WEBVTT - US Stocks Drift as Precious Metals Bounce Back

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play or Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Think back on twenty twenty five the returns we've had

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 2>inequities and fixed income and commodities, and think about twenty

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty six worst opportunities and where you really want to

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 2>start is in technology. We do that with Dan Ives.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 2>He's a senior tech analyst and head of technology research

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 2>at what Bush Security Stand.

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for being in our studio here heres always all.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, set us. Let's set us up for twenty twenty

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 2>six in tech, I mean the consumer electronics shows in

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>a couple of weeks in Vegas. I'm sure you're going

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>to be their huge presence there. Use my name. If

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>you go to Bolajia, they'll take care of you. I know.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 3>So just you know, you say Sweeney, it'll always gets

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 3>the best.

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Open stores opens. What are you thinking about twenty twenty

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:05.639
<v Speaker 2>six year for AI?

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 3>Look, I mean obviously it starts off at Cees where

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that Jensen's speech on that Monday is going

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>to set the tone tone set right in terms of

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 3>autonomous robotics, physical AI. But look, I think the reality

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 3>is is that despite a lot of the haters and

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 3>the bears and hibernation mood, it is going to be

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I think just a booming year for AI and tech stocks,

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>especially in the first half of the year. I think

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 3>investors are underestimating, specifically on software, like we talked about

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 3>not just Palenteer, but Manga, dB Snowflake, go Out, the

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure plays nebiis and some of those others. It's about

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 3>the derivative please the second, third, fourth derivatives, CrowdStrike, cybersecurity, power, Alto,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 3>and I think what we're going to see play out

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft Oracle. Look, I think we said here a year

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 3>from now, Oracle is the name that I think investors

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>are just throwing in the garbage. That's the one I

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>think investors are getting, yeah, because it's the view, like

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 3>taking on debt, open ai is not going to be

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 3>good for their bill. Look, if you look at any

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>open AI related tech stock, from AMD to you know,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 3>to Microsoft to Oracle, those stocks have sold off significantly.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 3>And I think the reality is this is an AI

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>revolution where you're in. We talked about the AI party.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 3>It's ten thirty ten forty five pm. Party goes to

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 3>four am, start a nine pm and Open AI is

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 3>going to play a huge role in that in the

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure build out. So to me, Paul, it's like I think,

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 3>like tech stocks, they're up twenty five percent.

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Really twenty six, But I mean is that the big

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 4>names like in Vidia, because I think to myself, lots

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 4>of competition out there for them. First of all, supply

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 4>chain challenges continue, but you've also got Google and Amazon,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 4>big competitors who are playing catch up with Nvidia. Can

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 4>it really hold on to that momentum in twenty twenty six.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's only one godfather of AI. He's wearing a

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 3>black leather jacket. His name's Jensen, And I think, look,

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 3>they are five years ahead of any other competitor. That's

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 3>why look for them, like even their third best chip

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>restricted each two hundreds right in China despite whatever the

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 3>polotic baba JD tencent, they want those chips because it

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 3>comes down to like they are so many years ahead

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 3>of competition. I think book AMD, that's going to be

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 3>a major play that we see playing out and then

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I think you start to look at like what Google's doing,

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 3>what Microsoft is doing. So in this chip world, it's

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 3>in the AI arms rates. But here's the deal. For

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the first time in thirty years, US is ahead of

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 3>China when it comes to tech.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 2>How about that?

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 3>That that is I think that's really like the most

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 3>important thing here is that's it's.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Getting lost in the sauce. I feel what you just said.

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 3>What is because for so many times, like I'd be

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 3>in Taiwan eighteen hours seeing like factory fabs, then land

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the newer garaport, there's some fisfied dung and donuts and

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 3>you're like, wow, we are like Sobahat now switched.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>So is Opening Eye going to go public in twenty

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty six and is that going to be a seminal event.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 3>For I think early twenty seven? Okay, they go, they

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>could file maybe by the way twenty six, But but

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the thing like SpaceX, you think about Anthropic,

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 3>you think about open Ai. Look, the reality is is

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 3>that you know, people talk about bubble some of the

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>best companies that haven't even gone public yet. And I

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 3>think there's a supply demand for big growth names. And

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 3>that's why to me, I think investors that are seeing

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 3>it's a bubble text done, they're doing it from the

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty fifth four of New York City office building Metro

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 3>North right. I mean the reality is like for someone

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 3>like me that sees it globally, sees the demand that

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 3>supply is twelve to one for video chips today in Asia.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 4>But here's the question is there enough energy out there

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 4>to meet that supply? Because that's one of the big

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 4>the biggest challenge going forward.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>That's Look, if you think the thing to me that

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 3>like if you're just like what could spoil the AI party?

