WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend: Apple, ECB Decision, China

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>anchors all around the world, and straight.

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:09.959
<v Speaker 2>Ahead on the program.

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple set to launch the iPhone fifteen this week. I'm

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm Carolyn hege Hair in London, where we're looking ahead

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 3>to the crucial ECB interest rate decision.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. We look at upcoming

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 4>data in China and what might serve as a catalyst

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 4>for a market recovery.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 5>I'm Keilly Lines in Washington, where the House is returning

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 5>from its August recess and racing to avoid a government shutdown.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 6>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 6>Eleve Them three own New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg one O six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco,

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 6>DAB Digital Radio London, Sirius XM one nineteen and around

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 6>the world on Bloomberg Radio dot Com and via the

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby, and we begin today's program with Apple

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's new product unveiling next week, which risks being

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>overshadowed by a growing government iPhone ban in China, Apple's

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>largest market outside the US. Now for all things Apple,

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we're joined by Bloomberg Technology co host ed Ludlow in

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 7>Ed.

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us, Thank you for having me. Wow

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 2>what a week. Oh yeah.

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, before we talk about the upcoming iPhone fifteen and

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch upgrades, let's start with last week and what

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>happened with the iPhone in China what that did to

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple shares this past week on Wall Street.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the reality is that the news was so

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 8>significant that on Wednesday and Thursday, across two sessions, Apple

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 8>lost almost two hundred billion dollars in market cap, which

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 8>for Apple, that just doesn't happen, you know, It's it's

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 8>kind of this steady ship technology giant. But the news

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 8>is kind of a see saw of things that The

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 8>headline is that, according to Bloomberg sources, China's government is

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 8>telling other government agents and state backed corporations that their

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 8>staff cannot use iPhone and they cannot use handsets from

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 8>other non Chinese handset makers. And what that looks like,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 8>you know, is similar to what we saw a year ago,

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 8>actually in May of twenty twenty two, when the Chinese

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 8>government said a similar thing about personal computers or PCs.

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 8>They basically said, you have two years to transition from

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 8>a foreign brand to a Chinese brand, and you have

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 8>to use a you have to use a Chinese PC.

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 8>And they're now replicating that playbook with smartphones.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>So is this like an opening salvo by Beijing in

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a crackdown on all US technology? Also it comes at

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the same time a new Huawei phone comes out.

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 8>Yes, So I would note that there are several cell

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 8>side analysts that point out, despite the headline and all

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 8>of the news reports, it's likely that the Chinese government,

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 8>as a matter of policy, you know, has been telling

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 8>govvernment workers, agencies, and state back corporations for some time, like, hey,

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 8>come on, let's be using Chinese brands, not our own brands,

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 8>domestic brands, not a foreign or international brand.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>So it's hard to gauge like what.

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 8>Kind of impact that would have. Next week, and I

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 8>know we'll get into it is the launch of the

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 8>iPhone fifteen, and this is kind of the most substantive

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 8>and significant technology upgrade to the iPhone handset for some time.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 8>But go back to the Chinese consumer. China Greater China

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 8>is about twenty percent of Apple's revenues, and in the

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 8>quarter just gone, the June quarter, Apple actually grew in

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 8>China eight percent, whereas overall sales declined. So if you're

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 8>a consumer in China and your government is telling you like, hey,

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 8>if you work for the government or a government agency

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 8>or a state back corporation, we don't want using iPhone,

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 8>and then Apple brings out a new iPhone, what are

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 8>you going to do? And that is the part that

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 8>the market and the analysts and that all of us

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 8>tech journalists are finally hard to quantify, like what the

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 8>impact will be? And you absolutely right. The surprise of

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 8>last week was Huawei, that's been out of the handset

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 8>game for a little while, bringing to market a mysterious

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 8>new smartphone which we literally lifted the lid on.

