WEBVTT - Who Loses—and Maybe Wins—From Trump’s New H-1B Fee

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's going to be happy, and we're going to be

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 2>able to keep people.

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 3>In our country that are going to be very productive people,

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 3>and in many cases these companies are going to pay

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot of money for that. I'm Stephanie Flanders, head

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 3>of Government and Economics at Bloomberg, and welcome to Trumponomics,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>the podcast that looks at the economic world of Donald Trump,

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 3>how he's already shaped the global economy, and what on

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 3>earth is going to happen next. Well. Over the weekend,

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump surprised the world by placing one hundred thousand

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 3>dollars fee on the cost of an H one B

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 3>visa for new employees entering the US. The short term

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 3>result was travel chaos. Thousands of skilled employees working in

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the US on an H one B who happened to

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>be traveling abroad were told to get back on US

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 3>soil by midnight Sunday just to make sure they weren't stranded.

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Eventually, the White House Press Secretary cleared up the confusion.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 3>The fee would only apply to new applicants, but that

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.199
<v Speaker 3>still left a big question hanging over the US tech

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 3>companies who depend on these skilled workers and those visas

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>to keep America at the forefront of global tech innovation,

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>and with India accounting for seventy percent of them, it

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>also causes a massive headache for the Indian software companies

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 3>who are a big part of Indian Prime Minister Mody's

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 3>growth strategy for the country. So that leads us to

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 3>a big, quite complicated question about that one policy. Who

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 3>gains and who loses from President Trump putting a big

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>price tag on skilled foreign talent working in the US.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it's not just the H one B change.

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 3>A few weeks ago we saw another example of a

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>business getting caught in the crosshairs of an America first

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 3>immigration policy with that ice raid a Hyundai plant in Georgia.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 3>So do expensive visas and raids like that one actively

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 3>undermine the Trump administration's effort to attract foreign investment and

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 3>in the end, could they actually be good news for

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 3>countries and companies outside the US, including maybe India, who

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 3>can offer those skilled workers an alternative home. Well, we

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of strands to unpit here and I'm

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 3>delighted that we can talk about both sides of this

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 3>policy today with Michael Deng geoeconomics technology analyst at Bloomberg

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Economics sitting in Washington today. And Chetna Kumar are geoeconomics

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 3>analyst for South Asia who's joining us from New Delhi.

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 3>And I should say, I'm sitting in New York and

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 3>it's Tuesday morning, US time, But I think it's probably

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 3>useful to start with some context on how important this

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>visa has become for the US and indeed its relevance

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 3>to India. So Michael just sort of talk us through

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the kind of companies that have relied on this visa

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 3>and how important they are to America's tech industry.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I think primarily most of the companies that have been

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>using H one b's, I would say probably two thirds

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are the software and IT sectors. So you have the

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>IT contracting and service companies Tata, Infosits, etc. But you

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>also have Big Tech to a significant degree, relying on

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>these H one b's to bring in software talent from overseas.

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>These companies are going to be the ones most directly

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>hit by this H one B fee change for IT

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>services specifically, the impact is going to be greater just

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>because it hits their business model directly. Big Tech in

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of software may be more capable of absorbing that hit.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But outside of these directly computer related industries, there's also adjacent,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller but also critical industries like semiconductors, for example, which

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily need to bring in a huge bulk of

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>foreign talent, but they do need to bring in a

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>smaller group of highly specialized engineers to support their design,

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>equipment and materials, manufacturing initiatives, etc. Which all kind of

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>coincide with this huge restoring push that's going on in

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the US. So across the board, you're seeing software and

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it computer related occupations being hit hard first, but then

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other more niche industries that need foreign

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>talent to support their own growth into the future also

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>being impacted.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 3>The broad response that the administration might have, and I've

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 3>heard even in the last few days, is these are

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 3>easy ways for US tech companies to bring in cheaper

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 3>foreign workers rather than pay American skilled workers, and it's

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 3>undercutting American skilled workers, and that's what they're trying to

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 3>prevent with this by putting this one hundred thousand dollars

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 3>wedge in there.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think that's true to some degree. We've started

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.679
<v Speaker 1>to see the market for especially junior entry level computer

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>science software developers get a little soft. Recently, the stat

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for recent graduates who are majoring in computer science and

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate is around six percent, as one of

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>the highest in the US currently. So I think specifically

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>for that segment and this computer industry that this H

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>one B policy is targeting, it is true to an extent.

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this could help that segment specifically. The fear

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is that this kind of blunt change also pulls in

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other strategic industries that don't rely

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>on this model of labor to support their workforce, and

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>that they need the more highly specialized workforce that the

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>H ANDEB is supposed to fulfill, and one hundred thousand

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>is quite a big barrier in many cases they do

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>require specialized talent, but that fee may be too big

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>of a barrier in terms of bringing in foreign talent,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and you could inadvertently harm US tech ambitions in the

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>long run as well.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>I was struct that Read Hastings, the co founder of

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Netflix and certainly no great supporter of Donald Trump. He's

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 3>been a sort of prominent back of the Democrats in

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 3>recent years. He came out saying he thought this was

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 3>a good idea this hundred thousand dollar fee for some

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>of the reasons that you just suggested. But we can

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 3>get into whether there might be exemptions and whether there's

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>a way in which this could be more targeted in

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 3>a second. But I wanted to get to you because

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 3>my impression from reading some of the coverage was that

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 3>there was really a lot of concern around this over

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 3>the weekend, and it's still raising questions about a big

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 3>chunk of Indian industry.

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 4>That's right, Stephanie. The one hundred thousand dollars fee impacts

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.559
<v Speaker 4>primarily Indian tech workers and Indian tech companies in the US,

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 4>because we know seventy percent of the H and B

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 4>talent comes from India, but traditionally it was Indian tech

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 4>companies the Data Cognizant emphasis which have been the greatest

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 4>beneficiaries of the H and D program, and their business

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 4>model relies on being able to hire these Indian tech

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 4>workers and bringing them to the US to service on

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 4>site contracts. So not being able to hire modified workforce

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 4>is going to dent their pricing how they're able to

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 4>offer services, and we've seen some of that impact show

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 4>up in Indian stock prices and ID stock prices over

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 4>the weekend and over this week particularly because of that.

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 4>I think the second concern is broader about US and

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 4>your relations and what this means for the broader trajectory

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 4>of the relationship. I think we can and ignore the

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 4>context within which this is happening. Tariffs on India have

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 4>been doubled to fifty percent. There have been some other

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 4>moves by the US administration attacking India, including provoking exemption

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 4>leavers for India's investments in the Iranian pot of Chapahar

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>and others, which make it seem like President Trump is

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 4>tightening the squeeze on India.

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Quite a bit.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 4>There was a notion that perhaps India could withstand the

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 4>fifty percent tariffs and a whole firm because it wasn't

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 4>really a goods manufacturing goods exporting countries.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 2>But targeting services is really the engine of India's economy.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 4>So for scale, India exports about two hundred billion dollars

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 4>worth of ID services every year, and about one hundred

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 4>billion of that goes to the US, So targeting H

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 4>and B workers is sort of seen as a strike

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 4>on that entire industry.

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, when people think of Indian outsourcing we think

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 3>of inevitably, we think of call centers. I know they've

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 3>developed a lot since the early days of call centers,

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 3>and there's lots of other services that these companies are providing.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 3>But this particular policies, if it's about people all coming

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 3>to the States, why are they affected. You're just talking

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 3>about the people who are helping coordinate on the ground

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 3>in the US.

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 4>So that's about three hundred thousand Indian H ONEB workers

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 4>in the US currently, and that's about a tenth of

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 4>the total Indian diaspora.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 3>That's a tenth of the diaspora in America.

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 2>In the US, that's right.

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 4>These Indian companies have relied initially because of the cost

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 4>arbitrage of being able to hire Indian workers and bring

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 4>them to the US. But there's also some advantages culturally

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 4>and being able to efficiencies to being able to bring

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 4>workers from India to service. A lot of the consulting

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 4>and it contracts on site, and many of these contracts

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 4>do require the service provider to be on site. And

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 4>that's why you see the surge of sort of Indian

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 4>workers in the US. It's not as much of a

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 4>rude shock as it seems because Indian companies have been

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 4>preparing and have been expecting the change of policy. Now

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 4>for a while, President Trump did try to ban the

0:08:57.840 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 4>H one D program in its first administration.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I was not successful.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 4>But since then, of the last ten years, we've sort

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 4>of seen Indian companies actually scale back their alliance on

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 4>H one D visas for workers in the US. They're

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 4>about thirty percent of the last decade, which is a

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 4>sizeable reduction. And at the same time, we've seen actually

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 4>US tech companies rely more on the Indian workforce in

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Indian deck workers like the Meta, Google, Netflix, et cetera,

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 4>to sort of bridge their own skills gaps. So we've

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 4>seen a little bit of the shift happened in the

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 4>last ten years of US companies increasing their alliance on

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 4>EAH one.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 3>D's Okay, now, Michael, given that a lot of things

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 3>that come out of the administration, shall we say, don't

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 3>turn out to be kind of hard and fast, is

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 3>there a perception that there could be quite a lot

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 3>of holes in this Do you see that as being

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 3>the first reaction of US companies to just see if

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 3>they can get an exemption. We've certainly seen a lot

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 3>of companies looking for exemptions in tariffs, for example.

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think in the absence of clear criteria and timelines,

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the first instinct for a lot of companies, I would argue,

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of maybe the IT consulting services companies

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>because they were cifically targeted in the proclamation. But any

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>other company like tangentially tech Related, STEM related is certainly

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>going to press for an exemption first because that circumvents

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the entire issue for them, and I think in critical

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>strategic industries like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, that's probably not going

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue for them. The key is whether

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this administration, at least in these critical technology ecosystems, understands

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the full scope of industries and companies that would need

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to be exempted, and do the understand all the labor

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dynamics and the workforce shortages that affect all the supporting

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>industries that aren't just the headline flagship firms. Certainly, I

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going to miss like an Nvidia or

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>an open AI for example, But a lot of smaller companies, suppliers, etc.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Also face workforce issues, and this gets into another issue

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that's persisted over the past decade, and that many of

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>these non software STEM industries have traditionally had trouble attracting

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>domestic US graduates because they've all gone to software, and

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>so that foreign talent pipeline has been the way that

0:10:58.040 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they've kept their workforce sufficient.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 3>And what kind of job would that be?

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So specialist engineers in terms of chip design, chip manufacturing,

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, I'm using semiconductors because I'm more familiar with

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the industry.

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Why would you not attract American workers into that sector.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 3>It seems like that would be just as attractive as

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 3>some of the other sort of STEM sectors.

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Mainly because software is so much more attractive in terms

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of the lifestyle and the salaries. And so there's that

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>gap there that was best filled for a while in

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>many cases by foreign researchers and foreign graduates. And I

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>think the stat even for semiconductor related fields is greater

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>than fifty or sixty percent of researchers all come from

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 1>outside of the US, and so cutting off that pipeline

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>right now would be pretty harmful for US tech competitiveness

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in these leading industries that really reply on a smaller

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>pool of specialized labor, and.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Just as as obvious question. If there is such scarcity,

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 3>can't they just pay the one hundred thousand dollars The

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 3>assumption of the US this administration has been in quite

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of areas that the rest of the world

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 3>is willing to pay up for access to the US

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.479
<v Speaker 3>in whatever form.

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think for certain industries they probably are okay

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>with paying it. Unfortunately, those industries also happen to be

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the flagship firms and industries that are probably most likely

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get an exemption, like big tech companies are

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to have that much of an issue paying

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand barrier if they really need the talent

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they require.

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 3>But they could just go and have dinner with Donald

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Trump again and maybe sort it out.

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Yes, and same thing for the headlining semiconductor firms

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for example. But if you dive down more into semiconductor manufacturing,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>when we're trying to reshore US fabs at a time

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>when there's already a pretty significant cost delta with Asia fabs,

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>adding one hundred thousand dollars barriers to the sort of

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>core engineers you need to ramp up capacity in US

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>fabs is not very beneficial to reshoring and it's sort

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of this layer underneath, this middle core of engineering talent

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>in the US is going to be most affected by

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this barrier.

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 3>I love the phrase that the cost delta with Asia FABS,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 3>but I guess we should sort of spell out that's

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 3>just the fact that Asian companies producing chips are cheaper

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and US ones. Yes, yes, yes, but we can stick

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 3>with FABS. I mean, just sort of teasing out the

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 3>implications of what Michael was saying. It suggests that in

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 3>these kind of high tech areas where the US has

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of significant ambitions, it seems like either they'll pay

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 3>the US companies to get this talent or they will

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 3>get an exemption. And that leaves the IT services sector, which,

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 3>as you've described, is something that has been very important

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 3>to some of India's biggest companies in the last few years.

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 3>So does this come down to more of a sort

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:41.479
<v Speaker 3>of underhand way to tax those Indian exports of services

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 3>without saying upfront that that's what we're doing.