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 3>It's not about demand fourth and dust revolution. It's not

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 3>about like the use cases. It's energy and regulation. And

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 3>look energy, that's why like you know, you look what's

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>happening a nuclear You saw the TAE deal with you

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 3>know obviously trum media. You saw what Google's doing in

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 3>terms of them buying their own energy company. I mean,

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 3>energy is the biggest restriction in the US. But I

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 3>continue to believe like nuclear is going to be the

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 3>play there.

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>See Yes, it's two and fifty three undred thousand people

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 2>to send on Vegas Ford and it's been going there

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>for forty years, I've been going to this thing. This

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>one feels like we might get like a seminal announcement

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 2>coming out of this, whether it's a product, service, an investment,

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 2>a deal. It just feels like maybe this CEES might

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>be something where something really material pops out of there.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I agree, because like look, for so many years,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 3>CEES is like, oh, a great refrigerator that talks to you,

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>a cool drone that now it's really become like central

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 3>to the when you think about the AI revolution, I

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>think when you do about chips, when you look what's

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 3>coming out of AMD, I think Nvidia is really gonna

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 3>double down on robotics. I think quantum is another one.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 3>If you go back a year ago, that's where Jensen

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>was sort of quantums, Like ten fifteen years away, Qualm

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>stocks sold up. I actually think there's gonna be a

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.239
<v Speaker 3>lot more bullish when it comes to quantum. And look,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 3>I know half the companies that I know that are

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 3>going there. They're not officially there. Why they go in there.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 3>They're not going there to you know, to go to

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 3>the Cosmo or go to the wind for dinner. They're

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 3>going because they're looking. They're looking for acquisitions.

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I kind of feel like during CS if I talked

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>to a CEO, I think my first question is could

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>be why you're not in Vegas? Like, I don't care

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>what business you're in. I'm in the pain.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 4>You're touched by the technology.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. But to Paul's point, it's this isn't just

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 3>about like consumer gadgets one hundred inch televisions that somehow

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>talk to you. Now it's really become central to like

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>where the technology. Think about the Chinese presence there in

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>terms of X paying bid everyone else. You think about

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 3>autonomous robotics, and that's why, like I think the one

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 3>thing like to stress to anyone listening is like this

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 3>is AI.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 2>It's not just.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 3>About like chat, GPT, but what mile do you use?

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 3>We are now this is the year Apple goes deep

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 3>thousands of deep end and pool when it comes to

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 3>a on the consumer side, we're now going to hit

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>the next level of the AI revolution. But this is

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>a nineteen ninety six moment, noine, nineteen ninety nine, two

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:03.119
<v Speaker 3>thousand bubble moments.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes, thankfully. Do we expect a big China presence at

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 4>this thing given the relationship right now between the US

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 4>and China.

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 3>If you're a China tech company, you have to come here.

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think, like when I think about like the

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Presidence last year, that was already significant. This year it

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 3>is it's booming because for them, okay, like they're not

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to sell into the US at

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 3>least currently, but this for them, it's a flex to

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 3>muscles on the global stage in terms of them selling

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 3>South America, Europe, Australia. I mean that is that world

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>descends upon the stay. We're right, because when you this

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 3>is the world event. But to Paul's point, like if

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 3>you're not there, it's almost like being at a wedding

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 3>at a table by the kitchen with random people instead

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 3>of being at like kind of like Paul, he's always

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 3>like front and center, like he's at the cool table.

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Matt Campbell named seven teenth Penn State head football coach.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think Campbell like he is the right guy

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 3>for Penn State. I mean it's not just that it's

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 3>the staff he's going to bring in. He's he knows

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 3>how to recruit. I think he's the magic formula. I

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>think now we'll get Dan town Win from the USC

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 3>as a defensive coordinator. This is going to build the

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 3>stage to what I've like people will say next year,

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 3>I got to rebuild in here. I disagree. I think

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 3>this gets us back into the playoffs next year, and

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 3>it goes back to the dream for a Natty in

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven or twenty eight.

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 2>There we go Penn State, a new cycle there as

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>coach Franklin moves on to Virginia Tech. We got the

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Matt Campbelltoner come up there at Penn State and Dan

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I very is an alument and very involved this school.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Dan I thanks so much for joining us. Is Senior Tech,

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 2>anols is web Bush Security giving us the latest thoughts there.

