1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:12,960
Speaker 1: Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane

2
00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:17,560
Speaker 1: jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

3
00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,480
Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

4
00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:34,280
Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg. It

5
00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:36,959
Speaker 1: was interesting to see the short end the two year

6
00:00:37,080 --> 00:00:40,519
Speaker 1: treasury yields decline as well, by the second most so

7
00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:44,879
Speaker 1: far this year. In response to the press conference, it

8
00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:48,320
Speaker 1: was interesting to hear what j. Powell said about trade,

9
00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:51,640
Speaker 1: even though he said that they do not do trade policy.

10
00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:54,640
Speaker 1: He said trade is a new risk, a low prile

11
00:00:54,840 --> 00:00:58,680
Speaker 1: profile risk that has become more prominent to the outlook

12
00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:01,960
Speaker 1: with respect to how much it could curtail it. Here

13
00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:06,600
Speaker 1: with us. Ibrahim Rabari, the Group head of Global Macroeconomics,

14
00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:09,280
Speaker 1: joining us here in our eleven three studios. Ibrahim, thank

15
00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:10,800
Speaker 1: you so much for being with us. I want to

16
00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:13,480
Speaker 1: start with trade because J. Powell, uh, you know, pretty

17
00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:17,440
Speaker 1: much stayed the course yesterday. But trade is really the

18
00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:20,680
Speaker 1: big question. And from your perspective, based on what we

19
00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:23,880
Speaker 1: know from President Trump's administration, how much do you think

20
00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:26,760
Speaker 1: the rhetoric that we have heard so far will curtail

21
00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:31,119
Speaker 1: economic growth this year. Well, thank you as a pleasure

22
00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:34,240
Speaker 1: to be here today, and I I think our base

23
00:01:34,280 --> 00:01:37,720
Speaker 1: cases it won't curtail activity that much, at least in

24
00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:39,800
Speaker 1: the US this year. And that's on the assumption that

25
00:01:39,880 --> 00:01:41,760
Speaker 1: we will see something along the lines of what the

26
00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:44,520
Speaker 1: media reported it will be announced today, and that the

27
00:01:44,520 --> 00:01:47,960
Speaker 1: response to that will be fairly moderate from from other countries,

28
00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:51,320
Speaker 1: notably China. Of course, in that scenario, I think trade

29
00:01:51,640 --> 00:01:54,160
Speaker 1: might be roughly neutral even for for for the U

30
00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:56,920
Speaker 1: S or ever so slightly negative because of course some

31
00:01:57,040 --> 00:01:59,200
Speaker 1: US companies are actually going to benefit from what these

32
00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:02,360
Speaker 1: from what the administration tries to achieve. Well, let's let's

33
00:02:02,360 --> 00:02:04,080
Speaker 1: just be very clear here. So we've already gotten the

34
00:02:04,080 --> 00:02:08,080
Speaker 1: steel tariffs, but what we're really talking about today is

35
00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:13,080
Speaker 1: the potential crackdown on theft of intellectual property from China.

36
00:02:13,160 --> 00:02:15,400
Speaker 1: So that is what we're talking about. We're expecting possibly

37
00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:18,480
Speaker 1: fifty billion dollars of sanctions in some in some form

38
00:02:18,560 --> 00:02:21,600
Speaker 1: or another from President Trump today. I want to talk

39
00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:24,600
Speaker 1: specifically about the escalations there because we are hearing that

40
00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:27,880
Speaker 1: China would retaliate by way of grains and the mid

41
00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:31,120
Speaker 1: and the Midwest States, So given a sort of escalation

42
00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:33,840
Speaker 1: of that, would that change your outlook? No, And I

43
00:02:33,880 --> 00:02:36,720
Speaker 1: think if it, If it, if it is limited indeed

44
00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:40,680
Speaker 1: to retaliation that's perhaps targeted the specific states, mostly in

45
00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:43,840
Speaker 1: the agricultural sector, then I think it's significant for those sectors.

46
00:02:43,880 --> 00:02:47,120
Speaker 1: But I don't think it will be more than a

47
00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:50,959
Speaker 1: very minor influence on our micro forecast the feds overall

48
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:53,880
Speaker 1: outlook as well, and therefore monitory policy. We're gonna catch

49
00:02:53,919 --> 00:02:56,880
Speaker 1: up with Bloomberg's Tom mackenzie from Beijing a little bit

50
00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:59,200
Speaker 1: later in the program to get more details on how

51
00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:01,240
Speaker 1: China may rest bond to the tariffs that could be

52
00:03:01,280 --> 00:03:03,480
Speaker 1: unvilolated by the President. I want to get your view

53
00:03:03,800 --> 00:03:06,080
Speaker 1: on the Federal Reserve. Abraham, what have we learned about

54
00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:10,720
Speaker 1: the reaction function of Chairman Power yesterday? Well, relative to

55
00:03:10,919 --> 00:03:14,080
Speaker 1: I think the uncertainty and and and and some expectations,

56
00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,360
Speaker 1: I think he came through as very gradualist and in

57
00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:21,360
Speaker 1: some sense as very little changed from the leadership under

58
00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:25,960
Speaker 1: under his predecessor, and clearly reactive. So I think the

59
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:30,720
Speaker 1: most significant statement in the press conference was that the

60
00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:34,280
Speaker 1: committee didn't see any signs of an acceleration of inflation,

61
00:03:34,520 --> 00:03:36,840
Speaker 1: so that tells me they're going to stay the course.

62
00:03:36,880 --> 00:03:38,800
Speaker 1: I think it's still the expectation that we will see

63
00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:42,480
Speaker 1: a higher quarter until quote unquote something breaks. But we're

64
00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:44,720
Speaker 1: certainly not seeing a change of tack. The message seems

65
00:03:44,720 --> 00:03:46,920
Speaker 1: to be shown me the data. Now. Federal Reserved chair

66
00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:49,360
Speaker 1: Janet Yellen used to say, we're data dependent. But this

67
00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:51,680
Speaker 1: sounds like an individual that is truly going to be

68
00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:54,760
Speaker 1: data dependent, who is not married to a certain economic

69
00:03:54,840 --> 00:03:57,400
Speaker 1: model in the expectations of what might develop based on that.

