Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Let make
Speaker 1: sure you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to the Buck Brief.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the death of OJ Simpson and race
Speaker 1: politics in America, the legacy of the OJ verdict, all
Speaker 1: of that on today's show. So as we know, OJ
Speaker 1: Simpson is dead. He died from cancer. He should have
Speaker 1: died in a prison cell or with a needle in
Speaker 1: his arm and a bag over his head, in a
Speaker 1: state facility somewhere for the death penalty, and instead he
Speaker 1: finished his days playing golf in Las Vegas, well before
Speaker 1: he lost his battle with cancer, playing golf in Las Vegas, partying,
Speaker 1: taking selfies with a very obtuse people who seem to
Speaker 1: think that OJ was still some celebrity worth talking to.
Speaker 1: The whole situation of OJ Simpson's verdict, what he did
Speaker 1: the case, it is grotesque, really beyond words. And one
Speaker 1: thing that I wanted to get to and we discussed
Speaker 1: this today on the radio show. When the jurors say
Speaker 1: that they did this they found OJ not guilty as
Speaker 1: a payback for Rodney King. I just want to know
Speaker 1: how much of a white guilt human sacrifice would be sufficient?
Speaker 1: Was it really just the two? Based on what? Why not? More?
Speaker 1: Why not say that it should be one hundred people
Speaker 1: who are murdered for no reason other than their skin
Speaker 1: color and a sense among some in society that racial
Speaker 1: injustice justified their murder because society is so racist. It's
Speaker 1: really thinking along the lines of societies that do human sacrifice.
Speaker 1: You know, oh, will kill these people because that will
Speaker 1: make certain gods happier with us. It is the most
Speaker 1: irredeemably awful and immoral thing to do in the name
Speaker 1: of justice. I mean to say that somebody should be
Speaker 1: allowed to murder people because you don't like what other
Speaker 1: things have happened in history. This would destroy society in
Speaker 1: its entirety over time. I mean, race politics is poison.
Speaker 1: It is pure poison, because you can never make it
Speaker 1: go away if you adapt the theory. Unfortunately, the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party has done this, and this is true of the
Speaker 1: left in America today across the board. If you take
Speaker 1: the approach that historical wrongs can be righted by doing
Speaker 1: wrong today, by harming innocent parties innocent people today, you
Speaker 1: have destroyed the foundational concepts of morality, which individual responsibility,
Speaker 1: individual culpability, and there's no end to it, right, it
Speaker 1: just turns into whatever the whims of the mob may be.
Speaker 1: The mob is angry, so people have to die, and
Speaker 1: people have to die because of racial injustice. And if
Speaker 1: those people who die happen to be white in the
Speaker 1: case of the OJ trial, well then that's just too
Speaker 1: bad for them. It's horrifying to see some of the
Speaker 1: voices out there who still try to pretend that there
Speaker 1: was anything other than a horrific miscarriage of justice from
Speaker 1: the OJ Simpson trial. And this is showing, I think
Speaker 1: a lot of people the moral rock that is at
Speaker 1: the heart of the Democrat left when it comes to
Speaker 1: race issues. OJ Simpson nearly decapitated two people. One of
Speaker 1: them was the mother of his children. The other was
Speaker 1: a completely innocent bystander who just happened to be in
Speaker 1: the very wrong place at the wrong time. I still
Speaker 1: to this day think that one of the most important
Speaker 1: sequences in the People Versus O. J. Simpson show that
Speaker 1: was on back in twenty sixteen on FX very good series,
Speaker 1: Very Well Done, was when Ron Goldman's father in the
Speaker 1: show played by an actor, but Ron Goldman's father starts
Speaker 1: just completely has a breakdown in front of Marshall Clark
Speaker 1: the prosecutors, saying, you know, my son is murdered here
Speaker 1: it's all about OJ and his wife and the politics
Speaker 1: and race and all this other stuff. He's like, my
Speaker 1: son was just murdered by a man for no reason
Speaker 1: other than he was just there and where and they're
Speaker 1: treating him like an afterthought. You know, where's the justice
Speaker 1: for my son? I mean, I honestly I got choked
Speaker 1: up watching that scene. I mean, I can't imagine what
Speaker 1: the Goldman family went through with all of this, and
Speaker 1: of course Nicole Brown's family too. But there was a
Speaker 1: focus at least on OJ killing his wife, the fact
Speaker 1: that he killed this other person, another white guy or
Speaker 1: another white person, and it was always this like afterthought,
Speaker 1: as though it wasn't as big of a deal in
Speaker 1: the press at least. And that's a that's appalling. It
Speaker 1: is appalling the OJ verdict. Any any voices that you've
Speaker 1: heard who have ever cheered for it should be ashamed
Speaker 1: of themselves. The jurors who acquitted O. J. Simpson, their
Speaker 1: decision should live in infamy. Uh. They are moral failures
Speaker 1: and they did something that was atrocious. The narrative that
Speaker 1: was pushed by some that this was about like la
Speaker 1: PD racism or whatever is an absolute garbage, as we
Speaker 1: all know, and it's just a it's a reminder of
Speaker 1: the same mentality it's in BLM and all this. Oh
Speaker 1: the cops are so racist and law enforcement is racist
Speaker 1: and destroy society. Every person is responsible for their conduct,
Speaker 1: and every person has to be held to account for
Speaker 1: their conduct. And there should be no excuses made for
Speaker 1: anyone because of something that happened, whether it's two hundred
Speaker 1: years ago or you know, two days ago, if it
Speaker 1: didn't involve anybody who is at issue. What happens elsewhere
Speaker 1: in society is not at issue in a trial where
Speaker 1: a man murders his ex wife and a bystander, and
Speaker 1: it was it was a wake up call, I think
Speaker 1: in American society, a wake up call for the poison
Speaker 1: of race politics and just the depths of the victim
Speaker 1: mentality in some segments of our society that anybody could
Speaker 1: think that this was a makeup call, makeup call for
Speaker 1: what what does that mean? As I've said, why stop there,
Speaker 1: why not say that we needed, we need to have
Speaker 1: a hundred people murdered, one hundred white people murdered in
Speaker 1: order to start to make up for the sin of
Speaker 1: racism in the society. Would say, well, that's obviously monstrous. Yeah,
Speaker 1: what OJ did is monstrous, but they were willing to
Speaker 1: justify that. They're willing to say, oh, well, you know
Speaker 1: that's the that's the price we had to pay as
Speaker 1: a society. That blood price was acceptable. It's disgusting, disgusting.
Speaker 1: So I feel very strongly about this, and I'll tell
Speaker 1: you it was a reminder for me. This played into
Speaker 1: my I was thirteen years old when the verdict came down,
Speaker 1: and I remember thinking, everybody who was in favor of this,
Speaker 1: I that's the Those are the bad guys. Everybody who
Speaker 1: was in favor of the acquittal, everybody who and it
Speaker 1: made excuses, Oh you know, if it does not fit,
Speaker 1: you must have quit. I mean they they were on
Speaker 1: the wrong side of this equation morally. And everybody who
Speaker 1: wanted a guilty verdict and saw this for what it was,
Speaker 1: they were on the right side of the equation. And
Speaker 1: it's largely broke down along partisan lines. So I think
Speaker 1: in my formation as a conservative and as a Republican,
Speaker 1: this played a role in my thinking. To be sure,
Speaker 1: I don't care about any historical inequity. If a if
Speaker 1: a black man was killed, if an Asian man or
Speaker 1: you know, woman was killed hispanic, if they were killed unjustly,
Speaker 1: if they were murdered, I would want their murderer to
Speaker 1: be punished. It doesn't matter what their race, the murderer's
Speaker 1: race is, what the history that you can tie to
Speaker 1: the country, no, no, no, or or what the police
Speaker 1: department has done in the past, I don't care. I
Speaker 1: wouldn't care about any of that because it is morally irrelevant.
Speaker 1: So it's a it's a point of clarity here as
Speaker 1: we honestly take a moment to uh to speak ill
Speaker 1: of the dead, because OJ deserves to be spoken ill of.
Speaker 1: OJ deserves to have his have his memory spoken of
Speaker 1: in this way, because this is who he never never took,
Speaker 1: never took the responsibility for his actions. He was a criminal,
Speaker 1: He was a malignant, narcissist, a disgraceful. He was given
Speaker 1: so much by the way, so many god given gifts
Speaker 1: and his amazing football talents, so rich, so famous, so beloved.
Speaker 1: A monster, A monster. So that's how I feel about that,
Speaker 1: And also monstrous. The Washington Post's headline on a police
Speaker 1: involved shooting. Speaking of race politics in this country, we'll
Speaker 1: get to that in a second. I'll talk to you
Speaker 1: about gold for a moment. Here. More Americans are buying
Speaker 1: now than at any time previously. Some are even trying
Speaker 1: to buy it at big box stores like Costco. That's right,
Speaker 1: they're buying gold at Costco, my friends. The price of
Speaker 1: gold has gone up some thirteen percent recently. Price and
Speaker 1: value gold is directly connected to world events, has only
Speaker 1: grown in value over time. It's why I have gold
Speaker 1: as part of my financial plan. I rely on the
Speaker 1: Oxford Gold Group for my gold and precious metal purchases.
Speaker 1: Nobody can predict the future, but we can prepare for it.
Speaker 1: The Oxford Gold Group, they are real pros at this.
Speaker 1: They make owning gold and silver simple and easy to understand.
Speaker 1: Call the Oxford Gold Group right now. You may qualify
Speaker 1: for up to ten thousand dollars in free precious metals.
Speaker 1: Call eight three three nine nine five gold. That's three
Speaker 1: g LD eight three three gold. So here's the Washington
Speaker 1: Post headline, and I think everybody sees exactly what's going
Speaker 1: on here. Police fire ninety six shots in forty one seconds,
Speaker 1: killing black man during traffic stop. This just happened, and
Speaker 1: you see that headline and you say to yourself, hold
Speaker 1: on a second, is this a case of racist police officers?
Speaker 1: Because that's what it sounds, That's what the headlines meant.
Speaker 1: They fired so many bullets at a traffic stop. Why
Speaker 1: would that be necessary? Well, maybe maybe it is because
Speaker 1: this happened last month. The bodycam footage is out dexter
Speaker 1: read pull this gun and shot at cops eleven times?
Speaker 1: Is there a more clear cut instance of using lethal
Speaker 1: force as a law enforcement officer them when someone draws
Speaker 1: a gun and is firing at you. I would want
Speaker 1: to know what does the Washington Post here? This writer
Speaker 1: is Jennifer Hassan at the Washington Post. Why did she
Speaker 1: construct her headline this way? Why did she leave out
Speaker 1: that the individual shot at cops they were returning fire.
Speaker 1: It's on video. There is no doubt to the authenticity
Speaker 1: of the video. It is very clear. Everyone agrees it
Speaker 1: is real. The facts are not in dispute here. So
Speaker 1: why do this? Well, it's malicious. It is meant to
Speaker 1: scratch at and reopen racial wounds and racial grievance in
Speaker 1: this country. And I don't think it's at all a
Speaker 1: coincidence that this is happening at a time of Democrats
Speaker 1: lagging in the polls, Joe Biden looking really weak going
Speaker 1: into his re election effort, and they would like BLM
Speaker 1: three point zero if they can. They would like a
Speaker 1: mobilization of the black community around a lie of police violence.
Speaker 1: That is what they are going for here. They want
Speaker 1: to tell people something that is untrue, to get them
Speaker 1: very upset, to create the circumstances for riots in the streets.
Speaker 1: People these kinds of headlines of Washington Post is written here.
Speaker 1: People will die because of this. If there are riots
Speaker 1: and buildings are burned down, people will lose their businesses.
Speaker 1: Cops will be assaulted. There'll be people that are severe,
Speaker 1: you know, go to the hospital severely injured because of this.
Speaker 1: And that is what the Democrats want because they think
Speaker 1: we deserve that as a country. Imagine you're imagine you're
Speaker 1: one of these police officers and you had to use
Speaker 1: lethal force against this person who tried to murder cops.
Speaker 1: I mean, as you're firing at close range your handgun
Speaker 1: on a police officers, you're attempting murder. This guy dexter read
Speaker 1: attempted murder of police and he died. He was shot
Speaker 1: because of it. The cops did the right thing, they
Speaker 1: did the just and moral and lawful thing. And there
Speaker 1: there's all this attempt to create this. Oh why for
Speaker 1: a traffic stop? I don't know. Why did he pull
Speaker 1: a gun and start shooting at police officers? That's the
Speaker 1: only question we really need to answer, and or that
Speaker 1: they should really want to answer. And there is no
Speaker 1: answer to it because the guy's dead because he pulled
Speaker 1: the gun and shot a police officer. So what else
Speaker 1: do we have to know? This is a but I mean,
Speaker 1: however disgusting and disgraceful you think the Washington Post is.
Speaker 1: It's not. It's not disgraceful enough. I'll give you some
Speaker 1: more thoughts, and I think where all this is going
Speaker 1: here in just a moment. But I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: I'm drinking Crockett Coffee right now, which is my coffee
Speaker 1: brand as in Clay and I started this along with
Speaker 1: my brother Mason. We have launched a great American coffee brand.
Speaker 1: We absolutely love it. I drink it all the time.
Speaker 1: I'm drinking it right now. It is delicious, and I
Speaker 1: hope you'll subscribe, and I hope you subscribe and get
Speaker 1: a bunch of it, meaning Italy sixty dollars worth, because
Speaker 1: then the shipping is free. Coffee is good for months,
Speaker 1: and so get four backs that'll get you about sixty
Speaker 1: dollars even better subscribe than you get fifteen percent off. Overall,
Speaker 1: this should be your coffee. It is absolutely delicious. We
Speaker 1: found the best coffee we possibly could, and it took
Speaker 1: months and months, we did taste tests. I'm a coffee drinker,
Speaker 1: so I really want to You'll see it's delicious coffee.
Speaker 1: That was point one on this. But also we want
Speaker 1: to build Crockett, as in the spirit of Davy Crockett,
Speaker 1: into a brand that represents America, a celebration of history,
Speaker 1: the frontier and pioneer spirit. Coffee is just the first
Speaker 1: product we're doing. We want to do other products as well.
Speaker 1: We want to build a company that reflects our values
Speaker 1: and our vision of America, and we also want it
Speaker 1: to be something that is an advertiser on other shows
Speaker 1: like this one, that share our values and that will
Speaker 1: never back away from shows because of politics. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: we're scared too many of these companies build themselves, build
Speaker 1: their name in the conservative media space, and then they
Speaker 1: get big, they start making real money, and they say, oh,
Speaker 1: we don't want the headache of supporting conservative content creators anymore.
Speaker 1: We don't want to be on their shows anymore. We
Speaker 1: will never do that. We will always stay on the mission,
Speaker 1: great products for you at great prices, great coffee in
Speaker 1: this case, and supporting our causes including Tunulta Towers Foundation,
Speaker 1: which we have partnered with as well at Crocket Coffee.
Speaker 1: So we're doing good with this money in a whole
Speaker 1: range of ways and with the sales of this coffee.
Speaker 1: So go to Crocketcoffee dot com, please subscribe today. That's
Speaker 1: Crocket Coffee, Crocketcoffee dot com. You know, I think we're
Speaker 1: starting to see a little bit of the desperation of
Speaker 1: the Democrats on the Biding issue because they need some
Speaker 1: kind of a why to reelect Biden. Obviously, abortion is
Speaker 1: going to play a big role in this. Abortion is
Speaker 1: going to play a big role in the Democrat effort
Speaker 1: to get Joe Biden elected. But also they need the
Speaker 1: Black vote to come out ninety percent plus in favor
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden. As they generally do in presidential elections,
Speaker 1: and so they can't speak to Joe Biden delivering for
Speaker 1: the black community because he hasn't and they know that
Speaker 1: it's particularly younger black male voters. No, Joe Biden has
Speaker 1: not delivered for them. Black female voters are still very
Speaker 1: solidly in the Democrat camp. But black, younger black mail
Speaker 1: voters I think are winnable for Republicans, which is great,
Speaker 1: and we would welcome as many of them as they're
Speaker 1: possibly willing to come and vote Republican. That would be fantastic.
Speaker 1: I hope that this is you know, we get our
Speaker 1: hopes up on the right a lot about getting more
Speaker 1: of the black vote. As conservatives, we want more of
Speaker 1: the black vote. Has not happened really in recent elections,
Speaker 1: and it's a continuing disappointment, I think when we get
Speaker 1: our hopes up for it. But it would be great
Speaker 1: if it started to happen this time around. But I
Speaker 1: don't think it's possible for someone like Joe Biden, or
Speaker 1: the Washington Post's newsroom or so many others to say
Speaker 1: they love the country and then to present this case
Speaker 1: of this shooting in Chicago as anything other than a
Speaker 1: justified use of force by law enforcement. I don't see
Speaker 1: because if you lie to people and say that it
Speaker 1: wasn't justified, you are trying to tear the country apart.
Speaker 1: And that is absolutely what democrats are doing with this.
Speaker 1: That is that is their intent, all right. You know
Speaker 1: here on the podcast, I cut through the noise, the nonsense,
Speaker 1: the ulterior motives. Obviously it's a central mission here. My
Speaker 1: friend Mark Jakin, my colleague Mark Chakin, he does the
Speaker 1: same thing for the US stock market. That's right. When
Speaker 1: it comes to investments, he cuts through the bs. Mark
Speaker 1: worked on Wall Street for fifty years, and across those
Speaker 1: decades he invented three new indices for Nasdaq and has
Speaker 1: predicted some of the biggest market ships of the past decade,
Speaker 1: including the recent mania in AI stocks. Mark says the
Speaker 1: majority of Americans are about to miss out on a
Speaker 1: critical turning point in this AI frenzy. He's calling this
Speaker 1: a new dawn for US stocks and predicts dozens of
Speaker 1: specific companies will be impacted in just the next ninety days.
Speaker 1: So my Mark has agreed to share it one of
Speaker 1: his favorite AI stocks with you now for free. All
Speaker 1: you have to do is go to twenty twenty four
Speaker 1: aistock dot com. That's twenty twenty four aistock dot com
Speaker 1: paid for by chackin analytics. All right, Geen, that's the
Speaker 1: buck brief for today. If you're listening on audio, please subscribe.
Speaker 1: We're almost at enough YouTube subscribers that we reach the
Speaker 1: official and monetization phase. I think we needed like one
Speaker 1: hundred more or something. This is maybe the fifth YouTube
Speaker 1: channel I've had to launch over the year because they
Speaker 1: always shut me down. Let's just keep it going. I'd
Speaker 1: love for more of you to watch on the video,
Speaker 1: so please subscribe. Type in buck brief when you go
Speaker 1: to YouTube if you're listening on audio, also on Rumble
Speaker 1: buck brief to check us out there. And yes, there
Speaker 1: we have it. Shield time