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am. E'stern listen on Apple,

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk a little geopolitics, because goodness knows, there is

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of stuff happening all the time. And our

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 4>next guest says, geopolitics is no longer background noise. It

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 4>is now a core pricing mechanism in global markets. So

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 4>let's dig in with Patrick Murphy, his executive director of

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 4>Geopolitical Advisors at Hillco Global. Patrick, thanks so much for

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 4>being with us, just an overview here on I mean,

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 4>right now on the hot seat, we've got Trump talking

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 4>to net and Yahoo, Trump talking to Putin and to Zelenski.

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 4>How are those big talks playing out in the stock market.

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Oh well, at first, Alex bol thanks for having me on.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 5>It's playing big time because you know, when we look

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 5>at geopolitics, it's now not just background noise as you mentioned,

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 5>it's really we're pricing mechanism out there. So these geopolitical things,

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean especially at least when you look at our

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 5>shipping costs from last year of three hundred percent, why

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 5>because we're the attacks against the shipping lanes there, especially

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 5>in the Red Sea, So in those certain routes, shipping

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 5>costs going up three hundred percent. So you know when

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 5>you say four hundred forty percent of the world's container

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 5>traffic comes from that region, that's a big deal. So

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 5>that's why you solved. The United States and UK joined

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 5>forces and what we call it Operation rough Rider to

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 5>attack the Sudi huthis there to put them back on

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 5>our heels. But it's still a volatile region. So that's

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 5>why this at the end of twenty twenty five, we

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 5>need to make sure that we are moving the ball forward,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 5>hopefully some peace so we can just continue this. You know,

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 5>economy that's moving in the right direction.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Patrick, you're a young guy, but many you've done a

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 2>lot in your life. I mean, this dude a rack

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>a served US Army. Okay, so thank you for your

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 2>servicer in a rack in Bosnia, thirty second Undersecretary of

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the Army. Not even sure what that means, but it

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>sounds really cool. Served in the US House of Representatives.

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the dudes had like three lives and he's

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 2>still young men very cool.

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 5>Well, I drink a lot of coffee, My friend drink

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 5>a lot of coffee.

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Pat When you when you talk to corporations out there, executives,

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 2>they did they understand that you know this, they really

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 2>are impacted by geopolitics because I think we as consumers

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 2>and investors, we learned that the hard way during kind

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 2>of the pandemic, if you will, we Cas said, boy,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>that's global supply chains pretty fragile.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, No, doubt about it. And I think what you're

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 5>seeing Paul is markets are rewarding resilience.

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>You look, look at the numbers.

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm a numbers guy, right, So seventy percent of global

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing their manufacturer basically like they're saying, hey, we want

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 5>to make sure that we are increasing on shore or

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 5>near shore. Why because they want to make sure that

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, they're moving from just in time basically inventory

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 5>models to make sure they're being replaced by hybrid systems.

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 5>So sixty percent basically a saty stock, right because we

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 5>saw the work COVID when they were hurting, they weren't

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 5>able to react and produce for their customers. So that's

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 5>what Hillco does. And we're phenomenal and basically excelling for

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 5>our clients where we say, hey, let's make sure that

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 5>we're doing pricing and repositioning when you look at these

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 5>jew political dislocations, particularly though where the public policy collides

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 5>with private capital. So you know we are best in

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 5>the world at this. I'm excited to be part of

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 5>this team. I love being part of the army team, Paul.

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 5>As you mentioned, I was a soldier in Iraq, professor

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.599
<v Speaker 5>at West Point, and I was at the undersectar is

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 5>basically the COO of the army, and I was the

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 5>acting start to the Army. But now I'm with the

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 5>great team at Hellco Global and you know, as a

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 5>part time professor at West Point. I'm sorry at Whartonell,

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 5>but it's just an exciting time to be a geopolitics

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 5>and make sure we're helping our clients be ahead of

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 5>the curve.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:02.719
<v Speaker 4>I like how we just slips in there that he's

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 4>now our professor at Wharton. Sure, you have like four

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 4>careers going on here, Patrick, I'm just curious what you're

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 4>hearing from your clients and as they look at investments

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 4>through this geopolitical lens, and what are some of their

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 4>biggest concerns heading into the new year.

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 5>I think they want to make sure that there's certainty

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 5>out there, right, and I think we all come together

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 5>as the markets first to make sure that we're speaking

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 5>in one voice. You know, we used to say politics

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 5>should end at our water's edge. We know that might

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 5>be trite and not necessarily the case in this And

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 5>I served in Congress when I came back from Iraq,

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 5>and you know I saw in the Pentagon, but there

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 5>aren't a lot of folks out there that just want

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 5>certainty so it can make the right decisions. But Alexis,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 5>what you're seeing is that there's a massive public private partnership.

