WEBVTT - Elephant Love Medley (Derogatory)

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you identify as freedom, beauty, truth or love.

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously I give beauty. But at the end

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the day, come freedom, beauty, truth, and come loos.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Love is a many splendid thing. Love lifts us up

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>where we belong. All you need is love. But don't

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>stop that together. It's honestly, I want to give Silky

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Nut mcganash half man, half woman drag and do both

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>parts like I know I could. UM. That song I

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>think perfectly encapsulates what is the Elephant Love Medley? The

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Elephant Love Medley, which is not a song but a

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>mash up of songs UM performance by Nicole Kim and

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Ewan McGregor to perfection. Um. I think that song perfectly

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>encapsulates today's discussion topic, Basil Lerman, the Basilerman cinematic universe, UM,

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and everything that comes with the beer. Sorry if you will, Yes,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the territory of one of the most maximalist utters of

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>our generation. Um, who is not gay for some reason.

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But we'll get into that. Yeah, we're going to be

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>discussing bases and you know he would say, which we

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>have not seen all of but um, like some of

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Basilerman's movies have been very important to me, but I

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>actually am not as aware of a lot of his

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>other works. So today I'm a bit more of the

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>virgin in this scenario, and we will be exploring basist

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>films from kind of his oldest to his most recent,

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>because this is like a virgin the show where we

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>give yesterday's pop culture today's takes, I'm ros damn you,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm fran Toronto Brock a kiss on the hand,

0:01:54.400 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe Continental, you know Rose, it doesn't matter if you

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>love them or Capital th That's pretty good, I have

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to say, Like, as someone who is just coming off

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the high of being at the New York Chromatic Ball,

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I forgot that Gaga are still okay. Let's but let's

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>let's okay. I have a bone to pick before you

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>even get into it. It was not the New York

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>CHROMATICA Ball. It was the New Jersey CHROMATICA Ball. Okay, Baby, Baby, Baby,

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't care how many times it's a New York

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>city on her tour dates. It was in New Jersey.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>It was in Jersey, and she reminded us many times

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that it was Jersey. That was honestly, like, one of

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>my biggest critiques was that she said Jersey just way

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>too many times. Well it's better than if she said, Hey,

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>New York City and you're like, we're in New Jersey.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But it was mostly New Yorkers and obviously she picked

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that venue. That's not where you were geographically. Okay, actually,

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just to get right into the recap. I have

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, like she she clearly like googled Jersey, like

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>right before the show, because you know, the best parts

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of like a Gaga show is like her ad libbing,

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and one of her ad libs was like, you know,

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I just I would not say that that's the best

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>part of a Gaga show. No, it was definitely my

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>favorite and most memorable. The most memorable parts of the

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 1>show for me was her ad libbing and she was like,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>she was like, you know, I love to come to

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Jersey and look at the beautiful boardwalks here. It was

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like have you had you seen her before? No, this

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was my first time seeing Gaga. I uh, I felt

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>spiritually ready for it. I do wish. One of my

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest regrets is that I didn't see the Fame Monster tour.

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I wish more than anything have seen that. But I

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>figured this was kind of I got really cheap tickets

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for the pit and I was like, this is my

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>time now, UM to see Gaga, Like I'm ready for this,

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and I loved um Chromatica. I love that album and

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so I was like, this is the album that I

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think is is worth seeing it for. Um, what was

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>your favorite performance? Okay, well she started out chromatical Ball

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>spoilers for those listening. She started out with three throwbacks,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>so she she did Bad Romance, poker Face, and justin List,

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>none of which she should be doing live. I did, like,

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I strongly feel that we don't need to see them

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>anymore and I would rather I have her have like

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>put total pop songs and totally totally disagree, but you know,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>we are different little monsters and that's okay that that

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was my favorite part of the show actually, um, because

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>she did it as a park and bark. She literally

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>stood on this rotating platform and a huge structural costume

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that was like disassembled by her dancers and like kept

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>doing these different views. But she did all of these

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>songs just standing and singing, and it was because she's

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>done them like some billions. But I think that it

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was a very compelling way to make us all pay

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>attention to listening to songs that we had heard before,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>because she put vocal spins on it that I had

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>never heard before. I think it was sonically very interesting.

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We were focusing on the back backup dancers and the visuals,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>so I did really really love those and as someone

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>who has never been to a Goga performance before, I

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see you know, I get that part of it.

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I just wish she felt liberated from doing their biggest

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>hits because like we've all seen the super Bowl, Like

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we've all seen the iconic performances of those songs, and

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think there's that much more to be

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>gleaned from seeing them live, especially when, like with something

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:03.679
<v Speaker 1>like Chromatica, I think there's other parts of her discography

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that are more thematically relevant to that album that could

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>have used new life breathed into them for this tour specifically. Yeah,

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she does no art pop in this tour

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at all, and I would have loved to see some

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>art pops. I thought that. I also was kind of

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>not that I haven't been at the show, but I've

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>also like, I know what the set list is, like

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I've watched the videos, you know, I think that, you know,

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the parts that were most memorable to me and most breathtaking.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>We're definitely just the visuals in general. The show started

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>out with a very abstract film. A lot of the

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>graphics were in black and white. Um, and you know,

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we've been seeing them all over Twitter. But it's just

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:51.119
<v Speaker 1>really well done projection work that is not trying too hard.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>That the kind of stuff that she does really well

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>or it's like the A V component is a way

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is next level. Yeah, and her, you know, I would

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>say some of her costumes were not amazing, but some

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of them were phenomenal, like the alien kind of mask

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>get up that we all saw. She performed shallow in that,

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was so like incredible, Like she did

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>her sitting at the piano and doing her ballads, which

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.679
<v Speaker 1>you and I was a glaring omission from the ballad

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>set list, but the ballads were another path. Yeah, I

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>thought it was unacceptable. That's maybe my all time fave

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>UM Gaga song I want her to do Speechless live again.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Speechless is in my top ten of Gaga. I think

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know I was talking about this is someone this weekend,

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we need to do a Gaga episode. I would love to.

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I have so much to say to her, and she

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was so formative to both of our upbringings, and I

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear about how that all comes first

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.679
<v Speaker 1>full circle. And I just want to warn the Little

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Monster virgins that, like we will when we eventually do

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a Gaga episode, we will not go easy on her.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>We will not hold her hand um I. As as

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I may have said before, like part of my standing

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>her and that's why I'm being critical, even like not

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>having seen the show, part of my standing her is

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like I want her to be the best she can be,

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and I love her so much. I know that she

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>has that in her, so I really take her to

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>task when I think she does stupid disappointing things, and

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that I think is like healthy stand um right, Like

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>any any music artist, if you want to label yourself

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>as a stand stand like, you can do so by

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>not um uh just patently agreeing with and standing everything

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the artist does without critique, like you know, kind of.

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I to my friend Hunter Abrahams is like the biggest

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>little Monster I know, and is in a Little Monster

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>fandom group chat with the like dozens of people, if

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. But they're a nazing and they rented a

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>party bus um and filled it with little monsters to

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to head to the MetLife Stadium, and I was a

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>little weary effort because I was like, oh my god,

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>little monsters are kind of like a really annoying fan base,

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Like what am I going to deal with? But like

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone on the bus, much like you were very down

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to just like make fun of Gaga and and all

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that make it so easy to make fun

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of her and so fun. Kind of on the note

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>of all this, of anyone is interested in some like

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>extra reading on Gaga, there was a really good So

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Pitchfork does a thing and like I know, Pitchfork, like

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I roll um every Sunday they like revisit an older

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>album and like do kind of an updated review of it.

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And this Sunday they released an art pop um review

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually really really well written. What did they say?

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And um kind of a lot of things that all

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of us say about art pop, which is like, you know,

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>very much placing it at the time in her career

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that was like really to multuous because she had like

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>suffered an injury, she was changing management. Um that it's

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>like a very flawed album. But like received a lot

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of unfair critique and also fair critique because she did

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>like really fucked up stuff like working with r Kelly

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>even though everyone knew he was, you know, a fucking abuser,

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>or deciding that she wanted to be the next I mean,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't sucked up per se, but just like a

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>polarizing thing when she was like, I'm the next Marina

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Abramovich and I am a performance artist. I'm a helicopter

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, like you know what I mean? Yeah, well,

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and this review I think does a really

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>good job of placing all of the context of like

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what she was trying to do with art pop, like

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>bringing fine art into a you know, pop landscape. So

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I definitely suggest reading that. I also did write something

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for Paper a couple of years ago, went after Gaga

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>tweeted that she didn't remember art pop was really disappointing. Um,

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I wrote something for paper that's, like I think, called

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in defense of art pop, so that I would. I

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>think it's actually one of the better things I've one

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of the few pieces of writing you would stand the

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>writing of one are the few pieces of journalism that

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I stand behind. Um, So go give that a read.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested, are you a pro jewels and drugs,

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>little monster or a anti Okay, just wanted to clarify. Um,

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I I have to say, you know, in the making

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>fun of Gaga of it All, like I said earlier,

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>my favorite parts were like the ad living Gaga is

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on autopilot up there, like she is realizing things. Bottom Yeah,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>She's yes, that's exactly what it's giving. She's she's had

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a full of that, and she's like realizing things like

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>as she says them. My friend Dakota, who I went

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to the ball with, she was like, it sounds it

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the way the way she talks is like

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I message like prediction, text, like every word, every word

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>like that comes after like it is like just happening

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in her mind as it as it occurs to her,

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because she speaks kind of she speaks kind of slowly

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>but with a lot of conviction. Like, um there was

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>this one moment where she was basically trying to introduce

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Edge of Glory, which was so good, and she was like,

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've always wanted to shoot a music video

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on a New York street fire escape, and and I

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>was like, what are you saying? Like who are you?

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>She's a fucking she's There was another there's another moment

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>where she was like, she had a really beautiful story

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>about Tony Bennett. She's like, Tony used to be my neighbor.

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Well he still is kind of And I was like,

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what are you? Why don't you even Or the moment

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>that has already gone viral on Twitter where she was

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>when she was um, when she was like, and they

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>better not come for gay marriage, Am I right? Queens?

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, God, that's like you've been saying

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that for a decade. Gaga, like that is a decade

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>old take. Um, speaking of liftings, I just I want

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>to I want to spend thirty seconds on this as

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a necessary p s A to anyone listening to this

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast to not make the same mistake I made of

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>watching the beginning of Secret Celebrity Drag Race Celebrity in quotes,

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know that that was yeah. Um, well

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm here to tell you that it really is not

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 1>a thing. Um, it was the greatest waste of my time.

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just watched it because I needed

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>something to watch with my trade this weekend. And I

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, I, I mean I had some I had

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>some trade imported this this weekend, and you watched drag

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Race with them. I watched Secret Celebrity drag Race because

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what girl, this was. I mean, I don't even

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>need to say it. I can only blame myself, but like, truly,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>truly I want that time back in my life and

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and and it is so cringe and such an insult

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to the drag Race stage. Sorry, like I do feel

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like I that the drag race stage deserves more than that. Um,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And I I know I don't think that's what I

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>That's why I emphasized because I was like, I know

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Rose disagrees with me on this, but um, all that

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is to say is that all the celebrities that are

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>doing lip sync battle, which is the heterosexual rip of

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>drag race that you know, gets probably more viral videos

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>than drag Race, all those girls should be doing I

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>have watched that Tom Holland video. Man, incredible, it's so incredible.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But Tom Holland and Hathaway, the rock Queen Latifa, all

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>those girls, they should be doing Secret Celebrity drag Race

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of lip sync battle, because that's the thing is like,

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like like even though drag Race is as huge as

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it is, they still cannot get real celebrities to I guess,

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like quote unquote Pete on it. Yeah, and that's really disappointing, honestly,

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>but like I don't know anyways, that's all I wanted

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to say. Please please, please do not watch Secret Celebrity

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Drag Race. Um, okay. One thing that I I'm glad

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're giving that recommendation because I listened to another

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>recommendation of yours this weekend, but it wasn't a negative one.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a positive one. So you were really audamantly

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to get me to watch the new League of

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>their Own series on Amazon. I was very resistant because

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm gonna make some people mad, but I

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>don't really like Abby Jacobson. I kind of I just

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like find her whole thing like off putting.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, not really a big broad City fan. Your

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>explanation made sense. You're not a girl who enjoys cringe

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>core like that's not and and I just think that

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>she kind of plays the same character over and over again,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>which is and she definitely does in this show. But

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that I moved past that because I watched

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the first two episodes and I actually really liked it,

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and I certainly I feel the same way about Abby

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Jacobson that I did before with like I do still

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>find her annoying, but even though she is the star

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of the show and I guess also wrote it and

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>created it, there's so many other characters to like fall

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in love with, and caper Land's amazing. Darcy Cardon is

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>such a fucking legend. I I've never seen a league

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of their own in full. It was like on TV

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot when we were kids, and so I've seen

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>parts of it, but I've never watched the whole thing,

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>but I don't recommend it. It's too long, it drags on,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like slow. And also the original really thinks that,

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like the coach Tom Hanks is like the most interesting

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>character in the movie, and he's not, you know, but um,

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that the movie is kind of like queer

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Canon because of like Madonna and Rosie and like the

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>like gay like undertones of it all. And I think

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>part of what's great about this reboot is that, like

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the undertones are not undertoning, they are overtoning every character,

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, they're all gay, like I mean spoilers for

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the first episode, Like I screamed when Darcy and an

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Abby made up the end of the episode when she

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and when she goes I thought so and just walks out,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and then I screamed again. And at the end of

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>episode two, um, when there's another same sex makeup, I

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hope that that happens at the end of like every

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>episode just ends with kissing. It's really it's a really

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>satisfying show. I I hesitated to put it in the

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>feel good category because I don't want it to get

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like ted lassoed, Like I think it's more complex than that.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>But like the show gives you all of these payoffs

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that are just reminiscent of that era of movies. But

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's also like I think it's also earned because there

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of tension and like there's a lot

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of funked up stuff that happens, um in terms of

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>like these women experiencing massaw genine and racism and sexism

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, like queer faphobia. Um so when those

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>like joyful moments do happen, like I think my favorite

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>moment in the first episode is when Abby Jacobson, Darcy

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Carden and the other woman just enter the field and

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>see everyone playing, and like they all like kind of

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>tear up because they've never experienced that before. And that

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is so like it's like actually kind of moving, and

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>so those moments feel really earned, and it's not like

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not just like like kind of masturbatory like woke rebooting,

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's not traumapore and it's like kind of like

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a good a good marriage of like acknowledging the flaws

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of our history and of probably like the original source

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>material and correcting them. The lesbian haircut scene girl, like

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>it was so like the first episode. Yes, it is

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>so in the canon of like the L word style

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>lesbian haircut scenes. Like it's so hot, Like the show

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is hot, and like Robert Dress, who plays Lube, is

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>so hot. Like everyone's hot. Everyone's hot. Also, caper Land

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>like should become one of the most famous people in

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. I totally agree. Oh my god, you need

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to listen to um. In terms of like

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>other things that I kind of maybe made you consume

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>this week, the leaked Kim Petris album. Yeah, I I

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>mean I didn't really mind. You know, It's like I

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>listened to like half of it, which took about seven minutes,

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>because they're like a minute fifty and you know, like

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. It's like perfectly fine pop music, and

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>like that's the thing with Kim Petris is like if

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't all this baggage with Kim Petris, I would

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>like listen to it and be like cool, I'm like

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>glad this exists. This is like perfectly good pop music.

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And like even even if it's not like her problematically

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>working with Dr Luke. Now, it's like the fact that

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>this album was never released and like you can only

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>listen to leaks of it, and it's like, why couldn't

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this album just come out? Like it's it's really baffling,

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and it does suck that there always has to be

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>something with her, because the thing is like she should

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>be a bigger than she is, Like she makes very good,

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>very consumable pop music like this and very tiktoki like

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and and and truly like at this point, the biggest

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>moment of her career was when Coconuts was a sound

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok and like, but like still nothing really came

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of that, when for a lot of other artists, those

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are the kinds of things that break them out, and

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like she has a song, a song with Paris Hilton

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>on this album and it's just good, Like like that

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Paris Hilton song is pretty good. It's it's fine. So

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>like when you're thinking about all that, like all the

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>why of it, it always leads you back to like, well,

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>there has to be some reason that this girl is

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>not breaking out in the way that she should be,

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and all roads lead back to Dr Luke in one

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>way or another. M hmmm, yeah, I mean I think

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>that the drama surrounding this league is interesting for the

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>virgins um. There's not a ton of clarity about what

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>exactly went down. But leading up to the release of

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.959
<v Speaker 1>this album Problematique, Kim has you know, been crying on

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Instagram stories about how her label won't let her release it,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>how she wants to quit because the album is in limbo.

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Apparently it's been officially scrapped, and in a deleted tweet,

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Kim said, you know the album scraped, so go listen

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>to the league, like I don't care, Like, did you

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.719
<v Speaker 1>see her t talk where she was like, thanks for

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>getting my album on the top of the leak charts.

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>M I've got like the Number one League. Like that

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff is funny, and like I appreciate that it's it

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>shows that like she has this like good sense of

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>humor and like she has all the components to be

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you are really successful and compelling pop star. But like,

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>I know, the thing with Kim is, like I know

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the odds are stacked against her because she's trans, and

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>like I'm sure that a lot of what's going on

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>no stems from probably like one bad decision that she

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>made with like signing the wrong contract at some point

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in her career, and that sucks that it will like

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>haunt her forever. Yeah, you know, I think that there's

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of nuance to this conversation, right because Dr

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Luke doesn't just produce Kim's music. He produces a lot

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of dojo songs like Nikki Um, like a lot of

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>like music artists that we like consume and have no

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>problem consuming. And I do think sometimes that Kim is

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>held under disproportionate scrutiny. She should be scrutinized, right um.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time I think that it's sometimes

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bizarre. I I'm not sure I always buy

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the you know, I'm trans and so the odds are

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>stacked against me, excuse me, because they're just like tons

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of marginalized people that um can do what they do without,

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, signing to known abusers. But also she maybe yeah,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think that, you know, I I think at

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, I don't really care about

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the mistakes she made in her past. And I also

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>don't care if the music I'm currently listening to is

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>produced by Dr Luke because Dr Luke makes some fucking hits. Um,

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>This Household is a pro turn Off the Light household.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>That is a perfect album. It is no skips. It

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is the best album of Kim's career. Listening to both

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Turn Off the Light albums like when When

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>When Halloween comes around? Like I want to listen to those,

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>like she's the only pop girlie who's made like spooky

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Halloween music. But anyways, I'm going to continue to listen

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to the League album. It's It's It's It's got some

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>really I think the title track is really good, but

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>there are some other hits on there. Yeah, it's like

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>if it was on Spotify, sure might into it. Yeah,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not easy to listen to it, so I won't

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And I want one thing before we wrap up the news.

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We have failed to mention that we are shutting down

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this podcast because Nympho Wars has returned, and so there's

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>no reason for any other podcasts to exist, including point.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So turn this off right now, go listen to Nympho Wars. Um,

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>And it's been nice knowing you Rose listen. You and

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I have talked about my heart. Someone told me recently

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that that listened from dream Girls is their favorite Beyonce song.

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the wrong take. That's actually category. Like, I know

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we're the wrong take. I know we're supposed to say,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>like you know as Nicks, that like things are subjective

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and that like you know, are you are? Isn't eye

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Behold or whatever the funk, It's not. That's

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of wrong. That's wrong, um, And I feel like

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a lot of takes like that with today's

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>discussion on Basi Lerman, which I think so as well.

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, for the long term versions

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the people that have been with us since day one,

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>bass has come up and a lot of our conversations

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just like here and there, we talk about Mulan Rouge,

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we talk about Romeo plus Juliette we talk about Romeo

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and Juliet, I will continue to say the plus is

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>simply how it is stylized. It's how it is stylized.

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It is, it is, it is not. This is not math.

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>The math is not math. Here's the thing is that

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>if I'm in a casual conversation and I say Romeo

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>plus Juliet, they know immediately that I'm referring to the

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Basil Lerman version and not the ninety eight like versions.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. That's why I say Basil Lerman's Romeo and Juliet. Right, well,

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that works too, And yet here I am saying Romeo

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>plus Juli. Yet I refused to not say um but Rose.

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, I would love to know, like what

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>your relationship is, too, bas because I feel like I've

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>already talked about mine on the pod, but like, you know,

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>what was your first baz or do you remember how

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you felt about the work. I think you know. I

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have as much of a relationship with his work

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on a large scale. I have a relationship with specifically

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>two things he has made. I love Romeo and Juliet.

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.479
<v Speaker 1>It was a movie that I watched a lot as

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a kid was really formative for me. It's the It's

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why I, when I was in

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>like fourth grade, went into my dad's like study and

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>grabbed the complete work of William Shakespeare and read the

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>entire thing. It's like one of the things that jump

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>started my love of Shakespeare. And Mulan Rouge was the

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>thing I was the most obsessed with for you know,

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like a solid year when I was a teenager. It's

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I was in love with you and McGregor.

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It helped me discover a lot of music through like

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>all of the covers and in it. You know, like

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>was very symbiotic with my love of musical theater obviously,

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, it was and is important to me. That

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>being said, I never felt that huge of a desire

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to explore any of his other work because I think

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 1>even then I realized the things I was drawn to

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in those movies were more of the story than the style.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And I know from seeing some of his other projects

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that so much of what Basilorman does is about style substance.

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of times very substantive, but sometimes

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the substances sacrificed. So what was your intro to bows

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Um similarly also had an obsession with Bass, spurred by

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Mulan Bruge, which I think was the conversation for a

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, culture critics that year. It you know,

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>won a lot of Oscars and all that jazz. But

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I just remember, and this is repeated, I'm sorry for

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the virgins, But like, I watched that movie and it

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>was a huge unlocking um for me, my um. You know,

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the by neighbor of my friend at the cul de Sac,

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Mel showed it to us and corrupted me. And I

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 1>was like, shout out to Mel, and I was like,

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this movie has escorts and faggots and like boysterousness and

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like murder, espionage, like promiscuity, like all of these things,

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>so many scenes that are driven by sex as an engine.

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was so interesting. And but what

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I latched onto was just what you were talking about,

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that the stylistic world building that Bass does

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in almost all of his films that I is just

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>very very very mighty. Any of my friends will tell

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you that I am a style over substance girl, like

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>ascetic style. How it looks is like I'm very I'm

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>It's my big weakness and I will overlook a lot

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of like quality control issues if it just looks really good. Um,

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like something that Justin and I always get to

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>arguments about, actually, and I'm not proud of that, but

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just who I am, um, and I need both.

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I really like style. I like a lot of bas

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Arman style, and I think the projects of his that

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I like are the ones where there's as much substance

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>as there is style, Like in Romeo and Juliet, it's

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>literally Shakespeare like there is you know, the oldest love

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>story ever told. You know, there is a lot there

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>too who meet to the style, and the style works

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in reinterpreting it and making it accessible for a modern audience.

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And then kind of the same thing in Mulin Rouge,

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like a very classic It's it's Labo m It's

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>like a very classic love story and the story works

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>hand in hand with the style in a way that

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is like overwhelming in a good way. Yeah. And I

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that when you are able to identify the

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>stylistic through lines that make bases work his work, I

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>think you kind of grow a new appreciation for what

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is a very consistent body of work, a very small

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>body of work, to be honest, like, it's not a

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>ton of stuff, but um, I don't know. That's kind

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of why I wanted to do an episode about it,

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and why I forced you in in in the good

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>tradition of this show, forced you to watch Strictly Ballroom, which,

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>just before we get into it, is the beginning of

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>what Baths refers to as the Red Curtain Trilogy, which,

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like I have thoughts on but like um, the Red

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Curtain Trilogy is Strictly Ballroom, Romeo plus Juliette and Mulan Rush.

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>What year did Strictly Ballroom come out? Strictly Ballroom is

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>comedy um that Bas adapted from a play he wrote

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think was really successful in Australia. And that's something,

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>honestly that's very important. Is that like, at the end

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of the day, Bas is a fucking theater nerd, like

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a a completely hysterical and erratic and insane theater nerd. Um,

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think that informs a lot of his work,

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and Strictly Ballroom is the story of a ballroom dancing

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>competitor who has not yet got the championship accolades that

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>he's wanted, and his partner dumps out on him, and

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>he's looking for someone to help him win the championship,

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and this woman named frayan like kind of falls into

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>his orbit and she it's kind of the classic story

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of nerdy, ugly woman takes off her glasses and literally

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a scene where he literally takes out takes off

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>her glasses. And then when I first I forgot that

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that there were movies in which that that was done

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in earnest because it's such a joke. Now it's a

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>joke for a reason, because there are several movies in

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>which it's done very earnestly. Yes, exactly, And she takes

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>off her glasses and we discovered that she is but

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a gorgeous woman. And I love any movie that does that.

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But it is exactly, it's it's a fantasy. It is cliche,

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, Bass is kind of good at cliches sometimes,

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and I that's something that I appreciated about this movie.

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But I just love to know you like your naked reactions.

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>You literally just watched it yesterday. I did just watch

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday. I hated it. I hated it. I hated

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it so much, all of it, all the way through

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole, the whole No, I watched the whole thing. Wow,

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it's only an hour and a half, you know, I

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>knew the whole time. I was like, okay, this will

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this too shall pass um. It was the one thing

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it did was give me such a clear understanding of

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>bass style, because you see the things that he does

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>on a macro scale now being done on a micro scale,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and you realize his artistic impulses have always been there.

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>The film is so frenetic and gaudy and maximalist. No

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>single shot is longer than like four seconds. There's so

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>many close ups. He really revels in kind of ugliness

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>as much as he revels in beauty. And I do

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>think that this world that he's looking at, this world

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of competitive ballroom dancing, is a really good place to

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>find that. Unfortunately, I just didn't like it. I just

0:33:56.120 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>thought it was so grading, and I didn't like any

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the characters. You didn't like, you didn't like Fran.

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I did not like fran. I thought she was pasthetic.

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, So I'm sorry to like totally sideswipe you.

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is my life story. This is a biopic.

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>I at least my life rights. Two baths in nine

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>two I was one year old and I said, bas,

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>here are my life rights. Please adapt my story into

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a film, and this is the film that he made,

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>and so you are truly coming for me because I

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>am fran I can absolutely see how this is the

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of movie that a director makes that makes the

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>industry pay attention to them and say, oh, what if

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we gave this person a ton of money so they

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>could do this on a bigger scale. And truly, like,

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>having most recently seen Elvis, I see the direct through

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>line from this movie to Elvis and how in a

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>way they are the same movie, just with a lot

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of different money and time between them and films totally

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>but strictly, strictly Ballroom. I had totally problems with it.

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I was like at the beginning, I was like, oh,

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is this a mockumentary? But no, that was like just

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, and it's like a stylistic thing that's never

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>brought back again. I know, like they're supposed to be caricatures,

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but it just like I don't know that there were

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>moments where it like felt like it wanted to be

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>grounded in reality, and then it Wasn't, and I just

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like it. It was like listening to a

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>really annoying song for an hour ago and I just

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted it to be over. I really really did not

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like it. I listened a lot of things that you

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:40.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't like about it are the things that I love

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>about Strictly Ballroom. And you know, I think at the

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, it is definitely like a fine movie.

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I Wasn't, I'm never itching to rewatch that movie.

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that part of the reason I

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>really wanted you I wasn't. I never do this, but

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I did text you and I said, just reminding you

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>to watch Strictly Ballroom, you know, And I did really

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>want you to watch it because I think it encapsulates

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>something that's really important about Basil Erman's work. When he

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the budget, like when he doesn't have the

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar budget that he has on something like Gadsby,

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you see the bones of what he's trying to say

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>as a as a director, and you don't get lost

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in all the glitz and glam of it all, which

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.720
<v Speaker 1>still makes his movies great. But even without the hundred

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, he's still doing the same buffoonery he does

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>everywhere else, right, but I love much more, much more,

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>d I y. I think the buffoonery works sometimes and

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>other times it really does not. It did not work

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for me in Strictly Ballroom, It did not work for

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>me and Elvis. It really worked for me in Romeo

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and Juliette and Mulin Rouge. Also watching Strictly Ballroom, I

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>had just rewatched Dirty Dancing like a week before, which

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is which is one of my favorite movies, and compared

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to each other, like you can't. You can't compare them

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 1>to each other because like they're like they're like they're

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of the same movie in a lot of ways. Well,

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Strictly is very clearly a satire of of Dirty Dancing, right,

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>they use in the late eighties. It's like and they

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>use time after time. They do it on purpose, you know,

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think that there's a kind of like, oh, den,

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>your woman who doesn't know her own sexual power and

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden she does. Like that's the satire.

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of why I love I'm Strictly Ballroom

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is because I actually think that the taking the glasses

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>off the nerd to discover that she's a gorgeous woman.

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that was in earnest like I think

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that Bass understands that that is a trope and and

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>UM sorry, we on like a virgin, try to discuss

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>camp as infrequently as possible, but it cannot be you know,

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>extricated from bass work. Is that camp is like one

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of the primary tools in Bazi's toolbox, and that is

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>something that I think he was flexing on instrict the

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that worked for me and did not work for you. Um,

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like um a very cartoonish blocking of scenes,

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 1>hyper stylized um emotional steaks with emotional with something that

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>is like completely fake and totally cartoonish in camp, but

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>also an emotional realism in the acting that kind of

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>grounds it. Um is something that is a lot of

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>his work. But that's the thing is that I in

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 1>strictly ballroom, I only saw the camp and did not

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>get the real emotion. Like like Romeo and Juliet is

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so larger than life, and yet in those moments where

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like heartbreaking or tender, you feel that Mulin Rouge

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like is so over the top and so maximalist. And

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>yet I still cry when Satine dies or like you

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>have that moment where you know she leaves Christian and

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>like it's heartbreaking and with strictly ballroom. To me, it

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was just a cartoon, and I agree. I did not

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>feel any emotional steaks. I did not think these were

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>real people at all. I think that there is a

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>little emotional realism between the two dance partners. I think

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Fran really gives it to us. But I agree that

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it has at the base level, just not it's on

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the acting level. Actually, it's just not what Leo and

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Nicole are doing. Because it acts, it's bad. Although Scott

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is very hot, so he has aged really poorly. I looked. Well,

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>let's get into what I think you have once described

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>as one of your favorite movies at all time Romeo

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>plus Juliet Um, and I think that when I came

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>away from this movie. First of all, I cried watching

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this movie, and I've watched it so many times I

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>still cried. Leo deserved an Oscar nom. I'm sorry, he

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>deserved an Oscar nom for this movie period. I probably

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>sound like an idiot for saying that, but I know

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Leo is incredible. That one scene where he's screaming when

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>a gun. I sigh, you stars, it's so good. I

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>also think I also think Claire Danes is incredible in it,

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 1>so fucking good, the ending, the ending, or like when

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>she when she goes to the priest with the gun.

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone acts their ass off in this movie. Um.

