know, down three percent

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, up three percent yesterday, now we're down again today.

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you deal with this? Well, you know, this

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>volatility has made everybody understand that risk is important, right,

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So people people need to understand that risk management is

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>essential to having better portfolios. And the better they understand

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>what's in their portfolio, the better of the portfolio performers

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they hope. So having some exposure right now the commodities

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>or word overweight energy, I think those things are very

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>prudent in the portfolio. And maybe some people might even

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>say energies. The more defense you heard, the you know,

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the expert come on and say, hey, I think it's

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be here and settle into this range. And there's

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of truth to that. So it's really hard

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to go to somebody like Venezuela. It's really hard to

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>go to somebody out there that you know, we haven't

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>really been friends with with Iran and switch hands from

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>one dictator to another dictator. So from our standpoint, I

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>think you have to have some commodity exposure, energy exposure

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.479
<v Speaker 1>in your portfolio, and our models, from a quantitative perspective,

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>from a risk perspective, all tell us and a fundamental

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>outlook that having some of that exposure is important, but

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be volatile. So I think in a volatile

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>market you have to look for things to protect the

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>down and still get some of the upside. You know,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>mathematically people forget that if you only went down half

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of what the market went down every day, you would

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>only need to go up six in the up market

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to outperform. So it's a lot better to try to

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>protect in volatility than it is trying to get that upside.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, when the market's up to I want to

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>be up two point two. That's a lot harder to

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>do and you get crushed on the down. So my

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>advice and volatility is start to look at risk and

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>start to manage risk. And you can find that in

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>some defensives right now. You can find that in health

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>care right now. So that's some of the things that

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we're doing for our clients. And if we are six

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>short days away from the FED meeting, and the narrative

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.239
<v Speaker 1>for a few months now has been you know, the

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>FED put is dead. You're not going to see the

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>central bank come in and prop up asset prices. But

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the SMP five hundred flirting with correction territory.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>At what point do you think that makes FED policymakers blink? Well, um,

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they blinked when we when Russia invaded Ukraine. Remember that Thursday.

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>They came out and there was so much FED speak.

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>They were almost scared. And I'm putting in my language here.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to put words in their mouth, but

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they were almost scared to see a negative three and

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a half percent down day. They had to come out

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and talk about that they might not raise interest rates

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>as much and they might not do this. And we

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>saw that swing negative three and a half percent to

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>positive three and a half percent. Why only because the

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>FED right, So we've already seen them blink. They're they're

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>absolutely worried about this market. And I'm not saying they

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be, but the BED making a mistake, a policy mistake,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>has definitely increased because of what's going on in the

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>world today. Their their vision is not as clear. It's cloudy.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>If you will inflation, I mean seven point nine. Really,

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>what does it matter if it's seven point nine or

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>eight or set the point is seven inflation, that's the point.

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So they are backed into a corner um and this

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>creates a lot of problems and it increases the larger

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>downside risks. Again another reason why for our clients as

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole, you need to look at managing risks. We

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we do see the market is priced in a lot

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of of of hikes and I guess we'll talk with

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you about that a little bit later, David. Great having

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you on the program, Dave Harden talking to us about

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing. Now, now let's get over to Amos Shaw,

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the president of A. L. T R. Creed Diamonds, and

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've seen such incredible swings in commodity prices, Amish,

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if the diamond industry has been hit the

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>same way as um the moves we've seen in oil

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>or in gold, et cetera. Even though, of course the

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of diamonds that that you're creating are different than

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the kind that are mined. So the overall diamond industry

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in the inflationary situation in the last six months has

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>already seen almost like a price increase. However, with the

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>current situation of conflict with the Russia being almost of

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the diamonds in circulation in about twy of new production

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that comes in the system is everywhere from those areas.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Um there is no direct sanctions on diamonds, the sanctioned

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>around the bank as well as the CEO. However, it's

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the consumers sentiment that's going to make the most difference.

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>So with the consumers starting to talk about it, I

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think we're expecting a price search in a tightening of supply. Wow,

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean we all. I feel like it's been well broadcast.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>How big of a supplier of you know, energy of

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>natural gas Russia is haven't heard as much about diamonds.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting that this is happening at the same

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>time as you know, we're heading into a so called

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>wedding boom. I don't know. If I look at my mailbox,

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten so many safe the dates for the coming year,

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>how because they were put off for two years exactly exactly. So,

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean the fact that you do have you know

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>already you're seeing these price increases given the demand obviously

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is growing as well. I mean, how how much higher

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>do you think the prices could naturally go? Here? I

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think the consumer sentiment could rise this anything between ten. However,

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>UM geopolitically shift. Consumer today is starting to look at

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the options because today they have a choice. They have

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a choice of created diamonds, labgown diamonds that are grown

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>above the earth, that are not grown in these contract territories,

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>cutting polished in other countries, and jewelry is made either

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in US or in Asia. So they have a choice

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>with US going you know, we're expecting two point five

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>million million millennials to get married this to get engaged

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this year, So there is a choice. Um, the price

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be subjected to how long this conflict last?

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Where are your Where do you do all of your work?

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Where do you create your diamonds and cut and polish them?

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Is is Russia? Part of the supply chain? No are

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>growing is actually in India. Cutting and polishing is in India.

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.479
<v Speaker 1>The design of jewelry is done in United States. And

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>we finished jewelry between China and United States. How much

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>how much of competitor are you too? You know earth

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>mind diamonds. I mean when people are looking, um, do

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>they get to see both choices? Is price um roughly

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in line? Is the quality indistinguishable? So u A Alto

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>created diamond is chemically, optically and physically same as an

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>earth mind diamond. The only difference that's grown about the

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Earth from a price value being that we are not

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>a part of a monolith pricing strategy. It's demand and supply.

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So today, uh, it's almost a fifty better value. So

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you almost get a fifty percent larger diamond for the

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>same price. And the best part is over seventy of

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>consumers today that shop for engagement drinks are aware of

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 1>lab grown diamonds, and so, I mean, I could definitely

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>see how this would be a tail when for lab

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>grown diamonds. But what about some of the diamond alternatives.

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope I say this word right. Mossonites, that's something

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you hear about more and more as sort of a

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>substitute for exactly Yeah, I can't even pretend to pronounce that.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>But how how do you see that competitive landscape unfolding? Actually,

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this is very good you brought it up because in

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen UM the US Federal Commission made sure

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that these can no longer be even identified to look

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>like or market it as diamond alternatives. Cubic, zirconia and

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>moisonite are actually formed from chemicals. One is their conium

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>dioxide and another is another chemical that is given the

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>form in a structure to look like a diamond. They're

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>actually not diamonds. Only earth mine diamonds and lab grown

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>diamonds and ultra created diamonds are carbon. They are diamonds.

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting I'm seeing such a broad price range um

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>when I look up just google Altar created diamonds and

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>click on the shopping tab. Some of them are two

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>rand three grand for two carrots. Some of them are

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen grand for two carrots. So it depends on the quality.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Just like earth Mind diamonds, the difference of prize is

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>relative to the characteristics the shape, the size, the color

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and clarity. They are graded just like earth Mind diamonds

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because they're both diamonds, and hence the pricing is uh

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Four Seas and ultimately the demand and supply

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for them, and thee very important thing that has changes.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Technology evolved, the value has got better for the consumer

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and excessibility has gone easier. All right, Amy, thanks so

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us, Amy Shaw, their president of alter

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Created Diamonds. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three, pet On Ball Sweeney,

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwid at Bloomberg Radio m