WEBVTT - AI Is Worse Than The Dot Com Bubble: Part One

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Media.

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Hi, I'm d Zeitron and this is Better Offline.

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to dot Comweek.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I hope you enjoyed my chat with Matt Rosof to

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 3>kick it off, and today is the first of a

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 3>four part special But why I think the AI bubble

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 3>is that much worse than the dot com bubble. So

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 3>for almost five years I put out a newsletter or

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 3>article basically every week that addresses the underlying financial rat

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 3>at the heart of the tech industry, whether it be

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 3>the outright corruption the crypto industry, the bullshit of the metaverse,

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 3>or the AI bubble that I won't shut up about.

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 3>It's been some of the most challenging work I've ever done.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I've been forced to learn accountancy, economics and the names

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 3>of at least ten different guys i'd gladly see under

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 3>a with a I'm not on accountant, forensic, or otherwise.

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a banker or a financial analyst. I've never

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 3>worked as a venture capitalist or a hedge fund, or

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 3>at a hedge fund. I guess that would be I'm

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 3>just a guy with a laptop and a microphone. But

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 3>I think I've picked up a great deal of knowledge

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 3>in the last few years, and the clarity of starting

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>from a position of oh God, what does that mean

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 3>actually allowed me to see things in the way that

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>many haven't, which is why I am so utterly horrified

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.279
<v Speaker 3>when I hear people flippantly say that the AI bubble

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 3>will work out fine because it's just like the dot

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 3>com bubble. While there are similarities, I need to be

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>clear that I think the AI bubble is far, far worse,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.839
<v Speaker 3>and the calamity that follow us would be far more destructive.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's review the dot com.

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Bubble actually had two elements, the stable, sensible tech companies

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 3>that actually made money, and then the likes of pets

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 3>dot com and webvan, both ideas that would eventually find

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 3>margin positive existence in the form of Dewey and Instacram.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I'd also add the telecommunications companies onto the side of

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 3>this as well, but technically they weren't making the websites.

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>They were just building me into them. What buried these

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>companies was their obsession with growth, with them a rush

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>to take them public. The idea of ordering pet food

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 3>or groceries online was one that would have made a

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 3>lot more sense if more people were connected to the

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.519
<v Speaker 3>Internet or had faster connections in the year two thousand,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 3>only about fifty two percent of Americans were online, and well,

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 3>both web van and pets dot Com were losing two

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 3>dollars for every dollar of revenue.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>That shit didn't make any sense, and it wouldn't have

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 3>even if we had high speed internet. But I think

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 3>by the middle of the two thousands we only had

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 3>most people on at best four hundred kilobits per second,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 3>so we're talking websites that took time to load. Anyway,

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the economic sourceer didn't make sense. Now the AI bubble

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 3>differs in so far as that what we would have

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 3>once considered stable sensible tech companies are acting irrationally, having

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 3>doubled or in the case of Microsoft, tripled the amount

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 3>of hardware known as PP and E that they operate

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 3>in just a couple of years, with no signs of

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 3>slowing down. These companies are racking up entering into multi

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 3>decade long lease agreements, and it accumulated so much hardware

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 3>that the depreciation will erode any profitability for the short

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 3>term medium term future. For example, Microsoft went from having

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 3>around eighty eight billion dollars in PP and E that's property,

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 3>plants of equipment which is where the GPUs are, by

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the way, in the beginning of twenty twenty three, to

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>a remarkable two hundred and thirty billion dollars in pp

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 3>and E as of its last quarter. And depreciation, by

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>the way, is not it's not a cash expense. They've

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 3>already bought the GPUs and the service and the like.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 3>What it does, however, is sit there because they spread

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 3>it out over five to six years. I think it's

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>five and a half from Microsoft. They spread it out,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 3>so it eats into that net income side. So instead

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>of they'd taken the immediate upfront hit, they spread it out.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 3>So this means that each quarter from here until fucking eternity,

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 3>at this point, Microsoft is going to be taking billions

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 3>of dollars of appreciation charges. Now, while the dot com

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 3>bubble was wasteful, it didn't involve the largest and most

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 3>well respected tech firms in the world accruing hundreds of

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars of GPUs that are absolutely a year

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>or so after being installed. It also didn't involve billions

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 3>in operational expenses or acres of data centers. In fact,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 3>there's really no comparison. Fiber doesn't compare at all the

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 3>scale of the fiber will get to it. But I

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 3>just want to be clear that fiber is also something

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 3>that you can use on many things. Fiber is something

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 3>that another company could come up and run with. Aigpus

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 3>are extremely limited in their outcomes. I've been over this before.

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Not going to repeat myself. Perhaps I'll do it more

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 3>in depth episode on that in the future. But look,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 3>in many ways, I fear the AI bubble is going

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 3>to be worse than the dot com bubble. It's going

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 3>to make it look small, and we are already seeing

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 3>some worrying signs. Now, let's start somewhere simple though.

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Layoffs.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 3>Fun fact, even during the dot com bubble, Microsoft barely

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 3>had any layoffs, with the company growing its headcount even

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 3>as the tech industry around it was consumed in flames.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 3>The biggest round of firings I could find during the

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety eight to two thousand and eight period was

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 3>between August twenty twenty four and January twenty twenty five,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 3>when it can seventy six members of its ex Box

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 3>group as well as one hundred and fifty seven test

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 3>engineers whose jobs were offshore to India. That gives you

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>a grand total of two hundred and thirty three people.

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 3>For comparison, Microsoft laid off six thousand people in May

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 3>of last year, or three percent of its global workforce.

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Now that's not to say that people at other companies

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 3>were equally fortunate. In two thousand and one, some Microsystems

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 3>called ninety percent of its workforce or thirty nine hundred jobs.

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 3>That was the first of many at that particular company.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 3>In two thousand and one, the telecommunications sector cut and

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>I am not shitting you here three hundred and seventeen thousand,

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 3>seven hundred and seventy seven rolls, with the computer industry

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 3>second rank for that year, shedding one hundred and fifty

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 3>three thousand and nine hundred and fifty two positions. Similarly,

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Amazon saw it stocked tumble in January two thousand when

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 3>it was discovered that it laid off one hundred and

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 3>fifty people, two percent of its workforce at the time,

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 3>and would lay off another thirteen hundred a year later,

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>or fifteen percent of its workforce. Now, that, by the way,

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 3>sounds like a lot. And also I think it's adorable.

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Back when the stock market cared, when companies did layoffs,

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 3>they don't today. And Amazon indeed is a very different

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 3>company today, going from a fledgling digital book seller to

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 3>one of the largest retailers and cloud storage providers in

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the world, and a very profitable one. And that Yet

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 3>this week Amazon laid off another fourteen thousand people, ten

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 3>percent of its corporate workforce, around three months after laying

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 3>off fourteen thousand more people in October twenty twenty five.

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Why well bids two things.

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 3>First, it's the scourge of Jack welch, go and listen

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 3>to the shareholder supremacy from twenty twenty four if you

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 3>like that one, and the idea that laying people off

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 3>well at boosts profits, which Wall Street loves now. Secondly,

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 3>it's because Amazon is buying billions of dollars of GPUs,

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 3>both in Vidia and directly from TSMC for its trainium

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 3>custom chips. That is TSMC Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation they

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 3>build basically every chip, and Amazon they build them internally

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>using a company called Annapurna Labs. It's a whole thing

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 3>saying it doesn't really mean much. They're not as good

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>as vidious GPUs, but nevertheless they keep fucking that chicken.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 3>And this is a massive burden on its earnings. These

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 3>chips have their costs spread out, like I mentioned as

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 3>a depreciation charge, dragging down the profits that Amazon can

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>report on its earnings in the process. Well, this isn't

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the problem when you buy one or two or ten GPUs.

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>It becomes one when you have hundreds of thousands of

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the fuckers. Amazon had sixteen point seven billion dollars of

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 3>depreciation charges and its last earnings. That's a great deal.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I think their net revenue is like twenty two to

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty four billion dollars, not great. In similar terms, today's

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>layoffs are happening not because the companies are in trouble,

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 3>but because they want to boost their profits at a

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 3>time when AI services aren't providing a profit and I

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 3>don't think they ever will. Nevertheless, these layoffs are a sign

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 3>of something that these companies know that revenue growth isn't

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 3>keeping pace with their ruinous expenditures. The only jobs that

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 3>AI is taking are those that the hyperscaler cuts to

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 3>keep paying for its existence.

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>In any case, people really need.

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 3>To recognize that the dot com bubble wasn't some small

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 3>event that could be casually waved off, and other things

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 3>that happen tell the story of what might before anyone

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 3>left in or invested in the tech industry when it does.

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 3>In two thousand and one, VC funds raised sixty three

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 3>percent less than the previous year, and the amount of

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 3>money going to startups, not just technology companies, dropped by

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 3>slightly more. Then there's the stock marketing. If you held

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 3>stocks in the company like pets dot Com were at

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 3>its highest relatively modest four hundred million dollars, or Webvam

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>with a peak market cap of eight billion dollars, you

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 3>were completely fucking screwed. Those companies went to zero or

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 3>near enough. Even those who invested in established firms like

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft and Sun faced their own haircuts, with Microsoft's share

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 3>price dropping from a high of one hundred and twenty

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 3>dollars to as little as forty dollars. Adjusted for the

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 3>two stock splits that happened in nineteen ninety nine and

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and three, it would take around seventeen years

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 3>for Microsoft to reach its original dot com bubble highs.

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 3>The fact is, the dot com bubble fucked a lot

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 3>of people. The tech sector's share of employment wouldn't surpass

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the levels of the bubble era until twenty fifteen. In practice,

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 3>this meant that newly graduated software engineers couldn't find much work,

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 3>and what work they could find offered stagnant wages that

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't keep pace with inflation. That's the thing about the

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 3>dot com bubble. We like to think if it as

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 3>something that happened around the turn of the millennium, but

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 3>in practice it took until two thousand and four for

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the contraction and the tech jobs market to finally bottom out.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 3>Existing workers face threats not simply from economic related cutbacks

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 3>making the company do the same with the resources they

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 3>already have, but also from outsourcing, which grew exponentially in

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 3>popularity in the early two thousands. This incidentally, was around

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>the time that China entered the World Trade Organization, meaning

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 3>that in addition to cuts in the service related the

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 3>sector the economy, a lot of high tech manufacturing jobs

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 3>went out the door too. The point I'm making is

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 3>that the dot com bubble was bad, and that the

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 3>second order effects, the things that didn't get as many

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 3>headlines or as much pop culture weight, were really truly gruesome.

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 3>Now there's a great line from The Big Shot. I

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 3>always find myself returning to. It's when Ben rick At,

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 3>the retired finance guy who came back in from the

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 3>cold in order to help Brownfield Capital short the mortgage market,

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.599
<v Speaker 3>castigates the two young founders for celebrating what would be

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the trade of the century.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 2>If we're right, people lose homes, people lose jobs, people

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>whose retirement savings, people lose pensions.

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>You know what I hate about fucking banking. It reduces

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>people to numbers. Here's a number.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Every one percent, unemployment goes up, forty thousand people died.

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Did you know that It's so fucking easy to talk

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 3>about this period with statistical data, to talk about layoffs

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 3>and abstract terms like tens of thousands or hundreds of

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 3>thousands of jobs, or to say how the stock market contracted,

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 3>but things would work out okay, that everybody would be

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>fine in the future, and thus the fuck ups today

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 3>would be okay. I need to be clear that anybody

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 3>who traded into the dot com bubble got washed out,

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 3>and similarly, anybody who believed story after story about the

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>eternal growth and telecommunications or web startups lost almost everything,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 3>if not everything they put in. Anybody who worked for Enron,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the people that didn't know about the illegal bullshit happening,

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 3>lost every cent of their stock based pension. Unemployment swelled

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 3>to a peak of six point three percent in June

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and three, and the NASDAK lost nearly eight

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 3>percent of its value from its peak in the year

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 3>two thousand. Anyone saying that this is just like the

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 3>dot com bubble as some sort of defense of the reckless,

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 3>monstrous expenditures of the AI bubble is trying to find

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 3>rationalizations for irrational, reckless actions. These are likely privileged people

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 3>who define at the time were of found ways to

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 3>look back at a time of incredible suffering and believe

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 3>that because things are better today, that.

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>All of it was worthwhile. It wasn't.

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 3>I know that the fiber build out led to something,

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 3>and I'll get to that in the future episode, I promise.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 3>But just because that happened doesn't make any this worthing.

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 3>All of the wasted money in that time could have

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>been spread out over a more thoughtful period. It wasn't,

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 3>and people suffered as a result. I'm going to talk

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 3>about this more next episode. Thank you for listening.

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Better Offline.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 3>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 3>is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 3>and audio projects at Mattasowski dot com, m A T

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 3>T O.

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>S O w Ski dot com.

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 3>You can email me at easy at better offline dot

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 3>com or visit better offline dot com to find more

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 3>podcast links and of course, my newsletter. I also really

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 3>recommend you go to chat dot Where's Youreed dot at

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 3>to visit the discord, and go to our slash Better.

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Offline to check out our reddit. Thank you so much

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>For more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:12:58.559 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Zonemedia dot com.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your podcasts.