WEBVTT - Gary Chropuvka on Financial Engineering (Podcast)

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>This is mesters in Business with very Renaults on Blueberg Radio.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have a special guest.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>His name is Gary Kropovka. He's the president of World Quants,

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a highly regarded quantitative investment firm. UH. Gary has a

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>fascinating background, really insightful UH twenty years at ge Sam

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, where he was co head

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the quantitative investment Strategies team. Ge Sam runs a

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>ton of capital UH, and last year he moved over

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to world Quan, which in and of itself was spun

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>out from Millennium Management in two thousand and seven. Millennium

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Management is another giant quantitative hedge funds, and World Quan

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>runs a nice lug of capital for them. As innovative

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>as so many different quantitative approaches are, World quant Is

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>really stands out. They're an unusual shop. They do a

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of really interesting things that read led by UM,

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a very a kind of clastic and brilliant founder and

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO UM And really this is just a very intriguing

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and fascinating conversation if you are at all interested in

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>quantitative investing, understanding one of the key drivers of markets

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>today or just to get a sense of what people

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>with advanced computer and mathematical degrees think about UM, the

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>financial engineering that's taking place in the markets these days.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>You're going to find this to be a fascinating conversation. So,

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, my interview of Gary Krapovka of

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>World quant This is Mester's in Business with very Renaults

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Our special guest this week is Gary Propovka.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>He is the president of World Quants, a highly regarded

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>quantitative shop spun out of Millennium Management back in two

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven. Gary has a BA in mathematics and

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a master's degree in financial engineering from Colombia. He's also

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on the board of trustees of Rutgers University. Gary Kropovka,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you so much, Barry. Great to

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>be here. So I'm I'm kind of fascinated by your background.

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 1>You you spend time UM at the quantitative investment strategies

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>co heading that at Goldman Sachs, and you have your

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>financial engineering degree from Colombia. Any overlap with Emmanuel Derman,

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you seem to have followed his footsteps. Yeah, I actually

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I predated Emmanuel Derman because I I was

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in the program when it first start bit back in

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands. UM I did follow em Manuel,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess to to Goldman facts UM. You know, after

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>he had he was there, but separate paths, but there's

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely a correlation among the two UM A share. I

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>went to Columbia, you know, after I joined the quant

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>group at Goldman UM, there was you know, looking looking

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>around the space, there were a lot of folks with

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>some pretty advanced degrees, and decided to try to marry

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the computer science as well as the engineering with some

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of the business side to uh, you know, to to

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>be better trained in the in the quant field. So

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so you eventually become co head of quantitative Investment Strategies

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at ge SAM. What what was that experience like? So,

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say I spent at over twenty years in

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the same group, and you know, I it really drove

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>what I love about, you know, my job, which is

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>fun dative investing. It's something that I have a huge

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>passion for. I love, you know, dealing with data and

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>figuring out problems. And you know, there were certainly a

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of investment problems that we dealt with in that

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in that group, and you know, really compelled me to

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>go and join World Quant for for you know, even

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>other opportunities. But you know, while I was at Goldman,

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>did a number of different things on the research side,

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>on the portfolio management side, on the product development side,

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the client side, and so had a had a host

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of experiences that I cherished, had a great experient, great

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>time there, learned a ton and uh and now I'm

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>here at the World Pants for the last roughly six months.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to talk more about World Quant in

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a in a few minutes. Let's let's stick with the

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>big data you referenced at Goldman and elsewhere. You know,

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>big data is almost a cliche these days. How is

0:04:55.240 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it used in quantitative investment? Yeah, I would say, you know,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>when I think about big data, and you know, it's

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a it's a large term. But I would say, you know,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>we're all consumers, not just in the investment or in

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the quant group, but this whole concept around big data

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is affecting each and every one of our lives. We're

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>all trying to have a have an information edge, We're

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to make better decisions, we're trying to you know,

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>utilize as much data to make informed decisions of where

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>we're spending our time, whether it's things like going on

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>vacation or you know, figuring out where you what restaurant

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to go to. And so, you know, the

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>world has moved beyond things like zag. It's um and

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>really trying to understand the idea. There's a lot of

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>things that will provoke what you want to do or

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>where you want to spend your time and where do

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>you want to invest in. And so this whole concept

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 1>of big data is really to take you know, anything

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and everything that may be applicable to a company and

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.559
<v Speaker 1>try to learn from it. And so, you know, there's

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>just this massive amount every time we click on something,

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>time we move, there's all this data that's being captured.

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And really, you know, one of the great things about

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>being a quantitative investor is that we have tools and

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>techniques to take all this awesome amount of data which

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>comes in many forms and I could touch on that,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but it comes in many forms and convert that into

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>some insight or some informational edge that helps us predict

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>companies or particular asset class. So this whole concept of

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>big data absolutely here to stay I'd say it's much

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>broader than the investing business. It's happening, you know, all

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of our lives. We're all sitting with you know, the

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>phones in our pockets that have massive amounts of information

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and so really the goal of all this big data

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is to create an informational edge to know something that

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe somebody else doesn't or um in order to be

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>able to leverage that in in pursuit of learning something else.