70
00:03:57,600 --> 00:04:00,680
Speaker 1: Is that your interpretation too, I I would certainly think

71
00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:04,200
Speaker 1: that he's not quite as as wedded to a certain

72
00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:07,480
Speaker 1: way of looking at the data. In the sort of

73
00:04:07,520 --> 00:04:10,320
Speaker 1: academic tradition of Phillips curves, neutral rates, they came up

74
00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:13,200
Speaker 1: very often as well. I don't think he's more data

75
00:04:13,240 --> 00:04:16,359
Speaker 1: dependent than Chairman Yellen was, but I think he was

76
00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:19,680
Speaker 1: at least clearer that he didn't see the trade off

77
00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:22,760
Speaker 1: between growth and inflation in a way that would necessarily

78
00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:26,600
Speaker 1: push him to catch up with that outlook. Meanwhile, perhaps

79
00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:30,679
Speaker 1: for Powell isn't necessarily offering up a prediction of where

80
00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:34,320
Speaker 1: he sees the credit cycle. But some investors have some

81
00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:37,600
Speaker 1: prominent investors and they're starting to see, in particular Scotland

82
00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:42,800
Speaker 1: Minard of Guggenheim Investment Management seeing a flat yield curve

83
00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:46,680
Speaker 1: in a year and a recession six to nine months

84
00:04:46,720 --> 00:04:49,880
Speaker 1: after that. Do you agree so? I think the risk

85
00:04:49,960 --> 00:04:52,440
Speaker 1: of a recession or at least a significant downturn over

86
00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:54,280
Speaker 1: the next two to three years is pretty high, and

87
00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:56,800
Speaker 1: I would guess it would be associated with a flat

88
00:04:56,839 --> 00:04:59,119
Speaker 1: yield curve as well. Now, of course, the uncertainty around

89
00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:01,240
Speaker 1: it is high. To when we think about downturns. What

90
00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:04,680
Speaker 1: we have to think about is vulnerabilities and shocks. Vulnerabilities

91
00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:07,000
Speaker 1: are clearly going up. Shocks are hard to predict. But

92
00:05:07,040 --> 00:05:09,359
Speaker 1: I think that two to three horizon seems very plausible.

93
00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:12,800
Speaker 1: Just in terms of yesterday, the disappointment for very hawkish

94
00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:15,640
Speaker 1: expectations was that we didn't quite make it to four hikes.

95
00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:19,839
Speaker 1: We did drift higher in terms of their projections for

96
00:05:19,920 --> 00:05:24,560
Speaker 1: rates through through and Tilsa's point this flattening of the curve.

97
00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:28,920
Speaker 1: You do have this situation where rates in twenty are

98
00:05:28,920 --> 00:05:33,680
Speaker 1: actually materially higher above where they see the long term

99
00:05:33,760 --> 00:05:36,240
Speaker 1: neutral rate. What do you make of that dynamic in

100
00:05:36,320 --> 00:05:38,920
Speaker 1: terms of the forecasting at the moment Abrahim. I think

101
00:05:38,920 --> 00:05:41,040
Speaker 1: it is very interesting, and I think particularly what's been

102
00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:43,800
Speaker 1: going on for the over the last six months is

103
00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:46,560
Speaker 1: actually very interesting. If you go back to September, only

104
00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:49,200
Speaker 1: five people at the on the effort and see were

105
00:05:49,520 --> 00:05:52,920
Speaker 1: at three percent or higher. Now it's twelve, so it's

106
00:05:52,920 --> 00:05:56,239
Speaker 1: a really big change in that specific number. I personally

107
00:05:56,279 --> 00:06:00,120
Speaker 1: think one reason why that number is now three in

108
00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:02,760
Speaker 1: four percent above the long term neutral rate is actually

109
00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:05,320
Speaker 1: so that they don't have to raise rates faster today.

110
00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:08,400
Speaker 1: So it's a warning sign for things not to get

111
00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:10,840
Speaker 1: out of fans that may have some coming influence. Does

112
00:06:10,839 --> 00:06:13,160
Speaker 1: this play into that idea that they are still slightly

113
00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:16,960
Speaker 1: cautious about the potential of overheating. I think they're cautious,

114
00:06:16,960 --> 00:06:18,760
Speaker 1: but at the same time, again, I think they're kind

115
00:06:18,760 --> 00:06:23,280
Speaker 1: of they're fairly reactive. So I think what the new

116
00:06:23,360 --> 00:06:25,680
Speaker 1: chair laid out yesterday's I think the data have to

117
00:06:25,760 --> 00:06:28,880
Speaker 1: convince him that inflation is picking up faster than expected.

118
00:06:29,200 --> 00:06:31,200
Speaker 1: How much is this out of the Fed's hands. How

119
00:06:31,279 --> 00:06:33,000
Speaker 1: much of this has to do with the fact that

120
00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:36,719
Speaker 1: the US is issuing a great proportion of debt on

121
00:06:36,760 --> 00:06:39,919
Speaker 1: the short end to finance its deficit, thus raising the

122
00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:43,080
Speaker 1: rates in the near term at the expensive growth of

123
00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:46,080
Speaker 1: the long term leading to a flattening of the yield curve,

124
00:06:46,160 --> 00:06:49,920
Speaker 1: even if the FED is somewhat cautious. So very recently,

125
00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:51,880
Speaker 1: we've seen a lot of movement in in in the

126
00:06:51,880 --> 00:06:53,920
Speaker 1: short term for a variety of reasons. As you mentioned,

127
00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:59,159
Speaker 1: issuance is one. We've seen the tax band effect, corporate

128
00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:00,920
Speaker 1: behavior as well. And the FED of course is also

129
00:07:01,040 --> 00:07:04,719
Speaker 1: changing it's it's it's balance sheet. But in terms of

130
00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:06,840
Speaker 1: the steepening or flattening dynamic that we've seen over the

131
00:07:06,920 --> 00:07:08,520
Speaker 1: last couple of months, the long and actually did move

132
00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:12,400
Speaker 1: significantly too. And I think there it isn't really it

133
00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:16,080
Speaker 1: is really these factors, even though tax plan and FED

134
00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:18,920
Speaker 1: balance sheet coming. But to leasis point, Abraham, something is

135
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:21,400
Speaker 1: happening at the front end in terms of short term

136
00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:24,880
Speaker 1: borrowing costs, whether you go through Libel commercial paper, what

137
00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:28,560
Speaker 1: you see in short data, investment grade treasury bills, borrowing

138
00:07:28,640 --> 00:07:32,880
Speaker 1: costs in the short term getting higher. Now, is that

139
00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:35,240
Speaker 1: going to result in tide of financial conditions in a

140
00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:39,480
Speaker 1: way that perhaps the FED doesn't actually quite want just yet. Yes,

141
00:07:39,520 --> 00:07:42,280
Speaker 1: And I was curious to see that nobody asked them

142
00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:45,240
Speaker 1: about that specific failure of the press pack in the

143
00:07:45,240 --> 00:07:49,280
Speaker 1: news conference, isn't it? Well, you tell your colleagues, but

144
00:07:49,920 --> 00:07:53,760
Speaker 1: you know what I think you will. I do think.

145
00:07:53,760 --> 00:07:55,480
Speaker 1: I mean there's a debate. I think there is a

146
00:07:55,520 --> 00:07:59,040
Speaker 1: moderate degree of financial tightening coming through on that score.

147
00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:02,040
Speaker 1: Might expectation for now is it will actually reverse and

148
00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:04,120
Speaker 1: that I think the Fed is going to wait to

149
00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:06,400
Speaker 1: see to see that happen. And it is linked to

150
00:08:06,520 --> 00:08:09,000
Speaker 1: some of these influences like the tax plan, but perhaps

151
00:08:09,040 --> 00:08:11,680
Speaker 1: also Treasury issue. Abraham rack Barr is Citty Group, Head

152
00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:28,520
Speaker 1: of Global Macroeconomic it's a big question how much will

153
00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:32,319
Speaker 1: a full blown trade war crimp the economic growth that

154
00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:34,880
Speaker 1: we've seen so far. Lara ram is going to answer

155
00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:37,679
Speaker 1: that question for us in complete detail, and you can

156
00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:40,120
Speaker 1: trade on it from here on out. Laura Ram is

157
00:08:41,320 --> 00:08:45,880
Speaker 1: Chief US Economists. So give us a number, alright, uh number?

158
00:08:47,320 --> 00:08:50,720
Speaker 1: Percent of of a crimp in the U economy? Yeah,

159
00:08:50,760 --> 00:08:53,800
Speaker 1: you know, small, really small. I think you know, less

160
00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:58,120
Speaker 1: than point one percent um in terms of economic impact

161
00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:00,959
Speaker 1: of tariffs. I think one of the questions we have

162
00:09:01,040 --> 00:09:04,560
Speaker 1: to ask ourselves. You know, two months ago, this market

163
00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:08,640
Speaker 1: rally seemed unstoppable. It was a one way rocket going higher,

164
00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:13,679
Speaker 1: and I think it speaks to the fear and power

165
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:18,040
Speaker 1: of the you know, any kind of protectionism that we've

166
00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:20,840
Speaker 1: has actually stopped, Like what's changed now two months ago?

167
00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:24,720
Speaker 1: It's really been this trade rotoric and you know, the

168
00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:29,199
Speaker 1: economy is still looking solid. Um, global economies are still

169
00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:32,480
Speaker 1: looking solid. The FED is getting a little more confident,

170
00:09:32,520 --> 00:09:34,760
Speaker 1: but their outlook really hasn't changed. And in fact, we've

171
00:09:34,760 --> 00:09:37,320
Speaker 1: had all this new government stimulus that makes the economy

172
00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:40,600
Speaker 1: look even better. This rhetoric has power, and I think

173
00:09:40,600 --> 00:09:42,520
Speaker 1: we all need to be humble in the face of that.

174
00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:45,760
Speaker 1: So here's my question. Everyone is saying that, you know,

175
00:09:45,800 --> 00:09:48,200
Speaker 1: the U. S economy is gaining steam, it could possibly

176
00:09:48,200 --> 00:09:50,200
Speaker 1: get an even bigger bump because of the tax cuts.

177
00:09:50,800 --> 00:09:54,959
Speaker 1: What could change that would make you advise your clients

178
00:09:55,000 --> 00:09:57,319
Speaker 1: that it is time to be more cautious. So I'm

179
00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:01,199
Speaker 1: already there, Um, I think because saying sounds good, Because

180
00:10:01,320 --> 00:10:04,000
Speaker 1: you know, markets are so forward looking and there's already

181
00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:07,080
Speaker 1: so much good news priced in. How do we get

182
00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:11,200
Speaker 1: better news priced in? From here? Everybody has been tripping

183
00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:15,040
Speaker 1: over themselves to raise their GDP forecasts. So when I

184
00:10:15,120 --> 00:10:18,040
Speaker 1: look ahead, I see, you know, our an economy that's

185
00:10:18,080 --> 00:10:21,920
Speaker 1: still really powered by the consumer. Well that's great, but

186
00:10:22,520 --> 00:10:26,599
Speaker 1: it's really powered more by wealth gains than wage gains.

187
00:10:26,679 --> 00:10:30,120
Speaker 1: And how do we connect that to financial markets? Because

188
00:10:30,559 --> 00:10:32,240
Speaker 1: why do we care about the economy. We care about

189
00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:34,840
Speaker 1: the economy because it's what drives our financial returns and

190
00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:39,000
Speaker 1: our financial picture. And when you connect those dots, it

191
00:10:39,040 --> 00:10:44,240
Speaker 1: makes the consumer hyper sensitive to changes in market sentiment.

192
00:10:44,679 --> 00:10:47,960
Speaker 1: So when I look out across growth over the next year,

193
00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:53,160
Speaker 1: we're still overly reliant on the consumer business investment. Green

194
00:10:53,200 --> 00:10:57,920
Speaker 1: shoots of recovery there, but not you know, really confident traction.

195
00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:01,920
Speaker 1: And so I see it is a more precarious picture

196
00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:04,440
Speaker 1: with a lot of good news already priced in. Okay,

197
00:11:04,559 --> 00:11:07,120
Speaker 1: So when you're saying that it's dependent on wealth gains,

198
00:11:07,320 --> 00:11:09,920
Speaker 1: in other words, are you saying that a sell off

199
00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:15,480
Speaker 1: in equities could potentially lead directly to aid economic downturn,

200
00:11:16,400 --> 00:11:20,160
Speaker 1: especially without wage gains for the US consumers, and especially

201
00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:22,800
Speaker 1: given the fact that US consumers have actually packed on

202
00:11:22,880 --> 00:11:25,559
Speaker 1: quite a bit of non mortgage debt which is set

203
00:11:25,600 --> 00:11:29,559
Speaker 1: to reprice given the higher short term rates. Yeah, and

204
00:11:29,600 --> 00:11:33,439
Speaker 1: you know, downturn is probably strong, but you know, moderation

205
00:11:33,640 --> 00:11:35,920
Speaker 1: from here, and I you know, look at the savings rate.

206
00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:38,040
Speaker 1: A lot of people discount that, and I think that's

207
00:11:38,040 --> 00:11:42,400
Speaker 1: a mistake because people have forgotten how it felt to

208
00:11:42,400 --> 00:11:46,959
Speaker 1: be over levered going into the last um you know, downturn.

209
00:11:47,320 --> 00:11:50,120
Speaker 1: And I think right now, when we look at what

210
00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:53,319
Speaker 1: is powering the consumer, Yes, everyone has a job, but

211
00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:56,360
Speaker 1: the wages just aren't there a short time borrowing Colston

212
00:11:56,400 --> 00:11:58,520
Speaker 1: ready started to push higher UM no matter what you

213
00:11:58,559 --> 00:12:00,440
Speaker 1: look at, what's the net effect of that on the

214
00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:03,720
Speaker 1: US economy at the moment, and that has a significant impact.

215
00:12:03,760 --> 00:12:05,839
Speaker 1: A lot of the treasury debt that's being issued is

216
00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:08,920
Speaker 1: short term debt, so that raises the funding costs for

217
00:12:08,960 --> 00:12:12,760
Speaker 1: the government. And yeah, all these credit card debts, you know, um,

218
00:12:12,800 --> 00:12:16,040
Speaker 1: you know, the short term debt that consumers have taken on.

219
00:12:16,520 --> 00:12:19,600
Speaker 1: A lot of that is UH is priced off of

220
00:12:19,640 --> 00:12:22,080
Speaker 1: the short end of the curve. So I think it's

221
00:12:22,200 --> 00:12:26,319
Speaker 1: this chipping away and it's human nature, right, we all

222
00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:29,040
Speaker 1: get too pessimistic and then we all get too optimistic.

223
00:12:29,080 --> 00:12:30,880
Speaker 1: And that's what I saw at the end of last year,

224
00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:37,000
Speaker 1: everybody just embracing that goldilocks growth and financial market environment

225
00:12:37,559 --> 00:12:42,360
Speaker 1: and forgetting that we've had, you know, complacency to me

226
00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:45,840
Speaker 1: is really set in and where advising investors to be

227
00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:50,840
Speaker 1: prepared for much higher volatility and to be really prepared

228
00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:55,440
Speaker 1: for a much more difficult investment terrain to navigate. It's

229
00:12:55,480 --> 00:12:58,360
Speaker 1: so interesting for me to hear you talk about consumer

230
00:12:58,480 --> 00:13:01,880
Speaker 1: leverage because most analysts an economists I speak to write

231
00:13:01,880 --> 00:13:04,160
Speaker 1: it off. They say, if you look at it, it's

232
00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:07,000
Speaker 1: you know, on a sort of per GDP growth basis

233
00:13:07,120 --> 00:13:10,240
Speaker 1: or per household wealth level, it's really not that big

234
00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:12,760
Speaker 1: of a deal. And yet you raise a really good point,

235
00:13:12,840 --> 00:13:14,800
Speaker 1: which is there's sort of a two tier system here.

236
00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:17,280
Speaker 1: We've got the consumers that don't have mortgages, that are

237
00:13:17,280 --> 00:13:20,480
Speaker 1: paying higher fixed costs with rents, etcetera. Have taken out

238
00:13:20,520 --> 00:13:25,520
Speaker 1: a record amount of debt, whereas the wealthiest have remained

239
00:13:25,640 --> 00:13:28,040
Speaker 1: a pretty pretty well set. Can you talk about how

240
00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:30,199
Speaker 1: significant this is for the economic out look going forward?

241
00:13:30,360 --> 00:13:32,880
Speaker 1: So you know, this is one of the things, UM,

242
00:13:33,040 --> 00:13:36,360
Speaker 1: that we still need to really pay attention to because

243
00:13:36,840 --> 00:13:40,040
Speaker 1: as we haven't seen the wage gains come through, it's

244
00:13:40,080 --> 00:13:43,600
Speaker 1: really impacting everything. I was speaking to UM a group

245
00:13:43,679 --> 00:13:47,800
Speaker 1: of you know, human resources executives UM that really are

246
00:13:47,960 --> 00:13:52,360
Speaker 1: at large UM nationally publicly traded companies they talk about

247
00:13:52,400 --> 00:13:56,320
Speaker 1: the fact that they are still being very cautious on

248
00:13:56,360 --> 00:13:58,800
Speaker 1: the wage front and doing everything they can to not

249
00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:04,640
Speaker 1: increase wages UM partly because as they're publicly traded, they

250
00:14:04,679 --> 00:14:07,880
Speaker 1: are really reticent to pass that along, you know, through

251
00:14:07,880 --> 00:14:10,560
Speaker 1: their earning statements. So I think we have to wonder

252
00:14:10,600 --> 00:14:13,319
Speaker 1: where we get to the quarter where either they end

253
00:14:13,400 --> 00:14:15,960
Speaker 1: up passing along those higher costs and the earnings look

254
00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:20,640
Speaker 1: less favorable. Um. But all of it really speaks to

255
00:14:20,800 --> 00:14:24,160
Speaker 1: the fact that this tightness in the labor market and

256
00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:28,440
Speaker 1: this UM strain on the consumer household balance sheet, something's

257
00:14:28,440 --> 00:14:30,800
Speaker 1: out a gift. So, as John was pointing out, really

258
00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:34,240
Speaker 1: uh wisely, the rise and interest rates, the rise in

259
00:14:34,280 --> 00:14:36,320
Speaker 1: short term rates and we're talking lib or, which is

260
00:14:36,320 --> 00:14:39,160
Speaker 1: one of the benchmarks, but also two year yields, and

261
00:14:39,160 --> 00:14:42,800
Speaker 1: and uh take it, take it the range. How much

262
00:14:42,840 --> 00:14:46,960
Speaker 1: will this directly go into higher defaults and delinquencies on

263
00:14:47,040 --> 00:14:49,800
Speaker 1: this consumer debt? So, you know, so far delinquents to

264
00:14:49,960 --> 00:14:52,880
Speaker 1: rates look really good, which is one of the things

265
00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:59,360
Speaker 1: that most analysts used to UM discount concern about this

266
00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:04,560
Speaker 1: UM and defaults. Higher debt levels, they're never a problem

267
00:15:04,640 --> 00:15:09,000
Speaker 1: until it's a big problem. UM. So you know, speaking

268
00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:11,000
Speaker 1: to the credit investor leaks, so that turns around you

269
00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:16,200
Speaker 1: and says, credits okay because default right alone, Yeah, exactly,

270
00:15:16,200 --> 00:15:19,080
Speaker 1: that's exactly right. So we're all sort of frogs in

271
00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:21,640
Speaker 1: the pot, you know, but the heat is slowly getting

272
00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:24,160
Speaker 1: turned up. So I think, you know, it really just

273
00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:27,720
Speaker 1: speaks to the fact that, um, when we get optimistic

274
00:15:27,800 --> 00:15:30,920
Speaker 1: about growth, we need to still be realistic. You know.

275
00:15:31,040 --> 00:15:34,120
Speaker 1: Optimism to me is still two and a half percent growth,

276
00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:38,760
Speaker 1: so low relative to past economic cycles. And the reason

277
00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:42,280
Speaker 1: for that is because when we look at the consumer

278
00:15:42,680 --> 00:15:45,560
Speaker 1: and we look at how the consumer is power going forward,

279
00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:49,040
Speaker 1: there just isn't a lot of juice left in the

280
00:15:49,080 --> 00:15:51,640
Speaker 1: juice box, you know, there's I think we're really coming

281
00:15:51,680 --> 00:15:54,600
Speaker 1: to a place where we either need to see business

282
00:15:54,640 --> 00:15:57,680
Speaker 1: investment pick up significantly or we need to see wages

283
00:15:57,800 --> 00:16:01,280
Speaker 1: ride rise, which means inflation um. And I think the

284
00:16:01,320 --> 00:16:05,640
Speaker 1: fact that the consumer is so reliant on wealth gains

285
00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:08,960
Speaker 1: means that there is a vulnerability there to a correction

286
00:16:09,000 --> 00:16:13,560
Speaker 1: the stock market, which is new for us watching the economy.

287
00:16:13,680 --> 00:16:15,600
Speaker 1: It's been great to cash shot with you managing to

288
00:16:15,640 --> 00:16:17,760
Speaker 1: make it over from Philadelphia to New York City and

289
00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:20,080
Speaker 1: some terrible weather over night. So thank you very much

290
00:16:20,080 --> 00:16:35,640
Speaker 1: for joining us FS Investment Solutions Chief US Economists. Today

291
00:16:35,880 --> 00:16:39,280
Speaker 1: is World Water Day. We should recognize that and to

292
00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:42,560
Speaker 1: solve the global water crisis, it would take donations of

293
00:16:42,600 --> 00:16:45,960
Speaker 1: about two hundred and billion dollars a year. Two hundred

294
00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:49,320
Speaker 1: billion dollars a year. How much do you think pim

295
00:16:49,360 --> 00:16:53,160
Speaker 1: the aid is annually? It's actually eight billion dollars, which

296
00:16:53,200 --> 00:16:55,160
Speaker 1: is a huge gap. Here to talk about how to

297
00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:58,520
Speaker 1: bridge that gap is Gary White and Matt Damon, co

298
00:16:58,600 --> 00:17:02,200
Speaker 1: founders of water dot Org and Water Equity. Matt Damon

299
00:17:02,400 --> 00:17:05,040
Speaker 1: is also known as his for his side gig of

300
00:17:05,160 --> 00:17:07,040
Speaker 1: acting Um. But I want to start with you, Gary.

301
00:17:07,240 --> 00:17:10,080
Speaker 1: I want to talk about bridging this gap, how you're

302
00:17:10,119 --> 00:17:13,440
Speaker 1: trying to attract investors, what the interest is and frankly

303
00:17:13,480 --> 00:17:16,600
Speaker 1: for our audience, are their actual returns here or is

304
00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:20,080
Speaker 1: this just a charity play? No, there actually are returns here.

305
00:17:20,119 --> 00:17:22,639
Speaker 1: And I think that what underpins this is that you know,

306
00:17:22,680 --> 00:17:26,240
Speaker 1: there's billions of people who lack access to water and sanitation,

307
00:17:26,760 --> 00:17:29,639
Speaker 1: and the reason this can work as an invest business

308
00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:32,439
Speaker 1: investment model is because they spend hundreds of billions of

309
00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:35,800
Speaker 1: dollars every year coping with this crisis. So they're spending

310
00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:38,920
Speaker 1: time walking to collect water hours each day. Women will

311
00:17:38,920 --> 00:17:41,680
Speaker 1: spend two hundred million hours today walking to collect water.