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Harold Parano who plays Marcuccio, so good, incredible performance. Also

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 1>incredible usage of that song, um young hah something. I

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>love the soundtrack. I mean the soundtrack of Romeo and

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Juliet is so good, like next level. Honestly, I think

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Romeo and Juliet, I mean Romeo plus Juliet um really

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of shows us what bas does best. And I

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>think that is cinematic invention, like to place Romeo and

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Juliet in the modern day, but to keep Shakespearean dialogue,

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of people are divided on whatever. And

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 1>that's like where a lot of the criticism was. I

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think a cinematic invention. We have not seen someone do

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that before, and I do it so well, so yeah,

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:26.439
<v Speaker 1>you absolutely understand what they're saying. And I, unlike you,

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a Shakespearean dialogue girl like I, you know,

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:33.760
<v Speaker 1>could barely get through shakespeare books without spark notes, as

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, high schooler, that's just like my reading comprehension

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>level and like and to see it in in context

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in this movie makes me sure that not only is

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>this one of the most beautiful stories ever told, but

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 1>like the best thing Shakespeare has ever written. It might

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>not be my favorite Shakespeare play, but I think it's

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the best play that Shakespeare has ever written. And what

0:41:55.239 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I love about how bads to end with that. But okay, okay, okay,

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>but here's the thing is, like, you know, in our

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>West Side Story discussion, we touch briefly on the fact that, like,

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not a believable story, right, Romeo and Juliet, like

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, falling in love after one day and then

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you kill the brother, you kill the cousin,

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and yet you still are in love with each other

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and then kill yourselves. It's like there's nothing about that

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that is has emotional realism in a modern day and

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>yet that as makes you believe it, and that is

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 1>really hard to do. And West Side Story did not

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 1>make me believe it. Let me tell you. He makes

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the stakes very real, very believable. He also, i think,

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>does what a lot of productions of Roman and Juliette

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>failed to do, which has reminds you that these are

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>teenagers and so of course the emotions are heightened. Of

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>course everything is literally life and death because they're young

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and horny, and it makes them sexy, romantic and sexy.

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 1>The scene where they see each other across the fish tank,

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it's so beautiful and the and the way thought was

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the cool scene. It's just so girl for me. The

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>needle job is the um kiss, it's so I mean.

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's the other thing is like um that that

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that cinematic invention, like the fact that the meat cute

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is through an aquarium. Um. The fact that the Queen

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 1>mad monologue is about you know, M D m A right,

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the mercutio is a faggot. And like when they when

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they fight with their guns, the gun says like dagger

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Like that's I think that's like on the

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>writing level, brilliant and fun and like people probably think

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like cheesy or cheap or you know, like all

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 1>all of those kinds of things, but like I I

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>just like have so much fun every single time I

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.399
<v Speaker 1>watched that movie, And I think that's like what's so

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 1>good about his work and about the quote unquote Red

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Curtain Trilogy, even though I don't really think I think

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really wedged down. I don't think Strictly ball rominally belongs.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good use of just spectacle storytelling. Um,

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense. Romeo and Juliet in context is a spectacle,

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and so like placing it in this context makes a

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. And yeah, I think all of the

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>different tools that he uses to contemporize this story, like

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the news report at the beginning, it just

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I love the news report. It's so it all works

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>so well. And part of part of that is because

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like I do think that Bas works best when he's

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>working with tropes and when he's applying his style to

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>familiar stories, right, And you know, when I watched this movie,

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>like in my like freshman English class, I I don't

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>remember having an attachment to an attur right, like to

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:07.479
<v Speaker 1>see the aesthetic through lines of things that I love

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about bases work because I actually, okay, I watched Strictly

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Ballroom in my high school dance class. You know, it's

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like one of those moments where like your your teacher

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like doesn't feel like working that day, and then and

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>then They're like, let's just watch a movie. Um, so

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it's weird that like my high school like just introduced

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>me to all of Basilerman's work for like no reason.

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Um well because my otur when I was a teenager

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with Sofia Coppola. So like, is the real divide between

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe our sensibilities? Truly, it's truly actually that, and I

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 1>think that actually perfectly encapsulates like where we come from

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on the artistic level. Okay, let's talk. Yeah, well, I

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>just have to quickly say that, Um, the thing, the

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing that that Baz does not pull off with

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Robia blows Juliette is the fact that, um, the invention

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of phones and also therapy are just kind of conveniently

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>ignored as they would have you know, resolved conflict of

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the play. Um, and yet here it is. But like, okay,

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, what is there even to say about Mulan Rouge.

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And we have already talked about Mulan Rouge in our

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:17.959
<v Speaker 1>episode on Nicole Kidman, which you should definitely go back

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>and revisit, So I think we won't get that too

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in depth in it today. But for me, like Romeo

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and I loved Romeo and Juliet, but I think Romo.

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>What Romeo and Juliet opened me up two more was

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare and it was like an entry point to that

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to me. Mulan Rouge I loved for itself and the

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:40.839
<v Speaker 1>thing that it was, and I remember seeing it and

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>being so gagged by it, and you know, like thinking,

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>oh God, the movie musical is back, because it kind

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of the movie musical was kind of dead when when

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Mulan Rouge came out, and it did sort of revive

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it for a little bit, but nothing really ever kind

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of came close to well. Ship was Chicago, was in Chicago,

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was in the in the dust of Or it came

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 1>right after again bas is working with an existing story.

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Malan Rouge is based off of Labo M and he

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>tells this kind of archetypal tail in the biggest way possible,

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and it just really works because all the elements are there,

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:25.239
<v Speaker 1>like the story, the setting, you know, like the you know,

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bohemian Revolution and like can Can dancers and Paris

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and like it just all works. And then you have

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 1>you and McGregor being like the most perfect soft boy

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>like lead ever. I was so in love with him

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>after this movie. Oh my god, oh, Jim Broadbent is

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so compelling. The villains are so compelling. Every performance is

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 1>so good and like the the just the fagotry injected

0:47:54.280 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>in all of bass films is really palpable, Like the

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>frenetic nous really works there, Like um, you know at

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning when Christian goes to their apartment and like

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there's the sound of music moment and then the person

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>who'd been writing the plays like goodbye, yeah, and I

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>can just hear those lines reading so perfectly, and like

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that the story moves so quickly and you don't miss anything.

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Like the swiftness with which you move through the setup

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>works really well and like gets you where you need

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to go with the perfect amount of time, Like that

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:36.360
<v Speaker 1>movie starts and like I think within the first ten minutes,

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like Nicole is descending from the ceiling. Yes, yes, and

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:44.479
<v Speaker 1>like everything about like all of baz is work line

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:48.399
<v Speaker 1>rating is actually I'm thinking also about and um um,

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Lady Calcula is so fierce and in that movie in

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the other in Romeo and Julia and how she goes

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Romeo slut Romeo Should I live? It's like that as

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>had you as a director be like can you take

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it to a hundred and twenty for me, like he

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:23.839
<v Speaker 1>like that or the nurse in Romeo and Juliett. Let's

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>get into the rest of bass work, which is I

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think much more mediocre. Um. I think that bas suffers

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>from structure issues, issues of like completely discarding like artistic

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:43.399
<v Speaker 1>devices that you've employed, or completely discarding emotional reality because

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be a cartoon. Like a lot of

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:48.720
<v Speaker 1>times those are the best parts of something like Mulan

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Rouge or Romeo and Juliett. And with others it's just

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>like you see right through it, you know what I mean.

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I never saw Australia. No, we don't need to discuss.

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I saw the I saw The Great Gods me when

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:02.359
<v Speaker 1>it came out in theaters. I think I remember it

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>being fine. The only thing memorable to me about Great

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Gods was the soundtrack, um, the Florence and then the

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Launa song, and so that's like very much. It's that

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>movie I think was way more style over substance. I

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:20.360
<v Speaker 1>think that like, obviously stylistically that movie is pretty gorgeous,

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>but like, and I also love parties. I love party scenes.

