1 00:00:04,120 --> 00:00:07,640 Speaker 1: Very pleased today to be joined by Dave Pacman, whose 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:11,119 Speaker 1: show I had a great time being on and really 3 00:00:11,160 --> 00:00:16,079 Speaker 1: happy to reciprocate today. A really interesting voice out in America. 4 00:00:16,880 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 1: Huge audience of people listening to Dave Pacmann being educated, 5 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 1: informed and inspired on his show. One of the things 6 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:30,080 Speaker 1: that you know, I wanted to ask you, is, you know, 7 00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:34,320 Speaker 1: in this era of complete and total collapse of trust 8 00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:40,280 Speaker 1: in media and institutions, how do you account for the 9 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:43,320 Speaker 1: growth of your show for the things that you're doing. 10 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:45,600 Speaker 2: I think it's two things. 11 00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:48,159 Speaker 3: I think number one, it's just a result of the 12 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 3: changing media landscape, people consuming content asynchronously, less of a 13 00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:57,520 Speaker 3: sort of leaning on twenty four hour news stations. And 14 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:01,480 Speaker 3: I think I've benefited hugely just from timing essentially that 15 00:01:01,560 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 3: these technologies and high speed internet, mobile phones, which account 16 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:09,119 Speaker 3: for probably seventy percent of the content bite by time 17 00:01:09,240 --> 00:01:13,120 Speaker 3: that's consumed that I produce. I think that's been helpful 18 00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:16,760 Speaker 3: to everybody in my space. In addition to that, it 19 00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:19,480 Speaker 3: does seem as though, at least for the people that 20 00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:24,400 Speaker 3: are in my audience, when the risks to the core 21 00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:28,160 Speaker 3: tenets of our democracy seem most at risk, there's a 22 00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:33,319 Speaker 3: desire to find whatever to those people seems like sanity, 23 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:37,039 Speaker 3: seems like someone who just is going to support political 24 00:01:37,080 --> 00:01:40,840 Speaker 3: differences aside some of the basics that the country is 25 00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:44,800 Speaker 3: funded on. And so I think that without question, the 26 00:01:45,160 --> 00:01:48,160 Speaker 3: threats to our democracy that go back to the Trump 27 00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:54,560 Speaker 3: term and obviously January sixth, have made people seek out, okay, 28 00:01:55,320 --> 00:01:59,600 Speaker 3: minor political differences aside, who can I count on that 29 00:01:59,680 --> 00:02:02,960 Speaker 3: no matter matter what, are going to support some of 30 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 3: these basics that seemed sacred at one point, And that's 31 00:02:07,920 --> 00:02:09,799 Speaker 3: the sort of environment I try to create. 32 00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:11,120 Speaker 2: So I think it's all those things. 33 00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:16,600 Speaker 1: When you look at Trump, tell me the threat that 34 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:20,280 Speaker 1: you think he poses. And what I mean by that 35 00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:25,079 Speaker 1: is I have a Canadian wife. I've been very outspoken 36 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 1: about Donald Trump, and I was talking to somebody who 37 00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:32,320 Speaker 1: would be recognized in the country as a very very 38 00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:37,639 Speaker 1: prominent commentator has been for a long time, would be recognizable, 39 00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:42,160 Speaker 1: and he made a comment. It wasn't a joke, it 40 00:02:42,240 --> 00:02:49,560 Speaker 1: wasn't dark humor. It was pondering his personal situation with 41 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:54,239 Speaker 1: regard to the probability of political reprisal and prisonment. Who 42 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:58,320 Speaker 1: knows what if Trump is to be taken literally and seriously, 43 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:02,200 Speaker 1: this person would certainly, as would I, uh, you know, 44 00:03:02,360 --> 00:03:05,160 Speaker 1: be on a list of people he wants reprisals about. 45 00:03:05,240 --> 00:03:10,600 Speaker 1: I mean, after after the last election, after the Lincoln Project, 46 00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:15,000 Speaker 1: my involvement ended, there were millions of dollars of flyers 47 00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:19,160 Speaker 1: that were distributed, millions of dollars of cost to them 48 00:03:19,200 --> 00:03:23,359 Speaker 1: calling me a pedophile in all the adjacent zip codes. 49 00:03:24,240 --> 00:03:28,240 Speaker 1: That's harassment. Using the power of the state is something different. 50 00:03:28,760 --> 00:03:31,160 Speaker 1: But I but I say to my Canadian wife, I mean, 51 00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:34,600 Speaker 1: we ponder this would would and it's and it's and 52 00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:40,120 Speaker 1: it's flabbergasting to to me to even to think this. 53 00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:44,440 Speaker 1: But because I've been so outspoken against Trump, would I 54 00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:48,680 Speaker 1: have to leave the country? You know? Is there going 55 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:53,320 Speaker 1: to be an American who asked for political asylum in 56 00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:58,400 Speaker 1: Canada because of Donald Trump if he comes back to power. 57 00:03:59,200 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 1: And when you talk about this stuff at some level, 58 00:04:04,480 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 1: when I hear this coming out of my mouth, I 59 00:04:08,600 --> 00:04:13,000 Speaker 1: think I sound batshit crazy, uh in the United States. 60 00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:17,360 Speaker 1: But there's a big part of me that that's saying 61 00:04:17,400 --> 00:04:22,280 Speaker 1: to that voice, No, this is plainly played out on 62 00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:27,560 Speaker 1: a seven year basis a lot like you thought it would. 63 00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:31,160 Speaker 1: And we're at a very dangerous moment. And and and 64 00:04:31,279 --> 00:04:33,719 Speaker 1: I'm one of the questions I've been like most looking 65 00:04:33,800 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 1: forward to asking you is this one. I mean, how 66 00:04:36,800 --> 00:04:41,120 Speaker 1: do how do you see danger? Right in this, in this, 67 00:04:41,360 --> 00:04:48,640 Speaker 1: in this moment, grow closer? Uh, steady at a distance? Real? 68 00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:52,720 Speaker 1: How do you? How do you see that? Well? 69 00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:55,599 Speaker 3: In terms of the danger, there's all the things that 70 00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:58,280 Speaker 3: have been said many times, including the ones you and 71 00:04:58,320 --> 00:04:59,800 Speaker 3: I spoke about when you were a guest on my 72 00:04:59,800 --> 00:05:03,000 Speaker 3: show show. When it comes to the attacks on media, 73 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:08,279 Speaker 3: the weaponization of government against political opponents, threats to journals. 74 00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:11,960 Speaker 2: There's all the things you're talking about a suit. 75 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:14,760 Speaker 3: I obviously believe all of those things. And the additional 76 00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:17,800 Speaker 3: layer I've been thinking about lately relates to what Hillary 77 00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:20,160 Speaker 3: Clinton said. It was either last week or the week before. 78 00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:23,240 Speaker 3: Many criticized her the idea that this is a cult 79 00:05:23,279 --> 00:05:27,159 Speaker 3: that needs to be deprogrammed. There's this question of how 80 00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:30,360 Speaker 3: far does the cult go? Does the cult outlive its 81 00:05:30,360 --> 00:05:35,479 Speaker 3: own leader? What are the circumstances in which the Republican 82 00:05:35,520 --> 00:05:37,400 Speaker 3: Party maybe can get back to what it was at 83 00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:39,360 Speaker 3: one point in the past, which I think there's an 84 00:05:39,400 --> 00:05:45,440 Speaker 3: important disagreement among the left about these accelerationist sort of debates. 85 00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:49,040 Speaker 3: Is the left better off with the craziest and most 86 00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:53,160 Speaker 3: dangerous possible person because they will ultimately fail and then 87 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:55,760 Speaker 3: it will make our side look that much more sane and. 88 00:05:55,680 --> 00:05:57,000 Speaker 2: Then we can improve things. 89 00:05:57,279 --> 00:06:00,919 Speaker 3: Or are we the left better off with people like 90 00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:07,359 Speaker 3: Arnold Schwarzenegger Romney representing the right, who are less crazy, 91 00:06:07,800 --> 00:06:12,280 Speaker 3: arguably more effective, but sane people that we can deal with. 92 00:06:12,680 --> 00:06:14,200 Speaker 3: I tend to be in. 93 00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:14,960 Speaker 2: The latter group. 