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Now there's Mate sixty Pro five G capable updated. It

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>sounds like they are really pushing this to take the

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>place of all those Apple products.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 8>Yes, so I talked about that tit for tat and

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 8>the geopolitics. The Commerce Secretary, Gina Romondo was in China

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 8>week before this, right last week and time to that

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 8>this mysterious phone hits the market, and it's mysterious because

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 8>it's not registered. The specs are not registered with the

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 8>China regulator, which is highly unusual. It on paper is

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 8>competitive with the leading smartphones. What Bloomberg did is we

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 8>actually got hold of one because it sold out within hours,

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 8>and we took it to a specialist tech insights and

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 8>they tore the thing apart and what they discovered is, yes, okay,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 8>it's more technologically advanced than we thought. China was cap

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 8>of love. It has a seven animeter processor, but that

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 8>is still two generations behind the cutting edge of chip making.

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 8>But it raised all these alarm bells about whether China

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 8>is breaching sanctions that the US currently has in place.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 8>But the point, as it relates to Apple is will

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 8>hold on. This has come out of nowhere? Could Huawei

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 8>take some market share from Apple at the same time

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 8>that the government is cracking down on products like the iPhone?

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 8>And so that was part of the nervousness in the

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 8>market and one reason that Apple share has fell.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy did they fall. Now.

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Some analysts, though, I mean JP Morgan Chase says this

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is bad not you know, the high valuation for the

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>company and the risks with this band. But some like

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Dan Ives had Wedbush Security saying this band is really

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 1>nothing to worry about. Let's hear what he said to

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg this just on Friday.

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 9>In my opinion, Barcelot worse than bite. I mean, there's

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 9>essentially been a pseudo ban of government employse for Apple

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 9>in terms of iPhones the last two years. Now, maybe

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 9>there was a little more restrictions here, but we're still

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 9>talking about what we with five hundred thousand iPhones max.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 9>Relative to a week, We've going to be forty five

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 9>million sold in China in the next year.

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And let's face it, ed Apple still valued at around

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>two point eight trillion dollars, the most valuably valuable publicly

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>traded company in the US.

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 8>So there's two things here. Whether the bark is worse

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 8>than its bite in the context of China's government, and

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 8>it's its attitude towards Apple, we don't know. You know,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 8>Dan talked about this sort of unit volume that could

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 8>be impacted. Think about it a slightly different way, think

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 8>about how it might impact the broad suite of Apple products.

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 8>The iPhone is still everything for Apple, but if you're

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 8>a consumer, and again, you know that your government is saying, hey,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 8>we don't want you using iPhone. In the context of

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 8>a government agency or a state backed corporation, do you

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 8>then hold off on buying an Apple Watch or a

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 8>MacBook or using other Apple products. So that's the unquantifiable

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 8>side of it. I'll tell you what we know, and

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 8>the data is really important. That the June quarter was

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 8>a record for Apple in Greater China, and what Tim

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 8>Cook said was responsible for that was what he called switches.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 8>Switches are consumers that are buying an iPhone for the

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 8>first time, or they're switching from another handset maker to iPhone.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 8>Maybe they've had one in the past, but they're switches.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 8>And so what we concluded from that was China was

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 8>growing because people were moving to iPhone and this story

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 8>in literally the last week or so has changed that narrative.

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 8>And as Dan kind of pointed out, we don't know

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 8>the number of handsets. You can try to calculate, but

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be interesting to see how the Chinese

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:34.679
<v Speaker 8>consumer reacts.

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's face it, we have a few months here before

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the holidays, we have these new products coming out. It

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>could really change things. Let's talk about what is happening

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>at Apple headquarters that's coming Tuesday. What are you expecting

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to see in these new products.

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we're excited to be down in Cupertino at Apple HQ.

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 8>The event is called wonder Lust. We actually don't have

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 8>a really clear handle on why, but this is the

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 8>biggest event of the year, and it's all about the

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 8>iPhone fifteen. And like Apple was done with prior generations,

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 8>there will be four individual submodels of the fifteen generation.

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 8>Two base models iPhone fifteen and iPhone fifteen plus a

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 8>plus sized version six point seven inch screen, and then

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 8>the Pro models. And the Pro model is everything. It's

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 8>so important. Higher average selling price consumers tend to favor

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 8>those kind of very tech heavy, substantive upgrades. And you

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 8>know with the Pro you will get an iPhone fifteen

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 8>Pro and an iPhone fifteen Pro Max. All according to

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg's reporting, and in particular, I shout out my good

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 8>friend and colleague Mark German because he always scoops this

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 8>stuff ahead of time. And there are two key things

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 8>about the iPhone on the Pro side, the Pro and

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 8>Pro Max, higher spec materials. We're going to have titanium

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 8>around the edges instead of aluminum or stainless steel, so

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 8>a higher quality but lighter weight product, a slightly wider screen.

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 8>They're called bezels, the sort of edge of the phone

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 8>the screen will stretch further. But then I'm a geek, right,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 8>I love the compute, I love the processors to look

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 8>out for what they talk about, the proprietary silicon and

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 8>again what drives upgrades in the smartphone market. It's real

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 8>cutting edge tech. In this generation of iPhone fifteen Pro,

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 8>we expect Apple's own a seventeen processor, the latest processor

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 8>they do, built on three nanometer technology that will give

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 8>it faster processing. It will give a greater memory bandwidth

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 8>in conjunction with the memory chips. But also we're looking

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 8>at the next generation of RF or radio frequency chip

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 8>as well, the U two across all of them Pro

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 8>and the base model fifteen's that will give it just

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 8>better connectivity and in short medium range, which if you

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 8>care about those things, right, and beyond that, some OS

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 8>and functionality update as well.

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Also a refreshed Apple Watch AirPods. There may be news there.

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so the air pods are kind of getting a

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 8>slight refresh. I think the big thing we missed on

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 8>iPhone and I apologize I should have got to it sooner.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 8>But is that we're going to go back to us

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 8>or we're going too USBC charging, So everyone out there

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 8>that's sort of insanely furious, like HI about how many

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 8>different charges you have to use every day? Apple is

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 8>moving the iPhone to USBC, which is substantive, right, It's

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 8>going from thirty pen to lightning to now USBC, and

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 8>the air pods will also get that USBC upseight and

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 8>that's pretty much it beyond the software at the AirPods

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 8>and then very modest changes to Apple Watch two updated

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 8>lines series nine forty one millimeter forty five millimeter and

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 8>then a second generation Ultra forty nine millimeter in size.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 8>So it's slight tweaks, but the real updates are in

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 8>the iPhone.

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, there is a lot to look forward to, ED,

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and be sure to tune into Bloomberg Technology weekdays at

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>noon on Bloomberg Television, and ED is going to be

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in Cooper Tino at Apple Headquarters this Tuesday, following all

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the action on Bloomberg TV. Coming up on Bloomberg Day

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Break weekend, we head to Europe and preview the upcoming

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>ECB decision.

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby. This is Bloomberg.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak, weekend, our global look ahead at

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby in New York. And up later in our

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>program a look at the market recovery in China. But first,

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the European Central Bank meets in the coming days, where

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>policymakers will decide whether or not to prolong the most

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>aggressive bout of monetary tightening in its history. Investors are

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>split on whether or not the ECB will pause, as

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the latest data show the pace of price increases are

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>slowing along with the downturn in the services sector.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>For more, let's go.

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>To London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak europe Banker Caroline

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Hepger Tom.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 3>To pause or not to pause is the question that

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 3>ECB policymakers will be mulling in the run up two

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 3>thursdays rate decision. A chorus of Governing Council members have

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 3>in recent days been reiterating their desire to hike interest

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 3>rate in another point, to bring down inflation in Europe,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 3>but there are others who are worried that the effects

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>of the last nine hikes are starting to take their

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 3>toll on the economy well. Economic growth remains resilient in

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 3>the second quarter. In the twenty member euro Area, the

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 3>latest PMI surveys have shown the services sector following manufacturing

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 3>into a downturn. I've been discussing this with Bloomberg's ECB

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 3>reporter Jana Randau and our senior Euro Area economist David Powell.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I started by talking to Yanna about her expectations, having

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 3>spoken to the Dutch Central Bank governor class Not, who

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 3>told Bloomberg that investors betting against the rate hike maybe

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 3>underestimating the likelihood of it happening.

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think he actually describes the controversy or the

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 7>challenges rather well. He didn't say raids will rise, nor

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 7>did he say raids will be on hold. Reading between

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 7>the lines, I sensed a slight preference for another hike,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 7>but he was very clear in saying it is complicated. Right,

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 7>the inflation outlook proves to be disappointing. It's sticky, it's

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 7>not coming down as quickly as they want. At the

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 7>same time, economic surveys point to a very quick deterioration

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 7>in the economic outlook. Hard data is so far, he

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 7>said on quite showing that yet the second quarter GDP

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 7>figures were actually rather promising. The labor market is holding up,

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 7>the housing market seems to have bottomed out. So so

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 7>a very very tricky situation. And we've heard, of course,

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 7>from from policymakers from from across the spectrum. We've had

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 7>the very hawkish people, the Slovak Central Bank governor speaking

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 7>about the need for one more hike and preferably preferably

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 7>in September. We heard from Mario sent In or the

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 7>Portuguese saying downside rescus some materializing. So the spectrum is

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 7>rather wide and it's very difficult, but I think not

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 7>view of ever so slightly preferring a move in September,

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 7>that is where I would put my.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Money, Okay, really between the lines and of the ECB officials, David,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Inflation has been slowing in the Euro Area, but the

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 3>economy is slowing down to how difficult a balancing act

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 3>is the ECB facing.

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, the ECB's primary focus, in fact only focus really

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 10>is inflation, unlike the Federal Reserve. So it's going to

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 10>be it's going to look at that most and as

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 10>Jhanna said, inflation remains very high. In fact, it is

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 10>higher than they forecast when they last released their forecast

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 10>in June. And also inflation expectation are very high despite

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 10>the slow down in the economy. So we think they're

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:10.119
<v Speaker 10>going to hike again in September. And as Jana also highlighted,

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 10>the some of the hawkish members have been speaking about

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 10>that preference for a hike in September, and they probably

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 10>know the window of opportunity will soon close to get

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 10>a last hike in It's clear that the economy is

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 10>facing a period of significant weakness and that's probably going

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 10>to get worse in the second half of this year.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 10>There's not only the surveys, there's more forward looking indicators

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 10>like the ECB's bank lending survey and data and credit

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 10>that show the picture is getting worse. So they'll probably

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 10>try to push this through now because it may be

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 10>the last opportunity to do so.

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Okay, Yana, how divided you think that the Council

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 3>will be though on this decision?

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 7>I would say the times when everybody agrees easily and

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 7>is very happy with the outcome, those times are over.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 7>Do I expect big, big fight? Probably not, but but

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 7>you do see different opinions emerging, and and very much

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 7>along the Hawkish and Dorvish lines. You would you would

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 7>expect with those in the dobbage camp really looking at

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 7>the economy, at the risks, at at how demand is slowing,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 7>how the slowdown in China is affecting manufacturing, which if

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 7>you believe the the p M I S is really

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 7>really doing poorly. And and of course now that weakness

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 7>is building into services to some extent. So the the

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 7>eyes of the doves are really on those indicators, whereas

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 7>the hawks do pay attention to to inflation expectations a

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 7>little more uh to to the risk that that there

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 7>is there is still upset risk to the inflation outlook.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 7>So I think by the end of it we will

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 7>come out with an agreement with with the consensus, but

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 7>it will be very difficult called to communicate and accommodate

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 7>all those views and all those concerns. So I would say,

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 7>you know, a little bit more politics if you want,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 7>is what it takes from from the president, from Christine

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 7>Lagard and brokering that consensus. It won't be as easy

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 7>because the path forward is not as obvious as it

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 7>used to be.

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 3>David, do you think that the diversions you say, this

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 3>might may be you know, the last sort of chance

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 3>of the central bank in Europe to raise rays the divergence?

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Is that going to be an issue for the euro?

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 3>What happens if the ECB pauses, Well, the.

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 10>Federal Reserve is probably done hiking, and that will also

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 10>give the EAC be another reason to think about whether

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 10>they want to continue hiking. So they don't. They don't

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 10>have to worry about a huge surge in the euro

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.479
<v Speaker 10>if they were to if they were to kind of

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 10>continue hiking, although there probably would be a reaction in

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 10>the market because right now the market is not expecting

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 10>a hike in September. It's only about a twenty percent

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 10>probability of that priced in. So the immediate market reaction

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 10>will probably be a higher euro, but it wouldn't be

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 10>the start of some kind of very long trend of divergence.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 3>And just in terms of the outlook economically for Europe,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, as we go into the end of this year,

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 3>more importantly, our view on the economic performance next year.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 10>Next year will be will be a difficult year. We

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 10>have all of these problems at the euro areas facing

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 10>and not only the area, but the rest of the

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 10>Western world, the United States, the United Kingdom in terms

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 10>of tighter monetary policy and the full impact of that

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 10>finally being felt. There is a long lag that comes

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 10>with raising interest rates, so the pain will be more

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 10>obvious towards the end of this year and into next year.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 3>David Okay, very interesting, Yanna. In terms of the ECB's

0:18:54.880 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 3>inflation expectations survey, it showed that consumers see inflation at

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 3>three point four percent of the next twelve months. How

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 3>much of a problem is it, you know that this

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 3>is how embedded are inflation expectations becoming for consumers and businesses.

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean the rate or the expectations for the

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 7>next year. You would expect that to still be high,

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 7>just because inflation is still high and even official forecasts

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 7>don't see it coming back to two percent over the

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 7>next twelve months. So the ECB will look at the

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 7>trajectory and see how that measure has actually come down,

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 7>and it has come down quite a bit. What's slightly

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 7>more interesting is the three year horizon, and there we've

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 7>seen that number up and down over the past months,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 7>but the last move was up slightly, so our consumers

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 7>slightly raised their expectations for inflation in three years, and

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 7>that rate also still is quite significantly above two percent.

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 3>That was Brian Beg's DCB reporter Jana Vanda and our

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 3>senior year area economist David Powell from Bloomberg Economics. I'm

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Caroline hepget here in London. You can catch us every

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 3>weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak you at beginning at six

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 3>am in London. That's one am on Wall Street.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Tom coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend. China's economy

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>is it slumping toward I rebound? I'm Tom Busby and

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this is.

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Broadcasting live from the Bloomberg It a active brokers

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 6>studio in New York. Bloomberg E Lemon Free Oh to Washington,

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 6>d C, Bloomberg ninety nine one to Boston, Bloomberg one

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 6>O six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixteen to

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 6>the country, Syrius XM Channel one nineteen to London DAB

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 6>Digital Radio, and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 6>in Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York with your global look

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Ahead of a slew of Chinese economic data coming out

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>next week, we take a look at that country's lackluster

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>economic recovery, will affading economic momentum, and danger China's growth

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>target this year. For more, Let's get to Bloomberg Daybreak

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Asia host Ryan Curtis.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 4>To China's growth is slowing, the REMMBE is weakening, imports

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 4>and exports are slower, prices are falling, and youth unemployment

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 4>is running above twenty percent. And in the coming week

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 4>we're expecting more data on retail sales, factory output, and

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 4>fixed asset investment, and few are expecting any kind of

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 4>dramatic turnaround in that set. Looming above all of this

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 4>as well is the property crisis. We caught up with

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg columnist John Authers, who said, as bad as things

0:21:58.000 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 4>are now, they could be a lot worse.

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 11>The concerns for China or the worries about Chinese growth

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 11>aren't having as big an effect on the rest of

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 11>the world as they used to. This looks like a

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 11>much more serious situation for China than twenty fifteen, when

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 11>they're badly handled Chinese evaluation really did lead to a

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 11>minor crisis that got very scary.

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 4>So to take a look at how investors are responding

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 4>to this weakness in the Chinese economy. Joining me is

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Tu Laning, Bloomberg's managing editor for Asia Stocks Leanink. Some

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 4>might argue that it is worse now that China seems

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 4>to be in a kind of secular and cyclical decline.

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 4>What are you hearing from investors.

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 12>A bit of a mixed views. I think the predominant

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 12>view is that people are a parish and that is

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 12>backed by data. The latest data that we saw from

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 12>northbound flows into China as well as the prime brokers

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 12>from Goldman, Sachs and Morgan Stanley. They've all shown that

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 12>loan only investors and also hedge funds globally have been

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 12>pulling money out of China and their positioning actually has

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 12>lowered to the level just before the pandemic. So that's

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 12>a pretty dismal sort of picture right now. But on

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 12>the other side, we are also seeing an emergence of

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 12>investors who are actually ready to have a bit of

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 12>a tactical move into the Chinese equities because we did

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 12>see it's not quite Bazuka, but some heavy measures from

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 12>the Chinese government to support the housing sector, and there

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 12>is some concrete evidence that people are actually lining up

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 12>at least in mega cities like Beijing and Shanghai to

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 12>buy homes. And that's sort of like the first concrete

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 12>thing or evidence that we are seeing from all these

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 12>stumulus measures for the housing sector that people are actually

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 12>reacting to it. And some of them would just be speculation,

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 12>as we saw in the you know, some of the

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 12>property names on Wednesday, the likes of Evergrand and Sunak

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 12>and Chumau and these.

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we saw those big gains, you know, something like

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 4>to sixty five to eighty three percent and everything. So

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned those measures about property, What specifically are investors

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 4>looking for in terms of a catalyst that might spark

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 4>a broader market recovery.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think it all comes down to reviving demand

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 12>from home buyers, right, And so far, basically people were

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 12>disappointed because whatever the government was trying to do, demand

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 12>is not coming back. We saw a few months of

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 12>housing a sales slump from official data. But now we

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 12>are actually seeing some kind of demand coming and it

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 12>may not be quite animal spirit as of yet, but

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 12>that's probably the initial science of some kind of warm

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 12>up or revival of the market, and that if that

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 12>can continue and that will show up in the September data,

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 12>and that would really be the catalyst that people are

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 12>looking for. And again it should not just show show

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 12>up in one month's data. It would have to kind

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 12>of last as well for people to actually engauge how

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 12>much demand pantep demand there actually is among home buyers

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 12>in China.

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 4>In that furious rally that we saw after some of

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 4>those measures, particularly that story in the Securities Times about

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 4>more coming, we basically saw a lot of the developers

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 4>that had been hit the hardest rebound sharply, but not

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 4>so much for some of the steadier hands like China

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Overseas and China Resources Land. Is it the case that

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 4>for those brave souls, they're just looking to make a

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 4>quick buck on a quick recovery.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so far. That is a sense that we are

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 12>getting by talking to the market participants. Yeah, these distressed

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 12>and names such as Eragrant and Sunnak and Shima, their

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 12>stock valuations are really really low. They've all become penny stocks.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 12>And even with yesterday's rally, bear in mind most of

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 12>them still saw their stock prices drop more than seventy

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 12>percent in the last couple of years. And I think

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 12>for hedge funds, it's difficult to get into the distressed

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 12>debt space because of the lack of liquidity, and of

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 12>course in the stock market, there's still plenty of liquidity

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 12>for them to take a punt at something that they

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 12>think may actually generate you know, double or triple digit

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 12>return in a short period of time.

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Outside of hedge funds who are quite opportunistic and looking

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 4>for some quick gains. For asset managers and bigger investors

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 4>to take a look at China, will they need to

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 4>see domestic investors get bullish first, or will they dare

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 4>to get.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 11>Out in front.

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, they're not coming back. I think that's just the fact.

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 12>From everyone that we're talking to, all those major long

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 12>only mutual fun especially global ones, very very few have

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 12>said that they have the appetite to add China weight.

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 12>The only exception I would say is GQG. They did

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 12>say to us a few weeks ago that they're actually

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 12>quite bullish on China tech stocks, and their timing I

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 12>think was quite optune because since they said it, the

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 12>tech stocks actually added about eight percent in value.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 4>We are still getting state media stories about tighter regulations

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 4>in various industries. Will this spook investors once again?

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 12>I think there is a difference between this wave of

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 12>sort of tightening in regulation versus what we saw in

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 12>the tech crackdown a year ago or two years ago.

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 12>Right now, it's really targeted at sort of maintaining the

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 12>fact that children will actually have you know, they won't

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 12>be addicted, and parents can set them, can be comfortable

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 12>with their kids using techy. So that is really catering

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 12>to the needs of the citizens and their well being.

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 12>So I would say that's slightly different from the kind

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 12>of unpredictable crackdowns on all kinds of sectors a few

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 12>years ago, and also from markets perspective, the latest tightening

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 12>in the gaming addiction actually didn't have any impact at all.

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 12>So all that I think overall has been priced in,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 12>and the broader view among investors about the tech regulation

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 12>or the broader regulation is that China actually wants to

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 12>support the domestic tech giants right now, and the main

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 12>reason for that is to create jobs because, as you know,

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 12>the youth unemployment is at the au tum high right now, yeah,

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 12>and it.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Was the tech giants that were most appealing to a

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of Western investors in the past. Let's go back

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 4>to John Authurs, because one of the things he was

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 4>concerned about was whether or not the turmoil that we've

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 4>seen in the China markets was spreading outward. Let's hear

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 4>again from our columnist John.

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 11>Authors, the fact a lot of Western investors have already

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 11>abandoned their direct exposure to China. The emphasize direct because

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 11>everybody has a lot of indirect exposures as well. That

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 11>fact has something to do with why it hasn't really

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 11>impeded other global markets.

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Is that another shoe to drop though? To Lienting that

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 4>perhaps this would spread outward from China, this kind of market.

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 12>Turmoil, I would say most of the people that we spoke

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 12>to have said that they see limited impact from China

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 12>slowdown to major Western economies like the US and Europe.

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 12>Especially in the US. I think overall, US and China

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 12>has been decoupling, and as you saw in the latest

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 12>US export data, I think import data, I should say,

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 12>China accounted for I think a much smaller portion than

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 12>it accounted for in twenty eighteen. And also there is

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 12>a bit of a decoupling between the two nations banking

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 12>system as well, so from both the you know, export

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 12>link and the banking link, there is actually not a

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 12>huge amount of China influence or you know, us exposure

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 12>to China that investors are really worried about right now.

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Venting, thanks so much for joining us. Tulian Ting, Bloomberg's

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Managing editor for Asia stocks him Brian Curtis, along with

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 4>Doug Chrisner. You can catch us every weekday here for

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at six am in Hong Kong

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 4>and six pm on Wall Street.

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Tom, Thanks Brian, and coming up here on Bloomberg day

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Break Weekend, we head to the nation's capital for a

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the biggest political stories in the upcoming week.

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in New York. The House reconvenes this week, and top

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of the agenda is an impending government show down. For more,

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>let's add to our Bloomberg ninety nine one newsroom in

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington and Bloomberg sound On co host Kaylee Lines.

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 5>That's right, Tom, They're coming back the House of Representatives.

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 5>That is, after a long August recess which still wasn't

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 5>short of drama. Congressmen and women will be returning to

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 5>Capitol Hill next week, but they'll come back into session

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 5>this coming Tuesday with a big deadline looming on the horizon.

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 5>A clock is ticking quite loudly trying to avert a

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 5>government shutdown before funding runs out on September thirtieth. Joining

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 5>us now with more of the preview is Mike Dorning,

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg News Deputy Congressional Editor. So Mike, first of all,

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 5>let's just talk about the clock. There's what eleven legislative

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 5>days between when they come back and when that deadline is.

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 13>That's about right. They have until September thirtieth, and then

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 13>the government funding runs out, so the government will shut

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 13>down October first if they can't agree to something.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 5>So that's if they can't pass all twelve appropriations bills

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 5>that they need to, or if they are unable to

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 5>pass a continuing resolution basically just punt kick it down

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 5>the road. It being the can if it's a continuing

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 5>resolution that they want to pursue. What questions are there

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 5>around that.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 13>Well, one of the key questions is whether they can

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 13>get enough of the House Conservatives to agree to a

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 13>continuing resolution that Speaker McCarthy's willing to put it on

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 13>the floor. They can easily get something like that passed

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 13>through the Senate. The Republican leader in the Senate has

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 13>already said he's for it. It's in the House where

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 13>although there's plenty of votes for it, it's a question

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 13>of how much Speaker McCarthy's willing to anger the Conservatives.

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 13>And then it's a question of what will be in

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 13>the continuing resolution and what won't That could be a

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 13>key issue.

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, in one of those issues is in regard to

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 5>Ukraine funding. And this is where there seems to be

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 5>a lot of daylight even between Republicans, as you say,

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 5>in the House and then in the Senate. Can you

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 5>walk us through that issue in particular, and where especially

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 5>those on the far right end of Republicans in the

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 5>House are on this.

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely. Traditionally Republicans had been very strong on defense, and

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 13>that's what where the Senate Republicans are coming from, that

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 13>old Reagan Esque project American military power in the House

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 13>on the far right, there's a lot of unease with

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 13>the American support for Ukraine, and there there's opposition to

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 13>sending more money to Ukraine, and House Speaker McCarthy has

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 13>puoted the idea of stripping that out and separately having

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:49.479
<v Speaker 13>a bill that would require Biden to meet demands on

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 13>border enforcement and changes in asylum policy and other immigration

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 13>issues if they're going to give more money to Ukraine.

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 5>So all of this to say, it's going to be

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 5>really complicated threading this needle trying to get enough support

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 5>even for a cr let alone an actual spending package

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the day. So at the moment,

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 5>how likely does a government shutdown seem.

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 13>Certainly looking like a bigger risk because there are these problems,

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 13>there's these fights, This idea that McCarthy has raised to

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 13>tie Ukraine aid to border and force some policy all

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 13>make a shutdown more likely. That said, in Congress, a

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 13>lot of times all this gets resolved at the last minute,

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 13>So we really won't know for sure until a day

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 13>or two before the shutdown how likely it is.

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 5>So waiting until the clock is at like eleven fifty

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 5>eight before it strikes or.

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 13>At least you know, maybe the same day, as often

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 13>the case, before you know what's going on now here.

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 13>One likely scenario is they just punt the issue down

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 13>the road for six, eight, ten weeks. So if that happened,

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 13>the whole drama begins again.

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 5>I'm sensing a theme here. Mike Dawning bloo whty can

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 5>christ over exactly, Thank you very much, and Tom get

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 5>ready for the shutdown showdown.

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Kaylee. That was Bloomberg's sound on co host

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Kaylee Lines, reporting from our Bloomberg ninety nine one newsroom

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, and you can hear sound on weekdays one

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to three pm on Bloomberg Radio. And that does it

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>again Monday morning at five am Wall Street Time for

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the latest on the market's overseas and the news you

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>need to start your day.

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us.

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.