WEBVTT - Mortgages, Private Debt, Banks, and Twitter

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We've got interest rate rising.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>We know that it's been terrible for the fixed income

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>market across the board. Uh, and a big part of

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that some mortgage markets. When we want to talk, you know,

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the MBS, that's mortgage backed securities.

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>We bring in Eric Heidelberg, MBS strategists for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>What is the super strava biker? I don't know. I

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>know that I probably put too much, too many miles

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>on my bike. So Paul's a big peloton guy, But

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you actually move on your bicycle. Uh, this time of year,

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I might be on something called Swift, which is inside,

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but we feel like we're moving because it's like in

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a cartoon world with other people. So it's in the

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>metaverse alright, Erica, So again, you know we look at

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I n go to give us a snapshot of all

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the indexes out there, and just in fixed and come world,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>like the equity world, just read everywhere. Talk to us

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>about how the mortgage backed security market has been behaving. Well, um,

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>there there probably aren't enough big words to describe it,

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but basically it's it's having its worst year ever by

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a significant margin, like at minus fourteen at some point

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of last month, we were approximately ten

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>times worse than the mortgage market had ever been year

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to date. Um. And that's what happens when you have

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a bear market because a lot of that is really

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>just driven by interest rates, which have turned around a

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit recently, but some of that is driven by

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>spread widening too, as the FED has stopped buying, and

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of volatility in the market's

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>not you know, with so much uncertainty around what's going

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to go on with inflation, etcetera. When was the last

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>time we had a big bear market in mortgage backed securities?

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Before I was born? So how does the FEDS, I mean,

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>how does QT play into this? How do rate rises

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>play into this? Because um, didn't your own pali snap

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>at somebody who asked if they were going to start

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>selling nbs at the last press conference. Yeah, well, he

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they refused to take that off the table, which is

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>probably wise, especially with some of his UH colleagues going

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>on and saying we really shouldn't have be supporting a

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>credit market, which I guess they consider mortgage backed securities

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to be. So, you know, he has some FED other

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>other FED members job owning sales, and I think they

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>want to leave that on the table because if mortgage

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>rates aren't responding to their activity, then you know, they

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>want to probably dangle that out there is to potentially

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>keep spreads relatively wide because they are using mortgage backed

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>securities and mortgage rates generally sorry, not really mortgage back securities,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but mortgages rates as a lever to try to slow

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>down the inflation rate by trying to slow on the

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>housing market and ali inflationary aspects that a red hot

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>housing market. Cause Google shows me seven point three three

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>six percent for a thirty year fixed mortgage. I think

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you can shop around and do a little bit better

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>if you need to, but yeah, the effect are great. Yeah. Sure.

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>The effective rate that came out from the NBA this

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>morning was some point oh six, which is the first

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>time it's topped seven percent. Other mortgage rates have been

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>showing it above seven um, and that is the first

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>time we've seen that since two thousand and six, where

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it actually only reached that level. I was looking at

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a minute ago, um briefly in two thousand and six,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and then before that it's really the early two thousand's

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>before sustained there. And the big difference right now is

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>just that so many homeowners have three percent mortgage rate,

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>whereas at that point, Yeah, you concluded, Matt got it,

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But I will say that I bought at the absolute

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>top of the market, so I got a good rate,

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but I paid way too much for my house. Yeah,

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and and maybe you're better off getting a worse rate,

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, wait until the housing market comes down

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and you can refinance. If if rates

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>ever do turn around that this is certainly a big

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>trend in the opposite direction. Even the arms cost a

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of ten six arms seven point six four four

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>huh Yeah, I think again, you can shop around and

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>do a little bit better there. But I'm not a

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>mortgage originator, so I don't know. So I mean Erica

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Tuto about the I didn't know anything about really the

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>mortgage backed securities market until the Great Financial Crisis. Then

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I got like everybody else, I got very smart, very quickly.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I learned is you have to

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>really pay attention to the credit quality of the mortgages

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in your mbs. Just generally speaking, how do we feel

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>about credit quality out there? The credit quality is by

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a large stellar compared to before the Great Financial isis.

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that triggered that was that there

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of subprime lending, and a lot of

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that subprime lending was made in the form of mortgages

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that reset upwards when rates went up. They were these

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>teaser rates. They were you know, payoups and arms. And

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>as a result, as soon as rates began to rise

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.679
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in the mid two thousands, those homeowners yeah, okay,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. Erica started kind forge to get to an

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>appointment with a FED president, Eric Heidelberg, NBA strategist for

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, giving us a lowdown on the mortgage market here,

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>like all the other fixed single markets, really has had

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a very tough I guess this Elon must Twitter deal

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>is on. That's the news yesterday. Twenty cents I'll believe

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it when I see on for now. Yeah, the signatures

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>on the documents. Let's do a deep dive into how

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this might all play out at the Low West coast

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>corresponding for Bloomberg News, he joins us here in our

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interact broker studio, as does men Deep seeing our

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>senior technology annals for Bloomberg Intelligence, and let's start with you.

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Sure well, I guess it's back on, but it is

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>pending a resolution or stay of these legal issues. Is

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that going to happen. I haven't heard anything, yes, so

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Must said that he reverts to his original offer fifty

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>four dollars twenty cents to share on the exact same

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>terms that were signed between the two parties April. In

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>his letter to Twitter, he said that it's contingent on

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a stay of legal proceedings, which Twitter has not indicated

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>either way what they're going to do. Really, all they've

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>said is that they want to close the transaction at

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that fifty four dollar twenty cents price, and you know,

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the timing super interesting, you know. According to one source,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>legal must legal team looked at it, and they looked

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>at what the judge in the case, who was due

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to preside had said, and they didn't fancy their chances.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's where we're at. But I mean, so from

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter perspective, the best thing to do would be

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to go through with the lawsuit and have the courts

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>order Musk to buy it, because otherwise, if they agree

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to drop the suit, then he could just back out again. Yeah.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Twitter has at least been consistent. They sued

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Musk for specific performance of assigned contract, and they have

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>maintained all along that their intent has always been to

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>close the deal at fifty four dollars twenty cents. The

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>reason I brought all that up is all they said

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>last night was a reiteration that they want to close

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>at fifty four dollars twenty cents. They didn't say whether

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>they dropped legal proceedings. They didn't say whether they accept

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Musk's latest and reversion of the offer. And so I

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's a really key point you're waiting for, as

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>well as what on earth these Wall Street bankers will

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>do with the debt. All right, men, deep, let's say

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that Ellen does buy Twitter. I mean it needs some

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>work here. I mean it needs some work in terms

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of engagement and growing the revenue and what does he

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar asset forty four billion dollars. Yeah, Well, with any

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>large M and A, you have to have some sort

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of premium, right, You're not going to get it at

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>market value or fair price. So that's a big, big,

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>big premium, big premium. And I think what's uh kind

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of not clear yet is how he plans to monetize it.

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Clearly he has his ideas around you know, coming up

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>with a subscription model or just kind of leveraging the

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>franchise as you know, a super app, which is what

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>he tweeted about yesterday. X So, look, I think with Musk,

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>because he's the face of Tesla, and Tesla as a

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>company has had a very good ear in terms of

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>attracting talent and what they're doing around you know, supercomputer

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and robots and just evis in general. I think what

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>he's looking for is not to go through the trial

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>because there will be bad PR and it's gonna hurt

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and then so really it's really care about bad PR.

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there's one billionaire out there that's gotten

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bad PR, it is Elon Musk. He's the king of

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>bad PR. Well, they had an AI day on Friday,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>where it was really aimed at getting more talent, attracting

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>talent around AI and machine learning to help him with

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>his supercomputer and you know all the things that tell

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>SLA is doing. So they really care about talent right now.

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think if he goes through this trial, it's

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>going to bring in a lot of negative publicity talking

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>about twelve or thirteen billion dollars a debt. I'm looking

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>at the f A function on the bloomber terminal consensus

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>IBATA is like a billion a billion three. They can't

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>have that kind of leverage. What are they thinking? Well, so,

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean his plans is to get Twitter to one

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>billion in daily active users, which is five times where

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they are now. And uh right, and he wants to

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>bring out the cyber truck by last year. That's not

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen, all right, timing, What's when do we think

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this thing is gonna close? Actually? Is there anybody's venturing?

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess this is what's so fascinating. He wants to

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>do the deal at the original terms of April. If

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at section two point to the closing se

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and I love that and the articles of closing that

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>we're in there. They've all been fulfilled. The Twitter shareholders

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>voted for it, the regulatory waiting periods of past. That's

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>why I say focus on Twitter and what Twitter does,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>because they seem to be in control here if they

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>do stay legal proceedings. I think there's a big portion

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of the market that says it's reasonable to think this

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>deal could close in the days rather than weeks. Could

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>happen very quickly. But as I said, maybe we still

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>do go to some somewhat form of trial. Maybe the

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>court has jurisdiction over the closing dynamic and a little

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>bit out of Musks control, it seems. I mean, doesn't

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that make sense for them to ask the judge to

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>just guarantee the closing because they can say, look, okay,

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>he's agreed again. But last time he agreed, he signed

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>all the documents, he committed himself legally, he made it

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a binding commitment, and then he backed out. So you

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>know what's thet from. You know, there are many voices

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in the market that thinks the judge will keep an

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>eye on this. Remember this is a chance recurt case.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>To Paul's point though that I think any of us

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>knew what chance three court was before this week. What

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is the It's just corporate m and a court. You know,

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>she has the final say. It would have taken her

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>months to reach the decision. But the debt, you know,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street bankers that musk Haide have to go

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to the asset managers and sell twelve and a half

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of leverage buyout debt. That is much less

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>attractive than it was in April when this whole thing

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was hatched. I don't I mean, are you hearing anything

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>from Wall Street the men deep about this capital structure here?

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel like he's got to go to

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>get some more private equity here. Well, the good thing

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is it's still you know, when you compared to the

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>deck to equity ratio thirty three billion in equity and

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the remainder twelve point five billion in debt, which is

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>still relatively low, typical buyouts like the Citrix buyout, that

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>component is much higher. So did anybody want a piece

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Citrics buyout? People wouldn't want to touch it

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>with a ten foot pole. Are banks lost six hundred

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>million dollars on the Citrix But that's gonna be dropping

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a bucket compared to this, I think us can still

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 1>raise the money by selling his stock. He has hundred

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and seventy billion in Tesla stocks, so he can, didn't

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>he see from the tweets are from the text messages,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I should say that there are a lot of very

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>rich people that want to help him out with cash. Yeah,

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>but again, what does this all come down to? You know? Trust?

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>This has been a bit of a roller coaster and

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>what we don't know from the court filings and disclosures

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>as part of the discoveries, what do all those rich

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>people think today? October five, Levan, a Eastern Are they

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>willing to get on board? Who knows? Alright, guys, great stuff.

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate you coming in here. Ed Ludlow, West Coast correspondent

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.599
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. He's been trolling around New York for

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the past few weeks. We have no idea what's going on,

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but we got Mandeep Sing. He's a Bloomberg in bloom

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>b I industry. Uh. He covers all things technology and

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>he's in the office quite off. Yeah, he's in your

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>office quite often. He's one of these proud of him

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we are, so we always appreciate getting that round table.

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So looks. We'll keep our eyes on this Twitter. Will

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they close? Boy? Talk about it in public markets? Two

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just Marketer on everywhere and deals. You don't see I

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>p O s. You see E t F launches, But

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much it. I mean, so if here's you

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>should have a television show about that on Monday Steam.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So people go into the private market, we hear more

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and more about this private equity, private debt. We're going

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to dive deeper into that biz. And we can do

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that with Randy Schumer. He's co had of Senior Lending

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and senior managing director Churchill Asset Management. He joined us

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So, Randy,

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's been tough everywhere out there for investors. Talk to

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>us about the private capital business that you've been so

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>involved in. How two been for you guys, Well, for

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's been in it for a long long time,

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to actually see it coming into its own

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And part of the reason is because, as you guys

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>have described, what the FED is doing with quantitative tightening

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>and interest rate hikes is creating a vacuum in the

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>public markets. So there's no clearing price for public bonds

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, and the loans are both loans and bond

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>market are kind of offline because nobody knows how much

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're an issuer, how much is that going to

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>cost me? So what they're doing is they're going to

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the private markets, in large part because it's long term

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>capital that's been locked up for us to invest in

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>companies and other peers of ours, and we can go

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>out with those companies and say we actually can give

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you capital that's not volatile, that's not that is going

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to be positive in terms of for investors interest rates

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>going forward because it's a floating rate asset class and

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for senior debt. So that's why it's getting attention. And

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the other thing for investors is that because you've got

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat risk off environment, leverages coming down, covenants are tighter,

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and even more important, yields are higher right now for

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>private credit? Are they do these borrowers continue to agree

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to floating rates? I mean, I guess now you want it,

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>right because as we're starting to get to what feels

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>like the top, you want to get into a floating rate. Well,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>they want it because it's available capital. So they're willing

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay the price. Secondly, the unitrunch financings that were

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>higher leverage, so six and seven times cash flows are

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>no longer in the market, and so from an investor perspective,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>at five times and even less, that's very attractive. Junior

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>capital now is being put into these capital structures to

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>provide the issue where the little bit more flexibility. Now

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>junior capital is a fixed rate instrument, so it's good

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for the issue where because they lock in their cost,

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's good for an investor because the fixed rate

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>cost is it's higher, it's you know, ten to twelve percent.

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Even senior debt today is close to ten percent. So

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very attractive from an investor perspective. It's been so hot.

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Paul and I talked to so many UM

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>fund managers who are starting to get into private markets

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and more and more we talked to private capital managers.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>What if we have a big recession? What you know,

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the the narrative has been short, shallow recession until recently,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and now I think people are starting to worry about

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a longer term, deeper recession. Is that a problem, Well,

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it is a problem for the overall markets because we

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know how that recession is going to unfold. It's

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be like a no way do none seems

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>unlikely because the bank capital balance sheets are pretty strong

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. It doesn't feel like it's going to be

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>an industry focus because we've had rolling recessions like that

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>over time in retail and so forth. Um, what probably

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen is it's going to be an

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>interest expense UH coverage issue because as interest rates go up,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>companies that were highly leveled, too highly leveled in our view,

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to suffer because they're not gonna be able

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay their interests. Because think about it, Treasury rates

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>were zero a year ago. There four percent today that

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>described and that's not changing. By the way, the Fed

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>fight against inflation is going to be continuing this year

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and next year, and so you're gonna see interest rates

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty high. So we think active management is critical. If

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you are in industries the way Churchill is that are

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>more defensive, like healthcare and technology and software, those businesses

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to do well typically through all cycles. But

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're in chemicals, gaming, energy, housing, those businesses are

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get hurt. And that's where you're going to

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>see in a recession um tighter interest and potentially default.

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>We're already seeing some kickups in large cap defaults just

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>because of that. All right, Let's just assume I'm a

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>super wealthy person out there and I want I just

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>bought a social media company and I need twelve or

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>thirteen billion dollars in debt. Is there even a market

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>out there for me? Well, I think there's there's probably

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a market. But the question is what's the price right now?

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the public markets, and you're

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>seeing it in spades over the last several days in

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the public equity markets, but we're seeing it all the

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>time in the credit markets, what is the clearing price?

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And the clearing price is determined by the value. What

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is the value of the business and or the or

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the assets, And that's going to be driven a lot

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>by what is the expectation for the cycle going forward.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You tell me where we're going to be with rates

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>next year, and and somebody who's asking me whether we're

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a hard landing. We're a barely a one

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>percent growth rate right now. We had negative growth in

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the first and second quarters. Some folks, you know in

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg including you're saying kind of a one percent It's

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to have a hard landing when you're going along

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>at one percent growth, right, So, what I think we

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>see as sort of a sloppy sideways where companies are

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to be continually trying to figure out, Okay,

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>where do I maneuver through these supply chain shortages? How

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do I keep my costs down? In an era of inflation,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>food prices, energy prices continue to go up. And again,

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're in an active management scenario where um,

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you're having a manager look very carefully at the free

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>cash flows of these businesses. Are retail investors gonna say, Okay,

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm comfortable with this manager because they've been through a

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>downturn before. We've been around for twenty years, We've seen

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>these ups and downs. You're dealing with though much more

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors. I mean, you're dealing with big numbers, right,

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you have big assets under management? Um? Is there

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>room for a smaller player in private capital? Is there

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>room for retail investors really get into it? Well, there's

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely room for retail investors. And in that case, it's

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>really a question of education. What is private credit how

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>does it help defining it as an uncorrelated asset class,

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't move with all the markets. So we

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>don't care where the DAO is today or yesterday or tomorrow.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>What we care is and when we look at our

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>portfolio companies, how are those businesses going to go through

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a cycle? And then explaining it to investors, here's why

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you should be comfortable with our track record with very

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>few losses over the last twenty years, through multiple cycles,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and with very careful screening of companies to make sure

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>that if we do hit a downturn, that those companies

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to be safe. Real quick, thirty seconds. What's

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a typical deal for you? What do you look for?

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>So we look for companies that are leaders in their field.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>We look for companies that are backed by the best

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>private equity firms that we have close relationships with, who

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of the thought leadership about Okay, why

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the sector and why this business um And we look

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 1>for structures that are conservative fully secured by ass that's

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in cash flow, low leverage pricing that is at a

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>premium to the public markets. And second and third ways

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>out because we all know that things happen you want

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to make sure their ways out if something happens that's unexpected,

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and then there always is all right, good stuff. Randy Schwimmer,

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>co head of Senior Lending and Senior Managing Director Churchill

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management, talking about the private capital business and again

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>as the public markets. And you've got a very popular newsletter. Yeah,

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>well we should that because you have a big readership

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and for this kind of a niche industry, right, I

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>think it's a pretty big deal. I appreciate that the

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>lead left dot com and it's free to any friends

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of this group right here because we're friends of Bloomberg.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff. I love to hear that. I range Schimmer

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Joints as we appreciate that. In studio he had the

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>long walk across the street, So we appreciate folks. They're out,

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they're getting out. And about how about that Hurricane Ian

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>has come and gone, but boy, the destruction in Florida

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and some other places is just extraordinary. Let's put some

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>numbers around, uh, the costs of the storm. We can

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>do that with Matthew Palozzola. He's a senior analyst covering

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>property and casualty insurance for Bloomberg Intelligence. He trains is

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. So, Matt, what's

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the headline number in terms of the insured loss coming

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>from this storm, which I think is one of the

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>biggest ones sure, So it's shaping up to be perhaps

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the second largest insured hurricane loss ever after Katrina, after Katrina. Um,

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's actually even bigger than the Twitter

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Elon deal at at around sixty billion dollars of insured losses,

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>which could imply that the economic losses would be over

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion dollars. And who backs up? The difference

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is that does the government take over that some of

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a government A lot of infrastructure is not insured,

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of it would be that a lot

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of it could be uh, you know, uninsured properties too. Yea,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, so this was bad. But if it hit Tampa,

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we were talking to you a week or

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>so ago that could but had a much bigger number.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>But still this is just huge. So we avoided the

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>worst case. But it's just it's just a less bad

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>bad case. Um. The direction on Tampa people were talking

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>about that kind of scenario costing insurance companies a hundred

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars which might have cost two dred billion in

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>economic losses. So, um, what is the result here for

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the insurers? I mean, um, they're obviously prepared for this

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, but this is pretty big. So this

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is a big um. This will hit the reinsurance market,

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>which is insurance for insurance companies. A couple of things

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to note is that catastrophe losses there haven't been a

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>lot so far in the year, especially in the quarter,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>so they have budgets for these things. We we have

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>some analysis that says this could cost about of third

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>quarter earnings on average for a selected group of companies,

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>which is what we would say an earnings event, not

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>a capital event. All right, So to us about just

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the insurance industry in in Florida in general, because it

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes to the insurance business. I mean, it's

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>not it. I thought the insurance infrastructure umbrella in place

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like Florida, which has so you know, they're so prone

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to these storms, would be more robust. But it's really not,

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is it. And it's it's in trouble. So one of

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the biggest, not the biggest insurer in the state is

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the state. So if you can't get insurance from private

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies. You have to go to citizens, which is

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the state fund. Uh and the policies and forces have

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>been growing and growing, and what's essentially happening is the

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>reinsurance companies don't want to give reinsurance to the primary

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>companies there and a lot of the smaller ones have

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>either left the state are actually gone insolvent. What does

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>this mean for rates for premiums? So typically the adages

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you get a big storm loss and rates kind of

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>spike up. Um rates will be going up for homeowners

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>insurance anyway. Rates on the commercial side have been going

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>up for a couple of years anyway, So I don't

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>think that adage is gonna hold this at a time

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>when rates rates are going up. Oh well, you know,

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are going up, which helps the insurance comes

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>on the investment income side, which theoretically means they don't

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>need to raise prices as much, but they still will

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>get your hopes what percentage of you know, you drag denistry.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>You look at some of these homes, are they all

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>insured or do people just say it's too expensive, I'm

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>just going to roll the dice. So if you have

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage, you need insurance right, And if you're in

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a flood zone and you have a mortgage, you need

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>flood insurance. I think what where the we're not going

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it is is the take up on flood

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>insurance outside of designated flood zones. So like if you

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>looked at these counties down there, that take up rate

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>people who buy the flood insurance is around thirty and

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that's probably only the people who need to buy it.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So the people who don't need to buy it don't

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>buy it, and then they have a flood loss and

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 1>it's out of there. And that's what these losses are, right,

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>because it was the surge that was the most damaging.

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So some of it is when I'd say sixty billion,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>that is not including the flood. It might include some

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of the National Flood Insurance Program, but it's not. That's

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly not the flood losses because a lot of that

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 1>will be uninsured. So what's it like to be an

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>insurance company these days? With wildfires every day in the news.

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>If it's not wildfires, it's raining, then the mud slides

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>from the stuff that was burnt, or hurricanes or superstorms

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, I guess they just adjust their models

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on the risk premium, and they do they go merrily along. Well,

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>if and if it's not that it's a pandemic, and

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.239
<v Speaker 1>if it's not that it's a war in Ukraine. So uh,

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, they're they're used to these things. Non

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>correlated risks are are tough, or massively correlated risks are

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>also tough. So uh, they've been adapting to new things.

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that's interesting is there's a ton of

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff that just isn't insured. So it's it's a little

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of an exciting time to be an insurance company

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>because you know, there's cyber there's there's tons of things,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of new opportunities. They'll be very weary

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to get into these things, but I think the ones

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>who first move will be good. So away from this storm,

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>when you're at a dinner party, and I'm sure you

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of invites as the insurance analysts, of course,

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you excited about? What do you what do

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you talk to people about when when when the woman

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>next to you says, hey, what are some good opportunities

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>out there? What do you recommend? Um? You know, the

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the interesting companies, to be honest, are the boring companies. Right,

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So you look at the bell Weather is like a

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>chub um. You know, it's just a company that keeps

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>growing every year, keeps being the best underwriter every year.

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know what another one's interesting is a I G.

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>They're they're working on a spinoff of their life insurance unit.

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Their valuation is much lower than the than the group average,

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think their performance has been catching up to

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the group. So it's it's a nice kind of turnaround story.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Kicks me out? Did they how come they insured something

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for me? And they were great about it, like no

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>questions asked, here's the money, thanks very much, and that

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>they were like, you're not coming back your Picasso, and

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>then they dropped exactly exactly all right. Matthew Palazzola, thanks

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here our studios here. Matthew Palozola.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>He covers property and count casualty insurance companies in industry

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. So he's been a person in demand.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>He always seems to be this time of year. So, man,

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I guess so earnings will be kicking off in a

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks and it usually leads with the big

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>investment banks um and I think it's gonna be a

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.479
<v Speaker 1>little dicey for these guys that the major earning season.

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm focused on a number of other companies. I saw

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that til Ray is coming out with earnings on Friday.

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the marijuana um we brand company, and then a

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of other weed companies are coming out on Tuesday.

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I just find it so interesting. I've been talking to

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>some analysts um in the industry, those who are allowed

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to because it's difficult to get coverage on this, and

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, like, these socks are trading for two time

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>sales for five times earnings. I mean, they're priced for uh,

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>some kind of drop in demand. But of course it's

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>only going to ride. This is more and more stags go.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, but let's talk Wall Street. We do that

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>with Alison Williams, Senior Global Banks and Asset Manager Analysts.

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I hired her as the Bank Sandles, but her title

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>keeps getting bigger and bigger and bigger. Bloomberg Intelligence Paul

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>has always taking credit for you, by the way, yeah always,

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>let's why tell us what we should be thinking about

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>for these earnings coming off for the big banks and

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>investment banks that you follow me what's JP Morgan, what's

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley? What are they gonna be saying in this quarter?

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So one thing we know is week fees Okay, so

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I P O S have you know, are are sort

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of completely gone away almost compared to record year last year.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Fees are gonna be down fift Wealth management fees are

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be weak. Asset management fees are gonna week

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>over draft fees are gonna be weak. So okay, but

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>don't we have a steeping and we have a steeping

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>yield curve. Isn't that good for you? So stepien and

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>yield curve is good. But it does take a while

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to to sort of feed through. And I think one

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we're gonna be watching um at

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the at the US Bank is loan growth and that

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>interest margin expansion because we think there's gonna be some slowing.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Our overdraft fees going to be weak because consumers have

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>been so responsible in terms of watching what they spend.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I think because banks have been pressured to cut eliminate.

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I will never understand this. Why do they when that

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>her go to issues? Yeah, but you know what, you

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>only get charged and overgraph fee if you spend more

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>money than you have in your account. Just don't do

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that right, rightly. That part of fiscal responsibility that everyone

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>should learn it is opt in service, right, you have

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to opt in for that service. So so it is

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting that the continued scrutiny there. But um but fees week,

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>as we said, um, loan growth slowing, and I think

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we've been worried about, right, Like everyone's

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>excited about rates going up because it's good for the margin,

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but you need people to borrow, and as rates are

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>going up, are gonna we haven't had any of your

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>your big banks that you however, nobody's pre announced yet,

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have they No one's pre announced, And I think that

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the as they said, a lot of

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the bad news, as we now always relates to the outlook,

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>right Like we're not we're not so worried about the

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>last three months, but we're worried about what's ahead. So

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>what what are the trends in loan growth? What does

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that tell us about next year? And then provisions that's

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>still a wild card, right, So in terms of the

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>economy and in terms of the accounting at these banks,

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>banks have to look ahead, reserve over the life of

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the loans UM and so there are some accounting and

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>assumptions there, and as the assumptions get tougher, UM will

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>there be some provisions. The exciting thing this earnings go

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>around is we have four big banks kicking off next Friday,

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have all the answers, if you will, sort

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of in one day. UM. Fixed income trading, the rate

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>side of things is going to be very strong. So

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that's positive for for people like JP Morgan and City

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>when they kick off the results equity trading UM, it's

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be down from the prior year. UM and

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>again we'll be looking to see those investment banking pipelines.

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there any potential to execute uh that you know

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>some of that pipeline going into your end. That's really

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>going to depend on the market. So you don't cover credit,

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sweee credit? You do? Okay? So what's the deal here?

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Have they just had uh? Have they just had a

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>lack of faith in UM market partners? Well, I'll say

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>two things with the recent price action. First, when a

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>bank comes out and says they're evaluating their strategy, and

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that strategy may or may not include a capital raise,

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that's that's never going to be good for the stock.

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Stocks hate uncertainty, and especially if that uncertainty, um, you know,

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>could relate to dilution, it's going to be hard for

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>those shares to study. And then when you have markets

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like we've had, right, So Credit Sweets was very volatile

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. It was not a strong market, so that's

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously a contributor. Banks in general are under pressure. There's

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty about banks. European banks are under pressure.

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>But they've had to reneg on deals they've made with clients, right.

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Apparently they lend out stock to clients, agreed to do

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it contractually obligated, and then they realized they can't get

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that stock from other market participants, so they've had to cancel. Well,

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, Bloomberg News has reported that I'm you know,

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>less familiar with those intimate details inside the bank, but

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:33.479
<v Speaker 1>I would say that, you know, the the bigger picture

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for Credit suitees is risk management, right, So that's really

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what killed them last year. They had all these they

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>had all these hits. Um, they made some steps potentially

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>not aggressive enough. You know, sometimes hindsight, if the market

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>had been a great market this year, maybe maybe things

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>would have been different, but they're not. They need to

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>make deeper cuts. They've made changes at the top UM

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, I guess that the tough thing

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be what are they going to say to

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>instill confidence? Because whatever plan they come out with, that's

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 1>also gonna take time and patient capital capital. Alison Williams,

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Alison Williams, Senior

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>banks analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. One of the biggest I

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>think themes in investment in the last decade plus has

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>been E s G, Environmental, social, and governance. It's attracted

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of assets for investors that are looking to,

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, focus on those issues in their investing. But

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's getting a little some pushback recently. UM

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg has a story out on that. We welcome Priscilla,

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News. She's in our London office. Priscilla,

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about kind of the work you guys

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have been doing looking at this E s G investment picture,

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>It seems like it may not be delivering some of

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the benefits that it that some of the

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>early folks were talking about. What did you find, Hey,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>good turnoon here from London. Thank you for having me so. Uh.

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This story that we have out that is also in

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the Markets magazine that it is going to come out

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>next week. Um. It's also the result of an investigation

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that we did for six months. We looked into companies

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>that issue sustainability linked bonds in particular. So sustainability linked

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 1>bonds are different from green social and sustainable bonds because

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>when I'll do like a short explanation, when a company

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to the market and they issue a label bond

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like green Social sustainable, the money that they take from

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>investors for that bond needs to be allocated for a

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>specific project. With this sustainability linked bonds, the story is

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>slightly different. So you take the money from investors, you

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>can use that money for whatever you want as long

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>as you and you tie this this bond to a

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger like corporate climate goals, so you can take this

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>money as long as you achieve other goals at a

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>company level. And it turns out out then when looking

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 1>at those bonds that boomed in Europe over the past

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>two to three years, uh, most of those goals they

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>were irrelevant, they were weak, or they were already achieved

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so the companies they weren't like they were achieving goals

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that were already achieved. So yeah, so the penalties like

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they weren't. Uh, the industry itself wasn't living up to

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>its potential. I mean, of course, why would you put

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>yourself as a company in a position where you're forced

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay millions of dollars and penalties. I mean, if

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>you have a whole bunch of investors who are willing

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to give you money for cheap because they think you're

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do something special, and then, um, you said,

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>super easy goals for yourself, low hurdles that you clear

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.240
<v Speaker 1>with no problem, that's like a win win for the company,

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, that an absolute win win. In those bones,

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>they were super subscribed by investors, especially in an environment

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>of low interest rates like that we had in the

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>past two years. That's the part I don't get. So

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>why why this is the part I don't get. Um,

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I understand why Chanel uh did the deal. I don't

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>understand why the deal was oversubscribed. I mean, who wants

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to give them a better rate for pretending to be green? Well,

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so investors did. At the time. The bond was super

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribed by investors. So when in an in an environment

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>where interest rates are so low, everything that comes to

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the market is super subscribed, right. And also when you

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>have a new portfolio, a bond that is labeled, it

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 1>gives the impression that you're doing good. So this bond

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is fulfilling, uh, sort of like E s G investment mandate.

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>But there's so much going on, so many bonds coming

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to the market, that maybe investors are credit analysts. They

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't dig down into the numbers to look at this. So, Priscilla,

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>is there any sense that you know, investors are like

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>latching onto this idea that hey, maybe this isn't such

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a great deal. Is there any pushback from the investment community. Yes,

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 1>So lately we've we've started seeing the headlines coming. We've

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>seen investors like moving Toro prize that they said like

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>criticizing those products, saying that they are not living up

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to their expectations. That companies are doing this and they

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>took massive advantage of those conditions to bring those zeals.

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So those criticism is there and it is becoming more

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and more evident. Did um central banks participate in these deals?

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I remember at the time the e C B

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 1>was all green as well as was the EU. Yes,

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 1>so the European Central Bank. So the market really started

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.800
<v Speaker 1>off in Europe at the end of two thousand nineteen,

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.399
<v Speaker 1>but we had like one to three deals. The first

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.280
<v Speaker 1>one was a bound for ann L, the Italian utility company,

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>which is by the way, one of the biggest issuer

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of this product. Um. So the market started in but

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it really kicked off in two thousand twenty one, and

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>that's because the ECB started buying those bonds, so sustainability

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>linked bones started being eligible as collateral for the European

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank from then and since then, because the central

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Bank was able to participate in those sales, they boomed.

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing. It's almost like, I mean, a conspiracy theorist

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>would say that the board that Chanel knows some people

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 1>on the e C being convinced them to do this

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 1>to get them easier financing. Um. But I guess those

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>days are gone, right. The pool of investors, you right,

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>has shrunk and central banks clearly are pulling back. Yes,

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And now there's also more and more attention

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>into those deals and people are looking at the documentation

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>because the market now has evolved. We have because it

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>was new right in two thousand ninety, not only a

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of people knew what they are what they were

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at. So now there's more base, there's more point

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of comparison, so you can go into the material and

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to the documentation of such bonds and actually see what

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they're all about. And investigators are looking into it even

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:17.439
<v Speaker 1>beyond you, right, I mean, uh, courts. Well, Uh, that's

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>what we hope, that's what we hope. So far, the

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>regulators haven't gone down in Europe to the route of

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>looking at the ambitiousness of the goals, but we could

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>only hope that is more and more deals come to

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the market and investors are more of the work, we

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>start seeing that they're not achieving the goals are actually

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>relevant to climate and to climate change into addressing the

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the proposed goals, I was gonna say go ahead now,

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>out of like all the deals that we've that we've analyzed,

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 1>there's not a single bond that pays more than one

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>percent penalty if they failed to achieve, So this is

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 1>not relevant for a company at all. Yeah, that makes sense.

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Interesting stuff. Priscillassato Roca, reporter for Bloomberg News, talking about

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the e s G Investing son I think getting some

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>pushback on maybe some of the initial promises that were

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:17.839
<v Speaker 1>made by folks in the E s G community. Thanks

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three. Put on false Sweeney I'm on Twitter

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney before the podcast. You can always catch

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.