WEBVTT - Bonus: Superpower Showdown

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Hi. I'm Andy Brown, the editorial director of the Bloomberg

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>New Economy, and I'll be with you for the next

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>few weeks sharing highlights of my two video broadcasts called

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>on the front Lines and Bloomberg New Economy Conversations that

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>look at how COVID nineteen is reshaping the global economy.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>You can find them all on Bloomberg dot com. Going

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>into this pandemic, U S. China relations were at rock bottom.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>They've since gotten much worse, with both sides trading blame

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>for the COVID nineteen outbreak, spinning conspiracy theories, and abandoning

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>cooperation on all fronts. To discuss what all this means

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>for the post COVID economy, I caught up with two

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal reporters, Ling ling Way and Bob Davis,

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>who just published a book called Superpower Showdown. It's based

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>on year as of inside reporting from the centers of

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>power in both Washington and Beijing. I hope you enjoyed

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this and other interviews on how the coronavirus is transforming

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the business world, and thanks to Stephanie Flanders for letting

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>me hijack her feed. Bob and Linglan gets great to

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>have you on the program. You've both been living and

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>breathing this US China trade and economic war from the

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>very beginning. Bob from Washington, d c U Lingling from Beijing.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>So bring us up to speed. How would both of

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you score this showdown so far? Maybe Bob you can

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>address that from a US perspective and ling Ling from

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 1>a from a China perspective. Let's start with Bob. Sure,

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and thanks great to be with you. Andy, really really

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. So you know, it's opening day and the

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>baseball season, and I look at it that way. I

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>mean we're like three three in the bottom of the seventeenth.

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>The pictures are exhausted. Everybody wants to go home. I

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a winner. It's just dragging on and

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>dragging on and they kind of taking a break. Uh. Sure. Also,

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much Andy for having a song. UM

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>really honored to be here. Um. So, on the surface,

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like China has scored some tactical wings.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Phase one trade agreement didn't really get

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>into the matters that Uh, the leadership cares about the

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>most industrial subsidies and as AU reform, none of it

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>was in part of the group agreement. And yes, China

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>did agree to buy tons of American products, especially act

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>UH purchases. However, you know, as we know that they're

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>not meeting really meeting the targets now, and the stuff

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they're buying now is also what chinaese at the moment,

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the soybeans and porks and chicken feed and all that

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>so um, you know. UH. And also Beijing seems to

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>be using this trade agreement as some additional leverage over

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the trmmonistration, so the trum reministration wouldn't push too hard

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in matters like human rights and what's happening in Hong Kong.

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>So on the surface does look like, you know, Beijing

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is gaining some kind of upper hand. However, really dip

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>down the cost of the trade war to China's super

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>significant and first of all, UH, it has shattered UM

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>investor confidence, you know, especially among business private businesses. You know,

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we have seen for months UM growth in private business

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>UH investment have been plunging. And yeah, the only thing

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that's propping up China's economy now is state investment, state

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sector investment. And another big casualty of this trade war

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to China is Chinese reform. Right now, there's no moment

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>term to carry out all those needed changes to the

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese economy. So longer term, um, I really think, Um,

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the momentum, the reform momentum, doesn't come back,

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to see China will win in the

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>long run. A lot of people congratulately Trump on standing

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>up to China, but fault him for his tactics. What

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>should he have done differently? Well, I mean I agree

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>with you know, the the reform effort in China is stalled. Um,

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the US isn't going to really get the purchases they

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they expect. So you've got to kind of

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>look at it from the US perspective. What do they

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>get out of it? I mean, it's China changed in

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>any significant way. I wouldn't say it's changed at all. Um,

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>So what would be the alternative? The alternative clearly would

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have been to try to recruit allies to work together

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>put pressure on China in a multilateral fashion. I mean

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>from day one, the Trump inistration rejected that. They blew

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>off the Transpacific Partnership literally on the first day, and um,

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, various times just made it clear they wanted

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to go one on one with China. Early on in

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>April two thousand seventeen, the French president mccrown had come

