WEBVTT - Open Marriages with Eli J. Finkel, Steve Hernandez, and Julia Loken

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>My name is Alex, and I have more than one partner.

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Nor no all right, will be all right soever? No

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>be al alright, no Molly all right ever. I was

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>raised in a family that, you know, my mom my

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>dad were always together and it was always just kind

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of like super monogamous and uh, and I kind of

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>picked up that same spirit. But when we were researching

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this episode, UM, there's a lot of really cool ideas

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of came to my mind. The same way

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that people might have a spouse or a sexual partner,

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:44.959
<v Speaker 1>they might also have a best friend or a friend

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>they play video games with, or a friend that they

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>do certain activities with. And it started making me think

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>about kind of the purpose for people in your lives.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's why really was so excited to do this episode, UM,

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>expanding kind of what relationships are in what they mean. So,

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>while I have a girlfriend and I am a very

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>monogamous minded person, I was so excited to kind of

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>hear the reasoning and the um experience in life experience

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>behind people who have different types of relationships. UM. And

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so this isn't really a story time because this is

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>something that I'm really here to learn with you guys.

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Usually I have a real nice, long story about my

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>experience in the field, but today I'm gonna let my

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>guests do the talking. So this just got me thinking,

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is one partner enough? And what's it like to actually

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have more than one partner? What's up, y'all? It's Alex

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>i oo here, this is my podcast. Let's get into

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it where we get into everything, especially things that I

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have no experience on. And today we're talking about O

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>S O S. You're gonna hear that a lot in

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>today's episode. It stands for other significant others. Like I

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>said in my story, I don't have a lot of

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>experience in this. I'm actually really excited to learn more,

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>more and more about it. And I'm gonna be learning

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>from not one, not two, which is our normal number,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>but three amazing guests. Uh and I want to introduce

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you to them right now. First up, we have a

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 1>stand up comedian who's also the host of several podcasts,

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>including The Male Gaze and Who's Your God. He's also

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>been featured on Comedy Central and was a field correspondent

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for I Love You America with Sarah Silverman. The one

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>and Only Steve Hernandez. What's up? Man, Hey all, that's

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>great to be here. Thanks for having you. Are fortunate

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to actually have a real personal connection to another

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>one of our guests. She is a Los Angeles based

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>comedian host of What's Your Sign, a comedy astrology podcast.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>She's also been featured in Nylon, Bustle, The New York Times,

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Women's health magazine, Vogue, and Cosmopolitan. Julia Lokan, how are you?

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm good? Thank you so much for having me. You

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>guys got a petty I mean combined. We're gonna get

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>into your relationship in general, but just pedigree alone. You

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>guys got just a full gamut of success, solid, solid credits. Uh.

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>And on top of those credits that you guys share,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we have one more guest with us. The author of

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>the best selling book The All Or Nothing Marriage, How

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the Best Marriages Work, professor at Northwestern University, as well

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 1>as a social scientists studying romantic relationships. He's published over

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fIF Geez, Louise, I'm looking at this. This

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is crazy, how much how much work has been done

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>amongst my three guests. He's published over a hundred and

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>fifties scientific papers and as a contributor to the op

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ed page of the New York Times. Eli Finkel, how

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>are you, Eli? I'm doing well. I'm excited to be here.

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Not only am I intimidated, but I'm very excited to

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to learn about about this topic about open relationships and

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>other significant others. First up, Steve and Julia, You guys

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and myself are going to be talking about opening up

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>your first hand experience in relationships that I can't speak

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on UH. And then we're gonna take a break and

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna come back, and Eli, you and I are

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be talking about the complications of UH and

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the intricate I would say intricacies more than complications of

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>different types of relationships. And then, last, but not least,

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we got we're talking love hacks and it's gonna be

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>all four of us and we're just gonna be figuring

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>out how the best relationships work. Well. Um, but before

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we get into that, I have a question that I

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>ask all of my guests, and it's pretty simple question.

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>It is, what have you been doing this week to

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>improve yourself? Julia, you seem like you have an answer

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for us. I do. I have lots of answers. I've

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>adopted like a real uh mantra for the year. Not

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a resolution per se, but something that I'm constantly kind

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of trying to do, which is systems not stories. So

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I make up a lot of like negative

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>self talk stories that end up persisting problems instead of

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>solving them. So I'm trying to come up with like, Okay,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been posting enough on social media. So instead

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of thinking like, oh, I'm bad at that, I'm going

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to create a schedule for myself and say, like Monday,

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I need to post this thing. Tuesday, I need to

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>do this. Um, I've been feeling bad physically, and so

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I did yoga today. That's another one where I was like,

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a system over a story, instead of making up

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a story about how I'm a terrible person who doesn't

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>take care of themselves. My friend was teaching a yoga

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>class and I took that yoga class. I like that

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>systems over stories. That's a I've never even heard of

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that before, but that makes so much sense as you

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>explained it. I love that. I love that, Uh, Steve,

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you got something for us. Yeah, I've got a few things.

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think in the middle of this pandemic and everything,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>especially it goes on longer and longer. I've been making

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.559
<v Speaker 1>it a real habit to reach out when I start

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to feel bad, when I start to feel anxious or depressed. So, uh,

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not only have been I've been making phone calls to

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>my friends with especially I think as a as a man,

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>men don't typically do this kind of thing, but I

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have been making phone calls. But twice this week I

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>met my friends out socially distanced over at the Silver

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Lake Reservoir and we went for a two a walk.

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But we're able to talk for half an hour and

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>then go, you know, on the two or three mile walk.

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It takes about an hour. And you know, no matter

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>what anyone says, any kind of thing, just moving your

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>body and seeing a friend because we can't do that anymore.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It energizes you and makes you feel so good. And

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're feeling hopeless or anxious or depressed even a

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit, remembering that you're not in the Salona, that

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>people love you in this world. It's been. It's it's

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it's changed the way I feel completely. Man. I love that,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>especially because, like you mentioned in the pandemic, it's really taken. Um.

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>We've had episodes about it where anybody who has mental

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>illness who's already kind of known about it and has

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>been dealing with it, it's taken a hit and a

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are also now realizing um kind of

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the daily struggles. We just recorded an episode about about

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>anxiety and how some of anxiety is built into everybody

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and some of it, especially in times like this, can

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>really flare up. And so I think that's a great

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>idea reaching out as huge. I started seeing a therapist

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic. It was the first time that I

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>decided to actually like reach out, reach out, and so

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that that was your answer makes me very

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>very happy. My friend, um Eli, how about you? What

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>are you been doing this week to improve yourself? Well,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the new academic term started this quarter and I'm teaching

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>my undergraduate course on relationships science, the field where you

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>use data to try to figure out what works and relationships.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And I've been studying this stuff for over twenty years now,

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>but I decided to do a significant overhaul on the course,

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>especially because it's the first time I've ever taught several

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred people on zoom and it has been a blast.

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing a lot more work than necessary, and

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly paying off so far. I don't even know

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if I fully understand what you just said. But we're

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna unpack. We're gonna unpack all of it. Um Uh.

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like taking a course on on how successful

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>relationships work. Probably is something that we should all do,

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we're here today talking about it. Um,

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we've got I'm just hyped today. We have such good energy.

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's get straight into it. Steve and Julia, let's

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>get into talking. Eli. I'll be with you in just

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a sex you can sit tight. First off, you guys

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>just got married. Congratulations, Thank you? How was? How was?

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>What's a wedding like in in pandemic mode? What it

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>would take me down? Take me down the road? Well,

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a real uh. I think it's like most things

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in in pandemic boat, it's a very much an exercise

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and surrender and being being okay with what you can

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and can't control in those kinds of things. Um, we

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>went to Vegas and we're going to try to have

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a really small, intimate kind of family only ceremony in

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>person thing, you know, obviously taking into account everything that

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>was going on. Um. But as the numbers, particular here

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in l A got worse and worse, it just became

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 1>apparent that that was not going to be an option. Um,

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but we still wanted to get married in it felt

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like a it's like a good way to kind of

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>wrap up a shitty year, and we wanted to be

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>married ads. So we decided to go to Vegas, which

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big Vegas person, and having like, uh, not

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a shotgun Vegas wedding, but some kind of like quicky

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Vegas wedding is like, uh a thing that I thought

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>would be fun um. And it was very funny. It

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was like I mean not it was very special and

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>romantic and sweet too, but it's just it was a

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>really surreal you know, being in Vegas during your pandemic.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you like I it just hit me on

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot more levels than I was expecting because you're

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing people. It was a weird thing to see people

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>still kind of out acting like it's not a pandemic

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and all of the things that come with that. But

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>it was also a really great I think, like I said,

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>exercise and surrender of really being like that what's important

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>about this isn't all of the other things like we

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>wore Dodger jerseys and we got our rings when we

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>were there and all of these things that it's like

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it was special because it was us getting married and

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>professing our love to each other and doing this thing.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't what we were wearing or any of those things.

