WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Marks, Beschloss, Chavez

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. What's the state of

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>corporate governance? The deficit is a real issue. The US

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to send mixed signals to the financial stories

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that cheap our world fed action to con concerns over

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar liquidity and encouraging China data. The five hundred wealthiest

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people in the world. Through the eyes of the most

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>influential voices Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary, star Ward CEO,

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Johnson sec Chairman j Clayton. Bloomberg wool Street Week

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio, Up, Up, and away.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>As the economy starts to come back, bringing jobs with it,

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and the U s it's new records in COVID vaccines.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>What's not to like? This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Weston. So an investment world where so much

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>seems to be going so right. What do you do

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for some distress, some distress somewhere. That's

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the question we put to a claim distress investor and author,

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Howard Marks of oak Tree Capital Management. Well, that's a

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>great question, uh begs an easy answer. Uh. One answer

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is that we're active providing solutions to companies that want

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to recapitalize their balance sheet, change their debt structure in

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some way, or just add additional liquidity. Not distress situations,

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>but UH, there are cases where there's an appetite for

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>credit and uh and the market doesn't make it available. Uh.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We are active around the globe, and there is more

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to do in Asia and in Europe than there is

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. UM, and UH you know there.

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we distinguish ourselves as investors UH by what

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>we do when our strategy is not in great favor.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Every strategy goes in and out of favor, and this

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is the time to uh try to be resourceful and

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>yet maintain our standards. It's very challenging, no, no doubt

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>about Howard. Look back for a moment you had your

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>year end. No, that sort of went through it and

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>as I say, it was a remarkable downturn and then

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>snap back up right away to make money. You had

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to move really fast. About a year ago, right now,

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that you had raised I think a record

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>amount of capital Ktree Capital Management at the time. Could

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you get the money out the door put it to

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>work fast enough? The fund we raised was actually raised

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>on July one, so the greatest opportunities were passed. We

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>used the opportunities that arose in UH, primarily in March,

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhat carried over into April and May. We used to

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>complete the investment of our prior fund. So we had

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a fund that was about invested UH at the beginning

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of and we got it fully invested. UH. That was

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>that was the best of the buying. The market has rebounded,

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>The economy is in the process I think of rebounding

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>with the markable speed. At the same time, it's not

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>even it's uneven. So let's talk about some of those disparities,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly things like travel and leisure. Are there still some

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>opportunities there APPS, because that seems to be lagging behind

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the rest of the economy. Yes. Well,

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>you know the easy calls, the things that are obviously

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:12.399
<v Speaker 1>going to rebound. UH. They're not fully back to where

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they were in times of prosperity in terms of their UH,

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the investment opportunities subsiding, but they are

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's clear they're coming back, they're treated as certainly

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>coming back. UH. And to to get to higher returns

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>these days, you have to be willing to extend credit

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>to somebody who's not clearly coming back. Are there any

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>sectors you're still avoiding at this point? No, we are

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>open to anything. I mean, our our our style usually

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>constrains us, for example, to not do technology. Uh, But

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>other than that, we're wide open. Howard, it strikes me

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that one of the things that's different from anything I

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>think I've ever seen, maybe any of us ever seen,

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is the degree to which the government, both on fiscal

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and monetary policy, is intervening in the marketplace. Is that

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of a dampener on your business in the sense that,

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, when it comes to distress debt, you've got

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of zombie companies I read. I think it's

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like the public and traded companies in the United States

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. Our zombie companies do not generate enough cash

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay off their dad. Does that really make it

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for some of like oak Tree? No? That well,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>that's no, that's the that's ensured. That's the kind of

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>situation that prevents opportunities to us. Uh. If companies have

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>no problems, no exigencies, Uh, then then the distress investor

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any problems and any act anything to do.

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So we we we take companies which are in extremists,

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>are producing bad news where the future doesn't look so great.

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And if we can buy those securities at the right

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>price uh, which means a price that overestimates the problems.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>That's how you make money as an investor. So we

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>don't shy away from difficulties. But isn't there a price

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>support under those companies if I can put it that way,

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Because essentially money is free, they can borrow more money

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.239
<v Speaker 1>even though they're losing money. They're not generally enough cash

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>again to pay service their debt. Doesn't that actually make

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it more difficult to get the right price for you?

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes it does, Yes it does. Uh. I mean the

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>right price for us is to be able to buy

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>things for less than their worth. That's our goal. We

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>need the cooperation from somebody who's willing to sell things

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>for less than their worth. Uh. And usually you get

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that when when the asset holders feel urgency to sell.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>What about currency? Where are you on the US dollar?

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>How much is that factor into your decisions? Because there

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of taking We don't take an opinion

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>on currency. One of the six tenants of Oak Tree's

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>investment philosophy is that our decisions are not guided by

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>macro forecasts. So you don't worry about long term weakness

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of the dollar. Well, I worry about it, uh for

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>other reasons, not in saying, well will I invest in

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this thing which is in pounds or rupees or a

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>minby or patios or something like that, and not tactically

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. But you know, I mean it's a concern.

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh what what the you the way the US is

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>behaving the visa be the dollar. Uh, but on the

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>other hand, not clear what one does about it. That

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>was Howard Marks, co founder and co chairman of oak

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Tree Capital Management. Coming up, we can beat our Wall

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Street Week round table of a Sani Bechelists from Rock

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Creek and Mona Mahajan of Alliance to find out where

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the investment opportunities are in this land of plenty. That's

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>next down Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Everything

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is coming up roses for investors, it appears, at least

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>this week. The question is where are the opportunities and

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for that matter, where are the threats? In all of

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>this and to answer that question, we're conveting our very

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>special Wall Street Week round table right now of Asani

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>USh Lost. She is the founder and CEO of Rock

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Creek and Mona Mahudgen. She is the U S investment

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>strategist for Alliance. Thank you both for being here, Welcome back.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Gonna let me start with you. I talk about opportunity

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and threats. I used to do a swat analysis, you know, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities,

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>threats and business plans. Take the opportunity and threats for

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a U S investor right now in this market, given

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that everything looks pretty good. Yeah, absolutely, Look,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's been a phenomenal market really in many ways across

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>asset classes. In our view, that's been driven by two

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>key themes this year. The first theme is clearly this

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>rotation we're seeing, at least in the equity space um

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>from growth into the more value oriented sectors at least

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>on a year to date basis, and really since November

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of last year. You know, keep in mind, last November

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw presidential elections, we saw the approval of our

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>first vaccines, and when you look at sectors like energy, financials,

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>industrials up nearly set plus since that time. The second theme,

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, is this rise in rates. The ten has

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>gone from point nine one now also supportive of some

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of those value sectors and putting a little bit pressure

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on the growth sectors. UM. For us, the opportunity really

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is we do see a continuation of the reopening trade.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>We think there's at least one last leg to go

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>um and that really you know, the highest conviction areas

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that we like there do include those that are leveraged

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to higher rates. We think, you know, yields could continue

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to grind higher and maybe a little bit choppy now,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>but we see a two handle on the tenure at

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>some point. Uh. In that environment, we think financials continue

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to do well. Certainly yield curve plays continue to do well,

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>such as steepeners um the reopening, the true reopening of

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the US economy. We think those the areas that do

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>well in that environment are those that are levered to

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>better earnings growth like leisure travel, you know, think your

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>true reopening sectors and the final bucket we put in

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that the opportunities is really those that are levered to

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the new policy agenda. We're seeing so parts of the

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure market parts of five G and cybersecurity that are

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>being lumped into infrastructure now. Now just quickly on the threats. UM,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>As we are heading to the second half of this year,

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we certainly are seeing some headwinds emerge. First and foremost,

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we will at some point hit peak reopening growth here

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in the US, probably in two Q or three Q

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of this year. UM, we will have you know that

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the highest growth rates we've seen probably in over a decade. UM. Secondly,

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing, as we noted earlier, yields continue to

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>grind higher, driven by of course reopening, but also potentially inflation.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, thirdly, I think we are looking at

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a fed that at some point David will have to

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>come off of this crisis level accommodation. You know, they

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>said in the last press conference it's when they see

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it in the data, not in the forecast. Well, that

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>data is certainly going to come to fruition in the

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>next couple of quarters. So keep in mind we've we've

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>had a great first half thus far. We might see

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>another leg higher in this value rotation, but at some

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>point we will consolidate those games. UM. Maybe it's seasonal,

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's selling May and go away. Maybe not May

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this year, but a little bit further out. But just

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind those the tail headwinds in the second

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>half of this year may start to emerge. Sorry, Mona

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>really focused right into your backyard, at least part of

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>your backyard when she talked about investments leverage to policy

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>because you for a long time I talked about climate

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and green investing asana. You've been a champion of that.

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>We certainly heard about the infrastructure plan two point two

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>five trillion, a lot of it directed towards climate issues.

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>That's an opportunity. At the same time, you need to

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>be a bit of a stock picker if you can

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>say that within that realm, not all climate projects are

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>created equally. Assume you're absolutely right, Davy, then I very

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>much agree with everything Mona said. I think added to

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what she said on the infrastructure side that you just mentioned.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Whether it ends up being two point to five or

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>one point nine or one point six or you know,

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in between, those numbers are quite huge, and even

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>if they get spent some of them more quickly, some

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of them over time, they're going to have a more

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>growth oriented kind of impact on the overall, Econo ME

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and what we're seeing as we are sitting here is

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable amount of investments that are going into that intersection

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>of innovation, with e V innovation, with take with medicine innovation,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with some of the other trends that we've talked about,

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but in particular climate related investments. So I think all

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of them will be also impacting markets in a very

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>positive way. Sort of looking longer term, I agree with

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Mono Tho that we will have some short term corrections

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>because you know, interest rates are historically low, even if

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we had the kind of bond markets particether the long

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>end that we've had this year, we have been historically

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at a very very low level of interest rates, and

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>people have got very used to that. Those of us

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>who've been around a few cycles know that it will

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>not last like this, and there will be some sort

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>of impact as inflation picks up even for a short

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>time UH and goes back to UM to lower levels

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>over longer term. On the interesstrar to the only last

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>point I want to make is that UM the need

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>for it is in the US, but also the need

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for it is global. There is huge need if we're

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>going to meet our climate goals to make sure that

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this infrastructure investments that we're talking about the US are

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>also carried through globly. Mono. One of the things that

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>we're reading about now is perhaps some risk coming from

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the divergence we're seeing. Uh, the United States is really

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>going ahead full steam with vaccinations. China, if if anything,

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>doing better than we are on the only with the

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>with the COVID nigeene. Europe not so much, and goodness knows,

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>parts of the lower and middle income countries are lagging

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>behind MONA. Is that simply opportunity for US investors or

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is there also some risk if the U s GE's

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>too far ahead of the rest of the world. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the themes that we're we're seeing

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>emerge again this year is this return to US what

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we're calling exceptionalism. Uh. Certainly we have been ahead of Europe,

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>as you noted, in terms of the vaccine rollout and

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>really setting up nicely for a strong set of summer

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>months ahead of US. UM we're seeing this play out

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in the markets as well. The US dollar many expected

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to come into the year continuing to be weak. In fact,

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen stabilization and even an upward trend. The dollar

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>index is now up about three percent year to date. UM. Similarly,

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in equity industries, you know, the SMP is now back

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the pack. UM. Clearly there could

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be a catch up trade, and it's one thing we're

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about now, especially as the US markets have run.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>There could be a catch up trade from Europe to

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>be to be had here. You know, if they are

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>lagging just a few months behind us in this vaccine rollout, um,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>we could see a real reopening of their economies and

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe another quarter or two. Keep in mind, the European

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>industries are more levered to these value cyclical parts of

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the market. Uh, they have a lot of bank exposure,

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>energy exposure, etcetera, industrials exposure, and so it is something

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we're cognizant of and really thinking about. You know, China

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and North Asia, as you noted, or ahead of us.

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps their peak growth has already happened in the

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>last couple of quarters, and we're certainly seeing that reflected

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace as well as their industries have started

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to roll over. So you know, over the next quarter

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>or two we are certainly seeing this this flight to

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 1>US assets both in the equity and bond market UM,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and that really has, uh, you know, been driven by

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental story behind how the US is outperformed UM

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>from a vaccine and COVID perspective, but just being being

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>mindful that Europe could play catch up in the months ahead. Okay,

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so very much for our special Wall Street

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Week round table of Sania Bachelists of Rock Creek, and

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Monamahydgen of Alliance. Coming up. You may think you know

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>what cryptocurrency is all about, but Marty chap Is, a

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Six Street Partners says it's not necessarily what you think

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it is. That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Wall Street. Central banks and retail investors have

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing in common. They're growing interest in cryptocurrencies. According

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to Coin Shares, inflows into crypto funds and products hit

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a record four point five billion dollars in the first

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>quarter of this year. Here's Mike Novograts of Galaxy Investment Partners.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I think about there's a hundred hundred forty trillion dollars

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of US wealth UM four hundred trillion dollars in global wells.

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're now up to a one a half half

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a percent of global wealth is in crypto, and that's growing.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be a percent by the end of

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the year. Bitcoin gets the most attention among its crypto peers,

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>but critics of digital currencies raise concerns about their structure

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and their volatility. I don't completely buy the whole thing.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>You're essentially saying that we're going to create a store

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of value and a medium of exchange around something that

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>only exists inside of a computer somewhere. It's not a

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>physical asset that Steve Ratner of will It Advisors, and

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>here's n y U Stern School professor Neuriel Rubini Beatson

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is not having any income, doesn't even use that, doesn't

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>have any quick the serdervice doesn't have a what's the

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>value is just the sellfulfilling bubble. Beyond bitcoin, it's the

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>underlying technology of blockchain that is attracting investor interest. According

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to CB Insights, startups focusing on blockchain raised about two

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>point five billion dollars in just the first quarter of

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>this year, outpacing the amount raised in all of What

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really doing is it's building an infrastructure to actually

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>transact on. That's Peter Krauss of Aperture Investors. Central banks

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>are also feeling the pressure to create their own central

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>bank digital currencies. A recent survey by the Bank for

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>International Settlements found that eighty six percent of central banks

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>are currently engaged, up from six in two thousand seventeen.

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>The motivation for central banks has been partly to guard

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>against the risk of financial exclusion or digital dollarization if

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>payments shift to privately controlled alternatives. Here's Financial Times editorial

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>board chair Jillian Tet what the Central Bank is essentially

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>want to do right now is a version of very well,

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>version of if you can't beat him, join them. Um.

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>They're almost trying to just intermediate the disintermediators. Marty Chavez

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is someone who really knows his way around blockchain and

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>distributed ledgers. He's been part of Silicon Valley startups, He's

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>taught the course at Stanford, He's been the c i

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>O and then the chief financial officer of Goldman Sachs,

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and now he's a senior advisor at six Street Partners.

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>And he says that digital currencies may ultimately hold the

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>key to global reserve currency dominance the way I would

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>look at it, and actually the whole class at at

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Stanford GSB on exactly this topic how software eight finance

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>last spring and the courses one thesis which is that

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the way finance is playing out, it's actually arrived. There

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>are all these old dichotomies. You're on the bi side

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of you're on the cell side, your trader or salesperson

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are you? And I t right, those categor stories are

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>all disappearing fast, and it's all becoming. You are a

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>producer of some banking and financial services and you've wrapped

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>them in a computer interface so called API, and then

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you're consuming a p I s from lots of other people.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you're not a world class producer of these

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a p I s around your products and services, you're

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>dead and you might just not know it yet. So

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, I would I would say what Jamie

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is saying, I agree with them, um, But it means

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that banks have to get really great at digitizing and technology.

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And also many banks, not all, have been great, and

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they have been doing this for a long time. How

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>can the banks compete with some of these new startups

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>who can take a lot more risk and be a

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>lot more innovative a lot faster. Well, many banks have

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>been working on this for a long time. So for instance,

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the things that we worked

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>on very effectively at Goldman Sachs for years UM is

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a group we call the Principal Strategic Investments. It was

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in the trading division, and the ideas go out and

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>find these startups and sometimes collaborate with clients and and

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>also with competitors to create some of these startups and

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>participate early on in the cycle of innovation and become

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>an investor and the customer of the startups and learned

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>from them. That's been an incredibly successful journey for Goldman,

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and other banks have done variants of it as well.

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you address the builder by question and bye bye,

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess I include aquahiers where you may be buying

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a small company in part because the talent that you're

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>getting with it, but a lot of the software that

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>was needed simply didn't exist in the early nineties, and

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 1>so it was absolutely the right strategy then. But as

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>time passed, we we changed that strategy and realized that

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>was no longer working. UM, that the world had transformed.

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>That were cloud services, a p I s amazing new tools,

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and the idea of building it all your own didn't

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. And so the new the new waterfall

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is first order business. We would like we would like

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it to be an open source. We would like to

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>use software that's out there um freely available, and participate

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.959
<v Speaker 1>in the creation of that open source. If that's not

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna work, then the next position is, let's let's look

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>for some vendors and we want them to operate according

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to universal standards. And so we can hold the vendors

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to account on their reliability and cost and other things.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But if it doesn't work, we can switch to another provider,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>same a p I. And then the last resort is

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we would go build it ourselves. That was Martin Chavez

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of Six Street Partners. Coming up, we wrap up the

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>week with our special contributor Larry Summers of Harvard. That's

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week with David Weston from bloom Bird Radio.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>We're going to complete the week, as we do every week,

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with our special coternity Larry Summers of Harvard. Larry, Welcome, back.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you with us. I think a lot

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>of the week was given over to infrastructure, whatever that means.

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>President Biden has his two point two five trillion dollar plan,

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of semantics about what was included, what's not included,

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And I want to you to address that as an economist,

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>how important is it to get clear but what infrastructure is?

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Because President Biden said it's bridges and tunnel. Sure, it's

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>also broadband in it, but then he said it's anything

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that enhances the life of the middle class. That seemed

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>a little broad. Look, what's most important is that we

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>make the investments as a country that we need to,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>not what we call them. We need better bridges, we

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>need to expand broadband, we need to build more schools,

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>We need to make sure there's adequate housing for UH

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>low income families. The semantics really aren't so important. Frankly,

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I'd have liked to see more traditional infrastructure in this package,

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think we're decades behind, and I'm not sure

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>this is big enough to bring us to the forefront,

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure there's enough really major, large scale

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>UH projects. He has eighty billion dollars to help amtracks

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>operating UH budget, but there are no major new UH systems,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>so I'd have liked to see a bolder, bigger vision

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>on infrastructure. And the other thing I'd have liked to

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>see David is more discipline. Discipline to make sure we

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>procure in a cost effective way. God knows, the First

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Avenue subway in New York costs seven times as much

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>per mile as the subway in Paris, and they're not

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>especially efficient UH in Paris. I'd have liked to see

0:22:54.840 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>more speed in implementation. I've talked many times at about

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a bridge near my office at Harvard, three D foot

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>bridge that took them five and a half years to repair,

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>when you know Julius Caesar built much longer bridges in

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>UH nine days. And I'd have liked to see rigorous analysis,

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and we may get that analysis that this spending is

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be incremental. For example, there's no question we

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>should have electric charging stations across America and electric cars,

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>but we built gas stations without the government ever paying.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Does the government really need to pay as much as

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is contained in this bill to get electric charging stations

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>across the country. So I think Democrats are completely right

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>on the need for much more resources. But I think

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>some Republicans have a point when they emphasize efficiency, when

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>they emphasize alacrity, and when they emphasize UH discipline in

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>UH setting the functions. But this is hugely important for

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>our economy. This is certainly worth UH in many of

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the areas substantially more government borrowing. So it's hugely important

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to get the money to do the investment, but it's

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>almost as important to make sure that it gets done

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>right or as close to right as possible. You've worked

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>at the top levels of government. Do we need to

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>rethink the way our government really administers itself in this sense?

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>When was the last time the US government spent two

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>point two five trillion dollars and did it the right way?

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Can we have a rigorous system for return on investment,

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>which is what you do in a corporation, to say, okay,

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>well invest this money, but this is what we expect back.

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna I think we need UH more

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of that. Look, corporations don't have to negotiate their investment

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>plans with something that is analogous to UH the Congress UH.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Corporations don't have the complexity and the breadth of the program.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, David is you know, anyone who

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>studied the history, for example, of corporate high t systems

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>will know that there were a lot of white elephants

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>built hundreds of billions of dollars poured into UH nothingness.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's a mistake to venerate everything UH

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the private sector touches. But yes, this should be a

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>huge UH priority in the design of UH all of this.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>But of course more extensive review can be the enemy

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of UH more alacrity, but more more, more speed. But

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we with the right kind of administration UH

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>can do much better. Taking take an area like high

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>transmission IGH density power lines, the issue there is not

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>lack of money, it's lack of regulatory approval. And we

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 1>got to figure out how to get the states cooperating

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>so each state doesn't hold up all the other states

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>UH in UH that area. I'd like to see President

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Biden talking more about the importance of doing it well

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and acknowledging more UH some of UH the past failures.

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I think there are some who

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sees on the semantic issues, who sees on some of

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the things UH that weren't great, who give the Pentagon

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a complete pass on every failed weapons system. But if

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>some mass transit system in an urban area UH doesn't

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>work exactly right on schedule or overruns its cost, go

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>into a state of hysteria. And that's wrong. And so

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd say to my friends in the Republicans side, let's

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have some symmetry and what you're prepared to do with

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>respect to military procurement and what you're insisting on in

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>these areas. Larry another big story this week where the

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>i m F meetings, the Spring meetings of the i

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>m F, and it really underscores something we're watching, which

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is increasing divergence around the world, both in terms of

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the vaccination programs as well as in the economic growth.

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>We see it even between the United States and Europe

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>at this point, but then when you go to the

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>low and middle income countries, it is quite stark, both

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on the vaccination rate and also the economy. What Cannon

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>should be done with this is something you've been talking

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 1>about for well over a year now. Look what we

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>understand better today than we did six months ago is

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to be heavily about the ways

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in which the virus does does or does not evolve.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>If it stops evolving, we're gonna get this problem completely

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>under control. If it keeps evolving, it's going to become

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>an endemic problem. And evolution happens in proportion to how

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>much the virus is all over the world, And that

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 1>means uncontrolled COVID anywhere is a big threat to people everywhere.

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And and this is a critical point that I've been

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>working on. We're gonna have one of these things every

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>decade or so. We're gonna have a threat like this

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 1>every decade or so, and we need an infrastructure to

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we're constantly watching and ready to stop

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it at its source. At the beginning, Okay, let's wrap

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>this up with a lightning quick ground of summer says.

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Start off with the central bank Digital currencies much the

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>vogue right now. We've learned that most central banks are

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>working at digital currency. Five years from now, well, the

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve have its own digital currency. I doubt it

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>will have a bunch of stuff with digital accounts, but

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>no real digital currency. We also heard this week from

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Yell and Secretary Treasury yelling about coordinate with O E.

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>C D on a corporate minimum tax internationally. Is that

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>going to happen within the next year, bravo, And it's

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be as or more important than the next the

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>next trade agreement we reach with some other UH country.

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the international integration issue of this moment. For

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>some of us living in New York, we got hit

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>with a big new tax. If you made a lot

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of money in New York, you're gonna pay a lot

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>more taxes here. There's a lot of concerned about that,

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>individual stories about people moving away. But in the larger sense,

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think this might affect the economy of New

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>York State? You deserve to pay more taxes. It should happen,

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>but New York City, New York City and New York

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>State can't do it alone without substantial consequences in this environment,

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and I am very fearful that, particularly without federal deductibility,

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>this is going to do a lot of damage to

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>New York's tax base and settle off a downward spiral.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And finally, larry the big story from last week with Archias,

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the sort of implosion of Archias. Should we expect within

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the near future more regulation of family offices? I wouldn't

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>be surprised, but even more. I'd expect more more regulation

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of prime broker lending to UH family offices. Uh. This

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't but could have set off a really negative cascade

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of forced selling and then forced liquidations on the LTCM model.

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>That didn't happen, but it could have, and we've got

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to revisit those issues. Okay, many many thanks to our

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>special contribute here at Walls Sting week. He is Larry

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Summers of Harvard. Finally, one more thought, getting more bees

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>with honey than with vinegar, especially if they're rich bees.

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>This week saw a lot of talk about taxing the

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>rich the United States, whether they're companies or they are people.

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>New York State is doing more than just talking about it.

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>After Governor Cuomo last year pleaded with the rich to

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>stay in New York. This week, the New York Governor

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>agreed to a budget slapping big new taxes on those

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>making over a million dollars, taxes that could raise the

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>marginal rate for the richest New Yorkers up over fifty two.

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Only time is going to tell whether the state's ninety

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>billionaires or thirty millionaires vote with their feet because of

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>all these new taxes. But we are already seeing what

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>using a bit of honey instead may mean as the

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government plans new tax bricks on the wealthy in

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, seeking to make up for all those violent

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>demonstrations in the political crackdown, with the result that investment

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>managers have set up more than a hundred new companies

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in recent months, and banks like Goldman Sachs, City Group,

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley are ramping up their

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>staffing over there. None of which is to say that

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>those of us who have benefited from the boom markets

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't pay our fair share, much less that we want

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to trade off civil liberties for tax breaks. But we

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>do have to hope that the people making decisions keep

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in mind that pesky law of unintended consequences. That does it.

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>For this episode of Wall Street Week, I'm David Weston.

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. See you next week.