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to the US for a state dinner. He talked to Trump,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>talked to him, said, you know, we can work on

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this together. And Trump literally said to him, I got

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>this one, you know. And and that's the way in

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>which they have tried. So yes, they've gotten China's attention,

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 1>They've certainly gotten the world's attention, but they haven't really

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>gotten very much in the alternative would have been to

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.679
<v Speaker 1>go the really hard slog route of you know, lining

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>up report, running up allies, and confronting them with you know,

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>with a united kind of world, sort of a w

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>t O alternative. Langley, you're one of the very very

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>few US reporters to have penetrated the Chinese leadership talk

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>ranks in John Nana High. First of all, I want

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to ask you what do they really make of Donald Trump?

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>He was very confusing to the Chinese side, very unpredictable.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, they spent really a lot of time figuring

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>him out. But on the other hand, you know, in

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a sense they also felt like they had him figured out.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>His transaction, everything on the table. So get give some

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>big number, give him big number, and he he would

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>accept it. Briefly, who do they want to win the

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>November election? Trump or Joe Biden? Um? I think, um,

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously there's some officials in China still think

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to this day Trump is a gift for China because

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't care about human rights and all those other issues. However,

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think there is a sense among at least

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>some corners of the government they they're they're hoping for

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a new beginning because they're making things really hard for them,

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, as evidence by the recent very sudden decision

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to close the Chinese consulate in Houston. So and they

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>look at that Biden as someone that they might be

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>able to talk to because Biden, as Bob mentioned earlier,

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>he might choose to go back to those multilateral organizations

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, choose to work with different nations, including China,

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on issues like climate change, you know, trade and all

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the other issues. You know how Chinese love dialogue and

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they're good at conducting dialogues. So in that sense, they're hoping,

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of them. I can't speak for what

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>president she did him want if I knew, I would

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have run a story about that, but I didn't. Just

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit divided. It's hard really to see

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>for sure staying with staying with China for for now.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Some some people watching the glacial pace of economic reform

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in China, which you've just referenced, have come to the

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that changing Chinese trade practices is basically mission impossible.

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if if she Pain truly believes that the

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>state led economic model that he is building and reinforcing

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is essential to the continued uh survival of the Chinese

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party, what could possibly persuade him to change course.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question for years, as you well know, Andy,

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>foreign pressure. What's good for reforms in China? You know,

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>back during the w teer era, right Ju longy he's uh,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he's a huge proponent for reforms used that uh, that

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>w T negotiation to get China to do some very

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>painful reforms, especially involving that SO era. Right now under

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Si jing Ping, that kind of uh, um, you know,

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that's no longer the case, um for impressure is actually

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>bad for reform because um, this narrative of the US

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to keep China down. It's really taking hold not

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>just in a shilst coast, but also among the Chinese public.

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Ling Ling has taken us inside Humanhai, the Chinese leadership compound,

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>take us inside the White House. So you've got Treasury

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Steve Manouchin on the one side, and he's pushing

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for a deal. Wall Street really wants a deal. You've

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>got the hawk ish Pete Navarro on the other side.

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>He would like, probably to see all of American companies

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>pull out of China and bring jobs back to America.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And in the process, he would, hope, I imagine, sort

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of bring the Chinese economy to its knees. And then

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got a president who's swinging between these these two poles.

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>How did all this play out in the negotiations? Well,

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean in our book, I mean, what we talked

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>about is a Wall Street Trump and a blue collar Trump,

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and there are both. He is legitimately both of them.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, his rants during the campaign about

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>China ripping us off, ripping off the US um, you know,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>stealing jobs and all that sort of thing, he does

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>genuinely believe that. Um. On the other hand, he looks

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>obsessively to the to the markets, right, and he ping

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>pongs between both of them. I mean you see that

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>playing out in his aids. Also, as you sort of

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you laid out, there are people in that White House

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>who believe that China is the greatest threat to the

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>United States is the rise of fascist and in the

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties, he is not one of them. Um, there

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are people in that White House who think, you know,

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, China is a problem. Certainly it's a problem,

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>but you know, there's a lot of problems in the

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>global economy, and you know, let's not let this get

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>out of hand. And he's not one of them either.

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So he goes from pole to pole, and the different

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>advisors play off of that, um and so at some

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>points you see the sort of blue collar ish, the

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Navarro and Lightheiser wing kind of went out. At other times, Uh,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, he pulls back when the markets react the most.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>The clearest signal for watching somebody is unparticular as Trump

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is what are the markets doing? The markets react, you

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>can count within within a week he'll back off on whatever,

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever it is. I think you can see

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this now on closing consulates this speech, that speech against

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>China at the markets move, then it'll tamper down. If

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't, you'll see more. We're rapidly running out of time,

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but I just want to ask a couple more questions.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I know you've done a lot of You did a

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of reporting on the impact of Chinese exports on

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>US manufacturing communities and so called China Shock. Right, it

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>resulted in several million lost jobs and places like Pennsylvania, Michigan,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina and helped propel Donald Trump to victory in

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the last election. What's happened to those communities since then?

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Will they vote for him again? Well, you know a

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of those communities there have been so they're they're

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>factory towns we're talking about about basically in the Southeast

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Midwest, and factory town have not done particularly

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>well under Trump. Uh. Even before COVID manufacturing employments down

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs hit. Uh. They might protect some companies, but

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>there are many more companies that use products than than

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>produce products. So you know, they were not beneficiaries of

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this trade pack or this trade fight, and I neither

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>were the farmers. On the other hand, there are many, many,

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>many other reasons. You know, workers and farmers are you know,

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>supportive of Trump. I I don't think he's lost. You know,

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing a story now on factory towns. I don't

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>notice any you know, shrinking away. It's all the sort

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of other kind of people, right, the suburban housewives, the

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of classics that you hear about that where you

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>see the shrinkage. But back his base, his base is

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>still pretty damn strong. Okay, quick one for both of you.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>This showdown is obviously a lot about much more than trade.

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>We've gone from a trade war to a tech wall,

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to a talent wall, to a financial wall. Now business

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>leaders like Ray Dialio or Bridgewater a warning about a

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>shooting war. What is the sequel to superpower showed down?

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Where is this story going? Briefly from each of you, Well,

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean a shooting more is like, you know, into

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the world scenario. So no, I don't think we're going there.

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>We've never got into a shooting world with the Soviet Union.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't see why in the world would possibly get,

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, to that extent. I mean, I think we

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>are probably at this point at in a cold war, right,

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I Mean it's a different sort of cold war, but

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in it. I think one thing that's

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>really hard to tell. I mean, we're also in the

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>silly season, right, I mean, we've got three months to

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in an election. So I mean all the sort of

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>tough you know steps that Trump is taking, if he

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>wins the second term, does he really continue to that level?

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And if Biden you know, uh, defeats him. Um, I

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>think the long term strength trying to stroy disengagement. But

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly the tone will you know, will change enormously last

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>work to you Lingle sure, Um, you know it's kind

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of ironic in away, right. So trade was the area

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>where where the relationship started to crumble, and now trade

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is the one of the few remaining channels where both

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sides still talking to each other. So right now this

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>relationship really is handing by a very very thing thread

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and by many other measures, we are already in a

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>new code war. I would just hope that you know,

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese officials often say that the ball is in the

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>U s court in terms of, you know, the future

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of the US trainer relationship. I would say it's in

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>China's court as well. That's how US a present shiting

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>thing still mikes it when he says, um, there are

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand reasons to have a good U. S. China relationship,

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not one single reason to spoilt. Let's hope he still

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>believes that Bob Davis ling ling Way Superpower Showdown. Great book.

0:14:54.680 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for being with us today, Thank you MU, thanks

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for listening. I hope you'll tune in later this year

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>for a digital edition of the annual Bloomberg New Economy Forum,

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>where business and government leaders from around the world will

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about the challenge of building a more sustainable and

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>equitable post COVID economy.