1
00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:06,800
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:09,640 --> 00:00:12,880
Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Prisner.

3
00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:15,400
Speaker 2: You can join Brian Curtis and myself for the stories,

4
00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:18,520
Speaker 2: making news and moving markets in the APAC region. You

5
00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:21,439
Speaker 2: can subscribe to the show anywhere you get your podcast

6
00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:24,919
Speaker 2: and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the

7
00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:26,080
Speaker 2: Bloomberg Business App.

8
00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:32,680
Speaker 1: Joining us now for some discussion of all this is

9
00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:37,159
Speaker 1: Greg Reed, DOCO, who is ey chief economist, to take

10
00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:40,280
Speaker 1: a closer look, so you can look at this two ways.

11
00:00:40,360 --> 00:00:43,400
Speaker 1: I mean, it's no matter what, it's a dilemma for investors,

12
00:00:43,440 --> 00:00:47,160
Speaker 1: Greg and economists. You've got about ten months of falling

13
00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:51,040
Speaker 1: inflation versus about two months now of stickiness, if not

14
00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:56,279
Speaker 1: outright games. So what's the more actionable takeaway for you?

15
00:00:57,720 --> 00:01:01,680
Speaker 3: Well, I think generally speaking, we're still on this disinflationary trend.

16
00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:04,080
Speaker 3: It is true that the last couple of months have

17
00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:07,200
Speaker 3: been a little bit bumpy in terms of the momentum

18
00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:09,560
Speaker 3: on a month to month basis, But whether you look

19
00:01:09,600 --> 00:01:13,000
Speaker 3: at CPI data, the consumer price index or PPI data

20
00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:17,440
Speaker 3: the producer price index, you're still seeing the underlying fundamentals

21
00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:21,480
Speaker 3: of a disinflationary trajectory. It will be bumpy. There will

22
00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:24,640
Speaker 3: be some upward movement in terms of energy prices like

23
00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:27,840
Speaker 3: we just saw over the course of February. But overall,

24
00:01:27,880 --> 00:01:31,120
Speaker 3: when you look at pricing sensitivity, when you look at

25
00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:34,920
Speaker 3: pricing power, when you look at wage growth, those are

26
00:01:34,959 --> 00:01:38,440
Speaker 3: all pointing towards further disinflation in the months to come.

27
00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:42,640
Speaker 2: I think the market still has to recalibrate expectations where

28
00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:45,600
Speaker 2: that it wouldn't be inflation, that is, wouldn't remain as

29
00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:48,320
Speaker 2: sticky as it seems to be on either the retail

30
00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:50,040
Speaker 2: or the wholesale level. And if you look at what

31
00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:54,080
Speaker 2: the swaps market is indicating right now, Gregory, maybe a

32
00:01:54,160 --> 00:01:57,200
Speaker 2: reduction in the degree of policy easing this year. Maybe

33
00:01:57,200 --> 00:02:00,480
Speaker 2: we don't get seventy five basis points in total rate cuts,

34
00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:03,000
Speaker 2: maybe it's close to the fifty and maybe the first

35
00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:06,280
Speaker 2: cut is not until July. Does that square with your

36
00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:08,720
Speaker 2: thinking that's a possibility.

37
00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:12,760
Speaker 3: I think the market has repriced the expectations for a

38
00:02:12,760 --> 00:02:16,440
Speaker 3: FED rate cut. You may recall that just six weeks

39
00:02:16,440 --> 00:02:21,440
Speaker 3: ago before the January meeting FMC meeting, we had markets

40
00:02:21,440 --> 00:02:25,840
Speaker 3: anticipating six rate cuts, almost seven with an onset in March,

41
00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:28,880
Speaker 3: that got pushed back quite a bit, and now we're

42
00:02:28,919 --> 00:02:32,079
Speaker 3: down to three rate cuts that are expected by investors

43
00:02:32,120 --> 00:02:35,800
Speaker 3: starting in July. So that is a big shift in

44
00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:38,880
Speaker 3: terms of market pricing. What I would caution is that

45
00:02:38,919 --> 00:02:41,720
Speaker 3: the January data, and to some extent the February data,

46
00:02:41,919 --> 00:02:45,920
Speaker 3: has been quite noisy. We've seen significant revisions in the

47
00:02:45,919 --> 00:02:48,920
Speaker 3: employment numbers, for instance. We know that there was a

48
00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:52,920
Speaker 3: lot of noisiness in the CPI data with January resets,

49
00:02:53,480 --> 00:02:57,880
Speaker 3: with some seasonal factors, with some methodology issues in terms

50
00:02:57,880 --> 00:03:01,080
Speaker 3: of the owner's equivalent rent component. I'm getting into the

51
00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:04,040
Speaker 3: weeds here, but just to say that you have to

52
00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:06,880
Speaker 3: really look for the signal in the data, and the

53
00:03:06,960 --> 00:03:10,360
Speaker 3: signal is still pointing towards a disinflationary trend. So I

54
00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:13,800
Speaker 3: think the Fed will likely consider easing monetary policy in

55
00:03:13,919 --> 00:03:16,639
Speaker 3: June with about one hundred bases points of rate cuts,

56
00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:21,160
Speaker 3: because both inflation and the employment mandate will be more

57
00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:22,400
Speaker 3: in line with what they're expecting.

58
00:03:22,760 --> 00:03:25,120
Speaker 1: Interesting, you won't like my next question, I don't think,

59
00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:29,600
Speaker 1: But well, I mean, obviously a little bit higher inflation

60
00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:32,520
Speaker 1: with a little bit stronger growth, I mean we can

61
00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:35,240
Speaker 1: probably handle that. It just kind of pushes out the

62
00:03:35,320 --> 00:03:40,480
Speaker 1: eventual coming down of inflation and probably growth coming down. However,

63
00:03:41,280 --> 00:03:43,880
Speaker 1: there are some signs that growth is stalling at a

64
00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:46,640
Speaker 1: time when you've got higher prices, and so that inevitably

65
00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:50,240
Speaker 1: brings stagflation into the picture. I'm not sure whether or

66
00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:52,640
Speaker 1: not you're in that camp, and it's probably too soon

67
00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:55,000
Speaker 1: to talk about it, but is it at least a

68
00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:55,640
Speaker 1: growing risk.

69
00:03:57,040 --> 00:03:59,320
Speaker 3: It is definitely one of the key risks for the

70
00:03:59,400 --> 00:04:02,840
Speaker 3: US economy. That risk of stagflation, where you have limited growth,

71
00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:06,320
Speaker 3: if not contraction in economic activity and higher inflation, is

72
00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:08,520
Speaker 3: definitely a risk. But I would point to the fact

73
00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:11,080
Speaker 3: that while twenty twenty three was a lot or a

74
00:04:11,080 --> 00:04:13,160
Speaker 3: lot of the story in twenty twenty three was about

75
00:04:13,480 --> 00:04:16,400
Speaker 3: a strong economy where the supply side of the economy

76
00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:21,160
Speaker 3: was rebounding strongly and allowing inflation to cool. We're probably

77
00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:23,320
Speaker 3: going to be more in a normal environment in twenty

78
00:04:23,360 --> 00:04:26,520
Speaker 3: twenty four, where slower final demand growth is going to

79
00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:29,960
Speaker 3: put downward pressure on prices. I was talking earlier about

80
00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:33,400
Speaker 3: pricing sensitivity. We're starting to see it. We saw retail

81
00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:37,920
Speaker 3: sales were weaker than expected. Consumers are exercising more scrutiny

82
00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:41,279
Speaker 3: in a higher price environment. That is a sign of

83
00:04:41,360 --> 00:04:44,880
Speaker 3: disinflationary momentum to come, and I would anticipate that as

84
00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:48,880
Speaker 3: the economy slows, as employment slows, income is also going

85
00:04:48,920 --> 00:04:52,080
Speaker 3: to slow. That's going to force consumers to be more scrutinized,

86
00:04:52,600 --> 00:04:55,640
Speaker 3: scrutinizing of how much they spend, and that will put

87
00:04:55,680 --> 00:04:58,440
Speaker 3: further downward pressure on inflation. It's not going to be

88
00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:01,320
Speaker 3: a retrenchment, but it will likely be a slowdown in

89
00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:04,360
Speaker 3: employment and a slowdown in inflation that leads to fed

90
00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:06,360
Speaker 3: the ease monetary policy gradually.

91
00:05:06,440 --> 00:05:09,400
Speaker 2: I'd like to get your take on the American manufacturing

92
00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:12,000
Speaker 2: economy tomorrow. We got a couple of key data points,

93
00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:17,640
Speaker 2: US industrial production and the regional Empire manufacturing data. What

94
00:05:17,760 --> 00:05:21,800
Speaker 2: is your feeling about American manufacturing overall?

95
00:05:21,880 --> 00:05:24,880
Speaker 3: It's been quite interesting to see the resilience in US

96
00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:29,599
Speaker 3: manufacturing despite global weakness. We know that in China, we

97
00:05:29,680 --> 00:05:33,400
Speaker 3: know that in Germany, the industrial side of these economies

98
00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:37,200
Speaker 3: has been a key drag on economic momentum. In the

99
00:05:37,360 --> 00:05:42,080
Speaker 3: US force manufacturing is less significant, representing about thirteen to

100
00:05:42,120 --> 00:05:46,440
Speaker 3: fourteen percent of the overall economy, but importantly we've seen

101
00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:51,600
Speaker 3: this desire to rebuild manufacturing capacity be a strong driver

102
00:05:52,120 --> 00:05:56,040
Speaker 3: of overall economic activity on the manufacturing side, or nowhere

103
00:05:56,080 --> 00:05:58,760
Speaker 3: near any type of boom on the manufacturing front. If

104
00:05:58,800 --> 00:06:01,160
Speaker 3: you look at the annual page of growth, it's very

105
00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:05,480
Speaker 3: close to zero. But nonetheless that comes despite a global

106
00:06:05,520 --> 00:06:09,400
Speaker 3: backdrop that is quite concerning. As we see this global

107
00:06:09,400 --> 00:06:13,240
Speaker 3: backdrop on the manufacturing front starting to stabilize and probably

108
00:06:13,279 --> 00:06:17,240
Speaker 3: finding a bottom that is going to be supportive of

109
00:06:18,040 --> 00:06:21,719
Speaker 3: braddle upward momentum in the US, and we'll probably move

110
00:06:21,760 --> 00:06:24,120
Speaker 3: back above that zero percent line.

111
00:06:24,680 --> 00:06:26,880
Speaker 1: We talked a little bit about international, so let's talk

112
00:06:26,880 --> 00:06:29,360
Speaker 1: to Japan. We've got the largest union group in Japan

113
00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:32,520
Speaker 1: coming out with the wages requests and data today, so

114
00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:33,960
Speaker 1: that's going to be a very big thing. It'll be

115
00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:37,640
Speaker 1: this afternoon, and then we'll have the BOJ on Tuesday.

116
00:06:37,960 --> 00:06:40,880
Speaker 1: Are we getting close enough do you think? Of course,

117
00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:42,880
Speaker 1: depending on what we see in the wages, are we

118
00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:45,560
Speaker 1: getting close enough to start thinking that the BOJ will

119
00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:46,640
Speaker 1: act next Tuesday?

120
00:06:47,720 --> 00:06:50,120
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think we're getting pretty close to the point

121
00:06:50,120 --> 00:06:53,520
Speaker 3: at which the BOJ not only exits the negative interest

122
00:06:53,560 --> 00:06:57,120
Speaker 3: rate world, but also let's go of its healed curve

123
00:06:57,160 --> 00:07:01,599
Speaker 3: control policy. Both of the are or have been tied

124
00:07:01,720 --> 00:07:04,760
Speaker 3: to an environment where Japan has been struggling with deflation.

125
00:07:04,880 --> 00:07:06,720
Speaker 3: This is not a new story. This has been an

126
00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:10,120
Speaker 3: ongoing story, but it had been exacerbated prior to the

127
00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:14,120
Speaker 3: COVID crisis. Now we're seeing more of an inflationary environment

128
00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:17,360
Speaker 3: in Japan. Inflation touch four percent. It has now come

129
00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:20,640
Speaker 3: down a little bit, but wage growth have accelerated. They're

130
00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:24,240
Speaker 3: likely in the wage negotiations going to be around five percent.

131
00:07:24,840 --> 00:07:28,680
Speaker 3: That is forcing the BOJ to consider adopting a slightly

132
00:07:29,320 --> 00:07:32,760
Speaker 3: more hawkish tone and more hawkish policy. And I think

133
00:07:32,960 --> 00:07:36,000
Speaker 3: those types of developments on the wage front are likely

134
00:07:36,040 --> 00:07:39,280
Speaker 3: to lead the BOJ to both exit its negative interest

135
00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:43,600
Speaker 3: rate environment and let go of its yield control, either

136
00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:46,680
Speaker 3: at this meeting in a week or in April.

137
00:07:46,920 --> 00:07:49,520
Speaker 2: Gregory, last question, I can give you thirty seconds, but

138
00:07:49,560 --> 00:07:51,800
Speaker 2: I'd like to get your view on the Chinese economy.

139
00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:55,120
Speaker 2: We've been talking about slow growth and deflation. What's your

140
00:07:55,200 --> 00:07:56,400
Speaker 2: view on China right now?

141
00:07:57,560 --> 00:08:01,320
Speaker 3: In thirty seconds. I think we have a structural slowdown

142
00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:05,320
Speaker 3: of the Chinese economy that will unlikely be the global

143
00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:08,560
Speaker 3: engine of growth as it has been over the past decade.

144
00:08:08,880 --> 00:08:11,960
Speaker 3: But from a cyclical perspective, perhaps we are finding a

145
00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:15,320
Speaker 3: floor in terms of economic activity and there might be

146
00:08:15,360 --> 00:08:17,920
Speaker 3: a little bit more momentum as we navigate through the

147
00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:18,520
Speaker 3: rest of the year.

148
00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:21,480
Speaker 1: All Right, Gregory, thanks very much for being with us.

149
00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:24,200
Speaker 1: At least we did not ask you the dreaded question

150
00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:27,360
Speaker 1: about the stock market, so you won one there from us.

151
00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:30,640
Speaker 1: Thanks for joining us, Gregory dot o Ey, chief economist,

152
00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:54,200
Speaker 1: looking more closely at economic performance really all around the world. Well,

153
00:08:54,280 --> 00:08:56,520
Speaker 1: joining us now for some discussion of markets in our

154
00:08:56,559 --> 00:09:00,640
Speaker 1: studios here in Hong Kong. Is Villain Sells gloio at

155
00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:05,560
Speaker 1: HSBC Global Private Banking and Wealth. Villain, thanks very much

156
00:09:05,559 --> 00:09:07,440
Speaker 1: for coming into our studios here. I know you're normally

157
00:09:07,480 --> 00:09:10,040
Speaker 1: based in London. Let's talk a little bit about the

158
00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:13,199
Speaker 1: investment climate in the United States after that hot PPI reading.

159
00:09:13,480 --> 00:09:16,480
Speaker 1: We've had both hot CPI and PPI now for a

160
00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:20,520
Speaker 1: couple of months, and it presents investors and economists, I

161
00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:22,960
Speaker 1: suppose with a little bit of a dilemma. The long

162
00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:27,240
Speaker 1: trend is disinflation, but the short trend is stickiness, which

163
00:09:27,320 --> 00:09:28,120
Speaker 1: is more important.

164
00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:31,000
Speaker 4: The long trend is more important, so we put our

165
00:09:31,040 --> 00:09:33,400
Speaker 4: cash to work. We have zero percent cash in our

166
00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:36,520
Speaker 4: model portfolios. Currently we have overweights in both bonds and

167
00:09:36,559 --> 00:09:39,320
Speaker 4: in the equity market. In the bond market is basically

168
00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:42,480
Speaker 4: to lock in those attractive bond y'lt. So we would

169
00:09:42,520 --> 00:09:46,080
Speaker 4: use any sort of volatility from those short term ups

170
00:09:46,080 --> 00:09:48,520
Speaker 4: and downs, you know, to step in into the bond

171
00:09:48,559 --> 00:09:51,040
Speaker 4: market and to lock that in in the equity market.

172
00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:54,800
Speaker 4: I think it's interesting to see that you see margin expansion,

173
00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:58,679
Speaker 4: earnings expansion, and actually the equity markets are somewhat less

174
00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:01,640
Speaker 4: concerned because of them than the bond market about those

175
00:10:01,640 --> 00:10:02,680
Speaker 4: inflation figures.

176
00:10:02,960 --> 00:10:06,800
Speaker 2: How do you look at liquidity right now globally? Are

177
00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:09,199
Speaker 2: we looking at excessive levels of liquidity?

178
00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:12,760
Speaker 4: There is a lot of liquidity. You had a headline

179
00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:16,080
Speaker 4: this morning on the Terminal and talking about you know,

180
00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:19,640
Speaker 4: record and money market holdings. You know, so there's certainly

181
00:10:19,760 --> 00:10:21,840
Speaker 4: still a lot of money that can be put to work,

182
00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:24,160
Speaker 4: and we do think it will go into both bonds

183
00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:27,800
Speaker 4: and equities and actually also into alternatives where we see

184
00:10:27,840 --> 00:10:31,840
Speaker 4: opportunities as well. That means to me that you know,

185
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:37,960
Speaker 4: concerns that or comments that is investor positioning is stretched

186
00:10:38,160 --> 00:10:42,040
Speaker 4: or sentiment to stretched, I think those are probably you know,

187
00:10:42,080 --> 00:10:45,280
Speaker 4: incorrect because indeed, you know that money can still be

188
00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:45,920
Speaker 4: put to work.

189
00:10:46,880 --> 00:10:49,680
Speaker 1: Villain. There are some people worried about the possibility of

190
00:10:49,679 --> 00:10:51,920
Speaker 1: stagflation down the road, But then you can also look

191
00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:54,200
Speaker 1: at the growth and commodities here. Of late, we've seen

192
00:10:54,440 --> 00:10:56,480
Speaker 1: a little break in trend. It's been a long downward trend.

193
00:10:56,520 --> 00:10:59,720
Speaker 1: Now is trending up a little, and I'm wondering whether

194
00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:02,760
Speaker 1: or not we can draw any conclusions from that along

195
00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:05,960
Speaker 1: with you know, the little bit stickier inflation suggests that

196
00:11:06,040 --> 00:11:08,640
Speaker 1: growth is sticky too, and maybe we go into an

197
00:11:08,840 --> 00:11:11,240
Speaker 1: upticking growth globally. Do you see it that way or no?

198
00:11:11,520 --> 00:11:13,720
Speaker 4: Exactly. You can't be negative on both. I would I

199
00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:16,920
Speaker 4: would actually be, you know, relatively encouraged by both. But

200
00:11:17,040 --> 00:11:19,360
Speaker 4: I could accept the argument that in the shorter time

201
00:11:19,400 --> 00:11:22,640
Speaker 4: we will see some inflation volatility on the growth side.

202
00:11:22,679 --> 00:11:25,760
Speaker 4: Though I am an optimist, I do think that, you know,

203
00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:29,200
Speaker 4: a US recession is very unlikely. Even Europe, I think,

204
00:11:29,240 --> 00:11:33,160
Speaker 4: has seen the lowest, you know, quarter of growth, slowest

205
00:11:33,240 --> 00:11:35,400
Speaker 4: quarter of growth, and we will see a very very

206
00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:38,080
Speaker 4: mild acceleration from there. And then in China we have

207
00:11:38,200 --> 00:11:41,120
Speaker 4: all of that stimulus which is probably putting a bottom

208
00:11:41,200 --> 00:11:45,680
Speaker 4: under you know, economic growth, So you know, we are

209
00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:49,679
Speaker 4: cyclically exposed in in the US and that's where where

210
00:11:49,679 --> 00:11:52,640
Speaker 4: our overweight is as well. So on the stackflations, it's

211
00:11:52,679 --> 00:11:54,480
Speaker 4: certainly not a stack part.

212
00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:59,240
Speaker 2: What about the enthusiasm surrounding artificial intelligence, I know it's

213
00:11:59,240 --> 00:12:01,840
Speaker 2: been a key I were of so many different threads

214
00:12:01,840 --> 00:12:04,160
Speaker 2: of the equity market here in the US. I mean

215
00:12:04,440 --> 00:12:06,680
Speaker 2: you can look at a company like in Nvidia as

216
00:12:06,840 --> 00:12:10,480
Speaker 2: being emblematic of that euphoria. Is this something that you

217
00:12:10,600 --> 00:12:14,760
Speaker 2: think is peaked or does that still have the potential

218
00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:16,240
Speaker 2: to extend gains?

219
00:12:17,080 --> 00:12:20,920
Speaker 4: So we have an we are basically looking mostly at

220
00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:24,120
Speaker 4: how is that AI now going to translate into the

221
00:12:24,120 --> 00:12:26,800
Speaker 4: rest of the economy and not just in a handful

222
00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:30,040
Speaker 4: of stocks. And you know, the encouraging part there is

223
00:12:30,080 --> 00:12:34,040
Speaker 4: that any any business owner that I talked to, and

224
00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:37,080
Speaker 4: obviously we have a lot of business owners amongst our clients,

225
00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:40,040
Speaker 4: they're all telling me they're using AI. For some of

226
00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:42,800
Speaker 4: them it is still marginal, but for some of them

227
00:12:42,840 --> 00:12:45,720
Speaker 4: it is really now quite substantial. So that is going

228
00:12:45,760 --> 00:12:49,959
Speaker 4: to you know, percolate through the rest of the economy

229
00:12:50,120 --> 00:12:53,320
Speaker 4: in terms of efficiency gains and so on. Robotics is

230
00:12:53,320 --> 00:12:57,000
Speaker 4: a specific you know topic where obviously it is already

231
00:12:57,080 --> 00:13:00,960
Speaker 4: leading to you know, lots of innovation. I would say

232
00:13:01,040 --> 00:13:07,360
Speaker 4: healthcare innovation is also supported you know by AI. And

233
00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:11,480
Speaker 4: then obviously a lot of you know, the in the

234
00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:14,320
Speaker 4: electric vehicle or the vehicle industry more generally as well.

235
00:13:14,840 --> 00:13:17,200
Speaker 4: You know, a lot of that is going into there,

236
00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:21,839
Speaker 4: so you can have indirect place which are obviously quite

237
00:13:21,920 --> 00:13:24,400
Speaker 4: quite a lot cheaper than the direct place. At this

238
00:13:24,480 --> 00:13:25,200
Speaker 4: point in time.

239
00:13:25,600 --> 00:13:27,600
Speaker 1: I want to go back to China for just a moment.

240
00:13:28,040 --> 00:13:30,960
Speaker 1: HSBC obviously was so much business in Hong Kong and

241
00:13:31,000 --> 00:13:34,640
Speaker 1: such a long presence out here Shanghai and Hong Kong,

242
00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:37,240
Speaker 1: and you know, built into your name, so we're looking

243
00:13:37,320 --> 00:13:41,880
Speaker 1: for expertise. Don't disappoint. The economic activity looks mixed at

244
00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:44,720
Speaker 1: the start of the year. We've got this five percent target,

245
00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:47,439
Speaker 1: We've still got a major drag from property. When we're

246
00:13:47,480 --> 00:13:50,240
Speaker 1: weigh it all up, how are we moving through this

247
00:13:50,360 --> 00:13:51,320
Speaker 1: year in China?

248
00:13:51,760 --> 00:13:54,880
Speaker 4: So the consensus forecast ten hours as well are relatively

249
00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:57,559
Speaker 4: flat in terms of economic growth over if you look

250
00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:01,520
Speaker 4: at different quarters. This is a central momentum in a

251
00:14:01,559 --> 00:14:04,120
Speaker 4: certain way that's already you know, I think that will

252
00:14:04,160 --> 00:14:08,080
Speaker 4: already help in terms of market sentiment. You know that

253
00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:11,360
Speaker 4: we're not decelerating from here, and I think that similus

254
00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:14,880
Speaker 4: is really critical. You know, the only thing that we're

255
00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:17,040
Speaker 4: not seeing at this point in time is a sharp

256
00:14:17,080 --> 00:14:19,880
Speaker 4: acceleration of that activity, either on the economic side or

257
00:14:19,920 --> 00:14:22,600
Speaker 4: on the earnings, and I think that is what you know,

258
00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:26,200
Speaker 4: investors are looking for. That being said, we have a

259
00:14:26,240 --> 00:14:28,400
Speaker 4: neutral and not an underweight at this point in time

260
00:14:28,440 --> 00:14:31,640
Speaker 4: because we do believe that number one, valuations are very low.

261
00:14:31,960 --> 00:14:37,240
Speaker 4: Number two foreign investors in particular are very underweight and

262
00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:40,320
Speaker 4: in my view, would be very unlikely to be able

263
00:14:40,360 --> 00:14:45,080
Speaker 4: to further sell, but are waiting for that acceleration to

264
00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:48,320
Speaker 4: step in. There are also some sectors which are doing well,

265
00:14:48,400 --> 00:14:51,360
Speaker 4: right so electric vehicles are doing well. There is obviously

266
00:14:51,400 --> 00:14:52,520
Speaker 4: activity as well.

267
00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:55,000
Speaker 1: View ideas straighting down now is so much.

268
00:14:54,880 --> 00:14:57,480
Speaker 4: Competition, but they but they are gain they have a

269
00:14:57,520 --> 00:14:59,960
Speaker 4: lot of market share gains, right so you know, hence

270
00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:05,400
Speaker 4: the European auto manufacturers, you know, being quite worried about

271
00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:06,120
Speaker 4: this to.

272
00:15:06,160 --> 00:15:06,760
Speaker 1: Say the least.

273
00:15:06,880 --> 00:15:10,000
Speaker 2: Yeah, well that's a great point. I mean, geopolitics, how

274
00:15:10,080 --> 00:15:13,040
Speaker 2: is it influencing market behavior right now? Whether you're looking

275
00:15:13,120 --> 00:15:16,400
Speaker 2: at something is you know, simple as let's say, US

276
00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:19,920
Speaker 2: export controls on advanced technology to China. You mentioned the

277
00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:24,480
Speaker 2: evs manufactured in China, trying to find a market in Europe.

278
00:15:24,880 --> 00:15:28,240
Speaker 2: Is geopolitics kind of foremost in your mind when you

279
00:15:28,280 --> 00:15:29,520
Speaker 2: evaluate opportunity?

280
00:15:30,160 --> 00:15:32,600
Speaker 4: It is a It is a discussion point with clients.

281
00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:35,320
Speaker 4: The difficulty always is number one to forecast it and

282
00:15:35,440 --> 00:15:38,720
Speaker 4: number two to forecast the timing. You know, also what people,

283
00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:42,440
Speaker 4: you know, the presidential candidates for example, we're not necessarily

284
00:15:42,480 --> 00:15:45,440
Speaker 4: sure they would indeed implement what they are saying, so

285
00:15:45,960 --> 00:15:50,600
Speaker 4: you know, very hard to invest on that basis, and

286
00:15:50,640 --> 00:15:53,000
Speaker 4: I don't think it would be you know, very wise

287
00:15:53,080 --> 00:15:56,760
Speaker 4: to second guess. But so the US itself has an

288
00:15:57,080 --> 00:16:00,000
Speaker 4: you know, economic and earnings engine which is very strong,

289
00:16:00,520 --> 00:16:03,400
Speaker 4: and therefore that's a big overweight for US. The other

290
00:16:03,480 --> 00:16:06,960
Speaker 4: bit within Asia, the way that we deal with geopolitics

291
00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:11,520
Speaker 4: there is we diversify our exposure. So whilst we are

292
00:16:11,600 --> 00:16:15,080
Speaker 4: neutral on China, we have overweights in India, Indonesia, South

293
00:16:15,160 --> 00:16:19,240
Speaker 4: Korea and Japan, so four countries where we see opportunities,

294
00:16:19,240 --> 00:16:22,600
Speaker 4: and that allows you to be somewhat less exposed to this.

295
00:16:23,720 --> 00:16:27,000
Speaker 1: So it sounds like you're fairly optimistic out of time now,

296
00:16:27,040 --> 00:16:30,800
Speaker 1: but I suppose one interesting possibility might be you mentioned

297
00:16:30,800 --> 00:16:33,840
Speaker 1: the foreign buyers back to a certain degree with Chinese equities.

298
00:16:34,040 --> 00:16:35,880
Speaker 1: If you had foreign buyers at the same time as

299
00:16:35,920 --> 00:16:38,640
Speaker 1: you had the national team buying, then maybe you would

300
00:16:38,640 --> 00:16:40,560
Speaker 1: have something more to talk about. Villain. Thank you for

301
00:16:40,640 --> 00:17:00,840
Speaker 1: joining us film selves from HSBC. We are joined by

302
00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:06,040
Speaker 1: Taro Kimura Bloomberg Japan economists with us in our Tokyo studios.

303
00:17:06,600 --> 00:17:09,159
Speaker 1: Tara Kumura, Thanks very much for joining us. You know,

304
00:17:09,240 --> 00:17:12,280
Speaker 1: are we likely to see an adjudgment made by the

305
00:17:12,280 --> 00:17:15,720
Speaker 1: bo J as a result of what these numbers will

306
00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:16,320
Speaker 1: likely say?

307
00:17:17,560 --> 00:17:20,679
Speaker 5: Hi, thanks for having me. I think it's likely to

308
00:17:21,119 --> 00:17:24,840
Speaker 5: It's it's a high probability, I will say, although it's

309
00:17:24,880 --> 00:17:27,880
Speaker 5: not my baseline, but the march is moved the next week.

310
00:17:27,920 --> 00:17:31,520
Speaker 5: Moves by the BOJ is plausible in a sense that

311
00:17:31,840 --> 00:17:34,920
Speaker 5: like the media reports are saying that the BOJ board

312
00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:39,080
Speaker 5: is moulleling based on what we see on the trade

313
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:44,600
Speaker 5: unions agreed pay raises, and I think the race growth

314
00:17:44,760 --> 00:17:48,480
Speaker 5: was what was long being missing piece for the BOJ

315
00:17:49,240 --> 00:17:52,879
Speaker 5: that renders them to continue easy monetary policy. They stimulated

316
00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:56,560
Speaker 5: the economy, but waste growth was very wobily, but finally

317
00:17:57,560 --> 00:18:02,119
Speaker 5: pushed up by recent inflation. It's became a wake up

318
00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:07,360
Speaker 5: call for the labor unions to restart requesting strong pay rises,

319
00:18:07,400 --> 00:18:10,760
Speaker 5: which they hadn't done for many years. And that's making

320
00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:14,320
Speaker 5: a kind of upbeat note in the spring waste negotiations.

321
00:18:14,359 --> 00:18:18,440
Speaker 5: And that's if we see a positive number, the strong

322
00:18:18,520 --> 00:18:21,080
Speaker 5: number in a grid rage rasis that pushes the WOH

323
00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:21,600
Speaker 5: to move.

324
00:18:22,160 --> 00:18:25,240
Speaker 2: So there I understand it. I'm maybe going to oversimplify

325
00:18:25,400 --> 00:18:28,159
Speaker 2: three basic threads to the policy right now. There's the

326
00:18:28,200 --> 00:18:31,960
Speaker 2: purchases of the ETFs, there's yield curve control, and there's

327
00:18:32,040 --> 00:18:35,040
Speaker 2: the negative policy rate. If you had to kind of

328
00:18:35,520 --> 00:18:39,840
Speaker 2: predict a sequencing of changes in each one of those,

329
00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:42,160
Speaker 2: what would it look like. Do you begin to dial

330
00:18:42,240 --> 00:18:45,720
Speaker 2: back on your ETF purchases initially? Do you change the

331
00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:49,840
Speaker 2: policy from a negative ten basis points to let's say

332
00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:52,280
Speaker 2: zero percent? Is that the next step and then the

333
00:18:52,359 --> 00:18:55,159
Speaker 2: last step is yield curve control or I'm curious what

334
00:18:55,359 --> 00:18:56,760
Speaker 2: would the sequencing look like?

335
00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:02,800
Speaker 5: In my view? Whenever the bo J's move is gonna be,

336
00:19:03,760 --> 00:19:07,600
Speaker 5: I think the BOJ will and all of this stuff

337
00:19:07,840 --> 00:19:12,600
Speaker 5: at this u uh simultaneously, meaning and negative rates rates

338
00:19:12,640 --> 00:19:16,320
Speaker 5: and also and youth curve control and stop purchasing ETFs

339
00:19:16,600 --> 00:19:21,760
Speaker 5: because it's a package that was introduced by previous governor Krouda,

340
00:19:22,280 --> 00:19:25,280
Speaker 5: and I think where the new governor Kazu Weda was

341
00:19:25,280 --> 00:19:28,560
Speaker 5: seeking a timing to pivot from those policy packages. That

342
00:19:28,600 --> 00:19:31,360
Speaker 5: doesn't mean that like the Bank of Japan suddenly become

343
00:19:31,400 --> 00:19:35,600
Speaker 5: aggressive and stop purchasing JGB at all. UH. Probably they

344
00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:39,600
Speaker 5: will end the youth curve control UH the package itself,

345
00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:43,880
Speaker 5: but I think they will keep continue some measures UH

346
00:19:43,920 --> 00:19:48,240
Speaker 5: to purchase Japanese government bonds so that the long term

347
00:19:48,240 --> 00:19:52,200
Speaker 5: meals UH wasn't suddenly right Sharply.

348
00:19:53,240 --> 00:19:56,120
Speaker 1: Do you think they we'll see capital abroad come back

349
00:19:56,160 --> 00:19:58,840
Speaker 1: to Japan or do you think things will stay pretty

350
00:19:58,880 --> 00:19:59,560
Speaker 1: much the same.

351
00:20:00,440 --> 00:20:04,080
Speaker 5: I think it depends on how the BOH will communicate

352
00:20:04,560 --> 00:20:11,879
Speaker 5: on the policy after ending negative interest rates. So in

353
00:20:11,920 --> 00:20:14,840
Speaker 5: my view, if the Bank of Japan moves next week,

354
00:20:15,160 --> 00:20:18,040
Speaker 5: that means from an economists point of view, still the

355
00:20:18,080 --> 00:20:21,359
Speaker 5: prices are globally and information they get whether there is

356
00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:25,359
Speaker 5: actually secured two percent inflation steadily, it's still kind of

357
00:20:25,400 --> 00:20:28,520
Speaker 5: not enough. That means that speaks to me that the

358
00:20:28,680 --> 00:20:33,960
Speaker 5: Bank of Japan Policy Board is tilting towards normalization instead

359
00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:38,840
Speaker 5: of purely pursuing steady two percent inflation because recent readings

360
00:20:38,840 --> 00:20:42,280
Speaker 5: by about consumption or CPI is actually weak. So that

361
00:20:42,359 --> 00:20:46,000
Speaker 5: speaks to me, if they move next week, it means

362
00:20:46,040 --> 00:20:49,280
Speaker 5: they move in haste, and that means their will to

363
00:20:49,359 --> 00:20:52,720
Speaker 5: normalize policy is strong. So that will end up probably

364
00:20:52,960 --> 00:20:56,199
Speaker 5: not just ending negative interest rate policy, and probably they

365
00:20:56,240 --> 00:21:00,600
Speaker 5: will move to gradual rate hikes once or twice this year.

366
00:21:00,760 --> 00:21:03,600
Speaker 5: That means the weight will raise in Japan, and probably

367
00:21:03,640 --> 00:21:07,800
Speaker 5: we will see some unwind of Yan carry trade, and yes,

368
00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:10,560
Speaker 5: the investment to Japan may come back.

369
00:21:10,840 --> 00:21:13,280
Speaker 2: Maybe we can move away from the theoretical for the

370
00:21:13,280 --> 00:21:16,040
Speaker 2: moment and get into the practical. And you can, as

371
00:21:16,119 --> 00:21:19,880
Speaker 2: a as a resident of the Japanese capital, describe for

372
00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:25,000
Speaker 2: us what the actual effect of inflation is right now,

373
00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:27,760
Speaker 2: and the average consumer in Japan, how is it showing up?

374
00:21:27,840 --> 00:21:31,760
Speaker 2: What is it like living there when inflation is now

375
00:21:31,840 --> 00:21:34,440
Speaker 2: after three decades beginning to occur.

376
00:21:35,119 --> 00:21:40,000
Speaker 5: Right So basically like me growing up in Japan, I

377
00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:45,320
Speaker 5: learned the concept of inflation in college from macroeconomics textbook,

378
00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:48,840
Speaker 5: and before that I was even aware. I wasn't even

379
00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:52,440
Speaker 5: aware that the price of a certain thing could change

380
00:21:53,040 --> 00:21:58,359
Speaker 5: without its intrinsic value moving. So I think it's like

381
00:21:58,440 --> 00:22:02,280
Speaker 5: for one generation people didn't see inflation, and finally they

382
00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:07,000
Speaker 5: tangibly recognized, oh, that's the inflation. And probably that's making

383
00:22:07,000 --> 00:22:10,320
Speaker 5: a difference in the waste negotiation process and also in

384
00:22:10,400 --> 00:22:13,880
Speaker 5: the deflation. It's optimal for Japanese people to put your

385
00:22:13,920 --> 00:22:18,879
Speaker 5: cash in the bank's deposit, but faced with inflation, including me,

386
00:22:19,280 --> 00:22:23,840
Speaker 5: they probably the individuals have to reconsider about their asset

387
00:22:23,920 --> 00:22:27,480
Speaker 5: management strategies. So Japan is kind of known as people

388
00:22:27,480 --> 00:22:31,159
Speaker 5: are reluctant to invest in stocks because it used to

389
00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:34,400
Speaker 5: be something that just declines. But now things are changing

390
00:22:34,480 --> 00:22:39,080
Speaker 5: and probably the household investments towards asset or other stocks

391
00:22:39,119 --> 00:22:44,800
Speaker 5: or other assets may become some factors that strengthen picking

392
00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:46,440
Speaker 5: up of the acid prices in Japan.

393
00:22:47,640 --> 00:22:50,480
Speaker 1: Tara, thanks very much for joining us. Taro Kumura, Bloomberg

394
00:22:50,520 --> 00:22:53,159
Speaker 1: Japan economists so refreshing. An economists too. Used to be

395
00:22:53,160 --> 00:22:57,120
Speaker 1: at the Bank of Japan now with Bloomberg who had

396
00:22:57,119 --> 00:22:59,320
Speaker 1: a great little anecdote there that he had to learn

397
00:22:59,320 --> 00:23:02,919
Speaker 1: about inflation from the textbooks. Unbelievable and it's so cool.

398
00:23:11,600 --> 00:23:14,520
Speaker 2: This has been the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast, bringing you

399
00:23:14,600 --> 00:23:17,720
Speaker 2: the stories making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific.

400
00:23:18,200 --> 00:23:21,320
Speaker 2: Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to get more

401
00:23:21,359 --> 00:23:24,960
Speaker 2: episodes of this and other shows from Bloomberg. Subscribe to

402
00:23:25,000 --> 00:23:28,800
Speaker 2: the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen

403
00:23:28,880 --> 00:23:32,000
Speaker 2: and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the

404
00:23:32,000 --> 00:23:33,080
Speaker 2: Bloomberg Business app.