94 00:06:15,120 --> 00:06:19,120 Speaker 3: I've never bought into the accelerationist ideas part of it 95 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:22,880 Speaker 3: is historical that some of the greatest advancements for my 96 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:27,600 Speaker 3: political movement have come incrementally the progressive era of the 97 00:06:27,680 --> 00:06:31,240 Speaker 3: late nineteenth and early twentieth century, the New Deal era, 98 00:06:31,360 --> 00:06:34,440 Speaker 3: the Civil Rights era. So for me, the accelerationism has 99 00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:37,600 Speaker 3: never seemed like the way to go. So where that 100 00:06:37,760 --> 00:06:41,159 Speaker 3: gets me is at some point, I mean, Trump's almost eighty, 101 00:06:41,279 --> 00:06:43,760 Speaker 3: Maybe he wins and gets four more years, maybe he doesn't. 102 00:06:44,040 --> 00:06:46,800 Speaker 3: But what happens after that point? And when I see 103 00:06:46,800 --> 00:06:49,320 Speaker 3: the interviews that my correspondents. 104 00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:50,360 Speaker 2: Are doing with some of these people. 105 00:06:50,680 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 3: They seem to be true believers to the degree that 106 00:06:54,040 --> 00:06:57,800 Speaker 3: I don't even know that it ends with Trump's whatever death, 107 00:06:57,960 --> 00:06:59,239 Speaker 3: the end of his political career. 108 00:06:59,240 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 2: I don't know what it is. 109 00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:03,240 Speaker 3: And so that's the layer that's scariest for me, which 110 00:07:03,279 --> 00:07:05,680 Speaker 3: is what does the cult do post Trump? 111 00:07:06,120 --> 00:07:09,080 Speaker 1: Let me talk about that and then we'll talk about 112 00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:11,200 Speaker 1: some of the things we're seeing on the on the 113 00:07:11,320 --> 00:07:15,160 Speaker 1: left right now play play out with regard to Israel 114 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:19,920 Speaker 1: and Hamas and some of the fractures inside the Democratic Conference. 115 00:07:20,080 --> 00:07:25,520 Speaker 1: But yep, you and I agree that, and I just 116 00:07:25,600 --> 00:07:29,040 Speaker 1: want to just stipulate to this, make sure there's no disagreement. 117 00:07:29,080 --> 00:07:31,720 Speaker 1: If there is, it's fine, we'll just talk about it. 118 00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:34,760 Speaker 1: But for the purposes of being aligned, I think you 119 00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:41,280 Speaker 1: and I absolutely agree that MAGA is a minority faction 120 00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:46,240 Speaker 1: in the country that has the possibility to take power 121 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:51,800 Speaker 1: and a coalition with apathy, That it's an autocratic faction, 122 00:07:52,280 --> 00:08:01,080 Speaker 1: that it is fascistic in character in nature, that it's dangerous, 123 00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 1: and that it's ascended at some level, that it's spreading 124 00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:09,080 Speaker 1: what I would say to you, I mean, the answer 125 00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:13,520 Speaker 1: to your question is, Jim Jordan, is what the future 126 00:08:13,560 --> 00:08:16,760 Speaker 1: of this looks like? Right? That's what the metastasis is, 127 00:08:17,080 --> 00:08:22,400 Speaker 1: and it has rendered the third oldest political party in 128 00:08:22,440 --> 00:08:26,280 Speaker 1: the world, lock Stock and Barrel controlled by Donald Trump 129 00:08:26,320 --> 00:08:30,520 Speaker 1: and these people into a nunhouse and in a two 130 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:36,240 Speaker 1: party system, you need two wings on the plane proverbially, 131 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:42,680 Speaker 1: so to speak. In all of the great achievements that 132 00:08:42,800 --> 00:08:49,400 Speaker 1: you talked about, all of them required bipartisan cooperation. You have. 133 00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:52,040 Speaker 1: You know, one of the great heroes in the in 134 00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:55,719 Speaker 1: the country's history was the Republican governor of New Hampshire 135 00:08:56,080 --> 00:09:00,840 Speaker 1: who was one of FDR's most new dealers, John Wynning, 136 00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:03,840 Speaker 1: who goes on to become the US Ambassador of the 137 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:06,959 Speaker 1: UK during the you know, during the Second World War. 138 00:09:07,040 --> 00:09:09,840 Speaker 1: You look at Arnold Schwarzenegger, who I look for. You know, 139 00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:14,880 Speaker 1: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Republican governor of California, has delivered the most 140 00:09:14,920 --> 00:09:19,520 Speaker 1: significant environmental achievement of the twenty first century is a 141 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:23,560 Speaker 1: matter of policy, and that was California's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act, 142 00:09:24,559 --> 00:09:27,800 Speaker 1: the first major global warming legislation of the country AB 143 00:09:27,880 --> 00:09:30,960 Speaker 1: thirty two. You know, So that's the you know, that's 144 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:34,760 Speaker 1: the question at hand, right is you know, the ability 145 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:37,640 Speaker 1: to look at the country as Americans and say, hey, 146 00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:40,360 Speaker 1: it's the idea of the country that's being challenged here. 147 00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:44,280 Speaker 1: You know, not a dispute over not a dispute over policies, 148 00:09:44,280 --> 00:09:48,000 Speaker 1: and I guess, how do you evaluate how the Democratic 149 00:09:48,040 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 1: Party's leadership is doing framing that, you know, framing that 150 00:09:52,040 --> 00:09:56,359 Speaker 1: message right now? I mean, you have a lot of polls, incredibly, 151 00:09:56,960 --> 00:09:59,840 Speaker 1: you know, three years on in a in a two 152 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:07,280 Speaker 1: team league where the people were talking about here party 153 00:10:07,280 --> 00:10:11,480 Speaker 1: of Marjorie Taylor Green, Lauren Bober, Josh Holly, Ted Bruz 154 00:10:11,520 --> 00:10:13,960 Speaker 1: and Donald Trump are ahead. 155 00:10:15,520 --> 00:10:19,480 Speaker 3: A couple different thoughts on this, I mean it's not sufficient, 156 00:10:19,679 --> 00:10:23,840 Speaker 3: but I think it is necessary to mention that there 157 00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:28,120 Speaker 3: is a material change to the texture of political debate 158 00:10:28,520 --> 00:10:33,120 Speaker 3: since the Trump era, wherein it actually doesn't matter what 159 00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:37,199 Speaker 3: Biden and Democrats do, they're starting with an even bigger 160 00:10:37,240 --> 00:10:41,199 Speaker 3: deficit than for example, George W. Bush did among Democrats 161 00:10:41,240 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 3: before he did. Anything like that happened under Bush, where 162 00:10:44,240 --> 00:10:46,160 Speaker 3: there was a contingent of Democrats who would just say, 163 00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:48,320 Speaker 3: no matter what, I don't approve of what the guy's doing, 164 00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:52,000 Speaker 3: that I don't care what the facts are. Group is 165 00:10:52,040 --> 00:10:54,480 Speaker 3: bigger than ever right now. So but that it's too 166 00:10:54,520 --> 00:10:57,480 Speaker 3: simple to just say that's all that's going on. It 167 00:10:57,600 --> 00:11:01,640 Speaker 3: is absolutely the case that even many Democrats don't know 168 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:03,960 Speaker 3: about some of the achievements of Joe Biden. You know, 169 00:11:04,000 --> 00:11:06,360 Speaker 3: I'm starting to think about a segment for my show. 170 00:11:06,400 --> 00:11:09,320 Speaker 3: I don't know exactly what shape it'll take, but something 171 00:11:09,320 --> 00:11:13,559 Speaker 3: along the lines of, is Joe Biden the best Democratic 172 00:11:14,040 --> 00:11:16,920 Speaker 3: president of my lifetime? By achievements, I mean a lot 173 00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:19,200 Speaker 3: of the things that even I didn't think he would do. 174 00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:23,480 Speaker 3: He's forgiven more student loan debt than any president in 175 00:11:23,559 --> 00:11:28,000 Speaker 3: history by number of dollars, chipsacked inflation Reduction Act. You 176 00:11:28,080 --> 00:11:30,000 Speaker 3: don't have to like all this stuff, but from the 177 00:11:30,040 --> 00:11:33,200 Speaker 3: point of view of achievements, this guy's gotten, with a 178 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:37,200 Speaker 3: divided Congress, a shocking amount of stuff done. I agree 179 00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:39,920 Speaker 3: with having gotten out of Afghanistan. It was a mess. 180 00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:41,600 Speaker 3: It would have been a mess if Trump did it too. 181 00:11:41,840 --> 00:11:45,600 Speaker 3: There's all of these things, and many Democrats have trouble, 182 00:11:45,640 --> 00:11:47,319 Speaker 3: and I'm not a Democrat, but I'm on the left, 183 00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:50,199 Speaker 3: have trouble naming any of these things or even saying, well, 184 00:11:50,240 --> 00:11:52,600 Speaker 3: I don't know, the economy is like kind of okay, maybe, 185 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:54,959 Speaker 3: but it's not even really that great. So I think 186 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:58,040 Speaker 3: you have to blame the Democratic Party for that to 187 00:11:58,120 --> 00:12:02,040 Speaker 3: some degree. Maybe corporate media, uh take some responsibility for that. 188 00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:05,360 Speaker 3: And there's a there's a real disconnect happening there. 189 00:12:05,640 --> 00:12:09,559 Speaker 1: I'm going to analyze the poll, the accumulation of all 190 00:12:09,559 --> 00:12:11,920 Speaker 1: the polls out there. Someone who's been around the track 191 00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:16,080 Speaker 1: and a couple of presidential campaigns. We were sitting around 192 00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:20,880 Speaker 1: in a meeting, and in a political meeting, right, there 193 00:12:20,880 --> 00:12:24,000 Speaker 1: are people around that table who have a lot of 194 00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:27,200 Speaker 1: different kind of views on policy and everything else. But 195 00:12:27,800 --> 00:12:31,720 Speaker 1: from a campaign perspective, right, a final campaign is not 196 00:12:31,840 --> 00:12:36,600 Speaker 1: a debating society. It's a it's trying to accomplish a goal. 197 00:12:36,720 --> 00:12:40,720 Speaker 1: It has a it has a broad amount of people 198 00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:43,920 Speaker 1: at the table. But but but ideally, you want to 199 00:12:43,960 --> 00:12:46,480 Speaker 1: be able to look at a set of facts right 200 00:12:46,880 --> 00:12:50,439 Speaker 1: in a condition and say what we're gonna do about it. 201 00:12:50,520 --> 00:12:55,400 Speaker 1: So I'll give you a perfect example. George W. Bush 202 00:12:55,720 --> 00:12:59,200 Speaker 1: Uh as someone you know, who knew him, You watch him. 203 00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:03,480 Speaker 1: Anybody who looks at George W. Bush and he's like, 204 00:13:03,520 --> 00:13:07,760 Speaker 1: that guy is stupid. I've always regarded as the mark 205 00:13:07,920 --> 00:13:11,320 Speaker 1: of stupidity is the person who says that got that 206 00:13:11,440 --> 00:13:15,280 Speaker 1: out loud. Right. He's not a dumb guy, by like 207 00:13:15,400 --> 00:13:19,439 Speaker 1: any stretch of the imagination, and neither was Ronald Reagan. Right, 208 00:13:19,559 --> 00:13:22,679 Speaker 1: I think their writing and everything else proves. And I 209 00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:27,400 Speaker 1: understand the politics of it. And there was a cohort 210 00:13:27,440 --> 00:13:31,000 Speaker 1: of the population right that these guys, these are dumb guys. 211 00:13:33,160 --> 00:13:36,520 Speaker 1: Neither one of those campaigns, and I was part of 212 00:13:36,559 --> 00:13:40,440 Speaker 1: one of them, ran a campaign trying to assert George 213 00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:42,520 Speaker 1: Bush was the smartest guy in the country. He's a 214 00:13:42,559 --> 00:13:46,359 Speaker 1: genius in fact. And so I look at the Biden campaign. 215 00:13:47,280 --> 00:13:50,480 Speaker 1: The first thing I see is they say that he's 216 00:13:50,520 --> 00:13:54,920 Speaker 1: not old, he's the wisest guy in the land. And 217 00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:59,640 Speaker 1: then I look at the polling. It's not what people believe. 218 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:05,000 Speaker 1: They have deep, deep worry about this. And so there's that. 219 00:14:06,840 --> 00:14:09,719 Speaker 1: And so there are two things the American people are 220 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:15,600 Speaker 1: constantly told. The first is that the country is hopelessly 221 00:14:15,640 --> 00:14:20,800 Speaker 1: and evenly divided. In fact, about eighty percent of the 222 00:14:20,880 --> 00:14:30,080 Speaker 1: country broad principles, agrees on solutions demmigration, guns, abortion, even 223 00:14:30,120 --> 00:14:41,760 Speaker 1: bigger numbers, broad dissatisfaction with healthcare industry, insurance companies, lots 224 00:14:41,840 --> 00:14:46,320 Speaker 1: of room for common ground, And they're told over and 225 00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:51,560 Speaker 1: over again countries right down the middle. Now eighty of 226 00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:55,200 Speaker 1: the country is saying we don't want the Trump and 227 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:59,760 Speaker 1: Biden rematch. Don't want it, and so there's a lot 228 00:14:59,880 --> 00:15:06,680 Speaker 1: of crossover in that from left to right, tall to short, 229 00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:11,680 Speaker 1: you know, skinny, skinny to heavy right, a lot of 230 00:15:11,720 --> 00:15:17,760 Speaker 1: cross section of America in that the two political parties, 231 00:15:17,840 --> 00:15:22,840 Speaker 1: as institutions that were told never agree on anything. Well 232 00:15:22,840 --> 00:15:27,760 Speaker 1: as an observer sitting out here in California today, they 233 00:15:27,760 --> 00:15:31,720 Speaker 1: agree on something, right, I mean they agree on is 234 00:15:32,760 --> 00:15:35,480 Speaker 1: in a duopoly structure, Right, you're gonna get what you 235 00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:39,320 Speaker 1: get and you're gonna like it. And so here we 236 00:15:39,400 --> 00:15:45,040 Speaker 1: sit in October, Trump slightly ahead eighty percent of the 237 00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:49,600 Speaker 1: country saying we don't want it, eighty percent of the 238 00:15:49,640 --> 00:15:53,920 Speaker 1: Republicans on the stage like autonomatons, right, saying to a 239 00:15:54,040 --> 00:15:57,000 Speaker 1: question right after they condemned the guy for the insurrection, 240 00:15:57,120 --> 00:16:00,400 Speaker 1: but yes, we'd be for him forever, no matter what's 241 00:16:00,440 --> 00:16:04,560 Speaker 1: if he's the nominee. What Joe Scarborough said, like on 242 00:16:04,640 --> 00:16:06,960 Speaker 1: a show, it was one hundred percent true, right, that 243 00:16:08,240 --> 00:16:12,520 Speaker 1: every single Democrat who comes on that show when the 244 00:16:12,600 --> 00:16:15,080 Speaker 1: camera like goes off there, like I'm really worried about 245 00:16:15,080 --> 00:16:19,080 Speaker 1: Biden's age, right, and I've been in this meeting with 246 00:16:19,200 --> 00:16:23,560 Speaker 1: him and this happened or this happened or that happened. 247 00:16:25,400 --> 00:16:29,080 Speaker 1: But when the camera liight goes on, it's all shut out. 248 00:16:29,160 --> 00:16:32,320 Speaker 1: And I just mentioned that because I'm old enough to 249 00:16:32,400 --> 00:16:36,280 Speaker 1: have been sitting watching that exact same thing happen in 250 00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:40,120 Speaker 1: twenty fifteen, when I was sitting with all the Republicans 251 00:16:41,440 --> 00:16:46,040 Speaker 1: and so like, there was a time when every Republican 252 00:16:46,080 --> 00:16:49,200 Speaker 1: in America had the position I have on Trump. We 253 00:16:49,280 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 1: all had it. When it ended, there were like ten 254 00:16:51,760 --> 00:16:54,920 Speaker 1: of us left right right, there were ten of us left. 255 00:16:55,280 --> 00:16:57,480 Speaker 1: So I look at that right now, and I want 256 00:16:57,600 --> 00:17:00,800 Speaker 1: what is your reaction to that? Right, this idea, this 257 00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:06,280 Speaker 1: belligerence in the political class that you know, someone talks 258 00:17:06,320 --> 00:17:11,600 Speaker 1: about primary ing Biden, challenging Biden, right, credible thing. It's 259 00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:14,480 Speaker 1: not just a dance that goes nuts, right, It's it's 260 00:17:14,640 --> 00:17:19,000 Speaker 1: MSNBC that goes nuts. Right, It's it's across the board. 261 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:25,160 Speaker 1: And I just what is the disconnect between the political 262 00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:28,720 Speaker 1: and media elite? And I hate to use the elite 263 00:17:28,800 --> 00:17:33,440 Speaker 1: because it's but what's the disconnect here between the country 264 00:17:34,080 --> 00:17:37,240 Speaker 1: and the people broadcasting from DC and New York as 265 00:17:37,280 --> 00:17:38,960 Speaker 1: you see it? Because it is profound. 266 00:17:40,000 --> 00:17:42,359 Speaker 3: Well, I think there's a few different interesting things to 267 00:17:42,400 --> 00:17:44,840 Speaker 3: talk about here. And one of the elements of this 268 00:17:44,960 --> 00:17:48,280 Speaker 3: that isn't mentioned in the polls that I've seen, which 269 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:53,480 Speaker 3: would be even if you think Biden's too old, are 270 00:17:53,520 --> 00:17:55,359 Speaker 3: you still going to vote for him if he's on 271 00:17:55,440 --> 00:17:58,280 Speaker 3: the ballot and the alternative is Trumper DeSantis? And I 272 00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:01,000 Speaker 3: believe the answer is overwhelmingly the answer is yes. So 273 00:18:01,280 --> 00:18:03,600 Speaker 3: you know, I, as I've talked about with my audience, 274 00:18:03,640 --> 00:18:06,720 Speaker 3: I don't have any For me, it is yeah. 275 00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:10,520 Speaker 1: Right for me, it is right. I mean he could 276 00:18:10,560 --> 00:18:13,719 Speaker 1: be in and he could be in a liquid oxygen. 277 00:18:13,840 --> 00:18:16,960 Speaker 4: Right, I mean, well, so I think I think what 278 00:18:17,080 --> 00:18:20,680 Speaker 4: that gets us to is I would love to move 279 00:18:21,040 --> 00:18:24,120 Speaker 4: to the next generation of leaders and have someone more 280 00:18:24,280 --> 00:18:28,520 Speaker 4: energetic I've talked about, not necessarily on all policy, but 281 00:18:28,600 --> 00:18:32,160 Speaker 4: in terms of style and ruthlessness in dealing with some. 282 00:18:32,160 --> 00:18:33,080 Speaker 2: Of these crazies. 283 00:18:33,119 --> 00:18:36,200 Speaker 3: I like Gavin Newsom's approach. I like Pete boudha Jeedge. 284 00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:37,880 Speaker 3: There's a bunch of different people that I think would 285 00:18:37,920 --> 00:18:41,680 Speaker 3: be from a from an optics perspective, way way way better. 286 00:18:42,320 --> 00:18:45,439 Speaker 3: And so do I think Biden's too old? But in 287 00:18:45,480 --> 00:18:47,600 Speaker 3: some sense by the letter of the question, I guess 288 00:18:47,640 --> 00:18:50,439 Speaker 3: I do. But obviously I'm voting for him, and so 289 00:18:50,560 --> 00:18:53,480 Speaker 3: I don't know it's if it's so much about a disconnect. 290 00:18:53,680 --> 00:18:58,919 Speaker 3: I think corporate center left media isn't willing to just 291 00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:02,080 Speaker 3: say what I'm saying, which is, yes, this is true, 292 00:19:02,119 --> 00:19:04,800 Speaker 3: and we're still better off with Biden, and so in 293 00:19:04,880 --> 00:19:07,520 Speaker 3: order to keep up a certain appearance, they will just 294 00:19:07,600 --> 00:19:10,720 Speaker 3: say and the Democrats will just say he's not too old, 295 00:19:10,800 --> 00:19:14,200 Speaker 3: which is almost like a short cut to he's too old, 296 00:19:14,240 --> 00:19:15,920 Speaker 3: but we're still going to vote for him because it's 297 00:19:15,920 --> 00:19:18,680 Speaker 3: the better option. I'm more comfortable saying it the way 298 00:19:18,680 --> 00:19:20,760 Speaker 3: I see it. I think most of my audience is 299 00:19:20,840 --> 00:19:24,680 Speaker 3: kind of on the same page. Right by the way, 300 00:19:24,720 --> 00:19:26,800 Speaker 3: And one of the things, if I can just quickly add, 301 00:19:27,240 --> 00:19:30,000 Speaker 3: I don't know if you've seen the actuarial analyses of 302 00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:33,240 Speaker 3: Trump and Biden. I mean, Biden's a couple years older, 303 00:19:33,240 --> 00:19:35,760 Speaker 3: but statistically he's going to live longer because he's not 304 00:19:35,880 --> 00:19:39,240 Speaker 3: obese and he exercises and whatnot. So I think if 305 00:19:39,280 --> 00:19:41,679 Speaker 3: we only want to care about who's likely to survive, 306 00:19:41,760 --> 00:19:44,280 Speaker 3: I think it's a crazy conversation. 307 00:19:44,359 --> 00:19:46,000 Speaker 2: But the math is on the side of Joe Biden. 308 00:19:46,600 --> 00:19:49,440 Speaker 1: I shure gram with people with this when this subject 309 00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:51,639 Speaker 1: comes up, on how long Trump's going to live for it. 310 00:19:51,680 --> 00:19:53,720 Speaker 1: And I say, my over under on this is about 311 00:19:53,720 --> 00:19:57,919 Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty five, right, he'll be He'll be 312 00:19:58,000 --> 00:20:01,800 Speaker 1: eating four big macs a day, dividing America well into 313 00:20:01,800 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 1: his one hundred and naughts. I hope not, but but 314 00:20:05,880 --> 00:20:08,600 Speaker 1: I but I do worry about it. Let me let 315 00:20:08,600 --> 00:20:15,280 Speaker 1: me turn away from the Republican craziness for for a minute. 316 00:20:15,359 --> 00:20:20,199 Speaker 1: And and I want to talk to you, as a 317 00:20:20,280 --> 00:20:23,239 Speaker 1: progressive about about a couple of things that that are 318 00:20:23,320 --> 00:20:29,359 Speaker 1: never talked about on MSNBC and and every and everything else. 319 00:20:30,520 --> 00:20:35,000 Speaker 1: If you watch Fox News for any length of time, 320 00:20:35,320 --> 00:20:41,640 Speaker 1: what you appreciate is that the dishonesty is epic. The 321 00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:49,359 Speaker 1: propaganda is effective. It has been generally unresponded to over 322 00:20:49,400 --> 00:20:55,399 Speaker 1: the case of many years. But the programming doesn't run 323 00:20:55,640 --> 00:21:03,280 Speaker 1: against Joe Biden, per se. It runs against the most 324 00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:08,680 Speaker 1: extreme instances of whatever you want to call it on 325 00:21:08,720 --> 00:21:13,440 Speaker 1: the far left. So Fox is running against the San 326 00:21:13,480 --> 00:21:19,080 Speaker 1: Francisco District Attorney. Right, that's their image of America. And 327 00:21:19,160 --> 00:21:22,880 Speaker 1: I've talked to people, I mean, who genuinely believe right. 328 00:21:22,960 --> 00:21:28,760 Speaker 1: Portland has gone. It's gone. Right, It's like Nagasaki Hiroshima, Right, 329 00:21:28,800 --> 00:21:31,000 Speaker 1: it was burned in the Black Lives Matter is a 330 00:21:31,080 --> 00:21:33,360 Speaker 1: nice city. It's gone. It's been gone for years. It's 331 00:21:33,400 --> 00:21:39,359 Speaker 1: gone now. I've lived in California on four different stints, 332 00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:42,359 Speaker 1: and I lived in San Francisco and was in and 333 00:21:42,400 --> 00:21:46,120 Speaker 1: out of San Francisco at times all the time when 334 00:21:46,160 --> 00:21:51,280 Speaker 1: Willie Brown and Gaven Newsom were to mayor. And I'm 335 00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:54,320 Speaker 1: going to say this about Gaven Newsom right, who I've 336 00:21:54,359 --> 00:21:56,800 Speaker 1: known for a long time, and I like Gavin was 337 00:21:56,800 --> 00:22:02,320 Speaker 1: a great mayor, and so it was Willy Brown as 338 00:22:02,359 --> 00:22:06,840 Speaker 1: San Francisco did not look in any way, shape or 339 00:22:06,880 --> 00:22:13,040 Speaker 1: form then like it does today. And I think that 340 00:22:13,160 --> 00:22:20,480 Speaker 1: Gavin Newsome is unimpeachable with regard to his progressive credentials 341 00:22:21,320 --> 00:22:25,080 Speaker 1: and in a historic way, whether it's gay marriage or 342 00:22:25,960 --> 00:22:29,280 Speaker 1: another or things. I think he's pragmatic. I don't think 343 00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:35,480 Speaker 1: being progressive and pragmatic or in conflict with each other whatsoever. 344 00:22:37,400 --> 00:22:45,000 Speaker 1: But people want law in order. And when you look 345 00:22:45,160 --> 00:22:50,080 Speaker 1: at Los Angeles, you look at San Francisco, it is 346 00:22:50,320 --> 00:22:56,400 Speaker 1: hard not to look and conclude are things falling apart? 347 00:22:56,560 --> 00:23:01,520 Speaker 1: What's happening here in all of this? Politically, question who 348 00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:05,959 Speaker 1: would accruse to the benefit of we will never be 349 00:23:06,040 --> 00:23:09,560 Speaker 1: taken over in this country politically through an election by 350 00:23:09,600 --> 00:23:12,440 Speaker 1: some far left cabal. We will we will be a 351 00:23:12,480 --> 00:23:17,359 Speaker 1: fascist country long long, long, long before that could that 352 00:23:17,400 --> 00:23:21,920 Speaker 1: could ever conceivably happen in the in the United States. 353 00:23:22,320 --> 00:23:25,719 Speaker 1: But when you look at the at that reality that 354 00:23:25,800 --> 00:23:31,920 Speaker 1: I just went through, Mayor of San Francisco District Attorney, 355 00:23:32,400 --> 00:23:36,360 Speaker 1: and then you look at the images on elite campuses 356 00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:41,399 Speaker 1: right in a country where sixty percent of you know, 357 00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:45,240 Speaker 1: the population is living paycheck to paycheck, forty percent don't 358 00:23:45,240 --> 00:23:48,840 Speaker 1: have four hundred dollars, and you're looking at these Harvard 359 00:23:48,920 --> 00:23:53,879 Speaker 1: students out right in what what a lot of Americans 360 00:23:53,960 --> 00:23:58,440 Speaker 1: view as a pro Hamas rally right in the immediate aftermath, 361 00:23:58,640 --> 00:24:05,000 Speaker 1: right before the Israeli strikes from back. React to that 362 00:24:05,080 --> 00:24:15,200 Speaker 1: because politically, that a resurgent, angry left manifesting itself politically 363 00:24:16,680 --> 00:24:20,159 Speaker 1: helps only one person on the ballot in this election. 364 00:24:20,359 --> 00:24:24,280 Speaker 1: And they have a right to do it. Everyone has 365 00:24:24,280 --> 00:24:27,920 Speaker 1: a right to participate in America. Say whatever. But I'm 366 00:24:27,960 --> 00:24:31,639 Speaker 1: wondering how you see that now, because that fissure on 367 00:24:31,760 --> 00:24:35,560 Speaker 1: the left has been one dimensional on the crime piece 368 00:24:35,600 --> 00:24:37,680 Speaker 1: out of the cities, and now there's a second element 369 00:24:37,720 --> 00:24:40,440 Speaker 1: to it, and there's a fracture on this in the 370 00:24:40,560 --> 00:24:41,760 Speaker 1: Democratic Conference. 371 00:24:42,680 --> 00:24:45,800 Speaker 3: Well, listen, I am at odds with a contingent of 372 00:24:45,800 --> 00:24:48,600 Speaker 3: my audience and a significant contingent. 373 00:24:48,200 --> 00:24:49,760 Speaker 2: On the left of this issue. 374 00:24:50,080 --> 00:24:55,840 Speaker 3: And it's since this Hamos terrorist attack happened it's only 375 00:24:55,880 --> 00:24:57,480 Speaker 3: become more pronounced. 376 00:24:57,920 --> 00:24:58,160 Speaker 1: Now. 377 00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:02,320 Speaker 3: My view on this issue is that, I mean, forget 378 00:25:02,359 --> 00:25:06,560 Speaker 3: about pro Hamas. I mean, it's a terrorist group that 379 00:25:06,640 --> 00:25:08,119 Speaker 3: committed a terrorist attack. 380 00:25:08,400 --> 00:25:08,840 Speaker 2: Period. 381 00:25:08,920 --> 00:25:12,840 Speaker 3: We can talk about decolonialization, we can talk about the blockade, 382 00:25:12,920 --> 00:25:17,840 Speaker 3: we can talk about stopping water and food settlements. I'm 383 00:25:17,920 --> 00:25:21,120 Speaker 3: up for talking about all of it, but anything short. 384 00:25:20,880 --> 00:25:23,280 Speaker 2: Of this was a terrorist attack. 385 00:25:23,960 --> 00:25:29,679 Speaker 3: They were targeting civilians, women, children, etc. And as progressives, 386 00:25:29,720 --> 00:25:35,440 Speaker 3: there can't be anything other than a full denouncing of that. 387 00:25:35,440 --> 00:25:38,080 Speaker 3: That already puts me at odds with a component of 388 00:25:38,119 --> 00:25:41,359 Speaker 3: the people on the left. Now, very quickly the emails 389 00:25:41,359 --> 00:25:43,960 Speaker 3: start coming in, David, you're biased on this issue because 390 00:25:44,000 --> 00:25:46,800 Speaker 3: you're Jewish. You're just not the right person to comment 391 00:25:46,880 --> 00:25:50,199 Speaker 3: on this because you're Jewish, which I am quick to 392 00:25:50,240 --> 00:25:53,600 Speaker 3: remind my audience. You know, that's the argument the right 393 00:25:53,760 --> 00:25:55,720 Speaker 3: used against us when we were. 394 00:25:55,560 --> 00:25:57,560 Speaker 2: Talking about gay rights. 395 00:25:58,080 --> 00:26:01,240 Speaker 3: Right wingers would email me and go, David, you can't 396 00:26:01,359 --> 00:26:04,720 Speaker 3: let of course the gay people want rights, they're biased, 397 00:26:05,040 --> 00:26:07,600 Speaker 3: we need they can't be involved in figuring out what 398 00:26:07,720 --> 00:26:10,080 Speaker 3: to do. Or during the Iraq War era of two 399 00:26:10,160 --> 00:26:13,879 Speaker 3: thousand and three, you oppose the war, did you serve, 400 00:26:14,160 --> 00:26:18,080 Speaker 3: Oh you didn't, Well, then you're just biased against the military. 401 00:26:18,440 --> 00:26:20,040 Speaker 2: It's the same argument, right. 402 00:26:20,080 --> 00:26:22,800 Speaker 3: So, and by the way, if the Jews are biased 403 00:26:22,800 --> 00:26:25,720 Speaker 3: on the issue, we've got to discount what any Palestinian 404 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:28,720 Speaker 3: says because they're also biased on the issue. We've got 405 00:26:28,720 --> 00:26:31,400 Speaker 3: a discount what Americans say because America has a vague 406 00:26:31,760 --> 00:26:34,400 Speaker 3: So this stuff, to me is some of. 407 00:26:34,320 --> 00:26:35,680 Speaker 2: The worst of the left. 408 00:26:36,200 --> 00:26:40,399 Speaker 3: Now, I believe that I see this issue through a 409 00:26:40,400 --> 00:26:44,080 Speaker 3: progressive lens, and so my view is, I'm never going 410 00:26:44,160 --> 00:26:48,479 Speaker 3: to support authoritarian regimes or terrorist groups. 411 00:26:49,119 --> 00:26:51,120 Speaker 2: I'm never going to support groups. 412 00:26:50,800 --> 00:26:54,359 Speaker 3: That subjugate women or gays, or if you want to 413 00:26:54,440 --> 00:26:57,560 Speaker 3: leave the religion, what happens if you leave there. I'm 414 00:26:57,600 --> 00:27:00,920 Speaker 3: a progressive, so I'm never going to support these things. Now, 415 00:27:01,119 --> 00:27:03,920 Speaker 3: many on the left disagree and say, David, you're ignoring 416 00:27:03,920 --> 00:27:07,720 Speaker 3: the colonial history of Israel. You're ignoring this context, ignoring 417 00:27:07,720 --> 00:27:11,280 Speaker 3: that context. The truth is, if I were to summarize 418 00:27:12,040 --> 00:27:15,160 Speaker 3: my main gripe with this contingent of the left right 419 00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:20,240 Speaker 3: now without delving into details, it would be many on 420 00:27:20,400 --> 00:27:24,520 Speaker 3: left and right want to make the Israeli Palestinian conflict 421 00:27:24,640 --> 00:27:27,480 Speaker 3: a simple issue, and they will attack. 422 00:27:27,160 --> 00:27:29,000 Speaker 2: Those who want to bring new ones nuance. 423 00:27:29,119 --> 00:27:33,000 Speaker 3: The right will say, it's really simple, Israel's the only 424 00:27:33,080 --> 00:27:38,080 Speaker 3: democracy there. Everybody else are savages. They should bomb everybody. 425 00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:41,080 Speaker 3: The right will say, I'm sorry. The people on the 426 00:27:41,119 --> 00:27:44,440 Speaker 3: left will say, it's a really simple issue. Israel is 427 00:27:44,520 --> 00:27:48,159 Speaker 3: a unique, bloodthirsty oppressor that can do no right and 428 00:27:48,280 --> 00:27:51,439 Speaker 3: maybe doesn't even deserve to exist. I don't agree with 429 00:27:51,480 --> 00:27:54,520 Speaker 3: any of these simple views on the issue, and I'm 430 00:27:54,560 --> 00:27:56,919 Speaker 3: finding that people on both sides of the aisle are 431 00:27:57,040 --> 00:28:01,440 Speaker 3: very displeased with the perspective that I'm putting forward. 432 00:28:01,640 --> 00:28:06,840 Speaker 1: As somebody who does this and has a massive audience, 433 00:28:07,119 --> 00:28:11,280 Speaker 1: and you know, it's clear that you deeply respect the audience. 434 00:28:11,520 --> 00:28:18,080 Speaker 1: There's a trust relationship. It's a great show. And do 435 00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:21,399 Speaker 1: you find when you look at the comments and the 436 00:28:21,440 --> 00:28:25,720 Speaker 1: emails coming in, does it worry you? It certainly does 437 00:28:25,800 --> 00:28:30,639 Speaker 1: when I see some of mine. Sometimes it's the capacity 438 00:28:30,720 --> 00:28:36,879 Speaker 1: of people to hold competing contradictory or duance thoughts, and 439 00:28:38,240 --> 00:28:45,120 Speaker 1: the emotiveness of a reaction to an opposing point of 440 00:28:45,200 --> 00:28:49,360 Speaker 1: view or thought does it. It's something I find very 441 00:28:49,480 --> 00:28:55,760 Speaker 1: very concerning and is something that has changed incredibly over 442 00:28:55,800 --> 00:28:57,680 Speaker 1: the York of my adult life. 443 00:28:58,240 --> 00:29:00,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm very troubled by it. And you know, I 444 00:29:00,760 --> 00:29:03,080 Speaker 3: showed my audience some of the messages I got over 445 00:29:03,160 --> 00:29:06,160 Speaker 3: the last week from people saying, you know, I'm canceling 446 00:29:06,160 --> 00:29:10,760 Speaker 3: my paid subscription because you're just so biased on this 447 00:29:10,960 --> 00:29:15,720 Speaker 3: issue of hamas and the idea of bias really means 448 00:29:16,080 --> 00:29:17,640 Speaker 3: I have an opinion you don't like. 449 00:29:18,280 --> 00:29:21,400 Speaker 2: We all have biases. These are opinion shows. By definition, 450 00:29:21,520 --> 00:29:22,320 Speaker 2: it's all bias. 451 00:29:22,480 --> 00:29:25,040 Speaker 3: None of us are claiming to be doing reporting here, 452 00:29:25,720 --> 00:29:26,800 Speaker 3: and it's. 453 00:29:26,680 --> 00:29:27,720 Speaker 2: Not unique, right. 454 00:29:27,760 --> 00:29:31,160 Speaker 3: I mean, I know that my audience and I sometimes 455 00:29:31,160 --> 00:29:35,240 Speaker 3: disagree about, for example, GMO foods. I've seen no good 456 00:29:35,320 --> 00:29:40,800 Speaker 3: evidence that GMO foods are unhealthy for humans to consume. Yes, 457 00:29:41,040 --> 00:29:43,800 Speaker 3: if they're GMO in order to cover them in pesticides, 458 00:29:43,800 --> 00:29:47,440 Speaker 3: the pesticides can be bad. But I just don't see 459 00:29:47,480 --> 00:29:50,160 Speaker 3: any evidence that GMO is unhealthy. Some people in my 460 00:29:50,200 --> 00:29:53,400 Speaker 3: audience disagree. They say it's bad for you. On nuclear 461 00:29:53,920 --> 00:29:57,280 Speaker 3: Many in my audience are reflexively against nuclear power, like 462 00:29:57,320 --> 00:30:00,160 Speaker 3: as a bridge to renewables, because they think of the 463 00:30:00,160 --> 00:30:04,040 Speaker 3: safety record of the seventies. And I know a little 464 00:30:04,040 --> 00:30:07,080 Speaker 3: bit about how new nuclear would be built, and I 465 00:30:07,080 --> 00:30:09,680 Speaker 3: don't think there's a safety issue, and I'd be open 466 00:30:09,760 --> 00:30:10,560 Speaker 3: to doing that as. 467 00:30:10,480 --> 00:30:11,760 Speaker 2: A bridge to renewables. 468 00:30:12,000 --> 00:30:15,680 Speaker 3: Many in my audience disagree, but those disagreements don't have 469 00:30:15,760 --> 00:30:20,520 Speaker 3: the texture of I'm canceling my membership right now, that 470 00:30:20,680 --> 00:30:25,680 Speaker 3: me just saying, hey, you know, like, yes, it's when 471 00:30:25,760 --> 00:30:29,360 Speaker 3: any civilian dies, it's a tragedy. When any child dies, 472 00:30:29,400 --> 00:30:36,000 Speaker 3: it's a tragedy. But imagine if Israeli military was willing 473 00:30:36,080 --> 00:30:39,640 Speaker 3: to use human shields in the way that Hamas does, 474 00:30:40,280 --> 00:30:42,560 Speaker 3: what do you think with the death toll would be 475 00:30:42,600 --> 00:30:45,880 Speaker 3: in these situations Because there's not a moral equivalence in 476 00:30:45,960 --> 00:30:49,400 Speaker 3: some canceled I'm not even allowed to open that door. 477 00:30:49,760 --> 00:30:52,600 Speaker 3: And so it's very troubling. And at the end of 478 00:30:52,640 --> 00:30:57,200 Speaker 3: the day, I'm comfortable just disagreeing with people, being in 479 00:30:57,240 --> 00:30:59,040 Speaker 3: the room with people I disagree with and think, hey, 480 00:30:59,040 --> 00:31:02,920 Speaker 3: here's nine things we when we disagree with It sounds. 481 00:31:02,680 --> 00:31:05,400 Speaker 1: That doubt Hayford has gone without having the impulse to 482 00:31:05,520 --> 00:31:08,720 Speaker 1: kill them, I imagine, right for their lives and all 483 00:31:08,760 --> 00:31:14,120 Speaker 1: of these things. I've always had friends you know that, 484 00:31:14,880 --> 00:31:18,280 Speaker 1: you know, just have have ranged the political spectrum, I 485 00:31:18,360 --> 00:31:21,680 Speaker 1: mean from you know, you know, in my view, a 486 00:31:22,000 --> 00:31:24,960 Speaker 1: way out there far left right. You know, a couple 487 00:31:26,800 --> 00:31:30,200 Speaker 1: you know that you know, always been way out there 488 00:31:30,320 --> 00:31:35,240 Speaker 1: on the you know, on the right, and you know, 489 00:31:35,560 --> 00:31:38,600 Speaker 1: never been an issue. It's you know, to me, you know, 490 00:31:38,760 --> 00:31:42,000 Speaker 1: the line cross is when you deny the result of 491 00:31:42,120 --> 00:31:47,440 Speaker 1: an election. The entire society foundationally is built around we 492 00:31:47,560 --> 00:31:50,200 Speaker 1: apportioned power through elections. So I don't know how the 493 00:31:50,320 --> 00:31:53,880 Speaker 1: society continues when all of a sudden you have the 494 00:31:53,960 --> 00:31:57,200 Speaker 1: political leadership of one of the country's two parties decide 495 00:31:57,480 --> 00:32:00,080 Speaker 1: we're going to opt out of the foundational element of 496 00:32:00,200 --> 00:32:01,360 Speaker 1: the of the society. 497 00:32:02,040 --> 00:32:04,080 Speaker 3: The other things I think have been over the line 498 00:32:04,120 --> 00:32:06,920 Speaker 3: would be if somebody is just straight up like a 499 00:32:07,040 --> 00:32:10,800 Speaker 3: KKK anti semi, obviously I'm not going to have them 500 00:32:10,840 --> 00:32:13,160 Speaker 3: in my social circle. Yeah, but I think these are 501 00:32:13,240 --> 00:32:14,440 Speaker 3: sort of like reasonable limits. 502 00:32:15,360 --> 00:32:18,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, I mean, you know, I you know, 503 00:32:18,360 --> 00:32:20,480 Speaker 1: I got my I have a frank group that, like, 504 00:32:20,560 --> 00:32:23,040 Speaker 1: you know, you look at any given problem, right and 505 00:32:23,280 --> 00:32:24,720 Speaker 1: you know, you would have one guy who so you 506 00:32:24,800 --> 00:32:26,880 Speaker 1: know you need to spend a billion to spend sending 507 00:32:26,920 --> 00:32:28,760 Speaker 1: that problem. And then you got someone on the right 508 00:32:28,880 --> 00:32:32,360 Speaker 1: be like, no, I think at fifty dollars, right, But 509 00:32:33,040 --> 00:32:37,560 Speaker 1: what like maybe you meet in the middle somewhere. But 510 00:32:38,520 --> 00:32:42,240 Speaker 1: when you look at the reaction on it's just on 511 00:32:42,400 --> 00:32:47,240 Speaker 1: the campuses, the civilian casualties that will occur in Gaza, 512 00:32:49,000 --> 00:32:54,760 Speaker 1: the loss of life, it's no less impoortant than the 513 00:32:54,880 --> 00:32:59,960 Speaker 1: loss of an Israeli life. The loss of a Palestinian 514 00:33:01,040 --> 00:33:05,720 Speaker 1: child is no greater an offense in my view, in 515 00:33:05,800 --> 00:33:09,440 Speaker 1: the eyes of God, than the loss of an Israeli child. 516 00:33:11,240 --> 00:33:19,800 Speaker 1: The difference, indisputably is that the Israeli children killed in 517 00:33:19,960 --> 00:33:28,040 Speaker 1: October seventh were murdered and the Palestinian children who will 518 00:33:28,120 --> 00:33:33,080 Speaker 1: suffer and die will die in a war that came 519 00:33:33,200 --> 00:33:37,400 Speaker 1: as a result of an act of terror and murder 520 00:33:38,640 --> 00:33:46,040 Speaker 1: that was state sponsored by the Iranian regime full stop. 521 00:33:47,880 --> 00:33:52,840 Speaker 1: And then there's an additional context. This was a pogrom. 522 00:33:54,280 --> 00:33:59,920 Speaker 1: What is a pod ron? Why are pogroms in port 523 00:34:01,760 --> 00:34:08,040 Speaker 1: And I suspect that those Harvard students in the most 524 00:34:08,200 --> 00:34:12,800 Speaker 1: privileged cocoon that you can imagine in the country, don't know, 525 00:34:14,360 --> 00:34:18,200 Speaker 1: haven't been taught, they don't know a lot about the Holocaust, 526 00:34:18,320 --> 00:34:26,360 Speaker 1: they don't understand what it means for Jews to hide defenseless, 527 00:34:29,120 --> 00:34:34,719 Speaker 1: waiting to be killed in that matter, and the repetition 528 00:34:35,040 --> 00:34:42,359 Speaker 1: of that through history, and then the mass cheering globally 529 00:34:44,560 --> 00:34:49,040 Speaker 1: for a savagery that is written about in the Jerusalem 530 00:34:49,239 --> 00:34:52,120 Speaker 1: Post in terms of what are you looking at here? 531 00:34:53,400 --> 00:34:55,839 Speaker 1: If you've been in a war zone, you've seen death 532 00:34:55,920 --> 00:35:00,279 Speaker 1: in a war zone, it's a horrible thing. But what 533 00:35:00,520 --> 00:35:06,640 Speaker 1: was this and that this according to some of the eyewitnesses, 534 00:35:07,280 --> 00:35:11,920 Speaker 1: it's probably comparable to what happened in Rwanda, was the 535 00:35:12,600 --> 00:35:23,160 Speaker 1: level of butchery and the level of savagery. Progressivism historically 536 00:35:24,280 --> 00:35:30,440 Speaker 1: in this country, which misunderstood, has not been a democratic 537 00:35:30,640 --> 00:35:35,640 Speaker 1: party vessel in both parties. Teddy Roosevelt one of the 538 00:35:35,719 --> 00:35:44,839 Speaker 1: great progressives. But progressivism was steeped in a morality, an optimism, 539 00:35:47,560 --> 00:35:54,640 Speaker 1: a belief of inclusion. Do you view this as an 540 00:35:54,719 --> 00:36:03,360 Speaker 1: infection a cancer? Because when you have people cheering for 541 00:36:03,560 --> 00:36:12,640 Speaker 1: the savage butchering of babies before there's any type of reprisal, 542 00:36:12,760 --> 00:36:17,200 Speaker 1: is their first instinct? What is that and what it 543 00:36:17,440 --> 00:36:22,360 Speaker 1: is to me is anti semitism, obviously, And and I 544 00:36:22,520 --> 00:36:24,600 Speaker 1: and I really mean this, right, and I and I 545 00:36:24,840 --> 00:36:27,799 Speaker 1: I was the one thing I would say Trump did good, Right, 546 00:36:27,800 --> 00:36:30,200 Speaker 1: I always have this question. I've never said this out loud. 547 00:36:31,160 --> 00:36:33,719 Speaker 1: It was it did give me one thing Trump did 548 00:36:34,000 --> 00:36:35,920 Speaker 1: did did did a good job at it. And there 549 00:36:36,000 --> 00:36:39,279 Speaker 1: is one thing I think Trump did a good job 550 00:36:39,400 --> 00:36:43,879 Speaker 1: with the space program. And I'm a space program guy, right, 551 00:36:44,600 --> 00:36:47,799 Speaker 1: But you know, I've kind of changed my tune over 552 00:36:47,840 --> 00:36:52,720 Speaker 1: the last couple of weeks because we go to Mars. 553 00:36:52,800 --> 00:36:58,480 Speaker 1: We're going on Elon Musk rocket, which means probably our 554 00:36:58,520 --> 00:37:02,319 Speaker 1: first export off the Earth is going to be anti Semitism, 555 00:37:03,960 --> 00:37:07,399 Speaker 1: which we should probably just keep here, right since it's 556 00:37:07,480 --> 00:37:09,560 Speaker 1: right like kind of the first like sign of the 557 00:37:09,640 --> 00:37:12,000 Speaker 1: first hatred, and we're not ready to get it. And 558 00:37:12,320 --> 00:37:15,719 Speaker 1: I just want to ask you, you know, I've been 559 00:37:15,960 --> 00:37:19,319 Speaker 1: I'm a very outspoken, you know, as a as a Republican, 560 00:37:19,960 --> 00:37:24,800 Speaker 1: former Republican on the right about all of this. You know, 561 00:37:27,239 --> 00:37:29,960 Speaker 1: how do you think about which I think needs to 562 00:37:30,040 --> 00:37:34,360 Speaker 1: be confronted, is the baseline of immorality, That there's some 563 00:37:34,600 --> 00:37:40,399 Speaker 1: group dynamic, some thread across these universities that are very 564 00:37:40,520 --> 00:37:46,440 Speaker 1: specific in character where there's some sort of significant explosion 565 00:37:46,640 --> 00:37:52,560 Speaker 1: of dogma grounded in anti semitism after unfathomable violence, they're 566 00:37:52,640 --> 00:37:55,840 Speaker 1: out cheeriot. I mean, can you imagine if there was 567 00:37:55,920 --> 00:38:00,279 Speaker 1: a Prosis rally like five years ago and I just 568 00:38:01,400 --> 00:38:06,120 Speaker 1: help me figure out what that is? And as a progressive, yeah, 569 00:38:06,280 --> 00:38:07,480 Speaker 1: what are we gonna do about it? 570 00:38:08,600 --> 00:38:09,680 Speaker 2: What we're gonna do about it? 571 00:38:09,760 --> 00:38:10,160 Speaker 1: I don't know. 572 00:38:10,400 --> 00:38:12,759 Speaker 3: But the degree to which I mean, listen, I've been 573 00:38:13,000 --> 00:38:16,360 Speaker 3: whenever this comes up, I'm careful to point out that 574 00:38:16,520 --> 00:38:21,120 Speaker 3: I really do believe that we're talking about an extremely loud, 575 00:38:21,840 --> 00:38:25,759 Speaker 3: overrepresented group of the left. The reason I'm confident in 576 00:38:25,920 --> 00:38:29,440 Speaker 3: saying that is when I brought this issue to my audience, 577 00:38:30,280 --> 00:38:34,520 Speaker 3: you might wrongly think, looking at the comments on my videos, 578 00:38:34,560 --> 00:38:37,760 Speaker 3: et cetera, that the group you're describing is a huge 579 00:38:37,880 --> 00:38:40,720 Speaker 3: portion of my audience. Once I told my audience about 580 00:38:40,719 --> 00:38:43,279 Speaker 3: this and really started hearing from the people who they 581 00:38:43,400 --> 00:38:45,080 Speaker 3: just live their lives, They go to work or raise 582 00:38:45,120 --> 00:38:46,759 Speaker 3: their kids, They listen to my show, and they don't 583 00:38:46,760 --> 00:38:49,279 Speaker 3: feel the need to write me all the time. I 584 00:38:49,360 --> 00:38:51,239 Speaker 3: heard a day from a deluge of people who said, hey, 585 00:38:51,280 --> 00:38:54,200 Speaker 3: you know what, the stuff you're saying isn't even controversial 586 00:38:54,239 --> 00:38:57,759 Speaker 3: to me. I'm a progressive. Obviously, you're saying things that 587 00:38:57,840 --> 00:39:02,840 Speaker 3: make perfect sense. You're hearing disproportionately from a very loud group. 588 00:39:03,440 --> 00:39:07,120 Speaker 3: I think that that to a degree is true about 589 00:39:07,160 --> 00:39:10,840 Speaker 3: the college campuses, and also there are some real problems 590 00:39:10,880 --> 00:39:13,919 Speaker 3: to be dealt with. You know, my younger half sister 591 00:39:14,200 --> 00:39:16,719 Speaker 3: is in college now, and I'm not going to say 592 00:39:16,719 --> 00:39:19,120 Speaker 3: where she goes to school, but at where she goes 593 00:39:19,160 --> 00:39:22,960 Speaker 3: to school, there is a mandatory fee for an on 594 00:39:23,239 --> 00:39:31,239 Speaker 3: campus uh Arab American Muslim group that immediately demonstrated in 595 00:39:31,480 --> 00:39:35,160 Speaker 3: favor not of the killing of children, but immediately felt 596 00:39:35,200 --> 00:39:38,200 Speaker 3: that after this terrorist attack by Hamas was the time 597 00:39:38,280 --> 00:39:42,160 Speaker 3: to come out and say we're decolonializing, we're moving closer. 598 00:39:43,320 --> 00:39:47,120 Speaker 3: And the on campus Jewish group, the Hillel group, doesn't 599 00:39:47,160 --> 00:39:49,839 Speaker 3: get any funding from everybody. It's listen, if you want 600 00:39:49,880 --> 00:39:53,000 Speaker 3: to donate to Hilll, you can, and you can take 601 00:39:53,040 --> 00:39:55,560 Speaker 3: a guess, you know which which group is getting the 602 00:39:55,600 --> 00:39:58,680 Speaker 3: appropriate amount of funding despite the controversial actions that they're 603 00:39:58,719 --> 00:40:01,279 Speaker 3: taking on campus. That that sort of stuff is like 604 00:40:01,360 --> 00:40:04,799 Speaker 3: a structural problem in my mind, and what I think 605 00:40:04,920 --> 00:40:07,880 Speaker 3: it comes down to to a great degree is that 606 00:40:09,360 --> 00:40:13,440 Speaker 3: Jews in the US you have to fight to explain 607 00:40:13,600 --> 00:40:20,719 Speaker 3: to people that it's a historically marginalized minority group because 608 00:40:20,800 --> 00:40:25,600 Speaker 3: of many of the tropes about conspiracies to control banking 609 00:40:25,719 --> 00:40:27,880 Speaker 3: in Hollywood and the sort of stuff that's. 610 00:40:27,800 --> 00:40:29,080 Speaker 2: Become part of the narrative. 611 00:40:29,680 --> 00:40:32,319 Speaker 3: And you're kind of pushing a boulder up a hill, 612 00:40:32,360 --> 00:40:35,880 Speaker 3: you're swimming against the current. We saw this with the 613 00:40:35,960 --> 00:40:39,040 Speaker 3: Women's March, where there was a resistance to having Jewish 614 00:40:39,120 --> 00:40:42,719 Speaker 3: women on the board because they weren't marginalized enough. 615 00:40:42,840 --> 00:40:44,640 Speaker 2: They were privileged in modern. 616 00:40:44,360 --> 00:40:47,440 Speaker 3: America twenty twenty, twenty seventeen, or whatever year it was. 617 00:40:47,520 --> 00:40:52,239 Speaker 3: So I think it's a combination of lack of information, 618 00:40:53,200 --> 00:40:57,040 Speaker 3: lack of historical knowledge as you point out, and some 619 00:40:57,400 --> 00:41:00,640 Speaker 3: successful movements that have worked the lot on these lines 620 00:41:00,680 --> 00:41:01,439 Speaker 3: to convince people. 621 00:41:04,000 --> 00:41:07,800 Speaker 1: When you when you when you look at the next 622 00:41:08,040 --> 00:41:14,360 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five years in American life, something's going to 623 00:41:14,440 --> 00:41:22,040 Speaker 1: give here. And I'll use for data points. So the 624 00:41:22,239 --> 00:41:28,000 Speaker 1: Pentagon cannot pass an audit, it's too big to audit. 625 00:41:29,320 --> 00:41:32,040 Speaker 1: And that being the case, what it would it means 626 00:41:32,120 --> 00:41:36,000 Speaker 1: substantially right, And this is the largest kind of just 627 00:41:36,360 --> 00:41:42,080 Speaker 1: you know, part of the budget. A non entitlement is 628 00:41:42,239 --> 00:41:44,560 Speaker 1: we don't know where things are, We don't know what 629 00:41:44,760 --> 00:41:48,880 Speaker 1: things cost. We don't know why things are where they are, 630 00:41:50,200 --> 00:41:53,040 Speaker 1: why they cost what they did. We just it's it's on. 631 00:41:53,360 --> 00:41:58,520 Speaker 1: It's unmanageable, and that's a that's a threat to national security. 632 00:42:00,800 --> 00:42:04,920 Speaker 1: There is no group of people that have been more 633 00:42:05,120 --> 00:42:10,520 Speaker 1: profligate with taxpayer money in all of the course of 634 00:42:10,680 --> 00:42:16,040 Speaker 1: human history than the Republican Congress and Republican presidents of 635 00:42:16,160 --> 00:42:20,600 Speaker 1: the of the most recent era, though they bear the 636 00:42:20,719 --> 00:42:24,280 Speaker 1: majority of the reason we're at thirty three trillion dollars 637 00:42:24,360 --> 00:42:31,040 Speaker 1: in debt as a as a country. You know, Democrats 638 00:42:31,120 --> 00:42:36,360 Speaker 1: have have some involvement on that. One question I have 639 00:42:36,600 --> 00:42:41,800 Speaker 1: for you, like, on that piece of it. Does that 640 00:42:42,040 --> 00:42:46,160 Speaker 1: worry you? There is a school thought that the size 641 00:42:46,200 --> 00:42:51,839 Speaker 1: of America's debt doesn't matter, it can grow infinitely. I've 642 00:42:52,080 --> 00:42:56,440 Speaker 1: never been in that school, but I'm also someone who 643 00:42:56,560 --> 00:43:02,040 Speaker 1: has been wrong in that the implication and the consequences 644 00:43:02,160 --> 00:43:05,360 Speaker 1: for the debt or something at this level that I 645 00:43:05,480 --> 00:43:08,840 Speaker 1: already thought would have happened. But like I've come to 646 00:43:08,880 --> 00:43:11,759 Speaker 1: the conclusion I'm not I'm not an economist, but I 647 00:43:11,960 --> 00:43:15,120 Speaker 1: but I have a I have a I have a 648 00:43:15,400 --> 00:43:20,759 Speaker 1: ideological point of view, so to speak, which is, there 649 00:43:20,800 --> 00:43:26,040 Speaker 1: will be a debt crisis ultimately, and when it happens, 650 00:43:26,120 --> 00:43:29,640 Speaker 1: it's poor people who will be the most dramatically affected 651 00:43:29,719 --> 00:43:35,200 Speaker 1: by it. And and so before I kind of go 652 00:43:35,280 --> 00:43:37,719 Speaker 1: into the back half of this question, does that does that? 653 00:43:37,920 --> 00:43:45,480 Speaker 1: Does government spending without really kind of strategy purpose profly it? 654 00:43:45,560 --> 00:43:49,359 Speaker 1: Does that? Does that bother you as a as a progressive? 655 00:43:50,280 --> 00:43:53,040 Speaker 1: Like boil your blood? Do you look at it through 656 00:43:53,080 --> 00:43:57,400 Speaker 1: a prism of when you mismat it's trillions of dollars 657 00:43:57,480 --> 00:43:59,840 Speaker 1: of resources, the people who get hurt by that, or 658 00:43:59,840 --> 00:44:02,920 Speaker 1: the people that you're trying to deliver a service to you? 659 00:44:03,360 --> 00:44:08,279 Speaker 1: How do you think about government inefficiency, spending, and debt 660 00:44:08,360 --> 00:44:11,440 Speaker 1: as a progressive? Before I kind of ask you the back. 661 00:44:11,320 --> 00:44:13,880 Speaker 3: Half of this question, I try to look at it 662 00:44:13,960 --> 00:44:16,640 Speaker 3: from as much of a data driven perspective as possible 663 00:44:16,719 --> 00:44:20,680 Speaker 3: and kind of take ideology aside I mean, ideologically, there 664 00:44:20,760 --> 00:44:26,080 Speaker 3: are certain activities that I want mediated through government. I 665 00:44:26,120 --> 00:44:29,600 Speaker 3: don't want private militaries. I think when it comes to 666 00:44:29,719 --> 00:44:34,719 Speaker 3: the military, I'm a socialist. When it comes to healthcare, 667 00:44:34,960 --> 00:44:38,600 Speaker 3: I would like to see more government involvement doesn't have 668 00:44:38,800 --> 00:44:41,960 Speaker 3: to be Medicare for all. I've seen successful models from 669 00:44:42,040 --> 00:44:46,879 Speaker 3: many different countries that have mixed systems or nonprofit systems. Okay, 670 00:44:46,960 --> 00:44:49,560 Speaker 3: but I'd like to see government more involved, either directly 671 00:44:49,760 --> 00:44:52,720 Speaker 3: or through regulation in that area, and that involves spending, 672 00:44:52,719 --> 00:44:57,120 Speaker 3: et cetera. With regard to the debt, in the terms 673 00:44:57,120 --> 00:45:01,560 Speaker 3: of its raw numbers, number one one, the debt sort 674 00:45:01,600 --> 00:45:04,640 Speaker 3: of can keep going up in the sense that if 675 00:45:04,719 --> 00:45:07,160 Speaker 3: as a percentage of the size. 676 00:45:06,840 --> 00:45:09,360 Speaker 2: Of the country it's under control. 677 00:45:09,920 --> 00:45:12,880 Speaker 3: We can all understand how if you make ten grand 678 00:45:12,920 --> 00:45:16,040 Speaker 3: a year versus a million bucks a year, one hundred 679 00:45:16,120 --> 00:45:19,520 Speaker 3: thousand dollars debt represents a very different situation at the 680 00:45:19,600 --> 00:45:23,080 Speaker 3: individual level. So similarly, the debt can keep going up 681 00:45:23,920 --> 00:45:28,000 Speaker 3: if it remains a relatively stable proportion of GDP. You 682 00:45:28,080 --> 00:45:31,239 Speaker 3: can argue it's actually not really a problem as long 683 00:45:31,280 --> 00:45:33,560 Speaker 3: as we're not laid on payments and it doesn't become 684 00:45:33,560 --> 00:45:35,440 Speaker 3: a national security issue because of who the money is 685 00:45:35,480 --> 00:45:39,040 Speaker 3: owed to, etc. So simply as a mathematical reality, the 686 00:45:39,120 --> 00:45:42,560 Speaker 3: debt kind of can keep going up indefinitely. Within context 687 00:45:43,239 --> 00:45:47,879 Speaker 3: in terms of why we are deficit spending. That's where 688 00:45:47,960 --> 00:45:50,760 Speaker 3: I just look at the economic multiplier effect of different 689 00:45:50,920 --> 00:45:54,960 Speaker 3: government programs. You take something like food stamps and compare 690 00:45:55,000 --> 00:45:57,800 Speaker 3: it to cutting taxes for the richest one percent, we 691 00:45:57,920 --> 00:46:01,359 Speaker 3: can assign an economic multiplier, meaning what is the likely 692 00:46:02,239 --> 00:46:05,560 Speaker 3: follow through effect of every dollar spent on food stamps 693 00:46:05,680 --> 00:46:08,279 Speaker 3: versus a dollar given to someone who doesn't need it 694 00:46:08,440 --> 00:46:09,880 Speaker 3: is just going to stick it in a bank account. 695 00:46:10,200 --> 00:46:13,760 Speaker 3: And so I believe that you can do deficit spending 696 00:46:14,800 --> 00:46:19,440 Speaker 3: with a higher economic multiplier that is economically stimulative, and 697 00:46:19,560 --> 00:46:21,960 Speaker 3: that's not a problem to me. That's not scary to me. 698 00:46:23,080 --> 00:46:27,319 Speaker 1: So when you look at healthcare, and the back half 699 00:46:27,360 --> 00:46:33,120 Speaker 1: of the question is as a progressive whose basic argument 700 00:46:33,640 --> 00:46:40,000 Speaker 1: is I want government to provide more services in more 701 00:46:40,200 --> 00:46:46,960 Speaker 1: spaces to achieve an outcome that accrues to the public 702 00:46:47,080 --> 00:46:49,920 Speaker 1: good and to the national. 703 00:46:49,600 --> 00:46:54,439 Speaker 3: Interest generally speaking, Yeah, I mean to say I want 704 00:46:54,480 --> 00:46:56,880 Speaker 3: the government doing more. I might want to change some 705 00:46:57,080 --> 00:46:59,399 Speaker 3: of the things the government's doing rather than just say 706 00:46:59,520 --> 00:47:00,840 Speaker 3: add a whole bunch of stuff. 707 00:47:00,880 --> 00:47:04,040 Speaker 2: But yeah, I think there are areas that are we 708 00:47:04,160 --> 00:47:04,920 Speaker 2: have an interest in. 709 00:47:05,000 --> 00:47:09,239 Speaker 3: Taking out of simply the market system and saying we're 710 00:47:09,239 --> 00:47:10,799 Speaker 3: going to affect them in some way. 711 00:47:11,320 --> 00:47:17,600 Speaker 1: So, so healthcare, you talked about very briefly, when you 712 00:47:17,760 --> 00:47:25,360 Speaker 1: see government involved in healthcare in a different role or 713 00:47:25,760 --> 00:47:29,280 Speaker 1: increasing role, however you think about it from this moment, 714 00:47:30,719 --> 00:47:34,920 Speaker 1: do you want to seek government operating the healthcare system 715 00:47:35,320 --> 00:47:41,120 Speaker 1: or do you want to see government really assuming payment responsibilities? 716 00:47:42,120 --> 00:47:47,640 Speaker 1: Right in an economy where we have this crazy system 717 00:47:47,960 --> 00:47:51,120 Speaker 1: where in the end and it's too complicated to talk 718 00:47:51,239 --> 00:47:54,279 Speaker 1: about it at the time, we have left, but trust me, right, 719 00:47:54,400 --> 00:47:59,440 Speaker 1: like everyone watching, you all pay for this. Everybody pays right, 720 00:47:59,480 --> 00:48:01,959 Speaker 1: We're ready all paying for this, right, So the notion 721 00:48:02,200 --> 00:48:05,799 Speaker 1: that a cost would be imposed on you that you're 722 00:48:05,840 --> 00:48:09,560 Speaker 1: not already paying with regard to healthcare has always been 723 00:48:09,640 --> 00:48:13,239 Speaker 1: on trip. Right, it's coming. So but I think, like 724 00:48:13,360 --> 00:48:16,880 Speaker 1: a lot of people hear you say that here a 725 00:48:17,000 --> 00:48:20,080 Speaker 1: progressive say that is say the government is going to 726 00:48:20,120 --> 00:48:24,840 Speaker 1: be between me and my doctor as opposed to government's 727 00:48:24,920 --> 00:48:29,160 Speaker 1: going to pay into a system in a way that 728 00:48:29,719 --> 00:48:33,319 Speaker 1: removes my economic anxiety that I break my leg I'm 729 00:48:33,360 --> 00:48:35,480 Speaker 1: going bankrupt, am I? 730 00:48:37,080 --> 00:48:39,920 Speaker 2: So here's the deal? What I would do. 731 00:48:41,480 --> 00:48:44,040 Speaker 3: This is so far from realistic in terms of the 732 00:48:44,239 --> 00:48:46,120 Speaker 3: direction that this country is going that what I would 733 00:48:46,120 --> 00:48:47,560 Speaker 3: do if I were to rebuild it to the ground 734 00:48:47,680 --> 00:48:50,440 Speaker 3: up is less relevant than the options that would be 735 00:48:50,480 --> 00:48:54,240 Speaker 3: improvements on what we have now. There are countries, including 736 00:48:54,360 --> 00:48:58,160 Speaker 3: Argentina and many others. Every country has pros and cons 737 00:48:58,280 --> 00:49:01,640 Speaker 3: where the government does operate rate some hospitals, and then 738 00:49:01,680 --> 00:49:06,320 Speaker 3: there are also private hospitals, and you are entitled to 739 00:49:07,480 --> 00:49:10,480 Speaker 3: free Obviously, everybody's paying for it one way or the other, 740 00:49:10,560 --> 00:49:13,560 Speaker 3: whether it's through healthcare premiums or taxes or however it is. 741 00:49:14,160 --> 00:49:15,840 Speaker 2: You can go to the public hospitals. 742 00:49:16,239 --> 00:49:19,080 Speaker 3: You can also choose to go to private hospitals and 743 00:49:19,160 --> 00:49:22,720 Speaker 3: pay out of pocket or get different insurance that covers 744 00:49:22,760 --> 00:49:24,120 Speaker 3: you at the private hospitals. 745 00:49:24,160 --> 00:49:25,799 Speaker 2: But what's the point of the whole thing. 746 00:49:26,320 --> 00:49:29,720 Speaker 3: The point of the whole thing is everybody gets access 747 00:49:29,920 --> 00:49:33,920 Speaker 3: to something, regardless of ability to pay. In other countries, 748 00:49:34,480 --> 00:49:38,360 Speaker 3: it's not that the government is operating any health care facilities, 749 00:49:38,960 --> 00:49:41,320 Speaker 3: but they are simply becoming a central insurance. 750 00:49:41,719 --> 00:49:43,320 Speaker 2: It is not tied to employment. 751 00:49:44,400 --> 00:49:48,440 Speaker 3: If you do work, you do pay an additional tax. 752 00:49:49,040 --> 00:49:50,680 Speaker 2: If you don't work, well, then. 753 00:49:50,600 --> 00:49:52,840 Speaker 3: It's subsidized by those who do work, but it's not 754 00:49:53,080 --> 00:49:56,440 Speaker 3: tied to employment, and that's a very common model in 755 00:49:56,560 --> 00:49:59,360 Speaker 3: many countries as well. You could also look at a 756 00:49:59,440 --> 00:50:02,880 Speaker 3: model where everybody is required to get their own health insurance, 757 00:50:03,480 --> 00:50:07,759 Speaker 3: the health insurers are nonprofit and it is subsidized by 758 00:50:07,840 --> 00:50:10,680 Speaker 3: the government. I mean, all of these options I'm open to. 759 00:50:10,800 --> 00:50:14,080 Speaker 3: I've interviewed experts on the Singaporean system, which is different 760 00:50:14,160 --> 00:50:18,759 Speaker 3: and very interesting. Germany and Switzerland have different models. France is, 761 00:50:18,840 --> 00:50:22,280 Speaker 3: like I believe, a nonprofit plus additional insurance. I'm really 762 00:50:22,440 --> 00:50:26,760 Speaker 3: open to any system that will ensure no one falls 763 00:50:26,880 --> 00:50:29,799 Speaker 3: below the cracks and ends up using the emergency room 764 00:50:30,000 --> 00:50:33,160 Speaker 3: for primary care, never paying, and then we all pay 765 00:50:33,239 --> 00:50:37,680 Speaker 3: for it anyway. Nobody benefits from that. That's one priority. 766 00:50:38,840 --> 00:50:43,440 Speaker 3: And also, if it's possible, decreasing the cost to the 767 00:50:43,560 --> 00:50:44,399 Speaker 3: end user as well. 768 00:50:45,920 --> 00:50:49,320 Speaker 1: So this here's my last here's my last question for you, 769 00:50:49,440 --> 00:50:51,239 Speaker 1: and I want to bring you back to something that 770 00:50:51,680 --> 00:50:53,800 Speaker 1: you said at the beginning when you were talking about 771 00:50:55,480 --> 00:51:00,520 Speaker 1: President Biden infrastructure legislation, some of the domestic policy achievements. 772 00:51:01,600 --> 00:51:04,400 Speaker 1: I was hiking in Utah last week on a CCC 773 00:51:04,719 --> 00:51:08,120 Speaker 1: trail and there's a there's a road marker for it. 774 00:51:08,280 --> 00:51:11,839 Speaker 1: It was made by men from New York and New Jersey, right, 775 00:51:12,000 --> 00:51:15,480 Speaker 1: And there's a New Jersey native right live in Utah. 776 00:51:17,920 --> 00:51:21,440 Speaker 1: You know, almost almost ninety years later, right, walking on 777 00:51:21,520 --> 00:51:26,480 Speaker 1: this chat trail, what an achievement? Rights, And there's academics 778 00:51:26,600 --> 00:51:29,360 Speaker 1: right that will debate, right, hey, was this successful or not? 779 00:51:29,640 --> 00:51:32,920 Speaker 1: Like as you're walking on the trail, right, that counts 780 00:51:32,920 --> 00:51:36,200 Speaker 1: as an element of success too. Right. So there's got 781 00:51:36,320 --> 00:51:40,040 Speaker 1: the twenty first century infrastructure of the country, like fifty 782 00:51:40,120 --> 00:51:44,200 Speaker 1: years from now when you look back, like who did that? Right, 783 00:51:44,280 --> 00:51:47,200 Speaker 1: Joe Biden did that? Right in the same way that 784 00:51:47,320 --> 00:51:50,080 Speaker 1: we look at the infrastructure like right now in the country, 785 00:51:50,200 --> 00:51:53,759 Speaker 1: drive on an interstate highway? Who did that? Dwight Eisenhber 786 00:51:53,880 --> 00:52:02,200 Speaker 1: did that? And enormously transformational pieces of legislation. I completely 787 00:52:02,360 --> 00:52:11,600 Speaker 1: believe that historic politically and psychologically. It's like the White House. 788 00:52:11,680 --> 00:52:15,000 Speaker 1: When I look at kind of the comments, there's this neediness. 789 00:52:15,440 --> 00:52:18,319 Speaker 1: It's like the campaign is in search of it. Thank 790 00:52:18,400 --> 00:52:21,879 Speaker 1: you at a moment when the country's in a fuck 791 00:52:21,960 --> 00:52:33,040 Speaker 1: you state of mind. And secondly, everything that government can 792 00:52:33,239 --> 00:52:38,560 Speaker 1: do has to be built on a foundation of belief 793 00:52:39,800 --> 00:52:45,120 Speaker 1: that it can make things better, and right now trust 794 00:52:45,280 --> 00:52:51,400 Speaker 1: is so broken. So to me, it's like trying to 795 00:52:51,520 --> 00:52:56,880 Speaker 1: start a fire with wet Wood. The greatest progressive leader 796 00:52:57,239 --> 00:53:03,399 Speaker 1: in American history, bar none was Franklin Roosevelt by way 797 00:53:03,480 --> 00:53:08,560 Speaker 1: of achievement and success. When times were tough in nineteen 798 00:53:08,680 --> 00:53:13,080 Speaker 1: thirty two, his campaign song was not everything sucks, it 799 00:53:13,200 --> 00:53:18,120 Speaker 1: was happy days are here again. How does a progressive 800 00:53:20,160 --> 00:53:29,160 Speaker 1: specifically talk to the country about rebuilding the trust necessary 801 00:53:30,760 --> 00:53:37,640 Speaker 1: to implement a progressive agenda, which inherently is built on 802 00:53:39,040 --> 00:53:43,040 Speaker 1: we can do something, and that's something is going to 803 00:53:43,160 --> 00:53:47,839 Speaker 1: make things better. How do you think about that as 804 00:53:47,960 --> 00:53:57,960 Speaker 1: somebody who I view as a real important voice communicating 805 00:53:58,120 --> 00:54:02,600 Speaker 1: to a new generation about some of the most important 806 00:54:02,680 --> 00:54:06,480 Speaker 1: ideas that have ever been put down by the mind 807 00:54:07,239 --> 00:54:12,480 Speaker 1: of humanity to paper. And this imperfect experiment is the 808 00:54:12,640 --> 00:54:18,239 Speaker 1: result of it. The political traditions that have emerged from 809 00:54:18,320 --> 00:54:22,520 Speaker 1: within it are as old as democracy and its concepts itself, 810 00:54:23,680 --> 00:54:28,760 Speaker 1: the ideas of restraint versus the power of change, trying 811 00:54:28,800 --> 00:54:34,120 Speaker 1: to find that's societ, that societal harmony. But trust, to 812 00:54:34,280 --> 00:54:37,160 Speaker 1: me just seems so elemental. I wanted to ask you 813 00:54:37,320 --> 00:54:40,960 Speaker 1: that last question before I ask you to deliver your warning, 814 00:54:41,320 --> 00:54:42,600 Speaker 1: which I'm looking forward to. 815 00:54:43,280 --> 00:54:46,320 Speaker 3: I mean, listen, I would probably go to folks like 816 00:54:46,440 --> 00:54:48,520 Speaker 3: you to figure out the right way to message this, 817 00:54:48,760 --> 00:54:50,920 Speaker 3: but just thinking off the top of my head. I 818 00:54:51,000 --> 00:54:53,360 Speaker 3: think the case I would try to make is I 819 00:54:53,560 --> 00:54:56,680 Speaker 3: understand the reason for the erosion, and trust anyone after 820 00:54:56,760 --> 00:55:00,120 Speaker 3: the last seven years would have a limited or non exist. 821 00:55:00,040 --> 00:55:00,880 Speaker 2: Amount of trust. 822 00:55:01,560 --> 00:55:05,160 Speaker 3: Here the historical successes of the movement I consider myself 823 00:55:05,280 --> 00:55:07,040 Speaker 3: part of I would talk about some of the ones 824 00:55:07,120 --> 00:55:10,560 Speaker 3: I mentioned earlier. We also don't need to convince anyone 825 00:55:10,800 --> 00:55:13,440 Speaker 3: in the sense that we already have the vast majority 826 00:55:13,480 --> 00:55:16,000 Speaker 3: of the public on our side, as you talked about earlier, 827 00:55:16,040 --> 00:55:18,600 Speaker 3: when it comes to so many of these issues, we've 828 00:55:18,680 --> 00:55:22,239 Speaker 3: got sixty seventy, sometimes eighty percent agreement already. What we 829 00:55:22,360 --> 00:55:24,759 Speaker 3: need to do is every single one of us participate 830 00:55:24,960 --> 00:55:28,160 Speaker 3: in the system such that the elected officials in DC 831 00:55:28,960 --> 00:55:32,880 Speaker 3: actually represent our views rather than, as Princeton said, the 832 00:55:33,040 --> 00:55:36,359 Speaker 3: views of the wealthy end of corporations. If we can 833 00:55:36,480 --> 00:55:39,120 Speaker 3: do that, then we are going to start going in 834 00:55:39,200 --> 00:55:41,719 Speaker 3: a path where we can continue to have more of 835 00:55:41,800 --> 00:55:42,480 Speaker 3: these achievements. 836 00:55:42,480 --> 00:55:44,239 Speaker 2: I mean, I think that's the arc that I would 837 00:55:44,320 --> 00:55:46,120 Speaker 2: kind of try to establish. 838 00:55:47,080 --> 00:55:50,200 Speaker 1: Next time I talk to you. The thing I'd love 839 00:55:50,320 --> 00:55:53,600 Speaker 1: to talk about is the size and scale of corporations 840 00:55:53,680 --> 00:55:56,520 Speaker 1: in America in the twenty first century and how we 841 00:55:56,920 --> 00:56:01,200 Speaker 1: appropriately about breaking them up. But I I've run out 842 00:56:01,239 --> 00:56:05,080 Speaker 1: of time. It's been a great discussion. We've started a 843 00:56:05,200 --> 00:56:07,920 Speaker 1: new thing here where we ask our guests to deliver 844 00:56:08,640 --> 00:56:14,560 Speaker 1: a warning, oh boy, to the audience, and uh, here 845 00:56:14,640 --> 00:56:14,920 Speaker 1: you go. 846 00:56:16,400 --> 00:56:19,040 Speaker 3: A warning of just a general warning of any. 847 00:56:18,960 --> 00:56:22,680 Speaker 1: Kind a warning. There's a lot happening in the in 848 00:56:22,800 --> 00:56:26,640 Speaker 1: the world right now. And you know, what do you 849 00:56:26,800 --> 00:56:29,160 Speaker 1: wanna what do you want to say to you know, 850 00:56:29,520 --> 00:56:35,480 Speaker 1: people about any subject it's important for them to hear. 851 00:56:36,160 --> 00:56:39,120 Speaker 1: I'll give you two mon there's a great, great patriot, 852 00:56:40,160 --> 00:56:45,360 Speaker 1: deeply knowledgeable, in a vital voice in America's political ecology 853 00:56:45,440 --> 00:56:45,759 Speaker 1: right now. 854 00:56:45,840 --> 00:56:49,120 Speaker 3: I think I'll give you my political and my non political. 855 00:56:49,719 --> 00:56:50,759 Speaker 2: The political is. 856 00:56:52,239 --> 00:56:56,200 Speaker 3: Really try to look at primary sources for whatever it 857 00:56:56,400 --> 00:56:58,560 Speaker 3: is that you're trying to figure out in the world. 858 00:56:59,040 --> 00:57:03,439 Speaker 3: Primary source, whether it's books from people who were actually there, 859 00:57:03,640 --> 00:57:07,120 Speaker 3: whether it's original direct reporting from those on the ground, 860 00:57:07,280 --> 00:57:11,160 Speaker 3: whatever is, primary sources. Don't get sucked in beyond that. 861 00:57:12,080 --> 00:57:15,480 Speaker 3: Start with primary sources. And then number two a warning 862 00:57:15,880 --> 00:57:18,880 Speaker 3: that it's a really good idea to try to walk 863 00:57:18,960 --> 00:57:22,240 Speaker 3: ten thousand steps a day and eat thirty grams of 864 00:57:22,320 --> 00:57:25,680 Speaker 3: fiber a day. That's my health warning to everybody. Two 865 00:57:25,760 --> 00:57:28,080 Speaker 3: goods of good bits of advice I hope. 866 00:57:29,040 --> 00:57:31,360 Speaker 1: Day FACTA, thank you very much, great to be with 867 00:57:31,480 --> 00:57:31,920 Speaker 1: you today. 868 00:57:32,480 --> 00:57:33,240 Speaker 2: Really appreciate it. 869 00:57:34,280 --> 00:57:34,880 Speaker 1: Bet, thank you.