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 5>What does that mean? That means like industrial policy is

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 5>being reshaped out there, from chips to ships. What does

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 5>that mean? That means that you're seeing things like the

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 5>Chips Act, right, Yeah, was tens of billions of dollars

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 5>of government investment, but that triggered three hundred billion an investment,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 5>and with semiconductor industry that's a positive thing. But it's

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 5>not just in semi conductors, not just with chimps. It's

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 5>also in defense. You saw in this administration they just

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 5>passed a bill that is going to provide two hundred

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars to the Department of Defense now called the

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Department of War, to what's called their Office of Strategic

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Capital to develop these public fire partnerships. So you're seeing

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 5>the government put in there that's again two hundred billion

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 5>is over the next four years.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>But then you're seeing JP Morgan Jay.

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 5>Say, hey, we're going to make sure we put one

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 5>point five try dollars an investment what they're calling a

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 5>resiliency and Security Initiative where they're making sure that they're

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 5>added the curve too, because why because in defense last

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 5>year two point four to four trillion dollars in defense spending,

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 5>right where there's this recount calibration with you know, basically

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 5>world powers to make sure that you know, to do

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 5>what's necessary to keep their family safe, and they have

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 5>security goals. NATO specifically, he's all about. They're supposially now

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 5>hitting three point five percent of their GDP and defense spending,

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 5>some countries like Germany blowing past four percent. So you're

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 5>seeing this real recaliber caliberation going on and it's exciting

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 5>to be part of it. And that's what our clients want.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 5>They want the data that's going to affect their bottom line.

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 5>It's gonna affect their customers to make sure they're head

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 5>to curve and sleep with the wheel.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Patrick, we've seen some movement towards near shoring, friends shoring,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>on shoring, all that type of stuff of various parts

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 2>of the economy. Does that signal that globalization is dead?

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't say it's dead. I think we had an

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 5>air of globalization and now we have an era of

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 5>basically strategic I would say fragmentation where you're having a

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 5>clear alignment with countries that are aligned with their values

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 5>toward each other. And I think you're going to see that,

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, moving forward, and that's why you know they're

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 5>protecting you basically the supplying channels out there. I've already

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 5>mentioned that shipping container routes, especially dealing with you know,

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 5>the red seat as who has canal, But I think

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 5>you're also seeing it on making sure that they're really

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 5>evaluating the market specifically really valuing Paul, the basically resiliency

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 5>that we haven't seen before because they understand that things

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 5>could change on a dime. And I think that's where

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 5>at HOPKA we really excel on that, you know, the

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 5>pricing and repositioningid these geopolitical dislocations that we're seeing out

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 5>there and so and it's not partisan, Paul, I mean

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 5>because he saw on their President Biden about sixteen million

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 5>new jobs and it's four years, but one point five

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 5>million jobs in manufacturing, and they're seeing President Trump now

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 5>doubled down on American manufacturing and you know, I think

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be here to stay, you know, moving forward. Yep.

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, Patrick, thank you so much for joining us

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate it. Patrick Murphy, He's the executive director Geopolitical Advisors.

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 2>The firm is Hillco Global. Stay with us. More from

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us Live

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>or watch US Live on YouTube.

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Alonso Munos Droids is here, Chief Investment Officer, Hamilton Capital Partners. Alonso,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>you sit down with your clients here and you say, boy,

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 2>we had a good twenty twenty five. Stocks, Euro up

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 2>fifteen to twenty percent, high single digit returns on your

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 2>fixed income investments. Commodities have been ripping, like we just

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 2>mentioned gold and silver. What's the conversation for twenty twenty

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 2>six with your clients?

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 6>Good morning, Paul, going to be here. Can't the markets

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 6>close everything? We're done? No, Look, I think we have

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 6>to be sanguine about the fact that there may be

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 6>some volatility next year. We have some big catalysts that

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 6>we're looking forward to, like FED policy, FED rate cuts

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 6>maybe in January, maybe not a lot of the expectations

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 6>or that the Fed's now going to pull back. We're

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 6>looking at the Supreme Court and what they do with tariffs.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 6>I think that's a big deal, and so I think

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 6>we're going to be, you know, really open to next year.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 6>We're keeping a little bit of cash on hand, but

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 6>we're going to stay on the AI trade. I think

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 6>that's what we're going to do going into next year.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 4>So you're staying on the AI trains, as you said

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 4>in your note. But if you're also holding onto some

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 4>dry powder, where are you looking for those other opportunities?