312
00:17:42,040 --> 00:17:44,359
Speaker 1: They could be spending that time at a productive activity,

313
00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:48,399
Speaker 1: or they're sick because of contaminated water, or in urban areas,

314
00:17:48,480 --> 00:17:51,400
Speaker 1: they're having to pay for water from water vendors uh

315
00:17:51,480 --> 00:17:54,320
Speaker 1: sometimes twenty of their income. So it seems like there's

316
00:17:54,320 --> 00:17:56,600
Speaker 1: a market here, and what we've been able to do

317
00:17:57,160 --> 00:18:00,919
Speaker 1: is to connect investors with small loans micro loans at

318
00:18:00,920 --> 00:18:04,040
Speaker 1: the household level so that women can get a water

319
00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:07,720
Speaker 1: tap at their house as opposed to walking hours each

320
00:18:07,800 --> 00:18:09,760
Speaker 1: day to get water, and then they can use those

321
00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:12,440
Speaker 1: savings or the time they spend working at a paying

322
00:18:12,480 --> 00:18:14,840
Speaker 1: job to repay the loan. So we found a way

323
00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:18,200
Speaker 1: to connect investors who want to have that social impact,

324
00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:21,280
Speaker 1: but also our fund provides a targeted three and a

325
00:18:21,320 --> 00:18:25,560
Speaker 1: half percent financial return to investors while helping people escape

326
00:18:25,600 --> 00:18:28,280
Speaker 1: the water crisis. So, Matt, I want to talk about

327
00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:31,639
Speaker 1: your involvement in this. Obviously, um you are known for

328
00:18:31,680 --> 00:18:34,399
Speaker 1: other things other than water preservation. You're also known for

329
00:18:34,600 --> 00:18:37,400
Speaker 1: the many Hollywood movies and awards that you've garnered over

330
00:18:37,480 --> 00:18:40,560
Speaker 1: your lifetime. Um, I'm just wondering what attracted you to

331
00:18:40,800 --> 00:18:43,760
Speaker 1: this and uh and sort of what has your celebrity

332
00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:48,399
Speaker 1: Brian mean, who are you trying to sort of target here? Uh? Well, UM,

333
00:18:48,440 --> 00:18:50,760
Speaker 1: I got interested in in the issue of water and

334
00:18:50,840 --> 00:18:53,200
Speaker 1: sanitation in two thousand six on a on a trip

335
00:18:53,240 --> 00:18:55,640
Speaker 1: that I took to kind of learn about issues extreme poverty.

336
00:18:56,400 --> 00:18:58,480
Speaker 1: Just the enormity of it just floored me. And the

337
00:18:58,480 --> 00:19:01,320
Speaker 1: fact that nobody, uh I wasn't aware of anybody really

338
00:19:01,320 --> 00:19:04,360
Speaker 1: talking about it. And um so I started to try

339
00:19:04,359 --> 00:19:06,600
Speaker 1: to get involved and and and and do something. I

340
00:19:06,640 --> 00:19:08,960
Speaker 1: started something called H two Africa and we were basically

341
00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:11,760
Speaker 1: trying to raise raise funds for little ENGOs that we're

342
00:19:11,800 --> 00:19:15,840
Speaker 1: doing good work um throughout Africa. And and but I still,

343
00:19:15,840 --> 00:19:17,840
Speaker 1: as as I started to get more familiarized with the

344
00:19:18,320 --> 00:19:20,680
Speaker 1: issue and the complexity of it, I was trying to

345
00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:23,200
Speaker 1: think about how I could really maximize my impact. And

346
00:19:23,200 --> 00:19:25,000
Speaker 1: and that was what made me think I should I

347
00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:27,359
Speaker 1: should partner with the kind of pre eminent expert I

348
00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:29,719
Speaker 1: could find. And that's what led me to to Gary

349
00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:32,720
Speaker 1: and and Gary's being very humble about this idea of

350
00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:35,280
Speaker 1: of micro lens. He kind of pioneered this idea of

351
00:19:35,320 --> 00:19:38,560
Speaker 1: taking the the concept of microfinance and applying it to

352
00:19:38,600 --> 00:19:40,520
Speaker 1: the water sector. And he did that because he had

353
00:19:40,520 --> 00:19:43,080
Speaker 1: spent his entire adult life in these communities and and

354
00:19:43,119 --> 00:19:45,600
Speaker 1: had that realization that people were paying for water. The

355
00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:48,520
Speaker 1: poorest of the poor. We're getting their water somehow, either

356
00:19:48,680 --> 00:19:51,119
Speaker 1: either with their time or they were in many cases,

357
00:19:51,119 --> 00:19:53,840
Speaker 1: as he said, that spending up to their income just

358
00:19:53,880 --> 00:19:57,040
Speaker 1: to get that water. And so, but what they didn't

359
00:19:57,040 --> 00:19:59,959
Speaker 1: have with savings, so he knew they could pay off

360
00:20:00,080 --> 00:20:03,000
Speaker 1: alan if if if if we fronted the money. You know,

361
00:20:03,040 --> 00:20:06,240
Speaker 1: in a lot of these uh urban areas that you know,

362
00:20:06,320 --> 00:20:09,280
Speaker 1: the municipality is piping water right under the feet of

363
00:20:09,320 --> 00:20:11,040
Speaker 1: the people who live in these slums that they're they're

364
00:20:11,040 --> 00:20:12,960
Speaker 1: just not connected to it. So they're paying ten to

365
00:20:13,040 --> 00:20:15,800
Speaker 1: fifteen times more for their water than the middle class

366
00:20:15,800 --> 00:20:18,720
Speaker 1: in their country. So so the theory went, And when

367
00:20:18,720 --> 00:20:20,320
Speaker 1: I first met Gary, this was kind of in its

368
00:20:20,400 --> 00:20:22,760
Speaker 1: nascent stages, but the theory went, well, if we could

369
00:20:22,800 --> 00:20:25,480
Speaker 1: front them the money, um, they could pay the loan

370
00:20:25,560 --> 00:20:27,919
Speaker 1: back and and then they'd be connected and they'd have

371
00:20:27,960 --> 00:20:31,000
Speaker 1: bought all this time back and so and so, you know,

372
00:20:31,040 --> 00:20:33,879
Speaker 1: not only would they you know, would they be uh

373
00:20:34,240 --> 00:20:35,920
Speaker 1: able to pay pay off the loan. They'd have more

374
00:20:35,960 --> 00:20:37,840
Speaker 1: income in the future because they'd have more time to

375
00:20:37,840 --> 00:20:39,760
Speaker 1: work at at at a job, rather than waste all

376
00:20:39,760 --> 00:20:41,560
Speaker 1: this time standing in line or going on you know,

377
00:20:41,600 --> 00:20:45,440
Speaker 1: collecting water um. And the idea has really Gary called

378
00:20:45,480 --> 00:20:48,439
Speaker 1: it water credit. That idea has been more successful than

379
00:20:48,440 --> 00:20:50,160
Speaker 1: we ever really could have hoped. I mean, it's been

380
00:20:50,200 --> 00:20:55,480
Speaker 1: just wonderful to see what's happened. These loans payoff at um.