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So it was a real like put your money where

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>your mouth is kind of exercise for me. I think. Ah,

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And how long have you guys been together? Exactly? Six

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>years here? Six years? Six years? And so was there

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>any part of you guys that I know you had

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned you wanted to wait. Seemed like of great time

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to to make something good out of the year. But

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>was there any part of you guys that said, hey,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we should just wait until it's until pandemics over so

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we can have the family and the party and the

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and the whole nine. I mean, we're still going to

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. That's that's the only reason. Julian her wedding dress,

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>she has like a nice wedding dress and everything. We're

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>still going to do that, God willing at in New

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Year's Eve next year. Everyone will be okay. By then,

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it'll be safe. But yeah, so we did it because

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I just I didn't want to call this. We only

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>got engaged in early November. I just I didn't want

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to call her fiance. For a whole year we lived

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>together already. She's been my wife in my heart for

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a while now, so it's just felt silly to me.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I'm not gonna I was a little

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>cautious because I felt bad about going to Vegas. But

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>we went. We spent the night in a hotel and

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>then our appointment was at twelve thirty pm, and then

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we got the heck out of Vegas. So I think

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>there was just that thing. It was funny because we're like,

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>let's go, let's do what. I wanted this to be official,

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and we did it. And then when we get to

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>this little white chapel and this uh, super sweet, hilarious

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>little Filipino woman in a glittery like bow tie was

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>marrying us. And then she she was really great because

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>she but she was rushing us too. She's like all right, now,

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>walked down the aisle and she ran up front and

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>press play on the CD player and the song played,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and then she's like say something sweet to her, say

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it from your heart. And then I look into Julia's

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>face and as fun as this, and I was like,

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 1>this is just to make it official, but the real

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 1>weddings next year. When I looked in her face, I

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>was I was like, surprised at how moved I was.

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I was like, okay, the real weddings next year. But

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>also I can't believe this. We're really getting married and

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>then absolutely nobody in the world that I would rather

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be partnered with them, this perfect woman right here. So

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised at how how much emotion and how

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>much is still right there and that thing that we

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>want to do to be fun and to make it

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>official with paperwork, but I was surprised at how swelled

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I was with emotion. She was like, speak from your

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>heart and you gotta believe me, Alex, I've got like

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the sickest like of I was already written in my head,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>but so I didn't want to waste it in Vegas.

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So I was just like mm, I just said like

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>very simple things, but also looking to joy his face,

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I'm so happy that we're here right

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>now doing this because I'm so excited to be partnered

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>up with them. My my heart is absolutely just overflowing

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. And I said, I'm actually so glad you

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>guys said that too, because and I don't and I

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and I really hope that nothing that I say is

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>taken for anything other than me really being excited about

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>learning about other types of relationships. But I'm so glad

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that you started with that because your relationship isn't uh

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily the I don't. I don't even know

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like a traditional relation. I don't know how, but maybe

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it's more traditional. We're gonna learn. But um, I want

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to get this right, Steve. You are open and Julia

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is not open. Is that correct? Yeah? I would say

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>that I identify as non monogamous, polyamorous, and Julia at

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>this point does not, So yeah, I would say that's

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>fair to say. So I would love to to just

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>break that down and conventional that's the word I was

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking of earlier. But I want to break

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that down because I'm so glad that you started with

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>how how loving and incredible, even if it was in Vegas.

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad you talked about how rich your love

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is because I think a common misconception, including a misconception

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that I had for the longest time until I actually

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.599
<v Speaker 1>made friends with somebody a few years back who was

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in an open relationship and kind of schooled me a

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit. A common misconception with an open relationship is

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>this whole like, well, they're not really. It's just they're

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>like into each other, but they're not that into each other,

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>but they don't want to not be with each other. Like.

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of misconceptions, and so I'm glad that

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>we're here um talking about and unwrapping it. Um. But first,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the nitty gritty of that, I'd

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>like to take it all the way back to kind

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of the early stages of your guys relationship, Julia. On

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>your end, what was that conversation, Like, at what point

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>did you guys have the conversation of being polyamorous or

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>or monogamous? And you know, were you guys already in love?

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Was it right at the beginning on the first date?

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Walk me through that. Well, we're both um, stand up comedians,

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and that means that we uh, I guess thankful. I

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I don't know if thankfully it is the

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>right word, but I think I think thankfully. I mean

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we could do it any other way. Um,

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but I these are things that I knew about Steve

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>before we were in a relationship together, because you talk

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>about yourself in your material, so I was aware that

0:14:55.960 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>he had been in previous, um, non monogamous relationships, and

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:04.359
<v Speaker 1>when we got together, it wasn't necessarily like an explicit

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation that we had, but I do feel like it

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>was something that I knew was part of him and

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>part of his baggage so to speak, that was coming

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>with or like just part of who he is, and

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that that was something that would likely come up and

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>then um, but it wasn't, uh, you know. I feel

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like it was more of a thing of like, yes,

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I'm aware of, will kind of cross

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that bridge when we get to it, because I think, uh,

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't something that was happening when we were first together,

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>but as obviously we've been together longer, there's been just different,

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, different conversations about it at different points, sometimes

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>around like is this something that you um can be

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>okay with? Is kind of the I guess the main

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>question that would come up at different points as we

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>got further along in our relationship. So the thing that

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested in earning about especially with you. I,

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I mentioned, I have made friends with people who

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>are in open relationships, but I've never made friends with

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's in a I guess partially open relationship. I

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's the proper term for it. Can

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you talk about your choice to be partially open and

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>why that was still important to you to remain monogamous

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>even though you were entering this relationship. It's something for

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>me that's just not a thing right now. I can't

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>say how I'm going to feel, you know, further down

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the line. And I think that's kind of my feeling

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>about the whole thing in general, is more just like

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not really an issue for me, not not the

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>practice in and of itself, but I mean the the

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to me. I don't I'm not like struggling with monogamy

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>or anything. I don't. I don't necessarily think that that's

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>always going to be the case or whatever, but I mean,

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>especially literally right now, in the pandemic and whatnot, Like

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm certainly certainly not open, but I think

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>it's less. I think it's more just like a to

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>each their own kind of thing, So it's not necessarily

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a decided I am monogamous. He is not kind of thing.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It's more just like, if this is what you need

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to do, this is what you do, I don't need

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to do that at the time. There may again, like

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 1>I said, there may come a time in the future

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>when I when I would like to, And at that point,

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be really grateful that I'm with a

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>partner who is open to those ideas and having those discussions,

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think that that more than anything, I think

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>being able to talk about it and being able to

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>hold the idea of evaluating is this working for me

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>versus these are the ways that this is supposed to go.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Um is the most important thing I think for anybody,

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>whether you're in a monogamous relationship or a non monogamous relationship, whatever,

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever kind of even casual dating sort of thing, if

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>if the core thing for all of those things is

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>figuring out what actually works for you and makes you

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>feel happy and fulfilled and like you are showing up

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in the most hole and complete kind of way. Oh man,

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing, is like I really have since

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 1>you guys started speaking on your relationship, I'm like, wow, again,

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's common misconceptions by by monogamous people. They

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>ask questions that are probably very very annoying to be asked,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>and they and they um, and they view things in

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>a different way where it's I think it's very label

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>based and it's like, well, if you're in a relationship,

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>then it means this and it has to mean that.

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And what you mentioned is like, look, at the end

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>of the day, you're with somebody who's just so open

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>minded that says, hey, if your heart desires something and

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>you need to follow your heart, then like you go

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>after it. Steve, I want to switch it over to

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit. I have not heard the your comedy, UM,

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>your comedy routines that involve talking about your maybe your

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>reasoning behind being polyamorous. But can you talk me through

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of what led you to that um that answer

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that was something at you that you desired. Um, I

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's something I got into with my ex. I've

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for about fifteen years and I was

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>married previously, we were open. That wasn't the reason why

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we ended. We ended because I started doing comedy, which

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is a terrible life. I wouldn't I wouldn't put it

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>on anybody I really do. I feel bad about it

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>with my ex wife that I started comedy after we

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>got married, and it was really like the worst thing

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you could put on someone but her. Her and I

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>were open as well. Uh we stumbled into it. Uh um,

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we stumbled into it. We started doing all

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the other things. And then when I was married, I

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>was like a regular kind of anybody who would identify

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>as polyamorous. All the kind of things you've heard are

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>are like the scummy jokes or whatever. I was like

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the guy who was trying to, like ten years ago,

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years ago, I was trying to talk everyone into it,

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like this is like the best lifestyle for everyone. Everyone

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to think this way. It is like that. I

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>now understand that that's absolutely not the case, and and

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that my how I define it as constantly evolving as well.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I really love relationships and I really love people, and

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, ultimately, I want each relationship to be what

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it what it can be, and if that includes physicalness,

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. If it's a romantic relationship without touching, I

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>would like it to be that kind of a thing too.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I understand most people have a hard time just finding

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>one partner so I know how greedy it looks for

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>me to say I want like more than this perfect person.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people would be like you, piece of ship

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you got, Julie, You've got the perfect person, and you

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>still want more, And it's like I don't. I mean, yes,

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>absolutely that's the case. I want the most out of life,

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and I want all my relationships to be authentically what

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>both people want them to be. All makes sense, I

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that's and and that's why I want

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to walk into this next question kind of as if

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not as a curiosity, but you the way that you

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>just explained it. Um, I think of a pretty common

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>question that would be asked is like, isn't isn't an

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>open relationship just basically like free pass to cheat? But

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the way that you explained it, it kind of feels

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot more ethical then then then the free pass

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the cheat type of things. So can you explain to

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>me how how you differentiated that and knowing like you mentioned,

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of like people who kind of mask

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>an open relationship with just not necessarily being able to

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>be faithful to one person and so they just kind

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of go off. Can you explain to me the difference

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>between the two of those things. Well, yeah, I can't.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I can only tell you about my own journey. And

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>there was a time when I was married previously, I

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>remember like looking for people to hook up with. UM.

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't really do that anymore. It's become more of

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.479
<v Speaker 1>a philosophical thing for me. I very much want to

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>honor our relationship. UM. I do know. Sometimes I di

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>did somebody last year for about ten months, three months

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>for the pandemic, and then kind of that seeped into

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. We ended up having to end it because

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we just couldn't really see each other that much too.

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>It got But when I was dating that person, uh,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>with Julia, I would tell her, you know, I'm gonna

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>see this person this day, or I'm gonna go call

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>her in the other room. And Julia would be okay

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>with it sometimes and sometimes she you could tell that

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it bothered her. And so for me, I I know

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>understand why it bothers her, because I think society and

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>how we view romance has put so much weight on

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the romantic relationship that she's bound to think that I'm

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not enough for this person. So I understand that. UM,

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And those times I would come back and we would

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>talk for a couple of hours or an hour, and

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>then she would be okay and so um to me,

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to live the fullest life I can live.

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I I want Julia to be happy, but I do

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>know what she feels hurt and stuff like that that

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it's based on stuff that I don't believe, and I

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>don't think she really leaves. And I mean, the newest

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>thing for me in the past year or two is

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I really want the people that I date or sleep

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>with to be happy and whole too. There's been a

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that will agree to something like this,

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>but I know ultimately they don't understand what they're signing

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>up for that they end up falling in love, they

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>end up wanting this other thing. And so the older

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I get, the longer I do it, the more I

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>understand to ethically do this where everybody involved is gonna

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be happy and their expectations are gonna be mad. I

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>think that it becomes a more rare and more rare opportunity.

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'm so glad the foundation of this is laid

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>because I do believe I'm gonna be able to have

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>those two or three other people in my life in

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty years where they're gonna be like different

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>kinds of soul mates, like great friends that I happen

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to be able to have sex with and kiss sometimes.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But to me, it's all about intimacy and it's all

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>about being honest and open about all of those things,

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>so that nobody old deceived or taking advantage of. You

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>had mentioned that, you know, you had said sometimes you

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>call and if it's in the other room, you always

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>give it the heads up. Are there and this is

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm bringing Julia. You're back. You're back in the conversation.

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? Are there any you guys have specific rules?

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm really I'm truly curious. Is it something that you

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>set ground rules ahead of time? Um? Was there anything specifically,

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Julia that you said, Hey, I really want to know

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>these things. I don't want to know these things. What

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of the ground rules? I think at

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>first I definitely had more of a like I don't

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>want to know kind of position. But the more that

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>things unfolded, the more I was like, well, I need

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to know, like a little bit only for the sake

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of I think it's like a protective thing for sure.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But then, um, you know, you talked about doing an

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>episode on anxiety. I think a lot of times your

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>mind can come up with way more complicated Uh. You know,

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a story mind, storyteller. That's why I need that

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>mantre for me. That it's easier to to have someone say, Okay,

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to this person. Uh, like you just some

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>some things I don't need to know, like details, but

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's so funny. We're best friends too, so

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>even this last person for instance, which I would say

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's our our whole relationship. Maybe we had a donuss

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>don't tell thing, but we really didn't. We spend We're

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>both comics, so we spent so much time together. There

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there's things here and there that I would do.

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>But this is the first person I would say that

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I dated. We're together, and it felt so funny because

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>she's my best friend and we talked about everything all

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the time, and so she was like, at first, I

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 1>don't wanna, I don't want to hear about any of this,

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, okay, but you know, I'm sitting

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>here and I have a French I'm like, have a

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>different super thing that I'm excited about, or that I

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have issues with our problems with and I'm like, I

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>can't believe I can't talk to my best friend about

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And so I think at some point I

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>did start that was something we talked about, and I

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>did start talking about it and maybe problems I was

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>having or issues or these things coming up. And I

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 1>do think that did calm you down a little bit, right, Yeah,

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 1>I think it helps because I think that's what I

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>mean where I'm like, I think in your mind, you

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>think it helps you to not know, And me for

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>me saying I don't want to know, um uh, I think,

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like I said, is definitely a protective thing. But I

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>think also for me it was really important to try

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 1>my best to not have my own preconceptions or judgments

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>influence his experience with this other person too, because as

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>much as you know I have, I'm very aware that

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>even though we're literally talking about monogamy, there are these

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>same kinds of issues for relationships. In any kind of thing.

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You could replace this with someone who has like a

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is super into sports or whatever, like, there's always going

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to be things that that are potential things for disconnection

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or potential things for you to have problems with that

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you that are bringing up personal triggers for you that

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you project onto that other person. And I going into this,

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to be very clear that, like, I'm going

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to take responsibity for whatever comes up for me and

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.679
<v Speaker 1>know that it's coming up because of these things, but

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>it is not a causal thing necessarily that like he

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is doing this to me to hurt me, Like this

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is what comes up for me is my fear of

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>abandonment when you go when you go and do something

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>without me, I get afraid that you're gonna leave me.

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that that thing isn't like that. I'm

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>not entitled to those feelings, but I'm able to understand

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that I am. I am not feeling that because he's

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>doing that. I'm feeling that because I have that fear

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>inside of me, and that might come again. That's what

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean and saying like for someone else, that same

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>fear of abandonment might come up when someone goes to

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the gym too much or whatever. Like there's it's it

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to literally be seeing another person, but because

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it is seeing another person, I do think it kind

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of accelerates those things for you to to deal with them.

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>A little bit more quickly. Um, but sorry, I went

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>off on a tear. Uh. The like the knowing stuff.

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>I think it does put your mind at because then

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you're just hearing again. You're you're allowing whatever whatever things

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>are coming up for you are kind of creating worst

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>case scenario sorts of things. So hearing about a person,

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it reminds you that they're a person. It reminds you

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's not like a boogeyman, uh, you know, like

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>evil some somewhat saboteur coming to destroy you and your

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>relationships and all of those kinds of things. So I

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>think that it's still a fine line and it's it's

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's up to you, the person on the receiving end

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>will say to kind of be making sure that you

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are sifting through and saying, like, what's something that can

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>be a practical ask of Like I said at one point, like, hey,

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>could you do your best to like make these calls

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>when I'm not here because I feel like a creep

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>having a sit in the other rooms. Like you know,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're gonna do this, but could you

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>please that's like a practical ask versus like when you're

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>doing this, it's hurt, you know whatever, Like those are things,

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what's what is okay to ask and what's not? Again,

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like systems versus the story. There we go, systems versus

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>stories coming back. It's really it really is and and

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and I hope this is taken as a compliment. It's

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>really cool hearing how like you guys are the most

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>stable relationship I think I've ever seen, and it and

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes off of something that I think a lot

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of people either view as as different or maybe you know,

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>all all different opinions, and it's and it's really cool

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>just seeing how something that um that is so different

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>than the way that I choose to express my love

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is still so stable and so comfortable. And it reminds

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>me of my own relationships that I've had, and especially

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the relationship I'm in now that is so focused on

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>making each other happy and also making ourselves happy. So

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's awesome. You've already expressed and this is

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>my last question before we take a break. Um, you've

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>already expressed kind of the ways that it can get

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>complicated or the anxieties about it, or um any of

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the problems that can come up. But what ways is

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>as the relationship become better in this, in this partially

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>open relationship. I am so in love with her. It

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>makes me so like, I feel so blessed and so

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>happy that someone would allow me to be myself in

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this way because because I don't you know, she she

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>called it baggage. Really, I know she didn't mean it

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, but you know, going into it, this is

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of just how I am. And I know this

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is how I work best, and that I personally, uh

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't feel comfortable with the idea of monogamy, even just philosophically.

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>It bothers me. So I love that she allows me

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to intellectually express this stuff, and you know that I'm

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>able to go out like this, and I mean, it's

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>just I just don't think it's gonna I feel so

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>bad because she's all over my instagram. Alex you gotta

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>see this instagram, but she's all over it, and I

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.479
<v Speaker 1>almost feel so bad because I'm so in love with her.

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It's so obvious that I'm in love with her that

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I almost don't want to see anyone else ever, because

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I gotta rub it in, I gotta rub

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it in their face how much I love my wife,

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and I like an asshole. I do feel so free

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and able to come home and have this person is

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.239
<v Speaker 1>my home base and that accepts me and knows me,

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>loves me unconditionally. To me, it is so freeing, and

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm just I feel blessed. Yeah, I mean

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that, like I said, there's nothing about it

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>philosophically that I disagree with. To me, my my hesitations

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>with with non monogamy open relationships is to me more

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>about efficiency and effectiveness, and I think that it's a

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that's that Like you said, there's a there are complications,

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>there are things like that, and it's not so much

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that I have no philosophical disagreements. It's more in the

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>practice being in a non monogamous relationship. It also is

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>held up a mirror in ways, like I've been saying,

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, even if it's not in our relationship,

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>are there other areas of my life where I'm not

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>being open in a way that I could be? Am?

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I am? I also like putting up barriers to connection

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in other ways. Maybe that that can mean literally in relationships,

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.719
<v Speaker 1>but also I think it's really forced me to um

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>not forced, but forced in a lot of ways to

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>uh like sped up. That's why I mean, I don't

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>mean it like aggressively for but like like accelerated things

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to where I think, again, you can get mushier of like,

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>oh is this I could have I could have done

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this like abandonment thing or self worth kind of thing.

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I could have projected that onto any number of things

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>or and that's a problem that could have persisted for

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of years. But because again we're like dealing

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with it so immediately and so literally, I think it's

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>really made me kind of um have to show up

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for myself in a lot of ways, and and um

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really happy for and really grateful for. And

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm grateful to have a partner who also like asks

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that of me and and wants me to be the

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>fullest expression of who I am and the most kind

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of like honest, authentic someone who's like growing and challenging

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>them selves and isn't going isn't going to let me

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>off not growing and and addressing things because it's for

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it's because it's good, not not in a way because

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh you need to do this, but in

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a way where it's like these are this is going

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to help you as a person. I'm like, I'm literally like,

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>my heart is so warm right now. You guys are

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>really it's really I'm so grateful that you guys are

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>here just to want to expand my knowledge on this

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>situation or on this um on this topic. And also

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just too, I think we need more love, Like we

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>need more love in the world right now, and so

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>getting to hear it from other people and like here

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>people profess their love for each other, it's just so

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it's so amazing. Um, we're gonna take a quick break

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, I'm gonna be speaking with Eli

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>about it's complicated, don't go anywhere. All right, we are back.

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>This is let's get into it. And I have the

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>one and only Eli Finkel, professor at Northwestern also the

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>author of the All or Nothing may Ridge. Eli. We

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just you. You just got to listen to me speaking

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>with Um with Steve and Julia, and uh, it just

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it just felt my I'm like, I'm so excited to

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>speak with you on on the actual kind of I

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know scientific background of a relationship like that, but um,

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>how how common are our relationships like that outside of monogamy. Well,

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about non monogamous relationships in particular, I mean,

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 1>they certainly go back at least till biblical times, and certainly, uh,

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, beyond that. Um, if you're talking about the

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of non monogamous relationship that Steve and Julia have,

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that's of the now, Um. The language that surrounds it

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>with authenticity and growth and living a full and honest

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>life like that. That's the language of America and the

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty one century more than it is the language of

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, King David. Yeah, and you and you talk

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how right now it's a lot different

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>than the way it used to be. Society now tells

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>us that we fall in love and the person that

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we choose has to be everything. It's got to be

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the place you find happiness, the place you go on adventure,

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is the place you have sex, you laugh, you're comforted,

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you're having intellectual conversations with and spiritually compatible all of

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>these things, and that they should be just the one.

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, everybody talks about the one, and they talk

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about soul mate, and it's always a very singular term. Um.

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 1>But in your book All or Nothing Marriage, you talk

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.879
<v Speaker 1>about how that idea, that concept is actually new, it's

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>very very new. But at the same time there are

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>there are other needs. So how can an OsO as

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we as were will use that term again, um, make

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>your primary relationship better? Well, a relationships quality is determined

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>to a large extent by how much the needs and

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>expectations we bring to the relationship are met by this

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>one other person. And it means that there's you know,

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a few different ways we can improve the relationship. UM.

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>One way is to do what relationships you know therapists

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and scholars like me tend to tell people, which is

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>how do you have more meaningful connections, how do you

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>communicate better, how to have effective date nights. But another

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.919
<v Speaker 1>strategy that that isn't really about sort of investing more

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>in the relationship, is figuring out the ways that this

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>one person isn't going to be able to satisfy every

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>single thing and stop relying on that one person to

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>do those things. And so this is the idea of

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the other significant other or the OsO. There are many

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>ways that we can look to our broader social networks

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for a range of different sorts of fulfillment. I don't

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>just me and romantic or sexual sorts of connections. You know,

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we used to socialize in in same sex groups and

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>nobody ever said things like I want to marry you

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>because you're my best friend. It would have seemed ludicrous.

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>But these days we spend more and more time with

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>our one significant other. It comes at the expense of

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 1>time that we spend separate from that person, but with

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>other significant others, friends or or potentially romantic partners aside

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>from the primary one um. And you know, to the

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 1>degree that we can sort of spread the love around

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and make sure that we're we're focusing

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on our relationship in the ways that play to the

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>strengths of that relationship and finding ways to look elsewhere

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>when there might be a limitation or or a something

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>less than perfect fulfillment within the relationship. So based off

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of that, and based off of also kind of what

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Julia and Steve had said, I started kind of connecting things.

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Julia had mentioned the same way that somebody

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>goes to the gym so much, it can make somebody

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like their time is being given somewhere else, or

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're dedicated to something else. How do you differentiate

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe there's not a differential like is is you know,

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>if I like to play video games every night with

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>my with my one homie that lives in on the

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.399
<v Speaker 1>other side of the earth, and I have to play

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it like it's it's how I get that out. Is

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that considered an os O? Is that just a hobby?

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>That's because what I'm starting to realize is maybe before

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, I thought when you're in an open relationship,

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the only time that you're with other people is to

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like have because it's a sexual thing. And I always

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that, and I'm so wrong, like insanely wrong. And

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm so happy that I've come to this episodes that

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I can learn about the depths of open relationships. But

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>now that now that we're kind of talking about and

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you say, sometimes it's people who just make you happy,

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>or it's doing something and committing to something else outside

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of your relationship, how do you differentiate like an OsO

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>then from something like I got. I go to the

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>gym every day, and I have my workout partner that

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I go and I work out with all the time.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would define an OsO broadly, but there

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>are certainly subcategories and and a workout buddy is very

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 1>different from a sex buddy or a love buddy. UM.

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>The broader context here, there are three different types of

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>open relationships. UM. It sounds as if, if I've got

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it correctly, that that Steve and Julia have one that

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is asymmetric, so Steve is open and Julia is not.

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>But also what we might just call open relationship. That's

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>one type where the assumption is, look, you can, you're

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed to, um, you know, have some other people on

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the side, and the you know, people negotiate the contours

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of that. There's a second type, which informally you could

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 1>call swinging, which is, um, we are with other people,

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>but only when we're both there. So that might be

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>something like orgies or perhaps uh, pretty sexual parties and

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.720
<v Speaker 1>things like that. UM. And the third type is is polyamory.

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 1>And polyamory is a subcase of open relationships that that

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>really is about long term, emotionally intimate connections with more

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>than one partner. UM. By the way, it can easily

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>be that all three are equally emotionally intimate. Right. So

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>so the again, there's all these different variations. And I

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>agree with you completely that there are many sorts of

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of reasons why people might want to open their relationship,

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>not least of which is to benefit their relationship. Um.

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>There are many deeply loving, intimate sorts of connections. I

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>get the sense that Steve and Julia have a relationship

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>like this, where where the the non monogamy that they've

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of written into the relationship actually serves to strengthen

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the relationship itself, among other goals. Um, and that is

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 1>indeed one of them. May your reasons why people might

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>want to do this. Some relationships can benefit from opening

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>them up, especially if people are compatible in lots of ways.

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But one person, say, for example, has a strong a

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>stronger sex drive or or different sorts of sexual kinks

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>than somebody else does, which how often does that happen?

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>A lot? So? So getting straight into that, how would

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>a couple like, let's say you take a couple they

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>are not open at all? Um, how does that couple

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>know if an open relationship is one an option to

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>an option that will help them or hurt them and

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>overall just a good idea? Well overall. One of the

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>great perils of being human is that you can't know.

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>You cannot predict the future. And you know, I enjoyed

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>listening to to Julie and Steve process um how they

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>go about their consensual non monogamy, the Steve's openness in

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the relationship, and it's it's um. They didn't talk about

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it as something definitive. Julia raised the possibility that who knows,

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>this is what I'm doing for now, but for later.

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's nice that I'll have opportunities available to me.

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>There won't be strict rules about these sorts of things

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to me. A question that also comes to mind to

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>add on top of that is, let's say that there's

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>there is a problem like you had mentioned. Um, you know,

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe one has more sex drive, one is always wanting

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to try new things or or any of the anything

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in a relationship. In my mind, I'm thinking if I

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was in that situation, I would think, how do I

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.919
<v Speaker 1>reignite the spark with this one person? But I think

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>there's also this second mindset that goes, maybe it's time

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>for me to find that that specific spark elsewhere, so

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that this relationship doesn't have to carry the burden of

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of those problems, you know what I mean? So, how

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>do you know how to differentiate, how to discern which

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>way to go? Well, you have two different situations. One

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is where you start entirely monogamous and then have to

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>broach the conversation. That's a very delicate conversation to broach

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because we have these very strict rules about the way

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 1>people are supposed to behave um, you know, in twenty

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>one century America, right, these rules differ across time, and

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>so it can be very, very hurtful to bring up

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the topic. In a case like Steven Julia, they knew

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:09.439
<v Speaker 1>from the start um what the contours of the relationship were,

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and either option has risk. I mean I would I

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>would ask all of the people who think consensual not monogamy, like,

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that's terrifying. Why would you do that? There's so much risk. Well,

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what. It's not like commitment to permanent

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>monogamy is risk free. It's not like Americans today have

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just totally nailed it right, like we know exactly how

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to do the perfect marriage, and as you can see,

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>nobody's divorcing and everyone's happy. These things are very very complicated.

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think you can say we're going to

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>open it and it's going to be fine, because our

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>ability to know how that's going to play out is

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>less than certain. Maybe we think we're opening up a

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but then somebody falls more in love than

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 1>he intended to. Um. Maybe somebody thinks she'll be fine

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:52.720
<v Speaker 1>with having it be open, but then the pain comes

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, she didn't anticipate it, and so be it.

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So there is definitely risk in doing it. I just

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think that the question really is is there risk

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in consensual nonmonogamy, because the answers yes, we should skip it.

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to be aware what the risks

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>are of monogamy, which includes things like boredom, frustration, sexlessness.

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>There's all sorts of risks that come from sixty years

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 1>of committed exclusivity. And how do those risks play out

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 1>for us relative to the risks of consensual nonmonogamy and

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 1>for many relationships, many people, the best plan is going

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to be monogamy, but certainly not for everybody. You and

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and you had mentioned this exact thing of of how

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not like we've really nailed monogamy down. You know,

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>divorce rates are at an all time high, and and

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:41.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not really not necessarily you know, proven that that's

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the that's the way to go. Um, in your in

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:48.280
<v Speaker 1>your studies, have you found any specific statistic that shows

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe open relationships have a higher success rate than monogamous relationships.

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 1>So the the ideal study here is basically impossible. So

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>so to draw causal conclusions, what we really want to

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 1>do is take a stay ample of a few thousand

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>people and randomly assigned some of them to have a

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>monogamous relationship and some of them to have a consensually

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>non monogamous relationship. For for practical reasons and um ethical reasons,

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't really run that study. So the best studies

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>really that are available at this time is to take

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>samples of people who have opted in right, So, among

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>people who have opted into a consentually non monogamous relationship

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 1>versus a monogamous relationship, who's who's happier if either right?

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Is there a difference? And that work has now been done.

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you take a sample of people who are

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>consentually non monogamous, and the study I'm thinking of is

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 1>they did a really good job. So these are all

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>heterosexual couples, that is, a male identifying person with a

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>primary partner who is female identifying or vice versa, and

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>open right, so they have a primary partner of the

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 1>other sex and non monogamous, and they compare that to

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a sample of people who also have UM male identifying

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>with female identifying or vice versa. But they've adopted a

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>monogamous norm. So, so far as we can tell, the

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:03.240
<v Speaker 1>major differ prints is the norm they have in their relationship. UM,

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So what are the differences when it comes to things

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>like satisfaction and commitment? No differences. There are no differences

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 1>in terms of overall level of satisfaction or average level

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of satisfaction. There are minor differences in terms of things

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like trust, um, And which way do you think that

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>effect might go? Because I think if anything goes the

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 1>other way, So the consensually non monogamous relationships are a

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:33.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit more trusting than the UH than the monogamous relationships.

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:35.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's partly the things that that we

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>saw from from Steven Julia, where this doing this stuff well,

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>having a primary partner and also seeing other people is

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is emotionally fraught and it requires additional levels of processing

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and conversation, and so I think that there is some

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>benefit that comes from those sorts of conversations. Once again,

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.240
<v Speaker 1>let me underscore This is not a risk free option.

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>People can get very very hurt in ways they don't anticipate,

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that can fall in love and is they don't anticipate.

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But there are all sorts of upsides as well of

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>this type of relationship. For again, for the people who

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable trying it. You know, I'm surprised, but I'm

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>also not necessarily surprised about that trust finding because you know,

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Juliet mentioned at first and I don't mean to speak

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>about you, what like you're not here, Julia, but she

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned at first, you know, that she didn't want to know,

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the kind of the anxiety of not knowing,

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking to myself, Yeah, if I didn't know, then

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>any time my significant other would leave, if my girlfriend

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 1>would leave for the grocery store, I'm like, just gonna

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>go talk to that fucking guy at the grocery store.

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But now that you know, I think having the knowledge

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and having the open conversation pun intended having the open

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation about hey, this is this is how I feel,

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and everything always builds more trust. So if you're if

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of covering the infidelity with hey, my heart

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is open and this is where I go. It actually

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense that that you would have

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>more trust a relationship like that. Yeah, one quick thing

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>on on terminology. So the reason why people who are

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 1>are you know, receptive to this lifestyle arrangement, this type

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 1>of relationship use the clunky language of non monogamy and

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>consensual nonmonogamy is because language like infidelity, UM and and adultery,

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this is usually language of people being dishonest. So so

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>infidelity I don't I don't think there's any infidelity UM

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in Stephen and Julia's relationship. But in a non monogamous relationship,

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not infidelity, it's openness, it is honesty. That's that's

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:35.479
<v Speaker 1>so again. I could talk about about people in general

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>because I mostly focus on data, but because UM, Steve

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and Julia were so generous with their story, we can

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:41.880
<v Speaker 1>use them as an example. I hope, I hope that's

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>fine with everybody. Um, they have this this emotional processing

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and what does that do? Like they come out, you know,

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>he comes out of the room. He's just at the

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>conversation and the two of them sit on the couch,

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe pour a glass of wine and have a conversation

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>about what it means and it's an opportunity for her

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to say, for example, I'm not putting words in your mouth, Julia,

0:47:57.400 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>just sort of speaking hypothetically like that was a little

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>hard on me. And he can say, I know, and

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sensitive to that, and it's very important to me

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that you feel loved. And they can take this opportunity

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to share what they feel in their sensitivity about those things,

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and the norms in favor of doing that are very high.

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>In the poly community in particular, there are very very

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>strong norms in favor of lots of communication. It's one

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of these things where I actually feel like the monogamous

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>world has a whole lot to learn from the consensually

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:29.879
<v Speaker 1>non monogamous world in terms of how to communicate, just

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 1>like I think that UM, the the sort of vanilla

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:36.399
<v Speaker 1>world has a whole lot to work to learn from

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the kink or b D s M community about the

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 1>nature of consent. I think people UM who are monogamous

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 1>have a lot to learn about how to communicate effectively

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about emotions and hurt feelings UM from people who are

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>practicing uh non monogamousts. I totally agree. I mean, I'm

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just a sponge today, Like it's really it's really the

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>level of I mean because I think in my mind,

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in my relations Jim, if you can talk or in

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>any relationship, if you can talk about your heart in

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 1>its fullness, then you can talk about anything like You're

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get offended by tiny little things, if you

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>can have big, broader conversations of of open honesty. UM,

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>your advice for a couple sometimes centers around adjusting your

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>expectations from your relationship or from what your marriage could

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>do for you. How does that apply here with open

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>relationships and how is it a little bit different. Well.

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:31.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that that's especially enlightening about studying

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is all of us are born into a

0:49:34.640 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>certain cultural and historical moment, and we think that we

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what marriages and we act as if marriage

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:43.399
<v Speaker 1>has sort of always been like this or or else.

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>We look at at you know, leave it to Beaver

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and say that marriage was always like that before, But

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. The nine fifties was a bizarro world that

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>existed for like fifteen years, and it just happened to

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 1>be the time that TV came in. Marriage was never

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>like that before, and it was never really like that after. Um,

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 1>so today we have a whole range of different expectations.

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, it didn't used to be the

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>case that people talked a lot about marrying their best friend,

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 1>or about you know, living an authentic life, and and

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 1>about you know, being in a marriage that helps us

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>grow as individuals. That's very much of the now. And

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and in my book, I I track the history of

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>these ideas and and this is where in the third

0:50:22.040 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 1>major era of marriage in America, I call it the

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:28.280
<v Speaker 1>self expressive era, where these sorts of emotional and psychological

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>needs are foundational to our expectations of marriage. That is,

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we think that a marriage that doesn't deliver these things

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:37.919
<v Speaker 1>is inadequate. Now, in the fifties that wasn't really the case,

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly in eighteen hundred that wasn't the case when

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 1>really it was about food production and shelter um. But

0:50:43.560 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>these days we have these sorts of expectations. The thing

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that was most fun about writing the book is that

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I had started thinking that these changes are bad, that

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:56.360
<v Speaker 1>basically we are ruining marriage. We're putting so many expectations

0:50:56.400 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on this one relationship that there's no way it can

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 1>withstand all the weight that we're throwing on it, I

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:04.120
<v Speaker 1>came to think something different. In the end, I came

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to think that when you're throwing all these expectations, it

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is true that a marriage that would have been totally

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:14.399
<v Speaker 1>adequate for our grandparents may disappoint us today. But it's

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>also true that a level of marital connection is possible

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>today that was out of reach in an era where

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we weren't even trying. And so so the calibration of

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>what is it that we're going to look to our

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>marriage to do in terms of our deep emotional fulfillment,

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:32.239
<v Speaker 1>in terms of our sexual fulfillment, in terms of helping us,

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 1>inspiring us in our career, if we can play to

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the strengths of the marriage on those things, and also

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>figuring out, you know where am I not ready to

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>look to just this one person? So so Steve has

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a philosophical objection and many people do to monogamy. He's

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 1>not willing to look to one person for just that.

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Do they have the sort of relationship that they can say, look,

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that is a reasonable place for you to look elsewhere

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:56.319
<v Speaker 1>to fulfill some of your needs. And we don't have

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:59.040
<v Speaker 1>strict rules about which needs you you need to meet

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 1>here versus in this other sort of context. I'm perplexed

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:07.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. I am, like, I'm just this is so cool.

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm really grateful for all three of you guys for

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 1>being on the show. I have one more question before

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we take a break. You've studied now romance in general,

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>but even these topics for decades. Now, what's something that

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you wish people knew People like me who are literally

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:24.399
<v Speaker 1>probably listening to this podcast, like, whoa, I never even

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 1>thought about it like that. What's something that you wish

0:52:27.080 --> 0:52:30.279
<v Speaker 1>people knew about the benefits, like the real benefits of

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 1>having an OsO, either romantic or or otherwise, well, that

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it can benefit the primary relationship. And again, I'm not

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:40.319
<v Speaker 1>a zealot for this stuff. I'm not a fanatic saying

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody should be doing this, Like Steve, I think there

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:45.440
<v Speaker 1>are very very serious, you know, risks involved with this.

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not for everybody. But but I think the assumption

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that if there's some amount of non monogamy, some amount

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of non exclusivity, that suggests some sort of failing in

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the primary relationship, and if if the relationship were good enough,

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>then there would be no need to look elsewhere. I

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 1>think it is the wrong logic um. Certainly that's true

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in some situations, but it may well be the case

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we're unbelievably compatible in all sorts of ways,

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is a way that's that you know, monogamy

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:14.719
<v Speaker 1>isn't a huge priority to either one of us, and

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we both think it's fun to be with other people,

0:53:16.680 --> 0:53:18.800
<v Speaker 1>or we find like we have a deep intellectual connection

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 1>with somebody else that doesn't in any way step on

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the connection that we feel with our primary partner, that

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that having an additional partner can actually benefit the relationship.

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't talk about the relevant studies here, but

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, there's one study that looks at how intimate

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 1>we feel with our partner as a function of whether

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we're in a monogamous or a non monogamous relationship. Here again,

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a separate study from before. No difference. Right,

0:53:42.160 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You might think that intimacy is this limited commodity, and

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>for each minute that Steve talks to some other woman,

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that that's a minute of intimacy that he doesn't get

0:53:49.880 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 1>with Julia. There's no evidence that that's the case. Wow,

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we're just factual, We're just we're just Wow, this is

0:53:58.120 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this is so sick. We're taking a break, but it's

0:53:59.920 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a quick break because we gotta talk. We gotta keep

0:54:01.680 --> 0:54:05.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. Don't go anywhere. We are back. I

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>told you it's going to be a quick break. We

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:10.799
<v Speaker 1>are here talking about love hacks. Uh. This is I'm

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>so excited about this, this whole episode, Like, I can't

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>wait for people to hear this. Steven and Julia from

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 1>your guys experience, what's something that you wish totally monogamous

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:21.800
<v Speaker 1>couples like me, what's one thing you wish they knew

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 1>about being an open relationship? I think just that it's

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of what I've been saying the whole time, where

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:29.919
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's not that different from any other kind

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of problem, and it's not necessarily the solution to your problem.

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Like Eli was saying, I don't think that it's for

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone or the solution to every problem. But it can

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 1>be a gateway to connection, and it can be it's

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:48.879
<v Speaker 1>an option. It's a possible solution to something, again, not

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:52.359
<v Speaker 1>always the solution. But also because just because that's not

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there doesn't mean you don't also have relationship problems. You

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>have relationship problems no matter what. So it's all about like,

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:03.799
<v Speaker 1>what are those problems? And if you're a monogamous that

0:55:03.840 --> 0:55:06.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean, like I said too, that you are having

0:55:06.400 --> 0:55:08.839
<v Speaker 1>any more intimacy or that you are not. So as

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:11.879
<v Speaker 1>long as you are getting what you want from your relationship,

0:55:12.520 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 1>who cares how it's how it's working. Um for me,

0:55:15.680 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I would have to say, um, you know it's it's funny.

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>My social media is so funny because my Instagram is

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 1>all Julia like so much Julie too much Julia, and

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:30.399
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter in yeah, and my Twitter is I joke

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 1>around a lot about being non monogamous and babes and

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:37.400
<v Speaker 1>checking out babes and doing stuff that nothing crass or anything.

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 1>You know I have, Uh, I have a lot of

0:55:40.160 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like a women friends and a big women audience and

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:45.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff too. So you could feel they would get mad

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 1>at first if I would tweet about it, because they

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:49.879
<v Speaker 1>love Julius so much. They fall in love with her

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on my Instagram and so they're kind of protective of her.

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 1>But you could see over time they understand it. It's like, oh,

0:55:56.239 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>but obviously they're staying together and Steve loves her. It's

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 1>almost like, listen, if you will allow me to be free,

0:56:04.440 --> 0:56:08.480
<v Speaker 1>like truly free then um, like you will own my

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>heart in like so many ways. So I think by by,

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think time has played out and showed to our

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 1>comedy community and everything that you know, if you can

0:56:18.120 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 1>allow the other person to be themselves, that's such a

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 1>loyalty and like a true fidelity of my heart exists.

0:56:25.640 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's almost by you know, that's stupid old saying that

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 1>if you like open your hand and let the bird

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:33.400
<v Speaker 1>fly away, then it's and it comes back it's yours

0:56:33.600 --> 0:56:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that we that's truly like how it's played out. I

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>feel what do you give? No, I was just gonna

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>say no, I agree, and I feel like I haven't.

0:56:39.680 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I haven't said I love you enough

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on this Uh like that I feel like it's implied

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we're married and I love you, but it is. I

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's the thing that you ask yourself most importantly,

0:56:50.040 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's like if you everything that you are doing

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 1>should be coming from love, and that might mean like

0:56:56.040 --> 0:56:58.680
<v Speaker 1>loving someone, also can mean breaking up with someone or

0:56:58.760 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 1>having it not work or whatever. But I think that

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:03.320
<v Speaker 1>anything in that thing, as much as it is a clichee,

0:57:03.400 --> 0:57:07.399
<v Speaker 1>it is very true that if you are like too

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:11.320
<v Speaker 1>afraid to try the thing for fear of losing the relationship.

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:13.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not yours you're holding. You were having to hold

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it under a condition that is not real. That's what

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I at least tell myself is that I'm like, if

0:57:18.920 --> 0:57:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I really love this person, then I need to love

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:25.480
<v Speaker 1>them exactly as they are. That doesn't mean I'm not

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 1>entitled to my feelings about it, or that I can't

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:31.400
<v Speaker 1>still be hurt or asked them to, you know, change behaviors, whatever.

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>But but if you really love someone, it cannot be

0:57:34.840 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>conditional on them doing only behaving in one certain way.

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think that remember reminding yourself that you that

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you love this person like is is the thing too?

0:57:47.560 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Write Eli you had something that I have a question

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 1>for you. So it wouldn't surprise me if if some

0:57:53.760 --> 0:57:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of the listeners are thinking, really it's not okay to

0:57:57.840 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ask possibly even demand any type of sacrifice? Um, any

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:04.720
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on that, like in principle are there? Is it

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 1>okay to make those demands? I think you absolutely can

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>make those demands. I think you can. You can always

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 1>ask for anything, um, And it doesn't mean that you

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:19.440
<v Speaker 1>get them. And I think, more importantly, if you aren't

0:58:19.480 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>sure why you are asking them to make that demand

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:25.040
<v Speaker 1>if you don't pass through. And mind you, my mom

0:58:25.120 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is a psychiatrist. I've been in therapy. I'm like a

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 1>real therapy person. I've I've read all the not not

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 1>all the books, but every book ever, every book, every

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 1>one was just published. Yeah, this is this is something

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that I have. I have thought through a lot and

0:58:43.480 --> 0:58:45.800
<v Speaker 1>all those things. So I understand that, like that is,

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we aren't taught to like think like this necessarily. But

0:58:49.440 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think again, this idea of like, if you aren't

0:58:52.240 --> 0:58:54.880
<v Speaker 1>sure why you're demanding that of someone, it's going to

0:58:55.040 --> 0:58:58.720
<v Speaker 1>pop up in another way in your relationship, likely that

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have anything to do with monogamy or not. So

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's a boundary for you and you know that

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about yourself, then yeah, again you can ask, you can

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 1>ask whatever you want, but you have to be prepared

0:59:10.640 --> 0:59:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the consequences if their answer is no.

0:59:14.160 --> 0:59:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And if it's really a boundary, if it was more

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of a way to like manipulate someone's behavior instead of

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a I know myself, I know that I'm not going

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to be comfortable with this, Like then it's coming from

0:59:24.440 --> 0:59:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a boundary love place as opposed to a like, you're

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>my husband, I'm allowed to tell you you need to

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:33.240
<v Speaker 1>do this thing the right I want to. I want to.

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It's because she read everybody. It's because she read every

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 1>book ever. So you both you both brought something up

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and and it made me want to kind of make

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a statement. But I'm still gonna come in it as

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a question because I am such a newbie into this conversation.

0:59:50.680 --> 0:59:55.680
<v Speaker 1>It seems like either way, a non monogamous relationship is

0:59:55.720 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely for a strong couple. You know, there's a lot

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of couples who choose not monogamy as like a last

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>resort to a relationship that's not strong. Um, but what

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>are some markers that you and your relationship could survive

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>or even thrive if it were to open up? Lak,

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>She's read all the books. I've every book. Yeah, Well,

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean the other thing is is you're You're you're

1:00:20.560 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>unique in the sense of like you hit that crossroads

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>where you were like this is a path that we're

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>about to take. What what what gave you those inklings

1:00:30.200 --> 1:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that like this is the right move to do something

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that you've never really done before. Well, I do want

1:00:35.480 --> 1:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Julia to answer, but we are very much obsessed with

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a thing has to last forever or as for as

1:00:43.400 --> 1:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>long as possible. To me, if if you're using this

1:00:46.280 --> 1:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff and you end up breaking up, it's because you

1:00:48.480 --> 1:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>needed to break up, and that's okay. And if at

1:00:50.960 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>some point Julie and I need to break up, I mean,

1:00:53.880 --> 1:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a real This is my second marriage, and I, like,

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was never gonna get married again. But

1:00:59.240 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about it so much. I knew would make

1:01:01.800 --> 1:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>her so happy, and I was, I'm surprised at how

1:01:05.080 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>happy it's made me. But I just thought about it

1:01:08.520 --> 1:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, I just realistically, I can't see

1:01:12.200 --> 1:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a way. I'm older now and she's older, we're not kids.

1:01:15.800 --> 1:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't see it ending. If it does end, if

1:01:18.400 --> 1:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we our value systems change or we want different things,

1:01:21.200 --> 1:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that happens with life. But to me, it's never about

1:01:24.200 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>how can we make this last forever. It's how can

1:01:27.560 --> 1:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>we both be the healthiest, most full versions of ourselves

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And and that might be hopefully that means we stay

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>together forever, but it might not mean that. So I

1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's important to to realize that people breaking up

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely not the end of the world. Some of

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst relationships. I know people have stayed together forever. Julia, No,

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, I think first and foremost, if

1:01:50.120 --> 1:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you are thinking about it, then it's maybe worth exploring.

1:01:53.560 --> 1:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't mean necessarily actually literally opening up, but I'm a

1:01:57.400 --> 1:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>big fan of like, if something philosophically works, you should

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of be able to apply it to other things

1:02:04.360 --> 1:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>besides that thing. So if you are feeling stagnant in

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>some kind of way, maybe it's not literally opening up

1:02:10.920 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>your relationship, but maybe it is uh, hanging out with

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>your friends or just even asking yourself, am I identifying

1:02:19.680 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>with this partnership? Like what would it mean to me

1:02:22.000 --> 1:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>if this partnership didn't work? And what fears do that

1:02:24.640 --> 1:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>bring up for for me? About my self worth? About uh,

1:02:28.840 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what pressures am I maybe putting on this person that

1:02:30.960 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not aware of that I am saying, Like is

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>there do I want to go back to school? Do

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I wanna like start up a new hobby? Is there

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>other things? I think it's again this the same thing.

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Is this idea of like, oh, our relationship is the problem.

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think sometimes it's your problem and it's not. It's

1:02:49.600 --> 1:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>not like because the relationship isn't working, it's because you

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't working in some way, and not to say that

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like your fault, but uh, I think it's like

1:02:57.560 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>being not being afraid to ask the questions, but exploring, like, well,

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>what what are my resistances to that in not opening up?

1:03:05.440 --> 1:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Or like where am I if I don't do it

1:03:07.400 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in this way? Where else could I uh be more

1:03:11.400 --> 1:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>open in my life? Yeah? Totally, Eli. You you you

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>put your hand up so I know you can speak

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to this. How I would love for people to think

1:03:19.600 --> 1:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>about monogamy is a Titanic ask. The idea that you

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>will not have emotional or romantic or sexual um connections

1:03:28.880 --> 1:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>with anybody but me for the next fifties sixty years

1:03:33.320 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is gigantic, and that's fine. I think many people should

1:03:36.040 --> 1:03:38.439
<v Speaker 1>indeed make that ask. It's the best option for many

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>many people. But treating it as some default, as some

1:03:42.120 --> 1:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>obvious thing that we're gonna do and then we're gonna

1:03:44.440 --> 1:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>start getting to what we're really asking of each other,

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a risk. That's a risk of we're going to

1:03:49.080 --> 1:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>ask more than is appropriate given what we're willing to invest.

1:03:52.560 --> 1:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And and so what I would urge people to do

1:03:54.600 --> 1:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is to be deliberate about this decision. Do we want

1:03:57.440 --> 1:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to commit to a lifetime of monogamy together? If so,

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? What does that mean in terms

1:04:01.680 --> 1:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of my fitness regiment? What does that mean in terms

1:04:03.680 --> 1:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of of how I'm going to, you know, manage my

1:04:06.480 --> 1:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>work related travel and make sure that I don't put

1:04:08.640 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>myself in risky situations, make sure that I don't become

1:04:11.520 --> 1:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a comedian. Right, there are all sorts of things that

1:04:13.680 --> 1:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need to calibrate in order to make that happen.

1:04:17.040 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And and the problem is, because everybody've used this as

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that's obvious default, people aren't engaging with the size the

1:04:24.800 --> 1:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of the ask. So God bless you want to

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>be monogamous forever, that's terrific. What are the things you're

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to ask of your marriage? What are the

1:04:32.440 --> 1:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>things that you're gonna do in order to make sure

1:04:34.400 --> 1:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that monogamy can actually be plausible for the two of

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you over the next however many years that you hope

1:04:39.200 --> 1:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the relationship lasts. I was gonna say, let me backtrack.

1:04:42.960 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I think demanding that your partner not become a comedian

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is the only thing that you're allowed to demand in

1:04:47.680 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>or the only demand that is across the board. I know,

1:04:52.280 --> 1:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, I totally I love that because it is

1:04:54.280 --> 1:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing I think, no matter what the default that

1:04:57.280 --> 1:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>there is no kind of relationship that doesn't require immense

1:05:00.600 --> 1:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>communication and deliberation and self discovery and sacrifice in all

1:05:05.520 --> 1:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of those ways. Is monogamy or not. All relationships require

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>work and and thought and effort and all of those things.

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me, as I've as I'm learning this

1:05:18.160 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>real time firsthand, you know, learning on this podcast, the

1:05:22.040 --> 1:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing is like, and it's so corny, but it's like,

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you gotta follow your heart, you know, Julia, you said,

1:05:27.320 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes do it. Sometimes following your heart and really loving

1:05:29.960 --> 1:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody is leaving them and breaking up with them, like

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you had mentioned as well, Steve, Like, it's not following

1:05:34.680 --> 1:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>your heart, is not staying in a thirty year marriage

1:05:36.960 --> 1:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>where you're miserable and you secretly wish that you were

1:05:39.720 --> 1:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that you were somewhere else with someone else.

1:05:42.480 --> 1:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Um And and the same thing is following your heart

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is knowing Hey, this you know, even though monogamy is whatever,

1:05:48.320 --> 1:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the main popular thing, it's not it's not

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>where my heart goes. I gotta go this way and

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with a partner, It's like, Yo, this is something that's

1:05:55.600 --> 1:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>really important to me. It's following my heart. And every

1:05:57.920 --> 1:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>great relationship I think incourage is the other person to

1:06:01.160 --> 1:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>follow their heart and chase after what their you know,

1:06:03.880 --> 1:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what their desires are. And so that's something that I

1:06:06.080 --> 1:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>really took away, especially from this whole episode. But I

1:06:09.600 --> 1:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>do want to close out that this segment is called

1:06:11.800 --> 1:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>love hacks, and and the reason why it's called that

1:06:13.640 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>is Eli in your book, Uh, you talk about love hacks.

1:06:17.320 --> 1:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain that, um and and tell us maybe

1:06:20.120 --> 1:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>one of your favorite love hacks? Sure? Well, yeah, I

1:06:23.840 --> 1:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>mean the book um Is is really about how we

1:06:26.960 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>calibrate our expectations to what we as a couple can

1:06:29.880 --> 1:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>actually achieve. UM sort of helps people think well about that.

1:06:33.360 --> 1:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So in some sense, the book is a supply and

1:06:35.760 --> 1:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>demand story. It says, you can demand whatever you want

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to ask of the relationship, but then the supply matters.

1:06:41.680 --> 1:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Are we compatible enough, are we investing enough time in

1:06:44.040 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the relationship? Are we keeping ourselves fit enough to be

1:06:46.400 --> 1:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>attractive to our partner for fifty years? These are the

1:06:48.760 --> 1:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>sorts of supply and demand calibrations. But there's a little

1:06:52.120 --> 1:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of a short cut that that's not going to

1:06:53.640 --> 1:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>make a bad relationship a good one, but it can

1:06:55.800 --> 1:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>help around the edges, which is the the idea of

1:06:57.640 --> 1:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>love hacks. Are there quick and dirty things we can

1:06:59.840 --> 1:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>do to make the relationship a little bit stronger that

1:07:03.120 --> 1:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>don't require big date nights and big conversations, that that

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>require relatively little investment, relatively little supply, but that can

1:07:10.200 --> 1:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>increase the quality of the relationship. UM. It's based a

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the on the observation by the novelist

1:07:15.520 --> 1:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Marcel Proust who says that mystery is not about traveling

1:07:18.560 --> 1:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to new places, but about looking with new eyes. And

1:07:21.400 --> 1:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in the book, I talked about eight different you know,

1:07:23.360 --> 1:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>science backed love hacks. UM. One of the ones that

1:07:26.240 --> 1:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you know we created in our lab here at Northwestern

1:07:28.520 --> 1:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is we we recruited a hundred and twenty married couples.

1:07:31.760 --> 1:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>We randomly assigned half of them to a condition where

1:07:34.240 --> 1:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they thought about conflict in their marriage from the perspective

1:07:37.120 --> 1:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of a neutral third party who wants the best for everybody.

1:07:39.920 --> 1:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>One of them was in a control condition where they

1:07:41.520 --> 1:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't do that task. And we found that even though UM,

1:07:44.160 --> 1:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the writing task took only twenty one minutes. We found

1:07:47.240 --> 1:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that people who had immersed themselves in this third party perspective,

1:07:50.880 --> 1:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>how can we think about conflict from this perspective of

1:07:53.480 --> 1:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a neutral third party who wants the best for everyone?

1:07:55.880 --> 1:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>That just re orienting your thinking in that way made

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>your relationship better over a subsequent year. Wow, and you

1:08:02.480 --> 1:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and and and I also want to touch on this

1:08:04.600 --> 1:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is you have mentioned this during the break, is that

1:08:06.760 --> 1:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>people act as if the study of romance, or or

1:08:10.920 --> 1:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>open relationships or or consensual monogamy is just kind of

1:08:14.880 --> 1:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like table talk. But in reality, there's so much research

1:08:20.160 --> 1:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>behind this. And you're obviously a firsthand example of of

1:08:24.080 --> 1:08:26.519
<v Speaker 1>how much research has done in books that have been written,

1:08:26.640 --> 1:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>including your own, including uh and I want you to

1:08:29.320 --> 1:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>shout it out. I can't exactly remember what. It's something

1:08:31.760 --> 1:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>slut um but that is actually not scientific um. But

1:08:36.320 --> 1:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>but it is. It is a book about relationships. There

1:08:38.439 --> 1:08:41.519
<v Speaker 1>are there are many books books about relationships. Not all

1:08:41.560 --> 1:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of them are based in the data. In fact, very

1:08:43.240 --> 1:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>few are. And it's one of the major reasons why

1:08:45.840 --> 1:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to write the book is is there are

1:08:48.400 --> 1:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people who have devoted their entire careers to

1:08:51.439 --> 1:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>collecting data about what makes relationships better or worse just

1:08:54.920 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>on average. Right, you can't really say and therefore you

1:08:58.120 --> 1:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you specific couple this is how you should to it.

1:09:00.479 --> 1:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>But it provides useful clues to know that these sorts

1:09:03.400 --> 1:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of behaviors tend on average to be beneficial, these sorts

1:09:06.000 --> 1:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of behaviors tend on average to be particularly harmful. And

1:09:09.720 --> 1:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>there are I don't know tens of thousands, hundreds of

1:09:11.920 --> 1:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>thousands of journal articles cloistered in academic libraries, and so

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I wanted to do was to

1:09:17.360 --> 1:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>distill what I thought were some of the main learnings

1:09:19.840 --> 1:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>from that scholarly literature and and bring it and bring

1:09:22.960 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>them to the public. Well, you definitely did, um and

1:09:27.080 --> 1:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and and I'm so grateful that, uh that that you

1:09:30.040 --> 1:09:32.479
<v Speaker 1>were here on the podcast, as well as Julia and Steve.

1:09:32.760 --> 1:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, growing up not knowing anybody who was even

1:09:35.080 --> 1:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in an consensual, non monogamous relationship until just a couple

1:09:39.160 --> 1:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, seeing not only a consensual non monogamous relationship,

1:09:44.200 --> 1:09:47.639
<v Speaker 1>but also seeing how much love it's just as strong

1:09:47.680 --> 1:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>as my parents who have been monogamous for thirty years

1:09:50.320 --> 1:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with each other, and understanding that the overall goal in

1:09:54.400 --> 1:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a relationship across the board is to just be open

1:09:56.840 --> 1:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and honest and loving with each other. I know that

1:09:59.120 --> 1:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for a moment it kind of became like the live

1:10:02.200 --> 1:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>version of breaking down your relationship. And so I'm so

1:10:04.760 --> 1:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>grateful that you guys came on, and also the fact

1:10:06.600 --> 1:10:08.759
<v Speaker 1>that you guys are like the gold standard for love

1:10:08.920 --> 1:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in itself and so um it means a lot to me.

1:10:12.800 --> 1:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's time for my favorite segment of

1:10:16.040 --> 1:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the show so that people can see all of these

1:10:18.080 --> 1:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>pictures of Julia, like you're talking about Steve. It's called

1:10:21.120 --> 1:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>not So Shameless promo. Uh, just tell us about what

1:10:24.760 --> 1:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you're working on, what you're excited about, and where we

1:10:26.840 --> 1:10:29.519
<v Speaker 1>can find you on social media. Go for it. Oh,

1:10:29.560 --> 1:10:31.639
<v Speaker 1>I've got a bunch of podcasts. I have a religion

1:10:31.680 --> 1:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast I used to be a minister called Who's Your

1:10:35.040 --> 1:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>God with Amy Miller, a movie podcast called Us from

1:10:37.320 --> 1:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Vista, and a horny guys news podcast called The

1:10:41.000 --> 1:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Male Gauge. You can find me at Big hern on

1:10:43.360 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Hernia on Instagram. Hernia did you get Is

1:10:47.200 --> 1:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that actually just spelled like hernia? I can't believe I

1:10:50.400 --> 1:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>got it. I cannot believe that you've got that. That's amazing.

1:10:54.360 --> 1:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>People should follow you just for the just for the handle,

1:10:57.640 --> 1:11:02.479
<v Speaker 1>just for the handle. People always say oh Hernia, like like, well,

1:11:02.520 --> 1:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>just refer to them him as if that is his name.

1:11:05.280 --> 1:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>So it's a good one. That's a good sign. I

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>love it. Julia hit Us listening not so shameless promo. Sure,

1:11:10.680 --> 1:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I am at Julia Logan on all platforms, as you

1:11:13.640 --> 1:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in my intro. I also I'm a co host

1:11:16.160 --> 1:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of an astrology comedy podcast called What's Your Sign? Uh.

1:11:20.160 --> 1:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're into astrology or not into astrology, I personally

1:11:24.200 --> 1:11:28.599
<v Speaker 1>love having haters listen. Uh. I love talking to astro haters.

1:11:28.640 --> 1:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It's one of my favorite things. I am truly fueled

1:11:31.320 --> 1:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>by the astro haters. So you could you could totally

1:11:34.360 --> 1:11:37.599
<v Speaker 1>hate it and absolutely listen. But that's at What's Your

1:11:37.640 --> 1:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Sign Podcast on all of the platforms. Um. I I'm

1:11:41.760 --> 1:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna start offering astrology readings, so if you're interested in that,

1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>slide in my d m Eli finkel Um the author

1:11:47.760 --> 1:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of The All or Nothing Marriage, a professor at Northwestern University.

1:11:50.880 --> 1:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>The book tries to take what we know, take a

1:11:53.720 --> 1:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>data based approach. What we know about relationships um to

1:11:57.200 --> 1:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>help people figure out how they themselves can build wronger

1:12:00.280 --> 1:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>relationships as possible. I'm on social media handle is Eli

1:12:04.280 --> 1:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>J Finkel f I n K E L and primarily

1:12:07.040 --> 1:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, but Paul Show on Facebook, Instagram, etcetera. I

1:12:10.400 --> 1:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>love that you know you can always find me at

1:12:12.200 --> 1:12:14.479
<v Speaker 1>alex Iono everywhere. It's the best part about having a

1:12:14.520 --> 1:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>weird last name ai O n oh. But more importantly,

1:12:18.240 --> 1:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>please make sure you rate our podcast and subscribe. You

1:12:21.120 --> 1:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>can leave a review. That is how we grow. But

1:12:24.040 --> 1:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm so grateful that you can and listen today and

1:12:26.080 --> 1:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you guys next time. We really want

1:12:35.080 --> 1:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>you to get the help you need, so if you

1:12:36.640 --> 1:12:39.759
<v Speaker 1>need help, please seek independent advice from a competent healthcare

1:12:39.800 --> 1:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>or mental health professional. The views and opinions expressed in

1:12:42.760 --> 1:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>this podcast are solely those of the podcast author or

1:12:44.920 --> 1:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>individuals participating in the podcast, and do not represent the

1:12:47.600 --> 1:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>opinions of I Heart Media or its employees. This podcast

1:12:50.240 --> 1:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>should not be used as medical advice, mental health advice, counseling,

1:12:53.120 --> 1:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or therapy. Listening to the podcast does not established dr

1:12:55.840 --> 1:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>patient relationship with hosts or guests of alex iono, let's

1:12:58.680 --> 1:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>get into it, or I heart Media. No guarantee is

1:13:01.160 --> 1:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>given regarding the accuracy of any statements or opinions made

1:13:04.000 --> 1:13:06.519
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast. Wol if that's a doozy