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 4>Where might they be?

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Alexis.

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 6>I think what we've been doing and our thought logic

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 6>going in next year is to buy the back end

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 6>of the yield curve of the US treagery curve, just

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 6>to lock in some of those rates or clients. We

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 6>expect that rates will start to come down maybe next year.

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 6>We saw that the unemployment rate moved up to four

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 6>point six, so there's a balance on Hey, everything's great.

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 6>GDP was really strong, there's a lot of money flowing

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 6>into this market with there are a lot of folks

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 6>struggling out there too. The unemployment rate is rising. The

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 6>FED is backed into a quarter, Jerome Palace on his

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 6>way out. So we're thinking about about a lot of

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 6>things for us right now. It's lock in some of

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 6>these rates, put in a simple hedge, and go into

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 6>next year, although you know, with some risk, with a

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 6>lot of optimism as well.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I see you know some of your core holdings at

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 2>your firm, Google, Tesla, Meta, We're gonna have the biggest

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 2>supporter arguably on the seal side of those types of names.

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Dan Ives coming in a little bit later here this morning.

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Here those stocks have been such good performers over the years.

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 2>What gives you a conviction to stay with them as

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 2>opposed to maybe, you know, maybe rotate into some other

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 2>areas well.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 6>We're always looking forward. I mean, we don't like to

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 6>look backwards. But if you haven't owned the Big the

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 6>Megacap seven or the Max seven we used to call him,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 6>than you've missed out on tremendous returns. And I think

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 6>for the everyday investor, for you know, folks are accumulating wealth,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 6>you have to be in these names, these leaders that

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 6>have led in the past but are leading into the

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 6>future as well. We saw the acquisition announcement this morning

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 6>from Meta. Yep, Big deal, and I think going forward,

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 6>we have an administration that has been friendly to these companies,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 6>and you see these the principles of these firms CosIng

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 6>up to the president. We like to allocate capital where

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 6>the capital is flowing, and we think that trade continues now.

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Of course, when Facebook turned over to Meta, it kind

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 4>of screwed up the whole Fang acronym, and then more

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 4>companies were added right as well as we have the

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 4>MAC set it. I want to talk a minute about

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 4>the bond market because there's a lot of talk about

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 4>the steepening of the yield curve. Does that if you

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 4>are buying into that that's going to happen next year,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 4>does that imply that inflation might be a problem, and

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 4>then doesn't that sort of throw a juggernaut into all

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 4>of it?

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 6>Well? I think to your point, the FED has primed

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 6>us to watch every single data point basically every day,

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 6>and so we're glued to our screens. I think as

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 6>we go on in next year, what we're seeing is

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 6>inflation not coming down specifically to that two percent target.

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 6>The economy is doing really well and the FED is

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 6>cutting rates, but the back end of the yield curve

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 6>has been pushing higher, So we start to look at

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 6>the risk, which are you the deficit, government spending, the shutdown,

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 6>the terrif us. I mean, there's a lot out there

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 6>that can drive that back into the yield curve higher.

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 6>For us, however, locking in some of those rates potentially

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 6>putting in a very simple simple hedge. We know that

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 6>the ten to twenty year traditionally does well when markets

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 6>push lower, when the momentum ships are the downside. So

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 6>for us, we kind of have a Barbelle approach. We're

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 6>locking in some good yields. You know, there's a lot

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 6>of cash in money markets, seven plus trillion dollars in

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 6>money markets, So where does that money go as rates

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 6>go down into the low threes?

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Hot tuoes alternatives? What are your clients? How much exposure

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 2>do they want two alternatives? And then what's that discussion

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 2>like with your clients?

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, I think it's difficult because these big

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 6>asset managers, the alternative asset managers, have made a huge

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 6>push to bring this to four to one k's to

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 6>the everyday investor, and they come with risk, you know,

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 6>lack of liquidity, client sophistication on understanding these products. But

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 6>We've had a lot of conversations. We've actually been in

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 6>private credit for some time, and we think that trade

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 6>continues and if anything, it's coming to four to one k's,

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 6>it's coming to the everyday investor in the form of vtfs.

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 6>We've seen tremendous amounts of vtfs launched with these products,

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 6>and I think we'll have to wait and see how

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 6>this plays out at the retail investor level.

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 4>You talk about hedging, A lot of folks see the

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 4>precious metals as a hedge, and lately they've been acting

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 4>more like meme stocks. So what do you do with

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 4>precious metals because some thought, you know, yesterday's biggest drop

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.719
<v Speaker 4>in silver in five years was more than just a

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 4>bit of a correction. It was like, you know what,

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 4>we're going to reset and maybe we're not going higher here.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Well, I left.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 6>I think the goldbugs are finally right everyone that told

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 6>us to buy gold. Now. When we talked to investors

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.719
<v Speaker 6>about commodities, commodities have always had a place in a portfolio,

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 6>typically five to ten percent, as you guys have talked about,

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 6>but we also warned folks that when we chase these

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 6>trends just like twenty twenty one, whether it's meme stocks

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 6>or technology stocks, or in this case gold and silver,

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, it can lead about outcomes for investors that

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 6>aren't willing to hold these positions for long term. So

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 6>it is fun to see. It is sort of fun

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 6>in conversation. And I think there's a supply demand global

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 6>supply demand dynamic at play here for gold and for silver,

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 6>and for some of these rare earth corals copper that

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 6>are inputs to data centers, to chips, to all these

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 6>things that we're talking about that are exciting about. Yeah,

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 6>I trade.

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 2>So we've had I would say, really good earnings environment

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 2>supporting stocks and bonds. Do you think earnings are going

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 2>to continue to be strong enough to support these markets here?

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 6>So we think that earnings are going to be good,

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 6>I think the bar continues to be pushed so high

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 6>that when companies don't absolutely smoke earnings, you see really

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 6>big price reaction. And I know, you guys, maybe we'll

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 6>remember this. Prior to COVID, if we had an up down,

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, one and a half percent in the market

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 6>at the broad index, we would all freak out.

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Now it's just.

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 6>A normal, normal Monday, normal Tuesday. So we're looking at

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 6>that volatility. I think, you know, going into next year,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 6>we're just open to the fact that, you know, earnings

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 6>will be good, but we could see some broader volatility,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 6>specifically within these names that have been that have been

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 6>hot for the last time.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 4>And it really has been good. Is just not good enough,

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 4>especially when you're talking about some specific names. It's been

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 4>like that for a while. Now, what about IPO market,

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 4>M and A. Lots of folks we're talking to seeing

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 4>bullish in those two areas.

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 6>Very much so. I mean banks, a lot of bank

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 6>mergers this year. I mean, we've seen some really big,

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 6>sort of flashy eye and M and A's announces share

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 6>and we think that continues. The market was basically frozen

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 6>for two years, you know, when the FED was in

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 6>their rate hiking cycles. So this is sort of a reopening,

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 6>a breath of fresh air to see some of these

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 6>deals take place and hopefully a lot of money money

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 6>to be made.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 2>You're based on in Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia. I'm just gonna

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 2>guess watch this, Okay, I guess without even asking.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Peachtree.

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 6>We're on Peachtree.

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 2>There you go, what are your clients asking you these days,

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 2>what's the biggest concern for them these days?

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 6>You know, I think that a lot of clients are

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 6>wondering when rates are going to come down. You know,

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 6>a lot of folks still have mortgages, they have credit cards,

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 6>they have auto loans. And what we're seeing, and part

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 6>of that dynamic is the economy is great in the

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 6>Fed's cutting rates, but that back into the yield curve

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 6>is sort of anchored in the in the low force

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 6>mid forced. So we're talking a lot about estate planning.

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 6>We're talking a lot about how to allocate fresh capital

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 6>with markets at all time highs. We're talking a lot

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 6>about gold and how to melt gold and sell gold,

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 6>and you know, but it's they're exciting conversations. You know,

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot of people have done really well in the

0:25:57.800 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 6>market and so looking to rebalance in the new year,

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 6>maybe get some exposure out of tech to financials and

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 6>healthcare sectors that haven't done you know, specifically, as well

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 6>as technology and consumer discretion.

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Alanza, thank you so much for joining us. Really appreciate

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 2>it a lot. Some MNOs. He's a chief investment officer

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Hamilton Hamilton Capital Partners. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 2>Surveillance coming up after this.

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>watch us Live on YouTube.

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.719
<v Speaker 2>It's an election year that has a lot of ramifications

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of parts of this economy, in this

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 2>markets and what does it mean for Republicans, Democrats and investors.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Coming out over gothamcconda joints us here lecture of Management

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Practice at the Yale School of Management. He's also now

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg opinion contributor here. So you know, we got

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the midterm elections here, typically got the party that's not

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 2>in the White House tends to do better in these

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 2>midterm elections. I'm hearing reporting that that may occur this

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 2>time as well. How do you guys see it?

