WEBVTT - Opting in: Privacy in the Digital Age

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Baritune Day with a very special episode of

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Spit for You. Normally, with this show, I sit down

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>with a musician who you know and love, and the

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>scientists who you probably don't know but definitely love a

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit more by the end of our time together,

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and we take this approach to find the story in

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the science of DNA. We have explored race, we have

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>explored adoption and sperm donation, but this show has a

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>different format. It's still me and two people, but we

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>are going back a little farther to the foundation of

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>what genetic testing even involves, to the data, and to

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the big questions around what it means to spit in

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>a tube and share your data with other people with

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a company, what it means for all of us to

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>live in this very connected world where our information is

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a necessary input to get all the conveniences we have

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>become attached to. We're gonna talk about data. We're gonna

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about privacy, We're gonna talk about permission and controls

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in this hyper connected world we're living in. And we're

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that because I think it's important and the

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>folks who I make this show with at I heard

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and twenty three and Me gave me the keys. I

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>could say whatever I want, y'all. In the past few years,

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I have started to question how the system is set up.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Do I really need to disclose as much about myself

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as I have been in order to live a quality life.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>At the exact time that I was approached to host

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this show, I was really coming into my own as

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a critic of technology. So I couldn't just say yes

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to a show sponsored by a genetic testing company. I

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>had to do my research, and I read the terms

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of service myself from front to back, which were very readable.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>To my surprise, I had some privacy oriented activist friends

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>take a look and they said, you know, this is

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. In fact, I demanded to speak with the

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>highest level people at twenty three and Me before I

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>would agree to do the show, because I wanted to

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>understand what they were doing to protect the information about

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>me that they had, and to use it in a

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>responsible way that I would always feel like I had

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>some choice and some agency in that matter. I got

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>onto the product because I trusted the representation of what

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that product was, and I have personal curiosity. My older

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>sister had recently done a twenty three in me, and

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>she was curious about my results because we don't share

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a father. So there's some mystery in there that science

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>might help resolve. But this episode returns to that original

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>hesitation I had about doing this show, that question what

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>happens with our information? And this show is not just

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.239
<v Speaker 1>about twenty three and me and my information in those

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of service. It's actually a bigger view. We're gonna

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>take on what it means to be connected in this

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>data driven world and what some of the costs are

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on a security level, what does it mean to try

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to have people sponsibly hold our data, and on a

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>larger system level, with artificial intelligence and algorithmic recommendations on

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>everything from what we buy to how many years we

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>might face in the criminal justice system. This stuff really matters.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm happy you're joining me. I have two other

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>people to join me. Gina Matthews is a computer science

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>professor whose research focuses on algorithmic decision making, on bias,

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>on accountability, on essentially what we do with all the

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>data that we've collected. She was a fellow at the

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Data in Society Research Institute. She received Magic Grant, which

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is the best type of grant to receive the Magic

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Grant from the Brown Institute for Media Innovation. Gina, Welcome

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to the show. Thanks so much for having me. Thank you.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And we also have ri E L. Silverstone. He is

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a data privacy and security expert. He spent the past

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years focusing on really complex security processes and

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>policies for all kinds of organizations, including companies that work

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>with genetic information. His title is Incredible External Data Protection

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Officer and Managing Director at Data Protectors. Thank you so

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. Thank you for I'd like to

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>start with you, r L. Because I think there's information

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that's about us, that's in systems and I want confidence

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to know that it is being managed responsibly and securely.

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And then further downstream, there's what we do with that information.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>On this first point on securing the data, what's an

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>external data protection officer? So we bring the people together

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that can protect data best. There is such a lack

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of professionals with experience in the world, so we teach

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on companies how to protect their data. We also interact

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>between the company and data protection authorities, especially in Europe,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and advise them on how to solve for demanding situations. Okay,

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>so you're really deep in there. How did you come

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to this field? A few years ago? I was in

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the computer revolution in Silicon Valley. What

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>do you mean you were in the middle of it.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So I went to high school in California, So you

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>were literally in the middle of in the middle. Yeah.

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So I got very interested in computer science and security

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and privacy back when I was fourteen. Did something happen

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>when you were fourteen to get you interested in this.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It's my high school. Some students were contacted by the FBI, okay,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>because they were doing things they weren't supposed to do

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and freaking and hacking like early hacking days. So the

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>word hacking is actually good. It's the freaking that's not good. So,

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and just to clarify, freaking is when people are getting

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>unauthorized access to the phone network. Yes, you were saying,

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the FBI based some calls to more than calls. The

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>FBI showed up in front of some of my schoolmates

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and they had some splaining to do because they were

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>usually computers to do things that people didn't think they

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>could or would do. And that's all we do in security.

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Your job is to decide what you could do with

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the computer, or what you should do with the computer.

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>My job is what you shouldn't do. So since then

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you've been on the journey that's got you now at

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>data protectors. But with some of the other type of

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 1>risks you've been exposed to. Your problems you've seen in

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>terms of trying to secure computer systems. Sure, so many

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>people don't know how to secure computer systems, not because

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of evil, but because they just don't know. So they're

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 1>looking for people to teach them. And opinions vary. But

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I've seen where data was used for bad for example,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to human trafficking, for example, to affect a balanced transfer

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>within the bank. But I've seen more computers and computer

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>security really affect people. For example, one of the systems

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I was responsible for control the temperature of heart lung

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>machines at hospitals. Imagine if that computer just shut down

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>for no reason, people could die. One other questions that's

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>been on my mind every day because I opened up

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>my news app and I see the same story. I

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>see organization company government entity X has lost millions of

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>personal records of category. Why social security numbers, phone numbers,

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>bank records, entire social media profiles. Why does this continue

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to happen Because companies generally see data protection as attacks

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and they like paying tacts as much as you and I,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So they do either the bare minimum needed or they

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>are very sensitive for security elect twenty three and me

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>because they know they wouldn't have a business if there

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>was a break. Then they invest more resources and make

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it the higher priority. That's it is. It's cost them money,

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and then many of them don't want to spend it.

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's the primary one. The secondary one is, look

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a security people, we've got to be right a hundred

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time. A hacker only has to be

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>lucky once, so processes have to be fixed. Well, I'm

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>glad someone like you is helpfully on the job. I

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>want to bring you in Gina. I'd love for you

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to explain someone we know a bit from arial how

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he got started. What was your introduction to computers and computing?

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>How did you end up in this field? I added

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>computers and computing as a second major when I was

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>an undergrad. Once I started with programming, I just really

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>liked the instant gratification nature of it, the ability to

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>change something and and also just build a whole world

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that you wanted to build. I went to graduate school

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>at UC Berkeley, which also was kind of the heart

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of the dot com boom there in Silicon Valley, and

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was super excited about the potential of computing. I felt

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like it was kind of a fundamental human good. It

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was automating tasks that were drudgery, it was connecting people,

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>was giving more people voice. I just felt super good

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>about it. And then over time I just saw more

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and more uses. Not that those other uses ceased to exist,

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but I saw the funded uses, the pushed uses, drifting

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>more and more to surveillance and manipulation. Over time, I

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>just felt more and more compelled to try to do

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>something to change that direction. On the front end of

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>your career, your hands on with computing, and now you

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>are hands on with trying to shift the direction of computing.

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But how does that early access, in that early atmosphere

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>shape your perspective? Now it's interesting. I went to a

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty year reunion of my grad research group. I have

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of academic siblings who are very highly placed

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>at big companies, and some of them will even say

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm basically just a network plumber. I mean, they're, you know,

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>incredibly talented systems building folks, but they feel very distant

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>from the impact of those platforms and systems on the

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>lives of individuals. I just can't do that. I've been

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a system builder and I enjoyed that very much, and

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I've been a security expert type person. But making the

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>cargo faster and locking the car down into its current

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>course doesn't seem to make a lot of sense when

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.959
<v Speaker 1>you don't agree with the way it's being driven. Can

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you explain kind of your approach on this topic, and

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>especially around big data systems or algorithms. What is your

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>role in this? I think we're right to worry about

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>accidental breaches or hackers getting in and taking data, but

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm honestly more concerned about things that I consider to

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>be unacceptable that are perfectly legal. Um. Just today, it's

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting I read uh that France is banning analytics on

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>judges decisions. It's interesting, right, that's public information, So the

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>pattern of decisions that judges make, they don't want people

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>doing analytics on that. It's the same kind of thing

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>when that happens to you and you realize it's not

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>just little pieces of data, but people are stringing it

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>together into big conclusions about your life. You feel violated,

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of let us surveil you, let us

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>analyze you, but don't you dare do it to us

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is a pattern I'm not at all happy with. So

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I worry about the wild west of surveillance and manipulation

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of individuals, and especially about big decisions that are made

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>about people's lives based on the little pieces of information

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>about them that make up big data. Do you think

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that enough people understand the balance and the tradeoff that

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we're making. I think there are decisions I've made historically

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>where I just didn't think about it. I was happy

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to get the free storage from the service. I was

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>happy to get a discount or coupons from the grosser.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>How do you see awareness of that balance or the

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>ability to challenge it developing over time. I think a

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are uneasy with it, but don't see

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>an effective way to be a citizen of the modern

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>world without it, because we haven't demanded a different playing field.

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>The boundary for invasion of privacy really shifts over time.

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>A photo of me posted, is that invading my privacy?

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>You think? With facial recognition, you can find anybody. And

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>what if I'm just in a picture someone took someplace.

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you think just your location information is personal data?

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just longitude latitude. But if you assemble that over time,

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you see where you work, where you live. Do you

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>go to a religious institution, do you go to a psychiatrist?

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So many things that you might think are not private

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>become private with more ability to analyze and link it

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>with other types of information. So I want to play

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a game with both of you. I call it what's

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the worst that can happen? And so I'd like your

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>imaginations and your experience to be brought to bear on question.

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with you R. E. L. There are theoretical

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>risks associated with data breaches and hacking, and then there's

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>things that actually have happened. What are the risks that

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>most concern you? Where are the multiple alarms ringing in

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>your business and in your life? That's a great question.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So Number one, most of our data, our name in

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the US, even our picture, if it becomes hack. So

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? We used to have that in the

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>phone books. We used to have it in our high

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>school yearbooks. We printed it in a physical thing called

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook. So we have points of data that are

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>out there. The points of data by themselves do absolutely nothing.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I can even give you a copy of your d

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>n A, but it doesn't mean anything to anyone because

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no context. When there is context, and when the

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>data can be made to do things it wasn't mean

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to be, for example, not a GPS location, but the

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>GPS location for time, which shows you how you're going

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>around the city of London, for example. So when that

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is out there, not only can it be marketed to

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>provide you things air quotes, but it is also dangerous

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>because of two things that people don't normally think about.

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>The first one is anticipating what you're going to do.

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's a big company knows that there are thirty

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>year old single people in this building, they're more likely

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to offer lattice there. But the biggest strengths there is

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no technology today that would act to limit them trying

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to change you or your preference. So not just anticipating

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>but I want, but creating what I want, manipulating right,

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and it actually exists right. We used to call it marketing,

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but in the future it can actually go into the

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>psychological realms. You have more and more data. You can

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>literally get into a situation that you're being manipulated to buy,

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to sell, or to do any other action good or bid. Right,

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty scary. You're playing a game very well, thank you.

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the terrifying future, Gina. Do you want to jump

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in on what's the worst that can happen? What are

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the grounded fears and concerns that you have based on

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>your experience in the series. I love this game, and

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact I play this game exactly when I give

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>talks about this. The thing that I think in fact

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>is happening to you and is super important is big

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>decisions made about your life based on that big data.

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Will you have access to credit? Will there be police

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in your neighborhood? Will you even hear about a job

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that's available. How will your performance on a job be rated?

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Will your insurance rates go up? Will you have access

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to a university? Big, big decisions about our lives are

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>being made with little pieces of information that we cannot

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>anticipate the risk of your insurance rates go up? If

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you purchase plus size clothing, what have you purchasing for

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody else? Your interest rates go up if you charge

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>marriage counseling, because you know that could have a big

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>financial impact on your life. There's lots of little things

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have any way of anticipating the outcome

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it could have. Well, follow up question on the insurance

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>rates and plus size clothing, can you explain that a

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>little further because I did not know that. Yeah, so

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>information about your purchasing habits can be shared with insurance companies.

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Just like when you go to get a job, you

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>can voluntarily sign away rights for them to look at

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>your credit history, your social media history. When you're trying

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to get into the country and get a visa, there's

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>many times you can say no, but if you want

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that job or you want that visa, you might have

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to say yes. And then you have voluntarily given people

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>access to all sorts of deep wells of information about you.

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a perfect segue to my personal experience with this.

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I went on this data detox journey where I basically

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>collected all the information that had been collected on me.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a big social platforms search engines, credit agencies, data brokers.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I found people with profiles of me that I've never

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>heard of, and a lot of the information was inaccurate.

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I was frustrated by that because I thought, well, you're

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be big tech, you're supposed to know all

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>these things. But I was also relieved because I'm like,

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>thank goodness, they got that wrong. But then I'm like,

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but they're going to make these big life decisions, Gina

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're talking about. Do I want them making those

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>decisions based on accurate information about me or inaccurate information

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like what is best for me? You know, Yeah, you

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>tell me, you guess correctly and it's private information, or

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you guess incorrectly and you make an illegitimate decision about me.

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>And this is another fact. If you don't participate in

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>data collection, then people will make decisions about you based

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on people that they determined to be like you for

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever definition that is. Yeah, these are what shadow profiles

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that some companies create to kind of mimic the population

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily have an account with them, but they

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>can still be re presented in a database. Sometimes we

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>call them avatars, even though they don't have a picture.

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But there are some companies out there that create an

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>avatar that knows to some degree what you're going to buy.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Next week, next year, which is why the intent behind

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the g d PR in Europe was to give people

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the right to rectify their data and also declaration where

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>companies got that data. You brought up g d p

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>R R E L and this is the general Data

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Protection regulation rules set across the EU that a lot

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of us experienced through new pop ups on websites we

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>visited and forcing us to acknowledge a very legal sounding

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>thing would have been the practical results of g d

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>p R, you know, in terms of what you just described.

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So here's the situation out there. G DPR has been

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in effect for a year. There's over three hundred thousand

0:18:55.400 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>cases in Europe involving either complaints from individuals or data

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>breaches data bridges about nine There's more than fifty six

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>million euros and penalties already levied in the first year.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Presumably is going to be much much higher. The law

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>has been created to some degree because they wanted to

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where a potential penalty will be

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>painful for those organizations. All right, So we've got a

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>lot more complaint activity, We've got some fine levying activity.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you see a shift in actual behavior by companies yes, absolutely,

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So I see behavior shift in two different areas. First,

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, people are asking a lot more questions. The

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>individual citizen rate is more aware and they're asking more questions.

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And companies that before didn't have a data protection officer

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>now does. So there's over half a million data protection

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>officers in Europe right now. Full employment for data protectors,

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>well there's only seventeen licens professionals. But so I'm hearing

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>a great job opportunity here for those For those that

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for a new field to get into data

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>protector growing market, go ahead, absolutely. But the exciting changes

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>in the US. There are companies in the US that

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have never worried about data protection to that level, but

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>now if they play in Europe, they have to play

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>by European rules. In the US, many companies have started

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>asking questions they never asked before. How do I protect

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the data so I won't get fine? How do I

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>protect the data so I won't be in the newspapers?

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And how do I protect the data so customers will

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>not stop buying for me? Well, that sounds like a

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>good story, and I'd love to hear Gina from you.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We've gotten shaken a bit by the negative possibilities. But

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing in terms of a shift in

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a better direction, Whether it's you know, how we put

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>some limits around the recommendations and algorithms and these big

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>life decisions that are going to affect so many of us,

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Where is the oversight emerging from at I think the

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>GDPR is a good first experiment in this space. I'm

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>happy to see it. I think in the academic community,

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in the practitioner community, there's a lot of discussion about

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>things we can do and that's a step in the

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>right direction. So things like explainable AI algorithms so that

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a recommendation based on machine learning with

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>big data that can't be explained. You can link it

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>back to a particular data point and its weight in

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the decision. Doing things like looking at the demographics of

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the training data, there's ways to look for patterns of

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>bias in decisions. Algorithms and systems developed and tested on

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a certain demographic are not going to automatically perform well

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>on another. One of the things that emerges is how

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>old this challenge is. I remember learning that the medical field,

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of both treatments and drug development as is

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>very long history of using the male body as the

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>default human. Every recommendation, dosage is treatment. We're all designed

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>for this kind of average male body, and it turns

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>out that's not the average body in the world. There

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>are many different types of bodies, and we're going back

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and people are kind of filling in the blanks. When

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing you talk about opting in and having more

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>accurate systems, having blanks in the data set, it seems

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to me that a we want a representation of as

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>many as possible in this tool that's defining our whole future,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>so long as be it's paired with a level of accountability, oversight,

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>correct ability, you know, in terms of we're going to

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>find mistakes. No systems ever perfect, but do we have

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a mechanism to correct those mistakes and serve people in

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the process. But to count on the will of a company, Plus,

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like a good long term plan for humanity.

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly the right. As human beings, we stink in

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>self regulation just not gonna happen. Plus, look, the principles

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are simple. First principle is transparency. Here's what I'm going

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to collect from you, and here's why then there's the

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>accountability actually do only the things I said I'm going

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to do, and then rectification. You've got to know about

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>something that is wrong about your data. If you don't know,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you can't fix it, and then your ability to both

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>correct it or have it deleted. I think surveillance is

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>sold to people based on the ability to benefit their lives,

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>but then they don't necessarily get that in return. Like

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>for example, I was just at a conference AI for

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Good in Geneva. We're talking about for all sorts of

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>potential great things like waste in our food distribution systems,

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>or the ability to get better medical care, to reduce

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>inefficiencies our transportation system. That still doesn't mean that it's

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>going to benefit the people that you surveil and manipulated

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to get it. I think we need better answers than

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>companies just out of the goodness of their heart, returning

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to people that efficiencies that come from artificial intelligence and

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>machine learning and big data and algorithms. People think that

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to share the benefits, but I don't think

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that we have a structure to really enable the sharing

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of those benefits right now. I agree. I would like

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to give us an example, a real example of something

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that takes place today, and then I would like to

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>suggest the solution. Guess this is perfect, My co host

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>are l here taking us to the next level. I

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>think the solution will actually come with the help of

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies like twenty three and meet now have

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>an incentive to request an overarching privacy framework in the

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>United States. Why well, the gdp R is all for Europe.

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But in the US, the privacy laws that exists, and

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>there are many of them, more than a hundred and

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty exists the level of a city, a county, or state.

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>But the company, like the ones I mentioned, we cannot

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>expect them to comply with something like seventeen thousand different

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictional privacy laws. If every one of them is going

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>to be different from every other, there's no way to

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>comply with that. So they should champion, using their big budgets,

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a situation where the US Senate the US Congress comes

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>together and makes a countrywide national privacy framework with a

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>national agency that regulates privacy because right now in the

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>US that's just the FTC and they have a day job.

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I wanna remember some of the good things I asked

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>you what the worst case scenario was there there was

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a flying game. I want to ask you, what's the

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>best case scenario? How would we operate if you had

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>your say completely or at least a bit more arial.

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>What's the best that could happen? Well, best solution would

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>be for everyone to be aware of his or her

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>value and also have their profile with certain bits, perhaps censored,

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>stored in a digital way for which they can give

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>access when they want the access to be given about

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what they want the access to be given. Right again,

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>not to mention everything about Europe is great, because they

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly have their own challenges. In Europe, there's a new

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>law called PSD two PC. The two allows people to say, okay,

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>my bank has such such information about me. If an

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>insurance company wants to see my data from my bank,

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they got to ask me to approve or disapprove or

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>automatically disapproved the sharing of the data. To make it easy,

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's tied to people's cell phones, for example, So you

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>get a text the company wants to get your data,

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you approve. Then they can make something ideally

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>better tailored to you. Now, the distance to get there

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US is a bit long. But that's one example. Gina,

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>what's the best that can happen? Well, I think that

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of potential for optimizing our world. I mean,

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>our transportation system could use a lot of efficiency gains,

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>our food distribution system could use a lot of efficiency gains,

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>connecting people, getting people the information they need just in time,

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>helping us navigate our world find things. There's a lot

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of power there. It's often powerful for both good and ill.

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>We don't look at both sides. We need a collective

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.719
<v Speaker 1>will to say to turn technology to the uses we

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>want and prevent it in cases we don't. And really

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that has to be done with legislation or some kind

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of collective control. I'm worried about big decisions made algorithmically

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about people's lives, but human decision making is no picnic either.

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>People make a different decision before lunch and after lunch

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they make snap decisions based on crazy things. We haven't

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly been following hiring law anyway. If you see a candidate,

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>you can make a biased decision based on gender or

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>race or disability status and not admit you're doing it.

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But people at least do grow they consider other information.

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>You can appeal to them. You can convince them to

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>move forward and progress. Artificial intelligence systems, machine learning systems

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>put inside a black box are institutionalizing the past. People

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 1>think they're really progressive. I see a great potential for

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a mix of human decision making and automated decision making

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>where people are deployed not to rubber stamp decisions, because

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a bad use of people. They just blank out

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and don't really engage on every decision, but to debug decisions.

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But that is going to mean incentivizing teams of people

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to actually find problems, and no company is going to

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>be truly incentivized to find problems in their system. So

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we need adversarial testing, We need access to data. We

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>need to ask the question, what is going to incentivize

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>this to get better? Because there's so many systems. I've

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>been doing a bunch of work in criminal justice systems,

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and in criminal justice systems, if they're making the wrong decision,

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what, they say, you're just complaining because you're guilty.

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not like a bug in your iPhone that a

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people report and eventually it goes away, even

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>though in your world it feels like you're the only

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>one that sees this bug and no one else does.

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>In things like criminal justice, there may be no incentive

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for it to get better unless we force transparency and

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>accountability and adversarial testing and things like that, which we're

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>not doing well. I feel like we're making some progress.

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that I definitely was frightened a bit by

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the visions you've painted in some of my

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>own experience and research in this area. I even think

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>privacy is often not the best word to describe what

0:29:56.120 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we're really getting into. For me, it's words like permission, consent, sovereignty, agency,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>self determination. Building those into the system as well is

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a necessary evolution of this whole platform. Can we layer

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in that level of accountability, transparency, adversarial testing so that

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of these systems accrue to more and that

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we're highlighting and reducing the downside so we can maximize

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>all the good stuff that we know it's possible. We

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have a long long way to go and the world's

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>moving fast. This is not going to happen automatically. Listeners

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>should not be like, oh, there's a lot of ways

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we know how to do this. It'll just happen if

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>we're patient. That's my point is that where we are

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>used to computer systems improving in this way, they will

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>not improve unless we fight for it. I think there's

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>this famous quote like the arc of history is long,

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>would have been towards justice. Big statement. I don't know

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>where it was originally stated, but I also don't think

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's quite true. I think people bend it towards justice,

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And there's constantly in every era of technology, in every

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>age of any society, you gotta fight for your freedom.

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You've got to put in the work and not assume

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that a firm more updates just gonna come along with

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>rights installed, right, with dignity installed, with respect installed, saying no,

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to argue for that, and constantly agitate

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>for it and fight for it and ask better questions

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>even if the answers aren't already right there. Doing this

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of conversation is definitely helping me see that picture

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>even more clearly. Are Yeah, but there's one thing that

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>every company can do, and we should demand the company. Okay, yes, so,

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:39.239
<v Speaker 1>first life cycle. Everybody knows the term life cycle. How

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>does life end with death? Companies that collect data frequently

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>forget the last step in the life cycle. So I've

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>seen companies that keep data, sometimes even credit card data.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>There's twenty years old. What are you gonna do with

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the twenty year old credit card data? You take that fact,

0:31:57.720 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and you take the fact that again, I hate to

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>be cheerleader for the GDP are alone, but I see

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>your side job here. It's literally cheerleader for the GDPR.

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, the GDP also requires companies to

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>make sure the data is always up to date. So

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>since data, once it's put on the internet rarely does,

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's up to organizations to do automatically ideally deleted data.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>When you collect the data, decide how long it's going

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to live. The companies also get a lesser requirement to

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>spend money. I'm aware. For example, one company in the

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>US deleted some five yota bytes of data because they

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>had that much data historically. I know a lot about computers,

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but YadA bites. I think I've heard that once in

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>my life. That's just a lot, right, It's just a

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>technical term for like a lot. Hold, Okay, well, I mean, look,

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you think about there is a natural incentive I think

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for organizations to just minimize liability. Data is seen as

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the new oil in some circles, as the currency, as

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this thing of value, but it's also a liability. Now,

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a personal question for you are because we

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>spoke briefly about this, I want to bring it back

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>down to individual level and data because you Mr. External

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Data Protection Officer, Mr. I've been in computer security since

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I was fourteen years old. You've used twenty three and me.

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I do, and we rarely actually have people on the

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>show talking directly about this service in particular. But I'm

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>just curious why you chose to use the service and

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>what you got out of it. When I was growing

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>up in Israel, I only have the twelve for relatives

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in my family tree. My grandparents never talked about Europe

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>before the Holocaust. They didn't want to remember. At a

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>certain point, I felt a little bit ungrounded, so I

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>used twenty three and ME and I found some hints

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for geographical distribution of my family. A year later, I

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>was in poland decided to go with the investigators from

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>archives and to look up things and careful what you

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>wish for Today I have about thirteen thousand blood relatives.

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Is not aware of there were second cousins living next

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>door or one straight over that I didn't know existed,

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and now they do and we're planning a reunion. But

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to plan a reunion for people. Yes, that's

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>called a festival. That's right. Then we're gonna give shirts out.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So I have family in Australia, in the US, of course, Canada, Israel,

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 1>but I also have relatives in Uruguay, in Switzerland and

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in many other countries. And now I have a family

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that's beautiful, thank you. But before I used them, I

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>did my own assessment. I want to disclose exactly everything

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I did, but but I certainly got to a comfort level.

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>And one of those things is the simple fact that

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>before they share your data with anyone, they ask your permission.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>If you agree, then they share the data points that

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you agree to share health or to be just familiar

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:04.959
<v Speaker 1>with the people that you want them to share it with.

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>You have the control now in the world of the

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>identified data. In other words, when they collect two million

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>genomes and they find certain probabilities or discoveries or what

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>have you, I'm happy for my DNA to be used

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for that. Maybe they'll find a better pill for me

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and I can grow hair again. But before I used them.

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I did my own due diligence. That's similar to my story.

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I looked into it and I was like, Okay, I'm

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>good with this. There are parts of it that I'm

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sure I maybe won't be so great with down the line.

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll be vigilant and try to pay attention and look

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>out for that possibility. But for what I've gotten out

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>of it, it felt like a choice that I was

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>willing to make. And I think as we start to

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>wrap this up and think about what needs to happen,

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like there's three levels of activism and engagement.

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>There's the individual. We should all be better about knowing

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>what we're signing up for, and to the extent that

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we have a choice to not sign up, exercise that choice.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I know in some cases it's really more compulsory, but

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>where you can exercise that. Then there's the companies, the

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are actually holding all this information making their

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>decisions and who won't always make good decisions out of

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the goodness of their heart, and so making sure that

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they are more accountable, incentivized in a structured way. And

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>then there's our g d p R cheerleader over here.

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I will never let me forget that government at a

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.919
<v Speaker 1>national level and potentially even international as the Internet knows

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.479
<v Speaker 1>no bounds, but certainly at national levels needs to act

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and step in because right now, without an enforcement mechanism,

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for us to feel protected. It's actually hard

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>for companies too, maybe who want to do the right

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>thing to have a simple way to try to execute that.

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Am I'm missing something in my attempt to kind of

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>synthesize everything in a paragraph, as far as what else

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>our listener needs to know about how to get to

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the next step. First of all, it's your If you

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>don't care about there, it's freely don't expect others to

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 1>protect it for you. The second bit is this, every

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>time you get a frequent flyer card, any kind of

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>loyalty card, yeah, think about what it is you're giving up.

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.720
<v Speaker 1>There are some things for which sharing data is perfect,

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>but in the reality of what you have is a

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>situation where your data is offered to roughly two million

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>websites every time you open the search, decide what it

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>is you want, and go find out who has it.

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not as hard as it was a year ago,

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but you have to take the first time. Gina Is

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>there any extra advice you want to offer to our listener.

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't underestimate the power of showing up and asking questions

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and writing and expressing your opinion and caring. There's not

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>nearly enough of that, and there's a lot of stuff

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>happening that really could use some eyeballs and some comments

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and some outrage here here. I would second that, and

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank both of you for showing up,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>are asking questions, for sharing your opinions, and for so

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 1>clearly caring. Thank you for doing this special podcast, and

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you for giving these issues this platform in voice.

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to dig in more on today's topics and guests.

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Check our show notes, and if you enjoyed the episode,

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>share it with a friend, all your friends, and be

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>sure to leave a review. If you want more surprising

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>stories about how we're all related, search and follow Spit

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on iHeart Radio or subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Spit is an i Heeart radio podcast with twenty three

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in me. I'm Barraitune Day Thurston. You can find out

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>more about me at bartune Day dot com or on

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>social media wherever Barraitune Days are found.