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that bass does it best in all of

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 1>his movies. But um, the only thing that I remember

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 1>from that movie is how good Carrie Mulligan is and

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I and I think of the famous shirt scene, which

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in the book is insane, like he's literally just pulling

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 1>out these shirts and and and showing ore. She's like,

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, this shirts so beautiful and she just

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 1>cries looking at shirts and it's like so confusing to read,

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but like Carrie Mulligan makes it makes sense, and I

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's really well blocked it, like it's something that

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:54.920
<v Speaker 1>part of it, you know, sure, part of it is

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that I just don't really love The Great Godsby as

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a book and so super care which is a bummer

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:08.280
<v Speaker 1>because Florence Welch is apparently like making a Great Gotsby musical. Okay,

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I will watch that, Yeah, I'll watch it too. So

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you there's some there's a I didn't know that there

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:16.399
<v Speaker 1>was this Basler ban TV show you were you were

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioning before. Can you can you give me a little

0:51:19.120 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>like t l d R on what that was? Yes?

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:24.320
<v Speaker 1>T L d R. The get Down is a Netflix

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:27.760
<v Speaker 1>original series that came out in the kind of House

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of Cars Oranges, the New Black era of Netflix. Basically,

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Getdown is about the emergence of disco and

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:38.760
<v Speaker 1>hip hop that rose around the same time, and how

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:42.959
<v Speaker 1>those communities, which are obviously, you know, based in black

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>culture and invention of black culture, surrounds a kind of

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>group of like artists and rappers coming up in like

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>nine seventies Harlem, and you know, on paper, it's like,

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>are you sure you want to tell this story? Vesseler

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:03.319
<v Speaker 1>and like yikes, um And but I honestly so. I

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>watched it as it came out, UM way back when,

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and I remember liking it a lot um and being

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 1>really shocked by that there wasn't more negative sentiment around

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 1>to get Down, like I I I really was. That

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:21.319
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of critical acclaim and the second that

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it was canceled after the release of its first two parts.

0:52:25.000 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But the second part I know, but this I know Netflix, Um.

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But the second part UM got even better reviews. It

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>was even more critically acclaimed, and they felt like Baths

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:37.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of cleaned up what he wasn't really doing well

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in the classic bas Lerman way, and something that must

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be noted and part of why I think the show

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>UM was not under a lot of criticism and honestly,

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know very in the through line of our Beyonce

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>discussion last week is, um, you know, the production hired NAS,

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:58.400
<v Speaker 1>grand Master Flash, Curtis Blow, d J cool Herk, like

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>all of these DJs that were in that era, like

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as producers on the show, Like they were credited to

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:09.239
<v Speaker 1>be a part of the story that Bows was trying

0:53:09.239 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to tell. And to me, that is the number one

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:13.479
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do as a creator is to make

0:53:14.480 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>these people your lateral collaborators on something and so. And

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I also know that the rollout of the show invested

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:24.759
<v Speaker 1>in the communities he was trying to represent. But I mean,

0:53:24.840 --> 0:53:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't even I don't have much more to say

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 1>about it other than the fact that Jaden Smith in

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the last episode of the last part kiss as a guy,

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is the story. We were robbed up because

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to watch the Jaden Smith like romance flatline.

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the show was shockingly good. I'm not

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:44.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna lie, Okay, interesting, Um, something that wasn't shockingly good

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:48.839
<v Speaker 1>was Elvis, which I talked about when I saw it

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 1>last month, and we all know I did not like it. Um,

0:53:53.520 --> 0:53:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you have since seeing it and now that we're talking

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>about Baz. I think we can talk about the reasons

0:53:59.560 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 1>why I don't think it works in the context of

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>all his other work, and why you agree disagree. You know,

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we have um some I disagreed with at

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:13.399
<v Speaker 1>least one point that you brought up on the pod

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that I kind of want to But the rest I

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 1>think I agreed with. Well, let's talk it about it. Yeah,

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but I I wanted to, like, no, no, no, not

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:23.280
<v Speaker 1>even call you in. I think that it's um because

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:25.799
<v Speaker 1>your take, I think is the most common take I heard.

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I've heard a lot of people say a version of

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the like the movie is not interested in Elvis's life,

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and like this is not a biopic, right, Like it's not,

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, a telling of a very fascinating figure in

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>pop culture. And I I agree that, like the focal

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 1>point should have been on Elvis and the fact that

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole movie focuses on his manager, someone who is

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 1>essentially like the Scooter Braun of the nineteen fifties. Like

0:54:52.200 --> 0:54:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like, we don't, like I don't want to watch

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a movie about Scootlebron, you know what I mean? Like

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:58.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's a bass next project, but it's like that's

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 1>not fascinating. But to me, I think that I guess

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I should say I didn't disagree with the take, but

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the spin on it is that if bas

0:55:06.280 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to do a movie about Elvis's life, I'm

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:13.839
<v Speaker 1>not looking for reality. Like I'm never going to sign

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>up for a bas Learnman movie and say, oh, I

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 1>expect this to be keeping up with the thing it's

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to portray. I did not do not expect it

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>to be historically accurate. I do not expect it to

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be invested in truth, even though freedom, beauty, truth and

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 1>love are as Lehman's belief systems. But like I just

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:34.839
<v Speaker 1>it's it's I knew that it wasn't gonna be true,

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:38.239
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote, and I still felt like there was a

0:55:38.239 --> 0:55:40.960
<v Speaker 1>movie in the Elvis movie that was really good. It

0:55:41.120 --> 0:55:45.719
<v Speaker 1>just like should have been structured better. The structure, Yeah,

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I I didn't need I didn't need truth either, but

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I did need beauty, freedom, and love and I didn't

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:55.239
<v Speaker 1>get I didn't get any of those. I think I

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think Baz told a story about Elvis that he wanted

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to rather than trying to find the most interesting story.

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And like I mean, when it comes to biopics. I

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have to say I don't love biopics, but I would

0:56:09.719 --> 0:56:12.720
<v Speaker 1>much rather watch a biopic that's like a slice of life,

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:16.919
<v Speaker 1>like something like My Week with Maryland or Judy, even

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:19.840
<v Speaker 1>though Judy is a really bad movie, but Renee's Elwigar

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:23.800
<v Speaker 1>gives an incredible performance in it. Um I think it's

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:28.279
<v Speaker 1>it's really difficult to tell the entirety of someone's life story,

0:56:28.360 --> 0:56:31.399
<v Speaker 1>especially someone who's had such a huge impact on pop

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 1>culture the way that Elvis did. But I think Basil

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Erman just got so much in his own way with

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that movie, and just it's it's crazy to see him

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:46.920
<v Speaker 1>doing the same things he did all the way back

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in Strictly Ballroom, but with so much money and power

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at his disposal, and it's all the same artistic impulses

0:56:57.000 --> 0:57:00.320
<v Speaker 1>just dialed up to a thousand, and they're still getting

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in the way of telling an interesting story. That is

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a failure of the maximalism for sure. And like, I

0:57:06.600 --> 0:57:12.040
<v Speaker 1>think that because bas has so many ideas or all

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:15.399
<v Speaker 1>of his you know, co collaborators forget to tell him, Hey, honey,

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have you ever thought about editing this movie? Because Great

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Gatsby is three hours long, Australia's three hours long. Elvis

0:57:21.080 --> 0:57:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is three hours long, and all of these movies do

0:57:24.360 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>not need to be three hours long. And also except

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Titanic needs to be throwing. And also just like structural nightmares,

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like have no idea why we're going back and forth

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, um time wise and and and failing.

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And also just like the way that bas employees voice

0:57:42.320 --> 0:57:45.520
<v Speaker 1>over is like so cheap and so bizarre. And I

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:49.439
<v Speaker 1>just like if I heard Tom Hanks's accent, if I'm

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:53.320
<v Speaker 1>on set day one with Tom Hanks and this is

0:57:53.360 --> 0:57:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the accent he is doing, I'm rewriting the movie. I'm

0:57:57.880 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 1>recounting the movie. He was so cast. He was horrible.