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 7>No, I think that's right, and that's the general tendency.

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 7>And you got a layer onto that. Two other things.

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 7>One is that Donald Trump is historically unpopular. He's you know,

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 7>he's essentially never broken fifty percent other than a week

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 7>here and there, but he's really unpopular now depending on

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 7>the poll you're looking at somewhere between thirty six and

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 7>forty one. Those are all bad numbers. Okay, So when

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 7>you have a particularly unpopular presence, going to do worse.

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 7>And the second is Donald Trump's sort of secret sauce

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 7>in politics, and it is extraordinary, Let's be clear, is

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 7>his ability to get people who do not normally vote

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 7>to show up and vote for him.

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 7>We just see this at a scale that's remarkable. You

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 7>saw in Michigan, you actually saw where the Democratics under

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 7>one because thirty thousand Trump voters voted for Trump and

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 7>left the rest of the ballot blank. Right, So that

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 7>doesn't work in midterms when he is not on the ballot,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 7>and so that puts the Republicans in an even worse situation.

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 7>Right now, what I'd say is there, and I think

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 7>there are Republicans and congress people, and I've heard this

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 7>from some who are really concerned.

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 2>They are right at the edge where.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 7>The gerrymanders set up to protect their districts are going

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 7>to start to look weak. If Trump drops another three

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 7>four five points, you know you're gonna start to see

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 7>incumbents who thought they were essentially asleep at the switch.

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 7>We're never you know, would have to die before they

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 7>lost reelection, right, right, are going to be in trouble,

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 7>and then you're gonna you'll see a big shift in

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 7>political dynamics.

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 4>So are we already seeing those folks distance themselves or

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 4>try to distance themselves from the president? I mean, they're

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 4>sort of in a no win situation, right.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 7>They are the extent of personal control that he exercises

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 7>over the party and the kind of ruthless way he

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 7>goes after people who go who break from him, as

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 7>Marjorie Dylor Green has experienced. There just isn't a precedent

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 7>in American history for that. This is just a new phenomenon.

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 7>But at some point they're going to start worrying about

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 7>ringing reelection and they're going to start saying, well, maybe

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 7>the primary isn't the only thing I have to worry about.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 7>I don't think you're seeing distancing yet, and I'm actually

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 7>pretty skeptical you will. We've seen so much turnover in

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 7>the Republican Party that a lot of these people are

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 7>either genuinely true believer or purely cynical, right, Like they're

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 7>kind of one or the other. What you are, I

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 7>think likely to see is more retirements. And you know,

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 7>there are all these rumors that you're going to see

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 7>people retiring during the term, enough that Mike Johnson might

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 7>actually lose the speakership. I don't think that will happen

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 7>because the level of essentially fear that they will put

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 7>into anyone who to do that is going to be extraordinary.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 7>But the fact that people are even talking about it

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 7>is not something on your career.

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 4>See mass retirements is what you're saying in Congress.

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 2>That being said to the extent that the Republican Party is,

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, weakening around the edges as Trump's administration ages

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 2>here again, I have to ask the question, where are

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats Who's leading the charge here? It can't be

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Chuck Schumer. No.

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 7>I think the extent of the generational shift that's hitting

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 7>the Democratic Party is profound, and this is going to

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 7>have long lasting effects in American politics. This is not

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 7>just going to be this election cycle seeing a new

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 7>sort of generation of Democrats who basically, I think the

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 7>way they would put it is they want to play

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 7>the game the way the Republicans do, right, and which

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 7>means that they are not as interesting compromise. They are

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 7>not as interested in blanking. Whether or not you agree

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 7>with that assessment, that's how they think about it. And

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 7>that shift is going to be is going to be

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 7>pretty When you have two parties who are willing to

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 7>go to the edge, that is very different than having

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.719
<v Speaker 7>one party that's willing to go to the edge. And

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 7>so that is going to happen. But Paul, as you know,

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 7>you asked me this question every time I bought it,

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 7>I tell you the same answer. It's still early, okay.

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 7>The way the leadership of the party is going to

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 7>evolve is the primary is and we're not going to

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 7>start the primaries till after the midterm elections. You're starting

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 7>to see people jockey. You're starting to see people have success.

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean, Gavin Newsome, I would not have predicted that

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 7>parodying Donald Trump's voice on Twitter would be a successful

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 7>political tactic, but it turns out it.

