WEBVTT - Why It's So Hard for Apple to Move Production from China to India

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Odd Lots listeners.

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Tracy.

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>We're doing another live show and it's right here in

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>New York City.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this one should be our biggest yet, and we're

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 2>going to have a bunch of Odd Lots favorites and

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>do something maybe a little different to some of our

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>previous live podcast recordings.

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>When the guests are revealed, the show is going to

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>sell out right away, so you should really just go

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>get your ticket right now. It's June twenty sixth. It's

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at Recket, NYC, and you can find a ticket link

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots or Bloomberg Events

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash odd Lots Live and.

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Why we hope to see you there.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Oudlots podcast.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Tracy. I'm gonna confess something I've kind of hinted it.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>It's not that big of a confession, and.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of hinted it already, which is that if

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants to impose a bunch of terrorists on a

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of cheap, random plastic goods from China.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm fine with that. That's cool.

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Fifty one hundred percent, one hundred and forty nine percent.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll consume less. I'll be a little bit more of

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a monk or something like that.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm fine with that.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, But isn't the argument not necessarily the cost, although

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>there is a cost on individual consumers. But the argument

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 2>is why do we want to focus on shifting plastic

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>production and toy manufacturing to the US. That's the criticism, right, Like,

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 2>why specifically focus on cheap goods in factories?

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>No, you might be right, Like, I don't think there's

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>much value in safe, you know, moving a plastic stepstule

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>factory or a stroller factory or whatever to the US.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't really see the point. I want there to

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>be affordable strollers obviously, just buy and large a lot

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, fine, this is not much of a confession, Okay, but.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I will confess too that if the price of a

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>new iPhone went up a lot, I would be pretty annoyed.

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I tend to notice these things. I tend to replace

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>mine every two or three years or something like that.

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>There are areas that we do import significantly from China

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that are not cheap child skis, cheap junk is. People

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like to fantasize that that's all China produces. There are

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>areas that I would be very upset to pay a

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>significantly higher price.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, getting back to the goal of tariffs and protectionist

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>trade policies, I assume, you know, putting tariffs on iPhones

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>would be about moving some of the production closer to home,

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>and I think there there's an open question about whether

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 2>we want that as well, because for most of our lifetimes,

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the stories we've been hearing about iPhones in China are

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>all about how terrible the labor conditions are and how

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>difficult it is to actually make these things. So right,

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I can see, you know, some strategic argument. Obviously, semiconductors

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 2>are considered a very important strategic goal nowadays, but the

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 2>actual manufacturing, you know, there is that China story out there.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, I think the administration is very sensitive to people

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>like me. One of the first things, even in the

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>midst of the heat of the trade war, and I

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.119
<v Speaker 1>should note we're recording this May twenty ninth, it could

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>be that the whole trade war is illegal. There was

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that court ruling made last night. We really don't know

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>where things got to end up. They're clearly sensitive to

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone thing, and so there were some carve outs

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>specifically related more or less related to that. I think

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>during the first Trump administration, Apple got some reprieve. These

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>are sensitive areas. Yes, we want to build up the

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>capacity to expand technological production, high tech things, high value

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>add things, and so forth, but we don't want the

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>sticker shock. This explains, of course, some of the sort

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of multiple personalities administration, if you will.

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's also the added complexity of building up these

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>very very advanced supply chains, right, and if you look

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>at Apple and what they did in China, that was

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 2>built over the course of many, many years, decades even,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>And the idea that the US is suddenly going to

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 2>flip a switch, a terriff switch and move all that

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 2>production elsewhere seems a little optimistic, right.

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And then there might be flipping a switch, but not

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in the full direction. Maybe there are multiple dials on

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the switch. Sure, so then one possibility that you hear

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is okay, maybe move more to India. But I don't

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>think Trump likes that. But maybe that would be a

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit better from the US perspective, in the sense

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're not contributing as much to Chinese economic development,

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and so, okay, it's not bringing jobs back, and Trump

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>said moving to the US. From time to time you

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>hear about maybe they could be built in Brazil or something.

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But all of these raised the question. There's two things.

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>It's like, hey, is this realistic at all? If door

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is switch that you could pull is move to the US,

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>move to India, that switch would have been moved. And

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>then the other thing, too is what does it even

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>mean to build the iPhone in India or the US,

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>because there's final assembly, et cetera. But of course component

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>parts within the iPhone themselves. Also, much of it is

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>actually made in China. And you know, I'm sure there's

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>thousands of tiny pieces of various things doing things, and

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>there many of them are built in China. So even

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of like we're going to move X production

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to X country is not a clear statement because it

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>could just be the final packaging or whatever, and that's

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>not really where the value add lies, which means we

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>really have to more deeply understand how and what gets

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>built in China and what it would mean to even

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>move that. Well, we're even talked about when we're talking

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>about moving these things, let's do it. Well, I'm very

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.799
<v Speaker 1>excited to say we do indeed have the perfect guest.

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be speaking with Patrick McGee. He's at

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the FT but he has a new book out came

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.559
<v Speaker 1>out May thirteenth called Apple in China Like the Capture

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of the World's Greatest Company, And it is a book

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>about the history of Apple's deep relationship with the state

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of China, with the economy of China, the sort of

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>co evolution of these entities. So much of the iPhone

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>story we know is sort of inextricably connected with the

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>rise of Chinese manufacturing. This is what Tim Cook is

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>known for in the very beginning. So Patrick, thank you

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on outlaws my pleasure.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Hi Joe, Hi Tracy.

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean if Apple says, oh, we're moving

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>more production to India or we want to what does

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that term mean to you?

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Ah? Well, cleverly, they don't say that. They say they're

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 3>moving assembly because they they know, but the reader probably doesn't,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 3>the lister probably doesn't. There's a massive distinction between assembly

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 3>and production. So I think Apple is sort of orchestrating

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.799
<v Speaker 3>this effort. Right, There's no press release that says anything

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 3>from Apple, so you can't quote Apple. But insofar as

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the word got out, you know, my money's on Koupatino

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>being behind this. So yeah, I mean put it this way,

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>if there are a thousand steps in making an iPhone

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and the final one is now being done in India,

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>that's enough to have a quote unquote substantive change to

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 3>the product, and therefore the box can say made in India.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Nothing about that phone is any less dependent on the

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 3>China centric supply chain than any other phone you have

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 3>ever purchased.

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so on this note, maybe a good place to

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 2>start is walk us through your typical iPhone, the one

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 2>that Joe is buying every two or three years. What's

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>its I guess birth process, Like, where do iPhones come from?

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 2>And what is the actual supply chain that creates them.

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 3>That's such a funny question. I'll tell you one funny answer,

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 3>which is that I asked, you know, a very senior

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>person at Apple how an iPhone is made, and he said,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 3>have you seen the I Love Lucy clip of them

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>making chocolate have you ever seen that? Yeah, of course

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 3>I actually hadn't. So Okay, so picture of its conveyor

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>belt and the chocolate is coming so fast that eventually

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 3>they just start heating them rather than packaging them up. Okay,

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 3>So there's a method to the madness here. I mean,

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Apple is able to take Adam Smith's idea the division

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>of labor and put it to the hilarious degree that

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 3>out does Nathan Field with the comedian trying to do

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 3>this with house cleaning two decades after the fact. So

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 3>it is often the fact that on a conveor belt

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 3>you have nine to eleven seconds to perform your task,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, putting a module in the left hand corner

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 3>or whatever, before the next iPhone comes over. So that's

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the final assembly process, and that's really what is taking

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 3>place now in India ramping that up to avoid tariffs.

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 3>But the actual production we're talking one thousand components and

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Apple works with the tightest engineering tolerances possible, only high

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 3>quality materials. That you put this in car terms, they

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>are making ten million porsches a year rather than ten

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 3>million volkswagons, right, and the numbers are just staggering. Right.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 3>So if you're doing one thousand components a day, and

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 3>you're shipping one million iPhones a day. That means at

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>peak season, you were doing the manufacturing, the logistics, the

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 3>just in time production of one billion parts per day.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 3>So find me an American factory that can do one

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 3>of those parts, because China has factories that can do

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 3>it for all one thousand. That's why nothing is moving

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 3>here anytime soon. It's the combination of Apple's imperfection for

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 3>defects quality and Apple's gar gantu and titanic like quantity.

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>There is producttion of Apple products and I believe iPhones

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in India or sorry, assembly of Apple products in India.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about the efficiency or the relative

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>efficiency because obviously the company has been thinking about these

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>risks for years and years and years, and I'm sure

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>would love to not be this tightly linked to one country,

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>which we know, for all the reasons we don't need

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to get into is risky. What do we know about

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the efficiency of its assembly in India?

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Let me just give you sort of objective numbers and

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 3>then we'll go from there. So the first iPhones made

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 3>in India were actually in twenty seventeen, OK, and by

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three, India was assembling about twenty five million iPhones.

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Go back a decade. The first iPhones were made in

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 3>China in two thousand and seven, and by two thousand

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 3>and fifteen you had two hundred and thirty million iPhones

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>being built. So roughly speaking, the quote unquote diversification in

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 3>India is happening at one tenth the pace of the

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 3>original creation and scale of the iPhone, and even that

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 3>vastly over the speed of development in India because, of course,

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 3>in the early years of the iPhone, I mean you're

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 3>literally inventing things like multi touch glass, right, you were

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 3>inventing and redesigning the iPhone every single year, whereas India

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 3>is basically just having to do the final steps in

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the process, and it's still not happening very quickly. Now, really,

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 3>what changes is that in Shanghai twenty twenty two, the

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 3>city enters lockdown, and that's a city of more than

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty five million people. It really is the first time

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.599
<v Speaker 3>in Apple's two decade history in China where did the

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 3>government provincial officials in this case, really had made a

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 3>decision diametrically opposed to Apple's interests and that's when Plan

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 3>b Let's really ramp up in India went into effect.

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 3>But it's been almost three years since then, and even

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 3>so you don't have a whole lot going on there.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I've talked to the engineers. They're called manufacturing

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 3>design engineers. These are the people who sort of do

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 3>the handholding the engineering one zho one in different countries,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 3>and they've been ramping up in India, and what they

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 3>find is that the ecosystem isn't there, the industrial clusters

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 3>aren't there. You don't have eight lane highways to and

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 3>from the factories. You often sometimes don't even have stable

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Wi Fi in the taxi the cab on the way

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 3>to the factory. Engineers are sometimes staying two hours away,

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 3>which means four hours of their day is just going

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 3>to and from the factory. And if they don't have

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 3>a stable cellular connection along the way, it can be

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 3>a little bit maddening. So many things you don't have.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing you just don't have is the

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of Nietzschean will to power on the part of

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 3>New Delhi to make manufacturing their thing. And you don't

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 3>have what engineers call quote unquote China speed, which is

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 3>just like this inexplicable, speedy development that would wow Apple

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 3>engineers in the earliest years. So, just to give one

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>example that's not in the book, there was this example

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>where these engineers from Apple are in this factory that

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 3>needs to be sort of retooled for the Apple line,

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 3>and it's the size of a football field. It's enormous,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 3>and they estimate, okay, it's going to take two to

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 3>three weeks to get this machine removed. They come back

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 3>the next day it's all been moved, and it's totally

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 3>blows their minds. All they've done is gone to sleep,

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 3>head breakfast, and come back and everything is complete. And

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 3>that which is happening in China all the time, and

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 3>it just is not happening in India.

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I like the idea of just one more lane bro

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 2>will solve our domestic iPhone assembly production problems. That's pretty funny. Okay,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 2>So I want to back up a little bit, but

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 2>can we talk a little more about Apple strategy in

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.239
<v Speaker 2>China specifically, So how much of that was a deliberate,

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 2>conscious decision versus something that just kind of happened alongside

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess the wave of outsourcing and globalization that we

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 2>saw in the late nineteen nineties early two thousands.

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, great question. And what I like about your intro

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 3>tracy is that I really do think the story of

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Apple and China over the last twenty years has really

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 3>just been about the tedium of assembly. A journalists have

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 3>won prizes for this kind of thing, right, and it's

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 3>set into motion this cat and mouse pattern where a

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 3>journalist goes into a factory and says, all these workers

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 3>are working too hard, there's underage employees, et cetera. And

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 3>then Apple is shame into making changes and it sort

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 3>of plays the role of White Knight improving factory conditions

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 3>across China's supply chain, and then journalist win's an award,

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 3>and then two years later someone does the next thing

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 3>in a different factory, and so on and so forth.

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 3>But we're totally overlooking questions of Apple strategy, like what

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 3>did they quote unquote discover in China that nobody else discovered?

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 3>And so really the book is an attempt to do that.

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 3>So the first thing I'd push back on is Tim

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Cook is very often called the architect of the China strategy,

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 3>and it's not to discredit him to say that he

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 3>is not the architect. Nobody is the architect. Basically, what

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 3>happens is really the supply chain itself, with or without

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Apple was moving to China. And so the basic history

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 3>of the eighties and nineties PC boom, like predating Windows

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 3>ninety five and then coming after, is that the fight

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 3>for computer dominance is exclusively based on things that are

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 3>boring logistics, manufacturing, distribution, right, because everybody's using Windows, everybody's

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 3>using Intel chips, and nobody's thinking about design. There is

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 3>no equivalent of Johnny I've at Dell, at Compac, at

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 3>any of these companies, and so it's really this mundane war,

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 3>and it's driven by largely American and later Taiwanese contract manufacturers,

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and so they are the ones who, in competition with

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 3>each other, start going to Asia to sort of oust

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 3>each other right and gain market share, and eventually they're

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 3>the ones who really find China. So when Apple is

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 3>doing their own outsourcing moves, they're working in multiple countries

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 3>before the armies of flexible, ubiquitous, low paid labor in

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>China really win out. So my story has this five

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 3>part chapter called Apple's Long March to China. It really

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 3>tells you that the candy called iMac that I'm sure

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 3>both of you and all of your listeners remember, like

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 3>that was made out of Korea by LG who then

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>expanded to Mexicali and Wales. Fox Con is brought on

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 3>as a second supplier, and that's in China, but it's

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 3>also in the Czech Republic, and it's also curt in California.

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 3>But when you've got these operations in multiple countries, especially

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 3>once China enters the World Trade Organization two thousand and one,

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 3>all you have to do is look at an Excel

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 3>sheet and realize that the efficiency, cost, the scale and

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 3>anything China is winning. And so Apple begins to really

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 3>consolidate everything into China. And around two thousand and three

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 3>when the iPod Mini becomes the most ubiquitous product Apple's

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 3>ever created, and then there's just no question that when

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 3>the iPod nano is invented, that's where it's going to

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 3>be built, and when the iPhone comes out, that's where

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be built. So it really is just

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 3>like stumbling into greater and greater volumes and success in China.

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 3>And I give all sorts of credit to China. I mean,

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 3>people think it's an anti China book. If they haven't

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 3>read it, it really isn't. There's only one place that

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Apple could have succeeded the way they did, and it's

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 3>because China had tailor made policies. We're leading industrial clusters,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 3>we're leading industrial policy and hardworking people that would do

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 3>this for twelve hours a day, six days a week.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Is the book an anti Apple book? I mean you

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>say it's not an anti China book. Apple who's created

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>literally trillions of dollars in value for Americans. It's created

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>thousands and thousands of amazing, high paid jobs that are

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>much better than the jobs that are at the assembly

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>or factories that exist in China. Is it an anti

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple book?

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 3>No. Anyone thinking it's an anti Apple book will be

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>in for a rude awakening because you'll quickly realize that

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 3>for starters, when I say I spoke to more than

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 3>two hundred people, I'm only counting the people with Apple experience.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Then I spoke to other people as well, in supply chain, academics, journalists,

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>that kind of stuff. But it is told through the

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 3>eyes of the people in the weeds on the grounds,

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, directing Apple's success. Right, So the first chapters

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 3>in particular, I mean, the first part is called Saving

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Apple is really just a story of Apple's genius in

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 3>pulling off these maneuvers and coming off the brink of bankruptcy.

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 3>They are literally days away from missing payroll. In nineteen

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 3>ninety six, I think I reveal for the first time

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 3>they'd even hired a Chapter eleven lawyer. And then as

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 3>the sort of hail Mary move, once they've got a

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 3>bit more money after selling a factory in Colorado, they

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 3>bring back Steve jobs. And really the first narrative is

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 3>just like this raw raw, go Apple, Can they do it?

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>And even in two thousand with the dot com bust,

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 3>like they're close to bankruptcy again and Gateway literally tries

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 3>to acquire them. So the story is one of sleepwalking

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 3>into a geopolitical reality. Really, as China changes, I mean,

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't criticize anyone at Apple for moving to China

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>in the early two thousands. That's what everybody was doing.

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I would even say there was an American consensus rather

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 3>than some bipartisan effort, that going to China was good

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>because you were going to inculcate the next great democracy,

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, and maybe in a hubristic or arrogant way.

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 3>But like Americans would have said, that's what we did

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 3>for Taiwan, that's what we did for Korea, Germany, et cetera.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean after World War Two. So there was all

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 3>sorts of reasons to move to China. The problematic decision

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 3>was that once Xijinping comes into power, Apple is not

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 3>an innocent bystander. As Xixhinping hardens his tone and becomes

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 3>more belligerent, he attacks Apple within thirty six hours of

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 3>taking the reins in March twenty thirteen, and that was

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 3>the point at which Apple could have made a strategic

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 3>decision to diversify its supply chain to India or something. Instead,

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 3>they ramp up their rewards for shareholders in the form

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 3>of buybacks and dividends, and they doubled down in China,

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 3>appointing a team to basically understand Chinese culture, understand Chinese politics,

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 3>and come up with a way of demonstrating to the

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>country and it's efficial. Look, we're really really in this

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 3>for China, as it were.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 2>What exactly was Apple's pitch to Chinese leadership? And I

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 2>guess how did it change over time? How much of

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>it was about, Oh, we're going to create jobs that

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 2>will pay more than agricultural wages, better standards of life,

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe relatively, versus the strategic value of building up China's

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 2>tech sector and all this strategic semiconductor technology and things

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 2>like that. How did it shift over time?

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's a fascinating narrative, And really the first four

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 3>parts of the book leading up to twenty thirteen are

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 3>just foundation buildings, so you sort of understand the history

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 3>of Apple and what sort of problems they're having. Essentially,

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 3>what happens is when chies in paying at tax Apple,

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 3>you can understand why he's upset with the company. It

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 3>looks like an exploitative power because their margins. Apple margins

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 3>have gone from something like one percent in two thousand

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 3>and three to twenty five percent in twenty twelve. But

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 3>at the same time, if you look like a company

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 3>like Fox con foxhon in absolute dollars made more money

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 3>than Apple for each of the first four years of

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the twenty first century. But as they get more involved

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 3>with Apple, their margins collapse from double digits to about

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 3>one or two percent. And so you can just do

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 3>this with really any company working with Apple, and it

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 3>looks like they're not in it for China, right, They're

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 3>not doing anything for the country. And Apple it takes

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 3>them two or three years, but they totally flip this

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 3>narrative on its head. So out of fear that Beijing

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 3>is going to force Apple to operate a bunch of

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 3>joint ventures, right, these fifty to fifty companies where China

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 3>owns the other half, and then they mimic the technology

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 3>and eventually oust you. I mean, this is what happened

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 3>in high speed rail for instance. Beijing has advocated joint

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 3>ventures for decades, really going back to the nineteen eighties.

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 3>So this is where a Western company is allowed to

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 3>be in the Chinese market. But the quid pro quo is, look,

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 3>if you want access to our operational efficiency, if you

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 3>want access to more than a billion people, you have

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 3>to operate in a joint venture where the Chinese half

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 3>of the company is going to learn everything they can

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 3>and then thrive on their own. Apple doesn't have any

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 3>joint ventures, and so they look like this anti China

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 3>model that's just exploiting the country. Is able to really

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 3>flip this on its head and say, look, it might

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 3>be the case that Samsung has three dozen joint ventures

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 3>and we have zero. But you need to understand we

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 3>work with hundreds of factories across the country. And the

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 3>reason they're only getting paid one percent margin, two percent margin,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 3>the reason they're sometimes even losing money on their partnerships

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 3>with Apple is that we are offering them the equivalent

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 3>of Ivy League hardware engineering training. We are sending people

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>over by the literal planeload to China America's best engineers,

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 3>where they train, audit supervised, install hundreds of millions of

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 3>dollars worth of machinery. They train the line, they supervise

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 3>the line. And once those companies have these skills that

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Apple gives to them, they are basically able, at least

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 3>after some time of exclusivity, they are able to supply

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 3>somebody else. So who's just like Apple, but in China, Huawei, Apo, Vivo,

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Chaome and so those companies today have fifty five percent

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 3>global market share of the smartphones. And the reason that

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 3>they're so good is that Apple trained all of their suppliers.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 3>So that's the message Apple gives to Beijing, and essentially

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 3>they've they sort of had a free ride ever since.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 3>It would be insane for Beijing to go after Apple

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 3>in some direct way because Apple is the great teacher

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 3>of China. They offer way too much and the numbers

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 3>we can get into are staggering.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Tracy real quickly before we move on. So Apple has

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a three trillion dollar market cap. Do you want to

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>take a stab at what the market cap of Hanahei,

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>which is the company that owns Fox Hanhai Precision Industry.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to get guess what its market cap is?

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 2>No, I absolutely do not. Just tell me so I

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 2>don't want to embarrass myself.

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Seventy two billion, three trillion versus Now, granted they're not

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the only company that makes them, but yeah, these are

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not as these are nowhere near as profitable industries use

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>this term. Apple is the great has been a great teacher,

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and I want to get into what people have learned

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>from Apple development and then built competitive companies. But you

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned those old and I hadn't thought about them in

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>a long time, those old iMacs that were multicolor, that

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>called a lot of attention. Some of them were really

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>not trivial at all to build with the existing man

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing technology that existed in the world at the time.

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And I remember sometimes they would announce a new one,

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, but we're really sorry to tell you

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to be able to produce this one

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the emerald green yet because we haven't perfected how

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to bend the plastic or whatever the material was, the

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>glass of emerald green, whatever that color is. It creates

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>an issue and all the people in the audience will

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>go boo.

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 3>But then they'd get.

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>There like six months later. And then you mentioned the

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>multi touch glass, which didn't originally exist at the time.

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>How much is it co learning? You know, we have

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this divide of there the designers and coopertinos and the

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>assemblers and the builders somewhere in Asia. But something also happens,

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And there's a theme repeatedly on the show where innovation

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>happens at the shop floor, and the idea of cleanly

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>drawing the line between the designers and the building is

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a fallacy. It must be the case that at least

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>in some of these realms, whether we're talking about the glass,

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>whether we're talking about the ability to bold plastic green

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>plastic into a pretty iMac that innovation also happens in China,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Apple benefits from that learning as well.

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm wondering if the right analogy would be something

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 3>like a graduate student at Harvard writing a paper with

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 3>their professor. Right, it is something along those lines, like

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 3>the Apple engineers by the planeload are going over there,

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 3>but they're absolutely co inventing something. Right. So I was

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 3>told that like the ideal manufacturing design engineer right would

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 3>look at what Johnny I had come up with and say,

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea how to build that, but I'm

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 3>going to do my best to find out. Right, So

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 3>they would have a certain skill set and with a

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 3>whole team of people, of course, and they would go

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 3>to the Chinese factories and they find the suppliers who

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 3>might have some background in multi touch glass, let's say, right,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 3>or we're adding electrical circuits to the glass, and then

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 3>they would train and co invent the next processes. So

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>they're not just co inventing the parts, they're co inventing

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 3>the processes that make the parts. Right, what Elon Must

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 3>sometimes calls the machine that creates the machine. So I'm

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 3>glad you brought this up, just because in no way

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 3>am I saying like the Chinese offered them nothing or

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 3>something like that, right, Like, it's not like to say

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 3>that Carvard it's a great school. Isn't to say that

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 3>like the students that go there don't deserve loads of credit.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Of course they do. And the same way like Apple

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 3>is a teacher of the Chinese and to be fair,

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 3>like the founder of Huawei has called Apple the teacher.

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 3>But that's not to say that they could have done

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 3>this anywhere. In fact, if anything, I think Apple has

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 3>a bit of hubris, believing that they can replicate their

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty five year investment into China and go do it

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 3>in India. And it's like, guys do not understand like

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 3>the degree to which China was a once in a

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 3>century partner with all these tailor made policies, they would

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 3>just build factories at the time that you and I

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 3>would still be doing the environmental paperwork. I just don't

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 3>think you see that in India, and you don't see

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that in America either. So China is not just like

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 3>a blank slate with lots of people. They offer all

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 3>kinds of things to Apple and Apple, and to be fair,

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 3>they offer all kinds of things to anybody. But Apple

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 3>understands the opportunity just better than anybody else.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 2>So you make the point in the book that there's

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 2>I guess a tension between a company like Apple and

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 2>they're very very sharp focus on shareholder returns and quarterly

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 2>profits and continued growth and just throwing off loads and

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 2>loads of cash. There's a tension with I guess nationalism

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 2>and economic and strategic development. And so Apple's focus on

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 2>growth has been to China's strategic and developmental benefit and

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe less or so to America's at least in terms

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 2>of strategic things. And what's funny is right after this interview,

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 2>we're actually going to speak to Avadao, who wrote a

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 2>book on Huaii, and she makes the point. Yeah, she

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 2>makes the point it really dovetails with your book, but.

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>We didn't mean to schedule like that.

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, But she makes the point that stock prices

0:25:56.359 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and balance sheets can't fully capture the societal value of

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a nation's technological competency. And this is something that maybe

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Huawei understands better than an Apple. Where do you see

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess the key differences in sort of corporate culture

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 2>between a Huawei and an Apple.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 3>So I might be taking this in a slightly different

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 3>direction than you're thinking. So if I need to re

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 3>answer in a second, let me know, but the Chinese

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 3>don't prioritize profits or margins the way that we do.

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 3>They prioritize control of the industry because if the Chinese

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 3>can take over something like electric vehicles, they in effect

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 3>de industrialize all their rivals and really gain dominance. The

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 3>place that you can see this most clearly is solar panels.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Nobody in China is making thirty percent margins on solar panels,

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 3>but more than ninety percent of solar panels are now

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 3>made in China. This is a technology that America invented

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 3>in the nineteen fifties and itself had eighty to ninety

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 3>percent market share of in the eighties, but we cannot compete.

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 3>That is basically what's happening with electric vehicles right now. Hence,

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 3>even before Donald Trump became president, Joe Biden put one

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent tariffs on Chinese made evs, and I think

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 3>it was just a few days ago that BYD slashed

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the prices of their evs in a bid for greater competitiveness.

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 3>So look, I think China has a state sponsored form

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 3>of capitalism. I'm emphasizing that it is a form of capitalism,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 3>but it's not a shareholder maximization form of capitalism. It's

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 3>a command and control form of capitalism.

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned, and I had never I had either forgotten

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>about it, didn't realize that Shujinpin called out Apple very early,

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>within thirty six hours of taking power in twenty thirteen.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk a little bit about the sort of

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>evolution of the CCP and Apple's relationship with it over time.

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>There is obviously this perception then she specifically has taken

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>on this more nationalist, ambitious edge versus his predecessors. Can

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you talk a little bit just more about that specific

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Apple and the CCP itself, beyond just the

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>economic capacity on the ground.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 3>So Apple gets in a sense a misleading picture of

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 3>what it's like to operate in China because when they

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 3>really consolidate production, it's two thousand and three, and that's

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the beginning era of Hu Jintao. Key later is nicknamed

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 3>the Woman with bound feet. His presidency is sometimes called

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.239
<v Speaker 3>the collective presidency because there was really an inability for

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 3>just him alone to make decisions, and so it ends

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 3>up being this like ten year period of China being

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 3>a multinational playground where rules aren't really enforced, just like.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>This Honeymoon, this Honeymoon Golden Era, where like sort of

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>China on easy mode.

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, yeah, and so Apple's really taken aback to the

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 3>point of just total confusion and having an inet response

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 3>when Xijinping really comes in and as I said, what

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 3>happens is like CTTV, which you could think of as

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 3>like a state sponsored CNN of the country, attacks Apple

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 3>for warranty differences of all things. It basically excuses Apple

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 3>of treating the Chinese customers in an inferior way by

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 3>refurbishing phones rather than giving them new phones when certain

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 3>problems are happening with them. And I have to say

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 3>this is the prologue to the book because basically opened

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the book and in the first paragraph apples and crisis.

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 3>And so I'm trying to go for like a white

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 3>lotus opening, if you will, before it becomes like this

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 3>nice beach read with the overhang of suspense that you

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 3>know that you know it's going to hit the fan

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 3>by twenty thirteen. But I have to say the narrative

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 3>leading up to it is wild, which is that in

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and eight, for the Beijing Olympics, Apple opens

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 3>its first store in China, purely as a marketing opportunity

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 3>for the Olympics. I mean they're actually happy that the

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 3>site they've been given is small, because everybody assumes it's

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 3>going to lose money. You have to remember that for

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 3>the first iPhone, Steve Bomber, Microsoft's CEO, laughed at the price,

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 3>and he's referring to American buyer saying, no one's going

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 3>to pay six hundred dollars for an iPhone. So if

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 3>you can understand like that, nobody thought it was going

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 3>to work in America. Why would there be a retail

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 3>sector in China, a country with developing wages and no

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 3>appetite for such an expensive product. Well, by twenty ten,

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 3>the iPhone just becomes the most conspicuous symbol of I've

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 3>made it in China, and to such an extent that,

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 3>like the lines outside what are now four stores in

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 3>China at the time, there's thousands of people. They're snake

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 3>climbing around these stores. But the thing is they're not

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 3>like Joe and Tracy excited for the next iPhone and

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 3>just camping out overnight because I have to have it.

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 3>It's migrants that have been trucked in like by the

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 3>bus load to buy as many iPhones as possible. So

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 3>these quasi gangsters, these scalpers known as yellow cows, can

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 3>a mass, let's say, ten thousand phones and go to

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 3>a city where there is no Apple store, and they

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 3>sell them at hawked up inflated prices because it's such

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 3>a conspicuous status symbol. I don't want to go on

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 3>and on about this, but essentially what happens is you

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 3>have to understand these gangsters are connected with the triads,

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 3>and they begin finding ways to make more money per

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 3>iPhone than Apple, but they're illegal ways. They're buying phones

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 3>in the US using fake IDs, so they're buying them

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 3>for less than one hundred dollars because they're buying a

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty four month contract but only paying the first month.

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 3>They're smuggling them into the country, they're zapping the processor,

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 3>rendering the damn thing irre inoperable, but at the same

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 3>time masking that it's a stolen phone essentially, and Apple

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 3>is totally flum mixed, not understanding what's going on, not

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 3>understanding Chinese culture, certainly not understanding Chinese politics. And this

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 3>is the origin story of the warranty differences. It's because

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Apple was trying to clamp down on these illegal practices,

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 3>and that story sort of gets lost in translation. But

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 3>that's why China's so upset with Apple in twenty thirteen.

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to.

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Correct the record here, which is I do not, in

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 2>fact camp out in front of an Apple stores waiting

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 2>for the latest iPhone. I think my iPhone is like

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 2>seven or eight years old. It works so well these days,

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 2>you really don't want to play exactly. I am the

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 2>customer that Apple hates because I am very satisfied with

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 2>my ancient phone.

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, seriously, what model of iPhone you have? Is it

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 3>really an eight? Or well?

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 2>This is I really don't I don't know either.

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>If you had asked me ten years ago, what model

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>iPhone do you have? I would have been able to

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>answer right away. If you asked me right now, I

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have no idea.

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 3>I bought it.

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>That's years ago. It's been so long since I've thought

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that it was important to know the differences. You know,

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>at one point I was like, oh, that's a lot different.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Now it's like, there's the game seems so marginal at

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>this point from each generation, at least as someone.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 3>That's not you know, it's just cringing right now, I

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 3>hear that. Yeah, I don't care.

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you said something interesting that at the time of

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the rush to China, there was this sort of consensus

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in the West that this was a good thing because

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it would accelerate the process of democratization of liberalization, the

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>likes of which maybe we've seen in Korea, Taiwan, so forth.

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, in theory, one of the things

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that business leaders really liked about doing business in China

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>was the fact unions aren't legal. There's this heavy hand

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of the state that keeps wages in check, and keeps

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>organizations in check, and probably keeps environmental groups in check,

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>et cetera.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 3>How much was this.

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Tension not appreciated that this phenomenon that we may be

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>expected to see play out in China of liberalization and

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>democratization would have been explicitly not what the business leaders

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>going to this country would have wanted to see.

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's absolutely a sense that business people had

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 3>just like agreed sense of why they wanted to be

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 3>in China. But I guess what I'm trying to push

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 3>back against is because it's like obviously a strategic error

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 3>in retrospect and obviously we experienced the China shock and

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 3>our own industries got hollowed out. I feel like now

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 3>there's just like a revisionist sense that like, we were

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 3>never doing this for valid reasons. There was never a

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of like real geopolitical strategic sense, right that Bill

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Clinton or Larry Summers were just like in the pocket

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 3>of business people and so forth. I just don't really

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 3>find that convincing. Taiwan was under martial law until the

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 3>late nineteen nineties, effectively, maybe it was the nineteen eighties,

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 3>but then in the late nineteen nineties they had their

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 3>first democratic elections. This is of course an ethnically Chinese island,

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 3>and you know, it was very much used. I mean,

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 3>however problematically, it was used as an example of we

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 3>could export democracy through capitalism. I do think there was

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 3>a track record and people made that argument in good faith,

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 3>in addition to business people who saw it for their

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 3>own purposes.

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 2>So one way of describing that Apple China relationship is

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 2>they're sort of frenemies, right. There is a tension built

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 2>into the relationship, but both sides got something out of it.

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 2>If we fast forward to today's environment, we have tariffs

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 2>in the US obviously, although no one knows what's going

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 2>to happen with those. You have China making a very

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 2>conscious decision to build up its tech sector. Who has

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 2>the upper hand in the relationship right now? Who is

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 2>the power?

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 3>So I would push back, I would not call them frenemies.

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Tim Cook and Chiesiping, broadly speaking, have the same interests,

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 3>which is to say, the more that Apple is allowed

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:32.399
<v Speaker 3>to have its production consolidated into China, the better their

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 3>scale is, the better their margins are, et cetera. That's

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 3>what Chijinping wants as well, because he understands, basically because

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Apple taught him that having Apple production in the country

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 3>engenders a form of technology transfer that helps the rest

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 3>of the electronic sector, which is a quote China scholar

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 3>an economists very not and that is the most important

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 3>thing that Chijinping wants, right. I mean, I compare Apple's

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 3>presence in China to something like that of the Marshall Plan,

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 3>something that sounds insane until you look at the numbers

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 3>and you realize that it's bigger than Marshall Plan. So

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 3>the problem is actually that Donald Trump and Tim Cook

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 3>have diametrically opposed interest which is to say that if

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump could move all production out of China, he will. Well,

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Apple doesn't want that. That's an existential threat quite. I

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 3>really mean that that's an existential threat to a three

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollar company. So that's where the tension is. The

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 3>tension really isn't between Cook and she, as strange as

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:21.959
<v Speaker 3>that is, it's between Cook.

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 2>You really don't think there's tension between Apple and China,

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 2>even with the tech crackdown, even with Xijinping coming out.

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the first things that he says is that

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 2>criticism of Apple, and clearly he's trying to like extract

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 2>some things from the company that the company is maybe

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 2>reluctant to give up.

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And the rise of really good Chinese competitors that are

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>winning market share all around the world, maybe outside the US.

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Tracy's examples are historical, right, So I'm not

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 3>saying there's never been tension. Of course, there's been loads

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 3>of tension, but the way that Apple responded was in

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 3>effect to playcate federal and provincial officials so that they

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 3>haven't really had any problem. Right. So there's a tension relationship,

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 3>let's say, But insofar as it's a marriage, I think

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 3>it's actually a pretty it's a Catholic marriage. There's not

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 3>going to be a divorce. It's going pretty well. The

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 3>problem isn't really between Apple and China. The problem is

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 3>to use the economic jargon, the negative externalities of the relationship. Right.

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 3>So the problem is that for everybody else this is

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 3>actually deeply problematic because if you have America's top engineers training,

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 3>a manufacturing supply chain that in effect can be weaponized,

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 3>and world's dominance, that's not a great place for Washington

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 3>or just your average American citizen. It's nice that this

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 3>relationship gives us relatively sophisticated and affordable iPhones, but the

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 3>downside here is that China is absolutely dominant in high

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 3>end electronics, and you can use those skills to build drones,

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 3>you can use those skills to build military weaponry. And

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Apple would frankly be training their chip makers if it

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 3>weren't for a Senate coming down on them pretty hard

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago. So that's the problem, right.

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 3>The problem isn't that something stops in the relationship between

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 3>Apple and China. The problem is that it continues.

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Just good to push back on this framing a little

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>bit and I certainly there is much that I find

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>very compelling.

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 3>About this story.

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>But you talk about the beginning of when the US

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and Chinese economies really got integrated in the late nineties

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 1>early two thousands, sometime around Chinese ascension into the WTO,

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Like everyone recognizes in retrospect that it's been a mistake,

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and has it been?

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean again, the other thing is.

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>That Apple is worth three trillion dollars. Almost every American

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with any investment probably has some exposure to it. It's

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>been incredible for the development and the alleviation of poverty

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in China. We've never gone to war with China. It

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like you know, in the modern era, it

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>hasn't come close to happening, at least so far. Like,

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>isn't there a version of this story that as long

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as we trust each other, Chinese students could come to

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the US and we could have the good jobs of

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like professorships at schools and so forth, and designers in California.

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And isn't there a story where this has made the

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>world wealthier and more peaceful.

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 3>So let me start just by completely agreeing with most

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.720
<v Speaker 3>of the points you just made. I think the poverty

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 3>alleviation in China has been really important and a net

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 3>good for humanity, and I think we have over the

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 3>last twenty years been a sort of golden age of

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, Silicon Valley works on the software, works on

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 3>the design, and China takes care of the hardware. And

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 3>insofar as there's like a mutually symbiotic relationship, there no

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 3>one fits that build better than Apple. So look, a

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 3>lot of good has come out of it. I mean

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 3>that that's absolutely true. I would totally disagree that we're

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 3>not seeing harbingers of war coming right. I mean, Chijinping

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 3>has literally said we will not leave the question of

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan to the next generation. I think he's gone so

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 3>specific as to say that twenty twenty seven might be

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 3>the year that Beijing and exes Taiwan. I mean, that's

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 3>really troubling, especially if you're Taiwanese. But it's really troubling

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 3>if you understand the chip sector, because ninety percent of

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 3>advanced chips come out of the country, and American military

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 3>officials have said that like in the event that somehow

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Beijing was able to take control of the FABS in Taiwan,

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 3>like we would go bomb them. We would bomb the FABS.

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean they would like if somehow TSMC survived the war,

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 3>which is basically untenable, but if somehow they did, the

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 3>American military would see fit to destroy them, because the

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 3>idea that they would be in Chinese hands without exporting

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 3>to America would be existential. So there's that, and then

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 3>there's just you don't have to be anti CCP, you

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 3>don't have to be anti China to recognize that this

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 3>is clearly America's biggest rival really since the founding. It's

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the USSR was never such an economic rival, never sort

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 3>of like rivaled America in terms of high end electronics.

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean absolutely there was like a nuclear arms battle,

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 3>but the Chinese are far more sophisticated. And like I

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 3>wrote my thesis on a Grand Strategy in America, and

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 3>what I would point out is that like in the

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighties, America started spending more or on its military,

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 3>understanding that the Soviet economy was not as dynamic, right,

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 3>and so it wasn't growing as quickly, and so you

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 3>were going to accelerate their own dem eyes if you

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of set up a military in which the Soviets

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 3>were likely to respond to the same vein. You cannot

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 3>apply that strategy to a country that is three or

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 3>four times the population and has literally been growing faster

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 3>than America for the last four decades. So it really

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 3>is a massive threat. And the idea that in the

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 3>event of some sort of battle, we're not able to

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 3>make stuff because we outsourced it all to China over

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 3>the last twenty five years is pretty dramatic. I just

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 3>think of World War two. Hitler was really concerned about

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the US coming in because of their industrial capacity. We

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 3>used to call it Detroit, the arsenal of democracy. We

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 3>don't have an arsenal democracy anymore, but we have trained

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 3>up China to be an arsenal of communism. That's I

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 3>don't think you have to be hyperbolic to realize that

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 3>that's a big deal.

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I have just one more question, and I'm going to

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 2>ask it very very briefly, because we're getting squeezed for

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 2>a time. But to what degree does AI and the

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 2>rise of this new technology complicate the Apple China relationship.

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Really complicates it? So for two reasons. One is that

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I would argue, or actually I could just demonstrate with

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 3>internal documents and some public documents that the iPhone has

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 3>become more Chinese with time. In other words, the number

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 3>of Chinese suppliers involved in the process is now much

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 3>greater than the number of Taiwanese or American multinationals operating

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 3>in the country or operating in their home countries. That

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 3>is put on steroids in the AI era because Chat,

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 3>TBT and other Western AI clients are not allowed on

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 3>the iPhone in China, and so Apple has to work

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 3>with the likes of bayd or Ali Baba to have AI,

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 3>let's say, displacing Siri or augmenting Siri. So that I

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 3>think is quite problematic because that means that Apple will

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 3>be in effect doing what they did for hardware, but

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 3>for AI. In other words, you'll have Apple software engineers

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 3>helping by Do, helping Ali Baba whoever their Chinese partner is,

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that they have cutting edge AI in

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 3>the country. If it wasn't bad enough that Apple was

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 3>training up their hardware engineering to be world class, we're

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 3>now in a situation where Apple software engineers are going

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to be training Chinese AI to be best in class.

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting stuff. Patrick McGee, thank you so much for

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>coming on Oline. That was a fantastic really fascinating conversation.

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Urge everyone to check out the book. Appreciate you coming

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>on my pleasure, Tracy. I thought that was really good,

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with that last point in the fundamental

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>sense that you know, I think arguably the relationship definitely

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>has been win win on multiple fronts, from the US,

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>from the Apple shareholders, from the Apple workers, from the

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Chinese workers' perspective. But this idea there are now so

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>much risks concentrated under a specific dimension. Yeah, I take

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that pretty seriously.

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:46.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the negative externality point makes a lot of sense,

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 2>although I still think there are some tensions between Apple

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 2>and the CCP itself. The other thing I was thinking

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 2>about was, I guess we're hearing this repeatedly on the show,

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 2>and I probably don't even need to say it at

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 2>this point, but it is. It's so difficult to replicate

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 2>China's industrial strategy and its industrial management in other countries,

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and I kind of at this point I wonder if

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 2>we'll ever get there.

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think anyone will ever get there. In

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 1>some sense, what I suspect is the story is that

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the Chinese industrial behemoths will slowly develop ecosystems

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in other countries, but the companies are downstream from China,

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I imagine, you know, you see more foreign outbound

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>investment from Chinese giants into Vietnam, into Cambodia, into Brazil,

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. That might pose other risks and they're never

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be the next China in some sense, but

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you still get that capital deepening and wealth creation outside

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of China, but likely driven by Chinese industrial giants.

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Also, Joe, yeah, I looked up my iPhone. Yeah, oh

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 2>it's an iPhone eleven. So I guess it's what are

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 2>we all years old?

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what we're even on now, like

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>only the biggest iphe nerds. And I don't mean that

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>pejoratively maybe like I have. I just I used to

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>know these I think it's really important. I used to

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>know these things, and I don't at all.

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Where are at all iPhone sixteen.

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And iOS eighteen.

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 2>Do you think one day we're going to get to

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 2>like iPhone two hundred and ninety eight, it'll just keep going.

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I think I saw our colleague

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Mark German, who is And now you say again, say

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this lovingly and Apple NERD. I think apparently, at least

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>with the software, they're going to change their naming conventions

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point. Yeah, so that it doesn't end.

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 3>That makes sense.

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I saw him tweet that last night.

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, shall we leave it there.

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Add Thoughts podcast.

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Follow Patrick McGee He's at Patrick McGee Underscore and check

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>out his new book. Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Carman armand dash, Ol Bennett at Dashbot and kel Brooks

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>at Cale Brooks. From our odd Lots content, go to

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where the daily newsletter

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and all of our episodes, and you can chat about

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>all of these topics twenty four to seven in our

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 1>discord Discord dot gg slash odlock.

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about Apple in China, then please leave

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 2>us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 2>if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 2>all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 2>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 3>And