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So give us, give us an example, how can you

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>use a data set, uh, specifically to identify opportunities that

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>other people that aren't looking at that data might miss. Sure,

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's there's tons of data out there

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, one can glam that. We could take

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>an example of, you know, looking through analyst reports and

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people read analysts reports, and

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know, things you can do is try to

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>pick up on their sentiment and so how we're analysts

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>starting to change their mind about a particular company. You know,

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a pretty common example of you know, figuring

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>out how you know, you can train a computer to

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>read all of these words that some of these analysts

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>are putting together. UM. That might be one example, UM

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at you know, what's in the newspaper and trying

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to gauge sentiment around you know, what's popular and maybe

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>what topics are interesting and what companies may be related

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to those topics, and or those topics trending positively or negatively.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Those are some examples of of ideas where you know

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there's something out there that you know not as company,

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>may not be coming out of a company's financials, but

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's something that's happening around the company that might be impactful.

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, those are two examples of of items

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that you know you'd constitute as big data because you're

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at massive amount of whether it's research reports or

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>news articles, to kind of get a gauge of can

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a better picture of that company's fortunes? And

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, one of the things that

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we do at work Pond is you know, there's not

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>just three ideas or five ideas. There's millions of ideas

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of ways to to navigate and have a view on

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a company, and big data forwards us the opportunity big

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>data along with some you know, some great analytical tools

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>to be able to kind of have views on particular companies. Huh,

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so so how does that play into things like smart

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>data or factor based approaches. Is that something that you

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>can apply um large data sets towards identifying new variations

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>on absolutely? And I think you're touching on an important

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>component if we think about the quant industry, you know,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>really started with a lot of these kind of let's

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 1>call them smart betas or traditional measures of factors. So

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about things like value or momentum, value being a

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>cheap company relative to its book value as an example, momentum,

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So if the stock is starting to trend in a

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>favorable direction, will it continue that particular trend? And so

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the whole idea around analyzing all the data

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you know as quants. For the original quants, you really

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to play off the law of large numbers, and

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so you had a lot of a lot of data

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>yet information on each and every company, thousands of companies,

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and you try to rank companies by these particular metrics

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>price to book or some measure of momentum. And you'd

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>create a portfolio around those kind of quote unquote smart datas.

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 1>And you know that tried and true works over time,

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, as the industry is evolved,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the smart data strategies, Um, there's now more interesting other

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>ways of evolving and utilizing things like big data to

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to similarly look at those look at factors.

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So very similar to rank companies. So quants always want

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to play the breath game, meaning spread out their bets,

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of different views on particular companies. But

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>what the alternative data and big data allows us to

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do is really play the depth game, so know a

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more about a particular company as opposed to just

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>their price to book. So you know, back to your

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>original question. The smart data strategies you know, which are

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>largely common um implementable, absolutely use large amounts of data, um,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you know in a pretty uh academically proven, you know,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>well thought out, but have been around for many decades.

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So one of the phrases I've been reading about is

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>variation and of that customized data. What what is comdomized data? Yeah,

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>so it is an interesting topic customization, I would say

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>when we think about when you think about customized data

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in the industry, Um, you know, there's there's really two

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>things that are happening. One is, um, what types of

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>i'll call it bets would you like to make? So

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, do you want to bet on value stocks,

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>do you want to bet on companies that are um

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>have higher dividend payers, And you're able to customize what

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to place a wager on UM. The other

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the customization, which continues to be a pretty

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting trend in the industry, is there are certain E

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>s G. Factors that one may want to hold near

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and dear and want to have companies in their portfolios

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that express their the beliefs that they, you know, have

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and want to express. So for example, you know, I

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>don't want to invest in tobacco stocks, or I don't

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>want to invest in, you know, something that is going

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to negatively impact the environment, and so you can, you know,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>with quant tools, you can figure out, okay, what are

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>those companies or how do they fall into those categories,

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an industry or the percentage of revenues that

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>company is going to get from you know, let's say

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>emissions UM and then be able to create a portfolio

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to identify, you know, whether it's a factor bet around

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>value or momentum and or um you know, different types

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of exposures that they want. So for example, things like

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>tobacco or or emission, so you can customize the what

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>your equity portfolio looks like relative to a benchmark or

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>just an absolute. So let's talk a little bit about

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what you do at World Quants. What does the president

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of the firm's jobs responsibility look like? Great barrier. Yes,

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So so as as president, which I'm extremely fortunate to

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have joined such an incredible team, you know, I'd say,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>really three things that I focus on. You know, one

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is overall business strategy, help with the operating of the

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>operating of the firm, and then add some leadership on

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the investing on the investing side, and it really that

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>breaks down into kind of four key elements that you know,

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of my role, and I work very closely

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>with our CEO, Igor Tolchinsky, UM and really thinking about

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 1>the following four things. One is vision, so you know,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>where where should we be spending our time? I would say, interestingly,

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we've got you know, roughly all over six hundred quantitative people,

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, we feel like we could solve

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting problems. UM. And really one of

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>one of our jobs is to ensure that we're focusing

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>on the right ones to solve and so you know,

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know, setting out that vision, UM, keeping people focused, UM,

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>making sure that incentives are aligned, were allocating resources to

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>tackling the right problems and and remaining focused on those

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>types UM. Speed and one of the things that you know,

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in an organization that has over six people, you want

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to make decisions quickly. UM Igory does a terrific job

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>of you know, of of of leading in attempt to

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>help him with that in terms of making decisions, making

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>sure things escalate very quickly, UM, so that we can

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>continue our focus and our vision. And then the last

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>thing I spend a decent amount of time on is talent.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, how do we acquire talent? How do

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we promote a culture of collaboration? UM? Intellectual stimulation. You

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of quants in general, we like to

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be intellectually stimulated. So how do we continue to do

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that and create a culture where ideas can be shared

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and collaborated across the firm? So those are those are

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>where I've been spending my time over the last six months.

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>What sort of programs do you have to incentivize your staff? Sure? So,

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>so we have many different ways that we try to

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>incentivize our people. UM. In terms of the you know,

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what we do for our for our researchers, and so

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>we have real different challenges that we have around around

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the world to you know, to to incentivize people's work.

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, that's just yet another piece of

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle where um, you know, we're trying to promote

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a particular activity or particular research and be able to, um,

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, incentivize them, call them out, reward them for uh,

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, for for doing some some really good work.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, we have many of these, and

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the unique things about this firm

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is that we have many different competitions where uh, you know,

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>where people can our our teams can be incented to

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>uh to do different things and to use their mind

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a little differently and have the right uh incentive structure

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to be able to to to be rewarded for those

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So so you're creating these um for lack of a

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>better word, competitions internally to solve an investing problem or

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>equation or issue, and everyone who works in the firm

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>can basically throw the hat in the ring and say

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the way I think we can solve this problem,

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you run the tests and figure out who's

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the winner on that or is it real time and hey,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the best results based on your suggestion. Yes,

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>so we we did. You have we have several competitions

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.359
<v Speaker 1>around around the firm UM with you know, set incentives

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for each of them, and we kind of have a

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>group of people that try to tackle this and instead

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of it being relative to others in the firm, they're

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we're saying, okay, here's a particular UM strategy that we

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>want to spend some time on. Let's see what you

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>can develop UM. And so that's you know, that's an

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>area where you know, we have projects that you might

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not fit into the core research that we do on

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a daily basis, but you know, maybe a little more um,

0:16:58.040 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little more out there. Maybe we're trying

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to look at a different asset class and we want

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to uncover. So we realize, you know, the the upfront

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>R and D or the research is going to take

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer, and so we want to incentivize

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>them to go out and um, you know, and really

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>think creatively about about capturing and we incentivize them accordingly

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because they're taking time out of their kind of core

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to really push the envelope a little bit more in

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of um, you know, in terms of figuring out

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>something unique. One of the questions I was going to

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>ask you is, hey, how is World quant differentiated from

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>other firms? But but things like the accelerated platform, these

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>sound somewhat different than what we typically hear about at

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 1>a at a lot of shops. Are these common in

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the worlds of quant or is this a little more

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>unique to what you guys do? Yeah, I think I think,

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Um sometimes people may do this, um, you know, for

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, to try to recruit people, and I've heard

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of people doing that, but putting it as a systematic way,

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, internally, I think is something quite unique. I

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>would say when we think about our you know, our group,

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>and really one of the compelling opportunities that is I

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>had when I when I thought of of joining and

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>fortunate enough to join World Font is you know, we've

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>got over six people around the globe. We operate in

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty three offices thirteen countries. UM. So we've got unbelievable

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>global diversity. And so I think that's you know, one

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>thing that makes us UM quite unique. UM. So we

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>operate in many different places we have many different opinions. UM.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>We've we've always promoted diversity, diversity of thought, UM, diversity

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of alpha's or drivers of return when we invest. And

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>so you know, having programs that can continue to incentivize

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>people UM and really create a collaborative and you know,

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say competitive in a in a good way, UM,

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>where where people continue to be intellectually stimulated. I think

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that's really what you know, really drives the firm, the collaboration. UM.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We just recently did a a research tour, a virtual

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>research tour, and myself and Igo and a few other

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the senior folks kind of did a did a tour

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>around and and you know, it's unbelievable when you know

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>people can promote the collaboration they're sharing with us some

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>of the research and the first thing they say is,

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to acknowledge the four or five people that

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>helped with this with this research project. And so you know,

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>just the idea around true collaboration, true appreciation for where

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you're getting assistance from. You know, I think it was

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>really makes makes this place a pretty unique, unique uh

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>neque place to be. World Tom was spun out of

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Millennium by Igor Tolchinsky, who is the founder and CEO.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about your boss. Yeah. So,

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>so when I first met Igor Um, he's just so

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>intellectually stimulating. I mean, a brilliant, brilliant investor, brilliant man. Um.

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, extremely charitable. Um. Some of the things that

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>he's done, UM. You know, so we are just a

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>really spectacular and you can see a lot of those

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>on the web. He's written some really interesting books and

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>just his vision, his ability to articulate, um, you know

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>where we're going, uh, and and and collaborate very well. Uh.

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>To the other thing that is just very impressive is

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>his decision making. And I think I've observed a lot

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of quants over the years. You know, you kind of

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>get into the analysis paralysis. UM. You know, the there's

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>always another test you can run on something. You know,

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Igor to his credit, is a decision maker. UM. And

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it is. You know, it's just great to be able

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to partner with him for six months of the last

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>six months and you know, look forward for for many

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>many years and decades to come. But he is, you know,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>someone who really does make decisions, takes in all the

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>information um, and you know, has really built an unbelievable business.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh here at will on. So when I normally speak

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to a firm and I say, hey, what's your firm's

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>investment philosophy? Usually I get a sentence that sums everything

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>up in in one nice little SoundBite. I get the

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>sense that you're operating a whole lot of different approaches.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It might be a little harder to pin you down

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>to one philosophy of of the firm. What is World

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Quants investment philosophy? So, so World World Plants investment philosophy

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:36.479
<v Speaker 1>is really, you know, pretty pretty simple global leverage our

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>people and provide them the tools and technology two to

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>make returns for our investors. I mean that's really you know,

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>in a nutshell, you know what we're trying to do. Um.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>We we have a very systematic way in which we

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. We try to leverage the law of large

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers and have millions of different alphas that we can leverage.

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>We put them together in a portfolio and then we

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>execute and make them a reality through trading. So, you know,

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the investment processes is quite simple and straightforward. But the

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>uniqueness of our philosophy is that we are extremely global

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of our people. Um, we do believe in

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>in playing the breath game. We have we have a

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of alpha's, a lot of ways to look at

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>companies and we try to leverage that throughout our process

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and create portfolios that driver turned for our clients. So

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about the past year, which

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>was some people have called it unprecedented. When you are

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>crunching numbers to try and find a pattern, how can

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you deal with the possibility of events which have simply

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>never occurred before. Yeah, Berry, that's a terrific question. Um.

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, that really separates the you know, the quantz

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote and the quant investors. And so, you know,

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that makes our jobs so interesting,

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I find is the ability to adapt and really to

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>to be market practitioners as well as as quants, and

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that really makes great quant investors. So, you know,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>if we think about two thousand twenty and also in

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty one thus far, you know we've seen

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously unprecedented events. Um. You know, whether it's

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.239
<v Speaker 1>around COVID or you know other types of you know

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of of events that that have happened over the last year,

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>which which ramifications have caused very large moves in you know,

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:38.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of common let's call them factors or expressions or

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 1>buckets of particular stocks or characteristics of stocks. You know,

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know, things like momentum we talked about

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>before value. UM, these have had some pretty unprecedented moves. UM.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's been you know, for value, about fifteen

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>UH standard standard aviation moves that are that we're above

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>two in two thousand and UM. You know, one just

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>massive moves. When you think about a simple five center

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>deviation move means that that happens once one day every

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>approximate fourteen thousand years. So to your point, there's been

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>no shortage of massive moves UM, you know, largely because

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>there's been such a big shift. And so I think

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>as quant investors, the way we try to approach it

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>is to I is to adapt as quickly as we

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>possibly can for some unforeseen event. Obviously we try to

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>predict whatever we can in advance. UM. But to the

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>extent UH you know you have something like uh COVID,

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, you want to think about companies that are

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be largely affected because of that, And there's

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>two approaches. One is you can try to risk manage,

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>which is usually what we would do, which is, you know, listen,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a once in a life time events. Let's

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>try to immunize our portfolios from those. So, whether you

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>know it's a it helps or hurt stocks, let's try

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to immunize ourselves. And the other is to say, okay,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>let's try to get a sense whether there's going to

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>be some type of trend here or there's some you know,

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>ability to to create alpha or some excess returns UM

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>when these events happen. So you know, you can think

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>about binary events, so things like elections that have happened

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>UM and what the ramifications are. You can think about

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>things like trade UM. You could think about companies exposure

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to you know, things like bitcoin when they announce and

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you do about it? And so, you know,

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>we think about the world in characteristics. So we call

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>them factors, and so you can create these quote unquote

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>factors and say I want to have a portfolio that

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>whether those factors do well or poorly, I'm my portfolio

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>will not be affected. So that's really the way we've

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>We've thought about a lot of two thousand, twenty and

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty one and our investment team has just done a

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>terrific job of being able to navigate that and identify

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>some of these risks that they haven't seen before. We

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>try to codify it in a systematic way and then

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 1>focus our attention on, you know, on really where we

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>believe we can make money UM, and that's a lot

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of these millions of alphas that we believe have been

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>contested for for years. So that's how we think about,

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, dealing with some of these unprecedented moves that

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in you know, things like short interest and

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>momentum and value that have happened over the last twelve

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>months or so. Huh So. So I'm intrigued by the

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>concept of of something UM that's so many standard deviations

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>away from the norm that it's really a one in

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a fourteen thousand year events, those sort of tail risks.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>How can we anticipate them on a quantitative basis? And

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and more specifically, UM, think back to January six and

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the attempted insurrection in the US capital. How can you

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>quantify that? And we've learned since that that actually came

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to I don't know if I would call

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it successful, but but pretty close to having the rioters

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>access UM, various people in Congress, maybe even the Vice president.

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you factor that into to your UM analyzes. Yes,

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>as I would say, you know, I'll take it up

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a step in terms of just in general how we

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>think about it. But it's really about, you know, trying

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to identify things that will impact UM companies and you know,

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>what are the ramifications and and I think that's really

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the way we try to think about that. So you know,

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>in that specific case, in terms of what would happen

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to particular companies UM, you know, those those events are

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>relatively UM you know, quick moves. We try to be

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>very diversified in many different ways. And you know, that's

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the first times I've used that term,

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but I would say the diversification point is so critical

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in investing UM, whether you're a quant investor or you're

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>any type of investor. It's it's definitely an extremely helpful

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>UM attribute when you have events like this occur. And

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>so you know, creating you know, different ways to look

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at risks UM as quickly as you possibly can, and

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>adapting a portfolio, you know, we think leads to very

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>successful outcomes in the long run. How did you guys

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 1>look at what was taking place with things like Robin

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Hood and read it to me that was reminiscent of

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, late nineties action, although it certainly was faster

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe more powerful than we've seen in the past.

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you look at these sort of group behavior

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that that social networks can foster. Yeah, again we um so,

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we look at in terms of, you know,

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>from a from a liquidity standpoint, what what are the

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>know how is this affecting the amount of the amount

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of ability to trade our securities? Um? You know, we

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>really do try to minimize that I mentioned earlier. We

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>try to minimize the amount of risk we take from

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>any particular factor and things like you know, short interest

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is something that you know is a is a pretty

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>common factor that you know, folks UM like us would

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>would try to identify and minimize. Um. Are you know

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>how much our our stocks will move because of that? UM,

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, you know, big picture thinking about liquidity, obviously,

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>there there is a big retail you know, retail input

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>um to liquidity. They tend to you know, trade it

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>trade you know, stocks that are that are relatively cheap

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in priced um. You know, and I think there's some

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, some pretty interesting data around that I would say,

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for you know, for our purposes. You know, we look

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>at things like liquidity and depths of market and how

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that's being impacted. And I would say, over the last

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, you know, interestingly that the world of market

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>micro structure has gotten pretty complicated, you know, to the

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>extent you could trade you could trade you know, ABC

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>stock in forty different venues in the US is interesting enough,

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, across sixteen different exchanges, or roughly about sixteen

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.959
<v Speaker 1>different exchanges. And so you know, we spend a lot

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of our time looking at things like volumes and spreads

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and and overall liquidity UM. And so that's really where

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we see um, you know, those effects. And I would say,

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it looks like over the last twelve months

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been a pretty rocky um, you know, rocky area.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know we're pretty much back to you know,

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of pre pandemic levels when I think about quote sizes,

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bid ask spreads, UM, you know for for SMP type names.

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So it looks like things are kind of getting a

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit back to normal in terms of of market liquidity,

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>depth and spreads. So you mentioned value earlier. I think

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>this is up until this quarter. I think the underperformance

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of value versus growth, it could be the longest run

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen of growth dominating value since since at least

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>since the CRISP database goes back to nineteen seventeen or

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>something like that. How do you think about something that's

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>rather unusual in those terms. How does the FED factor

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>into this or is that even an input to to

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>what you're building in your models. Yeah, no, it's it's

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it's exactly. It's very consistent with again thinking about it

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>as a as a very diversified portfolio, and you know,

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.479
<v Speaker 1>value investing over the long term has done reasonably well. UM.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm very impressed that you went back to the CRISP database,

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So kudos to you. UM. When I think about you

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>value again, value on itself, we tend to take an

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>approach where we want to be more diversified. We don't

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>want to just bet on value. We want to have

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>things that have growth at tributes and really have some

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we call it idiosyncratic or some specific type

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of return where we think that's our edge. And and

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of other types of factors like value or

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>growth or low volatility. UM, those are something that we

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>want to have a very modest amount of exposure or

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we really don't want to We don't necessarily

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of money on that particular aspect because

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it's very common and it's also subject to very sharp moves,

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, we aim to have a little

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>bit more consistent, persistent results. But to your point, you're right,

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this is it's been an unbelievable um challenge for Value.

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>We've we have seen a little bit of a turnaround, um,

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, since since the election, UM, and so you know,

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>value that start us to do a little bit better.

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But your point is well taken, But I think it

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>just speaks to our philosophy of you want to have,

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, many different ways of looking at the fortunes

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of a company and diversification. Diversification, diversification is key and

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at World Plant we that with millions of alpha's, we

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>have many different portfolio managers, many different ways of combining

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>our alpha's, and so you know, we kind of live

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and breathe from diversifying of our people to our alpha's,

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to our portfolio managers, and then to our execution. So again,

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, your observation is spot on, and

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I would say we as a as a group try

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not to take too many bets in one place. Huh. Interesting.

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>You know you mentioned certain strategies are popular, and I

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>can't help but think back to the um quant quake

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that took place about eight years ago, where a lot

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of quantitative strategies were very similar at different shops, and

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we saw what had become a fairly crowded trade. Maybe

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a decade ago, it's even longer ago. What

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of that crowded trades? Yeah, so

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so it was more than a decade ago, is you

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>know if I think it was almost eight thirteen and

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a half years ago? Okay, I think I think there

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was a huge lesson learned for for Kuant investors. Um.

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a period where, uh, you know,

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>there was you know, some some shops had a fair

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>amount of complacency where they didn't continue to use their research.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>There was more into there was you know, there there

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>should have been a lot more pushing in terms of

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>research and and I think you look back and you

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.760
<v Speaker 1>saw events that you know, for a number of reasons.

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>One is there was a fair amount of leverage in

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the system, and so you're able to amplify your returns

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>with leverage UM and leverage is great if you're always

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have high, high positive returns, but when you don't,

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, leverages is a you know as a very

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>big challenge because people call up and ask you for

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 1>money and you need to pay them. So I think

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that that really was one of the biggest

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>issues of of oh seven UM. But I'd also say

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>there was crowded traits, as you correctly point out. And

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>so I think one of the goals that we have

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at World pant is continue to differentiate, continue to create

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>unique ways of making money for our clients investing in

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>our almost three hundred researchers, to try to continue to

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 1>innovate and be much less crowded than other people. Again,

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to be unique. We don't want to be

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to those large movements in terms of those quote

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>unquote crowded trades. And that's really a huge goal and

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>frankly was a big lesson learned for I believe the

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>quand industry. UM that happens, you know, almost fourteen years ago.

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about the future of

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>quant investing. You mentioned previously that the industry has learned

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>from past mistakes. It's involved UM. Tell us a little

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>bit about the direction the industry is in evolving towards,

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Sir Barry, I think the you know, the quand industry

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>will continue to evolve in in places like data, in

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>places like storage, in places like analytics, UM and the

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>tools that are that one can use to try to,

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, figure out the fortunes of a company have

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>increased exponentially, and so you know, the amount of data

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that's out there, amount of data that can be stored,

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>amount of data that can be analyzed, the simulations that

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>one can run has grown, like I said, absolutely exponentially,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and really for a quant investor, it's terrific because you know,

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the world is kind of coming in our direction. The

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of data. We think, you know, one of our

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>edges to be able to take data, synthesize it and

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>create information and drive returns. And you know, we think,

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>here a world point, we're extremely well positioned to be

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>able to do that. And so, you know, honestly, I

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's a you know, it's an absolute golden age

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>for us as Kuan investors UM in terms of kind

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of where the industry is evolving really interesting. Any of

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this evolution surprised you what what has taken place that um,

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>either you didn't see coming, or you saw coming and

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't think would happen, and it happened anyway, right, I

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>would tell you know, one of the surprises is is

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the adoption of you know, more and more quantitative investing

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>strategies in general. Um. Just given uh, everyday people's thoughts

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 1>on you know, the use of computers and use of

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 1>your phone to drive information, It's happening across most every industry.

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm surprised, happily surprised that more and more

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of investment folks aren't employing more and more quantitative strategy.

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Good for us from where we sit, but I'm just surprised.

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think everybody wants to you know, if

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:41.879
<v Speaker 1>you're at a dinner party, you're you're asked, you're getting

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>asked a question, it's got to be empirically back that

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna look it up as quickly as you possibly can,

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and you want to test that there whatever someone said,

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever hypothesis, um, you know, and there's there's a lot

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of skeptics and they can be proven yea or nay

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. And I'm just you know, I guess I'm

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised that that's not happening more and more in

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the in the investment industry. So that would be one

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of the I would say, my my biggest surprises. But

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm but I'm okay with that. Huh. You mentioned earlier

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to read sentiment data from analysts reports. I've read

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about firms trying to actually scrape market wide sentiment data

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>off of social networks like Twitter. What what does that

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>look like? And can you really find an investable edge

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:34.280
<v Speaker 1>from the characters of millions of people who know um

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>relatively little, although they may not know that they know

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>relatively little? What what signal is in all that noise? Sure, Marry,

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you're you're touching on a really important components.

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>You think about all this alternative data, you know, it's

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>it's what do you do with it? And and how

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>do you utilize it? And I think you know, a

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>diversified approach of you using things like satellite images, using

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>things like social media, um, you know, can be quite impactful,

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of which might be very very short run.

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Some of it might have more longer term ramifications, things

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>like credit card transactions, web clicks. I mean, there's so

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 1>much alternative data out there that you know, if you

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>can think about how best to utilize it. Again, it's

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>that whole concept of marrying kind of technical acumen and

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>so you understand data, you understand uh something about you know,

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>putting data together to create some type of expected return,

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>but also marrying that with some business acumen. You know,

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I think is is really exploding. And so you know,

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.879
<v Speaker 1>whether it's social media, where it's at allite imaging, whether

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, clicking on you know, getting vendors that

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>that provide some of this data all anonymized to be

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>able to have a view of where company's fortunes maybe

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:56.879
<v Speaker 1>is certainly something that the industry is seeing. Um, there's

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a massive amount of data vendors out there. There is

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>some content validation and some of those data vendors, but

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of data out there to be able

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to employ not just social media, but other types of

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of data that you know, can be informative of a

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>company's fortunes. Yeah, I've been kind of fascinated by the

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>satellite data and how granular it can get not just

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>tracking ships carrying goods or oil around the world, but

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>how deep the ships are sitting in the water. That

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>gives some insight as to how are they traveling? Full

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>half full? Three corps. That's just astonishing stuff. Yeah, I

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it really is. And I think you know, listen,

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we all we all have our phones and

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>and you know I could I could kindly tracked my

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>kids on on Life three sixty and figuring out where

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:50.919
<v Speaker 1>they are. Um, you know this is happening. It's part

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of our everyday lives, um and uh. And you know

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it could be insightful information. You know certainly helped me,

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, with my kids and and you know other parts,

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:04.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's uh, you know, tankers or whether it's uh,

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, clicks. Uh. You know, these are insights that

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, can be you know, potentially telling. Again, I

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>would go back to my other common about diversification. So

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in isolation, these you know, will you know almost for

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>certain will not work all the time. Um, But if

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>there's some level of insight that you can gain from

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a piece of this data or a way to look

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>at this data, and then you marry that with millions

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and millions of other things. You know, you can have

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good sense of that company's fortune. So you know,

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>again it's it's really about diversification and not thinking about

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, these pieces of data in isolation. UM. You know,

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:44.879
<v Speaker 1>we had talked a little bit about value and other

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>types of factors. Again, I think you know, the approach

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>that that one that most quants take UM is really

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to think about diversification um as as a really helpful

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>way to produce UM you know, consistent results for clients.

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's really, you know, the key to

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>how most wants and at World want you know, we

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>think about diversification at pretty much every step of the way.

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's our people, whether it's the expected returns that

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we try to generate or portfolio managers and how we

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>go about executing and making that a reality. So you

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 1>talked several times about how gigantic these data sets are

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 1>and how fast they're growing, How how big can these get?

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And at what point do they become unmanageable? I mean,

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>when is too much data too much? Yeah? UM, we

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly have not found that out yet. UM. You know,

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the nice thing about it is there's the amount of data,

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, is increasing exponentially. There's some unbelievable stats on

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>just that massive amount of growth UM. And I think,

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, frankly, we've spent an enormous amount of time

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to take in that data, how to

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 1>collate it, how to check that data. Um. You know,

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:04.240
<v Speaker 1>again it's the gory details of data, but it's um

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's fascinating. I know, I d C I d

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>c UM. You know reported a quote them more than

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 1>five billion consumers interact with data every day. Five billion

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>consumers interact with data every day. By they say that

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>number will be six billion, or three quarters of the

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>world's population. So data is getting created again exponentially. I

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>think this is the thing that we spend a lot

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of time on is how do we ingest that, How

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>do we come up with processes to be able to

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you know ingest it, how do we store it, how

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:40.439
<v Speaker 1>do we analyze it? Again? And that's that's really, uh,

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of our integral parts of what we

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>do and how we do it. And you're seeing this

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>in the investment industry. You're seeing this in many different industries.

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's one of the exciting parts um,

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it's a lot of data. But again

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really you know, we've been waiting for

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>these times for for a long time. To continue to

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>have more and more data, it allows us a huge

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to drive an edge because we think we know

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what to do with that type of data. Um, to

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>pair that with some of our you know, smart researchers

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and figuring out what are the insights. So, you know,

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:16.959
<v Speaker 1>I think the other challenge that we face in terms

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of your comment about too much is again signal to noise?

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, What's what's a signal? Meaning what what gives

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>you insight? And what's just noise? And so part of

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>our jobs as researchers and portfolio managers, as good quants

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.319
<v Speaker 1>at worklan is is to kind of distinguish between the

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 1>signal meaning does this have some value, does it provide

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>me insight? Or is it really just noise and you know,

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 1>not really worthy of of of allocating any investment to it. Huh.

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Quite interesting. Let let me change gears on you a

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit. We recently heard rumblings about possible changes in

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>tax policy coming out of the new administration. I know

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman, I know a gam You did a lot

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>of work on UM tax efficiency from from your new perch.

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about things like tax efficiency in investing?

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that something that's still within your bailiwick or or

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is it more institutional and you're you're less focused on

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>tax Yeah, so, I mean the way we think about it,

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm happy to spend some time on just generally

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tax efficient investing. I think it is. It's you know,

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a very useful piece and I've had some prior

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>experience in it, but more substantively on you know, kind

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of what we do now at work on you know,

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>if there is a change to tax policy, we're gonna

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, figure out how it's going to impact a

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>particular company. You know, our corporate tax is going to

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:44.280
<v Speaker 1>go up or down UM, and how will that impact

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, cash flow or you know something on on

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a company's statements. UM. So that that's really how we

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>would tackle it, and you know, we'll we'll understand how

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:55.359
<v Speaker 1>we should you know, update our accounting UM for for

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 1>those types of events and adapt accordingly, like like you

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>would expect most in sters to do. UM. You know,

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in the ray of tax efficient investing, you know, I'm

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>happy to spend a few minutes there, but you know,

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't, uh, that's really not one of our core

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>focuses at world point. You're you're looking more as to

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>how the changes in taxes impact either the bottom line

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for the companies or their position relative to their competitors

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:26.360
<v Speaker 1>UM and what the tax code means, uh to their valuation.

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that is that a fair description? Like, I know,

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you guys aren't tax loss harvesting the way a traditional

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>UM advisor would. You're you're running a very different portfolio

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for for a different audience. So your perspective is what

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>does this mean to the companies that we may or

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>may not own, and and how does it affect them

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>relative to their competitors? Is that a fair statement? Yeah?

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a that's a fair statement. Again, we

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>want to see as as Biden you know, institutes new policies,

0:46:57.680 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>how that will affect corporations and frank we that goes

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you know beyond you know, tax policy, other types of policies,

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, if there's international policies that will

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>affect trade or or any type of you know of

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of things that come out of Washington or Frankly, any

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>any other government around the world. Given we are a

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 1>global organization, you know, we're gonna attempt to take that

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>into account, um, to try to understand it, understand what

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the ramifications are two companies and being able to position

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 1>our portfolios accordingly. And that's that's you know, we do

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that whether it's a regulatory issue or an event that

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked about again. Our ability to adapt and understand

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in markets, what's going to affect companies

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 1>or particular asset classes is really you know, one of

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the fun parts of the job as being a quantitative investor. Huh,

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>what what are other fun parts of the job? What

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 1>what do you enjoy doing most? Um, as presidents of

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>world want so, I will tell you I've had such

0:47:56.200 --> 0:48:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a great time of of walking out of meetings action steps. Uh,

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been you know, seeing seeing people intellectually stimulated around

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know again where a lot of it is on

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>zoom and so you know, we sit there and and

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.919
<v Speaker 1>just you know, watching how people dialogue has just been

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, so incredibly exhilarating. Um. You know a lot

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of the great ideas and you know, watching how respectful

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:22.840
<v Speaker 1>people heard of each other and challenging them in in

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:27.319
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful ways and almost hearing them think, uh, you know

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 1>right in real time. Is it's just been been incredible.

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh in terms of uh, you know, the the organization,

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just highly productive, highly collaborative. Um, there's just

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great decision making that goes on. We

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 1>just recently did a research off site where we just

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>walked through and have many, many decisions. We pride ourselves that,

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're very action oriented, and so you know,

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:53.399
<v Speaker 1>that's been you know, some of the fun things that

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that I've been fortunate enough to uh, you know, to

0:48:56.200 --> 0:48:58.720
<v Speaker 1>observe in my in my six months. Let me jump

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to my favorite questions that I asked all of my guests,

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>starting with what are you streaming these days? Give us

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>your your favorite Netflix or Amazon Prime show or any

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast you might be listening to. What's keeping you entertained? Sure? Um,

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say been a fan of House of Cards. Um,

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>My daughter and I watched Million Little Things. Um. Joe

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Rogan's interviews with Elon musk Are are pretty pretty impressive.

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And I would have to say, you know, one of

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>my favorite videos is a four minute and thirteen second

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett speeches. He talks about one World Trade Center.

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's an amazing video that you know, all

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>my friends, uh get a text from me on a

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty regular basis, just just level sets. It's a great video.

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:49.879
<v Speaker 1>H really interesting. Uh tell us about your mentors who

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>helped to shape your career. Sure, I would say my

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:58.920
<v Speaker 1>dad had unbelievable work ethic. Um it was a six

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 1>day a week guy. Um. One of my my first

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>bosses was was a guy named Gustic Conomos, who unfortunately

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 1>passed away at nine eleven. Um. But you know, was

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:13.359
<v Speaker 1>was was able to balance enormous credibility or industry credibility

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>with a sense of humor. And uh, you know, us

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>always used to tell me I may have taught you

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 1>everything you know, but I didn't teach you everything I know.

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>And I always always think that's a pretty funny, uh

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>funny quote. But uh, you know, And and the last

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:29.400
<v Speaker 1>one I would say on the quant spaces two gentlemen

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and Bob Jones and Don Mulvehill. Bob was the founder

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of the g Sam uh you know chront equity business

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, and you know, taught me a

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>lot and really helped shape my career and my interest

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in quantitative investing. And then Don was you know, an

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:46.240
<v Speaker 1>age old colleague and boss of mine that really taught

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>me a tremendous amount about UM investing, in dealing with

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:53.440
<v Speaker 1>clients and you know to too great early role models

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:57.719
<v Speaker 1>that I had had in the industry quite quite interesting.

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about some books? What do you what are

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you some of your favorites and what are you reading

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:07.840
<v Speaker 1>right now? Sure? So, uh, some of my favorite especially

0:51:07.840 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 1>since I had a decent amount of time between between

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>taking on the role at at World quand UM. You know,

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I was able to read David Rubinstein's How to Lead,

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was just terrific. Um Sartin to Tella

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 1>had the hit Refresh, which I thought was quite good.

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I was also able to read our books from our CEO,

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.280
<v Speaker 1>who has two good ones, Finding Alpha's and The Unrules,

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta plug those two. Those were quite quite

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 1>good and just interesting ways of thinking. UM. And then

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:36.799
<v Speaker 1>the one I'm reading now, which I think is a

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:40.839
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool book. It's called Outrageous Good Fortune. It's about

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Michael Burke, UM football hero you penn

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:49.520
<v Speaker 1>c I agent overthrew Communist government um Ran Intelligence for

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Europe Ran Ringling Brothers Circus. He was the executive

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>at TBS Sports, president of the Yankees, and president of MSG.

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So talk about a pretty packed life, but that books

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:04.160
<v Speaker 1>called outrageous good Fortune. I'm in the middle of that

0:52:04.280 --> 0:52:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's, uh, it's pretty amazing, really really quite interesting.

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>What sort of advice would you give to a recent

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>college grad who was interested in pursuing a career in

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>quantitative finance? UM, I would say to those that are

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>uh their First of all, they're welcome. We'd love to

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:34.000
<v Speaker 1>see them, UM to enjoy the journey. UH, substantively network.

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I think you learned so much from asking a lot

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of questions about what people do and how they do it. UM.

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Be a sponge. UM. Surround yourself with some really smart

0:52:44.360 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 1>people UM that are equally driven UM. And then you know,

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the last thing I would say, for particularly for Kuan investors,

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is you know, marry the how and the why. And

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:56.359
<v Speaker 1>what I mean by that is, you know a lot

0:52:56.400 --> 0:53:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of people either have the correlation understanding or the causation

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:05.360
<v Speaker 1>understanding correlation and they understand the math behind it causation,

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they understand the practical effects. So it could work again. UM.

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Marrying those two I think really makes for UM, you know,

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal quantitative investor. Uh, quite quite interesting. And our

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 1>final question, what do you know about the world of

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>quantitative investing in trading today that you wish you knew

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 1>years ago when you were first starting out UM. But

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say, besides buying UM it was a monster beverage,

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 1>which I think is up about six hundred thousand percent.

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>The SMP is only a less than a thousand percent UM,

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and I would say, I would say, there's there's really

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing I would want to know in advance. And it

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:52.800
<v Speaker 1>might sound a little weird, but I think it spoils

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the excitement. I'm one of the great things about being

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in this quantitative business that really finance in general, is

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 1>just the expert exploration and the quest for learning. That's

0:54:02.080 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>something that has driven me, you know in my career

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that I've I've truly enjoyed and and knowing you know stuff,

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 1>would you know what would kind of spoil that journey?

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, I the hiccups that I've had

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>across the around the years and and the successes I

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>think have made the journey awesome. And I'd say respectfully,

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:23.959
<v Speaker 1>No thanks on on you know the other pieces, because

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't have made the journey is fun. We have

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>been speaking with Gary Kropovka. He is the president of

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:34.839
<v Speaker 1>World Quantz. If you enjoy this conversation, well please check

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>out any of our previous almost four hundred prior conversations.

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, wherever you feed

0:54:43.600 --> 0:54:47.760
<v Speaker 1>your podcast fix. We love your comments, feedback and suggestions

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:51.800
<v Speaker 1>right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Sign up for my daily reads at ridoltz dot com.

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Check out my weekly column on Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion.

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Follow me on Twitter at Ritholtz. I would be remiss

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if I did not thank the crack team that helps

0:55:06.520 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 1>put these conversations together each week. Nick Falco is my

0:55:10.680 --> 0:55:15.880
<v Speaker 1>audio engineer. Michael Boyle is my producer. Attika Valbrunn is

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 1>our project manager. Michael Batnick is my head of research.

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ritholtz. You've been listening to Master's Business on

0:55:25.280 --> 0:55:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.