381
00:20:55,520 --> 00:20:57,560
Speaker 1: You know, these are the poorest people on the planet

382
00:20:57,560 --> 00:21:00,760
Speaker 1: paying these loans back. It's really it's really wonderful to see.

383
00:21:00,800 --> 00:21:03,399
Speaker 1: And and they're participating in their own solutions, and it's

384
00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:05,240
Speaker 1: just kind of shattering this image that the poorest of

385
00:21:05,240 --> 00:21:08,920
Speaker 1: the pork can't can't uh you know, can't can't change

386
00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:11,160
Speaker 1: their circumstances if they're you know, if if they're given

387
00:21:11,520 --> 00:21:13,359
Speaker 1: you know, a hand up, it's just it's just they're

388
00:21:13,359 --> 00:21:15,919
Speaker 1: given this opportunity and they absolutely take advantage of it.

389
00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:19,560
Speaker 1: And and we went from in two thousand twelve reaching

390
00:21:19,560 --> 00:21:22,760
Speaker 1: our first million people too, we're reaching a million a

391
00:21:22,840 --> 00:21:25,520
Speaker 1: quarter now. And it's a really scalable idea and and

392
00:21:25,560 --> 00:21:28,440
Speaker 1: in fact, our micro finance partners in in the countries

393
00:21:28,480 --> 00:21:30,520
Speaker 1: were work and when we talk to them, the biggest

394
00:21:30,560 --> 00:21:34,399
Speaker 1: bottleneck they identified for their work was access to affordable capital.

395
00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:36,680
Speaker 1: Because the demand is absolutely there. We could be doing

396
00:21:36,680 --> 00:21:38,760
Speaker 1: this so much more if we just had more money.

397
00:21:38,760 --> 00:21:41,280
Speaker 1: And that's how we came to this concept of water Equity,

398
00:21:42,000 --> 00:21:43,639
Speaker 1: just to put the question maybe to both you, is

399
00:21:43,680 --> 00:21:45,679
Speaker 1: the issue that the water is disappearing or that you

400
00:21:45,720 --> 00:21:48,919
Speaker 1: have crumbling infrastructure all over the world and that you

401
00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:51,480
Speaker 1: have governments that are not centralized in the way that

402
00:21:51,520 --> 00:21:55,320
Speaker 1: they think about this resource. Yeah, so there is certainly

403
00:21:55,359 --> 00:21:57,679
Speaker 1: an under investment in the infrastructure as we see in

404
00:21:57,720 --> 00:22:00,520
Speaker 1: Cape Town, you know, South Africa right now. And so

405
00:22:00,560 --> 00:22:02,840
Speaker 1: it really is all about capital and drawing it in.

406
00:22:03,040 --> 00:22:05,480
Speaker 1: And I think, you know, Matt's talking about kind of

407
00:22:05,520 --> 00:22:08,760
Speaker 1: one end of that that capital spectrum, and that is

408
00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:10,760
Speaker 1: like the poor person who needs out micro loan. But

409
00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:13,600
Speaker 1: what we see emerging is capital coming in from the

410
00:22:13,640 --> 00:22:17,960
Speaker 1: social impact investing space. So we launched water Equity as

411
00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:21,440
Speaker 1: a spinoff from water dot org and it's dedicated solely

412
00:22:21,520 --> 00:22:25,320
Speaker 1: to being an investment fund manager raising these funds from

413
00:22:25,320 --> 00:22:27,760
Speaker 1: the capital market so that we can then connect poor

414
00:22:27,760 --> 00:22:30,840
Speaker 1: women with the loans that they need for water and sanitation.

415
00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:33,720
Speaker 1: And so Water Equity now is in the midst of

416
00:22:33,840 --> 00:22:36,040
Speaker 1: raising a fifty million dollar fund on the heels of

417
00:22:36,040 --> 00:22:39,080
Speaker 1: our first successful fund, and we raised thirty seven million

418
00:22:39,119 --> 00:22:43,359
Speaker 1: of that UH that capital to date. So this allows you, know,

419
00:22:43,400 --> 00:22:46,760
Speaker 1: to just put it bluntly, for every million dollars an

420
00:22:46,760 --> 00:22:50,000
Speaker 1: investor comes into this fund with we reach a hundred

421
00:22:50,040 --> 00:22:53,119
Speaker 1: thousand people with water or sanitation, and at the end

422
00:22:53,119 --> 00:22:55,760
Speaker 1: of the fund life, the investors get their principle back

423
00:22:56,080 --> 00:22:58,720
Speaker 1: and they get an annual distribution targeted at three and

424
00:22:58,720 --> 00:23:01,480
Speaker 1: a half percent. So this is like a real investment

425
00:23:01,480 --> 00:23:05,879
Speaker 1: opportunity that is also backed actually by a ten percent

426
00:23:05,960 --> 00:23:09,480
Speaker 1: guarantee that we rolled into the fund as well. So

427
00:23:09,680 --> 00:23:12,360
Speaker 1: the it''s a solid investment that's going to help poor

428
00:23:12,359 --> 00:23:15,640
Speaker 1: people get more access to water and sanitation. So, Matt,

429
00:23:15,720 --> 00:23:18,720
Speaker 1: I want to get your perspective when you talk about it.

430
00:23:18,760 --> 00:23:21,479
Speaker 1: I mean, you had a high profile advertisement about this

431
00:23:22,280 --> 00:23:24,560
Speaker 1: that aired during the Super Bowl, so this isn't just

432
00:23:24,640 --> 00:23:27,480
Speaker 1: targeted to the institutional investors. I'm wondering what response you've

433
00:23:27,480 --> 00:23:31,560
Speaker 1: gotten from the broader world the rest of us, UH

434
00:23:31,720 --> 00:23:35,040
Speaker 1: from your push and kind of what you're trying to

435
00:23:35,119 --> 00:23:38,159
Speaker 1: create because it's not just the investment, clearly, Yeah, I

436
00:23:38,160 --> 00:23:42,359
Speaker 1: mean that it's funny. One of the biggest hurdles we

437
00:23:42,400 --> 00:23:45,440
Speaker 1: have to clear is just trying to explain the problem

438
00:23:45,560 --> 00:23:49,920
Speaker 1: because it's so unrelatable, uh, for for so many of

439
00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:53,120
Speaker 1: us in the West, right, Um, access to to to

440
00:23:53,119 --> 00:23:55,639
Speaker 1: to clean water is not something that we that we

441
00:23:55,720 --> 00:23:58,639
Speaker 1: tend to think about. Um, the water in our toilets

442
00:23:58,760 --> 00:24:01,560
Speaker 1: is cleaner than the water a hundred million people have

443
00:24:01,680 --> 00:24:04,280
Speaker 1: access to. So so one of the partnerships we have

444
00:24:04,359 --> 00:24:07,800
Speaker 1: is with Stella Artois and and um, we've that we're

445
00:24:07,800 --> 00:24:09,679
Speaker 1: in our fourth year of a partnership with them, and

446
00:24:10,359 --> 00:24:12,680
Speaker 1: we've reached through them one and a half million people

447
00:24:12,720 --> 00:24:15,119
Speaker 1: with with clean water. And and they've been they've been

448
00:24:15,160 --> 00:24:17,480
Speaker 1: wonderful partners. And they obviously they did that Super Bowl

449
00:24:17,520 --> 00:24:19,800
Speaker 1: ad which was which you know, their marketing team is

450
00:24:19,840 --> 00:24:23,159
Speaker 1: just so good. They're really helping us message quickly, like

451
00:24:23,320 --> 00:24:25,840
Speaker 1: you know, in a thirty second spot, Okay, here's the problem,

452
00:24:25,920 --> 00:24:28,640
Speaker 1: this is the magnitude of it, and then give their

453
00:24:28,680 --> 00:24:31,119
Speaker 1: consumers and on ramp to kind of do something about it.

454
00:24:31,240 --> 00:24:33,640
Speaker 1: Do you get pushed back just in terms of you know,

455
00:24:33,800 --> 00:24:36,200
Speaker 1: what makes you able to do this as a Hollywood elite?

456
00:24:36,240 --> 00:24:38,200
Speaker 1: You know, they're sort of that pushback from the from

457
00:24:38,359 --> 00:24:41,320
Speaker 1: the recent oscars. You know, what do you what do

458
00:24:41,359 --> 00:24:44,159
Speaker 1: you say to that? I'm I'm I'm just trying to

459
00:24:44,400 --> 00:24:47,000
Speaker 1: do kind of what I was raised to do, which

460
00:24:47,080 --> 00:24:49,280
Speaker 1: is used whatever sphere of influence. I have to do

461
00:24:49,359 --> 00:24:51,800
Speaker 1: something that I think is good and and and in

462
00:24:51,800 --> 00:24:54,800
Speaker 1: this case, it's not me kind of or Gary coming

463
00:24:54,800 --> 00:24:58,119
Speaker 1: in and and and swooping in as any kind of savior.

464
00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:01,720
Speaker 1: It's it's it's actually these in credibly poor people. Of

465
00:25:01,720 --> 00:25:03,399
Speaker 1: our borrowers are women, because this is an issue that

466
00:25:03,440 --> 00:25:07,399
Speaker 1: disproportionately affects women and girls. Um. But they're they're the

467
00:25:07,440 --> 00:25:09,919
Speaker 1: ones paying these loans back. They're the ones doing this

468
00:25:09,960 --> 00:25:12,720
Speaker 1: incredible thing. We're just we're just trying to facilitate it,

469
00:25:12,920 --> 00:25:16,120
Speaker 1: um and and and you know the reality is we've

470
00:25:16,200 --> 00:25:18,199
Speaker 1: hit ten point eight million people at this point. So

471
00:25:18,280 --> 00:25:20,520
Speaker 1: I at that point, I don't care what anybody says.

472
00:25:20,560 --> 00:25:22,359
Speaker 1: It's it's working and we're going to keep doing it.

473
00:25:22,640 --> 00:25:24,639
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for being with us. Matt Damon

474
00:25:24,760 --> 00:25:28,280
Speaker 1: and Gary White, they're co founders of water dot org

475
00:25:28,480 --> 00:25:32,439
Speaker 1: and water Equity On this World Water Day huge issue.

476
00:25:32,840 --> 00:25:35,880
Speaker 1: They say that in order to solve the global water crisis,

477
00:25:35,880 --> 00:25:39,439
Speaker 1: it would take donations of an estimated two hundred billion

478
00:25:39,480 --> 00:25:42,480
Speaker 1: dollars a year. That sounds massive, but it sounds less

479
00:25:42,480 --> 00:25:44,480
Speaker 1: so when you think of the two hundred and fifty

480
00:25:44,600 --> 00:25:48,320
Speaker 1: trillion dollars in private capital that is sitting in global

481
00:25:48,440 --> 00:25:58,440
Speaker 1: financial markets. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

482
00:25:58,800 --> 00:26:03,760
Speaker 1: Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

483
00:26:03,920 --> 00:26:08,200
Speaker 1: whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

484
00:26:08,320 --> 00:26:12,200
Speaker 1: Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

485
00:26:12,640 --> 00:26:13,720
Speaker 1: I'm Bloomberg Radio