WEBVTT - The Fed Decides amid Consumer Uncertainty

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>This is the.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Lingen with US Now with BMO Capital Marcus Ian on

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 3>full faith and Credit. You have had a vector of

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 3>lower interest rates, price up, yield down. Have you been

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 3>tripped by tariffs?

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 4>I do think tariffs complicate the calculus for lower rates.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 4>But I do think that the Fed is ultimately going

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 4>to start the process of normalization again, but not until

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 4>we've got greater clarity on what the trade war really means.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 4>And I do think tenure yields in this year at

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 4>three sixty five, and I'm holding that call for now.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.959
<v Speaker 3>That's extraordinary to go to a three sixty five right now,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the ten year yield, Folks, if my eyes won't fail me,

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 3>here's a four thirty rather four point three zero. I

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 3>justin Wolfer's of Michigan, just out with the massive trade

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 3>surplus of movies. If mister Trump goes after services, that's

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 3>more instability.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 5>Are you able to make an.

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Intelligent forecast out three hours or three months.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Well implicitly, because the president keeps changing the rules or

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 4>changing the trade dynamics, it's very difficult to estimate what

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 4>this all means for core PCE and therefore the FED

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 4>and the trajectory of the economy. I think the one

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 4>clear takeaway is that there has been a concern raised

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 4>about the dollars status as a reserve currency and whether

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 4>treasuries are still flight to quality assets. And the recent

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 4>price action suggests that those two still hold for the

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 4>time being. But that's going to be the major question

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 4>for the next several months.

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Ian Tom has been drawing our attention to what's happening

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 6>with Taiwan's dollar serving as much as five percent today.

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 6>How do you look at what's happening in other countries

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 6>with their currencies with regard to the dollar, but also

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 6>to the treasury market here in the US. It does

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 6>it send you a signal.

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 4>So there are two aspects of that. First is what's

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 4>going on with the dollar is almost by design for

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 4>a president who is attempting to make US exports more

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 4>attractive by cheapening them on the global stage. As that

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 4>relates to the treasury market. That also makes treasuries comparatively

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 4>cheaper than they might have otherwise been, but only if

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 4>the dollar remains the go to currency, and that's what

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 4>has been focused on this week's auctions. We have the

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 4>ten year tomorrow and the thirty year on Thursday.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 6>So demand there, What do you anticipate and is it

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 6>going to send you a signal about this whole idea

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 6>of whether or not the US continues to be this

0:02:58.320 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 6>global safe haven.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 4>The tenure will be the most important auction of the week.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 4>We're expecting reasonably solid demand across all the major bidding groups,

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 4>but the market will be focused on the indirect awards.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 4>They tend to use that as a proxy for overseas demand,

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 4>and that will define how the market reacts and whether

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 4>or not we find ourselves back in a narrative where

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 4>we're worried about the collective buyer strike on US treasures.

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 3>The solution andling in for a lot of governments is

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 3>to extenderation to initiate thirty year, fifty year even farther

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 3>out paper. Is that efficacious? I mean, who wins with

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 3>fifty year paper? Well?

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that it's been particularly successful at least

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 4>not historically, and so the idea of pushing out the

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 4>average maturity of treasuries borrowing, for example, for the time being,

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 4>is off the table. The only argument that that starts

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 4>to make sense would be in a significant reprice into

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 4>a lower rate environment, where Bessett would choose to lock

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 4>in attractive financing.

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Inanling and thank you so much, greatly appreciate with being

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 3>my capital market this morning. In the stunning call, he

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 3>reaffirms from a ten year yield price up yield down

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 3>a four point three zero to a three point six

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 3>five ish yield. That's a brave call right now out.

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>They're not that many people on board that ian. Thank

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 3>you so much.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty Now.

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Specialties, Alicia Levigne would be and ymelth Wealth to get

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 3>us through the market opening and beyond. Alicia, I want

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>you to talk to people whose heads are spinning and

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>they're in cash, how do they deploy into the markets?

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 7>Well, thanks for having me today. You know, we also

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 7>like to look at markers about when to deploy. We

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 7>try to tell our clients you can't ever time the market,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 7>but after that nine days, which as you know you've

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 7>all noted, is the best nine days since two thousand

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 7>and four, I think we're going to do a little

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 7>bit of backing and filling here. What we tell our

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 7>clients is, you know, if you're fresh capital, it's always

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 7>good to dust dollar cost average in, meaning you allocate

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 7>some percentage I would say over three months, you know,

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 7>one third, one third, one third, So you don't, you know,

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 7>have all your assets that are that are coming in

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 7>all at the same time. Because markets move around, they're

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 7>two way. It just seems like a better risk adjusted

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 7>way to getting into markets here, and so that's what

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 7>that's what we would that's what we would advise. I

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 7>think with the last four weeks has reiterated to market

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 7>participants who have been in these markets for decades or

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 7>to new ones, is that markets can recover a lot

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 7>more quickly than the real economy, and at times bottom

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 7>on really horrible news, even as the headlines are swirling

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 7>around us, and I think it was just another reminder

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 7>of that the last four weeks really really amazing.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 8>How the market ended April.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is.

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 6>It's like I was saying earlier, if you went to

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 6>sleep at the beginning of April and you woke up

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 6>kind of nothing actually happened, and it masked really the

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 6>volatility that we saw. You said bottomed. So my question

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 6>to you was that the bottom at least for this cycle.

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 7>So for the tariff tantrum, are we're calling this the

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 7>tariff tantrum? For the tariff tantrum, we think that forty

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 7>eight to thirty five is likely the bottom, but with

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 7>a huge caveat. And the caveat is, you know, is

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 7>there a credit crisis coming that reverberates throughout the economy

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 7>and then could it be undercut? But I think that

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 7>ultimately the conversation that we've had, every single economist has

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 7>talked about sagflation. A US recession has become the base

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 7>case scenario. We've heard about empty container ships from China,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 7>We've heard about empty shelves in the US. Christmas is gone,

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 7>Halloween is gone. These are some pretty nasty headlines and

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 7>I don't want to make light of it, because I

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 7>actually do think the US is going to slow down

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 7>and hit an air pocket in the next few months.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 7>But I think the market already priced it in when

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 7>it dropped almost twenty percent in about a week. And

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 7>what we know when the market drops to that extent,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 7>it tends to have positive forward returns. And whether you

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 7>measure by the elevated fix or whether you measure by

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 7>the drop down in twenty percent, or whether you measure

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 7>by rock bottom consumer and investor sentiment. And in a sense,

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 7>the market did what it always done, which is, you know,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 7>it recovered when things look the bleakst and it looked

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 7>the bleakest.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I love your bottom fishing here the idea that when

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 3>there's the catharsis there very quickly or Alesia, we've got

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 3>to get to the market opening.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 5>But have you witnessed Catharsis yet? I haven't seen it.

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 7>So I think we had Catharsis. You know that that

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 7>Thursday and Friday after after Liberation Day, so that the

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 7>third and the fourth of April was I mean that

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 7>dropped was about twelve drop in the I think we

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 7>had it.

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>A Lesha. I want you to talk to people about

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 3>meg seven. I got Apple with a bond offering this

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 3>morning at Microsoft and other cloud types doing better than good.

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Was there a reinformation in April of ownership of the

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 3>mag seven.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 7>So look, the conversation we've had for the last few

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 7>months is that American exceptionalism is over, that the rest

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 7>of the world is a better place to invest, that

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 7>Europe is going to far outperform the US this year,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 7>and by the way, it might, but over a cycle

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 7>we have to discuss. And I think, you know, there

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 7>was a talk of you know, international investors fleeing US markets,

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 7>whether it was the dollar, or the bond market or

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 7>the US equity market. Now there's some truth in that,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 7>but I think what we saw from earning season was

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 7>what made US markets so compelling. Are the triple beats, right,

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 7>triple beats beat on the top line, beat on the margins,

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 7>and therefore beat on the bottom line. I find it

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 7>hard to find companies in the rest of the world

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 7>that can deliver this kind of outcome quarter after quarter.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 7>Now there will be a day where this doesn't happen,

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 7>and the thirty percent concentration of the Magnificent seven in

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 7>the SMP is going to be the thirty percent concentration

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 7>is going to be a problem, but it's not today.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 7>And I think it's just a reminder that you know,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 7>you're not buying a political situation situation, you're buying companies

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 7>with earnings. And I know there's been an aversion for

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 7>international investors coming into US market, but the US and