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Really works for him.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 7>And you're seeing a bunch of other people who are similarly,

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 7>you know, making making waves, making noise that you're starting

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:02.479
<v Speaker 7>to say, Okay, the demochocratic problem in the primaries as

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 7>opposed to now right where all anybody cares about is

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 7>the midterm. But when the primaries roll around. Is it's

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 7>not going to be a lack of people. It's going

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 7>to be too many that there are just so many

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 7>plausible candidates. So I'm not you know, I'm not saying

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 7>any of these people would be a great president. But

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 7>if Kevin Yousome or Josh Shapiro or Wes Moore or

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 7>core like, there's a lot of people in the Democratic

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 7>Party who you look at and go, that's a plausible

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 7>present and that you know, there's sort of an embarrassment

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 7>of riches problem that they might have to deal with there.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, something that's going to be happening before the midterms,

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 4>of course, is the deadline for another government shutdown, and

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 4>the crux of the first government shutdown is still the problem,

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 4>which is no agreement on healthcare. Do you think they're

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 4>going to take it to the mat and then we're

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 4>going to avoid or could we be entering yet another

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 4>historic shutdown at the end of January.

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think there's a chance that will that

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 7>will avoid another shutdown, just because one of the bigger,

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 7>big underlying driving factors for the last shutdown was the

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 7>Fsteam files, and you know, mad as that seems it's

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 7>quite clear that the House was held out of session

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 7>to stop that, to delay that vote on the files.

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 7>Since that vote has taken place, that factor is out,

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 7>and I think everybody's kind of looking at the last

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 7>one and being that that didn't work right Like the

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 7>Democrats who did it, it did not they you know that,

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 7>even if they got what they wanted out of it,

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't feel that way because there's so much internal

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 7>pressure against it. The Republicans, this is just a nightmare.

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 7>But the other big driving dynamic in this, I don't

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 7>know how they're going to get out of it. Is

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 7>really simple. If premium skyrocket the way that it looks

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 7>they are doing and the looks like they're going to,

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 7>that is a political disaster for the Republican party, which

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 7>owns the issue. In that way, they're asking Democrats, but

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 7>to fix it, almost all the votes will be Democrats.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 7>The policy incentives which are to fix the problem, and

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 7>the political incentives, which are for Democrats to say, hey, guys, congratulations,

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 7>like you own this, those run in completely opposite directions.

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 7>And the closer we get to the midterms, the more

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 7>the political incentives are going to want the policy wants.

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Post midterms to what extent, is President Trump effectively a

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 2>lame duck.

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:07.719
<v Speaker 7>I mean he was, he was a lame duck from

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 7>the moment he got regotsorn in, right, But what has

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 7>stopped that from happening is again this incredible personalist control

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 7>over the party. That is again like Franklin Roosevelt in

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 7>his wildest dreams did not have anything like this. And

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 7>so if the midterms are a blood bath for the Republicans,

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.959
<v Speaker 7>and much of that just depends on the economy, right Like,

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 7>if AI keeps the economy to float through November, then

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 7>they bill be they're in a loose seats but if MA,

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 7>they may not lose sixty seats, they may lose twenty.

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 7>But if the midterms are a blood bath for the Republicans,

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 7>then I think you're going to see some pretty high

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 7>level of panics setting in because, especially if the economy

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 7>turns between now and twenty eight, which I'm not making

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 7>any predictions, just that we've had a long run without

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 7>that so that it wouldn't shock anybody, You're going to

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 7>see some Republicans who are pretty panicked and who are

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 7>not going to feel all that comfortable, say writing the

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 7>inner of jd Vance in the same way.

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 4>In thirty seconds or less. Do we get a deal

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Ukraine and Russia.

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 7>No, No, we're not like I like the deal. The

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 7>deal would have to be the Russians essentially withdrawal from Ukraine,

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 7>because the Ukrainians are pretty clear they're going to keep

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 7>fighting and as long as they're going to keep fighting

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 7>and as long as Putin wants to conquer Ukraine, which

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 7>is essentially still where you're saying, there's not going to

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 7>be a deal. The sort of Trump administration's decision to

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 7>side with Russia in this war and put pressure on

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 7>Ukraine is you know, like just one as a matter

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 7>of national interest, in national honor, horrifying, right, But even

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 7>setting that aside, what it's demonstrated is that the Ukrainians

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 7>can keep fighting without us, and fight well, and they

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 7>know it all right.

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Gotham, thank you so much for joining us. Skathamccon the

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 2>lecture of Management Practice at the l School of Management.

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Also a Bloomberg Opinion contributor.

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Liz Live each weekday,

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com the

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal