Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts team. Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt, Monday, March twenty first edition. I cannot believe
Speaker 1: how fast time is flying so far this year. Thanks
Speaker 1: for being with me. We have fascinating data out of
Speaker 1: Canada on how vaccination status somehow very much corresponds with
Speaker 1: Ukraine intervention opinions. I'll explain, but once you hear you'd
Speaker 1: be like WHOA. Plus, The Babylon b an excellent satirical
Speaker 1: news and comedy site, has been locked out of its
Speaker 1: Twitter account for calling a man a man. Not allowed
Speaker 1: to do that anymore. Bloomberg has an amazing graphic or
Speaker 1: op ed with graphic on how to deal with inflation,
Speaker 1: which I'll tell you about. And the spies who lie
Speaker 1: from the New York Post from page amazing stuff there,
Speaker 1: all these former Deep State supposed intelligence professionals and experts
Speaker 1: who somehow got it very wrong about one hundred Biden
Speaker 1: laptop right before an election, almost like it was never
Speaker 1: about getting it correct, it was just about doing what
Speaker 1: was necessary at the time for the apparatus to get
Speaker 1: what it wanted. I'll explain that and more coming up here.
Speaker 1: The tax filing deadline is coming up April eighteenth. This
Speaker 1: filing deadline brings out the irs scammers in a big
Speaker 1: way who are looking to steal your refund and personal information.
Speaker 1: The most common scams take place on the phone or
Speaker 1: via email. Don't be fooled by scam artists offering to
Speaker 1: help you with a tax return. It's important to understand
Speaker 1: how cybercrime and identity the after affecting our lives. Every
Speaker 1: day we put our information at risk on the Internet.
Speaker 1: Could be as easy as buying an airline ticket or
Speaker 1: registering a child for summer camp. In an instant, a
Speaker 1: cyber criminal could steal what's yours starting by obtaining your
Speaker 1: online information. But there's LifeLock. LifeLock will help you out.
Speaker 1: They detect a wide range of identity threats online. They
Speaker 1: find you've become a victim of identity theft, You'll have
Speaker 1: access to a dedicated restoration specialist who can help you
Speaker 1: restore your good name and save you dozens of hours
Speaker 1: of contacting the right people. No one can prevent all
Speaker 1: identity theft or monitor all transactions at all, businesses. But
Speaker 1: you can help protect what's yours with LifeLock by Norton.
Speaker 1: Join now and save up at twenty five percent off
Speaker 1: your first year by using promo code buck Call one
Speaker 1: eight hundred LifeLock. I'm a LifeLock customer, have been for
Speaker 1: five years now. Or go to LifeLock dot com use
Speaker 1: promo code buck for up to twenty five percent off.
Speaker 1: Go check it out today. So what should we do
Speaker 1: about Ukraine? The situation is playing out in that country
Speaker 1: as I had anticipated weeks ago. Russia's offensive northward from Crimea,
Speaker 1: southward from Belarus, and then west from the Donbass region.
Speaker 1: This is a three pronged movement to try to cut
Speaker 1: the country effectively in half and cut off Ukrainian cities
Speaker 1: and the forces to defend them from resupply. So this
Speaker 1: is looking like it's going to be exactly where I
Speaker 1: thought it would weeks ago. Whenever it's like, oh, the
Speaker 1: Ukrainians are going to beat the Russians and said no,
Speaker 1: they're going to cut the country in half and have negotiations.
Speaker 1: That is the situation, and that is the reality as
Speaker 1: far as we can see from what's going on inside
Speaker 1: of that country. And here's a situation we're going to
Speaker 1: have to deal with, how do we end the conflict
Speaker 1: if we insist on a state that will not actually endure,
Speaker 1: if we insist on a state of affairs that cannot continue.
Speaker 1: Here is US ambassador to the UN saying, the UN
Speaker 1: can't say if the US would recognize CRIMEA if that
Speaker 1: was actually formally part of peace talks. Here, I can't
Speaker 1: say that at the moment, we certainly have not recognized
Speaker 1: the independent dope US regions that the Russians just declared
Speaker 1: as independent. But I can't preview how we will respond
Speaker 1: to a negotiated settlement that the Ukrainians come up with
Speaker 1: the Russians to save the lives of their own people.
Speaker 1: What is the alternative to this? What is the alternative
Speaker 1: to a situation in which Russia gets some concession. It's
Speaker 1: continued bloodshed and warfare. Because the Russians have plenty in reserve,
Speaker 1: the Russians can keep going here. The Ukrainians are watching
Speaker 1: their cities get destroyed, and so we want this to
Speaker 1: end as quickly as possible. We want an end to
Speaker 1: the conflict. There is no future that I can see
Speaker 1: in which you do not have CRIMEA and Dawn Bass
Speaker 1: as officially part of the Russian Federation. Maybe they'll give
Speaker 1: back the area that they have taken through invasion around Kiev.
Speaker 1: But otherwise, what we're going to have sanctions on Russia forever.
Speaker 1: We're gonna live with this specter, decades long specter of
Speaker 1: a Russian nuclear exchange because we refuse to bring Russia
Speaker 1: back into the international community. There's there's what feels and
Speaker 1: sounds good for people not in the conflict right now
Speaker 1: on the outside, and then there's what is reality, and
Speaker 1: they are not the same thing. I think that's very
Speaker 1: important to recognize as we move through this. And I
Speaker 1: mentioned you at the very top here. How should Canada respond?
Speaker 1: This is a poll that came out of the weekend,
Speaker 1: an ekos eCos poll whatever from the Mini from the
Speaker 1: Toronto Star. I think it is one of those Canadian papers.
Speaker 1: How should Canada respond to Ukraine invasion? By vaccination status? Now,
Speaker 1: why should vaccination status have anything to do with whether
Speaker 1: or not you think we should or sorry Canada, but
Speaker 1: close enough, Canada should do more in Ukraine? Right that
Speaker 1: that doesn't hole that, that doesn't make any sense. Oh,
Speaker 1: because what this is really giving you is a snapshot
Speaker 1: of who believes state media, which is officially what they
Speaker 1: have in Canada and pretty much what they have in
Speaker 1: this country under the Biden regime too, Who believes state
Speaker 1: media regime mouthpieces in the news media, and who can
Speaker 1: be most easily pushed by emotion into taking very extreme
Speaker 1: positions on matters of foreign policy that don't actually affect
Speaker 1: the individuals in Canada or the US. How should Canada
Speaker 1: respond to the Ukraine invasion? Vaccinated versus unvaccinated if you
Speaker 1: have received three or more shots of the vaccine, so
Speaker 1: you're boosted or beyond. Eighty six percent want even tougher
Speaker 1: economic sanctions on Russia. Eighty five percent, want Russian assets, oligarchs,
Speaker 1: Russian oligarchs, sets seized, cutting off all oil from Russia
Speaker 1: eighty one percent. Sending more military equipment to Ukraine eighty
Speaker 1: two percent, Providing additional loans and non military a to
Speaker 1: Ukraine seventy eight percent, Providing Ukraine with fighter jets fifty
Speaker 1: two percent, Dispatching military forces to Ukraine thirty percent. So
Speaker 1: what third of them are like, let's go, let's go
Speaker 1: for war with Russia. And that's that's straight up, that's
Speaker 1: military intervention in an act of combat zone. Now we
Speaker 1: are a combatant that is or Canada close enough, that
Speaker 1: is war with Russia. He say, okay, buck Well, how
Speaker 1: do the unvaccinated view these issues? And this is fascinating?
Speaker 1: Impose tougher economic sanctions on Russia thirteen percent, seize Russian
Speaker 1: oligarch's assets thirteen percent, cut off oil twenty one percent,
Speaker 1: send additional military eighteen, Provide additional loans fifteen, provide ukrainin
Speaker 1: fighter jets fifteen, dispatching military forces to Ukraine eleven percent,
Speaker 1: and do nothing of the above fifty two. So isn't
Speaker 1: it fascinating to see that? People in And I'm sure
Speaker 1: this would be pretty similar in America too, The unvaccinated
Speaker 1: are somehow much less desirous of a military intervention by
Speaker 1: the Canadian armed forces in Ukraine than those who are
Speaker 1: already boosted. H Why is there such a big correlation here?
Speaker 1: What does one have to do with the other. Well, because,
Speaker 1: as we know, the vaccine apparatus, the regime of get
Speaker 1: the shot or else, relied very heavily on state media,
Speaker 1: relied very heavily on its control of communication in order
Speaker 1: to silence descent and get people to do things that
Speaker 1: now we recognize we're completely unjustifiable, baseless, and wrong. You
Speaker 1: can also get people to think whatever you want on
Speaker 1: foreign policy. If you can mobilize people to get they
Speaker 1: don't need or else and for them to be supportive
Speaker 1: of it, yay boosters, you can get them to think, yeah,
Speaker 1: we've always been at war with Russia and Ukraine. We've
Speaker 1: never not been at war with Russia and Ukraine. Catching
Speaker 1: the orwell vibes here, when really this needs to be
Speaker 1: a negotiated settlement brought to a conclusion as quickly as possible.
Speaker 1: This idea that is being pushed in the West that
Speaker 1: the glorious Ukrainian resistance, if only we give them a
Speaker 1: little bit more, is going to defeat the Russian military
Speaker 1: is in my assessment, fantasy and dangerous. But people who
Speaker 1: have believed everything they were told about the vaccine, and
Speaker 1: they believe everything you're told about Ukraine too. You're noticing this,
Speaker 1: You're noticing the crossover. Can you say that a man
Speaker 1: is a man on social media anymore? No, you cannot,
Speaker 1: not unless you want to lose your account, Not unless
Speaker 1: you want to lose your access to a important digital
Speaker 1: town square. We'll get into that in a second Twitter
Speaker 1: banning for now the Babylon b and what it tells
Speaker 1: us about our future. You've heard me say, what's happening
Speaker 1: in our cities to police is a disgrace. There's all
Speaker 1: these hostile activists defund the police, abolish the police, rogue prosecutors.
Speaker 1: All this stuff liberal media politicians who pander progressive policies
Speaker 1: have even resulted in wrongful charges against cops, who then
Speaker 1: face unimaginable personal pressure and financial burden. That's why the
Speaker 1: Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund at police defense dot org
Speaker 1: educates the public on the risks and threats associated with
Speaker 1: being a law enforcement officer today. They raise funds to
Speaker 1: support police financially burdened as a result of being wrongfully charged.
Speaker 1: They can't help without generous support from people like you.
Speaker 1: Go to police defense dot org. See what they're doing
Speaker 1: to support our heroic officers and their families in an
Speaker 1: era of defund the police. Learn about defending the police.
Speaker 1: Use the simulators. See the types of decisions police must
Speaker 1: make every day on the street. It's time to stand
Speaker 1: up for our men and women in blue. Help today
Speaker 1: at police defense dot org. That's police defense dot org.
Speaker 1: Babylon be suspended from Twitter, and you might be wondering,
Speaker 1: why hath the Bee been suspended? What terrible thing have
Speaker 1: they done that has resulted in this? Well, they just
Speaker 1: spoke the simple truth. Babylon Be referred to Rachel Levine,
Speaker 1: the Health and what HHS or whatever it is, admiral.
Speaker 1: Apparently HHS has admirals. The Babylon Bee did a story
Speaker 1: naming Rachel Levine the transgender BIDE Administration official man of
Speaker 1: the Year. Twitter has now said it will restore the
Speaker 1: account if the Babylon b after they suspended it. Obviously, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary Rachel Levine.
Speaker 1: Babylon b says it will restore the account if the
Speaker 1: Bee deletes the tweet. The problem with that is there's
Speaker 1: nothing wrong with the tweet. The tweet is accurate. That
Speaker 1: it is upsetting to people who like to live in
Speaker 1: a fantasy world, that like to live in the unreality
Speaker 1: of gender is a social construct, No, eat is not. Obviously,
Speaker 1: the people say this to you are pathetic too. I
Speaker 1: mean the ones in the media that are pushing this
Speaker 1: narrative all the time. It's just a social constructman. Really, really,
Speaker 1: you're a bigot. Four years ago, all these same people
Speaker 1: would have said, oh, no, of course we won't have
Speaker 1: you know, men and women's sports. That doesn't make any
Speaker 1: sense now that you're a bigot. Just like the people
Speaker 1: that get the three shots and want us to invade Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Whatever the apparatus tells them, they pairt whatever they think
Speaker 1: puts them on the side of the good smart people
Speaker 1: they go along with. They have no capability to think
Speaker 1: for themselves, to decipher fact from fiction on their own.
Speaker 1: They're just a part of the herd, and it's all
Speaker 1: the same to them. As long they're safe and warm
Speaker 1: and fed, it's all. It's all they care about. So
Speaker 1: we have this tweet delete or not situation underway here
Speaker 1: to delete or not to delete and Seth Dillon the
Speaker 1: Babylon Bee says that he won't do it because the
Speaker 1: Babylon Bees Man of the Year is Rachel Levine. That's
Speaker 1: what they've said the Twitter Twitter censors have decided that
Speaker 1: you're not allowed to say that Rachel Levine is a man.
Speaker 1: This is a fact. Rachel Levine is free to change
Speaker 1: his name, he is free to do any number of things,
Speaker 1: but you cannot change reality just because you feel like it,
Speaker 1: or because your emotions dictated as such. And this is
Speaker 1: a parody site. It does satire, and this satire bites.
Speaker 1: This satire hits home too much for them, so they
Speaker 1: are demanding. They are demanding the inversion of or the
Speaker 1: rejection of reality in this instance, that Rachel Levine is
Speaker 1: not a man. Rachel Levine is a man. Rachel Levine
Speaker 1: has been a man until this year, I believe, or
Speaker 1: the last couple of years. So this is a person
Speaker 1: who is now middle aged and you've only ever heard
Speaker 1: of because he is transgender. And we're to believe if
Speaker 1: you say anything that is wrong about this individual, you're
Speaker 1: a or you refuse to go along with the storyline here,
Speaker 1: you're a bad person. I say, no. How can you
Speaker 1: deal with the rise of inflation? Right now? There is
Speaker 1: a fantastic op ed in Bloomberg Bloomberg, Hello everybody, about
Speaker 1: what you can do to deal with the costs of inflation?
Speaker 1: But first, you run a small business. But who's running
Speaker 1: your HR? If the answer is answer is I'll figure
Speaker 1: it out myself or no one. Remember, just one employee
Speaker 1: complaint can turn your whole world upside down, can be
Speaker 1: such a mess. HR is not just about avoiding risk.
Speaker 1: As a business leader, you should do right by the
Speaker 1: people you employed. That's why you need Bambi. Bamby is
Speaker 1: an HR platform build for businesses like like yours, so
Speaker 1: you can automate the most important HR practices and get
Speaker 1: your own dedicated HR manager. Bambi's HR autopilot automates your
Speaker 1: core policies, workplace training, and employee feedback. Your dedicated HR
Speaker 1: manager will help you navigate the more complex parts of
Speaker 1: HR and guide you to compliance. And Look, Bambi is
Speaker 1: so straightforward and so easy, and it's a great value too.
Speaker 1: Go to Bambi dot com slash buck right now for
Speaker 1: your free human resources audit. That's right Bamby, b ambee
Speaker 1: dot com, slash buck, Bambi dot com slash buck go
Speaker 1: check it out today. Senator John Barrosso pointing out here
Speaker 1: that Biden cannot hide from the fact that he is,
Speaker 1: in fact, the high high gas price president. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: can't hide from the fact that he is the president
Speaker 1: of high gas prices, and they're looking for anyone to blame,
Speaker 1: whether it's Putin, whether it's Republicans, whether it's the energy companies,
Speaker 1: whether it's COVID. The Democrats have a very big problem
Speaker 1: with forty year high inflation, highest gas prices ever. When
Speaker 1: Joe Biden came into office, it was two dollars and
Speaker 1: thirty eight cents a gallon for gasoline. American families paid
Speaker 1: a thousand dollars more george for energy last year than
Speaker 1: the year before, and on polling last week, seventy percent
Speaker 1: of Americans say more American oil and gas and less
Speaker 1: emphasis on climate. The climate emphasis is the lunacy that
Speaker 1: makes everything more difficult, expensive and problematic for us on
Speaker 1: the energy front. That's why they're always making the wrong decisions,
Speaker 1: even obvious decisions, they make in the wrong direction because
Speaker 1: they believe in this other thing. We're not trying to
Speaker 1: achieve the same goal, which is energy independence for America,
Speaker 1: low price of energy, a booming economy and lots of prosperity. No,
Speaker 1: they want to save the planet by lowering climate change.
Speaker 1: That's their most important goal, which is why going into
Speaker 1: this midterm they got a problem. And this is the
Speaker 1: Bloomberg opinion piece that addresses it in some way. As
Speaker 1: I've said, take the bus peasant or go get a tesla.
Speaker 1: Peasant is not a compelling midterm pitch for Democrats right now,
Speaker 1: that's probably not going to work out very well. Bloomberg
Speaker 1: opinion piece. I should check out who wrote it. It It
Speaker 1: doesn't even matter. It's amazingly they published it. Inflation stings
Speaker 1: most if you earn less than three hundred thousand dollars. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: you know what. Here's how to deal. Don't take the bus,
Speaker 1: don't buy in bulk, try lentils instead of meat. And
Speaker 1: nobody said this would be fun. Take the bus and
Speaker 1: eat some lentils, peasants. That is a winning political message
Speaker 1: because who wants a delicious cheeseburger maybe with some bacon
Speaker 1: on it when you can have a nice patty of
Speaker 1: lentils to save a dime or so, take the bus
Speaker 1: and eat your lentils peasant. Plus, don't buy in bulk golls.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make sense because the price is going to
Speaker 1: go up with inflation. Prices aren't going down, so buying
Speaker 1: in bulk allows you to get the discount of bulk buying.
Speaker 1: Plus you avoid the inflationary increases that you'll see in
Speaker 1: a month, three months, etc. So this is bad advice
Speaker 1: across the board, but it is hilarious that they're saying,
Speaker 1: this is this is like when the boomers blew up
Speaker 1: the economy so that they could package mortgages and sell
Speaker 1: them on Wall Street and everything else. You know, the
Speaker 1: Wall Street Boomers, And then they turn around after almost
Speaker 1: melting down the entire global economy. Well, maybe the millennials
Speaker 1: should make their own coffee. Maybe you should stop drinking
Speaker 1: those four dollars lattes. I don't think the four dollars
Speaker 1: lattes were what almost destroyed the entire global economy. I'm
Speaker 1: pretty sure it was the commoditizing packaging and reckless risk
Speaker 1: selling of trillions and trillions of dollars of mortgages. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that was probably bad, bad idea, but nonetheless, here we are.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much, team for tuning in today. Appreciate you
Speaker 1: listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast. As always, I'll
Speaker 1: be back with you tomorrow. Shields High