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 7>market has sold US and particularly let's call it individual investors.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 7>They're all in Nope, they didn't sell and they were

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 7>buying more. And I think it's a great example when

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 7>you shed risk, when you shed length, when you know

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 7>longs have to be discarded in favor of shorts, it's

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 7>sort of a right opportunity for the pain trade to

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 7>be the other way.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, which is Alicia, Thank you so much, Alicia Levine

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>be and win wealth this morning greatly. I appreciate that.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch US live

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>watch US Live on YouTube.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Hugely anticipated with the Joy of Luxury Road from Madison

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 3>down to the Avenue of the Joy of Costco adapting

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 3>each day to the trade war. Dana Telsey joins us

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 3>this morning with a Telsey Advisory group. Will there be

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 3>empty shelves?

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 2>It certainly feels like it. Consumers, well, the retailers. First

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 2>of all, thank you for having me. The retailers need

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 2>to place their orders within the next few weeks for holiday.

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 2>We're hearing retailers starting to market and advertise back to school.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 2>They're going to start on June first. Some kids aren't

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 2>even out of school by June first, and yet they're

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 2>going to start marketing and advertising on June first. That's

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>because they want to have the goods available for the parents.

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 2>And overall, when you think about this, we have companies

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 2>that whether it's low end or high end, price increases.

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 2>There's a third to third a third of what you

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>can do to combat this. You can diversify your sourcing,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 2>but that takes time. It doesn't just happen overnight. You

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 2>share the cost of the manufacturers, and I think that's

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 2>something that's being negotiated almost on a daily basis, depending

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 2>on what the tariff may look like. And at the

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, you raise prices to the consumer.

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 3>You have a roll of dex like no one in

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.599
<v Speaker 3>the business back to your childhood and your affiliation with

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>the good people at BERGDRF. Goodman. Which company do you

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 3>want to call right now to find out the pulse

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:15.719
<v Speaker 3>of the Trump trade war?

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean overall, I want to hear about all a

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of the apparel retails and the footwear companies. The

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 2>footwear companies overall have some the biggest exposure to China

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>and to Asia. Steve Madden, you want to call Steve

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Madden fifty eight percent of their sourcing.

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 5>Steve Madden, My walls lighter, pick it up.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 6>You mentioned empty shelves, and I think a lot of

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 6>people over the past couple of weeks have been sort

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 6>of sounding the alarm here about empty shelves and higher prices.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 6>Yet we haven't seen that yet will we see it?

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 2>So you're exactly right. Basically, it's week by week that

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>we're watching things. You heard all the retail real estate

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>landlords report last week resilient consumer, good traffic. When would

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 2>you see it? Probably sometime during the summertime.

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 6>That's too soon. I think a lot of people would say,

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 6>how close there are you watching? What's happening with shipping?

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 6>Port of Los Angeles, Port of Long Beach, we heard,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 6>We've heard analysts who track the ships that are coming in.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>We're hearing around thirty sixty percent.

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, when you're down one third, two thirds, that's a

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 6>very big deal. When does the consumer start to see that?

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 2>So overall, everything we've heard is retail is inventory levels.

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 2>They were up at the end of the fourth quarter.

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>First quarter is still first going to be reported. You

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>have a big day this Thursday coming up. Then we'll

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>go from there. I think you'll continue to see inventories

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 2>being up. But when you're going to see empty shelves,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 2>it's going to take a little while, is it. Some

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 2>empty items in midsummer could look like that?

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Steve Madden shoe sho How cute, Lisa, you get

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 3>that there's symbols shoe Shooh. They're down fifty seven percent

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 3>from the shocking success back ten years of Steve Madden.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 3>What is Steve Madden actually doing in May?

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Overall? In May, and we're going to hear exactly what

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 2>they're saying, because they're going to report their earnings this week.

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I think they have more newness in their product. I

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to hear that fifty eight percent is

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 2>coming down hopefully by the end of the year to

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 2>forty percent of sourcing coming from China or even a

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 2>little bit less than that. And look what they just

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>announced a couple months ago they bought Kurt Geiger, which

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>is a more more fashion forward women's brand that's based overseas.

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Look what it was just announced a half hour ago.

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Sketchers is being bought for sixty three dollars a share

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 2>by three G Capital. So you're seeing some combinations begin

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to happen, even.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Sketches taking it interesting. Dan Chelsea with its encyclopedic and

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>retail we all come all here across the country on

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 3>your morning commute on YouTube. Good morning as well, Tim

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Stenovik in for Paul Suni.

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 6>Tim, Hey, Dana, your top pick for apparelin footwear is Perkinstock.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Why is that don't have sourcing in Asia? You were

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 2>going to say that as the end Germany and Portugal

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>take a look at the pricing power that they have

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>with the newness. They don't have a lot lot of

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 2>stores and from women's to men's to kids, you name it,

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the age group, there's appeal.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 6>Still the how big of a business is the US

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 6>for them? Because they're still importing so that's going to

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 6>be an issue if it's not made in the US.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 6>President Trump's not happy, right, But it's still a.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Lower tariff than what yeah from Asia. It's a continuing

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>growing business for them, and it's becoming even bigger.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Hailey Biber, Hailey Bieber is Hailey Bieber Biber.

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 6>I heard it's Bieber. I heard it's Bieber.

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Hailey showed up. Hailey Bieber invintaged Guccie at the

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 3>met Gala last year.

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Are you going today?

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 7>I'm not a you.

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>No, I think the most fits for you to go

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 2>no more.

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I said, we're going, and she was, She's just going

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 3>to offendy for the Pope, the new Pope. But but

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 3>the met Gala is definitive. Can Gucci begin to salvage

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 3>their brand at the Met Gala?

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Very hard. I think you could more likely see life

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>at Gap at the Met Gala rather than Gucci, given

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 2>what you have in the storage right now.

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Discuss within all your heritage here, Discuss the collapse of

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 3>what everybody had to have five years ago.

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Compared to five years ago when Gucci was the biggest

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>thing was mixed match patterns and prints. That was all

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 2>the rage at Gucci. Now it is who is Gucci?

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it relevant anymore? Where's the newness? Who's taken the place?

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 2>And where there's increases Memeu from Prada, that's where all

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the increases are coming from. And that's where you've seen, you've.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Been, we've seen a collapse ever like carrying Gucci.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 2>You know we've seen collapses before. You look at Burbery,

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Burbery went way by the wayside, Look at Ferragamo which

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 2>still hasn't come back, and there's a lot of work

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>to be done. So we've seen things. And one of

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the things with luxury brands, you have iconic items that

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 2>have heritage and authenticity. It's easier to reinvent than create

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>on a tee?

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 9>Can they be.

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 5>Reinvented under lvmh is mister Arnauld chopped?

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a bit to take out Gucci or something.

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not hearing that I'm hearing Bernard Arnault is focused

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>on La Loouis Vauton brand and the Christian.

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 5>Now, I mean, come on, Tiffany's a struggle.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 2>Tiffany's has done a great job. The Louis Vauton brand

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 2>and the Christian Dura brand are what the works are

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 2>in progress. Look at all the designer changes that you've

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 2>had at LVMH. A designer needs to get the feel

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>of the brand and then introduce the newness.

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 6>So who's your top pic for luxury right now?

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 2>On the luxury side, I think Tapestry. I think Coach

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 2>is continuing to take share from Michael Cores and they'll

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 2>report this Thursday, Okay.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 6>So we'll get more details then. I'm thinking about this

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 6>in the context of the I don't know, bigger stuff

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 6>that we see each and every day. So not the

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 6>Louis Vauton's not the LVMH's what we see at the

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 6>grocery store, the expensive eggs that Tom Keene is still

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 6>talking about, right, how are you seeing those prices moderate

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 6>come down or not come down?

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 2>So Primark Primark, which is the value retail, they have

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 2>nearly thirty stores in the US. They're from the UK.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 2>They reported their numbers last week and they said, with

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the tariffs in the US now and their prices are

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>below ten dollars for the most part. They said, going forward,

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>and what it looks like if these tariffs at one

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty five percent really are the name of

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the game, your prices will be up forty to fifty percent.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>That's significant for the low income consumer.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 3>Steve Madden creators you brought up, Thank you so much,

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Dana Telsey. TJX, which you and I can agree, are

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 3>the best execution out there. What's the pixie dust at TJX?

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 3>The curing and Steve Madden and Costco Egg department have

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 3>to learn.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Keep in mind TJX is very different from the others.

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.959
<v Speaker 2>The others are brand designers and creators that have their

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 2>own branded product. TJX has an assortment of branded product

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 2>for the most part, but they make their own Also,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 2>they're buying a lot of it for discounts or less

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 2>than what the full price is. That's what's so exciting

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 2>about tj It's a treasure hunt.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Talk about what you were readingow as a child at

0:18:55.640 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 3>fifty seventh and fifth Avenue. Scarcity. Scarcity is still out

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 3>there like a target, is there? Scarcity?

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 2>You have limited edition and collaborations that are scarcity. Look

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 2>what Alto just announced for seven tours. They're going to

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>be the beauty destination for Beyonce for Beyonce's Cowboy Carter Tour.

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. That's what scarcity is doing in order to

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 2>drive newness and innovation at mass price levels.

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 6>I've seen some pictures of concerts not fully attended. Can

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 6>you believe I'm saying that a Beyonce concert that's not

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 6>sold out that's surprising?

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Is that an issue?

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 2>I've not heard that's an issue. It's just starting now

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 2>for them. It's seven concerts that they'll be involved with.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 5>One more question, Dana, single best buy right now.

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:44.239
<v Speaker 2>Single best buy right now. I like Birkenstock. I think

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 2>with Joe Feldman, he's talking about Costco's.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what's it come on? This is I know you

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 3>listen every day at Lisa's got Costco on the brain.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Everyone process that others have to replicate.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Their private label is quality, their assortment and pricing is competitive.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 2>They can they can solve a vost business and also

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>offer for home, and their prices and the service levels,

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the in stock levels are differentiated versus everyone else. They've

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 2>got quality and value.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Dana TELCEA, thank you so much, Chelsea Advisory Group. The

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 3>spirit of New York City. I really can't say enough

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 3>about the vibrancy, even in these troubling times.

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 6>What's your birkinstock of choices at the Arizona.

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 3>At the Boston Birkenstocks. There's a few floating around the house.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I try to give them to the dogs to chew.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 3>I hear that I don't. I don't. I do the

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 3>clause Dana Telsea, goodbye.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty joining.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 3>It's now a huge value at first always Henrietta Treys

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 3>the Veda Partners and you're Washington, Henriette. I look at

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 3>my phone from a distance at home, It'll be three

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 3>feet away, seven feet away. I don't want to pick

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 3>it up and look at the news flows. So I

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 3>look at the Hill just as an example of a

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Washington internet site that's putting out all the gossip and

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 3>it's just a cacophony of stories. Is that the way

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 3>you feel about Washington right now?

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 9>It's a constant day louge. You're just drinking from a

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 9>fire hose. It's a lot, for sure. The latest stuff

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 9>that y'all are just talking about with Barbie's is just

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 9>the least of it.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 8>It's all over the place and all over the map.

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 3>If it's all over the map, if I use the

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 3>word the negotiation or deals, do you see any evidence

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 3>there are negotiations or deals or is it just all blather?

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So this is a great point. And really the

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 9>question I have is are you talking about trade deals?

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 9>Are you talking about the tax deals? Because they are

0:21:55.600 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 9>both incredibly fraught, very far from conclusion, and much less

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 9>than the White House is presenting them as.

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 9>On the trade front, I'm expecting the earliest we get

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 9>deals in the next couple of weeks to be with

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 9>the trio of countries that combined make up less than

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.959
<v Speaker 9>one percent of our trade and goods deficit, the Dominican Republic,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 9>Peru and Colombia.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 8>That's not going to move the needle.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 9>That's not going to bring shipping in from China or

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 9>Vietnam or any other Asian nations, which.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 8>Is really what we need.

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 9>And then on the tax front, we are facing the

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 9>real crunch time and the House is about to walk

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 9>the plank on one and a half trillion dollars worth

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 9>of spending cuts on things that are extremely popular like medicaid,

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 9>food subsidies for the poor, and the corporate tax rate

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 9>and individual tax rates that.

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 8>Ultimately the Senate will not tick up and will not

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 8>vote on.

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 9>So it's really going to be a question of what issue,

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 9>what trade deals, what negotiations on the tax front are

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 9>you watching?

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's start with the tax front before we get

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 6>to the trade front, rather before we get to the

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 6>tax front. If indeed what we hear this in the

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 6>coming weeks are deals that only represent such a small

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 6>portion of the trade that we do. Can we still

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 6>look to the details of those deals to understand what

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 6>those bigger trade deals could potentially look like. Will it

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 6>be meaningful, will.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 9>It move Well, so far it's really just around these

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 9>countries making good on the trade and goods deficits. So

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 9>what that means is LNG exports, soy exports, and other

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 9>agricultural commodities. But it doesn't get to any of the

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 9>core issues that presumably President Trump really had a problem

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 9>with on the campaign trails sufficiently or substantially enough to

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 9>launch trade wars with every single nation on Earth.

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 8>They're just not moving in that direction.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 9>And if they do those trade deals will take years

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 9>months to negotiate, just like they did in his first term,

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 9>So any kind of deal of magnitude is months away.

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 9>South Korea is the one that I think Howard Lutnik

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 9>is referencing when he says a deal could be reached soon,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 9>referencing last week.

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 8>They don't even have an administration, they don't have a president.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 9>So negotiating and reaching a deal with South Korea, which

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 9>by the way, we already have a free trade agreement

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 9>with and ninety five percent of the goods coming in

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 9>are tireff at zero percent rates is not going to

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 9>move the needle. And then I think compounding all these

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 9>issues is the very real reality that now we have

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 9>twenty five percent tariffs on automobiles and parts. I don't

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 9>know about you, but I got to go and get

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 9>a new engine and four tires. I might not need

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 9>twenty dollars, but last time I checked, I do require

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 9>four tires on my car. So that's going to all

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 9>be more expensive when I go on Wednesday to get

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 9>that done.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 6>Exemptions, tariff exemptions, You've got to know that sort of

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 6>go fund me there is you always do you you

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 6>don't always you know, Look we're not driving.

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 3>We're not driving much.

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 6>Do you always need to get four new tires?

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's the way, Well, that's the way it works.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 3>That's a weird little man, is correct.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 6>You can't Okay, continue, Henrietta, you've got a new note

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 6>oubt It says it's beginning to look a lot like COVID.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 6>In the context of these tariff exemptions industries you mentioned

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 6>toy importers, retailers, big box retailers. How are you looking

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 6>at the interest groups in Washington? What's been happening, who's

0:24:59.200 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 6>had the president's ear?

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 9>So interest groups are fanned out across the hill trying

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 9>to talk to any member that they can, when really

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 9>they need to get into the White House. And this

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 9>has been a pervasive problem for House and Senate members.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 8>All year as they've been preparing for the presidents.

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 9>So they go members and constituents will go to their

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 9>local representative or their senator if they're able to get

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 9>a meeting, and then that senator has no recourse. There

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 9>are not sufficient staffers at USTR or Commerce or Treasury,

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 9>let alone an exclusions process.

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 8>So what that is actually done?

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 9>And now that we're into the tariff for and there

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 9>are tariffs on every nation at a minimum of ten

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 9>percent and a whole host of different product lines at.

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 8>Usually twenty five percent rates.

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 9>Is that those entities, those businesses, toymakers, footwear retailers, shippers, truckers, retailers,

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 9>they are now moving away from asking for an exclusion

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 9>because it's too late for that to now a bail out.

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 9>So one thing I would encourage folks to watch is

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 9>the upcoming tax build from Ways and Means. One of

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 9>the biggest revenue raisers that they have in there at

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 9>seventy billion dollars is an elimination of the employee retention

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 9>tax credit. Y'all remember that from COVID when everybody was

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 9>firing everybody, and we started paying businesses to keep people

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 9>on their payroll to stop the damage as we saw

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 9>a vaccine. Now Here, the employee retention tax credit is

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 9>slated for complete removal and pulling it.

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Out of the system if it's maintained. That's your first

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 8>indication of a bailout.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Henrietta, I need you up in New York. I hope

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 5>you have real ID for May seventh.

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Next time we have entered a trace and we're going

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 3>to talk about this real ID disaster. We're in Henrietta

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 3>trace Veda Partners.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>blo Blomberg Terminal Newspapers.

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 3>Today, Lisa Manteo, what do you go? We do?

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 10>Okay, So we've been talking about President trumpright wanting to

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 10>impose that one hundred percent tariffs on films produced overseas.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 10>So screen Time Lukashaw has a really good look into

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 10>how it's going to impact Hollywood.

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 2>So he has a few things.

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 10>He says, there's few details. That's one of the issues.

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 10>It's not clear if the president wants to tax movies

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 10>that are shot overseas finished in the US, because that's

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 10>a whole different story, or if he plans a tax.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 10>TV show has made overseas for international audiences but available

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 10>in the US, and that's huge for Netflix companies like Netflix.

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 10>So he says a lot of producers and executives they

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 10>just want to shoot more in the US, but it's

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 10>a little bit more expensive.

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>So that's the whole point.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 10>You talk Tom about John Boyd going to mar A

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 10>Lago and talking about different federal incentives. But he goes

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 10>into how the entertainment industry still exports three times as

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 10>much as it imports, so Hollywood is really making a

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 10>lot of money exporting its product all over the world.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 10>So he kind of breaks it down in that way.

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 3>I thought that note was great. Lucas put it out

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 3>late late last night with this uproar, and like you say,

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 3>it's a surplus business. This is like the least of

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 3>our headaches, and yet that's what we're worried about. Yeah,

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 3>and I get autos is a headache.

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 5>I get that, but movies at the end of the

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 5>day really isn't.

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and you have streaming like Netflix or Disney Amazon.

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 10>They produce shows for global audiences dozens of markets, so

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 10>it's it's a big deal for falsesimalss.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 5>Streaming makes money. I still don't get it.

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 6>If your Netflix it makes money. Yeah, Yeah, I just

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 6>don't get I think the lawyers are going to be

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 6>busy with this one.

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 3>They're a little busy right now. Yes, So leaves with

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 3>that court case over the weekend too.

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 5>On the law firms least, So what are you got next?

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 10>So this is an interesting one from the Wall Street

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 10>Journal talking about how corporate America is leaving more jobs unfulfilled.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 10>They're not laying off of workers, but the trade war

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 10>has them just pausing hiring. So they're saying it's this

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 10>new approach you hire less or not at all. So

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 10>they can point out companies like Jet Blue, t rowe Price.

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 10>They say jobs advertise on indeed down one person in

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 10>the past two weeks, so they're showing how people are

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 10>hiring lit. But me, while you had the report on

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 10>Friday that was a surprisingly strong number.

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 3>It was strong, but it was at the same time

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 3>with revisions. It was done for like one hundred and

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 3>nineteen thousand and again. You know, we'll see that.

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 5>I said this tim six weeks ago.

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 3>I said may seconds important, but June seventh or June

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 3>sixth is the next jobs report. To me, it has

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 3>way way more important.

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you got also wonder how the Fed is looking

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 6>at things this week. Set to start their meeting tomorrow.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 6>We'll hear from Jay Powell on Wednesday. Any labor market

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 6>commentary obviously will be closely watched.

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I think his goals to get through it in that

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 3>one piece.

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 10>Give us one more least, all right, So we're talking

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 10>about AI and how could replace certain jobs. This was

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 10>an interesting one from the Financial Times. It says an

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 10>AI law firm in Europe could be replacing some real

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 10>life lawyers. So it's a company called Garfield AI. They

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 10>recently got approval. They were founded by this former London

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 10>litigator quantum physicist. And what they do is there mainly

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 10>for small claims courts, but they do it for people

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 10>on the cheap. So they create like a quote polite

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 10>chaser letter for just over two dollars, filing documents for

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 10>claims for just over sixty five dollars and this is

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 10>all AI. The founder says he will review things to

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 10>make sure that everything is complete and is in check.

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 10>But it just points at this different trend of how

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 10>AI can step into different sectors like law, finance, different

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 10>area they going to replace us.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so.

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 6>It impossible, Tom, There is no replacement.

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 2>There is no replace, There is no the personality.

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, have you used any of this stuff? Guys?

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 3>How do you give you? Yeah? Take quite a bit.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Wisenthal really did a survey of it, like he lose

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 3>like four or five, six of them. And I've heard

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Jenini is getting a buzz YEP with Google YEP, but

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I haven't used I mean, I use them in the search,

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 3>and I've said I'm stumbling into it.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 6>It's finally you can finally ask questions and get answers

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 6>like what search? What online search was supposed to be?

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 5>Okay for the newspapers today, Lisa Mateo, thank you so much.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot com,

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.