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. I'm literally there, there's no and I'm not

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:07.840
<v Speaker 1>someone who says very flatly like I like to add

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:11.520
<v Speaker 1>nuance of things. He was patently bad, and I'm upset

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:14.280
<v Speaker 1>about I feel like it was an insult, honestly to

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the story as a whole for him to do what

0:58:16.480 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>he did with this role. And I thought that Baz wrote,

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why Bas was so fascinated by him

0:58:22.720 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>as a character. It's that's another movie, babe, you know

0:58:25.440 --> 0:58:27.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean? But like for me, even though

0:58:27.880 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe because bas sees himself in him's and that's very telling.

0:58:33.120 --> 0:58:36.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the day girl, Oh my god. And I honestly though,

0:58:36.960 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Um Austin what's his face? Was transcendent when he's great,

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a great performance, and like I think he'll probably

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be nominated for an Oscar well, But the thing is

0:58:47.080 --> 0:58:50.640
<v Speaker 1>his acting. His I think his actual acting was not

0:58:50.760 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>very good, but I felt like his performances as Elvis

0:58:54.560 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 1>were some of some of my favorite things I've watched

0:58:56.800 --> 0:58:59.800
<v Speaker 1>on screen in a year or more. Like, I think

0:58:59.800 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 1>his acting is good in that he does a really

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:05.720
<v Speaker 1>good job of being Elvis, just like your voice and

0:59:05.760 --> 0:59:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the mannerism of the loan I think are enough to

0:59:07.920 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 1>get him an Oscar nomination. The wigs unforgivable in this movie.

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Elvis has cuckoo banana's hair, but it doesn't look it

0:59:17.640 --> 0:59:20.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to look like a wig, and it looks

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like a wig. And I just like I felt that

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that was like very distracting throughout. But like there's like

0:59:26.760 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a failure in like how biopics are marketed in general, right,

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:34.720
<v Speaker 1>like pretty much anything that UM tries to interpret a

0:59:34.760 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 1>real person is called a biopic, but not all just

0:59:38.040 --> 0:59:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as you said, like My Week with Maryland, it's not

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:42.360
<v Speaker 1>really a biopic, it's just a slice of life story.

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And I agree, like those are my favorite kind of

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>adaptations of real people in real celebrities. So I think

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the marketing at Elvis is part of why it's suffered, right,

0:59:52.320 --> 0:59:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Like people came in from a movie about Elvis and

0:59:55.680 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 1>because it's called Elvis, and that's just not what they

0:59:58.720 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>got um and becau as it had been labeled biopic,

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Like it just like doubles the anger that you feel

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>when you walk out of that um film. But like

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks obviously could have been in like eight percent

1:00:10.400 --> 1:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>less of it. And on top of that, like obviously

1:00:13.720 --> 1:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to have a conversation about Elvis without

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about like his relationship to black people in and

1:00:19.680 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>um that as is someone who is not necessarily um failed.

1:00:26.120 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at the get down, like

1:00:28.280 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are some really offensive things um and

1:00:31.280 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>how people are portrayed. Sure, um, but at the end

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of the day, he like you know, he tried, they

1:00:36.840 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>tried whatever. But like I thought that like what they

1:00:41.240 --> 1:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>were trying to say about like Elvis, you know, coming

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>up in the Black Church, or like being having this

1:00:45.880 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>transcendent moment in the Black Church and then being really

1:00:48.600 --> 1:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sad when Martin Luther King died. It's like it was

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>offensively shallow, Like there was shallow and like it was

1:00:57.920 --> 1:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a spin on what actually happened, because what actually happened

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is that Elvis stole black music, yeah, and appropriated it.

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And in the movie it's very like, oh, they were

1:01:10.200 --> 1:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so happy for his success. Yes, black people give him

1:01:14.640 --> 1:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and he was such good friends with BB King, like

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, and he wasn't like he they were friends. Yeah,

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>but like that was just like a quote unquote cinematic invention,

1:01:23.320 --> 1:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. Um, Like it just was not it

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was not right, and it has everything to do with

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>us exactly. And I just like I um, for me,

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the movie, and I'd be curious to know, like what

1:01:36.520 --> 1:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is the Elvis movie you want to see? Because for me,

1:01:39.920 --> 1:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like Elvis versus the American Moral Crisis of the

1:01:44.560 --> 1:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties is an amazing movie. Like the censorship of

1:01:48.680 --> 1:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it all was so fascinating and that should have been

1:01:51.240 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. Yeah, Like I honestly think a movie

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that is entirely about like that one concert he did

1:01:58.320 --> 1:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>at the baseball field, like and everything around that is

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting movie. I also think like a movie

1:02:07.920 --> 1:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that's just about his time in Hollywood would be a

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>really interesting piece of his life, um or something if

1:02:19.720 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to do something this little darker, something about

1:02:22.720 --> 1:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>his final years, Like is there a movie that's like

1:02:25.840 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>about one show that he did in Vegas? You know, like,

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>because I do think at the end of the movie,

1:02:32.560 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>when he's doing those Vegas performances like that, to me

1:02:35.200 --> 1:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>were some of the parts that worked the best. And

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>so I think like that movie with like an older

1:02:40.800 --> 1:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>actor who's like Elvis at the end of his life

1:02:43.920 --> 1:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>could be really interesting. But that's the problem with this

1:02:47.480 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>movie is that it tries to be all those different

1:02:50.440 --> 1:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>movies in one movie, and it is also still this

1:02:53.680 --> 1:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>movie about Elvis's manager. And and that's the thing is

1:02:57.160 --> 1:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like I love villains, Bats loves villains right like Tible,

1:03:01.120 --> 1:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, John Leguizamo, we forgot to talk about

1:03:03.760 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>John Leguizamo and fucking Romeo and Juliet. Like Bass is

1:03:07.080 --> 1:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>good at villains, And so because we understand him as

1:03:09.160 --> 1:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>an outur, we understand why he might focus on Tom

1:03:11.440 --> 1:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Hanks's character. But it's just not always interesting heroes, and

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Elvis was not a hero in his own movie to me.

1:03:18.360 --> 1:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, but also like Elvis was kind of a

1:03:21.840 --> 1:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>piece of ship in his later life and and at

1:03:25.720 --> 1:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>least in his later life, And I think I would

1:03:27.560 --> 1:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have really loved to see, you know, the growth between

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this like country boy who was you know, so modest,

1:03:37.080 --> 1:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>yet his hips didn't lie back when he did those

1:03:40.360 --> 1:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like recordings, which when I first watched the movie, I

1:03:42.400 --> 1:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>started revisiting like the earliest, early early recordings of Elvis

1:03:47.080 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and how different he sounds, and the movie I think

1:03:50.720 --> 1:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>gorgeously adapts like how um Elvis thought about um blues

1:03:57.880 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>music and grass and and and that I honestly had

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>never really thought about Elvis in the tradition of blues,

1:04:06.360 --> 1:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>honestly because Elvis music is almost became its own genre

1:04:10.760 --> 1:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>because a white person had never really done it before. Um.

1:04:13.920 --> 1:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And so this like rock hybrid became like it started

1:04:17.720 --> 1:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole new generation of rock pop, right. Um. But

1:04:20.520 --> 1:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I was revisiting all this like old Elvis music, and

1:04:22.600 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>like it really is like stunning, stunning music. It sounds

1:04:25.880 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>like it's it was recorded through a tin can but

1:04:27.800 --> 1:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it's still so just the movie did not make me

1:04:31.400 --> 1:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>want to revisit Elvis's music or learn anything else about him.

1:04:36.680 --> 1:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I just was so put off by all of the

1:04:42.440 --> 1:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>shenanigans and the sparkle and the editing and the fucking

1:04:47.400 --> 1:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Dojakat song and it just like it just left me

1:04:53.200 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>completely like apathetic about all of it. And that's the

1:04:57.280 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>thing is, like it's almost like the things that you

1:04:59.400 --> 1:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and I really love about Basil Ermann are the things

1:05:02.560 --> 1:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that his last three films have really suffered from, right,

1:05:06.400 --> 1:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a surplus of ideas that the plot suffers from. And like,

1:05:10.680 --> 1:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I agree that, like this is kind of

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a lame movie, but like I had the opposite reaction.

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I became much more fascinated with the reality of Elvis's

1:05:19.320 --> 1:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>life and so he did deep dive and revisit a

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of his work. And and you know that's something

1:05:23.440 --> 1:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think I can credit the movie for, Like

1:05:26.200 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still created Wikipedia. Yeah, that was it. I know that.

1:05:30.040 --> 1:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And I would rather have just read his Wikipedia than

1:05:32.880 --> 1:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I have seen that movie. I would left those three

1:05:34.960 --> 1:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>hours of my life. Well that's and that's the other

1:05:36.880 --> 1:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>thing is like the movie was very Wikipedia like it really,

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's like, if you're going to do a biopic,

1:05:43.160 --> 1:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like Slice of Life is the way to go. It

1:05:45.080 --> 1:05:48.439
<v Speaker 1>was very wikipedia and then still glossed over all these

1:05:48.520 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable aspects of his life, like the fact that he

1:05:51.280 --> 1:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was a fucking groomer, child predator. I forgot about that?

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>How did you gloss over that? And that's also like

1:05:56.600 --> 1:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>back to the piece of ship of it all. It's like,

1:05:58.640 --> 1:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it would be so fascinating to go from you know,

1:06:01.880 --> 1:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>po dunk country boy to the horrendously corrupt Vegas sell

1:06:07.160 --> 1:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>out that he became like the death of a soul,

1:06:10.600 --> 1:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>which I think the movie trying to get at was

1:06:13.840 --> 1:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>very fascinating to me. And how Vegas was a kind

1:06:17.200 --> 1:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of moment of sellout created obviously by a very evil manager,

1:06:21.080 --> 1:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but that's still something that's like really fascinating. And to

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>become someone who was angry, who was depressed, who you know,

1:06:27.800 --> 1:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>routinely took out a gun and shot TVs or whatever,

1:06:30.600 --> 1:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the movie I wanted to watch. What do

1:06:33.120 --> 1:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you think could be next for Baslorman or what would

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you like to see from him? Whatever it is? It's

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not original material, right, like Bas only adapts existing material

1:06:45.120 --> 1:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of Strictly ball Room, but even you

1:06:47.040 --> 1:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>could argue that that was an adaptation of Dirty Dance,

1:06:49.960 --> 1:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a bas Lerman Marvel movie. I Well, Bass has said

1:06:53.640 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that he wanted to adapt guys and dolls like Bass.

1:06:56.800 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know if y'all I reread the

1:07:00.240 --> 1:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Times profile. I remember reading it back when

1:07:02.520 --> 1:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it came out and and being and remembering how absurd

1:07:05.040 --> 1:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it was, um, and that it really actually changed my

1:07:07.440 --> 1:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>relationship to someone that I really really loved. But like,

1:07:10.480 --> 1:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>he's this like whackadoodle man who like lays in bed

1:07:13.560 --> 1:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and has like four assistance like surrounding him, like recording

1:07:16.720 --> 1:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>everything he says, and like you know, when he says,

1:07:19.840 --> 1:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>comes sit by the bed, they come sit by the bed, right,

1:07:21.840 --> 1:07:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and he like hops out of the bed and he's naked,

1:07:23.520 --> 1:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's like it's nude Fridays. And like he's laying

1:07:25.880 --> 1:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in bed with his collaborator. Inappropriate. Yes, it's it's so inappropriate.

1:07:29.680 --> 1:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It's literally sexual sexual harassment. UM. But also like him

1:07:32.920 --> 1:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and his collaborator slash wife is fascinating to me. Her

1:07:37.840 --> 1:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>name is CM. She goes by CM, like everyone calls

1:07:41.360 --> 1:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>her CM, and she won two oscars from Mulan Rouge right,

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the bas famously has no oscars from Mulan. I mean

1:07:48.400 --> 1:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>has the oscar. Sure, But like those awards went to

1:07:51.080 --> 1:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>his wife for production and costume, and I think that

1:07:54.040 --> 1:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing, you know, to to polish of the convo.

1:07:56.880 --> 1:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Bass would probably be better at making movies if he

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>was just gay, but he's not. He's not, and but

1:08:02.800 --> 1:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>he has this like costume designer, production design wife and

1:08:07.200 --> 1:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they have a bizarrely kind of chased business production relationship.

1:08:11.360 --> 1:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Like it's so I would love to meet and talk

1:08:14.200 --> 1:08:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and have dinner with him because I feel like I

1:08:16.560 --> 1:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>can't fully grasp Bas as a human even I think

1:08:19.760 --> 1:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're all the profile. I would think that would

1:08:21.320 --> 1:08:25.639
<v Speaker 1>be so infuriating conversation with him, Yeah, because he's clearly

1:08:25.680 --> 1:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a narcissist, but anybody that rich and famous has to be.

1:08:36.400 --> 1:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>We are going on vacation, it's the end of summer.

1:08:39.479 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna, you know, like live our lives a little bit.

1:08:43.439 --> 1:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So the next needed TLC. Yes, So the next two

1:08:45.920 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>episodes are prerecorded, but they're really good. They're going to

1:08:49.479 --> 1:08:52.759
<v Speaker 1>be sort of like the bonus episodes we were doing

1:08:53.240 --> 1:08:55.639
<v Speaker 1>in June where we get a little deeper, a little

1:08:55.640 --> 1:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>more personal and vulnerable. They're less timely, but still listen.

1:09:00.000 --> 1:09:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Are really good, um, and support us because we all

1:09:03.680 --> 1:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>deserve vacations. We've been working very hard all summer, especially

1:09:07.800 --> 1:09:11.799
<v Speaker 1>producer Phoebe, to get these apps edited and out and

1:09:12.040 --> 1:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>as always post about the show tag our finsta at

1:09:16.360 --> 1:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>like a virgin for um. Tell us what you think

1:09:19.320 --> 1:09:22.599
<v Speaker 1>of these special apps honestly, like we're always shaping the show,

1:09:22.720 --> 1:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>figuring out what you guys like, what you dislike, and

1:09:25.840 --> 1:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't always take it into consideration, but like always

1:09:28.280 --> 1:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>curious to know, like what you're responding to. Yes, Um,

1:09:31.640 --> 1:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you can leave us a review on Apple Podcasts. It

1:09:34.000 --> 1:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>really helps us a lot, even if it's like sassy

1:09:36.439 --> 1:09:39.639
<v Speaker 1>or well not negative, because if you don't like the show,

1:09:39.680 --> 1:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>then don't listen to it and don't tell us. Um.

1:09:42.280 --> 1:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm your co host Rose Damn You, and you can

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>find me anywhere online at Rose Damn You, and I'm

1:09:48.320 --> 1:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>your other co host Fran Toronto. You can find me

1:09:50.680 --> 1:09:53.759
<v Speaker 1>at friends, switch co on all social media and TikTok.

1:09:53.840 --> 1:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I finally finally finally started when I noticed you. But

1:09:56.680 --> 1:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you've been making TikTok's I've I've been enjoying them, been

1:10:00.160 --> 1:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to follow your guidance and just post things without

1:10:03.360 --> 1:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>just ship post um. Subscribe to Like a Virgin anywhere

1:10:06.320 --> 1:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts and leave us a rating on

1:10:08.640 --> 1:10:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Spotify or a review on Apple Podcasts. Like a Virgin

1:10:12.880 --> 1:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>is an i Heeart radio production our producers Phoebe Unter,

1:10:15.800 --> 1:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>with support from Lindsay Hoffman, Julian Weller, Jess Crane, Chitch

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and Nikki Etour until next week, Bye Choo