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Definitely is hard to see a what of motivating this administration,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 4>but it does seem like it's one of the ways

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 4>to tipen the squeze on India. The fifty percentatus have

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 4>not led to India keething on goods or stopping buying

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Russian oil. It's not let a big change. There's sort

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 4>of policy and agricultural market access. So targeting India's IT services,

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 4>it's best performing companies and bring a lot of revenue

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 4>is possibly one way of President Trump indicating the US

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 4>as pharm mow leverage over India than India has over

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 4>the US. But what the impact of this is then,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 4>whether it will actually be your tax or not. I

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 4>think it's going to play out over a long term,

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 4>and I think immediately though, yes, there will be a

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 4>margin squeeze for some of these Indian companies. They will

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 4>have to shift and think rethink their business models and

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 4>pricing strategies. There might actually be some structural advantages for India.

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 4>India and President Trump actually might be doing India a

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 4>good turn by sort of restricting H one B visas

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 4>for these kinds of jobs and others. How So, to

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 4>start with fewer H one B visas means there's opportunity

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 4>for a lot of these investments to go back into

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 4>jobs in India. We've seen over the last decade a

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 4>boom in global capability centers, which is the newer kind

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 4>of outsourcing that you were speaking to. These are not

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 4>the BPOs of the nineteen nineties. They are more advanced

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 4>captive centers that everybody from US banks like JP Morgan

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 4>in Goldman Sachs to US companies and chip design companies

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 4>have built and used in India and they provide everything

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 4>from advanced chip designing, engineering, data analysis, and even product development.

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 4>So what started as cost arbitrage in India sort of

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 4>turning into value and innovation in India. And there's an

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 4>expectation that because H and B pisas are going to

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 4>become cost there, some of these jobs might find their

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 4>way back to India and contribute to this booming GCC economy.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 3>There one observation that's been made about China over the years,

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and particularly in response to the first Trump term and

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 3>the trade war with China then, was that the initial

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>punishment also inspires a policy reaction within China. We've seen

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 3>where there's a sort of greater determination to reduce reliance

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 3>on the US, and now as we've come into the

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 3>second Trump term, we've seen various ways in which China

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 3>has kind of long prepared for this moment and has

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 3>has ways of mitigating the effects of the very high tariffs.

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, wouldn't we say the same thing about India?

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 3>And that's somewhat embedded in what you just said. But

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>is there not a slightly different Moody growth strategy that

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 3>comes out of this that is actually less beholden to

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 3>the US.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Possibly, And I think we're already seeing some of the

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 4>signals that the Prime Minister is sending about improving india

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 4>self alliance or people, or the government is seeing about

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 4>wanting to support people who are losing h mend jobs

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 4>coming back to India. But I do want to say

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 4>the case with India is a little bit different than

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 4>China in the sense that India's technology capabilities and India's

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 4>tech industry is so complementary and deeply linked with the US.

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 4>They're trying to unravel this relationship back hurts both for

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 4>a considerable period of time. Yes, India is a big

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 4>value exporter to the US, but not a big market

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 4>for US firms. It's a big sort of place of

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 4>operations for US companies, So I think unraveling this relationship

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 4>is harder. And I think service is a little bit

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 4>trickier than goods in terms of trying to replace and

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 4>build talent pools and supply chains so quickly. Yes, and no,

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I think there's going to be a different growth strategy.

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 4>And yes, India's exports are somewhat diversified, its services industries

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot more maturity. Its talent is wanted in other

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 4>parts of the world, and there might be some sort

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 4>of urgency in other countries trying to tap up Indian talent.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 4>But I think in the long run, there's enough drivers

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 4>and complementalees between these two industries, and these two countries

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 4>trying to break away may not be beneficial to either.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Michael, I guess just pulling out on that very quickly.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Apart from that longer term point, I mean, will other

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 3>countries just take advantage of this?

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think to a small degree, yes, And like we've

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>seen small signals of the UK, Germany, Canada, for example,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>where skilled worker immigration isn't quite as let's say, arbitrary

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>or difficult as the US that there's some science that

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>small quantities may go there, But the US is really

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the core of this global tech talent migration. And whatever

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>happens on the H one B side moving forward, how

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they decide the exemptions, what industries they work with or

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>what industries they don't really will shape the flow of

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>global talent.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 3>But I guess for those countries who worry about the

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 3>brain drain of their most skilled talent, I heard Canadian

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister Mark Carney talk about this earlier this week,

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 3>that they have a large number of very highly trained

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 3>people in advanced STEM courses in Canada and then a

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 3>big chunk of them go to the US. It's going

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>to be easier for these countries to hold on to

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 3>their skilled talent.

