WEBVTT - Perpetual Motion Machine: Adani, MSTR, OSTK

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast. You're a

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>weekly podcast where we talk about stuff related to money.

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levin and I write the Money Stuff column

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>he Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>What are we talking about today, Katie?

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about a Donnie Sure, what's going on.

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about micro strategy. There's a lot

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to say there, and we're going to talk about short selling,

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the favorite topics in the money

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Stuff universe.

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>That's good or saying yeah, you don't care about.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>It, I'm going to politely agree. This was interesting. So

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>got I'm a Donnie. US prosecutor's a qu a Donnie

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>who is one of the world's richest people of promising

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to pay more than two hundred and fifty million dollars

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>in bribes to Indian government officials to win solar energy contracts.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>This was very interesting on a number of different levels.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't read a lot about brivary I love

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>bribary cases. I read about them some it's so interesting.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>One thing that's interesting is like usually when you have

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>a bribery case, it's like and then they handed the

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>bag of cash to the official right, or like there's

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 2>emails being like the official would really like to buy

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>his mansion now here. It's like all of the like

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 2>emails they quote sound legitimate because what it says is like,

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>to win these power contracts, they had to pay incentives

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 2>to the state power companies, And so they would say

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 2>things like we need to pay incentives to the state

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>power companies. And it's like, well that sounds fine. Paying

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the state power companies rebate for buying power seems fine.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Now paying the state power company executives two hundred million

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>dollars is that? But so the stuff they quote makes

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>it clear that it's going to these people personally. You know,

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I read a lot about like how if you were

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 2>to pay bribes. None of this is ever legal advice,

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 2>but I read a lot about how if you were

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to pay bribes, you should try to make them look

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>business like and not like a sack of cash and

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 2>like winking emails saying I've given you the chickens, but

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 2>just like, yes, we're paying incentives to make a commercially

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 2>viable contract with the state power company, you know, and

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 2>if it happens to go to the executives personally, then

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 2>like you can prove it.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Hearing you describe that kind of reminds me of the

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Eric Adams emails with the airline, and one of his

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>staffers was like, no, you got to make it look

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a little legit. He put that in an email or

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>she I don't know, yeah, put that in an email.

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I only read like the charging documents from the SEC

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and from the Department of Justice, and so one assumes

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 2>they have evidence and testimonies saying oh, yeah, we gave

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 2>them the money personally. But it's actually weird because it's like,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 2>for one thing, these numbers are so large. If you're

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>paying two hundred million dollars, it doesn't sound like you're

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 2>paying two hundred million dollars to the power company. It's

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>like that's a big bribe.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, two hundred and fifty million.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And the bribes are weird because it's like one

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 2>of them is like they did deals with different Indian

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>states and so one of them it's like they paid

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>several hundred thousand dollars. So yeah, that sounds like a

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 2>bride and when I was like, they paid several hundred

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 2>million dollars, Like that sounds like a legitimate business expense.

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 2>And like also the guy who got two hundred thousand

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>dollars must be annoyed reading this indictment, like I could

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>have gotten two hundred million dollars. Strange.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Something that maybe you can expand upon is how this

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>ties into the US, Like US prosecutor, yes, are alleging

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that he bribed the Indian government. Like why is the

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>US getting involved?

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So part of the answer is the US loves

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 2>to get involved. Like there are much crazier cases than this, right,

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I love like Olympic doping cases where it's like, you know,

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 2>in Paris, a foreign athlete gets drugs from a foreign

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>doctor and the US is like, ah, that's undermining international

0:03:58.440 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>sport and they'll bring charges.

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, you know when an American athlete could

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>have won that race.

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point, thank you.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I think about this a lot anyways.

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Go on doping your horse. But everything sort of flows

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>through New York, you know. Like part of the answer

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is that a Donnie Green, which is the a Donnie

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Group entity that allegedly paid the bribes, like they had

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 2>like a partner on these power deals, and that's a

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 2>company called the Azure Global Power and that was for

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 2>a while listed in New York. But the main answer,

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 2>particularly in like the SEC case, is that a Donnie

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Green issued bonds. They did like an international dollar nominated

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 2>bond offering, and some of those bonds were sold to

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 2>US investors, and so allegedly they defrauded US investors. And

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 2>it's very interesting. Freud I wrote that this is basically

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 2>a green washing case because what happens is they issue

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>these bonds in twenty twenty one when they're paying the bribes,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 2>and they're allegedly paying the bribes, and they paid the

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 2>bonds back in twenty twenty four. So like nobody lost

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 2>any money. The investors are fine, the US investors a fine.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 2>How are they defrauded? Well, they were defrauded, because the

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 2>SEC makes a big point of saying, look at all,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 2>like the ESG promises that a Donnie puts in the

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 2>bond offering, like they're like, not only are we a

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>renewable power company, but we're also one that works in

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 2>developing countries and doesn't pay bribes and like you can

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 2>imagine being an ESG investor in twenty twenty one and saying,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>I would love to put money into a company that

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 2>does like renewable power which is green and very like

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 2>E and also works in developing countries, so it's like,

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, providing clean power to places where it's like

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>not as easy to fund solar projects. So it's like

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 2>s And then it doesn't pay bribes because like a

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 2>lot of you know, energy projects in developing countries, you

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>worry about it they pay bribes.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Good G.

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 2>It's some good G. And like the SEC says that

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Donnie Green position itself as a leader in environmentally conscious,

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 2>socially responsible and good corporate governance principles, and it sought

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to differentiate itself from its peers and other potential investments

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 2>or issuers and developing countries that might be susceptible to

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 2>corruption and bribery issues. Oh, if you're an ESG investor,

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 2>like you're looking at solar projects and development countries and like, oh,

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 2>these probably pay bribes and that's not very ESG. But

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 2>then Donnie's like, we do solar projects in India and

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 2>we don't pay bribes, and you're like, great, and those

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>people were defrauded because they allegedly invested in a company

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>that did pay bribes.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So there you go a detail that I love

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>about this whole thing. You talk about a Donnie Green,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about gotam a Donnie himself. The reason why

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>he is so rich and like so systemically important to

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the government and their ambitions and also the Indian stock market.

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>He made his money in coal mining. Oh sure, and

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>like this is all part of his broader reinvention.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, although like that's actually not that uncommon, Like

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of like energy and infrastructure companies are like

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 2>we also do green energy because like if you're in

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the energy business, you have some advantages and like yeah,

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 2>entering energy contracts better solar energy.

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I just like that he became greener and also allegedly

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's true pp Yeah yeah, well you say started doing

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that's true, you know, I.

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Mean obviously, like there's the there's like the Hindenburg allegations

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>a while back.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, January twenty twenty three.

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I don't think this is like particularly confirmatory

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of those, but it's a sort of general.

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I was wondering about that. I was trying to

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>rack my brain for that information, and I guess I

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>could have looked it up.

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 2>But the Hindenburg stuff is like very miscellaneous. It's not

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>like Donnie is bad because of this one bad thing

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>they did. It's like, oh, look at this nephew, right,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>So it's a little hard to like, somewhere in the

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Hindenburg report there might be like something about this, but

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to tell. I was gonna say something else.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>What was it we were talking about before Edinburgh cold bribes?

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>We could talk about Donald Trump a little bit, like

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it would be interesting to see what happens here with

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a new US attorney in New York.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I want to get to that, but I want

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to go back to the thing I was going to say.

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>A Donnie himself is very closely associated with power in

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>de He's like most with Mody and like he's a

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>political figure as well as a business figure. And it's

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me if you read this case. The way

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 2>that the deal works is that step one, a Donnie

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Green wins this enormous contract with the Indian federal government

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>green power thing, and then step two, to like make

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 2>that contract work, they have to go out and win

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 2>contracts with each Indian states power company, and like allegedly

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 2>they win the power contract, the federal contract first, and

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 2>then they go out and start bribing the state governments.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 2>There's no suggestion that they won the federal contract illegitimately,

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>which is like it's a little interesting. I don't know. Yeah,

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 2>they're like so politically connected in the Indian federal government.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 2>It's like, it's like interesting that they're like pan bribes

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 2>that say, it's just on the rais an eye brat

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. So Donnie really likes Donald Trump, at least

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>according to his social media presence after Trump. I think, yeah, I.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Think, if you're a business person, this is not true

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 2>in twenty sixteen, but it's true in twenty twenty four.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 2>If you're a business person, you really like Donald Trump

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 2>according to your social media presence.

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's actually that's very true across nationalities.

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just like, why not, Well, on that trem.

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>He didn't just congratulate him. He also committed to invest

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars in the US create as many as

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand jobs.

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Incentives.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, incentives sometimes are another word for bribes.

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, though again it's like if he committed to

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 2>invest ten billion dollars in the United States, that's a

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 2>good incentive. That's like, the United States in this relationship

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 2>is the principal. If he committed to invest ten billion

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>dollars in Trump Media, then that would be that that's like,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 2>that's the agent. But now I don't I don't think

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>that's happening. I remember in the first Trump administration being

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:04.479
<v Speaker 2>interested in what sort of foreign corupt Practices Act prosecutions

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 2>there would be given Trump's whole thing. And I remain

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>interested in the second Trump administration about that because in

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the first administration Trump owned a hotel or foreign governments

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 2>would put people up at high rates. But now there's

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 2>like there's Trump Media. There's like a lot going on.

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see, we'll see.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, micros Strategy, Micro's strategy is buying so

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>much bitcoin. Micro strategy shares are going up so much.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Micro Strategy has another short cellar after it. Where do

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to start?

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Its strategy is so interesting, but it's so simple, it's

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 2>so simple. We were talking to John Collison. I remember

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>on this podcast he argued for the view that companies

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>should focus on doing their business well and that a

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 2>company that spends too much time focused on like doing

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 2>stuff with stock or like optimizing its stock. Probably just

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 2>doing stock trades is probably it's probably a bad idea,

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 2>and you should focus on building the great business. Mega

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 2>said he has a business, right runs an enterprise.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Software nominally a software Yeah.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, totally has a business. But one gets the sense

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>that most of what it's executives focused on day to

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 2>day is is sharing lots of stock and using the

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 2>proceeds to buy lots of bitcoin.

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>How do we get more bitcoin?

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 2>And then talking up the fact that they've bought more

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin with the proceeds from selling stock. And I don't

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 2>know how that has affected the customers or their enterprise

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>software business. I don't know if like the enterpres yeah,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I know, right, but as a shareholder value maximization strategy,

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>right now, they've made the right choice, like clearly, like

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 2>they have made their stock go up so much by

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>doing this insane perpetual motion trade. Where there are stock

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 2>trades that, like I wrote, like one hundred and fifty

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 2>percent premium to the value of the underlying bitcode, it's

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>actually more than that because you take into leverage and stuff.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's say there's stock trades like three times the price

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 2>of like their underlying bitcoin, And so they just sell

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 2>a dollar worth of stock, they use it to buy

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>a dollar worth of bitcoin, and their stock goes up

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 2>by three dollars. So they just perpetually expanding their market cap.

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 2>And like, when I think about that trade, you know,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 2>we talked about the Destiny Attack one hundred fund, where

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 2>like it was trading at like a thousand percent premium

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 2>to the underlying private company shares because you could get

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>those shoes. And so I was like, why they should

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 2>is your stock because that'll compress the premium, right, Like

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 2>you sell more stock, that puts selling pressure on your stock.

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Your stock goes down. Meanwhile you buy the underlying assets,

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the underlying assets go up. You sort of eventually get

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>to a place where you're fairly valued. That's what micro

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 2>shategy is doing. But the premium keeps going up, like

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't work. Like it worked great for them, but

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't like actually compress the premium. So eventually they

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 2>will have a market cap greater than like the entire

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>world's economy because they found a perpetual motion machine.

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And I look forward to that reality. It is interesting.

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I have my ETF glasses on all the time.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But there's all of these. But no, there's leveraged micro

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy and ETFs that are doing incredible trading volume, which

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>is nuts. There's been a couple of days where like

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they've been the most traded stock, which is crazy. And

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a theory out there that, you know, some

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of the people I follow on Twitter or x are

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>entertaining that whether all the money that's coming into these

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>ETFs is like just part of the reason why you

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>have that big premium. Like Mike Green overhead Simplify has

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>made the case that yes, like some of these ETFs

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>have powered micro strategy just just like this insane premium.

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's why it's not getting arbitraged away.

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I hope that's not true. It just seems like such

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 2>a tail wagging the dog situation.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, it's just like one of the thought exercises.

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 2>One thing that I've heard argued is that micro strategy

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>is a pot of bitcoin. Why would you buy it

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 2>at a three times premium to the underlying bitcoin rather

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>than buying bitcoin or a bitcoin ETF or something like that.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>One answer is, like, you want to see where this

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 2>is going, and you think the premium will expand, which.

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Is like you know, like science experiment.

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Like you could have a theory that the premium will expand.

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Like micro Strategy is argued, like we're actually a better

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 2>way to hold bitcoin because we can get leverage. You

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>can't get leveraged, like you can leverage your bitcoin, but

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 2>like you're trying get three x the bitcoin, So it's

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 2>like it's it's not it's not really a leverage plan.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>We would have a fundamental view that the premium will expand.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Another thing is like for some reason, you cannot own

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>any other bitcoin instrument, and so you own this thing.

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I don't know who that would be.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I have heard people say iras, you can't buy the

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Queen ETF and your IRA, but you can buy micro

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Strategy in your IR which sounds terrifying. This is perhaps

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a less institutionally held stock than like a lot of

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 2>other stocks, perhaps, but there are some institutional investors in it.

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>And you could imagine being an equity fund manager where

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>your mandate is like you can't really buy ETFs in

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 2>your equity fund, but like can you buy this corporate stock?

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes you can, you.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Can, and like if you like you're like an equity

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 2>fund manager is like, really, I love bitcoin, this is

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>like your best way to get Yeah, the three X celebrity, Yes, maybe,

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 2>but like there's something amazing going on. Oh yeah, and

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 2>they are like capitalizing on it to the health.

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Well to that point, maybe one of the reasons why

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you buy micro Strategy at this premium is because you

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>love Michael Sailor, Like he does have a cult following.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you know who's not doing that trade Michael Sailor.

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. And I know there's this daily Mail

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>cover from like March two thousand that's been making the

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>rounds on X about him losing like six billion dollars

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in a day on micro Strategy, and it's just amazing

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to think that just the evolution of this company and

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of Michael Saylor, and he's now obviously a

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy man.

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 2>To be clear, I really respect. Respect is maybe not

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 2>the right word.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I really cherish and in mind.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I cherish and MMA is by the idea of like,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 2>we run a software company, but that's boring, so we're

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 2>just going to get all in. I'm buying as much

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin as we can and it does so well.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, so you said, you know, it's a pot

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin. Yeah, and so it owns about thirty billion

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of bitcoin and its market cap is one

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and five billion dollars. And I think it's interesting

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to compare that to like a traditional asset manager, like

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a black Rock, who has a market cap of like

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty three billion dollars with eleven something

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in assets.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but this is not the market cap of the manager.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 2>This is the market cap of the fund.

0:16:58.080 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 2>This is a fund that trades at three x the

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 2>value of its underlying stuff.

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not actually a fund.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, It's not actually a fund, it's just it just

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 2>is a fund as a software company.

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a fun slash software company that now Citron is

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to short.

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So this is like a famous widow maker, right,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>because people have noticed this for a long time, Yeah,

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 2>and have tried to short it and then carry out.

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Carry Stale did it just in March, and I was

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing a look at it. They did the same thing

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>long bitcoin short micro strategy. Their reasoning at the time

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>was that they're trading history and basic common sense suggests

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that the current inflam right there, premium will contract much

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as it has on prior occasions, providing a compelling opportunity

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for a pair trade. Since that Bloomberg News article, micro

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.959
<v Speaker 1>strategy is up one hundred and seventy five percent and

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is up thirty eight percent.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean they're right, like, yeah, before the end of

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 2>the universe that premium will contract.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Are the heat death of the year universe?

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 2>But like before carrots Dell gets out of the trade,

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 2>who knows, Yeah, right it is has a famous whoto maker.

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Sidron didn't like put out a report being like we're

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>all in on anti micro strategy. They were like, we're

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>hedging our long bitcoin with a little bit of short

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 2>micro strategy. But yeah, the same basic trade. Yeah, and

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the stock went down, which I was impressed by, Like

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I write about how I heard this is and nobody

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 2>sells it, so.

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, amazing. Maybe you didn't tweet about it enough,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>because that's what Ciitron did. It was cool to see that,

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but you I don't know. I want to make the

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>common sense argument that oh, maybe it went down on

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this specific one just because it's come up so much,

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like that's never stopped.

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like who knows, right, Like there's a lot going on,

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 2>including you know, micro Strategy is in the middle of

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 2>selling twenty one billion dollars worth of stock. They sold

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 2>like four point six billion dollars of stock last week.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Sorry not last week. It's yeah, it actually was last week.

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>I was this week, but time is a flat circle.

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, but the point is, like they disclose like this

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Monday that it's WLD four point six billion dollars or

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 2>stock last week. They're probably doing roughly that clip this week,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 2>so like, you know, maybe the stock went down because

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 2>they were like sold a bunch of stock. In any case,

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 2>they're selling stock buying bitcoin. Bitcoin is going up to

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 2>one hundred thousand dollars. There is no reason that what

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 2>they're doing should increase the premium. But like taking a

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 2>step back, if you're all in on bitcoin, having enormous

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 2>firepower to buy all out of bitcoin makes bitcoin go

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 2>up and it makes your strategy look better. Right, If

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 2>micro Strategy was buying bitcoin and bitcoin is going down,

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 2>like people would be like, yeah, that's annoying, right, But

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 2>they're buying bitcoin. Bitcoin is going up. People like, oh,

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 2>their geniuses. Look, they keep buying bitcoin. It keeps going up.

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 2>So it's like there is like a virtuous cycle component

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 2>to it, where like they're enormous buying firepower gives them

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 2>some momentum, like both in terms of like the value

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>of their assets and also in terms of like how

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 2>they look to the market because they look like they're

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 2>buying a thing that goes up.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, good game, Michael Saylor, whatever you are on

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>your yacht in Miami. Shall we keep talking about short

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>selling and short squeezes? And sure you wrote this week

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that short squeezes are legal now.

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 2>So I wrote this week about the appeals cart decision

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 2>from last month. Sorry it's a slow week.

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was wondering, like what's what's the next?

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 2>So often, you know, things just sit on the back

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 2>burner for a while, and I'm like, well today I'm

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 2>going to write.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>About let's look at what happened last month.

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, you can't always be it makes.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>For a great podcast, Yeah right.

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 2>We love to read timely. So I read this week

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>about something that happened last month, which is appeals court

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 2>decided that it's okay to do a short squeeze. So

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 2>it is is like companies most prominently overstock dot com

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I thought they invented it. Someone emailed me with Pegasus

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Wireless might have invented this. I wasn't following shorts squeze anyway.

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Companies do this thing from time to time where they

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 2>try to squeeze out their shorts. So a company will

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 2>get mad at short sellers. They'll think, oh, there's naked

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 2>short sellers like those story. They'll just be mad at

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 2>like people betting against them. And so they'll say, what

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna do is we're gonna give each shareholder some

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 2>magic token. Now it's a crypto thing, like overstocked it

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 2>with a crypto thing. But it doesn't have to be

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 2>a crypto thing. It can be like a paper certificate

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>saying you're entitled to you know, ten percent of the company,

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and you give them this magic thing in a way

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 2>that can't be traded. So people who get the magic

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 2>thing can't sell it. And what that means is that

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 2>short sellers can't buy it. And so if you're a

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 2>short seller, you borrowed stock from someone else, you sold

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the stock short, and you owe the person you borrowed

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the stock from the stock back and whatever else comes

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>with the stock. So I stock is a dividend, you

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>have to pay them a dividend. If there's a spinoff,

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 2>you have to give them shares of the spinoff. If

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 2>the company gives out this magic token, then the short

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>sellers owe the magic token back to their share lenders.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>If they can't get the magic token because it doesn't trade,

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 2>then they can't fulfill their obligation and they fall into

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 2>a black hole. That's the idea. And so the effect

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 2>of this is that do you announce, oh, we're gonna

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 2>pay out this magic token in like a week, and

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 2>then before you pay the magic token, all the short

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 2>sellers say, oh wait, if that happens, then I'll be,

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, in this black hole. And so I have

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>to buy back my stock now to avoid that. And

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 2>so the short sellers all buy back their stock and

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the stock goes up, and the short sellers lose money

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 2>and are sad, and you, as the CEO, are happy

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 2>because one your stock went up and frankly, you are

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>probably selling stock into that rally, because of course you're

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>this kind of ceo. But then two, the short sellers

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>lost money, and like that's what you really wanted because

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 2>you hate them, And this is like a controversial thing

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 2>because it just so clearly is like a form of

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 2>market manipulation, right, Like you're creating artificial demand for the

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>stock by doing this weird non traded dividend that like

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 2>clearly has no corporate finance purpose. Like clearly giving people

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 2>a non traded thing is not good for your shareholders

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 2>compared to giving them a traded thing. But you do

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 2>it to hose the short sellers, and the SEC hates

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 2>it and has brought fraud charges against a company that

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>is something kind of like this. And when Overstock tried

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 2>to do this a couple of years ago, the SEC

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of told them to knock it off, and so

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>they had to delay their dividend. Ultimately, Overstock decided, we'll

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>just do a traded dividend, and so what happened is

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 2>they announced this weird magic token thing. The short sellers

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 2>got nervous and like covered some of the shorts, and

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the stock went up, and the Sea of our stock

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 2>sold a lot of his own personal stock into that rally,

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 2>and then ultimately over Stocks said never mind, We're not

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of do that and it's not going ba time.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 2>And they said never mind because the SEC stopped them.

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>But it's never been clear that it's illegal, and so

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 2>some short sellers who got squeezed by Overstock sued Overstock

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 2>and they lost and the court said, well, this maybe

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>creates an artificial price, but there's no deception involved, like

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 2>they said very clearly what they were doing, and so

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 2>if there's no deception, it can't be market manipulation. You

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 2>have nothing to sue for. So that's that's the current

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 2>state of things.

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's like you said, it's legal.

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeah, you know, it's like it's the Tenth Circuit.

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 2>So it's not like where most securities cases are brought.

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>It's not clear what would happen if the sec brought

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 2>a case like this is private short sellers who no

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 2>one really sympathizes with. But yeah, it kind of seems

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 2>like it's like it's legal to do this.

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you wrote about this just so you

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>could write about that guy that you love.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Phil Falcom did an amazing short squeeze with these

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 2>bonds that are delightfully called the max Zips in like

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 2>two thousand. He bought these distressed bonds because he thought

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 2>they were an investment, and then like he found out

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 2>that his prime broker was also shorting them, and he

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 2>got so mad, which is rude. And he got so

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 2>mad that he bought up more and more bonds until

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 2>he owned like one hundred and thirteen percent of the

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 2>bonds because like, you know, he'd buy all the bonds

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and then the prime broker would be like, I'm going

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 2>to short some more bonds, and Phil Falcon I'd be like, ah, right,

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 2>buy those two, and like he ended up owning more

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 2>than one hundred percent of the bonds, and then he

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 2>like called in his borrow, like he called the prime

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 2>broker and said, I want all my bonds that you

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 2>owe me, and the prime breker is like, okay, I'll

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 2>go find them. And the prime breaker tried to buy

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 2>them and there was no one selling, and so ultimately

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 2>they got on a call with Phil Falcon and Falcon said,

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 2>just keep bidding. Sometimes you are just on the wrong

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>side of the trade, which is amazing, Yeah, And then

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Phil Falcone also said somebody owns more than one hundred

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 2>percent of these bonds, which is probably why you can't

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 2>buy them. And the prime worker is like, what, how

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 2>do you know that? Because I owned them. God it incredible,

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 2>And then the SEC sued him and said it was

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 2>marketing mapulation. Then he got in trouble.

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I do love him sending them on just like a

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>wild goose chase, only just keep bidding a lot of

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 1>life lessons there. Did he make money ultimately, I mean

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the SEC sued him.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of like the subsequent sec an things and

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 2>problems were probably not worth it to him in the

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 2>long run. He did make money on the trade.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>That's good. And also he did win something which is

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>very real, and that is frequent mentions in the money

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:37.959
<v Speaker 1>stuff column.

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Much Yeah, but you know it's it's like is that

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 2>trade legal now? Well, the problem is that, like I

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 2>don't think he did anything really deceptive, but he wasn't

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 2>like going around telling everyone that he was buying more

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 2>than all of the bonds until he had actually done

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 2>it and then he was telling everyone because it's yeah,

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 2>but there is some difference between that and like the

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 2>oversicked case, where it's like these companies are really really clear.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 2>They're like, we're going to go out and get those

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 2>shorts and so there's like no deception at all there.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes there is like sometimes they're like a little KOI

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 2>about it because the SEC doesn't like it when you

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 2>say I'm just going to go out and burn the shorts.

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 2>But like they can't be that CHOI because they really

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 2>hate short sellers and so they really are going around

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter all day being like those short sellers. Yeah,

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited for Elon Musk to like learn about this decision.

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like he's a little bit busy right now.

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I think he is not spending a lot of time

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 2>thinking about how much he hates short sellers right now.

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 2>But I'm fairly confident that the time will come again

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 2>when Elon Musk spends a lot of time thinking about

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>how much he hates short sellers. Yeah, and when he does,

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 2>there's like a whole new technology for him.

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, he'll be good to that point. Carson Block from

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Muddy Waters was on Bloomberg Television sometime on Thursday, and

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>he said that he does expect more anti short seller

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric under Trump. The exact quote is, we've already had

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>some rhetoric. We might have some more anti short seller rhetoric.

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>He didn't know. He doesn't think that Trump and Musk

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that short sellers are responsible for their company stocks falling,

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. But we know Elon Musk Cage short sellers.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And by the way, what's his name block, No,

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Devin Nuns. Yeah, the chief executive officer of Trump Media

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>and Technology Group has like written letters to Congress about, oh,

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the naked short sellers are getting our stock, which I

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 2>think it is very, very very hard to argue that

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the stock of Trump Media and Technology Group has been

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 2>systematically manipulated down to reflect less than its fundamental value.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 2>But you know, there's like, oh, there's weird fails, there's

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>naked short selling. So you've already seen, you know, from

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the Trump camp, a increase in anti short seller rhetoric,

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and there's anyways to burn short sellers, including like the

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 2>government can say it's illegal, which has happened in my

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, financial career, but otherwise, Yeah, And that was

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 2>You can find my work by subscribing to the moneystuffnewsletter

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg.

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Dot com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>every day on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 2>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net. Ask us a

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>question and we might answer it on air.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>people find the show.

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 2>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamasarakus and Moses

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 2>onm Our.

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Brendan Francis nunim is our.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Executive producer, and Stage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcasts. We'll be

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 2>back next week with more stuff.

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff podcast. If you

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>never want to miss a story, become a bloomberg dot

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>com subscriber today. Check out our special intro offer right

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>now now at bloomberg dot com slash podcast offer, or

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>click the link in our show notes. You also unlock

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>deep reporting data and analysis from reporters around the world.