WEBVTT - Tech News: Jony Ive and Apple Part Ways

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Be there and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are Yet It's time for the

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Thursday, July two thousand twenty two. Happy

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Best Steal day, everybody. Let's get to the news. A

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>huge story this week, at least in my mind, is

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that famous designer Johnny I've will no longer be designing

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for Apple, all right, so let's give a quick rundown

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>for those who are unfamiliar with I've. He started at

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple in the early nine nineties. This was an Apple

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>that lacked Steve Jobs because jobs have essentially been pushed

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>out of the company in and he would not come

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>back until I've had studied design all his life. His

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>father was a silversmith and his grandfather was an engineer,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>so it kind of ran in the family. And when

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs returned to Apple in ven and subsequently was

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>put in charge of the company, he and I've formed

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a type of partnership that would redefine Apple's look, and

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it would bring the company from the verge of bankruptcy

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>into an unprecedented era of success. So I've worked on

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>tons of iconic Apple products, including the colorful iMac line.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>You might not remember these. These were like the CRT

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>monitor Imax, so they look like old televisions, but they

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 1>had these very colorful shells on them, really vibrant ones,

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and everyone just wanted one because they looked cool and friendly.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I've spent countless hours on design, looking at stuff like

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>individual materials and testing out those materials to make sure

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that they would hold what his design called for properly

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and create the aesthetic he was going after. He would

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>obsess over the curve of an iPhone or the way

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>an Apple watch band would look on someone's wrist. It

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is not an exaggeration to say that a lot of

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple's appeal came out of Ive's work and input. Now,

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to overstate things here either. Obviously, there

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of other factors with Apple that are important,

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and I've led an entire department of designers who all

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>contributed to the success of the company. It wasn't just

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>one guy, but during the first decade of the two

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand's jobs and I've would be two of the most

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>prominent figures at Apple, things, however, would change after Jobs

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>passed away in two thousand eleven. Tim Cook, who was

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Steve Job's successor as CEO, has a very different approach

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to leadership than Jobs did. Cook is a financial genius,

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and he's well known for his ability to find new

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ways to generate revenue while also limiting costs. But Cook

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't really known for being innovative with products, nor is

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>he the salesman that Jobs was. That's just not who

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Cook is. His strengths lie elsewhere, and while Cook would

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>lead Apple to unprecedented profits, the press and Apple fans

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>began to worry that Apple was kind of losing its mojo,

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>that it was falling behind in technical and design innovation.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I've gradually began to step back from his work. In

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, he actually left Apple and founded a design

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>company called Love From, along with a fellow former Apple

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>designer named Mark Newsson. But even then, Apple would be

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Love From his chief client, and the two companies signed

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a three year deal rumored to be valued at around

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million dollars, where Love From would do a

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of design work for Apple, in some cases exclusively

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>for Apple because the agreement meant that love From was

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to work for any kind of company that

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>competed against Apple in certain categories. Now, reportedly, Apple and

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>love From have decided not to extend that three year contract.

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>The contract terms her up and they appear to have said,

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what, We're gonna walk away. That means that

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in thirty years, Apple will really

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be moving forward without any of ives involvement in the

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>design of its products. So does this mean that Apple's

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic is going to hold steady or are we actually

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>going to see a shift. Will some other genius step

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>forward and guide Apple's design in a new direction, or

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>will the team with an Apple do its best to

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of eight ives preferences. For some folks, the severing

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of this relationship is kind of a warning flag that

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple is going to gradually lose its appeal as a

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>company that designs sexy and appealing technology that you just

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>immediately want to pay cup in your own hands when

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you see it. That's how I think of a lot

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of Apple's products, even though I don't own many of them.

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>When I see those presentations, invariably I'm like, man, I

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>want to get my hands on that and see what

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels like. I think I will have to do

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a full profile episode about Johnny. I've before too long,

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not gonna go into any further detail here,

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>but i will say it is a pretty remarkable end

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of an era. Now let's move on to Twitter. The

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>company officially sued Elon Musk in a Delaware court over

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the issue of Musk trying to back out of his

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>deal to acquire Twitter. The filing is reportedly sixty two

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>pages long, and The Atlantic has a great rundown about

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit, including opinions on why Musk's arguments are aren't

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>likely to hold up in court. Uh namely that Musk

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is arguing that a flood of bots on Twitter means

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the platform is significantly overvalued, which Musk's team argue is

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>enough to allow Musk to back out of the deal.

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>The article has the title Elon Musk is a Nightmare client.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>The piece also points out some ironic features in the lawsuit,

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>namely that the filing portrays Musk as a capricious and

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>petty person and someone that you probably wouldn't want to

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>be in charge of your company. But the whole purpose

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>of the lawsuit is to force Musk to go through

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>with this acquisition deal and to purchase Twitter. So it's

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like saying, this guy's a joke. He should

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>not be running a company, and that's why you can't

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>take his excuses for why he can't run our company seriously,

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>So make him run our company. It's a mad, mad,

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>mad mad mad world, y'all. And of course it gets

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>better and the filing, Twitter revealed that part of the

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>deal it made with Musk was that the company would

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>not impede Musk's ability to tweet. He could tweet all

0:06:55.400 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>he liked. However, he was not to disparage Twitter or

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>its representatives because that would be in violation of the agreement.

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So it is possible that when Musk tweeted a poop

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>emoji at Twitter, that that would eventually come back and

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>haunt him and be used against him in a court

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of law. This is the world we live in now,

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>where a poop emoji becomes evidence. This is where we

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>are at as a society. None of the science fiction

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>authors predicted this, So Musk tweeting out negative things about

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and its representatives violates this agreement, which Twitter then

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>argues means that Musk has forfeited his right to terminate

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the agreement, and it gets juicier from there, And at

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>least from an outsider's perspective, I would say that it

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>looks like Twitter has the upper hand going into this litigation.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 1>But I am no expert, and Elon Musk has proven

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a slippery character on numerous occasions, so I'm

0:07:54.120 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not confident that he's out of serious trouble or as

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in serious trouble. I honestly can't tell one way or

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the other it is. It's a mystery to me, but

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's an entertaining one. Now, let's stay Muskie for a

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of stories and talk about the SpaceX Rocket booster

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>mishap earlier this week. Actually meant to cover this on

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday's episode because it happened on Monday. Then. It was

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in Texas where a SpaceX Starship Booster rocket burst into

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>flames during a ground test firing. Now, this was part

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of a regimen of fire tests with this booster, and

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to say this particular test was a failure.

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Musk himself acknowledged that the outcome was quote unquote not

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>good on Twitter, and must later said it appeared that

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>some unburned propellant from the raptor two engines of the Starship.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>The starship has thirty three of these kinds of engines,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that that was the cause of the fire. As of

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this recording, the teams are still assessing the causes and

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the damage. The exterior structure of the booster appears to

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be in pretty good shape, but I've yet to see

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>official word about the condition of the engines themselves now.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Originally SpaceX hoped to have a test orbital flight of

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the Starship by the end of this month. That seems

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>unlikely now, but again, there's been no official word as

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of this recording about when the company expects to conduct

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the test. I think the takeaway here is that rocket

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>science is hard. I mean, it's not brain surgery. And

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>over at Tesla, the company is saying goodbye to its

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>top executive in its AI department, Andre Caparthi, who has

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>served as director for Tesla's autopilot vision team, has announced

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>he is leaving Tesla. He has been part of the

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>company for five years, and this comes as Tesla faces

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny from the US government regarding the safety of the

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>autopilot feature in general, which has been cited as a

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>factor in some notable accidents, including some traffic accidents that

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>resulted in fatalities. It's also a time when Tesla as

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole has been laying off workers. The company recently

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>closed at San Mateo office after laying off most of

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the workforce there and transferring the remaining staff to other offices.

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So is this a further indication that Tesla might be

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in a bit of a sticky situation. I just don't know.

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not sure what Caparthi's motivations were for

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>leaving the company. It could just be that he wants

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a break, or maybe he wants a new challenge in

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>his career. I don't want to read too much into it,

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm saying. All Right, We've got more news

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>stories to cover today, but before we get to that,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. We're back Earlier this week,

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I talked about how a whistle blower leaked more than

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred twenty thousand internal documents from Uber to the press.

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Those documents covered Uber activities between two thousand thirteen and

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen, and mostly documented stuff that we already knew,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>just in much greater detail than we were aware of,

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>namely that Uber took to some pretty aggressive tactics in

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>order to expand into various markets, including but not limited

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to being pretty loosey goosey with local laws in an

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>effort to one established business and to then change the

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>laws in Uber's favor. Now I have more news about Uber,

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's grim. A group of more than five women

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have brought a lawsuit against Uber, alleging that they had

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>been victims of violence from Uber drivers, ranging from sexual

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>harassment to kidnapping to rape. The list of accusations is

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely horrifying, and the women claimed that Uber did too

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>little to prevent sexual predators from working as drivers for

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the company despite being aware of the issue. That's about

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>where we are right now. I'm sure we'll hear a

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more about this as the case moves on. But yeah,

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that is a terrible, terrible story, and I'll keep an

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>eye on and how it develops. Ring, the smart doorbell

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 1>and security camera company that's owned by Amazon, recently released

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a transparency report in which the company revealed that in

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>one it had received three thousand, one hundred forty seven

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>legal demands from various law enforcement agencies to hand over

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>surveillance footage that had been gathered from the smart doorbell

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>cameras and security cameras, so essentially turning customer cameras into

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>law enforcements surveillance cameras. Now that number of requests is

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>up from around nineteen hundred demands back in, or an

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>increase of around sixty and out of those three thousand

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>seven demands, more than eighty five percent of them were

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>accompanied by a court issued order such as a search warrant. However,

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Ring said that it turned over data as in footage,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and only around four out of every ten demands when

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you average it all out. So while of these demands

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>had a court order attached to them, were the ones

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that Ring actually handed information over. I'm not really sure

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>how this all shook out properly, but in addition to that,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Ring also received two thousand, seven seventy four preservation orders.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Now that's when a law enforcement agency asks Amazon to

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>hold onto data for up to six months while that

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>agency attempts to secure a warrant or other court order

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be necessary to demand access to the footage. So,

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in other words, this is an agency saying, hey, don't

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>delete this customer's data anytime soon, we might need access

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>to it. On top of that, Amazon shared footage with

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>police at least eleven times without any kind of warrant

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>or court order at all, something that the company had

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>previously indicated to customers wouldn't happen. The message to consumers

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is that Amazon is not going to hand over footage

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 1>to police unless they have a court order to do so.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out that in cases of emergency, essentially

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>when someone somewhere determines that there's imminent danger, Amazon can

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>share information to police, and that has led some critics

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to protest the practice. They say it sets a precedent

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and it could allow for future mission creep, meaning once

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you establish that there is an exception to the rules,

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it can be easy to have that exception expand over time.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And since this is a massive invasion of privacy and

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.479
<v Speaker 1>potentially a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution,

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>which protects against unreasonable search and seizure, that is a

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>significant problem. Yesterday, U S courts convicted former CIA employee

0:14:55.680 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Schultz on nine charges relating to leaking classified information.

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Who boy, this story is filled with a whole bunch

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of awful stuff. So first, Schult used to work at

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the CIA as a software engineer. In twenty fifteen, Schulton

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>filed a restraining order against one of his co workers

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in the CIA. Filed this restraining order in state court.

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>The two people, Schulton this co worker had been in

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>what CNN would describe as a feud. They got sent

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to different offices as a result. And then, according to

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors in this case, Schultz got angry at his employer,

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the CIA, when the agency started looking into bringing in

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a contractor to design a tool that was similar to

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>one that Schultz himself was already working on, and that

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this sent Schultz on a vindictive path. So, according to prosecutors,

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Schult then stole several cyber tools belonging to the CIA

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and then sent those tools to Wiki Leaks, the nonprofit

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>organization meant to serve as sort of a clearing house

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for whistleblowers. Schult left the CIA in t sixteen. He

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>got arrested in t seventeen on charges of possessing child pornography.

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Around that same time, Wiki Leaks began to publish what

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>would become known as the Vault seven leaks, the largest

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>leak of data in CIA's history. Prosecutors said that those

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>leaks originated from two programs that Schult was able to access,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>which implies that the tools Shult handed over to Wiki

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Leaks made the Vault seven leaks possible. While Schultz was

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>being investigated and prosecuted for the child pornography charges, he

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>then also was charged with leaking this classified information. He

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>had an initial trial that ended back in twenty but

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it ended with a mistrial. The government chose to retry

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the case, and that concluded yesterday on July two. That

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>one ended with Schult being convicted on those counts of

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>leaking classified information. He has yet to be sentenced, but

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this incident has become known, as I said, as the

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>largest leak of CIA information in history. All right, let's

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>move on to something less grim, at least for anyone

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't happen to be Google or YouTube. Tech Crunch

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>reports that the utes today are spending way more time

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok than they are on YouTube, and I think

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that comes as a surprise to nobody. VidCon, for example,

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Vidcan is a big conference that focuses on online video

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and traditionally, UH the big attraction of vidcan was the

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>attendance of YouTube content creators. Well, this past VidCon it

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was very clear that the focus had switched from YouTube

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to TikTok. Not that there weren't still YouTube creators there

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>there were, but that TikTok was largely the main attraction

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>at VIDCA this year. So that's a pretty strong example

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of where the trend is going. I'll tech Crunch employeed

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a research team from Q Studio. That's qu s t

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>u d i oh. That's a company that makes parental

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.959
<v Speaker 1>control software. And according to Q studios data, gen Z

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and jen Alpha users typically spend somewhere around nine minutes

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>on average per day watching content on TikTok and fifty

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>six minutes per on average per day watching content on YouTube.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So there would be about two and a half hours

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>of watching stuff online from just those two sources. But

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>considering how much television I soaked up when I was

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a kid, I can't get judge about any of this anyway.

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>The data shows what I think a lot of folks

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>already knew at younger generations are gravitating more towards the

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>short form content of TikTok than moving on to what

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you would find on YouTube and It's why a lot

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of platforms, including YouTube itself, have promoted features that present

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>content in shorter formats, essentially trying to mimic what TikTok

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is doing on YouTube. It's literally called YouTube shorts, and

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the goal there is to serve as kind of a

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>means of discovery so that users will see shorts that

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>attract them. They watch the short and then they'll say,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.959
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm gonna go and find the video

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that this came from, the longer form video and watch

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that too. Meanwhile, according to Business Insider, Google's s VP

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>prob Hoker rock Hoven said at a conference, the younger

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>audiences are turning to TikTok and Instagram to perform searches

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>rather than using Google to do though now that doesn't

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean that kids are using TikTok to do research

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for homework or anything like that, though maybe that's the case. Instead,

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the example given was more like you're trying to figure

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>out where you want to go to grab lunch, and

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that kids these days will look to TikTok and Instagram

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to find out, you know, goods aggestions as opposed to

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>using Google Search. So anyway, that's something Google wants to

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>address it, wants to develop new tools that will appeal

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to younger users so that they'll use Google for search. Meanwhile,

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting over here thinking I need to start a

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>TikTok account where I dress up in various quasi historical

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>outfits and do quick lessons on stuff like American history

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and Shakespeare or whatever. I could be the cliffs Notes

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok, except I'm sure that already exists, probably in

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple channels, but maybe I should do it. Anyway, while

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think about that, let's take another quick break and

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back with a couple more stories. Okay, we

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of stories to close out this episode.

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>First up, The Register reports that a letter signed by

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.479
<v Speaker 1>executives at some of the biggest tech companies in the world,

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>which include Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta, among others,

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>encourages state leaders to introduce computer science lessons for students

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in elementary, middle and high school here in the United States.

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>So the letter calls for kids to be given the

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to learn the basics of computer science early on,

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>including eventually how to code, with classes becoming more complex

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and in depth at higher grade levels. I think This

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is a great idea. Getting a grounding and computer science

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is practical, and it also means that students will learn

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to put other skills to use. Plus, it will mean

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that students who move on to colleges and universities will

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>already have a fundamental understanding before they jump into computer

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>science classes. That is critical. Computer science has advanced so

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>much in such a relatively short time that it can

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>be pretty challenging for students who have little to no

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>background in the subject to make progress at the university level. Plus,

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>computer science encourages students to learn problem solving skills like

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking skills, breaking problems down own in a way

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>where you can approach a solution that can be applied

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>outside the discipline of computer science. It's a really powerful

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>tool to have in your arsenal and it's something that

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had had access to back when I

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was a kid. You know, when I was going to

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>high school, the most advanced class we had in our

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>computer lab was data entry, right, that was that was

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the peak. That's as far as you could go. I

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>actually ended up taking an additional course in the computer

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>lab that wasn't even offered officially. I had to get

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>special permission to do it rather than take some other elective.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>And it turned out that I end up teaching the

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>class at least a portion of the class that were

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on the IBM computers because the teacher of my computer

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>lab was more familiar with Apple computers, so that's what

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 1>she focused on. Uh. Turns out I didn't do a

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 1>whole lot other than like again, data entry and word processing.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 1>So even though I was put in charge, I didn't

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>get to really advance my knowledge that much. And I

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>consider that real, you know, a real failure of the

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>school system, if I'm being honest, because it would have

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>been great to have had access to better educational tools

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to get into computer science, even just a little bit,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>because again in my case, it didn't happen at all.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Who is literally superficial applications of computers, nothing important about

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the computers themselves. So the letter also stresses the importance

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of fostering new generations of computer scientists because it will

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be a critical component for the workplace in general. That's

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>clearly been the case for a while. It's also critical

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for U S strategy to have experts and computer science.

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>You do not want the country to fall behind in

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that regard. In fact, a lot of people have argued

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that China is already well ahead of the United States

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>at this point, and that if we don't start addressing

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this issue, then we will be hopelessly left behind. The

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>letter also calls leaders to make certain that such classes

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are available to all students everywhere, including those belonging to

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>classically underserved communities. And I really hope that the letter

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>helps spur some action across the States. I think it

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would be incredibly helpful if that did happen. Finally, Nintendo

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>has a new acquisition. The company has purchased a CG

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>production company called Dynamo Pictures, which Nintendo plans to rebrand

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as Nintendo Pictures. The subsidiary will be tasked with creating

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>quote visual content utilizing Nintendo I p end quote. According

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to a Nintendo press release, that visual content is likely

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>going to include work that will actually appear in video

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>games themselves. Dynamo Pictures has previously done motion capture work

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on several large computer game and and video game titles

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like Death Stranding is one of them, so a lot

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of that work may be to reduced content that's actually

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>going to go into video games. However, I expect we'll

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>also see Nintendo Pictures work on stuff that's meant to

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>be on television or streaming or film. The acquisition is

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>not yet complete. It's still in the process. Nintendo said

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>in its released to two shareholders that it expects the

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>deal to close on October three of this year. But Yeah,

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm really curious to see what comes out of this.

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>It would be interesting to see if Nintendo starts to

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>generate more UH shows and films and stuff that leverage

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the I P. We know there's the Super Mario Brothers

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>movie coming out soon, which you know, the biggest story

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>about that is how everyone reacts to Chris Pratt doing

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the voice for Mario. A lot of folks were not

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>super happy to hear that, although I haven't heard any

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>specific like recordings from any of the sessions, so I

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know what kind of voice he's doing for the character,

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>or if he's doing a voice for the character, if

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he's just being Chris Pratt, don't know, haven't paid attention,

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>haven't checked in. But if he is just being Chris Pratt,

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that's going to upset a lot of folks

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>who are really hoping for the Itsamei Mario type character. Anyway,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to find out more about Nintendo pictures

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and what they'll be making in the future, so I

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>will be keeping an eye on that, and I'm sure

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about in future episodes of this show. And

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>with that, we are done with the news for Thursday,

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>July two thousand twenty two. If you have suggestions for

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>topics I should cover in future episodes of Tech Stuff,

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like if you really want to hear that

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that full profile on Johnny I, for example, although I'm

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure I'm gonna do that anyway, please reach out

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to me. There are a couple of ways you can

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>do that. One is to download the I Heart Radio app,

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>which is free to use. You can navigate over to

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the tech Stuff section of the I Heart Radio app,

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and on that section you're gonna see a little microphone icon.

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>If you click on that, you can leave a voice

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>message up to thirty seconds in length. If you like,

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you can let me know if I can use the

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>audio in a future episode, um, because I am all

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>about opt in, or if you prefer not to do

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that and I get it you maybe you're like listen

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>ug Onto apps already, or I don't really want to

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>talk on on your little microphone feature I totally understand.

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Another way to reach out to me is on Twitter.

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show is tech Stuff H s

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>from My Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app,

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.