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, But I would say the reason for a lot

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>of this brain drain is just the much higher compensation

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 1>and benefits in the US in the first place, And

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>so that doesn't fully go away even with this fee

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in place. If they're still hiring roughly the same amount

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of H one b's per year, it maybe shift in

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>terms of the industry that they hire through, right, and

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>so in terms of the overall quantity. If this H

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>one B is properly executed, I don't see a huge

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>shift happening to other countries, just in terms of the

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>reasons why they come to the US in the first.

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Place, Okay, and just on the sort of longer term

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 3>question and we faced this issue also in the sort

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 3>of Bidenomics era, that there was a great desire in

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 3>the administration for speed in building up US domestic industries

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 3>in certain sectors, semiconductors being one, but also a big

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 3>desire to have it all be home grown and be

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 3>aware a vehicle for upgrading US born talent. And there's

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 3>clearly a tension between those things. If you want to

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 3>have it all the US workers, as one person said

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 3>to me, well we could do that in five years.

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 3>If you want to do it in one or two years,

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 3>then there's going to be a lot of people will

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 3>be bringing in from overseas. Has that tension increased in

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the second Trump administration.

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So above all else, what the domestic semiconductor and

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>wider tech ecosystem needs is time to build up these

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>workforce programs to get graduates and employees into the right

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>industries firms. The Trump administration nominally has promised a lot

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of support for workforce issues, but some of their actions

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>had a chilling effect on supporting these industries properly, the

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Kanda Ice Reid being one example, just in terms of

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>making sure foreign talent can come in as a transition

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to patch that pipeline and tel domestic talent can come online.

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>For the semiconductor space, specifically, what happened with what's known

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as GNATCAST or the NSTC, which was responsible for administering

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>roughly seven to eight billion dollars in semi conductor research

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and development funding was also not great for workforce develment development.

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>There was a sizable portion of that was aimed at

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>further building out domestic workforce initiatives. So this sort of

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>inconsistency at a time when we really want to accelerate

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>this pace at getting the domestic workforce online is a

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>little troubling.

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 3>We started off asking about who the losers and who

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the gainers are. I think we've identified that the big

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 3>loser is going to be integration, or at least the

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 3>sort of the flow of workers from one country to another,

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 3>and that Trump administration would say that's exactly the point

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 3>that we're trying to have less of this kind of

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 3>free flowing global labor market. But che, I mean people

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 3>in India just reading this as an attack on Modi administration.

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 4>I think President Trump has not been particularly friendly to

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 4>any of his former partners and allies or US partners,

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 4>so in one way, He's not treating India any differently.

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 4>But I think the fall for India has been from

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 4>such a great height that it's hard to ignore. I

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 4>think this term sadden on the expectation of this relationship

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 4>or mutual appreciation between these two leaders leading to less

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 4>affrictions between them, or an early harbor, a straight deal

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 4>even and that's not happened. And I think the fact

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 4>that primis to more these shares this close relationship or

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 4>did share this close relationship with President Trump is increasing

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 4>the pressure on him. Certainly, the H one B visa

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 4>sort of holders in India are a small but very

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 4>visible and aspirational minority for the country. Getting this H

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 4>and B job and moving to the US and eventually

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 4>a pathway to green cord. We're seen as sort of

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 4>a hallmarket success for many young Indian students, and I

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 4>think that big impact. In addition to the very tough

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 4>rhetoric that we've seen from President Trump calling the Indian

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 4>economy dead, or his advisors calling the Ukraine war Modi's

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 4>war or in your laundromat for Russia, I think, putting

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 4>it all together, it's certainly added to the census that

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 4>India is not a special partner of the US anymore,

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 4>and it's not expecting to be treated any differently from

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 4>other partners that have in the expectation that sort of

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 4>its relationship between the leaders who sort of get in

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 4>their better deal and sort of faded away.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a reminder that you can put this one piece

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 3>of grit, this charge in the wheels of the global economy,

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 3>and it just tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 3>people and companies can be affected for quite a long

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 3>time to come. Chetner, Michael, thank you so much.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Thanks Stephanie, thanks.

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 3>For listening to Trumpomics from Bloomberg. It was hosted by

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 3>me Stephanie Flanders. I was joined by Michael Deng and

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Chetna Kumar of Bloomberg Economics. Trumpnomics was produced as ever

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 3>by Samasadi Moses and m and Avil Brown, with help

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 3>from Amy Keen and special thanks this week to Rachel

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Lewis Chriskey. Sound designed for the shows by Blake Maples

0:23:25.240 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 3>and Kelly Gary and Sage Bowman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts.